Observational Cosmology

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Observational Cosmology Astronomy 218 Observational Cosmology Cosmological Principle The central tenet of cosmology is the cosmological principle, Viewed on a sufficiently large scale, the properties of the Universe are the same for all observers. Cosmology is generally not concerned with the study of the myriad of astronomical objects that make up the Universe, except to the extent that they tell us about the behavior of the Universe as a whole. The cosmological principle is the ultimate flowering of the revolution started by Copernicus, we do not occupy a special place in the Universe. Pencil-Beam Surveys In the 1980s, Kirshner, Oemler, Schechter & Schechtman took a complementary approach to the CfA redshift survey of Gellar & Huchra, the pencil-beam survey. This provided a measure of large-scale structure that was narrow but deep. It revealed the first void (the void in Boötes) but no structure larger than 200–300 Mpc in their survey which reached >2 Gpc. Largest Scales Obviously, the cosmological principle fails at small scales. Even at the scale of 50 Mpc, the perspective of an observer in the center of a supercluster differs markedly from that of an observer in a void. The largest structure known in the Universe, the Sloan Great Wall (~300 Mpc) tells us that the cosmological principle only applies on scales of Gpc. Scales below ~1 Gpc are the realm of astronomy. Isotropy & Homogeneity The statement that the Universe appears the “same to all observers” is catchy, but not quantifiable. A more precise statement is that universe is homogeneous — the same at every location — and isotropic — the same in every direction. Redshift and pencil surveys support the description of the Universe as homogenous (every Gpc-cube block appears much like the local Gpc-cube block) and isotropic (the Gpc- cube block to our left appears much like the Gpc-cube block to our right). The notion of the Universe that developed after the Copernican revolution was of a homogenous and isotropic Universe, infinite in space and static in time. Olbers’ Paradox The first observation that leads to modern cosmology is Olbers’ Paradox. As pointed out by numerous astronomers over time (Thomas Digges in 1576, Johannes Kepler in 1610, Edmund Halley in 1721, …) observations contradict this infinite model of the Universe because the night sky is mostly dark. As Heinrich Olbers elucidated most clearly in 1826, if the universe is homogeneous, isotropic, infinite, and unchanging, the entire sky would be as bright as the surface of the Sun. Surface Brightness How does an infinite, unchanging homogeneous and isotropic universe prevent a dark sky at night? For a single star of luminosity L at a distance r, its flux is the result of the inverse square law for geometric dilution. If the star has a radius, R✭, it will subtend a solid angle in steradians of the fraction of a sphere of radius r covered by a circle of radius R✭. The surface brightness of the star is independent of r. Bright Sky If the surface brightness Σ✭ is independent of distance, than distant stars contribute as much as nearby stars. If we assume a uniform density of stars in the Universe, n✭, then at a radius r, a thin shell of thickness dr contains 2 dN✭ = n✭ 4π r dr stars. The fraction of the shell’s area covered by stars is Summing over all shells with radius less than r tells the fraction of the sky covered by stars to this radius, 2 f → 1, making the night sky bright, as r → rOlb ≈ 1/n✭ π R ✭ Finite Universe Since the sky is largely dark at night, one of the assumed characteristics of the Universe must be wrong. It was possible that the errant assumption was homogeneity. In Olbers’ day, distances to stars were unknown (Bessel first measured parallax in 1838), so n✭ and/or R✭ could grow much smaller with distance. Infinite size could also be the errant assumption. If the radius of the Universe (or at least the distribution of stars), r0, is 2 smaller than rOlb, then f ≈ n✭ π R ✭ r0 < 1. The average surface brightness is Σ✭ f ≈ n✭ L r0 / 4π. Lord Kelvin in 1901 removed the assumption of infinite age. Since the speed of light had been measured as early as 1677 (by Römer in 1676), stars of age t0 or in a Universe of age t0 can only be seen to a distance r0 = ct0. The Age of the Universe Kelvin’s assertion was ultimately proven by Hubble’s 1929 observation of Universal Recession. From Hubble’s law, ʋ = H0 d, we can estimate the age of the Universe as the time at which all galaxies are at zero distance, t0 = d/ʋ = d / (H0d) = 1/H0 −1 −1 For H0 = 70 km s Mpc , t0 = 14.0 Gyr. Conveniently, the age of the Universe is older than the oldest star. The light from a star further than the horizon distance, r0 = c/H0 ~ 4300 Mpc, is unable to reach us. The Dark Sky By integrating the observed luminosity function for galaxies, we determined the total luminosity density. 