<<

cells

Review in the Influenza

Janet To and Jaume Torres *

School of Biological Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, 60 Nanyang Drive, Singapore 637551, Singapore * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +65-6316-2857

 Received: 19 May 2019; Accepted: 27 June 2019; Published: 29 June 2019 

Abstract: Influenza is a highly contagious virus that causes seasonal and unpredictable . Four influenza virus types have been identified to date: A, B, C and D, with only A–C known to infect . Influenza A and B are responsible for seasonal influenza epidemics in humans and are responsible for up to a billion flu annually. The M2 is present in all influenza types and belongs to the class of viroporins, i.e., small that form ion channels that increase membrane permeability in virus-infected cells. In influenza A and B, AM2 and BM2 are predominantly proton channels, although they also show some permeability to monovalent cations. By contrast, M2 proteins in influenza C and D, CM2 and DM2, appear to be especially selective for chloride ions, with possibly some permeability to protons. These differences point to different biological roles for M2 in types A and B versus C and D, which is also reflected in their sequences. AM2 is by far the best characterized , where mechanistic details and rationale of its acid activation, proton selectivity, unidirectionality, and relative low conductance are beginning to be understood. The present review summarizes the biochemical and structural aspects of influenza viroporins and discusses the most relevant aspects of function, inhibition, and interaction with the .

Keywords: influenza virus; matrix protein 2 (M2); viroporins; inhibition; protein–protein interactions

1. Introduction

1.1. Influenza Viruses Influenza viruses are enveloped, segmented, negative-sense RNA viruses belonging to the family. Four influenza virus types have been identified to date, classified based on their core proteins: A, B, C [1] and D [2,3]. Type A is known to infect humans, as well as porcine, bovine and canine species [4]. The main reservoir of the influenza A viruses are aquatic birds [5]. The seasonal flu caused by influenza A virus (IAV) in humans is a very contagious respiratory illness that is among the top ten leading causes of death in the United States and associated with high medical burden [6–8]. Sudden pandemics with high mortality rates are caused by the sporadic transmission of avian or swan influenza viruses to humans, as pre-immunity to these new strains is non-existent [6,7]. Influenza B virus (IBV), its close relative, is less severe but still capable of causing serious outbreaks, is responsible for seasonal influenza epidemics among humans [9,10], and accounts for half of the influenza diseases in recent years (www.cdc.gov). Types B (IBV) and C (ICV) infect humans and [11], whereas type D (IDV) infects cattle and pigs [3]. In addition, IBV has also been reported to infect harbor seals [12]. Although IDV in cattle is usually asymptomatic, it can lead to disease in swine [2,13].

Cells 2019, 8, 654; doi:10.3390/cells8070654 www.mdpi.com/journal/cells Cells 2019, 8, 654 2 of 20

1.2. The Proteins in Influenza Viruses In IAV, the contains cholesterol-enriched rafts and transmembrane (HA) and (NA) [14], which are used to further classify IAV strains. A third membrane protein is matrix protein 2 (AM2 in IAV), present in lower abundance [15]. HA, NA, and M2 are type I, type II, and type III membrane proteins, respectively [16–18]. A layer of matrix protein 1 (M1) just underneath the membrane is the most abundant protein of the virus. M1 forms an internal coat, enclosing the viral ribonucleoproteins as well as three polymerase proteins (PA, PB1, and PB2) that form the viral RNA polymerase complex [19]. IAV and IBV have eight negative-sense RNA segments, each encoding one or two viral proteins. IAV encodes 10–11 proteins: HA, NA, NP, M1, M2, PA, PB1, PB2, NS1, NS2, and PB1-F2 [19]. IBV has the same proteins as IAV, except for the PB1-F2 protein, and has an additional surface NB that is unique to flu B. ICV and IDV consist of only seven segments each, and they do not encode envelope glycoproteins HA and NA. Instead, they carry only one glycoprotein, HEF (haemagglutinin–esterase fusion), which combines the functions of HA and NA [20]. M2, PB1-F2, and NB proteins are classified as viroporins, i.e., virus-encoded short polypeptides (approximately 60–120 amino acids) that have one, two, or even three [21] transmembrane (TM) α-helical domains. These polypeptides form of typically four to six monomers that permeabilize membranes to ions [22–24].

2. AM2 and BM2

2.1. AM2 The RNA segment 7 from IAV encodes both the and AM2 proton channel via alternative splicing [25,26]. AM2 is 97-residues long and forms a channel assembled by the tetramerization of four left-handed TM helices stabilized by disulfide bridges [18,27]. The AM2 monomer consists of an N-terminal ectodomain (residues 1–24), an α-helical (TM) domain (residues 25–46), and a C-terminal cytoplasmic tail (CT) domain (residues 47–97) that contains a highly conserved amphipathic helix (APH) (residues 51–59) [25,28]. AM2 forms an acid-activated proton channel with an asymmetrical preference of proton conduction from the viral exterior (N-terminus) to the interior (C-terminus). The proton channel activity of AM2 is essential for two important roles. Upon into cells via sialic acid-containing receptor-mediated endocytosis, the low pH (5 to 6) of late activates the proton channel activity of AM2, which acidifies the viral interior [25] with subsequent detachment of M1 from the vRNP complex. This enables trafficking of vRNPs into the host nucleus for synthesis of mRNA and vRNA [29,30]. The channel activity of M2 is also crucial during viral maturation, where it equilibrates the pH across the trans-Golgi membrane to prevent the viral HA from undergoing premature conformational change while being transported to the plasma membrane of infected cells [31–34]. Conductance and inhibition studies have used the transmembrane domain of AM2 (AM2-TM), since in Xenopus oocytes AM2(21–51) has retained the proton selectivity and drug sensitivity observed in full-length AM2 protein [35]. Four main features characterize AM2-facilitated membrane permeabilization to protons: acid activation, proton selectivity, relative low proton conductance, and unidirectionality. These features are encoded in key pore-lining residues of the AM2 channel. AM2 has a conserved HxxxW functional motif in its TM domain (Figure1), where His37 is responsible for proton selectivity and acid activation [ 36], and Trp41 ensures asymmetric proton conduction from the N-terminus to the C-terminus [37]. Other residues surrounding this motif also contribute to the dynamics and proton transfer equilibria in the channel. Cells 2019, 8, 654 3 of 20 Cells 2019, 8, x FOR PEER REVIEW 3 of 19

10 20 AM2 1 ...... MSLLTEVETPIRNEWGCRCN BM2 1 ...... ML CM2 1 ...... CNLKTCLKLFNNTDAVTVHCFNENQG DM2 1 MANLALKRSVLTLLMLVICGIPTCVNAETVEEFCRKKLNQTEEKVYVHCFNEDDG

30 40 50 60 70

AM2 21 DSSDPLVVAASIIGI LHLILWILDR LLFFKCIYRFFEHGLKRGPSTEGVPESMREE BM2 3 EPFQILSICSFILSA LHFIAWTIGH LLNQIKRGINMKIRIKGPNKETINREVSILR CM2 27 YMLTLASLGLGIITM LYLLVKIIIE LLVNGFVLGRWERWCGDIKTTIMPEIDSMEK DM2 56 RAMTLAALILGCFSM LYILIKAILM LLLLTIINGRPNGSWDDLKHVVKCFSETGSE

80 90 AM2 76 YRKEQQSAVDADDSHFVSIELE...... BM2 58 HSYQKEIQAKETMKEVLSNNMEILSDHIIIEGLSAEEIIKMGETVLEIEELH CM2 82 DIALSRERLDLGEDAPDETDNSPIPFSNDGIFEI...... DM2 111 NFARDIMVLESRRDGEETSSPEEGLGPPLSGFNENGVFMETL......

FigureFigure 1. SequenceSequence alignmentalignment of of M2 M2 viroporins viroporins in influenza. in . Influenza Influenza A M2 (AM2;A M2 strain (AM2; A/ Udornstrain/ 1972 A/Udorn/1972H3N2), influenza H3N2), B M2influenza (BM2; B strain M2 (BM2; B/Taiwan strain/70061 B/Taiwan/70061/2006),/2006), influenza Cinfluenza M2 (CM2; C M2 strain (CM2; C/ Ann strainArbor C/Ann/1/1950) Arbor/1/1950) and influenza andD influenza M2 (DM2; D M2 strain (DM2; D/ swinestrain /D/swine/Oklahoma/1334/2011).Oklahoma/1334/2011). The predicted The predictedtransmembrane transmembrane regions areregions underlined. are underlined. The functional The functional motifs HxxxWmotifs HxxxW (in AM2 (in and AM2 BM2) and and BM2) YxxxK and(in CM2YxxxK and (in DM2) CM2 areand indicated DM2) are in indicated bold red font.in bo Numberingld red font. Numbering corresponds corresponds to AM2. Sequences to AM2. were Sequencesretrieved fromwere retrieved UniProt ( www..orgfrom UniProt (www.uniprot.org). ).

2.2.2.2. BM2 BM2 InIn IBV, IBV,RNA RNA segmentsegment 77 encodes encodes both both M1 M1 protein protei andn and BM2 BM2 [38 [38,39].,39]. Like Like AM2, AM2, BM2 BM2 is a pH-activatedis a pH- activatedproton channel proton channel [40] and [40] has and a similar has a similar monomeric monomeric and oligomericand oligomeric organization organization as describedas described above abovefor AM2 for [AM241,42 ].[41,42]. Like AM2,Like AM2, a truncated a truncated peptide peptide containing containing its TM, its BM2(1–33),TM, BM2(1–33), conducts conducts protons protonswhen incorporated when incorporated into artificial into liposomesartificial liposomes [42] and Xenopus [42] andoocytes, Xenopus with oocytes, similar conductancewith similar and conductanceproton-selectivity and proton-selectivity as that observed as in that full-length observed BM2 in full-length protein [43 BM2]. Despite protein these[43]. Despite similarities, these AM2 similarities,and BM2 share AM2 almost and BM2 no share sequence almost identity, no sequence with the identity, exception with of the an exception HxxxW motif of an inHxxxW the TM motif domain in the TM domain (see Figure 1), which may explain some of their common features. AM2 and BM2 (see Figure1), which may explain some of their common features. AM2 and BM2 also di ffer in also differ in post-translational modifications; while BM2 is only modified by [44], post-translational modifications; while BM2 is only modified by phosphorylation [44], AM2 contains AM2 contains bonds and is palmitoylated and phosphorylated [45–48]. Like AM2, BM2 is disulfide bonds and is palmitoylated and phosphorylated [45–48]. Like AM2, BM2 is essential for virus essential for virus uncoating in the and for pH equilibration between Golgi lumen and uncoating in the endosome and for pH equilibration between Golgi lumen and during virus cytoplasm during virus protein transport [38]. However, while the AM2 ectodomain is important for protein transport [38]. However, while the AM2 ectodomain is important for its incorporation into its incorporation into virions [49], the BM2 has only a small ectodomain [41,42] (Figure 1). virions [49], the BM2 has only a small ectodomain [41,42] (Figure1). 2.3. Acid Activation Mechanism of AM2 2.3. Acid Activation Mechanism of AM2 At a high pH (e.g., 7 to 8), the AM2 channel is in a Cclosed conformation (Figure 2, left), where the At a high pH (e.g., 7 to 8), the AM2 channel is in a C conformation (Figure2, left), where side chains at the C-terminal end of the channel, includingclosed His37 and Trp41 tetrads, are tightly packed,the side and chains the pore at the is lined C-terminal by alternating end of thelayers channel, of side includingchains and His37well-o andrdered Trp41 water tetrads, clusters. are The tightly closedpacked, Trp41 and tetrad the pore dehydrates is lined bythe alternating His37 tetrad layers and raises of side the chains His37 and deprotonation well-ordered barrier, water thus clusters. blockingThe closed proton Trp41 conduction tetrad dehydrates through thethe His37channel. tetrad This and conformation raises the His37has been deprotonation observed by barrier, X-ray thus crystallographyblocking proton [50,51] conduction as well through as in both the channel.solution and This solid-state conformation NMR has [52–56]. been observedWhen the bypH X-ray decreasescrystallography to around [50, 516, ]the as wellHis tetrad as in both increases solution its protonation and solid-state state NMR to +2, [52 and–56 ].the When channel the pHbecomes decreases activated.to around Electrostatic 6, the His tetradrepulsion increases with protons its protonation is lower due state to tothe+ low2, and charge the state channel of the becomes His37 tetrad, activated. allowingElectrostatic proton repulsion permeation with from protons the viral is lower exterior due. toThis the asymmetry low charge partly state ofexplains the His37 the rectification tetrad, allowing ofproton proton permeation flow observed from experimentally. the viral exterior. Protons This asymmetryrapidly diffuse partly to the explains His37 thetetrad rectification via an ordered of proton waterflow observedcluster, when experimentally. the IAV particle Protons is incorporat rapidly diedffuse into to the endosome, His37 tetrad as via it is an surrounded ordered water by an cluster, acidicwhen environment. the IAV particle At a is low incorporated pH, the positive into the charge endosome, of the His37 as it is tetrad surrounded increases, by and an acidic the Trp41 environment. gate andAt athe low C-terminal pH, the positive helices chargeopen and of thebecome His37 more tetrad hydrated. increases, This and lowers the Trp41 the His37 gate anddeprotonation the C-terminal barrier,helices increasing open and proton become conduc moretance. hydrated. Further This reduction lowers of the pH His37 expands deprotonation the channel barrier, and increases increasing pore water mobility, further increasing proton conductance [57].

