Past- Present

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Past- Present PAST- PRESENT Essays on Historicism in Art jrom Donatello to Picasso Irving Lavin UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA PRESS BERKELEY • LOS ANGELES• OXFORD The publisher gratefully acknowledges the generous support of the Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton, and the Una Endowment Fund of the University of California, Berkeley. University of California Press Berkeley and Los Angeles, California University of California Press, Ltd. Oxford, England © 1993 by Irving Lavin Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Lavin, Irving, 1927- Past-present : essays on historicism in art from Donatello to Picasso / Irving Lavin. p. cm. - (Una's lectures ; 6) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-520-06816-5 (cloth) I. Art and history. 2. Historicism. I. Title. II. Series. N72.H58L38 1992 709-dC20 91-28489 Printed in the United States of America 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of American National Standard for Information Sciences - Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials, ANSI z39.48-1984. § Fig. 99. Caravaggio, Calling of St. Matthew. San Luigi dei Francesi, Rome (photo: Istituto Centrale de! Restauro, Rome 9779). Fig. 100. Detail of Fig. 99. CHAPTER FOUR + CARAVAGGIO'S Calling of Saint Matthew: T H E I D E N T I T Y OF THE PROTAGONIST powerful current runs through the entire history of involves a conundrum that is obscured in the King Western art-a complex, imponderable, paradoxical James translation. The glass is a mirror (speculum) Ametaphor that defines in visual terms the relation­ through which we see, and what we perceive "darkly" ship between the world and Christian belief The is an enigma. The point I want to focus on particu­ metaphor occurs in I Corinthians 1p2, where St. larly, however-because I believe Caravaggio did so, Paul explains the understanding that will come in in an unprecedented and utterly devastating way- is the fullness of faith: "For now we see through a the second part of the metaphor. "Face to face" is glass, darkly, but then face to face" (Videmus nunc per also a conundrum: the phrase may be taken both speculum in aenigmate, tune autem Jacie ad jaciem). One of metaphorically and literally-and this is exactly the principal interpretations of the passage was that how Caravaggio took it. Appropriating the Renais­ it alluded to the presence of God in everyday, ordi­ sance understanding of physiognomy as the outward nary, even unworthy things. Paul's dictum was thus manifestation of psychological and moral character related both to the ancient rhetorical tradition of (see pp. 109, 212 below), Caravaggio used the face in rhyparography, the art of portraying lowly and insig­ the second part of Paul's metaphor to portray (the nificant things, and to the Christian devotional tra­ pun is deliberate) the enigma of the first. Justification dition of the sermo humilis, or humble style, both of for Caravaggio's interpretation was provided by Paul's which have important corollaries in the visual arts. use of the same metaphor in 2 Corinthians p8, where These traditions enjoyed a great florescence in the he relates the image in the mirror to the change of face Northern European Renaissance, becoming a veri­ wrought by the spirit of the Lord in those who table mode of thought, as well as of persuasion, believe: "But we all, with open face beholding as in a among the major thinkers of the age, including glass the glory of the Lord, are changed into the same Nicholas of Cusa, Erasmus, and Rabelais. 1 image from glory to glory, even as by the Spirit of the My subject here is really an episode in this Lord" (Nos vero omnes revelata jacie gloriam Domini speculates millennial story, although a significant one, as I in eandem imaginem traniformamur a claritate in claritatem, hope will become clear. Paul's formulation in Latin tanquam a Domini Spiritu ). 85 My immediate purpose is to offer a counterproof tradition universally accepted since the early seven­ to arguments recently made to re-identify the figure teenth century had identified as the publican the of the Jewish tax collector Levi, whom Jesus calls to elegantly dressed bearded man who, bathed in Christ's the apostolate in Caravaggio's painting of that subject light, looks toward the approaching figure of the executed for the left wall of the Contarelli chapel in Lord and points to himself, assenting to the divine San Luigi dei Francesi, the French national church in command "Follow me.''3 Caravaggio's paintings Rome (Figs. 99, 100; Plate IV). Besides the Calling ef created an astonishing three-act religious drama in St. Matthew, Caravaggio painted three other canvases for which-to judge by appearances-the chief pro­ the chapel between 1599 and 1603 at the behest of the tagonist played three completely different and executors of Cardinal Matthieu Cointrel, who had incompatible