Marx, Durkheim, and Weber 75

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Marx, Durkheim, and Weber 75 21 ST-CENTURY SOCIOLOGY SERIES EDITOR: Steven Seidman, State University of New York at Albany The 21 st-Century Sociology series provides instructors and students with key texts in sociology that speak with a distinct sociological voice and offer thoughtful and original perspectives. The texts reflect current discussions in and beyond sociology, avoiding standard textbook definitions to engage students in critical thinking and new ideas. Prominent scholars in various fields of social inquiry combine theoretical perspectives with the latest research to present accessible syntheses for students as we move further into the new millennium amidst rapid social change. 1 CULTURAL THEORY: AN INTRODUCTION Philip Smith 2 CULTURAL SOCIOLOGY IN PRACTICE Laura Desfor Edles 3 CLASSICAL SOCIAL THEORY: A CONTEMPORARY ApPROACH Kenneth H. Tucker, Jr. Forthcoming: SELF AND CYBERCOMMUNITY Ben Agger GENDER, RACE, AND CLASS Lynn Chancer MASS CULTURE AND SOCIETY M. Gottdiener and Joseph Galbo CONSUMER SOCIETY Andrew Herman THE FEMINIST TRADITION IN SOCIOLOGY Susan Hoecker-Drysdale NEW TECHNOLOGIES AND SOCIETY Douglas Kellner URBAN SPACES Anthony Drum GLOBAL SOCIETY Roland Robertson MULTICULTURAUSM IN GLOBAL SOCIETY Peter Kivisto CLASSICAL SOCIAL THEORY A Contemporary Approach KENNETH H. TUCKER, JR. Contents Acknowledgments viii Introduction Part I The Social and Intellectual Context of Classical Social Theory 15 The World of Classical Social Theory 17 2 From the Enlightenment to Nietzsche: Science, Republicanism, and Identity 39 Part II Social Science and the Canon: Marx, Durkheim, and Weber 75 3 Marx: Modernity and Capitalism 77 4 Durkheim: Modernity and Social Solidarity 117 5 Weber: Modernity and Rationalization 154 Part III Rethinking and Expanding the Canon 191 6 Freud, Simmel, and Mead: Aesthetics, the Unconscious, and the Fluid Self 193 7 Du Bois and Perkins Gilman: Race, Gender, and Cultural Identity 228 Conclusion 253 Further Reading 260 Index 267 Acknowledgments There are many people who helped me throughout the writing of this book. Steven Seidman suggested and supported the project, and made valuable comments on the manuscript at an important stage in its devel­ opment. Several anonymous readers recommended helpful revisions dur­ ing the initial stages of the writing when I was formulating my ideas. Ken Provencher, commissioning editor at Blackwell Publishers, and copy­ editor Jack Messenger were invaluable resources for me. Robert Antonio, Robert Dunn, Elizabeth Long, and Sherry Silveus Tucker read most or all of the manuscript. They often disagreed with me, and their critical com­ ments vastly improved the book. I was unable to incorporate all of their suggestions, and any inaccuracies and/or misinterpretations are entirely attributable to me. The Sociology/Anthropology department and Critical Thought Program of Mount Holyoke College provide an interdisciplinary intellectual environment conducive to innovation in the teaching of social theory. Professors Joan Cocks and Harold Garrett-Goodyear and the stu­ dents in various Critical Social Thought seminars made excellent com­ ments on the Marx chapter. Finally, I wish to thank Sherry for her intellect, compassion, strength, and support. She has taught me far more than she realizes. Introduction As an undergraduate in the 1970s. I took a course on social theory during my sophomore year at the University of California. Santa Barbara. This class turned out to be a pivotal moment in my intellectual life. The professor discussed the critical Marxist social theory of a German group of philosophers and sociologists known as the Frankfurt School. including Max Horkheimer. Theodor Adorno. Herbert Marcuse. Jiirgen Habermas. and its roots in the thought of Karl Marx. Max Weber. and Sigmund Freud. These authors began writing in the 1930s. and became popular in the 1960s. They criticized the conformity and standardization of modem societies. in which corporate capitalism. uncontrolled technology. and the mass culture industry reduced the scope of freedom and critical thinking. The professor's informal style of presentation and the course material intersected with the activist mood of the times (though it was waning in the 1970s) and my personal biography to generate what the SOciologist Lillian Rubin calls. rather prosaically. an "aha experience." where public and private concerns intersect. Like many others at the time. I had ques­ tions about the structure of American social and cultural power in the wake of Vietnam. Like many young adults. my thoughts on these ques­ tions tended to be rather self-absorbed. I sensed that social and cultural power was tied to philosophical and personal issues. I wondered if there were connections between the reasons why people so often acted out of self-interest. treated each other as disposable means, and placed such great faith in technical solutions to social problems. Social theory spoke to me regarding these questions, for it connected personal and social issues in a profound way. My fascination with Marx­ ism was soon complemented by an interest in Weber and Emile Durkheim. early twentieth-century social theorists who struck me as addressing the same questions from different angles. As a graduate student at UC Berkeley, I moved from an interest in labor movements to a concern with the new 2 Introduction social movements of the 1960s, 1970s, and 1980s, which centered around issues of civil rights, gender, sexual orientation, the environment, and the decolonization of the European nineteenth- and twentieth-century em­ pires. These movements challenged