DOCSLIB.ORG

UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Electronic Theses and Dissertations

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Electronic Theses and Dissertations UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Shaping Issues: News Media Framing of Proof of Citizenship Requirements to Register to Vote Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/50v798qt Author Henderson, Ana Kathryn-Anne Publication Date 2015 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Shaping Issues: News Media Framing of Proof of Citizenship Requirements to Register to Vote by Ana Kathryn-Anne Henderson A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Jurisprudence and Social Policy in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in Charge: Professor Kristin Luker, Chair Professor Taeku Lee Professor Cybell Fox Fall 2015 © 2015 Ana Kathryn-Anne Henderson Abstract Shaping Issues: New Media Framing of Proof of Citizenship Requirements to Register to Vote by Ana Kathryn-Anne Henderson Doctor of Philosophy in Jurisprudence and Social Policy University of California, Berkeley Professor Kristin Luker, Chair Voter eligibility in nearly every jurisdiction in the United States is limited to US citizens age 18 or over. In 1993, federal law established that citizenship and age eligibility are “proven” by an applicant swearing under penalty of perjury that she is citizen age 18 or over. In 2004, Arizona voters approved an initiative requiring documentary proof of citizenship in order to register. Four other states passed similar laws and an additional five states instituted administrative procedures to purge suspected non-citizens from their voter rolls. There is very little evidence of non-citizens voting, and in most of the few cases uncovered, non-citizens without intent to commit fraud. In addition, there is evidence that the laws in Arizona and Kansas prevented more than 50,000 people from registering to vote because their applications lacked proof of citizenship, and that administrative efforts to remove registered non-citizens mistakenly identified US citizens for removal. Nevertheless, the few public opinion polls available show public support for proof of citizenship requirements is high. This dissertation uses a content analysis of 181 news stories about non-citizen voting or proof of citizenship requirements to identify media frames used in news coverage of these issues. It finds that media coverage about non-citizen voting and proof of citizenship increased substantially after 2008 even though there was no increase in cases of non-citizen voting; this helped to raise visibility of the “problem.” It identifies seven frames in support of proof of citizenship and seven frames in opposition and finds that news stories analyzed were more likely to use supporting frames than opposing frames. In addition, it finds that most stories analyzed employed a “he said/she said” style of reported consisting of repeating truth-claims from advocates for and against proof of citizenship. This style allowed political elites to present their partisan frames directly to the public, usually without interrogation into the factual basis of those claims. Moreover, reporting style had a significant impact on frames presented, with stories that used a “fact-checking” style far more likely to present frames that proof of citizenship was not necessary and would disenfranchise citizens. Finally, the analysis of two examples from the stories of “valence framing” – different but logically equivalent presentations of the same information – demonstrate how media frames can influence public perception. 1 Acknowledgements I would like to thank the many people who helped me throughout the process of developing this dissertation. In particular, my dissertation Chair Kristin Luker, who was a great cheerleader in addition to providing wonderful advice, and Committee members Taeku Lee and Cybelle Fox, who provided probing questions about drafts of my work that helped me refine and improve my explanations. In addition, I thank Professor Sarah Song, who Chaired my Qualifying Committee and provided helpful advice even after my qualifying exam, and Professor Chris Edley, who provided his unqualified support when I decided to go back to school to expand my “tool kit” many years after having been his student in law school. Reference Librarian Ellen Gilmore of the UC Berkeley School of Law Library provided me with invaluable information on the myriad databases available, saving me many hours of experimentation to determine the best source of information for this study. This project benefited from input at the 2015 ASLCH Graduate Student Conference, and I think its conveners for including me as well as the participants for the many helpful conversations during that very snowy day in Washington DC. I thank my friends for their support, especially my colleague Katie Heard, who was great company for studying, working and occasionally commiserating over this long dissertation-writing process. Finally, I thank my family for helping me through the past few months of intensive work. I greatly appreciate the opportunity you have given me to complete this project. Thank you, Rand! i Chapter 1: Introduction In the United States, voting is limited to US citizens all federal elections, all state elections and nearly all local elections. In most states, citizens must register to vote in order to cast a ballot. 1 While there have been many procedures and requirements to register used over the course of US history, since at least 1993, citizenship eligibility was established by swearing, under penalty of perjury, that one was a citizen. However, in the late 2000s and early 2010s, some states started requiring “proof” of citizenship in order to register and vote. One’s sworn statement of citizenship was no longer sufficient; independent verification, through documents or consultation with state or federal officials, was required. The shift to requiring proof of citizenship was not a response to the discovery of widespread non-citizen voting. On the contrary, there was very little evidence of non- citizens attempting to vote. In addition, requiring proof of citizenship made it harder for citizens to register to vote, in some cases depriving them of their right to vote. Nevertheless, support for proof of citizenship requirements remained high not only among some candidates, elected officials and pundits who advocated for the change in policy but among public, as well. Based on the empirical evidence, public support for proof of citizenship requirements is counterintuitive. The available evidence indicates that the number of non-citizens attempting to register is very small and far outweighed by the number of citizens prevented from registering to vote due to lack of documentation. 