Peculiar Letter Author(S): Andrew Gurr Source: Shakespeare Quarterly, Vol

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Peculiar Letter Author(S): Andrew Gurr Source: Shakespeare Quarterly, Vol George Washington University Henry Carey's Peculiar Letter Author(s): Andrew Gurr Source: Shakespeare Quarterly, Vol. 56, No. 1 (Spring, 2005), pp. 51-75 Published by: Folger Shakespeare Library in association with George Washington University Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3844026 . Accessed: 22/08/2011 12:27 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Folger Shakespeare Library and George Washington University are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Shakespeare Quarterly. http://www.jstor.org Henry Carey'sPeculiar Letter ANDREW GURR IN NOVEMBER1596 RESIDENTS OF THE LIBERTYOF THE BLACKFRIARSasked the Privy Council to stop James Burbage and his company at the Theatre from using his new playhouse in their precinct. This well-known petition contains some puz- zling statements. The petitioners complained, for instance, that ... all playersbeing banished by the Lord Mayor from playingwithin the Cittie by reason of the great inconveniencesand ill rule that followeth them, they now thincke to plant them selves in liberties.1 What seems strange here is not the company's plan to start growing in the liberty of Blackfriars, but the claim that the Lord Mayor had recently banned playing inside the city. No papers survive to say when or even that such a ban was issued. The authority that normally sent out such orders was not London's mayor but the Privy Council, acting for the monarch. Yet the thirty-four petitioners-residents of the afflicted liberty-should have known what they were saying. They were led by Lady Elizabeth Russell, sister-in-law to William Cecil, Lord Burghley, who chaired the Privy Council. The others included Richard Field, the printer from Stratford who had issued Shakespeare's narrative poems in 1593 and 1594. Though the claim that the Lord Mayor had banned playing in the city does echo twenty years of may- oral complaints to the Privy Council, it is distinctly mysterious. Just which Lord Mayor was it who took authority to initiate this unique ban on playing inside the city? Had the Privy Council, which had resisted Guildhall's pleas before, nothing to say about it and no say in it? Henry Carey, the first Lord Hunsdon, Lord Chamberlain, and the Privy Council member who might have been most concerned, had died in July, some months before the petitioners set down their complaint. Burbage's new indoor playhouse was built for use by the company that Carey himself had set up in May 1594 as the Lord Chamberlain's Men. At the time of the petition, William Brooke, Lord Cobham, Carey's successor as Lord Chamberlain, was less interested in help- ing Carey's company, now the second Lord Hunsdon's; it may even have been Brooke's objection that, in the same year as the petition, made them change the 1 E. K. Chambers,The ElizabethanStage, 4 vols. (Oxford:Clarendon Press, 1923), 4:319-20. 52 SHAKESPEARE QUARTERLY name of their most celebrated new creation, Sir John Oldcastle, to Sir John Falstaff.2Brooke, himself a resident of the Blackfriarsprecinct, was unsympathet- ic to the company'sscheme, as was the younger Carey,since his signatureappears on the petition immediatelybelow Lady Russell's.Both Brookeand George Carey would surelyhave known whether or not the Lord Mayorhad recentlymanaged to impose a ban on playinginside the city. Asking why the petitionersshould haveattributed such a ban to the LordMayor ratherthan to the PrivyCouncil takes us back deep into the story of a power strug- gle that entangledShakespeare's company through its first years.I believe the ban may have been laid down in May 1594, when Henry Carey as Lord Chamberlain and Charles Howard, the Lord Admiral,first set up their two new companies.In effect,I think, the Lord Chamberlain'sand the LordAdmiral's Men were createdby their patrons as a duopoly to replacethe monopoly of the former Queen'sMen. I have written elsewhereabout their scheme to createa pair of new companiesand give them fixedplaying places in the suburbs.3It was then, I believe,that they agreed to