DOCSLIB.ORG

Fruit Fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) Host Status Determination: Critical Conceptual, Methodological, and Regulatory Considerations∗

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Fruit Fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) Host Status Determination: Critical Conceptual, Methodological, and Regulatory Considerations∗ ANRV330-EN53-24 ARI 2 November 2007 18:52 Fruit Fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) Host Status Determination: Critical Conceptual, Methodological, and Regulatory Considerations∗ Martın´ Aluja1 and Robert L. Mangan2 1Instituto de Ecologıa,´ A.C., Xalapa, Veracruz, Mexico;´ email: [email protected] 2Kika de la Garza ARC, USDA-ARS, Weslaco, Texas; email: [email protected] Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2008. 53:473–502 Key Words First published online as a Review in Advance on host plant, oviposition behavior, host range evolution, quarantine September 17, 2007 pest, risk analysis, systems approach The Annual Review of Entomology is online at ento.annualreviews.org Abstract This article’s doi: Although fruit fly host status determination/designation lies at the 10.1146/annurev.ento.53.103106.093350 heart of strategic decisions on national and international trade of Copyright c 2008 by Annual Reviews. fruit and vegetables, all attempts thus far to define host plant sta- All rights reserved by Wageningen UR on 02/01/08. For personal use only. tus have been contentious and as a result long-standing disputes 0066-4170/08/0107-0473$20.00 between commercial partners throughout the world have lingered ∗ The U.S. Government has the right to retain a over decades. Part of the problem is that too little effort has been nonexclusive, royalty-free license in and to any devoted to understanding the underlying mechanisms involved in copyright covering this paper. host plant use by fruit flies and that instead economic and political Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2008.53:473-502. Downloaded from arjournals.annualreviews.org interests usually prevail. Here we review the most important evolu- tionary, biological, ecological, physiological, and behavioral aspects that drive host use by fruit flies, and then construct a flow diagram rooted in these fundamentals that outlines a series of steps and def- initions to determine if a particular fruit or vegetable (and cultivars thereof) is a natural host, or a conditional (potential, artificial) host, or a nonhost. Along the way, we incorporate risk analysis considera- tions and propose that the underlying complexity determining host plant utilization by fruit flies requires a flexible systems approach ca- pable of realistically dealing with fly/host/environment/geographic variability on a case-by-case basis. 473 ANRV330-EN53-24 ARI 2 November 2007 18:52 INTRODUCTION lined system designed to reach science-based decisions on fruit fly host designations. Fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) are among Systems approach: the most important pests worldwide because integration of pre- of their direct economic impact (i.e., fe- EVOLUTIONARY and postharvest male oviposition and larval feeding render CONSIDERATIONS OF HOST practices, from the fruit/vegetables unmarketable) and the strict USE BY TEPHRITID FLIES production of a quarantine restrictions imposed by many commodity to its Overview of Broad Patterns Involved distribution and countries to curtail their entry (1, 31, 64). commercialization, A critical component when trying to assess The evolutionary pathway leading to special- that cumulatively the risk of introductions into a country or ized herbivory is a complex one and the fac- meet predetermined an entire region is the status of a given tors shaping host plant use are highly diverse, requirements for quarantine security fruit/vegetable species (and cultivars thereof ) with patterns spanning from extreme conser- as a host of a particular fruit fly species (3, vatism (175, 182, and references therein) to Natural host: fruit or vegetable 82). Given the underlying biological complex- extreme plasticity (57, 58). Tephritid conser- unequivocally found ity/conditionality of fruit fly host use and the vatism is exemplified by the large subfamily infested under totally economic and political impact of the issue of Tephritinae, which is almost exclusively asso- natural field host plant status determination/designation ciated with plants within the Asteraceae (52). conditions (i.e., at the international level, there is an urgent But there is also evidence for rapid host