DOCSLIB.ORG

Development of a Spatial Model for Soil Quality Assessment Under Arid and Semi-Arid Conditions

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Development of a Spatial Model for Soil Quality Assessment Under Arid and Semi-Arid Conditions sustainability Article Development of a Spatial Model for Soil Quality Assessment under Arid and Semi-Arid Conditions Mohamed S. Shokr 1, Mostafa. A. Abdellatif 2, Ahmed A. El Baroudy 1, Abdelrazek Elnashar 3,4 , Esmat F. Ali 5, Abdelaziz A. Belal 2 , Wael. Attia 2, Mukhtar Ahmed 6,7 , Ali A. Aldosari 8 , Zoltan Szantoi 9,10 , Mohamed E. Jalhoum 2 and Ahmed M. S. Kheir 11,* 1 Soil and Water Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Tanta University, Tanta 31527, Egypt; [email protected] (M.S.S.); [email protected] (A.A.E.B.) 2 National Authority for Remote Sensing and Space Science (NARSS), Cairo 11843, Egypt; [email protected] (M.A.A.); [email protected] (A.A.B.); [email protected] (W.A.); [email protected] (M.E.J.) 3 State Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing Science, Aerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China; [email protected] 4 Department of Natural Resources, Faculty of African Postgraduate Studies, Cairo University, Giza 12613, Egypt 5 Department of Biology, College of Science, Taif University, P.O. Box 11099, Taif 21944, Saudi Arabia; [email protected] 6 Department of Agricultural Research for Northern Sweden, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 90183 Umeå, Sweden; [email protected] 7 Department of Agronomy, PMAS Arid Agriculture University, Rawalpindi 46300, Pakistan 8 Citation: Shokr, M.S.; Abdellatif, Geography Department, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia; [email protected] 9 European Commission, Joint Research Centre, 21027 Ispra, Italy; M.A.; El Baroudy, A.A.; Elnashar, A.; [email protected] Ali, E.F.; Belal, A.A.; Attia, W.; 10 Department of Geography and Environmental Studies, Stellenbosch University, Ahmed, M.; Aldosari, A.A.; Szantoi, Stellenbosch 7602, South Africa Z.; et al. Development of a Spatial 11 Soils, Water and Environment Research Institute, Agricultural Research Center, Giza 12112, Egypt Model for Soil Quality Assessment * Correspondence: [email protected] under Arid and Semi-Arid Conditions. Sustainability 2021, 13, Abstract: Food security has become a global concern for humanity with rapid population growth, 2893. https://doi.org/10.3390/ requiring a sustainable assessment of natural resources. Soil is one of the most important sources su13052893 that can help to bridge the food demand gap to achieve food security if well assessed and managed. The aim of this study was to determine the soil quality index (SQI) for El Fayoum depression in the Academic Editor: Western Egyptian Desert using spatial modeling for soil physical, chemical, and biological properties Georgios Koubouris based on the MEDALUS methodology. For this purpose, a spatial model was developed to evaluate Received: 25 January 2021 the soil quality of the El Fayoum depression in the Western Egyptian Desert. The integration between Accepted: 3 March 2021 Digital Elevation Model (DEM) and Sentinel-2 satellite image was used to produce landforms and Published: 7 March 2021 digital soil mapping for the study area. Results showed that the study area located under six classes of soil quality, e.g., very high-quality class represents an area of 387.12 km2 (22.7%), high-quality class Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral occupies 441.72 km2 (25.87%), the moderate-quality class represents 208.57 km2 (12.21%), slightly with regard to jurisdictional claims in moderate-quality class represents 231.10 km2 (13.5%), as well as, a low-quality class covering an area published maps and institutional affil- of 233 km2 (13.60%), and very low-quality class occupies about 206 km2 (12%). The Agricultural Land iations. Evaluation System for arid and semi-arid regions (ALESarid) was used to estimate land capability. Land capability classes were non-agriculture class (C6), poor (C4), fair (C3), and good (C2) with an area 231.87 km2 (13.50%), 291.94 km2 (17%), 767.39 km2 (44.94%), and 416.07 km2 (24.4%), respectively. Land capability along with the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) used for validation Copyright: © 2021 by the authors. of the proposed model of soil quality. The spatially-explicit soil quality index (SQI) shows a strong Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. significant positive correlation with the land capability and a positive correlation with NDVI at R2 This article is an open access article 0.86 (p < 0.001) and 0.18 (p < 0.05), respectively. In arid regions, the strategy outlined here can easily distributed under the terms and be re-applied in similar environments, allowing decision-makers and regional governments to use conditions of the Creative Commons the quantitative results achieved to ensure sustainable development. Attribution (CC BY) license (https:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ Keywords: spatial modeling; land capability; ALESarid; GIS; remote sensing; NDVI 4.0/). Sustainability 2021, 13, 2893. