The Municipality of Grey Highlands 206 Toronto Street South, Unit One P.O

Planning and Development 595 9th Avenue East, Owen Sound Ontario N4K 3E3 519-372-0219 / 1-800-567-GREY / Fax: 519-376-7970

September 22, 2017

Mayor McQueen and Members of Council The Municipality of Grey Highlands 206 Toronto Street South, Unit One P.O. Box 409 Markdale, Ontario, N0C 1H0

Dear Mayor McQueen and Members of Council:

Re: Notice of Decision – Municipality of Grey Highlands Grey Official Plan

This letter is to advise that approval has been given, for the Municipality of Grey Highlands Official Plan as set out in the attached Notice of Decision given on this date. You will note that the text of the amendment has been modified and that a number of mapping schedules to the Plan have also been revised. These modifications are reflected in Schedule 1, which is included in the decision.

Please be advised that once the appeal period is over, a subsequent letter will be sent to confirm whether the decision is then final.

Should you require any further information, please do not hesitate to contact this office.

Yours truly,

“ORIGINAL SIGNED”

Randy Scherzer, MCIP, RPP Director of Planning & Development (519) 372-0219 & ext 1237 [email protected] www.grey.ca

Enclosures Notice of Decision with Schedule 1 and Mapping County Staff Report PDR-CW-40-17 on the Grey Highlands Official Plan cc. Rob Adams, Municipality of Grey Highlands Cassondra Dillman, Municipality of Grey Highlands Tyler Shantz, Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing, London Office Chris Hibberd, Nottawasaga Valley Conservation Authority

Grey County: Colour It Your Way Page 2 September 22, 2017

Andrew Sorensen, Grey Sauble Conservation Authority Erik Downing, Saugeen Valley Conservation Authority Rick Watt, Niagara Escarpment Commission Charlene Winger Doug Dingeldein Marc Flewelling Paul and Karen Vickers Jim Harrold The Metis Nation of Ontario, Alden Barty, Consultation Assessment Coordinator Cuesta Planning Consultants Travis & Associates Nancy Matthews, Chair, Heritage Grey Highlands Dr. Ted and Terri Schipper Cathy Little, Beaver Valley Ratepayers Association Michael Hawkins Antoin Diamond, Bruce Trail Conservancy Lorrie Gillis Town of The Blue Mountains David Bain Barry Parker Pat Breton Municipality of West Grey Township of Southgate Municipality of Meaford Township of Georgian Bluffs Township of Clearview County of Simcoe Mrs. P. Hutchinson Mr. K. Reid Mrs. B. Marshall Claire Murray-Chow Mrs. D. Close Caitlin Port, Skelton Brumell & Associates Inc. Donald H. Avery, Watershed Action Group Committee Victor Labreche, Labreche Patterson & Associates

Grey County: Colour It Your Way Grey Highlands Official Plan Date of Decision: September 14, 2017 Municipality: Municipality of Grey Highlands Date of Notice: September 22, 2017 Subject Land: All lands within Grey Highlands Last Date of Appeal: October 12, 2017

NOTICE OF DECISION With respect to an Official Plan under Subsection 17(35) of the Planning Act

A decision was made on the date noted above to approve all of the Municipality of Grey Highlands Official Plan as adopted by By-law No. 2015-88 with modifications.

Purpose and Effect of the Official Plan

The purpose and effect of the Municipality of Grey Highlands Official Plan is to establish new policies for the Municipality. The new Official Plan will replace the current Official Plan for the Municipality of Grey Highlands. The new Official Plan sets out policies for growth and development within the Municipality to the year 2026. The policies apply to all lands within the Municipality of Grey Highlands. A copy of the County’s modifications are attached as Schedule 1.

When and How to File an Appeal No person or public body shall be added as a party to the hearing of the appeal unless, before the plan Any appeal to the Ontario Municipal Board must be was adopted, the person or public body made oral filed with the County of Grey no later than 20 days from submissions at a public meeting or written the date of this notice as shown above as the last date submissions to the council or, in the opinion of the of appeal ( by October 11, 2017 at 4:30 p.m.). Ontario Municipal Board, there are reasonable grounds to add the person or public body as a party. The appeal should be sent to the attention of the Director of Planning, at the address shown below and it When the Decision is Final must, (1) set out the specific part of the proposed official The decision of the County of Grey is final if a Notice of plan amendment to which the appeal applies, Appeal is not received on or before the last date of (2) set out the reasons for the request for the appeal noted above. appeal and the specific part of the proposed official plan to which the appeal applies, and Other Related Applications (3) be accompanied by the fee prescribed under the Ontario Municipal Board Act in the amount There are no other directly related applications at this of $300.00 payable by certified cheque to the time. Minister of Finance, Province of Ontario. Getting Additional Information Impact of Public Comments Additional information about the Plan is available for Public and agency comments were considered public inspection during regular office hours at the throughout the Official Plan process, and resulted in a County of Grey Planning & Development office at the number of changes to the policies and mapping. address noted below or from the Municipality of Grey Highlands. Who Can File An Appeal Mailing Address for Filing a Notice of Appeal: Only individuals, corporations or public bodies may appeal the decision of the County of Grey to the County of Grey Planning & Development Department Ontario Municipal Board. An appeal may not be filed by 595-9th Avenue East, an unincorporated association or group. However, an Owen Sound, ON, N4K 3E3 appeal may be filed in the name of an individual who is Tel: 519-376-2205 a member of the association or group. Fax: 519-376-7970

DECISION With respect to an Official Plan Amendment Subsection 17(34) of the Planning Act

The County of Grey hereby approves all of proposed Municipality of Grey Highlands Official Plan as adopted by By-law No. 2015-88, subject to the modifications contained in Schedule 1.

Schedule 1: Modifications to the Municipality of Grey Highlands Official Plan Modification Section or Recommended Modification Policy or Principle Basis for the Proposed Number Schedule Modification Number 1 4.1.1 Section 4.1.1 of the Plan is hereby deleted and replaced by the following: Consistency with Provincial Policy Statement (PPS) 2014, the Province’s Permitted Uses in Prime Agricultural Areas “4.1.1 Permitted Uses Guideline, and conformity to the County Official Plan. • Agricultural uses, see Table 1 below, • Agricultural related uses, see Table 1 below, • Small scale on-farm diversified uses, see Table 1 below, • Single detached dwelling, • Forestry and reforestation, • Wayside pits and quarries (excluding the stockpiling of sand salt mixtures) and portable asphalt plants, • Sand and/or gravel extraction operations identified within the Schedule B High Potential Mineral Aggregate Resources, • Licensed aggregate operations identified as Mineral Resource Extraction on Schedule B High Potential Mineral Aggregate Resources, • Limited non-farm recreational and institutional uses such as; . Churches, schools, cemeteries, in addition to other non-residential uses such as community halls, public uses, airstrips, communication towers, and historic sites, . Electric power facilities and accessory uses and structures. Modification Section or Recommended Modification Policy or Principle Basis for the Proposed Number Schedule Modification Number

Table 1: Permitted use examples in Agricultural and Rural Land Use Designations Agricultural Use Agricultural Small Scale On-farm Related Use Diversified Use • Growing of all • Apple storage • Home occupations types of crops, and distribution (e.g. professional • Raising of all centre, office, bookkeeper, types of • Farm gate sales land surveyor, art livestock, selling locally studio, hairdresser, • Barns / manure grown massage therapist, storage, produce/goods, daycare, veterinary • Pastureland, • Agricultural clinic, kennel, • Feedlot, research centre, classes or • Fish farm, • Winery using workshops), • Mushroom farm, predominately • Home industries • Christmas local grapes, (e.g. sawmill, trees/nurseries, • Cidery using welding or • Greenhouses, predominately woodworking shop, manufacturing / • Grain Dryers, local fruit, fabrication, • Feed storage i.e. • Flour mill for seasonal storage of bunkers / silos, local grain, boats or trailers, • • Grain dryer / Machine shed, biomass pelletizer) • storage for Temporary or • Café/small permanent multiple local farmers, restaurant, cooking accommodation classes, food store for seasonal or • Farm equipment repair shop, (e.g. cheese, ice full time farm cream), labour (subject • Livestock • Agri-tourism uses to the policies of assembly yard, (e.g. farm vacation section 3.8), or stockyard for suite, bed and • Cold storage (for local farmers, • Auction for local breakfast, hay own farm’s use), rides, petting zoo, • produce, Indoor/outdoor farm-themed riding • Farm input Modification Section or Recommended Modification Policy or Principle Basis for the Proposed Number Schedule Modification Number arenas/tracks, supplier e.g. playground, horse • Minimum seeds, feed, trail rides, corn amount of fertilizer, etc., maze, seasonal processing to • Abattoir selling / events, equine make a produce processing local events, wine saleable (e.g. meat, tasting), evaporating • Food • Value-added uses maple sap, or processing plant (e.g. processor, extracting for local packager, cheese honey) produce (e.g. factory, bakery), cider-making, • Retail uses (e.g. pitting, canning, farm market, quick-freezing, antique business, packing) tack shop)”

2 4.1.3(c) Section 4.1.3(c) of the Plan is hereby deleted and replaced by the Consistency with PPS 2014 following:

“4.1.3(c) New lots will be permitted for Agricultural-related uses, provided the lot is as small as feasible to permit the Agricultural-related use. New lots for small scale on-farm diversified uses will not be considered.”

3 4.1.3(e) Section 4.1.3(e) of the Plan is hereby deleted and the remaining sections Editorial – duplication of another policy are re-lettered accordingly.

