DOCSLIB.ORG

Assessing Forest Degradation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Assessing Forest Degradation Forest Resources Assessment Working Paper 177 Assessing forest degradation Towards the development of globally applicable guidelines November, 2011 Forest Resources Assessment Working Paper 177 Assessing forest degradation Towards the development of globally applicable guidelines FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS Rome, 2011 The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. This product is based on information obtained from various published and unpublished sources. The views expressed in this product do not necessarily reflect the views of the authors or FAO. All rights reserved. FAO encourages the reproduction and dissemination of material in this information product. Non-commercial uses will be authorized free of charge, upon request. Reproduction for resale or other commercial purposes, including educational purposes, may incur fees. Applications for permission to reproduce or disseminate FAO copyright materials, and all queries concerning rights and licences, should be addressed by e-mail to [email protected] or to the Chief, Publishing Policy and Support Branch, Office of Knowledge Exchange, Research and extension, FAO, Viale delle Terme di Caracalla, 00153 Rome, Italy. © FAO 2011 Contents Contributors v Foreword vi Acknowledgements vii Acronyms viii 1. Introduction 1 What is forest degradation? 1 Why does it matter? 2 Why measure it? 3 Towards guidelines 4 2. Issues in defining and assessing forest degradation 10 Indicators of forest degradation 10 Comparative analysis of definitions related to forest degradation 11 Discussion 12 Options for future action 15 3. Growing stock and biomass 16 What to measure 16 Measurement methods 18 Measurement frequency and reporting 23 Issues and challenges 23 4. Biodiversity 24 What and how to measure 24 Measurement frequency and reporting 43 Issues and challenges 43 5. Production of forest goods 45 What and how to measure 46 6. Soil erosion 55 What to measure 56 Measurement methods 61 Measurement intensity, frequency and reporting 71 Issues and challenges 72 References 74 ANNEX 1. Preparatory background information 82 ANNEX 2. Examples of equations for volume, biomass and carbon estimations 84 ANNEX 3. Additional descriptors of erosion features 87 ANNEX 4. Illustrative examples of erosion features 90 ANNEX 5. Soil erosion field worksheets 98 Boxes BOX 1.1 International definitions of forest degradation/degraded forest 2 BOX 1.2 Difficulties in measuring forest hydrological services 6 BOX 3.1 Defining growing stock and biomass stock 16 BOX 3.2 Growing stock in the FAO Forest Resources Assessment 17 BOX 3.3 Estimating tree volume 21 BOX 3.4 Estimating above-ground tree biomass 22 BOX 3.5 Forest biomass calculation 22 BOX 4.1 Definition of indicator species 27 BOX 5.1 Yield regulation in natural tropical forests 49 BOX 5.2 The logging of ipê as a catalyst of forest degradation in the Brazilian Amazon 51 BOX 6.1 Community mapping 58 BOX 6.2 Worked examples of scoring erosion features 62 BOX 6.3 Worked example – estimating soil loss in rills 63 BOX 6.4 Worked example – estimating soil loss in gullies and ravines 65 BOX 6.5 Worked example – estimating soil loss using plant root exposure 66 BOX 6.6 Worked example – estimating soil loss using armour layer 70 BOX 6.7 Worked example – estimating soil loss using soil build-up against a barrier 71 Tables TABLE 3.1 Basic tools for measuring growing stock 19 TABLE 4.1 Biodiversity indicators of SFM, from five indicator sets or processes 25 TABLE 4.2 Possible biodiversity indicators of forest degradation 27 TABLE 4.3 Proposed best fragmentation measures 33 TABLE 4.4 Possible species indicators of degradation in ecosystem function 40 TABLE 5.1 Potential indicators of degradation of the provision of forest goods and services 47 TABLE 5.2 Measurement of forest degradation based on the supply of forest goods 50 TABLE 6.1 Definition and scoring for erosion types 59 TABLE 6.2 Scoring for erosion state, extent and severity 61 TABLE 6.3 Erosion classes derived from summing scores for type, state, extent and severity 61 Figures FIGURE 1.1 Forest resilience and tipping points 7 FIGURE 1.2 Degradation thresholds 8 FIGURE 1.3 Range of natural variation is used to provide a reference level for degradation 9 FIGURE 4.1 Four spatial pattern processes of forest loss 31 FIGURE 5.1 Schematic illustration at the stand/compartment level of periodic change in growing stock due to harvesting (selective logging), tropical forest 46 FIGURE 5.2 A map of ‘degradation waves’ of forest goods depicting changes from 1991 to 2005 from Dar es Salaam (DES), the capital city of Tanzania 48 FIGURE 6.1 Calculation of the cross-section of the trapezoid shape of gullies and ravines 64 