range nothing is manipulated) need for a solid conceptual and methodolog- evolution, with related insects attacking a wide ical framework that can aid scientists, regula- range of unrelated plants (7, 154). tory officials, policy makers, politicians, and In broad terms, two principal driving stakeholders throughout the world in solving forces guide host range evolution: phyto- current and future disputes over the status of chemical coevolution between plants and her- particular plants as fruit fly hosts. bivores (47) and selective pressure by gen- Here we analyze the causes of confusion eralist natural enemies (19, 22, 87, 158). and complexity involving fruit fly host de- Which selective forces played a more impor- termination and ultimately agricultural risk, tant role in the case of tephritid flies is open including, among others, (a) the evolution to debate. Ancestral tephritids most proba- of fruit fly/host plant relationships and the bly evolved from a saprophagous to a phy- behavioral mechanisms related to host find- tophagous lifestyle (43). Currently, most fruit ing and utilization; (b) conditional infestation flies specialize in flowers and fruit structures by Wageningen UR on 02/01/08. For personal use only. based on the physiological (motivational) state that frequently lack the plants’ characteristic of the fly; and (c) conditional infestation based secondary chemistry (112). Furthermore, it on the state of the host. We propose that the has been argued that domesticated fruit were underlying complexity/conditionality that de- selected on the basis of their low toxicity to Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2008.53:473-502. Downloaded from arjournals.annualreviews.org termines host ranges requires a flexible sys- vertebrates (84) and that artificial selection tems approach capable of realistically dealing for increased human palatability also low- with fly/host/environment/geographic vari- ered the levels of chemical defenses in com- ability on a case-by-case basis. We construct mercially grown fruit (80). Additionally, Fitt a flow diagram (Figure 1) that proposes a (58) pointed out that as fruit ripen, defen- series of steps and definitions to determine sive compounds disappear. Conversely, some if a particular fruit or vegetable (and culti- fruit fly species feed on seed tissue that may vars thereof ) is a natural host, or alternatively be more toxic than the pulp, and in the case (non-natural host), if it should be considered a of pulp, there is evidence that some fruit re- conditional (potential, artificial) host or a non- main highly toxic to larvae (see below). For host. We finish by outlining promising areas example, in the case of flies within Anastrepha, of research that could help solidify a stream- primitive species such as A. cordata, A. hamata, 474 Aluja · Mangan ANRV330-EN53-24 ARI 2 November 2007 18:52 Monophagous Evolutionary background, Stenophagous life history, ecology, behavior, Oligophagous physiology, and biogeography Polyphagous Univoltine Multivoltine Monitoring of adult populations and extensive field sampling to gather evidence of natural field infestation Poor Natural host Non-natural host Good Bioassays under Field cages with entire fruit-bearing trees forced artificial Enclosed fruit-bearing branches Additional Risk analysis Quarantine conditions Laboratory cages field and systems treatment research approach Inability to Life cycle completion complete life cycle Natural factors Conditional host (potential or artificial) Nonhost Monitoring/risk analysis factors Manipulated conditions Economic/political/regulatory No quarantine Additional Risk analysis Economic, Quarantine implications action needed, field and systems political, treatment but screening research approach and Research events to detect regulatory mutations concerns Trade restrictions recommended No fertile adult development Figure 1 by Wageningen UR on 02/01/08. For personal use only. Flow chart indicating proposed steps for fruit fly host status determination/designation. The entire approach is rooted in the fundamentals of the system, i.e., the evolutionary background of host plant associations, life-history parameters, ecology, physiology, and most importantly behavior. When quarantine systems are based on a systems approach, the entire system should be continuously evaluated by resampling and reanalyzing the components to improve security. