City of Northfield Park and Recreation Advisory Board (PRAB) December 20, 2012 REGULAR MEETING AGENDA 7:00 p.m. – Northfield Public Library Meeting Room
1. Call Meeting to order Chair Knutson 2. Approval of Agenda 3. Approval of Meeting Minutes: November 15, 2012 Thompson/PRAB 4. Public Comment: Public This is the opportunity for residents of Northfield to address the Park and Recreation Advisory Board. After being recognized by the chair, each individual will identify herself/himself and the group they represent, if any. To insure all individuals will have a chance to speak, speakers will be limited to a three-minute presentation. Please note this is the time for public comments on items not before the board. 5. Reports a. Staff reports/monthly updates Staff
6. New Business a. Discuss skating rink at Ames Park Knutson b. Sharrows Gehring
7. Old Business a. Update on pool concession stand Hvistendahl, Gehring/Staff b. Planning process for skateboard park Knutson c. Update on ambulance garage and Way Park Knutson
Adjourn: No later than 9:00 p.m. without vote to extend
Next PRAB meeting: Thursday, January 17, 2013, 7:00 – 9:00 p.m. at the Northfield Public Library
Park and Recreation Advisory Board REGULAR MEETING MINUTES RECORD Meeting: PRAB Date: November 15, 2012 Location: Library Meeting Room Start time: 7:00PM Regular Meeting Adjourn time: 9:00 p.m. Members present: Nathan Knutson, David Hvistendahl, Dale Gehring, Neil Lutsky, Grace Clark Members absent: Dick Johnson, Mel Miller Others present: Tim Madigan, City Administrator, Rhonda Pownell, Council Member, Erika Zweifel, Council Member, Joe Stapf, PW Director/City Engineer; Lynne Young, Staff Liaison; Allison Watkins, Recreation Manager; TJ Heinricy, Streets and Parks Supervisor; Erin Mayberry, Community Education Liaison; Barb Thompson, Clerical Liaison;
Meeting Called to The Meeting is being recorded by documentary filmmaker Order Cecilia Cornejo, who is working in collaboration with the Skateboard Coalition of Northfield.
Approval of Agenda A motion was made to accept the Agenda as written for the November 15, 2012 PRAB Meeting. Motion was made by D. Hvistendahl and seconded by D. Gehring. All voted in favor. Motion carried. Approval of Minutes Several PRAB members suggested amendments to the A motion was made to accept the minutes of October 18. amended minutes of the regular 1.Pool Concession Stand Report: David Hvistendahl’s meeting on October 18, 2012 as name was stricken as he was not present at the concession amended. Motion made by D. stand subcommittee meeting . Hvistendahl and seconded by N. 2. The motion on land acquisition near the Veterans’ Lutsky. All voted in favor. Motion Memorial, was clarified to read: The PRAB made a carried. Motion to recommend to City Council, the purchase of the land located at 512 West 9th Street for a price up to $25,000 using PRAB funds. 3. Skateboard Park Discussion was changed to read: G. Clark presented her recommendations. She felt that the most viable option for the placement of the skate park would be at Babcock Park, listing Riverside second and Memorial Field after that. Using the LDC (Land Development Code) and the Parks, Trails and Open Space Master Plan, G. Clark argued that neither Riverside Park nor Memorial Park is an appropriate location for the permanent skate park. Public Comment Bruce Roberts-VOC- Will the site for the temporary skate park be discussed during the skate park agenda item? Jean Fossum – Will public comments be allowed during the PRAB discussion of the permanent skate park? Reports Lynne Young – Liaison- Lashbrook Park Outlot A will be on the Council agenda on Tuesday Nov 20th. Administrator Madigan informed the PRAB that the ambulance building will be on the market after the first of the year. The Hospital Board will meet with Council in
Page 1 of 3
January. Allison Watkins- Recreation Supervisor. After research and review, summer ice will be held in July 2013. This is supported by the PRAB. Erin Mayberry – CE Liaison – To show the partnership between the City and the School District, the City Logo is now on the District’s website. TJ Heinricy – Streets and Parks Supervisor. The Soccer Association is interested in adding 2 new fields and will come before the PRAB in December for discussion of this project. The DNR and MNDOT are in preliminary planning to repave the trail between Dundas and Sechler Park. Pool Concession Stand Report: Brian Erickson will bring a scaled back project design for the December PRAB meeting.