4 4.2.1 Section 4.2.1 of the Plan is hereby deleted and replaced by the following: Consistency with PPS 2014, the Province’s Permitted Uses in Prime Agricultural Areas Guideline, and conformity “4.2.1 Permitted Uses to the County Official Plan. • Agricultural uses, see Table 1 under section 4.1.1, • Agricultural related uses, see Table 1 under section 4.1.1, • Small scale on-farm diversified uses, see Table 1 under section 4.1.1, • Single detached dwelling, • Forestry and reforestation, • Golf courses, Modification Section or Recommended Modification Policy or Principle Basis for the Proposed Number Schedule Modification Number • Resource based recreational uses, • Wayside pits and quarries (excluding the stockpiling of sand salt mixtures) and portable asphalt plans, • Sand and/or gravel extraction operations identified within the Schedule B High Potential Mineral Aggregate Resources, • Licensed aggregate operations identified as Mineral Resource Extraction on Schedule B High Potential Mineral Aggregate Resources, • Uses connected with the conservation of water, soil, wildlife, and other natural resources, • Limited non-farm recreational and institutional uses such as; . Churches, schools, cemeteries, in addition to other non- residential uses such as community halls, public uses, airstrips, communication towers, and historic sites, . Electric power facilities and accessory uses and structures.”

5 4.10.2(a) Section 4.10.2(a) of the Plan is hereby deleted and replaced by the Conformity to the County Official Plan following:

“Section 4.10.2 The following proposed mineral aggregate extraction operations will require an amendment to the Grey Highlands Official Plan:

(a) All new or expanding quarry operations proposed within Grey Highlands; (b) All new sand and/or gravel operations proposed outside of the areas identified as an Aggregate Resource Area shown on Schedule B; and, (c) All proposed expansions beyond the areas identified as an Aggregate Resource Area on Schedule B.”

6 4.10.1 Section 4.10.1 is hereby modified by inserting new clauses (1) (2) and (3) Conformity to the County Official Plan at the end of the existing permitted uses section. Modification Section or Recommended Modification Policy or Principle Basis for the Proposed Number Schedule Modification Number

(1) “Asphalt plants and concrete batching plants may be permitted as accessory uses to a licensed extractive operation subject to the following items being addressed through the Aggregate Resources Act site plan amendment process: a. it is a non-permanent use and will cease to operate once the aggregate material has been completely removed or the operator stops removing material from the site on a regular basis; b. a traffic impact study is provided to the satisfaction of the County and the local municipality; and, c. the applicant must demonstrate that the proposed location is appropriate and that impacts to the social and natural environment as defined in Section 4.11 of this Plan within a defined study area can be minimized. d. noise, odour and dust studies are provided which satisfy the Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change’s standards.

(2) An Official Plan Amendment will be required for asphalt plants and concrete batching plants proposing to locate outside of the Mineral Resource Extraction areas identified on Schedule B.

(3) For existing licensed extractive operations approved before September 14, 2017, where an asphalt plant is expressly prohibited as a condition of the Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry Aggregate License, no new asphalt plants shall be permitted, without an amendment to this Plan.”

7 1.4 In the first sentence of section 1.4 of the Plan the words “and October 9, Editorial – clarification on approval dates. 2012” are inserted after the words ‘June 25, 2012’.

8 2.2(b) Following the word ‘Employment’ the word “Area” is inserted before the Editorial – ensuring the term aligns with the designation. period.

Modification Section or Recommended Modification Policy or Principle Basis for the Proposed Number Schedule Modification Number 9 2.2(d) In section 2.2(d) the letter ‘s’ at the end of the word ‘adds’ is hereby Editorial. deleted.

10 Various sections Any use of the phrase ‘Minimum Distance Separation Formulae’ Clarification based on Provincial comments on the County throughout the Plan is hereby deleted and replaced by the phrase Plan. ‘Provincial Minimum Distance Separation Formulae’.

11 2.3.1 The second sentence of section 2.3.1 is hereby deleted and replaced by the following;

“In some instances, such as provincially significant wetlands, provincially Clarification that deer wintering yards are included as and regionally significant ANSI’s, significant wildlife habitat (including deer significant wildlife habitat. wintering yards), and significant woodlands, mapping and policies are provided in this Plan; however, in all cases the Resources will be identified and protected through the following methods:”

The bulleted list in this section shall remain unmodified.

Section 2.3.1 is further modified by inserting the following new sentence Recognition of the future natural heritage systems based at the end of the paragraph which begins with “This Plan attempts to…”: approach.

“Following the implementation of the County’s Green In Grey Natural Environment Study, the Municipality will consider implementing systems- based protection at the time of the next five year review of the Grey Highlands Official Plan.”

12 2.4(e) In section 2.4(e) the word ‘must’ is deleted and replaced by the words Clarification that limited residential development could be “shall predominantly”. considered in other locations e.g. a rural severance.

13 2.5 The fifth sentence of the first paragraph of section 2.5 is hereby deleted Clarification based on the approvals of the Source and replaced by the following two sentences: Protection Plans.

“The Municipality acknowledges that the final Source Protection Plans have now been approved, and will work in conjunction with the Drinking Water Source Protection (DWSP) staff to implement the Source Modification Section or Recommended Modification Policy or Principle Basis for the Proposed Number Schedule Modification Number Protection Plans. Based on the timing of Official Plan Amendment 27 to the Grey Highlands Plan, the Source Protection Plans have not yet been fully implemented in the Grey Highlands Official Plan.”

The final sentence of the first paragraph of section 2.5 is hereby modified by deleting the words ‘finalized and’.

14 Schedule F Schedule F is hereby deleted and replaced by a new Schedule F showing This map will be replaced by the most current mapping for updated landfill and source water protection mapping. source protection and showing further categories of landfill, as per the recommendations of the Ministry of the Link to new Schedule F (hard copy maps have also been attached) Environment and Climate Change.

15 3.0(a) A new sentence is added to the beginning of section 3.0(a) which states; Clarification of servicing hierarchy and clarification in case Ministry should change their Guidelines in the future. “In accordance with the servicing hierarchy policies of this Plan, the preferred method of servicing shall be municipal water and municipal sewer systems, followed by private communal services. Should municipal or private communal services not be feasible, individual on-site private services can be considered.”

The end of section 3.0(a) is hereby modified by inserting the words “or any successor thereto” following the words ‘Reasonable Use’.

16 3.1(b) Section 3.1(b) of the Plan is hereby modified by adding a second Clarification based on the requirements of the Planning Act sentence to this clause as follows: and the County Official Plan.

“Land division via the consent process shall only be considered where a plan of subdivision is not otherwise needed for the orderly development of the lands.”

17 3.1(n) Section 3.1(n) is hereby deleted and replaced by the following: County staff would generally support this objective, but question whether the wording should be caveated, as it’s “unduly impact agriculture lands, buildings or other rural activities.” arguable that all rural severances would create less usable space for agriculture, buildings, or activities. 18 3.1(r) A new sentence is added at the end of this clause which reads as follows; Added in a new clause that considers the creation of Modification Section or Recommended Modification Policy or Principle Basis for the Proposed Number Schedule Modification Number conservation lots, and the securement of trail lands, “Where lots are being created for conservation purposes, by an approved without the need for direct access onto an open and conservation organization, the Municipality may waive the need for direct maintained public road. frontage onto a public road at its discretion.”

19 3.2(a) The second sentence of section 3.2(a) of the Plan is hereby modified by County staff are of the understanding that Flesherton has deleting the word ‘sanitary’ and replacing it with the word “water”. municipal sanitary sewer services and is currently lacking municipal water services. This section of the Plan would The last sentence of the first paragraph is hereby modified by deleting the currently indicate the opposite. word ‘sewage’ and replacing it with the word “municipal”.

20 3.3.2 Two new sentences at the end of section 3.3.2 are hereby added as Clarification on best practices. follows:

“Proponents undertaking Environmental Impact Studies are also encouraged to engage Conservation Authorities in pre-submission consultation. Additional mapping and information may also be available from the Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry.”

21 3.4 and 2.3.2(d) Sections 3.4 and 2.3.2(d) are hereby modified by inserting the word Clarification based on the fact that the Municipality does “future” before prior to the use of the term ‘Urban Design Guidelines’. not currently have Urban Design Guidelines. 22 3.6(c) Section 3.6(c) of the Plan is hereby modified to insert “planning reports” in Clarification of studies required. the list of required studies following the phrase ‘community plans’.

23 3.10(iii), 3.10(c)(i), Sections 3.10(iii), 3.10(c)(i), and 3.10(d)(i) are hereby modified by Clarification that any residential area of a municipality and 3.10(d)(i) inserting the following phrase; would permit an accessory apartment, but that they would not be otherwise permitted in industrial areas where “(where residential uses are permitted),” residential uses are not permitted.

after the words ‘Settlement Areas’ .

24 3.10(d)(vi) The final sentence of section 3.10(d)(vi) is hereby deleted and replaced Conformity to the County Official Plan. with the following:

“The Council may by by-law grant one further period of not more than Modification Section or Recommended Modification Policy or Principle Basis for the Proposed Number Schedule Modification Number three years during which the use is authorized.”

25 Various sections Any reference to ‘small scale agricultural-related uses’ shall be deleted to Clarification based on consistency with the PPS 2014 and remove the requirement of being ‘small scale’ and shall simply read the Province’s Permitted Uses in Prime Agricultural Areas ‘agricultural-related uses’. Any references to ‘small scale on-farm Guideline. diversified uses’ shall remain to reference the small scale criteria.

26 4.1.2(f) A new sentence is added to the end of section 4.1.2(f) as follows: Clarification based on consistency with the PPS 2014 and the Province’s Permitted Uses in Prime Agricultural Areas “Where a winery, cidery, or brewery is predominantly using local Guideline. ingredients, such as apples, fruit, grapes, or hops grown on the farm operation, it shall be considered an agricultural-related use. Notwithstanding subsection (i) above, where the operation is processing fruit, produce, or materials grown on-farm, it shall not be required to seek out poorer quality agricultural lands.”

