CEU eTD Collection

( E ) U turus In partial degree MasterGenderfulfillment In of the for of Studiesin Arts : Lawson Second Reader: Second Supervisor: As Supervisor: Reproductive T Reproductive Department ofStudiesGender CentralUniversity European Budapest, Hungary Budapest, AssociateProfessor ZoranaBarisic sociate Professor sociate Submitted Submitted to 2013 By echnologies

Éva

AnnaLoutfi

in Contemporary Croatia in Contemporary

Fodor

CEU eTD Collection chang ( SDP how show will I system. political the within position their destabilize to order in actors other discipline and actions i EU to accession of reproduced processactively discourse the how show will I Also, 2009. in reproduction process Europeanization Pa Democratic Croatian whatsoever EU the to connection none or process Europeanization natio a on byactors the be easilyused to comes it when changes laws of shadow repr assisted medically on Europe in law liberal most the potentially and conservative most the introduced Croatia years, three of span the Within ABSTRACT I argue that argue ee passed were esofthe happen its

Europeanization played a significant role in the policy makingprocess inpolicy theEuropeanizationrole significant aplayed

accession to accession 2009

to lawsthe to MARon

n how and makings of of makings lawimplicitlylabeling

as

rty)

in order to push the controversial law on medically assisted assisted medically on law controversial the push to order in

the a t he means for policy maki policyfor means

European Union. European by the actors on a national level in order to legitimize their their legitimize to order in level national a on actors the by hs laws these the

actively used a technical framework provided by the the by provided framework technical a used actively negig rcs o Erpaiain fetd significant affected Europeanization of process undergoing Social Democratic Party) did the latter to make space for space make to latter the did Party) Democratic Social in nal level in order to push order to inlevelnal

such . it The

a short period inshort ofatime Croatia.

n rain case Croatian in asnon i

will will The aim of this thesis is to show to is thesis this of aim The - ng process on a national level national a on process ng appropriate for a Europeanafor appropriate country. hw o te oin f Erp” can “Europe” of notion the how show oduction (MAR), all while under the the under while all (MAR), oduction I il hw o HZ ( HDZ how show will I . their

own

agendas. The use of of The use agendas.

bared why inCroatia mposes

these these little

the the

a

CEU eTD Collection Thisstandingbehind isyou.her. bothwork tinydedicated of to piece of knowledgemindOnehavethenever peoplethat couldandbebetter can not enough. open Thanklove support. and and Gordanayou bestowingforthankmeZdenko, your both confidence, with unconditional askedbetteraforhave partnercould in not crime. Ž getgrip. myaare me You to when of pride. source endless myIvana,for Lemonworldcompanion,me,you listening thankmetolerating tellinto and meinsightfulhelpingwith comments. alsowant Anna I to mythanksecondforsupervisor, formeherLoutfi, takingwingunder and help.and whomwoulddaylight.seepaper thisnever broad you Thankfor would likeI to thank ACKNOWLEDGMENTS eljko,

thank youfor peculiarthank the waysthroughoutyears.of support understandingand One

Éva you foryou teachingmeis there anone's neverfor to end quest

Fodor, myfor herFodor, mentor, support throughall andthis without of

ii

yourguidance, knowledge

g CEU eTD Collection BIBLIOGRAPHY CONCLUSIONS 2.5.3. 2.5.2. 2.5.1. 2.5. 2.4.4 2.4.3. 2.4.2. 2.4.1 2.4. 2.3.4 2.3.3. 2.3.2 2.3.1. 2.3 2.2. 2.1. PROCESS CREATING2. THECIT 1.3. 1.2. 1.1.E 1.THEORETICALBACKGR INTRODUCTION TABLEOFCONTENTS

T

S N C T T C HE UROPEANIZATION AS A

IGNIFIERS I T HE POLICYMAKING PRO N SDP HE LAWSIN S HANGING THELAW IN ONTEXTUALIZATION

ATIONALISM I I I NTERACTIONOF THE NO I HDZ T T HE NTERACTIONOF THENO NTERACTIONOF THEME NTERACTIONOF THE NTERACTIONBETWEEN T ON HEROLE OF NON HE A CTORS

L - C

AW ONMEDICAL REPROD GOVERNMENTAL ATHOLIC

, HORT

FAMILYAND GENDER RO C

HURCH

-

GOVERNMENTALACTORS

C 2012 GROUPS DISCURSIVECONCEPT OMMITTEESAND CESS

N N DICALCOMMUNITY AND HEGOVERNMENTAL BODI - - GOVERNMENTALACTORS GOVERNMENTALACTORS IZENS: ANALYSISOFT IZENS:

ANDGETTING UCTION

OUND

LES HDZ

“

BACK TO

WITH SDP ES iii AND SDP AND , E

SDP UROPE

HDZ SDP

AND ”

HE POLICY MAKING POLICYHE MAKING HDZ

33 31 27 26 20 17 12 10 58 57 53 50 42 41 39 37 37 35 64 62 16 5 5 1

CEU eTD Collection iv

CEU eTD Collection AccessedMay2013) 13th, 3 (AccessedMay2013) 13th, http://www.presseurop.eu/en/content/news 2 AccessedMay2013) 13th, 1 a such countries in available even not are which solutions specifically, More reproduction. assisted medically on EU in solutions liberal” “more the of bylaw“conservative”was(fromreplaced 2009) What strictlaw,thecame evenregulation to close of middle the in was who Croatia from apart Humanfor Court Rights “visitors” European of the the with even day, in visible Court the Consequently, Italy of Court Constitutional regulation Italian field. arrangemen specific very a with Croatia, In howlaws lawstheseto positionedcomparedwere in member countries. the of shadow liberal most and conservative most the introduced Croatia years, three of span the Within GazetaWyborcza, “ECHR condemns Itali ESHRE.(2008).Retrieved from: ESHRE.(2008). Retrieved from: I NTRODUCTION

makes

bans on external donors and freezing of the embryos (among othe (among embryosthe offreezing and donors external on bans accession to European Union European to accession a

law

ne the l md lw n eial asse rpouto i 20 bcm aligned became 2009 in reproduction assisted medically on law made wly in Europe Europe in

case of Croatia even more more even Croatia of case

se

hne t the to changes s

1 “force n h ae w area the in http://ec.europa.eu/health/blood_tissues_organs/docs/study_eshre_en.pdf on medically assisted reproduction (MAR reproduction assisted medically on http://ec.europa.eu/health/blood_tissues_organs/docs/study_eshre_en.pdf atr utpe or vrit o te ma the on verdicts court multiple after ,

d t that was most similar to Italy to similar most was that t ” changes to the law in order to ease the rigor of rigor the ease to order in law the to changes ” - anlaw on assisted reproduction”,Press Euro, August 29, 2012. brief/2601161

a, tla culs fighting couples Italian law, . ere

ht ae rai itrsig i htsne is sense, that in interesting, Croatia makes What swhich ierneo ise which issues of range wide a

perce 1 the the

- echr a law whose content can laweacontent whose a 2 nego

surprising ived as as ived . Apart from Italy, no other memberfrom state,other Apart no Italy, . Italy haItaly -

condemns the tiating process when passing its own its passing when process tiating rain a fo 21 presented 2012 from law Croatian d so so . -

See o Finland or Sweden s italia is ihy controversial highly ’s previous regulation in that that in regulation previous ’s

n that, that, - law

- assisted ) infertility are regular regular are infertility over , tt

all er, er, are

r sily be put in linebeput sily

, potentially, , while under the the under while issues - a t se in. step to had he yas a years, three reproduction involved with involved ). Till this this Till ). 3

ht the that These . h law the

( (

the the

CEU eTD Collection 4 nationala on level inside, projected is it how and EU to relation such through created discourse the on focus to positioning peripheral Croatia’sWith of creators makes EU in membership hand, other the On areas. certain of regulations as cells reproductive of area the in states member other of of effects the account into take to necessaryis In it so, doing time. of period short a such in ways differing such in reproduction assisted medically to order process making policy the during prevailed that discourses and procedures the relations sex for criterion reproduction assisted medically In unexplained. integration, European full at aim Europeanization Union, the of part a already is who countries. perspective, fromgender issues,a especially in perspective gender a from issues specific including While notare availableAustriainthat countriessuchor as Denmark singlewomen’s include

Ibid.

this research, I will show show will I research, this

much

between individuals themselves with the state. the with themselves individuals between gain Despite of the fact that all ex all that fact the of Despite

the

research in the area of reproductive cells reproductive of area the in research clear a

European landscape and presenters of differing notions of “ of notions differing of presenters and landscape European

a ctznhp r edr roles. gender or citizenship ual in ,

when it comes to policy itcomes to making. when

er the

eligibility for these treatments or treatments these for eligibility da n ht xcl md Cota euae sus inhere issues regulate Croatia made exactly what on idea

policy making process in the field of reproduction remain remain reproduction of field the in process making policy how Europeanization how

in Croatia in that comes with the EU candidate status, it is importantis it status, candidate EU thecomes with that - Yugo .

Policies is still missingis still 2 slav countries, with the exception of Slovenia Slovenia of exception the with countries, slav

They affected

on reproduction are used as used are reproduction on

has been has

also present a specific regulation of of regulation specific a present also Hence, anHence, the

the Europeanization policy making policy they clearly consist of patterns in patterns of consist clearly they when itcom when

EU, a deeper analysis of these these of analysis deeper a EU, 4 possibility of embryo donations donations embryo possibilityof .

con analysis of these laws and laws these of analysis ducted es to ex esto process of laws on on laws of process

within and states European the

-

the Yugoslavian Yugoslavian is needed is

into into a effects of of effects academia

solutions solutions the to nt defining defining - ness active

in ”. ”. ,

CEU eTD Collection hs laws these the of opinions Parliament Croatian the of archives the from and Church Catholic clippi press obtained was material analyzed The groups. governmental non from statements official and periods official the within consist methodology My Europeanacountry.for the of changes for space make the within position ( SDP how show will their I system. political destabilize to order in actors other discipline and actions their impose law the of content the on 2009 in reproduction assisted medically on law controversial ho level national a on process making policy of use The agendas. u be easily can “Europe” in show, will I laws. these of makings to comes it when were madeactors Croatia. in time of period significant affected Europeanization of show Thethisaimis of thesis to I argue that Europeanization played a significant role in the policy making process in Croatia inCroatia making process inpolicy theEuropeanizationrole significant that aplayed argue I HZ ( HDZ w a discourse actively reproduced by the actors on a national level in order to legitimize to inlevelnationalorder a on actors by the reproduced actively discourse a

from the video recordings of the Parliamentary debates in 2009 and 2012, 2012, and 2009 in debates Parliamentary the of recordings video the from

ngs from that period, period, that from ngs n lre sca cnet f otmoay rai and Croatia contemporary of context social larger a in the alaetr committees parliamentary rain eortc Party) Democratic Croatian

ininfluenc to order

pnos rm h Primnay omtes uig h plc making policy the during committees Parliamentary the from opinions the

Europeanization process, as I will show in this thesis, as as thesis, inthis show will I as process, Europeanization . s sed by the actors on a national level in order to push their own own their push to order in level national a on actors the by sed Also, I will show how the how show will I Also,

h wer Who of analyzing the discourse used during parliamentary debates, debates, parliamentary during used discourse the analyzing of 2009 law 2009 why from

e e the actors and what kind of of kind what and actors the e these lawsthese

and gain support for gainand support

changes statements from several NGO groups NGO several from statements the

implicitly labeling the original law as law original the labeling implicitly b . I use this variety of sources in order to to order in sources of variety this use I . ore Social Democratic Social 3

sd Europeanization used little or no connection to the EU. I will show show will I EU. the to connection no littleor we happen re passed re

proc

to the laws on MAR on laws the to ess of accession to to accession of ess

the content of the lawcontentthe ofthe hs research this

and how and

while also having a monopoly monopoly a having also while Party did the latter in order to order inlatter the did Party ,

focusing specifically on on specifically focusing alliances

the n re t ps the push to order in ,

undergoing process how the notion of of notion the how to

the show in , between these these between

including the the including in

? such a short a such EU te EU a appropriate appropriate

means for means different plaq nds to to nds from ce ce CEU eTD Collection limitations to researchlimitationsthe to 2012. and 2009 in processes those during used discourses the and processes making policy the of analysis extensivemy present proces making policy the affect they how and of processes to comes it when with working am I framework theoretical the women of familypositioning and ideason nationalism, reprodu on literature existing the within research this position will I it. on influences their and actors various from making policy of terms in laws the to approaches

I have I conducted Finally .

I il rsn m fnl ocuin and conclusions final my present will I , 4 s on a national level. national a on s

in my first chapter first myin I ctive policies in terms of of terms in policies ctive n chapter number number chapter n . I will I Europeanization

also also present two

the the , I ,

CEU eTD Collection oiis ht a aayig n hs research this in analyzing am I that policies levels national on policies of transformation the 2013:2). Forest and Lombardo in (Schmidt discourses” political communicative and policy coordinative function, rhetorical its of sense the in mainly policy, national on Europeanization of impact frame. discursive section this In ha the of deal great since Union a European the ofinfluence direct the under policies its underwent transformation of Croatia Union, European in membership for candidate a As 1.1. inmakingfieldprocess the reproduction. of policy the with come that connotations patriarchal and heteronormative nationalistic, the legislatures national “complet of places as policies” “family of notions and mainstreaming gender concept discursive specific a as Europeanization perspectives. different from policies reproductive the to connected theories multiple outline will I chapter, this In inEuropeanstartaccessionUnion to hadbecome fullto membersto order EU. of the time that Europeanization reproduction. assisted medically reproduction of field particular a in process making policy the into dwell will research This 1. THEORETICALBACKGROU s

negotiations with EU in 2005. Consequently, 2005. in EU with negotiations been introducedinareasbeen different ofand politicsmaking. policy

European ,

I will I I find I I refer to discourse here discourse to refer I ization as a discursive concept discursive a ization as

in relation to Europeanization to relation in , present in general, in thi wl p will I s view of Europeanization of view s

one specific concept of Europeanization that defines it defines that Europeanization of concept specific one

The research The is used as an umbrella term for the processes states in the the in states processes the for term umbrella an as used is resent N D

y eerh ihn h eitn ltrtr on literature existent the within research my

as “a key mediating factor that helps explain the the explain helps that factor mediating key “a as

5

will be will . .

due to specificities inherent to reproductive to inherent specificities to due a great range of concepts, ideals and values idealsand concepts, of range great a Additionally, wl as epan h raoig behind reasoning the explain also will I . Then, I will present present will I Then, . more appropriate in terms of examining examining of terms in appropriate more

positioned positioned I will position the issues with issues the position will I within a specific frame of of frame specific a within

theories dealing with dealing theories e freedom” for freedom” e opening opening through

-

CEU eTD Collection of European framework by those same actors same those by framework European of and Fores Lombardo in (Radaelli context institutional national their within interests” strategic their framing (re) and ideas “exchanging through done is that norms EU of internalization policies certain making Europeanization the by influenced or of part a as process a understand to inorder that, out points (2004) Radaelli inmembershipobligatoryafor EU. the perceived not are that level national a on policies through solutions and problems defining On communitaire. per one on such, As 2004). (Radaelli policies public and structures both including level national a on discourses into transcribed then only and Union European rules informal) and of number a through the with and implicit with content (their policies Schmidt 2004, (Radaelli values and norms existing the to compliance in reality that judges and assesses that character normative othe the and reality) of sense make to actors (enabling activity level. ideas certain on focus policies. reproductive to comes it when “maneuvering” of area wide a have indeed autonom evd s rca t eey addc a i dmns opine o European to compliance demands it as candidacy every to crucial as ceived t 2013:6). t The concept behind this sees Europeanization in two ways behindin EuropeanizationTheseesthisconcept two

y of member states given by the EU in “private matters” to show how member states memberstates showhow matters”to “private in EU bygiventhe states member y of intended solution to it) and the way they are communicated to others. This happens This others. to communicated are they way the and it) to solution intended the

that are that fet ht uoenzto hs n h dsore and discourse the on has Europeanization that effect When h ohr hand other the , , procedures, norms, styles that are first constructed on the level of of level the on constructed first are that styles norms, procedures, ,

it needs to precede the changes the precede to needs it

processes of construction, diffusion and institutionalization of (formal of institutionalization and diffusion construction, of processes national on actors the by Europeanization the to inherent as perceived it comes to policyin itresponsecomes either to making,willthis result

do need to undergo certain acquiring of European concepts. concepts. European of acquiring certain undergo to need do Erpaiain s sd s n xlntr mdl for model explanatory an as used is Europeanization ,

and

explicit meanings and understanding of the problem problem the of understanding and meanings explicit

Radaelli 2004). This 2004). Radaelli 6

as it as

provid which means which es ground for action. Overall, this this Overall, action. for ground affects , first , r

that sees it as having as it sees that that the actors involved in involved actors the that hand

one on the formulation of the the of formulation the , Europeanization is is Europeanization , h construction the being

the

to to

cognitive cognitive or usage or It is the the is It I will will I aqui

the

of of as as s

CEU eTD Collection Retrievedfrom 5 Despite 2009). Verloo, and Meier (Lombardo, shrinking disc general in equality gender the to connectionin ideas The alreadyare memberstheyal,(“familyet“labeled” (Vegaas are private 2008). policies”) remain legally areas other Uni the from far fall policies” “other all while mainstreaming, gender to comes it when action normative actions positive and afterwards national the Consequentially, of part legislature. a become race and religion ethnicity, orientation, sexual disability, H normative nature. obligatory of and and states to comes it When iswhat perceivedasEuropeannormsUnion of (S show values. or interests culture, synchro are they so policies same those frameworking of terms through in making policy of processes form to free membermakesstates) (andin candidates but deliberation communication,that wayanda tendency a has learning policy of way policiesmaking of way

Treatyof Rome coversthis in the article 141 whileEC, TreatyofAmsterdam covers thisin article 141.4. rie struggles ursive s

the usage of “framing and reframing of cultural norms” in order to give support to support give to order in norms” cultural of reframing and “framing of usage the to belegislaturecandidateofnationalcountrieswhothe the defined those through andto idn. Hence binding. ,

,

Treaty of Am of Treaty membership hr gne misraig oe it place into comes mainstreaming gender where h ns euain Hne te ntuet ta Erpa Uin nrdcd for introduced Union European that instruments the Hence, regulation. on’s ttp://europa.eu/eu

gender policies and directives that aim at the national legislatures, member legislatures, national the aimat that directives and policiesgender

5 ht r vsbe through visible are that Epomn ad ao mre rmie te oue o drc and direct of focuses the remained market labor and Employment . plce rgrig aiy icuig erdcin n marriage) and reproduction (including family regarding policies , is referred to as to referred is candidate states have little space for maneuvering as they are are they as maneuvering for space little have states candidate sterdam heralded a widening of the concept of equal opportunities opportunities equal of concept the of widening a heralded sterdam Here, the discourse is presented in a rather dynamic manner as it as manner dynamic rather a in presented is discourse the Here, - law/treaties/index_en.htm

an dpin f ietvs hog Tet o Rm and Rome of Treaty through directives of adoption ence,basedgender, age, discriminationon directives on “policy learning” (Schmidt and Ra and (Schmidt learning”“policy 7

processes of fixing, bending, stretching and and stretching bending, fixing, of processes chmidt in andchmidt 2012:5). Forest Lombardo

(AccessedMayon 2013)13th,

have a have of this, most authors observing the the observing authors most this, ,

were soft laws which which laws soft were

tend ency of ency ie wt te national the with nized daelli 2004). This 2004). daelli

changing are

by the by

not

,

CEU eTD Collection positioned Others. asthe to due ignorance bythe andbiases certain of trap a infall that actors powerful the the find (2009) strategies also while hand, addition, whe bending of terms in volatile highly be Meier Verloo and Lombardo, res understand comprehensive requires that issue defined political clearly “…a not as equality gender positioning in resulted this scale, wider a On 2009:5). Verloo a the than goal other some fit it make to equality gender the of “concept to the adjusting in related resulted which thoroughly matters economic are they as bending of processes the by influenced been have Lombaral et (Bruno subvert to easy them to volatile are these struggles these of aim the be to appears mere issues, gender specific the to comes EU of states member focus mainstreami gender and Europeanization between connections osblt, ytmtc fot, n rsetv isiuin t b st ih” (Jalušič right” set be to institutions respective and efforts, systematic ponsibility, ing

project

this n h fmns srgls ht oe ih h dcso mkn poess n the in processes making decision the with come that struggles feminist the on

within EU ( EU within designated a framework for women’s as traditional and non and traditional as women’s for framework a designated ing reasoning for reasoning

when it comes to it comes when atclr neet a universal as interests particular discourses feminist hegemonic to open

ifrn maig oc te rcs o ipeetto starts implementation of process the once meanings different . As a result, a As . Meier et al.200 Meieret

heeet f edr qaiy tef (obro Mir and Meier (Lombardo, itself” equality gender of chievement exclusion of certain groups of women of groups certain of exclusion 2009:59). This might be related to the fact that conceptsto tend fact that the be to related This might 2009:59).