New Business Community Services Director Position. Administrator Madigan addressed the PRAB, looking for input for the hiring of a new Community Services Director. With L. Young retiring, a search firm has been hired to fill her position. After discussion, the PRAB supports the liaison position returning to Public Works. Old Business Recommendation for site of permanent skateboard A Motion was made by Neil Lutsky position D. Gehring spoke in favor of the Memorial Park and seconded by David Hvistendahl to as location for skate park. send a rank listing of PRAB preferred Nancy Peterson– Village on Cannon- spoke against locations for the site of the permanent locating the skate park at Riverside Park citing noise skate board park levels, who used it and the manner it was used. 1. Riverside – West end of park near Jane (is Jane or Jean?) Fossum- 8th Street – spoke against Hwy 3 both Riverside Park and Memorial Park citing the master 2. Memorial Park – 3 options for site; plans for both parks and going against residents’ wishes. major open area to the west of the pool, Susan Pedersen- Union Street-spoke against Riverside replacing the solar panels to the west of Park, citing engineering issues for building in the park. the pool, or just east of the entrance of Also against locating the temporary park again in the pool. Riverside Park. Yes votes: Lutsky, Hvistendahl, Ann Lofte – Union Street- spoke for Weldon Hogge – 7th Gehring, Knutson Street- Weldon is against locating the skate park in No votes: none Memorial Park because it will prevent picnics in the Abstain: Clark park and because of the lack of parking. Motion carried. Jim Pokorney – Washington Street- spoke in support of the PRAB, and the need to make a decision for the good A Motion was made by D. Hvistendahl of the entire town. and seconded by Lutsky to request from Frank Meyer- 2nd Street- spoke on behalf of the Council, $30,000 to build a cement slab Skateboard Coalition. The Coalition supports the report at the new Riverside Park location. by Lutsky and Hvistendahl. Will work on the noise Yes votes: Lutsky, Gehring, abatement caused by steel equipment on cement. Hvistendahl, and Knutson A discussion was held to appropriate funds from the No votes: Clark Park Fund to build the cement slab in Riverside Park if Motion carried. that is the location chosen by Council.
PRAB Project Priorities. The PRAB discussed the need for a stable funding source so that improvements could be made, the lack of structural management and the lack of a Parks Department. The maintenance as well as the safety of existing parks and facilities are priorities.
Page 2 of 3
River Corridor Study Discussion. Chair Knutson presented a memo to the PRAB. By using the City of Northfield’s Parks, Open Space, and Trail System Master Plan, he presented 4 key areas for a relationship between the PRAB and the study. Existing Community Parks Cannon River Conservation Lands Cannon River Corridor-Trail System Plan Cannon River Corridor-Natural Resources Stewardship Plan The PRAB would like the use of the City of Northfield’s Parks, Open Spaces, and Trail System Plan as the framework for the development of the area. Charles City, Iowa would be a great resource for inspiration on our development of the area. The PRAB would be interested in forming a sub-committee to serve when the time comes.
Jefferson Park Discussion. This is not a priority for the PRAB at this time
Adjourn The meeting was adjourned at 9:00PM p.m. A Motion was made by N. Lutsky and seconded by D. Gehring to adjourn the meeting. All voted in favor. Motion carried.
Submitted by B. Thompson, Clerical Liaison
Page 3 of 3
Park & Recreation Advisory Board Meeting date: December 20, 2012 Agenda Item 5a
Item: Staff reports
Submitted by: Lynne Young, Library and Recreation Services Director and Allison Watkins, Recreation Manager
Recreation Administration:
There is not much to report at this time. Lynne expects to meet with Tim Madigan and Joe Stapf early in the new year to discuss transitioning recreation, pool and arena back into public works.
The search continues for Erin Mayberry’s replacement. Most of you should have received the winter/spring brochure this past week. I am pleased that Erin has incorporated the City logo on both the website and in the brochure.
Pool:
The sub-committee (Dale Gehring, David Hvistendahl – Mel Miller was unable to attend) met on Tuesday Dec. 11 with Brian Erickson, Allison and Lynne to discuss the redesign of the concession stand at the pool per city council. It was agreed that a new space needs to be constructed, and the general thought is to move the office into the new space and the concession stand into the old office. Locating the concession stand in the current office will allow for outside users to partake in the use of the concession stand without having to pay pool admission. Locating the office in the new space will allow for more eyes on the pool and a shorter response time to emergencies by pool manager and other staff. The entry way into the pool will remain the same, but this plan has the advantage of allowing for future development of a new entry way.