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13052893 https://www.mdpi.com/journal/sustainability Sustainability 2021, 13, 2893 2 of 15 1. Introduction Soil quality (SQ) is one of the most common concepts that has emerged over the last decades and has been used to assess soil under different systems [1–3]. For practical purposes, the judgment of SQ depends on impacts of soil on crop yield, erosion, and quality of surface and ground, food, and air [4]. The meaning of the soil quality index (SQI) is the ability of the soil to function within an ecosystem boundary, whether managed or natural, and to achieve sustainability of crop productivity while maintaining soil from degradation processes [5,6]. In many regions around the world, soil quality is declining rapidly [7], due to many reasons, including, but not limited to, changes in land use types with intensive land use [8,9]. Therefore, the assessment of SQ is considered the basis for monitoring and maintaining the sustainability of agricultural systems [10]. Evaluation of SQ is based on personal knowledge, which leads to a reward for lack of data and a lack of similarity between geographical locations. Thus, SQ evaluation should be carried out in a quantitative, documented, reproducible, and spatially-explicit approach with the lowest level of subjectivity [11]. In addition, indicators that influence soil properties are needed for soil quality assessment [12,13]. Soil fertility, physical, chemical, and biological factors have a crucial role in determining soil suitability for crop production, influencing soil quality and crop yields in turn [14]. The quantification of SQ required a minimum set of data, including a small number of accurately selected soil indicators, such as physical, chemical, and biological properties [15]. Thus, the SQ indicators could be divided into stable and dynamic soil characteristics [16]. The soil texture is considered stable soil properties that have affected the difference in crop productivity, while pH, soil depth, soil water, and nitrate concentrations are dynamic soil characteristics and need to be monitored periodically. This explains the impact of the management process on the difference in plant productivity that affects dynamic soil properties, e.g., the variable rate of application of irrigation or fertilization [1]. Therefore, monitoring of soil quality parameters will help to simplify and increase awareness of the reasons and impacts of climate change and the responses required [17]. This is because soil quality is a measure of soil capacity to function to maintain productivity, to maintain environmental quality, to limit ecosystems and land use, and to promote plant and animal health [18]. Various assessment methods of the spatial variability of soil properties include geo- statistics approaches based on measurements at adjacent locations with certain weights assigned to each measurement [19,20]. For instance, classical ordinary Kriging interpo- lation (OK) can directly illustrate the spatial variation of soil properties [21] as one of the geostatistical methods that have been widely used to evaluate and analyze spatial correlation and spatial variability of soil properties such as physical, chemical, and biologi- cal properties [22]. On the other hand, there is a significant positive correlation between soil quality and land capability, which shows that the two approaches are related to the assessment of land for crop production [23]. Recently, several land capability models have been developed to provide a quantified procedure to match land with various actual and proposed uses, particularly for the arid and semi-arid regions, including the study area, for instance, the Agricultural Land Evaluation System for arid and semi-arid regions, (ALESarid) which has been developed by [24]. This model is integrated with GIS software to calculate land capability and could provide a reasonable solution between the accuracy, ease of application, and moderate data demand [25]. Additionally, the normalized differ- ence vegetation index (NDVI) as a biophysical parameter can be calculated from remote sensing data that are sensitive to the dynamic change of vegetation conditions, including several factors, such as soil quality [26,27]. Thus, land capability and NDVI may have better potential to precisely validate the proposed soil quality model. Consequently, soil quality assessment using GIS and remote sensing (RS) applications is very important for land assessment, facilitating reclamation and cultivation plans, but this Sustainability 2021, 13, x FOR PEER REVIEW 3 of 17 Sustainability 2021, 13, 2893 3 of 15 several factors, such as soil quality [26,27]. Thus, land capability and NDVI may have bet- ter potential to precisely validate the proposed soil quality model. approachConsequently, needs to soil be appliedquality assessment in a variety using of environments, GIS and remote particularly sensing (RS) arid applica- and semi-arid regions.tions is very The important spatial modelfor land developed assessment, infacilitating this research reclamation is expected and cultivation to be a moreplans, accurate methodologybut this approach for needs assessing to be the applied spatial in distributiona variety of environments, of soil quality, particularly as it includes arid soiland physical, semi-arid regions.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Digital Mapping of Soil Properties in the Western-Facing Slope of Jabal
    JJEES (2020) 11 (3): 193-201 JJEES ISSN 1995-6681 Jordan Journal of Earth and Environmental Sciences Digital Mapping of Soil Properties in the Western-Facing Slope of Jabal Al-Arab at Suwaydaa Governorate, Syria Alaa Khallouf 1,4, Sami AlHinawi2, Wassim AlMesber3, Sameer Shamsham4,Younis Idries5 1General Commission for Scientific Agricultural Research (GCSAR), Damascus, Syria 2Suwayda Research Center- GCSAR, Suwayda, Syria 3Damascus University, Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Soil Science, Syria 4Al-Baath University, Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Soil and Land reclamation, Syria 5General Organization of Remote Sensing (GORS), Syria Received 28 December 2019; Accepted 10 April 2020 Abstract Digital soil mapping has been increasingly used to produce statistical models of the relationships between environmental variables and soil properties. This study aimed at determining and representing the spatial distribution of the variability in soil properties of western face-sloping of Jabal Al-Arab, Suwaydaa governorate. pH, organic matter (OM), total nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P, as P2O5), potassium (K, as K2O), iron (Fe), boron (B) and zinc (Zn) were studied, thus, Forty-five surface soil samples (0 to 30 cm) were collected and analyzed. Descriptive statistics demonstrated that most of the measured soil variables (except pH, P2O5, and Zn) were skewed and ab-normally distributed, and logarithmic transformation was then applied. Kriging was used- as geostatistical tool- in ArcGIS to interpolate observed values for those variables, and the digital map layers were produced based on each soil property. Geostatistical interpolation recognized a strong spatial variability for pH, P2O5 & Zn, moderate for OM, N, Fe & B, and weak for K2O.
    [Show full text]
  • Digital Soil Mapping in the Bara District of Nepal Using Kriging Tool in Arcgis
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Agronomy & Horticulture -- Faculty Publications Agronomy and Horticulture Department 10-26-2018 Digital soil mapping in the Bara district of Nepal using kriging tool in ArcGIS Dinesh Panday University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Bijesh Maharjan University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Devraj Chalise Nepal Agricultural Research Council Ram Kumar Shrestha Institute of Agriculture and Animal Science, Lamjung, Nepal Bikesh Twanabasu Westfalische Wilhelms Universitat, Munster Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/agronomyfacpub Part of the Agricultural Science Commons, Agriculture Commons, Agronomy and Crop Sciences Commons, Botany Commons, Horticulture Commons, Other Plant Sciences Commons, and the Plant Biology Commons Panday, Dinesh; Maharjan, Bijesh; Chalise, Devraj; Shrestha, Ram Kumar; and Twanabasu, Bikesh, "Digital soil mapping in the Bara district of Nepal using kriging tool in ArcGIS" (2018). Agronomy & Horticulture -- Faculty Publications. 1130. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/agronomyfacpub/1130 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Agronomy and Horticulture Department at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Agronomy & Horticulture -- Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. RESEARCH ARTICLE Digital soil mapping in the Bara district of Nepal using kriging tool in ArcGIS 1 1 2 3 Dinesh PandayID *, Bijesh Maharjan , Devraj Chalise , Ram Kumar Shrestha , Bikesh Twanabasu4,5 1 Department of Agronomy and Horticulture, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska, United States of America, 2 Nepal Agricultural Research Council, Lalitpur, Nepal, 3 Institute of Agriculture and Animal Science, Lamjung Campus, Lamjung, Nepal, 4 Hexa International Pvt.