roles. died in 1585: the Martyrdom ef St. Matthew for the right An alternative suggestion has been made that wall (Figs. IOI, 102) and two versions of the altarpiece Levi-who-became-Matthew should be identified showing Matthew composing his Gospel under the with the youth seated at the left of the counting inspiration of his symbolic angel (Figs. 103, 104 ).2 A table, unaware of Christ's approach, engulfed in Caravaggio's Calling of St. Matthew Fig. 101 (opposite). Caravaggio, Martrydom ef St. Matthew. San Luigi dei Francesi, Rome (photo: Istituto Centrale de! Restauro, Rome 9773). Fig. 102 (above). Detail of Fig. 101 (photo: Istituto Centrale per ii Catalogo e la Documentazione, Rome Ez4570 ). darkness, his head down, grasping a money bag the two figures sit, the so-called Savonarola chair, is close to his chest.4 The main arguments presented identical- in fact, Caravaggio also reused the bench to support this interpretation, though reasonable, do under the youth with the sword (at right) for the not in themselves seem persuasive to me: that the evangelist in the second version of the altarpiece pointing gesture of the seated figure could refer to (Fig. 104 ), and he had already used both props in the his companions at the end of the table - in fact, the London Supper at Emmaus(Fig. 105). The simple, una­ gesture seems clearly self-referential and not at all dorned pieces of furniture were just that, props, like ambiguous; that the physiognomy of the youth is the Capuchin's frock and the pair of wings Caravag­ more readily reconcilable with the Socratic features gio borrowed from the painter Orazio Gentileschi Caravaggio gave the evangelist Matthew composing during the very period he was working on the Con­ his Gospel in the original version of the altarpiece tarelli chapel. 5 In any case, accepting this partial for the chapel-in fact, notwithstanding the differ­ cure for the consistently split personality of Cara­ ence in age, the evangelist's features seem much vaggio's hero would be worse than the disease, for coarser; and that the design of the chairs on which we would then have to confront, without help from Caravaggio's Calling of St. Matthew Fig. m3 (above). Caravaggio, St. Matthew Composing His Gospel. Destroyed in 1945; formerly Kaiser-Friedrich-Museum, Berlin (photo: Zentralinstitut fur Kunstgeschichte, Munich 120854 ). Fig. 104 (following plates). Caravaggio, St. Matthew Composing His Gospel. San Luigi dei Francesi, Rome (photo: lstituto Centrale de! Restauro, Rome 9783). 88 Caravaggio's Calling of St. Matthew Plate IV (above). Caravaggio, Calling of St. Matthew, detail. San Luigi dei Francesi, Rome (photo: courtesy Maurizio Marino). Plate V (right). Pieter Coecke, Last Supper, detail. Musees Royaux des Beaux-Arts, Brussels. Plate VI (opposite, above). Jan van Hemessen, Calling of St. Mat­ thew. Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York. Plate VII (opposite, below). Hendrick Terbrugghen, Calling of St. Matthew. Cencraal Museum, Utrecht. Caravaggio's Calling of St. Matthew Fig. 105 (above) . Caravaggio, Supptr at Emmaus. National Gallery, London. Fig. 106 (opposite). Piecer Coecke, I.Ast Supper. Musees Royaux des Beaux-Arts, Brussels. the theory's proponents, the inconsistency of the divine illumination. Indeed, the metaphor has par­ same individual as Matthew in the first two scenes, ticular relevance in the Calling of St. Matthew, as a but another in the third. visual analogue to a passage connecting Matthew's To my mind, however, the alternative identifica­ conversion to his vision of Christ's radiance, in the tion is excluded a priori by other, more fundamental, liturgy for the saint celebrated in the chapel on his considerations. A youthful beardless and hatless feast day. The breviary quotes St. Jerome's luminous publican would contradict the worldly maturity response, in his commentary on this episode in the universally attributed to this government official, first Gospel, to the shadow of doubt cast on the however corrupt. The relative obscurity of the authenticity of the conversion by the pagan philoso­ youth at the side as Levi would contradict the high pher Porphyry and the apostate emperor Julian. drama of the composition as a whole, which focuses They claimed that either the story was false or it on the man in the center who looks toward Christ bespoke the folly of anyone who would follow and points. A Levi oblivious to Christ's appearance without hesitation at a call. Jerome replied that "cer­ would contradict the essential point of the episode, tainly the radiance and the majesty of the hidden the publican's response-not lack of response-to the divinity which shone out from the human face of Call. A benighted Levi would contradict one of the Christ could draw to Him at first sight those who most profound and innovative principles of Cara­ saw Him."6 vaggio's art, the use of light as a visual metaphor for These points are obvious enough, perhaps even Caravaggio's Calling of St.