2 However, the “facts” may not be the sole or predominant source of influence on public support for proof of citizenship requirements. This dissertation explores one possible influence on support for proof of citizenship requirements: news media coverage. The mass media can play a significant role in raising public consciousness about and shaping perceptions of and opinions about a given issue. This dissertation presents the results of my examination mass media reporting about non-citizen voting and proof of citizenship requirements. This includes exploration of trends in reporting over time to investigate whether the media’s “agenda- setting function” may have increased public awareness. It also includes the results of my content analysis of a set of 181 news stories to identify the “media frames” utilized when reporting on these issues. I. History of Voting Access: a Long-Standing Goal of Recognition and Inclusion 1 North Dakota does not require voter registration. In addition, California, Colorado, Connecticut, the District of Columbia, Idaho, Illinois, Iowa, Maine, Minnesota, Montana, New Hampshire, Vermont, Wisconsin, and Wyoming allow individuals to register and cast a vote on Election Day, and Hawaii will allow Election Day registration starting in 2018. See National Conference of State Legislatures, “Same Day Voter Registration,” available at http://www.ncsl.org/research/elections-and-campaigns/same-day- registration.aspx. A handful of local jurisdictions, mostly towns in Maryland, allow resident non-citizens to vote in local elections. 2 To use a medical metaphor, if proof of citizenship were a drug treatment, its “side effects” (large number of citizens disenfranchised) would far outweigh its benefits (prevention of a tiny number of non-citizens registering). 1 Voting in the United States is an important right, not just because, as the U.S. Supreme Court has recognized, it is “preservative of all rights,” 3 but also because access to the vote is an expression of citizenship and a symbol of national membership. Possessing access to the ballot – the right to vote -- validates that an individual is entitled to the full benefit of legal rights and protections as well as public goods and services granted to citizens; it is an indicator of what political theorist Judith Shklar referred to as “citizenship as standing.” 4 However, access to the franchise has been contentious since the country’s founding. Despite its democratic principles, throughout US history, various segments of the population have been denied the right to vote through a variety of means aimed at preserving access to the ballot to a chosen few. Limitations on voting access have followed larger power stratifications, most notably race, sex, and economic
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 110 CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION
    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 110 CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION Vol. 154 WASHINGTON, WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 24, 2008 No. 152 Senate (Legislative day of Wednesday, September 17, 2008) The Senate met at 9:30 a.m., on the U.S. SENATE, Treasury and the Chairman of the Fed expiration of the recess, and was called PRESIDENT PRO TEMPORE, will be over in the House around 2 to order by the Honorable BENJAMIN L. Washington, DC, September 24, 2008. o’clock this afternoon. Democrats are To the Senate: CARDIN, a Senator from the State of holding a caucus at 4:30 p.m. to talk Under the provisions of rule I, paragraph 3, Maryland. of the Standing Rules of the Senate, I hereby about this issue. The Secretary is com- appoint the Honorable BENJAMIN L. CARDIN, ing to that caucus at 5 o’clock. PRAYER a Senator from the State of Maryland, to I hope we can make more progress. The Chaplain, Dr. Barry C. Black, of- perform the duties of the Chair. We have not only the Jewish holidays fered the following prayer: ROBERT C. BYRD, coming up next week, but a very im- Let us pray. President pro tempore. portant event is this Friday. I was told Gracious, loving God, let Your light, Mr. CARDIN thereupon assumed the and heard on the radio this morning Your wisdom, Your righteousness, and chair as Acting President pro tempore. that as much as 85 percent of the Your love fill our minds and hearts f American people will watch the debate this Friday.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rise of Talk Radio and Its Impact on Politics and Public Policy
    Mount Rushmore: The Rise of Talk Radio and Its Impact on Politics and Public Policy Brian Asher Rosenwald Wynnewood, PA Master of Arts, University of Virginia, 2009 Bachelor of Arts, University of Pennsylvania, 2006 A Dissertation presented to the Graduate Faculty of the University of Virginia in Candidacy for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of History University of Virginia August, 2015 !1 © Copyright 2015 by Brian Asher Rosenwald All Rights Reserved August 2015 !2 Acknowledgements I am deeply indebted to the many people without whom this project would not have been possible. First, a huge thank you to the more than two hundred and twenty five people from the radio and political worlds who graciously took time from their busy schedules to answer my questions. Some of them put up with repeated follow ups and nagging emails as I tried to develop an understanding of the business and its political implications. They allowed me to keep most things on the record, and provided me with an understanding that simply would not have been possible without their participation. When I began this project, I never imagined that I would interview anywhere near this many people, but now, almost five years later, I cannot imagine the project without the information gleaned from these invaluable interviews. I have been fortunate enough to receive fellowships from the Fox Leadership Program at the University of Pennsylvania and the Corcoran Department of History at the University of Virginia, which made it far easier to complete this dissertation. I am grateful to be a part of the Fox family, both because of the great work that the program does, but also because of the terrific people who work at Fox.
