DOCSLIB.ORG

The Higher Education Contribution Scheme

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Higher Education Contribution Scheme CASE PROGRAM 2004-8.1 The Higher Education Contribution Scheme Introduction In July 1987, when John Dawkins became Australia’s Federal Minister for Education, he faced a higher education sector under intense pressure to expand. There were large waiting lists for places at universities but the sector could not afford to enrol additional students. Pressure to expand was also coming from international comparisons which showed a substantial gap between the rate of output of tertiary graduates in Australia and that of other industrialised countries. Significant additional funding for universities from the Commonwealth was unlikely due to tightness in the federal budget. Universities were not permitted to charge students fees. In December Dawkins established a committee, chaired by former NSW Premier, Neville Wran, to find a solution to the higher education sector’s financial challenges. The funding gap in the higher education system The 1970s and 1980s were a time of rapid growth in enrolments in the Australian higher education sector.1 In 1975 there were 270,000 students enrolled. By 1987 the total had increased almost 50 per cent to 394,000.(See Exhibit 1) The sector’s 65 This case was written by Tim Watts, Australia and New Zealand School of Government, for Professor Glenn Withers, Australian National University, as a basis for class discussion rather than to illustrate either effective or ineffective handling of a managerial situation. The assistance of Meredith Edwards, David Phillips, Mike Gallagher, Bruce Chapman and Chris Robinson in preparing this case is gratefully acknowledged, but responsibility for the accuracy of the version of events presented here lies with the author. Cases are not necessarily intended as a complete account of the events described. While every reasonable effort has been made to ensure accuracy at the time of publication, subsequent developments may mean that certain details have since changed. This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Licence, except for logos, trademarks, photographs and other content marked as supplied by third parties. No licence is given in relation to third party material. Version 3-3-05. Distributed by the Case Program, The Australia and New Zealand School of Government, www.anzsog.edu.au. 1 Dawkins, JS Higher Education: A policy discussion paper, Canberra, AGPS, 1987. Page 5 1 universities and colleges were graduating about 78,000 students a year. Only eight years earlier this figure had been 66,000. University graduates as a proportion of the population had risen from eight per cent in 1981 to around 10 per cent in 1986.2 Despite the growth of the sector, Australia was not matching the performance of other OECD countries in delivering tertiary education.(See Exhibit 2) Between 10 and 11 per cent of Australians aged 18-24 were enrolled in higher education institutions in 1987, compared to 13 to 15 per cent of Americans and Canadians of this age.3 Comparative statistics on the proportion of the population qualified to first degree level suggested that Australia’s rate was equal to that of the UK and Germany but only about 60 per cent of that in Japan, the US and Canada.4 Australia’s universities were also not meeting the increasing demand for places. Official estimates put the total number of qualified applicants who were not accepted by a university in 1987 at around 20,000.5 The majority of these unsuccessful applicants were school leavers aged 17-19. Bruce Chapman, an economist from the Australian National University and a consultant to the Minister at the time, says these waiting lists were very sensitive politically. “The headlines were all about kids missing out on university and unfairly being denied an opportunity. Parents weren’t happy and it was becoming a major issue for Dawkins.” To explore the extent of the challenges confronting the higher education system, Dawkins’ office produced a discussion paper which was released in December 1987. The paper outlined the Government’s objective of bolstering national competitiveness in the increasingly knowledge-based global economy by increasing the number of university educated workers. Forecasts were made about the extent to which the higher education system would need to grow in the coming decade. Taking account of projected demographic and labour market changes, and the Government’s objective, the paper argued that the Australia would need to be producing 125,000 university graduates a year by 2001. Additional funding requirements to support this rate of graduate were projected to be 30 to 40 per cent above the amount allocated to higher education in the 1987 budget. (See Exhibit 3) Dawkins’ discussion paper also pointed to a backlog of capital expenditure on existing buildings and equipment not being undertaken. It also suggested that spending on new technologies to improve the quality of education in the sector was not occurring due to funds shortages.6 An estimate by Professor Peter