    [Show full text]
  • The Muencheberg Soil Quality Rating (SQR)
    The Muencheberg Soil Quality Rating (SQR) FIELD MANUAL FOR DETECTING AND ASSESSING PROPERTIES AND LIMITATIONS OF SOILS FOR CROPPING AND GRAZING Lothar Mueller, Uwe Schindler, Axel Behrendt, Frank Eulenstein & Ralf Dannowski Leibniz-Zentrum fuer Agrarlandschaftsforschung (ZALF), Muencheberg, Germany with contributions of Sandro L. Schlindwein, University of St. Catarina, Florianopolis, Brasil T. Graham Shepherd, Nutri-Link, Palmerston North, New Zealand Elena Smolentseva, Russian Academy of Sciences, Institute of Soil Science and Agrochemistry (ISSA), Novosibirsk, Russia Jutta Rogasik, Federal Agricultural Research Centre (FAL), Institute of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, Braunschweig, Germany 1 Draft, Nov. 2007 The Muencheberg Soil Quality Rating (SQR) FIELD MANUAL FOR DETECTING AND ASSESSING PROPERTIES AND LIMITATIONS OF SOILS FOR CROPPING AND GRAZING Lothar Mueller, Uwe Schindler, Axel Behrendt, Frank Eulenstein & Ralf Dannowski Leibniz-Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF) e. V., Muencheberg, Germany with contributions of Sandro L. Schlindwein, University of St. Catarina, Florianopolis, Brasil T. Graham Shepherd, Nutri-Link, Palmerston North, New Zealand Elena Smolentseva, Russian Academy of Sciences, Institute of Soil Science and Agrochemistry (ISSA), Novosibirsk, Russia Jutta Rogasik, Federal Agricultural Research Centre (FAL), Institute of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, Braunschweig, Germany 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 1. Objectives 4 2. Concept 5 3. Procedure and scoring tables 7 3.1. Field procedure 7 3.2. Scoring of basic indicators 10 3.2.0. What are basic indicators? 10 3.2.1. Soil substrate 12 3.2.2. Depth of A horizon or depth of humic soil 14 3.2.3. Topsoil structure 15 3.2.4. Subsoil compaction 17 3.2.5. Rooting depth and depth of biological activity 19 3.2.6.
    [Show full text]
  • Good Practices for the Preparation of Digital Soil Maps
    UNIVERSIDAD DE COSTA RICA CENTRO DE INVESTIGACIONES AGRONÓMICAS FACULTAD DE CIENCIAS AGROALIMENTARIAS GOOD PRACTICES FOR THE PREPARATION OF DIGITAL SOIL MAPS Resilience and comprehensive risk management in agriculture Inter-american Institute for Cooperation on Agriculture University of Costa Rica Agricultural Research Center UNIVERSIDAD DE COSTA RICA CENTRO DE INVESTIGACIONES AGRONÓMICAS FACULTAD DE CIENCIAS AGROALIMENTARIAS GOOD PRACTICES FOR THE PREPARATION OF DIGITAL SOIL MAPS Resilience and comprehensive risk management in agriculture Inter-american Institute for Cooperation on Agriculture University of Costa Rica Agricultural Research Center GOOD PRACTICES FOR THE PREPARATION OF DIGITAL SOIL MAPS Inter-American institute for Cooperation on Agriculture (IICA), 2016 Good practices for the preparation of digital soil maps by IICA is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 IGO (CC-BY-SA 3.0 IGO) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/igo/) Based on a work at www.iica.int IICA encourages the fair use of this document. Proper citation is requested. This publication is also available in electronic (PDF) format from the Institute’s Web site: http://www.iica. int Content Editorial coordination: Rafael Mata Chinchilla, Dangelo Sandoval Chacón, Jonathan Castro Chinchilla, Foreword .................................................... 5 Christian Solís Salazar Editing in Spanish: Máximo Araya Acronyms .................................................... 6 Layout: Sergio Orellana Caballero Introduction .................................................. 7 Translation into English: Christina Feenny Cover design: Sergio Orellana Caballero Good practices for the preparation of digital soil maps................. 9 Printing: Sergio Orellana Caballero Glossary .................................................... 15 Bibliography ................................................. 18 Good practices for the preparation of digital soil maps / IICA, CIA – San Jose, C.R.: IICA, 2016 00 p.; 00 cm X 00 cm ISBN: 978-92-9248-652-5 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Progressive and Regressive Soil Evolution Phases in the Anthropocene