not only entrenched social power, but the assumptions that informed understandings of society and history. They raised novel issues for social theory, including the role of colonization, gender, race, and sexual orientation in structuring social stratification and personal identity, how different social groups develop varied cultur­ ally based knowledges, and how to understand such differences in an egalitarian, non-hierarchical manner. Progress and science were not seen as objective processes guaranteeing truth, but critiqued as ideologies jus­ tifying elite power. The new movements also questioned the substance and preconditions of democratic practices, and the limitations of parlia­ mentary versions of democracy. These new issues challenge the viability of classical sociological tradi­ tions to understand contemporary issues and events. In the wake of the new social movements, much criticism has been directed at the sociologi­ cal canon, especially the triumvirate of Marx, Weber, and Durkheim. They are accused of marginalizing race, gender, and colonialism in their theories, and their relevance to today's issues is questioned. It is time to write an undergraduate text that reviews the accomplishments of the classics while pointing to their theoretical limitations. This book summa­ rizes the major themes of the classical sociological theory of Marx, Weber, and Durkheim. It also interprets their thought through the lens of new theoretical concerns, from the role of Empire in shaping sociological theory to the prospects and limitations for democracy in each theorist's perspec­ tive. The text examines other nineteenth- and early twentieth-century theorists who open up new perspectives on these issues in ways not ad­ equately addressed by Marx, Durkheim, and Weber. These theorists in­ clude Freud, Georg Simmel, G. H. Mead, W. E. B. Du Bois, and Charlotte Perkins Gilman, who raise issues of colonialism, race, gender, and the complexity of cultural and personal identity. I will closely read the texts of these theorists, drawing out their major themes and internal contradictions. I think the best criticism intensively examines the arguments of the thinkers under study. I will also place their thought in the historical circumstances of their time, so that their ideas are presented in the context of the social problems and intellectual debates they addressed. But such internal or "immanent" criticism is not enough. We always interpret thinkers of the past with contemporary themes in mind. I will be led by my own interpretation of the major issues of social theory today, and whether the classical theorists can contribute to an understanding of them. I will defend and criticize the classical theo­ rists where appropriate, assessing their significance for our time. While Introduction 3 some of their viewpoints are indeed dated, others can help to puncture the conventional wisdom of current social theory. The Canon and Its Problems In most colleges and universities, sociology students who study social theory read texts by Marx, Weber. and Durkheim. These three nineteenth­ century European social theorists are considered to have formulated many of the fundamental themes of sociology. They achieved several of sociolo­ gy's most distinctive approaches and central concepts. Each of these thinkers was contributing to a common intellectual enterprise, what Collins and Makowsky refer to as the discovery of society.l They responded in diver­ gent ways to a shared historical context, which included the rise and transformation of Western society in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. The aftermath of the French Revolution, the industrial revolu­ tion, the emergence of the market, and European colonialism opened up social. economic, and cultural opportunities and problems previously un­ imaginable, from the possibilities of more complex types of social organi­ zation (capitalism and socialism) to a novel type of culture
Recommended publications
  • A Genealogical Handbook of German Research
    Family History Library • 35 North West Temple Street • Salt Lake City, UT 84150-3400 USA A GENEALOGICAL HANDBOOK OF GERMAN RESEARCH REVISED EDITION 1980 By Larry O. Jensen P.O. Box 441 PLEASANT GROVE, UTAH 84062 Copyright © 1996, by Larry O. Jensen All rights reserved. No part of this work may be translated or reproduced in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, including photocopying, without permission in writing from the author. Printed in the U.S.A. INTRODUCTION There are many different aspects of German research that could and maybe should be covered; but it is not the intention of this book even to try to cover the majority of these. Too often when genealogical texts are written on German research, the tendency has been to generalize. Because of the historical, political, and environmental background of this country, that is one thing that should not be done. In Germany the records vary as far as types, time period, contents, and use from one kingdom to the next and even between areas within the same kingdom. In addition to the variation in record types there are also research problems concerning the use of different calendars and naming practices that also vary from area to area. Before one can successfully begin doing research in Germany there are certain things that he must know. There are certain references, problems and procedures that will affect how one does research regardless of the area in Germany where he intends to do research. The purpose of this book is to set forth those things that a person must know and do to succeed in his Germanic research, whether he is just beginning or whether he is advanced.
