4th Quarter 2019 Social Weather Survey SWS MEDIA RELEASE 3 March 2020, page 1 of 28

52 Malingap St., Sikatuna Village, Tel: 924-4456, 924-4465 Website: www.sws.org.ph Fax: 920-2181

Fourth Quarter 2019 Social Weather Survey: Net Satisfaction “Good” for Vice-President Robredo, “Very Good” for Senate President Sotto, “Good” for Speaker Cayetano, and “Moderate” for Chief Justice Peralta • “Very Good” for the Senate and House of Representatives, “Good” for the Supreme Court and Cabinet

Social Weather Stations

The Fourth Quarter 2019 Social Weather Survey, conducted from December 13-16, 2019, found 59% satisfied and 23% dissatisfied with the performance of Vice-President , 73% satisfied and 10% dissatisfied with Senate President Vicente “Tito” Sotto III, 67% satisfied and 15% dissatisfied with Speaker , and 40% satisfied and 19% dissatisfied with Chief Justice Diosdado Peralta [Tables 1 and 2]. The resulting net satisfaction ratings (% satisfied minus % dissatisfied) were a "good" +36 for Vice-Pres. Robredo, a "very good" +62 (correctly rounded) for Senate President Sotto, a "very good" +53 (correctly rounded) for Speaker Cayetano, and a "moderate" +21 first rating for Chief Justice Peralta. The December 2019 survey also found 73% satisfied and 11% dissatisfied with the performance of Senate, 63% satisfied and 12% dissatisfied with the House of Representatives, 62% satisfied and 13% dissatisfied with the Supreme Court, and 56% satisfied and 11% dissatisfied with the Cabinet as a whole [Tables 3, 4, and 5]. The resulting net satisfaction ratings were a "very good" +62 for the Senate, a "very good" +51 for the House of Representatives, a "good" +49 for the Supreme Court, and a "good" +45 for the Cabinet as a whole. [SWS terminology for Net Satisfaction Ratings: +70 and above, "excellent"; +50 to +69, "very good"; +30 to +49, "good"; +10 to +29, "moderate", +9 to -9, "neutral"; -10 to -29, "poor"; -30 to -49, "bad"; -50 to -69, "very bad"; -70 and below, "execrable". SWS considers the movement from one classification to another as either an "upgrade" or "downgrade".]

4th Quarter 2019 Social Weather Survey SWS MEDIA RELEASE 3 March 2020, page 2 of 28

Vice-President Robredo stays “Good” at +36 Vice-President Robredo's net satisfaction rating stayed good, up from +33 in September 2019 to +36 in December 2019 [Chart 1, Tables 6 and 7]. The 3-point rise in the overall net satisfaction rating of Vice-Pres. Robredo was due to increases in Metro , , and the , combined with a steady score in Balance . Vice-Pres. Robredo's net satisfaction rating stayed moderate in , up from +15 in September 2019 to +25 in December 2019. It stayed good in Mindanao, up from +32 in September to +38 in December. It stayed good in the Visayas, up from +46 in September to +48 in December. It also stayed good in Balance Luzon, down slightly from +34 in September to +33 in December. Rural net satisfaction stayed good, up from +40 in September to +45 in December. Urban net satisfaction stayed moderate, up from +20 in September to +26 in December. By basic demographics, Vice-Pres. Robredo’s net satisfaction rating rose from neutral to moderate among class ABC and among high school graduates. It stayed good among class D or the masa, among both men and women, among the 18-34 year olds, and among those 45 years old and above. It also stayed good among non-elementary graduates, elementary graduates, and college graduates. However, it fell from very good to good among class E, and from good to moderate among 35-44 year olds. Senate Pres. Sotto stays “Very Good” at +62 Senate Pres. Sotto’s net satisfaction rating stayed very good, up slightly from +61 in September 2019 to +62 in December 2019 [Chart 2, Tables 8 and 9]. The 1-point increase in the overall net satisfaction rating of Senate Pres. Sotto was due to increases in all areas except Balance Luzon. Senate Pres. Sotto’s net satisfaction rating rose from very good to excellent in Metro Manila, up from +68 in September to +78 in December. It stayed very good in the Visayas, up from +61 in September to +67 in December. It stayed very good in Mindanao, up slightly from +51 in September to +53 in December.

4th Quarter 2019 Social Weather Survey SWS MEDIA RELEASE 3 March 2020, page 3 of 28

It stayed very good in Balance Luzon, although down from +64 in September to +60 in December. Urban net satisfaction with Senate Pres. Sotto stayed very good, up from +64 in September to +69 in December. Rural net satisfaction also stayed very good, although down slightly from +59 in September to +57 in December. Compared to September 2019, Senate Pres. Sotto’s net satisfaction ratings stayed very good in all basic demographics, except among class ABC where it fell from very good to good. Speaker Cayetano up to “Very Good” +53 Speaker Cayetano’s net satisfaction rating rose from good to very good, up from +49 in September 2019 to +53 in December 2019 [Chart 3, Tables 10 and 11]. The 4-point increase in the overall net satisfaction rating of Speaker Cayetano was due to increases in all areas except Balance Luzon. Speaker Cayetano’s net satisfaction rating rose from good to very good in Metro Manila, up from +48 in September to +54 in December. It stayed very good in Mindanao, up from +52 in September to +65 in December. It also stayed very good in the Visayas, up from +57 in September to +67 in December. It stayed good in Balance Luzon, although down from +45 in September to +40 in December. Urban net satisfaction with Speaker Cayetano stayed very good, up from +51 in September to +56 in December. Rural net satisfaction rose from good to very good, up slightly from +49 in September to +50 in December. Compared to September 2019, Speaker Cayetano’s net satisfaction ratings rose from good to very good among class D, among women, among 18-24 year olds, among those 45-54 year olds and above, and among college graduates. However, it fell from very good to good among class E and among 25-34 year olds. It stayed good among class ABC, among men, among 35-44 year olds, and among high school graduates and below.

4th Quarter 2019 Social Weather Survey SWS MEDIA RELEASE 3 March 2020, page 4 of 28

Chief Justice Peralta’s first net rating a “Moderate” +21 Chief Justice Peralta’s first net satisfaction rating was a moderate +21 [Chart 4, Tables 12 and 13]. It was moderate in all areas: highest in Metro Manila at +27, followed by Mindanao at +26, the Visayas at +18, and Balance Luzon at +17. It was also moderate in both rural and urban areas, at +23 and +19, respectively. It was highest among class D at moderate +24, followed by class E at moderate +17, and class ABC at neutral -2. It was moderate among both men and women, at +20 and +22, respectively. By age group, it was highest among 18-24 year olds at good +41, 35-44 year olds at moderate +25, 55 years old and above at moderate +18, 25-34 year olds at moderate +15, and 45-54 year olds at moderate +14. It was highest among high school graduates at moderate +26, non-elementary graduates at moderate +21, elementary graduates at moderate +17, and college graduates at neutral +7. Senate stays “Very Good” at +62 The net satisfaction rating of the Senate stayed very good, up from +56 in September 2019 to +62 in December 2019 [Chart 5, Tables 14 and 15]. The 6-point decline in the overall net satisfaction with the Senate was due to increases in all areas. It rose from very good to excellent in the Visayas, up from +57 in September to +71 in December. It stayed very good in Mindanao, up from +56 in September to +62 in December. It stayed very good in Metro Manila, up from +58 in September to +63 in December. It also stayed very good in Balance Luzon, up from +55 in September to +59 in December. It stayed very good in urban areas, up from +56 in September to +61 in December. It also stayed very good in rural areas, up from +56 in September to +64 in December. Compared to September 2019, net satisfaction with the Senate stayed very good in all basic demographics except among class ABC where it fell from very good to good. House of Representatives up to “Very Good” +51 The net satisfaction rating of the House of Representatives rose from good to very good, up from +43 in September 2019 to +51 in December 2019 [Table 16].

4th Quarter 2019 Social Weather Survey SWS MEDIA RELEASE 3 March 2020, page 5 of 28

The 8-point rise in the overall net satisfaction rating of the House of Representatives was due to increases in Mindanao, Balance Luzon, and the Visayas, combined with a steady score in Metro Manila. The House of Representatives’ net satisfaction rating rose from good to very good in Mindanao, up from +45 in September to +60 in December. It also rose from good to very good in the Visayas, up from +48 in September to +56 in December. It stayed good in Balance Luzon, up from +39 in September to +47 in December. It also stayed good in Metro Manila, at +44 from September to December. Net satisfaction with the House of Representatives rose from good to very good in rural areas, up from +44 in September to +55 in December. It stayed good in urban areas, up from +40 in September to +47 in December. Compared to September 2019, net satisfaction with the House of Representatives rose from good to very good in all basic demographics, except among class ABC, among women, among 45- 54 year olds, and among high school graduates where it stayed good. Supreme Court stays “Good” at +49 The Supreme Court’s net satisfaction rating stayed good, up from +41 in September 2019 to +49 in December 2019 [Chart 6, Tables 17 and 18]. The 8-point rise in the overall net satisfaction rating of the Supreme Court was due to increases in all areas. The Supreme Court's net satisfaction rating rose from good to very good in Mindanao, up from +41 in September to +54 in December. It also rose from good to very good in the Visayas, up from +48 in September to +56 in December. It stayed good in Metro Manila, up from +36 in September to +47 in December. It also stayed good in Balance Luzon, up from +39 in September to +45 in December. It rose from good to very good in rural areas, up from +42 in September to +55 in December. It stayed good in urban areas, up from +39 in September to +43 in December. Compared to September 2019, the Supreme Court's net satisfaction rating rose from good to very good among class D, among women, among 25-44 year olds, and among elementary graduates and above.