FIGURE 6.2 Sketch of a soil pedestal capped by a stone 67 FIGURE 6.3 Solution notch and staining in limestone rock 68 FIGURE 6.4 Diagrammatic representation of an armour layer and photograph showing removal of a portion of an armour layer 69 FIGURE 6.5 Build-up of soil behind a Gliricidia hedge, Sri Lanka 70 Contributors Many people contributed to the production of this document. In particular, chapters were authored as follows: Chapter 1: Victoria Heymell and Ken MacDicken. Chapter 2: Ken MacDicken (based on an earlier paper by Markku Simula). Chapter 3: Dan Altrell, Anne Branthomme and Rebecca Tavani Chapter 4: Ian Thompson, Robert Nasi, Kimiko Okabe, Valerie Kapos and James Gordon Chapter 5: Manuel R. Guariguata, Cesar Sabogal and Diji Chandrasekharan Chapter 6: Des McGarry v Foreword Forests provide us with a wide range of goods and services. Today, just as centuries ago, we still need forests for their products such as timber, paper, medical plants, fruits etc. Presently more people understand the values of services that forests provide, including wildlife habitat, hydrological functions and carbon storage. Likewise the degradation of forest resources is an important society concern that is perceived in many different ways. Forest degradation can be a serious environmental, social and economic problem with the potential to adversely affect millions of people who depend on forest goods and services. Given the contribution of forests to sustainable development and their role for human well-being, the state of the forests is important to all of us. Good information on the extent of forest degradation is needed to elaborate policies and implement forest-management plans allowing the restoration of degraded forests and the rehabilitation of degraded forest lands. Identifying and assessing the condition of forests is not easy – particularly since people have widely different views of what constitutes degradation. For some, any forest management activity may cause degradation. For others forest is only degraded when it can no longer deliver needed goods and services. There is no globally agreed definition of forest degradation which makes the discussion more complex. FAO, together with members of the Collaborative Partnership have taken a number of steps to tackle this problem. Results of this work are summarized in a series of working papers that can be found at http://www.fao.org/forestry/ fra/2560/en/. This document pulls together a range of views and approaches to the assessment of forest degradation. It should be regarded as precursor to the development of comprehensive, globally applicable guidelines for assessing forest degradation. There is much work yet to be done on this important topic – we trust the present paper contributes to the goal of reducing and mitigating the inevitable processes of forest degradation. Eduardo Rojas-Briales Assistant Director-General, Forestry Department, FAO vi Acknowledgements The preparation of “Assessing forest degradation – towards the development of globally applicable guidelines” represents a joint effort of the Collaborative Partnership on Forests (CPF) undertaken under the umbrella of the 2010 Global Forest Resources Assessment (FAO, 2010). FAO gratefully acknowledges the financial and in-kind contributions to this work made by CPF partners. Thanks go to all who have contributed to the development of this work: to those who provided answers to the initial questionnaires, to the authors of the 20 case studies, and to the authors and experts who contributed to technical meetings. A special thanks go to the authors of the chapters that describe key criteria for measuring forest degradation and to Victoria Heymell who saw the task through many arduous steps. Thanks also go to Mette Løyche Wilkie, Emma Foti, Marisalee Palermo and the rest of the FRA team in FAO for providing advice, guidance and assistance along the way and to Alastair Sarre who did the final editing. vii Acronyms AAC annual allowable cut ASTER Advanced Space-borne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer C&I criteria and indicators CBD Convention on Biological Diversity CPF Collaborative Partnership on Forests dbh diameter at breast height FAO Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Reforestation: Likely Working on Certification, an Emerg- Nations Secretary-General’S Climate Ing Concept That Sought to Set Third Summit