    [Show full text]
  • How Britain Unified Germany: Geography and the Rise of Prussia
    — Early draft. Please do not quote, cite, or redistribute without written permission of the authors. — How Britain Unified Germany: Geography and the Rise of Prussia After 1815∗ Thilo R. Huningy and Nikolaus Wolfz Abstract We analyze the formation oft he German Zollverein as an example how geography can shape institutional change. We show how the redrawing of the European map at the Congress of Vienna—notably Prussia’s control over the Rhineland and Westphalia—affected the incentives for policymakers to cooperate. The new borders were not endogenous. They were at odds with the strategy of Prussia, but followed from Britain’s intervention at Vienna regarding the Polish-Saxon question. For many small German states, the resulting borders changed the trade-off between the benefits from cooperation with Prussia and the costs of losing political control. Based on GIS data on Central Europe for 1818–1854 we estimate a simple model of the incentives to join an existing customs union. The model can explain the sequence of states joining the Prussian Zollverein extremely well. Moreover we run a counterfactual exercise: if Prussia would have succeeded with her strategy to gain the entire Kingdom of Saxony instead of the western provinces, the Zollverein would not have formed. We conclude that geography can shape institutional change. To put it different, as collateral damage to her intervention at Vienna,”’Britain unified Germany”’. JEL Codes: C31, F13, N73 ∗We would like to thank Robert C. Allen, Nicholas Crafts, Theresa Gutberlet, Theocharis N. Grigoriadis, Ulas Karakoc, Daniel Kreßner, Stelios Michalopoulos, Klaus Desmet, Florian Ploeckl, Kevin H.
    [Show full text]
  • The House of Coburg and Queen Victoria: a Study of Duty and Affection
    University of Nebraska at Omaha DigitalCommons@UNO Student Work 6-1-1971 The House of Coburg and Queen Victoria: A study of duty and affection Terrence Shellard University of Nebraska at Omaha Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/studentwork Recommended Citation Shellard, Terrence, "The House of Coburg and Queen Victoria: A study of duty and affection" (1971). Student Work. 413. https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/studentwork/413 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UNO. It has been accepted for inclusion in Student Work by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UNO. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE HOUSE OF COBURG AND QUEEN VICTORIA A STORY OF DUTY AND AFFECTION A Thesis Presented to the Department of History and the Faculty of the Graduate College University of Nebraska at Omaha In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts by Terrance She Ha r d June Ip71 UMI Number: EP73051 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Diss««4afor. R_bJ .stung UMI EP73051 Published by ProQuest LLC (2015). Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code ProQuest LLC.
    [Show full text]
  • Endogenous Trade Costs and the Formation of a Customs Union
    Endogenous Trade Costs and the Formation of a Customs Union Unpublished manuscript. Do not circulate, quote, or cite, without permission! How Geography Unified Germany: Endogenous Trade Costs and the Formation of a Customs Union∗ y z THILO R. HUNING AND NIKOLAUS WOLF Abstract We analyze the foundation of the German Zollverein as an example how geography can shape institutional change. We show how the redrawing of the European map at the Congress of Vienna 1815—notably Prussia’s control over the Rhineland and Westphalia—affected the incentives for policymakers to cooperate. Our argument comes in three steps. First, we show that the new borders were not endogenous to trade. They were at odds with the strategy of Prussia in 1815, but followed from Britain’s intervention at Vienna regarding the Polish-Saxon question. Second, we develop a theoretical framework, where state planners set tariffs on imports and transits to maximize revenue. We show that in a world with transit tariffs a revenue-maximizing state planner faces a trade-off between benefits from cooperation and the cost of loosing geographical advantage. In a third step we calibrate the model combining historical data on tariffs, freight rates, market sizes with GIS data on lowest costs routes under endogenous tariffs. We then run counterfactuals to show how borders affected incentives: if Prussia would have succeeded with her strategy to gain the entire Kingdom of Saxony instead of the western provinces, the Zollverein would not have formed. We conclude that geography can shape institutional change. To put it differently, as a collateral damage to her intervention at Vienna “Britain unified Germany”.
