DOCSLIB.ORG

The Church Boys' Brigade

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Church Boys' Brigade The Church Boys’ Brigade – an Anglican Brigade for Canada Object - the extension of Christ’s Kingdom among boys by binding them in a disciplined society under a three-fold pledge of sobriety, purity and reverence. The Pioneer Company of the interdenominational Boy’s Brigade was established in Glasgow in 1883. It quickly proved to be a success at holding older lads to their churches and spread to other parts of the world. The Brigade idea was copied by others and organisations such as the Jewish Lads’ Brigade, the Catholic Boys’ Brigade and the Boys’ Life Brigade were started. The Church Lads’ Brigade was formed for the Church of England in 1891. In a similar manner, in 1892, the Church Boys’ Brigade was set up in Toronto specifically for Anglican Churches. The first company of the Church Boys’ Brigade was established in St Cyprian’s, Toronto, by Rev Charles Shortt and Dr Charles Carter in February 1892. Another six companies were started in the ensuing months and a council was formed to draw up a constitution. It was modelled on the Boys’ Brigade in Scotland, the Church Lads’ Brigade in England and the Knights of Temperance in the USA. The CBB was fully constituted by March 1894 and grew quickly from 18 companies in 1895 with 300 to 400 members to 28 companies with 1,300 members in 1896. By the following year, there were more than 50 companies spread across Ontario. Herbert Wilkinson Captain No.1 Company St John’s Church Boys’ Brigade 1893/94 The Brigade grew out of the choir organisations and was for teenage lads, mostly 13 to 17 years. Members wore a glengarry cap, without tails, and a fan shaped badge that was red, white and blue - the Brigade Colours - blue for temperance, white for purity, red for the blood of Jesus, the colour of Calvary. A lapel badge with a triangle and the letters SPQR (found on the standards of Roman Legions) was worn when in civvies. 1 It operated in a similar way to other Brigades which sought the betterment of the individual and the nation at large. There were a number of differences though. There was less emphasis on discipline and company officers were elected from the ranks of the boys themselves, instead of placing the clergy in charge. The boys used a password. Those responsible for overseeing the affairs of the Brigade were Chief Warden and Organiser for the movement in Canada, Rev Charles Shortt (St Cyprian’s); Chief Sub Warden, Mr Godfrey Shaw (All Saints); Commandant, Rev George Lothrop Starr (St John’s, Norway); Adjutant, Mr O St G Preer; Brigade Major, Major Henry Pellatt (later Major-General Sir Henry Pellatt). Bishop Arthur Sweatman Sir Henry Pellatt Rev G Lothrop Starr The Bishop of Toronto, Bishop Arthur Sweatman, was a keen supporter of the Church Boys’ Brigade. In 1895, when the Bishop met William Smith, Founder of the Boys’ Brigade, on his tour of Canada, he expressed the wish that he would like to drop the word ‘Church’ and have the CBB affiliated to the Boys’ Brigade so long as their internal arrangements were not interfered with. This did not happen. It is likely that leaders in the CBB were happy to stay as they were. In England, the Church Lads’ Brigade was inaugurated on the 11th November 1891 after the Boys’ Brigade Executive showed they were not interested in establishing an Anglican Branch within the BB. In 1896, the second Annual Convention of the Church Boys’ Brigade was held at The Pavilion, Toronto, a rally with over 500 members on parade and their company banners flying. During the rally there was a report on the 1895 Summer Camp by Rev Starr and the St Simon’s Company was presented with the Silver Challenge Cup, presented for drill by Major Pellatt. In the evening there were exhibitions of fencing and boxing. 