    Progressive and regressive soil evolution phases in the Anthropocene Manon Bajard, Jérôme Poulenard, Pierre Sabatier, Anne-Lise Develle, Charline Giguet- Covex, Jeremy Jacob, Christian Crouzet, Fernand David, Cécile Pignol, Fabien Arnaud Highlights • Lake sediment archives are used to reconstruct past soil evolution. • Erosion is quantified and the sediment geochemistry is compared to current soils. • We observed phases of greater erosion rates than soil formation rates. • These negative soil balance phases are defined as regressive pedogenesis phases. • During the Middle Ages, the erosion of increasingly deep horizons rejuvenated pedogenesis. Abstract Soils have a substantial role in the environment because they provide several ecosystem services such as food supply or carbon storage. Agricultural practices can modify soil properties and soil evolution processes, hence threatening these services. These modifications are poorly studied, and the resilience/adaptation times of soils to disruptions are unknown. Here, we study the evolution of pedogenetic processes and soil evolution phases (progressive or regressive) in response to human-induced erosion from a 4000-year lake sediment sequence (Lake La Thuile, French Alps). Erosion in this small lake catchment in the montane area is quantified from the terrigenous sediments that were trapped in the lake and compared to the soil formation rate. To access this quantification, soil processes evolution are deciphered from soil and sediment geochemistry comparison. Over the last 4000 years, first impacts on soils are recorded at approximately 1600 yr cal. BP, with the erosion of surface horizons exceeding 10 t·km− 2·yr− 1. Increasingly deep horizons were eroded with erosion accentuation during the Higher Middle Ages (1400–850 yr cal.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Era of Digital Soil Mapping Across Forested Landscapes 14 Chuck Bulmera,*, David Pare´ B, Grant M
    CHAPTER A new era of digital soil mapping across forested landscapes 14 Chuck Bulmera,*, David Pare´ b, Grant M. Domkec aBC Ministry Forests Lands Natural Resource Operations Rural Development, Vernon, BC, Canada, bNatural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Laurentian Forestry Centre, Quebec, QC, Canada, cNorthern Research Station, USDA Forest Service, St. Paul, MN, United States *Corresponding author ABSTRACT Soil maps provide essential information for forest management, and a recent transformation of the map making process through digital soil mapping (DSM) is providing much improved soil information compared to what was available through traditional mapping methods. The improvements include higher resolution soil data for greater mapping extents, and incorporating a wide range of environmental factors to predict soil classes and attributes, along with a better understanding of mapping uncertainties. In this chapter, we provide a brief introduction to the concepts and methods underlying the digital soil map, outline the current state of DSM as it relates to forestry and global change, and provide some examples of how DSM can be applied to evaluate soil changes in response to multiple stressors. Throughout the chapter, we highlight the immense potential of DSM, but also describe some of the challenges that need to be overcome to truly realize this potential. Those challenges include finding ways to provide additional field data to train models and validate results, developing a group of highly skilled people with combined abilities in computational science and pedology, as well as the ongoing need to encourage communi- cation between the DSM community, land managers and decision makers whose work we believe can benefit from the new information provided by DSM.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Soil Quality Index (SQI) for Assessing Forest Soil Health
    Soil Vital Signs: A New Soil Quality Index (SQI) for Assessing Forest Soil Health Michael C. Amacher, Katherine P. O’Neill, and Charles H. Perry May 2007 United States Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research Paper Department Research Station RMRS-RP-65WWW of Agriculture Amacher, Michael C.; O’Neil, Katherine P.; Perry, Charles H. 2007. Soil vital signs: A new Soil Quality Index (SQI) for assessing forest soil health. Res. Pap. RMRS-RP-65WWW. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 12 p. Abstract __________________________________________ The Forest Inventory and Analysis (FIA) program measures a number of chemical and physical properties of soils to address specific questions about forest soil quality or health. We developed a new index of forest soil health, the soil quality index (SQI), that integrates 19 measured physical and chemical properties of forest soils into a single number that serves as the soil’s “vital sign” of overall soil quality. Regional and soil depth differences in SQI values due to differences in soil properties were observed. The SQI is a new tool for establishing baselines and detecting forest health trends. Keywords: forest soil health, Forest Inventory and Analysis, soil indicator database, soil quality index The Authors Michael C. Amacher is a research soil scientist with the Forest and Woodland Program Area at the Forestry Sciences Laboratory in Logan, UT. He holds a B.S. and a M.S. in chemistry and a Ph.D. in soil chemistry, all from The Pennsylvania State University. He joined the Rocky Mountain Research Station in 1989.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Digital Soil Mapping Approaches with Large Sets of Environmental Covariates
    SOIL, 4, 1–22, 2018 https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-4-1-2018 © Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under SOIL the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. Evaluation of digital soil mapping approaches with large sets of environmental covariates Madlene Nussbaum1, Kay Spiess1, Andri Baltensweiler2, Urs Grob3, Armin Keller3, Lucie Greiner3, Michael E. Schaepman4, and Andreas Papritz1 1Institute of Biogeochemistry and Pollutant Dynamics, ETH Zürich, Universitätstrasse 16, 8092 Zürich, Switzerland 2Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research (WSL), Zürcherstrasse 111, 8903 Birmensdorf, Switzerland 3Research Station Agroscope Reckenholz-Taenikon ART, Reckenholzstrasse 191, 8046 Zürich, Switzerland 4Remote Sensing Laboratories, University of Zurich, Wintherthurerstrasse 190, 8057 Zürich, Switzerland Correspondence: Madlene Nussbaum ([email protected]) Received: 19 April 2017 – Discussion started: 9 May 2017 Revised: 11 October 2017 – Accepted: 24 November 2017 – Published: 10 January 2018 Abstract. The spatial assessment of soil functions requires maps of basic soil properties. Unfortunately, these are either missing for many regions or are not available at the desired spatial resolution or down to the required soil depth. The field-based generation of large soil datasets and conventional soil maps remains costly. Mean- while, legacy soil data and comprehensive sets of spatial environmental data are available for many regions. Digital soil mapping (DSM) approaches relating soil data (responses) to environmental
    [Show full text]
  • Sustaining the Pedosphere: Establishing a Framework for Management, Utilzation and Restoration of Soils in Cultured Systems
    Sustaining the Pedosphere: Establishing A Framework for Management, Utilzation and Restoration of Soils in Cultured Systems Eugene F. Kelly Colorado State University Outline •Introduction - Its our Problems – Life in the Fastlane - Ecological Nexus of Food-Water-Energy - Defining the Pedosphere •Framework for Management, Utilization & Restoration - Pedology and Critical Zone Science - Pedology Research Establishing the Range & Variability in Soils - Models for assessing human dimensions in ecosystems •Studies of Regional Importance Systems Approach - System Models for Agricultural Research - Soil Water - The Master Variable - Water Quality, Soil Management and Conservation Strategies •Concluding Remarks and Questions Living in a Sustainable Age or Life in the Fast Lane What do we know ? • There are key drivers across the planet that are forcing us to think and live differently. • The drivers are influencing our supplies of food, energy and water. • Science has helped us identify these drivers and our challenge is to come up with solutions Change has been most rapid over the last 50 years ! • In last 50 years we doubled population • World economy saw 7x increase • Food consumption increased 3x • Water consumption increased 3x • Fuel utilization increased 4x • More change over this period then all human history combined – we are at the inflection point in human history. • Planetary scale resources going away What are the major changes that we might be able to adjust ? • Land Use Change - the world is smaller • Food footprint is larger (40% of land used for Agriculture) • Water Use – 70% for food • Running out of atmosphere – used as as disposal for fossil fuels and other contaminants The Perfect Storm Increased Demand 50% by 2030 Energy Climate Change Demand up Demand up 50% by 2030 30% by 2030 Food Water 2D View of Pedosphere Hierarchal scales involving soil solid-phase components that combine to form horizons, profiles, local and regional landscapes, and the global pedosphere.
