DOCSLIB.ORG

Standards for the Circular Economy

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Standards for the Circular Economy Author Petty Pumsleitner, B.A. Submission Institute for Integrated Quality Design (IQD) Thesis Supervisor Univ.-Prof. Dr. Erik G. Hansen Assistant Thesis Supervisor STANDARDS FOR THE Ferdinand Revellio, M.Sc. CIRCULAR ECONOMY November 2020 Master’s Thesis to confer the academic degree of Master of Science in the Master’s Program General Management JOHANNES KEPLER UNIVERSITY LINZ Altenberger Straße 69 4040 Linz, Austria jku.at DVR 0093696 STATUTORY DECLARATION I hereby declare under oath that the submitted Master’s Thesis has been written solely by me without any third-party assistance (except for proofreading), information other than provided sources or aids have not been used and those used have been fully documented. Sources for literal, paraphrased and cited quotes have been accurately credited. If I have used the exact words, phrases, clauses, or sentences of someone else, I have enclosed that information in quotation marks. If I have paraphrased the opinions of someone else, I have not enclosed the paraphrase in quotation marks, but I have stated those opinions in my own words and put a reference at the end of it. I agree that the university uses the digital version of this work for an electronic plagiarism check using suitable software, and that for technical reasons my work may be stored in a database. The submitted document here present is identical to the electronically submitted text document. St. Peter in der Au, November 2020 _______________ Petty Pumsleitner November 12, 2020 Petty Pumsleitner I GENDER CLAUSE In order to enhance the readability of this Master’s Thesis, the masculine form for descriptions and formulations was used. It certainly does not imply any discrimination against the other sex. Women and men should be regarded equal. November 12, 2020 Petty Pumsleitner II EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Due to the limits of the linear economy with the take-make-waste process, a transition towards Circular Economy is vital. Withal, standardization is one main important means to pave the way for Circular Economy. Standards comprise the latest and commonly agreed knowledge and specifications from technology, science and practical experience and do not just serve for quality control, environmental- and labour protection, they also regulate international trade and promote innovation and higher perception for stakeholders in almost all branches. For this reason, the Master Thesis elaborates the fundamentals of Circular Economy on the one hand and fundamentals of standardization on the other hand and merges both topics to determine and comprehend standardization for the Circular Economy. Therefore, early and recent developments of Circular Economy are depicted, and different schools of thought are emphasized, such as Cradle-to-Cradle or the Ellen MacArthur Foundation. Latter mentioned organization brought up the so-called Butterfly Diagram to constitute how technical and biological nutrients are allocated across the economic cycle, which indicates a closed-loop system to keep materials and products as long as possible in the value chain. Thus, reducing the usage of resources by extending the product life and utilization of materials. This will lead to entire new business models and processes within organizations, which can be supported with profound standards and comprehensive guidelines for a sustainable implementation of Circular Economy. In order to find conclusive results and appropriate standards, a quantitative and qualitative research approach was chosen (scanning for standards in the internet, action research with unstructured interviews with DIN Deutsches Institut für Normung, ASI Austrian Standards International and QA Quality Austria), which leaded to a comprehensive understanding of the topic and brought up insights from latest projects and activities in the field of standardization for Circular Economy. The research investigation for this Master Thesis led to findings that are sub-divided into a) quantitative depiction of standards mapped to the Ellen MacArthur Framework – the Butterfly Diagram, b) qualitative depiction of selected standards and guidelines (coverage of more than fifty percent of the categories of the Butterfly Diagram) and c) latest standardization initiatives for Circular Economy. In conclusion, this Master Thesis provides valuable results to gain elementary knowledge about existing and future standards to lead the transition towards Circular Economy. November 12, 2020 Petty Pumsleitner III Table of Contents List of figures ................................................................................................................................ VI List of tables ................................................................................................................................ VII List of abbreviations .................................................................................................................... VIII 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 1 1.1. Research problem and relevance ................................................................................... 1 1.2. Research aim and questions .......................................................................................... 2 1.3. Structure of the Thesis .................................................................................................... 3 2. Standardization and the Circular Economy ............................................................................ 5 2.1. Fundamentals of Circular Economy ................................................................................ 