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2008.53:473-502. Downloaded from arjournals.annualreviews.org A. crebra, and their closely related relatives The other argument, that host ranges evolve (flies in the sister group Toxotrypana) spe- because of the selective advantages of mov- cialize on seeds or associated tissue of and ing to hosts that provide shelter from natu- attack latex-producing plants (e.g., Apocy- ral enemies, has not been formally tested, al- naceae, Asclepiadaceae, and Sapotaceae). In though Feder (53) provided evidence that, at contrast, some derived species (e.g., fratercu- least in the case of the apple maggot (Rhago- lus group) feed almost exclusively on fruit pulp letis pomonella), a shift from native hawthorns and are highly polyphagous (7, 9). Species to introduced apples did allow the frugivore such as A. ludens (also within the highly de- to gain enemy-free space. rived fraterculus group) have retained the abil- According to Zwolfer¨ (182) fruit flies arose ity to feed on both types of substrates (9). in the middle Tertiary (at least by the early www.annualreviews.org
Load more

Recommended publications
  • FFN41-Dec2020
    FRUIT FLY TEPHRITID WORKERS DATABASE TWD NEWS FRUIT FLY NEWS FFN#41 December 2020 Fruit Fly News Guest of Honour Prof. KENG HONG TAN Guest of Honour: Professor Keng Hong Tan Prof Keng Hong Tan ("Hong" as his friends called him), is the Guest of Honor of the Fruit Fly News (FFN#41_December 2020). He agreed to share with us his walk of life, which took him to many places in the world and enabled him to meet many fruit fly workers. He kindly agreed to share his experience and some of his personal photos. Read more New Fruit Fly Projects National Fruit Fly Strategy 2020–2025 FruitFlyNet-II The Australian National Fruit Fly Strategy 2020– FruitFlyNet-ii is a Strategic Project for Open 2025 (NFFS) has been developed by the National Innovation funded by ENICBCMED/EU program. Fruit Fly Council (the Council) to provide a It involves 5 countries: Greece, Spain, Italy, framework for ongoing stakeholder cooperation Lebanon and Tunisia. The project aims to develop to support a contemporary, viable, cost-effective for the first time a fully automated e-monitoring, and coordinated national approach to fruit fly IPM spraying, e-solutions and environmental management. Read more friendly control of the olive fruit fly and the Medfly. Read more Project F3 Fruit Fly Free Fruit Fly IPM-Horizon 2020 South Africa, Mozambique and Belgium started a The Fruit fly Integrated Pest Management project, new project funded by the World Trade funded by the European Commission, shows Organization through their STDF programme. resilience and innovation during Covid-19 times. The objective is to develop a regionally Despite the obstacles, FF-IPM’s researchers harmonised framework for development and managed to produce high-quality results and held implementation of recognised Pest Free Areas virtual meetings and workshops.
    [Show full text]
  • A Survey of Fruit-Feeding Insects and Their Parasitoids Occurring on Wild Olives, Olea Europaea Ssp
    This article was downloaded by: [USDA National Agricultural Library] On: 11 February 2009 Access details: Access Details: [subscription number 790740294] Publisher Taylor & Francis Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK Biocontrol Science and Technology Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/title~content=t713409232 A survey of fruit-feeding insects and their parasitoids occurring on wild olives, Olea europaea ssp. cuspidata, in the Eastern Cape of South Africa Nolwazi Mkize a; Kim A. Hoelmer b; Martin H. Villet a a Department of Zoology & Entomology, Rhodes University, Grahamstown, South Africa b United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Beneficial Insect Introduction Research Unit, Newark, USA Online Publication Date: 01 January 2008 To cite this Article Mkize, Nolwazi, Hoelmer, Kim A. and Villet, Martin H.(2008)'A survey of fruit-feeding insects and their parasitoids occurring on wild olives, Olea europaea ssp. cuspidata, in the Eastern Cape of South Africa',Biocontrol Science and Technology,18:10,991 — 1004 To link to this Article: DOI: 10.1080/09583150802450154 URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09583150802450154 PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE Full terms and conditions of use: http://www.informaworld.com/terms-and-conditions-of-access.pdf This article may be used for research, teaching and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, re-distribution, re-selling, loan or sub-licensing, systematic supply or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make any representation that the contents will be complete or accurate or up to date.