inter

due to the previously mentioned soft measures when it it when measures soft mentioned previously the to due 5 sectional approach 2 and Lombardo, Verloo , . The other side to the soft measures is the fact that fact the is measures soft the to side other The do and Forest 2013:11). Forest and do re ly 8

hr ae oefl discourse powerful are there aacd parti balanced ,

certain groups groups certain ing of the problem and political political and problem the of ing that is perceivedas that that as a result of of result a as cipation could potentially be potentiallycould 009). As such, “family policies” policies” “family such, As ng, ng,

remain in

Lombardo and Verloo Lombardoand Verloo specific discourses of of discourses specific ae tnec in tendency a have in

the the -

contested contested on the outskirts outskirts the on s and actors. actors. and s

crucial. crucial. ulc sphere public “femocrates explained ,

making Hence on one on In ’ in ” ,

CEU eTD Collection line of their own party interest and core values, but values, core andinterest theirparty lineown of reshape actors national onlycasedid ofCroatia. Not to itrealwhen arepresentcomes picture negotiationnot ofdoes in reproduction assisted medically manners differingthe provingthat top on laws of makings the during Croatia in used been for allows that spec concept volatile highly a presents also it but levels, national policy to different solutions of translation the for area wide a present only not does Europeanization changes ( problem presented the to solutions policy complete or solution the of parts certain either legitimize actor happe which terms national with embedded completely is that frame discursive a choosing and EU m this to solution the paths 2013:7). Forest and inLombardo Radaelli(Schmidtand problem perceived the and preferences actors fruition momen the will existingto come one included”. explicitly or implicitly andstructured ais meaningfulinsolution into informationincidentalproblem,a policy which (2005:20) Verloo 2009 Verloo, in Merrill and (Ferree actions and events ideas, their exchange who policy a of Construction ific constructions of discourse to be built on it. These constructions, as I will show, have show, will I as Theseconstructions, it. builton be to discourse of constructionsific uig U o ol i a eeecn mne, u as truh icus i odr to order in discourse through also but manner, referencing a in only not EU using s ned in Croatia in 2009 law 2009 in Croatia in ned to solutionslawthein to 2009 the ibid :11 . . wl so hw h lte hpee i Cota n 02 hn s when 2012 in Croatia in happened latter the how show will I ). ). ). ,

who defines it as “an organizing principle that tra that principle organizing “an as it defines who h plc cntutn ta I il focus will I that constructing policy The d

and reframed policy solutions to the presented problems along the the along problems presented the to solutions policy reframed and is atter can go. First is the possibility of actors refusing to reference to refusing actors of possibility the is First go. can atter

ey uhapout of product a much very (Lombardo and Forest 2013:7). The second possibility is of of is possibility second The 2013:7). Forest and (Lombardo

A new solution to a policy problem that diverges from the the from diverges that problem policy a to solution new A - bottomperspective makingpolicydu on were presented. presented. were t that the discourse on the national level nationalthe changes on discourse the that t 9

n wy ht t eiiie that legitimizes it that way a in

also, when it comes to 2012, they actively also, to itwhen comes

an

Consequently, there are two possible Consequently,two are there interaction on ee s n i one is here between nsforms fragmentary or or fragmentary nsforms Lombardo, Meier and and Meier Lombardo, differe ringthe ntroduced ntroduced ignificant ignificant nt actors nt

change

period period by CEU eTD Collection relational to geographicalrelationalthe to territory nation modern the how explaining by this on expands (1996:63) loca of subordination A Ginsberg1991 and(Rappsocial stratification siteof the interface as aslocalwell global and ter in multiple is It 1991). Ginsberg and (Rapp appear reproduction. T notionsstrong 1998:5 process” related a of example reverse a “…offered it as identities co traditional the reconstructed 1998:5 Ragone fact natural “a as such ideas to challenges present and institutions social the cont the consequencethat expected an as comes it reproduction, assisted medically of area the in advances the all With discoursesand inpositioningwomen sphere.of private the prev the show willspecifically, I More private. and public of constructions to crucial are that roles gendered and nationalism, family on heteronormative theories present will I 2012. and 2009 from laws the of analysis content byreprodu Ion to specific issues coveredthe policies theturn Now 1. solutions. “ of notion used e da o te uue f nation of future the on ideas he s Calhoun (1997:79 Calhoun s 2 . Nationalism, family andgender roles Nationalism, . - 9).

This comes as a novelty to the policies on reproduction as they tend to incorporate to tend they reproduction as on policiesthe to novelty a as This comes

Reproduction ofnationalism. - 9) European Nt only Not . - 83) noted, homogenization of the nation, creation of national unity and and unity national ofcreation nation, the ofhomogenization noted, 83) iette bgn wti te ofns f h nation the of confines the within begins identities l roversies these technological roversies these

- is constructed as a site where political contestation and resistance resistance and contestation political where site asa isconstructed ness

does ncept of reproduction in the context of new transnational transnational new of context the in reproduction of ncept ” in order to legitimize their positions to certain policy policy certain to positions their legitimize to order in ”

hs rsn a uze for puzzle a present this are an integral part to to part integral an are through through 10 the “physical body” being tied to “physicalthebeing body”to tied ailing theories on women’s roles in nationalist in roleswomen’s on theoriesailing

ms of signifiers as it is a site of critical of site a is it as signifiers of ms

changes trigger changes

th hooin ad uit, u it but jurists, and theologians e regulation in the field of of field the in regulation e ction crucialareas theyto - state state

(Franklin and Ragone Ragone and (Franklin cause positions itself as as itself positions an an ” - state.

(Franklin and and (Franklin the state the expanding of expandingof

Verder

with ). ). y CEU eTD Collection restricted to restricted to beingis arena newfound democratic in the theirstatus that “debt” paradoxicalthis is to due It debts” (2000) o qualities and deeds, its is continuity nation’s the to fundamental significancehierarchy of to societies. wi embedded are roles these that tradition the through visible is concept placed ambiguously are that in people different di by space of ideas and stories feelings, shared imaging of possibility frames Anderson(1983) observations,his on Based upon certain take is terminologythat ideas closelyto tiedgender. on process 199 locationsof revealing as them post in enacted are reproduction on politics how of frame wider the within nation certain a of history the in rebirth” “nation’s a 1994:254) of connotation gendered a through perceived is system” aspracticeand providediscourse this of continuation a socialistto era to supposed are who reproduce. those to supposed not are who those and reproduce defines reproduction, on discourses through authority an “ a set of m of set a fferent places within borders. As such, such, As borders. within places fferent 2:364) that stemfrom perc the that es say that the that say

Women a Women is . .

eanings and affects”. and eanings This idea becomes visible with the usage of a of usage the with visiblebecomes idea This Based on this on Based

solerole to going are state nation the to elements the that and highlybegendered to going re positioned as positioned re politics in transition in politics

of reproducers (now that the idea of women as workers is (now that ideawomenworkers theof reproducers of as te prt te el o men” of realm the spirit: the f ,

it is imminent then that the discourse the that then imminent is it of of

between past and future” (Hall 1992 (Hall future” and past between

eption ofas womeneption “intersection of politics and the lifecycle”( the and “intersectionpolitics of their actions their

Gal and Kligman (2000) observe how observe (2000) Kligman and Gal (Gal 1994) (Gal

securers of the past and men as securers men as and past the of securers was nationalism

– .

11 The justifications for such practices are located located are practices such for justifications The “women may create life in this world, but more but world, this lifein create may “women u n ie tra, nue truh utr, heroic culture, through ensured eternal, life

- merciful towards women due to their to due women towards merciful

the biggestofwinnersthe nationalism

Vrey 1996:73) (Verdery results in a construction of “identities of construction a in results

I histo t is then natural to expe to natural thenis t rical narrative that lists events events lists that narrative rical

as an ideology grounded in a ina ideologygrounded an as enacted by the state in these in state the by enacted :612). :612).

the

it is the state that, as that, state the is it the previous system. system. previousthe

. change to “the new changeto Gal 1994, 1994, Gal The duality of this this of duality The th in post in th - a ad Kligman and Gal socialist of the of perceived ct the post the ct

future due future (Verdery (Verdery - Kligman societies socialist “past “past

as a asa -

CEU eTD Collection signifying those concepts as a part of the constant struggle through interaction of groups in groups of interaction through struggle constant the of part a as concepts those signifying s a opening are that signifiers” “floating (2005) Laclau’s the as viewed be can masculinity. or policie Kligman and (Gal interactions through invoked is that manner implicit an in public and private between borders of change constant family the between negotiations constant with embedded then is family, meaning reproduction, of Area 1. wheretheyrecognizedspecifically maternalare the through role. diverg not did Croatia how show will I hand, discour to central as roles their and men by diverged Croatia how show will I discourses, nationalist w around centered are that theories prevailing the to opposed As it(Franklin given to Ragoneand1998:2). maternity and femininity to inherent activity domestic a sphere. private the to confined the arena, public the within positioned struggles. military and political p and differences ethnic/national its of signifiers of transmitters culture, and collectivity of reproducers groups, of ethnic/national reproducers of collectivities, boundaries ethnic of reproducers biological being of line in fall roles nation modern the of context the within roles women’s of layers multiple formed that relations familial through relict). communist 3 .

Signifiers s view

itself them

The

and the state the and -

state. More specifically, Yuval specifically, More state. Consequently

as an area provided for a construction of certain ideas on family, women women family, on ideas certain of construction a for provided area an as notions that come “with” come that notions

tha

Private Private

t recognizes t a ainl dniy a be constructed been has identity national a , osqety t Consequently, sphere here is the domain of female as reproduction is reproduction as female of domain theis here sphere

2000:51). male domain male

ses produced both in both produced ses

family as a political institution political a familyas sphere private the in women positioningfrom e 12

the

he idea of the progress of the nation was was nation the of progress the of idea he

- policy making in the field of reproduction reproduction of field the in making policy Other theories that cover the cover that theories Other Davis and Anthias (19 Anthias and Davis , while the concept of family remained remained family of concept the while , which results in results which articipants in national, economic, economic, national, in articipants creating specific construction of of construction specific creating 2009 and 2012. and 2009

omen’s position an roles in roles an position omen’s

89) claim women’s women’s claim 89) limited importance limited . This results in resultsThis .

and

On the other other the On

reproductive reproductive pace for re for pace internalized a -

CEU eTD Collection the laws while also legitimizing the existing order of relations within the society between between society the within relations of order existing the legitimizing also while laws the reproduce that making decision of processes through conce a offers (1999) Peterson power, of hierarchies mentioned the to connection In nationalism. of context the within masculinity of in resulted policies reproductive of makings the in role men’s addition, In andRagone nation the to crucial been fulland rights citizenship sharingfrom excluded haveboth themreproductive capacities from excluded and included been have women “…that such in status political a and citizenship woman’s that m man, to relation the through power th reaffirm to used and regulated highly are nation, a of cornerstones (1992 Devan and mediums It sameregulationstate. by that pro to comes it when proposes, (1993) such, As signifiersontofamily. aswomen such or str of field the Hence, universal. as “fulfill”th then who groups betweendifferent alliances of influence for open and fixed non as them presents signifiers these onto ideas redefi that ideas of plurality to open then ambiguously become that woman, a and family as such entities, those are Signifiers political. of field the is fully recognized on the condition of being married being of condition the on fullyrecognized is . This resulted in channeling women’s relation to the public, in this case, the nation, the case, this in public, the to relation women’s channeling in resulted This used used the , 1998) ,

aiy s u i rlto t te tt a idsual ntrl a McClintock as natural, indisputably as state the to relation in put is family

thee concepts on the basis of sexual difference. In various countries women’s women’s countries various In difference. sexual of basis the on concepts thee for the preservation of the imagined the of preservation the for :350 .

- state, because only women can bear future citizens future bear can women only because state, , aiis ersn te areas the represent families ), eaning marriage. At the same time, it is women’s citizenship citizenship women’s is it time, same the At marriage. eaning is

no surpriseno that then uggle becomes the field of projection of certain concepts concepts certain of projection of field the becomes uggle

- t f h msuie uodntn te feminine the subordinating masculine the of pt erdcie esrs whic measures reproductive 13 es

e signifiers with particular interests presented presented interests particular with signifiers e

community s

the the discourses on masculinity through through masculinity on discourses the ht udr h asmto o being of assumption the under that, .

familiesandunionssymbols areof Hence, there a paradox inherent to inherent paradox a there Hence, ete.Eeto f hegemonic of Exertion them. ne . At the same time, for Heng Heng for time, same the At . e existing hierarchies of of hierarchies existing e ” rsls n strong in results h

(Oaks multiple concepts concepts multiple

in Franklin Franklin

CEU eTD Collection eeoeul r heterosexual non excludes that practice sexual certain a signify just not does (2012:518) heteronormativity argues, Wieringa As regulated. and society the within positioned are individuals the heteronormati hand, other the On inwasno showchapter, different.next the will I as reproduction, assisted medically on laws of making perspective, making decision by “occupied” completelybe to tend perspective, making decision a from policies, reproductive intact. remains values of hierarchy patriarchal existing the that prevai masculinity on powers and incorporate creative whose fathers, “state establishing time same the at while matter” bodily anatomy female of conduit tractable (self endless self of fantasy res consequence, a as that, such values social of preservation of construction the that argue bodies. women’s and th men both which regulates also but through constructs, policies as interpreted be can policies reproductive t Additionally, the th reenact they policiesusedregulationforasmeaningchannels bodies, women’sas of as andsuch sexuality, nation. the of sons the honor, masculine of preservation (1998 Nagel women. and men

men while also producing specific discourses on masculinity. In Croatia’s case, from the the from case, Croatia’s In masculinity. on discourses specific producing also while men roleof masculine. - ) propagation, inexhaustibly reproducing its own image through the compliant, compliant, the through image own its reproducing inexhaustibly propagation, ) - e patrilineal connotations that are inherent to reproduction of the discourses on on discourses the reproductionof to inherent are that connotations patrilineal e elationships, as it is also used in order to create a hierarchy between between hierarchy a create to order in used also is it as elationships, regenerating fatherhood and patriarchal power, unmitigated, resurgent and in and resurgent unmitigated, power, patriarchal and fatherhood regenerating i ge i ln wt Waylen with line in goes his

subsume the maternal function”.maternal the subsume ls during the policy making process, but it but process, making policy the during ls

discourses ge frhr n epan this explains and further goes ) vity is a crucial element in terms of how sexual practices of of practices sexual how of interms element crucial a is vity –

nietl oein, n sxal sbre female suborned sexually and obedient, incidental,

on 14

men’s roles are grounded in the idea of the the of idea the in grounded are roles men’s

Hence, it is not only that a certain discourse certaindiscourse a that only not isit Hence, n Randall and

ahr t Rather, ult in narrative copies of “...a of copies narrative in ult

Heng and Devan ( Devan and Heng 19:0 wo ru that argue who (1998:10) is s means as also utilized also ec, t s la how clear is it Hence, his way, reproductive reproductive way, his e state not only only not state e

o te explicit the for in a way a in 1992:350 so - ) CEU eTD Collection allmentionedpresentedpreviouslyinwereandthe concepts usedof particular thiscountry. showhow to in assistedmedicallyinreproductionCroatia laws order analysis the on of to the fra specific a creating also while it for solutions the and problems policy certain legitimizing of means strong a present does may,it as that Be them. regulate who levelnational on actors for i init particular,matter this oninfluence Union of European debates. the during discourses the in prevailed fathers as roles men’s on ideas vivid of range a but making, decision the in role crucial their to just “restricted” we process, making policy the in roles, men’s that is interesting Croatia makes What perform. to supposed are they roles the and men and women both regulating policies these heteronor solutions issues of variety a touch reproduction on policies Overall, insexualtheminorities manners. differing la the of both in prevailed ideal heteronormative the how show will shapinginfluencemoral“theimperatives lives”that people’spersonal (Wieringa 2012:518). and laws institutions, impactregulations liveson memberssexual reproductivethe that and as ofas ofwell society” including life, daily of normativity the “informs it as influence of interms “space” wider much aheteronormativity occupies heterosexualHence, relationships. aie family mative include

nationalism through the prism of a normative family. On the other hand, hand, other the On family. normative a of prism the through nationalism also also ed opeal as prevail to tends mework for deliberation of those policies. Hence, I now turn turn now I Hence, policies. those deliberationoffor mework

15

a focal point in the discourses surrounding surrounding discourses the in point focal s rather implicitnon and srather hl as providing also while Europeanization ws in Croatia excluding excluding Croatia in ws When it comes to the to comes it When

as concept concept as - obliging obliging

policy policy re not re

I CEU eTD Collection the actual implementation of the part of the law that dealt with the preservation of the the of preservation the with repro dealt that law the of part the of implementation actual the that fact by the supported islawwhich themaking of the earlierto secondary was to referred obligi on insists Union anti certain to adherence of lack a showed which notions patriarchal certain and roles gender traditional relations, power existing heteronormativity, values Catholic of set a transmitted that show will I adherence in are that laws for used usually framework procedural a creating for means as utilized was case particular this in Europeanization the that argue I Yugoslavia. from law old year thirty m of matter the on agenda policy real a setting finally of way a as 2009 in cells) reproductive of preservation the of regulation Union)(CroatianDemocraticHDZ that argue I laws content, theauthoritymuch the very under were of of terms in that, meant This uncertain. remains Union European of impact direct the policies laws repr assisted medically of field the in Croatia in process making policy the affected transformations com aquis EU’s with synchronized become to order in level national the on policies of transformation as it frames that Europeanization of concept specific a to refer I mentioned, previously As PROCESS 2.

CREATING THE CITIZENS: THE CREATING

as I find it central to myanalysis to centralit find I as ductive cells (in form of banks) of form (in cells ductive

munitaire, but with a specific focus on the discourse that that discourse the on focus specific a with but munitaire, to European’sto aquiscommunitaire.

. ” of process the how discuss will I chapter this In hs rmwr alwd o a oooy n h cnet of content the on monopoly a for allowed framework this n rai. Those Croatia. in

specific values and beliefs that would fall in the category of of category the in fall would that beliefs and values specific ng to. The regulation of the preservation of reproductive cells I I cells reproductive of preservation the of regulation The to. ng edically assisted reproduction that was still regulated by a a by regulated still was that reproduction assisted edically

. MAKING POLICY OFTHE ANALYSIS was not implemented not was

As reproductive policies fall in the category of family of category inthe fall policiesreproductive As values and beliefs fell under the categories of of categories the under fell beliefs and values 16

,

then party inpower, party the actors actors on nationalthe the level. - discriminatory acts discriminatory . On the other hand, I will show show will I hand, other the On . these during produced is used this “demand” (the (the “demand” usedthis Europeanization

that hs law this “

traditional traditional European oduction

as it it as has has CEU eTD Collection documents/reports_nov_2008/croatia_progress_report_en.pdf MainChallenges 2008 Communicat 7 6 EuropeanCommission show to asked was Croatia solutio areasdifferent which reports Commission’s regular the to Due HDZ(Croatian DemocraticUnion) (2005 Croatia and Union European between negotiations fulfill to order in transformations introducing in years accession Union, European the in membership for candidate a As 2 finally,fromderiveth conclusions Union. Croatian’s to due context national and European the within positioning the made. present were laws will these which I within context Then 2012. and 2009 from laws the of content the discuss will I First Europeanization process. connected Social the by lead coalition wing left by 2012 in law the of makings the during discourse the how EuropeanUnion, EuropeanCommission. (2008). HDZwas leadingthe partyoffice in from2003 to2007 andfrom 2007to2011. .1. .1. Contextualization - ns that needed to beEuropean aquistheincommunitaire the syncneeded with of to nsthat democrats, who came into office by the end of 2011, actively used the di the used actively 2011, of end the by office into came who democrats, Then vrl, h am s o hw h mlil wy truh hc te ocp of concept the which through ways multiple the show to is aim the Overall, ion ion from Commissionthe tothe EuropeanParliament and the Council, Enlargement Strategy and notions , I will present an analysis of the policy making process in 2009 and 2012 and, and, 2012 and 2009 in process making policy the of analysis an present will I , ,

certain problems were put on the policythe agendaon certainput wereproblems

wasbeing

- of of 2009

“

Europe was . Retrieved . from

, utilized on a nationala on levelutilized a specific a among issues in other areas, inother issues among

” as ones symbolizing advancement symbolizing ones as ”

e 6 biaoy ietvs n obeying and directives obligatory

analysis. during that period.during that http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/pdf/press_corner/key advancement advancement the Croatia2008 Progress Reportaccompanying the Union’s demands. It is worth noting that the the that noting worth is It demands. Union’s 17

After that, After

presented

(AccessedApril7th 2013) in the in from 2009 to 2012 fromto 2009

- Croatia in the field of tissues and field oftissues in the I will present the main actors, their actors, main the present will I 2011) were led by ri byledwere 2011) Progress Report Progress h dacmn seset in assessments advancement the

of the government government the of wa

during the policy making policy the during s no exceptio no s

.

o l ohr legal other all to

7

from 2008 by the the by 2008 from ceso t the to accession ght wing party, wingparty, ght