    18 www.taylorguitars.com [Sustainability] arrived in Washington, D.C. in well over a decade, but in 2014 the 1993 and began my professional concept took a twist when govern- career working in environmental ments, private companies, and civil Ipolitics. Anyone involved with interna- society groups signed the New York tional forest policy in the 1990s was Declaration of Forests at the United Reforestation: likely working on certification, an emerg- Nations Secretary-General’s Climate ing concept that sought to set third Summit. The Declaration is a voluntary, from POLITICS to PLANTING party management standards for active non-legally binding pledge to halve the forestry operations. The idea was (and rate of deforestation by 2020, to end still is) that a consumer would choose a it by 2030, and to restore hundreds With Taylor embarking on reforestation efforts product that had an ecolabel over one of millions of acres of degraded land. that did not, if it assured you that the A year later, in 2015, largely due to in Cameroon and Hawaii, Scott Paul explains the product originated from a well-managed pressure from activist organizations, forest. Think Gifford Pinchot meets the literally hundreds of companies involved politics of forest restoration and why Taylor’s Good Housekeeping Seal of Approval. in the Southeast Asian palm oil trade timing might be ideal. The Forest Stewardship Council was announced some sort of new policy. born at this time, and for a decade Looking back at these two events, it’s certification overshadowed much of the fair to say that while lofty words do not global forest policy dialogue.
    [Show full text]
  • Non-Timber Forest Products
    Agrodok 39 Non-timber forest products the value of wild plants Tinde van Andel This publication is sponsored by: ICCO, SNV and Tropenbos International © Agromisa Foundation and CTA, Wageningen, 2006. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form, by print, photocopy, microfilm or any other means, without written permission from the publisher. First edition: 2006 Author: Tinde van Andel Illustrator: Bertha Valois V. Design: Eva Kok Translation: Ninette de Zylva (editing) Printed by: Digigrafi, Wageningen, the Netherlands ISBN Agromisa: 90-8573-027-9 ISBN CTA: 92-9081-327-X Foreword Non-timber forest products (NTFPs) are wild plant and animal pro- ducts harvested from forests, such as wild fruits, vegetables, nuts, edi- ble roots, honey, palm leaves, medicinal plants, poisons and bush meat. Millions of people – especially those living in rural areas in de- veloping countries – collect these products daily, and many regard selling them as a means of earning a living. This Agrodok presents an overview of the major commercial wild plant products from Africa, the Caribbean and the Pacific. It explains their significance in traditional health care, social and ritual values, and forest conservation. It is designed to serve as a useful source of basic information for local forest dependent communities, especially those who harvest, process and market these products. We also hope that this Agrodok will help arouse the awareness of the potential of NTFPs among development organisations, local NGOs, government officials at local and regional level, and extension workers assisting local communities. Case studies from Cameroon, Ethiopia, Central and South Africa, the Pacific, Colombia and Suriname have been used to help illustrate the various important aspects of commercial NTFP harvesting.
    [Show full text]
  • Fiscal Year 2016-‐2017 Accountability Report
    AGENCY NAME: South Carolina Forestry Commission AGENCY CODE: P120 SECTION: 043 Fiscal Year 2016-2017 AcCountability Report SUBMISSION FORM The mission of the South Carolina Forestry Commission is to protect, promote, enhance, and nurture the woodlands of SC, and to educate the public about forestry issues, in a manner consistent with achieving the greatest good for its citizens. AGENCY MISSION Across all ownerships, South Carolina’s forest resources are managed sustainably to support an expanding forest products manufacturing industry while providing environmental services such as clean air, clean water, recreation and wildlife habitat. AGENCY VISION Please select yes or no if the agency has any major or minor (internal or external) recommendations that would allow the agency to operate more effectively and efficiently. Yes No RESTRUCTURING RECOMMENDATIONS: ☐ ☒ Please identify your agency’s preferred contacts for this year’s accountability report. Name Phone Email PRIMARY CONTACT: Doug Wood (803) 896-8820 [email protected] SECONDARY CONTACT: Tom Patton (803) 896-8849 [email protected] A-1 AGENCY NAME: South Carolina Forestry Commission AGENCY CODE: P120 SECTION: 043 I have reviewed and approved the enclosed FY 2016-2017 Accountability Report, which is complete and accurate to the extent of my knowledge. AGENCY DIRECTOR (SIGN AND DATE): (TYPE OR PRINT Henry E. “Gene” Kodama NAME): BOARD/CMSN. CHAIR (SIGN AND DATE): (TYPE OR PRINT Walt McPhail NAME): A-2 AGENCY NAME: South Carolina Forestry Commission AGENCY CODE: P120 SECTION: 043 AGENCY’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS The SC Forestry Commission was created in 1927 with its General Duties defined in State Code 48-23-90.