Cells 2019, 8, 654 4 of 20 proton conductance. Further reduction of pH expands the channel and increases pore water mobility, Cells 2019, 8, x FOR PEER REVIEW 4 of 19 further increasing proton conductance [57]. The His37 tetrad tetrad can can adopt adopt four four protonation protonation states, states, one one for foreach each His Hisprotonation, protonation, where where the fi therst firsttwo twoprotonations protonations already already occur occur at a athigh a high pH pH[58,59]. [58, 59The]. Thetransition transition between between Cclosed C closedto Copento Cstateopen state(Figure (Figure 2, right)2, right) is triggered is triggered by protonation by protonation of the of third the third His37 His37 at an at acidic an acidic pH [58,60], pH [ 58 ,with60], witha pKa a pKavalue value that ranges that ranges from from4.9 to 4.9 6.6 to depending 6.6 depending on membrane on membrane composition composition [54,58,61–64]. [54,58,61 At–64 this]. At point, this point,protons protons can be can released be released into intothe thevirus virus interior. interior. This This Copen Copen formform has has been been characterized characterized by by X-ray crystallography [50,51,55,58,65–68]. [50,51,55,58,65–68]. Deprotonation of of the His37 tetrad triggers a change back to the Cclosed conformationconformation [55,68]. [55,68]. Depending onon the the role role of of the the His37 His37 tetrad, tetrad, several severa protonl proton transport transport models models have have been been suggested suggested [35]. In[35]. the In “shutter” the “shutter” mechanism mechanism [62], [62], the His37 the His37 tetrad tetrad works works as a gate.as a gate. At a At low a low pH (aroundpH (around pH 6,pH see 6, above)see above) the gatethe opensgate opens due to due the to electrostatic the electrostati repulsionc repulsion between between the biprotonated, the biprotonated, positively positively charged histidinecharged residues. residues. The excess The proton excess is proton transferred is transferred via the Grotthuss via the Grotthuss mechanism mechanism (i.e., proton (i.e., transfer proton throughtransfer athrough network a of network hydrogen-bonded of hydrogen-bonded water molecules water [69 ]),molecules without changing[69]), without the protonation changing state the ofprotonation His37. In thestate “shuttle” of His37. mechanism In the “shuttle” (e.g., [55]), mechanism the His37 tetrad (e.g., changes[55]), the protonation His37 tetrad state changes at a low pH,protonation while the state proton at a islow shuttled pH, while through the proton the His37–Trp41 is shuttled region. through the His37–Trp41 region.

Figure 2.2. Acid activation mechanism of the AM2 channel. Left: At At a a high pH (e.g., 7 to 8), the AM2

channel adoptsadopts aa CCclosedclosed conformation.conformation. The The closed closed Trp41 Trp41 tetrad tetrad dehydrates dehydrates the His37 tetrad and raises the His37His37 deprotonationdeprotonation barrier,barrier, therebythereby blockingblocking protonproton conduction.conduction. The low charge state of the His37 tetrad at a high pH reduces the electrostatic repulsion with incoming protons, allowing proton permeation from the viral exterior.exterior. Right: At At a low pH (below 6), the positive charge on the His37 tetrad increases and the Trp41 gategate andand C-terminalC-terminal openopen andand becomebecome moremore hydrated,hydrated, loweringlowering thethe His37 deprotonation barrier and increasing proton conductance,conductance, thereby leadingleading to channel activation in the C conformation. Scheme adapted from [70]. in the Copen conformation. Scheme adapted from [70]. 2.4. Rate of Proton Conductance in AM2 and BM2 2.4. Rate of Proton Conductance in AM2 and BM2 Although the proton conductance rate of AM2 is higher at a low pH [71,72], in the range of 1 1 Although4 the 1proton conductance rate of AM2 is higher at a low pH [71,72], in the range of 10 – 10 –10 protons s− [71,73,74], it is still orders of magnitude lower than expected for a water-filled 104 protons s−1 [71,73,74], it is still orders of magnitude lower than expected for a water-filled pore of pore of the size of the M2 channel without ionizable groups [75]. This low conductance may exist the size of the M2 channel without ionizable groups [75]. This low conductance may exist to prevent to prevent toxicity in the host and has been attributed to a rate-limiting step caused by His37 toxicity in the host and has been attributed to a rate-limiting step caused by His37 protonation– deprotonation [36,76]. However, the His37–water proton exchange rate appears to be too fast to account for this (~105 s−1) [54], and additional factors may account for the low rate of proton conduction [77–80]. Recent single-molecule fluorescence experiments using Trp41 as a probe have detected interhelical motion in AM2 on a microsecond timescale, which is consistent with the proton

Cells 2019, 8, 654 5 of 20 protonation–deprotonation [36,76]. However, the His37–water proton exchange rate appears to be too 5 1 fast to account for this (~10 s− )[54], and additional factors may account for the low rate of proton conduction [77–80]. Recent single-molecule fluorescence experiments using Trp41 as a probe have detected interhelical motion in AM2 on a microsecond timescale, which is consistent with the proton conduction rate, and which increased from a high to low pH with a transition midpoint in the range of those reported for the pKa of the His37 tetrad [81]. This is consistent with a range of studies that show that the AM2 tetramer is more dynamic at a low pH [70,76,77,82–86]. Thus, proton conductance through AM2 may be limited by the transition between Cclosed and Copen conformers. The structure and dynamics of water in the AM2 pore are also important because it is the essential medium for proton permeation. X-ray free-electron laser (XFEL) [68] and 2D infrared (2D-IR) spectroscopy [87] studies of AM2 have shown that, at a low pH, water molecules form a continuous hydrogen-bonded network spanning the channel length. In BM2, although conductance at a low pH increases more than for AM2, proton conductance is still much lower than the theoretical conductance at a low pH. This suggests that conformational change of BM2 may also constitute a rate-limiting step [43]. The role of the two His residues, especially His19, is important since an H19C abolishes proton conduction [88], whereas an H27A mutation can reduce proton transport by 25% in a liposome proton flux assay [42]. The proton-dissociation ∼ equilibrium constants (pKa values) of the His19 tetrad in BM2 TM domain in lipid bilayers were found to be one pH unit lower (i.e., more difficult to protonate) than the pKa values of the AM2-equivalent His37 tetrad [89,90]. This was attributed to the presence of a second titratable histidine, His27 (in the position occupied by Arg45 in AM2), separated by three residues from Trp23 (see Figure1), forming a putative reverse WxxxH motif. This His27 residue was suggested to increase the proton-dissociation rate of His19 by stabilization of its neutral state. This has been confirmed by a two-electrode voltage clamp (TEVC) electrophysiological assay in Xenopus oocytes [43] that compared AM2 (A/Udorn/72) and BM2 (B/Lee/40) (both C-terminally fused to FLAG), where the apparent pK3 (3rd protonation state) value of the AM2 channel was about one pH unit higher than that of the BM2 channel, indicating that the latter is less easily protonated and requires a lower pH for activation. Despite this, BM2 was found to have a 10-fold higher conductance than AM2, resulting in an overall 60% higher specific conductance of the BM2 channel than the AM2 channel at a pH of 5.5, which is consistent with liposome flux assays, where the specific conductance of BM2(1–33) is about double that of AM2(18–60) [42].

2.5. Asymmetric Conductance in AM2 and BM2 The AM2 proton channel is inward rectified (i.e., it conducts more easily in the inward direction), from the N- to C-terminus. This is attributed to Trp41 and Asp44 [37,60]. The Trp41 tetrad forms a gate that physically occludes the C-terminal end of the pore, while Asp44 stabilizes the Trp41 gate via water-mediated hydrogen bonds. When oocytes are subjected to low pHin and high pHout conditions, no outward current in the AM2 proton channel is observed [60]. The W41F mutant of AM2 allows a reverse current when the internal pH was low [59]. The latter ssNMR study showed that the protonation and tautomeric equilibria at His37 were altered, suggesting a role for Trp41 in preventing C-terminal acid activation by His37. Interestingly,the BM2 proton channel is slightly outwardly rectified [40]. In BM2, the corresponding residue of AM2-Asp44 is Gly26 (see alignment). Although mutation G26D in BM2 is unable to prevent this outward leakage in a pHin low/pHout high condition, the double mutant G26D/H27R (to mimic AM2 Asp44/Arg45) has achieved similar asymmetric proton flow (I–V curve inward rectified) to the AM2 channel [43]. Thus, asymmetric inward rectified proton flow can be restored by engineering these two residues of AM2 into the corresponding positions of the BM2 channel. Indeed, in the X-ray crystal structure of AM2(22–46), Asp44 participates in ionic interactions with Arg45 and also in water-mediated hydrogen bonding with Trp41 [50]. Conversely, AM2-Asp44 mutants D44N and D44C exhibit an outward current under a low pHin /high pHout condition, similar to BM2 [60]. Cells 2019, 8, 654 6 of 20