4th Quarter 2019 Social Weather Survey SWS MEDIA RELEASE 3 March 2020, page 6 of 28

It stayed good among classes ABC and E, among men, among 18-24 year olds, among those 45 years old and above, and among non-elementary graduates. The Cabinet stays “Good” at +45 The Cabinet's net satisfaction rating stayed good, up from +35 in September 2019 to +45 in December 2019 [Chart 7, Tables 19 and 20]. The 10-point rise in the overall net satisfaction rating of the Cabinet was due to increases in all areas except in Metro Manila. The Cabinet’s net satisfaction rating rose from good to very good in Mindanao, up from +33 in September to +51 in December. It also rose from good to very good in the Visayas, up from +40 in September to +51 in December. It stayed good in Balance Luzon, up from +33 in September to +40 in December. It also stayed good in Metro Manila, although down slightly from +41 in September to +40 in December. It stayed good in rural areas, up from +33 in September to +47 in December. It also stayed good in urban areas, up slightly from +40 in September to +42 in December. Compared to September 2019, the Cabinet’s net satisfaction rating stayed good in all basic demographics, except among 18-44 year olds where it rose from good to very good. Survey background The Fourth Quarter 2019 Social Weather Survey was conducted from December 13-16, 2019 using face-to-face interviews of 1,200 adults (18 years old and above) nationwide: 300 each in Metro Manila, Balance Luzon, Visayas, and Mindanao (sampling error margins of ±3% for national percentages, and ±6% each for Metro Manila, Balance Luzon, Visayas, and Mindanao). The area estimates were weighted by Philippine Statistics Authority medium-population projections for 2019 to obtain the national estimates. The quarterly Social Weather Surveys on public satisfaction with the Vice-President, Senate President, Speaker of the House of Representatives, and the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, and the top four government institutions, are not commissioned. They are done on SWS's own initiative and released as a public service.

4th Quarter 2019 Social Weather Survey SWS MEDIA RELEASE 3 March 2020, page 7 of 28

The survey questions on public satisfaction with the top government officials next to the President are as follows: “Maaari po bang pakisabi ninyo kung gaano kayo nasisiyahan o hindi nasisiyahan sa pagganap ng tungkulin ni [NAME] bilang [POSITION]. Kayo ba ay lubos na nasisiyahan, medyo nasisiyahan, hindi tiyak kung nasisiyahan o hindi, medyo hindi nasisiyahan, lubos na hindi nasisiyahan, o wala pa kayong narinig o nabasa kahit na kailan tungkol kay [NAME]?” [“Please tell me how satisfied or dissatisfied you are with the performance of [NAME] as [POSITION]. Are you very satisfied, somewhat satisfied, undecided if satisfied or dissatisfied, somewhat dissatisfied, very dissatisfied, or you have not ever heard or read anything about [NAME]?”].

● Leni Robredo, Bise-Presidente ng Pilipinas (Vice-President of the ) ● Vicente ''Tito'' Sotto III, Pangulo ng Senado (Senate President) ● Alan Peter Cayetano, Ispiker ng Kapulungan ng mga Kinatawan (Speaker of the House of Representatives) ● Diosdado Peralta, Punong Mahistrado ng Korte Suprema (Chief Justice of the Supreme Court) The survey questions on public satisfaction with the top government institutions are as follows: “Batay sa kabuuang nagawa nila, ano po ang pakiramdam o opinyon ninyo sa mga sumusunod na institusyon ng gobyerno? Kayo ba ay Lubos na nasisiyahan, Medyo nasisiyahan, Hindi tiyak kung nasisiyahan o hindi, Medyo hindi nasisiyahan, lubos na hindi nasisiyahan, o wala pa kayong narinig o nabasa kahit na kailan tungkol sa (institusyon)? Pakilagay po ang mga kard sa naaangkop na lugar dito sa rating board.” [“Based on their overall performance, how do you feel about the performance of the following government institutions? Are you Very satisfied, Somewhat satisfied, Undecided if satisfied or not, Somewhat dissatisfied, Very dissatisfied or You have never heard or read anything about (institution)? You may indicate your answer by placing each card on the appropriate answer on this rating board.”]. • ANG SENADO (Senate) • KAPULUNGAN NG MGA KINATAWAN (House of Representatives) • KORTE SUPREMA (Supreme Court) • ANG GABINETE SA KABUUAN (Cabinet as a whole)

4th Quarter 2019 Social Weather Survey SWS MEDIA RELEASE 3 March 2020, page 8 of 28

SWS employs its own staff for questionnaire design, sampling, fieldwork, data-processing, and analysis, and does not outsource any of its survey operations. This report was prepared by Leo S. Laroza.

#

Table 1 SATISFACTION WITH THE VICE-PRESIDENT AND SENATE PRESIDENT, PHILIPPINES

Sep18 Dec18 Mar19 Jun19 Sep19 Dec19 LENI Satisfied 57% 53% 63% 57% 56% 59% ROBREDO Undecided 20 20 16 14 19 17 Vice- Dissatisfied 23 26 21 29 23 23 President Net* +34 +27 +42 +28 +33 +36

VICENTE Satisfied 68 72 71 72 72 73 SOTTO III Undecided 18 16 19 14 16 16 Senate Dissatisfied 13 11 10 13 11 10 President Net* +55 +61 +61 +60 +61 +62

* Net figures (% Satisfied minus % Dissatisfied) correctly rounded.

Fourth Quarter 2019 Social Weather Report December 13-16, 2019 National Survey

4th Quarter 2019 Social Weather Survey SWS MEDIA RELEASE 3 March 2020, page 9 of 28

Table 2 SATISFACTION WITH THE SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AND CHIEF JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT, PHILIPPINES

Mar19 Jun19 Sep19 Dec19 Satisfied ALAN PETER 64% 67% CAYETANO Undecided 19 17 House Dissatisfied 14 15 Speaker Net* +49 +53

Satisfied 40 DIOSDADO Undecided 31 PERALTA Chief Justice Dissatisfied 19 Net* +21

* Net figures (% Satisfied minus % Dissatisfied) correctly rounded.

Fourth Quarter 2019 Social Weather Report December 13-16, 2019 National Survey

Table 3 PUBLIC SATISFACTION WITH THE SENATE AND HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES: PHILIPPINES

Jun 18 Sep 18 Dec 18 Mar 19 Jun 19 Sep 19 Dec 19 Satisfied 57% 62% 71% 72% 74% 69% 73% Undecided 25 23 16 17 15 17 16 Senate Dissatisfied 17 14 13 10 11 13 11 Net* +41 +48 +58 +62 +63 +56 +62 Satisfied 45 53 57 61 62 57 63

House of Undecided 33 29 25 25 22 26 24 Rep. Dissatisfied 20 17 17 13 14 14 12 Net* +25 +36 +40 +47 +48 +43 +51

* Net figures (% Satisfied minus % Dissatisfied) correctly rounded.

Fourth Quarter 2019 Social Weather Report December 13-16, 2019 National Survey

4th Quarter 2019 Social Weather Survey SWS MEDIA RELEASE 3 March 2020, page 10 of 28

Table 4 PUBLIC SATISFACTION WITH THE SUPREME COURT: PHILIPPINES

Jun 18 Sep 18 Dec 18 Mar 19 Jun 19 Sep 19 Dec 19

Satisfied 43% 49% 54% 62% 66% 57% 62% Supreme Undecided 31 32 27 26 22 26 24 Court Dissatisfied 24 18 17 12 12 16 13 Net* +19 +31 +37 +50 +54 +41 +49

* Net figures (% Satisfied minus % Dissatisfied) correctly rounded.

Fourth Quarter 2019 Social Weather Report December 13-16, 2019 National Survey

Table 5 PUBLIC SATISFACTION WITH CABINET AS A WHOLE: PHILIPPINES

Jun 18 Sep 18 Dec 18 Mar 19 Jun 19 Sep 19 Dec 19

Satisfied 43% 48% 52% 57% 64% 51% 56% Cabinet as a Undecided 37 33 29 29 23 29 30 whole Dissatisfied 18 16 17 12 13 16 11 Net* +25 +32 +35 +44 +51 +35 +45

* Net figures (% Satisfied minus % Dissatisfied) correctly rounded.