Recommended publications
  • Michelangelo Buonarroti – Ages 10 – Adult | Online Edition
    MICHELANGELO BUONARROTI – AGES 10 – ADULT | ONLINE EDITION Step 1 - Introducing the Michelangelo Buonarroti Slideshow Guide BEGIN READING HERE MOTIVATION Have you ever had to do a job you really didn’t want to do? Maybe you even got in an argument about it and stormed away angry. Did you end up doing the job anyway, because the person in charge, like a parent or teacher, insisted you do it? That is exactly what happened to our master artist when he was twenty-eight years old. Who would have had that much power over him as an adult? Click Start Lesson To Begin DEVELOPMENT 1. POPE JULIUS II Pope Julius was the powerful ruler of the church in Rome, and he heard about Michelangelo’s amazing talents. The Pope wanted to build beautiful churches and statues in Rome, so people would remember him. He tricked Michelangelo into moving to Rome to work as a sculptor. Sculpting was Michelangelo’s first love as an artist. But soon after Michelangelo began working, the Pope canceled the sculpture and forced him to begin a new project. That’s when the arguments began. Why? Click Next To Change Slide 2. SELF-PORTRAIT Michelangelo considered himself a sculptor. He generally signed his letters and contracts for important works of painting as “Michelangelo the Sculptor.” Time and time again he spoke of his dislike for painting. He claimed it was NOT his profession. Can you guess what Pope Julius asked him to do? (PAINT) Yes, the powerful Julius wanted and insisted that Michelangelo paint, because he was under contract.
    [Show full text]
  • Reading 1.2 Caravaggio: the Construction of an Artistic Personality
    READING 1.2 CARAVAGGIO: THE CONSTRUCTION OF AN ARTISTIC PERSONALITY David Carrier Source: Carrier, D., 1991. Principles of Art History Writing, University Park, Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University Press, pp.49–79. Copyright ª 1991 by The Pennsylvania State University. Reproduced by permission of the publisher. Compare two accounts of Caravaggio’s personality: Giovanni Bellori’s brief 1672 text and Howard Hibbard’s Caravaggio, published in 1983. Bellori says that Caravaggio, like the ancient sculptor Demetrius, cared more for naturalism than for beauty. Choosing models, not from antique sculpture, but from the passing crowds, he aspired ‘only to the glory of colour.’1 Caravaggio abandoned his early Venetian manner in favor of ‘bold shadows and a great deal of black’ because of ‘his turbulent and contentious nature.’ The artist expressed himself in his work: ‘Caravaggio’s way of working corresponded to his physiognomy and appearance. He had a dark complexion and dark eyes, black hair and eyebrows and this, of course, was reflected in his painting ‘The curse of his too naturalistic style was that ‘soon the value of the beautiful was discounted.’ Some of these claims are hard to take at face value. Surely when Caravaggio composed an altarpiece he did not just look until ‘it happened that he came upon someone in the town who pleased him,’ making ‘no effort to exercise his brain further.’ While we might think that swarthy people look brooding more easily than blonds, we are unlikely to link an artist’s complexion to his style. But if portions of Bellori’s text are alien to us, its structure is understandable.