    [Show full text]
  • The German Catholic Settlers of Waterloo County
    THE GERMAN-FRENCH CATHOLIC SETTLERS OF WATERLOO COUNTY, ONTARIO Robert Wideen : 2020 Soufflenheim Genealogy Research and History www.soufflenheimgenealogy.com The German-French Catholic Settlers of Waterloo County, Ontario, Canada and Surrounding Counties - The Beginnings: 1824-1850’s. Compiled by Chris Bowman, 1991-2018 Most of the individuals in this work are from Alsace, mentioned 281 times, Baden, 245, and Bavaria, 62 times. Bas-Rhin is mentioned 165 times, Haut-Rhin 32. Soufflenheim, 92 times, and the nearby villages of Schirrhein 6 and Rountzenheim 20. New Germany in Ontario, the destination of a large number of emigrants from Soufflenheim, is found 388 times. 1883 Map of Waterloo County, Ontario. New Germany center right. CONTENTS The German-French Catholic Settlers Of Waterloo County, Ontario ........................................................... 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................ 2 Index of Names ......................................................................................................................................... 3 Biographies ................................................................................................................................................ 5 A - D ........................................................................................................................................................... 5 E - H ........................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Kingdom of Wurttenmerg and the Making of Germany, 1815-1871
    Te Kingdom of Württemberg and the Making of Germany, 1815-1871. Bodie Alexander Ashton School of History and Politics Discipline of History Te University of Adelaide Submitted for the postgraduate qualification of Doctor of Philosophy (History) May 2014 For Kevin and Ric; and for June, Malcolm and Kristian. Contents Abstract vii Acknowledgements ix List of Abbreviations xi Notes xiii Introduction 15 Chapter 1 35 States and Nation in the Late Eighteenth and Early Nineteenth Century Chapter 2 67 Stuttgart and Vienna before 1848 Chapter 3 93 Te Kingdom of Württemberg and Early Kleindeutschland Chapter 4 123 Independence and South German Particularism, 1815-1848 Chapter 5 159 Te Years of Prophecy and Change, 1848-1849 Chapter 6 181 Counterrevolution, Reaction and Reappraisals, 1850-1859 Chapter 7 207 Six Years of Autumn: 1860-1866 Chapter 8 251 Te Unification of Germany, 1866-1871 Conclusion 295 Bibliography 305 ABSTRACT _ THE TRADITIONAL DISCOURSE of the German unification maintains that it was the German great powers - Austria and Prussia - that controlled German destiny, yet for much of this period Germany was divided into some thirty-eight states, each of which possessed their own institutions and traditions. In explaining the formation of Germany, the orthodox view holds that these so-called Mittel- and Kleinstaaten existed largely at the whim of either Vienna or Berlin, and their policies, in turn, were dictated or shaped by these two power centres. According to this reading of German history, a bipolar sociopolitical structure existed, whereby the Mittelstaaten would declare their allegiances to either the Habsburg or Hohenzollern crowns. Te present work rejects this model of German history, through the use of the case study of the southwestern Kingdom of Württemberg.
    [Show full text]
  • Thüringen Historischer Überblick Englisch
    thüringen Historischer Überblick englisch 02.02.2009 10:40 Uhr Seite 1 THÜRINGEN BLÄTTER ZUR LANDESKUNDE he ‘Land’ Thu- to the formation of a ringia received nation, yet simulta- Tnumerous attri- neously to castigate the butes in view of its cataclysmic fragmen- history, such as “heart- tation: “Our culture land of German cultu- owes Thuringia a lot, re”, “centre of Refor- but our state does not mation”, “home of the owe anything” (Hein- Bach family” and “land rich von Treitschke). of classicism”. The more recent his- The landscape, steep- toriography reversed ed in culture and tra- this verdict as it unco- dition, around the Wart- vered significant politi- burg castle and the cal, social, and econo- town Weimar had not mic forces of innova- been unified territory tion that originated until the 20th century, from Thuringia. but instead a prime ex- Considering the step- ample of German par- by-step unification be- ticularism. This provo- tween 1920 and 1990, ked the historiography Wartburg Eisenach the positive develop- of the 19th century to (Thoma Babovic, ments prevail: the emphasize the cultural Thüringer Tourismus GmbH) princely spirit of re- impulses that derived presentation bestowed from Thuringia leading splendid castles, parks, Thuringia An Historical Overview museums, libraries and theatres in a ny, despite changing views on this mat- unique density upon the “Land of Re- ter. sidencies” and made it synonymous The Mediaeval Empire was gradually with the ‘Land’ of writers and think- weakened for the benefit of the regional ers. Thuringia, however, continues to powers to the point of their de facto be regarded as a leading example of independence after the Thirty Years’ the longlasting, territorial fragmenta- War (1618–48).