Fourth Quarter 2019 Social Weather Report December 13-16, 2019 National Survey

4th Quarter 2019 Social Weather Survey SWS MEDIA RELEASE 3 March 2020, page 11 of 28

Chart 1 NET SATISFACTION RATINGS* OF VICE-PRESIDENTS, PHILIPPINES, OCT 1986 TO DEC 2019

100 C. AQUINO RAMOS ESTRADA ARROYO B. AQUINO DUTERTE + 90 80 + 70 60 + 50 Robredo 40 Estrada +36 + 30 20 Binay + 10 Laurel De Castro 0 Guingona -10 Arroyo -20

* Net figures (% Satisfied minus % Dissatisfied) correctly rounded. Fourth Quarter 2019 Social Weather Report December 13-16, 2019 National Survey

Table 6 NET SATISFACTION RATINGS* OF VICE-PRESIDENTS, PHILIPPINES (page 1 of 2) NET* NET* NET* NET* LAUREL ESTRADA (cont.) GUINGONA DE CASTRO OCT 86 +44 DEC 95 +41 MAR 01 +19 OCT 06 +32 OCT 87 - 5 APR 96 +46 JUL 01 + 8 DEC 06 +32 MAY 90 - 3 JUN 96 +55 SEP 01 + 8 FEB 07 +36 NOV 90 - 3 SEP 96 +53 NOV 01 +12 JUN 07 +30 JUL 91 + 5 DEC 96 +47 MAR 02 +11 SEP 07 +38 NOV 91 - 5 APR 97 +54 MAY 02 - 4 DEC 07 +41 FEB 92 + 4 JUN 97 +58 SEP 02 +17 MAR 08 +47 APR 92 -10 SEP 97 +44 NOV 02 +13 JUN 08 +37 ESTRADA DEC 97 +52 MAR 03 +16 SEP 08 +34 SEP 92 +78 FEB 98 +38 JUN 03 +15 DEC 08 +39 DEC 92 +70 MAR 98 +41 SEP 03 +16 FEB 09 +36 MAY 93 +78 ARROYO NOV 03 +13 JUN 09 +44 JUL 93 +87 SEP 98 +73 JUN 04 + 2 SEP 09 +32 SEP 93 +75 NOV 98 +81 DE CASTRO DEC 09 +23 DEC 93 +77 MAR 99 +81 AUG 04 +39 MAR 10 +14 APR 94 +82 JUN 99 +79 DEC 04 +31 JUN 10 +23 AUG 94 +75 OCT 99 +72 MAR 05 +19 BINAY SEP 94 +75 DEC 99 +60 MAY 05 +22 SEP 10 +58 NOV 94 +73 MAR 00 +70 SEP 05 +39 NOV 10 +57 MAR 95 +62 APR 00 +68 DEC 05 +34 MAR 11 +74 JUN 95 +47 SEP 00 +63 MAR 06 +29 JUN 11 +69 OCT 95 +46 DEC 00 - 4 JUN 06 +31 SEP 11 +63

Fourth Quarter 2019 Social Weather Report December 13-16, 2019 National Survey

4th Quarter 2019 Social Weather Survey SWS MEDIA RELEASE 3 March 2020, page 12 of 28

NET SATISFACTION RATINGS* OF VICE-PRESIDENTS, PHILIPPINES (page 2 of 2) NET* NET* BINAY ROBREDO DEC 11 +70 SEP 16 +49 MAR 12 +70 DEC 16 +37 MAY 12 +70 MAR 17 +26 AUG 12 +76 JUN 17 +36 DEC 12 +70 SEP 17 +41 MAR 13 +62 DEC 17 +42 JUN 13 +76 MAR 18 +34 SEP 13 +69 JUN 18 +32 DEC 13 +62 SEP 18 +34 MAR 14 +73 DEC 18 +27 JUN 14 +67 MAR 19 +42 SEP 14 +52 JUN 19 +28 DEC 14 +44 SEP 19 +33 MAR 15 +31 DEC 19 +36 JUN 15 +42 SEP 15 +33 DEC 15 +24 APR 16 +25 JUN 16 +22

* Net ratings = % Satisfied minus % Dissatisfied. (Survey Data: Social Weather Stations surveys.)

Fourth Quarter 2019 Social Weather Report December 13-16, 2019 National Survey

Table 7 PUBLIC SATISFACTION WITH VICE-PRES. LENI ROBREDO: JUN 2019 TO DEC 2019 (page 1 of 2)

Satisfied Undecided Dissatisfied Net* Jun19 Sep19 Dec19 Jun19 Sep19 Dec19 Jun19 Sep19 Dec19 Jun19 Sep19 Dec19

Total PH 57% 56% 59% 14% 19% 17% 29% 23% 23% +28 +33 +36

NCR 50 47 55 12 19 15 37 32 30 +14 +15 +25 Bal. Luzon 59 56 57 16 21 19 26 22 24 +33 +34 +33 Visayas 65 65 67 14 15 14 21 19 19 +44 +46 +48 Mindanao 51 57 61 13 16 16 36 25 22 +15 +32 +38

Urban 49 49 55 14 19 16 36 29 29 +12 +20 +26 Rural 63 61 63 14 18 17 23 20 19 +41 +40 +45

ABC 53 39 50 21 27 21 25 32 29 +28 +6 +21 D 55 56 59 15 18 17 29 25 24 +25 +31 +35 E 67 65 65 7 19 14 26 14 19 +42 +51 +46

Fourth Quarter 2019 Social Weather Report December 13-16, 2019 National Survey

4th Quarter 2019 Social Weather Survey SWS MEDIA RELEASE 3 March 2020, page 13 of 28

PUBLIC SATISFACTION WITH VICE-PRES. LENI ROBREDO: JUN 2019 TO DEC 2019 (page 2 of 2) Satisfied Undecided Dissatisfied Net* Jun19 Sep19 Dec19 Jun19 Sep19 Dec19 Jun19 Sep19 Dec19 Jun19 Sep19 Dec19 Total PH 57% 56% 59% 14% 19% 17% 29% 23% 23% +28 +33 +36

Men 58 55 56 13 20 17 28 24 26 +30 +30 +30 Women 56 58 63 15 17 16 29 22 21 +27 +35 +42

18-24 56 56 59 18 22 17 26 22 22 +30 +34 +37 25-34 54 56 55 17 18 22 29 24 22 +25 +31 +33 35-44 58 56 57 12 19 13 30 22 29 +29 +34 +28 45-54 57 59 63 13 16 16 31 23 20 +26 +36 +43 55 + 59 55 61 13 19 15 27 24 23 +31 +31 +38

Some Elem 60 58 63 16 18 20 23 20 16 +37 +39 +47 Some HS 62 63 65 12 17 11 25 18 23 +37 +45 +43 Some Voc/Coll 54 53 58 14 20 18 31 26 24 +23 +28 +33 Coll. Grad 48 46 45 16 20 21 35 33 32 +13 +14 +12

*% Satisfied minus % Dissatisfied correctly rounded. Ignores Don’t Know and Refused to Answer responses. Question. Please tell me how satisfied or dissatisfied you are in the performance of LENI ROBREDO as Vice-President of the Philippines. Are you very Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Undecided if satisfied or dissatisfied, Somewhat dissatisfied, Very dissatisfied? Fourth Quarter 2019 Social Weather Report December 13-16, 2019 National Survey

Chart 2 NET SATISFACTION RATINGS* OF SENATE PRESIDENTS, PHILIPPINES, APR 1990 TO DEC 2019

C. AQUINO RAMOS ESTRADA ARROYO B. AQUINO DUTERTE + 70 Gonzales Sotto Gonzales 60Salonga +62 Angara Maceda Fernan Enrile + 50 Drilon Drilon Ople 40 Villar K. Pimentel + 30 Gonzales Drilon

20 N. Pimentel + 10

0

-10

* Net figures (% Satisfied minus % Dissatisfied) correctly rounded. Fourth Quarter 2019 Social Weather Report December 13-16, 2019 National Survey

4th Quarter 2019 Social Weather Survey SWS MEDIA RELEASE 3 March 2020, page 14 of 28

Table 8 NET SATISFACTION RATINGS* OF SENATE PRESIDENTS, PHILIPPINES (page 1 of 2)