Karmel, former vice-chancellor of the Australian National University, indicated that the additional capital investment needed to increase the sector’s enrolment capacity by the amount targeted in the discussion paper would be $1.4 billion.7 Commonwealth funding to the higher education sector was around $2.5 billion in 1987. Since 1975, Federal funding to the sector as a proportion of GDP had fallen 2 Dawkins, Page 10 3 Dawkins, Page 9 4 Dawkins, Page 10 5 Dawkins, Page 15 6 Dawkins, Page 79 7 Karmel, P. ‘Analysis of specific funding and resource allocation proposals’, in Harman, G & Meek, VL (eds), Australian Higher Education Reconstructed? DAHES, Sydney 1988. Page 55 2 from 1.4 per cent to 1 percent. The rise in total enrolments meant that funding per student had fallen by 23 per cent in that time.8 In 1986, before Dawkins had taken on the education portfolio, there had been a proposal to Cabinet from the Finance Minister, Peter Walsh to introduce fees at universities. This had been rejected on the grounds that it would discourage people from lower income households to undertake tertiary education. Walsh was able to get through Cabinet a $250 per year upfront fee on students called the Higher Education Administration Charge (HEAC). It was set at a level roughly equivalent to the administrative costs per student borne by universities. HEAC only generated $95 million in revenue, a minor amount in the context of the total annual budget of the sector. This would only increase if student numbers grew. Another shortcoming was that institutions were allocated just 10 per cent of the revenue generated by HEAC. After the first year of HEAC, enrolment data revealed that the number of female students and part-time students had dropped. This outcome confirmed the views of those such as Susan Ryan, the former Minister for Education, who had argued against the introduction of upfront charges on grounds that poorer members of the community would be discouraged from entering university. The Wran Committee Quickly following on from the release of his discussion paper, Dawkins established a committee to examine new funding options. He issued the following terms of reference: “1. The Government is committed to expanding the capacity and effectiveness of the higher education sector and to improving access to higher education for groups that are currently under-represented. This goal has significant funding implications, as outlined in the Policy Discussion Paper on higher education. Given current and likely future budgetary circumstances, the Government believes that it is necessary to consider sources of funding involving the direct beneficiaries of higher education. 2. The Committee should develop options and make recommendations for possible schemes of funding which could involve contributions from higher education students, graduates, their parents and employers. In developing options, the Committee should have regard to the social and educational consequences of the schemes under examination.”9 Dawkins set the Committee a tight timeframe. It was to report back in only four months, by March 1988. Former NSW Premier, Neville Wran, was chosen as chair of the Committee. The other members were Mike Gallagher, a senior public servant who had worked previously on higher education funding issues; Professor Bob Gregory, a respected economist from the Australian National University; and Meredith Edwards, an executive from the Department of Social Security with a strong social science 8 Edwards, M et al Social Policy, Public Policy, , Allen & Unwin, Sydney 2001. Page 100 9 Dawkins, page 87 3 academic background and whose experience in the welfare system meant she was well placed to assess the impact of any changes on lower income students. Edwards says Dawkins was mindful of the opposition to student fees within his own party when he selected the members of the Committee. “The Labor party had abolished university fees under Gough Whitlam in 1974. It was one the most remembered achievements of the party and it was still explicit in their platform. The ideological commitment to free university education was very strong.” Gallagher says Dawkins made sure the committee contained people who would have credibility with those in the party who were most strongly opposed to charges on students. A small group of public servants from the Department of Education was seconded to serve as a secretariat to the Committee. The Committee met once every couple of weeks, with the secretariat completing research and drafting reports during the intervening periods. Several members of the Minister’s staff, including consultant, Bruce Chapman, and private secretary, David Phillips, regularly sat in on meetings. The beneficiaries of the higher education system In the first weeks of its deliberations, the Wran Committee focused on understanding the major beneficiaries of higher education and determining how to fairly apportion funding responsibility. Three major categories of beneficiary were identified: the students, society at large and the business sector which employed graduates.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 1 Heat Treatment This Is a List of Greenhouse Gas Emitting