5 2.1.1. Early development of Circular Economy .............................................................. 5 2.1.2. From linear to circular loops ................................................................................ 6 2.1.3. Recent development of Circular Economy .......................................................... 7 2.1.4. Implementation strategies .................................................................................... 9 2.2. Fundamentals of standardization .................................................................................. 13 2.2.1. Objectives and key benefits ............................................................................... 13 2.2.2. Types of deliverables ......................................................................................... 15 2.2.3. Organizations for standardization ...................................................................... 17 2.2.4. Development process and conformity assessment ........................................... 21 2.3. Standardization of Circular Economy ............................................................................ 24 2.3.1. The European Approach .................................................................................... 24 2.3.2. Standardization efforts ....................................................................................... 27 3. Conceptual framework ......................................................................................................... 33 4. Methodology ......................................................................................................................... 35 4.1. Research design ........................................................................................................... 35 4.2. Research method .......................................................................................................... 36 4.2.1. Creation of reference model .............................................................................. 36 4.2.2. Data collection ................................................................................................... 36 4.2.2.1. Quantitative data collection – scanning for standards ........................ 36 4.2.2.2. Qualitative data collection – action research ...................................... 38 4.2.3. Data analysis ..................................................................................................... 41 4.2.4. Data interpretation ............................................................................................. 43 5. Results ................................................................................................................................. 44 5.1. Standards for the Circular Economy ............................................................................. 44 5.1.1. Overview of results ............................................................................................ 44 November 12, 2020 Petty Pumsleitner IV 5.1.2. Level 1: Total sample ........................................................................................ 45 5.1.3. Level 2: Selected sample – EMF categories ..................................................... 46 5.1.3.1. EMF Ellen MacArthur Framework – Technical Cycle ......................... 46 5.1.3.2. EMF Ellen MacArthur Framework – Biological Cycle ......................... 50 5.1.3.3. Comparison with Perinorm and DIN Infopoint ..................................... 53 5.1.4. Level 3: Selected sample – Coverage of >50% of EMF categories ................... 55 5.2. Circular Economy Standards in Detail and Development Process ............................... 56 5.2.1. BS 8001:2017 Framework for implementing the principles of the Circular Economy in organizations .................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Technical Report RHUL–MA–2015–3 4 March 2015
    The Value of Threat Models in Enterprise Security Testing of Database Systems & Services Timothy D. Williams Technical Report RHUL–MA–2015–3 4 March 2015 Information Security Group Royal Holloway University of London Egham, Surrey, TW20 0EX United Kingdom www.ma.rhul.ac.uk/tech Student Number: 100758891 Name: Timothy D. Williams The Value of Threat Models in Enterprise Security Testing of Database Systems & Services Supervisor: Dr. Lorenzo Cavallaro Submitted as part of the requirements for the award of the MSc in Information Security at Royal Holloway, University of London I declare that this assignment is all my own work and that I have acknowledged all quotations from the published or unpublished works of other people. I declare that I have also read the statements on plagiarism in Section 1 of the Regulations Governing Examination and Assessment Offences and in accordance with it I submit this project report as my own work. Signature: Date: Academic Year 2013/2014 Copyright c 2013/2014 by Timothy D. Williams Abstract The Value of Threat Models in Enterprise Security Testing of Database Systems & Services by Timothy D. Williams Master of Science in Information Security Royal Holloway, University of London 2013/2014 This thesis explores the value of threat models in organisation-wide security testing of databases. Factors that drive security testing are explored. Different types of security testing, different approaches to threat modeling and different database technologies are considered. The importance of metadata management, particularly for newer schema- less databases, is highlighted. An integrated approach to database security testing is proposed which includes white-box, black-box and grey-box techniques.
