Post Games Report Volume 2
Post Games Report Team:
Director: David Leather (DCEO) Senior Editor: Belinda White Information & Statistics: James Dobinson Sub Editors: Bob Rutt, Debbie Gallagher, Sonia Stewart, Jane McKeown, Nigel Bodman and Maria Carvath Compilation Assistance: Mike Gouldin A1 Foreword
The first volume of the Technical section of the report blends the generic functions of Games organisation mentioned in the Executive Summary and focuses more intensively on: The Sport element of the Games. The organisation of the three Villages. The operational functions of the 16 Competition Venues. Tracking the history and organisational development of the Sport and Venues divisions, this volume focuses on the key standard achieved. The Sport division’s development over time reflects the key messages behind the Games that made Manchester unique: To deliver an outstanding sporting spectacle of world significance, celebrating athletic excellence, cultural diversity and the unique atmosphere of the ‘Friendly Games’. To deliver a successful Games on behalf of all competitors, spectators and stakeholders. To leave a lasting legacy of new sporting facilities and social, physical and economic regeneration. To set a new benchmark for hosting international sporting events in the UK and the lasting benefits they can generate for all those involved. The Venues section gives an account of the venue structure employed to service the 16 different venues and with the strategies employed to successfully operate each venue. As a number of venues hosted more than one sport, there are some interesting accounts of how operational issues were overcome, such as venue transitions, involving complex changes to seating areas and broadcast positions. The Villages section details the huge number of functions brought together to provide a ‘home away from home’ for the 72 teams that visited Manchester. Charged with the challenging task of servicing athletes, team officials, Chef de Missions and CGAs, the Village team worked extensively to ensure that all relationships were sufficiently serviced. The Village team’s mission was to: Promote athlete-friendly amenities and services. Provide a comfortable, relaxed and secure ‘home away from home’. Create a good impression, of the Games and a lasting and positive memory of Manchester and its people. Combined with the aspects that made the Villages in Manchester and the satellite village of Bisley unique, the report explains how these challenges were dealt with from a local perspective and how these solutions can provide a knowledge base for future Games OCs. Given the depth of information in this volume, the sections are colour coded to assist the reader in navigating to the appropriate area. All acronyms mentioned have been listed in full to complement the text and the appendix provides further detailed information including the full competition schedule.
2 MANCHESTER 2002 THE XVII COMMONWEALTH GAMES • POST GAMES REPORT VOLUME 2 A2 List of Contents
A Foreword/Content D Sport Venue Operations
A1 Foreword ...... 2 D1 Stadium Plaza - Sportcity ...... 80
A2 List of Contents ...... 3 D1.1 Sportcity Visitor Centre ...... 86
A3 Acronyms and General Terms ...... 4 D2 City of Manchester Stadium ...... 88
D3 Table Tennis Centre - Sportcity ...... 91
B Sport Operations D4 National Squash Centre - Sportcity ...... 94
B1 Sport Organisation (including Sports Programme) . . .8 D5 National Cycling Centre - Sportcity ...... 96
B2 Elite Athletes with a Disability ...... 14 D6 Manchester Aquatics Centre ...... 98
B3 Technical Officials ...... 18 D7 Manchester Evening News Arena ...... 102
B4 Sport Presentation ...... 22 D8 G-Mex Centre – Manchester
B5 Victory Ceremonies ...... 24 (G-Mex, MICC, MPC, Fleet Depot) ...... 104
B5.1 Medals ...... 26 D9 Belle Vue - Manchester ...... 109
B6 Medical Services ...... 28 D10 The Forum Centre, Wythenshawe ...... 112
B7 Anti-Doping Programme ...... 33 D11 Heaton Park - Manchester ...... 114
B8 Sports Equipment ...... 36 D12 Road Walks – Manchester/Salford ...... 118
B9 Pre-Games Testing Programme ...... 38 D13 Marathon – Manchester/Salford ...... 121
D14 Triathlon – Salford Quays ...... 124
CVillage Operations D15 Bolton Arena ...... 126
C1 Commonwealth Games Village ...... 44 D16 Rivington Park - Bolton ...... 128
C2 Technical Officials’ Village ...... 68 D17 National Shooting Centre - Bisley ...... 130
C3 Commonwealth Shooting Village D18 Training Venues ...... 133
– University of Surrey, Guildford ...... 71 D19 Venue Tours ...... 134
C4 Team Welcome Ceremonies ...... 74 E Appendices
E1 Full Competition Schedule ...... 138
E2 Restricted or Prohibited Items and Actions ...... 157 E3 Training Venues
– Facilities and Management Support ...... 158
MANCHESTER 2002 THE XVII COMMONWEALTH GAMES • POST GAMES REPORT 3 VOLUME 2 A3 Acronyms and General Terms
The following are all the acronyms that appear in the report. For a full definition of each acronym please refer to the Glossary of Terms in Volume 1.
General Acronyms Acronym Description Section Reference Acronym Description Section Reference ACC Accommodation Village Volume 2 ACD Automatic Call Distribution Technology Volume 3 ACP Accreditation Check Point Accreditation Volume 3 ACR Accreditation Accreditation Volume 3 A&D Arrivals and Departures Transport Volume 3 AGMA Assoc of Greater Manchester Authorities General Volume 1 ASFGB Amateur Swimming Federation of Great Britain Sport Volume 2 AVM Athlete Venue Meal Catering Volume 2 BBC British Broadcasting Corporation Broadcast Volume 3 BJA British Judo Association Sport Volume 2 BOA British Olympic Association Sport Volume 2 BOH Back of House Venues Volume 2 BSV Bisley Shooting Village Villages Volume 2 BTA British Tourist Authority General Volume 1 CATV Cable Access Television Technology Volume 3 CCCN Contract Change Control Note Finance Volume 1 CCTV Closed Circuit Television Villages Volume 2 CC&W Catering Cleaning and Waste CC&W Volume 1 CEO Chief Executive Officer CEO Volume 1 CGA Commonwealth Games Association CGA Relations Volume 1 CGCE Commonwealth Games Council For England CGA Relations Volume 1 CGF Commonwealth Games Federation CGA Relations Volume 1 CGV Commonwealth Games Village Villages Volume 2 CIS Commentator Information System Technology Volume 3 CHOGM Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting Executive Volume 1 CMS City of Manchester Stadium Venues Volume 2 COMBO Commonwealth Games Broadcasting Organisation Broadcast Volume 3 CRC Crew Resource Centre Village Volume 2 CRS Central Results System Technology Volume 3 CSC Contemporary Services Corporation Workforce Volume 3 CSF Critical Success Factor General Volume 1 CSV Commonwealth Shooting Village Village Volume 2 CWG Commonwealth Games Family CGA Relations Volume 1 DCMS Dept for Culture, Media and Sport General Volume 1 DDI Direct Dial In Technology Volume 3 DRM Delegation Registration Meeting CGA Relations Volume 1 EAD Elite Athletes with a Disability Sport Volume 2 EBA English Bowls Association Sport Volume 2 ENG Electronic News Gathering Broadcast Volume 3 ETC English Tourism Council General Volume 1 EU European Union General Volume 3 EVS Event Services Event Services Volume 3 FA Functional Area General Volume 1 FACC Functional Area Crew Coordinator Workforce Volume 3 FACT Functional Area Core Team General Volume 1 FCO Foreign and Commonwealth Office Protocol Volume 3 FDG Fleet Depot G-Mex Transport Volume 2 FF&E Fittings, Furniture & Equipment Procurement Volume 3 FOH Front of House Venues Volume 2 FON Flags of Nations Look Volume 3 FOP Field of Play Sport Volume 2
4 MANCHESTER 2002 THE XVII COMMONWEALTH GAMES • POST GAMES REPORT VOLUME 2 GCC Games Coordination Centre Venues Volume 2 GEMS Games Event Management System Workforce Volume 1 GFIS Games Family Information System Technology Volume 3 GMAS Greater Manchester Ambulance Service General Volume 1 GMCC Greater Manchester Coordinating Committee General Volume 1 GMCFS Greater Manchester County Fire Service General Volume 1 GMG Guardian Media Group Queen’s Baton Volume 3 GMLO Greater Manchester Lieutenancy Office Protocol Volume 3 GMP Greater Manchester Police General Volume 1 GMPTE Greater Manchester Passenger Transport Executive General Volume 1 GONW Government Office North West General Volume 1 GRE Games Readiness Exercises Games Control Volume 1 GSSS Games Strategic Sports Squad Sport Volume 2 GVN Games Voice Network Technology Volume 3 HM Her Majesty Protocol Volume 3 HoG Heads of Government Protocol Volume 3 HoS Heads of State Protocol Volume 3 HMA Honorary Medical Advisor Medical Volume 2 HRP Human Resources Professional Workforce Volume 1 IBC International Broadcast Centre Broadcast Volume 3 ICC International Convention Centre Venues Volume 2 IDR Intermediate Distribution Rack Technology Volume 3 IF International Federation Sport Volume 2 IFTD International Federation Technical Delegate Sport Volume 2 I&I Inspections and Inventories Villages Volume 2 IOC International Olympic Committee General Volume 1 IOC Integrated Operations Contingencies Games Control Volume 1 IP Intellectual Property Brand Protection Volume 3 IPC International Paralympic Committee General Volume 1 IPR Intellectual Property Rights Brand Protection Volume 3 ISO Independent Sampling Officer Anti-Doping Volume 2 ITO International Technical Official Sport Volume 2 LAN Local Area Network Technology Volume 3 LRC Local Relay Committees Queen’s Baton Volume 3 LRS Local Results System Technology Volume 3 LTV Long Term Volunteer Workforce Volume 3 M2002 Manchester 2002 Limited General Volume 1 MAC Manchester Aquatics Centre Sport/Venues Volume 2 MAUC Main Accreditation and Uniform Centre Accreditation Volume 3 MCC Manchester City Council General Volume 1 MCGL Manchester Commonwealth Games Limited General Volume 1 MDS Master Delivery Schedule Procurement Volume 3 MHE Materials Handling Equipment Procurement Volume 3 MIDAS Manchester Investment and Development Agency Events Volume 1 MPC Main Press Centre Media/Venues Volume 2 MWG Management Working Group General Volume 1 NEM New East Manchester General Volume 1 NGB National Governing Body Sport Volume 2 NPC National Paralympic Committee Sport Volume 2 NSC National Squash Centre Venues Volume 2 NSF National Sport Federation Sport Volume 2 NTO National Technical Official Sport Volume 2 NWDA North West Development Agency General Volume 1 NVP Non-Valid Pass Accreditation Volume 3 OB Outside Broadcast Media Volume 3 OC Organising Committee General Volume 1 OGKS Olympic Games Knowledge Service General Volume 1 PABX Private Automatic Branch Exchange Technology Volume 3
MANCHESTER 2002 THE XVII COMMONWEALTH GAMES • POST GAMES REPORT 5 VOLUME 2 PAG Policy Approvals Group General Volume 1 PIMS Protocol Information Management System Protocol Volume 3 PMR Private Mobile Radio Technology Volume 3 PP Presenting Partner Queen’s Baton Volume 3 PS Private Secretaries Protocol Volume 3 PSTN Public Switched Telephone Network Technology Volume 3 RENOAC Registered Not Accredited Accreditation Volume 3 RFU Rugby Football Union Sport Volume 2 SCG Strategic Commercial Group General Volume 1 SCommsG Strategic Communications Group General Volume 1 SE Sport England General Volume 1 SEC Security Security Volume 1 SIC Sports Information Centre Villages Volume 2 SMG Sport Management Group Venues Volume 3 SMT Strategic Management Team General Volume 1 SNG Satellite News Gathering Broadcast Volume 3 SOC Support Operations Centre Village Volume 2 SOCOG Sydney Organising Committee for the Olympic Games Sport Volume 2 SRB Single Regeneration Budget General Volume 1 TER Technology Equipment Room Technology Volume 3 TOC Technology Operations Centre Technology Volume 3 TOR Technology Operations Room Technology Volume 3 TOV Technical Officials Village Village Volume 2 TPT Transport Transport Volume 1 TTC Table Tennis Centre Venues Volume 2 TVA Team Vehicle Areas Village Volume 2 UCI Union Cycliste Internationale Sport Volume 2 UoS University of Surrey Villages Volume 2 UPS Uninterruptible Power Supply Technology Volume 3 VAHO Venue Accreditation Help Office Accreditation Volume 3 VCC Venue Communications Centre Venue Comms Volume 2 VCP Vehicle Check Point Security Volume 3 VGM Venue General Manager Venues Volume 2 VIK Value In Kind Sponsor Services Volume 1 & 3 VIL Villages Village Volume 2 VIP Very Important Person Protocol Volume 3 VOC Village Operations Centre Village Volume 2 VOE Venue Operations Exercises Games Control Volume 3 VOM Venue Operations Manager Venues Volume 1 VOSA Village Operations Support Area Village Volume 2 VPC Venue Press Centre Media Services Volume 3 VSD Volunteer Services Department Workforce Volume 1 VTM Venue Transport Manager Transport Volume 2 VXM Venue Technology Manager Technology Volume 3 WACWorld Athletics Championships Sport Volume 2 WADA World Anti Doping Agency Sport Volume 2 WIG Workforce Integration Group Workforce Volume 3
6 MANCHESTER 2002 THE XVII COMMONWEALTH GAMES • POST GAMES REPORT VOLUME 2 Section B Sport Operations
B1 Sport Organisation (including Sports Programme) B2 Elite Athletes with a Disability B3 Technical Officials B4 Sport Presentation B5 Victory Ceremonies B5.1 Medals B6 Medical Services to Athletes B7 Anti-Doping Control Programme B8 Sports Equipment B9 Pre-Games Testing Programme B1 Sport Organisation
Overview The Sports Programme and competition management were judged to be a great success and overall press coverage was extremely positive. The 17 sports and their 23 disciplines attracted 3,690 athletes from 72 nations, including the highest ever percentage of women athletes competing (38%). Competition management involved 1,078 Technical Officials from 33 nations. Promoted as the inclusive Games, the Elite Athletes with a Disability (EAD) programme was very well received. Four world records were achieved (two each in Athletics and Swimming) by EADs. The overall quality of venues and sport presentation was praised by athletes and team officials. Larger than expected crowds created a superb atmosphere at all venues reflecting the tremendous response from the public. Huge crowds were attracted to all the Road Events with over 350,000 people lining the streets to watch. The Sport team responsible for planning and delivering the Sports Programme included 74 full-time staff as well as 117 Victory Ceremony volunteers and 1,364 other Sport volunteers.
Key Milestones Closing date for Athlete Entry by numbers 25 January 2002 Training Venues Event Plan finalised 31 March 2002 Final version of Competition Schedule 30 April 2002 Closing date for individual Athlete Entry 25 June 2002
8 MANCHESTER 2002 THE XVII COMMONWEALTH GAMES • POST GAMES REPORT VOLUME 2 Close FF Day 10 Sun 4 Aug F FF HF F Free Events Day 9 Sat 3 Aug Rest Day FF SSS SF HHQSF H H QQ Day 8 Fri 2 Aug Rest Day HF HHHFHF H SHSFF Ceremonies SS Rest Day Day 7 Thurs 1 Aug FF FF FF HF F F F H QQ HH H HHHHHQSHQFSSF d 31 July Day 6 We HHHHHHQQQ SSF F H HFHHHHHFHHFHF F HHHHH Final FF F F F F H HF HF HF es 30 July Day 5 Tu FFFFF FFFFFFFFF HFHFHFHFHF HH Rest Day Semi Final Day 4 Mon 29 July FF FF FH SF FF Day 3 Sun 28 July F Quarter Final Day 2 Sat 27 July FF FF FF FF FF FF Q FF FFF HFH F HF FH HH HH HH QQ SS HH HH HH HH QQ HH HH HH HH HH Day 1 Fri 26 July HF HF HHHHHHHHH SS HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH HHHHHHHHHHHHHFH HHHHHHHQQSSS F Open Heats H Day 0 Thurs 25 July HF HF HF Key le Tennis Centre - Sportcityle Tennis le Tennis Centre - Sportcityle Tennis Salford Quays M.I.C.C. G-MEX City of Manchester Stadium Ta b City of Manchester Stadium Manchester Aquatics Centre Manchester Aquatics Centre Manchester Aquatics Centre City of Manchester Stadium City Centre Route Salford Quays Bolton Arena Bolton Arena Wythenshawe Forum MEN Arena Manchester Velodrome Rivington Rivington Rivington G-MEX Belle Vue Regional Hockey Centre G-MEX Heaton Park MEN Arena City of Manchester Stadium National Shooting Centre - Bisley National Squash Centre - Sportcity National Squash Centre - Sportcity Ta b SPORTS 2002 - 4 AUGUST PROGRAMME 25 JULY Trial (Individual) Trial wn Bowls me iathlon Opening Ceremony Diving Swimming Swimming Synchro & Field Athletics - Track Marathon Walks - Team Badminton - Individual Badminton Heats Boxing Finals Boxing - Track Cycling Ti Mountain Bike Mountain Race Road Gymnastics Hockey Judo La Netball 7s Rugby Shooting Squash - Singles Squash - Doubles - Team Tennis Table - Individual Tennis Table Tr Weightlifting Wr estling Closing Ceremony
MANCHESTER 2002 THE XVII COMMONWEALTH GAMES • POST GAMES REPORT 9 VOLUME 2 M2002 Sport Team The original M2002 organisational structure for strategy and planning included a Sport and Venues division covering three areas: Sport, Venues and Medical. Full-time Senior Sport Managers were responsible for policy and pre-Games events across a group of five/six sports, whilst Competition Managers were engaged, on a part-time basis, to lead and advise on sport specific venue issues. This team was recruited and in place prior to Sydney 2000. Initial venue planning focused very much on the field of play and athlete services. As the organisation developed, the emphasis of venue planning had to focus on support services at venues such as broadcast, media, VIPs, transport, parking, catering, accreditation and technology. It was, therefore, determined that the Venues team should have an identity independent from Sport and a new Venues division was created with a Director of Venues appointed in Spring 2001. The Sport team expanded during 2001 to support the work of the Senior Sport Managers and existing contracts with competition managers were re-negotiated to secure a greater level of involvement than had previously been anticipated through to April 2002. In November 2001, the Sport division was restructured into four departments: Sport Operations, Sport Services, Pre-Games Events and Medical. Their respective pre-Games responsibilities are set out in the organisation chart below.
M2002 Sport Division
Medical Director Sport Director (External)
Deputy Sport Director
Assistant Director Assistant Director Assistant Director Assistant Director Pre-Games Sport Operations Sport Services Sports Medical
M2002 Sport Special Projects Special Projects Senior Sport Village Medical Venue Medical Greater Manchester Cluster Managers Ambulance Service Anti-Doping Manager Coordinator Manager Manager Managers (x4) & St Johns
NGB Sport Policy Medical & Medical & Medical & Cluster Managers Development Support Staff Support Staff Support Staff (x5)
NGB Competition Technical Managers (x24) Officials
Sport Entries & EAD
Sport Information & Publications
Sport Equipment
Victory Ceremonies
Sport Presentation
Contract Manager
10 MANCHESTER 2002 THE XVII COMMONWEALTH GAMES • POST GAMES REPORT VOLUME 2 In April 2002 Competition Managers moved into their respective venue teams mostly working on a full-time basis. Sport volunteers were notified of their Games time roles in May/June and subsequently provided with appropriate training and familiarisation. At Games time, Senior Managers were assigned the following roles: Director of Sport – represented in the GCC, Observer Programme presentations and overall coordination. Assistant Director Sport Operations – GCC and support to Road Events. Senior Sport Manager – GCC, Training Venues and support to Gymnastics, Judo and Wrestling. Sport Entries Coordinator – GCC and support to Hockey and Lawn Bowls. Assistant Director Pre-Games – Training Venues, Observer Programme and support to Rugby, Squash, Weightlifting and Track Cycling. Special Project Manager – UK Sport, British Olympic Association (BOA), Sport England and support to Athletics and Aquatics. Assistant Director Sport Services – Technical Official and Technical Delegate liaison, sport entry information, EAD issues, contract management and support to Netball, Boxing, Shooting and Table Tennis. Deputy Director of Medical Services – GCC and coordination of Village Medical Centre.
Technical Committees Technical Committees were generally made up of National Governing Body (NGB) staff and sport volunteers (appointed for each sport) two years out from the Games. Meeting every three months, their remit was to lead and advise M2002 on sport organisation and related operational requirements. Task specific working groups and sub-committees were established to liaise with Competition Managers and M2002 Sport division on a more regular basis.
Venue Involvement Sport staff and Competition Managers worked in conjunction with Venue teams and relevant Functional Areas (FAs) to ensure that the needs of Athletes and Technical Officials were met and effective operational plans were developed for all training and competition venues. Inputs from Sport included: Specifying operational requirements for competition and training including field of play (FOP), preparation, warm-up and service areas. Cleaning of FOP and athlete/technical official service areas during competition periods. Leading and coordinating arrangements for Games time management of training-only venues. Liaising with Look to ensure that all sporting equipment was positioned correctly.
Third Party Involvement The Sport Division worked with a range of external partners to develop and deliver a successful Sport Programme. Activities involving key third parties included: International Federations (IFs) (x 18): Obtaining sanction for inclusion of the sport within the Sport Programme. Ensuring recognition within the international calendar and obtaining data protection wherever possible. Appointing a Technical Delegate as their representative to the Games to ensure compliance with relevant IF rules. Approving the Sport Programme, event schedule, competition rules and qualification selection procedures where appropriate. Appointing/approving Technical Officials. Approving the Technical Handbook. Validating and seeding entries and assisting with competition draws.