8 −3 −3 ≈ 2 × 10 L☉ Mpc ≈ 10 W AU Since the light of most galaxies comes from stars, this luminosity density is a sum over all stars, ≈ n✭ L The average surface brightness of the sky is 8 −2 −1 −8 −2 −1 ≈ 8 × 10 L☉ Mpc ster ≈ 3 × 10 W m ster 7 –2 –1 –15 In contrast, Σ✭ ≈ 2 × 10 W m ster so Σsky ~ 10 Σ✭ telling what we already know, the night sky is black. The Expanding Universe Preserving homogeneity and isotropy in the face of Universal Recession requires the entire Universe to be expanding, making Hubble’s law the same everywhere. Any distance in the Universe can be written in terms of a scale factor, a(t), and the current distance, r0 = r(t0). r(t) = a(t) r0 The distance between any two point increases at a rate H(t) is the Hubble parameter, H0 = H(t0) is Hubble’s constant Center-Less Universe The idea of expansion that does not originate at a central point is contrary to our common experience. The analogy of a balloon with coins stuck to it (or ants living on it) can be helpful. As the balloon expands, the coins all move farther and farther apart, but no coin or other point on the surface of the balloon is the “center” of expansion. Stretching Light Just as distances between locations grow, so to do lengths increase. Thus the same ballon analogy can be used to explain the cosmological redshift, as the wavelengths also grow according to the scale factor a(t). Cosmological redshift is not due to the motion of a galaxy through space, but due to the motion (stretching or contraction) of space. One Quarter Helium We described the composition of the Sun in terms of the hydrogen mass fraction, X = 0.71, the helium mass fraction, Y = 0.27 and the mass fraction of metals, Z = 0.02. Further, we discussed that stars in the Galaxy can have much smaller metallicities Z < 10−4. If you look however at the helium mass fraction, Y, it approaches 0.25. In 1946, this led Alpher, Bethe & Gamow, to propose that the Universe started out in a “Big Bang”, hot enough to fuse protons and neutrons into helium. Cosmic Microwave Background In 1964, Arno Penzias and Robert Wilson at Bell Labs were trying to get rid of the last bit of “noise” in the radio antenna used to communicate with the new Telstar satellite. They found that this “noise” was identical in all directions in the sky, and was not time dependent. The signal peaked at λ = 1.06 mm, in the microwave band. In consultation with Robert Dicke and James Peebles, this was found to be the anticipated remnant of the “Big Bang”. Blackbody Background Penzias & Wilson found the CMB spectrum was well fit by a 3K blackbody. Later measurements have refined the temperature (TCOBE = 2.725 ± 0.001 K) but do not find significant departures from a pure blackbody. The current energy density of the CMB is –14 –3 –3 = 4.17 × 10 J m = 0.260 MeV m Using the average photon energy, ε = 2.7 kBT0 = .634 meV, the number density is Dipole Anisotropy A map of the microwave sky shows a distinct dipole pattern, due not to any property of the radiation itself, but to our peculiar motion. A moving observer detects a different temperature as function of the angle between the line of sight and the direction of motion. Overall, this dipole anisotropy indicates a 371 km s−1 motion in the direction of Leo (α,δ = 11.2h, −7°). Compensating for the Sun’s orbit in the Galaxy and the Milky Way’s motion in the local group, this implies ʋ = 627 km s−1 in the direction of Hydra (α, δ = 11.1h, −27°). Expanding Blackbody Because the blackbody radiation is cosmological, we know that the expansion of space has stretched its wavelength. A region of volume expands with the Universe, so V(t) ∝ a(t)3. A photon gas in this volume obeys the first law of thermodynamics dQ = dE +PdV. In a homogeneous universe there is no heat flow, this dQ = 0, thus For the photon gas 4 E(t) = u(t)V(t) = (4σSB/c)T(t) V(t) 4 P(t) = u(t) = (4σSB/sc)T(t) therefore Temperature over Time Removing common factors leaves With V(t) ∝ a(t)3 this can be re-written as or Thus T(t) ∝ a(t)−1, which implies that the mean photon energy ε(t) ∝ a(t)−1 and λ(t) ∝ a(t).