    [Show full text]
  • Parasitoids of Queensland Fruit Fly Bactrocera Tryoni in Australia and Prospects for Improved Biological Control
    Insects 2012, 3, 1056-1083; doi:10.3390/insects3041056 OPEN ACCESS insects ISSN 2075-4450 www.mdpi.com/journal/insects/ Review Parasitoids of Queensland Fruit Fly Bactrocera tryoni in Australia and Prospects for Improved Biological Control Ashley L. Zamek 1,, Jennifer E. Spinner 2 Jessica L. Micallef 1, Geoff M. Gurr 3 and Olivia L. Reynolds 4,* 1 Elizabeth Macarthur Agricultural Institute, NSW Department of Primary Industries, Woodbridge Road, Menangle, NSW 2568, Australia; E-Mails: [email protected] (A.L.Z.); [email protected] (J.L.M) 2 EH Graham Centre for Agricultural Innovation, NSW Department of Primary Industries and Charles Sturt University, Locked Bag 588, Wagga Wagga, NSW 2678, Australia; E-Mail: [email protected] 3 EH Graham Centre for Agricultural Innovation, NSW Department of Primary Industries and Charles Sturt University, Charles Sturt University, P.O. Box 883, Orange, NSW 2800, Australia; E-Mail: [email protected] 4 EH Graham Centre for Agricultural Innovation, NSW Department of Primary Industries and Charles Sturt University, Elizabeth Macarthur Agricultural Institute, Woodbridge Road, Menangle, NSW 2568, Australia Present address: Level 1, 1 Phipps Close DEAKIN ACT 2600 Australia. * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +61-0-2-4640-6426; Fax: +61-0-2-4640-6300. Received: 3 September 2012; in revised form: 4 October 2012 / Accepted: 10 October 2012 / Published: 22 October 2012 Abstract: This review draws together available information on the biology, methods for study, and culturing of hymenopteran parasitoids of the Queensland fruit fly, Bactrocera tryoni, and assesses prospects for improving biological control of this serious pest.
    [Show full text]
  • Response of Psyttalia Humilis (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) to Olive Fruit Fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) and Conditions in California Olive Orchards
    BIOLOGICAL CONTROL-PARASITOIDS AND PREDATORS Response of Psyttalia humilis (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) to Olive Fruit Fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) and Conditions in California Olive Orchards VICTORIA Y. YOKOYAMA,1 PEDRO A. RENDO´ N,2 XIN-GENG WANG,3 SUSAN B. OPP,4 5 3 MARSHALL W. JOHNSON, AND KENT M. DAANE Environ. Entomol. 40(2): 315Ð323 (2011); DOI: 10.1603/EN10186 ABSTRACT The larval parasitoid, Psyttalia humilis (Silvestri), reared on Mediterranean fruit ßy, Ceratitis capitata (Weidemann), by USDA-APHIS-PPQ, San Miguel Petapa, Guatemala was imported into California for biological control of olive fruit ßy, Bactrocera oleae (Rossi). This study reports the results of Þeld releases and recovery of P. humilis in California, and laboratory investigations to determine the effects of food provision, high temperature, and insecticidal bait spray on the parasi- toidÕs survival and fecundity. Parasitoids (3,613Ð7,823) were released in Orland, San Juan Bautista, Cayucos, Sylmar, Santa Barbara, and San Diego during October through December 2006. Mean daily temperatures at the release sites ranged from 10.7ЊC in Orland to 20.9ЊC in San Juan Bautista. The lowest (0.5) and highest (29.7) mean number of adult B. oleae per day per trap was captured in Orland and Sylmar, while the lowest (0.01) and highest (2.21) number of third instar larvae per fruit was collected on 11 December in Orland and on 5 October in San Diego in prerelease samples, respectively. Parasitoids were recovered from all release sites, the lowest (0.3%) and highest (100%) parasitism occurred on 25 January in Sylmar and on 26 October in Cayucos, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Genetically Modified (GM) Olive Flies: a Credible Pest Management Approach?