Union. scourse that scourse n -

demand cells (with (with cells during its during What ing

CEU eTD Collection %8Divanje_o_ra%C4%91anju_djece http://hr.wikisource.org/wiki/Zakon_o_zdravst Croatian).Retrieved from 10 documents/reports_nov_2008/croatia_progress_report_en.pdf 9 documents/reports_nov_2008/croatia_progress_report_en.pdf 8 range enormous covers that communitaire aquis European the with syncing of process the to Due veryspecifictime. reg finally that reproduction assisted medically on 2009 from law the Hence, reproduction. assisted medically in technologies to new institutions the medical implement for it leaving missing were area this in measures regulatory that, matterof financingreferencetheof proced ofstate’s donationson andthe achieved the to limited was law law point asAsa was used thein insuch, 70s. technological inareathis Yugoslavia advances the Hence, infertile. was procedure that the case inundergoing cells reproductive of donors male for allowed it and marriedcouples to only applicable was law the reproduction assisted medically of area steriliza children” procreate to freelydecide to rights the acquiring for measureshealth “Lawon The 1978. from Yugoslavia Until Heathand Consumerprotection acts regulatory Union’s the with undergo to needed cells reproductive of preservation of acces “…a as named was this addition, In protection. health and Consumer cells) reproductive of acknowledgment special the Retrievedfrom Retrievedfrom “Zakono zdravstvenim mjerama ostvarivanjeza prava slob na

s of laws in different fields, certain side effects of such quick transformation of national of transformation quick such of effects side certain fields, different in laws of ion negotiation on this chapter“ this negotiationionon 2009 tion, planed parenthood, contraception and medically assisted reproduction. In the the In reproduction. assisted medically and contraception parenthood, planed tion, ,

the http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/pdf/press_corner/key http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/pdf/press_corner/key

ra f eial asse rpouto ws euae b a a from law a by regulated was reproduction assisted medically of area

10

oee a ie ag o rpoutv ise sc a abortion, as such issues reproductive of range wide a covered

. ( Accessed

in order for Croatia to end the negotiations in the field of of field the in negotiations the end to Croatia for order in 9

venim_mjerama_za_ostvarivanje_prava_na_slobodno_odlu%C4 (Consumer and healthprotection and (Consumer

on Mayon 13 18

th ,2013)

(AccessedApril7th 2013) (AccessedApril7th, 2013) odnoodlucivanje o radjanjudjece” (in 8

that that

ltd hs poeue cm a a at came procedures these ulated - - a transformation that was in sync sync in was that transformation a a at f t of part a was the ubn of husband ). Basically, ). key element for the for element key

ures, but, ures, other than

e hpe on chapter he a the issue the wom an CEU eTD Collection cynically observe the centre which results in the imitation of that centre (in this case the EU) EU) the case this (in centre that of imitation the in results which centre the cynicallyobserve preten as levels national positions 2002:78) Mair and Zielonka the with stance procedures assisted medically of regulation process making (Laitin HDZ for tool legitimizing a called“me so the in differences vital the maintain thereby will and reside, citizens/or are they which Europeanization po HDZ’s in duality The reproduction. reinterpr processes the level. national on actors the to available concept point this Further, content. actual the that Directives “ of notions patril the with inflicted highly itself law the of structure heteronormative monopoly actors so did it but laws”, “European of deliberation the particip in results also which criteria” democraticformal the meet states applicant the that insists Union were legislative

a

practice that “works against transparency, accountability and active popular popular active and accountability transparency, against “works that practice whose ation”. In this case, not only not case, this In ation”. ttos n re and etations ntalities” that differentiate intra differentiate ntalities” that on

h Erp” n te promise the and Europe” the

ideas that that ideas of accession to European Union European to accession of positions were

. The ideas of being “fully integrated into the national culture of the state in state the of culture national the into integrated “fully being of ideas The . resulted in a law that, in its content, was unique was content, its in that, law a in resulted bound to happen. to bound ban

directly “touched” in these laws escaped HDZ in terms of discourse and discourse of terms in HDZ escaped laws these in “touched” directly on were - poe ter o ti matter this on theirs opposed reig f mro ( embryos of freezing significations by the national actors in certain areas such as as such areas certain in actors national the by significations sition stems from the paradox inherent to the process of of process the to inherent paradox the from stems sition transcribed into law into transcribed

s ilnaad ar(021)nt: “ note: (2002:16) Mair and Zielonka As in Zielonka in did ed

HDZ actively HDZ

- Europeancultures”national to to . 19 h law The Europeanization of of

mlcty ulfig as qualifying implicitly nagnrl level general a on and Mair, and As such, t such, As

– deec t cert to adherence in order to deny the participation of other other of participation the deny to order in

from banning the freezing of embryos to embryos offreezing the banning from

also used Cneunl, hs resu this Consequently, .

2002:56). 2002:56). nae wt hgl ideological highly with engaged he language he

only a technical framework for framework technical a only

s vr morphing ever as ders from the periphery who periphery the from ders among otne ob pn for open be to continues i anti ain As such, HDZ’s policy policy HDZ’s such, As was

Europea used f used pro ineal notions. The The notions. ineal

used implicitly as implicitlyas used - …the life - discriminatory discriminatory o r and during during and r ). ). n countries’ countries’ n discursive Laitin (in (in Laitin European European td in lted

a -

CEU eTD Collection Retrievedfrom 11 (eggs cells onlythat three r female only that meant This part crucial The isspecificallyingiving birthnot articles noted thisother law.thisor of in be to needs treatment, reproduction. extra an in partners, male their with along relationship, their of status the prove to supposed were reproduction. medical of procedures the to eligible being aslaw the to added also were afterwards months of couple a happened m of 2009. July, in passed was married only law the of that 1 article the to According reproduction” medical on “Law the present first will I 2 contentthe of becomewhichreligious nationalistandsitethrough certain a i managesinto deliberations EU of to terms exclusivelyaccession framingthe comes with that other the On setting. agenda i communitaire aquis in inscribed values to adhering and EU the with negotiations fro clear is It providing previousl the of example perfect a presented 2009 from law Hence, nationalism. reproducing actually while manner instrumental an in

.2. .2. Croatianparliament, “ The laws The shortin edical reproduction. With additional amendments made in a parliamentary session that session parliamentary a in made amendments additional With reproduction. edical - otniu poeue eoe negig n poeue o te m the of procedures any undergoing before procedure contentious

an insight an http://www.zakon.hr/zakoni/Zakon_o_medicinskoj_oplodnji.doc hr t wa etn HZs used HDZ’s extent what to here m laws. ril 6 f h lw state law the of 6 Article s

of the law were articles that put a direct ban direct a put that articles were law the of

Lawmedicalon reproduction to

apattern.

) can actually be fertilized and maximum of three maximum of fertilizedand be actually can ) adequate age for giving birth giving for age adequate (eggs cells eproductive hand

, it also shows how much the existence of the technical technical the of existence the much how shows also it , 11 d

(September, 2009) women in common marriages common in women 2009) (September, y mentioned y that a woman, in order to to order in woman, a that ” 20

(inCroatian)

women are allowed to undergo to allowed are women

their positioning as a party leading the the leading party a as positioning their ) could be could .

What exactly is an adequate age for age adequate an is exactly What , Narodne , novine,July 17 “differentiatio deas get communicated throughget deas freeze

on freezing of the embryos. embryos. the of freezing on

( Accessed . Further, the law state law the Further, .

n” on a national level level national a on n” e lgbe o the for eligible be i

on Mayon 14th2013) mpregnated eggs eggs mpregnated edically assisted assisted edically th

2009. n terms of of terms n treatments .

They They

s CEU eTD Collection concev 12 whilein lawpoint inforcewas this Croatia. this of part crucial a as cells reproductive of donation the donors the to inmeasures relation all these would regulate t connection that in Statutes a that noted and be to needs it needed articles, these to relation when In law. of implementation administration public of body the and court the of register accessthis to right the provides also It justified. medically if basis exceptional provid donor of samealso article law).TheCroatian byageyears (full he/she18 reproductiveturns cells once help the with conceived was he/she if donors of register the access to child the assistmedically the undergoing do female or reproduction assisted medically the undergoing woman to donor (male coupling the of part other the or one with marriage such in or couple the to relation blood A donation.the consent to same of help the with conceived children three to up have can couple the latter, the of terms reproductiverestrictioncellsthe andofof donationonly cellscouple oneto reproductive prohi absolute the donation, to it givecomes needwhen to donors the that consent of inisterms law explicit the (gametes), cells reproductive the of donors of termsIn gametes. of preservation and donating underg woman the in put be to be could Article19 also limitsthe donation only tothose couples who lesshave three then children who have been rticle 18 rticle

ied throughiedmedically assistedprocedures. donor. Article 11 explicitly states that spouses of the donors need to give their written written their give to need donors the of spouses that states explicitly 11 Article donor. es the same right to legal guardians of the child and the doctor of the child on on child the of doctor the and child the of guardians legal to right same the es

also

specifically prohibits that the d the that prohibits specifically bition of any monetary (or other) exchange or contracts for those those for contracts or exchange other) (or monetary any of bition

ed procedure). On the other hand, article 10 sets up a right of of right a up sets 10 article hand, other the On procedure). ed relation that he/she would not be permitted to enter to permitted be not would he/she that relation

oing this treatment. The law legally recognized recognized legally law The treatment. this oing

21 onor of the reproductive cells be cells reproductive the of onor

n or to man that is married to the woman woman the to married is that man to or havenot law has not been enacted at any at enacted been not has law

been implemented, hence beenimplemented,

a person in person a the o 12 . In . the the CEU eTD Collection 2013) Retrievedfrom 13 law (article1 the of implementation the to connection in when bodies state other and court the for and doctor child’s for child, the of guardian legal the for age, full the reaches he/she once child is similarity main The children. re the to three access of continuation of births in results successfully it “until” used be only can “donation” their but couples, different to embryos and cells their provide finance T fromlaw 2009. which under terms c reproductive and donating regulate to continues law “new” The preservationthecomes to ofthe The years. five to up reproduction assisted medically embry the of preservation the of expenses so. do to able are they only iftheirfinancedstate yearsthedoctors bytreatments the 42 canundergo over old 2 in law the from limit age the of definition ambivalent personal their to relate that statements giving from restrained not is but disability, a has who person a to expanded union. sex same in or married common married, not are but infertile, n Another acts. isthere numberexplicitaan proclamationoflawthis accordanceofof Europeantheto Union f law the unlike 2012 fromlaw the of part introductory the in that, noting worth is in2012 July waspassed reproduction” that assisted medically “Lawthe on to I turn Now

CroatianParliament,“Law medicallyon assisted reproduction”(in Croatian) ,Narodne novine,July 13

b te tt, codn to according state, the by d 5). 5).

http: otable change is that that is change otable //narodne he main difference is that now the now is that mainhe difference the

donations are being done, the new law has some similarities with the with similarities some has law new the done, being are donations

- h bn n reig mro ws itd n te tt cvr the covers state the and lifted was embryos freezing on ban The novine.nn.hr/clanci/sluzbeni/2012_07_86_1962.html odto, s en eiil for eligible being as condition,

gister of donors (of reproductive cells and embryos) for the for embryos) and cells reproductive (of donors of gister femalereproductive cells.

the the law was expanded to to expanded was law the

article os that were not used during the process of of process the during used not were that os 22

. nte nvly s ht h dnrs can donor/s the that is novelty Another 8.

donation of embryos can be provided and beand provided canembryosdonation of ae euain is regulation same 009 was removed, and now women now and removed, was 009

undergoing the treatments. The The treatments. the undergoing ells. When it comes to the to comes it When ells. (single)

( Accessed

h lw a also was law The oe wo are who women applie

on Mayon 1st, rom 2009, 2009, rom d when it it when decide th

2012. 13 . It

CEU eTD Collection h rcgiin n rglto ta cms ih t ons o h ideal the to points it with comes that regulation and recognition The treatments for eligible as couples married recognized only 1992 Devan, and Heng 1993, unions symbolic to. apply specifi constructionof homo . medicallyreproduction assisted also c pro the and state of expense undergo also now can problem infertility the with woman single a 2012, from law the with that, are laws two these between differences main the Overall, law.fromthe or in spouses their form couple. the in2009 oftermsprohibiting medicalexpens their to comes it whenreimbursement s couples the between (an monetary to comes it When reproduction. assisted medically through to embryo an or cell reproductive donated either The ame ban applies to contracts, but the article does state that the donors should be provided a a provided be should donors the that state does article the but contracts, to applies ban ame ells are ells As Calhoun ( Calhoun As law from 2012 from law eal rgltd bt fr oos n fr oe udron the undergoing women for and donors for both regulated, legally genizing the nation the genizing

“eligible” for preservation. Consequentially, preservation. for “eligible” Implicitly, f Implicitly, On the other hand, the earlier obligation of the donors to get a written consent consent written a get to donors the of obligation earlier the hand, other the On

1997 in service of larger of service in :79

also and donors donors and the ban on freezing of the embryos embryos the of freezing on ban the amilies c gender roles and citizenship and roles gender c - 83 beenremoved now has cellsreproductive thedonate to ablebe to der

or or has ) noted, reproduction noted, )

creating donationsofre

occupy the centre centre the occupy ). ). a n . This is clear is This

undergoing the procedures it continues to be prohibited.be continuesto it procedures undergoingthe article that binds the parents of a child conceived through through conceived child a of parents the binds that article national unity national

( national productive cells ifproductivecellsthe with 23 )

of the content of these laws these of content the of policies are used as means, among other, for other, among means, as used are policies communities

state’s affirmative act in the 2009 law that law 2009 the in act affirmative state’s . inform the child about his/her about child the inform

Hence, p Hence, of those those of es. The law is identical to the one fro one the to identicalis law The es. the donations of the embryos are now are embryos the of donations the was

olicies on reproduction signify a a signify reproduction on olicies f infertility of

lifted individuals to whom these laws laws these whom to individuals (Anderson, 1983, McClintock, McClintock, 1983, (Anderson, donor is donor

and not only reproductive reproductive only not and

inrelationblood to t tt’ expense. state’s at d other) exchange other) d

as they as

eue a the at cedures procedures citizens and, and, citizens

conception conception

represent represent The The

of m

CEU eTD Collection ou o rglto a se s ecie, is ad oeot a a erdcr f h future the of f sense,notion of Inthat the state. the citizens of reproducer a as foremost, and first perceived, is she as regulation of focus role women’s is it sense, that that In remember state. to the necessary by prescribed effects and meanings of vessel a represent they as state nation modern the for crucial are bodies citizen’s mentioned, previously As spouse. woman of possibility for space a period opensfinal its in treatment the of denied be to just This procedures painful the undergoing woman. a into put is cell fertilized the Also partner. their by made donation the to agreeing spouses their from consent written a have donations on regulations lawthe through eligibility the to crucial as it of absence the and woman a of status marital the around explicitly revolved to applicable regulation 20 the by treatments the for eligible ones only 1993:65). citizenship As is laws two these of comparison the through comes What ininby state lessand, manner, in2009 somewhat a the explicit 2012 to natural indisputably something as family progeny. their through future its and nation that represent that sexes different of parents ideal consequently,

oa’ pltcl oiinn ws opeey condi completely was positioning political woman’s , both ,

This is clear by the by clear is This

partners undergoing the procedure had the right to draw their consent their draw to right the had procedure the undergoing partners w . On the other han other the On . s s h result the as

Crucial to to a

notion of of notion

da o tee as r truhte positioning the through are laws these of ideas

single women from 2012 from women single

f mediation of

the as euaig erdcin have reproduction regulating laws previously mentioned example of example mentioned previously d

, marital status was also crucial for the recognition by the the by recognition the for crucial also was status marital , reproducer. In th In reproducer.

in2009 stemming

the 24

amily, where woman’s role is nested through nested is woman’srole amily,where

. By the 2009 law, every single donor had to had to singledonor law,every 2009 theBy . state 9 law 09

e law

case 's pro 's rm aiil relations familial from . The whole article on single women women single on article whole The . bt t lo poi also it but ,

a specific regulation specific a of Croatia of ind n e mrtl status marital her on tioned - reproductive measures regulated measures reproductive

married couples married

tnec t simplify to tendency a ,

a woman becomes the the becomes woman t e heteronormative he t t te specific the to nts

of citizenship of (McClintock; (McClintock;

just before just

being the the being by her her by , her . CEU eTD Collection omnt i gnrl n oh as drn ad fe te oiy aig rcs) was process) making policy the after and (during laws both on general in community laws these of makings the cha next the in shown be will doctors 2002:344). Beasley and (Bacchi citizens” full for inappropriate deemed ways in regulated be “can they such as and scale” citizen the on up measure not “do control in full of signifier a the undergoing women the as which by citizenship, body a over autonomy one’s of perception the is this of result The womanhow it shows but eyes, in state’s 2002:342). Beasley order political specific a for have might this implications possible the to due consents through husbands their also but doctors, the community. medical of supervision the under are processes same those if state the by allowed is compromise” “a F reproductionofnew Croatian a re by existingcontinue to system patriarchalfor 1999). (Peterson, notions patriarchal in grounded order social existing the legitimize to order in process making policy the during deciding of process the domi decision the to points dogmas) religious or theory political of usage the through that (be discourse masculine of prevalence the and regulations state of symbols hierarch power relational of (re)signification for order in involvement state’s of point a becomes now Constitution, state. the for crucial becomes perspective, this or Bac or nated by men. Further, it points out positioning of masculine over feminine throughout throughout feminine over masculine of positioning out points it Further, men. by nated chi and Beasley (2002), (2002), Beasley and chi

woman who, at the same time, needs to be eagerly proactive, but only in sense of of sense in only but proactive, eagerly be to needs time, same the at who, woman Not only does this imply a specific context in which in context specific a imply this does only Not Croatian W omen ies to take place. take to ies

- become n 09 n 2012 and 2009 in ness the woman’s body become body woman’s the .

pter. Not only were both ministers, who were crucial to to crucial were ministers,who both onlywere Not pter. labeled as patients who must be controlled not onl not controlled bemust who patients as labeled full The -

citizenship is conditioned by their marital status. maritalstatus. by their conditionedis citizenship 25 heterosexual and married family (Bacchi and and (Bacchi family married and heterosexual The right on health care, as guaranteed by the the by guaranteed as care, health on right The

exemplified usage of paternal terms as main as terms paternal of usage exemplified - ascribing the passive attributes to to attributes passive the ascribing dcos bt h ipc o te medical the of impact the but doctors, , MAR procedures procedures MAR s

a public site of negotiation of site public a In a sense, i sense, a In who - making processes being processes making are not seen as being seen as not are

a child can be born be can child a t is then necessary then is t The role of of role The an idea of of idea y by y

and and

CEU eTD Collection the relations that comerelations the itthat during through in making policy the and 2009 processes 2012. fin I as crucialfind I actors the to turn I Now 2 ofnew(re)production ofcitizens nation thefor union medium of frame.heteronormative role the heteronorma of usage active the is discourse this of side other The nation. the of future the on ideas imply of policies these fieldas reproduction the in debates the during appear to tendency a has discourse nationalist Overall, isinchild brought of (incase the which into community the on and procedure the undergo decideto do who women single po reproductive the extent explicit as (such laws the of content stipulatio very the in and debates in present homophobia law. 2012 the in removed was 2009 from treatments these article undergoing an that mention 1999:39). to (Peterson; important nationalism of concepts in groups LGBT of marginalization of notion general the with hand in hand comes which practices” and identities heterosexual perception D interventionitsliveslegitimizein its private ofcitizens. proves further which extraordinary .3 espite The Actors d it useful in shedding some lights in terms of their political standing, their power and power their standing, political theirof interms lights some sheddingin useful it d

of the fact that the law from law the that fact the of

n that the that n of f eeoeims ntttoaiain wit institutionalization heterosexism’s of

women and the exclusion of all other individuals who fall outside outside fall who individuals other all of exclusion the and women

woman eligiblewoman Thefamilyspecificit from beingof positioningthe comes symbolic a iis omnct te da on ideas the communicate licies a successful treatment). successfula treatment). al imaginary on one hand. On the other hand, it is also the site site the also is ithand, other the On hand. one imaginaryon al meaninga

for the pro the for

o te tt bsos hs omnt i odr to order in community this bestows state the how 2012 includes single women, both women, single includes 2012 when

explicitl

siteofstate’s observing the policy making policy the observing tive family that is central to to central is that family tive 26 cedure is not in not iscedure

y

obdig rnsxa pros from persons transsexual forbidding te crlay xlso o non of exclusion “corollary the h

high ”

same interest. the

- appropriateness” of those those of appropriateness” sex union) shows to what to shows union) sex

The transphobia and transphobia The

process the laws construction of of construction

create a clear clear a create

of the laws the of

t is It the the - CEU eTD Collection Yugoslavidentity could notsubstitute the nationa ofcurrents nationalistic ideology.also It became clearduring 1960sthe that asupranational or combined 15 14 fe that programs specific of area the in demography definitely was 1990s the during party the of focuses strongest the of One within foundnewlyofcontext the the C nations“ European “oldest and struggle” „…millennium as such ideas the around rotated that was to element nationalist The were institutions football( club“)”„favorite to fromleader,Parliament to subjected (all leader the of principle to subjected was everything society: political within of interference total ...a „ was there as party authoritarian nationalist, a labeled as also was it office)thefor reelected constantlywas HDZ which(during1990s the leading the was HDZ year), this years f partygovernment (22 existence Croatia’s of history short its In level.nationalinasis HDZ defined their statue HDZ’s t of about elements main the out point idea to necessary is it an position give to order In underway. is reproduction” medical on “Law the 2004 since office the in term consecutive second their was it as language), Croatian(in HDZ or CDU DemocraticUnion, Croatian The 2 officialThe site of HDZ. Retrieved from .3.1. HDZ .3.1. „…the l

rooted in notions such as „historical memories“ and the newly constructed meta constructed newly thememories“ and„historical as suchnotionsin rooted traditionidentityand of Croatian’ssociety nation” and on and civilization, Christian and democracy of principles the on Croatia of Republic make gathers that allpartycitizthisthat nationCroatian one classes andof other state “Croatian egitimacycrisisof socialism resulted indemisethe ofsocialistideology theof and rise oldthe

ht was that or almost sixteen years altogether in Croatia. It is worth noting that during that noting is worth It in Croatia. yearsaltogether sixteen almost or

- constitutive party that does depart from their fundamental principles fundamental their from depart does that party constitutive nelne wt ntoait politics nationalist with interlinked l ne te fiel the under ll party’s ideology party’s

http://www.hdz.hr/mi_smo/povijest/ roatian state ( state roatian lidentities ofconstituent the nations...“(Zakošek;2007:33 o rpouto. hs a priual visible particularly was This reproduction. of d

was clear as th as clear was 27

Zakošek2007:31 his party and how they relate on a a on relate they how and party his Sbeunl, this Subsequently, . discourse public e 14

,

Hlad in Hlad

when they announced that that announced they when ( Accessed ). was in power in 2009 in2009 inpower was

Lalović 2000: Lalović

on Mayon 10 15

of the party party the of resul

authority authority th –

2013) stories e in ted ens inens 1 - 9 34) 0

). ).