Arena: The Handicap ramp/platform has been completed. We have had 2 patrons coming to view high school girls and boys hockey games and the arena has had a lack of viewing space for such patrons until now. This will be painted in the summer during none ice time and the dasher boards will be backed with poly in front of the ramp/platform.
The roof vents at the arena have developed some leaks that became obvious during the rain on Saturday. We hope to have someone in this week to address the problem. Memorandum
Date: 16 December 2012 To: Members of the Park and Recreation Advisory Board Lynne Young Prepared By: Nathan Knutson, Chair Park and Recreation Advisory Board Subject: Skating Rink in Ames Park
A request was received from the public for the PRAB to consider the establishment of an ice skating rink in Ames Park. This request appears to be consistent with current community visioning efforts, such as the Northfield Roundtable, and will likely be of interest to other groups, such as the Streetscape Taskforce with its June 2012 “Gateway Corridor Improvement Plan”: http://www.ci.northfield.mn.us/assets/n/Northfield-Gateways---Final-Document(lowres)-Part-A.pdf
The City of Northfield’s Parks, Open Space, and Trail System Plan (Master Plan) also suggests facility development guidelines for ice skating and for Ames Park.
For further discussion:
• Development of ice skating rink in Ames Park • Existing ice skating rinks in Northfield parks • Development of additional ice skating rinks in other Northfield parks
Attachments: Email to PRAB (December 4, 2012) Master Plan Appendix A – Facility Development Guidelines (A.37) Master Plan Chapter 3 – Park and Greenway Classifications (3.2) Master Plan Appendix A – Ames Park (A.4)
From: Arlen Malecha
Good Day Members of the Park Board -
I would like to request that the Park Board consider the establishment of a giant ice rink in Ames Park. Strings of lights could be strung overhead to illuminate the area. A portable warming house could be brought in for families to use. Perhaps music could be played over speakers to add to the merriment.
I can already imagine the delight of children and their families skating and then wondering across the river to get a bite to eat or do some shopping. Folks passing by would get a Norman Rockwell feel as they see families enjoying some quality time together.
Perhaps various non-profits could take turns selling hot cocoa and hot dogs to raise a few funds for their organizations. Businesses or civic groups could be asked to help flood the rink and shovel snow when needed to keep the rink in good repair. A free-will offering box could be hung for skaters wishing to help offset the expenses incurred by the City for operation of the rink.
Perhaps it is too late to consider for this year but I think it warrants consideration in years to come. It would be one more thing that makes Northfield special.
Thank you for your consideration of my request and thank you for your service to the citizens of Northfield.
- Arlen
Arlen Malecha, Real Estate Advisor COLDWELL BANKER South Metro | 419 Division St S, Northfield , MN 55057 Cell / Text: 507.581.0303 | Office: 507.663.1234 | Fax: 507.663.1997
Search all MLS Listings at: www.cbsouthmetro.com Like us on Facebook at: www.Facebook.com/ColdwellBankerNorthfield P Please consider the environment before printing this email. Appendix B – Park Evalautions and Development Considerations
Appendix B – Park Evaluations and
Development Considerations
The park system evaluation and development considerations provide general overviews of Overview each park based on field investigations. These reviews were undertaken to provide the Park Board and City staff with an understanding of the system and a basis for the key findings and recommendations.