    [Show full text]
  • Product Certification
    Product Certification A comprehensive guide to BSI’s product certification services KITEMARK™ Table of contents 1 BSI Overview - NRTL service for the US and Canada in coalition with MET labs 2.15 - RADMAC - EN 442 radiators and convectors 2.16 BSI Overview 1.1 - STB Mark - certification in Belarus 2.16 What is Product Certification? 1.2 - Keymark - EU construction standards 2.16 Why choose BSI for Product Certification? 1.3 - REAS - Electrical Products to Australia & New Zealand Market 2.17 - EFSG - European Fire & Safety Group 2.17 - VCA certification - Vehicle Certification Agency 2.18 2 Product Certification Schemes and Services - NCS International 2.18 BSI Kitemark 2.2 Benchmark 2.4 3 Section 3 – EU directives CE marking 2.5 ATEX Equipment Directive (94/9/EC) | (99/92.EC) 3.1 Verification Certificate 2.7 Boiler Efficiency Directive (92/42/EEC) 3.2 Green Deal 2.9 Gas Appliances Directive (GAD - 2009/142/EC ) 3.3 GS Certification (pending) 2.10 Lift Directive (LD 95/16/EC) 3.4 Gap Analysis 2.10 Marine Directive (MED 96/98/EC) 3.5 Other Schemes BSI can offer: 2.11 - IEC Certification Schemes for Electronic Products 2.11 Low Voltage Directive (2006/95/EC) 3.6 - IEC Quality Assessment System for Electrtronic Components 2.12 Non Automatic Weighing Instruments Directive (NAWI) - CCA certification - CENELEC Certification Agreement 2.14 90/384/EEC | 93/68/EEC | SI 2000/323) 3.7 - ENEC mark - applicable for Electro technology 2.14 Personal Protective Equipment Directive (PPE 89/686/EEC) 3.8 >> ii Pressure Equipment Directive (PED 97/23/EC)
    [Show full text]
  • The British Standards Institution Annual Report and Financial
    Inspiring trust for a more resilient world. The British Standards Institution Annual report and financial statements 2020 Through our unique combination of expertise, we share knowledge, innovation and best practice to help individuals and organizations realize their potential and embed resilience into their everyday business to the benefit of their communities. For over a century, we have been the business improvement company that forges consensus and advocates best practice to enable organizations to turn standards of best practice into habits of excellence. By Royal Charter In this report the ‘Company’ refers to The British Standards Institution, a Royal Charter Company, Companies House number ZC0202, which is the parent company for the financial statements. ‘BSI’, ‘BSI Group’ or ‘Group’ means the Company and its subsidiaries. The BSI logo, ‘Kitemark™’, the ‘Kitemark™’ device, ‘Supply Chain Solutions™’ and ‘Entropy Software™’ are registered trademarks of The British Standards Institution in the UK and are registered, or in the process of registration, in other jurisdictions. Throughout this report, the word ‘underlying’ is defined as ‘before exceptional items and excluding the effects of material disposals’. Strategic Report Corporate Governance Financial Statements Our purpose Strategic report 1 Our purpose 2 At a glance 4 Highlights of 2020 Inspiring trust 5 Chairman’s review 8 Our business model 10 Our strategy 12 Key performance indicators for a more 14 Chief Executive’s review 20 Business review 30 Principal risks and uncertainties 34 Sustainability overview 36 Sustainability review resilient world 40 Standards review 44 Financial review Corporate governance 49 Introduction by the Chairman 50 Board of Directors Our mission 52 Group Executive 54 Corporate governance report To share knowledge, innovation and best practice to help 57 Statement of Directors’ responsibilities in respect of the financial statements people and organizations realize their potential and make 58 Report of the Audit Committee excellence a habit.