2 Summer Camp was an important part of the Brigade programme and was viewed as a ‘right and happy break in the heavy round of yearly toil’. Howard’s Farm, Balmy Beach, was a popular spot and the programme was fully of healthy activity - Reveille, 6.30am, Breakfast, 7am, Inspection, 8am, Morning Parade and Prayers, 8.45am, Drill, 9am, Bathing Parade, 10.30am. Between dinner and tea there was cricket, football, scouting and fishing. In the evening was another inspection, battalion drill and prayers. First post was sounded at 10pm, last post, 10.30pm, lights out, 10.45pm. A guard was mounted every day. In 1896, in honour of Bishop Arthur Sweatman’s presence at camp, it was known to everyone as ‘Camp Sweatman’. On 22nd June 1897, the Church Boys’ Brigade paraded to Exhibition Park, Toronto, along with many other military and civilian organisations, to celebrate the Diamond Jubilee of Her Majesty Queen Victoria. The Church Boys’ Brigade organised an inter-company Hockey League (ice hockey). Companies listed in the Daily Mail and Empire, 14th February 1896: St Simon; St Cyprian; St Saviour, East Toronto; St John, Norway; St George; St Stephen; All Saints; St Luke; St John, Weston; St John, Toronto; St Margaret; St Thomas Mission; Church of the Redeemer; St Anne; St Barnabas; St Mary, Dovercourt; St James’. There was a company at St James’, Guelph, west of Toronto. The Rector, Rev Alfred James Belt, was Warden, assisted by the drill instructor, Lt Ogg. The Guelph Mercury reports that the Company spent a week at camp in 1897 at Puslinch Lake but that other camps were being held at Peterborough, Hamilton and Clinton, indicating that CBB companies existed near these places. Several companies were at the Brigade’s main camp at Kew Beach, near Toronto, ‘where the brigade’s headquarters is situated’. There was a Church Boys’ Brigade at St Matthew’s, Quebec. The Warden was Rev Frederick Norie (sometimes misspelt Norrie), curate from 1893 to 1896, Sub Warden, Mr J W Grant, who assisted the Rector, Rev Lennox Williams. Mr Mayne-Reade of the Royal Canadian artillery was the drill instructor. A newspaper report informs its readers that, ‘the lads looked very neat and trim in their grey and red uniforms and their marching was very creditable’. There were 28 members. A Church Boys’ Brigade was instituted on 16th August 1897 in St John’s, Port Arthur (now part of Thunder Bay), Diocese of Algoma. Mr R B H Bell of Trinity College, Toronto, assisted the Rector, Rev J W Thursby, establish the Company of 31 boys, taking them to summer camp for two weeks. The Company turned out on its first Church Parade 3 and were inspected by the Bishop, there to carry out a Confirmation Service. In July 1898, ‘the Boys’ Brigade was getting on well under instructor Mr T J C Redden’. It is not known for how long this Company was operational. What is known is that Company Number 2722 of the Church Lads’ Brigade was opened in May 1908, in the time of Rev Charles Hedley. The CLB Company was dormant by 1911. The Chase Tribune, 12th September 1913, contained a few paragraphs about Rev G Lothrop Starr. It mentioned his association in Toronto with Sir Henry Pellatt and the organisation of a Church Boys’ Brigade, ‘which was the foundation of the uniform cadet corps of that city’. To become Cadet Corps would have been an expected development for this organisation but there is a lack of evidence to corroborate this statement. The Canadian Army Cadet History website does not carry any details that can be conclusively connected to the Church Boys’ Brigade in Toronto. Regina Cadets with Mr Selby at Fort Qu’Appelle, 1911, from the Diocese of Qu’Appelle Archives There is reference to Cadet Corps #169, Regina Church Boys Cadet Corps in Saskatchewan, attached to St Paul’s Anglican Church, which was formed 26th October 1908 (Militia Order 245/08) and disbanded 30th September 1920 (MO 374/20). Drill instructors were provided by the 95th Saskatchewan Regiment. The Archivist and Registrar for the Diocese of Qu’Appelle, Trevor Powell, was able to confirm that this was a Church Boys’ Brigade Company that had been set up in 1908 by Mr W J P Selby. However, Regina is a long way from Toronto. It is possible that the Church Boys’ Brigade had an affiliation with the Queen’s Own Rifles in Toronto. The Queen’s Own Rifles website states, ‘Over the years, the Queen’s Own Rifles has included several Cadet Corps that are no longer in existence or affiliated with the regiment…the history of several other Corps is lost in time.’ However, the Cadet Corps specifically mentioned are all connected with schools or colleges. 