MANCHESTER 2002 THE XVII COMMONWEALTH GAMES • POST GAMES REPORT 11 VOLUME 2 Commonwealth Games Federation: Approving the Sport Programme, event schedule and Technical Handbook. Approving qualification/selection procedures for team sports. Approving all relevant policies and procedures. Commonwealth Games Associations (x 72): Obtaining nominations for Technical Officials. Distributing regular updates of the Sport and Venues Factfile. Advising M2002 on various aspects of competition such as format, rules, maximum entry per nation and qualification/ selection procedures. Promoting competitions for EADs and advising M2002 on rules, classification and eligibility. National Governing Bodies (NGBs): Nominating a senior official as their representative on the Sport Committee. Nominating Competition Managers and representatives for the 17 Sport Technical Committees. Proposing/endorsing the selection of NTOs for the Games. Assisting in the identification and recruitment of Sport volunteers. Sport England: Approving the Sport Programme. Resolving issues such as choice of sport and events for EADs to ensure consistency with Sport England’s policies.
12 MANCHESTER 2002 THE XVII COMMONWEALTH GAMES • POST GAMES REPORT VOLUME 2 Key Lessons and Recommendations Sports Programme and Entries: Scheduling of the Athletics competition at the start of the Games programme was a great success. The Games got off to a flying start establishing a momentum that was sustained through to the Closing Ceremony. Inclusion of events for EADs was another great success and enhanced the overall impact of the Games. The EAD programme should be further developed in future Games. Special arrangements were necessary for athletes aged under 16 years of which there were 97 from 31 competing nations. Guidelines were issued to relevant FAs by the M2002 Child Protection Officer (for further details see volume 1, section C1). Entries for some sports/disciplines were very low making it difficult to create a competitive atmosphere for spectators and television viewers. It is recommended that future competitions carefully scrutinise the inclusion of sports represented in the programme to ensure quality of competition and numbers of competitors. Qualification/selection procedures for team sports should be reviewed to balance the CGF requirement for each region to be represented against the desire for the best teams in the Commonwealth to take part. Late confirmation/withdrawal and inaccuracy of sport entry information created uncertainty and adversely affected planning and delivery of the Sport Programme. The CGF should review the indicative and final sport entry processes and their associated enforcement procedures. Planning and Information: For planning purposes, it is important that the Sport Programme is agreed with IFs as early as possible. It is essential that the varying and specific requirements of each sport are understood and recognised in the venue planning process. However, flexibility is essential in all areas of sport operation in order to adapt to the particular characteristics of a venue and respond to unforeseen circumstances. Every effort should be made to ensure that CAD drawings reflect agreed plans and are delivered in a timely manner particularly where sign off is required from a third party. For example FOP plans need to be approved by the IF Technical Delegate (IFTD). Publication of misleading or inaccurate information should be avoided wherever possible. For example, Technical Handbooks should not be produced until indicative entries are received and all Technical Officials are appointed. Competition Managers (and Venue Managers) have special communication requirements at Games time particularly for Road Events. During the planning phase these requirements need to be fully scoped and acknowledged by Technology. Systems should be rigorously tested prior to the Games. Organisation and Staffing: The Sport FA needs to be properly resourced to contribute effectively to the work of other FAs and the timing of appointment of Competition Managers on a full-time basis carefully considered. The delineation of responsibilities between Venues and Sport needs to be clear and a communication strategy introduced to ensure there is no duplication of work. Close working relationships are needed between Competition Managers and Venue General Managers (VGMs) throughout the planning and delivery of the Games. Wherever possible, Sport staff should be advised of their Games time role on appointment and personnel changes minimised. Organisational and logistical problems can arise in relation to training venues. Responsibility for their operation at Games time should be clearly defined and resourced appropriately. The specification and procurement of sports equipment is complex and a dedicated team is needed to manage the process and deal with related contract issues. Recruitment, training and communication with sport volunteers are best managed by the Sport division independently of the main volunteer programme because of the specialist nature of their work. To benefit delivery of the Games, Sport volunteers need to be sourced and allocated to their roles in sufficient time to participate in training and pre-Games test events.
MANCHESTER 2002 THE XVII COMMONWEALTH GAMES • POST GAMES REPORT 13 VOLUME 2 B2 Elite Athletes with a Disability
Overview For the first time in the history of the Games, indeed at any multi-sport event anywhere in the world, a limited number of full medal events for elite athletes with a disability (EADs) were included in a fully inclusive sports programme. Whilst there are undoubtedly lessons to be learnt for the future, this was a world first of which both Manchester and the Commonwealth Games can be justly proud. Described by Phil Craven, President of the International Paralympic Committee, as “a significant step in the history and development of sport for athletes with a disability”, this programme proved to be one of the highlights of the Games. Manchester 2002 was both a milestone and a benchmark for other multi-sport Games organisers and the philosophy of Games wide inclusivity far exceeded their best expectations. The major question now is ‘where do we go from here?’ A total of 10 events in five sports attracted 160 entries from 20 nations showing strong support for the programme. Some athletes were participating in international disabled competition for the first time and medals won in these events were included in the final medals table, another first.
Sport EAD Event Athletics Men 100m Visually Impaired (B1/B2) Women 800m Wheelchair Lawn Bowls Men Triple Physically Disabled Women Single Blind (B1) Swimming Men 50m Multi Disability Men 100m Multi Disability Women 50m Multi Disability Women 100m Multi Disability Table Tennis Women Single Wheelchair Weightlifting Men Bench Press Physically Disabled A list of EAD entries by CGA for each event can be found in volume 5. The inclusion of events for disabled athletes in a fully inclusive manner not only enhanced the Games but became one of its highlights. The EAD Programme attracted positive media coverage underlined by the images of able bodied and disabled athletes competing side by side particularly at the Lawn Bowls competition. The new David Dixon Award for the Most Outstanding Athlete of the Games was presented to Natalie du Toit, a South African amputee swimmer who was a double gold medallist in both the Women’s EAD Multi-Disability 50m and 100m events and also reached the Final of the able bodied Women’s 800m Freestyle. Four World Records were set by athletes with a disability – Natalie du Toit in both the 50m and 100m multi-disability Swimming events and Adekunte Adesoji from Nigeria in the Men’s 100m sprint for visually impaired athletes. The performance of Lawn Bowler, Ruth Small (England) was a remarkable highlight for the host team, willing her to win gold in the final seconds of the Women’s Blind Singles event. The Games also presented a once in a lifetime opportunity for young local athletes from Sale Harriers in Manchester to be guide runners for the Men’s 100m visually impaired sprinters.
14 MANCHESTER 2002 THE XVII COMMONWEALTH GAMES • POST GAMES REPORT VOLUME 2 Sport Team Overall responsibility for the development of the EAD Programme rested with the Assistant Director, Sport Services. It involved close liaison with the International Paralympic Committee (IPC), Commonwealth Games Federation (CGF), and Commonwealth Games Associations (CGAs) and communication of the inclusivity principles and philosophy to the relevant IFs and NGBs. However, the programme could not have been delivered without the wholehearted commitment of Competition Managers and Technical Committees in each of the five sports hosting events for EADs. The spirit of inclusivity was enthusiastically adopted by the whole organisation and for Sport this meant: Listing of EAD events within formal event schedules. Inclusion of EAD events in the normal running order of events i.e. not bolted on to the front or back of a session. Event terminology that was spectator/media friendly. Assigning Technical Officials to oversee both disabled and able-bodied events. An inclusive podium design for use in all victory ceremonies. A Games transport system that was accessible to people with a disability. For many this was a steep learning curve. However, a commitment from all parties to make it work meant that the many issues arising along the way were properly and speedily addressed.
MANCHESTER 2002 THE XVII COMMONWEALTH GAMES • POST GAMES REPORT 15 VOLUME 2 Venue Involvement In consultations with VGMs, it was necessary to ensure that accessibility to all athlete preparation areas, FOP and other relevant areas for doping control, victory ceremonies and press conference facilities were ratified as accessible. A complete overview and review process also completed for spectators was repeated for athletes and became a significant measure of testing accessibility standards at all Games venues. An accessibility team of experts were consulted to give recommendations and make modifications where required. In addition, there was a need to provide adequate seating for the higher number of spectators with a disability expected to attend these events.
Third Party Involvement The development of the EAD Programme and the successful delivery of the world’s first fully inclusive multi-sport Games, required constructive communication with the following third parties: International Paralympic Committee (IPC): Advice on the programme, competition format, rules and classification/eligibility issues. Imparting a better understanding of the Commonwealth and establishing a database of National Paralympic Committees (NPCs) in Commonwealth nations. Commonwealth Games Federation (CGF): Conveying the implications of M2002’s wholehearted commitment to the inclusivity principle. Raising awareness of the potential impact on future Games. Commonwealth Games Associations (CGAs): Establishing communication links for the first time with disability sport organisations and NPCs in their own nation. Imparting a better understanding of the inclusivity principle i.e. one team not two. National Governing Bodies (NGBs) in the UK: Establishing communication links with disability sport organisations and NPCs in the UK. Imparting a better understanding of inclusivity principles. Raising awareness and understanding of disability issues and the rules of disability sport for Competition Managers and Technical Officials.
Key Lessons and Recommendations Delivery of the EAD Programme was a considerable challenge for the OC. The following lessons and recommendations have emerged from this experience: EAD Sports Programme: The IPC was a key partner for M2002 during the development and delivery of the EAD Programme. Wherever possible, future OCs should avoid entanglement with national disability sports organisations and retain direct contact with the international organisation. The CGF, IPC and future OCs should review the EAD programme and selected events, agree classification procedures as early as possible, and promote the programme collectively. Inclusion of multi-disability Swimming requires agreement with the IPC on rules for determining rank order. Sport Specific Technical Committees for events in the EAD Programme should recruit members with disability expertise.
16 MANCHESTER 2002 THE XVII COMMONWEALTH GAMES • POST GAMES REPORT VOLUME 2 Awareness and Training: It is vital that all FAs fully understand the operational implications of an inclusive sport programme. Ideally, Venue and Competition Management teams and all volunteers should receive training in disability awareness. Competition Managers, Technical Officials and Sport volunteers should also receive appropriate training regarding disability awareness, rules of competition and standard sport specific disability procedures. The CGF and IPC should consider undertaking a formal review of the M2002 experience and agree a way forward for incorporating the principles of inclusivity within the Commonwealth Games. It is important for the OC and the IPC to harmonise their communications with CGAs and NPCs to maximise awareness of the Games EAD programme within Commonwealth nations. It is recommended that future OCs develop a communication programme with CGAs to promote understanding of the EAD programme, competition rules and classification issues. Operational Aspects: Careful planning and design is required to ensure that all athletes can gain access to competition venues including preparation and warm up areas, FOP and designated areas for doping control, victory ceremonies and press conference facilities. This principle also applies to the Games Village, Games transport and training venues. Sports entry and results systems (including local scoreboards) should be designed to meet EAD event requirements. Event descriptions (for media coverage, sport presentation, sport programmes and scoreboards) must be media and spectator friendly. There was a need in Manchester to source and provide essential equipment and training for EADs arriving without racing chairs for the Women’s 800m Wheelchair event and wheelchairs for Lawn Bowls. There was a further requirement to arrange Games time classification for a significant number of disabled athletes who arrived in Manchester without the relevant IPC classification, contrary to eligibility rules for entry to the competition. Finally, the sprint times of the Nigerian visually impaired sprinter who twice broke the 100m B2 World Record, led to a desperate search for a local runner fast enough to guide him.
MANCHESTER 2002 THE XVII COMMONWEALTH GAMES • POST GAMES REPORT 17 VOLUME 2 B3 Technical Officials
Overview A very high standard of officiating was achieved throughout the Games, reinforcing the high quality presentation of all sports and contributing significantly to the overall event. A total of 1,078 Technical Officials from 33 nations were assigned to the Games. Of these, 365 were International Technical Officials (ITOs) generally appointed from nominations received from CGAs in accordance with procedures defined by the CGF Constitution, and 713 were NTOs appointed from within the relevant NGBs by each of the Sport Specific Technical Committees. The breakdown of officials by sport was as follows:
Technical Officials by Sport & Origin 150
England 120 Rest of UK International
90
60
30
0 Judo Boxing Netball Cycling Hockey Squash Triathlon Athletics Shooting Rugby 7s Wrestling Badminton Gymnastics Lawn Bowls Table Tennis Table Weightlifting (Aquatics) Diving (Aquatics) Swimming (Aquatics) Synchro Swimming
Included within the overall total were 269 Officials (25%) from 29 nations who were appointed by International Federations and assigned to International Panels as defined in the CGF Constitution. The breakdown by region for this group was as follows:
Technical Officials by Origin (Percentage)
England (66%) International (25%) Rest of UK (9%)
For the first time in the history of the Games, M2002 communicated directly with each Technical Official rather than through CGAs and/or National Sport Federations (NSFs) which had been common practice in previous Games. Although administratively it was more demanding, the approach proved highly successful in establishing direct personal contact and resolving pre-Games issues such as accessibility/mobility, dietary requirements, uniform sizing, and multi-destination travel itineraries.
Key Milestones Technical Delegates confirmed 1 May 2001 IF/CGF Regulations approved 31 July 2001 All English Technical Officials appointed 31 December 2001 IF Panel Delegates confirmed 28 February 2002 All Technical Aides accredited 1 July 2002
18 MANCHESTER 2002 THE XVII COMMONWEALTH GAMES • POST GAMES REPORT VOLUME 2 Accommodation All Technical Officials (except those for Shooting) were accommodated in the Technical Officials’ Village (TOV) close to the city centre which offered student type accommodation (flats for four to six individuals with shared facilities) as well as a common lounge bar area and temporary Games time catering facility. Peak occupancy of the TOV was 975 on Days 4-6 of the Games. The accommodation was basic, but functional and the quality of the food, the excellent bar/lounge facility and the dedication and efficiency of the staff and volunteers made for a vibrant and friendly atmosphere much appreciated by the vast majority of the officials. One measure of success was the pre-Games welcome party which was attended by 800 Officials. Shooting Technical Officials were accommodated at both Bisley (the competition site) and the Commonwealth Shooting Village at Guildford in Surrey. Overall accommodation requirements amounted to 14,660 bed nights which were provided on a bed and breakfast basis with a cash per diem provided by M2002 for the purchase of other meals. The freedom and flexibility to eat when and where they liked was well received by Technical Officials. Further information on the planning and organisation of the Technical Officials’ Village can be found in section C2 of this volume.
Technical Delegates In addition to Technical Officials, 19 International Technical Delegates were invited to observe the Games and report to their respective Sport Federations. The following delegates attended:
Sport IF Technical Delegate Origin Aquatics Sam Ramsay South Africa Athletics Al Guy Ireland Badminton Gary Walters Canada Boxing Frank Hendry Scotland Cycling Ray Godkin Australia Gymnastics (Men) Hardy Fink Canada Gymnastics (Women) Kym Dowdell Australia Hockey (Men) Muneer Sait India Hockey (Women) Evlyn Raistrick Scotland Judo Francois Besson France Lawn Bowls Kerry Clarke OBE New Zealand Netball Irene O’Brien Scotland “This being my sixth Rugby 7s Fraser Neill Ireland Shooting Fritz Schattleitner Austria Commonwealth Games, Squash Andrew Shelley England Table Tennis Colin Clemett England the fourth as Technical Triathlon Leslie Beckerman Canada Weightlifting Dr. Tamas Ajan Hungary Delegate, I state without Wrestling Michel Dusson France equivocation that the
Observations contained in the formal reports of the IFTDs lie outside the scope of this report but a 2002 Games set a new number of them expressed their thanks formally to the Sport division on their experience at the Games. standard which will not Quoting from the report of the Union Cycliste Internationale(UCI) Technical Delegate, Ray Godkin (Australia): easily be matched in the “The level of Commissionaires (Cycling Technical Officials) both International and National was of future.” the highest standard and they conducted the events accordingly.” Ray Godkin, Australia
“The uniforms supplied were of the highest standard as were the accommodation and transport arrangements.”
MANCHESTER 2002 THE XVII COMMONWEALTH GAMES • POST GAMES REPORT 19 VOLUME 2 Similar sentiments were expressed by other IF Technical Delegates and Officials: “You must all be very proud – a wonderful event – all on our side could only praise and find no fault – I talked with all managers and officials and received only positive comment.” (Evlyn Raistrick, Technical Delegate for Women’s Hockey, Scotland) “In every respect the Games were a roaring triumph of organisation, coordination and enthusiasm.” (Andrew Shelley, Technical Delegate for Squash, England) “The best squash event ever.” (Susie Simcock, President of World Squash Federation)
The Team Management of the Technical Official appointment process was the responsibility of the Assistant Director, Sport Services. A dedicated Technical Officials Liaison Officer was appointed 12 months before the Games to be responsible for pre-Games communication with each Official including: Relevant Games information. Specific arrangements for individual Technical Officials. Pre-Games distribution of non-valid accreditation passes. Travel arrangements for the 216 International Technical Officials (ITOs) to be funded by M2002. The Liaison Officer acted as a one-stop shop for Technical Officials pre-Games and at Games time managed the Sports Information/Technical Officials Help Desk function at the TOV, assisted by four volunteers.
Venue Involvement The primary venues for Technical Officials were the TOV and the Commonwealth Shooting Village (CSV). Management of both facilities was the responsibility of the Villages Venue Team (described in this volume at section C). At competition venues, the Venue Management and Fitout team were responsible for providing the facilities and services scoped by Competition Managers that enabled Technical Officials to undertake their roles in accordance with the rules of the relevant International Federation. Identification and procurement of relevant sports equipment was the responsibility of the Sport Services (Equipment) function working closely with M2002’s Central Procurement team.
20 MANCHESTER 2002 THE XVII COMMONWEALTH GAMES • POST GAMES REPORT VOLUME 2 Third Party Involvement Recruitment of Technical Officials and subsequent communications required effective cooperation with the following third parties: IFs and IFTDs: Advice on the functions and numbers of Officials required. ITO appointments and approvals. Approval of NTO appointments made by Sport Specific Technical Committees. CGAs: Nomination of Technical Officials in accordance with the CGF Constitution. NSFs: Assistance with ITO communication. Nomination of potential replacements in the case of illness or injury.
Key Lessons and Recommendations Nominations: Compliance with the timescales and procedures of the CGF Constitution for the nomination and appointment of ITOs is very difficult for those sports where the IF will ultimately make the ITO appointments regardless of the nominations received from CGAs. It is recommended that the procedures are reviewed by the CGF. There should be early communication with CGAs and IFs (at least 30 months before the Games) to agree the functions and numbers of Technical Officials required, including agreement as to those to be appointed by the IF directly; and to seek nominations from CGAs for specific functions by sport (excluding those functions to be appointed by the IF). This will enable early communication with those ITOs for whom the OC has travel cost responsibility. International Panels: An early review of the CGF Constitution in relation to International Panels is recommended. The Constitution contains confusing terminology at variance with the description of Technical Officials commonly used by IFs. In Manchester only three IFs (Lawn Bowls, Swimming and Triathlon) did not appoint any ITOs travelling at the expense of the OC. The apparent restriction to ‘subjective sports’ only within the Constitution is no longer relevant. Information and Communications: Direct communication between M2002 and each Official significantly improved the quality of pre-Games information received by Technical Officials. Establishing personal contact pre- Games also helped in the resolution of issues at Games time. It is strongly recommended that the OC create a dedicated post for this purpose and that this person is made responsible for the Sports Information/Technical Officials Help Desk at the TOV during Games time. It is essential that all Officials are familiar with timing and scoring equipment and the results software to be used at the Games. Adequate provision should be made for the delivery of pre- Games training programmes to ensure absolute familiarity with Games time systems. National Officials can receive training at pre-Games test events but International Officials can only receive training upon their arrival at the Games. Planning and Operations: The location and quality of Games time accommodation is an important consideration. Technical Officials prefer to be housed together in one dedicated place with appropriate social facilities and good transport links to their venues. The obligation to provide 17 nights accommodation for ITOs is very generous for those sports of only a few days duration. A formula based on start of competition (minus four days) to end of competition (plus two days) would be more equitable. Bed and breakfast terms plus a per diem payment for other meals can reduce OC costs and provide Officials with the flexibility needed. Efficient administrative systems are essential for dealing with Officials including accreditation, uniforms, reimbursement of travel expenses and provision of travel tickets.
MANCHESTER 2002 THE XVII COMMONWEALTH GAMES • POST GAMES REPORT 21 VOLUME 2 B4 Sport Presentation
Overview The Sport Presentation team was responsible for delivering a well-crafted, themed presentation at every sporting venue throughout the Games, communicating information to spectators and building a positive environment for athletes to excel. Specific M2002 themes were used in scripting, music, video clips and scoreboard displays conveying the Manchester style and brand. Along with enthusiastic crowds they contributed to the overall impact of competition that was captured on television and widely reported in the press. The various components of sport presentation were combined to create a unique atmosphere for spectators from gates open to gates close. Announcements and commentary on action from the FOP included welcomes and safety procedures, athlete entries and introductions, Sponsor acknowledgments, scoreboard and video board presentations, and the cueing of victory ceremonies including anthems. Feedback from athletes, officials, sponsors and the media was extremely positive. Plaudits on the professional presentation and exciting atmosphere were also received from the CGF, CGAs and IF members as well as delegates from Athens 2004 and Melbourne 2006.
The Team A third party contractor (Great Big Events) was appointed to create and deliver the sport Sport Presentation presentation for M2002 led by an Executive Producer. Teams were established at all 17 sport Total Staff venues with a total headcount of 225 including 80 volunteers.
Sport Presentation Total Staff A core team operated full-time from M2002 Headquarters within the Sport Department to create the overall content and operational infrastructure for each of the sports. Shortly before the Games, a Sport Presentation team was established for each venue led by a Presentation Manager. The only variation to this model was for Athletics where a separate contractor (Fast Track) provided the Presentation team. Contractors (120) Volunteers (80) Volunteer involvement was high within each Presentation team and hands-on job specific training Paid Staff (25 was given to Presentation Supervisors, Assistants and Spotters during rehearsal periods.