    [Show full text]
  • International Standards Make a Global Trading Nation
    International standards make a global trading nation “International standards and their process of development and ongoing maintenance form the bedrock of smooth and efficient trade, supply chains, free and competitive markets and reduce technical barriers to trade.” Ross Wraight, President of the International Federation of Standards Users and Chief Executive of Standards Group Limited November 2019 International standards make a global trading nation International standards create a common language to do better business: a passport to trade The UK is a leader in international standards development, delivering UK soft power globally and enabling innovation and economic growth at home International standards give UK consumers a voice across the world European regional standards remove market frictions across Europe and are part of the international standards system UK trade policy should maximize the strategic opportunities from UK standards leadership and deliver trade deals supported by common international standards International standards are a passport to trade. International standards from ISO and IEC are a cornerstone of the WTO rules-based trading system. They are adopted through BSI as British Standards to create a common language for trading partners: they deliver simpler market access globally. The use of international standards lowers technical barriers, reduces production and supply chain costs, builds confidence in business services and enhances consumer trust. The UK occupies a strong leadership position in shaping international standards. The UK is a leading player in international standards, with more participants in ISO standards development work than any other country. UK stakeholders participate through BSI’s membership of the international and European regional standards organizations.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2019 "Journey to a New Strategy"
    annual report 2019 Journeyto a new strategy 2019 ANNUAL REPORT 2 MESSAGE FROM THE ISO SECRETARY-GENERAL 4 OUR PERFORMANCE 8 OUR HIGHLIGHTS 24 ISO WEEK IN CAPE TOWN 30 OUR MEMBERSHIP 36 OUR PARTNERSHIPS 42 OUR INITIATIVES 56 OUR OFFICERS 60 OUR FINANCES 64 MESSAGE FROM THE ISO PRESIDENT ISO Annual Report 2019 | 1 MESSAGE FROM THE ISO SECRETARY-GENERAL – SERGIO MUJICA A NEW STRATEGY DEFINING AN AMBITIOUS DESTINATION 2019 was a very important year for ISO, one in which our organization prepared itself for the next major step in its journey. At the same time, as we looked at ways to meet future challenges, we didn’t slacken the pace for a minute. The overall picture of 2019 is one of an organization that is delivering like never before, all the while managing an important transition toward our next strategy. This year’s report aims to give a clear idea of the direction in which we are heading, why we have chosen that route, and how we are going to get there. At the same time, I would like to take you through some of the year’s achievements of which I am most proud. In 2019, we continued to meet, and even surpass, expectations. For example, we published 1 638 documents, a greater number than in any other year. These included standards like ISO/IEC 27701 that will play a significant role in addressing threats to online privacy, standards to enable sustainable, integrated urbanization through Building Information Modelling, and ISO 56002, the new standard for innovation management.
    [Show full text]
  • The British Standards Institution Annual Report and Financial Statements 2015
    The British Standards Institution Annual report and financial statements 2015 The British Standards Institution Annual report and financial statements 2015 Making excellence a habit. At BSI we help to develop excellence by driving the success of our clients through standards. We enable others to perform better, manage risk and achieve sustainable growth. For over a century our experts have been challenging mediocrity and complacency to help embed excellence into the way people, processes and products work. We make excellence a habit. In this report the ‘Company’ refers to The British Standards Institution, Strategic report a Royal Charter Company, which is the parent company for the financial 01 Highlights of our year statements. ‘BSI’, ‘BSI Group’ or ‘Group’ means the Company and its subsidiaries. 02 Our business The BSI logo, ‘Kitemark™’, the Kitemark™ device, ‘Supply Chain Solutions™’ 04 Our strategic initiatives and ‘Entropy Software™’ are registered trademarks of The British Standards 06 Key performance indicators Institution in the UK and are registered, or in the process of registration, 07 What is Organizational Resilience? in other jurisdictions. Throughout this report the word ‘underlying’ is defined 08 Organizational Resilience as ‘before exceptional items and excluding the effects of material disposals’. 12 Chairman’s statement 14 Chief Executive’s review 17 Our business model 18 Business review 18 Performance by geographical region 19 Performance by business stream 22 Principal risks and uncertainties 24 Standards review 27
    [Show full text]
  • Standards Matter to Consumers How Standards Benefit Us All, Every Day Standards Matter
    Standards matter to consumers How standards benefit us all, every day Standards matter Standards matter Standards are everywhere and affect people every day. Our mobile phones, our washing machines, the cars we drive and the toys our children or grandchildren play with are all made to specific ‘standards’ that help to ensure that they are easy to use, work properly and are as safe as possible. Standards don’t just deal with products. Services What are standards? such as healthcare, tourism, energy providers, A standard is a document that sets guidelines and banking and insurance are also covered by standards good practice for organizations to follow. It is not that deal with issues such as staff training and compulsory for organizations to use (sign up to) qualifications, information provision, customer a standard, although if a standard supports service, complaints handling and billing. There are legislation (for example, in the case of toys or also standards to tackle key issues such as social domestic appliances) a manufacturer or supplier responsibility, the management of sustainable events may demonstrate their compliance with the (see Olympic case study on p. 11) and the accessibility requirements of the law by using the standard. of public buildings. As standards are voluntary, consumers can feel Standards matter to everyone. They protect us confident that organizations choosing to use them and give us the information that we need to make take issues such as safety, accessibility and customer informed choices. Standards help to make products service seriously. Organizations might show evidence and services: of compliance with specific standards by advertising • Safer – reducing accidents and saving lives.
