DOCSLIB.ORG

Antioch Dunes National Wildlife Refuge Comprehensive Conservation Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Antioch Dunes National Wildlife Refuge Comprehensive Conservation Plan U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Antioch Dunes National Wildlife Refuge Comprehensive Conservation Plan Vision Statement “Our vision is that endangered species management will be incorporated into the overall management of the riverine sand dune ecosystem. Using management actions that mimic natural processes, the Refuge will support self-sustaining populations of Lange’s, wallflower, primrose, and other native species.” “Through high quality interpretive and environmental education programs, the public will have opportunities to visit and gain an appreciation for the unique ecosys- tem of the Refuge and an understanding of endan- gered species protection and the role of the Refuge System in recovering endangered species.” U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service California/Nevada Refuge Planning Office 2800 Cottage Way, Room W-1916 Sacramento, CA 95825 August 2002 Antioch Dunes National Wildlife Refuge Table of Contents Acronymns and Definitions ......................................................................................................................................iii List of Selected Scientific Names ............................................................................................................................ iv Chapter 1 - Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 1 Introduction.................................................................................................................................................. 1 Purpose and Need for the Plan ................................................................................................................. 1 The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the National Wildlife Refuge System ................................ 2 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Responsibilities ....................................................................................... 2 The National Wildlife Refuge System ....................................................................................................... 2 Legal and Policy Guidance........................................................................................................................... 2 The Antioch Dunes National Wildlife Refuge ........................................................................................ 3 Location .......................................................................................................................................................... 3 Land Ownership............................................................................................................................................ 6 Partnerships .................................................................................................................................................. 6 Refuge Setting .............................................................................................................................................. 6 Refuge History .............................................................................................................................................. 7 Refuge Purpose ........................................................................................................................................... 10 Related Projects and Studies in the Area ............................................................................................. 10 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service .................................................................................................................. 10 The Recovery Plan for the Primrose, Wallflower, and Lange’s ....................................................... 10 Other Agencies ............................................................................................................................................ 11 Brannan Island State Recreation Area .............................................................................................. 11 The Regional Parks Botanic Garden at Tilden Regional Park ........................................................ 11 Montezuma Wetlands ........................................................................................................................... 11 CALFED ................................................................................................................................................ 12 Chapter 2 - The Planning Process .......................................................................................................................... 13 The Planning Process ............................................................................................................................... 13 Issues .......................................................................................................................................................... 14 Issues Identified by the Public ................................................................................................................. 14 Issues Identified by Refuge Staff, Panel of Experts, and Other Agencies ......................................... 15 Chapter 3 - Refuge and Resource Description .................................................................................................... 17 Ecoregion Setting...................................................................................................................................... 17 Geographic and Physical Setting ............................................................................................................ 17 Wilderness .................................................................................................................................................. 18 Management Area Designations............................................................................................................. 