FA and Venue Involvement Presentation Managers were encouraged to meet and work with individual Competition Managers and to liaise closely with representatives from various other FAs including Broadcast, Media Services, Sponsor Services, Victory Ceremonies and Venues. This contact helped to refine operational plans and the associated job-specific training developed for each Presentation team. Presentation Managers integrated well into each of the venue teams. Having them on board a few weeks before the Games provided opportunities to attend key venue meetings, meet with venue teams and build close working relationships. Venue General Managers and their support staff were flexible in accommodating the special requirements of the Presentation teams and provided positive feedback on the exciting atmosphere created by Sport Presentation.
Third Party Involvement Delivery of the successful sport presentation programme involved support and cooperation from the following contractors and third parties: Host Broadcaster (BBC/COMBO): Joint-working to meet operational needs, agreeing a detailed event timetable and creation of excitement build for live broadcasts. Press Managers (via Media Services Department): Joint-working to understand operational requirements, for example the sound levels experienced in the mixed zone.
22 MANCHESTER 2002 THE XVII COMMONWEALTH GAMES • POST GAMES REPORT VOLUME 2 Video Production Contractor (Editz): Commissioned by Sport Presentation to produce video highlights packages, pre-produced video packages and graphics. Audio Production Contractor (Dimension Audio, part of Avesco plc): Supply, installation and technical support for venue sound systems. Video Screens (Screenco): Supply, installation and technical support for fixed screens in venues and mobile screens required for road events. Graphics for Results (Swiss Timing): Creation of required graphics screens as specified by Sport Presentation. CGF/CGAs: Close coordination to ensure that all national anthems were properly recorded and played correctly.
Key Lessons and Recommendations Brand Consistency: Sport Presentation has a powerful and immediate impact at all venues and the team is responsible for delivering a consistent ‘brand’ across the Games. Appointment of a single experienced Sport Presentation provider can remove uncertainty and deliver a professional product. Delivery Coordination: To help ensure quality output, the Sport Presentation team should deal directly with technology suppliers wherever possible. It is beneficial for the team to be closely involved in the planning of Victory Ceremonies from an early stage. Familiarisation and Training: Wherever possible, ensure that all Presentation Managers have an opportunity to be involved in test events.
MANCHESTER 2002 THE XVII COMMONWEALTH GAMES • POST GAMES REPORT 23 VOLUME 2 B5 Victory Ceremonies
Overview The Victory Ceremonies team was responsible for the production of 286 victory ceremonies involving the presentation of 1,482 medals and bouquets at 14 competition venues including Bisley. Delivery of this programme included the following tasks: Planning the victory ceremony schedule in conjunction with Sport and the Host Broadcaster. Scoping the conceptual design for the podia (hailed as a success by EADs). Scoping of operational requirements at the team base (Bessemer Street) and specifying fitout for each venue. Obtaining victory anthems from CGAs (mastered onto CD and copied to all Sport Presentation teams at venues). Assessing flag requirements for victory ceremonies across all venues; procurement through UK Sport; replacement of incorrect flags as necessary; and management of flag system. Assisting in the design and procurement of victory medals; specifying and procuring presentation bouquets and an appropriate presentation cushion/tray. Specifying the design of costumes for medal teams. Identifying the number of VIPs required to present medals/bouquets and arranging nominations and invitations via Protocol. Senior managers from M2002 and selected volunteer staff (a Commonwealth first) were also invited to present medals. Recruiting, training, scheduling and arranging rehearsals for the Crew 2002 Victory Ceremonies team. Arranging for safe storage and distribution of victory medals at Games time. Delivery schedules were set prior to the Games and maintained without any major problems during the Games. Special arrangements were required at the City of Manchester Stadium to overcome potential delays arising from security checks. Presentation items were delivered to Bessemer Street and transported out to Sportcity on a daily basis by the Victory Ceremonies team.
The Team During the planning phase, the team comprised a Victory Ceremonies Manager (focusing on Sportcity venues) and three Coordinators each responsible for a venue cluster. Shortly before the Games, the team was relocated to Bessemer Street and expanded to deliver Games time operations in Manchester and Bisley. A total of 116 volunteers were recruited and assigned to one of a series of mobile teams (14 members per team). A separate and slightly smaller team of 12 was established for Bisley. The Games time team also included Venue Victory Managers (three teams of two) based in Manchester at the City of Manchester Stadium, Aquatics Centre and G-Mex. Their brief was to coordinate victory ceremonies across all venues assigning the mobile teams from Bessemer Street as and when required.
FA Partners and Third Party Involvement Delivery of the victory ceremony programme involved other FAs and a number of third parties: Ceremony Format and Presentation Schedule: The format and timing of medal ceremonies was developed and agreed in conjunction with Venues, Protocol, Sport Presentation and the BBC. Medal Presenters: Medal presenters were determined by the CGF in association with the M2002 Protocol team. Podium Design: A podium was required that was accessible to all athletes including those with a disability. Initial designs were commissioned from an external contractor and further developed by Fitout and Look in consultation with relevant parties. Positive feedback from athletes suggested that functionally the podium was a success but dressing of the fascia and its visual impact overall, particularly in the Stadium, could have been improved. Additional podium sections were required to meet the needs of team sports and had to be transported between venues at Games time.
24 MANCHESTER 2002 THE XVII COMMONWEALTH GAMES • POST GAMES REPORT VOLUME 2 Flag Poles and Indoor Trapeziums: Installation of flag poles at all external venues was the responsibility of the M2002 Fitout team. Indoor trapeziums were provided by two external contractors and installed with motorised raising equipment that required an operator (provided by the suppliers) to be present at every indoor ceremony. Flags: Procurement of flags for victory ceremonies were part of a larger order placed by M2002 with specialist suppliers. Bouquet Design: On behalf of M2002, Interflora (the Official Floral Provider) arranged a local competition to produce a design for the victory ceremonies bouquet. The winning bouquet proved aesthetically pleasing and was simple in design and sturdy enough to withstand the rigours of transportation and delivery around venues. Medal Distribution: Medal storage and distribution services were commissioned from a specialist company (Securitas) that managed deliveries in accordance to an agreed schedule. Special arrangements were required at Salford Quays and Rivington where road closures prevented delivery at a reasonable time of day. In both cases, medals were delivered to Bessemer Street and transported to the venue in a locked cash box by members of the Victory Ceremonies team. Communication Technology: Mobile phones were essential to support Games time operations and were procured via Technology. Use of radios at venues was arranged via the Venues Communication Manager.
Key Lessons and Recommendations The Victory Ceremonies function is best placed within the Sport division but strong internal links are essential with Venue Managers, Look, Fitout and Procurement. Ideally staff should be recruited with relevant specialist knowledge or a background in sport, event management and flags. To promote effective coordination in the lead up to the Games, assigning Victory Ceremony staff to work with venue teams (even on a part-time basis) is worth consideration. Volunteers should be carefully selected and properly trained to ensure a professional product. An assessment of physical ability is also required to assign volunteers to tasks such as podium build and flag hoisting. Assigning staff to mobile ceremony teams represents an efficient use of resources but it can create logistical problems and add to the pressures felt by volunteers. Exposure to risk can be better controlled if teams are permanently assigned to one venue. Design of a suitable uniform/costume for the Victory Ceremony team needs careful consideration and can take some time. Agreements are required from Sport and Broadcast and both should be involved as early as possible in this process. Delivery of a standard podium able to meet the exact requirements of a fully inclusive international multi-sport event is a major challenge. A design solution needs to be agreed as early as possible allowing sufficient time for the testing of any prototype (at least two months prior to the Games) and the inclusion of any subsequent redesign in the final version. Ideally, a correctly sized podium should be procured for each venue, optimising the visual impact of the ceremony and avoiding the logistics of transportation at Games time. Quality control is essential for victory flags. Delivery by an appropriate specialist of flags should be scheduled at least six weeks prior to Games allowing sufficient time for quality checks and replacement orders. Ordering and distribution of medals needs to be managed carefully to ensure sufficient stock at all venues. Ensure staff and volunteers receive adequate radio training before the Games in order to aid communication.
MANCHESTER 2002 THE XVII COMMONWEALTH GAMES • POST GAMES REPORT 25 VOLUME 2 B5.1 Medals
Overview Medals were procured from the Royal Mint in the following numbers: 1,642 victory medals (gold, silver and bronze) for presentation to athletes. 2,500 replica prize medal box sets for presentation to VIPs. 25,000 commemorative medals that were awarded to M2002 staff, volunteers, ceremony performers, athletes, team and technical officials.
Medal Design
Prize Medals 524 x gold, 524 x silver and 594 x bronze – same design in a presentation case. The gold medal had a sterling silver core and was plated with 22 carat gold; the silver medal was sterling silver and the bronze medal solid bronze. Both gold and silver medals were hallmarked. Each medal was 60mm diameter and 6mm width with attached ring/bar and ribbon. The front face featured a stylised version of the Commonwealth Games Federation Crown. The rear face featured the Spirit of Friendship Logo on a textured sub-graphic background. Medal Bar Front: Engraved with the wording: ‘XVII Commonwealth Games’. Ribbons The ribbons were different colours (as per the figures of the Spirit of Friendship logo): blue for gold, red for silver, green for bronze. Each ribbon was of a single colour with M2002 embroidered in self coloured Friendship logo. VIP Medals Replica sets of prize medals (gold, silver, bronze) in presentation case without ring and bar and ribbon. These were 20% smaller than the actual medals. Commemorative Medal: Silver plated 50mm diameter, 5mm width in presentation case displaying M2002 logo. Front face featuring the Spirit of Friendship logo plus the wording: ‘XVII Commonwealth Games’ and ‘Manchester 2002’ and ‘Commemorative Medal’. Rear face designed by the Ceremonies team with a range of images depicting Manchester’s unique history and industrial heritage.
26 MANCHESTER 2002 THE XVII COMMONWEALTH GAMES • POST GAMES REPORT VOLUME 2 The Team Responsibility for victory and commemorative medals was assigned to the former Special Projects division (Ceremonies department) in 1999. At that time their brief included the design, procurement and distribution of all medals. By late 2001 an informal working group had emerged to coordinate medal design and procurement. Led by the Ceremonies Manager (Creative) it included the Victory Ceremonies Manager (Sport) and the Look Manager (Venues). This group undertook the following tasks: Specifying medal designs. Securing sign off from M2002 and the CGF. Confirming final medal numbers. Arranging manufacture via the Royal Mint. Arranging safe storage and distribution through a third party security contactor.
FA/Venue Involvement Specification of medal numbers was supplied collectively by Sport, Protocol and Workforce ahead of confirmation of the final order to the Royal Mint. Distribution and presentation of prize medals to athletes was managed by the Victory Ceremonies team which also assisted in the design and procurement process. Distribution and presentation of replica boxed sets to VIPs was managed by the Protocol team. Distribution of commemorative medals to athletes, team and technical officials was managed via Sport. Similar arrangements for M2002 staff, volunteers and ceremony performers were administered by Workforce. The Commercial department was involved in negotiations regarding sponsorship and VIK deals covering medal production and distribution.
Third Party Involvement An independent report on scope, specifications, design and potential manufacturers was commissioned from a medal design consultant in January 2000. CGF approval of medal designs was obtained between September and December 2001. A production contract for all medals was signed with the Royal Mint in February 2002. Final numbers were confirmed in March.
Key Lessons and Recommendations The design approval process needs to be carefully programmed to ensure that key sign off is achieved as efficiently as possible. If any part of the medal delivery process is sponsored, it is necessary to clarify roles and responsibilities with regard to contract management and logistics. Confirmation of final numbers is essential to avoid over-procurement and wastage but a best-guess may be unavoidable in order to meet production deadlines. Arrangements for distribution of commemorative medals and boxed sets need to be fully scoped, clearly defined and signed off by those involved from other FAs.
MANCHESTER 2002 THE XVII COMMONWEALTH GAMES • POST GAMES REPORT 27 VOLUME 2 B6 Medical Services
Overview Throughout the period of the Games, medical care and ‘hospitalisation’ services were provided for the Games Family at 18 venues, the Village Medical Centre and, where necessary, at other medical or hospital centres. Overall, the OC’s responsibilities for medical services fell in to three categories: Provision of services for athletes and other members of the Games Family. Provision of a Village Medical Centre. Provision of services for spectators.
These services were developed through three committees: Primary Care Sports Medicine Emergency Services
Within these three broad areas the key work streams prior to the Games were: Procurement of medical equipment and consumable items. Contracting for the provision of services not undertaken ‘in house’, namely: first aid staff, ambulance and paramedic services and diagnostic services. Recruitment and training of medical staff. Design of medical areas at venues and at the Athletes’ Village. Specification, resourcing and delivery of optical, dental, imaging and other specialist services. The specification for medical services was developed using information from previous Games, in particular the last two Commonwealth Games and the Sydney Paralympics. Members of the OC also visited the World Student Games and the World Athletics Championships to gain a more accurate understanding of medical benchmarks. Information from these Games indicated a higher level of activity than those expected and eventually experienced by M2002. Although the services provided by M2002 were well utilised, no undue pressures were experienced on the services provided at either the Village Medical Centre or at competition venues. All emergencies were treated appropriately with excellent play zone recovery responses for injured athletes at all venues. Teams were impressed with the world class scanning services (ultrasonography and magnetic resonance) that were available on-site to athletes. Excellent working relationships were established with local health services and the Games had no adverse impact on local health services and levels of hospital activity. In Manchester, pressures on city-wide services from the resident population appeared to decrease during the period of the Games with a very small commensurate increase in contacts from visitors to the city. Medical Services coped well with a number of challenges including: multiple injuries at Mountain Biking; a small number of infectious diseases that required hospitalisation; a suspected outbreak of Norwalk virus; and some teams trying to by-pass the arrangements put in place for their medical care. Medical Contacts 500 Games Family 400
300
No. of Contacts 200
100
0
15-Jul16-Jul17-Jul18-Jul19-Jul20-Jul21-Jul22-Jul23-Jul24-Jul25-Jul26-Jul27-Jul28-Jul29-Jul30-Jul31-Jul1-Aug2-Aug3-Aug4-Aug5-Aug6-Aug
28 MANCHESTER 2002 THE XVII COMMONWEALTH GAMES • POST GAMES REPORT VOLUME 2 Medical Contacts 300 Spectators First Aid 250 Ambulance
200
150
No. of Contacts 100
50
0
25-Jul 26-Jul 27-Jul 28-Jul 29-Jul 30-Jul 31-Jul 1-Aug 2-Aug 3-Aug 4-Aug 5-Aug
Over the period 15 July – 7 August there were 4,767 contacts from athletes and other Games Family members. Between 25 July – 4 August 2,007 spectators were treated by first aiders, 153 requiring an ambulance.
The Team The Medical Services team was located at the Village Medical Centre. The core team consisted of the Medical Director, Assistant Director and Village Medical Centre Manager. Their Games time role was to ensure that medical services in the Village and at venues were appropriately staffed and resourced. Additional staff were deployed during the Games to assist the team with re- stocking of venues and resolving staffing issues as they arose. With the exception of the core team, all 500 staff were volunteers who were recruited from across the UK. Each competition venue was managed by a Venue Medical Manager. Venue staff were pivotal to the successful operation of medical services at venue level. All staff attended one of two training days in early May and additional training was provided for the Venue Medical Managers and for crowd doctors. Venue orientation training was also available. The Medical Director was assisted by a team of specialist advisors in the lead up to the Games, namely: An expert in sports medicine. A primary care advisor. An emergency services advisor. Two highly respected physiotherapy advisors. During Games time the advisors assisted with the management and deployment of specialist staff and provided professional advice and guidance.
Key FA Partners and Contacts Two organisations were contracted to provide services for the Games: St John’s Ambulance provided first aid staff for spectators at all competition venues; and Greater Manchester Ambulance Service provided paramedics and ambulances at all venues for both spectators and athletes. The Assistant Director of Medical Services was seconded to the Games in February 2001 from the Department of Health. Radiology and laboratory tests were carried out by local NHS Trusts. Samples were collected by staff at the Village Medical Centre and results were returned within four hours. Hospital specialists acted as on-call experts to the medical services staff. The infectious diseases unit at the Pennine Acute Trust provided a fast referral and advisory service.
MANCHESTER 2002 THE XVII COMMONWEALTH GAMES • POST GAMES REPORT 29 VOLUME 2 Manchester Health Authority undertook a review of city wide major incident plans in preparation for the Games and assisted in the preparation of the city for the increase in visitor numbers. The Games received daily health surveillance reports from the Greater Manchester Health Protection Unit to establish a high standard of service within the precinct of the Games.
Competition Venues Recommendations contained in Government Safety Guidelines (‘Event Safety Guide’ and ‘Guide to Safety at Sports Grounds’) were adopted by the Medical Services team to ensure that there was a consistent approach to the number and type of staff deployed at all Games competition venues. The guidelines refer to the number of first aiders, crowd doctors and paramedics appropriate to an event. Risk assessments were undertaken for all venues in order to document and foresee any possible risks arising from insurance claims. In addition, the International Federations made recommendations on high risk sports that would require paramedics or ambulances in attendance during competition and/or training events. Paramedic ambulances were provided at Athletics, Boxing, Cycling, Gymnastics, Hockey, Judo, Shooting, Road Events, Rugby 7s and Wrestling. Each competition venue had the following core team: Venue Medical Manager Crowd doctor First aiders Sports medicine doctor Physiotherapists and/or sports massage therapists Paramedics A medical room for athletes was established at each venue. Physiotherapy and massage therapy areas were also provided at each venue for the use of accredited athletes and technical officials. A first aid room was provided for spectators. Staff were on site two hours before competition started and remained in post until all athletes had been treated or, in the case of first aiders and crowd doctors, until spectators had left the venue. Wherever possible, injured athletes were transferred to the Village Medical Centre for treatment rather than Accident and Emergency Departments in order to reduce the burden on local hospitals. Athlete medical service teams treated 1,068 athletes at competition and training venues. The projected workload for spectator services, using information from previous Games was 1,500 contacts.
Village Medical Centre The Village Medical Centre was staffed with the following professionals: Village Medical Centre Manager Receptionists Pharmacists Radiologists Physiotherapists Massage therapists Sports medicine doctors General practitioners Dental staff Optometrists Nurses Orthopaedic surgeons Podiatrists The Centre was open from 07:00–23:00 daily from 15 July – 7 August with a doctor and nurse on duty overnight.
30 MANCHESTER 2002 THE XVII COMMONWEALTH GAMES • POST GAMES REPORT VOLUME 2 The projected loadings for medical services at the Village Medical Centre were calculated using statistical data collected from the Commonwealth Games in Kuala Lumpur and Victoria and actual workload information from the Sydney Paralympics. The space allocation for the Village Medical Centre was smaller than required and as a result some delays were encountered at peak times, particularly for treatments involving sports medicine or physiotherapy. However, the actual workload experienced at the Games was less than predicted (see table below) and there were few delays overall. All requests for dental or eye services were met as well as on-site imaging services with full access to expert radiologists. The number of people admitted to hospital was also lower than expected with 12 patients admitted for a total of 22 in-patient days.
Medical Team Workload Service Predicted workload Actual workload Primary Care & Sports Medicine 1,500 Primary Care 1,080 Sports Medicine 191 Eye services 400 206 Dental services 400 150 Physiotherapy 3,000 1,719 Pharmacy 2,000 1,316 X Ray & Ultra sound 400 227 Magnetic Resonance Imaging 200 99 Pathology 200 Podiatry 100 In patients 22 11 Total 8,122 5,099
Medical services at the Bisley Shooting Village, were provided on an ad-hoc basis by agreement with local dentists, optometrists, pharmacists and hospitals. Athletes and Games Family members were assessed by the doctor based at the Village and referred to other services as necessary. An overnight visiting doctor service was also provided to athletes. Access to this service was arranged following a telephone consultation by the doctor on duty overnight at the Village Medical Centre in Manchester.
Non-Competition Venues Main Press Centre/Host Hotel and Technical Officials Village: First aid was available at all non-competition venues. Outreach clinics were provided twice daily at the Host Hotel and the Technical Officials Village (TOV). A general practitioner and nurse from the Village Medical Centre visited the hotels to provide this service. Training Venues: A pool of physiotherapists based at the Village Medical Centre provided physiotherapy at training venues from 15 July – 3 August. Physiotherapists for team sports could be booked in advance at the Sports Information Desk. Other training venues were allocated a physiotherapist on demand between 07:30 and 20:30 daily. A paramedic ambulance was provided at training venues where required according to International Federation rules.
Legacy A core group of experienced medical staff who have had the opportunity to enhance their skills through the training provided by medical services and to gain practical experience in both crowd and sports medicine.
MANCHESTER 2002 THE XVII COMMONWEALTH GAMES • POST GAMES REPORT 31 VOLUME 2 Key Lessons and Recommendations Future OCs should review the medical data from other Games in the light of local clinical practices, skill mix, experience and level of qualifications in order to help plan their services. Medical services should be delivered by a core group of full-time, paid healthcare professionals supplemented by volunteers. First aid staff should come under the direct management of the Games organisation. Ideally, they should be part of the Venue Medical team, managed by the Venue Medical Manager and accountable directly to Games Medical Services. The OC should directly control the recruitment and ongoing communication with the medical workforce in the lead up to the Games. A small reserve team of experienced and adaptable staff should be created to assist at venues and cover for absentees. Venue medical services should be managed by full-time paid staff from two weeks prior to bump-in through to post-Games bump-out. Medical Services personnel should be fully involved in the pre-Games testing process. Where an OC uses volunteer staff, consideration should be given to providing accommodation. This can result in much greater time commitment from personnel and reduce the complexity of managing a changing workforce. Careful consideration needs to be given to the ratio of sports medicine and primary care physicians in the Village Medical Centre to reflect the workload. Where medical staff need to work across a number of venues the accreditation system should ensure easy access to multiple venues. A legacy programme of enhanced local skills and direct donation of medical equipment should be planned prior to the Games.