    [Show full text]
  • 75. Sistine Chapel Ceiling and Altar Wall Frescoes Vatican City, Italy
    75. Sistine Chapel ceiling and altar wall frescoes Vatican City, Italy. Michelangelo. Ceiling frescoes: c. 1508-1510 C.E Altar frescoes: c. 1536-1541 C.E., Fresco (4 images) Video on Khan Academy Cornerstone of High Renaissance art Named for Pope Sixtus IV, commissioned by Pope Julius II Purpose: papal conclaves an many important services The Last Judgment, ceiling: Book of Genesis scenes Other art by Botticelli, others and tapestries by Raphael allowed Michelangelo to fully demonstrate his skill in creating a huge variety of poses for the human figure, and have provided an enormously influential pattern book of models for other artists ever since. Coincided with the rebuilding of St. Peters Basilica – potent symbol of papal power Original ceiling was much like the Arena Chapel – blue with stars The pope insisted that Michelangelo (primarily a sculpture) take on the commission Michelangelo negotiated to ‘do what he liked’ (debateable) 343 figures, 4 years to complete inspired by the reading of scriptures – not established traditions of sacred art designed his own scaffolding myth: painted while lying on his back. Truth: he painted standing up method: fresco . had to be restarted because of a problem with mold o a new formula created by one of his assistants resisted mold and created a new Italian building tradition o new plaster laid down every day – edges called giornate o confident – he drew directly onto the plaster or from a ‘grid’ o he drew on all the “finest workshop methods and best innovations” his assistant/biographer: the ceiling is "unfinished", that its unveiling occurred before it could be reworked with gold leaf and vivid blue lapis lazuli as was customary with frescoes and in order to better link the ceiling with the walls below it which were highlighted with a great deal of gold’ symbolism: Christian ideals, Renaissance humanism, classical literature, and philosophies of Plato, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • BOZZETTO STYLE” the Renaissance Sculptor’S Handiwork*
    “BOZZETTO STYLE” The Renaissance Sculptor’s Handiwork* Irving Lavin Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton NJ It takes most people much time and effort to become proficient at manipulating the tools of visual creation. But to execute in advance sketches, studies, plans for a work of art is not a necessary and inevitable part of the creative process. There is no evidence for such activity in the often astonishingly expert and sophisticated works of Paleolithic art, where images may be placed beside or on top of one another apparently at random, but certainly not as corrections, cancellations, or “improved” replacements. Although I am not aware of any general study of the subject, I venture to say that periods in which preliminary experimentation and planning were practiced were relatively rare in the history of art. While skillful execution requires prior practice and expertise, the creative act itself, springing from a more or less unselfconscious cultural and professional memory, might be quite autonomous and unpremeditated. A first affirmation of this hypothesis in the modern literature of art history occurred more than a century-and-a-half ago when one of the great French founding fathers of modern art history (especially the discipline of iconography), Adolphe Napoléon Didron, made a discovery that can be described, almost literally, as monumental. In the introduction to his publication — the first Greek-Byzantine treatise on painting, which he dedicated to his friend and enthusiastic fellow- medievalist, Victor Hugo — Didron gave a dramatic account of a moment of intellectual illumination that occurred during a pioneering exploratory visit to Greece in August and September 1839 for the purpose of studying the medieval fresco and mosaic decorations of the Byzantine churches.1 He had, he says, wondered at the uniformity and continuity of the Greek * This contribution is a much revised and expanded version of my original, brief sketch of the history of sculptors’ models, Irving Lavin, “Bozzetti and Modelli.
    [Show full text]
  • Theatre Tips Sion of the Men in Her Life, Unfolded on Stage
    Issue 152 September 2018 A NEWSLETTER OF THE ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY COMMUNITY GETTY IMAGES Theatre Tips sion of the men in her life, unfolded on stage. Broadway show inexpensively, but of course, Not every theatre experience is as emotion- you shouldn’t rely on winning to have plans M ELISSA JAR M EL ally charged as that one, but they all offer a to see theatre that night. Some shows like One of the best ways that I know how chance to see life from a different perspective Mean Girls, Book of Mormon, and Once On to take myself out of lab life is to see live the- and with a unique group of people. In future This Island offer in person lotteries every atre, and I’m lucky that New York City offers posts, I hope to highlight shows I’ve watched day that are usually drawn two hours before an overwhelming number of options to do on and off Broadway, but this time I want to the performance. In the last couple of years, this affordably (though Hamilton ticket pric- give you tips for seeing theatre on a budget. many shows have begun to offer digital lot- es may have you fooled about this). If you are a full time student, teacher, tery options. Broadway Direct (https://lot- One of the aspects I love most about or faculty member (or other qualifying cat- tery.broadwaydirect.com/) offers digital lot- going to the theatre is the acute feeling that egory), the Theatre Development Fund is teries for Lion King, Aladdin, Spongebob, and I am part of a connected community.