18 Topography ................................................................................................................................................. 18 Geology........................................................................................................................................................ 18 Soils.............................................................................................................................................................. 21 Climate ........................................................................................................................................................ 21 Air Quality .................................................................................................................................................. 21 Contaminants ............................................................................................................................................. 22 Hydrology ................................................................................................................................................... 23 Water Supply .............................................................................................................................................. 23 Vegetation .................................................................................................................................................... 23 Wildlife ........................................................................................................................................................ 26 Fish .............................................................................................................................................................. 26 Invertebrates ............................................................................................................................................. 26 i Endangered Species ................................................................................................................................. 27 Lange’s Metalmark Butterfly - Apodemia mormo langei .................................................................... 28 Background ............................................................................................................................................ 28 Population Size and Status ................................................................................................................... 29 Antioch Dunes Evening Primrose, Oenothera deltoides spp. howellii ............................................... 30 Background ............................................................................................................................................ 30 Population Size and Status ................................................................................................................... 32 Contra Costa Wallflower, Erysimum capitatum spp. angustatum ....................................................... 32 Background ............................................................................................................................................ 32 Population Size and Status ................................................................................................................... 34 Public Use .................................................................................................................................................. 34 Easements .................................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Beetle Appreciation Diversity and Classification of Common Beetle Families Christopher E
    Beetle Appreciation Diversity and Classification of Common Beetle Families Christopher E. Carlton Louisiana State Arthropod Museum Coleoptera Families Everyone Should Know (Checklist) Suborder Adephaga Suborder Polyphaga, cont. •Carabidae Superfamily Scarabaeoidea •Dytiscidae •Lucanidae •Gyrinidae •Passalidae Suborder Polyphaga •Scarabaeidae Superfamily Staphylinoidea Superfamily Buprestoidea •Ptiliidae •Buprestidae •Silphidae Superfamily Byrroidea •Staphylinidae •Heteroceridae Superfamily Hydrophiloidea •Dryopidae •Hydrophilidae •Elmidae •Histeridae Superfamily Elateroidea •Elateridae Coleoptera Families Everyone Should Know (Checklist, cont.) Suborder Polyphaga, cont. Suborder Polyphaga, cont. Superfamily Cantharoidea Superfamily Cucujoidea •Lycidae •Nitidulidae •Cantharidae •Silvanidae •Lampyridae •Cucujidae Superfamily Bostrichoidea •Erotylidae •Dermestidae •Coccinellidae Bostrichidae Superfamily Tenebrionoidea •Anobiidae •Tenebrionidae Superfamily Cleroidea •Mordellidae •Cleridae •Meloidae •Anthicidae Coleoptera Families Everyone Should Know (Checklist, cont.) Suborder Polyphaga, cont. Superfamily Chrysomeloidea •Chrysomelidae •Cerambycidae Superfamily Curculionoidea •Brentidae •Curculionidae Total: 35 families of 131 in the U.S. Suborder Adephaga Family Carabidae “Ground and Tiger Beetles” Terrestrial predators or herbivores (few). 2600 N. A. spp. Suborder Adephaga Family Dytiscidae “Predacious diving beetles” Adults and larvae aquatic predators. 500 N. A. spp. Suborder Adephaga Family Gyrindae “Whirligig beetles” Aquatic, on water
    [Show full text]
  • Captive Rearing of Lange's Metalmark Butterfly, 2010–2011
    Captive Rearing of Lange’s Metalmark Butterfly, 2010–2011 Jana J. Johnson,1,2 Jane Jones,2 Melanie Baudour,2 Michelle Wagner,2 Dara Flannery, 2 Diane Werner,2 Chad Holden,2 Katie Virun,2 Tyler Wilson,2 Jessica Delijani,2 Jasmine Delijani,2 Brittany Newton,2 D. Gundell,2 Bhummi Thummar,2 Courtney Blakey,2 Kara Walsh,2 Quincy Sweeney,2 Tami Ware,2 Allysa Adams,2 Cory Taylor,2 and Travis Longcore1 1 The Urban Wildlands Group 2 The Butterfly Project, Moorpark College December 19, 2011 Final Report to National Fish and Wildlife Foundation Lange’s Metalmark Butterfly Captive Breeding/Rearing Project # 2010-0512-001 The Urban Wildlands Group P.O. Box 24020 Los Angeles, California 90024-0020 Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 1! Captive Rearing Methods .............................................................................................................. 3! Collection of Wild Females ....................................................................................................... 3! Adult Feeding ............................................................................................................................ 5! Butterfly Containment ............................................................................................................... 9! Morgue .................................................................................................................................... 10! Eggs ........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • ACTA ENTOMOLOGICA 59(1): 253–272 MUSEI NATIONALIS PRAGAE Doi: 10.2478/Aemnp-2019-0021