    Heat treatment This is a list of greenhouse gas emitting companies and peak industry bodies and the firms they employ to lobby government. It is based on data from the federal and state lobbying registers.* Client Industry Lobby Company AGL Energy Oil and Gas Enhance Corporate Lobbyists registered with Enhance Lobbyist Background Limited Pty Ltd Corporate Pty Ltd* James (Jim) Peter Elder Former Labor Deputy Premier and Minister for State Development and Trade (Queensland) Kirsten Wishart - Michael Todd Former adviser to Queensland Premier Peter Beattie Mike Smith Policy adviser to the Queensland Minister for Natural Resources, Mines and Energy, LHMU industrial officer, state secretary to the NT Labor party. Nicholas James Park Former staffer to Federal Coalition MPs and Senators in the portfolios of: Energy and Resources, Land and Property Development, IT and Telecommunications, Gaming and Tourism. Samuel Sydney Doumany Former Queensland Liberal Attorney General and Minister for Justice Terence John Kempnich Former political adviser in the Queensland Labor and ACT Governments AGL Energy Oil and Gas Government Relations Lobbyists registered with Government Lobbyist Background Limited Australia advisory Pty Relations Australia advisory Pty Ltd* Ltd Damian Francis O’Connor Former assistant General Secretary within the NSW Australian Labor Party Elizabeth Waterland Ian Armstrong - Jacqueline Pace - * All lobbyists registered with individual firms do not necessarily work for all of that firm’s clients. Lobby lists are updated regularly. This
    [Show full text]
  • A Guide to Titles and Forms of Address for Dignitaries
    OFFICIAL A GUIDE TO TITLES AND FORMS OF ADDRESS FOR DIGNITARIES How referred to in Title Address block in correspondence Salutation person Governor-General His Excellency General the Honourable David Hurley AC DSC (Retd) Your Excellency or Initially ‘Your Excellency’ Governor-General of the Commonwealth of Australia Dear Governor-General thereafter ‘Sir’ Contact: Governor-General of the Commonwealth of Australia Governor His Excellency The Honourable Hieu Van Le AC Your Excellency At first meeting ‘Your Governor of South Australia Excellency’ thereafter Contact: Governor of South Australia ‘Sir’ Premier The Honourable Steven Marshall MP Dear Premier Premier Premier of South Australia Contact: Premier of South Australia Prime Minister The Honourable Scott Morrison MP Dear Prime Minister Prime Minister or Prime Minister of Australia Mr Morrison Contact: Prime Minister of Australia Lieutenant Governor Professor Brenda Wilson AM Dear Professor Wilson Professor Wilson Lieutenant Governor of South Australia Contact: Lieutenant Governor of South Australia Chief Justice The Honourable Chief Justice Chris Kourakis Dear Chief Justice Chief Justice Chief Justice of South Australia Contact: Chief Justice of South Australia Government Ministers The Honourable (Dr if required) (first name) (surname) MP or MLC Dear Minister Minister or Minister Minister for xxx (surname) Contact: State Cabinet Ministers If addressing a Minister in their electorate office Dear Minister Minister or Minister The Honourable (Dr if required) (first name) (surname) MP or
    [Show full text]
  • Legislation and Regulations, Media Releases and Policy Statements and Publications
    Appendix B Legislation and regulations, media releases and policy statements and publications Legislation and regulations, media releases and policy statements and publications Legislation and regulations Current 1. Foreign Acquisitions and Takeovers Act 1975 (Act No. 92 of 1975 as amended: see Appendix D) 2. Foreign Acquisitions and Takeovers Regulations 1989 (Statutory Rules No. 177 of 1989 as amended: see Appendix E) 3. Foreign Acquisitions and Takeovers (Notices) Regulations (Statutory Rules No. 226 of 1975 as amended: see Appendix E) Historical 1. Companies (Foreign Take-overs) Act 1973, No. 199 of 1973 — December 1973. 2. Companies (Foreign Take-overs) Act 1972, No. 134 of 1972 — November 1972. 83 Foreign Investment Review Board Annual Report 2005-06 Media releases and policy statements 1. Statement by the Treasurer, The Hon Peter Costello MP — Qantas Offer — 14 December 2006. 2. Statement by the Treasurer, The Hon Peter Costello MP — Foreign Investment: Brambles Industries Limited — 9 November 2006. 3. Statement by the Treasurer, The Hon Peter Costello MP — Foreign Investment Proposal: Thales Australia Holdings Pty Limited — Acquisition of remaining 50 per cent interest in ADI Limited — 12 October 2006. 4. Statement by the Treasurer, The Hon Peter Costello MP — Reappointment of member of Foreign Investment Review Board [Ms Lynn Wood] — 29 April 2005. 5. Statement by the Treasurer, The Hon Peter Costello MP — BHP Billiton Group — No objections raised to the acquisition of WMC Resources Limited, subject to conditions — 4 April 2005. 6. Statement by the Treasurer, The Hon Peter Costello MP — Xstrata Plc — No objections raised to the acquisition of WMC Resources Limited, subject to conditions — 11 February 2005.