3. CM2 and DM2

3.1. CM2 The M2 protein (CM2) was first reported by Hongo et al. [91] and was proposed to function as a voltage-activated chloride ion channel when expressed in Xenopus oocytes [92]. CM2 is encoded by RNA segment 6 (M gene) of the influenza C virus [20], which produces a p42 protein precursor, and upon cleavage by a peptidase, CM1 and CM2 are obtained [93,94]. Like AM2, CM2 is a type III membrane protein, with a 23-aa N-terminal extracellular domain, a 23-aa transmembrane domain and a 69-aa C-terminal cytoplasmic domain [95] (Figure1). CM2 is abundantly expressed in virus-infected cells, and a small amount is incorporated into the virus particles [96]. CM2 forms disulfide-linked dimers and tetramers via evolutionarily conserved Cys1–Cys6–Cys20 [97] and is post-translationally modified by N-glycosylation (Asn11), palmitoylation (Cys65), and phosphorylation [95,96,98]. The structure of the TM domain of the CM2 protein (Tyr27–Val46) has been obtained by site-specific infrared dichroism and the molecular modeling [99] of isolate C/Ann Arbor/1/1950 [100]. In that model, side chains of L31, L34, M41 and L44 residues were predicted to be lumenally oriented, and the peptide formed a left-handed coiled-coil tetramer [99,101]. The transmembrane pore of CM2 was occluded by residue M41, and a motif of hydrophilic residues, T30, S33, T40 and Y43, was located at the outer surface of the CM2 channel. CM2 protein is capable of modifying pH within the trans-Golgi network (TGN). Indeed, when CM2 was co-expressed with a pH-sensitive hemagglutinin of IAV, CM2 protein was able to protect the co-expressed HA against acid activation in the TGN [102], although its activity was much lower than that of the AM2 protein. Additionally, a chimeric AM2 protein containing the CM2 transmembrane domain could partially restore the infectious virus production of an M2-deficient influenza A virus [103], which suggests that CM2 can alter intracellular pH. Electrophysiological studies of CM2-expressing mouse erythroleukemia cells also identified proton permeability [97], and such permeability probably plays a role in the uncoating process of the influenza C virus. The glycoprotein HEF of the influenza C virus has the ability to cause low pH-dependent hemolysis and fusion [104], and the virion is presumably uncoated in the acidic endosomal compartment. The CM2 protein might, therefore, have a function similar to that of the M2 protein in virus uncoating. Nevertheless, the proton and chloride permeabilities have not been clearly dissected. AM2 is 106- to 107-fold more permeable to H+ than to alkali metal cations Na+/K+ [71,105,106]. By contrast, CM2 is permeable to Cl- anions but not to cations, exhibits a milder response to pH [92,102,107] and has only a small proton channel activity that is insensitive to [92]. Those authors proposed that the CM2 protein is transported to the cell surface where it may lower the ionic strength just beneath the viral budding site by inducing the efflux of Cl- ions. This may be advantageous during virion assembly to promote the interaction of M1 with RNPs, since a slight increase in salt concentration may trigger the dissociation of the M1–RNP complex in ICV [108]. Indeed, deletion of CM2 has caused impaired packaging and uncoating in virus-like particles (VLPs) and recombinant influenza viruses [109].

3.2. DM2 A new type of influenza virus, known as type D, has recently been identified in cattle and pigs [3]. The proteome of IDV is closer to ICV than to IAV or IBV [2] and, correspondingly, CM2 and DM2 share similarities. DM2 was recently tested in Xenopus oocytes using the two-electrode voltage clamp (TEVC) method, and an induced inward current was observed similar to that of CM2, with similar reversal potential [110]. Neither CM2 nor DM2 contain an HxxxW motif (found in AM2 and BM2), but a “YxxxK” motif has been proposed instead [110], where Y and K would have a lumenal orientation (parallel to H and W in the HxxxW motif found in AM2 and BM2) (see alignment). Indeed, the gating voltage of CM2 and DM2 was shown to be affected by modifications at the YxxxK motif [110], which were proposed to be involved in cation–pi pairs between Y and K, and were proposed to be able Cells 2019, 8, 654 7 of 20 to regulate ion flow. Overall, the significance of the difference in functional motifs between AM2 and BM2 versus CM2 and DM2 remains to be elucidated. The main features of viroporins in influenza are summarized in Table1.

Table 1. Properties of influenza viroporins. PB1-F2 and NB are much less studied compared to M2 proteins, and although studies have been performed, the precise selectivity is not yet clear. The YxxxK motifs in CM2 and DM2 are predicted to be the functional motifs of these channels, although the exact mechanism of action remains to be elucidated.

Influenza Coding Typical Functional Ion Host Range Viroporin Type RNA Length Motif Conductance Humans, aquatic AM2 Segment 7 97 aa HxxxW H+,K+ A birds, porcine, PB1-F2 Segment 2 90 aa – Ca2+, MVC bovine, canine Humans, pigs, BM2 Segment 7 109 aa HxxxW H+,K+ B harbor seals NB Segment 6 100 aa – ND

C Humans, pigs CM2 Segment 6 115 aa YxxxK Cl−

D Cattle, pigs DM2 Segment 6 152 aa YxxxK Cl− Abbreviations: MVC, monovalent cation; ND, not determined.

4. Other Influenza Viroporins IAV and IBV encode other viroporins, PB1-F2 and NB, respectively. For the sake of completion, these two viroporins are briefly described here. PB1-F2 forms nonselective ion channels in planar lipid bilayers and microsomes [111], and is known to localize to the mitochondria of infected cells [112]. PB1-F2 can interact with two mitochondrial proteins—adenine nucleotide translocator (ANT3) and voltage-dependent anion channel 1 (VDAC1)—present in the inner and outer mitochondrial membranes, respectively, leading to the dissipation of mitochondria membrane potential [113,114]. PB1-F2 from pathogenic IAV can be incorporated into the phagolysosomal compartment to trigger NLRP3 inflammasome activation, inducing the secretion of pyrogenic cytokine IL-1β and thereby leading to severe pathophysiology [115]. In addition, the PB1-F2 of A/Puerto Rico/8/1934(H1N1) (PR8) has been reported to bind the mitochondrial antiviral signaling protein (MAVS), leading to impairment of IFN-β production [114]. However, the precise role of PB1-F2 in modulation of IAV-induced immunopathogenesis remains to be dissected. NB protein is encoded by IBV at RNA segment 6 [116]. NB is modified by glycosylation and palmitoylation, with the latter being important for NB trafficking to the cell surface [117]. Purified NB has been found to form ion channels when incorporated into artificial lipid bilayers [118], and further studies on an NB-S20A mutant have resulted in altered proton permeability and channel gating [119]. However, in contrast to the BM2 protein, NB is not required for in cell culture [120]. IBV NB cannot modify pH within the TGN [107].

5. Influenza Viroporin Inhibition The vast majority of viroporin inhibitors have been developed against the AM2 protein. This is not surprising since AM2 was the first viroporin discovered, has a well-established biological role in viral pathogenesis and is a proven drug target [31,38,121]. Amantadine (Amt, Symmetrel) is considered the first viroporin channel inhibitor and the second antiviral agent ever discovered [122]. It binds the pore of the AM2 channel in a hydrophilic pocket [56,123,124]. Together with its close derivative, (Rim, Flumadine), they are the only licensed antiviral drugs that target viroporins [125] despite their modest affinity for AM2 (e.g., for Amt, IC50 = 16 µM). However, most currently circulating IAV strains are Amt- and Rim-resistant [126–129], and therefore the use of Amt and Rim has been discontinued in humans [130]. The focus of the current research is the Amt-resistant variants of AM2 [131–134]. Indeed, more than 95% of circulating influenza A viruses carry the S31N mutation in their M2 sequence, Cells 2019, 8, 654 8 of 20 while about 1% have V27A , and less than 0.2% carry rare mutations (L26F, A30T, G34E and L38F) [135]. The reader is referred to previous reviews (e.g., [136,137]) and a more recent one that is also general for viroporin inhibition [138]. Recently, the role of water in drug binding was highlighted by the demonstration that small molecules can enable potent inhibition by targeting key waters in hydrogen-bonded networks that are used to facilitate proton diffusion [51]. Although AM2 and BM2 are functional homologs, wild-type BM2 is insensitive to Amt and Rim [38,40], and no BM2 inhibitors have been identified to date. The lack of amantadine inhibition of BM2 may be explained by differences in lumen hydrophobicity in the two channels. For example, the BM2 structure solved by solution NMR in DHPC [42] shows a coiled-coil tetramer channel apparently in the Cclosed conformation, with three polar residues (Ser-9, Ser-12, and Ser-16) lining the pore and a bulky phenylalanine ring (Phe-5) protruding into the pore at the N-terminus and possibly blocking the BM2 channel pore. By contrast, the corresponding pore-lining residues in the AM2 channel are much more hydrophobic: Val-27, Ala-30 and Gly-34 [36,53]. Thus, the more hydrophilic channel of BM2 protein may not be able to accommodate a hydrophobic drug like amantadine. However, the poor inhibition by other small molecules is difficult to explain, since N-terminal interhelical separation of BM2, measured using fluorinated Phe-5, cannot prevent the access of small molecules to the lumen of the pore [90]. In addition to and other small molecules, the AM2 proton channel can be also inhibited by both oxidized and reduced copper ions, Cu(II) and Cu(I). Biphasic inhibition observed in electrophysiological assays has suggested two Cu(II)-binding sites with different affinities [139]. Solid-state NMR studies have shown that the low-affinity site is non-specific and localized at the membrane surface, whereas the high-affinity site would be located inside the channel in between the four imidazole rings from His37 residues and the four indole rings from Trp41 [140]. Influenza A virus replication is affected by Cu(II), presumably through inhibiting the AM2 proton channel by the dissociated Cu(II) [141]. BM2 is also inhibited by Cu(II) in a biphasic manner [43], although it is less sensitive to Cu(II) inhibition. Therefore, Cu(II) complexes may also be toxic to influenza B viruses.

6. M2-Mediated Disruption of Ion The channel activity of IAV M2 has been found to be sufficient for the activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome in influenza-infected cells [142]. AM2 also contributes to influenza pathogenesis by downregulating the expression and function of two host ion channels, the amiloride-sensitive epithelial sodium channels (ENaC) [143] and the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) chloride channels [144]. These are present in apical membranes of lung epithelium and are important regulators for the absorption and secretion of fluids and electrolytes [145,146]. An impairment in their activity is associated with detrimental consequences, including pulmonary edema and (see [147]). AM2 has been found to reduce the surface protein levels and channel activity of ENaC, probably via signal transduction mechanisms. M2 can upregulate the steady-state levels of reactive oxygen species, likely by decreasing mitochondrial membrane potential and activation of protein kinase C (PKC), leading to modification of ENaC to enhance its endocytosis and proteasomal degradation. Inhibition of ENaC appears to be mediated by the C-terminus of M2 [143]. CFTR is a cyclic AMP-activated chloride channel that mediates the regulation of the thickness and composition of lung epithelial lining fluids (ELFs). M2 reduces the activity of the CFTR channel by alkalinizing the secretory pH, thereby targeting CFTR for destruction via a ubiquitin-dependent pathway. Several studies have demonstrated that the proton channel activity of M2 is required for inhibition of CFTR: (i) addition of M2 ion channel inhibitor amantadine rescued CFTR expression and activity in Xenopus oocytes expressing both M2 and CFTR channels, and (ii) co-expression of CFTR with M2 channel-defective mutants (M2-G34V and M2-V27F) did not alter the GlyH-101-sensitive currents [144]. Cells 2019, 8, 654 9 of 20

7. Protein–Protein Interactions (PPIs) Influenza viroporins are also involved in viral pathogenesis by engaging in critical interactions with viral proteins or disrupting normal host cellular pathways through coordinated interactions with host proteins. The reader is referred to a recent review on this subject [148] that provides an update on the characterization of the main PPIs for most viroporins, as well as the role of viroporins in these PPI interactions. In the next part of this review, we highlight and summarize the nature and outcome of some of these protein–protein interactions involving M2, and how the influenza virus may exploit these host cell factors to its advantage.