    2019 ACTA ENTOMOLOGICA 59(1): 253–272 MUSEI NATIONALIS PRAGAE doi: 10.2478/aemnp-2019-0021 ISSN 1804-6487 (online) – 0374-1036 (print) www.aemnp.eu RESEARCH PAPER Aquatic Coleoptera of North Oman, with description of new species of Hydraenidae and Hydrophilidae Ignacio RIBERA1), Carles HERNANDO2) & Alexandra CIESLAK1) 1) Institute of Evolutionary Biology (CSIC-Universitat Pompeu Fabra), Passeig Maritim de la Barceloneta 37, E-08003 Barcelona, Spain; e-mails: [email protected], [email protected] 2) P.O. box 118, E-08911 Badalona, Catalonia, Spain; e-mail: [email protected] Accepted: Abstract. We report the aquatic Coleoptera (families Dryopidae, Dytiscidae, Georissidae, 10th June 2019 Gyrinidae, Heteroceridae, Hydraenidae, Hydrophilidae and Limnichidae) from North Oman, Published online: mostly based on the captures of fourteen localities sampled by the authors in 2010. Four 24th June 2019 species are described as new, all from the Al Hajar mountains, three in family Hydraenidae, Hydraena (Hydraena) naja sp. nov., Ochthebius (Ochthebius) alhajarensis sp. nov. (O. punc- tatus species group) and O. (O.) bernard sp. nov. (O. metallescens species group); and one in family Hydrophilidae, Agraphydrus elongatus sp. nov. Three of the recorded species are new to the Arabian Peninsula, Hydroglyphus farquharensis (Scott, 1912) (Dytiscidae), Hydraena (Hydraenopsis) quadricollis Wollaston, 1864 (Hydraenidae) and Enochrus (Lumetus) cf. quadrinotatus (Guillebeau, 1896) (Hydrophilidae). Ten species already known from the Arabian Peninsula are newly recorded from Oman: Cybister tripunctatus lateralis (Fabricius, 1798) (Dytiscidae), Hydraena (Hydraena) gattolliati Jäch & Delgado, 2010, Ochthebius (Ochthebius) monseti Jä ch & Delgado 2010, Ochthebius (Ochthebius) wurayah Jäch & Delgado, 2010 (all Hydraenidae), Georissus (Neogeorissus) chameleo Fikáč ek & Trávní č ek, 2009 (Georissidae), Enochrus (Methydrus) cf.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix F3 Rare Plant Survey Report
    Appendix F3 Rare Plant Survey Report Draft CADIZ VALLEY WATER CONSERVATION, RECOVERY, AND STORAGE PROJECT Rare Plant Survey Report Prepared for May 2011 Santa Margarita Water District Draft CADIZ VALLEY WATER CONSERVATION, RECOVERY, AND STORAGE PROJECT Rare Plant Survey Report Prepared for May 2011 Santa Margarita Water District 626 Wilshire Boulevard Suite 1100 Los Angeles, CA 90017 213.599.4300 www.esassoc.com Oakland Olympia Petaluma Portland Sacramento San Diego San Francisco Seattle Tampa Woodland Hills D210324 TABLE OF CONTENTS Cadiz Valley Water Conservation, Recovery, and Storage Project: Rare Plant Survey Report Page Summary ............................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction ..........................................................................................................................2 Objective .......................................................................................................................... 2 Project Location and Description .....................................................................................2 Setting ................................................................................................................................... 5 Climate ............................................................................................................................. 5 Topography and Soils ......................................................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • Speciation, Hybridization, and Conservation Quanderies: What Are We Protecting Anyway? J
    _______________________________________________________________________________________News of The Lepidopterists’ Society Volume 58, Number 4 Conservation Matters: Contributions from the Conservation Committee Speciation, hybridization, and conservation quanderies: what are we protecting anyway? J. R. Dupuis1 and Felix A. H. Sperling2 1Dept. of Plant and Environmental Protection Sciences, Univ. of Hawai’i at Mãnoa, Honolulu, Hawai’i 96822 2Dept. of Biological Sciences, Univ. of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 2E9 [email protected] There are few scientific disciplines more prone to social purpose of protecting rare animals or plants. Since then, quandaries than conservation biology. Its multidisci- extensive conservation efforts have taken place to stabi- plinary and synthetic nature lends itself to conflicts among lize populations of Lange’s metalmark, including the es- science, money, laws, and social values, which are encap- tablishment of a captive breeding program, planting of E. sulated in questions like what should you do with limited n. psychicola, hand-clearing/herbiciding invasive plants, funding but seemingly endless needs? In insect conserva- and experimental grazing. Despite these efforts, popula- tion, these quandaries often have an added layer of taxo- tion numbers are still precariously low, with competition nomic uncertainty. When a unique population is discov- from invasive weeds and wildfires proving to be formidable ered in some remnant patch of wildland, the first question opponents. is usually is this a different species/subspecies? A ‘yes’ can open the floodgates to discussions of endemism, legal pro- While Lange’s metalmark has a wing pattern that is dis- tection, and conservation prioritization. What may have tinct from most of the A. mormo species complex, it has lit- started as a weekend collecting trip, and the excitement tle to distinguish it genetically.