Park System The park system classifications described in the System Plan are applied to each of the parks defined in this section. The classifications include: Classifications x Neighborhood Parks x Community Parks x Youth Athletic Complex x Community Athletic Complex x Greenway (Natural Open Space) x Special Use x Park-School App e n d i x A –Pa r k an d Tr a i l De v e l o p m e n t Co n s i d e r a t i o n s x Regional Park/ Reserve x Private Park/ Recreation Facility Facility De v e l o p m e n t The following table defines the most appropriate location for different Facility Types and The followingtypes table of defines recreational the most facilities. appropriate The tablelocation is intended for different as a types general of recreational guideline. Gu i d e lfacilities. i n e s The(Source: table is intendedBrauer & asAssociates, a general Ltd.guideline. General Recreation Facility Guidelines Location Guidelines Manual) Activity Neighbor. Community Youth Ath. Community Greenway Special Park- Regional Private Park Park Complex Ath. Complex Use School Park Informal play iii iii ii ii ii iii ii Youth softball i ii iii iii ii iii ii Adult softball i iii ii ii ii Youth baseball i ii iii iii ii iii ii Adult baseball i iii ii ii ii Youth soccer i ii iii iii ii iii ii Adult soccer i iii ii ii ii Youth football i ii iii iii ii iii ii Adult football i iii ii ii ii Youth lacrosse i ii iii iii ii iii ii Adult lacrosse i iii ii ii ii Ice hockey ii ii iii iii Appendix B – Parkii Evalautionsiii and Development Considerationsii
Ice skating ii iii ii iii ii iii ii TennisActivity Neighbor.ii Communityiii Youthiii Ath. Communityiii Greenway Specialii Park-iii Regional Privateii Basketball Parkiii Parkiii Complexiii Ath. iiiComplex Use ii Schooliii Park ii Sliding hill ii iii i i i ii i Play StructuresLegend: (open) iiiNot an appropriateiii locationiii iii ii iii ii ii Hardsurf. game i iii Appropriate oniii a very limitediii basis (typicallyiii not desirable) ii iii i ii Horseshoes ii Appropriatei oniii a limited basis (desirable onlyii if need is documented and/orii if a more idesirable locationii is not availableii ) Volleyball iii iiiAppropriate andiii desirable locationiii iii ii iii ii ii Disc Golf iii iii ii ii Skate park ii iii ii iii ii i ii PARKS,Archery NATURAL range OPEN SPACE/GREENWAY, iii ii iii ANDTrack TRAIL /field SYSTEM PLAN iii ii iii iiB- 1 Amphitheater iii ii iii Nature center iii ii ii iii ii Aquatics fac. iii iii iii iii i ii Fishing area iii iii iii Picnic area iii iii iii iii ii ii ii iii ii Beach area iii iii iii Sm. pic. shelter iii iii iii iii ii ii iii ii Lg. pic. shelter iii iii iii iii ii Seating areas iii iii iii iii iii iii iii iii ii Restrooms iii iii iii ii ii iii ii Warming bldg. i ii iii iii i Concess. Bldg. i ii ii ii Site amenities iii iii iii iii iii iii iii iii ii (benches, trash, fountain., etc. Arch. Elements iii iii iii iii iii iii iii iii ii (arbors, etc.) Parking i iii iii iii ii iii iii iii ii Paved trail iii iii iii iii iii iii iii iii ii Nature trail i ii iii ii iii Mtn. bike trail i ii i Equestrian trail ii Groomed ski ii iii trail
Legend: (open) Not an appropriate location i Appropriate on a very limited basis (typically not desirable) ii Appropriate on a limited basis (desirable only if need is documented and/or if a more desirable location is not available) iii Appropriate and desirable location
No r t h f i e l d Pa r k s , Op e n Spa c e , an d Tr a i l Sy s t e m Pl an A.37
PARKS, NATURAL OPEN SPACE/GREENWAY, AND TRAIL SYSTEM PLAN B- 2 Se c t i o n 3 – Pa r k s , At h l e t i c Facilities, a n d Op e n Sp a c e Pl a n
The system plan consists of a variety of parks and open spaces defined Pa r k a n d Gr e e n w a y under various classifications. Each classification serves a particular purpose Classifications in meeting local park and recreation needs. Although some flexibility is warranted, classifying parks is necessary to ensure a well-balanced system and that all recreational needs are effectively and efficiently met. The classifications applied to Northfield are based on guidelines recommended in the National Parks, Recreation, Open Space and Greenways Guidelines (National Recreation and Parks Association, 1996) and Planning and Urban Design Standards (American Planning Association, 2006), albeit expanded or modified to address circumstances unique to the city. The following table provides an overview of each classification used in Northfield. (Each of the classifications are further expanded upon later in this section.) Pa r k s a n d Gr e e n w a y Classifications Classification Common Guidelines Application to Northfield Neighborhood Neighborhood parks are the basic units of the park system and Neighborhood parks remain a basic unit of the Park (and serve a recreational and social purpose. Focus is on informal park system in Northfield. In areas with urban Mini- active and passive recreation. Neighborhood parks are typically 5 densities, a service area of ¼- to ½-mile radius Neighborhood acres or more, with 8 to 10 acres preferred for new parks. Mini- remains appropriate. When new parks are Park) neighborhood parks, which are used only on a limited basis when connected with greenway-based trails, service securing more land is impractical, are 1 to 3 acres of developable areas can be expanded to ½-mile radius or land. Service area is ¼-mile radius for mini parks and up to a slightly more since trails and open space become ½-mile for a typical neighborhood park, uninterrupted by major part of the park experience. 5 acres* is typically roads and other physical barriers. adequate for new parks if the park is integrated into larger greenway system. Community Community parks serve a broader purpose than neighborhood Given the city’s proximity to the riverfront Park parks. Focus is on meeting community-based recreational needs, as and the natural areas that will be set aside in well as preserving unique landscapes and open spaces. Size varies, greenways, there is limited need for any new depending on function. 