    [Show full text]
  • Reforestation Forester Work Location: Ukiah, CA
    Position Description Position Title: Reforestation Forester Work Location: Ukiah, CA The Mendocino Family of Companies (Mendocino Forest Products Company, Mendocino Redwood Company, Humboldt Redwood Company, Humboldt Sawmill Company, and Allweather Wood), is a leading manufacturer and distributor of environmentally certified redwood, Douglas-fir, and preservative treated lumber products throughout California and the Western U.S. Our culture is based in environmental stewardship and community support. The company maintains Forest Stewardship Council® (FSC® C013133) certification for its forestlands, manufacturing, and distribution operations. Mendocino Redwood Company, LLC (MRC) located in Ukiah, CA is seeking a Reforestation Forester to join our forestry team. This is a full-time position that involves working closely with the Forest Manager for the purpose of meeting forest stewardship and business objectives. Relocation help is available! Summary Direct responsibility for tree planting from inception to free-to-grow status, including all facets of vegetation management and materials sourcing. These activities must 1.) Comply with all applicable state and federal laws; 2.) Produce the desired rate of return on investments; 3.) Be conducted safely, and 4.) Be deployed in a manner that is consistent with the Company’s core values and consistent with the requirements of its Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) certification. Ensuring prompt reforestation and state certification of compliance with required stocking standards is key to achieving sustained yield harvest levels and financial objectives. Duties and Responsibilities To perform this job successfully, an individual must be able to perform each essential duty satisfactorily. The requirements listed below are representative of the knowledge, skill, and/or abilities required. Reasonable accommodations may be made to enable individuals with disabilities to perform the essential functions.
    [Show full text]
  • Forestry Materials Forest Types and Treatments
    -- - Forestry Materials Forest Types and Treatments mericans are looking to their forests today for more benefits than r ·~~.'~;:_~B~:;. A ever before-recreation, watershed protection, wildlife, timber, "'--;':r: .";'C: wilderness. Foresters are often able to enhance production of these bene- fits. This book features forestry techniques that are helping to achieve .,;~~.~...t& the American dream for the forest. , ~- ,.- The story is for landolVners, which means it is for everyone. Millions . .~: of Americans own individual tracts of woodland, many have shares in companies that manage forests, and all OWII the public lands managed by government agencies. The forestry profession exists to help all these landowners obtain the benefits they want from forests; but forests have limits. Like all living things, trees are restricted in what they can do and where they can exist. A tree that needs well-drained soil cannot thrive in a marsh. If seeds re- quire bare soil for germination, no amount of urging will get a seedling established on a pile of leaves. The fOllOwing pages describe th.: ways in which stands of trees can be grown under commonly Occllrring forest conditions ill the United States. Originating, growing, and tending stands of trees is called silvicllllllr~ \ I, 'R"7'" -, l'l;l.f\ .. (silva is the Latin word for forest). Without exaggeration, silviculture is the heartbeat of forestry. It is essential when humans wish to manage the forests-to accelerate the production or wildlife, timber, forage, or to in- / crease recreation and watershed values. Of course, some benerits- t • wilderness, a prime example-require that trees be left alone to pursue their' OWII destiny.