4 So what happened to the Church Boys Brigade? This information has been gleaned from a few detailed newspaper reports in the 1890s but material after this has been very scarce. It is known that St James, Carleton Place, was still operating a Church Boys’ Brigade in 1909 as the Rector did not wish to upset the CBB by sponsoring a Boy Scout Troop, and that the All Saints CBB was replaced by Boy Scouts as its 1922 Parish History informs that Godfrey Shaw was the Scoutmaster. It is likely that, after an initial period of growth, there was a period of contraction. Several key figures in the organisation had moved away from Toronto. Rev Shortt moved from St Cyprian in 1897 to St Thomas’s, and in 1900, left Canada altogether to take up missionary work in Japan. Rev Starr, who from 1894 was curate at St John’s, Norway, left for Manitoba in 1898 and then on to Kingston Cathedral in 1904.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Quest for Natural Biogeographic Regions
    Chapter 3 Carving up Australasia: the quest for natural biogeographic regions Most systematists will squirm at inferences derived from a non-monophyletic or artificial taxon. The importance of monophyly is critical to understanding the natural world and drawing inferences about past processes and events. Since the early 19th century, plant and animal geographers have also been concerned about correctly identifying natural areas. Plant geographer and taxonomist Augustin de Candolle tried to propose natural laws when proposing natural areas and failed. Humboldt abandoned natural classification and assigned vegetable forms, thereby creating a useful classification, which was unfortunately artificial. For early 19th century Australasian biogeographers, the concept of cladistic biogeography and area monophyly was decades away, while the importance of finding natural areas was immediate. Natural areas allowed the biogeographer to make inferences about the biotic evolution of a region such as Australia or New Zealand. Discovering the relationships between natural areas would allow for better inferences about dispersal pathways and evolutionary connections between continental floras and faunas, rather than proposing ephemeral land-bridges or sunken continents. Still, after 150 years of searching, biogeographers puzzle over the natural regions of Australasia. Why natural regions? As in biological systematics, artificial taxa represent a pastiche of distantly related taxa (think of the term ‘insectivores’, which would include all insect eating animals, such as funnel-web spiders, bee-eaters and echidnas). Artificial taxa are more closely related to other taxa than they are to themselves. The same is true for biogeography – artificial areas, such as ‘Australia’, are composites that are more closely related to other areas than they are to themselves.
    [Show full text]
  • Rare and Curious Specimens, an Illustrated
    Having held the position in an acting capacity, Etheridge experienced no dif­ ficulty in assuming the full-time position of curator on 1 January 1895. He had, of course, to relinquish his half-time post in the Geological Survey but, as consulting palaeontologist to the Survey, he retained a foot in each camp and continued to publish under the aegis of both institutions. His scientific staff consisted of six men. Whitelegge was still active in his researches on marine invertebrates and was engaged in testing the efficiency of formalin as a preservative. North continued his studies on birds, but somewhat less actively since, to free Brazier for work on his long-delayed catalogue, he had been made responsible also for the ethnological, numismatic and historical collections. Conchology was now in the hands of Charles Hedley, first appointed in 1891 on a temporary basis to handle the routine matters of this department and to leave Brazier more time for his catalogue. Born in England, Hedley came to Australia at the age of twenty to seek relief from asthma and after a short period working on an oyster lease on Stradbroke Island, turned to fruit growing at Boyne Island. When a badly fractured left arm rendered him unfit for heavy work, he moved to Brisbane where, in 1889, he obtained a position on the staff of the Queensland Museum and developed an interest in shells. Finding that the collections and library of that insti­ tution were inadequate for his needs, he moved to Sydney and, within a few months, was recruited to the Museum at the age of thirty.