7.1. Modulation of Host Autophagy In IAV, M2 plays an important role in evading host autophagy by interacting with autophagic proteins such as Beclin-1 and LC3 (microtubule-associated protein light chain 3). M2 blocks autophagosome fusion with lysosomes by interacting with Beclin-1 through the N-terminal 60 amino acids of M2, resulting in enhanced apoptotic cell death [149]. IAV is also able to subvert host autophagy by encoding a short linear motif (SLiM) in its M2 protein to mimic a highly conserved LC3-interacting region (LIR) motif, W/FxxI/L/V. This interaction hijacks LC3 to the plasma membrane to prevent autophagosome–lysosome fusion and is essential for IAV budding and transmission [150]. Mutations in M2 that abolish its binding to LC3 have led to reduced filamentous virion budding and stability in vitro [151], suggesting that the M2–LC3 interaction may also aid in viral transmission by enhancing virion stability.

7.2. Interplay with Host Defense Influenza infection induces a number of host antiviral activities, including interferon (IFN) responses and activation of double-stranded RNA (dsRNA)-activated protein kinase (PKR) [152]. During the early stages of infection, host PKR activation is inhibited by IAV to permit viral replication, by (i) masking of viral dsRNA using its nonstructural protein 1 (NS1) to prevent PKR activation [153], and (ii) activation of the PKR inhibitor P58IPK through (NP)-mediated dissociation of Hsp40 from the Hsp40–P58IPK complex [154]. During the late stages of infection, AM2 stabilizes the Hsp40–P58IPK complex, leading to PKR activation and subsequent cell death and viral release [155]. While BM2 was found to interact with Hsp40 through the C-terminal domain 1 (CTD1) of Hsp40 [155], the binding site in P58IPK is not known. (BST-2, bone stromal cell 2) is an interferon-inducible antiviral host factor that restricts the release of many enveloped viruses by forming a proteinaceous link, tethering budding virions to the cell surface [156]. IAV has evolved several mechanisms to neutralize the activity of tetherin, one of which involves AM2 interaction with tetherin to downregulate its surface expression via the proteasomal pathway, probably mediated by AM2 extracellular and transmembrane domains [157].

7.3. Targeting by Host Restriction Factors One identified binder of the cytoplasmic tail of M2 is annexin A6 (AnxA6) [158], a Ca2+/lipid-binding scaffold protein that interacts with lipid rafts and regulates cholesterol homeostasis. siRNA-silencing of AnxA6 expression has enhanced viral release, while its overexpression has resulted in reduced viral titer, suggesting that AnxA6 negatively regulates IAV infection [158]. It is speculated that AnxA6 may interact with the M2 cytoplasmic tail during membrane scission, although it remains to be elucidated how this host– interaction may contribute to the impairment of IAV budding and release. Cyclin D3 is a key cell-cycle regulator of the G0/G1 phase that binds to the M2 cytoplasmic tail [159]. Like AnxA6, siRNA-knockdown of cyclin D3 led to increased virus titer. It has been proposed that cyclin D3 disrupts the interaction between IAV M1 and M2 by competing with M1 for binding to M2, consequently impairing the proper assembly of progeny virions. To counteract cyclin D3 activity, IAV Cells 2019, 8, 654 10 of 20 is able to induce the relocalization of cyclin D3 from the nucleus to the , where it is targeted for proteasomal degradation.

7.4. Modulation of Viral Replication The cytoplasmic tail region of IAV M2 encodes another host SLiM that interacts with the host -1 (Cav-1). Cav-1 is a cholesterol-binding raft-residing membrane protein with multiple roles in lipid and membrane trafficking, as well as in signal transduction [160]. Inhibition of Cav-1 correlates with decreased virus titers in IAV-infected cells [161]. A consensus Cav-1-binding motif (CBM), ΦxxxxΦxxΦ (where Φ represents an aromatic ) [162], was found in the amphipathic helix of the M2 cytoplasmic tail (F47FKCIYRRF55)[161]. The M2/Cav-1 interaction has been found to be involved in modulating IAV replication [161], but it remains to be determined whether this interaction also affects the surface localization of M2 and other viral proteins. Targeting the function of the host cellular Na,K-ATPase pump offers a promising antiviral treatment (recently reviewed in [163]), since infection by RNA viruses can affect the expression and activity of Na,K-ATPase. For instance, infection with IAV/H1N1 and IAV/H5N1 has led to the downregulation of Na,K-ATPase in alveolar epithelium [164]. Cardiac glycosides are classical inhibitors of Na,K- and have been reported to exhibit inhibitory effects on the influenza virus [165]. This action of cardiac glycosides on viral replication could be due to activation of signaling cascades, or by altering the concentration of intracellular ions. Influenza protein translation has been reported to be affected by cardiac glycosides such as ouabain, digoxin and lanatoside C, which express antiviral activity against influenza [166,167]. The β1 auxiliary subunit of the Na+/K+ ATPase, ATP1B1, was identified to interact with the cytoplasmic region of both AM2 and BM2, and a stable ATP1B1-knockdown cell line was able to suppress influenza virus A/WSN/33 replication [167]. Using deletion mutations, the authors narrowed down the interacting region to residues 28–48 in BM2, and residues 117–303 in ATP1B1, although the interaction between AM2 and ATP1B1 has not been characterized.

7.5. Modulation of Surface Expression During the late stages of the IAV replication cycle, the vRNP complexes as well as viral envelope glycoproteins and structural proteins need to be targeted to the virus assembly sites. M2 has to be transported from the rough (RER) to the apical plasma membrane through the host secretory pathway [168,169]. This transport travelling is thought to be modulated by several cellular factors, including the ubiquitin protein ligase E3 component N-recognin 4 (UBR4), the vesicle transport protein Rab11 and the transport protein particle complex 6A delta (TRAPPC6A∆). UBR4 is a 600-kDa member of the UBR box-containing an N-recognin family with multiple roles, including targeting protein for ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation [170]. In the context of an IAV infection, UBR4 has been proposed to promote surface localization of the viral envelope proteins HA, NA, and M2. The M2 transmembrane and cytoplasmic tail regions have been found to be important for its interaction with host UBR4. Knockout of UBR4 has led to enhanced co-localization of M2 with the autophagosome marker DIRAS3 and reduced M2 cell surface expression [171]. Taken together, the interaction between M2 and host UBR4 may benefit IAV replication by (i) protecting M2 from host degradation, and (ii) promoting surface localization of M2 and other viral glycoproteins to facilitate efficient IAV budding and release. The Rab11 pathway is known to be involved in the IAV budding process [172]. Rab11 is a small GTP-binding protein that traffics proteins and vesicles between the trans-Golgi network (TGN), recycling endosome and apical membrane [173–175]. Knockout of Rab11 has also led to a reduction of M2 surface levels [176], proposing a role for Rab11 in the apical delivery of M2. TRAPPC6A and its truncated form TRAPPC6A∆ also interact with IAV M2 through a highly conserved residue located at the M2 cytoplasmic tail (M2-L96) [177]. TRAPPC6A is a component of the multi-subunit transport protein particle (TRAPP) complex that mediates Cells 2019, 8, 654 11 of 20

ER-to-Golgi transport [178]. siRNA knockdown of TRAPPC6A∆ increases M2 surface expression, while TRAPPC6A∆ overexpression has produced the opposite effect, suggesting that TRAPPC6A∆ slows down M2 apical trafficking. Two other subunits of the TRAPP complex, TRAPPC5 and TRAPPC9, were identified as binders to M2 in all of four independent influenza interactome screening campaigns [171,179–181]. It would be interesting to determine if these TRAPP complex subunits may cooperate in the modulation of the influenza life cycle. Finally, the host factor Golgi-specific brefeldin A-resistant guanine nucleotide exchange factor 1 (GBF1) is proposed to play an important role in the trafficking of viral proteins to the cell surface during the late stages of virus replication [181]. The latter work reported that siRNA-mediated depletion of GBF1 correlates with (i) significant reduction in virus titers, (ii) reduced efficiency of VLP formation and (iii) altered intracellular localization of the viral envelope proteins HA and NA. However, while GBF1 has been reported to associate with M2, it is not completely understood how M2 contributes to the process.

8. Conclusions In summary, most information available for influenza viroporins is centered around AM2, followed by BM2. For the latter, structural data are increasingly available, but protein–protein interaction data studies comparable to AM2 are lacking. Viroporins in ICV and IDV have attracted much less interest, concomitant with their lower virulence in humans and biomedical relevance. Nevertheless, their mode of action, and those of lesser known viroporins, can help to better understand ionic transport across membranes.

Author Contributions: Writing—original draft preparation, J.T. (Janet To) and J.T. (Jaume Torres); writing—review and editing, J.T. (Janet To) and J.T. (Jaume Torres); funding acquisition, J.T. (Jaume Torres). Funding: Jaume Torres acknowledges the funding of the Singapore Ministry of Education Tier 1 grant RG134/16. Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

1. Ritchey, M.B.; Palese, P.; Kilbourne, E.D. of influenza A, B, and C viruses. J. Virol. 1976, 18, 738–744. [PubMed] 2. Hause, B.M.; Collin, E.A.; Liu, R.; Huang, B.; Sheng, Z.; Lu, W.; Wang, D.; Nelson, E.A.; Li, F. Characterization of a novel influenza virus in cattle and swine: Proposal for a new genus in the Orthomyxoviridae family. MBio 2014, 5.[CrossRef][PubMed] 3. Hause, B.M.; Ducatez, M.; Collin, E.A.; , Z.; Liu, R.; Sheng, Z.; Armien, A.; Kaplan, B.; Chakravarty, S.; Hoppe, A.D.; et al. Isolation of a novel swine influenza virus from Oklahoma in 2011 which is distantly related to influenza C viruses. PLoS Pathog. 2013, 9, e1003176. [CrossRef][PubMed] 4. Parrish, C.R.; Murcia, P.R.; Holmes, E.C. Influenza virus reservoirs and intermediate hosts: Dogs, horses, and new possibilities for influenza virus exposure of humans. J. Virol. 2015, 89, 2990–2994. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 5. Webster, R.G.; Bean, W.J.; Gorman, O.T.; Chambers, T.M.; Kawaoka, Y. Evolution and ecology of influenza A viruses. Microbiol. Rev. 1992, 56, 152–179. [PubMed] 6. Hay, A.J.; Gregory, V.; Douglas, A.R.; Yi, P.L. The evolution of human influenza viruses. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2001, 356, 1861–1870. [CrossRef] 7. Neumann, G.; Noda, T.; Kawaoka, Y. Emergence and potential of swine-origin H1N1 influenza virus. Nature 2009, 459, 931–939. [CrossRef] 8. Molinari, N.A.M.; Ortega-Sanchez, I.R.; Messonnier, M.L.; Thompson, W.W.; Wortley, P.M.; Weintraub, E.; Bridges, C.B. The annual impact of seasonal influenza in the US: Measuring disease burden and costs. Vaccine 2007, 25, 5086–5096. [CrossRef] 9. Webster, R.G.; Monto, A.S.; Braciale, T.J.; Lamb, R.A. Textbook of Influenza; John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2013. Cells 2019, 8, 654 12 of 20