accepta ban on playinginside the city and to send their two companiesoff to play only in the suburbs.There the Lord Admiralwas in authority,and two playhouses, the Rose (in Surrey) and the Theatre (in Middlesex),were alreadyin regularuse. Confiningplaying to the suburbsof Middlesexand Surreywould keep it out of the Lord Mayor'sjurisdiction, and as a result, they no doubt hoped, might halt the streamof mayoralpleas to ban all playingeverywhere. The idea that Carey and Howard, in concert with the Lord Mayor,set up an agreementin 1594 for playingin and around London has significantimplications. While in the absenceof key documentssuch an idea is only a hypothesis,the clear- est readingof the evidencesuggests that the two authoritiesof centraland city gov- ernmentworked together to settle their differencesover which locationsthe profes- sional playing companiescould use then and in the future.That hypothesis,con- sideredalong with the survivingdocuments, also suggeststhat the agreedsolution continuedto be an issue after the two companiesbegan playing in 1594. The story of the Privy Council and city government'spower struggle over plays colors this reading. 2 See, for instance,Gary Taylor,"The Fortunes of Oldcastle,"Shakespeare Survey 38 (1985): 85-100. 3 See Gurr,"Privy Councilors as theatre patrons"in Shakespeareand TheatricalPatronage in Early ModernEngland, Paul Whitfield White and Suzanne R. Westfall,eds. (Cambridge:Cambridge UP, 2002), 221-45. Charles Howard was Lord Chamberlainthrough 1584 until he became the Lord Admiral,when the chamberlainshippassed to Carey,his father-in-law.The term duopolyfor the two companies is Richard Dutton's, though he cautiously marks it as not affirmed until 1598 in the Privy Council's surviving orders (Masteringthe Revels. The Regulationand Censorshipof English RenaissanceDrama [Iowa City: U of Iowa P, 1991], 111). I offer a summary of some of the conse- quences of establishing a duopoly in 1594 in The ShakespeareCompany 1594-1642 (Cambridge: CambridgeUP, 2004), 1-40. HENRY CAREY'S PECULIAR LETTER 53 Seen from a long historicalperspective, the successof Shakespeare'scompany in the yearsfollowing its creationappears an obvious step in the unstoppablegrowth of professionalplaying and the production of the great plays they contributedto English (and later global) culture.The political maneuverssurrounding the duop- oly'sestablishment, however, suggest that their creationwas far more riskyand their success more doubtful than we would like to think. That the Lord Chamberlain's Men were denied the use of an indoor playhouse in the Blackfriarsuntil 1608 affirmsthat risk. Extantpapers from the 1570s onwardshow that quite a few may- ors had unsuccessfullypleaded with the Privy Council to ban playingin London.4 They were forcedto pleadbecause it was the Council that issued ordersabout play- ing, as it did for all theaterclosures resulting from increasesin the numberof plague deaths. Survivingletters show the Council allowing playing, for instance, on 23 December 1578 (a letter also going to the magistratesof Middlesex and Surrey, where the custom-builtplayhouses stood), 18 November and 3 December 1581, 11 April 1582, and 26 November 1583. Banningor stayingorders, mostly because of plague,survive from 7 May 1587, 25 July 1591, 28 January1593 (for plague,includ- ing Middlesex and Surrey),and 3 February1594. After 1594, ordersabout playing went only to magistratesin the two counties,bypassing the city itself.5I suspectthat somethinghappened in that year,in a strangeconsonance with the Blackfriarspeti- tion, which allowedthe PrivyCouncil to stop regulatingplaying inside the city even as it continuedto close other public venues in an attempt to limit the spreadof the plague. What may be the key document in the strugglebetween the pro-playingPrivy Councillorsand the anti-playingmayoralty is preservedin the Remembranciaof the City of London, a patchy but vital transcriptionof letters written to and from Guildhall.This collection includes a copy of a letter sent on 8 October 1594 by Lord ChamberlainHenry Carey from his Privy Council office at Nonsuch Palace to the Lord Mayor,Sir RichardMartin, at the Guildhall.6The letter implies that Shakespeare'scompany wanted an indoor playhouse from the outset; it may also explain why Lady Russell and her co-signatoriesbelieved that it was the Lord Mayor who had stopped playing inside the city. Composed less than five months afterCarey's playing company had been established,while the first chill of the com- ing winterwas in the air,it delivereda blunt requestin his characteristicallycurt and businesslikemanner. 