An Empirical Analysis of ‘Acting White’! Roland G. Fryer, Jr. Robert M. Beren Professor of Economics Harvard University and NBER July 2009 ! We are grateful to George Akerlof, Pol Antras, David Card, Prudence Carter, Kenneth Chay, William Darity, Federico Echenique, Ronald Ferguson, Edward Glaeser, Michael Greenstone, Jennifer Hochschild, Christopher Jencks, Adriana Lleras-Muney, Lawrence Kahn, Lawrence Katz, Rachel Kranton, Steven Levitt, Glenn Loury, Linda Loury, Jens Ludwig, Franziska Michor, Ted Miguel, Emily Oster, Paul Peterson, Mica Pollock, Gavin Samms, Jesse Shapiro, and Andrei Shleifer for helpful comments and suggestions. The editor and two anonymous referees provided valuable feedback that greatly helped the paper take shape. Patricia Foo, Alexander Kaufman, Sue Lin, Katherine Penner, and David Toniatti provided exceptional research assistance. Fryer thanks the Education Innovation Laboratory at Harvard University for invaluable support. Direct all correspondence to Fryer at Harvard University, 1875 Cambridge Street, Cambridge, MA, 02138 [e-mail:
[email protected]]. The usual caveat applies. Abstract Using a newly available data set, which allows one to construct a novel measure of a student’s social status, we demonstrate that there are potentially important racial differences in the relationship between social status and academic achievement. The effect is intensified among students with a grade point average (GPA) of 3.5 or higher and those in schools with more interracial contact. Earlier studies showing a positive relationship between popularity and academic achievement for blacks are sensitive to the inclusion of more continuous achievement measures. We argue that the data are most consistent with a model of ‘acting white’ in which investments in education are taken as a signal of one’s opportunity costs of peer-group loyalty, though imprecise estimates make definitive conclusions difficult.