    [Show full text]
  • The Use of Proximal Soil Sensor Data Fusion and Digital Soil Mapping For
    The use of proximal soil sensor data fusion and digital soil mapping for precision agriculture Wenjun Ji, Viacheslav Adamchuk, Songchao Chen, Asim Biswas, Maxime Leclerc, Raphael Viscarra Rossel To cite this version: Wenjun Ji, Viacheslav Adamchuk, Songchao Chen, Asim Biswas, Maxime Leclerc, et al.. The use of proximal soil sensor data fusion and digital soil mapping for precision agriculture. Pedometrics 2017, Jun 2017, Wageningen, Netherlands. 298 p. hal-01601278 HAL Id: hal-01601278 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01601278 Submitted on 2 Jun 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution - ShareAlike| 4.0 International License Abstract Book Pedometrics 2017 Wageningen, 26 June – 1 July 2017 2 Contents Evaluating Use of Ground Penetrating Radar and Geostatistic Methods for Mapping Soil Cemented Horizon .................................... 13 Digital soil mapping in areas of mussunungas: algoritmos comparission .......... 14 Sensing of farm and district-scale soil moisture content using a mobile cosmic ray probe (COSMOS Rover) .................................... 15 Proximal sensing of soil crack networks using three-dimensional electrical resistivity to- mography ......................................... 16 Using digital microscopy for rapid determination of soil texture and prediction of soil organic matter .....................................
    [Show full text]
  • Selection and Use of Soil Characteristics in Digital Soil Mapping in Tanzania
    Selection and use of soil characteristics in digital soil mapping in Tanzania A M. Kilasara ASokoine University of Agriculture, P.O. Box 3008 Morogoro, Tanzania, Email [email protected], [email protected] Abstract A study of soil characteristics was conducted in three different agro-ecological zones representing the humid, sub humid and semi-arid-sub humid zones in East Africa. The selected sites correspond to high potential medium and near-marginal areas for the production of maize. Emphasis was put on the topsoil characteristics which largely influence the performance of soils in terms of crop production in the inter-tropical African region. Topsoil depth, available water capacity, organic carbon content, pH, and bulk density, cation exchange capacity are among the key characteristics that influence the functioning of the studied soils. In certain cases, a few key characteristics determine the soils behaviour while in others the same do not. The selection of which ones are critical for a given soil requires detailed analysis supported by field evidence such as experimental data. Spatial heterogeneity in magnitude of individual soil characteristics was common in all sites. In the future digital soil mapping should provide room for subsequent upgrading of the soil information as more data become available. A digital soil map should be prepared such that it provides a possibility to extract information at various resolutions according to needs. Key Words Soil characterisatiation, digital soil map. Introduction The publication of the soil map of the World in 1981 paved the way for classifying soils using a widely accepted harmonised criteria and nomenclature at the global scale.
    [Show full text]
  • Soil Quality 1
    START FARMINGSOIL QUALITY 1 introduction to soils Soil Quality Culman Steve ealthy soils yield healthy crops, But what is healthy soil and how do we Healthy, high-quality soil has: Hachieve it? • Good soil tilth • Sufficient depth Soil health is the foundation of productive farming practices. Fertile soil provides essential nutrients to • Sufficient, but not excessive, nutrient supply plants. Important physical characteristics of soil-like • Small population of plant pathogens and insect structures and aggregation allow water and air to pests infiltrate, roots to explore, and biota to thrive. Diverse • Good soil drainage and active biological communities help soil resist • Large population of beneficial organisms physical degradation and cycle nutrients at rates to • Low weed pressure meet plant needs. Soil health and soil quality are terms • No chemicals or toxins that may harm the crop used interchangeably to describe soils that are not • Resilience to degradation and unfavorable only fertile but also possess adequate physical and conditions biological properties to “sustain productivity, maintain —from Soil Health Training Manual environmental quality and promote plant and animal health” (Doron 1994). According to the (USDA) Natural Resource Remember, soil fertility is only one component Conservation Service, “Soil quality is how well soil does of soil quality. Fertile soils are able to provide the what we want it to do.” In order to grow our crops, we nutrients required for plant growth. These are the want the soil to hold water and nutrients like a sponge chemical components of soil. Some plants need certain where they are readily available for plant roots to take nutrients in large amounts, like nitrogen, phosphorus, them up, suppress pests and weeds that may attack and potassium, which are called macronutrients.
    [Show full text]