4 See Chambers,4:271-316. 5 Chambers,4:319, 325, 332-33. 6 The letter from Carey to Martin is reprinted in MaloneSociety Collections: Part I (Oxford: The Malone Society, 1907- ), 1:1,73-74, hereaftercited as MSC.The Remembranciawere the recordskept by the City Remembrancer,who from 1586 to 1605 was Giles Fletcher. Of the nine volumes, Volume 1 covers 1579 to 1592, and Volume 2 covers 1593 to 1609. 54 SHAKESPEAREQUARTERLY After my hartie comendacions,where
Recommended publications
  • The Appearance of Blacks on the Early Modern Stage: Love's
    Early Theatre 17-2 (2014), 77–94 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12745/et.17.2.1206 matthieu a. chapman The Appearance of Blacks on the Early Modern Stage: Love’s Labour’s Lost’s African Connections to Court While scholarship is certain that white actors did appear in blackface on the Eliza- bethan stages, this paper argues for the additional possibility of actual moors and blacks appearing on stage in early modern London. Examining the positive social, political, and economic implications of using in performance these bodies per- ceived as exotic, I argue for the appearance of blacks in Love’s Labour’s Lost as a display of courtly power in its 1597–8 showing for Elizabeth I. Building on this precedent, Queen Anna’s staging of herself as black in the 1605 Masque of Black- ness, I argue, worked to assert the new Jacobean court’s power. In the year 1501, Spanish princess Catherine of Aragon arrived in England to marry Arthur, eldest son of Henry VII. The English greeted Catherine with much fanfare and were impressed with the pageantry of her entrance, which, as Sir Thomas More wrote, ‘thrilled the hearts of everyone’.1 In spite of the fanfare, not everything about Catherine’s entrance was entirely positive. The Spanish princess’s arrival brought not only a wife for the prince of Wales, but also attention to a confusion prevalent in English culture, the simultan- eous visibility and invisibility of blacks. Of the fifty-one members of Cath- erine of Aragon’s household to make the trip to England with her, two were black.2 Describing these individuals
    [Show full text]
  • It Would, to Put It Mildly, Be Nice to Know More About the Backstage Oper- Ations of a Playing Company Like the Chamberlain’S Men Or the Admiral’S in the Later 1590S
    Early Theatre 10.1 (2007) ANDREW GURR The Work of Elizabethan Plotters, and 2 The Seven Deadly Sins It would, to put it mildly, be nice to know more about the backstage oper- ations of a playing company like the Chamberlain’s Men or the Admiral’s in the later 1590s. About the company that Shakespeare joined in 1594 we are unlikely ever to know much more than the few hard facts now current can tell us. But given Henslowe’s Diary with its intricate records of the day-by- day operations of Edward Alleyn and his company, there is better reason to hope for some clarification of the extraordinary processes that helped fifteen or more players to put six different plays on stage every week and to run a repertory consisting of more than thirty plays each year. Regrettably little about that uniquely high-speed process has come out so far, and this study of the backstage book-keeper and stage management will not take it very much further. But, as the chronic optimists say, every little helps. The Admiral’s company must have had several helpers for the staging of their plays besides the costumiers, to whom the Henslowe papers note pay- ments, and the property men. The difficulties of reading the Diary start there. Were the backstage workers employed by Henslowe himself as owner of the playhouse the company rented, or were they members of the company, hired and paid by the sharers? None of the stage hands is named in the accounts, though there are some bonds signed by hired men who were players.