27 4.1.3(1)(b)(i) The first sentence of section 4.1.3(1)(b)(i) is hereby modified by inserting Conformity to the County Official Plan. the following phrase after the words ‘bona fide farmer’;

“, for the purposes of this policy a bona fide farm shall have a Farm Business Registration number.”

28 4.1.3(1)(d) Section 4.1.3(1)(d) is hereby modified by inserting the following words Conformity to the County Official Plan. after the word ‘encouraged’ at the end of this clause:

“, provided it does not result in the creation of an undersized remnant lot.”

29 4.2.2(j) Subsection 4.2.2(j) is hereby deleted and the remaining sections are re- Former exception which is no longer relevant under the lettered accordingly. current policy context.

30 Various sections References to a specific past official plan amendment shall be modified to Editorial – clarification. reference the OPA number, as per the current section 4.2.2(p) which references ‘OPA 2 Campfire’.

31 4.3.2(c) In section 4.3.2(c) the words “or adjacent lands” are hereby deleted. Clarification – modifications to the adjacent lands generally Modification Section or Recommended Modification Policy or Principle Basis for the Proposed Number Schedule Modification Number would not require approval from the Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry. 32 4.5.1(c) In section 4.5.1(c) the word “residential” is inserted between the words Clarification based on the requirements of the County ‘average’ and ‘development’. Official Plan.

33 4.5.2(c) In section 4.5.2(c) the word ‘Major’ is hereby deleted from the beginning Clarifying the intent of the policy, as the policy made it of this subsection. difficult to determine what the word ‘major’ meant in that context. 34 4.5.3.1.1 In section 4.5.3.1.1 the first usage of the word ‘family’ is deleted and Clarification of terminology. replaced by the word “detached”. In this same section the second usage of the word ‘family’ is deleted and replaced by the word “unit”.

35 4.5.3.1.2(a) In section 4.5.3.1.2(a) the clause “unless already pre-zoned in the zoning Clarification that new development may be pre-zoned, or by-law,” after the words ‘implementing zoning by-law’ and before the may come via site specific zoning by-law. words ‘and should consider’.

36 4.5.3.1.2(f)(iv) In section 4.5.3.1.2(f)(iv) the words “or privately” are hereby deleted. Clarification – In communities which are partially serviced, the County typically has not supported new lot creation which is not connecting to the available municipal service. 37 4.5.3.2.1 In section 4.5.3.2.1 the following clauses are deleted: County staff would have concern with allowing for residential or institutional uses within designated • “Institutional uses such as places of worship, schools, cemeteries, employment areas. Particularly where there are industrial libraries, and nursing and retirement homes. uses, or lands designated for future industrial use, County Accessory residential uses” staff would see a high potential for land use conflict and difficulty to address the Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change’s D-6 Guidelines. 38 4.5.3.3.1 In section 4.5.3.3.1 the clause ‘All forms of residential development’ is Clarification that residential in the downtown should be hereby deleted and replaced by the clause “Multi-residential, or accessory limited to multi-residential, or accessory residential uses. residential development”.

39 4.9.3(c) Section 4.9.3(c) is hereby amended by adding in a second sentence as Based on the changes to the agricultural-related use follows: section there is some overlap between the space extensive uses and agricultural-related use. Based on this “Notwithstanding the foregoing, where the proposal is an agricultural- overlap County staff would recommend amending section related use, it may be considered on Agricultural designated land, without 4.9.3(c). Modification Section or Recommended Modification Policy or Principle Basis for the Proposed Number Schedule Modification Number an amendment to this Plan.”

40 4.10.2(c)(iv) Section 4.10.2(c)(iv) is hereby amended by adding the following clause There are rare instances where a traffic study or road after the existing wording: assessment may serve no useful purpose in the evaluation of a pit/quarry application e.g. a small pit proposed with “; during pre-submission consultation the traffic study and/or roads direct access onto a Provincial Highway. The ability to assessment requirement may be waived at the discretion of the road waive the need for these studies may prove useful in such authority(ies) depending on the nature of the proposal, and the existing circumstances. haul route condition;”

41 4.10.2(g) In section 4.10.2(g) the below new sentence is added following the first Modification to include wording in here which encourages sentence in this subsection: the use of ‘maximum disturbed area’ provisions where feasible. “Maximum Disturbed Area provisions on the operations and rehabilitation site plans are strongly encouraged where feasible.”

42 4.11.3 & Schedule C Schedule C is hereby deleted and replaced by a new Schedule C. The modified schedule clarifies that Deer Wintering Areas are grouped under Significant Wildlife Habitat. Link to new Schedule C (hard copy maps have also been attached)

43 4.11.10 Section 4.11.10 is hereby modified by including the below sentence at the Clarification that new non-farm uses in the aggregate end of this subsection: resource areas are only permitted on existing lots of record, and that new non-farm lots cannot be created “New non-farm lot creation is not permitted within areas mapped as within Aggregate Resource Areas. Aggregate Resource Area.”

The complete modified subsection reads as follows:

“New non-farm development (other than passive open space uses) shall only be permitted where it has been demonstrated to the appropriate approval authority that:

a) the extraction of the aggregate resource is not feasible due to the quality or quantity of material or the existence of incompatible development patterns; Modification Section or Recommended Modification Policy or Principle Basis for the Proposed Number Schedule Modification Number b) the proposed land use or development serves a greater long term interest of the general public than does aggregate extraction; and c) it has been demonstrated that the proposed development within 300 metres of the Aggregate Resource Area would not significantly preclude or hinder future aggregate extraction.

New non-farm lot creation is not permitted within areas mapped as Aggregate Resource Area.”

44 4.12.12 Section 4.12.12 is hereby renumbered to 4.11.12. Typographical.

45 6.1.2 In section 6.1.2 the reference to the term ’10 years’ is hereby deleted and Clarification based on the provisions of Bill 140. replaced with “20 years”.

46 6.2 In section 6.2 the phrase “and local municipal staff” is hereby deleted from Editorial – typographical the first sentence of this section.

47 Definitions Within the definition of ‘Flooding Hazard’ clause (a) is hereby deleted: Clarification based on Grey Highlands not having any Georgian Bay shoreline. “(a) Along the shorelines of Georgian Bay the Flooding Hazard limit is based on the one hundred year flood level plus an allowance for wave uprush and other water-related hazards;”

48 Definitions In the Definitions section of the Plan the definition for the word Modification to include ‘trails’ in the ‘Infrastructure’ ‘Infrastructure’ is hereby modified to insert the word “trails” in between the definition. phrases ‘transportation corridors and facilities,’ and ‘oil and gas pipelines’.

49 4.11.9 In section 4.11.9 a new clause is added at this subsection as follows: This section is needed as per the recommendations of the Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change, who “As per Grey County’s 2015 Historic Landfill Site Reviews Study, sites noted that the County should still show former landfills on shown on Schedule F as ‘Abandoned Landfill Previously Identified Site’ the map, even where a D-4 study is not being will not require further Guideline D-4 Assessments at this time. These recommended. sites were previously mapped by the MOECC, but have been further Modification Section or Recommended Modification Policy or Principle Basis for the Proposed Number Schedule Modification Number reviewed in the 2015 County Study.’

50 Maps 1 - 12 Maps 1 - 12 are hereby deleted and replaced by amended versions The modifications to these maps will reflect the comments deleting the Development Control boundaries and showing the underlying from NEC and Grey Highlands Staff. land use designations.

Link to Modified Maps 1 - 12 (hard copy maps have also been attached)

Dated at Owen Sound this 22nd day of September 2017

“ORIGINAL SIGNED” ______Alan Barfoot Warden County of Grey

Committee Report Report PDR-CW-40-17 To: Warden Barfoot and Members of Grey County Council From: Scott Taylor, Senior Planner Meeting Date: September 14, 2017 Subject: Approval of Municipality of Grey Highlands Official Plan Status:

Recommendation(s) That the Committee of the Whole hereby approves the new Municipality of Grey Highlands Official Plan as adopted by By-law No. 2015-88, subject to the following modifications attached to Report PDR-CW-40-17 as Schedule 1 and dated September 14, 2017.

Background The Municipality of Grey Highlands adopted a new Municipal Official Plan on December 14th, 2015. The new Municipality of Grey Highlands Official Plan (MGHOP) is intended to replace the previous MGHOP from 2001 (approved by the Ontario Municipal Board in 2003 and hereafter referenced as the 2003 Plan). A link to the adopted MGHOP has been included in the Attachments section of this report.

This new Official Plan started as a five-year review to the Grey Highlands Official Plan, but was eventually adopted as a whole new Plan. As part of the Official Plan process, the Municipality hosted a number of public consultation sessions, as well as a circulating the MGHOP to the required agencies. The Municipal Council has also considered the County’s proposed modifications, in February 2017, in order to provide feedback to the County. There is one key subject matter where the County Planning staff recommendation does not match the desires of the Municipal Council. This topic will be explored further in the Analysis section of this report.

Proposed modifications to the Plan are being recommended based on input received from the public, Council, stakeholders, and County/Municipal staff. The approval of the MGHOP will also have the effect of repealing the former 2003 Official Plan.

PDR-CW-40-17 1 September 14, 2017 Analysis of Planning Issues – Legislation, Provincial Policy Statement, and Niagara Escarpment Plan Planning Authorities must have regard for matters of Provincial interest, as set out under the Planning Act and be consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement (PPS) 2014. Decisions must also conform to the County of Grey Official Plan and any Provincial Plans that are in force and effect.