20 acres minimum preferred, with 40 or traditional community parks beyond that defined more acres optimal. Service area can be community-wide or several under this plan. neighborhoods in a given area of the city. Athletic Consolidates programmed adult and youth athletic fields and This classification has application to Northfield to Complex/ associated facilities to a limited number of sites. Tournament meet local needs for athletic facilities (in concert Facility level facilities are appropriate. Size varies, with 20 acres or more with school sites.) As a growing community with desirable, but not absolute. 40 to 80 acres is optimal. families, facility demand will continue to grow in sync with age-group population growth. Greenway/ Lands set aside for preserving natural resources, remnant Within the city proper, the potential for Natural landscapes, and open space, and providing visual aesthetics/ establishing greenways and preserving open Open Space/ buffering. Also provides passive use opportunities. Ecological space is limited, with the notable exception of Conservation resource stewardship and wildlife protection are high priorities. the Cannon River corridor. This reinforces the Areas Suitable for trail corridors. Overall land area varies depending on importance of working closely with landowners opportunity and general character of natural systems within a city. and developers in growth areas to set aside land for greenways and interconnected trails systems. Regional Park/ Larger scale, regionally based parks and open spaces focusing on No regional parks impact Northfield, although Reserve natural resource preservation and stewardship. Typically a minimum the larger blocks of land set aside by St. Olaf and of 500 acres and up to several thousand. Service area is regional, Carleton College serve an important open space which generally encompasses several cities. function, especially if publicly accessible trails are provided. Special Use Covers a broad range of parks and recreation facilities oriented The use of this classification will be limited toward single-purpose uses – such as a nature center, historic sites, in Northfield, primarily to the parks in the plazas, urban squares, aquatic centers, campgrounds, golf courses, downtown area, such as Bridge Square Park. etc. Overall size varies, depending on need. School Site Covers school sites that are used in concert with, or in lieu of, city Continuing the established relationship between parks to meet community recreation needs. School sites often School District 659 and the City is vital to provide the majority of indoor recreational facilities within a successfully meeting the long-term demand for community. Size varies, depending on specific site opportunities. athletic facilities in a cost-effective manner.
* Neighborhood park size note: The recommended minimum 5 acre size for new neighborhood parks may be modified at the City’s discretion if the park is part of an overall public amenity package associated with a given development area. This might include, for example, providing enhanced streetscapes and public squares that add value to the public realm and complement neighborhood park features. Note, however, that the essential value of a neighborhood park should be retained to ensure that 1) the recreational needs of local residents are adequately meet, and 2) the City does not accept a series of smaller mini-parks in lieu of a neighborhood park, which is inefficient and inconsistent with the system plan as defined in this section.
No r t h f i e l d Pa r k s , Op e n Sp a c e , a n d Tr a i l Sy s t e m Pl a n 3.2 App e n d i x A –Pa r k an d Tr a i l De v e l o p m e n t Co n s i d e r a t i o n s
Am e s Pa r k Classification: Community / Special Use Park — 2.5 acres Character: Ames Park is located at a key entry point to the historic downtown area of Northfield, directly adjacent to the Cannon River. The park is in a highly visible location and connected to the downtown area by a sidewalk across the bridge. Overall the park is under-utilized, with much of the land maintained as open green space for community events. An existing memorial trail (dedicated to Jean Campbell Brooks) extends along the shoreline through the park. The shoreline currently exhibits some erosion. The only parking available to support the park is across the river. The view to the north of a loading dock is in need of visual screening. The powerline running through the park is also a visual distraction and functional impediment. Development Considerations: The park’s overall aesthetic qualities need enhancement – especially given its importance as a “gateway” into the downtown area. As defined in Section 3, the park was selected as a candidate site for a new skateboard park, which if built here would require careful siting as part of an overall design. Other key amenities and improvements worthy of consideration as part of an overall master plan include: enhancing the park’s visual and functional connection to the downtown area; improving walkways, overlooks, and sitting areas; adding a shelter or arbor structure for sitting and architectural aesthetics; adding streetscape elements complementary to the downtown area; and enhancing the memorial area and specialty gardens. The shoreline of the river also needs to be stabilized and enhanced with native plantings. Additional ornamental landscaping throughout the park is needed to improve the park’s aesthetic qualities and selectively screen or frame views. Maintaining a good-sized multi-use turf area is an important design element to accommodate annual community events and provide space for informal lawn activities.