    [Show full text]
  • Before We Sleep: Macbeth and the Curtain Lecture
    Before we sleep: Macbeth and the curtain lecture Neil Rhodes Date of deposit 23 01 2020 Document version Author’s accepted manuscript Access rights Copyright © 2020 Cambridge University Press. This work has been made available online in accordance with publisher policies or with permission. Permission for further reuse of this content should be sought from the publisher or the rights holder. This is the author created accepted manuscript following peer review and may differ slightly from the final published version. Citation for Rhodes, N 2020, 'Before we sleep: Macbeth and the curtain published version lecture', Shakespeare Survey, vol. 73. In press. Link to published https://www.cambridge.org/core/what-we- version publish/collections/shakespeare-survey Full metadata for this item is available in St Andrews Research Repository at: https://research-repository.st-andrews.ac.uk/ Before We Sleep: Macbeth and the Curtain Lecture Macbeth has been described as Shakespeare’s most topical play, engaging with recent events such as the Gunpowder Plot and reflecting upon issues close to King James himself, the official patron of Shakespeare’s playing company.1 This is to give the play a very public dimension, highlighting its historical and political concerns, and suiting it too to the large arena theatre in which it was first performed. Yet there are many aspects of Macbeth that work in a quite opposite way. Acted in daylight, it is nevertheless a play dominated by darkness and by the liminal territory between day and night. Though it was staged in the broad, open playing space of the Globe, some of its most memorable scenes take place in intensely private locations.
    [Show full text]
  • The Globe Theatre
    The Globe Theatre The Globe Theatre was a theatre in London associated with William Shakespeare. It was built in 1599 by Shakespeare's playing company, the Lord Chamberlain's Men, on land owned by Thomas Brend, and was destroyed by fire on 29 June 1613. A second Globe Theatre was built on the same site by June 1614 and closed by an order of The Globe's actual dimensions Parliament on 6 September 1642. are unknown, but its shape and A modern reconstruction of the Globe opened in 1997 approximately size has been approximated from 750 feet (230 m) from the site of the original theatre. research over the last two centuries. The evidence suggests History of The Globe Theatre The Globe was owned by actors who that it was a three-storey, open- were members of a troupe called ‘The Lord Chamberlain’s Men. There air amphitheatre approximately were six actor shareholders, of which Shakespeare was one. However, 100 feet (30 m) in diameter that he did not own the majority of shares: Richard Burbage and his brother could house up to Cuthbert, owned 50% of the share. 3,000 spectators. The Globe is The Globe was built in 1599 using timber from an earlier theatre which shown as round on Wenceslas had been built by Richard Burbage's father, James. Though James Hollar's sketch of the building, owned the theatre, he did not own the land on which it was built: he later incorporated into his leased it. The landowner, Giles Allen, claimed that the theatre etched Long View of London from belonged to him once the lease expired.
    [Show full text]
  • Marston, the Dutch Courtesan, and Theatrical Profit
    3532 Early Theatre 23.1 (2020), 109–26 https://doi.org/10.12745/et.23.1.4165 Lucy Munro Living by Others’ Pleasure: Marston, The Dutch Courtesan, and Theatrical Profit We have known for over a century that John Marston held a share in Children of the Queen’s Revels, the all-boy playing company that first performed The Dutch Cour- tesan in 1604, but how this knowledge affects our understanding of his plays requires further exploration. Drawing on neglected documentary sources, this essay reappraises the company’s links with the Chapel Royal choir to argue that Dutch Courtesan capitalizes on the skills that most clearly connected its performers with the royal choir, even while scrutinizing the ways in which the company turned pleasurable recreation into profit. Early in the second scene of The Dutch Courtesan, the ‘witty city jester’, Coclede- moy, offers a mock ‘oration’ in praise of the ‘most pleasurable function’ of the bawd, Mary Faugh. Opening by describing her ‘profession or vocation’ as ‘most worshipful of all the twelve companies’, he eventually concludes that ‘only my smooth-gummed bawd lives by others’ pleasure and only grows rich by others’ rising’ (‘Fabulae argumentum’ 2–3; 1.2.27, 28, 31–2, 32–3, 50–2).1 Cocledemoy’s ‘only’ serves to distinguish the bawd from the merchant, lawyer, and physician, whose trades he has just described, but the sex-trade was not, of course, the only means through which pleasure was sold in early Jacobean London. Cocledemoy’s paean to the bawd carries with it hints of another form of ‘trade’, much closer to home: the theatre was itself a means of ‘liv[ing] through others’ pleasure’, that is, the enjoyment of the paying audience.