32 MANCHESTER 2002 THE XVII COMMONWEALTH GAMES • POST GAMES REPORT VOLUME 2 B7 Anti-Doping Programme
Overview Anti-Doping formed part of the Medical Services department of the Sport division. It was responsible for ensuring that drug testing was carried out in accordance with the requirements of the Commonwealth Games Constitution and it demonstrated M2002 and UK Sport’s commitment to drug-free sport. UK Sport was contracted to provide M2002’s Anti-Doping Programme along with King’s College, London, which provided laboratory analysis, DHL who provided courier services and Kittiwake which supplied equipment. The CGF’s Honorary Medical Advisor (HMA) liaised with IFs to determine the policy for selecting athletes for testing and the type of testing to be administered. During the Games the HMA was replaced by the Acting HMA to oversee the delivery of this service. Although it was initially thought that blood testing would not be required, just before the Games the CGF requested that blood testing be included in the screening process. Testing occurred in all sports and at all venues including the Games Number of urine samples taken during the Games Village, and included EADs. There was interaction therefore with 150 several other FAs, and with venue teams. There were no significant operational issues at any of the venues which might 120 have compromised the integrity of the samples collected.
In total there were 978 test samples only two of which were 90 taken outside of competition. Of these, 961 were urine tests and
17 blood tests. The figures for male and female athletes were No. samples 60 568 and 410 respectively. The programme of testing in Manchester represented the 30 highest number of cumulative samples processed in the history of UK Sport’s Anti-Doping Directorate for any major competition. 0
The Anti-Doping Team 25-Jul 26-Jul 27-Jul 28-Jul 29-Jul 30-Jul 31-Jul 1-Aug 2-Aug 3-Aug 4-Aug Management of the Doping Control Programme came under the remit of the Director and Assistant Director of Medical Services. Control was then devolved to the Anti-Doping Manager, who was a staff Anti-Doping Structure member from UK Sport based at Games Headquarters part-time. The CGF HMA appointed a Medical Commission for the Games. Medical CGF Honorary UK Sport Director This comprised over 20 representatives from around the world Commission Advisor of Anti Doping who were responsible for representing the IFs and the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) ensuring the quality and accuracy of HMA testing sessions. M2002 Director of Medical Services Testing was overseen by the CGF Medical Commission and co- M2002 ordinated by the HMA. UK Sport’s Director of Anti-Doping offered WADA support to the Medical Commission, as well as liaising with the Anti-Doping UK Sport Manager & Team WADA observer team. The Anti-Doping Manager and UK Sport M2002 Assistant CGF Director of staff managed operations from the Anti-Doping Headquarters, Medical Services whilst staff at UK Sport’s London office processed the results received from the laboratory. The testing teams comprised the lead Independent Sampling Officer (ISO) (responsible for co-ordinating Anti-Doping Manager & Team the anti-doping process), team ISOs (who carried out testing), volunteer chaperones (who notified and escorted athletes), and World Anti- volunteer drivers/support staff (who provided additional assistance Doping Agency to the team). Observers Testing Station The staff at the competition venues worked very well as a team. CGF Medical Staffing levels were adequate at all the venues, although as Commissioners anticipated, there was occasionally a lack of space for the number Lead ISO of people involved. ISOs gave the volunteer chaperones on the job training and advice. Wherever possible the same teams were assigned to particular sports/venues to ensure continuity. Team ISOs Chaperones Support Staff
MANCHESTER 2002 THE XVII COMMONWEALTH GAMES • POST GAMES REPORT 33 VOLUME 2 UK Sport Team The UK Sport team in Manchester comprised of one staff member (the Anti-Doping Manager) until Anti-Doping Staffing one week before the Games when the team expanded with additional secondees from UK Sport. The new staff did not have sufficient time to get acquainted with the venues or key contacts, and the management team had to work intensively for the first four days of the Games to integrate the new staff. This process resulted in a difficult transition for many venue teams but improved after the fifth day of the Games. Independent Sampling Officers A day-long training session was conducted with lead ISOs approximately four months before the Games. All ISOs received a Games information pack, which included an overview of the Games Volunteers (92) and specific information on matters such as accommodation, transportation and catering. At Contractors (61) Games time each lead ISO was provided with an information pack and verbal briefing on the UK Sport Staff (7) venue and competition prior to leaving headquarters for a new event. M2002 Volunteers UK Sport staff interviewed and recruited 92 M2002 volunteers – 67 chaperones/drivers and 25 support staff. The chaperones underwent rigorous training including three sessions at competitions to gain practical experience. The standard was very high, with many volunteers excelling at the job, and all showing enthusiasm and commitment. The attrition rate from the day of recruitment was approx 25%, although most occurred in the early stages, with very little attrition after the first event. Many chaperones put in long hours during the Games, and showed themselves to be flexible and highly motivated. Volunteers recruited to be drivers also assisted the teams at competition venues. As well as driving teams and samples to and from venues they carried out duties such as maintaining the security of the Anti-Doping Station, completing the entry and exit log, and occasionally escorting competitors. Drivers had completed one intensive training session. It was always understood that the escorting duties would be the exception and the use of additional staff for escorting was greatly appreciated.
Venue Involvement Anti-Doping Stations were established at each competition venue, and at the CGV. The facilities were either already existing, or designed according to plans provided by UK Sport and met international guidelines. The Anti-Doping Manager was responsible for final sign-off of the venues, including fitout and equipment. Venue facilities were located near to the FOP and accredited-only athlete areas. This was critical to avoid media intrusion and restrict general access. The facilities in the main were of a higher standard than UK Sport generally encountered in its regular testing programme, although comments were made that some were on the small side (for example, those at the Manchester Aquatics Centre). Stations were established for the exclusive use of Anti-Doping teams and were kept locked when not in use. The stations were only used on days of testing, and were in general opened at least one hour before the start of competition. Testing was usually completed within two hours of the end of competition.
Key FA Partners and Third Parties Since Anti-Doping was an autonomous area, there was limited integration with many FAs, although there was close advance liaison with Sport Managers, Accreditation, Cleaning and Waste, Ceremonies and Media Services. WADA had an independent observer team at the Games who attended random testing sessions and produced a report on the effectiveness of the testing programme. An integral part of the success of the programme was the positive partnership developed between M2002 and UK Sport. A manager from the UK Sport team working in Manchester with the OC ensured a clear and efficient flow of information between the two groups. Liaison between UK Sport and M2002 Sport Managers/Venue Managers was also critical to ensure overall understanding of what was involved and expected on both sides. A certain amount of natural cynicism towards drug-testers was dispelled from the beginning due to this close working relationship.
34 MANCHESTER 2002 THE XVII COMMONWEALTH GAMES • POST GAMES REPORT VOLUME 2 The Anti-Doping Manager attended several Team Managers’ Meetings before and during the Games and presented an overview of testing, the selection policy and the procedure for athlete notification and athlete reporting procedures to Anti-Doping post competition. These meetings proved to be very useful in that they gave Team Managers vital information to take back to their teams and eliminated some of the concerns about the testing process. An Anti-Doping Handbook was sent to all CGAs six months prior to the Games and information was easily available on UK Sport’s website. Athletes in the UK were able to access a comprehensive Games specific education programme, implemented by UK Sport as a resource. Future organisers may want to expand the information which goes to overseas teams, particularly aimed at individual athletes and national teams rather than CGAs, despite this not being a requirement of the Constitution. Liaison with the media in regard to the official release of any result information was handled through the CGF where PR protocol would release the information via a media release.
Third Party Involvement DHL provided an overnight courier service for the Anti-Doping programme. A flexible agreement was drawn up in advance whereby staff at headquarters could telephone DHL when samples were ready for collection. There was also the option of an additional pick-up on request. DHL transported the samples directly to London for analysis. The IOC accredited laboratory was at King’s College, London. The working relationship between the laboratory and UK Sport was very effective during the Games. Quality control samples were submitted to the lab by the CGF, which were correctly analysed.
Key Lessons and Recommendations By contracting with the national testing organisation, M2002 was able to call on the expertise and experience of a well established and respected body. Early liaison with the CGF with regard to test type and distribution is strongly recommended. A close working relationship with the HMA is also crucial in the planning phase to eliminate any ambiguity in the CGF Constitution including guidelines detailing the number of tests. In each host nation this decision must be at the discretion of the HMA. Contact with the WADA observer team is critical to coordinate their presence at events and to pass on information regarding their expectations of the testing teams. The planning of venue anti-doping facilities should begin as early as possible in the venue planning process. Where venues are dispersed, venue-specific, or venue-cluster specific staff, should be deployed to supply a more structured approach to the testing programme. The transport system for Anti-Doping personnel needs to be carefully planned in order to ensure ease of movement between venues and around the Host City. Pre-Games and Games time testing should be separated as much as possible. The two types of testing require very different management and a staff member dedicated to coordinating pre-Games testing, such as liaising with teams regarding athlete selection and with the OC on athlete whereabouts, would be invaluable. Venue familiarisation for staff should start as soon as is feasible in order to make operational structures for transportation, catering and accommodation effective. The accreditation system needs to be flexible enough to allow testing teams to access all venues with ease. Blood testing needs to be planned well in advance of the Games. Resources and experienced staff qualified to take blood samples should be recruited along with existing chaperones.
MANCHESTER 2002 THE XVII COMMONWEALTH GAMES • POST GAMES REPORT 35 VOLUME 2 B8 Sports Equipment
Overview Competition Managers for each sport/discipline were requested to make a preliminary assessment of all their sport specific equipment needs 24 months before the Games. Sport acted as the client department and over the following 18 months a great deal of further work was necessary to clarify legacy arrangements and to confirm the scope of capital items and consumables ahead of procurement.
Lottery Sport Fund Immediately post Sydney 2000, agreement was reached with Sport England that M2002 should make a Lottery Sport Fund (LSF) application for all sports equipment with a legacy potential. The LSF bid was submitted in March 2001 but the final award of £1.85 million was subsequently subsumed within a much larger Sport England grant for the Games. Sport England became more closely involved with the overall procurement process and was required to: Approve the sports equipment list by sport/discipline. Determine whether capital items should be hired or purchased dependent upon legacy potential and cost/benefit analysis. Advise on preferred legacy destinations. Approve Look proposals.
The Team In July 2001, a Sports Equipment Manager was appointed to determine requirements and draw up specifications for Procurement. However the scope of work was underestimated and additional staff were required to assist with this task. Between March – June 2002 a further three dedicated Sport Contract Managers were recruited to complete the procurement process and manage legacy arrangements. Their responsibilities included: Establishing a close working relationship with suppliers. Administering relevant contract variations. Managing the issue resolution process. Coordinating the delivery of equipment to venues. Coordinating post-Games legacy arrangements. Financial administration of relevant accounts.
36 MANCHESTER 2002 THE XVII COMMONWEALTH GAMES • POST GAMES REPORT VOLUME 2 Scoping and Procurement of Equipment From the outset, items of sports equipment were allocated to one of three procurement categories: Major capital items (over £30,000) Minor capital items Consumables
As the Games drew nearer however, this initial scope was revisited and amended by Competition Managers and Sport England, which reduced the time available for the procurement process. Changes arose due to: Unexpected changes to indicative entry numbers (for example, the need for a second boxing ring and associated equipment). Different interpretations of relevant IF rules and regulations. Clarification of essential information late in the process, such as branding details from Look, installation, maintenance and Games time accommodation requirements for servicing contractors.
Legacy Arrangements Sport England were responsible for specifying the legacy destination of every piece of sports equipment and up to 1,000 items have been relocated to venues around the country. Over 50 organisations, including community venues, English Institute of Sport venues and major event venues, have received items of equipment, which have already been used for events, competitions and elite athlete strength and conditioning training. The Athletics track is to be re-laid at the National Indoor Arena in Birmingham for use at the 2003 World Indoor Athletics Championships.
Key Lessons and Recommendations Procurement of sporting equipment for a major multi-sport event is far from straightforward. Due account should be taken of the following aspects: Organisation: Demands on Sport as the client FA for sports equipment should not be underestimated and the whole process has to be properly managed and resourced. It requires a collaborative approach involving Sport, Look, Procurement and Finance. A dedicated Contract Management team for sports equipment contracts. Scoping/Specification: Confusion can arise when defining the term ‘sports equipment’. For M2002 it needed to encompass all operational requirements at Games time. However, Competition Managers and NGBs are likely to underscope their requirements for the Games. They have a narrower view of what constitutes sports equipment that excludes some consumables, cleaning equipment and other materials required for the FOP. Do not assume that NGBs or Competition Managers have a full and complete understanding of the relevant IF rules, regulations and expectations. The scope of requirements will change in the lead up to the Games and Sport needs to gain a thorough understanding of the procurement process and associated timelines, and appreciate their obligations in this regard. Avoid late disputes and delivery delays by ensuring that equipment specifications are complete in every detail. Sponsorship and Branding: Considerable time can elapse while awaiting the outcome of any sports equipment sponsorship deals, official supplier agreements or other VIK supply arrangements. Accommodating the demands of the Look Programme is a complex and time consuming process. The principles of branding need to be understood at an early stage.
MANCHESTER 2002 THE XVII COMMONWEALTH GAMES • POST GAMES REPORT 37 VOLUME 2 B9 Pre-Games Testing Programme
Overview In partnership with NGBs, the pre-Games Events Programme was designed to test Games time planning principles in the ‘field’ at regional, national and international sporting events in Manchester prior to the Games. Key programme aims included: Testing and assessing risk. Turning planning principles into operation. Ensuring clarity of Games time responsibilities. Developing team work and cohesion and testing the readiness of the organisation for Games time operation. In order to meet testing requirements, M2002 worked closely with NGBs to organise new events or bring existing events to Games venues in Manchester. In many cases, new Games routes, courses, and venues were used to test a wide range of operational requirements. Three pre-Games Events were undertaken in 2001 (Triathlon, Marathon, Shooting). Between January and July 2002 a total of 20 events were staged as part of the main pre-Games programme. The majority of these events took place at Games venues. M2002’s involvement ranged from observation through to full testing scenarios for all FAs. De-briefing sessions were held after every event with monitoring reports outlining the key issues for resolution and lessons learned.
Pre-Games Event Programme 12 August 2001 Triathlon – Salford Quays 24-30 August 2001 Shooting – Commonwealth Championships – Bisley 23 September 2001 Marathon – Manchester 14-16 December 2001 Gymnastics – World Cup Grand Prix 18-20 January 2002 Badminton – Under 19 – Bolton Arena 19-20 January 2002 Weightlifting – British Championships – ICC 8-10 February 2002 Diving – British Championships – MAC 8-9 February 2002 Cycling Track – Invitational – NCC 5 March 2002 Netball – International Invitation – MEN Arena 16 March 2002 Synchronised Swimming – Inter District – MAC 10-15 April 2002 Swimming – British Championships – MAC 13-19 April 2002 Squash – World Doubles Championships – NSC 21 April 2002 Walks – Salford Quays 24-26 April 2002 Boxing – Junior ABA Quarter and Semi- Finals, Wythenshawe 5-6 May 2002 Rugby – Under 15 – CMS 18 May 2002 Judo – Team Invitational – Wigan 25-26 May 2002 Athletics – Under 20’s Northern Counties – CMS 1 June 2002 Wrestling – British Championships – Sugden Centre 14-16 June 2002 Hockey – International Invitational – Belle Vue 14-16 June 2002 Lawn Bowls –Invitational – Heaton Park 15-16 June 2002 Athletics – Commonwealth Trials – CMS 16 June 2002 Mountain Bike – International Invitational-Rivington 30 June 2002 Road Cycling – British Championships – Rivington 1-7 July 2002 Table Tennis – Invitational – ITC
38 MANCHESTER 2002 THE XVII COMMONWEALTH GAMES • POST GAMES REPORT VOLUME 2 The Team M2002 established a Pre-Games Events team to work closely with NGBs. The team ensured that detailed operating plans were developed for the events and that testing objectives were met. The following three events were organised as ‘full’ test events to enable a full range of FA testing objectives to be achieved: Commonwealth Games Weightlifting Trials – January 2002 Commonwealth Games Swimming Trials – April 2002 Commonwealth Games Athletics Trials – June 2002 The testing objectives ranged from venue and field of play familiarisation to the testing of spectator flows and a trial of the timing, scoring and results systems. The operational delivery of all services mirrored, as far as possible, Game time mode. The following is a summary of all Pre-Games events conducted. In all cases, M2002 paid a contribution towards the additional costs incurred as a result of either bringing an existing event to Manchester (for example, the British Diving Championships at the Aquatics Centre), or by organising a one-off event in order to test a new venue (for example, the Under-15 Rugby event at the City of Manchester Stadium).
Pre-Games Event Summary Under 19 National Badminton Championships – 18-20 January 2002 (Badminton Association of England) This event was staged at the Bolton Arena and was designed to test venue logistics, the competition environment and to enhance venue familiarisation. A layout test was also combined with the event to mirror the physical layout of Sponsor signage, presentation areas, medal ceremony location, athlete preparation areas and seating layout.
British Weightlifting Championships & Commonwealth Trials – 19-20 January 2002 (British Amateur Weightlifting Association) The British Championships are an annual event staged on a modest budget. The aim of supporting this event was to test out the new venue which was normally an auditorium and not a sporting arena. This was a full test of all FAs including logistics, competition schedule, lifting platform, EAD access, seating configuration, lighting, scoreboard and PA systems.
British Diving Championships – 8-10 February 2002 (Amateur Swimming Association) The Championships, normally held in Sheffield, were moved to the Manchester Aquatics Centre (MAC) providing an ideal opportunity to test the logistical requirements of the competition and venue in Diving mode. The event mirrored the Games time schedule, established the athlete preparation areas, tested camera positions and the full set-up of the diving pool presentation areas.
Pre-Games Track Cycling Invitational Event – 8-9 September 2002 (British Cycling Federation) The purpose of this event was to test the outcome of the lab based timing and results software development. The event was a ‘closed test’ designed to ensure software compatibility and to simulate the Games time results process.
Netball International Series Match – 5 March 2002 (All England Netball Association) This event was brought to Manchester by the AENA as part of a test series. As the new Games time playing surface was not available, this event was primarily a test for M2002’s Technology department who tested results, timing and system integration.
Inter District Synchronised Swimming Championships 16 March 2002 (Amateur Swimming Association) Normally staged in Wigan and/or Radcliffe Pools, this event provided an opportunity to test the logistics of the MAC for Synchronised Swimming. The test involved the trial of the under-water music system and the PA system. This was the first Synchronised Swimming event staged at MAC, and was the first opportunity for competition management to familiarise themselves with the set-up.
MANCHESTER 2002 THE XVII COMMONWEALTH GAMES • POST GAMES REPORT 39 VOLUME 2 British Swimming Championships and Commonwealth Trials – 10-15 April 2002 (Amateur Swimming Association) This event enabled M2002 and the Amateur Swimming Federation Great Britain (ASFGB) to test the logistics of the venue, to identify and test flows of athletes, officials and workforce and to simulate the Games time competition schedule. M2002’s contribution assisted with the costs to allow FAs to deliver services in full-event mode. The major impact the test had on the venue was closing it to public access for just under a week.
British Open Squash Championships and Pre-Games Doubles Invitation – 13-19 April 2002 (England Squash) This event was the first to be staged at the newly completed National Squash Centre (NSC). It tested venue logistics, elements of workforce, competition management and spectator, athlete and competition officials flows. The discipline of squash doubles was relatively new event to the UK so match officials needed the opportunity to ‘test’ in this mode prior to the Games.
Commonwealth Trials & European Grand Prix Walks Championship – 21 April 2002 (UK Athletics) This event was an opportunity to test the Games time course at Salford Quays. The test involved marking out the walk course, setting up strategic positions for walks officials, course marshals and crowd positions and enabled the competitors to experience the course in competition mode.
ABA Junior Boxing Championships – 24-26 April 2002 This event was normally staged at clubs across England, but was switched to Manchester to test Wythenshawe Forum in Games time mode. With over 250 athletes, officials, medics, judges and volunteers the event tested scoring and results software, the competition schedule and venue logistics.
CB 10’s Under 15 Rugby – 6 May 2002 (Rugby Football Union) This was a new event designed by the RFU to test out the training venue, the legacy track and the Stadium as a rugby venue. The final day mirrored the Games time competition structure. The event was also part of the process of attaining a licence for the Stadium. A total of 800 male and female rugby players took part in the event.
Home Nations Team Judo Championship – 18 May 2002 (British Judo Association) This event was designed to give athletes and officials of the BJA the chance to become familiar with competing on a Games time podium and the playing surface specifically procured for Games competition. The set-up and take-down times were tested to assist in estimating Games time transition periods.
Under 20’s North of England Athletic Championships – 25-26 May 2002 (UK Athletics) Usually staged at a venue provided free of charge (or at little cost) this event was the first opportunity to test Athletics at the Stadium. Used as part of the licensing programme, the event costs were higher than normal because of the need to bring forward service provision in the venue.
British Wrestling Championships and Commonwealth Trials – 01 June 2002 (British Wrestling Association) This event was also designed as an opportunity for British Wrestlers to compete on the Games time podium, and again test the new sports equipment procured for the Games.
Eight Nations Invitational Hockey Championships – 14-16 June 2002 (English Hockey Association) Taking place at Belle Vue, this event was intended to test out the competition requirements of Hockey at this new venue. The event tested the venue logistics and enabled England Hockey and M2002 to improve their familiarity with the venue and test the playing surface.