Potential Development Costs to Optimal Level: $200,000 to $300,000 for listed general park improvements. An additional $250,000 to $300,000 is needed if the skateboard park is developed. Relocation of power lines would be an additional cost.
Cannon River Dam & Falls Bridge Square Park (see page \A.7)
Riverwalk Dahomey Ave.
Memorial Walkway & Plaza
Open Green Space For Informal Use View A
5th Street Existing De v e l o p m e n t
Vi e w A
No r t h f i e l d Pa r k s , Op e n Spa c e , an d Tr a i l Sy s t e m Pl an A.4 Memorandum
Date: 16 December 2012 To: Members of the Park and Recreation Advisory Board Lynne Young Prepared By: Nathan Knutson, Chair Park and Recreation Advisory Board Subject: Skateboard Park Process
The City Council approved two (2) motions at its December 4, 2012 meeting affirming the PRAB’s location recommendation (M2012-171) and matching the PRAB’s funding allocation (M2012-172). As a result of these motions, the project is moving forward. First, the PRAB should determine whether a skateboard park subcommittee should be formed. Second, and based on the PRAB’s prior experience with other park projects, the following process will likely be required:
1. Soil Borings. Requires city staff involvement. This could occur immediately, is required to confirm feasibility of Riverside Park as the location for the skateboard park, and may require further information regarding expected design loads associated with the skateboard park. PRAB should recommend that city staff source, fund, and proceed with soil borings and geotechnical engineering for Riverside Park to confirm location feasibility.
2. Hire Design Consultant or Design-Build Contractor: City Council approval will be required to proceed with RFP process. Based on responses, PRAB makes recommendation to City Council regarding selection. PRAB should recommend that city staff research whether design consultant or design-build contractor selection is most appropriate in advance of January 2013 PRAB meeting.
3. Develop Skateboard Park Design and Budget. Collaborative effort with city staff, PRAB, skateboarders, and other interested parties. Costs for design alternatives will be defined and fundraising goals established. Duration of these efforts dependent on (a) timeline established in responses to RFP and (b) fundraising goals met.
4. Bidding or Negotiations: If “design consultant” process is used, the project would need to go out to bid prior to construction. City Council approval will be required to proceed with bidding. If “design-build contractor” process is used, the project’s construction could possibly proceed if negotiated final costs are in alignment with funds raised and/or allocated.
5. Construction: City Council approval will be required to proceed with construction.
Finally, although the skateboard park remains the priority, there are a significant number of additional resources to be considered in conjunction with the development of the skateboard park:
• Village on the Cannon Residence: On December 11, 2012, Neil and I met with residents who shared a keen interest in the broader development opportunities for Riverside Park • Relationship to river corridor study to parks along this corridor • Relationship to current and future bike trail traffic, such as Mill Towns Trail • Relationship to City of Northfield’s June 2012 “Gateway Corridor Improvement Plan” • Relationship to Northfield Roundtable efforts related to this area
Attachments: Skate Park Location Motion M2012-171 Skate Park Funding Motion M2012-172 Council Member Nakasian email to PRAB (December 6, 2012)
MOTION M2012-171
THE CITY COUNCIL AFFIRMS THE PARK & RECREATION ADVISORY BOARD’S RECOMMENDATION FOR THE PERMANENT SITE AND DESIGNATES RIVERSIDE PARK WEST AS THE LOCATION FOR A PERMANENT SKATEBOARD PARK, WITH OLD MEMORIAL FIELD TO BE USED IF TECHNICAL CONSIDERATIONS RENDER RIVERSIDE PARK NOT FEASIBLE.