Recommended publications
  • On the Nature of Filaments of the Large-Scale Structure of the Universe Irina Rozgacheva, I Kuvshinova
    On the nature of filaments of the large-scale structure of the Universe Irina Rozgacheva, I Kuvshinova To cite this version: Irina Rozgacheva, I Kuvshinova. On the nature of filaments of the large-scale structure of the Universe. 2018. hal-01962100 HAL Id: hal-01962100 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01962100 Preprint submitted on 20 Dec 2018 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. On the nature of filaments of the large-scale structure of the Universe I. K. Rozgachevaa, I. B. Kuvshinovab All-Russian Institute for Scientific and Technical Information of Russian Academy of Sciences (VINITI RAS), Moscow, Russia e-mail: [email protected], [email protected] Abstract Observed properties of filaments which dominate in large-scale structure of the Universe are considered. A part from these properties isn’t described within the standard ΛCDM cosmological model. The “toy” model of forma- tion of primary filaments owing to the primary scalar and vector gravitational perturbations in the uniform and isotropic cosmological model which is filled with matter with negligible pressure, without use of a hypothesis of tidal interaction of dark matter halos is offered.
    [Show full text]
  • Mining the Sky with Redshift Surveys 3 Semblance Whatever to the Predictions of Models of the Time
    Mining the Sky with Redshift Surveys Marc Davis1 & Jeffrey A. Newman1 University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA Abstract. Since the late 1970’s, redshift surveys have been vital for progress in understanding large-scale structure in the Universe. The original CfA redshift sur- vey collected spectra of 20-30 galaxies per clear night on a 1.5 meter telescope; over a two year period the project added ≈ 2000 new redshifts to the literature. Subsequent low-z redshift surveys have been up to an order of magnitude larger, and ongoing surveys will yield a similar improvement over the generation preced- ing them. Full sky redshift surveys have a special role to play as predictors of cosmological flows, and deep pencil beam surveys have provided fundamental con- straints on the evolution of properties of galaxies. With the 2DF redshift survey and the SDSS survey, our knowledge of the statistical clustering of low-redshift galaxies will achieve unprecedented precision. Measurements of clustering in the distant Universe are more limited at present, but will become much better in this decade as the VLT/VIRMOS and Keck/DEIMOS projects produce results. As in so many other fields, progress in large scale structure studies, both observational and theoretical, has been made possible by improvements in technologies, especially computing. This review briefly highlights twenty years of progress in this evolving discipline and describes a few novel cosmological tests that will be attempted with the Keck/DEIMOS survey. 1 The Original Center for Astrophysics Survey Up until the late 1970’s, most extragalactic spectroscopy was dependent on photographic plates, or photographic plates in contact with image intensifier tubes.
    [Show full text]
  • The HI Content and Extent of Low Surface Brightness Galaxies – Could LSB Galaxies Be Responsible for Damped Ly-Α Absorption?