    [Show full text]
  • 4. the Elizabethan Theatre R
    The world of the theatre All the World’s a Stage The Elizabethan Theatre The world of the theatre Period of Greatest Popularity The world of the theatre Elizabeth I 1558 - 1603 • Under Henry VIII drama was still anchored to Medieval trends and features • Under Elizabeth I we have the real flourishing of Elizabethan drama The world of the theatre James I 1603 - 1625 • Made the theatre more widely accepted in English culture • Greatly contributed to Shakespeare’s success • Shakespeare wrote plays suitable for the new king • The most famous is Macbeth The world of the theatre Acting Companies • Strolling actors: they moved from town to town • Use of “pageants” • Performed wherever they could find an audience • Negative reputation because of the audience they attracted The world of the theatre • In early Renaissance An Elizabethan Inn Moralities and Mysteries were performed there • People gathered in front of the actors’ pageants The world of the theatre • Strolling actors are fined and imprisoned as vagabonds • Acting companies seek the sponsorship of noblemen and royalty to gain protection and social acceptance • These patrons support the actors by giving them their name but no financial 1572 support • Plays start to be performed in playhouses or private theatres Vagabond Act The world of the theatre The First Permanent Theatres The world of the theatre London’s permanent theatres The building of permanent playhouses in London was a break with the past The world of the theatre London’s permanent theatres Towards the end of the 16th century, several theatres were built. • The Theatre (by James Burbage, 1576) • The Curtain (by James Burbage, 1577) • The Rose (by Philip Henslowe, 1587) The world of the theatre London’s permanent theatres Towards the end of the 16th century, several theatres were built.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction Andrew Gurr and Farah Karim-Cooper
    Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-04063-2 - Moving Shakespeare Indoors: Performance and Repertoire in the Jacobean Playhouse Edited by Andrew Gurr and Farah Karim-Cooper Excerpt More information Introduction Andrew Gurr and Farah Karim-Cooper In the winter of 2014, Shakespeare’s Globe moves indoors with an opening season for the indoor Jacobean theatre, aptly named the Sam Wanamaker Playhouse. The title of this book is in part inspired by this endeavour, one that Wanamaker envisioned as part of his own two-playhouse plan when he sought to reconstruct the Globe Theatre; this book will go some way to reflect upon and examine the task of building, as Oliver Jones refers to it in Chapter 3,a‘Jacobean ideal’. This scheme, the completion of a project first envisaged by Sam Wanamaker in the 1980s, is meant to add what the Shakespeare company wanted as early as 1594, a winter playhouse to accompany the outdoor playhouse they already possessed. Sam’s reason for wanting an indoor venue as well as the outdoor Globe was that the Shakespeare company, within three months of its being founded, tried to obtain an indoor playhouse they could use in the winter. In 1596 the Blackfriars was built for them, but sadly the locals blocked them from using it. In the event, their plan did not succeed until 1609, when Shakespeare himself was near the end of his writing career. The new indoor theatre is somewhat based on drawings discovered at Worcester College Oxford in the 1960s and that were once considered to be authored by Inigo Jones.