40 MANCHESTER 2002 THE XVII COMMONWEALTH GAMES • POST GAMES REPORT VOLUME 2 Pre-Games Lawn Bowls Invitational – 14-16 June 2002 (English Bowling Association) The event provided the first opportunity to test the venue in competition mode and gave M2002 and the English Bowling Association (EBA) the chance to replicate the Games time competition schedule. The event attracted competitors from the four Home Nations.
Athletics Commonwealth Trials – 15-16 June 2002 (English Amateur Athletics Association) This event was classified as a full ‘dress rehearsal’, testing all elements of operational delivery. It formed the final test event before Games time and was linked to testing of command and control functions through the GCC. Competition Managers, Venue Managers and Technology Managers all reported in their Games time operating mode and escalated issues through to their direct managers. Reporting structures and clear lines of communication were more clearly defined as a result of enhancing the Games time delivery reporting structure and operations of the GCC.
Pre-Games Invitational Mountain Bike Championships – 16 June 2002 (British Cycling Federation) This event was set-up as a one-off opportunity to test the Games time course at Rivington. M2002 met the costs of setting up the course, holding a practice session, managing the competition, training staff and accommodating officials, athletes and support staff close to the course.
British Road Cycling Championships – 30 June 2002 (British Cycling Federation) Held annually in any part of the UK, this event was brought to Rivington as an opportunity to test the Games Road Cycling course. It tested the logistics of setting up and managing the course, and provided competition management with a practical test of their operating plan for the event and gave the local community and emergency services a chance to understand the impact of the event on the area. A course that at one time attracted some residential concerns, was accepted and welcomed to the area winning much needed support for the Games.
Pre-Games Invitational Table Tennis Tournament – 01-07 July 2002 (English Table Tennis Assoc) As the first event to be staged in the new Tennis Centre at Sportcity, this tournament provided an opportunity to test all aspects of the centre prior to the Games. This event provided a perfect opportunity to test the physical (ie: lighting, sound) and aesthetic aspects of the building.
Key Lessons and Recommendations Timescales: Establishing a programme, budget and team to deliver the Pre-Games Events Programme should be one of the early key priorities. Pre-Games Events need to be scheduled to occur at a critical time to link with Games time planning needs and allow the lessons learnt from the test events to be included in the final operating plan. Consultation with NGBs: Full consultation is required with NGB officials and volunteers to ensure that testing objectives are fully understood and agreed. The OC should negotiate an early contractual agreement for events to be brought to the Host City in conjunction with each of the NGB and agree a joint funding proposal to support the event. IF Technical Delegates: Input from IFTDs is essential to ensure the success of many Pre-Games events and to identify the planning adjustments required at Games time. Building a constructive relationship with IFTDs and obtaining their sign-off is key to this process. Full Tests: Whilst test events will be different from the Games, it is important to incorporate as many full testing opportunities as possible. All operational staff, regardless of their final venue, should be involved in at least one full test to assist them in understanding their Games time role.
MANCHESTER 2002 THE XVII COMMONWEALTH GAMES • POST GAMES REPORT 41 VOLUME 2
Section C Village Operations
C1 Commonwealth Games Village C2 Technical Officials’ Village C3 Commonwealth Shooting Village – University of Surrey, Guildford C4 Team Welcome Ceremonies C1 Commonwealth Games Village
Overview Manchester 2002 Villages existed for the primary purpose of providing services to competing athletes and officials with the aim of enhancing their overall Commonwealth Games experience. There were three centres: Commonwealth Games Village Shooting Village Technical Officials Village The M2002 vision was to provide a place of residence during the Games that was safe, comfortable, convenient and allowed residents to focus on involvement in their respective events. A range of associated services were also provided to assist the Chef de Mission for each CGA in the management of their delegation.
The Commonwealth Games Village The Commonwealth Games Village (CGV) was located at the Fallowfield Campus of the University of Manchester, approximately three miles from the City Centre of Manchester. The CGV was home to 4,754 athletes and team officials from 72 nations with a further 422 accommodated at the overflow sites, a total of 5,176.
Airport Main Dining Access Control Point
Accreditation Enquiries Lost & Found Vehicle Control Point
Cash Machine Medical Centre Overflow Accommodation Zones Accommodation To N Bicycle Access Entry the city centre Shower/Toilet Coast
Casual Dining Taxi Exit
Dales Cinema Team Drop Off
O l d H a l l L a n e Games Zone Telephone Forest
Guest Centre Public Transport Lake
Guest Centre 24 hrs Web Nest Peaks Dales Laundrette
Coast
Residential
d Multi-faith Zone Centre a
o Lake
R International Zone
w
o
l
s
m
l
i
W Forest
Transport Mall
M o s e l To Didsbury e y Peaks and airport R o a d
To be used as a guide only - Not to scale © Crown Copyright. All rights reserved Manchester City Council LA076236 2002. © Manchester 2002 Limited
44 MANCHESTER 2002 THE XVII COMMONWEALTH GAMES • POST GAMES REPORT VOLUME 2 Additional accommodation was identified at four overflow sites located near to the Commonwealth Games Village (Allen Hall, Weston Court, Beechwood House and Daisybank Hall). The campus site covered 30 acres and in normal operation housed approximately 3,300 students who attend the University of Manchester. The site consisted of 3,514 (376 at the overflow sites) bedrooms in six different Halls of Residence, along with some of the University’s conference and sporting facilities, which were transformed into associated services. The CGV was the first in Games history to integrate both elite athletes and elite athletes with a disability (EADs) in one Village. This was achieved through the rigorous testing and planning implemented through the M2002 Access Programme. A series of access reviews enabled the Village to fully cater for both EADs and athletes. With the exception of the Shooting competition located in Surrey, the Village was no more than a 40 minute bus journey to the furthest competition venue. The CGV was secured by a perimeter fence and divided into operational zones. Operating dates for the CGV were as follows:
Date Description Hours Of Operation 10 – 14 July 2002 Pre-Opening (for CGAs Administration only) 09:00-18:00 15 July – 7 August Operating period 24 hours 7 – 31 August Decommissioning of Village for hand back to the 06:00–22:00 University on 31 August.
Key Partners The Village department worked closely with the following partners in planning the delivery of the Village: University of Manchester, Fallowfield Campus - Use of the University of Manchester, Fallowfield Campus for the accommodation of athletes and team officials University of Manchester, Sport Directorate -Use of existing sporting fields and venues for overlay to operate Village administration, retail, dining and transport facilities Hollings College -Provision of parking space, change rooms for housekeeping staff, bike racks for staff and conference facilities for large meetings Unite Group- Overflow accommodation allowing for an additional 240 beds adjacent to the Village in Weston Court and Beechwood House Manchester Grammar School - Use of space for parking, use of existing land for access into logistics areas of Village. Manchester High School for Girls - Use of existing hardstand area to operate a back of house logistics, delivery and warehouse operation. Chancellors Hotel and Conference Centre - Operation of a 69 bed hotel, use of existing meeting rooms for Media and Protocol operations. University of Manchester, Estates Group - Use of existing staff to provide all estate management and maintenance and security for the site. Opal Estates - Overflow accommodation at a site within five minutes travel time to the main Village site.
Key Milestones Local Residents Open Day 13 April 2002 Service Level Agreement with University 15 April 2002 Workplan agreed with Catering Contractor 10 May 2002 Retail contracts finalised 10 May 2002 Completion of Capital Works 27 June 2002 Handover of Campus to M2002 28 June 2002 Room allocations finalised 10 July 2002 Move-Out 26 August 2002
MANCHESTER 2002 THE XVII COMMONWEALTH GAMES • POST GAMES REPORT 45 VOLUME 2 Residential Zone Dales The Residential Zone was a restricted area of the CGV. CGA team offices were located close to their residential areas. The Residential Zone was divided into five zones each identifiable through a colour and an English themed icon.
Games Time Zone Games Time Colour University Location Dales Orange Ashburne Hall Lakes Lakes Blue Owens Park Coast Yellow Richmond Park Peaks Purple Woolton Hall Forest Green Oak House
This system operated as per existing University blocks to make orientation easy and way finding simple. Each accommodation block and room within the block was also numbered. The Residential Zone consisted of 28 buildings. All bedrooms were fully carpeted with shades or Coast curtains on the windows. Occupancy levels fluctuated with single or twin share which was dependent on the size of the room. Bunk or single beds were provided with some beds being extra long measuring 2m in length. The Residential Zone provided the following services: Guest Centre Main Dining Area Casual Dining Area Peaks Village Medical Centre Recreational Facilities Laundrettes
Main Dining Area The Main Dining area was located in a temporary structure adjacent to the International Zone and opened 24 hours a day from 15 July. Forest All individuals who had dining privileges indicated on their accreditation had free access to the Main Dining facility for 18 days. All diners had their accreditation scanned prior to entering the dining facilities. Meal tickets were required for all persons who did not have dining privileges. Meal tickets for guests could be purchased from the Catering Desk in the CGA Services Centre. The array of food and beverages that M2002 offered in the Main Dining area reflected the cultural and religious diversity of the Commonwealth. Service delivery arrangements recognised the high standards needed to satisfy the special requirements of athletes involved in major sporting competition. The menu had a component of staple/fixed items and main course/special items that changed on a daily basis.
Breakfast menu 05:00 - 11:00 Lunch menu 11:00 - 17:00 Dinner menu 17:00 - 23:00 Supper menu 23:00 - 05:00
Casual Dining Area Casual Dining provided a dining experience in a casual food court style environment. As with Main Dining, only those with dining privileges indicated on their accreditation had free access to the Casual Dining area.
46 MANCHESTER 2002 THE XVII COMMONWEALTH GAMES • POST GAMES REPORT VOLUME 2 Village Medical Centre The Village Medical Centre provided primary care and sports medicine for the Games Family. A full description of the services provided can be found in section B of this volume.
International Zone The International Zone was the area of the CGV where VIPs, invited guests and the media met their guests, went shopping and enjoyed entertainment. A range of common services were contained in the Zone, including: CGA Services Centre for Chefs de Mission (including dedicated desks for Assistance, Transport, Arrivals and Departures, Team Welcome Ceremonies, Finance, Catering and Rate Card) Sports Information Centre (for Team Officials) Entertainment Marquee and Bistro Presentation area for Team Welcome Ceremonies Retail services Information booth Ticket box office Gymnasium The Transport Mall was accessed from the International Zone and was the sole pick-up and drop- off point for all athlete and team officials’ bus services. These services transported athletes and team officials on a pre-arranged schedule to training, competition and non-competition venues. The Village Operations Centre (VOC) and Management Office were located on the first floor of the International Centre and were restricted to authorised personnel only.
N
Main Dining 1 Athlete Memorabilia 2 Badminton Racquet Stringing 3 Bank/Travel Agent/Bureau de Change 4 CGA Services Centre 8 3 11 5 Day Pass Centre 6 Dry Cleaner 5 6 7 Entertainment Marquee 21 7 9 17 8 Florist 4 9 General Store 13 International Centre 10 Gym/Sauna 16 15 1 12 18 22 10 11 Hair Salon 72 flags of the Nations 23 12 Information 14 The Firs Pavilion 2 13 Jewellers and Engravers 14 Media Sub-Centre 20 15 Merchandise 19 16 Phone Home Zone 17 Photo Processing Chancellors Hotel 18 Post Office & Conference Centre International Zone 19 Protocol Office 20 Team Welcome Ceremonies 21 Ticket Office 22 Sports Information Centre 23 Uniform Numbering Service
Accessible toilet Entry Transport Mall Bar/Bistro Exit
Main Dining
Team drop off
Toilets
Transport Mall
To be used as a guide only - Not to scale © Crown Copyright. All rights reserved Manchester City Council LA076236 2002. © Manchester 2002 Limited
MANCHESTER 2002 THE XVII COMMONWEALTH GAMES • POST GAMES REPORT 47 VOLUME 2 Access to the International Zone was available from the Transport Mall (primarily used by competing athletes) and the Day Pass Centre that was open to all Village residents. An existing conference facility, adjacent to the International Zone entrance, provided accommodation for the Village Mayor, Protocol Services, Media Services and meeting rooms. This centre also provided a hotel facility for Village personnel.
CGA Services Centre A Help Desk was located at the entry to the International Zone where staff assisted in directing Chefs and Managers to the appropriate location within the International Zone. The CGA Services FOH area housed a number of key services to the Village: Transport Desk: providing assistance with training and competition shuttle service information, vehicle access and general transport information. Arrivals and Departures Desk: assisting CGAs with the planning of their travel arrangements and any baggage claims. CGAs were asked to provide information and updates on their team arrivals/departures. Team Welcome Ceremonies Desk: assisting the Chef de Mission to schedule and confirm their Team Welcome Ceremony. Finance Desk: assisting the Chef de Mission to conduct transactions on their Team’s account. This included, for example, paying for additional overflow accommodation. Finance operated a proxy system whereby the Chef de Mission could nominate an authorised person to conduct financial transactions on their behalf. Catering Desk: coordinating the ordering of athlete venue meals, catered events, meal ticket distribution, meal ticket sales and meeting room bookings. Rate Card Desk: available for Chefs de Mission to place any additional Rate Card orders such as furniture, fittings, phone top-ups or upgrades to existing items. Deliveries were made following pre-payment at the Finance Desk.
Sports Information Centre The Sports Information Centre (SIC) provided the Chefs de Mission, Team Managers and Team Leaders with critical information relating specifically to training and competition for each of the 17 sports. Access to this area was restricted to Chefs de Mission, Team Managers, Team Leaders or proxies. Athletes were denied access to this area. Each of the 17 sports had a dedicated information desk within the Centre. The desks were staffed with personnel who could report directly to the relevant Competition Manager and provided a one- stop sports and transport information point to team officials.
Key Lessons and Recommendations Integrate the Sport team into the Village team as early as possible to develop good working relationships. Secure the SIC during non-operational periods to ensure that information is tamper-proof and cannot be removed while staff are absent.
Information Booth An Information Booth provided information to residents and guests about the Village, the Commonwealth Games, Manchester and surrounding areas. Commonwealth Games information included competition schedules, venue locations and non-competition information such as the Spirit of Friendship Festival. Information on Manchester and surrounding areas, local tourist sites and places to shop, was also available.
48 MANCHESTER 2002 THE XVII COMMONWEALTH GAMES • POST GAMES REPORT VOLUME 2 Ticket Box Office Athletes and Team Managers could request complimentary tickets through their Chef de Mission and these were issued to the Chef de Mission or a designated Team Official at the Ticket Box Office. Tickets were also available for purchase.
Village Planning and Coordination The number and size of the Commonwealth Games Villages meant planning and coordination was critical from the outset. The two key aspects to planning and coordination were development and operations. During the development stage the planning for overlay of the Village was undertaken with the aim of meeting the requirements for housing all athletes including EADs. To deliver the overlay required there was an extensive capital works programme planned for the Village which was partly funded by the University and partly by M2002 budget. The philosophy, key milestones and key services relating to the Village were defined in early 2001. The main principle was to focus on the service level from day one of operation and create a positive Village experience for residents. These principles underpinned all planning and ultimately were a significant contributory factor to the success of the Village. Operating Plans were prepared by each FA, and from these, detailed plans, policies and procedures for the Village were developed. These Operating Plans became the benchmark for Village review and desktop sessions. Comprehensive risk assessment and contingency planning exercises were completed by June, allowing time to focus on testing, refining, training and preparing for the operations of the Village. The Villages Advisory Group met every three weeks from April 2002 to provide a customer focus on the planning for the Village. This forum greatly assisted in the final detailed planning and fine-tuning operational aspects of the Village and comprised of current and ex-athletes, including one EAD.
The Village Operations Centre The Village Operations Centre (VOC) identified, recorded, tracked and resolved key issues and coordinated activities as required. The VOC was operational 24 hours each day from 10 July - 7 August and 16 hours each day outside of these dates during the life of the Village. The Village Duty Managers were on duty 24 hours each day and available to make decisions or escalate issues to the appropriate Village FA Manager or the General Manager. The VOC contained: Village Communications Centre (VCC) comprising the Village Telephone Operator and base stations for mobile radios On-site Duty Manager Health and Safety Officer Security Contractor’s main command and control area Village Security Commander’s Team Greater Manchester Police (GMP) The VOC was intended to be the central point of communication with the GCC, but it proved difficult to funnel all communication with the GCC and the venues through this channel.
Key Lessons and Recommendations GCC reporting arrangements need to be clarified at an early stage. The difficulty here is that personnel often escalate issues to the GCC independently of the VOC. Ideally, all key generic VOC elements should be located in one place. Recruit VOC Duty Managers with experience appropriate to their level of responsibility. There were a number of requests for political asylum. Awareness training and ‘what if’ rehearsals are essential to advise staff on how to deal with these situations and remain detached given the emphasis on customer care.
MANCHESTER 2002 THE XVII COMMONWEALTH GAMES • POST GAMES REPORT 49 VOLUME 2 A comprehensive Evacuation Plan is essential. It needs to be understood by all staff and communicated to all residents.
Greeting of VIPs Located at the Chancellors Hotel and Conference Centre, members of the Protocol, and the Village Mayor and his deputies were on hand to meet VIPs at the Games Village. The Protocol department managed the following: The Village Mayor’s involvement at Team Welcome Ceremonies. Participation in Royal visits, Heads of State/Heads of Government visits. Greeting of all VIPs, CGV tours and hosting of any VIP events held in the Village.
Chef de Mission Meetings The Chef de Mission meetings, chaired by the Chief Operating Officer, were held at 07:30 each day and proved to be a popular forum for CGAs to raise and escalate any Village and other Games related issues. The Chef de Mission Meetings commenced on the 17 July and with two exceptions were held on a daily basis until 4 August. The meetings generally lasted between 40 minutes and one hour.
Accommodation Services The Accommodation Services Programme covered resident centres, laundry operations, room allocation, arrivals and housekeeping operations.
Guest Centres The CGV followed the successes of Sydney and Salt Lake Olympics by providing Guest Centres with comprehensive front desk services for residents. These were staffed by a combination of University staff and Village volunteers with a high degree of customer service skills. A Guest Centre was located in each of the five zones of the Village. The hours of operation were: Zone Hours Of Operation Dales 06:00–22:00 Lakes 24 hours Coast 24 hours Peaks 06:00–22:00 Forest 06:00–22:00
The Guest Centres included the following functions to support the guests of the Village: Customer Service Desk providing a point of contact for all enquiries including telecommunications and technology related issues. Three information stations providing Games Family Information (GFIS). Television and lounge area for rest and relaxation. Centralised tracking system for lost and found items. Reporting key lock-outs/missing keys and replacement key requirements. Coordination of the Chef de Mission inventory (i.e. furniture, medical equipment, supplies and technology). Support provision for all teams during arrivals and departures. Team designated mail box for incoming mail. Clean towel distribution. Laundry detergent distribution for communal laundry facilities in the Village. For Village pre-opening (10 – 14 July) all Guest Centres opened from 09:00 to 18:00. The Guest Centre concept was extremely successful and well used by residents. All services were used and the speed and responsiveness of staff was key to providing a welcome, easy-living environment. Guest Centres conducted Inspections and Inventories (I&I) with the Chefs de Mission before they took charge of their allotted rooms. Each space was inspected and signed off. The I&I generated a high number of work orders, most of them very small, requiring a handyman at each Guest Centre.
50 MANCHESTER 2002 THE XVII COMMONWEALTH GAMES • POST GAMES REPORT VOLUME 2 One of the main attractions at each Guest Centre was the live CATV feed from the competition venues which resulted in the Guest Centres becoming overcrowded, and made it difficult for staff to deal with people on the phone. Golf buggies were allocated to four of the five Guest Centres for EADs and a booking system was operated to assist their movement around the Village. The Guest Centres were used as a central location for lost property and at the end of each day the lost property boxes at each Guest Centre were overflowing. One Guest Centre was chosen as the central lost property area for items of luggage. At the end of the Games all luggage had been reclaimed but there was a boxful of unclaimed lost property at each of the Guest Centres.
Condoms A supply of 156,000 condoms was provided to the athletes during the period of the Games. This was broadly based on two condoms per athlete per day. The condoms were supplied to M2002 through a VIK arrangement by Durex, SSL International PLC. The condoms were distributed mainly via the Guest Centres at the Village and also through the Chefs de Mission. They were stored at the Logistics Warehouse based at the Village prior to delivery to Guest Centres. Key Lessons and Recommendations: Consider allocating a separate area within each Guest Centre for I&I staff to ensure that paperwork is properly controlled and staff can focus on their task. Consider designating one dedicated lost property area for all items in the Village. Access to room keys must be carefully controlled and managed. For operational reasons, up to three sets of sub-masters (keys) may be required for housekeeping. Ensure an adequate supply of condoms is sourced from a reputable supplier, with an allowance for a 5% contingency. Condoms should be freely available via Guest Centres.
Room Allocation CGAs were allocated their accommodation, offices and storage space according to the athletes and officials numbers determined during Delegation Registration Meetings (DRMs). Pre-Games information was collected from all CGAs on their preferences for accommodation based on team numbers, including gender and sports breakdowns, as well as religious, cultural and political sensitivities. Other information collected in advance also included specific requirements for bed extensions for taller residents, accessible accommodation for wheelchair EADs and requirements for overflow accommodation. All CGAs were encouraged to book their DRM in advance of their team arrival in Manchester. Although more than 90% of the CGAs chose to conduct their DRMs before their team arrival; only around 25% of them did it during the Village Soft Opening (10-14 July). The Village had a total capacity of around 4,754 bed spaces. During the initial stages of allotment it became apparent that the final number of competing athletes would exceed the Village capacity. As a result each CGA was asked to manage their team within their room allocation or by purchasing overflow accommodation at rates of £60 per person per night for single occupancy or £45 per person per night for twin-share. Teams optimised the use of their rooms by managing arrival and departure dates to allow a new athlete to move into a room immediately after the previous occupant had departed.