NET* NET* NET* NET* SALONGA GONZALES (cont.) DRILON DRILON (cont.) MAY 90 +56 APR 96 +37 JUL 00 +48 MAR 05 +23 NOV 90 +47 JUN 96 +36 SEP 00 +47 JUN 06 +25 JUL 91 +39 SEP 96 +43 N. PIMENTEL VILLAR NOV 91 +32 MACEDA DEC 00 +22 OCT 06 +42 GONZALES DEC 96 +41 DRILON DEC 06 +39 FEB 92 +28 APR 97 +47 SEP 01 +30 MAR 07 +52 SEP 92 +61 JUN 97 +49 NOV 01 +39 JUN 07 +51 DEC 92 +59 SEP 97 +40 APR 02 +25 SEP 07 +47 ANGARA GONZALES MAY 02 +23 DEC 07 +59 MAY 93 +53 FEB 98 +31 SEP 02 +35 MAR 08 +53 JUL 93 +52 MAR 98 +50 NOV 92 +36 JUN 08 +52 SEP 93 +51 JUL 98 +48 MAR 93 +43 SEP 08 +43 DEC 93 +55 FERNAN JUN 93 +31 ENRILE APR 94 +54 SEP 98 +48 SEP 93 +33 DEC 08 +5 AUG 94 +47 NOV 98 +55 NOV 93 +28 FEB 09 +8 NOV 94 +45 MAR 99 +57 JUN 04 +32 JUN 09 +23 DEC 94 +48 JUN 99 +49 AUG 04 +28 SEP 09 +14 MAR 95 +36 DEC 04 +18 DEC 09 +19 OPLE JUN 95 +44 FEB 05 + 2 MAR 10 +19 OCT 99 +42 MAR 05 + 8 JUN 10 +41 GONZALES DEC 99 +28 SEP 05 +22 SEP 10 +39 OCT 95 +37 MAR 00 +33 DEC 95 +35 DEC 05 +24 NOV 10 +34 Fourth Quarter 2019 Social Weather Report December 13-16, 2019 National Survey NET SATISFACTION RATINGS* OF SENATE PRESIDENTS, PHILIPPINES (page 2 of 2) NET* NET* ENRILE (cont.) DRILON (cont.) MAR 11 +43 SEP 15 +42 JUN 11 +39 DEC 15 + 7 SEP 11 +35 APR 16 +38 DEC 11 +36 JUN 16 +36 MAR 12 +56 K. PIMENTEL MAY 12 +48 SEP 16 +37 AUG 12 +65 DEC 16 +30 DEC 12 +47 MAR 17 +29 MAR 13 +30 JUN 17 +33 JUN 13 +38 SEP 17 +46 DEC 17 +49 DRILON MAR 18 +41 SEP 13 +37 DEC 13 +25 SOTTO MAR 14 +17 JUN 18 +54 SEP 18 +55 JUN 14 +20 DEC 18 +61 SEP 14 +36 MAR 19 +61 DEC 14 +28 JUN 19 +60 MAR 15 +35 SEP 19 +61 JUN 15 +29 DEC 19 +62

* Net ratings = % Satisfied minus % Dissatisfied. (Survey Data: Social Weather Stations surveys.)

Fourth Quarter 2019 Social Weather Report December 13-16, 2019 National Survey

4th Quarter 2019 Social Weather Survey SWS MEDIA RELEASE 3 March 2020, page 15 of 28

Table 9 PUBLIC SATISFACTION WITH SENATE PRESIDENT VICENTE ''TITO'' SOTTO III: JUN 2019 TO DEC 2019 (page 1 of 2)

Satisfied Undecided Dissatisfied Net* Jun19 Sep19 Dec19 Jun19 Sep19 Dec19 Jun19 Sep19 Dec19 Jun19 Sep19 Dec19 Total PH 72% 72% 73% 14% 16% 16% 13% 11% 10% +60 +61 +62

NCR 79 77 84 10 12 10 11 9 6 +68 +68 +78 Bal. Luzon 73 73 71 13 16 16 13 10 11 +60 +64 +60 Visayas 74 72 76 15 15 15 11 11 8 +63 +61 +67 Mindanao 65 64 66 19 21 20 15 13 12 +50 +51 +53

Urban 73 73 77 13 15 14 14 10 9 +60 +64 +69 Rural 72 70 68 16 17 18 12 11 12 +60 +59 +57

ABC 71 73 67 14 22 14 15 5 18 +56 +68 +49 D 73 72 74 14 15 16 12 11 9 +61 +61 +65 E 70 70 67 13 18 19 15 10 11 +56 +60 +55

Fourth Quarter 2019 Social Weather Report December 13-16, 2019 National Survey PUBLIC SATISFACTION WITH SENATE PRESIDENT VICENTE ''TITO'' SOTTO III: JUN 2019 TO DEC 2019 (page 2 of 2) Satisfied Undecided Dissatisfied Net* Jun19 Sep19 Dec19 Jun19 Sep19 Dec19 Jun19 Sep19 Dec19 Jun19 Sep19 Dec19 Total PH 72% 72% 73% 14% 16% 16% 13% 11% 10% +60 +61 +62

Men 72 72 75 14 15 16 14 11 9 +57 +61 +67 Women 73 71 70 15 17 16 11 10 12 +62 +60 +58

18-24 73 70 76 11 19 11 16 11 13 +57 +59 +63 25-34 67 66 73 16 19 15 15 14 11 +52 +52 +63 35-44 74 73 72 13 16 16 14 10 12 +60 +63 +60 45-54 79 74 74 9 14 14 12 10 11 +67 +65 +63 55 + 71 73 70 19 15 22 9 9 7 +62 +64 +63

Some Elem 70 64 66 20 22 18 9 10 13 +62 +53 +54 Some HS 72 73 72 13 15 16 13 10 12 +59 +63 +60 Some Voc/Coll 76 73 76 12 15 15 12 11 8 +64 +63 +68 Coll. Grad 60 69 68 19 18 19 20 12 13 +40 +57 +54

*% Satisfied minus % Dissatisfied correctly rounded. Ignores Don’t Know and Refused to Answer responses. Question. Please tell me how satisfied or dissatisfied you are in the performance of VICENTE ‘‘TITO’’ SOTTO III as Senate President. Are you very Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Undecided if satisfied or dissatisfied, Somewhat dissatisfied, Very dissatisfied? Fourth Quarter 2019 Social Weather Report December 13-16, 2019 National Survey

4th Quarter 2019 Social Weather Survey SWS MEDIA RELEASE 3 March 2020, page 16 of 28

Chart 3 NET SATISFACTION RATINGS* OF SPEAKERS OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, PHILIPPINES, FEB 1990 TO DEC 2019

C. AQUINO RAMOS ESTRADA ARROYO B. AQUINO DUTERTE + 70 60 Cayetano + 50 De Venecia +53 Villar 40 + 30 Mitra Belmonte 20 Alvarez De Venecia + 10 0 Nograles -10 Fuentebella Arroyo -20 -30

* Net figures (% Satisfied minus % Dissatisfied) correctly rounded. Fourth Quarter 2019 Social Weather Report December 13-16, 2019 National Survey

Table 10 NET SATISFACTION RATINGS* OF SPEAKERS OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, PHILIPPINES (page 1 of 2) NET* NET* NET* NET* MITRA DE VENECIA (cont.) DE VENECIA DE VENECIA (cont.) FEB 90 +33 SEP 96 +24 SEP 01 +16 JUN 07 - 1 NOV 90 +26 NOV 96 +24 NOV 01 +19 SEP 07 - 4 JUN 91 +13 MAR 97 +41 MAR 02 +15 DEC 07 + 1 OCT 91 +20 JUN 97 +46 MAY 02 + 9 NOGRALES FEB 92 +25 AUG 97 +34 SEP 02 +23 MAR 08 -12 DE VENECIA NOV 97 +43 NOV 02 +22 JUN 08 -15 SEP 92 +39 FEB 98 +25 MAR 03 +18 SEP 08 -12 NOV 92 +39 MAR 98 +28 JUN 03 + 9 DEC 08 -17 MAY 93 +40 VILLAR SEP 03 + 9 FEB 09 -22 JUL 93 +42 SEP 98 +22 NOV 03 + 7 JUN 09 -15 SEP 93 +41 NOV 98 +31 JUN 04 +15 SEP 09 -20 DEC 93 +41 MAR 99 +33 AUG 04 +14 DEC 09 -20 MAR 94 +33 JUN 99 +38 DEC 04 + 5 MAR 10 -19 AUG 94 +23 OCT 99 +31 MAR 05 - 8 JUN 10 -10 MAY 05 - 2 NOV 94 +26 DEC 99 +18 BELMONTE SEP 05 0 DEC 94 +27 MAR 00 +26 SEP 10 +9 DEC 05 0 MAR 95 +13 JUL 00 +42 NOV 10 +7 MAR 06 - 1 JUN 95 +20 SEP 00 +39 MAR 11 +17 JUN 06 + 9 SEP 95 +15 FUENTEBELLA JUN 11 +15 OCT 06 + 4 DEC 95 +24 DEC 00 - 4 SEP 11 + 9 DEC 06 + 2 APR 96 +23 DEC 11 + 8 MAR 07 + 5 JUN 96 +27 MAR 12 +18 Fourth Quarter 2019 Social Weather Report December 13-16, 2019 National Survey