    [Show full text]
  • February 2015 Vol 21, No
    The Theatre Arts Management Shop at Catawba College Shuford School of Performing Arts Presents: MC EPPTHE HOUSE: SPOTLIGHT CATAWBA COLLEGE 2300 West Innes St. February 2015 Vol 21, No. 4 www.catawba.edu/theatrearts Salisbury, NC 28144 TELEPHONE (704) 637-4481 EMAIL THEATREARTS @CATAWBA.EDU Co-Editor: Verity Pryor-Harden Take a break from Winter and [email protected] laugh with us! Co-Editor: Pen Chance [email protected] THIS MONTH UPCOMING PRODUCTION: THE COMEDY OF ERRORS The Bard meets commedia dell’arte in our hilarious, fast- paced rendition! Continued on Page 2 SO, YOU WANT A SUMMER JOB? Senior Maggie Saunders shares some advice on how to prepare for auditions as well as the skinny on Theatre Conferences The Cast of The Comedy of Errors (photo by Jacob Hylton) Continued on Page 3-4 PEYTON GLENDINNING PAINTS IT RED Freshman Peyton Glendinning directed a staged reading of RED by John Logan. Continued on Page 5 ALUMNUS OF THE MONTH: DANIEL HINES Learn more about the ’08 alum who is currently Mask making. (Photo by David Pulliam) starring in the National Tour of MEMPHIS! Continued on Page 6 LITTLE BLUE BOOK Check out what’s happening behind the scenes! Continued on Page 8 Like us on Facebook: /catawbatheatre | Follow us on Twitter: @CatawbaTheatre | Follow us on Instagram: @catawbatheatre THE SPOTLIGHT PAGE2 The Comedy of Errors by Daisha Stafford & Lauren Stacks The Comedy of Errors Using the ancient Italian art Form, commedia dell’arte, Catawba College Theatre Arts Department will zoom in on the people of Ephesus in William by William Shakespeare Shakespeare’s Comedy of Errors.
    [Show full text]
  • Not-Shakespeare and the Shakespearean Ghost Peter Kirwan a Book with the Title the Oxford Handbook of Shakespeare and Performanc
    Not-Shakespeare and the Shakespearean Ghost Peter Kirwan A book with the title The Oxford Handbook of Shakespeare and Performance sets up implicit exclusions from its cover page, in a word with complex and overlapping associations: ‘Shakespeare’. This is not a volume about the performances undertaken by an individual called Shakespeare, but performances of the writing performances of William Shakespeare, his dramatic (and perhaps poetic) works. Even at this most basic level, the term ‘Shakespeare’ is complex: a quarter to a third of the plays to which Shakespeare contributed contain the writing of other dramatists, and, as anyone who has been involved in creating theatre knows, the words of a playtext make up only one part of the whole play/performance of which the written texts are only one type of record. Shakespeare is shorthand for a body of work associated with Shakespeare, an industry spanning four centuries of reworking, rewriting, and reperforming this body, as the other essays in this book make clear. The instability of ‘Shakespeare and/in performance’ is already implicit in the seemingly infinite number of collaborative forms which the coupling of those terms makes possible, but this essay seeks to address a broader question: the performance of the wider early modern drama as Shakespearean performance. The overwhelming focus on Shakespeare over his contemporaries in criticism, production, and teaching around the world has led to a situation in which the ‘Shakespearean’ often stands for much more than Shakespeare. Even in surveying academic book titles, the selling power of Shakespeare’s name makes it synecdochic of a playing company (The Shakespeare Company), the theatre industry of his time (The Shakespearean Stage), his place of work (Shakespeare’s London), and the art of the early modern stage (The Shakespearean Drama).
    [Show full text]
  • William Shakespeare 1 William Shakespeare
    William Shakespeare 1 William Shakespeare William Shakespeare The Chandos portrait, artist and authenticity unconfirmed. National Portrait Gallery, London. Born Baptised 26 April 1564 (birth date unknown) Stratford-upon-Avon, Warwickshire, England Died 23 April 1616 (aged 52) Stratford-upon-Avon, Warwickshire, England Occupation Playwright, poet, actor Nationality English Period English Renaissance Spouse(s) Anne Hathaway (m. 1582–1616) Children • Susanna Hall • Hamnet Shakespeare • Judith Quiney Relative(s) • John Shakespeare (father) • Mary Shakespeare (mother) Signature William Shakespeare (26 April 1564 (baptised) – 23 April 1616)[1] was an English poet and playwright, widely regarded as the greatest writer in the English language and the world's pre-eminent dramatist.[2] He is often called England's national poet and the "Bard of Avon".[3][4] His extant works, including some collaborations, consist of about 38 plays,[5] 154 sonnets, two long narrative poems, and a few other verses, the authorship of some of which is uncertain. His plays have been translated into every major living language and are performed more often than those of any other playwright.[6] Shakespeare was born and brought up in Stratford-upon-Avon. At the age of 18, he married Anne Hathaway, with whom he had three children: Susanna, and twins Hamnet and Judith. Between 1585 and 1592, he began a successful career in London as an actor, writer, and part-owner of a playing company called the Lord Chamberlain's Men, later known as the King's Men. He appears to have retired to Stratford around 1613 at age 49, where he died three years later.