In the case of the MGHOP, the Plan must also not be in conflict with the Niagara Escarpment Plan. Niagara Escarpment Commission staff have provided detailed comments on the MGHOP.

Section 2 of the Planning Act sets out the matters of Provincial interest which all land use decisions shall have regard for. The matters under this section of the Act cover a broad spectrum of interests, which will not be explored in detail in this report. County Planning staff are satisfied that the MGHOP has regard for matters of Provincial Interest, and implements these interests through sound land use planning policies.

Section 1 of the PPS promotes development within settlement areas that can be serviced by municipal water and sewer systems. The Municipality has a significant amount of land within designated settlement areas. The Primary Settlement Area of Markdale provides the greatest opportunity for new growth, as it has full municipal services. Other smaller settlement areas, and the recreational communities, are also forecast for growth under the MGHOP. Section 1 further promotes the efficient use of land, resources and infrastructure, and promotes infill, intensification and the redevelopment of former brownfield sites. The MGHOP provides policy that requires all new development to be serviced appropriately, at densities that provide for the efficient use of land and infrastructure.

Section 1.4 of the PPS requires municipalities to provide a range of housing types and densities to meet the projected current and future needs. The MGHOP includes policies that are aimed at providing for a range of housing types. The MGHOP also includes second unit provisions as per Bill 140.

Section 2.1 of the PPS provides for the protection of significant natural heritage features within the Province. The MGHOP contains similar policies to the County Plan in this regard, and also implements the new adjacent lands standards of the 2010 Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry (MNRF) Natural Heritage Reference Manual (NHRM). The new MGHOP also implements the County’s Significant Woodlands and Other Identified Wetlands mapping from the County Official Plan.

Section 2.3 of the PPS provides for the protection of agricultural lands throughout the Province. The MGHOP provides a similar policy basis to the County Plan on these matters, as well as implementing wording from the 2014 PPS, with respect to agriculture-related uses and on-farm diversified uses.

PDR-CW-40-17 2 September 14, 2017 Section 2.6 of the PPS provides for the protection of built and cultural heritage resources. The MGHOP includes a policy framework for the protection of said resources including referencing the role of First Nations and Métis peoples in the planning process.

Analysis of Planning Issues – County Official Plan The MGHOP must conform to the purposes and policies of the County Official Plan; however the MGHOP can also provide more detailed policies than would be provided for in an upper tier plan. The County Plan contains detailed rural and agricultural policies, and as such municipal official plans often focus on providing detailed settlement area policies.

The MGHOP successfully implements a number of policies from the County Plan, as modified by Official Plan Amendment (OPA) 80, including but not limited to the following:

1. An average development density of not less than 20 units per net hectare for Markdale should be achieved based on section 4.5.1(c) of the Plan. Further on in this section, detailed infill and intensification policies also provide appropriate direction for the Municipality. 2. The requirements for a Comprehensive Review have been added in cases where employment lands are being proposed to be redesignated to another land use, or where settlement areas are being expanded. 3. The Constraint mapping implements the County’s Significant Woodlands, and Other Identified Wetlands mapping. Associated policies have been included in the MGHOP for each of these constraints. 4. Implements the County’s 2015 Historic Landfills Study.

In addition to the above, there are two areas of deviation from the County Plan that were adopted in the MGHOP, which warrant some further discussion.

1. The mineral aggregate resource policies as adopted by the Municipality are not consistent with the approach taken by the County in OPA 80. More specifically the County does not require an official plan amendment for new or expanding pits within mapped aggregate resource areas, and the County Plan also states that local official plan amendments are not required either. In contrast, the adopted MGHOP would require municipal official plan amendments in this regard. Similarly, the MGHOP would require plan amendments for new asphalt plants proposed within existing pits, whereas the County Plan would not.

County staff have proposed modifications in this regard based on conformity to the County Plan. Aggregate resources is one area where the County Plan is quite prescriptive, and notes that official plan amendments are not required

PDR-CW-40-17 3 September 14, 2017 within mapped aggregate resource areas. Similar policies to those in the County Plan have also already been approved in the Town of The Blue Mountains Official Plan and the Municipality of Meaford Official Plan. County staff cannot justify making a special exception for Grey Highlands, as it would not conform to the County Plan. County staff would however note that when new pits or asphalt plants are proposed, there would still be a zoning amendment needed at the Municipal level that will trigger a public process and the requisite technical studies. Municipal Council does not support the proposed approach recommended by County staff.

2. The MGHOP has taken a more restrictive approach to on-farm businesses than the policies in the County Plan. The County has proposed modifications to the agriculture-related uses policies, in order to ensure consistency with the PPS (as per the Province’s Permitted Uses in Prime Agricultural Areas Guideline). The PPS does not require said uses to be small-scale, and would allow for the severance of such uses, which are the modifications by the County.

The County is not however proposing to modify the policies related to on-farm diversified uses or small-scale uses, even though they are significantly more restrictive than in the County Plan. A comparison of the two small-scale definitions has been provided in Table 1 below. The notable differences are that the MGHOP sets a minimum parcel size of 20 hectares for new on-farm diversified uses, or small-scale commercial/industrial uses, in the Agricultural and Rural designations, and sets a maximum business building size of 250 square metres for such businesses. The County Plan allows for up to 750 square metres of business building size on lots 20 hectares or greater, and does not contain a 20 hectare minimum lot size for such businesses in the Rural designation.

PDR-CW-40-17 4 September 14, 2017 County Official Plan Policies Grey Highlands Official Plan Policies SMALL SCALE on parcels 20 hectares or greater in SMALL SCALE on parcels 20 hectares or the Agricultural, Special Agriculture or Rural greater in the Agricultural or Rural designation small scale when used in the context of designation small scale when used in the commercial or industrial uses means those uses context of commercial or industrial uses which exceed the provisions of a Home/Rural means those uses which exceed the Occupation, but do not exceed the following: provisions of a Home/Rural Occupation, but do not exceed the following: • occupies combined building(s) not exceeding • occupies combined building(s) not 750 square metres; exceeding 250 square metres; • outside storage and display is limited to an • outside storage and display is limited area not greater than 500 square metres; to an area not greater than 750 • if the building(s) is less than 750 square square metres; metres the outside storage/display area may • the passing of an implementing be increased to a maximum combined outside Zoning By-law Amendment. storage/display area and building area that does not exceed 1250 square metres; and • the passing of an implementing Zoning By-law Amendment.

On parcels less than 20 hectares in the Special Agriculture or Rural designations, a maximum combined building area of 250 square metres and a maximum outdoor storage/display area of 750 square metres will be permitted.

On parcels less than 20 hectares in the Agricultural designation no small-scale commercial or industrial operations will be permitted.

Table 1: Small Scale Policies Comparison Although the adopted MGHOP policies are more restrictive than the County Official Plan, they would not appear to be in conflict with the PPS or the County Plan. County staff have not proposed to modify these policies in this regard, but would note that it could result in more municipal official plan amendments being triggered on lots less than 20 hectares in the Rural designation.

Subject to the detailed modifications in Schedule 1, County staff consider the MGHOP to have regard for matters of Provincial Interest, be consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement and to conform to the County of Grey Official Plan.

PDR-CW-40-17 5 September 14, 2017 Financial / Staffing / Legal / Information Technology Considerations At this time there are no expected financial, staffing, or legal considerations beyond those normally encountered in processing a new Official Plan. While there is always the possibility that the Plan could be appealed to the Ontario Municipal Board, County staff are of the opinion that the Municipality has done an excellent job of addressing any concerns that have been brought forward.

Link to Strategic Goals / Priorities Goal 1 of the County Strategic Plan is to ‘Grow the Grey County Economy’ and Goal 2 is to ‘Support Healthy, Connected Communities’. This development of these new Official Plan policies should support both of these strategic goals.

Attachments Link to the Adopted Municipality of Grey Highlands Official Plan

Schedule 1: Proposed Modifications to the Municipality of Grey Highlands Official Plan

Respectfully submitted by,

Scott Taylor, MCIP, RPP Senior Planner

Director Sign Off: Randy Scherzer

PDR-CW-40-17 6 September 14, 2017 Schedule 1: Proposed Modifications to the Municipality of Grey Highlands Official Plan

Modification Section or Recommended Modification Policy or Principle Basis for the Proposed Modification Number Schedule Number 1 4.1.1 Section 4.1.1 of the Plan is hereby deleted and replaced by the following: Consistency with Provincial Policy Statement (PPS) 2014, the Province’s Permitted Uses in Prime Agricultural Areas “4.1.1 Permitted Uses Guideline, and conformity to the County Official Plan. • Agricultural uses, see Table 1 below, • Agricultural related uses, see Table 1 below, • Small scale on-farm diversified uses, see Table 1 below, • Single detached dwelling, • Forestry and reforestation, • Wayside pits and quarries (excluding the stockpiling of sand salt mixtures) and portable asphalt plans, • Sand and/or gravel extraction operations identified within the Schedule B High Potential Mineral Aggregate Resources, • Licensed aggregate operations identified as Mineral Resource Extraction on Schedule B High Potential Mineral Aggregate Resources, • Limited non-farm recreational and institutional uses such as; . Churches, schools, cemeteries, in addition to other non- residential uses such as community halls, public uses, airstrips, communication towers, and historic sites, . Electric power facilities and accessory uses and structures.