    [Show full text]
  • Geomorphology and the Great Barrier Reef
    Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-85302-6 - The Geomorphology of the Great Barrier Reef: Development, Diversity, and Change David Hopley, Scott G. Smithers and Kevin E. Parnell Excerpt More information 1 Geomorphology and the Great Barrier Reef 1.1 Introduction The Great Barrier Reef (GBR) is the largest coral reef system in the world. It extends from 248 300 S in the south to 98 300 S in the north, a distance of about 2300 km along the north-east shelf of Australia (Fig. 1.1). Accurate estimates of dimensions and other geographical data are available only for the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park (345 500 km2) or the Great Barrier Reef World Heritage Area (348 000 km2) which also includes islands excluded from the Park. Within this area are 2900 reefs occupying over 20 000 km2 or 9% of the 224 000 km2 shelf area (Hopley et al., 1989). However, this administrative area does not include the contiguous shelf of Torres Strait, data for which are more scant. The Strait is 150 km wide and east of the line of high islands, which link Australia to Papua New Guinea, the shelf has a width of over 200 km. Estimated total shelf area here is about 37 000 km2 and, relying on comparative data from the adjacent Great Barrier Reef Marine Park (which ends at 108 420 S) there may be a further 750 reefs and shoals with a total area of about 6000 km2. The GBR is also one of the best studied in the world. Although first described during James Cook’s voyage of exploration in 1770, because of science’s preoccupation with atolls, it did not become a major focus until after the establishment of the Great Barrier Reef Committee in 1922 and the ground-breaking year-long Royal Society Expedition to Low Isles near Cairns in 1928–29 (see below and Bowen and Bowen, 2002).
    [Show full text]
  • The Biology and Geology of Tuvalu: an Annotated Bibliography
    ISSN 1031-8062 ISBN 0 7305 5592 5 The Biology and Geology of Tuvalu: an Annotated Bibliography K. A. Rodgers and Carol' Cant.-11 Technical Reports of the Australian Museu~ Number-t TECHNICAL REPORTS OF THE AUSTRALIAN MUSEUM Director: Technical Reports of the Australian Museum is D.J.G . Griffin a series of occasional papers which publishes Editor: bibliographies, catalogues, surveys, and data bases in J.K. Lowry the fields of anthropology, geology and zoology. The journal is an adjunct to Records of the Australian Assistant Editor: J.E. Hanley Museum and the Supplement series which publish original research in natural history. It is designed for Associate Editors: the quick dissemination of information at a moderate Anthropology: cost. The information is relevant to Australia, the R.J. Lampert South-west Pacific and the Indian Ocean area. Invertebrates: Submitted manuscripts are reviewed by external W.B. Rudman referees. A reasonable number of copies are distributed to scholarly institutions in Australia and Geology: around the world. F.L. Sutherland Submitted manuscripts should be addressed to the Vertebrates: Editor, Australian Museum, P.O. Box A285, Sydney A.E . Greer South, N.S.W. 2000, Australia. Manuscripts should preferably be on 51;4 inch diskettes in DOS format and ©Copyright Australian Museum, 1988 should include an original and two copies. No part of this publication may be reproduced without permission of the Editor. Technical Reports are not available through subscription. New issues will be announced in the Produced by the Australian Museum Records. Orders should be addressed to the Assistant 15 September 1988 Editor (Community Relations), Australian Museum, $16.00 bought at the Australian Museum P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Transformations of the Meeting-House in Tuvalu
    Transformations of the meeting-house in Tuvalu Michael Goldsmith My problem is this: the Tuvaluan meeting-house is displayed as a symbol of indigenous culture in many different contexts. It is therefore often assumed, by both outside commentators and Tuvaluans themselves, to be of long standing in the history of that culture. Yet the word maneapa, by which the meeting-house is generically known, is of Gilbertese origin.1 Moreover, the weight of evidence suggests that not only the word but probably even the type of building itself is a post-colonial borrowing or implantation. If, indeed, there were no maneapa as such in Tuvalu before British hegemony was es­ tablished, then questions arise as to what, if anything, existed in its place; why the maneapa was introduced or borrowed; why it has achieved its current importance and, further, why it has become a symbol of national identity. In this connection, the concept of “transformation” calls out for a strong measure of historical attention. Yet the meaning of history is not as self-evident as the traditional definitions imply, with their references to narrative, sequences of events and so on (Braudel 1980:27). Another avenue, almost a new orthodoxy, has been explored under the influence of structuralism. Bather than using sequences of events to explain structure, some anthropologists use the delineation of structure to explain events. While Lêvi-Strauss’ name is the most closely linked to this programme (1966-.passim), even historical materialists find it beguiling. Godelier, for example, reverses the con­ ventional Marxist understanding of history with his contention that it explains nothing but is the category which itself needs to be explained, once structure has been revealed (Godelier 1977:49).