4th Quarter 2019 Social Weather Survey SWS MEDIA RELEASE 3 March 2020, page 17 of 28

NET SATISFACTION RATINGS* OF SPEAKERS OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, PHILIPPINES (page 2 of 2)

NET* NET* BELMONTE (cont.) ALVAREZ MAY 12 + 8 SEP 16 +22 AUG 12 +20 DEC 16 +10 DEC 12 +15 MAR 17 +12 JUN 17 +16 MAR 13 +11 SEP 17 + 8 JUN 13 +16 DEC 17 +14 SEP 13 +18 MAR 18 + 1 DEC 13 +16 JUN 18 + 8 MAR 14 - 1 MACAPAGAL-ARROYO JUN 14 + 2 SEP 18 -4 SEP 14 +13 DEC 18 -21 DEC 14 +11 MAR 19 -17 MAR 15 +12 JUN 19 -20 JUN 15 + 9 CAYETANO SEP 15 + 5 SEP 19 +49 JUN 16 +18 DEC 19 +53

* Net ratings = % Satisfied minus % Dissatisfied. (Survey Data: Social Weather Stations surveys.)

Fourth Quarter 2019 Social Weather Report December 13-16, 2019 National Survey

Table 11 PUBLIC SATISFACTION WITH SPEAKER ALAN PETER CAYETANO: SEP AND DEC 2019 (page 1 of 2)

Satisfied Undecided Dissatisfied Net* Sep19 Dec19 Sep19 Dec19 Sep19 Dec19 Sep19 Dec19

Total PH 64% 67% 19% 17% 14% 15% +49 +53

NCR 64 70 18 14 16 16 +48 +54 Bal. Luzon 60 59 23 21 15 19 +45 +40 Visayas 68 76 19 15 11 9 +57 +67 Mindanao 68 75 13 13 15 10 +52 +65

Urban 65 70 17 16 14 14 +51 +56 Rural 63 65 21 18 14 16 +49 +50

ABC 63 67 22 12 14 18 +49 +49 D 64 68 18 17 15 14 +49 +54 E 63 64 24 19 11 15 +52 +49

Fourth Quarter 2019 Social Weather Report December 13-16, 2019 National Survey

4th Quarter 2019 Social Weather Survey SWS MEDIA RELEASE 3 March 2020, page 18 of 28

PUBLIC SATISFACTION WITH SPEAKER ALAN PETER CAYETANO: SEP AND DEC 2019 (page 2 of 2) Satisfied Undecided Dissatisfied Net* Sep19 Dec19 Sep19 Dec19 Sep19 Dec19 Sep19 Dec19 Total PH 64% 67% 19% 17% 14% 15% +49 +53

Men 65 70 19 14 15 15 +50 +55 Women 63 65 20 20 14 14 +49 +50

18-24 59 69 23 20 15 9 +43 +60 25-34 64 63 20 20 13 16 +51 +48 35-44 68 69 17 16 14 14 +55 +55 45-54 63 70 19 12 15 17 +48 +52 55 + 63 67 19 17 15 15 +48 +52

Some Elem 59 64 22 17 13 16 +46 +48 Some HS 59 65 22 16 16 17 +43 +48 Some Voc/Coll 68 69 17 17 13 13 +55 +55 Coll. Grad 66 72 15 16 18 12 +49 +61

*% Satisfied minus % Dissatisfied correctly rounded. Ignores Dont Know and Refused to Answer responses. Question. Please tell me how satisfied or dissatisfied you are in the performance of ALAN PETER CAYETANO as Speaker of the House of Representative. Are you very Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Undecided if satisfied or dissatisfied, Somewhat dissatisfied, Very dissatisfied? Fourth Quarter 2019 Social Weather Report December 13-16, 2019 National Survey

Chart 4 NET SATISFACTION RATINGS* OF CHIEF JUSTICES OF THE SUPREME COURT, PHILIPPINES, OCT 1986 TO DEC 2019

70 C. AQUINO RAMOS ESTRADA ARROYO B. AQUINO DUTERTE 60 Teehankee +50 Fernan Narvasa 40 Carpio +30 Carpio Peralta Davide +21 20 Panganiban Bersamin +10 Puno 0 De Castro -10 Sereno -20 -30 -40 Corona -50

* Net figures (% Satisfied minus % Dissatisfied) correctly rounded. Fourth Quarter 2019 Social Weather Report December 13-16, 2019 National Survey

4th Quarter 2019 Social Weather Survey SWS MEDIA RELEASE 3 March 2020, page 19 of 28

Table 12 NET SATISFACTION RATINGS* OF CHIEF JUSTICES OF THE SUPREME COURT, PHILIPPINES (page 1 of 2)

NET* NET* NET* NET* TEEHANKEE DAVIDE DAVIDE (cont.) CORONA OCT 86 +52 DEC 99 +18 SEP 05 +13 JUN 10 -18 FERNAN MAR 00 +18 DEC 05 +10 SEP 10 -5 MAY 90 +40 JUL 00 +20 PANGANIBAN NOV 10 -7 NOV 90 +18 SEP 00 +20 MAR 06 - 3 MAR 11 -4 JUL 91 +35 DEC 00 +36 JUN 06 + 2 JUN 11 0 MAR 01 +46 NOV 91 +31 OCT 06 + 4 SEP 11 0 JUL 01 +26 DEC 11 -14 NARVASA DEC 06 + 4 SEP 01 +31 MAR 12 -28 APR 92 +20 PUNO NOV 01 +34 MAY 12 -44 MAY 93 +26 MAR 02 +22 MAR 07 + 1 CARPIO APR 96 +19 MAY 02 +19 JUN 07 + 3 AUG 12 + 3 JUN 96 +17 SEP 02 +35 SEP 07 - 5 SEP 96 +28 NOV 02 +32 DEC 07 - 2 SERENO DEC 96 +21 MAR 03 +34 MAR 08 + 2 DEC 12 +14 APR 97 +26 JUN 03 +18 JUN 08 +3 MAR 13 + 9 JUN 97 +37 SEP 03 +15 SEP 08 - 3 JUN 13 +13 SEP 97 +26 NOV 03 + 5 DEC 08 - 4 SEP 13 +17 DEC 97 +30 JUN 04 +18 FEB 09 +3 DEC 13 +16 APR 98 +35 AUG 04 +21 JUN 09 +4 MAR 14 + 4 SEP 98 +39 DEC 04 + 8 SEP 09 +2 JUN 14 + 6 NOV 98 +36 MAR 05 - 5 DEC 09 +1 SEP 14 +10 MAR 99 +40 MAY 05 +1 MAR 10 0 DEC 14 +11

Fourth Quarter 2019 Social Weather Report December 13-16, 2019 National Survey NET SATISFACTION RATINGS* OF CHIEF JUSTICES OF THE SUPREME COURT, PHILIPPINES (page 2 of 2)

NET* NET* SERENO (cont.) CARPIO MAR 15 +10 JUN 18 +11 JUN 15 +11 SEP 15 + 4 DE CASTRO DEC 15 - 1 SEP 18 +4 APR 16 +13 JUN 16 +17 BERSAMIN SEP 16 +26 DEC 18 +11 DEC 16 +16 MAR 19 +14 MAR 17 +14 JUN 19 +13 JUN 17 +21 SEP 19 +16 SEP 17 + 9 DEC 17 + 6 PERALTA MAR 18 - 7 DEC 19 +21

* Net ratings = % Satisfied minus % Dissatisfied. (Survey Data: Social Weather Stations surveys.)