    [Show full text]
  • Siriusxm Goes Gavel to Gavel with Convention Coverage
    NEWS RELEASE SiriusXM Goes Gavel to Gavel With Convention Coverage 7/7/2016 Unprecedented audio coverage across seven original SiriusXM channels including P.O.T.U.S. Convention Radio; Patriot; Progress; Insight; Urban View; Business Radio Powered by The Wharton School, and Radio Andy! Diverse perspectives and special content from Breitbart News, The Circus on SHOWTIME®, Yahoo News, Randi Zuckerberg, Dan Rather, and many more. Former NYC Police Commissioner Ray Kelly to kick off special series with "Securing a Convention" Plus live coverage from CNN, Fox News, Fox News Headlines 24/7, MSNBC, NPR, and more. NEW YORK, July 7, 2016 /PRNewswire/ -- SiriusXM announced today its comprehensive live coverage of the Republican and Democratic National Conventions as well as a wide-variety of political programming across a broad- range of its news, talk and entertainment channels. "SiriusXM's coverage of the 2016 political conventions will be broad, diverse, and unmatched in the audio space," said Scott Greenstein, SiriusXM President and Chief Content Officer. "Regardless of political persuasion, SiriusXM listeners will have choices like never before to hear every minute of each convention along with sharp political analysis and opinion across an unprecedented number of channels on our platform." Beginning Monday, July 18th for the Republican National Convention and Monday, July 25th for the Democratic National Convention, SiriusXM will transform its non-partisan P.O.T.U.S. (Politics of The United States) channel into "Convention Radio" -- featuring uninterrupted, gavel to gavel coverage from the convention floor. P.O.T.U.S channel hosts including Tim Farley, Michael Smerconish, Julie Mason, Michael Steele, and Rick Ungar will broadcast from each convention city, with White House Correspondent Jared Rizzi reporting live from the convention floor.
    [Show full text]
  • INTERVIEW of the PRESIDENT by MICHAEL SMERCONISH Oval
    INTERVIEW OF THE PRESIDENT BY MICHAEL SMERCONISH Oval Office 12:13 P.M. EDT Q Mr. President, thank you for this privilege. This is our seventh conversation, and I appreciate the honor of coming into the Oval Office. Thank you for that. THE PRESIDENT: Michael, it’s great to be with you again. Q Let’s talk polarization. It’s a subject of concern for both my listeners and me. Putting aside the blame, the fact is you’ve been unsuccessful in getting Republicans to work with you. Today I noted that The Washington Post endorsed you, embraced your candidacy, but said that you’ve been isolated in the White House. What can, what will you do in a second term to win cooperation from Republicans? THE PRESIDENT: Well, I think the most important thing is, after the election -- and I believe I'm going to win - - to once again bring the Republicans together with my administration and Democrats and say to them, the election is over; we still have some big problems to solve, and the goal of making me a one-term President is behind us, and the question now is how do we move forward in a way that strengthens middle-class families, make sure that job growth is strong, that wages are going up. Probably the first piece of business is going to be to go ahead and fix our deficit and debt issues, and make a decision about how big our government is and how we're going to pay for it. And I put forward a $4 trillion deficit reduction plan -- we've already cut a trillion dollars’ worth of government spending.