    Genetically Modified (GM) olive flies: A credible pest management approach? September 2013 UK company Oxitec has developed genetically modified (GM) olive flies, which it is seeking to release in large numbers in olive groves. Oxitec has made an application to make its first experimental releases in netted olive groves in Spain. It has stated it also wishes to release GM olive flies in other countries such as Italy, Greece and Morocco. This briefing explores the issues raised by the proposed releases. Oxitec: the company Oxitec is a UK company producing genetically modified (GM) insects with the aim of creating a global market in GM insects for open release into the environment. Oxitec is a spin-out company from the University of Oxford which manages its investment in the company via Oxford Spin-out Equity Management.1 Other known major investors include the Boston- based multi-millionaire Landon Clay, Oxford Capital Partners2, and, since 2012, Asia Pacific Capital3. Smaller investors include researchers working in the field.4 The company has received more than £1.5 million in research funding from UK government sources and the UK Treasury has extended tax relief to investors in an attempt to assist the company grow sufficiently to reach an Initial Public Offering (IPO)5,6. UK Trade and Investment (UKTI) has worked with embassies worldwide to seek to help Oxitec to secure markets for its GM insects.7 Oxitec has close links to the multinational pesticide and seed company, Syngenta: most of its senior management, including its Chief Executive Hadyn Parry, and two Board members, including the Chair, are ex-Syngenta staff.8 From March 2009 to June 2011, Oxitec received research funding directly from Syngenta for genetic transformation of Lepidoptera (a large order of insects that includes pests such as pink bollworm and diamond back moths9).10 Both Oxitec and Syngenta use a consultancy firm run by Colin Ruscoe, Chair of the British Crop Protection Council,11 and the same PR agency (The Blue Ball Room)12, which is run by Parry’s wife.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of a Cricket Paralysis Virus-Based System for Inducing RNA Interference-Mediated
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.11.15.383588; this version posted November 15, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-ND 4.0 International license. 1 Development of a cricket paralysis virus-based system for inducing RNA interference-mediated 2 gene silencing in Diaphorina citri 3 4 Emilyn E. Matsumura1,a, Jared C. Nigg2, Elizabeth M. Henry1, Bryce W. Falk1* 5 6 1 Department of Plant Pathology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA 7 2 Viruses and RNA Interference Unit, Institut Pasteur, UMR3569, CNRS, Paris, France 8 a Present address: Laboratory of Virology, Wageningen University and Research, 6700 AA 9 Wageningen, The Netherlands 10 * Corresponding author: Bryce W. Falk, [email protected] 11 12 Abstract 13 Diaphorina citri, the Asian citrus psyllid, is the insect vector of the phloem-limited bacterium 14 ‘Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus’, which causes the most devastating citrus disease worldwide: 15 Huanglongbing (HLB). An efficient cure for HLB is still not available and the management of the 16 disease is restricted to the use of pesticides, antibiotics and eradication of infected plants. Plant- 17 and insect-infecting viruses have attracted increasing attention for their potential to manipulate 18 traits in insects, especially insect vectors of plant pathogens. However, so far there are no insect 19 virus-based vectors available for use in D. citri. Cricket paralysis virus (CrPV) is a well-studied 20 insect-infecting dicistrovirus with a wide host range and has been used as a model in previous 21 translational studies.
    [Show full text]
  • The Chemical Ecology of the Oriental Fruit Fly Bactrocera Dorsalis and the Potential for Novel Odor-Based Management Tools
    The chemical ecology of the oriental fruit fly Bactrocera dorsalis and the potential for novel odor-based management tools Tibebe Dejene Biasazin Faculty of Landscape Architecture, Horticulture and Crop Protection Science Department of Plant Protection Biology Alnarp Doctoral thesis Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Alnarp 2017 Acta Universitatis agriculturae Sueciae 2017:62 Cover: Left: Bactrocera dorsalis flies feeding from a SPLAT-ME-spinosad dollop on a leaf of mango tree. Right: B. dorsalis hold inside a pippete tip exposing antennae ready for electrophysiological recordings. (photo: Tibebe Dejene) ISSN 1652-6880 ISBN (print version) 978-91-7760-014-5 ISBN (electronic version) 978-91-7760-015-2 © 2017 Tibebe Dejene Biasazin, Alnarp Print: SLU Service/Repro, Alnarp 2017 The chemical ecology of the oriental fruit fly Bactrocera dorsalis and the potential for novel odor-based management tools Abstract Over the last few years, several tephritid species have invaded sub-Saharan Africa, competitively displacing native fruit fly pests, and severely affecting horticulture production. In two different farming scales, small and large, we verified the influence of suppressing the invasive Bactrocera dorsalis using the male specific attractant, methyl eugenol (ME), formulated in SPLAT-spinosad. In small-scale farm plots, use of ME did reduce B. dorsalis populations, but population levels remained high throughout the study. In mark-release-recapture studies, male flies were found to disperse fast and beyond one km from the release point. In large-scale farm plots, the invasive pest was controlled within eight months of suppression using ME-based suppression in combination with other pest management techniques. However, this was paralleled by a quick resurgence of the native fruit fly Ceratitis capitata, likely due to competition release.