Adopted: DECEMBER 4, 2012
MOTION M2012-172
ALLOCATE $30,000 TO MATCH THE FUNDS ALLOCATED FROM THE PARK FUND AND ASK CITY STAFF TO BRING BACK OPTIONS IN JANUARY OF WHERE THE FUNDS WOULD COME FROM (Skateboard Park).
Adopted: DECEMBER 4, 2012
From: Suzie Nakasian
Dear Nathan - please relay this email to all members of the PRAB at your next meeting.
Thank you for your thoughtful and respectful consideration of all of the groups who have contributed to the skatepark discussion to this point.
Following on the specific concerns that have been raised by some Village of the Cannon residents, as well as residents near Memorial Park, I write to ask your consideration of 5 suggestions which i convey as one Council member on behalf of my constituents, and not as a spokesperson for the whole Council).
Regarding the design of the skate park, I encourage the PRAB to consider: 1. Including representation from the Village of the Cannon (or neighbors of Memorial in the event that your process should have to move to that site) in the PRAB design process for the skatepark; 2. incorporate design, landscaping and orientation strategies, as well as building materials that have been proven effective in reducing the noise emanating from skateparks in other municipalities. 3. regarding concern for the safety of pedestrians near the park, consider the possibility of introducing a no-skate zone in select sidewalk areas in the vicinity of the VOC as an additional means of ensuring pedestrian safety. 4. consider limiting the hours that the park can be used - and convey those hours with signs near the park, and finally 5. consult with other municipalities on the strategies that they have found effective in addressing issues of noise and risk relating to their parks.
I am mindful in writing you with these suggestions that you may already be planning to pursue these ideas. But given the deeply felt and legitimate concerns of residents near both of the proposed park sites, I feel it important to covey these suggestions in writing.
Thank you for your consideration. Suzie Nakasian Ward 1 Representative Northfield City Council Memorandum
Date: 16 December 2012 To: Members of the Park and Recreation Advisory Board Lynne Young Prepared By: Nathan Knutson, Chair Park and Recreation Advisory Board Subject: EMS Site Update
The June 21, 2012 PRAB meeting agenda included information related to the Hospital’s decision to move the EMS station from its current location on West Second Street (adjacent to Way Park). In its May 25, 2012 letter to the Hospital (attached), the Friends of Way Park offered the following for further consideration with respect to EMS site disposal:
1. Dedicate full EMS site for park use. 2. Subdivide EMS site into two (2) lots and dedicate the western portion to Way Park for development of future off street parking. 3. Dedicate any funds generated by the sale of EMS site property to the park fund for the City of Northfield.
At its October 25, 2012 meeting, the Hospital Board moved to officially dispose of the EMS site and place the property on the market for sale. In its December 2, 2012 email to the Hospital (attached), the Friends of Way Park communicated its concerns and requested further clarification regarding this decision.
Update: The Friends of Way Park indicated that the Hospital Board was evaluating this decision. The Hospital Board met on December 13, 2012 and was to have included the EMS site disposal on its agenda.
Attached: FWP Email to Northfield Hospital (December 2, 2012) FWP Letter to Northfield Hospital (May 25, 2012)
From: "Sarah Carlsen"
1 Attachment, 26 KB
Dear Ms. Quinn Crow, I am hoping that you can provide some context for and clarification of what looks like a decision at the Hospital Board’s meeting on October 25th to move forward with the disposal of the EMS site. As chair of the Friends of Way Park (FWP), I was both surprised and disappointed to read about this apparent decision in the meeting minutes. I believe that the City's Park and Recreation Advisory Board (PRAB) is equally surprised and concerned. PRAB discussed the issue with the City Council at a June 27 work session, after which both groups hoped meet with the Hospital to find ways in which the Northfield park system could benefit from decisions regarding the EMS property. I understand that Mr. Henke’s sudden death had to have come as a shock, and created many challenges for the Hospital Board. I also understand that there is a case for expedient disposal of the site. At the same time, it is rare that land in an established neighborhood, next to a park, becomes available, and I hope the Hospital Board and staff are willing to take a long term view as they move forward with the disposition of this site. What happens to that property will have long term impact for the neighborhood, Way Park and the City of Northfield. I fear the process is moving forward without the full context of the discussions that had taken place.