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by CERN Document Server Extragalactic Gas at Low Redshift ASP Conference Series, Vol. , 2001 Mulchaey, et al. The HI Content and Extent of Low Surface Brightness Galaxies { Could LSB Galaxies be Responsible for Damped Ly-α Absorption? Karen O’Neil NAIC/Arecibo Observatory, HC3 Box 53995, Arecibo, PR 00612 [email protected] Abstract. Low surface brightness galaxies, those galaxies with a central surface brightness at least one magnitude fainter than the night sky, are often not included in discussions of extragalactic gas at z < 0.1. In this paper we review many of the properties of low surface brightness galaxies, in- cluding recent studies which indicate low surface brightness systems may contribute far more to the local HI luminosity function than previously thought. Additionally, we use the known (HI) gas properties of low sur- face brightness galaxies to consider their possible contribution to nearby damped Lyman-α absorbers. 1. Introduction - What is a LSB Galaxy? Typically, low surface brightness (LSB) galaxies are defined as those galaxies with an observed central surface brightness that is at least one magnitude fainter than the night sky. In the B band, this translates to µB(0) 22.6 – 23.0 mag 2 ≥ arcsec− . However, alternatives to this definition do exist. One common defini- tion is that a LSB galaxy is a galaxy whose inclination corrected central surface 2 brightness is µB(0) 23.0 mag arcsec− (Matthews, Gallagher, & van Driel 1999). Although it is≥ a more consistent definition, this second definition relies on understanding the dust properties and opacity of the studied galaxies.
    [Show full text]
  • The Deep2 Galaxy Redshift Survey: the Voronoi–Delaunay Method Catalog of Galaxy Groups
    The Astrophysical Journal, 751:50 (23pp), 2012 May 20 doi:10.1088/0004-637X/751/1/50 C 2012. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved. Printed in the U.S.A. THE DEEP2 GALAXY REDSHIFT SURVEY: THE VORONOI–DELAUNAY METHOD CATALOG OF GALAXY GROUPS Brian F. Gerke1,13, Jeffrey A. Newman2, Marc Davis3, Alison L. Coil4, Michael C. Cooper5, Aaron A. Dutton6, S. M. Faber7, Puragra Guhathakurta7, Nicholas Konidaris8, David C. Koo7,LihwaiLin8, Kai Noeske9, Andrew C. Phillips7, David J. Rosario10,BenjaminJ.Weiner11, Christopher N. A. Willmer11, and Renbin Yan12 1 KIPAC, SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, 2575 Sand Hill Road, MS 29, Menlo Park, CA 94725, USA 2 Department of Physics and Astronomy, 3941 O’Hara Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA 3 Department of Physics and Department of Astronomy, Campbell Hall, University of California–Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA 4 Center for Astrophysics and Space Sciences, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, MC 0424, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA 5 Center for Galaxy Evolution, Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of California–Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697, USA 6 Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC V8P 5C2, Canada 7 UCO/Lick Observatory, University of California–Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA 8 Astronomy Department, Caltech 249-17, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA 9 Space Telescope Science Institute, 3700 San Martin Drive, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA 10 Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics, Giessenbachstr. 1, 85748 Garching bei Munchen,¨ Germany 11 Steward Observatory, University of Arizona, 933 North Cherry Avenue, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA 12 Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, University of Toronto, 50 St.