    [Show full text]
  • Bob Hawke: Australia's Greatest Prime Minister, the Australian Financial Review, Friday 5 May 2019
    Bob Hawke: Australia’s Greatest Prime Minister, The Australian Financial Review, Friday 5 May 2019 Australia’s greatest Prime Minister died in Sydney on Thursday. He leaves a modern Australia, incomparably more prosperous, and more closely linked to its dynamic and assertive region, than the country he began to lead 36 years ago last March. Democracy is struggling throughout the developed world. The existential questions about the future of democracy are being raised less vigorously here in Australia than in Europe or the United States of America—despite the fractured recent Australian history of Prime Ministerial leadership. That is a Hawke legacy. Hawke became Prime Minister at a time of national disappointment about economic performance, after nearly a decade of high unemployment and inflation, and many decades with incomes growth well below developed country norms. He accepted responsibility for correcting these weaknesses. His greatest achievement was to establish the foundations through economic reform for a long period of rising employment and incomes with low inflation. The economic success stands alongside and required another historic achievement: the reorientation of Australia towards the realities of our Asia Pacific geography—including acceptance of large-scale immigration without racial discrimination. The economic and foreign policy reorientations were achieved within a social and fiscal programme of stunning breadth, directed at enhancing opportunity and personal security for ordinary Australians. Hawke was a democrat.
    [Show full text]
  • The Higher Education Contribution Scheme: Keeping Tertiary Education Affordable and Accessible Timothy Higgins1
    3 The Higher Education Contribution Scheme: Keeping tertiary education affordable and accessible Timothy Higgins1 A policy success? The Higher Education Contribution Scheme (HECS)2 was a key part of the 1988 Dawkins reforms to the Australian higher education landscape.3 In 1987, there was an urgent economic case for expansion of the higher education sector, which led then education minister John Dawkins to embark on a path of ambitious and radical policy reform. The organisational process was efficient and rapid and the capable individuals assisting Dawkins were deliberately chosen, setting out persuasive arguments 1 I would like to acknowledge and thank Bruce Chapman and Meredith Edwards for their helpful comments on an earlier version of this chapter, and John Dawkins for directing me to a number of useful resources as I researched the early history of HECS. 2 HECS was renamed HECS-HELP after being incorporated into the umbrella Higher Education Loan Program (HELP) introduced in the 2003–04 Budget. We refer to HECS and HECS-HELP interchangeably in this chapter. 3 The focus of this chapter is on HECS, rather than the broader Dawkins higher education reforms, of which HECS was just one, albeit central, part. For a detailed insider’s account of the development of HECS, see Edwards et al. (2001). For comprehensive accounts of the history, development and assessment of the consequences of the Dawkins reforms more broadly, see Macintyre et al. (2017) and Croucher et al. (2013). 59 SUCCESSFUL PUBLIC POLICY for student contributions and carefully designed policy features and parameters that were critical to the acceptance of HECS.
    [Show full text]
  • Democratic Ambivalence? Ministerial Attitudes to Party and Parliamentary Scrutiny
    4. Democratic Ambivalence? Ministerial attitudes to party and parliamentary scrutiny James Walter Introduction This chapter draws upon research into the working lives of a particular cohort of Australian federal politicians—those elected on 10 December 1977.1 They were interviewed twice in 1978—on arrival in Canberra and again at the end of that year—for a monograph on their experience of acculturation to parliament and to representative politics (Walter 1979). All but two were interviewed again between 2005 and 2009 when their parliamentary careers were over. The sequence provides an unusual opportunity for longitudinal comparison of attitudes, aspirations and beliefs of a cohort at the beginning of their political careers, and again in retrospect as they look back on their achievements.2 Not all of the new parliamentarians of 1977 participated in the initial study; of the 27 new backbenchers that year,3 four were excluded because of past federal parliamentary experience and one refused to participate. When it came to the follow-up interviews about 30 years later, of the initial group of 22, one (former Senator Janine Haines) was deceased and one (former Senator Allan Rocher) could not be located. The resulting subject group (now numbering 20, and all male) was as shown in Table 4.1. In following the fortunes of a single cohort, we are reminded of the contingencies of politics. It is not a ‘representative’ group that can be drawn upon for statistical purposes, but rather one whose membership is entirely fortuitous. Yet its collective biography gives us a snapshot of the experience of politics at a historically important juncture in Australian history, as the policy regime that had prevailed since the late 1940s faltered and a new orthodoxy was ascendant.