    [Show full text]
  • Emergence of Parasitic Flies from Adult Actinote Diceus (Nymphalidae: Acraeinae) in Ecuador
    VOLUME 55, NUMI:lEH 2 79 Larvae began to bllrrow in soil in preparation for pupation 36-4.5 Hodges ( 197l) stated that adults can be coll ected during the day days aftPf egg hatch. Mortality was high at this stagp: of 4.5 larvae while nectaring on flowers. T suspect this report to bp in error since that burrowed. on Iy 18 pupated. I .arvae pupated under dead leaves all collections throughout the range of the moth. that I have been and pieces 0[" wood. just under the soil surface. and up to 16 ..5 em able to document, were made at lights, and none of the moths I underground in tbe rootball of senescing hostplants. Pupation usu­ reared was active cluring the day. Moreover, the adults do not feed. ally occurred in firmly packed ovate cells. The cremaster possesses a I thank M. Caterino, J. Herbeck, J. Kruse, F. Sperling, J Tuttle bifurcate tip as depicted by Osborne ( 199.5 ) for Proserpinus clarkiae and especially J. Powell for comments which greatly improved the (Hoi sduval ) (Sphingidae). quality of this work aud J. Kruse [or his assistance in the field. J. The 18 pupae were maintained outside in a ventilated plastic tub Powell and J. DeBenedictis helped with museum tallies. This work in Berkeley until November when they were placed in a refrigcrator was supported in part by an ARCS foundation fellowship, the M. C. at 1.7°C ± 1°C. No development was evident in the pupae until they Walker fund, and a grant hom the California Agricultural Experi­ had been moved £l'om refrigeration to outside tf'mperatures (be­ ment Station to F.
    [Show full text]
  • Moths & Butterflies of Grizzly Peak Preserve
    2018 ANNUAL REPORT MOTHS & BUTTERFLIES OF GRIZZLY PEAK PRESERVE: Inventory Results from 2018 Prepared and Submi�ed by: DANA ROSS (Entomologist/Lepidoptera Specialist) Corvallis, Oregon SUMMARY The Grizzly Peak Preserve was sampled for butterflies and moths during May, June and October, 2018. A grand total of 218 species were documented and included 170 moths and 48 butterflies. These are presented as an annotated checklist in the appendix of this report. Butterflies and day-flying moths were sampled during daylight hours with an insect net. Nocturnal moths were collected using battery-powered backlight traps over single night periods at 10 locations during each monthly visit. While many of the documented butterflies and moths are common and widespread species, others - that include the Western Sulphur (Colias occidentalis primordialis) and the noctuid moth Eupsilia fringata - represent more locally endemic and/or rare taxa. One geometrid moth has yet to be identified and may represent an undescribed (“new”) species. Future sampling during March, April, July, August and September will capture many more Lepidoptera that have not been recorded. Once the site is more thoroughly sampled, the combined Grizzly Peak butterfly-moth fauna should total at least 450-500 species. INTRODUCTION The Order Lepidoptera (butterflies and moths) is an abundant and diverse insect group that performs essential ecological functions within terrestrial environments. As a group, these insects are major herbivores (caterpillars) and pollinators (adults), and are a critical food source for many species of birds, mammals (including bats) and predacious and parasitoid insects. With hundreds of species of butterflies and moths combined occurring at sites with ample habitat heterogeneity, a Lepidoptera inventory can provide a valuable baseline for biodiversity studies.