    [Show full text]
  • PFS Science White Paper
    PFS Science White Paper Prepared by the PFS Science Collaborations Contents 1 Introduction: Rationale for and Capabilities of a Wide-Field Spectrograph for Subaru . 5 1.1 Scientific Rationale ..................................... 5 1.2 The history of the PFS concept .............................. 6 1.3 Galaxy Redshifts from zero to > 10 ............................ 8 1.4 Large-Scale Structure, Baryon Oscillations and Weak Lensing ............. 9 1.5 Galaxy Evolution Studies ................................. 10 1.6 Spectroscopy of quasars .................................. 11 1.7 Spectroscopic Surveys at z > 5 .............................. 12 1.8 Stellar Spectroscopy .................................... 13 References .......................................... 13 2 Spectrograph Design ..................................... 15 2.1 The Collimator and the Fibers .............................. 16 2.2 The Gratings ........................................ 17 2.3 The Dichroics ........................................ 18 2.4 The Cameras ........................................ 18 2.5 Spectrograph Performance ................................. 20 2.6 The Next Steps ....................................... 22 2.7 Science and Survey Design ................................. 22 2.8 Spectrograph Design .................................... 23 3 HSC Survey .......................................... 31 4 Cosmology with SuMIRe HSC/PFS Survey ......................... 33 4.1 Executive Summary .................................... 33 4.2 Background ........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Observational Cosmology - 30H Course 218.163.109.230 Et Al
    Observational cosmology - 30h course 218.163.109.230 et al. (2004–2014) PDF generated using the open source mwlib toolkit. See http://code.pediapress.com/ for more information. PDF generated at: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 03:42:03 UTC Contents Articles Observational cosmology 1 Observations: expansion, nucleosynthesis, CMB 5 Redshift 5 Hubble's law 19 Metric expansion of space 29 Big Bang nucleosynthesis 41 Cosmic microwave background 47 Hot big bang model 58 Friedmann equations 58 Friedmann–Lemaître–Robertson–Walker metric 62 Distance measures (cosmology) 68 Observations: up to 10 Gpc/h 71 Observable universe 71 Structure formation 82 Galaxy formation and evolution 88 Quasar 93 Active galactic nucleus 99 Galaxy filament 106 Phenomenological model: LambdaCDM + MOND 111 Lambda-CDM model 111 Inflation (cosmology) 116 Modified Newtonian dynamics 129 Towards a physical model 137 Shape of the universe 137 Inhomogeneous cosmology 143 Back-reaction 144 References Article Sources and Contributors 145 Image Sources, Licenses and Contributors 148 Article Licenses License 150 Observational cosmology 1 Observational cosmology Observational cosmology is the study of the structure, the evolution and the origin of the universe through observation, using instruments such as telescopes and cosmic ray detectors. Early observations The science of physical cosmology as it is practiced today had its subject material defined in the years following the Shapley-Curtis debate when it was determined that the universe had a larger scale than the Milky Way galaxy. This was precipitated by observations that established the size and the dynamics of the cosmos that could be explained by Einstein's General Theory of Relativity.
    [Show full text]
  • Clusters of Galaxy Hierarchical Structure the Universe Shows Range of Patterns of Structures on Decidedly Different Scales
    Astronomy 218 Clusters of Galaxy Hierarchical Structure The Universe shows range of patterns of structures on decidedly different scales. Stars (typical diameter of d ~ 106 km) are found in gravitationally bound systems called star clusters (≲ 106 stars) and galaxies (106 ‒ 1012 stars). Galaxies (d ~ 10 kpc), composed of stars, star clusters, gas, dust and dark matter, are found in gravitationally bound systems called groups (< 50 galaxies) and clusters (50 ‒ 104 galaxies). Clusters (d ~ 1 Mpc), composed of galaxies, gas, and dark matter, are found in currently collapsing systems called superclusters. Superclusters (d ≲ 100 Mpc) are the largest known structures. The Local Group Three large spirals, the Milky Way Galaxy, Andromeda Galaxy(M31), and Triangulum Galaxy (M33) and their satellites make up the Local Group of galaxies. At least 45 galaxies are members of the Local Group, all within about 1 Mpc of the Milky Way. The mass of the Local Group is dominated by 11 11 10 M31 (7 × 10 M☉), MW (6 × 10 M☉), M33 (5 × 10 M☉) Virgo Cluster The nearest large cluster to the Local Group is the Virgo Cluster at a distance of 16 Mpc, has a width of ~2 Mpc though it is far from spherical. It covers 7° of the sky in the Constellations Virgo and Coma Berenices. Even these The 4 brightest very bright galaxies are giant galaxies are elliptical galaxies invisible to (M49, M60, M86 & the unaided M87). eye, mV ~ 9. Virgo Census The Virgo Cluster is loosely concentrated and irregularly shaped, making it fairly M88 M99 representative of the most M100 common class of clusters.