CEU eTD Collection programs that dealt with the demographic problem all through the 1990s until Tuđman died. died. Tuđman until 1990s the through all problem demographic the with dealt that programs a only that idea the builton was state nationof construction whole the but solution, for beggingproblem t being as Croats towards directed explicitly was end, the in that, growth demographic of idea the to connected inherently was state Croatian the of wellbeing the sample, the from visible As 1996 issuesthrough demographic politics party’s the of elements Croatians. hands of into responsibility a setting number population’s with correlation direct in put is Croatia of existence the consequence, a As existence. very its important, more what’s and, interest visible is it Here, focusedCroatia.Hisspeecheson were demographic the difficulties: (1990 Tuđman Franjo of era the during -

Nationaldemographicfor development: program e an ru ht s endangered. is that group main he rain tt ad rain ain. Te at t s long a is it fact The nation... Croatian and state Croatian for tasks crucial actually, responsible, most the of one on embark to about are „We the of future the for tasks crucial Croatianinpeople”(Tuđman Đurin2012:37) the of one revival demographic “…the rate” birthmade in decrease worrisome a with also but continents, all to Croatians minority inminority C a being Croats to lead would which nations stronger demographically of citizens of Croatia immigrationto massivein result would pine...which would Croatia ofcitizens dishearte …rai’…ainl elen i i joad, not jeopardy, in is wellbeing “…Croatia’s…national n

ethnic Croat can be a proper Croatian. proper a be can Croat ethnic u, eas, f e o o sat ih t a rsi nme o Cot and Croats of number drastic a it, with start not do we if because, us, n how the idea of demographic decrease is directly identified with the state’s state’s the with identified directly is decrease demographic of idea the how roatia by the end of the 21st centuryby 21st ofendtheroatia the(National program1996:49)

Hence, projects that dwelled into this revival were one of the crucial crucial ofthe one were dwelledrevival this into that projects Hence, out

the decade. Here, I will show a show willI Here, decade. the A sc, they such, As . - 1999), the leader of the HDZ and the president of of president the and HDZ the of leader the 1999), Not only was the ethnic lineage put in focus as as focus in put lineage ethnic the was only Not 28

eutd in resulted

This kind of discourse was discourse of kind This

a

sample of such program from program such ofsample only with the scattering of of scattering the with only e porm cnetd to connected programs few

- em o sol not should job term present in the the in present

directly directly

that CEU eTD Collection isThisvisiblein 2003 Croatianof Programthe the government in motherhood familyNationalthe and policy National (2003) policy population (2006). ente women for concessions certain and conditions the living in of improvement based systematic were that strategies through with dealt was problem demographic the now first was that perspective different i the with continued HDZ problem”, demographic 1990s. the during used frequently were that memories historical the of idea Eur faithufulthe Union. European of joining successful Croatia’s was focus main whose leadinginreturn HDZ’sofficeHence,a electionsthe winsignified thethe to at party as 2003, inelectionduringthe whecampaignpromos 2003 seen be can this of example An image. and policies their of focus significant most the being pro a as itself positioning started now HDZ Sanader, new the With elections. national the at won left the from coalition and transformation underwent HDZ death, his Upon mplemented by the coalition of parties when they won the office in 2000. This meant that meant This 2000. in office the won they when parties of coalition the by mplemented 2004:65) the which in nations oldest the in of one as nation, Croatian dream old one is this friends, dear Europe, united Union, “European during the parental leave, an extension of the parental leave to three years to mothers fees to years three of to leave parental the increase of extension an leave, an parental the during be will There interest. politics’ national of focus very the into put will government rejuvenation The support. and role place, new a needs Croatia in “Family

ope in which Croatia deserves a part in due to its long history goes along the the along longgoes historyits to indue part a deservesCroatia inwhich ope of Croatia and strengthening of the place and role of family in society society in family of role and place the of strengthening and Croatia of 29

re Sanader re stated: -

Europe, wants to take a part in” (Lalić (Lalić in” part a take to wants Europe, EU to accession with party, European a

change in office happened as the the as happened office in change - 2007:

ly elected president, Ivo Ivo president, elected ly

The idea of return to return of idea The

In terms of “the of terms In

ring ring CEU eTD Collection Retrievedfrom 17 2013)10th, kulture.hr/userdocsimages/dokumenti/ministarstvo/program_rada/Program_vlade_RH.pdf 16 Jadrankain becameKosor, colleaguesofwhominister. onehis primea HDZ, closest decid Sanader negotiations the finishing upon EU of member full 1 (Julydate” a “got finally Croatia 2011 in and 2007 in term f negotiations the opened finally 2004 in Later population’s90sas asHDZopposed to growth transformed. other among education accessible to businesses, small for loans favorable workforce, the into citizens inclusionof children), with family and youth the among issues(especially housing from had, be to was“troubles” demographic of problem the which through growth and development economic in focus its had (2006) policy wellbeing” nation’s of “death the from changed clear also is It relivingfrom“dutyCroatianscountry”thethe own of by savingtheir reproducing. bodies, its and state the on put now are responsibilitythe and obligation the Hence, children. Croatiankeep that problems causesof to refocused it on dwelling programs the how and politics state’s in role central a got family a how visible is it Here CroatianGovernment, “ Programof Government of Rep. of Croatia(In Croatian), December 23,2003. Retrived from morechildren”with three with

17 http://narodne ,

d t ed . Overall, an obvious switch has happened in terms of policies regarding regarding policies of terms in happened has switch obvious an Overall, . from Croatia officially became a candidate for membership and, in October 2005, October in and, membership for candidate a became officially Croatia

and more children and a special program will be prepared to those families those to prepared be will program special a and children more and lae h ofc. Subsequently, office. the leave o

here how, with how, here NationalPopulation policy - novine.nn.hr/clanci/sluzbeni/128700.html 16

or the accession to EU. HDZ with Ivo Sanader won another another won Sanader Ivo with HDZ EU. to accession the or the demograph the

solved. This is visible is This solved. ”

(in Croatian), (in 30

. P .

ic problem still recognized, the discourse the recognized, still problem ic rograms such as the National population population National the as such rograms under HDZ. In 2009, the Prime M Prime the 2009, In HDZ. under

h epy space empty the Narodne novine, through a through

(Accessed st , 2013) when it will become a become will it when 2013) , families from having more more havingfrom families

on Mayon 2013 10th list of goals this policy policy this goals of list November24,2006.

was

( Accessed

now http://www.min

offered

on Mayon

)

inister to to - CEU eTD Collection sdp.pdf 18 Pa mandate HDZanother won infocusandri keepingwhile worker’s equality also rights human on insistence the on based left to centre the on spectrum political the on itself health on rights warranted gender of affirmation for classes, and groups individuals, disempowered and a The s of regardless preserving at aims and equal free, of party democratic “…as autonomous party the define they Statute, their on Based from Yugoslavia. sovereignty of proclamation Croatia’s upon formed was such as and Croatia of Communists of League Party, Democratic Social 2 Now,I significant this other actorsturn chapter. to inlaws.policy ofthe these process in later laws these passing inand creating Minister’srole crucial at back get popularity.will I fac strong Kosor’s) another was himself consequently Minister the of (and persona colorful The Sanader’s governments. of era the during Ministers visible and exposed most the of one was he covering, was Ministry his policies of area wide the to Due 2005. fromsucceedingpositiont 2011 heldAndrija2003 that who Hebrang fromMinistry to 2005 the of head the was He Milinovic. Darko profession, by gynecologist a Welfare, Social and la HDZ this to crucial from member a mention to important is it 2009 from law the analyzing am I Since ttainment of the modern world, modern the of ttainment Offi .3.2 SDP .3.2 rliament to HDZ as it indeed hasindeedit as HDZ to rliament y cial site cial of SDP,Statue of SDP,inCroatian.

als

( Accessed o strive at preserving the rights of workers, respect for antifascism as antifascism for respect workers, of rights the preserving at strive o

exual orientation, religious views, ethnicity, political standing or social status. status. social or standing political ethnicity, views, religious orientation, exual

on Mayon 2013) 10th w. The main agitator for the law in 2009 was, at the time, Minister of Health Health of Minister time, the at was, 2009 in law thefor agitator main The w.

includes

SDP, SDP, care, education etc. Overall, SDP Overall, etc. education care, , SDP was always positioned as the positionedas wasalways SDP ,

and responsible members” responsible and is the second second the is

epc fr ua being human for respect for affirmation of the rights and freedoms of the neglected the of freedoms and rights the of affirmation for

the second biggest number ofnumber biggest second the

Retrievedfrom 31 biggest party in Croatia. It is a successor to successor a is It Croatia. in party biggest

ghts. Duringwhen 90sand2003, the ghts. after

http://www.sdp.hr/media/303876/statut 18 – .

t dgiy rig dignity, its is clearly a party that positions positions that party a clearly is T

strongest oppositional force in oppositionalforce strongest he values the party cherishes party the values he (party) members in Croatia Croatia inmembers t ad freedom and hts civilization qaiy and equality tor in his his in tor

- al o

CEU eTD Collection htt 19 doo with minister). prime the being Sanader of period he during commit National the of president the different losing after fr coming agitations nationalist the of despite EU for become candidate a Croatia forin to made order were ICTY, with cooperationthe andcrimes conc strong ( coalition the of period the during also is It office. in coalition SDP’s with pre s Racan. Ivica by led 2000 in made itoffice won left with fromcoalition, smaller aalongwhom the parties SDP, other with Parliament. term in power the them gave which trong turn in Croatian’s politics as the preparatory documents and discussions (signing the the (signing discussions and documents preparatory the as politics Croatian’s in turn trong Officialprogramme ofcoalition the p://www.kukuriku.org/o - ” membership agreement) on Croatia becoming a candidate for European Union started started Union European for candidate a becoming Croatia on agreement) membership

(Kukurikuin other smaller parties smaller other

Croatianhashistory”society autonomy throughout the which on national values societal and Croatian natural and language of culture, tradition, identity, determinants fundamental and the equal preserving an simultaneously securing of Cro way of best influence the proportionate is This competitive. and developed economically it make will family European in being Croatia’s that guarantee “We leading were that bodies essions in different fields of of fields different in essions

the the office to HDZ in 2003, members of SDP SDP of members 2003, in HDZ to office

Croatian)

- koaliciji/o

from the left the from , named European Union asnamedone Union , European

A coalition’s enter coalition’s A - „ koaliciji/ Cockdoodle a do

the negotiations with EU (for example (for EU with negotiations the s of representing specific interests in and outside the the outside and in interests specific representing of s tee following the negotiations on the accession to EU to accession the on negotiations the following tee

, ( Accessed SDP SDP daily politics and, most importantly, in area of war war of area in importantly, most and, politics daily ta n ntttos f uoen no, while Union, European of institutions in atia 32 won the office. The coalition, coalition, The office. the won “ , in , Croatian.Retrived from

on Marchon 12th2013)

in

the office at the time was perceived as as perceived was time the at office the om different groups on the right. Even right. the on groups different om By the end of 2011, again in coalition coalition in again 2011, of end Bythe remained at remained

of their three mainoftheirthree objectives 19

important positions important –

Ivica Racan was was Racan Ivica 2000 “ Cock a doodle a Cock - 2003) that 2003) :

in CEU eTD Collection 1469.pdf 20 right 2011) of as people 143 697 3 or population total the of (86.28% Catholics religious as themselves identify who (Fink,20 (top hierarchy the to due the from more even be exemplified to tends Church the of coherence Additionally, the notions”. moral stemming power their to te that due potential mobilization process making policy the during players” t Croatia In 2 EU. the in membership and accession to connected processes the to danger any in not but secondary, o notions institutionsof beinthrough Croatia’skept is participation that to promisetraditiona going positionedas are 20 (Bailey market the of regulation the supra the towards nation the from focus the removed that democracy social of version HDZ. call positioncontinues values prior istheSDP and along thanto party It clearthe that he Catholic Church. Fink (2009:82) argues that Catholic Churches tend to be “societal veto “societal be to tend Churches Catholic that argues (2009:82) Fink Church. Catholic he

.3.3. The Catholic.3.3. Church CroatianBureau of Statistics,

European .

As some authors see it, social demosocial it, see authors some As

(Accessed

09). 09). f European Union is Union fEuropean ’s case, another actor that shou that actor another case, ’s In Croatia, the Croatia, In , the

while preserving “a national lens” in a somewhat different manner to one of of one to manner different somewhat a in lens” national “a preserving while

on Marchon 12th, 2013) - EU. EU. national level, in this case this in level, national 20

, which gives the Church pow Church the gives which , It is clear then to what extentwhat to then isclear It - down) and the ideas that are homogenous and in line with linein and homogenous are ideasthat the anddown) Census2011

Church is the biggest congregation in terms of number of people people numberof of incongregationterms biggest theis Church

d t b atvtd n ise ta cnrdc gnrly held generally contradict that “issues on activated be to nds crucial

As such, it positions it such, As . Retrieved . from 05). 05). ld be added to this list this to added be ld cratic parties in genera in parties cratic 33 European Union, believing that it that believing Union, European Here, the specificity of Croatia’s identity and and identity Croatia’s of specificity the Here,

er as a non a as er http://www.dzs.hr/Hrv_Eng/publication/2012/SI the economic discourse build around the the around build economicdiscourse the

tradi - governmental actor i actor governmental tion and identity of Croatia ofidentity and tion

l have l as able to exert influence is influence exert to able as - state and positioned it positioned and state turned

in the 90s the in

will result in result will ities can one n its own its n doctrines doctrines

to a to

as as - CEU eTD Collection 2013)10th, kulture.hr/userdocsimages/dokumenti/ministarstvo/program_rada/Program_vlade_RH.pdf 21 Christian ofimportance liststhe HDZ earlier, mentioned Fi in Minkenberg and (Katzenstein institutions“ „parapublic of status havingstrong makingwhilst fieldspolicy of Here, 2003 declared, era. himself Sanader Sanader's knit through tight all continued This HDZ and schools. Church high Catholic the and between elementary relationship in course elective an now is catechism the in cooperation signified that See Holy the and Croatia of government then the between contract a in resulted This clear nationalthehas Croatiaof communistin period the kept consciousness even (2012 Đurin party. the of beginning very the from HDZ haswith it tiespolitical deep with do to has Croatia in Church the of strength The Programof Government of Rep. of (In Croatian),Croatia December 23, 2003.Retrived from - reading

2007 (pg.4) 2007 certain in act to it enables that recognition public gains church the how visible is it andsurvivalthein being”nationalCroatian ofthe (Tuđman Đurin 2012:38) in positiverole important one communist that before half this in Church the “…because of the nation'sofbeing,thehas an pulse internal the reading of capability longlasting its with Church, the of voice „The

a

comment Tuđmancommentinmade 90s: the

in the previously mentioned Program of the Croatian government Croatian the of Program mentioned previously the in

il o euain n clue As culture. and education of field

preservation, I would dare dare would I preservation, irreplaceable - mind - century long totalitarism, and the other five ye five other the and totalitarism, long century - ness should be added to that, played a very very a played that, to added be should ness institutional 34

:38

and,today especially,actualrole“

) argues that “…the Catholic Church in in Church Catholic “…the that argues )

civilization the which givesthem state the to tie to to say, of national consciousness consciousness national of say,

n o the of one

as one of its core values core its of one as nk 2009:80). nk

( Accessed ath

http://www.m consequence eism”. 21

on Mayon

Also, as Also, This is This in ars s - , CEU eTD Collection May2013) 10th 22 medically on Law the change to order in legislative the pressuring infertility, of problem the pressuring infertility, of problem a for order in institutions authoritative with couples the of education and informing “ Me program a through is action focusesof particular Croatia” in childhood and parenthood pregnancy, dignified which for citizens advocates interested of group “a is Action) in (Parents Akciji u Roditelji or RODA advanc Union European from representatives rai of terms in monumental as postulated are which Zagreb in Prides Gay organizing for groups, other similar among crucial, are and minorities LGBT of rights the advocating of terms in place Kon while minorities, gender groups. LGBT are Kontra and Iskorak area. institutional the outside actors prominent most the of one were Croatia Network Women’s laws thesewithinvolvement theirto due as perceived be can that specifically more or movements to comes it When 2 andsupport ininfluenceto making. policy Croatiaalliesittill Catholicin comesHDZtheHence,remain and when strong today. Church .

.3.4 Non .3.4 .aig h pbi snil t aot h polm f eial asse reproduction, assisted medically of problem the about to sensible public the ..making Officialofsite RODA, inCroatian. Retrieved from ement inaccession. ement EU the - governmental groups ig wrns ad tolerance and awareness sing

nitn on insisting

actors as

h ata ipeetto o te anti the of implementation actual the tra defines itself as a as itself defines tra their visibility has immensely grew along with Croatia’s Croatia’s with along grew immensely has visibility their

in the in

them to expand the rights of the patients faced with the the with faced patients the of rights theexpand to them 2009 and 2012 and 2009 . Is .

korak and Kontra, RODA (Parents in Action) and Action)and inRODA (Parents Kontra, and korak n Croatia in Iskorak is the Center for rights of the sexual and and sexual the of rights for Center the is Iskorak http://www.roda.hr/artic 35

Lesbian group. Both groups Both group. Lesbian

groups from the from groups dically assisted reproduction that aims at aims that reproduction assisted dically

process . As such, they are also perceived as as perceived also are they such, As . ’ , a couple of them can be listed be can them of couple a , le/category/o -

discriminatory directives directives discriminatory non - governmental sector governmental - udruzi 22 . One of their their of One . hold

( Accessed

a

special special

on

CEU eTD Collection 28 mreza.hr/platform_eng.htm 27 BDI_2012.pdf http://www.roda.hr/uploads/neplodnost/medicinski%20potpomognuta%20oplodnja_ISTINE%20i%20LA%C5% 26 10th2013) http://www.poliklinika 25 24 23 lawsandaspreviouslybetweenactors. dialoguethe the groups described now policy I 2012, the and 2009 in to process making crucial found I actors the contextualizing and presenting the done Having policyperspective itwhencomes to making process. position their Croatia, multipleover organizationswomenall of movement cohesive athey that present fact insemination” stereotypes” and prejudices sexism, of sanctioning and abetment public, in women of displaying realistic and “complete at aim would that “measures” for pressure to is goal Their Croatia. over all groups oriented women di ofgender sorts all it marginalized;opposes politically economicallyand often are who women against recognizeddiscrimination initiatives that and Croatia “umbrella”“…unitesis Women’sangroups organizations,that Network organization N it makes which problems these has Croatia in 000 80 to minimally number unofficial infertility” to connected are that problems other solving and reproduction, assisted Ibid. Officialsite of Women’s Network Croatia, inCroatian. Retrieved from Officialsite of RODA,Croatian. in Retrieved from Policlinicfor gynecology, obstetrician and reproductivemedicine, in Croatian.Retrieved from Ibid. Ibid. GO group is. group GO

( Accessed 28 a b sgiid s oefl n em poiig srcue ad coherent and structured a providing terms in powerful as signified be can

. Considering the wide area they cover in terms of “female questions” and the andquestions” “female of interms cover theyarea wide Considering the . o pol srgln wt ifriiy n rai rne fo 5 000 50 from ranges Croatia in infertility with struggling people of s - ivf.hr/index.php/hr/neplodnost

25

on Mayon 2013) 10th

to 515 000 515 to ( Accessed

on Mayon 2013) 10th 26 . As the projections projections the As .

and for “easily accessible sterilization and artificial artificial and sterilization accessible “easily for and

t

urn to the actual policy making process of these these of process making policy actual the to urn

- 36 i - ivf/85

is clear what the mobilizing strength of this this of strength mobilizing the what clear is

- plodnostineplodnostcovjeka

scrimination” go, go, every http://www.zenska either fifth or sixth couple sixth or fifth either 27 . As such, it united 39 it39 united Assuch, .