    [Show full text]
  • The Building of Economics at Adelaide
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Anderson, Kym; O'Neil, Bernard Book — Published Version The Building of Economics at Adelaide Provided in Cooperation with: University of Adelaide Press Suggested Citation: Anderson, Kym; O'Neil, Bernard (2009) : The Building of Economics at Adelaide, ISBN 978-0-9806238-5-7, University of Adelaide Press, Adelaide, http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/UPO9780980623857 This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/182254 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ www.econstor.eu Welcome to the electronic edition of The Building of Eco- nomics at Adelaide, 1901-2001. The book opens with the bookmark panel and you will see the contents page.
    [Show full text]
  • Hawke: the Prime Minister
    book reviews the Left, especially Ian Buruma Hawke: The Prime Minister from the float strengthened, but and Timothy Garton Ash, treat By Blanche d’Alpuget for d’Alpuget only Hawke can Ramadan highly positively, yet Melbourne University Press, take credit. denigrate more liberal Muslim 2010 d’Alpuget barely covers the figures—especially the Somali-born $44.95, 401 pages deregulation of the banking sector Dutch citizen Ayaan Hirsi Ali. ISBN 9780522856705 or Keating’s role in putting together Berman’s outrage and anger begins the detail of the policy together, to burn through as he demonstrates awke: The Prime Minister underplaying his contribution to their subtle condescension, their Hhas been written to confirm the government from the start. arguable sexism, their dismissal the ‘great man’ view of history, Hawke’s great contribution as a of her ideas, and their absurd which is not surprising given Labor leader, aside from winning efforts to paint Hirsi Ali as an Blanche d’Alpuget is Bob Hawke’s four elections, was the Accord. In ‘enlightenment fundamentalist.’ current wife. The result this landmark change In the end, this final burst of is that Hawke’s judgment for labour relations in white heat is illuminating. is depicted as near Australia, the major Berman demonstrates that what peerless and he is seen as unions and the Hawke Western intellectuals are doing having full ownership of government agreed to is in fact adopting the categories the reform legacy of his arbitrated wage increases of the Islamist movement governments. It would that were lower than rises themselves—to whom Qaradawi have been a better book if in inflation in exchange is an orthodox moderate and it were less cavalier in its for social benefits such Ramadan is half-way lost to portrayal of Hawke and as universal health care, Western liberalism while Hirsi Ali more willing to credit superannuation, and tax is ‘an infidel fundamentalist,’ as she his team of ministers for reforms benefiting low- was labelled by the murderer of her successes.
    [Show full text]
  • The Political Economy of the Higher Education Contribution Scheme
    The Political Economy of the Higher Education Contribution Scheme Bruce Chapman and Timothy Hicks 1 Introduction In 1989 the Australian government adopted the world’s first national income contingent student loan (ICL) system, then known as the Higher Education Contribution Scheme (HECS). What follows is a documentation and analysis of the issues important to an understanding of the political and policy environment of this financing reform. A critical motivating factor for the chapter is that closely related versions of HECS have now been implemented in around eight other countries and such systems look set to be adopted in several others very soon1. Thus the lessons drawn from what happened 28 years ago in Australia are highly likely to be relevant to perceptions of the role of political forces in policy reform well beyond this experience. At the outset it is instructive to separate two aspects of the policy reform: the decision by the government to re-introduce tuition charges, which had been abolished in 1974; and the choice of an ICL instead of the adoption of normal (at the time, pervasive) approach to higher education financing, involving the use of time-based repayment loans (usually financed by banks). ICLs differ from “normal” loans in that repayments are only required if and only when a debtor’s future income exceed a specified level. In terms of the politics of the matter, it is the re-introduction of tuition charges in Australia that warrants the most attention, but with respect to the contribution to international economic policy it is the inaugural adoption in Australia of an ICL which is of much greater interest.