    [Show full text]
  • Spectral Classification and Luminosity Function of Galaxies in the Las Campanas Redshift Survey
    Spectral Classification and Luminosity Function of Galaxies in the Las Campanas Redshift Survey The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Bromley, Benjamin C., William H. Press, Huan Lin, and Robert P. Kirshner. 1998. “Spectral Classification and Luminosity Function of Galaxies in the Las Campanas Redshift Survey.” The Astrophysical Journal 505 (1): 25–36. https://doi.org/10.1086/306144. Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:41399833 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA THE ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 505:25È36, 1998 September 20 ( 1998. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved. Printed in U.S.A. SPECTRAL CLASSIFICATION AND LUMINOSITY FUNCTION OF GALAXIES IN THE LAS CAMPANAS REDSHIFT SURVEY BENJAMIN C. BROMLEY AND WILLIAM H. PRESS Physics Department, Harvard University; Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics HUAN LIN Department of Astronomy, University of Toronto AND ROBERT P. KIRSHNER Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics Received 1997 November 19; accepted 1998 April 3 ABSTRACT We construct a spectral classiÐcation scheme for the galaxies of the Las Campanas Redshift Survey (LCRS) based on a principal-component analysis of the measured galaxy spectra. We interpret the physi- cal signiÐcance of our six spectral types and conclude that they are sensitive to morphological type and to the amount of active star formation. In this Ðrst analysis of the LCRS to include spectral classi- Ðcation, we estimate the general luminosity function, expressed as a weighted sum of the type-speciÐc luminosity functions.
    [Show full text]
  • Galaxy Structures-Groups, Clusters and Superclusters
    October 15, 2018 5:55 WSPC/INSTRUCTION FILE GalStruct_sepp International Journal of Geometric Methods in Modern Physics c World Scientific Publishing Company GALAXY STRUCTURES - GROUPS, CLUSTERS AND SUPERCLUSTERS TIIT SEPP Department of Cosmology, Tartu Observatory, Observatooriumi 1 T~oravere, Estonia 61602 and Institute of Physics, University of Tartu, T¨ahe 4, Tartu, Estonia 50113 [email protected] MIRT GRAMANN Department of Cosmology, Tartu Observatory, Observatooriumi 1 T~oravere, Estonia 61602 [email protected] Received (30 June 2013) Revised (30 June 2013) We provide a brief summary of the history of galaxy structure studies. We also introduce several large-scale redshift surveys and summarize the most commonly used methods to identify the groups and clusters of galaxies. We present several catalogues of galaxy groups.These catalogues can be used to study the galaxy groups in different environ- ments. We also consider the properties of superclusters of galaxies in the nearby Universe and describe the largest system of galaxies observed - the Sloan Great Wall. Keywords: large scale structure; galaxies; galaxy groups; galaxy clusters; galaxy super- clusters. 1. Introduction Galaxies are the best tracers we have for the study of the structure of the Universe. Although we can consider our Universe homogeneous and isotropic on the largest scales it becomes highly structured once we start to study it in detail. At the arXiv:1309.7786v2 [astro-ph.CO] 30 Dec 2013 first step from largest to smaller the Universe can be described by the cosmic web structure. The cosmic web consists of galaxy-rich areas that contain different galaxy structures - galaxy groups, clusters and superclusters.
    [Show full text]
  • • Scope and Structure of the Course • Project Overview • Assessment and Grading ASTR 505 – Fall 2014 Sara Ellis
    ASTR 505 – Fall 2014 Sara Ellison [email protected] www.astro.uvic.ca/~sara/A505.html • Scope and structure of the course • Project overview • Assessment and grading Course purpose: A practical course in galaxy research, based on data mining techniques. Course structure: 6 weeks of lectures and literature discussion, followed by an independent research project. Lecture structure: weekly (up to) 1.5-2 hours of lecture, followed by literature discussions for (up to) 1 hour. Course objectives: • Learn about galaxies! • Learn about current research in galaxies through literature discussions. • Learn practical research skills (presentations, science writing, logging your research) • Learn technical skills (programming, visualization, database management, multi-variate analysis) • Write a report which could lead to a paper or get a thesis started! The details (weeks 1-6): Friday 9am-12pm Sept 5: Sara Ellison - Intro to large surveys and projects. Sept 12: Luc Simard – mysql and databases. Sept 19: Luc Simard – photometric properties of galaxies. Sept 26: Hossein Teimoorinia – Practical application of artificial neural networks in astronomy Oct 3: Asa Bluck – data manipulation and visualization. Oct 10: Sara Ellison – Spectroscopic properties of galaxies. Lecture attendance is compulsory – if you need to be absent, consult with the lecturer, and let me know. Literature discussions: Take place in the last hour of each lecture. Papers posted to website. Make sure you read and prepare for participating in the discussion (10% of grade)! Preparation can be done as a group. The details (week 7+): Friday 11:15am-12:30pm Once projects are underway, the format changes, and most of your time should be spent on projects.