PDR-CW-40-17 7 September 14, 2017 Modification Section or Recommended Modification Policy or Principle Basis for the Proposed Modification Number Schedule Number types of • Farm gate sales land surveyor, art livestock, selling locally studio, hairdresser, • Barns / manure grown massage therapist, storage, produce/goods, daycare, veterinary • Pastureland, • Agricultural clinic, kennel, • Feedlot, research centre, classes or • Fish farm, • Winery using workshops), • Mushroom farm, predominately • Home industries • Christmas local grapes, (e.g. sawmill, trees/nurseries, • Cidery using welding or • Greenhouses, predominately woodworking shop, • Grain Dryers, local fruit, manufacturing / fabrication, • Feed storage i.e. • Flour mill for seasonal storage of bunkers / silos, local grain, boats or trailers, • Machine shed, • Grain dryer / biomass pelletizer) • Temporary or storage for • Café/small permanent multiple local restaurant, cooking accommodation farmers, classes, food store for seasonal or • Farm equipment (e.g. cheese, ice full time farm repair shop, cream), labour (subject • Livestock • Agri-tourism uses to the policies of assembly yard, (e.g. farm vacation section 3.8), or stockyard for suite, bed and • Cold storage (for local farmers, breakfast, hay own farm’s use), • Auction for local rides, petting zoo, • produce, Indoor/outdoor farm-themed riding • Farm input supplier e.g. playground, horse arenas/tracks, trail rides, corn • Minimum seeds, feed, fertilizer, etc., maze, seasonal

PDR-CW-40-17 8 September 14, 2017 Modification Section or Recommended Modification Policy or Principle Basis for the Proposed Modification Number Schedule Number amount of • Abattoir selling / events, equine processing to processing local events, wine make a produce meat, tasting), saleable (e.g. • Food • Value-added uses evaporating processing plant (e.g. processor, maple sap, or for local packager, cheese extracting produce (e.g. factory, bakery), honey) cider-making, • Retail uses (e.g. pitting, canning, farm market, quick-freezing, antique business,

packing) tack shop)” 2 4.1.3(c) Section 4.1.3(c) of the Plan is hereby deleted and replaced by the following: Consistency with PPS 2014

3 4.1.3(e) Section 4.1.3(e) of the Plan is hereby deleted and the remaining sections are re- Editorial – duplication of another policy lettered accordingly.

PDR-CW-40-17 9 September 14, 2017 Modification Section or Recommended Modification Policy or Principle Basis for the Proposed Modification Number Schedule Number • Resource based recreational uses, • Wayside pits and quarries (excluding the stockpiling of sand salt mixtures) and portable asphalt plans, • Sand and/or gravel extraction operations identified within the Schedule B High Potential Mineral Aggregate Resources, • Licensed aggregate operations identified as Mineral Resource Extraction on Schedule B High Potential Mineral Aggregate Resources, • Uses connected with the conservation of water, soil, wildlife, and other natural resources, • Limited non-farm recreational and institutional uses such as; . Churches, schools, cemeteries, in addition to other non- residential uses such as community halls, public uses, airstrips, communication towers, and historic sites, . Electric power facilities and accessory uses and structures.”

5 4.10.2(a) Section 4.10.2(a) of the Plan is hereby deleted and replaced by the following: Conformity to the County Official Plan

“Section 4.10.2 The following proposed mineral aggregate extraction operations will require an amendment to the Grey Highlands Official Plan:

PDR-CW-40-17 10 September 14, 2017 Modification Section or Recommended Modification Policy or Principle Basis for the Proposed Modification Number Schedule Number 6 4.10.1 Section 4.10.1 is hereby modified by inserting new clauses (1) (2) and (3) at the Conformity to the County Official Plan end of the existing permitted uses section.

(2) An Official Plan Amendment will be required for asphalt plants and concrete batching plants proposing to locate outside of the Mineral Resource Extraction areas identified on Schedule B.

7 1.4 In the first sentence of section 1.4 of the Plan the words “and October 9, 2012” Editorial – clarification on approval dates.

PDR-CW-40-17 11 September 14, 2017 Modification Section or Recommended Modification Policy or Principle Basis for the Proposed Modification Number Schedule Number are inserted after the words ‘June 25, 2012’.

8 2.2(b) Following the word ‘Employment’ the word “Area” is inserted before the period. Editorial – ensuring the term aligns with the designation.

9 2.2(d) In section 2.2(d) the letter ‘s’ at the end of the word ‘adds’ is hereby deleted. Editorial.

10 Various Any use of the phrase ‘Minimum Distance Separation Formulae’ throughout the Clarification based on Provincial comments on the County Plan. sections Plan is hereby deleted and replaced by the phrase ‘Provincial Minimum Distance Separation Formulae’.

11 2.3.1 The second sentence of section 2.3.1 is hereby deleted and replaced by the following;

“In some instances, such as provincially significant wetlands, provincially and Clarification that deer wintering yards are included as regionally significant ANSI’s, significant wildlife habitat (including deer wintering significant wildlife habitat. yards), and significant woodlands, mapping and policies are provided in this Plan; however, in all cases the Resources will be identified and protected through the following methods:”

The bulleted list in this section shall remain unmodified.

Section 2.3.1 is further modified by inserting the following new sentence at the Recognition of the future natural heritage systems based end of the paragraph which begins with “This Plan attempts to…”: approach.

“Following the implementation of the County’s Green In Grey Natural Environment Study, the Municipality will consider implementing systems-based protection at the time of the next five year review of the Grey Highlands Official Plan.”

12 2.4(e) In section 2.4(e) the word ‘must’ is deleted and replaced by the words “shall Clarification that limited residential development could be

PDR-CW-40-17 12 September 14, 2017 Modification Section or Recommended Modification Policy or Principle Basis for the Proposed Modification Number Schedule Number predominantly”. considered in other locations e.g. a rural severance.

13 2.5 The fifth sentence of the first paragraph of section 2.5 is hereby deleted and Clarification based on the approvals of the Source Protection replaced by the following two sentences: Plans.

“The Municipality acknowledges that the final Source Protection Plans have now been approved, and will work in conjunction with the Drinking Water Source Protection (DWSP) staff to implement the Source Protection Plans. Based on the timing of Official Plan Amendment 27 to the Grey Highlands Plan, the Source Protection Plans have not yet been fully implemented in the Grey Highlands Official Plan.”

The final sentence of the first paragraph of section 2.5 is hereby modified by deleting the words ‘finalized and’.

14 Schedule F Schedule F is hereby deleted and replaced by a new Schedule F showing This map will be replaced by the most current mapping for updated landfill and source water protection mapping. source protection and showing further categories of landfill, as per the recommendations of the Ministry of the Environment Link to new Schedule F and Climate Change.

The end of section 3.0(a) is hereby modified by inserting the words “or any successor thereto” following the words ‘Reasonable Use’.

PDR-CW-40-17 13 September 14, 2017 Modification Section or Recommended Modification Policy or Principle Basis for the Proposed Modification Number Schedule Number 16 3.1(b) Section 3.1(b) of the Plan is hereby modified by adding a second sentence to Clarification based on the requirements of the Planning Act and this clause as follows: the County Official Plan.

“Land division via the consent process shall only be considered where a plan of subdivision is not otherwise needed for the orderly development of the lands.”

17 3.1(n) Section 3.1(n) is hereby deleted and replaced by the following: County staff would generally support this objective, but question whether the wording should be caveated, as it’s arguable that “unduly impact agriculture lands, buildings or other rural activities.” all rural severances would create less usable space for agriculture, buildings, or activities. 18 3.1(r) A new sentence is added at the end of this clause which reads as follows; Added in a new clause that considers the creation of conservation lots, and the securement of trail lands, without the “Where lots are being created for conservation purposes, by an approved need for direct access onto an open and maintained public conservation organization, the Municipality may waive the need for direct road. frontage onto a public road at its discretion.”

19 3.2(a) The second sentence of section 3.2(a) of the Plan is hereby modified by County staff are of the understanding that Flesherton has deleting the word ‘sanitary’ and replacing it with the word “water”. municipal sanitary sewer services and is currently lacking municipal water services. This section of the Plan would The last sentence of the first paragraph is hereby modified by deleting the word currently indicate the opposite. ‘sewage’ and replacing it with the word “municipal”.

20 3.3.2 Two new sentences at the end of section 3.3.2 are hereby added as follows: Clarification on best practices.

21 3.4 and Sections 3.4 and 2.3.2(d) are hereby modified by inserting the word “future” Clarification based on the fact that the Municipality does not

PDR-CW-40-17 14 September 14, 2017 Modification Section or Recommended Modification Policy or Principle Basis for the Proposed Modification Number Schedule Number 2.3.2(d) before prior to the use of the term ‘Urban Design Guidelines’. currently have Urban Design Guidelines. 22 3.6(c) Section 3.6(c) of the Plan is hereby modified to insert “planning reports” in the Clarification of studies required. list of required studies following the phrase ‘community plans’.

23 3.10(iii), Sections 3.10(iii), 3.10(c)(i), and 3.10(d)(i) are hereby modified by inserting the Clarification that any residential area of a municipality would 3.10(c)(i), following phrase; permit an accessory apartment, but that they would not be and otherwise permitted in industrial areas where residential uses 3.10(d)(i) “(where residential uses are permitted),” are not permitted.

after the words ‘Settlement Areas’ .

24 3.10(d)(vi) The final sentence of section 3.10(d)(vi) is hereby deleted and replaced with the Conformity to the County Official Plan. following:

“The Council may by by-law grant one further period of not more than three years during which the use is authorized.”

25 Various Any reference to ‘small scale agricultural-related uses’ shall be deleted to Clarification based on consistency with the PPS 2014 and the sections remove the requirement of being ‘small scale’ and shall simply read Province’s Permitted Uses in Prime Agricultural Areas ‘agricultural-related uses’. Any references to ‘small scale on-farm diversified Guideline. uses’ shall remain to reference the small scale criteria.