10. Koutsakos, M.; Nguyen, T.H.; Barclay, W.S.; Kedzierska, K. Knowns and unknowns of influenza B viruses. Future Microbiol. 2016, 11, 119–135. [CrossRef] 11. Ran, Z.; Shen, H.; Lang, Y.; Kolb, E.A.; Turan, N.; Zhu, L.; Ma, J.; Bawa, B.; Liu, Q.; Liu, H.; et al. Domestic pigs are susceptible to infection with influenza B viruses. J. Virol. 2015, 89, 4818–4826. [CrossRef] 12. Osterhaus, A.D.M.E.; Rimmelzwaan, G.F.; Martina, B.E.E.; Bestebroer, T.M.; Fouchier, R.A.M. Influenza B virus in seals. Science 2000, 288, 1051–1053. [CrossRef][PubMed] 13. Ferguson, L.; Olivier, A.K.; Genova, S.; Epperson, W.B.; Smith, D.R.; Schneider, L.; Barton, K.; McCuan, K.; Webby, R.J.; Wan, X.F. Pathogenesis of influenza D virus in cattle. J. Virol. 2016, 90, 5636–5642. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 14. Palese, P.; Shaw, M.L. Orthomyxoviridae: The viruses and their replication. Fields Virol. 2007, 1647–1689. 15. Zebedee, S.L.; Lamb, R.A. Influenza A virus M2 protein: Monoclonal restriction of virus growth and detection of M2 in virions. J. Virol. 1988, 62, 2762–2772. [PubMed] 16. Skehel, J.J.; Wiley, D.C. Receptor binding and membrane fusion in virus entry: The influenza hemagglutinin. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2000, 69, 531–569. [CrossRef][PubMed] 17. Kundu, A.; Avalos, R.T.; Sanderson, C.M.; Nayak, D.P. Transmembrane domain of influenza virus neuraminidase, a type II protein, possesses an apical sorting signal in polarized MDCK cells. J. Virol. 1996, 70, 6508–6515. [PubMed] 18. Sakaguchi, T.; Tu, Q.A.; Pinto, L.H.; Lamb, R.A. The active oligomeric state of the minimalistic influenza virus M-2 ion channel is a tetramer. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1997, 94, 5000–5005. [CrossRef][PubMed] 19. Fields, B.N.; Knipe, D.M.; Howley, P.M. Fields Virology; Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2013. 20. Muraki, Y.; Hongo, S. The molecular virology and reverse genetics of influenza C virus. Jpn. J. Infect. Dis. 2010, 63, 157–165. 21. Castano-Rodriguez, C.; Honrubia, J.M.; Gutierrez-Alvarez, J.; DeDiego, M.L.; Nieto-Torres, J.L.; Jimenez-Guardeno, J.M.; Regla-Nava, J.A.; Fernandez-Delgado, R.; Verdia-Baguena, C.; Queralt-Martin, M.; et al. Role of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Viroporins E, 3a, and 8a in Replication and Pathogenesis. MBio 2018, 9.[CrossRef] 22. Carrasco, L. Modification of membrane permeability by animal viruses. Adv. Virus Res. 1995, 45, 61–112. 23. Nieva, J.L.; Carrasco, L. Viroporins: Structures and functions beyond permeabilization. Viruses 2015, 7, 5169–5171. [CrossRef] 24. Hyser, J.M.; Estes, M.K. Pathophysiological Consequences of Calcium-Conducting Viroporins. Annu. Rev. Virol. 2015, 2, 473–496. [CrossRef][PubMed] 25. Lamb, R.A.; Zebedee, S.L.; Richardson, C.D. Influenza virus M2 protein is an integral membrane protein expressed on the infected-cell surface. Cell 1985, 40, 627–633. [CrossRef] 26. Lamb, R.A.; Choppin, P.W. The gene structure and replication of influenza virus. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 1983, 52, 467–506. [CrossRef][PubMed] 27. Sugrue, R.J.; Hay, A.J. Structural characteristics of the M2 protein of influenza a viruses: Evidence that it forms a tetrameric channel. Virology 1991, 180, 617–624. [CrossRef] 28. Hull, J.D.; Gilmore, R.; Lamb, R.A. Integration of a small integral membrane protein, M2, of influenza virus into the endoplasmic reticulum: Analysis of the internal signal-anchor domain of a protein with an ectoplasmic NH2 terminus. J. Cell Biol. 1988, 106, 1489–1498. [CrossRef][PubMed] 29. Helenius, A. Unpacking the incoming influenza virus. Cell 1992, 69, 577–578. [CrossRef] 30. Martin, K.; Helenius, A. Transport of incoming influenza virus nucleocapsids into the nucleus. J. Virol. 1991, 65, 232–244. [CrossRef] 31. Takeuchi, K.; Lamb, R.A. Influenza virus M2 protein ion channel activity stabilizes the native form of fowl plague virus hemagglutinin during intracellular transport. J. Virol. 1994, 68, 911–919. 32. Ciampor, F.; Bayley, P.M.; Nermut, M.V.; Hirst, E.M.A.; Sugrue, R.J.; Hay, A.J. Evidence that the amantadine-induced, M2-mediated conversion of influenza A virus hemagglutinin to the low pH conformation occurs in an acidic trans golgi compartment. Virology 1992, 188, 14–24. [CrossRef] 33. Grambas, S.; Hay, A.J. Maturation of influenza a virus hemagglutinin-Estimates of the pH encountered during transport and its regulation by the M2 protein. Virology 1992, 190, 11–18. [CrossRef] 34. Sugrue, R.J.; Bahadur, G.; Zambon, M.C.; Hall-Smith, M.; Douglas, A.R.; Hay, A.J. Specific structural alteration of the influenza haemagglutinin by amantadine. EMBO J. 1990, 9, 3469–3476. [CrossRef][PubMed] Cells 2019, 8, 654 13 of 20

35. Ma, C.; Polishchuk, A.L.; Ohigashi, Y.; Stouffer, A.L.; Schön, A.; Magavern, E.; Jing, X.; Lear, J.D.; Freire, E.; Lamb, R.A.; et al. Identification of the functional core of the influenza A virus A/M2 proton-selective ion channel. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 12283–12288. [CrossRef][PubMed] 36. Pinto, L.H.; Dieckmann, G.R.; Gandhi, C.S.; Papworth, C.G.; Braman, J.; Shaughnessy, M.A.; Lear, J.D.; Lamb, R.A.; Degrado, W.F. A functionally defined model for the of influenza A virus suggests a mechanism for its ion selectivity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1997, 94, 11301–11306. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 37. Tang, Y.; Zaitseva, F.; Lamb, R.A.; Pinto, L.H. The gate of the influenza virus M2 proton channel is formed by a single residue. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 39880–39886. [CrossRef][PubMed] 38. Pinto, L.H.; Lamb, R.A. The M2 proton channels of influenza A and B viruses. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281, 8997–9000. [CrossRef][PubMed] 39. Hatta, M.; Goto, H.; Kawaoka, Y. Influenza B virus requires BM2 protein for replication. J. Virol. 2004, 78, 5576–5583. [CrossRef][PubMed] 40. Mould, J.A.; Paterson, R.G.; Takeda, M.; Ohigashi, Y.; Venkataraman, P.; Lamb, R.A.; Pinto, L.H. Influenza B virus BM2 protein has ion channel activity that conducts protons across membranes. Dev. Cell 2003, 5, 175–184. [CrossRef] 41. Paterson, R.G.; Takeda, M.; Ohigashi, Y.; Pinto, L.H.; Lamb, R.A. Influenza B virus BM2 protein is an oligomeric integral membrane protein expressed at the cell surface. Virology 2003, 306, 7–17. [CrossRef] 42. Wang, J.; Pielak, R.M.; McClintock, M.A.; Chou, J.J. Solution structure and functional analysis of the influenza B proton channel. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2009, 16, 1267–1271. [CrossRef] 43. Ma, C.; Wang, J. Functional studies reveal the similarities and differences between AM2 and BM2 proton channels from influenza viruses. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Biomembr. 2018, 1860, 272–280. [CrossRef][PubMed] 44. Odagiri, T.; Hong, J.; Ohara, Y. The BM2 protein of influenza B virus is synthesized in the late phase of infection and incorporated into virions as a subviral component. J. Gen. Virol. 1999, 80, 2573–2581. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 45. Sugrue, R.J.; Belshe, R.B.; Hay, A.J. Palmitoylation of the influenza a virus M2 protein. Virology 1990, 179, 51–56. [CrossRef] 46. Holsinger, L.J.; Alams, R. Influenza virus M2 integral membrane protein is a homotetramer stabilized by formation of disulfide bonds. Virology 1991, 183, 32–43. [CrossRef] 47. Thomas, J.M.; Stevens, M.P.; Percy, N.; Barclay, W.S. Phosphorylation of the M2 protein of influenza A virus is not essential for virus viability. Virology 1998, 252, 54–64. [CrossRef][PubMed] 48. Hutchinson, E.C.; Denham, E.M.; Thomas, B.; Trudgian, D.C.; Hester, S.S.; Ridlova, G.; York, A.; Turrell, L.; Fodor, E. Mapping the phosphoproteome of influenza A and B viruses by mass spectrometry. PLoS Pathog. 2012, 8, e1002993. [CrossRef] 49. Park, E.K.; Castrucci, M.R.; Portner, A.; Kawaoka, Y. The M2 ectodomain is important for its incorporation into influenza A virions. J. Virol. 1998, 72, 2449–2455. 50. Acharya, R.; Carnevale, V.; Fiorin, G.; Levine, B.G.; Polishchuk, A.L.; Balannik, V.; Samish, I.; Lamb, R.A.; Pinto, L.H.; DeGrado, W.F.; et al. Structure and mechanism of proton transport through the transmembrane tetrameric M2 protein bundle of the influenza A virus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 15075–15080. [CrossRef] 51. Thomaston, J.L.; Polizzi, N.F.; Konstantinidi, A.; Wang, J.; Kolocouris, A.; Degrado, W.F. Inhibitors of the M2 Proton Channel Engage and Disrupt Transmembrane Networks of Hydrogen-Bonded Waters. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 15219–15226. [CrossRef] 52. Schnell, J.R.; Chou, J.J. Structure and mechanism of the M2 proton channel of influenza A virus. Nature 2008, 451, 591–595. [CrossRef] 53. Wang, J.; Wu, Y.; Ma, C.; Fiorin, G.; Wang, J.; Pinto, L.H.; Lamb, R.A.; Klein, M.L.; DeGrado, W.F. Structure and inhibition of the drug-resistant S31N mutant of the M2 ion channel of influenza A virus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 1315–1320. [CrossRef][PubMed] 54. Hu, F.; Schmidt-Rohr, K.; Hong, M. NMR detection of pH-dependent histidine-water proton exchange reveals the conduction mechanism of a transmembrane proton channel. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 3703–3713. [CrossRef][PubMed] Cells 2019, 8, 654 14 of 20