    [Show full text]
  • THE FOREST for the TREES? Government Policies and the Misuse of Forest Resources
    THE FOREST FOR THE TREES? Government Policies and the Misuse of Forest Resources Robert Repotto VV () R L D R IE S C) U R CES INS T ITUT Q THE FOREST FOR THE TREES? Government Policies and the Misuse of Forest Resources Robert Repetto WORLD RESOURCES INSTITUTE A Center for Policy Research May 1988 Kathleen Courrier Publications Director Don Strandberg Marketing Manager Hyacinth Billings Production Supervisor FAO Photo Cover Each World Resources Institute Report represents a timely, scientific treatment of a subject of public concern. WRI takes responsibility for choosing the study topics and guaranteeing its authors and researchers freedom of inquiry. It also solicits and responds to the guidance of advisory panels and expert reviewers. Unless otherwise stated, however, all the interpretation and findings set forth in WRI publications are those of the authors. Copyright © 1988 World Resources Institute. All rights reserved. Library of Congress Catalog Card Number 88-050465 ISBN 0-915825-25-2 Contents I. Overview 1 The Extent and Rate of Deforestation 3 The Reasons for Deforestation in Tropical Countries 12 Forest Sector Policies 17 Policies Outside the Forest Sector 27 Conclusions and Recommendations 32 Policy Reforms by National Governments 32 Policy Changes by Industrial Countries and International Agencies 40 II. Country Studies 43 Indonesia 43 Malaysia 52 Philippines 59 China 66 Brazil 73 West Africa 81 United States 90 References 99 Acknowledgments e wish to thank the authors of Gregersen, Roberto Lopez C, Norman Myers, country case studies, whose schol- Jeffrey Sayer, John Spears, William Beattie and W arly insights contributed so much Roger Sedjo.
    [Show full text]
  • An Investment Primer for Reforestation CARBON REMOVAL, ENVIRONMENTAL and SOCIAL IMPACTS, and FINANCIAL POTENTIAL
    1 An Investment Primer for Reforestation CARBON REMOVAL, ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL IMPACTS, AND FINANCIAL POTENTIAL JANUARY 2020 1 CONTENTS Contents About CREO 2 Terms 3 Executive Summary 4 Background Forestry for Climate 6 Reforestation Investment Potential 9 - Investment Avenues 9 - Costs and Returns 10 Carbon Markets Regulatory Compliance 14 Voluntary 15 Corporate Offsetting 15 Summary 16 Timber and Non-Timber Forest Products Timber 18 Agroforestry 19 Summary 20 Restoration and Conservation Initiatives Direct Revenue Creation 22 Blended Finance 23 Catalytic Capital 24 Summary 24 Moving Forward 25 Appendix A: CREO Modelling Assumptions 26 Appendix B: Carbon Markets 27 Citations 28 2 ABOUT CREO About CREO The CREO Syndicate (“CREO”) is a 501c3 public charity founded by wealth owners and family offices with a mission to address the most pressing environmental challenges of our time affecting communities across the globe—climate change and resource scarcity. By catalyzing private capital and scaling innovative solutions, CREO is contributing to protecting and preserving the environment and accelerating the transition to a sustainable economy for the benefit of the public. CREO works closely with a broad set of global stakeholders, including Members (wealth owners, family offices, and family-owned enterprises), Friends (aligned investors such as pension funds), and Partners (government, not-for-profit organizations and academia), who collaboratively develop and invest in solutions across sectors, asset classes and geographies. CREO’s primary activities include 1) knowledge building; 2) relationship building among like-minded, values-aligned, long-term investors; 3) conducting select research to support the advancement of its mission; and 4) deal origination. 3 TERMS Terms Afforestation (AF): Planting and/or deliberate seeding on land not forested over the last 50 years.