Fourth Quarter 2019 Social Weather Report December 13-16, 2019 National Survey

4th Quarter 2019 Social Weather Survey SWS MEDIA RELEASE 3 March 2020, page 20 of 28

Table 13 PUBLIC SATISFACTION WITH DIOSDADO PERALTA, CHIEF JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT: DEC 2019 (page 1 of 2)

Satisfied Undecided Dissatisfied Net*

Total PH 40% 31% 19% +21

NCR 42 30 15 +27 Bal. Luzon 38 36 20 +17 Visayas 41 24 24 +18 Mindanao 44 27 17 +26

Urban 39 31 19 +19 Rural 42 31 19 +23

ABC 21 52 23 -2 D 42 31 18 +24 E 42 24 25 +17

Fourth Quarter 2019 Social Weather Report December 13-16, 2019 National Survey PUBLIC SATISFACTION WITH DIOSDADO PERALTA, CHIEF JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT: DEC 2019 (page 2 of 2) Satisfied Undecided Dissatisfied Net* Total PH 40% 31% 19% +21

Men 42 29 21 +20 Women 39 33 17 +22

18-24 56 24 15 +41 25-34 36 34 21 +15 35-44 45 26 20 +25 45-54 37 29 23 +14 55 + 35 37 17 +18

Some Elem 42 27 20 +21 Some HS 40 30 23 +17 Some Voc/Coll 43 31 17 +26 Coll. Grad 28 39 21 +7

*% Satisfied minus % Dissatisfied correctly rounded. Ignores Don’t Know and Refused to Answer responses. Question. Please tell me how satisfied or dissatisfied you are in the performance of DIOSDADO PERALTA as Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. Are you very Satisfied, Somewhat satisfied, Undecided if satisfied or dissatisfied, Somewhat dissatisfied, Very dissatisfied? Fourth Quarter 2019 Social Weather Report December 13-16, 2019 National Survey

4th Quarter 2019 Social Weather Survey SWS MEDIA RELEASE 3 March 2020, page 21 of 28

Chart 5 NET* SATISFACTION RATINGS OF THE SENATE AND HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES: PHILIPPINES, SEP 1988 TO DEC 2019

C. AQUINO RAMOS ESTRADA ARROYO B. AQUINO DUTERTE +100 +90 +80 +70 Senate +60 +62 +50 +51 +40 House of Rep. +30 +20 +10 +0 -+10- -+20

* Net ratings = % Satisfied minus % Dissatisfied. (Survey Data: Social Weather Stations surveys). [INS-RATE.PRS] Fourth Quarter 2019 Social Weather Report December 13-16, 2019 National Survey

Table 14 NET* SATISFACTION RATINGS OF THE SENATE AND HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, PHILIPPINES (page 1 of 2) House House House House Senate of Rep. Senate of Rep. Senate of Rep. Senate of Rep. C. AQUINO RAMOS (cont.) ARROYO ARROYO (cont.) SEP 88 +26 +22 DEC 95 +14 + 8 MAR 01 +24 +20 OCT 06 +14 + 5 FEB 89 +5 + 8 APR 96 +13 + 5 JUL 01 +28 +21 DEC 06 +18 + 7 SEP 89 +11 +12 JUN 96 +18 +11 SEP 01 + 4 + 4 FEB 07 +26 +11 NOV 90 + 2 + 3 SEP 96 +15 + 8 NOV 01 +18 +15 JUN 07 +29 +20 JUL 91 + 5 + 5 DEC 96 +15 +11 MAR 02 + 9 + 5 SEP 07 +32 +18 NOV 91 - 1 + 2 APR 97 +29 +25 MAY 02 + 8 + 1 DEC 07 +19 + 3 FEB 92 + 7 +11 JUN 97 +34 +27 SEP 02 +17 +12 MAR 08 +27 + 8 APR 92 +13 +11 SEP 97 +18 +13 DEC 02 +17 +12 JUN 08 +27 +10 RAMOS DEC 97 +27 +23 MAR 03 +23 +19 SEP 08 +21 +11 OCT 92 +34 +25 FEB 98 +19 +17 JUN 03 +25 +18 DEC 08 +26 +9 DEC 92 +27 +25 MAR 98 +19 +17 SEP 03 +20 +11 FEB 09 +23 +2 MAY 93 +20 +22 APR 98 + 9 NOV 03 + 7 + 3 JUN 09 +30 +12 JUL 93 +32 +26 ESTRADA MAR 04 +25 +17 SEP 09 +30 +10 SEP 93 +21 +17 SEP 98 +22 +19 JUN 04 +19 +11 DEC 09 +27 +9 DEC 93 +30 +32 NOV 98 +31 +24 AUG 04 +17 +13 MAR 10 +25 +7 APR 94 +26 +21 JUN 99 +30 +26 DEC 04 +12 + 7 B. AQUINO AUG 94 +16 +13 OCT 99 +16 +13 MAR 05 + 1 - 4 SEP 10 +48 +30 NOV 94 +18 +14 DEC 99 + 1 - 2 MAY 05 - 3 - 9 NOV 10 +51 +33 DEC 94 +15 +10 MAR 00 +21 +16 AUG 05 +20 +12 MAR 11 +49 +30 MAR 95 +13 +12 JUL 00 +28 +25 DEC 05 +14 + 7 JUN 11 +47 +31 JUN 95 +17 + 7 SEP 00 +25 +16 MAR 06 + 9 - 1 SEP 11 +50 +31 OCT 95 0 0 DEC 00 +28 +20 JUN 06 +17 +12 DEC 11 +44 +27

Fourth Quarter 2019 Social Weather Report December 13-16, 2019 National Survey

4th Quarter 2019 Social Weather Survey SWS MEDIA RELEASE 3 March 2020, page 22 of 28

NET* SATISFACTION RATINGS OF THE SENATE AND HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, PHILIPPINES (page 2 of 2)

House House Senate of Rep. Senate of Rep. B. AQUINO (cont.) B. AQUINO (cont.) MAR 12 +58 +40 APR 16 +41 +29 MAY 12 +49 +30 JUN 16 +52 +42 AUG 12 +67 +42 DUTERTE DEC 12 +51 +31 SEP 16 +52 +38 MAR 13 +45 +29 DEC 16 +48 +36 JUN 13 +54 +37 MAR 17 +52 +39 SEP 13 +36 +27 JUN 17 +49 +34 DEC 13 +33 +26 SEP 17 +46 +34 MAR 14 +26 +18 DEC 17 +56 +43 JUN 14 +12 +13 MAR 18 +45 +35 SEP 14 +28 +21 JUN 18 +41 +25 DEC 14 +26 +20 SEP 18 +48 +36 DEC 18 +58 +40 MAR 15 +31 +20 MAR 19 +62 +47 JUN 15 +33 +20 JUN 19 +63 +48 SEP 15 +44 +26 SEP 19 +56 +43 DEC 15 +30 +16 DEC 19 +62 +51

* Net ratings = % Satisfied minus % Dissatisfied. (Survey Data: Social Weather Stations surveys.)

Fourth Quarter 2019 Social Weather Report December 13-16, 2019 National Survey

Table 15 PUBLIC SATISFACTION WITH THE SENATE: JUN 2019 TO DEC 2019 (page 1 of 2)

Satisfied Undecided Dissatisfied Net* Jun19 Sep19 Dec19 Jun19 Sep19 Dec19 Jun19 Sep19 Dec19 Jun19 Sep19 Dec19

Total PH 74% 69% 73% 15% 17% 16% 11% 13% 11% +63 +56 +62

NCR 69 72 74 17 14 13 13 13 12 +56 +58 +63 Bal. Luzon 71 68 70 17 18 17 12 14 12 +59 +55 +59 Visayas 75 68 79 16 18 13 9 11 7 +65 +57 +71 Mindanao 80 68 73 11 17 16 8 12 11 +72 +56 +62

Urban 70 68 72 16 17 15 13 13 12 +57 +56 +61 Rural 76 69 74 15 17 17 9 13 10 +67 +56 +64

ABC 69 67 64 18 16 19 13 16 17 +56 +51 +48 D 75 69 73 15 17 16 10 13 10 +64 +55 +63 E 70 69 76 17 18 13 13 11 11 +58 +59 +66

Fourth Quarter 2019 Social Weather Report December 13-16, 2019 National Survey

4th Quarter 2019 Social Weather Survey SWS MEDIA RELEASE 3 March 2020, page 23 of 28

PUBLIC SATISFACTION WITH THE SENATE: JUN 2019 TO DEC 2019 (page 2 of 2)

Satisfied Undecided Dissatisfied Net* Jun19 Sep19 Dec19 Jun19 Sep19 Dec19 Jun19 Sep19 Dec19 Jun19 Sep19 Dec19 Total PH 74% 69% 73% 15% 17% 16% 11% 13% 11% +63 +56 +62 Men 74 69 73 16 17 15 10 13 11 +63 +56 +63 Women 74 68 73 15 18 16 11 12 11 +62 +55 +62 18-24 73 74 77 16 16 13 11 9 10 +61 +66 +67 25-34 74 69 76 13 14 15 14 16 9 +60 +53 +67 35-44 76 71 75 13 14 13 11 13 12 +65 +58 +63 45-54 73 69 67 16 19 21 10 10 11 +63 +58 +57 55 + 72 64 72 18 21 16 9 14 11 +63 +50 +61 Some Elem 68 64 75 19 20 14 12 12 11 +56 +52 +64 Some HS 73 66 75 16 19 17 11 14 8 +63 +53 +67 Some Voc/Coll 76 71 72 15 16 15 9 12 12 +67 +59 +60 Coll. Grad 73 69 69 11 16 19 16 14 12 +56 +54 +58