55. Sharma, M.; Yi, M.; Dong, H.; Qin, H.; Peterson, E.; Busath, D.D.; Zhou, H.X.; Cross, T.A. Insight into the mechanism of the influenza A proton channel from a structure in a lipid bilayer. Science 2010, 330, 509–512. [CrossRef][PubMed] 56. Cady, S.D.; Schmidt-Rohr, K.; Wang, J.; Soto, C.S.; Degrado, W.F.; Hong, M. Structure of the amantadine binding site of influenza M2 proton channels in lipid bilayers. Nature 2010, 463, 689–692. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 57. Liang, R.; Li, H.; Swanson, J.M.; Voth, G.A. Multiscale simulation reveals a multifaceted mechanism of proton permeation through the influenza A M2 proton channel. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, 9396–9401. [CrossRef][PubMed] 58. Hu, J.; Fu, R.; Nishimura, K.; Zhang, L.; Zhou, H.X.; Busath, D.D.; Vijayvergiya, V.; Cross, T.A. , heart of the hydrogen ion channel from influenza A virus: Toward an understanding of conductance and proton selectivity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103, 6865–6870. [CrossRef][PubMed] 59. Mandala, V.S.; Liao, S.Y.; Kwon, B.; Hong, M. Structural Basis for Asymmetric Conductance of the Influenza M2 Proton Channel Investigated by Solid-State NMR Spectroscopy. J. Mol. Biol. 2017, 429, 2192–2210. [CrossRef] 60. Ma, C.; Fiorin, G.; Carnevale, V.; Wang, J.; Lamb, R.A.; Klein, M.L.; Wu, Y.; Pinto, L.H.; Degrado, W.F. Asp44 stabilizes the Trp41 gate of the M2 proton channel of influenza a virus. Structure 2013, 21, 2033–2041. [CrossRef] 61. Pielak, R.M.; Chou, J.J. Kinetic analysis of the M2 proton conduction of the influenza virus. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 17695–17697. [CrossRef] 62. Okada, A.; Miura, T.; Takeuchi, H. Protonation of histidine and histidine-tryptophan interaction in the activation of the M2 ion channel from influenza A virus. Biochemistry 2001, 40, 6053–6060. [CrossRef] 63. Colvin, M.T.; Andreas, L.B.; Chou, J.J.; Griffin, R.G. Proton association constants of his 37 in the influenza-A M218-60dimer-of-dimers. Biochemistry 2014, 53, 5987–5994. [CrossRef][PubMed] 64. Liao, S.Y.; Yang, Y.; Tietze, D.; Hong, M. The Influenza M2 Cytoplasmic Tail Changes the Proton-Exchange Equilibria and the Backbone Conformation of the Transmembrane Histidine Residue to Facilitate Proton Conduction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 6067–6077. [CrossRef][PubMed] 65. Stouffer, A.L.; Acharya, R.; Salom, D.; Levine, A.S.; Di Costanzo, L.; Soto, C.S.; Tereshko, V.; Nanda, V.; Stayrook, S.; DeGrado, W.F. Structural basis for the function and inhibition of an influenza virus proton channel. Nature 2008, 451, 596–599. [CrossRef][PubMed] 66. Thomaston, J.L.; Alfonso-Prieto, M.; Woldeyes, R.A.; Fraser, J.S.; Klein, M.L.; Fiorin, G.; DeGrado, W.F. High-resolution structures of the M2 channel from influenza A virus reveal dynamic pathways for proton stabilization and transduction. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 112, 14260–14265. [CrossRef][PubMed] 67. Thomaston, J.L.; DeGrado, W.F. Crystal structure of the drug-resistant S31N influenza M2 proton channel. Protein Sci. 2016, 1551–1554. [CrossRef][PubMed] 68. Thomaston, J.L.; Woldeyes, R.A.; Nakane, T.; Yamashita, A.; Tanaka, T.; Koiwai, K.; Brewster, A.S.; Barad, B.A.; Chen, Y.; Lemmin, T.; et al. XFEL structures of the influenza M2 proton channel: Room temperature water networks and insights into proton conduction. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, 13357–13362. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 69. Agmon, N. The Grotthuss mechanism. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1995, 244, 456–462. [CrossRef] 70. Liang, R.; Swanson, J.M.J.; Madsen, J.J.; Hong, M.; DeGrado, W.F.; Voth, G.A. Acid activation mechanism of the influenza A M2 proton channel. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, E6955–E6964. [CrossRef] 71. Lin, T.; Schroeder, C. Definitive assignment of proton selectivity and attoampere unitary current to the M2 ion channel protein of influenza A virus. J. Virol. 2001, 75, 3647–3656. [CrossRef] 72. Chizhmakov, I.V.; Ogden, D.C.; Geraghty, F.M.; Hayhurst, A.; Skinner, A.; Betakova, T.; Hay, A.J. Differences in conductance of M2 proton channels of two influenza viruses at low and high pH. J. Physiol. 2003, 546, 427–438. [CrossRef] 73. Mould, J.A.; Li, H.C.; Dudlak, C.S.; Lear, J.D.; Pekosz, A.; Lamb, R.A.; Pinto, L.H. Mechanism for proton conduction of the M2 ion channel of influenza A virus. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 8592–8599. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 74. Moffat, J.C.; Vijayvergiya, V.; Gao, P.F.; Cross, T.A.; Woodbury, D.J.; Busath, D.D. Proton transport through influenza A virus M2 protein reconstituted in vesicles. Biophys. J. 2008, 94, 434–445. [CrossRef][PubMed] Cells 2019, 8, 654 15 of 20

75. Decoursey, T.E. Voltage-gated proton channels and other proton transfer pathways. Physiol. Rev. 2003, 83, 475–579. [CrossRef][PubMed] 76. Hu, F.; Luo, W.; Hong, M. Mechanisms of proton conduction and gating in influenza M2 proton channels from solid-state NMR. Science 2010, 330, 505–508. [CrossRef][PubMed] 77. Williams, J.K.; Zhang, Y.; Schmidt-Rohr, K.; Hong, M. PH-dependent conformation, dynamics, and aromatic interaction of the gating tryptophan residue of the influenza M2 proton channel from solid-state NMR. Biophys. J. 2013, 104, 1698–1708. [CrossRef][PubMed] 78. DiFrancesco, M.L.; Hansen, U.P.; Thiel, G.; Moroni, A.; Schroeder, I. Effect of cytosolic pH on inward currents reveals structural characteristics of the proton transport cycle in the influenza A protein M2 in cell-free membrane patches of Xenopus oocytes. PLoS ONE 2014, 9.[CrossRef] 79. Zhou, H.X. A theory for the proton transport of the influenza virus M2 protein: Extensive test against conductance data. Biophys. J. 2011, 100, 912–921. [CrossRef][PubMed] 80. Markiewicz, B.N.; Lemmin, T.; Zhang, W.; Ahmed, I.A.; Jo, H.; Fiorin, G.; Troxler, T.; DeGrado, W.F.; Gai, F. Infrared and fluorescence assessment of the hydration status of the tryptophan gate in the influenza A M2 proton channel. PCCP 2016, 18, 28939–28950. [CrossRef] 81. Lin, C.W.; Mensa, B.; Barniol-Xicota, M.; DeGrado, W.F.; Gai, F. Activation pH and Gating Dynamics of Influenza A M2 Proton Channel Revealed by Single-Molecule Spectroscopy. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2017, 56, 5283–5287. [CrossRef] 82. Miao, Y.; Fu, R.; Zhou, H.X.; Cross, T.A. Dynamic Short Hydrogen Bonds in Histidine Tetrad of Full-Length M2 Proton Channel Reveal Tetrameric Structural Heterogeneity and Functional Mechanism. Structure 2015, 23, 2300–2308. [CrossRef] 83. Li, C.; Qin, H.; Gao, F.P.; Cross, T.A. Solid-state NMR characterization of conformational plasticity within the transmembrane domain of the influenza A M2 proton channel. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2007, 1768, 3162–3170. [CrossRef][PubMed] 84. Yi, M.; Cross, T.A.; Zhou, H.X. Conformational heterogeneity of the M2 proton channel and a structural model for channel activation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 13311–13316. [CrossRef][PubMed] 85. Khurana, E.; Dal Peraro, M.; DeVane, R.; Vemparala, S.; DeGrado, W.F.; Klein, M.L. Molecular dynamics calculations suggest a conduction mechanism for the M2 proton channel from influenza A virus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 1069–1074. [CrossRef][PubMed] 86. Wei, C.; Pohorille, A. M2 Proton Channel: Toward a Model of a Primitive . Orig. Life Evol. Biosph. 2015, 45, 241–248. [CrossRef][PubMed] 87. Ghosh, A.; Qiu, J.; DeGrado, W.F.; Hochstrasser, R.M. Tidal surge in the M2 proton channel, sensed by 2D IR spectroscopy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 6115–6120. [CrossRef] 88. Ma, C.; Soto, C.S.; Ohigashi, Y.; Taylor, A.; Bournas, V.; Glawe, B.; Udo, M.K.; DeGrado, W.F.; Lamb, R.A.; Pinto, L.H. Identification of the pore-lining residues of the BM2 ion channel protein of influenza B virus. J. Biol. Chem. 2008, 283, 15921–15931. [CrossRef][PubMed] 89. Williams, J.K.; Tietze, D.; Lee, M.; Wang, J.; Hong, M. Solid-State NMR Investigation of the Conformation, Proton Conduction, and Hydration of the Influenza B Virus M2 Transmembrane Proton Channel. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 8143–8155. [CrossRef] 90. Williams, J.K.; Shcherbakov, A.A.; Wang, J.; Hong, M. Protonation equilibria and pore-opening structure of the dual-histidine influenza B virus M2 transmembrane proton channel from solid-state NMR. J. Biol. Chem. 2017, 292, 17876–17884. [CrossRef] 91. Hongo, S.; Sugawara, K.; Nishimura, H.; Muraki, Y.; Kitame, F.; Nakamura, K. Identification of a second protein encoded by influenza C virus RNA segment 6. J. Gen. Virol. 1994, 75, 3503–3510. [CrossRef] 92. Hongo, S.; Ishii, K.; Mori, K.; Takashita, E.; Muraki, Y.; Matsuzaki, Y.; Sugawara, K. Detection of ion channel activity in Xenopus laevis oocytes expressing Influenza C virus CM2 protein. Arch. Virol. 2004, 149, 35–50. [CrossRef] 93. Pekosz, A.; Lamb, R.A. Influenza C virus CM2 integral membrane glycoprotein is produced from a polypeptide precursor by cleavage of an internal signal sequence. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1998, 95, 13233–13238. [CrossRef][PubMed] 94. Hongo, S.; Sugawara, K.; Muraki, Y.; Matsuzaki, Y.; Takashita, E.; Kitame, F.; Nakamura, K. Influenza C virus CM2 protein is produced from a 374-amino-acid protein (P42) by signal peptidase cleavage. J. Virol. 1999, 73, 46–50. [PubMed] Cells 2019, 8, 654 16 of 20