    [Show full text]
  • Ribera's Drunken Silenusand Saint Jerome
    99 NAPLES IN FLESH AND BONES: RIBERA’S DRUNKEN SILENUS AND SAINT JEROME Edward Payne Abstract Jusepe de Ribera did not begin to sign his paintings consistently until 1626, the year in which he executed two monumental works: the Drunken Silenus and Saint Jerome and the Angel of Judgement (Museo di Capodimonte, Naples). Both paintings include elaborate Latin inscriptions stating that they were executed in Naples, the city in which the artist had resided for the past decade and where he ultimately remained for the rest of his life. Taking each in turn, this essay explores the nature and implications of these inscriptions, and offers new interpretations of the paintings. I argue that these complex representations of mythological and religious subjects – that were destined, respectively, for a private collection and a Neapolitan church – may be read as incarnations of the city of Naples. Naming the paintings’ place of production and the artist’s city of residence in the signature formulae was thus not coincidental or marginal, but rather indicative of Ribera inscribing himself textually, pictorially and corporeally in the fabric of the city. Keywords: allegory, inscription, Naples, realism, Jusepe de Ribera, Saint Jerome, satire, senses, Silenus Full text: http://openartsjournal.org/issue-6/article-5 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5456/issn.2050-3679/2018w05 Biographical note Edward Payne is Head Curator of Spanish Art at The Auckland Project and an Honorary Fellow at Durham University. He previously served as the inaugural Meadows/Mellon/Prado Curatorial Fellow at the Meadows Museum (2014–16) and as the Moore Curatorial Fellow in Drawings and Prints at the Morgan Library & Museum (2012–14).
    [Show full text]
  • On the Problem of Describing and Interpreting Works of the Visual Arts
    On the Problem of Describing and Interpreting Works of the Visual Arts Author(s): Erwin Panofsky, Jaś Elsner, and Katharina Lorenz Reviewed work(s): Source: Critical Inquiry, Vol. 38, No. 3 (Spring 2012), pp. 467-482 Published by: The University of Chicago Press Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/664547 . Accessed: 24/05/2012 14:10 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. The University of Chicago Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Critical Inquiry. http://www.jstor.org On the Problem of Describing and Interpreting Works of the Visual Arts Erwin Panofsky Translated by Jas´ Elsner and Katharina Lorenz In the eleventh of his Antiquarian Letters, Gotthold Ephraim Lessing discusses a phrase from Lucian’s description of the painting by Zeuxis called A Family of Centaurs: ‘at the top of the painting a centaur is leaning down as if from an observation point, smiling’ (ano de tes eikonos hoion apo tinos skopes Hippokentauros tis ...). ‘This as if from an observation point, Except for a few changes, that partly emerged from the discussion, this article presents the thread of a talk, that was given on 20 May 1931, to the Kiel section of the Kant Society.
    [Show full text]
  • Professor Emeritus History of Art School Of
    www.hs.ias.edu/lavin IRVING LAVIN Professor Emeritus History of Art School of Historical Studies Institute for Advanced Study [email protected] Curriculum Vitae Education: St. Louis Public Schools B. A. Washington University, St. Louis, 1945-48 Major Field: Philosophy Cambridge University, England, 1948-9 Special study with Bertrand Russell: Logic and History of Philosophy M. A. Institute of Fine Arts, New York University, 1951 Thesis: The Sources of Donatello's Pulpits in San Lorenzo M. A. Harvard University, 1952 Ph. D. Harvard University, 1955 Dissertation: The Bozzetti of Gianlorenzo Bernini Fellowships and Grants: Schweig Scholarship, Study in England 1948-49 Belgian American Educational Foundation Fellow, Brussels, Summer, 1949 Sheldon Traveling Fellowship, Harvard University, 1953-54 Dumbarton Oaks Senior Research Fellow, 1957-59 Senior Fulbright Scholar, Italy, 1961-63 American Council of Learned Societies, Senior Fellowship, 1965-66 Guggenheim Fellow, 1968-69 Honors and Awards: Arthur Kingsley Porter Prize, College Art Association of America, awarded 1959, 1962, 1968 American Academy of Arts and Sciences, Fellow, 1978 Tercentennial medal commemorating the death of Gianlorenzo Bernini, City of Rome, 1980 Honorary citizen of the city of Montevarchi, commemorating the quadricentennial of the birth of Francesco Mochi, 1980 Sescentennial medal commemorating the birth of Donatello, L’Accadmia delle Arti del Disegno, Florence, 1986 Premio Daria Borghese, Rome, 1981 Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei, Rome, Socio Straniero, 1986 Accademia Clementina,