    [Show full text]
  • Philadelphia Inquirer
    The Pulse: Asian American vote could be a wake-up call to the GOP 11/19/12 5:37 AM Sign In | Register Monday, November 19, 2012 What are you looking for? 40° Mostly Cloudy Forecast » Philly.com Business Directory News | Sports | Holidays 2012 | Entertainment | Business | Food | Lifestyle | Health | Marketplace SOUTH JERSEY COMMUNITIES AND CULTURE POLITICS EDUCATION OBITUARIES NATION/WORLD WEATHER TRAFFIC LOTTERY The Pulse: Asian American vote 11 2 2 0 @ could be a wake-up call to the GOP Like Tweet Share Michael Smerconish, Inquirer Columnist POSTED: Sunday, November 18, 2012, 6:36 AM Much is still being analyzed regarding the voting demographics for the presidential election. Some seem easily explained. For example, the monolithic vote for Barack Obama among African Americans. His 93 percent support among blacks is no doubt attributable, in part, to his own race, and would explain why Mitt Romney received not a single vote in 59 Philadelphia divisions. And, given the GOP primary climate, it's not hard to understand why 71 percent of Hispanics voted against Romney, who ran as a severely conservative candidate on immigration. That was what the primary process demanded. Texas Gov. Rick Perry was roundly criticized after saying during an Orlando debate: "If you say that we should not educate children who have come into our state for no reason than they've been brought there, by no fault of their own, I don't think you have a heart." Newt Gingrich incurred the same wrath when he advocated a "path to legality" for illegal immigrants who have lived in the United States for 25 years or more, and who had established family and community ties.
    [Show full text]
  • Penn Law Journal: a Home for Inalienable Rights
    et al.: Penn Law Journal: A Home for Inalienable Rights UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA LAW SCHOOL FALL 2013 VOLUME 48, NUMBER 2 A HOME FOR INALIENABLE RIGHTS ALSO: REBEL WITH A CAUSE THE RINGMASTER Published by Penn Law: Legal Scholarship Repository, 2014 1 Penn Law Journal, Vol. 48, Iss. 2 [2014], Art. 1 PENN LAW SCHOOL GOT A TASTE OF FIRST MONDAY in early October when Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy visited just days before the start of the Court’s new session. Justice Kennedy participated in a Q&A with Dean Michael A. Fitts, taught a constitutional law class, and met with students as part of the new Visiting Jurist Program, which is designed to promote closer ties between eminent members of the judiciary and law students. During the Q&A attended by alumni, Kennedy discussed the role of law schools and the importance of ethics in legal education, also touching on the potential use of cameras in the Court and the evolution of gay rights. Cover Photo: Pictured on the cover are Sasha Ballen (left) and Dee Spagnuolo L’03 who are challenging Pennsylvania’s effort to void their marriage. Cover photo: © Carly Teitelbaum https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/plj/vol48/iss2/1 2 et al.: Penn Law Journal: A Home for Inalienable Rights PENNLAW JOURNAL FEATURES A Home for Inalienable Rights 22 BYS JO H MIDDLEtoN AND Emma SCHWARTZ The gay rights movement is rolling downhill, with public opinion shifting and more states legalizing same-sex marriage. You can see all of the signs of change at Penn Law, where there appears to be a pot of gold at the end of the rainbow.
    [Show full text]
  • Shaping Issues: News Media Framing of Proof of Citizenship Requirements to Register to Vote
    Shaping Issues: News Media Framing of Proof of Citizenship Requirements to Register to Vote by Ana Kathryn-Anne Henderson A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Jurisprudence and Social Policy in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in Charge: Professor Kristin Luker, Chair Professor Taeku Lee Professor Cybell Fox Fall 2015 © 2015 Ana Kathryn-Anne Henderson Abstract Shaping Issues: New Media Framing of Proof of Citizenship Requirements to Register to Vote by Ana Kathryn-Anne Henderson Doctor of Philosophy in Jurisprudence and Social Policy University of California, Berkeley Professor Kristin Luker, Chair Voter eligibility in nearly every jurisdiction in the United States is limited to US citizens age 18 or over. In 1993, federal law established that citizenship and age eligibility are “proven” by an applicant swearing under penalty of perjury that she is citizen age 18 or over. In 2004, Arizona voters approved an initiative requiring documentary proof of citizenship in order to register. Four other states passed similar laws and an additional five states instituted administrative procedures to purge suspected non-citizens from their voter rolls. There is very little evidence of non-citizens voting, and in most of the few cases uncovered, non-citizens without intent to commit fraud. In addition, there is evidence that the laws in Arizona and Kansas prevented more than 50,000 people from registering to vote because their applications lacked proof of citizenship, and that administrative efforts to remove registered non-citizens mistakenly identified US citizens for removal.