( - Accessed

on Mayon 23 The . 24

CEU eTD Collection associatedwiththose officials, payingare some serious attention at anytime”given 30 documents/reports_nov_2008/croatia_progress_report_en.pdf http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/pdf/press_corner/key in thisfield are underway.“ ReportEC, on Progress of Croatia. Retrived fro haveyet not upgraded,been restructuredand licensed according tothe EUtechnical requirements.Preparations serious capacityyetis not sufficiently developed, especially Ministrythe in of Health andin inspection departments.A of cellsstillis process the to due 29 recognized being is and agenda an Europeanization of part a as set now is (1995 the in complaint Commission’s after year a within law the of itisregulationpreservation.a inthatHence,clear the becameofpart areareproductivea cells co it when cells reproductive ofregulation the and rights and obligations donor’s the donations, of process the during upheld be to needed that standards and criteria the cells, i reproduction” cells. reproductive the with deals that made be to needs alignment legal a Protection, Health and Consumer on chapter the close to order earlier, mentioned As 2 law.ofthe humanAsafield ofreproduction). non parties, (oppositional this in interest hold who the of exclusion the in resulted that process making policy whole the up speed agenda Eur the with this In 2 “ .4.1 .4.1 .4. “ Limitedprogress can be reported inthe field of tissues and cells.Legal alignmentin fieldthe of reproductive lists of lists subjects problemsor towhich governmentalofficials, andpeople outside of governmentclosely T :3 The he policy process making he adverseevents and reactions reporti . At the same time, HDZ used used HDZ time, same the At . section ) theory, this is a point of ) istheory,this point a outstanding.This keyis a forelement the accession negotiationson thischapter. Administrative

Law on medicalLaw reproduction opean Union whilst Union opean , I will show how HDZ how show will I , n 2009 was actually dealing with alignments for the donations of reproductive reproductive donationsof thefor alignments with dealing actually was 2009 n . To be more specific, more be To .

uoen Commis European

putting the policy on medically assisted reproduction on the the on reproduction assisted medically on policy the putting what he“awhat calls

consequence, HDZ basicallymonopoly hadHDZconsequence, ng systemng is notinplace. Facilities for handlingtissues andcells European Commis European made limited references to the process of negotiation of process the to references limited made the s o’ rpr n rai fo 20 ntdta, in that, noted 2008 from Croatia on report ion’s

European Commission European -

37

29

pro

( - h mjrt o te Lw n medical on “Law the of majority The Accessed governmental groups and experts in the the in experts and groups governmental blemstream s ion’s report from 2008 from report ion’s

on Ap on m m report. Going by Kingdon’s Kingdon’s by Going report. ” ril 25th,ril 2013, pg.64) 30 wa

whereactualprobleman

(Kingdon1995:3) h n ht located that one the s

on the content content the on of the acto the of mes to their their mesto in order to order in

rs CEU eTD Collection http://www.nacional.hr/en/clanak/50360/a 33 Mar.24on from Krnetic,Snjezana. “Milinovicu jos nije prosao zakon o umjetnoj 32 umjetnoj Monitor,June 15, 2009.Retrievedfrom 31 and Ministry, expert The Welfare. Social and Health of Ministry Committees. groups interest different of statements the by untouched generally time, same the At controversial. bodies institutional complain the of most enough, Interestingly parliamentaryinsessionslaw thison Croatiasta law repeating treatme the for eligible were couples married only which by regulation Europe in conservative left of parties infertilityfor treated were who themselves patients the and doctors of organizations professional groups, NGO the After policymakingprocess. previouslybeneededissuesnot range dealt levelnational of the to through recognizedon that wide a proposed such, as and, obliging were base annual an on sent Commission the that so a for need in problem a as it formulated and Orhidea Gaura,Orhidea “A law against parenthood”, Nacional, July 14 Social RollerVesna andLjerk

http://www.24sata.hr/politika/milinovicu n eial asse reproduction assisted medically on - democratic - oplodnji/22122/ th

that first draft was presented to to presented was draft first 2013) T , 32 no other actors from either civil society or specialists in human reproduction reproduction human in specialists or society civil either from actors other no date to he policy making process itself on this law was very much confined to the to confined much very was law this on itself process making policy he . In Croatia, the proposed law was was law proposed the Croatia, In . partyalsorefused tophysically the bein Parliament during votingthe on this newlaw.

focused on the on focused 31 a Bratonja a Martinović, “Doctors against the backward lawon IVF”(In Croatian) ,

, ( . In parliament, SDP was inoppositionstrong was SDP parliament, In .

Accessed

the only other country that had a law similar to this is Italy is this to similar law a had that country other only the

in regard to its ban on on ban its to regard in

on Mar.23on

http://www.monitor.hr/clanci/lijec parts on the on parts

- law previously mentioned previously - the - jos against rd

2013) - a dcae ucntttoa nt og eoe the before long not unconstitutional declared was nije public it it public t

- - s 38 preservation of the of preservation parenthood prosao

oig rm ifrn isiuinl n non and institutional different from coming

rted. rted. luti on for Croatian government. The Reports Reports The government. Croatian for on - h fezn of freezing the came u came zakon group consisted o consisted group

th oplodnji”.24 sata.July 10 , , 2009.Retrieved from aee i public in labeled

(Acc -

o parts of the law the of parts - nder a strong attack from various from attack strong a nder umjetnoj essedMaron 27th2013) nici -

protiv rep -

oplodnji or official reports by the the by reports official or along mro ad h initial the and embryos roductive cells remain cells roductive - f those working in the the in working those f nazadnog

s n o te most the of one as

with the r the with - nts. nts. 125435 that were deemed were that th

2012. - zakona 33

,

, t s worth is It Retrieved (Accesse

where th where est of the of est - o - d ed ed e - CEU eTD Collection Retrivedfrom duetoinconsistency withthe Croatian Constitution or r policialsystem or Committeefor legislature suggest aParliamentary session meaningfirst readingof law,the 35 partners. there is an inevitablechance of serious genetica disease transfer through the naturalconception between the ar proceduresfor medically assisted reproductioncan start definedare inthe article6 of Accordinglaw.the to that 34 of means as presented indeed was Europeanization law the that then clear becomes such for requests applicant the if Union European of legislation the to adjusted being are that laws of case in and economy national the to disruption significant a of deflection prevent the of case urgent in threats, the security national immediate undergo of cases lawsin only procedure tracked fast the Parliament, Croatian of Conduct of Rules the implication The 2 parliamentarycommittees and oppositionalSDP. the party, is process legislative about coming started actors draft place. in was Parliament the in reading one only meaning Ministry the by public reproduction assisted medically of par early the aside. put 2000swere previous as itself law the to was public wider The group. the in position a granted were worthIt is whennoting the proceduresof infertility treatmentcan begin inthis law: .4.2. Interaction.4.2. governmental the between bodies ticle, procedurethe is only possible curingthe after of infertility seenis successfulas not or hopeless,whenor Such carequest ties in office never decided to go forward with it until 2009 until itwith forward go to decided never office in ties be . What is important to take into account is that that is account into take to important is What

ae vial t cran alaetr bodies parliamentary certain to available came 20 http://www.sabor.hr/Default.aspx?art=1566 0,det ntr”o h lw n ielgcl oin htae neett it, to inherent are that notions ideological and law the of “nature” to due 00s, n ben disregarded ifcompetentthe body, Committee for Constitution, Rules of Conduct and s of the fast tracked legislativehere tracked process fast the sof

of laws of

Despite of the fact that earlier drafts on these laws were indeed made inmadelawsindeedearlierdrafts these fact on were that Despite ofthe n I will I and ( in order to become harmonized with the the with harmonizedbecome to order in drafts on medically assisted reproduction from the beginning of of beginning the from reproduction assisted medically on drafts 34

.

n h nx catr wi I chapter next the In

was was hruhy rsn te opans ae y h both the by made complaints the present thoroughly never fully formed as a social problem to the wider wider the to problem social a as formed fully never 39 ule ofule law.

( Accessed the legislative pr legislative the

Officialofsite CroatianParliament, Statue

on Aprilon 29th, 2013) did , , SDP

l xli wa te at tracked fast the what explain ll are ignorant

the official reactions of other other of reactions official the . Consequently, . crucial due to the fact that, by fact that, the to due crucial

and HDZ aquis

of the specific elements elements specific the of ocess was fast tracked fast was ocess The termsThe under which the

communitaire

the continuous continuous the ny hn the when Only the regulation regulation the )

ion or or ion if 35 not . It .

CEU eTD Collection ( 39 38 37 https://infodok.sabor.hr/Reports/KarticaAktaFrm.aspx?zak_id=21342 36 perceivemaking values.process) ininterests nationalas linegoingthe with culture, or conte their in policies same those of synchronization the for window the opening safely while processes, policy in communication and deliberation for framework a as ideas and concepts European projecting Europe” Welfare clearer even becomes argument con European the of usage The C procedures conclude to harmful were that procedures the of matter the on of terms in complaint in ended matter this on lawwith the of correspondence the on standpoint a take not law the against goes it that and it right Human of protection the for to Convention correspond not does it that evaluation their through European the to that fact then else anything for Accessed Libela,Column of (InShame Croatian), June 2009. ommittee, based decidedmajorityommittee, the on law. vote back to the Ibid. Complete oflist opinionsof Committees becan r Ibid.

discriminates on the basis of basis the on discriminates

38 , 39

ta te otn o te a ws breaching was law the of content the that d on April29 on i , also a member of HDZ, labeled the law as “…one of the most advanced laws in laws advanced most the of “…one as law the labeled HDZ, of member a also ,

n the very beginning of the law, law, the of beginning very the n during available aquis th a , , 2013)

parliamentar

t with nt discrimination on discrimination o them to for the deliberative the for

communitaire a tie. tie. a

htte ( they what

The The ht r lat amu t ter health their to harmful least are that

marital status. Despite of this opinion opinion this ofDespite status. marital hn the when ssin n h lw n 09 Ti ge i ln with line in goes This 2009. in law the on session y text that is crucial to to crucial is that text omte for Committee ,

omte fr uoen integrations European for Committee the basis of a marital status with a separate opinion opinion separate a with status marital a of basis the etri local it does sa does it procedure procedure

Retrievedfrom chief of the Committee for Health and Social Social and Health for Committee the of chief vedfrom: 40 s and Dignity of the Human being and that the that and being Human the of Dignity and s

actors in power positions during the policy policy the during positions power in actors the y that the law is made in correspondence in made islaw the that y of this of the equality of equality

h rgt f oe t hav to women of right the http://www.libela.org/stup (AccessedAprilon 29th, 2013) Radaelli’s oa’ health woman’s aquis

law specificall law

communitaire as the voting voting the as communitaire

the

rvosy mentioned previously sexes the . Despite of it the the it of Despite . . The Committee Committee The . Committee could Committee y. Despite of the the of Despite y. 37

- 36 had a had srama/p/8/

announced

e

similar

those those

CEU eTD Collection influence that tends to prevail in this process this inprevail to tends that influence maki Policy 2 withHDZ. and HDZ with bodies parties oppositional governmental the between interaction the of implications the shown Having nationalists” “Eastern”(Mel corrupt “upward as constructed values”. energy “an as sees he that consciousness” as 2 to refers (2006:29) in law ( subjectivity” complex the a by and…characterized to changes the promoting 2000:870) described and apprehended officially and scientifically belittled, it as whole as Croatia” landscape European the in Croatia position to tool a as 2009 from law the using identity” European “…west this EU. to accession the to “modernity” ideas of connect activelythey“forward ones” as the as positiondiscourse through themselves “rightfully” Croatia “return” and groups parliamentary non and parliamentary certain and SDP examplesof parties Oppositional .4.3. The role.4.3. of non hs eut i a ey pcfc daou” between “dialogue” specific very a in results This SP hn icriey rsne a wth o rai’ “ Croatia’s to switch a presented discursively then SDP .

ng in the field of reproduction reproduction of field the in ng nte er future. near the in criticism

( Böröcz 2000:870) Böröcz to “Europe” to of n the and “coloniality” as “coloniality” - -

this law this looking liberals and liberals looking governmental actorsgovernmental a prryd b SP a SDP, by portrayed, was

, Committees giving the (ignored) notes on the laws were were laws the on notes (ignored) the giving Committees This way, the oppositional groups that are not in the office office the in not are that groups oppositional the way, This I now turn to non to turn now I . Activeof usage

hr it where egh 2006:195) egh In doing so, SDP presents it presents SDP so, doing In

. This means that that means This . it is it , among other process other among ,

upsdy belong supposedly n a ahnr t tasom ifrne into differences transform to machinery a and 41 – modernizations’ involves

women’s movement and medical community, community, medical and movement women’s

1 a “dnmc isiig lively, inspiring, “…dynamic, as 012 “ . - ööz 2000:870) Böröcz Europe governmental bodies and their interaction their and bodies governmental

te te big …ekr ignored, “…weaker, being Other the s

three main actors in terms of their their of terms in actors main three the ”

was law from 2009 from law

socialists blame(ing) the local the blame(ing) socialists s in order to “ to order in

practiced and will and - hence D ad SDP and HDZ es self as crucial in building in crucial as self , also a “colonization of of “colonization a also , . hs s ht Melegh what is This - rightful rightful objectified”

by finally get back get finally

discipline” HDZ HDZ discipline”

“misrepresented the oppositional the dniy by identity”

hc is which

( Böröcz Böröcz

to to

CEU eTD Collection counselingbefore undergoing procedure.the 41 ( 40 now andchairmanthe Com ofthe ex the Hebrang, Andrija MP HDZ’s prominent more the of one from debates the during up came that quote next the in clearer even becomes This clear: s marital the on based restriction of terms In treatments. infertility the for eligible are women the to elements crucial the of One 2 itwhencomesto rule this to exception in go to tend reproduction of field in role significant a play all parties of stances area”. policy cohesiveaccess, movements,women given a of in specialists accumulation the “gradual among signifies perspectives that and knowledge stream policy the as in came process making 2012). Engeli in appl Rothmayr and Goggin, (Bleklie, parties and institutions Accessed tatus of women who who women of tatus Also,according tothe article 8, bothpartners need toundergo psychological or psychotherapeutic andlegal Libela,Column of (InShame Croatian), June 2009. Retrieved from .4.4 Interaction.4.4 of non the cto ferir mentioned earlier of ication

denied of a parent” and “When the time comes, that child would demand explanation demand would child that comes, time the “When and parent” a of denied be would child that because treatment IVF undergo cannot partners without “Women

eita ad wa’ ee mr iprat o m, n rn o Gd ta h is he than God, care readytake to ofchild ofa either.” front in me, for important more even what’s and, registrar on April29 on “I’ve told her how, if her companion isn’t ready to say the final yes in front of the the of front in yes final the say to ready isn’t companion her if how, her told “I’ve the the direction of defining right from wrong wrong from right defining of direction different th , , 2013)

. It is It .

(Green ee upsd o neg tee treatments, these undergo to supposed were

parts ofthe important to add to important -

Pedersen, 2007). 2007). Pedersen, - governmental actorsgovernmental andHDZ Kingdon’s (1995 Kingdon’s mittee ofandHealthmittee Welfare:Social 2009 the

lawfrom 2009. authority of medicalauthorityof community

a fo ws regulation was from law

that the policies th policies the that 40 42

41 taking positions during the during positions taking

N

ext :17) theory to this, this part of the policy the of part this this, to theory :17) ,

-

I will show the “interaction” of actors actors of “interaction” the show will I Minister of Health and Social Welfare Social and Health of Minister with http://www.libela.org/stup reproductive policies reproductive at at embed

Minister Milinovic was was Milinovic Minister y which by

certain moral values values moral certain ,

and

policy making policy

the

- ny married only srama/p/6/ In terms of of terms In Instituti

ideological

being the being

onal onal n’t n’t in

CEU eTD Collection alter.org/vijesti/politika/tako 43 Nov.24 from http://www.jutarnji.hr/hebrang 42 saying RODA of statement official the through disclaimed quickly was making, policy the groups the how ofcivilpartsucha society, aswere RODA, during consultationofprocessthe vocalized issueswith also they as Action) in (Parents RODA from came also complaints the of Part and society inspecificfamilies particular. of underlining patriarchal the within falls spouses their through only sphere status marital her through mediated exclusively being citizenship women’s on idea mentioned previously the with line in falls This married. are they if treatments these for “contenders” legitimate as recognized only were law, this by women, how statements Hebrang’s and Minister’s the from clearis It Women’s Croatia,network isconcerndeepitexpressedarticlethis over saying movement women’s the with together Kontra and Iskorak movements LGBT “Hebrang:IVF is notfor w “ That’s howMilinovic blathered” (In Croatian) H th

4 ad lo ril 6 o te osiuin f eulc f rai ta specifically that Croatia motherhood” guarantees and of protects Republic of Constitution the of 62 article also and 14, rig human of breach marital crude a their presents status on depending bodies own their disposition freely to women of rights the limits that law A Constitution. the interpretationof for ground a is and Croatia of highe the one is sexes between equality The matterrights ofaffiliation.allnoof religioustheir citizens sex or the protect to duty the has government Croatian The equality. sex the and secularity shouldberightanfora granted IVFtreatment”. problem a that’s and is father his(!) who of 2012) … drc atc o te Con the on attack direct “…a being ignorant to ignorant being

- omen withoutomen a husband”,(inCroatian) Jutarnji list,February 14 je - lupetao Te oin f oe scrn ter recogniti their securing women of notion The .

the elements of the law. It is worth noting that, Minister’s claim noting that, worth is It law. the elementsof the

---

um - milinovic jetna - stitution and intrusion of the constitutional norms of of norms constitutional the of intrusion and stitution oplodnja

( Accessed - Alter, July Alter, 9 43 43

- nije

- on Mayon 2nd,2013) za hts that are granted by the articles 3 and and 3 articles the by granted are that hts st values in the Constitution of Republic Republic of Constitution the in values st - zene th 42 ,2009. Retrieved,2009. from -

t mea it - bez - muza ns that only married women women married only that ns -

/287011/

http://www

( Accessed on in the public public the in on th , 2009. , .h

on Retrieved - CEU eTD Collection Croatian) 46 Mayon 2013)2nd http://dnevnik.hr/vijesti/hrvatska/milinovicev 45 2013) kada Croatian),Index, July 10 44 are extracts the important. as it acknowledged Milinovic Minister and Conference Bishop’s Croatian op their expresses Croatia in Church Catholic fol himself positioning the the of part the to element crucial Another womenundergoingtreatments. the of status marital of issue the around rounded law new the about complaints the of majority institu non from pressure the that clear is it where point the marriages of number the increase the influence to amendments these for expects marriage. common in those to expanded now was reproduction assisted thro infertility of treatments for eligibility the which by law the to amendment an add to decided Ministry the 2009), September, (in passed was law initial the after months how M “Medical reproductionfor thosecommon in marriagetoo”, Dnevnik.hr,July 17 “NGORODA: Minister whenlies hesays consulted he with on us the lawon medical reproduction” (In lowing note. note. lowing inister Milinovic:inister “Whencomes it toChurch’s opinion on law,the the governmentcares deeply it”about (In -

tvrdi

th Minister himself declared that, for his party (HDZ), life begins with conception conception with begins life (HDZ), party his for that, declared himself Minister e Minister lied about their involvement in the policy making process making policy the in involvement their about lied Minister e human being frombeinghuman conceptiontill the death in each person a of of dignity law …acknowledgment this delivering when account an t of principles “Basic Retrievedfrom: - da

- law where the actual influence exerted by the Catholic Church can be located be can Church Catholic the by exerted influence actual the where law nas - je fromin note 2009: the

- konzultirao

th close ,2009 Retrieved from http://www.libela.org/stup

- oko the in see be can this on stance whose Church Catholic the he Catholic Church when it comes to IVF need to be taken into taken be to need IVF to comes it when Church Catholic he

- zakona 2009 law 2009

- - o zakon

- medicinskoj http://www.index.hr/vijesti/clanak/udruga

was the ban on freezing of the embryos. This is a a is This embryos. the of freezing on ban the was - - o srama/p/9/ - 44 umjetnoj inion through the official document document official the through inion

- ” op

lodnji/441161.aspx -

oplodnji ( Accessed - bez tional actors had an impact as as impact an had actors tional

December1,2012) - potpore th , 2009. , Retrieved from

( Accessed - u Minister said that he that said Minister - saboru.html - roda

44 on Mayon 2nd,

ugh medically ugh - . milinovic A c A 45

( . This is This . Accessed from the the from ouple of of ouple 46

These - laze ,

as -

CEU eTD Collection on Nov.24on Retrived 47 it as mind to comes argument progeny. to comes it when Church for relationship importance the exemplifies which child a to had one connection parental and genetic the between equation as interpreted be might it but unclear, is particular in part This a sense medical in method questionable as Fertilization Vitro In towards position its sets Church Here, married to exclusive Bishops’couples. note was MAR and 2009 from law “original” the in account into taken clearly was this law, the of terms In (procreation). marriage to notions crucial as also but normativethe beingexiste equaledto Again continued: Thenote “pro as positioning HDZ’s by account into taken indeed was Church l up. brought of recognition of terms in stance moral a how visible is it Here, Croatian Bishop’s Conference, “Contribution todiscussion on medical reproduction”(inCroatian), July 2009. ,

no “ the is reproduction medically assisted of matter inthe maritalstatus theimportance of the to belongs only and bemarriageshouldn’t violationany lifedignity,marriage of of withintransfer the specifically which and practicetogether go birth and love spouses...because a through marriage in achieved be should life of gift another..the with one mother a and father a become “ embryos, but it purposely takes away fatherly love and care which is in direct direct in is which care and love Convention oppositionrightsto the child”. ofon the fatherly away takes purposely it but embryos, th deny it does only not because, after or before children of interest from ...procedures of eugenics of ...procedures car which marriage, of …unity th

t cure the source cure source ininfertilityoft thethe isissue…complicatedhealth a itbest not the as 2012) Having the actual content of the law in mind, the influence and the opinion of the the of influence opinion the and themind, inlaw of the Having actualcontent the http://obitelj.hbk.hr/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=99&Itemid=50

and

, for them, infringes on the rights of child of rights the on infringes them,for ,

continued:

posits genetic connection as “the basis for men’s control over over control men’s for basis “the as connection genetic posits