MANCHESTER 2002 THE XVII COMMONWEALTH GAMES • POST GAMES REPORT 51 VOLUME 2 To accommodate increased numbers of athletes and officials, M2002 sourced and secured overflow accommodation nearby at four student accommodation halls: Allen Hall, Weston Court, Beechwood Gardens and Daisybank Hall. In accordance with the CGF guidelines, each Chef de Mission was allocated single room accommodation, usually with en-suite facilities. Moreover, each of the 62 wheelchair EADs were also offered accommodation in a single occupancy bedroom. The bedroom summary was as follows:
1,200
Single rooms 1,000 Twin rooms 800
600
Number of Rooms 400
200
0 Forest Lakes Coast Dales Peaks Overflow A Overflow B Overflow C Overflow D Oak Owens Richmond Ashburne Woolton Allen Hall Weston Beechwood Daisybank House Park Park Hall & Court Gardens Hall Sheavyn House
Housekeeping The level of service for housekeeping allowed for linen to be changed every fourth day and fresh towels supplied every second day. Additional linen and towels were available from the Guest Centre on a dirty-for-clean basis. Communal bathrooms were cleaned twice daily. An external company was contracted to provide housekeeping services during the Games due to their ability to cater for a high volume of beds. A separate Laundry Service Agreement included supply of hired linen, Games time laundering and linen delivery to the Village. In addition a venue towel agreement was reached where towels were laundered and delivered each day to competition venues as well as the Village. After the Games, all the linen and towels were returned to the supplying company. Loss rates for the hired linen were approximately 10% sheets, 5% pillowcases and 20% linen bags. Housekeeping operations in the Village were very demanding and a number of service quality issues were raised. Services need to be fully scoped in advance and adequately resourced (including contingency arrangements) at Games time to meet the standards required. Key Lessons and Recommendations Appoint a specialist housekeeping contractor rather than a general cleaning company. Insist that the housekeeping and linen/laundry functions are managed jointly. This will help ensure effective coordination of distribution and collection services. Ensure that a manager with proven experience in the hotel industry is hired to oversee housekeeping and linen/laundry operations. Ensure that the housekeeping contract is closely monitored. Random spot checks must be undertaken daily in all areas to ensure that the contract is being delivered to the specifications agreed.
Arrivals/Departures All new arrivals had their luggage screened and accreditation processed at the Main Accreditation and Uniform Centre (MAUC) which was located four miles from the Village site. The smooth flow through this centre was important since this gave the first and lasting impression for residents.
52 MANCHESTER 2002 THE XVII COMMONWEALTH GAMES • POST GAMES REPORT VOLUME 2 Due to the constraints on the Village site, athletes boarded the bus at the MAUC and were dropped off at one of two external locations allowing an easy walk to their accommodation. Luggage was separated from the athlete on departure from the MAUC and delivered directly to the CGAs Guest Centre where the teams were met by their Chef de Mission and allocated keys. Key Lessons and Recommendations The hours of A&D are long and the team needs to be staffed by two people (Manager and an Assistant Manager) in order to deliver this function effectively. The A&D system needs to be fully integrated, providing accurate information to A&D staff, Villages and Bus Operations. Departures during the early stages of the Games can be difficult to manage and require good information from Team Managers.
Human Resources and Communications The Village Human Resources and Communications team was responsible for both paid and CGV Staff volunteer staff including: Training and motivation of all Crew for all Villages. Crew Resource Centre. Publications including Village Guide Books and Village Newspaper. Local resident and business consultation.
An analysis of staff in the CGV is provided opposite: Contractors (1,492) University Staff Volunteers (1,247) Monthly sub-committee meetings were held with the University in order to integrate University Paid Staff (187) staff into Games time roles within the Village. Additional overtime for University staff was approved during Games time, though it was not significant. Volunteers The challenge faced by the Village was the extended operating period (29 days – 24 hours) compared with most other Games venues. Overall, the Village Volunteer Programme was a resounding success due in part to the high motivation and recognition programmes, high quality meals and free transport/parking. The Village attrition rate was less than 10% both for paid and volunteer staff. Village Operations began to communicate with volunteers four months after all acceptances were confirmed and approximately 90% of all offers were accepted. Village volunteers received a Village specific newsletter to keep them informed. Training was designed to orientate the volunteer and impart overall expectations. Other components included organisation, safety procedures, customer service, cultural awareness, working with EAD athletes and the protocols in relation to approaching athletes. The training programme comprised: Venue training – delivered to all Village FAs, including contractors. Village Operations job specific training – development of training resources and the production of 22 job specific Training Manuals. Open day for all supervisory volunteers in April 2002 – introducing them to the Village concept, structures and physical layout. Informal ‘Meet and Greet Nights’ – enabling all Village FAs to meet their Crew ahead of venue training sessions. Venue training for Supervisors – attended by 80% of Supervisors and used as a platform for the main volunteer training programme. Venue and job specific training provided in June/July 2002 – three sessions and a venue tour Over three days, approximately 1,400 of 2,000 volunteers attended venue and job specific training. Those who were unable to attend were trained by Supervisors during the five day ‘soft’ opening or during their first shift. Tours were also available from January 2002 and were held weekly for Crew and visitors.
MANCHESTER 2002 THE XVII COMMONWEALTH GAMES • POST GAMES REPORT 53 VOLUME 2 Key Lessons and Recommendations Get to know your volunteers and their skill set early to utilise their abilities. Allow over-estimation of shifts and numbers to accommodate for attrition. Venue Crew Managers should be in place several months prior to the Games to help refine operational plans. Ensure volunteers receive their shift allocations in good time and make resources available to ensure all rosters are updated by FAs and fed into a central system. Consider operating a centralised system for recording/reporting attendance during Games time. Ensure operational consistency through training programmes that are fully coordinated with other FAs.
Crew Resource Centre (Games time) A dedicated access point was created for all volunteers and paid staff. The Crew Resource Centre (CRC) was located at this entrance and operated 24 hours each day during Village operations and undertook the following functions: Help desk/communications and hotline Counselling and grievances Uniforming and accreditation Day passes for paid staff, volunteers and contractors Athlete accreditation re-badging Redeployment, roster coordination, roster updates and distribution Contractor support First aid facilities including a list of first aiders Crew break areas The Village handled all redeployment and roster changes internally and roster updates were made available via designated pigeon holes. Crew arriving without official accreditation passes were issued with a Crew Day Pass, valid for the date of issue only. The CRC also provided Crew and Contractor Day Passes to non-Village staff from other Games venues who required short term access. The CRC supported contractors by issuing the second part of accreditation passes. Key Lessons and Recommendations Requests/queries from the friends and family of athletes became time consuming and resulted in volunteers having to deal with complaints. The CRC dealt with a large number of guests seeking to gain access when the Day Pass Centre was closed (21:00-09:00). Procedures need to be put in place to deal with this requirement. It is recommended that staff check-in should take place in a BOH location. Because of the very low incidences of first aid for Crew, it is recommended that the Village Medical Centre provide first aid to Crew.
Office Administration The Office Administration team provided a central point for the operation of the Village Management Office and any issues that related to the operation prior to Games time and during the Games. Operating hours were between 6:30 and 20:00, seven days a week from 10 July – 7 August. The Team coordinated all office moves for Village Operations and proved to be an integral part of Village Operations particularly at Games time.
54 MANCHESTER 2002 THE XVII COMMONWEALTH GAMES • POST GAMES REPORT VOLUME 2 Information Services Information Services were responsible for: Managing the Information Station in the International Zone. Providing Guest Centres with information for distribution to residents. Coordinating the production of publications such as Village Guidebooks, Maps, Phone Directories and the Village Newspaper. The Information Station was staffed with a fully trained supervisor and a team of volunteers all of whom had experience in customer service. Information on the Village, the Games and local tourism was provided. The Village Newspaper was initially produced every second day then daily after the Opening Ceremony. It consisted of a tabloid sheet (four page sheet) and was distributed to all parts of the Village. Three colour supplements were also produced providing a pictorial of the Village and the Opening and Closing Ceremonies. Delivery to the Technical Officials’ Village was provided by Logistics and to the Commonwealth Shooting Village by courier.
Local Residents and Business Consultation To encourage local residents and businesses to become advocates of the Games Village, M2002 provided an open channel of communication for them to report any issues or queries regarding the operation of the Village up to and during Games time. A comprehensive consultation plan was undertaken well in advance of the Games involving more than 400 residents and local businesses. The consultation process involved: Preparation and distribution of information leaflets. Resident and business meetings. Open days to facilitate communication between M2002 and local residents. A final consultation report addressing all issues was produced in February 2002. Shortly before the Games a 24 hour Residents Hotline was opened, managed by volunteers in the VOC. Overall, consultation went extremely well. Minor issues were experienced during the traffic management period within Old Hall Lane where there were high volumes of vehicle movement.
Financial Management Finance consisted of BOH budget management/financial control and a Finance Desk within the CGA Services Centre. The Finance Desk was established for the Games period to provide the CGAs with a means to conduct financial transactions such as additional accommodation charges. BOH financial management continued through to Games time providing a budget and contract management function. At Games time it became a conduit for fast-track procurement of essential items. Key Lessons and Recommendations Ensure that a Village Finance Manager is identified and assigned to the Village team at least six months before the Games. Establish a Finance team to ensure continuity of service to CGAs. Ensure that Procurement has a presence at the Village during the Games. During the Games, be prepared to sanction last minute, urgent purchase orders.
Games Integration and Commercial Programme The Games Integration and Commercial Programme included: Retail outlets Entertainment Recreation facilities (including cinema, Religious Services Centre interactive games and internet access) Village Day Pass Centre Media coordination Special events and Protocol tours Team Welcome Ceremonies Pre-opening visits Weigh-in rooms Signage and wayfinding Look
MANCHESTER 2002 THE XVII COMMONWEALTH GAMES • POST GAMES REPORT 55 VOLUME 2 Retail Outlets A temporary retail area was established in the International Zone to provide a focal point for residents, guests and the media. This area was open from 15 July to 7 August, with the following services and hours of operation:
Retail Service 15 July – 7 August Operating Hours Bank and Currency Exchange 09:00–21:00 Post Office 10:00-21:00 Florist 09:00–18:00 Hair Salon 09:00–21:00 Jewellers and Engravers 10:00–20:00 Photo processing/ General Store 09:00–21:00 Phone Home Zone 24 hours Dry Cleaning 09:00–20:00 Merchandise Store 09:00–21:00 Athlete Memorabilia 09:00–21:00 Ticket Office 08:00–21:00 Newsagent 09:00–21:00 The majority of retailers were secured through commercial contracts with the exception of the florist outlet that was operated by Interflora as an Official Provider. On the whole, the retail area was a resounding success. From 10 - 14 July, traffic flows and sales were limited. However, from 15 July customer numbers increased dramatically. The standard operating hours of each unit were 09:00–21:00 but were varied according to demand. Weather conditions had the biggest impact on demand as there was limited shelter.
Entertainment A varied entertainment programme was developed for the Village based on the following daily format: 13:30-17:30 Strolling street theatre Main thoroughfares 13:30-15:30 Jazz act Casual Dining Area 21:00-22:00 Support live act Entertainment Marquee 22:00-23:00 Main live act Entertainment Marquee The Entertainment Marquee was a licensed facility that offered a bistro dining area and a bar serving a range of drinks (alcoholic and non-alcoholic). The bistro and bar facility operated on a user-pay basis. The Entertainment Marquee was a communal seating area where patrons could view cultural performances, live entertainment and recreational activities including live CATV coverage of Commonwealth Games events. Throughout the afternoon, strolling street theatre was featured on the main thoroughfares of the Village. The street theatre was a huge success and created a lively atmosphere. Leaflet drops, advertisements in the Village Voice and posters in Guest Centres and other locations were used to promote the programme. The Closing Night Party was very well attended. There were three sites in operation: the Entertainment Marquee, a Night Club and Casual Dining area. Alcohol was only available in the Dining Hall and Entertainment Marquee. As a result, both the Night Club and Casual Dining area were not well patronised. However, barriers and additional security personnel were required to cope with large numbers of people in the Marquee area. Key Lessons and Recommendations The entertainment schedule should be prepared well in advance to ensure that the site, stage, rigging, and PA/audio/lighting systems are properly scoped.
56 MANCHESTER 2002 THE XVII COMMONWEALTH GAMES • POST GAMES REPORT VOLUME 2 Security staff should be rostered for at least 30 minutes beyond the advertised conclusion of nightly performances. Temporary structures can adversely affect sound quality. A video wall is best located in a casual dining area or separate bar. It is recommended that the evening entertainment programme does not start until the end of the day’s televised events. Attendance at evening shows was relatively high pre-competition but decreased considerably once competition commenced. Performing artists require a suitable ‘Green Room’ with shower facilities where they can change into their costumes, apply make up and relax between acts.
Recreation Facilities Recreation facilities were provided to enable residents to relax and unwind in the confines of the Village site. Internet Facilities (Windows XP Webnest) Access to internet and e-mail was provided at the ‘Windows XP Webnest’, a pre-existing first floor facility with 110 personal computers open from 09:00-23:00 daily. Each terminal was restricted to the internet with no printing or word processing functionality. Similar facilities were provided at ground floor level adapted to meet the needs of residents with vision impairment or mobility problems. This room contained low level tables and four PCs, with a large keyboard and mouse for the vision impaired. Peak operating times were 15:00–17:00 and 20:00-23:00 and combined usage of the facilities exceeded 25,000 visits. Cinema From 25 July – 7 August, four films were shown each day at 11:30, 14:30, 17:30 and 20:30. A variety of theme days, classics, thrillers and comedies were selected to appeal to the tastes of residents and were promoted through the ‘Village Voice’, Guest Centres, Games Room and the Webnest. Over the 24 days of operation 1,827 people attended the cinema. The evening session at 20:30 was the most popular, particularly during inclement weather. Gymnasium Open from 06:00–22:00 daily, the Village Gymnasium was located in an existing University facility within the International Zone. Additional facilities were provided including a free weights room, saunas and scales. Total usage of the gym facilities during operation was 4,986 and peak times were from 06:00-09:00 and 16:00–19:00. Games Room Open from 09:00–23:00 daily, the Games Room was a very popular Village facility featuring 24 Microsoft Xboxes provided by Microsoft. External contractors supplied other entertainment facilities such as pool tables, table football, electronic darts, air hockey and arcade style games. Over the operating period 13,722 visits were made to the Games Room with a typical peak hour attendance of 200 people. Some equipment was in constant use and maintenance issues arose on a daily basis. Religious Services Centre Open from 08:00–22:00 daily, the Religious Services Centre offered a multi-faith facility for all Village residents and staff. Two rooms were allocated for services including private prayer, relaxation, meditation and counselling. A local charitable organisation (SCORE) assisted in recruiting an experienced team of chaplains (both local and international) from a range of faiths. Further information on the Chaplaincy Service can be found in volume 3, section C4.
MANCHESTER 2002 THE XVII COMMONWEALTH GAMES • POST GAMES REPORT 57 VOLUME 2 Laundrettes There were 43 self-service washing machines and 36 dryers for complimentary use of the residents which were located in each of the five zones. The laundry was open for an 18 hour period each day and laundry detergent was available free of charge at the Guest Centre desk upon presentation of accreditation. Key Lessons and Recommendations The recreation programme must appeal to the client age-group but should reflect the ‘home- away-from-home’ feel of the Village. Demand indicated that there would be sufficient usage overnight if recreation facilities were made available. A 24 hour operation should be considered if staff can be rostered to manage the service. A local based supplier should be contracted to provide prompt and efficient maintenance services.
Village Day Pass Centre CGA Day Passes and Village Day Passes provided access to the International Zone for Sponsors, managers, observers, media and CGA guests. Each pass was valid only for the day of issue. Day passes provided an excellent means of controlling the flow of guests into the Village. CGAs were requested to submit their requests for day passes by 17:00 on the day prior to issue so that an adequate number of passes could be prepared each morning for anticipated guests. Additional controls were required to manage visitor access into the Residential Zone. Villages affixed a laminated token to Day Passes which caused confusion with security and guests. Should this process be adopted in future it needs to be incorporated into the design process. Passes were valid until 21:00. A daily audit was undertaken by security staff to ensure that all guests had left the Village and CGAs were requested to ask their guests to exit the Village by this time. Staffing numbers at the Day Pass Centre (all volunteers) were originally set at 34, but later reduced to 27, which proved adequate for operations. A shuttle bus service from the Village to the City Centre was not well used and cancelled mid-way through the Games. Key Lessons and Recommendations Arrangements need to be in place to ensure that all guests have left the Village by 21:00. Additional controls may be required to manage visitor access into the Residential Zone and these should be considered in the day pass design process.
Media Co-ordination A Media Sub-Centre was located on the perimeter of the Village with unrestricted daily access for accredited media. The Centre included both a Press Conference Room and a Press Workroom. CGAs were able to book and conduct their press conferences through this facility. Media Day Passes were available, providing access to the International Zone between 09:00-21:00. Up to 150 press and 150 rights-holding broadcaster passes were issued on a rota system. A Media Open Day of the entire Village was conducted during the soft opening period with 70 people attending from local, national and international media organisations.
58 MANCHESTER 2002 THE XVII COMMONWEALTH GAMES • POST GAMES REPORT VOLUME 2 Key Lessons and Recommendations Ensure that the Media Sub-Centre is located close to the main entrance of the Village. Provide an adequate shuttle bus service to and from the Village for both broadcast media and press. Restrict non rights-holding broadcasters from entering the Village perimeter, but allocate space for them to conduct interviews immediately outside the Village. Any request for broadcasting facilities within the Residential Zone needs to be considered early and details agreed between the Host Broadcaster and the Village.
Special Events and Protocol Tours Major events included the Official Village Opening, Media Day, Observer Programme and various Royal Visits organised in conjunction with Protocol. Both the Official Village Opening and Media Day provided an excellent opportunity for domestic and international media coverage. A number of smaller events were also coordinated through Protocol at Games time. Over the period 26 July - 4 August Protocol conducted 37 tours involving 201 guests. Tours had to be booked before 17:00 on the preceding day. Unaccredited guests were issued with a Protocol Day Pass and within the Residential Zone they were escorted by a Protocol Crew member at all times.
Opening and Closing Ceremonies Village Operations played a vital role in the organisation of athletes and team officials attending the Opening and Closing Ceremonies. After exiting the Stadium towards the end of the Opening Ceremony, athletes were directed to a restricted zone that allowed Villages to facilitate rapid direct re-entry of athletes back into the Village. Special entertainment was provided for athletes and officials who did not participate in the Ceremony and they were able to view it live from the Entertainment Marquee. Key Lessons and Recommendations Ensure that there is an end to end process for the exit and re-entry of athletes to the Village. Ensure that transport arrangements are fully coordinated with local traffic police and emergency services.
Pre-Opening Visits Delegations were allowed access five days prior to the official opening of the Village on 15 July. Services provided during this period included catering, logistical support, access control, transport and CGA Services. Pre-opening visits were useful for both Village Operations and CGAs as they offered an opportunity to complete the Delegation Registration process and ensured that operational procedures were in place prior to the arrival of athletes.
Weigh–In Rooms Weigh-in procedures for Boxing, Wrestling and Judo were held in Village overflow accommodation. Scales were calibrated on a daily basis and used throughout competition time. At peak times the numbers of people accessing the weigh-in areas put additional pressure on the Accreditation Check Point and there were accreditation problems for technical officials because of its location. Key Lessons and Recommendations Conduct weigh-in at a venue separate to the Village. Sport should take ownership of the weigh-in operation.
Signage and Wayfinding An in-depth review of existing signage, completed in September 2001, provided a basis for determining which pre-existing structures could be utilised to erect additional signage for the Village. The M2002 Signage team produced a clear product based on pictograms visually consistent with existing University campus signage.
MANCHESTER 2002 THE XVII COMMONWEALTH GAMES • POST GAMES REPORT 59 VOLUME 2 Look Village dressing was a key component in transforming the campus site and creating an appropriate atmosphere for the Games. However, the Village Look strategy was finalised only a few months prior to the official opening and in some instances the products were erected during the Village operating period. The hub of the site was the ‘Walk of Fame’ created over the period of competition and displaying the names of athletes who had won medals at the Games. This was used as a backdrop for a number of media interviews. Various aspects of the Village Look are shown in the photographs below.
Key Lessons and Recommendations Finalise the Village Look Strategy as early as possible and schedule installation of the various dressing components well in advance of Village Opening. The ‘Walk of Fame’ provided a key focal point for the Village and was a great success. Inclusion of this feature (or something similar) should be considered for future Games.
60 MANCHESTER 2002 THE XVII COMMONWEALTH GAMES • POST GAMES REPORT VOLUME 2 Support Operations The Support Operations team provided the following services: Fitout (including de-commissioning and reinstatement) Logistics (including work scheduling, warehouse operations, linen/laundry services, Rate Card and CGA support) Maintenance Waste Management Two areas were designated to support these operations: Logistics Warehouse - a temporary but secure structure located on land adjacent to the Village providing a BOH entrance for all Support Operations facilities, staff and equipment. Support Operations Coordination Centre (SOCC) - located in the heart of the Village Residential Zone.