    [Show full text]
  • May 5 Event to Honor Brown
    PHILADELPHIA ® April 2004 The Monthly Newspaper of the Philadelphia Bar Association Vol. 33, No. 4 SaveSave thethe Date:Date: May 5 Nov.Nov. 55 && 6,6, 20042004 Event to Justice Scalia Dennis W. Archer Honor Archer to Brown Join Scalia by Daniel A. Cirucci The Association will commemorate the at April 29 50th anniversary of the historic U.S. Sup- reme Court decision in Brown v. Board of Education during Law Week on Wednes- day, May 5 with a program sponsored Quarterly jointly by the Association and the Phila- by Jeff Lyons delphia School District. On May 17, 1954, the Supreme Court ruled that segregated “separate but equal” American Bar Association President public schools were unconstitutional and Dennis W. Archer will join U.S. Supreme that schools must be integrated “with all Court Associate Justice Antonin Scalia as deliberate speed.” The half-day commem- a speaker at the Association’s April 29 oration is scheduled to begin at 10 a.m. in Quarterly Meeting and Luncheon. the auditorium of the school district Tickets for the event are now available headquarters at 21st Street and the Park- for general sale. At the luncheon, the in- way and will conclude with a noon lun- augural Justice Antonin Scalia Award for cheon. An invited audience of about 200 Professional Excellence will be presented. will be composed of approximately one- The event will be held in the Grand third students, one-third educators and Ballroom at the Park Hyatt Philadelphia one-third lawyers. at the Bellevue, Broad and Walnut streets. Philadelphia School District CEO Paul continued on page 14 Vallas and School Reform Commission Borgata Hotel Casino & Spa will host the Philadelphia Bar Association Bench-Bar Chair James Nevels will participate and Conference in November.
    [Show full text]
  • "JFK: 50 Years Later" Launches on Siriusxm to Commemorate the 50Th Anniversary of President John F
    "JFK: 50 Years Later" Launches on SiriusXM to Commemorate the 50th Anniversary of President John F. Kennedy Assassination Limited-run pop-up channel offers listeners one-stop destination to hear SiriusXM's extensive JFK programming spanning multiple channels and perspectives from hosts and guests including Dan Rather, Sarah Palin, Oliver Stone, Chris Matthews and former Secret Service agent Clint Hill NEW YORK, Nov. 20, 2013 /PRNewswire/ -- SiriusXM today announced that it is paying tribute to President John F. Kennedy and the 50th anniversary of his assassination with the launch of "JFK: 50 Years Later," a special weekend-long pop-up channel featuring exclusive programming drawn from SiriusXM's multiple talk channels. (Logo: http://photos.prnewswire.com/prnh/20101014/NY82093LOGO ) "JFK: 50 Years Later" debuts at 6:00 am ET on Friday, November 22 and will air through 6:00 am ET on Monday, November 25 on SiriusXM channel 108. The special channel will feature programming drawn from an array of programming airing this week across multiple SiriusXM channels to mark the anniversary of Kennedy's death. "JFK: 50 Years Later" will feature interviews with guests including Oliver Stone, Dan Rather, Chris Matthews, Sarah Palin and Dick Gregory; special broadcasts of two events from Washington, D.C.'s Newseum: "Inside Media: Covering the Kennedy Assassination" featuring journalist Sid Davis and "Eyewitness to History," hosted by CNN's Jake Tapper and featuring former Secret Service agent Clint Hill and Bob Schieffer. In addition, a variety of SiriusXM hosts including Martha Stewart, Bob Edwards, Dr. Laura, Joe Madison, Cousin Brucie and Fran Tarkenton will share their personal reflections from fifty years ago, the moment they heard the news on November 22, 1963.