… the procedure of the IVF are not cures because they do they because cures not are IVF the of procedure the nce of “love” and “birth”“love”andonly nce of is h mta rset f pues ihs o only to rights spouse’s of respect mutual the ries 45

cannot be violently separated…there violentlybe cannot Rothman’s 47

in relation to the “fatherly love”. love”. “fatherlythe to relation in

in i Claa, 1995 Callahan, (in f fr cneto is conception form ife

- marriage on one hand,marriage one on life” when making it. making when life” e right to live of of live to right e

of the genetic the of

(Accessed ” :20

)

CEU eTD Collection republike cancontract be (inhereread Croatian): 48 It fullest. its in agenda their push to not decided they itself, IVF of procedure the towards the contracts hand,to Ondue other the law actual inflwhere the of part another is this that be may conclusion a couple, married mentions remained to crucial as mentioned with compromise a found Ministrythe that seemsit embryos, the offreezing the on lawactual the pro as from note the hand, other the On eugenics. ideas of the to it connects it as reproduction assisted medically of processes itself, note Assamevisiblefrom undergo Churc those the procedures. who women to painful and harmful was result, a as that, reproduction assisted medically of of M Bishops’ note. the of freezing to refers moveis believeitbeyondtimepatria to the I itbelongsto. is,who child a who in determining replaces paternity men,geneticparenthood of parenthood genetic the to equivalent being as women of parenthood genetic the recognize tradition of modification contemporary The women. of children the The treatyThe betweenHoly the Republic Seeand of Cr ost of the critiques going against against going critiquesofthe ost reproductivecells Church’s own institutionChurch’sown

h Ctoi bishop Catholic the - life group for whom the life begi life the whom for group life - hrvatske

covering issues such as religious course in schools amongst other amongst schools in course religious as such issues covering uence of the Church can be detected. Churchofthe detected. uence canbe exclusively also note the that fact The values. core HDZ’s with line in and intact

- o - gospodarskim

” was perceived as “an alternative” procedure inmodern“an was ”perceivedas alternative”procedure the technologies

embry the alliance An alliance. the keep to order in s D’ gvrmn al hog is itr i Cotas politics, Croatia’s in history its through all government HDZ’s the the al interests may why,interests alto point despiteposition of their ambiguous

Chruch’s tiesto strong -

pitanjima/242635/zakoni.aspx Croatian bishops positions it exclusively, and not surprisingly, not and exclusively, it positions bishops Croatian os goes in line with the explanation on the first part of the the of part first the on explanation the with line in goes os http://zakon.poslo the 2009 law 2009 the ns with the conception. Considering the ban within within ban the Considering conception. the with ns rchal concern with geneticwith concernrchal rel oatiaon economicquestions. detailedThe content of the 46

vna.hr/public/ugovor

were rooted in the fact that “preservatiothe that infact therooted were the

( state Accessed 48

(through financial(through support

on Mayon 2013 13th - izmedu al patriarchy has been to been has patriarchy al h expresses doubt in theh expressesdoubt

- ationships”. ationships”. svete that was previously previously was that ), it is clear how clear is it ), - stolice

- i - Part Part that

and n

CEU eTD Collection the makings of this law and possibly the exertion of inof exertion possiblythe and law this makingsof the level Committeeofshowthevote a Welfare aut ofSocialofandHealth definite the of majority the by supported were and laws these which with specificity The Health Welfare. Social of Committee the from came process making policy the during involvement different through exerted directthe hand, necessarily Onmaking policyone process. not actual during thechannels and also was community medical of influence certain a that clear law.makingHDZwhilethe non this gave HDZ and Church the between Alliance Church. Catholic the by content its in influenced provided that law. catalyst the as of deliberation acted the for it framework as stream this to crucial be to appeared Commission. European the by part, in recognized, 199 (Kingdon; policies” and proposals policy of problems, coupling that of out grow changes policy greatest “the result a As actors. institutional ar problem) (policy problems recognized stream third d mari to relation in laws the of content the laws, these making while Church the of importance the of Minister fromthe recognition expressedand clear a waswhile there that, seems itOverall, fullyact to group ininterest(Minkenbergan2009). as Fink, connection the stronger the indeed, that seems Another group of a of group Another uring the debates and in the final inthe and debates uringthe tal status and freezing of the embryos was was embryos the of freezing and status tal – -

politics stream politics institutional actor power as its opinion was obviously taken into account by account into taken obviously was opinion its as power actor institutional ctors needs to be mentioned when talking about this law this about talking mentionedwhen be needsto ctors

–

once the once

version of the of version solutions cnetd i a oiy with policy) a (in connected e

On the other other the On 47

of the Church to the s the to Church the of

presented as a as presented law

(policy proposition) to proposition)(policy

in2009 uoenzto a a osat process constant a as Europeanization fluence over the status doctors, status the over fluence hand, policy solution was highly highly was solution policy hand,

5 . :17) Kingdon(199

matter of matter . The policy problem was was problem policy The tate the lesser the abilitlesserthe the tate

the constructed and constructed the HDZ’s HDZ’s 5

- ) claimsthat )

doctors the “help” of of “help” the onomy within

core values values core a

technical technical

, have in have

as it is itas

the the y

CEU eTD Collection May2013) 1st, http://izbori.tportal.hr/arhiva/izbori/39410/Unaprijed HTVinquiz advance“,T talkingabout the b 50 Retrivedfrom: 49 2010 in as successfulpregnancies t of success the of terms in statistics of presentation Thisforactors. visibleduringthe especially other making hadwas notionsprocess policy this due a to restricted is knowledge garnering of terms in that, reproduction human fact the and made was law the which with specificity The withpolicythe making pro sub these repositioned Minister the by support for them to plead latter the and part, in itself, law the law, the of making the medicwhile the that, concluded be itcan Hence, had that Committee the from support shown already the to next specialists the ofsupport the alsohad now that policy a with presented waspublic ann Minister had that reproduction September in that mention to important also is It implementationplayeroncethe of powerful a as him/her labeling clearlyis practice own doctor’s the to given is that autonomy the Here, procedures. the undergo to competence women’s on judgment personaldoctor’s to resolved was women the of age of issue the consequence, doctors were members) of19 out (9 Committee this half of asalmost society Croatian

It Complete oflist Committee members can be onfound officialthe page of CroatianParliament. isalsoworth notingthat Hebrang said that isit „..not inwoman's interestfor herchild tobe freezed“ when with expertise inwithexpertise ,

which Minister Milinovi Minister which

ounced that most of them showed support for support showed them of most that ounced http://www.sabor.hr/Default.aspx?sec=2607 an on freezingan embryos.the quoteThe can be found in the article„We gotfive questios for

- this fieldthis Portal,October 15th, 2009. Retrieved from: ( doctors a result of the treatments regulated by the law. During a conference conference a law. During byregulated the treatments the of resulta cess incess 2012.

of medicineof )

- sub specialists as important actors which will become obvious obvious become will which actors important as specialists c also attended, that attracted almost exclusively almost attracted that attended, also c the lawsbegins.the - specialists

insistson - smo 48 -

( dobili al community was not directly involved with involveddirectlywith not community was al n ua reproduction human in

( Accessed

2009

for practicing,for to points - 5 he 2009 he - pitanja nrj Hbag s its as Hebrang Andrija

hr ws Cneec on Conference a was there through the article that leaves it up up itleaves that article the through

on Mayon 2013) 10th

that that “his - za

law measured by the number number the by measured law - ” law and as such the wider wider the such as and law ” kviz of area an in positioned is it - HTV ) -

a.html n attendance in

the small

(

Accessed

exclusionary

chairman specialists specialists of people people of

49 human . Asa . .

on The The 50 .

CEU eTD Collection ( three http://web.potpomognutaoplodnja.info/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=336:analysis 2010. 51 strong a be to proved such, as advantage and, scale wider a on problem social a of construction a in resulted This it. on opinions the to exposed more be to started public wider a started, sector NGO of reaction considered”. seriously be should alternatives whichspecialists over policy among the debate involved an directly affect genera the but way, general a in subjects (1995 ar might reaction the whatever Hence, law. the majority public the of opinion concrete no that fact the to duewasalso politicalforpossible This but aims. inactualtreatments, theonly not of terms the of Utilization can presenting bethat data perceivedthe supporting Minisas in used was society in status their of terms in specific as doctors the of positioning the how success show not did law o new the that reading”fact the hide actually “wrong that numbers willfully the showed also but claims, such denied only not that came academia from and Action) in (Parents RODA from responsea after, Soon themselves. t compared inpregnancies increase anwas there announcedthat wasit reproduction, humanin Acces doctors the by presented were numbers The power. into came law the before period the o “ Analysisof verthree - Retrivedfrom: versions sed :66) the “public opinion may set limits on the possibilities the on limits set may opinion “public the :66)

on Mayon 2013) 10th

fo - of r r the oppositionalSDP party, - the - medical same sions ofsions samethe pptpresentation

- ppt

- otne t b srn ee atr h ipeetto o te law the of implementation the after even strong be to continued

presentation community community hs rvd o e re n rai’ cs i 20, u sne the since but 2009, in case Croatia’s in true be to proved This

- reaction came into place into came for l public opinion is rarely well enough formed to to formed enough well rarely is opinion public l - from 49 the

- -

ngo ReactionfromNGO RODA”, RODA, May 19 national i e rm the from se - roda&catid=98:statistike&Itemid=115

once the law was being implemented being was law the once was presented during the makings of of makings the during presented was election ter’s law. ter’s

and may affect an agenda of of agenda an affect may and ie pbi, o Kingdon for public, wider s

at

the endthe of2011.

51 . Here, it is it Here, .

-

of - th the f clear

,

CEU eTD Collection standarde http://www.novilist.hr/Vijesti/Hrvatska/Ostojic European 54 Vladu NoviList, August 4th, 2012. Retrived from: 53 http://www.kukuriku.org/plan21/programski 52 ness “backwardness”lawlabeledasthey as the position assis medically on law the to changes the supported that showed polls These law. thisfor support wider garnerevenactivelyto in pollsOstojic,used order doctor, opinion Ministeraof Rajko Health infert with fights that electorate the of mobilization “ t reactionary of regulation change (SDP) In 2 While presenting the law the presentingWhile Europe Ljerka Drazen Ciglenecki:„IVF: 69% citizens behind Government, behind20% Bishopsthe andHDZ“ Croatian), (in “Cockdoodle a do”official program Plan21, Cock a doodle do September 14 .

5. Changing the5. Changing law 2012 in early

of the new law.newofstatement:An inthe seenexampleofcanbethis next the - 69 ,

Bratonja - ent

h eitn law existing the ” 2012 a coalition of left parties left of coalition a 2012 (AccessedMayon 2013) 10th standards.”, gradana of Minister Ostojic, when it comes to to comes it when Ostojic, Minister of enters the circle of European countries that have bui have that countries European of circle the enters Croatia it, with “European”…because, is law…it the of draft the of proud am “…I is that standard” “golden majorityinpracticedhuge(!) countries…” the of European reproduction…the the by human defined for are association they way European the reproduction assisted medically of standards thre that one “...the

and ideas that connected connected ideasandthat ered o the o

IVF, now called “Law on medically assisted reproduction” assisted medically on “Law called now IVF,

Martinović -

20 the -

uz 2009 law. This is visible through the through visible is This law. 2009 Novi

office - biskupe

list,

and , from Oe f hi mi goal main their of One .

January the -

i w Vesna - HDZ

Minister’s di Minister’s Croatia back to the 19 the to back Croatia 2009

3 and getting

Roller, ( rd “forwardness” Accessed ,

- 2012. http://www.novilist.hr/Vijesti/Hrvatska/Umjetna okvir/ regarding , -

rusi “

“Ostojic Cock a doodle doo doodle a Cock

Retrivedfrom:

-

Milinovicev ( scourse on Mayon 10th2013) Accessed 50

“

back to Europe” netlt tetet Hne te a on law the Hence, treatment. infertility is

to the changes in the law in changesthe the to demolishing h 20 law 2009 the s was builtwas 69.1%

ility on Mar.2on 52 th - e reproduction ted zakon

century..I will insist on respecting the respecting on insist will century..I during the election campaign was was campaign election the during . It is It .

reinstatement of a discourse around around discourse a of reinstatement 53 -

o ” 4

of - , led by Social byled , th

umjetnoj Milinovic’s around the notion ofnotion the around lt in the most modern methods modern most the in lt important to n to important 2013) examinees

was filled with notions of of notions with filled was th

,2011. Retrieved from

54 - oplodnji

n 2012 in law

can be perceived as as perceived be can

in .

- and It democratic Party Party democratic

- ote that the new the that ote the sample fully sample the i

- - alsosignifie oplodnja uvodi

is . The official official The .

introducing European - europske -

Uz

-

d the

to -

a -

CEU eTD Collection utvrdjivanja “Retrivedfrom : Osto 56 medicinski NoviMay list, 9 something 55 signifies 2009 from law the by put been of idea The using they earlier the this to accordingly acting Europe””“true and Europe” discourse a creating Consequentially the of middle the in only were who intellectuals and professionals of groups by system” “new the in positions power to reinstated inherent least, at them for be, “modernity”. to and “forwardness” seems that “Europe” of notion the is discourse, the how clear is it quotes these of all In proclaimedthat presenting upon Finally, Media Servis,Media „Turbulent discussion on IVF: HDZ worriedabout the methodsonestablishing infertility, HINA,“Ostojic ofproudLaw the on medically assisted r jiconegivesthem (the lowestgrade in Croatianschooling system)“ Croatian), (in Index, May 2012.9th,

used against HDZ in relation to the law inthe HDZ relation to usedagainst this discou this - …hs lw mgt e h ms batfl it rai cn fe t Europe…on to offer can Day” Europe Croatia gift beautiful most the be might (law) “…this inassistedisreproductionthat best accordancethe with medically guarantees which treatment optimal the of principle the being one First principles. six on based is law legislature…This their into treatments infertility of

potpomognutoj - Eurocentrism neplodnosti analysis Croatia’s th http://www.index.hr/vijesti/clanak/burna ,2012.

a capitalism as , rse

of criticism of

while - Retrivedfrom: embedded in “…ideas of “ of “…ideas inembedded ostojic 56 - return to to return oplodnji

byth

h nw a in law new the p civilization - im resentingandlaw.the passing oil n political and social in order to create basis for exclusion of those groups who are who createbasisgroups exclusionfor in those to of order - era communist the of end e

- podijelio HDZ from the from its established http://www.novil Melegh

- rightful place implies that the existing place where it has has it where place existing the that implies place rightful ga - - discourse al jedinice/614056.aspx smatra

oppositional groups (mainly SDP) and the discourse the and SDP) (mainly groups oppositional

(2006) (2006) point of orientation for SDP, SDP, for orientation of point May,

-

diskriminatornim in2009 tef n atr Europe Eastern in itself 51 - Europeanization ist.hr/Vijesti/Hrvatska/Ostojic

rasprava eproduction:HDZ considers the lawdiscriminatory”, 02 n h Cota Primn, Minister Parliament, Croatian the in 2012 argues that argues hierarch (Melegh 2006:19 (Melegh .

Now beingNow - o

(AccessedMayon on 2013 10th . This turn was grounded in securing grounded was This turn . - umjetnoj

e drn te omns period communist the during ies “

backward

(

Accessed the ”, “ ”, -

inoffice, the Europeanpractice…” oplodnji East Europe East Westernization 1). This 1).

” on Mayon 2013) 10th nt exist not , tee rus started groups these , - - when constructing a a constructing when hdz ponosan - goes in line with line in goes brinu

SDP continued SDP socialist elites elites socialist - na - ent metode , “return to “return , - ) Zakon

,

n the on 55 -

- o not - .

CEU eTD Collection oehn nt tuy uoen (D) n i odr o eiiie h ai the legitimizemedicallylegislative reproduction.on assisted to order in and (HDZ) European” “truly not something to oppositionas both itself continuepositioning to law this on deliberation usesactively SDP re discourse strong a construct to continued they fact The passing. it on doubts no were there and Parliament the in majority had coalition SDP’s as legitimization such escaped easily i this makes What withor Europe”, “that a of member a already was Croatia that insisting manner passive a in also but manner paradoxical it Union European the and them 2006:30). “silence”to them and t applying with done is This system. political the community proce making policy SDP extent what to shows This parties manner, normative a (Melegh2006:119). be in“anation order to closer successfulWestupward in thebe Europe” can or to step taken” manner) instrumentaland abstract gets interest national “ European spectrum of valuesspectrumof European volving around the European Union despite of EU of despite Union European the around volving . In .

without the the Hence ”

while necessarily position necessarily while process of doing so, SDP’sprocess positioning of doing so, , the discourse the , trsig s lo h fc ta primnay eae n hs ol have could this on debate parliamentary that fact the also is nteresting Europeanization - Europeanization ss to the public the to ss

positions SD positions to as a rather active actor in the process of of process the in actor active rather a as discursive

“…denymembership“uofthat ”

and

y eee wt the with leveled ly SDP SDP utiliz

P and limits the discursive possibilities for possibilities discursive the limits and P and

also ef A sc, t re it such, As self.

. This can be understood be can This .

of policies. of bec ed use ing thus

“ ame crucial crucial ame a very specific imaginary when communicating the the communicating when imaginary specific very a d as part ofaspart past the

the party (in this case SDP) case this (in party the is one that is seemingly communicated between between communicated seemingly is that one is “the national i national “the 52

he earlier mentioned Eastern values in orde in values Eastern mentioned earlier he ’s in buildingthe in “ was European

non existent interest in it, proves how proves it, in interest existent non niversallyvalid

presen presented asCroatia’s presented too. nterest becomes irrelevant where a a where irrelevant becomes nterest ” in” discourse SDP’s as building up building as Europeanization ” t ed

interest

discursive Croatia

against other actors other against

community” (Melegh (Melegh community”

(defined in a very very a in (defined n somewh a in

m of the very very the of m “…a

barrier other political other

. As such, theAs . such, on one hand, hand, one on

European European

that, in that,

in at at r

CEU eTD Collection 2013) from: 58 https://infodok.sabor.hr/Reports/KarticaAktaFrm.aspx?zak_id=24015 57 intent was Milinovic Darko Minister Former treatment. the undergo to able being women single the to regards in law new the opposing strongly was Union Democratic Croatian the by led nohand, other the On lawbackdecided the byto being human embry ‘human 2011 from to the in unlike that, there from clear is it Hence, stage. embryonic the from starting one as life of beginning the defined that 2011 from Court European the of verdict a out pointing while inventions biotechnological wh doubts the with law the of European compliance the to comes it When acts. Union European of number 2009, from law the unlike in mentioned As 2

.5 Complete oflist opinionsof Commi Courtof Justice ofEuropean the Union, Press a somewhat a . 1 http://curia.europa.eu/jcms/upload/docs/application/pdf/2011

. Interaction. of the

inParliam the changes her sex to do the same which also means that there is a breach of the the of breach a is there that means also which same the do who woman to a sex for her allows changes it because treatment, IVF on right the has partner male a without woman a that possibility the against is it but IVF, against not is party “My aquis

te te a i i cmlac wi compliance in is law the ether that stated stated that ” 58 o’ if that if o’

ideological stance using a particular verdict of the European Court European the of verdict particular a using stance ideological

(European Court of Justice 2011). 2011). Justice ofCourt (European communitaire, communitaire, the earlier section earlier the

ent w opposition w how :

fertilization

Committees a “… had

majority votes. ofthe 2

009 law 009 any human ovum must, as soon as as soon as must, ovum human any

the tteesbecan r an explicit procl explicit an al, HDZ al,

Committee for European integrations European for Committee

where I described and compared the laws, the compared and described I where is such as to commence the process of development of a a of development of process commencethe to as such is , the observations of the Committee turned their focus their turned Committee the of observations the ,

releaseNo 112/11, 18 October, 2011. Retrieved

and HDZ with etrivedfrom:

criticized the law heavily. Predictably, opposition opposition Predictably, heavily.law the criticized 53

amation of the accordance of this law to a to law this of accordance the of amation th Despite of these objections, the Committee the objections, theseDespiteof

the Laws on the legal protection of of protection legal the on Laws the - 10/cp110112en.pdf

SDP

(AccessedAprilon 29th, 2013)

fertilized

( Accessed 57

, be regarded as a as regarded be , expressed certain expressed

the

May 13th

2012 of Justice of

law ,

CEU eTD Collection potpomognutoj 13 60 355509 2012 59 figurefather the to connected strictly is that times modern of product a as treatments infertility the within o On partner. male her without state the by women te in crucial as father of c heteronormative of area inclearlythe are quotes theseof as 2012 in it of denying no was there 2009, inexplicit that not was Church the and between HDZ alliance Church ideas identical almost show statements these of Both Followingnotion,Milinovicthis wason roleexplicitsignificant inthe menquote: ofnext the

MediaServis, HI th , , 2012.Retrieved from: NA, “LawNA, medicallyon assisted reproductionpassed in Parliament”the .