    [Show full text]
  • California-Friendly Plant List—Listed by Common Name
    California-Friendly Plants Listed Alphabetically by Common Name Grasses for Lawns COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME Buffalograss Buchloe dactyloides Hybrid Bermudagrass Cynodon species Victoria Zoysiagrass Zoysia 'Victoria' Landscape Plants and Trees African boxwood Myrsine africana African daisy Arctotis hybrids African daisy Osteospermum spp. African sumac Rhus lancea agave Agave spp. Aleppo pine Pinus halepensis aloe Aloe spp. Apache plume Fallugia paradoxa Argentine mesquite Prosopis alba Arizona mesquite Prosopis juliflora ash leaved gum, silver dollar tree Eucalyptus cinerea ashy silktassel Garrya flavescens Atlas cedar Cedrus atlantica Australian bluebell creeper Sollya heterophylla Australian fuchsia Correa spp. Australian tea tree Leptospermum laevigatum Australian willow Geijera parviflora autumn sage Salvia greggii & hybrids Aztec lily Sprekelia formosissima baboon flower Babiana stricta hybrids Bailey acacia Acacia baileyana Baja bush-snapdragon Galvesia juncea Baja California sage Salvia californica Baja California wild rose Rosa minutifolia Baja evening primrose Oenothera stubbei Baja fairy duster Calliandra californica Baja indigo bush Dalea orcutii barberry Berberis spp. barrel cactus Echinocactus spp. barrel cactus Ferocactus spp. beach evening primrose Camissonia cherianthifolia (Oenothera) bear grass Nolina spp. bee's bliss sage Salvia 'Bee's Bliss' bell mallee Eucalyptus preissiana bentennial baccharis Baccharis 'Centennial' betony Stachys albotomentosa bishop pine Pinus muricata black locust Robinia pseudoacacia black pennisetum
    [Show full text]
  • COMMENT LETTERS RECEIVED Awan, Afifa@SLC
    APPENDIX G: COMMENT LETTERS RECEIVED Awan, Afifa@SLC From: Katherine Perez <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2015 8:49 PM To: Awan, Afifa@SLC Subject: Re: Notice of Intent to Adopt A Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Georgia Pacific Gypsum Antioch Wharf Upgrade Project Afifa Awan, It is the recommendation of the tribe to have the propose project (Georgia Pacific Gypsum Antioch Wharf Upgrade project) monitored by both a qualified archaeological firm and native american monitor. Katherine Perez MLD Nototomne Cultural Preservation cell: (209) 649-8972 or office: (209) 887-3415 [email protected] On Tuesday, June 16, 2015 4:46 PM, "Awan, Afifa@SLC" <[email protected]> wrote: To All Interested Parties, Please find attached the Notice of Intent to Adopt A Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) for the Georgia Pacific Gypsum Antioch Wharf Upgrade Project. The MND can be downloaded from http://www.slc.ca.gov/Division_Pages/DEPM/Reports/Antioch_Wharf/Antioch_Wharf.html. This notice provides the date of the California State Lands Commission meeting that will consider the subject Project. Sincerely, Afifa Awan Environmental Scientist California State Lands Commission 100 Howe Avenue, Suite 100-South Sacramento, CA 95825-8202 Desk: (916) 574-1891 [email protected] 1 Awan, Afifa@SLC From: Rene Urbina <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2015 4:25 PM To: Comments, CEQA@SLC Cc: Teri Rie Subject: Georgia Pacifica Gypsum Antioch Wharf Upgrade Project - SCH#2015062045, CSLC File Ref: MND #778; PRC 1589.1; W30204 Hello Afifa Awan, We received the Notice of Public Review to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Georgia Pacific Gypsum Antioch Wharf Upgrade Project.
    [Show full text]
  • Diptera) of Finland 369 Doi: 10.3897/Zookeys.441.7527 CHECKLIST Launched to Accelerate Biodiversity Research
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 441: 369–382 (2014)Checklist of the family Anthomyiidae (Diptera) of Finland 369 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.441.7527 CHECKLIST www.zookeys.org Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Checklist of the family Anthomyiidae (Diptera) of Finland Verner Michelsen1 1 Natural History Museum of Denmark (Zoological Museum), Universitetsparken 15, DK-2100, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark Corresponding author: Verner Michelsen ([email protected]) Academic editor: J. Kahanpää | Received 15 March 2014 | Accepted 8 May 2014 | Published 19 September 2014 http://zoobank.org/4946FF28-E271-4E73-BFE5-12B71572C9F3 Citation: Michelsen V (2014) Checklist of the family Anthomyiidae (Diptera) of Finland. In: Kahanpää J, Salmela J (Eds) Checklist of the Diptera of Finland. ZooKeys 441: 369–382. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.441.7527 Abstract An updated checklist of the the genera and species of Anthomyiidae (Diptera) found in Finland is provided. Keywords Checklist, Finland, Diptera, Anthomyiidae Introduction The family Anthomyiidae is a large and taxonomically difficult group of flies that has for the same reason suffered from unstable taxonomy and nomenclature. A checklist of the anthomyiid species known from pre-war Finland was compiled by their leading regional specialist of calyptrate flies Lauri Tiensuu (1906−1980) and published in Frey et al. (1941). The Anthomyiidae were then not recognized as a separate family but combined with the fanniid and true muscid flies in a comprehensive Muscidae fam- ily equivalent of the present Muscoidea less Scathophagidae. Tiensuu’s list included confirmed records of 199 anthomyiid species classified in 41 genera and subgenera. No less than 34% of the species names and 58% of the genus-group names in that list are Copyright Verner Michelsen.