Fitout During the pre-Games period, the Support Operations team was responsible for capturing all user requirements for furniture, technology and Rate Card items for every space in the Village. A database was used to manage this process. All items were tracked in order to plan and execute the bump-in and bump-out at each Village and monitor changes following the arrival of CGA teams. Support Operations also coordinated the activities of all retailers ensuring their facilities were installed correctly, maintained properly and removed safely. The Village Fitout team managed the bump-in and bump-out process which included the overlay of temporary and permanent alterations to the site, FF&E movements and reinstatement. All commodities were procured through the Fitout team. From 1 June 2002, the site was handed over in stages from Manchester University to M2002, allowing a maximum of six weeks for installation of all temporary overlay. Temporary facilities included 35 marquees, 45 jackleg cabins, 4,000 linear metres of fencing, 100 shipping containers, roadways and external lighting. Mobile generators were used to provide power to the majority of temporary structures. Site adaptation works in the Village included sub-surface drainage and water supply works, plumbing, road works, ramping and removal and reinstatement of fencing. After the Games, in conjunction with Fitout, the Support Operations team was responsible for the removal of all temporary overlay and FF&E over a three week period (8 - 30 August) to ensure early hand back of the campus to Manchester University. The team also managed the reinstatement process to rectify damage sustained during the Games and remove the significant volumes of waste and spoil that had accumulated over the operational period.
Work Scheduling and Dispatch At Games time a team based at the SOCC managed work requests for logistics, maintenance and environmental services. Responsibilities included: Creating and issuing an appropriate work order. Monitoring inventory levels of stock. Managing the Master Delivery Schedule. Reserving parking spaces for vehicles. Arranging access passes. Managing vehicle checkpoints.
Warehouse Operations Warehouse storage and preparation spaces for consumables required a covered floor area of 800 square metres along with 60 x 20 feet containers and an open storage area of 1,200 square metres. The warehouse incorporated a cross-docking facility to accept and screen deliveries using a pallet sized x-ray machine.
MANCHESTER 2002 THE XVII COMMONWEALTH GAMES • POST GAMES REPORT 61 VOLUME 2 The short term and long term holding of CGA goods, mail, packages and furniture spares were accommodated here as well. Most of the external area was used to store beverages for the catering programme.
Linen/Laundry Services Linen receipt, packaging, distribution and collection services were managed from the warehouse as well as the storage of consumable and hardware products. Each day there were four to six delivery time slots over a 16 hour period. Dirty linen was collected, packed into bags and stacked into cages before loading onto vehicles for transport to laundries.
Maintenance The University of Manchester Estate Management team was contracted to provide site maintenance based on agreed response times for specific maintenance requests and an itemised schedule of charges. Maintenance and repair services included plumbing, glazing, mechanical, joinery and a locksmith. Other technicians were on call for lifts and electrical repairs.
Rate Card and CGA Support Two staff were assigned to manage the tracking, installation and movement of Rate Card items. A number of small CGA Support Teams were also established to distribute and install items around the Village. CGA teams raised their orders through their respective Guest Centre. The Support Teams were coordinated from the Village Operations Support Area (VOSA) through the Work Order system. Their remit included: Deliveries and general distribution. Installation of equipment and furniture. Movement of team freight and sport equipment to designated storage areas. Operations were supervised by a team official or CGA representative who also managed the receipt and delivery of all freight items. Key Lessons and Recommendations Involve Logistics Coordinators in the Village planning process at the earliest possible opportunity. Storage areas for the site need to be scoped to ensure there is an adequately sized warehouse and covered store provision. An additional Logistics Manager at a senior level would have benefited operations at the SOCC during peak periods when the team found themselves inundated with requests. It is recommended therefore that an Assistant Village Logistics Manager is appointed to oversee work scheduling and customer services at the SOCC. It is advisable to retain all CGA Rate Card items in store until the arrival of the CGA team into the Village. Pre-distribution is not recommended because late changes in accommodation are likely. Temporary structures and marquees can get very cold at night particularly after heavy rain. Take this into account when planning fitout, uniforms and volunteer training in order to avoid unnecessary attrition.
Waste Transfer Area A waste transfer area approximately 60 metres square was set up within the Logistics Compound and adjacent to the Main Dining area. It was the collection point for all forms of waste generated in the Village. Waste streams for recycling included paper, cardboard, plastic, glass, general waste, medical waste and sharps. The compound was used to store 1,200 litre waste bins that were delivered and removed twice daily by a contracted waste company (Greater Manchester Waste). Bins were transported to and from the transfer area throughout the day by small vehicles.
62 MANCHESTER 2002 THE XVII COMMONWEALTH GAMES • POST GAMES REPORT VOLUME 2 Core Operations Key service operations at the CGV included: Security Services Transport Mall Team Vehicles and Taxis Catering Services Cleaning Services
Village Security The CGV was protected by Heras barrier fencing with six access control points (including the Overflow Village) managed 24 hours by full time security staff and security volunteers. Two access control points provided ‘mag and bag’ security screening on all items entering the site. A vehicle check point was established adjacent to the Village on an access road closed to the public. The checkpoint operated effectively despite fears of vehicle back-up on to a main thoroughfare. An important task for Security was to coordinate the various agencies and contractors involved in securing the site. These included GMP, University Security and security contractors (Showsec and Guardian Executive). Daily meetings took place to maintain the integrity of the Village and ensure effective coordination. Reported crimes, both within the Village and in immediately adjoining areas were communicated to GMP. During the Games there were 21 minor thefts from athletes’ rooms and two arrests, one for theft and the other for common assault. Internal communication systems operated effectively and the CCTV camera system, operated by University Security, gave excellent coverage of the whole Village. Key Lessons and Recommendations Security controls must be carefully scrutinised. Contracting a local, recognised and reliable security company is essential to deliver an effective service. Every effort should be made to develop a good working relationship with the contractor.
Transport Mall Athlete transport services operated from the Transport Mall to the south of the Village. Separate inbound and outbound sections were created to provide clear pedestrian flows for athletes and officials. The Transport team provided guidance and assistance. All competition and training services operated to a published timetable on a scheduled frequency. However, contingency arrangements were in place to enhance the schedule in response to additional demand. T3 scheduled bus services were provided to sporting venues, official training venues and official accommodation sites. T3 services to sport and training venues ceased upon completion of the sports competition. All buses were EAD accessible and each bus could accommodate three wheelchair users. All portable sports equipment was carried on to buses. Oversized or excess baggage was transported to venues on an accompanying luggage truck. CGAs could log a work order to have any heavy team equipment moved from their housing allocation to the Transport Mall. The weather throughout the Games caused significant issues for transport. After heavy rain over 2,000 gallons of surface water had to be drained from the trackway area of the Transport Mall. This operation was repeated twice daily in an attempt to keep the facility open. Due to the rain, staff were constantly soaked on the external load zones. Fleeces and regular coffee runs were essential to avoid volunteer attrition.
MANCHESTER 2002 THE XVII COMMONWEALTH GAMES • POST GAMES REPORT 63 VOLUME 2 Team Vehicles and Taxis Two car parks were designated for accredited team vehicles at the CGV and specific permits were issued for each vehicle. Team vehicles were permitted to drop off and pick up at two dedicated Team Vehicle Areas (TVA) on the perimeter of the Village. Taxis operated to and from a dedicated load zone on Moseley Road on the southern side of the Village. Taxis were prevented from entering the Village and were not allowed to wait on the perimeter outside the officially designated area. Key Lessons and Recommendations Load zones located on public highways can create operational problems. Ideally they should be located in restricted access areas or within the Village itself. Ideally CGA parking should be located on-site. It is recommended that Transport take sole responsibility for all drivers and vehicles through a central permit system. It is recommended that a Client Services Manager is appointed to support the Village Transport Office and interface with the CGA teams across all transport areas. It is essential that all fleet drivers are familiar with load zones and any policy on vehicle entry into the Village. When scoping the Transport Mall ensure it will continue to be usable in periods of bad weather. Widely circulate and promote the bus timetable to inform CGA teams.
Catering Services Catering was a major function essential to the overall performance and level of service provided at the Village. The quality of meal services and food quality were vital components of the Village experience for athletes and staff. A catering contractor (Sodexho) provided all food services in the Village.
64 MANCHESTER 2002 THE XVII COMMONWEALTH GAMES • POST GAMES REPORT VOLUME 2 There were three main food and beverage outlets in the CGV: A Main Dining Hall adjacent to the International Zone of the Village that could accommodate up to 1,800 people at one sitting, making it the largest temporary restaurant ever created in the UK. It focused on providing all the nutritional aspects of an athlete’s diet. This facility peaked at 14,000 meals per day. A Casual Dining facility located in the heart of the Residential Zone with seating for 250 people. This facility was open for 16 days serving on average 2,000 meals a day in a ‘food court’ atmosphere. Food options included coffee, sandwiches, wok station, fish and chips and a BBQ. Staff dining facilities were provided in a designated area of the Main Dining Hall managed through a meal voucher system. In addition, there were two coffee carts located around the Village offering espresso style coffee and snacks to Village residents. The service was supplemented with a series of impromptu outdoor meals in different areas of the Village including a buffet system for Opening and Closing Ceremonies and similar catering arrangements for special events. Bespoke catering services were available to CGA teams and could be reserved through the Catering Office or any of the Guest Centres. Demand for additional catering service was unpredictable and often arranged at the last minute. Athletes away from the Village for more than four hours could obtain food and beverages through the Athlete Venue Meal booking system administered by the Catering Office. On site caterers would supply these meals at nominated venues. Cleaning, Catering and Waste (CC&W) provided its own Logistics team (two supervisors and 13 volunteers) to focus primarily on catering support within the Village. The main task of the team was to re-stock 20 fridges and 13 vending machines located across the Village. On peak days several pallets of beverage products were required to meet demand. Volunteers were carefully selected due to the demanding physical nature of the job. Qualified vehicle and material handling equipment operators were essential to perform these duties. Sponsored products were freely available to athletes and officials. They included ASDA 500ml bottled water, Powerade, Coca Cola branded soft drinks, Cadbury chocolate and Kenco coffee. VIK product storage and distribution was managed by the Catering Logistics team from a temporary warehouse. Kenco coffee was supplied to all restaurants and coffee carts in the Village and Kenco coffee machines were also provided in staff break areas.
Cleaning Services A single contractor (Executive Group) was appointed to undertake cleaning of all temporary structures and grounds in the International and Residential Zones. Temporary structures included 40 Marquees, 10 Portaloo Cabins, and 40 Tent structures of various sizes including the Main Dining Hall. All temporary structures were cleaned twice daily. Litter pick crews worked in two shifts and swept both zones during each shift. Daily auditing of standards was conducted by the Village Catering Cleaning and Waste Manager and any issues arising were resolved locally.
MANCHESTER 2002 THE XVII COMMONWEALTH GAMES • POST GAMES REPORT 65 VOLUME 2 Key Lessons and Recommendations Staff Dining It is important that the catering contractor provides an interesting and varied menu for staff throughout the Games period. Main Dining Any policy restricting the removal of food is extremely difficult to police and may not pose a sufficient problem to justify the use of volunteers at entrance/exit points. Highly visible signage is one way to reinforce the message. Ensure that a bar code system is operated in Main Dining to track demand. Bar Bistro Effective signage is required to promote and direct customers to the full range of catering services provided on site. Entertainment and Bar Facilities Entertainment and bar facilities were promoted through the Village Daily Newspaper. It was felt that the use of strategically placed billboards outside the main athlete entry points and in the International Zone would have attracted more customers. Local Competition Many athletes and officials ventured outside the Village to experience local hospitality in a number of attractive cafes, restaurants and bars. Potentially this can have a major revenue impact on the Village catering services. Venue Catering for Athletes Adequately scope athlete food requirements at venues particularly Squash, Table Tennis, Judo and Weightlifting.
66 MANCHESTER 2002 THE XVII COMMONWEALTH GAMES • POST GAMES REPORT VOLUME 2 Media Coverage The Villages enjoyed positive press prior to the Games. Granada TV ran a documentary entitled ‘Beyond the Baton’ which featured the lead up to the Village operation. A number of interviews with media representatives were also conducted which gave the Village some pre-Games exposure. An Official Media Day was held during the soft opening period. This was an extremely successful event which gave some unaccredited media the chance to view the Village prior to the official opening. Approximately 70 media attended this event including two international television broadcasters. Media coverage from this included live broadcasts from the Village. An Official Village Opening was held on 15 July and was officially declared open by special guest Olympic Gold medallist Ron Clark. Over 50 invitees attended this event including the Lord Mayor and Lady Mayoress of Manchester.
During Games time the Media Sub Press Centre was well utilised. Due to its location adjacent to HRH The Countess of Wessex the main entry of the Village, the media found it advantageous to access the Village for interviews tours the Athletes’ Village and then use the Sub Centre for filing stories and gaining additional assistance from the Village Press team. A number of media interviews were conducted with Villages during the operating period and in addition post Games coverage has also been positive. A number of Sponsors also requested filming of their operations in the Residential Zone during the Games. Whilst this is not ideal, it is recognised that it should be permitted. Key Lessons and Recommendations Allocate a day where Sponsors’ production teams are conducted on a tour of the key areas. Hold an Official Media Day prior to the soft opening of the Village to give unaccredited media the chance to view the site.
VIP and Royal Visits The Village enjoyed a number of successful Royal visits providing a morale boost for staff and visitors. The highlight for the Village Dining Hall was the visit by Her Majesty The Queen who was welcomed by athletes and staff and was able to visit many areas of the Village. Other Royal visits included The Earl and Countess of Wessex and The Princess Royal. The Prime Minister, Rt Hon Tony Blair, visited the Village on the day of the Opening Ceremony and addressed the residents of the Village.
MANCHESTER 2002 THE XVII COMMONWEALTH GAMES • POST GAMES REPORT 67 VOLUME 2 C2 Technical Officials’ Village
The Venue The Technical Officials’ Village (TOV) was located in student accommodation close to Manchester city centre. Able to accommodate up to 1,100 students, it was home to 951 Technical Officials at Games time. The central location of the Village and good local transport enabled Officials to explore the city during their stay. The complex was divided into 269 units (flats) with a total of 1,034 bedrooms offering sleeping accommodation to an acceptable standard. Each flat contained three-five bedrooms with a kitchen, toilet and shower room. Other facilities within the building included a laundrette, bar/lounge and a general store. A marquee was erected for use as a dining room. The bar/lounge proved to be a popular mixing area for Technical Officials. Between 15 July and 7 August the TOV was open and staffed for 24 hours a day. During the decommissioning period (7 – 10 August) access times were 06:00–22:00. The busiest arrival date was 23 July, with 250 Technical Officials checking in to the Village. The busiest departure date was 5 August, with 450 Technical Officials checking out.
Entry
N N
Cambridge Street Exit
Accessible Toilets
Cash Machine
Bar
Check in Lifts
Guest Centre
Information Centre
Launderette
Main Dining
Medical Centre Chester Street Hulme Street
Taxi Lifts Shop Toilets Reception
Transport info
Lower Chatham Street Venue Transport
Access Control Point To be used as a guide only - Not to scale © Crown Copyright. All rights reserved Manchester City Council LA076236 2002. © Manchester 2002 Limited
Vehicle Access Control Point
Guest Centre The Guest Centre was located in the bar area and provided a one-stop-shop responding to the needs of all residents. This included the following services: Information Desk Arrivals and departures Key lockout assistance Housekeeping, maintenance and repair requests Towel exchange Meeting room bookings Message service Lost and found Mail collection Television viewing GFIS terminals
68 MANCHESTER 2002 THE XVII COMMONWEALTH GAMES • POST GAMES REPORT VOLUME 2 Other Guest Services The TOV provided a range of other services to guests: Sports Information Desk – Providing a comprehensive sports and technical information service to Technical Officials. Dining – Breakfast was provided free for guests with a user-pay arrangement for lunch and dinner. Technical Officials tended to have breakfast in the Village and lunch at the venue using their per diem for an evening meal. Medical Services – A doctor (general practitioner) operated a drop-in surgery between 07:00- 09:00 and 20:00-22:00 daily. Visits by a nurse could be arranged via the doctor or by telephoning the Village Medical Centre. Technical Officials were also able to access the CGV to obtain emergency medical treatment. Meeting Rooms – Two meeting rooms were available which residents could book at the Guest Centre. Laundrette – A self-service laundrette was available for residents on a user-pay basis. The laundrette provided washing and drying facilities with free access to washing powder. Bar/Lounge – A wide range of drinks and beverages was available to residents on a user-pay basis in the bar/lounge area which included a television. General Store – An existing retail unit located within the building but fronting on to a public highway and therefore open to the general public.
Operations Housekeeping, catering and maintenance were managed by the venue’s existing service providers to a service level agreement broadly similar to that provided at the CGV. Bed linen was changed every four days and towels every two days. Breakfast was included in the contract with the catering service provider and was served daily between 06:00 and 09:00. The services provided by the staff and caterers were consistently of a high standard.
Key Partners and Contractors During the planning phase, Villages worked closely with the following partners/contractors to ensure that the TOV was fully integrated into Games time operations: Student Village building management team (Jarvis) Games security provider (Showsec) Student Village housekeeping and contract cleaning staff Technical Officials Breakfast and user pay catering contractor (Sodexho) Village Staffing At Games time, good communication and strong working relationships were required between M2002 Crew and these partners/contractors. However, working arrangements were complicated by the lack of consistency in staffing terms and conditions across the different organisations, for example, meal entitlements.
Staffing The Crew Motivation Coordinator visited the TOV regularly and the Risk/Health and Safety Contractors (50) Manager visited daily. Volunteers (47) A daily local Village Newspaper (the ‘TOV Times’) communicated general information and Paid Staff (7) important messages to both Technical Officials and M2002 Crew.
Transport Technical Officials were provided with a shuttle bus service from the TOV to all competition venues jointly managed by Sport and Transport. No additional recreational shuttle services were necessary because of the building’s close proximity to the city centre. Other transport arrangements were managed by the Venue Transport Manager including transfers between the Village and: Manchester Airport Piccadilly Train Station MAUC Technical Officials Reception Opening and Closing Ceremonies
MANCHESTER 2002 THE XVII COMMONWEALTH GAMES • POST GAMES REPORT 69 VOLUME 2 A Transport Desk was available for Technical Officials to arrange their Games transport needs. Transport staff also managed vehicle access to the site and assisted with the shuttle bus service as and when required.
Security Security arrangements were coordinated from the CGV using the same security contractor. During the Games there were a small number of thefts from the TOV all of which were handled by M2002 Security.
Medical Incidents The visiting doctor reported that the majority of referrals were related to high blood pressure, in part a reflection of the age group of many officials. There were limited facilities at the TOV and on occasions the doctor would take a patient back to the CGV for further treatment.
Key Milestones TOV space planning completed 30 November 2001 TOV accommodation contract completed 1 March 2002 Room allocations finalised 1 June 2002 TOV move in 4 July 2002 Main opening 15 July 2002 Close down 7 August 2002
Key Lessons and Recommendations Planning: Venue partners should be included in the venue team at an early stage to ensure they share a common goal. The OC should ensure that local residents and business interests are kept well informed about plans for the TOV and its likely impact on the surrounding area. In planning an accommodation venue, provision should be made for at least one overnight stay in order to identify any service issues, such as potential plumbing and electrical problems. Consider separate areas for guest check-in, general information and transport/sport specific information help desks. Allow sufficient time between hand-over and formal opening to ensure that rooms receive a ‘deep’ clean. Provision of an on-site bar worked well and is recommended for future Games. Expect demand for public telephones and access to the Internet to be high and provide services accordingly. Not all Technical Officials choose to eat out using their per diem. Consider providing additional facilities for informal dining throughout the day. Consider the provision of on-site facilities for the workforce, specifically a break room and storage lockers. The efforts and commitment shown by Technical Officials should be adequately recognised. Develop a programme of recognition and gifting as part of the planning process. Operations: A venue based Finance team is required with hours of operation that reflect the working day of the Technical Officials in order to ensure the timely return of per diems and travel expenses late in the evening. All service desks (Transport, Guest Information and Sport) should have hours of operation that meet the special needs of their client group. Recommended opening times are 06:00–24:00. Incorporate adequate internal/external signage to assist movements around the complex.
70 MANCHESTER 2002 THE XVII COMMONWEALTH GAMES • POST GAMES REPORT VOLUME 2 C3 Commonwealth Shooting Village
Overview The Commonwealth Shooting Village (CSV) was located at the University of Surrey, Guildford approximately 11 miles from the National Shooting Centre at Bisley. It accommodated 318 athletes and team officials and 98 Technical Officials. The Village was operational 24 hours a day between 15 July – 7 August. The Villages department worked closely with the University of Surrey to ensure the venue was fully integrated within the campus. Many of the Village’s support facilities were shared with students and conference delegates who were on the University campus at Games time. The CSV provided a similar level of service to the CGV and included a range of facilities for athletes and officials. The Management team worked closely with Villages to plan and deliver operations at the Shooting Village. Additional fitout was undertaken by a local contractor.
The Team The Village team comprised three paid staff and thirty volunteers at Games time. Recruitment of volunteers was difficult and only 80% of positions were filled due to a general lack of awareness of the volunteer programme in the Surrey area. Most volunteers committed to more shifts than they were expecting. Fortunately there was little attrition from the volunteers in the Village, due in part to the generous incentive, motivation and recognition programme which was well received. With a core staff of three, however, implementation of this programme was challenging. Existing University staff were integrated into the Games team. Volunteers undertook a range of duties in the Guest Centre and Venue Operations Centre. On the job training was intended to keep service standards high and consistent. Late assignment of staff meant that training and support of volunteers was fairly basic in the early days of operation at the Village. In some cases, newly recruited volunteers were uniformed, accredited and immediately sent to begin their shift. Many volunteers’ first day of work coincided with the arrival of athletes. Training was repeated at the start of every new shift. Pressure arising from lack of training and familiarisation eased in the second week when Crew members settled in and capable shift leaders were identified.