Retrievedfrom

( child“Daddy!”says: a When fathers? to same the give you didn’t why women, to opportunity wh this giving so equality, gender and paternity of dignity the denying are “You beingsdie”. Cicero:”le that Vatican as samesay thing the to mighthavewanted who the Pope the of hear opinion the muchto owe we think I saying:” by continued He father.” a with up grow Conven Accessed in 2009 in

- take a centraltake incomments position these oplodnji “Newlawon medicallyassistedreproduction passeswith88 votes” Croatian), (in Index, July it was it tion on the rights of a child which inscribes the right of the child to live and and live to child the of right the inscribes which child a of rights the on tion

on Nov.24thon 2012) on the marital status and paternity as crucial as paternity and status marital the on t your desires be led by mind”. I hope that your desire is desire your that hope I mind”. by led be desires your t http://www.glasistre 59

used as used -

sa - 88 http://www.index.hr/vijesti/clanak/izglasan - m o chil of rms glasova

, a

youno,enny,say:meeny, “No, daddy!”.moe, miny,no

point of reference of point

- za/625678.aspx .hr/vijesti/arhiva/sabor ’ nes n rgt wie mlcty o recognizing not implicitly while rights and needs d’s 54

( Accessed

when . On the other hand,On other the . th -

donio ne hand, the connotations embedded embedded connotations the hand, ne mentioning Vati mentioning on Nov.24thon to oncept

- - novi zakon ns xrse by expressed ones

elements elements

- (in zakon -

o surrounded 2012) - Croatian).,Glas Istre,July 13 potpomognutoj - o -

can. The implications The can. medicinski to

n these laws. If the If laws. these ey also o around the idea the around t letting human letting t n o were you en - h Catholi the - oplodnji imply 60

-

th c ,

CEU eTD Collection claimed that: of members the conferences. peculiar with Parliament the outside criticism their with continued soon this to solution a hence surrogacy, too. men single include not does it because equality gender how about warns hand other the On 2009. in debates the during shown descent patrilineal the to given importance extreme the of line the along go to continues this Again, of mothers aswomen to reference quote. this in fathers as already law 2012 and 2009 child a having of possibility man’s single upon touches implicitly it as interesting particularly is quote the of part second The trans about thinking actually was and terminology men the about sure not was Minister perspective physical purely a from treatments these undergoing for position a in trans ait how remainsfact unclear despite thetreatment thischild a through minorityandgrou women of subordination by masculine, of lines very the outside searched is that something dynamics. societal to subordinated or model evolving that the family itself was p was itself family the that ) (Peterson, 1999). (Peterson, destroy is it but tragedies, Croatian biggest the with leveled be can law This Bleiburg. and Jasenovac hi the in tragedy biggest theis IVF the on law new “The

ed”. He added, added, He ed”. oe vile more HDZ, Damir Jelic Damir HDZ,

ps ige oa’ eiiiiy o ifriiy ramns os tagt against straight goes treatments infertility for eligibility woman’s single s

. (as visible in the part on transgender people and the possibility of having of onpossibility the andtransgenderpeople visibleinpart the (as Interestingly,

eas w wl nvr nw o mn hmn ie hv been have lives human many how know never will we because rivate and removed from a possibility of being a changing and and changing a being of possibility a from removed and rivate “…beatified Aloysius Stepinac said that that said Stepinac Aloysius “…beatified

On one hand, this is an interesting turn to the prevailing prevailing the to turn interesting an is this hand, one On

, assembled a conference to speak about the new law. He He law. new the about speak to conference a assembled , the nation that Yuval that nation the “problem , Milinovic did not refer to these men as single men, but but men, single as men these to refer not did Milinovic meaning thro meaning ” 55 , was explicitly banned by HDZ in 2009. 2009. in HDZ by banned explicitlywas ,

ugh surrogacy ugh

- The confirmation of power is then then is power of confirmation The Davis and Anthias (1989) observed. (1989) Anthias and Davis Interestingly, t Interestingly, , a paradox is obvious as HDZ HDZ as obvious is paradox a , story of Croatian people after people Croatian of story ,

which was banned both in both banned was which the Jasenovac is the the is Jasenovac the

woman would be womanwould he possibility of of possibility he

or

One of of One the

HDZ ex ex CEU eTD Collection 62 clanak Retrievedfrom 61 the of discourse in Jasenovac of usage the Interestingly, spectrum. political the in position their used are Bleiburg and Jasenovac in is Bleiburg and Jasenovac lives” human “destroyed of numbers the out pointing time, same the At fascistduringthe government State Independentthe of Croatia killed.were communist WW the of end the of at regime crimes the signifies hand, other the on Bleiburg, killed. and tortured were Croats and people Roma Jews, Serbs, where WWII in Croatia of State Independent ter discourses. in place special a have events the of Both Jasenovac. and Bleiburg of mentions the with clear was events and myths of terms in community imagining firsttime the For memberAnother of

Ibid. TeaRomic, “Jelic: Law on IVFis like Bleiburg andJasenovac” (in Croatian),Vecernji list,July 10 right wing parties is not expected not is parties wing right - 429021

through IVF God’sthrough isa treatment gift,also it but wayis the ofquestionable” doing born child A themselves. defend cannot who those of killing innocent, and innocent exact is it and kill”, “don’t said God the whom to planet this on species only the are paternity…we against and nature against infertilitycuring. the methodsof other tryingwithout IVFtreatment the for free be the survive even don’t must 30% and sacrificed, sisters and brothers (!) his of ten child, one get To innocent. the of killing allowsthe It citizens. Croatian of majority big the irritates it such as and Nazis the by enhan race the of scienceeugenics, supports law “This stopait” put to Bleiburg....Let’s with goes Same nation. Croatian of history the in act shameful most

aeoa w Jasenovac ( http Accessed ://www.vecernji.hr/vijesti/jelic HDZ used a discours a used HDZ

HDZ, a gynecologistaHDZ,

on Nov.24thon 2012) . 61

as a concentration camp in Croatia during the period of the the of period the during Croatia in camp concentration a as II when families whose members whose families when II sur prising

due to the fact that the different numbers of those killed those of numbersdifferent the that fact the to due regularly used regularly

.

e HDZ was HDZ revolving around around revolving , Ante Corusic,, bycontinuedsaying: - zakon 56 -

umjetnoj ly this law that allows for the killing of the of killing the for allows that law this ly party in power during the war in the in war the during power in party

by the parties themselves depending on depending themselves parties the by zing....my colleagues too easily decide too colleagues zing....my - oplodnji Croatia were perceived as perceived were cement that has been practiced been has that cement - je -

poput s of ms as

nation - jasenovca Croatian -

state in correlation to to correlation in

- bleiburga connected to connected . The idea of ideaof The . . nationalist .the law islaw .the th , 2012. , 19 - . 90s 90s 62

CEU eTD Collection ey osrcin f hs plce. h ae of area The policies. those of construction very the during actor powerful a actually was but law, the opposing or supporting as positioned to contrast In more groups. makingprocess access institutional ( observed al. et Montpetit that reproduction assisted medically to comes it when making policy during actors powerful The 2 similar the on constructed is groun discourse very the but in, reproduced is it system current system democratic sphe public the in used period it the to due politics” “anti of concept the for crucial is it as sphere private the in used was Hungary in discourse HDZ (Gal tradition” “a as framed and relations causal in resulted This terms. demographic WWI, Hungary In rights. their and bodies women’s on debates in Hungary, country, post another for mentions (1994) Gal one to similar is reproduction on policies the of members leading w Croatia ofState Independent when . 5 . 2

mobilization . Interaction. community of medical and SDP the dsdependingselectiveness the on historical specific nation.of events the to

n 02 al wti te ae lines same the within falls 2012 in the

gained Treaty of Trianon of Treaty

the policy maki policy the

involvedleast, moreat actors or, the considerationof

hm a them . It is clear then, how the how then, clear is It . f eia cmuiy resulted community medical of a create was HDZ e s pr o te fiil tnig f h opstoa pry in party oppositional the of standing official the of part a as re

n as means for agitation for means as

nalbe tts hn t c it when status infallible

ng process in 2009, this time medical time this 2009, in process ng was used as an event which signifi which event an as used was when d

ih h cag of change the with

it was created created was it

a construction of narratives of narratives of construction a as

in

regularly mentioned i mentioned regularly

2012 as it did in Hungary with one difference. difference. one with Hungary in did it as 57 specific . The social prestige and professional authority authority professional and prestige social The .

.

This 1994:272 expert –

communist era, while in Croatia it was was it Croatia in while era, communist in

idea the nationalist discourse em discourse nationalist

ht hy positioned they that a ise m s oenet ti time this government,

-

e of nation’s unity depends on the the on depends unity nation’s of 3). Hence, discourse used by the the by used discourse Hence, 3). was

n the nationalist speeches of the the ofspeeches nationalist the n o oiy aig As making. policy to

iee as t te policy the to also widened es the loss of the nat the of loss the es

the events that are put in put are that events the community was not not was community the particular interest particularof n Engeli in

themselves as as themselves bedded within within bedded

following , the policy policy the - socialist

bigger bigger ion in ion 20

only only Th 12 a e - )

CEU eTD Collection : 64 razmnozavanje.html 15 63 undergoing persons the banned explicitly that law 2009 the from article the hand, other the law special a that it wassuggested amendment latter Whilethe were overthrowing overthrown. state bythe In undergo to able being lesbians regarding coalition governing the of All 2012). July in pro amendments happened indeed (which law the pass to going was coalition criticism strong H 2012. April in presented was the Once Parliament. the coalition in passed was law original the since years three of period the non variousfrom pressureThe 2 waspreserved. doctors were law the but time, this process making policy whole the only2009, not to Asopposed humanrights. experts reproduction, human of area the in medical Commit the of members for The discussion. the leading committee reproduction National the with actors multiple to granted openly was process policy the law, new the to comes it When groups. making law the in positions granted now b brought were solutions alternative where process whole the of stream http://queer.hr/23985/izglasan DinaJ,“Lesboph Pejicic,Ana “Storm calmingis not down:”Croatia aparadiseis for reproduction”(inCroatian), Dnevnik, July .5.3 th , , 20 . Interaction. of non the 12.Retrieved from: took power took would

obicMARlawon passes by the oppositional parties led by Croatian Democratic Union, the left wing left the Union, Democratic Croatian by led parties oppositional the by posed by the opposition and one proposed amendment from a party in the the in party a from amendment proposed one and opposition the by posed

63 (AccessedAprilon 22nd) . Hence, the autonomy of the doctors in terms of their specialty in the area area the in specialty their of interms doctors the of autonomy the Hence, .

be made regarding lesbians and their right for In Vitro fertilization Vitro In for right their andlesbians regarding made be , the preparations for the changes on the law started and the revised law revised the and started law the on changes the for preparations the , http://dnevnik.hr/vijesti/hrvatska/bura - lezbofobni

- - governmental gr governmental aving the majority in the Parliament it was clear that, despite that, clear was it Parliament the in majority the aving governmental actorsgovernmental andSDP - zakon

“, Queer.hr,“, July 13

- o - mpo/ was 58 in

oups was strong and was constant throughout constant wasand strong was oups

(AccessedMar.24 on family law to experts on the bioethics and and bioethics the on experts to law family the

main actors in forming the content of the the of content the forming in actors main medical th ,2012.Retrieved from - se - ne - smiruje

community involved throughout community -

Vitro fertilization financed fertilization Vitro tee ranged from specialists specialists from ranged tee - th hrvatska

2013)

y doctors who doctors y - raj - za - 64 were . On

CEU eTD Collection Mar.24 from: 66 http://queer.hr/23645/umjetna 65 spher public the to entrance woman’s for the channel does exclusive an provide only to Not tend practice heteronormative rights. and needs certain with citizen rightful a as her of recognition t time, same the At lesbianinfertiletheundergo as“singledo who women procedures the women”. uni sexsame reproduction assisted medically of financed procedures state for eligibleas unions sex samespecifically byexcluding or such of formations heteronormative on insisting by that be laws, these through reinstated being 2012). from law the (by sex same of be cannot they does, it if but partners, two of consist to need not does that family a of form specific a to or 2009) from law the (by acknowledged be to wants it if framework heterosexual to fa a of form specific very a to points clearly This reproduction. assisted medically for procedures financed state for eligible is union sex same the of part a is who heter or identities heterosexual of practices. categories under fall not do that relations and individuals completely aimed it as modern LGBT washumanconsideredthe going against rights medicallyfromforreproductiosex thebeing assisted eligible change “Center “IVFfor trans inmenCroatia? osexual one in the law from 2009, the law from 2012 is implicit in stating that no personno statingthat implicit inis 2012 fromlaw thefrom 2009, law inthe osexual one http://queer.hr/23867/centar th community

2013) forLGBT equality draftThe : of the newdiscriminating”,lawis Queer.hr. July 10 Despite of the fact that that fact the of Despite ignored continuing the practice from 2009 in regards to exclusion of those those of exclusion to regards in 2009 from practice the continuing ignored e (as it did with the 2009 law), it also submerges her to do so while being in a a in being while so do to her submerges also it law), 2009 the with did it (as e ons in Croatia at this time this at Croatia in ons

reacted to this saying how the final version of the law is not humane or or humane not is law the of version final the how saying this to reacted

hese formations also point to a position of a woman in terms of of terms in woman a of position a to point also formations hese being - oplodnja

Hardly”,Queer.hr, July 5 - t first at za

- lgbt . - On the other hand, considering the non existence of laws on on laws of existence non consideringthe hand, other the On za - - ravnopravnost 66 transmuskarce . hr i n mnin f h ay te uin hn a then union other any the of mention no is there , it remains unclear how the state is going “to control” “to is going state the how unclearremains it , o only Not 59 65 -

- prijedlog . u th D

- eba wmn bt lo rn me trans also but women, lesbian , , 2012.Retrieved from hrvatskoj istin ctive forms of families are constantly constantly are families of forms ctive - zakona - tesko/ - o

- mpo (AccessedMar.on 24 - n was now removed as itremovednow n was as diskriminira/ mily that is confined is that mily th

2012.Retrieved

(Accessedon th

2013) were n

CEU eTD Collection „ per that From public. wider the by solving needof in problem social actual an as issue this of recognition inthe role significant playeda the of involvement the hand, other aimswho allwere used identities advancement, medical as place. took 2009 from law the to changes when discourse the through I making. policy of processes inthe actors important be to them allows that power gainscertain groups non of status the such, As democrats. social of government the of periods the part in movement LGBT with and women society, civil the that concluded be can it crucial, as relate measures discriminatory Commis European from reports non Du observed. (2001) Stetson something those within constant and coherence this gains women to tend democrats Social general, in that find RO action, in Parents Overall heteronormativeconnotations. man a to relation matrimonial n European

t his subchapter I aimed to show to what extentwhat to show aimedto I subchapter his ing a coalition partner in SDP to an extentan to in SDP partner coalition inga ’s , the constant agitation constant the ,

stemming from the accession to EU and the universal right on medical treatment treatment medical on right universal the and EU to accession the from stemming movements when it comes to to comes it when movements at at - ness “ assignifying European stand European n „forward and “ DA and some LGBT groups) was successful as it resulted in them them in resulted it as successful was groups) LGBT some and DA

“Europeanvalues”. modernity, ard“ . This .

for changes to changes for - ness“ to distinct itself from HDZ and HDZ from itself distinct to ness“ , s was utilized in order to get th get to order in utilized was o, n h fed f ua rgt t wih h anti the which to rights human of field the in ion,

medical shows how the new law too did not manage to avoid th avoid to manage not did too law new the how shows icular, shows stability with time and, especially, during during especially, and, time with stability shows icular, e to the constant improvement Croatia shows, by the the by shows, Croatia improvement constant the to e anti the

be potentially powerful partners in alliance with with alliance in partners powerful potentially be

- community and the limited support from NGOs NGOs from support limited the and community discrimination, discrimination, 60

oiy aig rcs. h sbtnil policy substantial The process. making policy . Fink (2009) and Minkenberg (2002) point outpoint (2002) Minkenbergand Fink(2009) . the Thepositioning of SDP spective

the notion the 200 9 law 9 ,

- D ue te icus vie in veiled discourse the uses SDP oenetl rus rdcs is produces groups governmental s by

r of of ecognition of of ecognition different e law passed in 2012. On the the On in 2012. passedlaw e „ European values European , as the Europeanasparty the

Specific notions such such notions Specific

in a way a in movemen multipl - governmental ,

“were t project an an project s

(such as as (such icity of of icity

used used e - ,

CEU eTD Collection assisted medically on law the inreproduction 2012 of change the legitimize to and 2009 in HDZ discipline in soaked were that power, Inaddition, by made suggestions implementation of the or debate wider a for possibility pas to order in framework this used HDZ how used one was explicitly Parliament, Croatia's in laws deliberating of perspective technical a from traditional, as perceived is what with aligned was it that way such in content the form to position exclusive the them leaving process making policy the from actors other the excluded HDZ has way what in showed I chapter this in Overall, consideras„modern“ „beloand they inwhat fallnot do valuesthat different diametricallyhaving as sameHDZ that ofimage for laws in accordance with aquis commu aquis with accordance inlaws for I have I shownthe

bySDP

. the notions of “Europe”. As such, this discourse was used to to used was discourse this such, As “Europe”. of notions the discursive I now my turnI finalto conclusions. ngingEurope“. to

formations SDP used, asused,party formations in later SDP opposition and 61

te law the s

n itaire of European Union. I have shown shown have I Union. European of itaire

Catholic ideas. The very process, process, very The ideas. Catholic in such manner it removed the the removed it manner such in

different different bodies.

CEU eTD Collection shown how SDP actively used the discourse of “ of discourse the used actively SDP how shown speciala on focus put also p I and dialogue hand, of other history long the a On has cooperation. HDZ which with Croatia in Church Catholic the of opinions and values the with line in was content, its in law, the how shown have I 2009. cells reproductive Commission of preservation European the by report 2008 the from mono also but agenda, the on Croatia in reproduction assisted medically regulating of issue put only not to, order in Europeanization for tool a as implemented was that framework have I reproduction. discourses and actors the process, making policy the reveal to order in questions these to answers certain presented I o laws reproduction the making whilst family normative and nationalism roles, how show the by recognized problems of accessionto matter. this from coming influences Additionally, gender. and families nationalism, of concepts to correlation also but men, and women of bodies actual reproduction on Policies arliamentary and those of civil society acted during both of the policy making processes. I I processes. making policy the of both during acted society civil of those and arliamentary CONCLUSIONS outside the national the outside poly on the content of that regulation. I have argued that HDZ used a specific demand demand specific a used HDZ that argued have I regulation. that of content the on poly

h peiul mnind issues mentioned previously the

This research aimed to show how show to aimed research This the (MAR)

European Union, European

in2012. and 2009 shown how HDZ how shown

have multiple layers to them that not only include regulation of the the of regulation include only not that them to layers multiple have

borders

SDP hs actors these

( European European Social Democratic Party Social Democratic

was are to

aea fast a have another factor in the search for the policy solutions on solutions policy the for search the in factor another influenced by that factor byinfluencedthat

demonstrated (Croatian Democratic Union) Democratic (Croatian

Commission used whilst regulating the medically assisted assisted medically the regulating whilst used 62 re often

solved in regard to constructions of gender gender of constructions to regard in solved a country a - rce rcdr o h lwo A in MAR on law the for procedure tracked European

moe eti vle ta ae n direct in are that values certain impose

o te poiinl rus both groups, oppositional the how . On the other hand, other the On . ) , such as such , asking and their role in this period. I have have I inperiod. this role their and - ness

in terms of t inof terms ” in ord in ”

for the regulation in the the in regulation the for

Croatia in the process of of process the in Croatia

used a very p very a used n medically assisted assisted medically n er both er he agenda setting setting agendahe it also aimed to aimed also it

to

discipline articula claim the

a r

CEU eTD Collection presentspossiblyafruitful fufor area making policy this in actors different between processes Negotiating reproduction. on laws and Croatia the to answers elaborate more even provide definitely would research my in included I that themselves actors the from reasoning specific more a hand, other the On covered. be not could reasons, obvious for which, public the in material analyzed the as evident are study this to limitations The madebeprovidedforinlawsimplementedspace these “Europe” to and Croatia. of notions of utilization the extent what to shows also It reproduction. assisted discursiveinuseof Europeanization and technical of understanding an provides research this Overall, unclear. remain area the in miss still researchmakingon inpolicyfield processofthe reproduction of ex the content. its in unique almost was that 2009 from MAR the for eligibility citizen in Croatia happened that changes The “backward” labeledHDZ that “forwardness” and “Europe” of notions assisted between medically on law the of change 2012. in areproduction legitimize to and Parliament the in HDZ ing. On the other hand, “side effects” of Europeanization as a process in Croatia and and inCroatia process a asEuropeanization of effects” “sidehand, other the Oning.

the .

line of European countries with more l more with countries European of line is

lo oehn ta peet a iiain o hs eerh n, s such, as and, research this to limitation a presents that something also D’ construction SDP’s in the law on medically assisted reproduction indeed positioned positioned indeed reproduction assisted medically on law the treatment or in the area of donations as opposed to the law the to opposed as donations of area the in or treatment the ture researchinfield ofreproductive policies. ture the Croatia f icus, s age, lay argued, I as discourse, of 63 n

This law makinginlaw process the iberal

research research questions posited here in regards to to regards in here posited questions data

regulations whether in the area of of area the in whether regulations

is just one pa one just is showed

and the law from 2009 as as 2009 from law the and

-

how this happened as as happened this how Yugoslav countries iscountries Yugoslav

n h connection the in rt of the available available the of rt area of medicallyofarea

CEU eTD Collection Retrievedfromnovine. (2012). Croatian Parliament. fromnovine.Retrieved Croatian kulture.hr/userdocsimages/dokumenti/ministarstvo/program_rada/Program_vlade_RH.pdf f CroatianGovernment Retrievedfrom Government Croatian http://obitelj.hbk.hr/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=99&Itemid=50 r Croatia (1997).Calhoun,J. C. Bloomington: editor. Indiana University 1995. Press, femin law: the and ethics, Reproduction, 1995. Joan. Callahan, Press. (1989). J. Campling, & F., Anthias, N., Davis, Marginsthe Europe". of" Hungary and Union European The Raven: the and Fox The (2000). J. Böröcz, inUnion European the Obfuscation (2005). J. D. Bailey, terms? in contradiction a citizenship embodied is bodies: Citizen (2002). C. Beasley, & C. Bacchi, Anderson, Benedict. B rom: rom: eproduct IBLIOGRAPHY

http://www.min Critical Social PolicySocial Critical nBishop’s (2009). Conference. ion Parliament. . Retrieved . http://narodne

(1983). . - . (2006). (2006). . .