    [Show full text]
  • Changes in the Insect Fauna of a Deteriorating Riverine Sand Dune
    ., CHANGES IN THE INSECT FAUNA OF A DETERIORATING RIVERINE SAND DUNE COMMUNITY DURING 50 YEARS OF HUMAN EXPLOITATION J. A. Powell Department of Entomological Sciences University of California, Berkeley May , 1983 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 1 HISTORY OF EXPLOITATION 4 HISTORY OF ENTOMOLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS 7 INSECT FAUNA 10 Methods 10 ErRs s~lected for compar"ltive "lnBlysis 13 Bio1o~ica1 isl!lnd si~e 14 Inventory of sp~cies 14 Endemism 18 Extinctions 19 Species restricted to one of the two refu~e parcels 25 Possible recently colonized species 27 INSECT ASSOCIATES OF ERYSIMUM AND OENOTHERA 29 Poll i n!ltor<'l 29 Predqt,.n·s 32 SUMMARY 35 RECOm1ENDATIONS FOR RECOVERY ~4NAGEMENT 37 ACKNOWT.. EDGMENTS 42 LITERATURE CITED 44 APPENDICES 1. T'lbles 1-8 49 2. St::ttns of 15 Antioch Insects Listed in Notice of 75 Review by the U.S. Fish "l.nd Wildlife Service INTRODUCTION The sand dune formation east of Antioch, Contra Costa County, California, comprised the largest riverine dune system in California. Biogeographically, this formation was unique because it supported a northern extension of plants and animals of desert, rather than coastal, affinities. Geologists believe that the dunes were relicts of the most recent glaciation of the Sierra Nevada, probably originating 10,000 to 25,000 years ago, with the sand derived from the supratidal floodplain of the combined Sacramento and San Joaquin Rivers. The ice age climate in the area is thought to have been cold but arid. Presumably summertime winds sweeping through the Carquinez Strait across the glacial-age floodplains would have picked up the fine-grained sand and redeposited it to the east and southeast, thus creating the dune fields of eastern Contra Costa County.
    [Show full text]
  • Species and Community Profiles to Six Clutches of Eggs, Totaling About 861 Eggs During California Vernal Pool Tadpole Her Lifetime (Ahl 1991)
    3 Invertebrates their effects on this species are currently being investi- Franciscan Brine Shrimp gated (Maiss and Harding-Smith 1992). Artemia franciscana Kellogg Reproduction, Growth, and Development Invertebrates Brita C. Larsson Artemia franciscana has two types of reproduction, ovovi- General Information viparous and oviparous. In ovoviviparous reproduction, the fertilized eggs in a female can develop into free-swim- The Franciscan brine shrimp, Artemia franciscana (for- ming nauplii, which are set free by the mother. In ovipa- merly salina) (Bowen et al. 1985, Bowen and Sterling rous reproduction, however, the eggs, when reaching the 1978, Barigozzi 1974), is a small crustacean found in gastrula stage, become surrounded by a thick shell and highly saline ponds, lakes or sloughs that belong to the are deposited as cysts, which are in diapause (Sorgeloos order Anostraca (Eng et al. 1990, Pennak 1989). They 1980). In the Bay area, cysts production is generally are characterized by stalked compound eyes, an elongate highest during the fall and winter, when conditions for body, and no carapace. They have 11 pairs of swimming Artemia development are less favorable. The cysts may legs and the second antennae are uniramous, greatly en- persist for decades in a suspended state. Under natural larged and used as a clasping organ in males. The aver- conditions, the lifespan of Artemia is from 50 to 70 days. age length is 10 mm (Pennak 1989). Brine shrimp com- In the lab, females produced an average of 10 broods, monly swim with their ventral side upward. A. franciscana but the average under natural conditions may be closer lives in hypersaline water (70 to 200 ppt) (Maiss and to 3-4 broods, although this has not been confirmed.
    [Show full text]