    [Show full text]
  • Area-Wide Management of Fruit Fly Pests
    Compendium of Fruit Fly 27 Host Plant Information The USDA Primary Reference in Establishing Fruit Fly Regulated Host Plants Nicanor J. Liquido*, Grant T. McQuate, Karl A. Suiter, Allen L. Norrbom, Wee L. Yee, and Chiou Ling Chang CONTENTS 27.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................364 27.2 Methods ..............................................................................................................................364 27.3 Results and Discussion .......................................................................................................365 27.3.1 Comprehensive Fruit Fly Species-Specific Host Plant Databases and Provisional Host Lists ...........................................................................................365 27.3.2 Tephritidae Databases ...........................................................................................366 27.3.3 Host Plants of the Dacinae of the Pacific Islands ................................................. 367 27.4 Conclusion .......................................................................................................................... 367 Acknowledgments .......................................................................................................................... 367 References ......................................................................................................................................368 Abstract The inherent ecological adaptiveness
    [Show full text]
  • Rhagoletis Completa
    Prepared by CABI and EPPO for the EU under Contract 90/399003 Data Sheets on Quarantine Pests Rhagoletis completa IDENTITY • Rhagoletis completa Name: Rhagoletis completa Cresson Synonyms: Rhagoletis suavis subsp. completa Cresson Taxonomic position: Insecta: Diptera: Tephritidae Common names: Walnut husk fly (English) Mouche des brous du noyer (French) Notes on taxonomy and nomenclature: In the previous edition of this data sheet (EPPO/CABI, 1992), R. suavis was treated as a synonym of R. completa. In this edition, it is treated as a separate species (see below). Bayer computer code: RHAGCO EU Annex designation: I/A1 • Rhagoletis suavis Name: Rhagoletis suavis (Loew) Synonyms: Trypeta suavis Loew Bayer computer code: RHAGSU EU Annex designation: I/A1 HOSTS • Rhagoletis completa The principal hosts are Juglans spp. In North America, J. nigra, J. californica and J. hindsii are attacked (Bush, 1966). Under certain conditions peaches (Prunus persica) may be attacked (Bush, 1966) but the significance of this is not clear. Wild hosts are other Juglans spp. (Foote, 1981). In the EPPO region, the only economically significant host might be walnuts (J. regia). Although there was only one old record, possibly a misidentification, on this host in North America (Cresson, 1929), there were records of high levels of infestation of walnut fruits in 1991 in some Italian orchards. • Rhagoletis suavis Recorded from Juglans ailanthifolia, J. cinerea, J. nigra and walnuts (J. regia) (Bush, 1966). Peaches (Prunus persica) are also an occasional host (Dean, 1969). GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION R. completa and R. suavis are indigenous to North America. The former species has very recently been introduced into the EPPO region and has become established in a limited area.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity and Pest Management APRIL 2019
    biodiversity and pest management APRIL 2019 EIP-AGRI Focus Group ‘Pests and diseases of the olive tree’ Biodiversity and pest management AUTHORS: MARÍA TERESA MARTÍNEZ FERRER, TÂNIA NOBRE, VASILEIOS GKISAKIS, FRANÇOIS WARLOP, JUAN OLIVARES, SUSANA PASCUAL 1 biodiversity and pest management APRIL 2019 1. Introduction Maintaining biodiversity and the associated ecosystem services is an objective of the European Union, implemented through agri-environmental programmes. Biodiversity decline is occurring at a worldwide scale and has twofold implications. From a conservation point of view, the number of extinct and endangered species increases, and this impoverishment of natural ecosystems reduces their resilience. From an agronomical point of view, reduction of biodiversity affects processes that hamper crop productivity, such as pollination or pest management, being the consequence of this biodiversity decline a reduction in agroecosystem sustainability. But both, ecosystem resilience and agro ecosystem sustainability are not isolated. In the case of pest control, in many cases it is assumed that it depends on biodiversity. However, a positive relationship between biodiversity of natural enemies and pest suppression is not always the case. In fact, in some cases this relationship does not occur (Fig.1), and the success of biological control depends not on biodiversity, but on the presence of one or only few species of natural enemies. As an example, in the case of olive trees, a single species such as Anthocoris nemoralis or relatively simple predator assemblages are associated with better biological control than complex assemblages (Paredes et al., 2015). However, it seems that the general rule in different agroecosystems is that biodiversity rather than abundance of natural enemies is linked to pest control, although this has been proven mainly in annual crops and in non- mediterranean environmental conditions (Dainese et al., 2019).