You and I first last March 19th at a meeting with Mark Henke, Scott Richardson, Vicki Stevens, and Matt Rohn (Vice-Chair, FWP) just before you retired. Our intent for the meeting was to explore how and whether the hospital could support a Hospital Memorial and Healing Garden at Way Park, and whether the disposal of the EMS Site could benefit the park in some way because its location contiguous to the park. Our impression from Mr. Henke’s response, and subsequent appointing of Susan Lohmann to work with us on the garden as a hospital representative, was that the hospital was open to discussing more options. Mr. Henke indicated a willingness to at least consider creative options for the site, including donating all or part of the land for the benefit of the park. While we understand his comments did not represent any firm commitment, we were heartened by his openness.
On May 25th, I sent a letter to Mr. Henke, copying a number of stakeholders at both the City and the hospital, outlining our preferred alternatives for the site. Ms. Stevens responded on via email on June 22 indicating that there was no additional information at that time, but assured me that she would contact me as additional information came available. I have had no additional communication from the hospital, nor am I aware of any conversation between the hospital and the City of Northfield, between the time of the letter and the note in the minutes of the October 25th meeting. I’m attaching a copy of the letter I sent to Mr. Henke, because I believe you had retired by the time he received the letter. Since the October Hospital Board action, it is my understanding that City Manager Tim Madigan has indicated to Councilor Jessica Peterson White and to PRAB that, although he has contacted you, he remains uncertain about the Hospital's intentions. The Friends of Way Park Board, in turn, has been trying to learn since the end of October precisely what the Hospital Board has decided, if we or the City will be consulted about the property, or if a real estate agent is about to list the property for sale. We have been in touch with Hospital Communications Director Scott Richardson, and he has been unable to give us a definitive answer, which is why I am writing directly to you. We value the relationship we have had with the Northfield Hospital administration in the years since the hospital was relocated. We’ve benefited from the hospital’s willingness to let us use the water at the EMS Site to support the tree watering efforts of our volunteers. We continue to be excited about designing and installing a memorial garden space that honors the history of the hospital on that site. It is in that spirit of community collaboration that we ask whether the decision to sell the whole site is final, and, if so, whether there is any openness to reconsidering that decision or its scope relative to Way Park or the park system
Thank you for your time and attention. I look forward to hearing from you. Sarah Carlsen Chair, FWP Friends of Way Park PO Box 342 Northfield, MN 55057 May 25, 2012 Re: EMS Site Disposal
Mr. Mark Henke President and CEO Northfield Hospital 2000 North Avenue Northfield, MN 55057
Dear Mr. Henke,
The recent decision to move the EMS station from its current location on West Second Street presents an opportunity for the Northfield Hospital Board and the Northfield City Council to make a lasting impact on the community. On behalf of the Friends of Way Park (FWP), I ask you to please consider the following options as you begin discussions on the disposition of the EMS site.
Ideally, the full EMS site would be dedicated for park use. FWP has proven to be a committed and able partner for Way Park in the past five years, and would commit to helping fund any future projects. Although we understand that current funding limitations might prevent any development of this land for some time, we also take the long view: if this site is sold rather than retained for public use, we’ve lost what could be a significant opportunity for future park needs. The additional land could support a parking lot, or expanded space for the Hospital Memorial Healing Garden, or both. Honoring the history of the hospital has always been part of the vision for Way Park. Preserving additional green space gives the City future flexibility in developing this area.
The EMS station currently occupies a lot that is significantly wider than standard lots on West Second Street. While we understand that it has been used as a single lot, it may be possible to subdivide it in a way that would leave the main lot intact, while dedicating the west segment of the property to Way Park. This second option could meet the need for off-street parking that has long been part of the master plan. Cars line the streets around the park for skating, organized ball games, and special events such as Midsommar, all of which draw people who do not live within walking distance. The new amphitheater is likely to attract even more community-wide events. Dedicating this small portion of the EMS site could allow additional parking spots to be added at the edge of the park, near the amphitheater, without impacting the current form of the park. The remaining full lot could be sold. If this option is chosen, we would encourage targeting any resulting funds from the sale to the park fund for the City of Northfield.
Mr. Mark Henke May 25, 2012 Re: EMS Site Disposal
Friends of Way Park will be happy to provide information or any other assistance to help put this potential asset to good use for the community. I appreciate your consideration of these possibilities.
Sincerely yours,
Sarah Carlsen Chair, FWP cc: Betsey Buckheit Gina Franklin Patrick Ganey Ivan Imm Nathan Knutson Tim Madigan Suzie Nakasian Rhonda Pownell Scott Richardson Mary Rossing Vicki Stevens Erica Zweifel