*% Satisfied minus % Dissatisfied correctly rounded. Ignores Dont Know and Refused to Answer responses. Q. Based on their overall performance, how do you feel about the performance of the following government institutions? Are you VERY SATISFIED, SOMEWHAT SATISFIED, UNDECIDED IF SATISFIED OR NOT, SOMEWHAT DISSATISFIED, VERY DISSATISFIED or YOU HAVE NEVER HEARD OR READ ANYTHING about (THE SENATE)? Fourth Quarter 2019 Social Weather Report December 13-16, 2019 National Survey

Table 16 PUBLIC SATISFACTION WITH THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES: JUN 2019 TO DEC 2019 (page 1 of 2) Satisfied Undecided Dissatisfied Net* Jun19 Sep19 Dec19 Jun19 Sep19 Dec19 Jun19 Sep19 Dec19 Jun19 Sep19 Dec19

Total PH 62% 57% 63% 22% 26% 24% 14% 14% 12% +48 +43 +51

NCR 53 60 60 25 22 22 20 16 16 +33 +44 +44 Bal. Luzon 64 54 59 21 28 28 14 15 12 +50 +39 +47 Visayas 63 62 66 23 21 21 14 14 10 +49 +48 +56 Mindanao 65 57 69 23 28 19 11 11 9 +54 +45 +60

Urban 54 56 62 26 26 21 18 16 15 +36 +40 +47 Rural 69 58 64 20 26 26 11 14 8 +57 +44 +55

ABC 41 62 52 34 24 24 24 14 19 +17 +48 +32 D 64 57 63 21 26 24 14 15 11 +50 +42 +52 E 60 58 65 26 25 21 14 13 11 +46 +46 +54

Fourth Quarter 2019 Social Weather Report December 13-16, 2019 National Survey

4th Quarter 2019 Social Weather Survey SWS MEDIA RELEASE 3 March 2020, page 24 of 28

PUBLIC SATISFACTION WITH THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES: JUN 2019 TO DEC 2019 (page 2 of 2)

Satisfied Undecided Dissatisfied Net* Jun19 Sep19 Dec19 Jun19 Sep19 Dec19 Jun19 Sep19 Dec19 Jun19 Sep19 Dec19 Total PH 62% 57% 63% 22% 26% 24% 14% 14% 12% +48 +43 +51

Men 62 59 65 22 24 22 16 16 11 +46 +43 +53 Women 63 55 61 23 29 25 13 13 12 +50 +42 +49

18-24 59 58 62 26 29 27 14 11 10 +45 +48 +52 25-34 62 56 65 21 27 25 17 15 10 +45 +41 +55 35-44 67 60 66 17 24 19 15 12 13 +52 +48 +54 45-54 66 58 58 24 24 27 10 15 12 +55 +43 +46 55 + 59 54 62 25 27 22 15 16 12 +45 +38 +50

Some Elem 61 50 60 28 31 27 11 11 9 +50 +39 +51 Some HS 63 55 64 23 30 21 13 12 12 +50 +43 +52 Some Voc/Coll 64 60 62 20 23 24 15 16 13 +50 +45 +49 Coll. Grad 54 58 67 22 22 25 22 18 8 +32 +40 +59

*% Satisfied minus % Dissatisfied correctly rounded. Ignores Don’t Know and Refused to Answer responses. Q. Based on their overall performance, how do you feel about the performance of the following government institutions? Are you VERY SATISFIED, SOMEWHAT SATISFIED, UNDECIDED IF SATISFIED OR NOT, SOMEWHAT DISSATISFIED, VERY DISSATISFIED or YOU HAVE NEVER HEARD OR READ ANYTHING about (THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES)? Fourth Quarter 2019 Social Weather Report December 13-16, 2019 National Survey

Chart 6 NET* SATISFACTION RATINGS OF THE SUPREME COURT: PHILIPPINES, NOV 1990 TO DEC 2019

C. AQUINO RAMOS ESTRADA ARROYO B. AQUINO DUTERTE +100 +90 +80 +70 +60 Supreme Court +50 +49 +40 +30 +20 +10 +0 -+10-

* Net ratings = % Satisfied minus % Dissatisfied. Survey Data: Social Weather Stations surveys. [INS-RATE.PRS] Fourth Quarter 2019 Social Weather Report December 13-16, 2019 National Survey

4th Quarter 2019 Social Weather Survey SWS MEDIA RELEASE 3 March 2020, page 25 of 28

Table 17 NET* SATISFACTION RATINGS OF THE SUPREME COURT: PHILIPPINES

C. AQUINO RAMOS (cont.) ARROYO ARROYO (cont.) B. AQUINO (cont.) NOV 90 +14 JUN 97 +30 JUN 03 +21 DEC 09 +18 APR 16 +36 JUL 91 +15 SEP 97 +19 SEP 03 +16 MAR 10 + 9 JUN 16 +44 NOV 91 +11 DEC 97 +28 NOV 03 + 8 B. AQUINO DUTERTE FEB 92 +18 FEB 98 +23 MAR 04 +23 SEP 10 +33 SEP 16 +40 APR 92 +16 ESTRADA JUN 04 +20 NOV 10 +36 DEC 16 +38 RAMOS SEP 98 +24 AUG 04 +17 MAR 11 +26 MAR 17 +40 AUG 92 +32 NOV 98 +29 MAR 05 + 5 JUN 11 +26 JUN 17 +38 DEC 92 +24 MAR 99 +39 MAY 05 - 1 SEP 11 +29 SEP 17 +31 MAY 93 +18 JUN 99 +30 AUG 05 +13 DEC 11 +21 DEC 17 +37 JUL 93 +23 OCT 99 +16 DEC 05 +12 MAR 12 +27 MAR 18 +20 SEP 93 +22 DEC 99 + 6 MAR 06 + 6 MAY 12 +13 JUN 18 +19 DEC 93 +30 MAR 00 +31 JUN 06 + 9 AUG 12 +35 SEP 18 +31 APR 94 +26 JUL 00 +31 OCT 06 + 4 DEC 12 +36 DEC 18 +37 AUG 94 +29 SEP 00 +18 DEC 06 +13 MAR 13 +34 MAR 19 +50 NOV 94 +19 DEC 00 +41 FEB 07 +16 JUN 13 +37 JUN 19 +54 DEC 94 +17 JUN 07 +12 SEP 13 +41 SEP 19 +41 ARROYO SEP 07 +24 MAR 95 +18 MAR 01 +37 DEC 13 +36 DEC 19 +49 JUN 95 +15 DEC 07 + 5 MAR 14 +35 JUL 01 +33 MAR 08 + 9 OCT 95 +17 SEP 01 +16 JUN 14 +30 DEC 95 +25 JUN 08 +6 SEP 14 +32 NOV 01 +21 SEP 08 +9 MAR 96 +16 MAR 02 +15 DEC 14 +26 JUN 96 +14 DEC 08 +8 MAR 15 +34 MAY 02 +11 FEB 09 +4 SEP 96 +16 SEP 02 +19 JUN 15 +32 DEC 96 + 5 JUN 09 +17 SEP 15 +27 DEC 02 +25 SEP 09 +14 APR 97 +26 MAR 03 +26 DEC 15 +22

Fourth Quarter 2019 Social Weather Report December 13-16, 2019 National Survey

Table 18 PUBLIC SATISFACTION WITH THE SUPREME COURT: JUN 2019 TO DEC 2019 (page 1 of 2)

Satisfied Undecided Dissatisfied Net* Jun19 Sep19 Dec19 Jun19 Sep19 Dec19 Jun19 Sep19 Dec19 Jun19 Sep19 Dec19 Total PH 66% 57% 62% 22% 25% 24% 12% 16% 13% +54 +41 +49

NCR 53 56 62 25 23 22 20 20 14 +33 +36 +47 Bal. Luzon 66 54 57 23 29 28 10 15 12 +56 +39 +45 Visayas 70 63 67 16 20 19 14 14 11 +56 +48 +56 Mindanao 69 58 66 20 20 21 10 18 13 +59 +41 +54

Urban 60 56 59 23 26 24 15 17 16 +45 +39 +43 Rural 70 58 64 20 24 24 10 15 10 +60 +42 +55

ABC 53 51 49 29 28 24 17 18 24 +36 +34 +25 D 66 57 64 21 25 23 12 16 11 +54 +41 +53 E 65 59 59 24 23 26 11 14 14 +55 +44 +45

Fourth Quarter 2019 Social Weather Report December 13-16, 2019 National Survey

4th Quarter 2019 Social Weather Survey SWS MEDIA RELEASE 3 March 2020, page 26 of 28

PUBLIC SATISFACTION WITH THE SUPREME COURT: JUN 2019 TO DEC 2019 (page 2 of 2)

Satisfied Undecided Dissatisfied Net* Jun19 Sep19 Dec19 Jun19 Sep19 Dec19 Jun19 Sep19 Dec19 Jun19 Sep19 Dec19 Total PH 66% 57% 62% 22% 25% 24% 12% 16% 13% +54 +41 +49