    [Show full text]
  • Grzanka Dissertation
    ABSTRACT Title of Document: WHITE GUILT: RACE, GENDER, SEXUALITY AND EMERGENT RACISMS IN THE CONTEMPORARY UNITED STATES Patrick Ryan Grzanka, Doctor of Philosophy, 2010 Directed By: Associate Professor Sheri L. Parks, Department of American Studies White guilt is a culturally and historically contingent emotion rooted in White people’s recognition of unearned privileges and collective and/or individual roles in the perpetuation of racism. Situated within the context of neoliberal multiculturalism, this interdisciplinary dissertation investigates contemporary manifestations of White guilt in popular discourse and the lived experiences of young White adults in the United States. As a form of identity-based affect, White guilt may aid in the development of antiracist White people; however, because White guilt retains a focus on the White subject, it may offer limited potential to transform social relationships and systems of inequity. Three interrelated studies compose the methodological work of this project and undertake the task of empirically grounding White guilt so that we may better understand its forms, limits and consequences. The first study interrogates journalists’ coverage of three moments of controversy in the early 21st century: Anderson Cooper’s “emotional” reporting during the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina, the Don Imus-Rutgers University basketball scandal and Isaiah Washington’s firing from Grey’s Anatomy after allegedly calling a co-star a “faggot.” Reporting on these episodes illustrates how multiculturalism manages and defers racial guilt and shame while simultaneously eliding the intersections of identity that structure experience. The second study is the creation and initial validation of a survey-based measure of White guilt (the Test of White Guilt and Shame or “TOWGAS”), which attempts to reconcile several limitations of extant research on racial affect – namely, the persistent conflation of guilt and shame.
    [Show full text]
  • Statement of Reasons, MUR 6992
    MUR699200075 FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20463 BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION In the Matter of ) ) MUR 6992 Donald J. Trump ) Donald J. Trump for President, Inc. and Bradley T. ) Crate in his official capacity as treasurer ) The Trump Organization LLC ) STATEMENT OF REASONS OF CHAIR SHANA M. BROUSSARD AND COMMISSIONER ELLEN L. WEINTRAUB This matter under review (“MUR”) involves yet another instance of Donald Trump and his 2016 presidential campaign receiving what may have been illegal contributions, this time in the form of high-ranking Trump Organization employees performing campaign activities that appear to have been undertaken at the direction of the candidate himself.1 Former Trump Organization Executive Vice President and Special Counsel Michael Cohen and General Counsel Alan Garten appear to have performed work on behalf of Donald J. Trump for President, Inc. (the “Trump Committee,” “campaign”) – work that was paid for by the Trump Organization and thus likely constituted impermissible in-kind contributions. The ban on corporate contributions to federal candidates is one of the foundational principles underpinning the Federal Election Campaign Act (“FECA,” or the “Act”), having been firmly ensconced in federal law for well over a century.2 Though the Act includes provisions that permit individuals, including corporate employees, to provide personal volunteer services to campaigns without making a corporate contribution, if the individual is being compensated for his or her services the activity is no longer
    [Show full text]
  • Campaign Finance and Its Influence Over the Political Process and Public Policy, 52 UIC J
    UIC Law Review Volume 52 Issue 1 Article 8 2018 Money in Politics: Campaign Finance and Its Influence Over the Political Process and Public Policy, 52 UIC J. Marshall L. Rev. 185 (2018) Conrad Foreman Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.uic.edu/lawreview Part of the Election Law Commons Recommended Citation Conrad Foreman, Money in Politics: Campaign Finance and Its Influence Over the Political Process and Public Policy, 52 UIC J. Marshall L. Rev. 185 (2018) https://repository.law.uic.edu/lawreview/vol52/iss1/8 This Comments is brought to you for free and open access by UIC Law Open Access Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in UIC Law Review by an authorized administrator of UIC Law Open Access Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. MONEY IN POLITICS: CAMPAIGN FINANCE AND ITS INFLUENCE OVER THE POLITICAL PROCESS AND PUBLIC POLICY CONRAD FOREMAN* I. INTRODUCTION: SYSTEMIC CORRUPTION .......... 186 A. People Hate Politicians (For Good Reason) ............186 II. BACKGROUND: CAMPAIGN FINANCE REGULATION AND ROLLBACK........................................................... 190 A. Concern About Corruption: The First Calls for Campaign Finance Reform ......................................190 B. Unlimited Spending in the Political Process: How We Got Here ....................................................................192 1. The First Major Blow to Campaign Finance Regulation ..........................................................192 2. Planting Seeds for the Abolition of Spending Limits ..................................................................193 3. Opening the Floodgates: Citizens United and Its Progeny ...............................................................194 a. Unlimited Money: Super-PACs and Elimination of Aggregate Contribution Limits ........................................................199 C. Alternative Models: Public Funding in the States .202 III. ANALYSIS: WE DO NOT LIVE IN A DEMOCRACY .. 205 A. Financial Filtration and the Funding Advantage ..205 B.
    [Show full text]