95. Pekosz, A.; Lamb, R.A. The CM2 protein of influenza C virus is an oligomeric integral membrane glycoprotein structurally analogous to influenza A virus M2 and influenza B virus NB proteins. Virology 1997, 237, 439–451. [CrossRef][PubMed] 96. Hongo, S.; Sugawara, K.; Muraki, Y.; Kitame, F.; Nakamura, K. Characterization of a second protein (CM2) encoded by RNA segment 6 of influenza C virus. J. Virol. 1997, 71, 2786–2792. [PubMed] 97. Muraki, Y.; Okuwa, T.; Himeda, T.; Hongo, S.; Ohara, Y. Effect of Cysteine Mutations in the Extracellular Domain of CM2 on the Influenza C Virus Replication. PLoS ONE 2013, 8.[CrossRef][PubMed] 98. Tada, Y.; Hongo, S.; Muraki, Y.; Matsuzaki, Y.; Sugawara, K.; Kitame, F.; Nakamura, K. Phosphorylation of influenza C virus CM2 protein. Virus Res. 1998, 58, 65–72. [CrossRef] 99. Kukol, A.; Arkin, I.T. Structure of the Influenza C virus CM2 protein transmembrane domain obtained by site-specific infrared dichroism and global molecular dynamics searching. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 4225–4229. [CrossRef][PubMed] 100. Muraki, Y.; Washioka, H.; Sugawara, K.; Matsuzaki, Y.; Takashita, E.; Hongo, S. Identification of an amino acid residue on influenza C virus M1 protein responsible for formation of the cord-like structures of the virus. J. Gen. Virol. 2004, 85, 1885–1893. [CrossRef][PubMed] 101. Torres, J.; Kukol, A.; Arkin, I.T. Mapping the energy surface of transmembrane helix-helix interactions. Biophys. J. 2001, 81, 2681–2692. [CrossRef] 102. Betakova, T.; Hay, A.J. Evidence that the CM2 protein of influenza C virus can modify the pH of the exocytic pathway of transfected cells. J. Gen. Virol. 2007, 88, 2291–2296. [CrossRef] 103. Stewart, S.M.; Pekosz, A. The influenza C virus CM2 protein can alter intracellular pH, and: Its transmembrane domain can substitute for that of the influenza a virus M2 protein and support infectious virus production. J. Virol. 2012, 86, 1277–1281. [CrossRef][PubMed] 104. Ohuchi, M.; Ohuchi, R.; Mifune, K. Demonstration of hemolytic and fusion activities of influenza C virus. J. Virol. 1982, 42, 1076–1079. [PubMed] 105. Chizhmakov, I.V.; Geraghty, F.M.; Ogden, D.C.; Hayhurst, A.; Antoniou, M.; Hay, A.J. Selective proton permeability and pH regulation of the influenza virus M2 channel expressed in mouse erythroleukaemia cells. J. Physiol. 1996, 494, 329–336. [CrossRef][PubMed] 106. Mould, J.A.; Drury, J.E.; Fring, S.M.; Kaupp, U.B.; Pekosz, A.; Lamb, R.A.; Pinto, L.H. Permeation and activation of the M2 ion channel of influenza A virus. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 31038–31050. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 107. Betáková, T.; Kollerová, E. pH modulating activity of ion channels of influenza A, B, and C viruses. Acta Virol. 2006, 50, 187–193. [PubMed] 108. Zhirnov, O.P.; Grigoriev, V.B. Disassembly of influenza C viruses, distinct from that of influenza A and B viruses requires neutral-alkaline pH. Virology 1994, 200, 284–291. [CrossRef][PubMed] 109. Furukawa, T.; Muraki, Y.; Noda, T.; Takashita, E.; Sho, R.; Sugawara, K.; Matsuzaki, Y.; Shimotai, Y.; Hongo, S. Role of the CM2 protein in the influenza C virus replication cycle. J. Virol. 2011, 85, 1322–1329. [CrossRef] 110. Kesinger, E.; Liu, J.; Jensen, A.; Chia, C.P.; Demers, A.; Moriyama, H. Influenza D virus M2 protein exhibits ion channel activity in Xenopus laevis oocytes. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0199227. [CrossRef] 111. Henkel, M.; Mitzner, D.; Henklein, P.; Meyer-Almes, F.J.; Moroni, A.; DiFrancesco, M.L.; Henkes, L.M.; Kreim, M.; Kast, S.M.; Schubert, U.; et al. Proapoptotic influenza A virus protein PB1-F2 forms a nonselective ion channel. PLoS ONE 2010, 5.[CrossRef] 112. Chen, W.; Calvo, P.A.; Malide, D.; Gibbs, J.; Schubert, U.; Bacik, I.; Basta, S.; O’Neill, R.; Schickli, J.; Palese, P.; et al. A novel influenza A virus mitochondrial protein that induces cell death. Nat. Med. 2001, 7, 1306–1312. [CrossRef] 113. Zamarin, D.; García-Sastre, A.; Xiao, X.; Wang, R.; Palese, P. Influenza virus PB1-F2 protein induces cell death through mitochondrial ANT3 and VDAC1. PLoS Path. 2005, 1, 0040–0054. [CrossRef][PubMed] 114. Varga, Z.T.; Grant, A.; Manicassamy, B.; Palese, P. Influenza virus protein pb1-f2 inhibits the induction of type I interferon by binding to mavs and decreasing mitochondrial membrane potential. J. Virol. 2012, 86, 8359–8366. [CrossRef][PubMed] 115. McAuley, J.L.; Tate, M.D.; MacKenzie-Kludas, C.J.; Pinar, A.; Zeng, W.; Stutz, A.; Latz, E.; Brown, L.E.; Mansell, A. Activation of the NLRP3 Inflammasome by IAV Virulence Protein PB1-F2 Contributes to Severe Pathophysiology and Disease. PLoS Path. 2013, 9.[CrossRef][PubMed] Cells 2019, 8, 654 17 of 20

116. Williams, M.A.; Lamb, R.A. Effects of mutations and deletions in a bicistronic mRNA on the synthesis of influenza B virus NB and NA glycoproteins. J. Virol. 1989, 63, 28–35. [PubMed] 117. Demers, A.; Ran, Z.; Deng, Q.; Wang, D.; Edman, B.; Lu, W.; Li, F. Palmitoylation is required for intracellular trafficking of influenza B virus NB protein and efficient influenza B virus growth in vitro. J. Gen. Virol. 2014, 95, 1211–1220. [CrossRef][PubMed] 118. Sunstrom, N.A.; Premkumar, L.S.; Premkumar, A.; Ewart, G.; Cox, G.B.; Gage, P.W. Ion channels formed by NB, an influenza B virus protein. J. Membr. Biol. 1996, 150, 127–132. [CrossRef][PubMed] 119. Premkumar, A.; Ewart, G.D.; Cox, G.B.; Gage, P.W. An amino-acid substitution in the influenza-B NB protein affects ion-channel gating. J. Membr. Biol. 2004, 197, 135–143. [CrossRef] 120. Hatta, M.; Kawaoka, Y. The NB protein of influenza B virus is not necessary for virus replication in vitro. J. Virol. 2003, 77, 6050–6054. [CrossRef] 121. Pinto, L.H.; Holsinger, L.J.; Lamb, R.A. Influenza virus M2 protein has ion channel activity. Cell 1992, 69, 517–528. [CrossRef] 122. Davies, W.L.; Grunert, R.R.; Haff, R.F.; McGahen, J.W.; Neumayer, E.M.; Paulshock, M.; Watts, J.C.; Wood, T.R.; Hermann, E.C.; Hoffmann, C.E. Antiviral Activity of 1-Adamantanamine (Amantadine). Science 1964, 144, 862–863. [CrossRef] 123. Pielak, R.M.; Oxenoid, K.; Chou, J.J. Structural Investigation of Rimantadine Inhibition of the AM2-BM2 Chimera Channel of Influenza Viruses. Structure 2011, 19, 1655–1663. [CrossRef][PubMed] 124. Hay, A.J.; Wolstenholme, A.J.; Skehel, J.J.; Smith, M.H. The molecular basis of the specific anti-influenza action of amantadine. EMBO J. 1985, 4, 3021–3024. [CrossRef][PubMed] 125. Vanderlinden, E.; Naesens, L. Emerging Antiviral Strategies to Interfere with Influenza Virus Entry. Med. Res. Rev. 2014, 34, 301–339. [CrossRef][PubMed] 126. Deyde, V.M.; Xu, X.; Bright, R.A.; Shaw, M.; Smith, C.B.; Zhang, Y.; Shu, Y.; Gubareva, L.V.; Cox, N.J.; Klimov, A.I. Surveillance of resistance to adamantanes among influenza A(H3N2) and A(H1N1) viruses isolated worldwide. J. Infect. Dis. 2007, 196, 249–257. [CrossRef][PubMed] 127. Bright, R.A.; Shay, D.K.; Shu, B.; Cox, N.J.; Klimov, A.I. resistance among influenza A viruses isolated early during the 2005-2006 influenza season in the United States. JAMA 2006, 295, 891–894. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 128. Bright, R.A.; Medina, M.J.; Xu, X.; Perez-Oronoz, G.; Wallis, T.R.; Davis, X.M.; Povinelli, L.; Cox, N.J.; Klimov, A.I. Incidence of adamantane resistance among influenza A (H3N2) viruses isolated worldwide from 1994 to 2005: A cause for concern. Lancet 2005, 366, 1175–1181. [CrossRef] 129. Hayden, F.G.; De Jong, M.D. Emerging influenza antiviral resistance threats. J. Infect. Dis. 2011, 203, 6–10. [CrossRef][PubMed] 130. Fiore, A.E.; Fry, A.; Shay, D.; Gubareva, L.; Bresee, J.S.; Uyeki, T.M.; Centers for Disease Control Prevention. Antiviral agents for the treatment and chemoprophylaxis of influenza—Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). MMWR Recomm. Rep. 2011, 60, 1–24. 131. Li, F.; Ma, C.; DeGrado, W.F.; Wang, J. Discovery of Highly Potent Inhibitors Targeting the Predominant Drug-Resistant S31N Mutant of the Influenza A Virus M2 Proton Channel. J. Med. Chem. 2016, 59, 1207–1216. [CrossRef] 132. Li, F.; Ma, C.; Hu, Y.; Wang, Y.; Wang, J. Discovery of Potent Antivirals against Amantadine-Resistant Influenza A Viruses by Targeting the M2-S31N Proton Channel. ACS Infect. Dis. 2016, 2, 726–733. [CrossRef] 133. Ma, C.; Zhang, J.; Wang, J. Pharmacological Characterization of the Spectrum of Antiviral Activity and Genetic Barrier to Drug Resistance of M2-S31N Channel Blockers. Mol. Pharmacol. 2016, 90, 188–198. [CrossRef][PubMed] 134. Hu, Y.; Musharrafieh, R.; Ma, C.; Zhang, J.; Smee, D.F.; DeGrado, W.F.; Wang, J. An M2-V27A channel blocker demonstrates potent in vitro and in vivo antiviral activities against amantadine-sensitive and -resistant influenza A viruses. Antivir. Res. 2017, 140, 45–54. [CrossRef][PubMed] 135. Dong, G.; Peng, C.; Luo, J.; Wang, C.; Han, L.; Wu, B.; Ji, G.; He, H. Adamantane-resistant influenza a viruses in the world (1902-2013): Frequency and distribution of M2 gene mutations. PLoS ONE 2015, 10.[CrossRef] [PubMed] 136. Du, J.; Cross, T.A.; Zhou, H.X. Recent progress in structure-based anti-influenza drug design. Drug Discov. Today 2012, 17, 1111–1120. [CrossRef][PubMed] Cells 2019, 8, 654 18 of 20