    [Show full text]
  • Renato Pacini, Starlight Musical's Orchestra Conductor for This Season, Is Appearing on the Fair Grounds Podium for the First Time
    • 4 O I V STARLIGHT MUSICALS presents _%s VN / -^ INDIANAPOLIS THEATRE ASSOCIATION, INC. INDIANA STATE FAIR GROUNDS INDIANAPOLIS cat^ INDIANAPOLIS THEATRE ASSOCIATION, INC. CLAYPOOL HOTEL • TELEPHONE RILEY 5417 INDIANAPOLIS, IND. OFFICERS Summer, 1951 MELVIN T. ROSS President and Gen. Manager Mr. and Mrs. John Q. Public HENRY HOLT Anyplace, Indiana 1st Vice-President H. T. PRITCHARD Dear Mr. and Mrs. Public: 2nd Vice-President CHARLES HEDLEY This is in answer to your letters of last season—the thousands of letters which expressed your Vice-Pres. and Producer L. G. GORDNER enjoyment of the entertainment you saw here at the Fair Grounds. Recording Secretary WILLIAM J. SCHUMACHER Any innovation in the entertainment business, especially if it involves a series of attractions, Corresponding Secretary takes thought, perseverance, time and money to become sufficiently well-established to bring the J. S. ROGAN Treasurer attractions which you, the public, deserve. DIRECTORS This is our most ambitious season to date. We believe that in our series this year we have chosen the cream of the crop as far as musical attractions are concerned. And the widened scope Fred Ayres Donald R. Barneclo of our plans has been made possible by your increased enthusiasm and patronage — for which we Noble Biddinger thank you. •J. M. Bloch William H. Book Almost every city our size in the middle west has a series of summer attractions which has Cecil M. Byrne lived, and grown, because the public wanted it. We, too, shall continue to grow and prosper by Joseph E. Cain giving you the type and calibre of entertainment which has kept you coming back year after year.
    [Show full text]
  • A Revision of the Australian Pinnidae
    AUSTRALIAN MUSEUM SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATIONS Hedley, Charles, 1924. A revision of the Australian Pinnidae. Records of the Australian Museum 14(3): 141–153, plates xix–xxi. [26 June 1924]. doi:10.3853/j.0067-1975.14.1924.838 ISSN 0067-1975 Published by the Australian Museum, Sydney nature culture discover Australian Museum science is freely accessible online at http://publications.australianmuseum.net.au 6 College Street, Sydney NSW 2010, Australia A REVISION OF THE AUSTRALIAN PINNIDJE. By CHARLES HEDLEY. (Plates xix-xxi.) The Pinnidm are a small family of marine bivalves including many fossil and about fifty recent species which occur throughout the warmer seas of the world. Though thin and brittle these shells are notable for their length, being exceeded in this respect only by the Giant Clams. They live planted point downwards with the tips of the broad ends projecting above the surface of zostera flats. An ugly wound may be inflicted on the bare feet of those who tread on their sharp blades, from this the shells are called in Australia "Razorbacks." The doings of a commensal crab, Pinnotheres, frequently a guest in the Pinna mansion, is related by classic legends either as the behaviour of a rascal or of a grateful attendant. The first attempt at classification of the Pinnidm was by Chemnitz, who in 1785 drew attention to a feature separating various species of Pinna,. In some, for instance P. ineurv1ata., the apical muscle scar has a ridge running lengthwise down the centre; in others, as in P. atrata, this ridge is absent. Apparently prompted by this observa­ tion, Gray proposed' the genus Atrina for the second group, with P.