1 Athlete's lounge and games room 2 Bank 3 Gift bag collection 4 Hair salon 5 Post office 6 Shops 7 Team Leader's meeting room
Cash Machine and Bank
Bar
Casual Dining
Games Shuttle Drop Zone
Guest Centre
Information 2 5 7 Senate 6 House Laundrette 3 Lost and Found Amphitheatre 4 1 Luggage Drop Off
Main Dining
Medical Centre
Merchandise
Public Transport
To Guildford Taxi Cathedral Telephone
Toilets
To be used as a guide only - Not to scale © Crown Copyright. All rights reserved Manchester City Council LA076236 2002. © Manchester 2002 Limited
MANCHESTER 2002 THE XVII COMMONWEALTH GAMES • POST GAMES REPORT 71 VOLUME 2 Guest Centre The Guest Centre operated as a check-in for the Village, providing information and advice on accommodation related issues. Staff were responsible for managing all arrivals and departures and provided the following other services: Customer Service Desk Linen exchange Key lockout assistance Housekeeping, maintenance and repair requests Room inspections Lost and found Mail collection Accreditation – issuing of day passes Amenities distribution General information on Internet access, local gymnasium facilities, dry cleaning services and access to religious services Main Dining Village residents had access to the Main Dining area during designated hours and their accreditation was scanned prior to entering. The menu offered a range of products to meet the nutritional and ethnic requirements for athletes and officials. Certain staple/fixed items were available for each meal supplemented with course/special items that were changed on a daily basis. Breakfast was served between 06:30 and 09:30 each day. Light lunches were served from 12:00 to 14:00, although the majority of competitors and officials preferred to take their lunch at the competition venue. Dinner was served from 18:00 to 21:00.
Other Guest Services The CSV provided a range of other services to guests: Games Room – Incorporating lounge facilities, electronic games such as Microsoft Xbox and other games such as pool, pinball machines and air hockey tables. Laundrette – Village residents had access to the University’s self-service laundrette. CGAs were given a cash allotment for three washes per team member with the understanding that if they needed more they could be requested through the Guest Centre. Retail Outlets – The University campus provided a post office, bank and other retail outlets, including a general store. Guildford town centre was a 15 minute walk from the Village and offered a wide variety of other retail and recreational facilities. Medical Services – Core medical services were delivered from the NSC and space was provided close to the accommodation blocks to facilitate team medical requirements. After 19:00 requests for medical services were handled via a Manchester based telephone service. Bar – Village residents had access to three bars on the campus. Gymnasium – Athletes had access to a local gymnasium offering discounts on the use of other facilities. Internet – A local company provided internet access to Village residents.
Security An agreement was made between M2002 and the University of Surrey to enhance site security as the accommodation area was not secured with a fence. Accreditation controls were put in place to ensure the safety and security of all Village residents.
Transport Transport information and travel arrangement services were available at the Transport Customer Service Desk located at the Village. Updates on Team Arrivals and Departures was also available from this Desk. A Games Family shuttle bus service operated between the Village and the NSC. The early morning (06:15-08:15) and early evening (17:00–18:30) services were the most heavily used. A half hourly service also operated throughout the day between 09:00 and 16:30. All CGA teams had access to a Pool Car Service that provided transport around the local area. The service could be booked through the Transport Customer Service Desk.
72 MANCHESTER 2002 THE XVII COMMONWEALTH GAMES • POST GAMES REPORT VOLUME 2 For accredited Games Family members, a Bisley to Manchester return service (free of charge) was operated twice daily between 15 July – 7 August. Dedicated seats were available on scheduled Virgin Trains operating between Reading and Manchester Piccadilly with a coach service linking the CSV and the venue with Reading Station. A chartered train service from Guildford Station non-stop to Manchester Piccadilly was available for the Opening and Closing Ceremonies. On arriving in Manchester, athletes were transported to the CGV to meet their respective CGA teams. Access to the return service, immediately following both Ceremonies, was via a shuttle to Manchester Piccadilly from the NCC at Sportcity.
Accommodation and Housekeeping The accommodation blocks were in two configurations: there were 10 bedroom flats where 12 athletes and team officials were accommodated on a shared room basis. Technical Officials were housed in single en-suite rooms in a separate block. The Village was a ‘stand alone’ venue in technology terms with its own technology network. This created communication problems with both the venue and the CGV in Manchester and, at times, made it difficult to complete and transfer information. Two critical accommodation issues arose: firstly, many teams arrived before their Chefs de Mission had completed their DRMs. This meant that teams had to be housed temporarily until after these meetings. Secondly, because of a loss of beds due to male/female splits within teams, coupled with some teams being larger than expected, it was necessary for staff to move out of their lodgings (into other rooms on site) to make allowances for teams who could not be accommodated together in a block arrangement.
Key Milestones Space planning finalised 19 October 2001 SLA with University of Surrey 3 November 2001 Contract with University of Surrey completed 30 March 2002 Accommodation allocations agreed 28 June 2002 Move in 4 July 2002 Main opening 15 July 2002 Village closure 7 August 2002
Key Lessons and Recommendations Volunteer training should include full on-site familiarisation, a full briefing of procedures (especially those associated with team arrivals), plus a key performance standard matrix focusing on specific task fulfilment. Core volunteers should be available to mentor new volunteers during the first few days of operation. Where a venue has a small core staff team, volunteers should be empowered to take on more responsibility. A staff member should be allocated to manage volunteers. A break area should be provided in order to allow staff and volunteers to relax. It could also be utilised as a forum for reward and recognition, dissemination of information via bulletin boards and as a private area to conduct Crew handovers. Any satellite village and venue should have distinctly different names to avoid any potential confusion for logistical deliveries from the Host City. The Village should be set up at least a week before the first arrival, allowing sufficient time for the commissioning overlay and staff familiarisation programmes to be completed well in advance of the first arrivals. In scoping a satellite village, consideration should be given to: - Whether or not there needs to be an on-site Finance department representative. - The scope of the medical services and whether or not to have a 24 hour on-site doctor. - How it is networked with the rest of the Games organisation. - Whether or not there should be an on-site CGA representative. Service level agreements should be put in place where services are provided by existing venue management.
MANCHESTER 2002 THE XVII COMMONWEALTH GAMES • POST GAMES REPORT 73 VOLUME 2 C4 Team Welcome Ceremonies
Overview Team Welcome Ceremonies took place in the Village from 19 – 24 July in the International Zone of the outside the Firs Pavilion. The Ceremonies marked the official arrival of each team in the Village. Ceremonies took up to 45 minutes and were conducted three times per day. The aim was to welcome the teams from the 72 nations of the Commonwealth to the Village, to Manchester and England prior to the Opening Ceremony, to set the tone of the Games, to create a warm and friendly ambience and to provide an inspirational start to the Games for athletes and guests.
The Set Stage This was the area used by the Mayor to give a welcome speech and where the children performed. It comprised of: Two-level stage build across steps of the Firs Pavilion Covered by canopy for inclement weather Lectern for speech Fully accessible Dedicated PA System A dedicated PA system was used and clad in Look dressing. This comprised of: Microphone for Mayor Microphones for children performing Speakers for athletes/guests Play-in facilities for CDs/mini disks PA operator Athlete/Guest Seating Area This provided flexible seating for up to 500 people. Seats were adapted on a daily basis dependent upon team numbers. Roof Canopy ‘Trackway’ flooring Dedicated seating area for VIPs/Guests Easy access for EADs
74 MANCHESTER 2002 THE XVII COMMONWEALTH GAMES • POST GAMES REPORT VOLUME 2 Flag Poles 74 permanent flag poles for the flags of the nations plus M2002 and CGF flags. These were sited between the Firs Pavilion and the Armitage Centre. Five temporary flag poles were used during the ceremony performance. Four were originally planned and a further one was installed due to the congestion of the schedule of the final four days.
The Ceremony The ceremony running order was as follows: Team paraded in and took their seats. Mayor’s welcome speech. Gift presented to team representative. Response from team (if requested) including possible gift from team. NB: If more than one team was being welcomed then at this point the gift was presented to the next team representative followed by a response from that team (up to a maximum four teams per ceremony). Mayor announces arrival of flag(s). The Flag Team of Sea Cadets paraded from the side of the Firs Pavilion to ceremonies poles. Flag(s) raised accompanied by anthem(s). NB: If there were multiple teams the flags were raised in alphabetical order. The Mayor introduced the schoolchildren (as they parade onto stage area). Children performed their version of the Welcome Song. Mayor thanked performers and concluded ceremony.
The Team Team Welcome Ceremonies were managed by three paid staff and a team of 12 volunteers. The volunteers worked in four teams each managed by a team leader. All the teams had a specific role with dedicated responsibilities. The team was supported by Village Integration volunteers who provided assistance at the transport drop off site and also general stage/site/marshalling duties.
Administration Team The team were responsible for the day-to-day running of the Team Welcome Ceremonies Information Desk in the CGA Services Centre in the International Centre. A split shift pattern operated to ensure this desk was covered while the CGA services Centre was open from 07:00–22:00. Their primary role was coordinating communication and liaison with team representatives, CGA assistants, Protocol and Village Integration. The Administration team were crucial to the planning and production of the daily schedule. It is essential that this team are well trained and possess excellent administration skills. We were very fortunate to have two highly experienced administrators but even so this area was understaffed with only two volunteers.
Materials Team Responsible for all the different material assets that were used in the ceremonies: the flags of all the nations, national anthems, welcome song music and the Sea Cadet Flag Team. This was managed by one team leader and one volunteer.
MANCHESTER 2002 THE XVII COMMONWEALTH GAMES • POST GAMES REPORT 75 VOLUME 2 Participants Team Team Lesotho in traditional dress on their way to the Opening Ceremony. This team were responsible for making sure that all the school performers and athletes were in the right place at the right time. They escorted all the participants to and from the Welcome Ceremonies and were managed by a team leader, four volunteers and assisted by Games Integration volunteers on an ad-hoc basis.
Stage Team The team were responsible for all aspects of stage equipment including the overseeing of the PA system, ensuring that all the stage props, and the furniture and fixings were correct and in good working order. The team consisted of a team leader and two volunteers.
Key Partners and Contacts Village Mayor & Deputy Mayors Presented all ceremonies on a rota system. Manchester Education & Welfare Body of Persons Licence was agreed with Manchester Local Education Authority (LEA) School children were accompanied by police checked chaperones. Minimum ratio of 1-12 was agreed. Parent consent/release form was obtained for each child. Education Authorities/Schools All LEAs in the North West were represented (a total of 22). Each LEA nominated a school from their district. 29 primary schools in total took part including seven from the city of Manchester. Most schools took part in one ceremony. Some took part in two when additional welcome ceremony slots were put into the schedule. 45 children performed at each ceremony. Children performed the Welcome Song. Transport was provided by school approved supplier. Refreshments were provided. Indoor changing rooms and toilet facilities were provided.
76 MANCHESTER 2002 THE XVII COMMONWEALTH GAMES • POST GAMES REPORT VOLUME 2 Each child received a Games pump bag with a certificate and a letter from an M2002 sporting ambassador. Each school received a photograph of their ceremony. Accreditation – all children received wristbands and chaperones received a Day Pass. Sea Cadets Sea Cadets from North West Units raised the flags. One unit comprising of eight cadets took part each day. Flags were raised accompanied by national anthems. At the end of each ceremony, flags were taken from the temporary poles and raised on the permanent flagpoles. Cadets were between 12 and 18 years of age and each unit was accompanied by two chaperones who were Sea Cadet Officers. A parental consent/release form was obtained for each cadet. A body of Persons Licence was agreed with Manchester LEA. Rehearsals took place both off site and at the CGV. Composer A local composer composed the Welcome Song which was given to all schools for them to perform at the ceremonies. Each school was given the song and asked to provide their own interpretation. Due to its simplicity and relevance the song was hugely successful. 360 Media Designed and produced the stage and set for ceremonies area. Major difficulties were encountered during the set build due to the location. It was not possible to use stock staging and therefore a purpose-built stage increased costs. Gifts for the Teams A local artist was commissioned to produce hand-made pieces of artwork for each nation. These were produced on cotton and personalised for each nation. Quarry Bank Mill Quarry Bank Mill, a National Trust Property and a fully restored working mill, donated the cotton on which the gifts for the nations were produced Red Devils The Red Devils – the Army Parachute Display Team – agreed to perform a display for Team England’s Welcome Ceremony. They parachuted into the Village bringing the England flag with them.
Key Lessons and Recommendations It is vital to get a positive, lively atmosphere and for the Welcome Song to set the tone of the ceremonies. Attendance at ceremonies increased directly as a result of lively performances. Consider that if it is not possible to use stock staging that the costs will rise for a purpose built area. Consider the location very carefully. Wet weather cover is essential both for the stage and seating area. Factor in the possibility for late team arrivals and consider condensing the schedule into a shorter time scale. Pre-booking of nations into slots helped to alleviate problems with congestion in the schedule, particularly for the large teams. The schedule originally allowed for ceremonies over eight days – this had to be reduced to six due to teams’ late arrival. More than 40 teams had to be welcomed in the final two days. Flexibility to move teams within the schedule is essential to again cope with late arrivals. It is imperative to scope the correct technology required to deliver a successful ceremony and recognise that these should be dedicated facilities such as an instant replay machine and PA operator. Ensure during the build period that contractors have good access to the site. A paid member of staff should be available to supervise the Administration team. This team should be brought on board earlier to allow for more detailed training.
MANCHESTER 2002 THE XVII COMMONWEALTH GAMES • POST GAMES REPORT 77 VOLUME 2 It is essential that the presenter (Village Mayor or equivalent) has excellent presentation skills. Flags – the flags were ordered as part of the scope for Victory Ceremonies and arrived later than scheduled. This created problems as some flags were either of poor quality or incorrect and it proved difficult to replace them with the correct ones at short notice. A recommendation is that flags should be especially ordered for the Village to account for earlier deadlines and the fact that they come under close scrutiny by all the nations. Anthems – Team Welcome Ceremonies are the only occasion on which all 72 anthems are played in front of the teams. Anthems were provided by Sport Presentation and arrived late (i.e. the day before the first welcome ceremony). Future scoping of anthems should account for much earlier deadlines. Schools – it is essential to identify schools who can be flexible enough to respond to last- minute changes to the schedule. Consider carefully the school selection process, M2002 found that leaving the final decision to the LEA did not always result in the most appropriate schools being chosen. Sea Cadets – using local Sea Cadets for flag raising was very successful due to the opportunity to train in advance and rehearse on site. They were also very popular with the teams.
78 MANCHESTER 2002 THE XVII COMMONWEALTH GAMES • POST GAMES REPORT VOLUME 2 Section D Sport Venue Operations
D1 Stadium Plaza - Sportcity D1.1 Sportcity Visitor Centre D2 City of Manchester Stadium D3 Table Tennis Centre - Sportcity D4 National Squash Centre - Sportcity D5 National Cycling Centre - Sportcity D6 Manchester Aquatics Centre D7 Manchester Evening News Arena D8 G-Mex Centre – Manchester (G-Mex, MICC, MPC, Fleet Depot) D9 Belle Vue - Manchester D10 The Forum Centre, Wythenshawe D11 Heaton Park - Manchester D12 Road Walks – Manchester/Salford D13 Marathon – Manchester/Salford D14 Triathlon – Salford Quays D15 Bolton Arena D16 Rivington Park - Bolton D17 National Shooting Centre - Bisley D18 Training Venues D19 Venue Tours D1 Sportcity Plaza
Overview Sportcity encompassed four venues – the City of Manchester Stadium (CMS), National Squash Centre (NSC), Table Tennis Centre (TTC) and the National Cycling Centre (NCC) – together with the spectator circulation areas and other facilities immediately around these venues. The main area of Sportcity (excluding the NCC) was surrounded by a perimeter fence and had 16 gates used for vehicle and pedestrian access. The Sportcity Plaza (within the perimeter fence) was open to all spectators with tickets to the four venues giving a maximum daily capacity of 44,300. Free Plaza tickets were available to ticket-holders for non Sportcity venues thus giving them an opportunity to see Sportcity. Up to 4,000 Plaza tickets were available on most days, 2,000 per session, for each day from 27 July to 3 August inclusive. The facilities in the Plaza – merchandising, catering, medical, information booths and Sponsor showcasing – were available to all visitors to Sportcity. The role of the Sportcity Operations Manager was to coordinate all the areas and activities around the venues, especially the Plaza and to liaise with the venue teams. The main area of concern was the ingress and egress into and out Sportcity and the Stadium. The activities coordinated by the Sportcity Operations Manager and their team were as follows:
Activity Lead Responsibility Management of the bus terminus, coach parking and the shuttle bus GMPTE and accessible minibus services Games Family Transport (athletes/media/VIPs), volunteers giving Transport FA directions from the car parking and the bus terminus, and spectator, blue badge, contractor and workforce car parking Mag & Bag Security FA Showsec’s site security and stewarding SMG Customer Information Event Services FA City Link route, residents parking, Neighbourhood Wardens New East Manchester and City Guides Ticket sales, collection and ticket enquiries Ticketing FA Services for spectators with disabilities GamesMobility Crossing patrols, traffic management, signage and One Stop Shop MCC Liaison with local police officers and GMP’s Clayton Brook GMP and Traffic Silver Controls
Key Milestones, Events and Dates Weekly Sportcity Directors Meetings 29 May Sportcity team formed 10 June Commonwealth Athletics Trials 15/16 June Team relocated to Stadium 24 June Regular venue teams meetings 24 June Sportcity lockdown as an ‘island site’ 15 July Games operational 23 July – 4 August
The Venue The Sportcity Plaza was the main concourse area designed to facilitate the easy ingress and egress of spectators accessing predominantly the Stadium but also the NSC and the TTC. Many facilities within Sportcity were provided specifically to meet the needs of the Games. Bus Terminus A temporary bus terminus was built by GMPTE on the Sportcity Northern Car Park to accommodate the city centre and the Heaton Park and Old Trafford Park & Ride shuttle buses. It consisted of a queue marshalling area capable of accommodating up to 8,000 people, 23 bus departure stands, seven bus unloading stands and space to allow buses to layover. It had direct access onto
80 MANCHESTER 2002 THE XVII COMMONWEALTH GAMES • POST GAMES REPORT VOLUME 2 Alan Turing Way and was operational from 08:00 to midnight each day (and 01:00 after the Closing Ceremony). Toilets and break facilities were provided for GMPTE staff, bus crews and M2002 workforce. The toilets were also available to spectators. In a typical day, over 80% of spectators arrived at Sportcity by public transport. With additional usage of the Northern car park, the route from the north was the busiest into and out of the main Sportcity Plaza. The following diagram gives a visual representation of the Sportcity plaza facilities and sectors.
Mag & Bag
Deliveries Compound Key Athlete pathway Catering outlets
Public toilets
Information point
City Link Lost & found
Pushchair/wheelchair storage
Mag & Bag Disabled access Merchandise outlet Mag & Bag First aid centre
To be used as a guide only - Not to scale © Crown Copyright. All rights reserved Manchester City Council LA076236 2002. © Manchester 2002 Limited
Coach Parking Three areas were allocated for coach parking close to Sportcity: Riverpark Road to the north 60 coaches Bell Crescent to the south 30 coaches Overflow on Grimshaw Lane (north) 20 coaches Pick up and drop off facilities were also provided nearby for operators not requiring a parking space. Accessible Minibus Service GMPTE provided four accessible mini buses as a shuttle service for people who were unable to walk to Sportcity from either the coach or car parking. Once at Sportcity they were dropped off at the GamesMobility Centre where they were then assisted to their ultimate destination. The mini buses were regularly utilised and appreciated by consumers. City Link This was a two kilometre pedestrian route linking the city centre to Sportcity via Gate 16 adjacent to the NSC. It was marshalled by City Guides and the Police and proved to be a great success, especially on egress with an average of 5,000 people using it at the end of each session.
MANCHESTER 2002 THE XVII COMMONWEALTH GAMES • POST GAMES REPORT 81 VOLUME 2 Car Parks Public Car Parks The majority of the car park sites were owned by MCC and were operated by NCP under the direction of M2002. There were five to the north and five to the south, giving a total of 9,100 spaces all within 10–20 minutes walk of Sportcity. Each car was charged £5 to park in these designated areas. All car parks were provided with a cabin for the staff and toilets for the public. They were all dressed with trees and plants and branded with the Games Look. Due to the popularity of the shuttle bus system the car parks were not used to the extent that was originally expected and from 28 July two car parks were made available free to all workforce. However, the car parks were utilised to a larger extent during the Rugby sessions and on the Opening and Closing Ceremonies nights. Blue Badge Car Parking 140 spaces were allocated at a nearby supermarket car park with spectators gaining access to Sportcity by a short walk to Gate 5 in the south. 200 overflow spaces were provided on an adjacent site. Access to Sportcity was available by Gate 4 on the east side. Both car parks were fully utilised for the majority of the sessions. Workforce Car Parks Initially, one car park with 400 spaces was provided for the Sportcity workforce. This was increased to a capacity of 1,000 spaces after the first two days of the Games. Contractor Parking Contractor parking spaces were provided on the Sportcity northern car park. Showsec were also allocated two car parks near Sportcity with a total of 450 spaces.
Mag & Bag Security From 15 July the Sportcity site was classed as an ‘island site’ where all personnel and visitors Sportcity Plaza and their bags were screened and checked through Mag & Bag. Any prohibited items were Mag & Bag Staffing confiscated. (A complete list of these items can be found in the appendix to this volume). In excess of 7,000 items were surrendered, the most common being Swiss Army knives and alcoholic beverages. Marquees housing the screening equipment were erected at eight of the perimeter entry gates with 68 lanes in total (50 for spectator and 18 for accredited access) designed to process 9,675 people per hour. From 15 – 23 July Gate 1 in the north and Gate 10 in the south were open 24 hours for all accredited personnel, and Gates 14 and 16 for athletes.