26 4.1.2(f) A new sentence is added to the end of section 4.1.2(f) as follows: Clarification based on consistency with the PPS 2014 and the Province’s Permitted Uses in Prime Agricultural Areas “Where a winery, cidery, or brewery is predominantly using local ingredients, Guideline. such as apples, fruit, grapes, or hops grown on the farm operation, it shall be considered an agricultural-related use. Notwithstanding subsection (i) above, where the operation is processing fruit, produce, or materials grown on-farm, it shall not be required to seek out poorer quality agricultural lands.”

PDR-CW-40-17 15 September 14, 2017 Modification Section or Recommended Modification Policy or Principle Basis for the Proposed Modification Number Schedule Number 27 4.1.3(1)(b)(i) The first sentence of section 4.1.3(1)(b)(i) is hereby modified by inserting the Conformity to the County Official Plan. following phrase after the words ‘bona fide farmer’;

“, for the purposes of this policy a bona fide farm shall have a Farm Business Registration number.”

28 4.1.3(1)(d) Section 4.1.3(1)(d) is hereby modified by inserting the following words after the Conformity to the County Official Plan. word ‘encouraged’ at the end of this clause:

“, provided it does not result in the creation of an undersized remnant lot.”

29 4.2.2(j) Subsection 4.2.2(j) is hereby deleted and the remaining sections are re-lettered Former exception which is no longer relevant under the current accordingly. policy context.

30 Various References to a specific past official plan amendment shall be modified to Editorial – clarification. sections reference the OPA number, as per the current section 4.2.2(p) which references ‘OPA 2 Campfire’.

31 4.3.2(c) In section 4.3.2(c) the words “or adjacent lands” are hereby deleted. Clarification – modifications to the adjacent lands generally would not require approval from the Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry. 32 4.5.1(c) In section 4.5.1(c) the word “residential” is inserted between the words ‘average’ Clarification based on the requirements of the County Official and ‘development’. Plan.

33 4.5.2(c) In section 4.5.2(c) the word ‘Major’ is hereby deleted from the beginning of this Clarifying the intent of the policy, as the policy made it difficult to subsection. determine what the word ‘major’ meant in that context.

34 4.5.3.1.1 In section 4.5.3.1.1 the first usage of the word ‘family’ is deleted and replaced Clarification of terminology. by the word “detached”. In this same section the second usage of the word ‘family’ is deleted and replaced by the word “unit”.

PDR-CW-40-17 16 September 14, 2017 Modification Section or Recommended Modification Policy or Principle Basis for the Proposed Modification Number Schedule Number

35 4.5.3.1.2(a) In section 4.5.3.1.2(a) the clause “unless already pre-zoned in the zoning by- Clarification that new development may be pre-zoned, or may law,” after the words ‘implementing zoning by-law’ and before the words ‘and come via site specific zoning by-law. should consider’.

36 4.5.3.1.2(f)(i In section 4.5.3.1.2(f)(iv) the words “or privately” are hereby deleted. Clarification – In communities which are partially serviced, the v) County typically has not supported new lot creation which is not connecting to the available municipal service. 37 4.5.3.2.1 In section 4.5.3.2.1 the following clauses are deleted: County staff would have concern with allowing for residential or institutional uses within designated employment areas. • “Institutional uses such as places of worship, schools, cemeteries, Particularly where there are industrial uses, or lands designated libraries, and nursing and retirement homes. for future industrial use, County staff would see a high potential Accessory residential uses” for land use conflict and difficulty to address the Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change’s D-6 Guidelines. 38 4.5.3.3.1 In section 4.5.3.3.1 the clause ‘All forms of residential development’ is hereby Clarification that residential in the downtown should be limited deleted and replaced by the clause “Multi-residential, or accessory residential to multi-residential, or accessory residential uses. development”.

39 4.9.3(c) Section 4.9.3(c) is hereby amended by adding in a second sentence as follows: Based on the changes to the agricultural-related use section there is some overlap between the space extensive uses and “Notwithstanding the foregoing, where the proposal is an agricultural-related agricultural-related use. Based on this overlap County staff use, it may be considered on Agricultural designated land, without an would recommend amending section 4.9.3(c). amendment to this Plan.”

40 4.10.2(c)(iv) Section 4.10.2(c)(iv) is hereby amended by adding the following clause after the There are rare instances where a traffic study or road existing wording: assessment may serve no useful purpose in the evaluation of a pit/quarry application e.g. a small pit proposed with direct “; during pre-submission consultation the traffic study and/or roads assessment access onto a Provincial Highway. The ability to waive the requirement may be waived at the discretion of the road authority(ies) need for these studies may prove useful in such circumstances. depending on the nature of the proposal, and the existing haul route condition;”

PDR-CW-40-17 17 September 14, 2017 Modification Section or Recommended Modification Policy or Principle Basis for the Proposed Modification Number Schedule Number

41 4.10.2(g) In section 4.10.2(g) the below new sentence is added following the first Modification to include wording in here which encourages the sentence in this subsection: use of ‘maximum disturbed area’ provisions where feasible.

“Maximum Disturbed Area provisions on the operations and rehabilitation site plans are strongly encouraged where feasible.”

42 4.11.3 & Schedule C is hereby deleted and replaced by a new Schedule C. The modified schedule clarifies that Deer Wintering Areas are Schedule C grouped under Significant Wildlife Habitat. Link to new Schedule C

43 4.11.10 Section 4.11.10 is hereby modified by including the below sentence at the end Clarification that new non-farm uses in the aggregate resource of this subsection: areas are only permitted on existing lots of record, and that new non-farm lots cannot be created within Aggregate Resource “New non-farm lot creation is not permitted within areas mapped as Aggregate Areas. Resource Area.”

The complete modified subsection reads as follows:

“New non-farm development (other than passive open space uses) shall only be permitted where it has been demonstrated to the appropriate approval authority that:

a) the extraction of the aggregate resource is not feasible due to the quality or quantity of material or the existence of incompatible development patterns; b) the proposed land use or development serves a greater long term interest of the general public than does aggregate extraction; and c) it has been demonstrated that the proposed development

PDR-CW-40-17 18 September 14, 2017 Modification Section or Recommended Modification Policy or Principle Basis for the Proposed Modification Number Schedule Number within 300 metres of the Aggregate Resource Area would not significantly preclude or hinder future aggregate extraction.

New non-farm lot creation is not permitted within areas mapped as Aggregate Resource Area.”

44 4.12.12 Section 4.12.12 is hereby renumbered to 4.11.12. Typographical.

45 6.1.2 In section 6.1.2 the reference to the term ’10 years’ is hereby deleted and Clarification based on the provisions of Bill 140. replaced with “20 years”.

46 6.2 In section 6.2 the phrase “and local municipal staff” is hereby deleted from the Editorial – typographical first sentence of this section.

48 Definitions In the Definitions section of the Plan the definition for the word ‘Infrastructure’ is Modification to include ‘trails’ in the ‘Infrastructure’ definition. hereby modified to insert the word “trails” in between the phrases ‘transportation corridors and facilities,’ and ‘oil and gas pipelines’.

49 4.11.9 In section 4.11.9 a new clause is added at this subsection as follows: This section is needed as per the recommendations of the Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change, who noted “As per Grey County’s 2015 Historic Landfill Site Reviews Study, sites shown that the County should still show former landfills on the map, on Schedule F as ‘Abandoned Landfill Previously Identified Site’ will not require even where a D-4 study is not being recommended. further Guideline D-4 Assessments at this time. These sites were previously

PDR-CW-40-17 19 September 14, 2017 Modification Section or Recommended Modification Policy or Principle Basis for the Proposed Modification Number Schedule Number mapped by the MOECC, but have been further reviewed in the 2015 County Study.’

50 Maps 1 - 12 Maps 1 - 12 are hereby deleted and replaced by amended versions deleting the The modifications to these maps will reflect the comments from Development Control boundaries and showing the underlying land use NEC and Grey Highlands Staff. designations.

Link to Modified Maps 1 - 12

PDR-CW-40-17 20 September 14, 2017 ¼12 ¼29 THE MUNICIPALITY OF GREY HIGHLANDS MMEAFORD E A F O R D ± OFFICIAL PLAN SCHEDULE A

¼13 LAND USE 30 MAP 1 29 Blantyre ¼7

27 Fairmount

¼40 26 LEGEND 25

24 Agricultural I 23 TTHEBLUEMOUNTAINS H E B L U E M O U N TA I N S Rural Rocklyn II 22 III Temple Hill Primary Settlement Area ¼12 21 Epping IV Union Secondary Settlement Area Goring V 20 VI Tertiary Settlement Area 19 VII VIII Inland Lakes & Shoreline IX 18 ¼19 X Space Extensive Commercial XI 17 and Industrial XII 16 Hazard Lands Beaverdale 15 Duncan ¼2 Provincially Significant Wetlands 14 Recreation Area Harkaway 13 Niagara Escarpment Plan Boundary 12 CCHATSWORTH H AT S W O R T H 11 OPA #18 A Special Recreation Policy Area 10 Talisman 9 Wodehouse 8 OPA #2 Kimberley 7

4 10 $ Lady Bank 3 Beaver Valley 30 2 ¼

¼32

Cheeseville OPA #6 Vandeleur 1:95,000 W E S T G G R R E E Y Y Lake Eugenia AUGUST 2017 - GREY COUNTY PLANNING ¼31 THE MUNICIPALITY OF GREY HIGHLANDS OPA #9 OFFICIAL PLAN

OPA #4 Beaver Valley ± Lady Bank SCHEDULE A CCHATSWORTH H AT S W O R T H 40 ¼30 LAND USE 35