    [Show full text]
  • INVERTEBRATE ZOOLOGY Crustacet 286 JANET HAIG Needed
    keprinted from the "Proceedings of Symposium on Crustacea"—Part t A REVIEW ©F THE INDO-WEST PACIFIC SPECIES OF GENUS PACHYCHELES (PORCELLANIDAE, ANOMURA)* JPiSDrr JANET HAIG 1 | B R A R Y Allan Hancock Foundation, University of Southern California, Los i/yj&gK . ABSTRACT Parhvcheles is a well-defined genus in the Porcellanidae, occurring world-wide and with approximately snacks Tb date the Indo-West Pacific members of the genus have not been reviewed a* a whole. In thisaSthere is a total of 11 species: of these, two have recently been described and two more have not pievioSy been recognized as members of genus Pachycheles. INTRODUCTION PACHYCHELES Stimpson, 1858, is a well-defined genus in the Porcellanidae, occurring world-wide in ironical warm-temperate, and cold-temperate regions and with approximately 40 species. Most of them live intertidally or in shallow water, although occasional individuals ol a few species have been dredged in *fopths of 100 meters or more. Like most porcellanids they conceal themselves under stones, in tie cavities of sponges, or among algae; in tropical regions they frequently live in corals. Pachycheles belongs to that group of genera in which the basal antennal segment is short, not ritctiiriinf the movable segments from the orbit. The carapace is usually about as broad as long in malesand somewhat broader than long in females. Jhe.outer orbital angle is produced into a spine m some species but, except for spiniform tubercles.which may be developed along the lateral margins (1 condition occurring only in P. spinipes), there are no other spines on the carapace.
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Zoologist V1 No3.Pdf
    The Marine Zoologist, Volume 1, Number 3, 1955 Item Type monograph Publisher Royal Zoological Society of New South Wales Download date 11/10/2021 01:09:20 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/1834/32611 ~~THEMARINE ZOOLOGIST" VOL. 1. NO.3. (Incorporated with the Proceedings of the Royal Zoological Society of New South Wales, 1953-54, published March 4, 1955) The Genus Tolema and Its Allies (Class Mollusca) By CHARLES F. LASERON, F.R.Z.S. (Plate I, figures 1-12.) 'this research has been assisted by a grant from the Science and Industry Endowment Fund. Family PURPURIDAE. Genus TOLEMA Iredale, 1929. Tole-ma' Iredale, Rec. Austr. Mus, XVII, 1929, p. 186. Genotype Tolema australis Laseron, not Purpura sertata Hedley. as used by Iredale. Owing to the confusion caused by the mixing of two species from the continental shelf, a curious problem in nomenclature has arisen. In 1903 Charles Hedley described a shell collected by the Thetis Expedition as Purpura sertata. The type was very immature, but Hedley considered its characters sufficiently distinctive for identifica­ tion when the adult shell should be found. Large specimens were' later found which seemed to be· the adult of Purpura sertata, and which so resembled. the Japanese species Ooralliophila lischkeana Dunker that Hedley concluded they were the same, and in his Check· List of 1917 he synonymized sertata in favour of Dunker's name. In 1936 Iredale accepted the identification of the large shell as the· adult of sertata, but considered it distinct from the Japanese species. He restored the specific name of sertata, having in 1929 proposed the new genus Tolema with the so-called "sertata" as genotype.