    [Show full text]
  • The British Standards Institution Strategic Report 2015 Making Excellence a Habit
    The British Standards Institution Strategic report 2015 Making excellence a habit. At BSI we help to develop excellence by driving the success of our clients through standards. We enable others to perform better, manage risk and achieve sustainable growth. For over a century our experts have been challenging mediocrity and complacency to help embed excellence into the way people, processes and products work. We make excellence a habit. In this report the ‘Company’ refers to The British Standards Institution, Strategic report a Royal Charter Company, which is the parent company for the financial 01 Highlights of our year statements. ‘BSI’, ‘BSI Group’ or ‘Group’ means the Company and its subsidiaries. 02 Our business The BSI logo, ‘Kitemark™’, the Kitemark™ device, ‘Supply Chain Solutions™’ 04 Our strategic initiatives and ‘Entropy Software™’ are registered trademarks of The British Standards 06 Key performance indicators Institution in the UK and are registered, or in the process of registration, 07 What is Organizational Resilience? in other jurisdictions. Throughout this report the word ‘underlying’ is defined 08 Organizational Resilience as ‘before exceptional items and excluding the effects of material disposals’. 12 Chairman’s statement 14 Chief Executive’s review 17 Our business model 18 Business review 18 Performance by geographical region 19 Performance by business stream 22 Principal risks and uncertainties 24 Standards review 27 Financial review 31 Social responsibility review Corporate governance 34 Board of Directors 36 Group
    [Show full text]
  • Faster, Smarter, Better
    Faster, smarter, better Using standards to tackle the recession raising standards worldwide™ Checklist Which standards can help you beat the recession? Standards have a proven history of supporting and contributing to business growth in the UK and around the world. But they are only as effective as the organization putting them into action. Choosing the standards that fit your business needs is an essential part of the equation. What are your biggest challenges? And what are you hoping to achieve? Review this quick checklist to find out which standards could be helping your business survive and thrive in the recession. Act early to decrease cost and inefficiency: 1 ISO 9001 Quality management; ISO 14001 Environmental management Keep trading continuously: 2 BS 25999 Business continuity Hold on to your best customers: 3 ISO 9001 Quality management; BS 10001 Customer satisfaction Hold on to your best staff: 4 ISO 14001 Environmental management; SA8000 Social accountability; BS OHSAS 18001 Occupational Health and Safety Diversify and innovate: 5 Kitemark; ISO 9001 Quality management; ISO 14001 Environmental management; all product standards Keep control of inventory: 6 ISO 9001 Quality management Increase market presence: 7 Management Systems certifications and Kitemark Work on improving your business: 8 ISO 9001 Quality management Avoid unnecessary risk and debt: 9 BS 31100 Risk management; ISO IEC 27001 Information security management; ComplytoSupply™ Work to create and maintain competitive advantage: 10 ISO 9001 Quality management; Kitemark; all product standards To find out more about how these standards and quality marks can help your business beat the recession, visit www.bsigroup.com Faster, Smarter, Better | Using standards to tackle the recession A proven history, with measurable results Standardization has existed for over 100 years, and the numbers of standards continues to grow.