137. Gu, R.X.; Liu, L.A.; Wei, D.Q. Structural and energetic analysis of drug inhibition of the influenza A M2 proton channel. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2013, 34, 571–580. [CrossRef] 138. To, J.; Surya, W.; Torres, J. Targeting the Channel Activity of Viroporins. Adv. Prot. Chem. Struct. Biol. 2016, 104, 307–355. 139. Gandhi, C.S.; Shuck, K.; Lear, J.D.; Dieckmann, G.R.; DeGrado, W.F.; Lamb, R.A.; Pinto, L.H. Cu(II) inhibition of the proton translocation machinery of the influenza A virus M 2 protein. J. Biol. Chem. 1999, 274, 5474–5482. [CrossRef] 140. Su, Y.; Hu, F.; Hong, M. Paramagnetic Cu(II) for probing membrane protein structure and function: Inhibition mechanism of the influenza M2 proton channel. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 8693–8702. [CrossRef] 141. Gordon, N.A.; McGuire, K.L.; Wallentine, S.K.; Mohl, G.A.; Lynch, J.D.; Harrison, R.G.; Busath, D.D. Divalent copper complexes as influenza A M2 inhibitors. Antivir. Res. 2017, 147, 100–106. [CrossRef] 142. Ichinohe, T.; Pang, I.K.; Iwasaki, A. Influenza virus activates inflammasomes via its intracellular M2 ion channel. Nat. Immunol. 2010, 11, 404–410. [CrossRef] 143. Lazrak, A.; Iles, K.E.; Liu, G.; Noah, D.L.; Noah, J.W.; Matalon, S. Influenza virus M2 protein inhibits epithelial sodium channels by increasing reactive oxygen species. FASEB J. 2009, 23, 3829–3842. [CrossRef][PubMed] 144. Londino, J.D.; Lazrak, A.; Jurkuvenaite, A.; Collawn, J.F.; Noah, J.W.; Matalon, S. Influenza matrix protein 2 alters CFTR expression and function through its ion channel activity. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol. 2013, 304, L582–L592. [CrossRef][PubMed] 145. Matalon, S.; O’Brodovich, H. Sodium channels in alveolar epithelial cells: Molecular characterization, biophysical properties, and physiological significance. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 1999, 61, 627–661. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 146. Rogan, M.P.; Stoltz, D.A.; Hornick, D.B. Cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator intracellular processing, trafficking, and opportunities for mutation-specific treatment. Chest 2011, 139, 1480–1490. [CrossRef][PubMed] 147. Londino, J.D.; Lazrak, A.; Collawn, J.F.; Bebok, Z.; Harrod, K.S.; Matalon, S. Influenza virus infection alters ion channel function of airway and alveolar cells: Mechanisms and physiological sequelae. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol. 2017, 313, L845–L858. [CrossRef] 148. To, J.; Torres, J. Beyond Channel Activity: Protein-Protein Interactions Involving Viroporins. Sub-Cell. Biochem. 2018, 88, 329–377. [CrossRef] 149. Gannagé, M.; Dormann, D.; Albrecht, R.; Dengjel, J.; Torossi, T.; Rämer, P.C.; Lee, M.; Strowig, T.; Arrey, F.; Conenello, G.; et al. Matrix Protein 2 of Influenza A Virus Blocks Autophagosome Fusion with Lysosomes. Cell Host Microbe 2009, 6, 367–380. [CrossRef] 150. Bourmakina, S.V.; García-Sastre, A. Reverse genetics studies on the filamentous morphology of influenza a virus. J. Gen. Virol. 2003, 84, 517–527. [CrossRef] 151. Beale, R.; Wise, H.; Stuart, A.; Ravenhill, B.J.; Digard, P.; Randow, F. A LC3-interacting motif in the influenza A virus M2 protein is required to subvert autophagy and maintain virion stability. Cell Host Microbe 2014, 15, 239–247. [CrossRef] 152. Meurs, E.; Chong, K.; Galabru, J.; Thomas, N.S.B.; Kerr, I.M.; Williams, B.R.G.; Hovanessian, A.G. Molecular cloning and characterization of the human double-stranded RNA-activated protein kinase induced by interferon. Cell 1990, 62, 379–390. [CrossRef] 153. Lu, Y.; Wambach, M.; Katze, M.G.; Krug, R.M. Binding of the Influenza Virus NS1 Protein to Double-Stranded RNA Inhibits the Activation of the Protein Kinase That Phosphorylates the eIF-2 Translation Initiation Factor. Virology 1995, 214, 222–228. [CrossRef][PubMed] 154. Sharma, K.; Tripathi, S.; Ranjan, P.; Kumar, P.; Garten, R.; Deyde, V.; Katz, J.M.; Cox, N.J.; Lal, R.B.; Sambhara, S.; et al. Influenza a virus nucleoprotein exploits Hsp40 to inhibit PKR activation. PLoS ONE 2011, 6.[CrossRef][PubMed] 155. Guan, Z.; Liu, D.; Mi, S.; Zhang, J.; Ye, Q.; Wang, M.; Gao, G.F.; Yan, J. Interaction of Hsp40 with influenza virus M2 protein: Implications for PKR signaling pathway. Protein Cell 2010, 1, 944–955. [CrossRef][PubMed] 156. Le Tortorec, A.; Willey, S.; Neil, S.J.D. Antiviral inhibition of enveloped virus release by Tetherin/BST-2: Action and counteraction. Viruses 2011, 3, 520–540. [CrossRef][PubMed] 157. Hu, S.; Yin, L.; Mei, S.; Li, J.; Xu, F.; Sun, H.; Liu, X.; Cen, S.; Liang, C.; Li, A.; et al. BST-2 restricts IAV release and is countered by the viral M2 protein. Biochem. J. 2017, 474, 715–730. [CrossRef][PubMed] Cells 2019, 8, 654 19 of 20

158. Ma, H.; Kien, F.; Manière, M.; Zhang, Y.; Lagarde, N.; Tse, K.S.; Poon, L.L.M.; Nal, B. Human annexin A6 interacts with influenza a virus protein M2 and negatively modulates infection. J. Virol. 2012, 86, 1789–1801. [CrossRef][PubMed] 159. Fan, Y.; Mok, C.K.P.; Chan, M.C.W.; Zhang, Y.; Nal, B.; Kien, F.; Bruzzone, R.; Sanyal, S. Cell Cycle-independent Role of Cyclin D3 in Host Restriction of Influenza Virus Infection. J. Biol. Chem. 2017, 292, 5070–5088. [CrossRef] 160. Rudick, M.; Anderson, R.G.W. Multiple functions of caveolin-1. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 41295–41298. 161. Sun, L.; Hemgård, G.V.; Susanto, S.A.; Wirth, M. Caveolin-1 influences human influenza A virus (H1N1) multiplication in cell culture. Virol. J. 2010, 7.[CrossRef] 162. Couet, J.; Li, S.; Okamoto, T.; Ikezu, T.; Lisanti, M.P. Identification of peptide and protein ligands for the caveolin- scaffolding domain. Implications for the interaction of caveolin with caveolae-associated proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 1997, 272, 6525–6533. [CrossRef] 163. Amarelle, L.; Lecuona, E. The antiviral effects of na,K-ATPase inhibition: A minireview. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 2154. [CrossRef][PubMed] 164. Chan, M.C.W.; Kuok, D.I.T.; Leung, C.Y.H.; Hui, K.P.Y.; Valkenburg, S.A.; Lau, E.H.Y.; Nicholls, J.M.; Fang, X.; Guan, Y.; Lee, J.W.; et al. Human mesenchymal stromal cells reduce influenza A H5N1-associated acute lung injury in vitro and in vivo. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, 3621–3626. [CrossRef] 165. Hoffmann, H.H.; Palese, P.; Shaw, M.L. Modulation of influenza virus replication by alteration of sodium ion transport and protein kinase C activity. Antivir. Res. 2008, 80, 124–134. [CrossRef][PubMed] 166. Dowall, S.D.; Bewley, K.; Watson, R.J.; Vasan, S.S.; Ghosh, C.; Konai, M.M.; Gausdal, G.; Lorens, J.B.; Long, J.; Barclay, W.; et al. Antiviral screening of multiple compounds against ebola virus. Viruses 2016, 8, 277. [CrossRef][PubMed] 167. Mi, S.F.; Li, Y.; Yan, J.H.; Gao, G.F. Na+/K+-ATPase β1 subunit interacts with M2 proteins of influenza A and B viruses and affects the virus replication. Sci. China Life. Sci. 2010, 53, 1098–1105. [CrossRef][PubMed] 168. Doms, R.W.; Lamb, R.A.; Rose, J.K.; Helenius, A. Folding and assembly of viral membrane proteins. Virology 1993, 193, 545–562. [CrossRef][PubMed] 169. Hughey, P.G.; Compans, R.W.; Zebedee, S.L.; Lamb, R.A. Expression of the influenza A virus M2 protein Is restricted to apical surfaces of polarized epithelial cells. J. Virol. 1992, 66, 5542–5552. [PubMed] 170. Tasaki, T.; Mulder, L.C.F.; Iwamatsu, A.; Lee, M.J.; Davydov, I.V.; Varshavsky, A.; Muesing, M.; Kwon, Y.T. A family of mammalian E3 ubiquitin ligases that contain the UBR box motif and recognize N-degrons. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2005, 25, 7120–7136. [CrossRef] 171. Tripathi, S.; Pohl, M.O.; Zhou, Y.; Rodriguez-Frandsen, A.; Wang, G.; Stein, D.A.; Moulton, H.M.; Dejesus, P.; Che, J.; Mulder, L.C.F.; et al. Meta- and Orthogonal Integration of Influenza “oMICs“ Data Defines a Role for UBR4 in Virus Budding. Cell Host Microbe 2015, 18, 723–735. [CrossRef] 172. Bruce, E.A.; Digard, P.; Stuart, A.D. The Rab11 pathway is required for influenza A virus budding and filament formation. J. Virol. 2010, 84, 5848–5859. [CrossRef] 173. Chen, W.; Feng, Y.; Chen, D.; Wandinger-Ness, A. Rab11 is required for trans-Golgi network-to-plasma membrane transport and a preferential target for GDP dissociation inhibitor. Mol. Biol. Cell 1998, 9, 3241–3257. [CrossRef][PubMed] 174. Ullrich, O.; Reinsch, S.; Urbé, S.; Zerial, M.; Parton, R.G. Rab11 regulates recycling through the pericentriolar recycling endosome. J. Cell Biol. 1996, 135, 913–924. [CrossRef][PubMed] 175. Urbé, S.; Huber, L.A.; Zerial, M.; Tooze, S.A.; Parton, R.G. Rab11, a small GTPase associated with both constitutive and regulated secretory pathways in PC12 cells. FEBS Lett. 1993, 334, 175–182. [CrossRef] 176. Rossman, J.S.; Jing, X.; Leser, G.P.; Lamb, R.A. Influenza Virus M2 Protein Mediates ESCRT-Independent Membrane Scission. Cell 2010, 142, 902–913. [CrossRef][PubMed] 177. Zhu, P.; Liang, L.; Shao, X.; Luo, W.; Jiang, S.; Zhao, Q.; Sun, N.; Zhao, Y.; Li, J.; Wang, J.; et al. Host cellular protein TRAPPC6A∆ interacts with influenza A virus M2 protein and regulates viral propagation by modulating M2 trafficking. J. Virol. 2017, 91.[CrossRef][PubMed] 178. Sacher, M.; Jiang, Y.; Barrowman, J.; Scarpa, A.; Burston, J.; Zhang, L.; Schieltz, D.; Yates Iii, J.R.; Abeliovich, H.; Ferro-Novick, S. TRAPP, a highly conserved novel complex on the cis-Golgi that mediates vesicle docking and fusion. EMBO J. 1998, 17, 2494–2503. [CrossRef][PubMed] Cells 2019, 8, 654 20 of 20

179. Heaton, N.S.; Moshkina, N.; Fenouil, R.; Gardner, T.J.; Aguirre, S.; Shah, P.S.; Zhao, N.; Manganaro, L.; Hultquist, J.F.; Noel, J.; et al. Targeting Viral Proteostasis Limits Influenza Virus, HIV, and Dengue Virus Infection. Immunity 2016, 44, 46–58. [CrossRef] 180. Wang, L.; Fu, B.; Li, W.; Patil, G.; Liu, L.; Dorf, M.E.; Li, S. Comparative influenza protein interactomes identify the role of plakophilin 2 in virus restriction. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8.[CrossRef] 181. Watanabe, T.; Kawakami, E.; Shoemaker, J.E.; Lopes, T.J.S.; Matsuoka, Y.; Tomita, Y.; Kozuka-Hata, H.; Gorai, T.; Kuwahara, T.; Takeda, E.; et al. Influenza virus-host interactome screen as a platform for development. Cell Host Microbe 2014, 16, 795–805. [CrossRef]

© 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).