(2003). (2003). http://www.zakon.hr/zakoni/Zakon_o_medicinskoj_oplodnji.doc Nationalism (2009). (2009). CommonJournal of JCMS: MarketStudies http://narodne from ComparativeHistoryStudiesin and Society

, Imagined Communities Imagined Lawassisted medically on 22(2),324 - novine.nn.hr/clanci/sluzbeni/128700.html The ProgramThe Governmentof Croatiaof Rep. of ainl ouain policy Population National a o me on Law

through Integration: Legitimating ‘New’Social Legitimating Integration: through .Minneapolis: Press.University ofMinnesota - novine.nn.hr/clanci/sluzbeni/2012_07_86_1962.html

- A 352

c ontributiondiscussionmedicalto on

64 ia reproduction dical

Woman .

London:Verso

- reproducti nation

i Cro (in - state ist perspectives. Contributing Contributing perspectives. ist

on , 43 . i Cota) Narodne Croatian), (in . New York: St. Martin's St. York: New .

ta) Nrde novine. Narodne atian), ,

(in Croatian) , Narodne , (in Croatian) 42 13 (1),

(4) ,

847 - 35. .

Retrieved

-

Renegotiate Renegotiate 875. Democracy Democracy

CEU eTD Collection ofpolicy S. Fink, Policy alliances. feminist (2009) M.M. Ferree, documents/reports http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/pdf/press_corner/key Enlarge Council, C the and Parliament European the to Commission the Communicationfrom accompanyingthe European Union, European http://ec.europa.eu/health/blood_tissues_organs/docs/study_eshre_en.pdf Technologies the AssistedComparative inRegulationMedically EU:and Reproduction Analysisof EuropeanUnion,E andSwitzerland]. France [in Christianswomen, and doctors, reproduction: on Policystruggle (2012). I. Engeli, folkloristiku symptoms. current its and it shaped O Djurin,(2012). Sanja. 10/cp110112en.pdf Retrieved stolice questions. economic (1998). Parliament. Croatian EuropeanUnion,Court ofUnion.Justice European ofthe(2011).

- - making i (2009). Churches as societal veto players:Churchesin (2009). influencereligiousveto as societal actor - republike - making. from: ,

. Retrievedfrom . Vol.49( .

http://curia.europa.eu/jcms/upload/docs/application/pdf/2011 Abingdon,Oxon: R Political ResearchPolitical Quarterly - _nov_2008/croatia_progress_report_en.pdf WestPoliticsEuropean et taey n Mi Calne 2008 Challenges Main and Strategy ment hrvatske uropeanSociety ofReproductionand Human Embryology.(2008).

I

n

2 eree from: Retrieved ), h icriePltc fGne qaiy tecig edn and Bending Stretching, Equality: Gender of Politics Discursive The nqaiy itretoaiy n te oiis f discour of politics the and intersectionality Inequality,

33 n

politics of sexuality in Croatia during the 1990s, the discourses that discoursesthat the 1990s, the in during Croatia sexuality of politics - - 51 o -

gospodarskim

The treaty betw treaty The miso. 20) C (2008). ommission. outledge.

Narod http://zakon.poslovna.hr/public/ugov , 32 - pitanjima/242635/zakoni.aspx . 65 (1), (1), 77 a mens: rasi c hrvatski umjetnost: na

een the Holy See and Republic of Croatia on Croatia of Republic and See Holy the een ,

65 (2), 330 (2), - 96. -

- 345. roatia 2008 Progress Report Report Progress 2008 roatia

Press112/11 releaseNo - 2009 sps a tooiu i etnologiju za asopis

Rtivd from Retrieved .

or - - centred theories - izmedu se: Framing Framing se: - svete .

- CEU eTD Collection Lalović, Dragutin. 200 Dragutin. Lalović, in SDP 2003. L (2005). Laclau,E. Research. after and Romania, (1992). G. Kligman, Longman. (1995). W. J. Kingdon, Abingdon,Oxon: Routledge. policy and bending, stretching, equality: gender of politics discursive Jalus Se in Nationalism, Race of Politics The Fatherhood: (1992). D. Janadas, & G., Heng, Futures Its eds.McGrew,in “Theand HallIdentity” Cultural (1992). Questionof Hall.S. Croatian).(In (1996). Croatia. of Republic of Government Reproduction. of Politics The (1991). Anthropology R. Rapp, & F., Ginsburg, UniversityPress Susan Gal, PoliticsSocietiesEuropean and East (1994) Susan. Gal, technologi S., Franklin, alić, Dra alić, ic , V. (2009). Stretching and bending the meanings of gender in equality policies. equality in gender of meanings the bending and Stretching (2009). V. ,

Singapore.

ž cal innovation cal

( en. (2004). Features of packaging politics in the electoral campaigns of HDZ and and HDZ of campaigns electoral the in politics packaging of Features (2004). en. & p p ,

Gail Kligman. Gail . In 20

& 274

Političkamisao ,

311 Onpo

Nationalisms &Nationalisms sexualities Post inGenderthe – . Washington, D.C.: National Council for Soviet and East European European East and Soviet for Council National D.C.: Washington, . 316) hnaoto sbne:tepltc f erdcini Ceausescu's in reproduction of politics the banned: is abortion When - 0. On totalitarian features of Croatian state (1990 state Croatian of features totalitarian On 0. 343. .Philadelphia: ofUniversityPennsylvaniaPress. pulist reasonpulist . gna, lentvs a alternatives, Agendas,

Cambridge:PolityPress H. ,

( 2000 (1998).

Vol.41(1),55 ) . ,

. London:Verso. . P - 8(2), 256 8(2), Socialist Transition: The Abortion Debate inHungary, Debate Abortion Transition:SocialistThe

olitics of of olitics Reproducing reproduction: kinship, power, and and power, kinship, reproduction: Reproducing National program for demographic developmen demographic for National program 66

(p - - 73

286. gender after socialism after gender p . 343 .

d ulc policies public nd

- 364 ). New York:NewRoutledge.).

2d d) Nw York: New ed.). (2nd , Princeton: Princeton Princeton: , -

making Annual Review Of Of Review Annual - 1999).In Modernity

p. 52 (pp. and xuality,

Politička -

68). The and and t

CEU eTD Collection Nations,” Nagel,Joanne P Abortion of Shaping ComparativeStudies Political the and Cultural, on Institutional, Impact Policy: Political Public and „Religion (2002). Michael. Minkenberg, EasternCentralEurope and on (2006). A. Melegh, Research wom of fallacy marking bench Lombardo, P,Bustelo,M Meier,E, perspectives postcolonial and nationalism. nation, and Minneapolis:Press.University Minnesota of race gender, Gender, heaven: liaisons: future a Dangerous in longer No (1997). A. McClintock, Review McC London:Cass.F. (2002). J. Zielonka, & P., Mair, 78 contestations. and developments Policy Lombardo, andchallenges.I European Lombardo, st (2009). M. Verloo, & P., Meier, E., Lombardo, A policies: equality gender of discursive Europeanization The (2013). M. Forest, & E. Lombardo, misao retching, bending, and policy bending, retching, – 495. lintock, ,

, Vol.37

44 ,

- Ethnic and RacialStud Ethnic 117 , sociologicalInComparativeEuropean approach. Politics, 1 E. & E. E. & E. 61

Anne. ( Anne. ( . (1998). . ( - 1 B1 80. )

, Verloo

Verloo ) 188

, 35 On the east the On 1993). - -

204 “Masculinityin Makingof theand Sexuality Nationalism:Gender and 62. , M. , , M. ,

n

(2009) (2009)

“Family Feuds: Gender, Nationalism and the Family,” the and Nationalism Gender, Feuds: “Family FeministReview

(2009) , V - .York:NewCentral University European Press. - making n n oiia decision political in en west slope globalization, nationalism, racism and discourses and racism nationalism, globalization, slope west ol.35 ies h elre Erpa Uin dvriy n adaptation and diversity Union: European enlarged The . Institutiona

. 21(2) &

Contentious citizenship: feminist debates and prac and debates feminist citizenship: Contentious

( .Abingdon,Oxon: Routledge. Maloutas 2 ), I , n

221 242

International Feminist Journal of Politics of Journal Feminist International

, 67

92 - lizing - 247 269.

, , M.P ,

The discursive politics of gender equality: equality: gender of politics discursive The 108 .

intersectionality in the European Union? Union? inEuropean the intersectionality lce i Wsen Democracies“. Western in olicies . (2005).mainstreaming Gender. the and - 128 - aig In making.

re Rve o Social of Review Greek

- 18

(p

p .

Feminist 89 ,

- 11( 112 tices tices

I 4 ). n ) . CEU eTD Collection 366 of Council the on equality, gender mainstreamingand gender to approach Reflections Europe Empowerment: and Displacement (2005) Mieke Verloo, University Princeton Press. Verdery University NJ:Princeton Press:61 ContemporaryinEurope,”Was WhatComesEasternWhat Socialismand Next? Princeton, Verdery EU Comparativethe Report: AnaLiseVega, F., AgustínRolandsen Emanuelaand Lombardo roda&catid=98:statistike&Itemid=115 6:analysis http:// RODA”.NGO (2010). RODA. &(1998). Waylen,Randall, G. V., methodologicalandissues. PolicyV.A.changedisco (2004). and & Schmidt, Radaelli,M., C. Francis. (2004). M. C. Radaelli, FeministPoliticsInternational Journalof V Peterson, obodno_odlu%C4%8Divanje_o_ra%C4%91anju_djece http://hr.wikisource.org/wiki/Zakon_o_zdravstvenim_mjerama_za_ostvarivanje_prava_na_sl procreaterightsdecideto to acquiringthe childrenfreely Parliament “ Federalofthe Republic Croatia. (1978). of .

web.potpomognutaoplodnja.info/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=33

, ,

Katherine. - Katherine of Sie (1999). Spike. . - three Retrived from:Retrived “ Analysis of three versions of the same ppt presentationAnalysis versionsofsameofthree theppt - versions (1996). . ( 199 Policy change and discourse in Europe in discourse and change Policy 4)

WestPoliticsEuropean . “From . Parent - of

- Sxn Pltcl Ident Political “Sexing ht a Scaim n Wa Cms Next? Comes What and Socialism Was What the - - Gender,politicsstate the and 83. same

- ppt ,

- 1(1),34 StateFamily to GenderinPatriarchs: Nationand - presentation 68

- , 65. 27

(2), 183 (2), ities: Nationalism as Heterosexism,” Heterosexism,” as Nationalism ities:

Law on health measuresLawhealth on for

- ”. Retrievedfrom ”. reaction - 210.

. In . Abingdon, Oxon: Taylor & Taylor Oxon: Abingdon, . .London:Routledge. ( - 2008 urse in Europe: conceptualin urse Europe: Soc from

ial Politics ial ) - . -

ngo

QUING LARG QUING Re - action fromaction

12 Princeton: Princeton: ( 3

) , 344 ,

- CEU eTD Collection potpomognutoj http://www.novilist.hr/Vijesti/Hrvatska/Ostojic lawconsidersthe discriminatory. HINA from H 2013, Orhidea. Gaura, zakon Dnevnik.hr July(2009, Dnevnik.hr. Medical 17). reproduct biskupe http://www.novilist.hr/Vijesti/Hrvatska/Umjetna Bishopsthe and Ciglenecki,(2012 Drazen. zakon uvodi www introducingisstandards. European & Roller,January(2012,Martinović, B., L. V. Ostojiclawis3). Milinovic’sdemolishing and a Web i Past the of uses Political history: InStates,Yugoslav Successor of burden heavy The 2007. Nenad. Zakošek, Indiaand Indonesia. Passionate Wieringa, (2012). S. Aesthetics SymbolicandSubversion: Heteronormativityin - Alter. (2009, July(2009,Alter. That’sMilinovichow blathered.9). .novilist.hr/Vijesti/Hrvatska/Ostojic http://www.h - - - . (2012 . from europske o o rticles - - - i umjetno umjetnoj - HDZ : . Retrieved Nov.24, 2012,Retrievedfrom: . Nov.24,

http://www.nacional.hr/en/clanak/5036 , May , 9

- -

oplodnji standarde

HDZ. (2009 j - - oplodnji oplodnji - alter.org/vijesti/politika/tako

AsianReview,Studies ).

, July , 14

NoviList Ostojic proud medicallyLawof theon reproduction:HDZ assisted - HDZ

, August , 4). http://www.novi - - bez i - uvodi - Političkamisao ). ). ga - potpore .

A

Retrived - NoviList smatra

- Novilist lawparenthood against europske IVF:69%citizens 20% behind behind Government, - u - - -

diskriminatornim rusi May 10, 2013, May10, saboru.html . list.hr/Vijesti/Hrvatska/Ostojic

. Retrieved from. 2013, May10, http://dnevnik.hr/vijesti/hrvatska/milinovicev Retrived 36(4), 36(4), 515 - standarde - 69 ,Vol.44(5), Milinovicev - ionforinmarriage those commontoo. ponosan - - je oplodnja - lu 0/a

May2013, 10, petao

-

- 530.

law -

na H from: - 29 . - - - Uz

- zakon - milinovic Alter.

Nacional Zakon against

- - 43 Vladu

- Retrieved2012, Nov.24, o - o - -

parenthood umjetnoj from: - - .

69 medicinski

Retrieved - gradana - rusi - oplodnji - Milinovicev

- May 10, -

20 - uz - i - - the n - - CEU eTD Collection 2013, from 2013, July(2012, menQueer.hr. IVFfor intrans5). Croatia?Hardly. utvrdjivanja : establishing infertility,on MediaServis.(2012 novi votes. M http://www.monitor.hr/clanci/lijecnici lawIVF on Roller zakon RetrievedMar.24 Krnetic, zene 2012,fromRetrieved Nov.24, Feb.14).(2009,JutarnjiHebrang: womefor list. not isIVF 2013, Dina J., ( konzultirao http://www.index.hr/vijesti/clanak/udruga medicallawthe on reproduction”. July Index.hr.(2009, “NGORODA:Ministerhelies he says10). whenuson consulted with zakon GlasIstre HINA.(2012 http://www.index.hr/vijesti/clanak/burna edia Servis.edia(2012 - - zakon bez - - , Vesna , from Index.hr o o - - Snjezana. (2009, Julypassed Snjezana. lawMilinovic (2009, has not still the10). IVF. on - umjetnoj potpomognut 2012, July 2012, 13). muza . : Retrieved - . -

http://queer.hr/23645/umjetna - o oko http://queer.hr/23985/izglasan Monitor.hr neplodnosti , July , 13 -

medicinski and LjerkaBratonjaand Martinović, . -

/287011/ - Retrieved zakona th - oplodnji

2013, from 2013, , May , 9 July , 13 Nov.24, 2012, Nov.24, ) oj .

. - Law on medicallyLawon assisted - - o Le oplodnji Retrieved - ostojic

potpomognutoj - Nov.24, 2012, Nov.24,

- medicinskoj Ostojicgivesthem Fs sbophobic lawMARsbophobicon passes 125435 ). ). ). Turbulentdiscussion methodsIVF:HDZtheworriedon about

http://www.jutarnji.hr/hebrang New lawNew medicallyre on assisted http://www.24sata.hr/politika/milinovi - im - 355509

Index.hr March 23, 2013, March23, - podijelio from - protiv - oplodnji/441161.aspx - : - from:

- -

oplodnji rasprava

- oplodnja roda . Retrieved . 2012,from Nov.24, http://www.glasistre.hr/vijesti/arhiva/sabor lezbofobni - - nazadnog 70 jedinic - (2009 milinovic

http://www.index.hr/vijesti/clanak/izglasan . Index.hr - - reprod - sa o

za from - e/614056.aspx , June , 15 - umjetnoj - 88 - zakon tr - zakona ansmuskarce - gl - uctioninpassed Parliament the . . laze n without a husband.a nwithout Retrived asova Queer.hr - ---

o ).

- - - - kada oplodnji

Queer.hr mpo/ umjetna o Doctorsagainst bacthe productionpasseswith 88 - - za/625678.aspx umjetnoj

-

May 10, 2013, 2013, May10, . tvrdi

- cu Retrieved

u - - - - hrvatskoj hdz oplodnja . Retrieved . April 22, jos - da - oplodnji/22122/ - - - nije brinu nas Jutarnji list.Jutarnji May 10, - - prosao -

- je 24 sata24 -

nije tesko/ metode - from - - za donio kward -

. . -

- -

- CEU eTD Collection koaliciji/o Officialcoalitionthe „ programmeof Theofficialsiteof e Theofficialsiteof Croatian Parliament TheOfficialSDP.siteof Theofficialsiteof HDZ. TreatiesUnion,r of European http://www.dzs.hr/Hrv_Eng/publication/2012/SI CroatianBureauofCensuStatistics, Websites: brief/2601161 PressEuro Wyborcza. Gazeta dobili 2012,from Retrieved Nov.24, T je 2012,fromRetrieved Nov.24, Romic, http://dnevnik.hr/vijesti/hrvatska/bura reproduction Pejicic, lgbt discriminating. Queer.hr . (2012, JulyQueer.hr.(2012, LGBT forCenterequality 10). lawnew ofthe Theis draft : - - Portal.hr.15th).fiveOctober (2009, We HTVfor quiz got in questios advance. poput - ravnopravnost - 5 Tea. (2012 Tea.

- Ana.(2012 - pitanja jas - koaliciji/

. RetrievedApril from. 2013, 22, enovca .

Dnevnik.hr - echr - za Queer.hr ,July 10th - - -

- , July , 15 kviz (2012, August29).(2012,

bleiburga prijedlog condemns -

archivesofCroatian Parliament - HTV . . Retrievedfrom . April2013, 22, http://www.hdz.hr

http://www.sdp.hr Retrieved ). ). - -

zakona - etrievedfrom: isStormcalmingnot down:”Croatia

clanak - a.html Jelic:IVFlikeison Law Blei http://izbori.tportal.hr/arhiva/izbori/39410/Unaprijed http://www.vecernji.hr/vijesti/jelic italian s 2011. s2011. - - April 22, 2013, April2013, 22,

- Cock a doodlea do“. Cock 429021 o - law se - . ECHR condemnsECHR Italian mpo

- www.sabor.hr/Default.aspx?art=1566 ne - assisted

- - http://www.presseurop.eu/en/content/news 2013.

smiruje http://europa.eu/eu

diskriminira/

71

- 1469.pdf Retrievedfrom - reproduction - from: hrvatska https://infodok.sabor.hr http://www.kukuriku.org/o

http://queer.hr/23867/centar

b urg and Jasenovacand urg - raj -

lawassistedreproduction.on law/treaties/index_en.htm

- - za

zakon isparadiseafor - razmnozavanje.html - umjetnoj

.

Vecernjilist - T oplodnji - - Portal.hr - smo - - za -

-

-

.

CEU eTD Collection http://www.poliklinika Policlinicgynecology,for ColumnLibela, Shame. of mreza.hr/platform_eng.htm OfficialCroatia.Women’s siteof Network OfficialRODA. siteof -

http://www.roda.hr ivf.hr/index.php/hr/neplodnost

obstetrician and reproductive medicine, inobstetricianmedicine,reproductiveand Croatian. http://www.libela.org/stup

Retrieved from Retrieved

72

- - srama i - ivf/85 http://www.zenska

- plodnostineplodnostcovjeka -