    [Show full text]
  • The Growing Role of Human Factors and Usability Engineering for Medical Devices
    The growing role of human factors and usability engineering for medical devices What’s required in the new regulatory landscape Bob North, Human Centered Strategies The growing role of human factors and usability engineering for medical devices: What’s required in the new regulatory landscape Background Medical errors have been cited as the cause of nearly 100,000 deaths per year in the US healthcare system by the US Institute of Medicine in 1994 in its book, To err is human: Building a safer health system. According to the World Health Organization’s website, similar trends exist for European healthcare systems, with estimates that 8 to 12 per cent of hospitalizations involve adverse events and that as many as 18 per cent of patients report having experienced a medical error-induced problem. Costs in the UK alone for hospital infection intervention is estimated at £1 million per year. Adverse events over the past two decades have shown disturbing trends in post-market events that are attributable to design issues regarding the user interface (UI) of medical devices. Infusion pumps, automatic electronic defibrillators, ventilators, and combination products such as drug auto-injectors, have a history of use-related design problems resulting in overdoses, improper therapy delivery, incorrect diagnoses and dangerous delays in therapy. As part of the systematic process to reduce errors by regulatory bodies, medical device companies in the US and EU have been introduced to the disciplines of Human Factors and Usability Engineering (HF/UE). HF/UE has been applied in the automotive, aerospace, and telecommunications industries for more than 60 years, but has only recently been applied in the medical industry.
    [Show full text]
  • The British Standards Institution Annual Report and Financial Statements 2016
    The British Standards Institution Annual report and financial statements 2016 ...making excellence a habit. The British Standards Institution Annual report and financial statements 2016 Making excellence a habit At BSI we help to develop excellence by driving the success of our clients through standards. We enable others to perform better, manage risk and achieve sustainable growth. For over a century our experts have been challenging mediocrity and complacency to help embed excellence into the way people, processes and products work. We make excellence a habit. A successful business is... Trusted Secure Responsible Robust Innovative Agile Resilient Highlights of 2016 Contents Strategic report Strategic report Revenue Underlying operating profit 01 Highlights of 2016 02 Our business model £401.8m +21% £50.1m +42% 12 Our strategic initiatives 2015: £331.1m 2015: £35.4m 14 Key performance indicators 15 Chairman’s statement 17 Chief Executive’s review Operating profit Cash 20 Business review 20 Performance by geographical region £47.3m +39% £48.1m -6% 23 Performance by business stream 2015: £34.1m 2015: £51.0m 26 Principal risks and uncertainties 28 Standards review 32 Financial review Net asset value Average employees 36 Social responsibility review £82.9m +6% 3,835 +9% Corporate governance 2015: £78.4m 2015: 3,525 40 Board of Directors 42 Group Executive 44 Corporate governance report • Strong global performance despite economic, 49 Statement of Directors’ responsibilities political and social uncertainty 50 Report of the Audit Committee
    [Show full text]
  • The British Standards Institution Annual Report and Financial Statements 2016
    The British Standards Institution Annual report and financial statements 2016 ...making excellence a habit. The British Standards Institution Annual report and financial statements 2016 Making excellence a habit At BSI we help to develop excellence by driving the success of our clients through standards. We enable others to perform better, manage risk and achieve sustainable growth. For over a century our experts have been challenging mediocrity and complacency to help embed excellence into the way people, processes and products work. We make excellence a habit. A successful business is... Trusted Secure Responsible Robust Innovative Agile Resilient Highlights of 2016 Contents Strategic report Strategic report Revenue Underlying operating profit 01 Highlights of 2016 02 Our business model £401.8m +21% £50.1m +42% 12 Our strategic initiatives 2015: £331.1m 2015: £35.4m 14 Key performance indicators 15 Chairman’s statement 17 Chief Executive’s review Operating profit Cash 20 Business review 20 Performance by geographical region £47.3m +39% £48.1m -6% 23 Performance by business stream 2015: £34.1m 2015: £51.0m 26 Principal risks and uncertainties 28 Standards review 32 Financial review Net asset value Average employees 36 Social responsibility review £82.9m +6% 3,835 +9% Corporate governance 2015: £78.4m 2015: 3,525 40 Board of Directors 42 Group Executive 44 Corporate governance report • Strong global performance despite economic, 49 Statement of Directors’ responsibilities political and social uncertainty 50 Report of the Audit Committee
    [Show full text]