    [Show full text]
  • Descendants of Johannes Keilman 6 January 2016
    Descendants of Johannes Keilman 6 January 2016 First Generation 1. Johannes Keilman was born about 1760. Johannes Keilman and Elizabeth Schar were married. Elizabeth Schar was born (date unknown). Johannes Keilman and Elizabeth Schar had the following child: +2 i. Conrad Keilman, born abt 1791, Iba, Germany; married Anna Christina Lemmert, 11 Sep 1814, Iba, Germany; died bef 1850, Cumberland, Maryland. Second Generation 2. Conrad Keilman (Johannes-1) was born about 1791 in Iba, Germany. He died before 1850 at the age of 59 in Cumberland, Maryland. Conrad is listed as Keulman in the Ship Passeger Record for Ship Olbers arriving at the Port of Baltimore on 13 Jul 1844. The following were traveling with Conrad (53) and assumed to be part of his family: Ann Christ (53), wife, Jacob (14), son, Marilin (9), daughter, Sophia Krapff (29) (relationship unknown), Sophia's son, Andreas(7) and Koening Krapff (19). All are listed as coming from Iba, Germany. Georg Lindel (16) is also listed as coming from Iba. Conrad Keilman and Anna Christina Lemmert were married on 11 Sep 1814 in Iba, Germany. Anna Christina Lemmert, daughter of Andreas Lemmert and Anna Martha Schallos, was born on 26 Apr 1791 in Iba, Germany. Conrad Keilman and Anna Christina Lemmert had the following children: +3 i. Anna Elizabeth Coleman, born 18 Oct 1818, , Germany; married Christian P. Petenbrink, 7 Jan 1846, Allegany County, Maryland, Cumberland; married Nickel; died 21 Mar 1893, Somerset County, Pennsylvania, Southampton. +4 ii. Elisabeth Keilman, born 20 Sep 1820, Iba, Germany; married Frederick Rohl; died 1 Mar 1901.
    [Show full text]
  • View/Download/Print a Modified Register Report (MRR)
    1: Balthasar FETTERMAN-778 - (c) 2020 C F Kerchner First Generation 1. Balthasar FETTERMAN-778 was born on 2 Nov 1713 in Neuhausen, Germany. He died in Apr 1798 in Longswamp Twsp, Berks County, PA. He was buried about Apr 1798 in Lehigh Zion Lutheran Church Cemetery, L Macungie Township, Lehigh County, PA. Balthasar married (MRIN:1057) Catharina Gertrude LUDWIG-3154, daughter of Franz Georg LUDWIG-6136 and Anna Maria ENGEL-20500 (MRIN:1925), on 15 Jun 1734 in Ober-Florsheim, Rheinland-Pfalz, Germany. Catharina was born about 1714 in probably, Germany. She died about 1750 in near, Dillingerville, Lehigh County, PA. She was buried about 1750 in Lutheran Cem, Dillingerville, PA. They had the following children. 2F i. Johannetta Catharina FETTERMAN-6533 was born on 26 May 1735 in Ober- Florsheim, Rheinland-Pfalz, Germany. She died before 1749 in probably, Germany. 3 F ii. Susanna Elisabetha FETTERMAN-6534 was born on 25 Mar 1738 in Ober- Florsheim, Rheinland-Pfalz, Germany. She died before 1749 in probably, Germany. + 4 M iii. Cassimer FETTERMAN-3155 was born on 28 Jul 1739. He died about Aug 1825. +5Miv.Johann Herman FETTERMAN-3166 was born on 10 Apr 1743. He died about Aug 1806. +6Fv.Anna Rosina FETTERMAN-4137 was born on 24 Jun 1746. She died on 6 Oct 1820. 7 F vi. Catharine FETTERMAN-4953 was born about 1747 in probably, Germany. She died in probably, PA. Catharine married (MRIN:1568) Samuel BACHERT-4954 about 1770 in probably, PA. Samuel was born about 1745 in maybe, Germany. He died in probably, PA.
    [Show full text]