    [Show full text]
  • MARGARET J. GELLER Education: University of California, Berkeley, BA
    MARGARET J. GELLER Education: University of California, Berkeley, B.A. (physics, 1970) Princeton University, M.A. (physics, 1972) Princeton University, Ph.D. (physics, 1974) Positions: 1970-1973 NSF Predoctoral Fellow, Princeton University 1974-1976 Center Postdoctoral Fellow, Center for Astrophysics 1976-1978 Research Fellow, Harvard College Observatory 1977-1980 Lecturer, Harvard University 1978-1980 Research Associate, Harvard College Observatory 1978-1980 Senior Visiting Fellow, Institute of Astronomy, Cambridge University 1980-1983 Assistant Professor, Harvard University 1983-1991 Astronomer, Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory 1991- Senior Scientist, Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory Professional Societies: International Astronomical Union American Association for the Advancement of Science (Fellow 1992) American Physical Society (Fellow 1995) Honorary Societies: Phi Beta Kappa (elected 1969) American Academy of Arts and Sciences (elected 1990) National Academy of Sciences (elected 1992) Honorary Degrees: D.S.H.C. Connecticut College (1995) D.S.H.C. Gustavus Adolphus College (1997) D.S.H.C. University of Massachusetts, Dartmouth (2000) D.S.H.C. Colby College (2009) D.S.H.C. Universitat Rovira i Virgili (Tarragona, Spain) (2009) D.S.H.C. Dartmouth College (2014) L.H.C. University of Turin (2017) Awards (Selected) : MacArthur Fellowship (1990-1995) AAAS Newcomb - Cleveland Prize (1989) Best Case Study (for redshift survey graphics), IEEE SIGGRAPH Visualization (1992) Helen Sawyer Hogg Lectureship, Royal Astronomical Society
    [Show full text]
  • Large-Scale Structure in the Distribution of Galaxies As A
    Large-Scale Structure in the Distribution of Galaxies as a Probe of Cosmological Models Michael A. Strauss∗,†, Princeton University Observatory, Princeton, NJ 08544 ([email protected]) March 10, 2018 The last 20 years have seen an explosion in our understanding of the large-scale distribution and motions of galaxies in the nearby universe. The field has moved from a largely qualitative, morphological description of the structures seen in the galaxy distribution, to a rich and increasingly rigorous statistical description, which allows us to constrain cosmological models. New surveys just now getting underway will be unprecedented in their uniformity and volume surveyed. The study of the evolution of large-scale structure with time is now becoming feasible. 1 Introduction In 1970, Alan Sandage wrote an article[1] describing observational cosmology as a “search for two numbers”, namely the Hubble Constant H0, which sets the overall scale of the universe, and the acceleration parameter q0, which measures its curvature[2, 3]. Although the values of these two parameters are still very much a matter of contention[4], the field of observational cosmology has broadened considerably since then, as we have become aware of the richness of the information encoded in the large-scale distribution of galaxies. The observed distribution of galaxies on the sky shows hints of structure on large scales[5, 6], but without distance information to each individual galaxy, one is only seeing the galaxy distribution in projection. However, Hubble’s law[7] states that due to the expansion of the universe, the redshift of a galaxy cz is proportional to its distance r: cz = H0r.
    [Show full text]