30 MAP 2 30 ¼ 25 Feversham

Cheeseville 20 Vandeleur 95 OPA #13 15 Lake Eugenia ¼2 100 LEGEND OPA #23 Markdale 105 Agricultural

110 III Maxwell Rural 115 Eugenia II ¼32 Primary Settlement Area 120 I 13 Secondary Settlement Area ETSR 125 ¼ I Tertiary Settlement Area ¼12 130 WTSR 135 II Inland Lakes & Shoreline

140 Space Extensive Commercial III and Industrial 40 145 Hazard Lands 150 35 Irish Lake 80 Provincially Significant Wetlands Flesherton 155 75 70 65 Port Law Recreation Area 160 5 Niagara Escarpment Plan Boundary OPA16 #15 Wareham Ceylon WWESTGREY E S T G R E Y 170 Special Recreation Policy Area 10 11 A 8 9 6 7 175 4 5 2 3 25 180 1 20 15 185 10 5 1 190

195 II 10 D U F F E RC N IO U N T Y $ 200 I ETSR 205 ¼14 40 35 ¼4 Priceville 30 25 20 15 10 23 5 ¼ 1 SSOUTHGATE O U T H G AT E

¼9 1:95,000 AUGUST 2017 - GREY COUNTY PLANNING Duncan ¼7 28 THE MUNICIPALITY OF GREY HIGHLANDS ¼2 A 27 OFFICIAL PLAN 26 TTHEBLUEMOUNTAINS H E B L U E M O U N TA I N S 37 25 ¼13 35 24 ± SCHEDULE A 30 23 Talisman OPA #12 22 LAND USE 25 21 MAP 3 20 20 XIV Rob Roy 19 Kimberley 15 18 ¼31 10 17 XI II 16 5 ¼30 15 1 XII 14 LEGEND 13 Beaver Valley Lady Bank 12 Agricultural XI S I M C O E C O U N T Y 11 SIMCOECOUNTY Singhampton 10 Rural X 9 OPA #1 8 Primary Settlement Area Feversham 7 4 Secondary Settlement Area IX ¼ 6 5 Tertiary Settlement Area Lake Eugenia VIII OPA #11 4 3 Inland Lakes & Shoreline 2 VII Space Extensive Commercial 1 and Industrial McIntyre Hazard Lands 35 Maxwell VI 80 Eugenia 30 75 Provincially Significant Wetlands V 70 ¼2 25 65 Recreation Area 60 20 124 ¼32 55 ¼ Niagara Escarpment Plan Boundary IV 50 45 III 40 10 35 Hatherton A Special Recreation Policy Area 5 30 25 1 20 II 15 10 5 Maple Valley 1 I NDR Flesherton ¼9 Port Law Badjeros I SDR

Wareham II OPA #19

III DDUFFERINCOUNTY U F F E R I N C O U N T Y

OPA #5 10 $ 1:95,000 AUGUST 2017 - GREY COUNTY PLANNING 89

96 90 C H AT S W O R T H THE MUNICIPALITY OF GREY HIGHLANDS Artemesia-Euphrasia Townline OFFICIAL PLAN 97 91 SCHEDULE A

98 ±

Thistlewood Road 92 Grey Road 12 LAND USE Highway 10 99 See Section MAP 4 93

4.5.1.(c) 100 MARKDALE

94 Concession 2 NETSR 101

95 LEGEND

102 Agricultural Lawler Drive

96 Edith Avenue Rural Brackenbury Street 103 Grayview Drive OPA #23 Primary Settlement Area T ro onto Street North

104 W E S T G R E Y Main Street East Inland Lakes & Shoreline George Street Space Extensive Commercial Walker Street 105 and Industrial Cambrai Road Argyle Street Hazard Lands

Provincially Significant Wetlands

Concession 1 NETSR Recreation Area Chapman's Crescent T ro onto Street South

Niagara Escarpment Plan Boundary Eliza Street

Lorne Street Queen Street Centre Street Special Recreation Policy Area A

Uplands Drive Isla Street SETTLEMENT AREA

Victoria Avenue Neighbourhood Area Glasgow Street Main Street West Employment Area

Downtown Area 105 Terra Drive Open Space Area

106

Concession 1 SWTSR

107

Ford's Drive Highway 10

Grey Road 12 108 Glenwood Place

109

1:11,000 110 AUGUST 2017 - GREY COUNTY PLANNING Concession 2 SWTSR C o nc 1 e Ea 4 ss st 6 io Ba n ck THE MUNICIPALITY OF GREY HIGHLANDS 2 L N in H E e OFFICIAL PLAN ig T hw S ay 1 R 0 4 0 4 1 d d a SCHEDULE A a o C R R o y ± e o n c r ess G LAND USE i on 1 N MAP 5 E T S R t ree FLESHERTON St ill M

t V e ic t to re e ri St LEGEND d a a re St d o St re oo R ia et w Agricultural n th g o in o Sy n ll g y o a d C t L e e C n re Al Rural ha t b m S ert t S re St tre a re C e t Primary Settlement Area t rg e e o a t n re ce M ss St n Inland Lakes & Shoreline i e on Be l a El M 1 c a S he ry Space Extensive Commercial W ll St T St re and Industrial S ree e R t t Hazard Lands Pe M te i r St e Provincially Significant Wetlands lli v ga re ri n e D D t d riv n Recreation Area e la h ig H H To Niagara Escarpment Plan Boundary i ro y ll n a St t re o w e R rk Al t oa a ic d P e t St t Special Recreation Policy Area s re A e ree Be t d St l ll ro e a b H p m SETTLEMENT AREA a C Neighbourhood Area

t e Employment Area C re o St n m Downtown Area ce a H ss rh i u gh io D w n ay Open Space Area 2 1 S 0 W 1 T 5 S 6 R

4 d a o R y re G

0 6 1 d a o 1:11,000 R AUGUST 2017 - GREY COUNTY PLANNING T

Lower Valley yo Roaylor 2 ion 1 13 ncess n Co G essio THE MUNICIPALITY OF GREY HIGHLANDS r nc e o C a Roay d OFFICIAL PLAN

R 39 o d a 38 1 d 3 ion B cess Poin SCHEDULE A ± Con 37 12th t

R 36 o LAND USE a d 35 MAP 6 34 n 11 essio Conc LAKE EUGENIA ge lley Rid F Va

e w e e ny Lan e l Pen riv l D i n LEGEND Stanley g on essi Conc Agricultural 10th levard ore Bo u Lakesh Rural

26 Primary Settlement Area 25 33 Secondary Settlement Area 4 32 2 n 10 essio Tertiary Settlement Area 31 Conc 30 Inland Lakes & Shoreline 23 29 Space Extensive Commercial and Industrial 28 Hazard Lands 27 ane es L Provincially Significant Wetlands reet Wil h S t Nort Recreation Area

Para

t Sunset Niagara Escarpment Plan Boundary ree d rk St i Pa s t e ree uave St L on 9 i Zo a Po ess n onc e C Special Recreation Policy Area i A n

t rs r Stree d llisie oa Pe res R C o d r Sh e a 3 uth s et So o 5 Stre c son R Simp s e Sidero t n tree ld bert S a t Canro n t o I lan Stree 3 D Bea n n g Ra c io a 0 ss k a d

e Sidero M once t h C C rm t u 8 glan Stree e Ra L dars R nStrean t a on Stree n le po a Na e

M e e a s Ea t g o reet e r 8 St t on tStrest e L i

d St Arnaud cess n a Co

oa n Street e aud A rn e y R St t

Low

1:20,000 AUGUST 2017 - GREY COUNTY PLANNING 9 Toe of prominent 350 8 INSET AREA E escarpment slope 280 300 420 THE MUNICIPALITY OF GREY HIGHLANDS

420

255 245 OFFICIAL PLAN Deemed toe of prominent escarpment slope Talisman Boulevard Brow of prominent Grey Road 7 ± SCHEDULE A escarpment slope

415 31.7 F Lanktree Drive LAND USE 425 MAP 7 Wodehouse Court

Kimberley Court TALISMAN &

Amik Court 7

245 235

KIMBERLEY 255 Talisman Boulevard Concession 4 LEGEND 420

410 Talisman Mountain Drive Agricultural

315 Rural

250 310 Sideroad 7B Primary Settlement Area

260 Secondary Settlement Area Concession 5260 260 6

70.0m Tertiary Settlement Area 380 380 415 Inland Lakes & Shoreline 385 Space Extensive Commercial Concession 6 255 245 44.0 and Industrial 97.0

255 5

255

2 Shilvock Sideroad Hazard Lands E 77.0 «¬

410 Sideroad 7A Provincially Significant Wetlands

265 24.0 255 340 166.12 Recreation Area

365 Sideroad 7A TALISMAN Niagara Escarpment Plan Boundary 275 250 240 5

Shilvock Sideroad 325 E Brow of prominent Centre Road A Special Recreation Policy Area escarpment slope 280 360

270

0 335 265

2 270

405

295 425 375

400 Creamery Road

Grey Road 13 265

410 Toe of prominent escarpment320 slope

255

415 4 285

395 420 420 Note: The 70.0 m distance 280 410 290 is measured from a point 425

330 260

275 on the road equal to the 405

410 0

275 7 245 fire hydrant 250 2 «¬

345 295 located at Sideroad 7A

370

390 KIMBERLEY

1:12,000 405 355 1:5,000 AUGUST 2017 - GREY COUNTY PLANNING 305 290 4

245

340 405 Grey Road 13 INSET AREA B

365 320 THE MUNICIPALITY OF GREY HIGHLANDS OFFICIAL PLAN 425 425 375

420 315 3 415 D SCHEDULE A

300 ± Grey Road 30 345

Toe of prominent 250 280

5 LAND USE 290

8 escarpment slope 335

270

410 MAP 8

325

380

395

360 360 3 00 275 BEAVER VALLEY Brow of prominent 390 3 SKI CLUB escarpment slope 0 335 5