    [Show full text]
  • A Revision of the Types of the Marine Shells of the Chevert Expedition
    AUSTRALIAN MUSEUM SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATIONS Hedley, Charles, 1901. A revision of the types of the marine shells of the Chevert Expedition. Records of the Australian Museum 4(3): 121–130. [29 July 1901]. doi:10.3853/j.0067-1975.4.1901.1087 ISSN 0067-1975 Published by the Australian Museum, Sydney naturenature cultureculture discover discover AustralianAustralian Museum Museum science science is is freely freely accessible accessible online online at at www.australianmuseum.net.au/publications/www.australianmuseum.net.au/publications/ 66 CollegeCollege Street,Street, SydneySydney NSWNSW 2010,2010, AustraliaAustralia MARINE SHELLS OF THE CHEVERT EXPEDITION-HEDLEY. 121 A REVISION OF THE TYPES OF THE MARINE SHELLS OF THE CHEVERT EXPEDITION. By CHARLES HEDLEY, Conchologist. (Plates xvi. - xvii.) THE largest collection yet made of the marine mollusca of tropical Queensland, is that taken under the direction of Sir William Macleay, in 1875, by the staff of the" Chevert," and now in the Macleay Museum, Sydney. This collection was partly des­ cribed by Mr. J. Brazier in the earlier volumes of the Proceedings of the Linnean Society of New South Wales. Later writers, who have studied the marine mollusca of this region, have failed to identify species therein described, and have complained that the account given is inadequate for recognition.' In fairness to the Sydney Conchologist, it should be remembered that a debased style, dispensing with figures or dimensions in diagnoses, introduced by the Brothers Adams, then prevailed in London, and naturally lowered the level of work abroad. It has resulted that recent Monographs h:lClude the names of the "Chevert" shells among the doubtful or unknown species.
    [Show full text]
  • Tokelau and Tuvalu an Atoll Fisheries Bibliography
    Tokelau and Tuvalu An Atoll Fisheries Bibliography Robert Gillett September 1988 Field Document 88/4 FAO/UNDP Regional Fishery Support Programme Suva, Fiji Table of Contents Page Introduction............................................................................................................... iii Location of References.......................................................................................... v References Listed by Author................................................................................ 1 References Listed by Subject............................................................................... 29 Annual Reports.................................................................................................... 29 Aquaculture.......................................................................................................... 30 Aquarium Fish...................................................................................................... 30 Baitfish ................................................................................................................. 30 Bibliographies Concerning Tuvalu and Tokelau ................................................. 32 Beche-de-Mer ...................................................................................................... 33 Boats and Boatbuilding........................................................................................ 33 Bottomfish...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • James Edge-Partington in Australia in 1897
    From Field to Museum Studies from Melanesia in Honour of Robin Torrence edited by Jim Specht, Val Attenbrow, and Jim Allen Specht, Jim, Val Attenbrow, and Jim Allen. 2021. Preface ..................................................................... 1 Neall, Vincent, Lucy McGee, Michael Turner, Tanya O’Neill, Anke Zernack, and J. Stephen Athens. 2021. Geochemical fingerprinting of Holocene tephras in the Willaumez Isthmus District of West New Britain, Papua New Guinea ...................................................................... 5 Pengilley, Alana. 2021. Geochemistry and sources of stone tools in south-west New Britain, Papua New Guinea .................................................................................................................... 25 Shaw, Ben, and Simon Coxe. 2021. Cannibalism and developments to socio-political systems from 540 BP in the Massim Islands of south-east Papua New Guinea ....................... 47 Ford, Anne, Vincent Kewibu, and Kenneth Miamba. 2021. Avanata: a possible Late Lapita site on Fergusson Island, Milne Bay Province, Papua New Guinea .............................. 61 Hogg, Nicholas W. S., Glenn R. Summerhayes, and Yi-lin Elaine Chen. 2021. Moving on or settling down? Studying the nature of mobility through Lapita pottery from the Anir Islands, Papua New Guinea .............................................................................................. 71 Lentfer, Carol J., Alison Crowther, and Roger C. Green. 2021. The question of Early Lapita settlements in Remote Oceania and reliance
    [Show full text]