    [Show full text]
  • Afforestation and Reforestation - Michael Bredemeier, Achim Dohrenbusch
    BIODIVERSITY: STRUCTURE AND FUNCTION – Vol. II - Afforestation and Reforestation - Michael Bredemeier, Achim Dohrenbusch AFFORESTATION AND REFORESTATION Michael Bredemeier Forest Ecosystems Research Center, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany Achim Dohrenbusch Institute for Silviculture, University of Göttingen, Germany Keywords: forest ecosystems, structures, functions, biomass accumulation, biogeochemistry, soil protection, biodiversity, recovery from degradation. Contents 1. Definitions of terms 2. The particular features of forests among terrestrial ecosystems 3. Ecosystem level effects of afforestation and reforestation 4. Effects on biodiversity 5. Arguments for plantations 6. Political goals of afforestation and reforestation 7. Reforestation problems 8. Afforestation on a global scale 9. Planting techniques 10. Case studies of selected regions and countries 10.1. China 10.2. Europe 11. Conclusion Glossary Bibliography Biographical Sketches Summary Forests are rich in structure and correspondingly in ecological niches; hence they can harbour plentiful biological diversity. On a global scale, the rate of forest loss due to human interference is still very high, currently ca. 10 Mha per year. The loss is highest in the tropics; in some tropical regions rates are alarmingly high and in some virtually all forestUNESCO has been destroyed. In this situat– ion,EOLSS afforestation appears to be the most significant option to counteract the global loss of forest. Plantation of new forests is progressing overSAMPLE an impressive total area wo rldwideCHAPTERS (sum in 2000: 187 Mha; rate ca. 4.5 Mha.a-1), with strong regional differences. Forest plantations seem to have the potential to provide suitable habitat and thus contribute to biodiversity conservation in many situations, particularly in problem areas of the tropics where strong forest loss has occurred.
    [Show full text]
  • “Catastrophic” Wildfire a New Ecological Paradigm of Forest Health by Chad Hanson, Ph.D
    John Muir Project Technical Report 1 • Winter 2010 • www.johnmuirproject.org The Myth of “Catastrophic” Wildfire A New Ecological Paradigm of Forest Health by Chad Hanson, Ph.D. Contents The Myth of “Catastrophic” Wildfire: A New Ecological Paradigm of Forest Health 1 Preface 1 Executive Summary 4 Myths and Facts 6 Myth/Fact 1: Forest fire and home protection 6 Myth/Fact 2: Ecological effects of high-intensity fire 7 Myth/Fact 3: Forest fire intensity 12 Myth/Fact 4: Forest regeneration after high-intensity fire 13 Myth/Fact 5: Forest fire extent 14 Myth/Fact 6: Climate change and fire activity 17 Myth/Fact 7: Dead trees and forest health 19 Myth/Fact 8: Particulate emissions from high-intensity fire 20 Myth/Fact 9: Forest fire and carbon sequestration 20 Myth/Fact 10: “Thinning” and carbon sequestration 22 Myth/Fact 11: Biomass extraction from forests 23 Summary: For Ecologically “Healthy Forests”, We Need More Fire and Dead Trees, Not Less. 24 References 26 Photo Credits 30 Recommended Citation 30 Contact 30 About the Author 30 The Myth of “Catastrophic” Wildfire A New Ecological Paradigm of Forest Health ii The Myth of “Catastrophic” Wildfire: A New Ecological Paradigm of Forest Health By Chad Hanson, Ph.D. Preface In the summer of 2002, I came across two loggers felling fire-killed trees in the Star fire area of the Eldorado National Forest in the Sierra Nevada. They had to briefly pause their activities in order to let my friends and I pass by on the narrow dirt road, and in the interim we began a conversation.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparing MODIS Net Primary Production Estimates with Terrestrial National Forest Inventory Data in Austria
    Remote Sens. 2015, 7, 3878-3906; doi:10.3390/rs70403878 OPEN ACCESS remote sensing ISSN 2072-4292 www.mdpi.com/journal/remotesensing Article Comparing MODIS Net Primary Production Estimates with Terrestrial National Forest Inventory Data in Austria Mathias Neumann 1,*, Maosheng Zhao 2, Georg Kindermann 3 and Hubert Hasenauer 1 1 Institute of Silviculture, Department of Forest and Soil Sciences, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Peter-Jordan-Str. 82, A-1190 Vienna, Austria; E-Mail: [email protected] 2 Department of Geographical Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA; E-Mail: [email protected] 3 Natural Hazards and Landscape, Department of Forest Growth and Silviculture, Federal Research and Training Centre for Forests, Vienna, Seckendorff-Gudent-Weg 8, A-1130 Vienna, Austria; E-Mail: [email protected] * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +43-1-47654-4078; Fax: +43-1-47654-4092. Academic Editors: Randolph H. Wynne and Prasad S. Thenkabail Received: 11 December 2014 / Accepted: 17 March 2015 / Published: 1 April 2015 Abstract: The mission of this study is to compare Net Primary Productivity (NPP) estimates using (i) forest inventory data and (ii) spatio-temporally continuous MODIS (MODerate resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer) remote sensing data for Austria. While forest inventories assess the change in forest growth based on repeated individual tree measurements (DBH, height etc.), the MODIS NPP estimates are based on ecophysiological processes such as photosynthesis, respiration and carbon allocation. We obtained repeated national forest inventory data from Austria, calculated a “ground-based” NPP estimate and compared the results with “space-based” MODIS NPP estimates using different daily climate data.