    [Show full text]
  • Enter a City Gallant—Clowns in the Jacobean Theater
    Journal of Literature and Art Studies, June 2018, Vol. 8, No. 6, 880-891 doi: 10.17265/2159-5836/2018.06.006 D DAVID PUBLISHING Enter a City Gallant—Clowns in the Jacobean Theater KOBAYASHI, Yuko Tokyo University of Science, Tokyo, Japan Economic growth and social stability in the late sixteenth century brought unprecedented prosperity to the city of London. As Thomas Platter observed in 1599, most of the inhabitants were employed in commerce, and merchants accumulated their wealth. After his accession to the throne, King James generously distributed honors to wealthy merchants and others. Titles became a salable commodity. The sale of honors impaired respect for the titles and aroused bitter feelings and contempt for knighthood and baronetage among citizens. Gentlemen and ladies who suddenly rose to dignity tried to act suitably in their new status and dressed themselves up; yet they often became the subject for laughter. These upstarts were represented in contemporary dramas as ridiculous, contemptuous, and ill-mannered. The fancifully-dressed “city clowns” who came into being in the first decades of the seventeenth century, were found not only on stage but also in and outside of theaters. Keywords: Jacobean drama, stage clown, city gallant, stage costume Introduction England experienced a major social change from the late sixteenth to the early seventeenth century. Due to the political stability and economic growth in the Elizabethan period, imports increased and merchants prospered as well as the middle-class people. These conditions had a significant influence on life style of London citizens. One of the most popular entertainments for them was theater-going.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rise and Fall of Elizabethan Theatre
    Syracuse University SURFACE Syracuse University Honors Program Capstone Syracuse University Honors Program Capstone Projects Projects Spring 5-1-2007 The Rise and Fall of Elizabethan Theatre Erin M. McLaughlin Follow this and additional works at: https://surface.syr.edu/honors_capstone Part of the Cultural History Commons, and the Other History Commons Recommended Citation McLaughlin, Erin M., "The Rise and Fall of Elizabethan Theatre" (2007). Syracuse University Honors Program Capstone Projects. 588. https://surface.syr.edu/honors_capstone/588 This Honors Capstone Project is brought to you for free and open access by the Syracuse University Honors Program Capstone Projects at SURFACE. It has been accepted for inclusion in Syracuse University Honors Program Capstone Projects by an authorized administrator of SURFACE. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Rise and Fall of Elizabethan Theatre Erin M. McLaughlin Candidate for B.A. Degree in History with Honors April 2007 APPROVED Thesis Project Advisor: ____________________________ Christopher Kyle Honors Reader: __________________________________ Dympna Callaghan Honors Director: __________________________________ Samuel Gorovitz Date: ________April 26th 2007___________________ Abstract The emergence of plays and the theatre as a commercial industry in England peaked during the reign of Queen Elizabeth I. However, during this time numerous laws were passed which threatened the existence of this increasingly popular form of entertainment. The Rise and Fall of Elizabethan Theatre brings together the social, political and economic situations of early modern England and highlights the effects each had on the emerging theatre scene. Through evaluation of primary sources and the works of theatre historians, The Rise and Fall of Elizabethan Theatre attempts to chart the reasons for the mixed reception towards playgoing in Elizabethan England.
    [Show full text]