    [Show full text]
  • Tephritid Fruit Fly Semiochemicals: Current Knowledge and Future Perspectives
    insects Review Tephritid Fruit Fly Semiochemicals: Current Knowledge and Future Perspectives Francesca Scolari 1,* , Federica Valerio 2 , Giovanni Benelli 3 , Nikos T. Papadopoulos 4 and Lucie Vaníˇcková 5,* 1 Institute of Molecular Genetics IGM-CNR “Luigi Luca Cavalli-Sforza”, I-27100 Pavia, Italy 2 Department of Biology and Biotechnology, University of Pavia, I-27100 Pavia, Italy; [email protected] 3 Department of Agriculture, Food and Environment, University of Pisa, Via del Borghetto 80, 56124 Pisa, Italy; [email protected] 4 Department of Agriculture Crop Production and Rural Environment, University of Thessaly, Fytokou st., N. Ionia, 38446 Volos, Greece; [email protected] 5 Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Mendel University in Brno, Zemedelska 1, CZ-613 00 Brno, Czech Republic * Correspondence: [email protected] (F.S.); [email protected] (L.V.); Tel.: +39-0382-986421 (F.S.); +420-732-852-528 (L.V.) Simple Summary: Tephritid fruit flies comprise pests of high agricultural relevance and species that have emerged as global invaders. Chemical signals play key roles in multiple steps of a fruit fly’s life. The production and detection of chemical cues are critical in many behavioural interactions of tephritids, such as finding mating partners and hosts for oviposition. The characterisation of the molecules involved in these behaviours sheds light on understanding the biology and ecology of fruit flies and in addition provides a solid base for developing novel species-specific pest control tools by exploiting and/or interfering with chemical perception. Here we provide a comprehensive Citation: Scolari, F.; Valerio, F.; overview of the extensive literature on different types of chemical cues emitted by tephritids, with Benelli, G.; Papadopoulos, N.T.; a focus on the most relevant fruit fly pest species.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Enemies of True Fruit Flies 02/2004-01 PPQ Jeffrey N
    United States Department of Agriculture Natural Enemies of Marketing and Regulatory True Fruit Flies Programs Animal and Plant Health (Tephritidae) Inspection Service Plant Protection Jeffrey N. L. Stibick and Quarantine Psyttalia fletcheri (shown) is the only fruit fly parasitoid introduced into Hawaii capable of parasitizing the melon fly (Bactrocera cucurbitae) United States Department of Agriculture Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service Plant Protection and Quarantine 4700 River Road Riverdale, MD 20737 February, 2004 Telephone: (301) 734-4406 FAX: (301) 734-8192 e-mail: [email protected] Jeffrey N. L. Stibick Introduction Introduction Fruit flies in the family Tephritidae are high profile insects among commercial fruit and vegetable growers, marketing exporters, government regulatory agencies, and the scientific community. Locally, producers face huge losses without some management scheme to control fruit fly populations. At the national and international level, plant protection agencies strictly regulate the movement of potentially infested products. Consumers throughout the world demand high quality, blemish-free produce. Partly to satisfy these demands, the costs to local, state and national governments are quite high and increasing as world trade, and thus risk, increases. Thus, fruit flies impose a considerable resource tax on participants at every level, from producer to shipper to the importing state and, ultimately, to the consumer. (McPheron & Steck, 1996) Indeed, in the United States alone, the running costs per year to APHIS, Plant Protection and Quarantine (PPQ), (the federal Agency responsible) for maintenance of trapping systems, laboratories, and identification are in excess of US$27 million per year and increasing. This figure only accounts for a fraction of total costs throughout the country, as State, County and local governments put in their share as well as the local industry affected.
    [Show full text]