    [Show full text]
  • Reineke's Stand Density Index
    Reineke’s Stand Density Index: Where Are We and Where Do We Go From Here? John D. Shaw USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station 507 25th Street, Ogden, UT 84401 [email protected] Citation: Shaw, J.D. 2006. Reineke’s Stand Density Index: Where are we and where do we go from here? Proceedings: Society of American Foresters 2005 National Convention. October 19-23, 2005, Ft. Worth, TX. [published on CD-ROM]: Society of American Foresters, Bethesda, MD. REINEKE’S STAND DENSITY INDEX: WHERE ARE WE AND WHERE DO WE GO FROM HERE? John D. Shaw USDA Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research Station Forest Inventory and Analysis 507 25th Street Ogden, UT 84401 Email: [email protected] Abstract: In recent years there has been renewed interest in Reineke’s Stand Density Index (SDI). Although originally described as a measurement of relative density in single-species, even-aged stands, it has since been generalized for use in uneven-aged stands and its use in multi-species stands is an active area of investigation. Some investigators use a strict definition of SDI and consider indicies developed for mixed and irregularly structured stands to be distinct from Reineke’s. In addition, there is ongoing debate over the use of standard or variable exponents to describe the self-thinning relationship that is integral to SDI. This paper describes the history and characteristics of SDI, its use in silvicultural applications, and extensions to the concept. Keywords: Stand Density Index, self-thinning, density management diagrams, silviculture, stand dynamics INTRODUCTION Silviculturists have long sought, and continue to seek, simple and effective indicies of competition in forest stands.
    [Show full text]
  • Impact of Non-Timber Forest Product Use on the Tree Community in North-Western Vietnam
    Article Impact of Non-Timber Forest Product Use on the Tree Community in North-Western Vietnam Thi Hoa Hong Dao 1,2,* and Dirk Hölscher 1,3 1 University of Goettingen, Tropical Silviculture and Forest Ecology, 37077 Göttingen, Germany; [email protected] 2 Forest Inventory and Planning, Faculty of Silviculture, Vietnam National University of Forestry, 024840 Hanoi, Vietnam 3 University of Goettingen, Centre of Biodiversity and Sustainable Land Use, 37077 Göttingen, Germany * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +49-(0)551-39-33652; Fax: +49-(0)551-39-4019 Received: 18 May 2018; Accepted: 16 July 2018; Published: 18 July 2018 Abstract: Trees providing non-timber forest products (NTFPs) are valuable forest resources, and their management can support conservation objectives. We analyzed the abundance of tree species providing NTFPs, recognized by local H’mong people, in both the strictly protected core zone and the low-intensity forest use buffer zone in north-western Vietnam. We identified 249 tree species, of which 48% were classified as NTFP species. The abundance of 35% of the NTFP tree species was significantly correlated with footpaths, indicating an influence of human activity. A multiple logistic regression model indicates that using NTFP trees for food, medicine, and root harvesting, increases the probability of an NTFP tree absence in the buffer zone. In contrast, the high density of species, and collections of fruit, leaf, and resin decrease the probability of an NTFP tree absence in the buffer zone. Further assessment with a logistic model indicated that NTFP use has lower impacts on the tree community than timber use.
    [Show full text]