3 Entrance to the 1 0 2 LEGEND 2 Beaver Valley 95 285 400 0 29 C Ski Club 3 Agricultural 405 Pioneer Drive 2 405 0 410 255 255 315 Rural

Mary B's Concession 5 L 370 ane 400 3 Primary Settlement Area 1:3,0002 290 BV River Row 5 260 300 Secondary Settlement Area

Meadow Lane INSET AREA C Tertiary Settlement Area Deemed toe of prominent 275 escarpment slope 1 Concession 6 250 Inland Lakes & Shoreline 285 350 Space Extensive Commercial 340 and Industrial Brook Glade Drive 305 270 42.67m 335 Beaver Trail Hazard Lands 410

415 415 295

260 355 355 310 Provincially Significant Wetlands

280

t Line7th

350 265 265 Recreation Area 270 325 410 330 370

390 Niagara Escarpment Plan Boundary 290 Concession 14 Bowles Bluff Road B 405

Grey Road 30 415 88.39m

Mary B's Lane

280 355 Special Recreation Policy Area A 395

57.91 330

300 310 375

285 285

275 315

255

430 365

380 420 26 152.4 400 425 430 280 25 24.38 285

Hickory Lane 425

24 335 Pioneer Drive 435

Butternut Court 23

290 22 42.67 Valley Crescent 285 285 A 290

320 21 Lower Valley Road

385 Club house

290 430 Concession 13 295 345 345 20

310 Toe of prominent 275 Brow of prominent escarpment slope Beaver Trail

420 305 305 escarpment slope 360 1:4,500 1:13,500 285 1:3,000 AUGUST 2017 - GREY COUNTY PLANNING 300 290 THE MUNICIPALITY OF GREY HIGHLANDS OFFICIAL PLAN

Concession 10 SCHEDULE A Grey Road 2 ±

LAND USE MAP 9

Mill Bridge Road FEVERSHAM

River Road

LEGEND Agricultural Rural Primary Settlement Area Secondary Settlement Area

Tertiary Settlement Area Wellington Street Inland Lakes & Shoreline

In John Street glis Drive Space Extensive Commercial and Industrial Concession 9 19 Hazard Lands 18 Provincially Significant Wetlands

Recreation Area

17 Niagara Escarpment Plan Boundary 8th Concession A 8th Concession B

A Special Recreation Policy Area 16

Concession 8

1:7,000 AUGUST 2017 - GREY COUNTY PLANNING 12 MAXWELL SINGHAMPTON THE MUNICIPALITY OF GREY HIGHLANDS OFFICIAL PLAN Concession A Grey Road 31 SCHEDULE A ±±

Concession 7 11 LAND USE MAP 10

Road 45 MAXWELL & SINGHAMPTON

Collingwood Road LEGEND Agricultural

13 Rural 10 Osprey Street Primary Settlement Area

COUNTY T N U O C E O C M I S rles Street Y T N U O C E O C M I S Cha Secondary Settlement Area William Street Tertiary Settlement Area Grey Road 4

Inland Lakes & Shoreline Space Extensive Commercial and Industrial uill Street Yo Hazard Lands 9 Provincially Significant Wetlands 9

Recreation Area Grey Road 124 Grey Road 2 Concession 6

Niagara Escarpment Plan Boundary

Gwendale Street A Special Recreation Policy Area

11 8

Grey Road 4

1:8,000 1:8,000 Concession 5 AUGUST 2017 - GREY COUNTY PLANNING 7 THE MUNICIPALITY OF GREY HIGHLANDS OFFICIAL PLAN

SCHEDULE A ± Saugeen Street Concession 1 NDR LAND USE

Prince Street MAP 11 James Street

Artemesia-Glenelg Townline PRICEVILLE

Artemesia Street Elgin Street LEGEND

Queen Street B Durham Road A Agricultural

Rural Windmill Way Durham Road A River Street Primary Settlement Area

Secondary Settlement Area Kincardine Street

Grey Road 4 Tertiary Settlement Area Inland Lakes & Shoreline

Kinross Street Space Extensive Commercial and Industrial

Queen Street A Hazard Lands Concession 1 SDR

WWESTGREY E S T G R E Y Torry Street Provincially Significant Wetlands Prince Street Recreation Area

Niagara Escarpment Plan Boundary

A Special Recreation Policy Area

9 8

Concession 2 SDR 1:7,000 AUGUST 2017 - GREY COUNTY PLANNING 23

CEYLON ROCKLYN THE MUNICIPALITY OF GREY HIGHLANDS 144 OFFICIAL PLAN Concession 2 SWTSR 22 ± SCHEDULE A ± 145 LAND USE West Back Line Concession 6 MAP 12 146 CEYLON, ROCKLYN

7th

Line 147 & BADJEROS

148 Concession 7

149 LEGEND

Sideroad 22B Agricultural

150 Old Highway 4 Rural

21 Primary Settlement Area Concession 3 SWTSR Secondary Settlement Area 151 Tertiary Settlement Area 1:8,000 Inland Lakes & Shoreline 152 Space Extensive Commercial BADJEROS and Industrial

Road 63 Bell Street Hazard Lands

Provincially Significant Wetlands Jane Street

Recreation Area CONCESSION 2 SDR 62 Niagara Escarpment Plan Boundary 61

Ba A Special Recreation Policy Area seline 60 Grey Road 9

24 59

58 153 South Line C

Grey Road 4 25 Wilcox Lake Road

154

Concession 3 NDR 26 CONCESSION 3 SDR

155 AUGUST 2017 - GREY COUNTY PLANNING 1:8,000 27 1:6,000 VI

¼12

MMEAFORD E A F O R D $26 ¼19 ±

¼13 30 ¼21 29 ¼7 28 27 ¼29 ¼40 26 25 24 T H E B L U E M O U N TA I N S I THEBLUEMOUNTAINS 23 ¼19 II ¼119 22 III ¼12 21 IV V 20 VI 19 VII VIII

TSWORTH T R O W S AT H C TSWORTH T R O W S AT H C IX 18

COUNTY T N U O C E O C M I S X Y T N U O C E O C M I S XI 17 XII 16 15 ¼2 14 28 A 27 13 26 12 37 25 35 11 24 30 23 10 22 25 9 21 20 20 8 XIV 19 15 7 31 18 10 ¼ 17 6 XIII 16 5 15 5 1 XII 14 4 13 12 3 40 ¼30 XI 11 2 35 10 9 1 X 30 8 ¼30 25 7 IX ¼4 6 20 5 95 15 VIII 4 3 100 2 VII 105 1

110 III VI 35 ¼2 80 115 II 30 75 32 V 70 120 ¼ 25 65 I SR 5 60 20 ET 12 55 124 IV I 50 ¼ 130 45 WTSR III 40 II 135 10 35 5 30 140 25 III 1 20 40 II 145 15 10 35 5 150 1 80 I NDR 75 155 70 65 160 I SDR

165 II 11 170 WWESTGREY E S T G R E Y 910 7 8 5 6 175 ¼9 3 4 25 III 1 2 20 180 15 10 185 5 1 190

195 II

200 I ETSR205 40 ¼14 35 30 25 20 15 10 DDUFFERINCOUNTY U F F E R I N C O U N T Y 5 ¼23 1

SSOUTHGATE O U T H G AT E

¼9 1:155,000

THE MUNICIPALITY OF GREY HIGHLANDS OFFICIAL PLAN LEGEND SCHEDULE C Stream / River Significant Woodlands Lakes Significant Wildlife Habitat CONSTRAINT MAPPING (Deer Wintering Areas) Other Identified Wetlands

Earth & Life ANSI

Earth ANSI

Life ANSI

Regional ANSI

AUGUST 2017 - GREY COUNTY PLANNING VI

¼12

M E A F ORD $26 ¼19 ±

¼13 30 ¼21 29 ¼7 28 27 ¼29 ¼40 26 25 24 T H E B L U E M O UNTAINS I T H E B L U E M O UNTAINS 23 ¼19 II 119 22 ¼ III ¼12 21 IV V 20 VI 19 VII VIII

TSWORTH S AT H C TSWORTH S AT H C IX 18

COUNTY C E O C M I S X OUNTY C E O C M I S XI 17 XII 16 15 ¼2 14 28 A 27 13 26 12 37 25 35 11 24 30 23 10 22 25 9 21 20 20 8 XIV 19 15 7 31 18 10 ¼ 17 6 XIII 16 5 15 5 1 XII 14 4 13 12 3 40 ¼30 XI 11 2 35 10 9 1 X 30 8 ¼30 25 7 IX ¼4 6 20 5 95 15 VIII 4 3 100 2 VII 105 1

165 II 11 170 W E S T G REY 910 7 8 5 6 175 ¼9 3 4 25 III 1 2 20 180 15 10 185 5 1 190

195 II

200 I ETSR205 40 ¼14 35 30 25 20 15 10 D U F F E R I N COUNTY 5 ¼23 1

S O U T H GATE

¼9 1:155,000

THE MUNICIPALITY OF GREY HIGHLANDS LEGEND OFFICIAL PLAN Special Policy Area (Karst) SCHEDULE F (! Existing Landfill Site (! Abandoned Landfill: D-4 Recommended to clear site CONSTRAINT MAPPING (! Abandoned Landfill: Previously Evaluated (! Abandoned Landfill: Previously Identified Site Wellhead Protection Zone A Zone B Zone C Zone D

AUGUST 2017 - GREY COUNTY PLANNING Zone E