Men 65 57 61 22 23 24 13 18 13 +52 +40 +48 Women 66 57 62 22 26 23 11 15 12 +55 +42 +51

18-24 70 65 69 19 19 21 9 14 9 +60 +50 +60 25-34 67 56 66 21 25 23 12 19 11 +54 +37 +55 35-44 63 61 69 24 24 15 13 13 15 +50 +48 +54 45-54 65 54 53 26 28 34 9 15 10 +56 +39 +43 55 + 66 54 56 19 25 26 14 18 15 +52 +36 +41

Some Elem 64 53 55 27 28 31 8 11 13 +56 +41 +42 Some HS 68 58 63 18 25 21 12 15 12 +56 +43 +51 Some Voc/Coll 65 58 63 22 24 23 12 17 13 +54 +41 +50 Coll. Grad 62 55 64 20 23 24 17 21 12 +45 +34 +52

*% Satisfied minus % Dissatisfied correctly rounded. Ignores Don’t Know and Refused to Answer responses. Q. Based on their overall performance, how do you feel about the performance of the following government institutions? Are you VERY SATISFIED, SOMEWHAT SATISFIED, UNDECIDED IF SATISFIED OR NOT, SOMEWHAT DISSATISFIED, VERY DISSATISFIED or YOU HAVE NEVER HEARD OR READ ANYTHING about (THE SUPREME COURT)? Fourth Quarter 2019 Social Weather Report December 13-16, 2019 National Survey

Chart 7 NET* SATISFACTION RATINGS OF THE CABINET AS A WHOLE: PHILIPPINES, NOV 1990 TO DEC 2019

C. AQUINO RAMOS ESTRADA ARROYO B. AQUINO DUTERTE +100 +90 +80 +70 +60 +50 Cabinet +40 +45 +30 +20 +10 +0 -+10- -+20 -+30-

* Net ratings = % Satisfied minus % Dissatisfied. Survey Data: Social Weather Stations surveys. [INS-RATE.PRS] Fourth Quarter 2019 Social Weather Report December 13-16, 2019 National Survey

4th Quarter 2019 Social Weather Survey SWS MEDIA RELEASE 3 March 2020, page 27 of 28

Table 19 NET* SATISFACTION RATINGS OF THE CABINET AS A WHOLE: PHILIPPINES (page 1 of 2)

C. AQUINO ESTRADA ARROYO (cont.) ARROYO (cont.) NOV 90 -16 SEP 98 +18 JUN 03 +10 SEP 09 -5 JUL 91 -13 NOV 98 +22 SEP 03 + 2 DEC 09 - 1 NOV 91 -14 MAR 99 +2 NOV 03 - 7 MAR 10 - 7 FEB 92 - 7 JUN 99 +21 MAR 04 +12 B. AQUINO APR 92 - 3 OCT 99 + 4 AUG 05 - 6 SEP 10 +22 RAMOS DEC 99 -15 DEC 05 - 6 NOV 10 +20 APR 94 +17 MAR 00 + 6 MAR 06 -10 MAR 11 +24 AUG 94 + 8 JUL 00 +15 JUN 06 - 5 JUN 11 +25 NOV 94 +12 SEP 00 +10 OCT 06 - 3 SEP 11 +24 DEC 94 + 9 DEC 00 +10 DEC 06 - 5 DEC 11 +22 MAR 95 - 6 ARROYO FEB 07 - 2 MAR 12 +26 JUN 95 - 1 MAR 01 +14 JUN 07 + 1 MAY 12 +19 SEP 96 + 5 JUL 01 +17 SEP 07 + 1 AUG 12 +33 DEC 96 + 7 SEP 01 + 2 DEC 07 - 9 DEC 12 +26 APR 97 +20 NOV 01 + 1 MAR 08 -10 MAR 13 +23 JUN 97 +27 MAR 02 - 1 JUN 08 - 9 JUN 13 +28 SEP 97 + 8 MAY 02 - 8 SEP 08 - 3 SEP 13 +27 DEC 97 +19 SEP 02 + 6 DEC 08 -1 DEC 13 +20 FEB 98 + 3 DEC 02 + 5 FEB 09 -7 MAR 14 +20 APR 98 + 1 MAR 03 + 7 JUN 09 +3 JUN 14 + 7

Fourth Quarter 2019 Social Weather Report December 13-16, 2019 National Survey NET* SATISFACTION RATINGS OF THE CABINET AS A WHOLE: PHILIPPINES (page 2 of 2)

B. AQUINO (cont.) DUTERTE DUTERTE (cont.) SEP 14 +18 SEP 16 +36 SEP 18 +32 DEC 14 + 9 DEC 16 +32 DEC 18 +35 MAR 15 +13 MAR 17 +32 MAR 19 +44 JUN 15 +12 JUN 17 +34 JUN 19 +51 SEP 15 +16 SEP 17 +32 SEP 19 +35 DEC 15 +11 DEC 17 +38 DEC 19 +45 APR 16 +22 MAR 18 +28 JUN 16 +37 JUN 18 +25

Fourth Quarter 2019 Social Weather Report December 13-16, 2019 National Survey

4th Quarter 2019 Social Weather Survey SWS MEDIA RELEASE 3 March 2020, page 28 of 28

Table 20 PUBLIC SATISFACTION WITH THE CABINET AS A WHOLE: JUN 2019 TO DEC 2019 (page 1 of 2) Satisfied Undecided Dissatisfied Net* Jun19 Sep19 Dec19 Jun19 Sep19 Dec19 Jun19 Sep19 Dec19 Jun19 Sep19 Dec19

Total PH 64% 51% 56% 23% 29% 30% 13% 16% 11% +51 +35 +45

NCR 54 57 55 25 25 28 19 16 15 +36 +41 +40 Bal. Luzon 66 49 51 23 32 36 11 16 11 +55 +33 +40 Visayas 66 55 62 23 26 22 11 15 11 +55 +40 +51 Mindanao 64 50 60 21 26 28 14 17 9 +50 +33 +51

Urban 58 55 56 25 27 28 16 15 13 +43 +40 +42 Rural 68 49 56 21 30 32 10 16 9 +58 +33 +47

ABC 57 51 53 26 26 28 17 21 17 +40 +31 +36 D 65 51 57 23 29 30 12 16 11 +53 +35 +46 E 61 52 53 24 29 32 15 14 10 +46 +38 +43

*% Satisfied minus % Dissatisfied correctly rounded. Ignores Don’t Know and Refused to Answer responses. Q. Based on their overall performance, how do you feel about the performance of the following government institutions? Are you VERY SATISFIED, SOMEWHAT SATISFIED, UNDECIDED IF SATISFIED OR NOT, SOMEWHAT DISSATISFIED, VERY DISSATISFIED or YOU HAVE NEVER HEARD OR READ ANYTHING about (THE CABINET AS A WHOLE)? Fourth Quarter 2019 Social Weather Report December 13-16, 2019 National Survey PUBLIC SATISFACTION WITH THE CABINET AS A WHOLE: JUN 2019 TO DEC 2019 (page 2 of 2)

Satisfied Undecided Dissatisfied Net* Jun19 Sep19 Dec19 Jun19 Sep19 Dec19 Jun19 Sep19 Dec19 Jun19 Sep19 Dec19 Total PH 64% 51% 56% 23% 29% 30% 13% 16% 11% +51 +35 +45

Men 64 52 55 23 27 31 13 17 12 +50 +35 +43 Women 64 51 57 23 30 29 12 15 11 +52 +36 +46

18-24 66 49 62 18 32 28 13 14 10 +53 +35 +52 25-34 67 49 62 19 30 28 13 19 8 +54 +30 +54 35-44 65 58 62 20 26 26 14 13 10 +51 +44 +53 45-54 66 50 51 26 30 31 7 15 14 +59 +35 +37 55 + 58 50 47 27 28 35 14 17 13 +43 +33 +34

Some Elem 59 43 43 27 33 41 14 15 11 +45 +28 +32 Some HS 65 48 55 21 32 26 13 15 14 +51 +33 +41 Some Voc/Coll 66 55 60 23 25 29 11 17 10 +55 +38 +50 Coll. Grad 60 55 58 23 28 33 16 16 9 +44 +38 +49

*% Satisfied minus % Dissatisfied correctly rounded. Ignores Don’t Know and Refused to Answer responses. Q. Based on their overall performance, how do you feel about the performance of the following government institutions? Are you VERY SATISFIED, SOMEWHAT SATISFIED, UNDECIDED IF SATISFIED OR NOT, SOMEWHAT DISSATISFIED, VERY DISSATISFIED or YOU HAVE NEVER HEARD OR READ ANYTHING about (THE CABINET AS A WHOLE)? Fourth Quarter 2019 Social Weather Report December 13-16, 2019 National Survey