    [Show full text]
  • Trade Liberalisation and the ALP V5
    Under Revise and Resubmit for the Australian Journal of Politics and History Trade Liberalisation and the Australian Labor Party Andrew Leigh* PhD Student, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University Former Senior Adviser to Senator Peter Cook, Shadow Minister for Trade Abstract The three most substantial decisions to reduce Australia’s trade barriers – in 1973, 1988 and 1991 – were made by Labor Governments. Labor’s policy shift preceded the conversion of social democratic parties in other countries to trade liberalisation. To understand why this was so, it is necessary to consider trade policy as being shaped by more than interest groups and political institutions. Drawing on interviews with the main political figures, including Gough Whit lam, Bob Hawke, Paul Keating and John Button, this article explores why the intellectual arguments for free trade had such a powerful impact on Labor’s leadership, and how those leaders managed to implement major tariff cuts, while largely maintaining party unity. * * * * * * * * * [T]he ideas of economists and political philosophers, both when they are right and when they are wrong, are more powerful than is commonly understood. Indeed the world is ruled by little else. John Maynard Keynes1 Labor and Free Trade In the space of a generation, Australia’s tariff walls have been dismantled. From 1970 to 2001, the average level of industry assistance fell from over 30 percent to under 5 percent.2 Yet in retrospect, what was perhaps most surprising was not that the era of protectionism came to an end – after all, this was a period in which tariffs were reduced across much of the developed world – but that in Australia, it was Labor Governments that took the lead in cutting industry protection.
    [Show full text]
  • Bread and Roses
    Bread and Roses Bread and Roses Voices of Australian Academics from the Working Class Edited by Dee Michell University of Adelaide, Australia Jacqueline Z. Wilson Federation University Australia and Verity Archer Federation University Australia A C.I.P. record for this book is available from the Library of Congress. ISBN: 978-94-6300-125-0 (paperback) ISBN: 978-94-6300-126-7 (hardback) ISBN: 978-94-6300-127-4 (e-book) Published by: Sense Publishers, P.O. Box 21858, 3001 AW Rotterdam, The Netherlands https://www.sensepublishers.com/ Printed on acid-free paper All Rights Reserved © 2015 Sense Publishers No part of this work may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, microfilming, recording or otherwise, without written permission from the Publisher, with the exception of any material supplied specifically for the purpose of being entered and executed on a computer system, for exclusive use by the purchaser of the work. TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction: A Working-Class World-View in an Academic Environment vii Dee Michell, Jacqueline Z. Wilson and Verity Archer Part 1: Identity 1. The ‘C’ Word: Class, Migrants and Academia 3 May Ngo 2. I Didn’t Work for It: The Acquisition of an Academic Habitus (Or How a Working-Class Kid Got a Middle-Class Job) 9 Martin Forsey 3. ‘Stumbling Forwards – Understanding Backwards’: Some Puzzles in the Life of One Working-Class Breakthrough 19 Rob Watts 4. Which Voice? Which Working Class? 29 Terry Irving 5. Wog Westie Feminist: Or the Evidence of Experience 39 Zora Simic 6.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of Australia's Compulsory
    A REVIEW OF AUSTRALIA’S COMPULSORY SUPERANNUATION SCHEME AFTER A DECADE Dr Michael E. Drew ASIA School of Economics and Finance Queensland University of Technology Brisbane 4001 Australia Dr Jon D. Stanford FSIA∗ School of Economics University of Queensland Queensland 4072 Australia Email: [email protected] Tel: (07) 3365 6594 Fax: (07) 3365 7229 March 2003 Discussion Paper No 322 ISSN 1446-5523 M.E. Drew & J Stanford This discussion paper should not be quoted or reproduced in whole or in part without the written consent of the author. ∗ Corresponding Author. 2 1. INTRODUCTION The following review of Australia’s retirement savings system takes 1992 as the beginning of compulsory mass superannuation in Australia with the introduction of the Superannuation Guarantee (SG). Today, in 2002, the SG has reached its maximum levy of nine per cent of salary for most employees. While our review necessarily considers issues of national economic policy and of aggregation, our central concern is that of those individual members of a superannuation fund, and that of how such members can maximise their retirement benefit. Our perspective is that of financial economists; we apply standard finance technology to evaluate the performance of superannuation funds and the markets in which they operate in order to come to a view as to whether the superannuation industry is efficient. The Australian superannuation system places trustees in the key role of managing superannuation assets and we subject the role of trustee to close scrutiny while identifying the very substantial principal-and-agent problems that exist in the industry.
    [Show full text]