    [Show full text]
  • Sources of Donatello's Pulpits in San Lorenzo Revival and Freedom of Choice in the Early Renaissance*
    ! " #$ % ! &'()*+',)+"- )'+./.#')+.012 3 3 %! ! 34http://www.jstor.org/stable/3047811 ! +565.67552+*+5 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=caa. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. JSTOR is a not-for-profit organization founded in 1995 to build trusted digital archives for scholarship. We work with the scholarly community to preserve their work and the materials they rely upon, and to build a common research platform that promotes the discovery and use of these resources. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. http://www.jstor.org THE SOURCES OF DONATELLO'S PULPITS IN SAN LORENZO REVIVAL AND FREEDOM OF CHOICE IN THE EARLY RENAISSANCE* IRVING LAVIN HE bronze pulpits executed by Donatello for the church of San Lorenzo in Florence T confront the investigator with something of a paradox.1 They stand today on either side of Brunelleschi's nave in the last bay toward the crossing.• The one on the left side (facing the altar, see text fig.) contains six scenes of Christ's earthly Passion, from the Agony in the Garden through the Entombment (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • The Life of Michelangelo Buonarroti by John Addington Symonds</H1>
    The Life of Michelangelo Buonarroti by John Addington Symonds The Life of Michelangelo Buonarroti by John Addington Symonds Produced by Ted Garvin, Keith M. Eckrich and PG Distributed Proofreaders THE LIFE OF MICHELANGELO BUONARROTI By JOHN ADDINGTON SYMONDS TO THE CAVALIERE GUIDO BIAGI, DOCTOR IN LETTERS, PREFECT OF THE MEDICEO-LAURENTIAN LIBRARY, ETC., ETC. I DEDICATE THIS WORK ON MICHELANGELO IN RESPECT FOR HIS SCHOLARSHIP AND LEARNING ADMIRATION OF HIS TUSCAN STYLE AND GRATEFUL ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF HIS GENEROUS ASSISTANCE CONTENTS CHAPTER page 1 / 658 I. BIRTH, BOYHOOD, YOUTH AT FLORENCE, DOWN TO LORENZO DE' MEDICI'S DEATH. 1475-1492. II. FIRST VISITS TO BOLOGNA AND ROME--THE MADONNA DELLA FEBBRE AND OTHER WORKS IN MARBLE. 1492-1501. III. RESIDENCE IN FLORENCE--THE DAVID. 1501-1505. IV. JULIUS II. CALLS MICHELANGELO TO ROME--PROJECT FOR THE POPE'S TOMB--THE REBUILDING OF S. PETER'S--FLIGHT FROM ROME--CARTOON FOR THE BATTLE OF PISA. 1505, 1506. V. SECOND VISIT TO BOLOGNA--THE BRONZE STATUE OF JULIUS II--PAINTING OF THE SISTINE VAULT. 1506-1512. VI. ON MICHELANGELO AS DRAUGHTSMAN, PAINTER, SCULPTOR. VII. LEO X. PLANS FOR THE CHURCH OF S. LORENZO AT FLORENCE--MICHELANGELO'S LIFE AT CARRARA. 1513-1521. VIII. ADRIAN VI AND CLEMENT VII--THE SACRISTY AND LIBRARY OF S. LORENZO. 1521-1526. page 2 / 658 IX. SACK OF ROME AND SIEGE OF FLORENCE--MICHELANGELO'S FLIGHT TO VENICE--HIS RELATIONS TO THE MEDICI. 1527-1534. X. ON MICHELANGELO AS ARCHITECT. XI. FINAL SETTLEMENT IN ROME--PAUL III.--THE LAST JUDGMENT AND THE PAOLINE CHAPEL--THE TOMB OF JULIUS.
    [Show full text]
  • PERILLO TOUR to Italy!
    PERILLO TOUR To Italy! Group Name: Are You Dense Fundraiser Trip to Italy Tour Name: Rome & Amalfi Coast Tour Travel dates: September 24 – October 2, 2020 Number of participants: 40 Contact: [email protected] For travel outside the United States U.S. citizens must have valid passports, with an expiration date of at least six months after the scheduled return date. Itinerary: Day 1 - Depart USA Boarding your overnight flight, you’re off on your Italy adventure. Buon viaggio! Day 2 - Arrive in Rome - Afternoon at Leisure - Dinner in Hotel Benvenuti a Roma! Your Perillo representative will be at the airport to greet you and guide you to your motorcoach transfer to the hotel. Enjoy some free time this afternoon - take a walk on Via Veneto, have a gelato or maybe do some shopping. Tonight, enjoy dinner in our hotel or local restaurant. Overnight in Rome (B,D) Day 3 - Rome Sightseeing - Afternoon at Leisure Hail Caesar! All aboard our chariot for a panoramic tour of Imperial Rome including the Roman Forum, Largo Argentina (where Caesar was stabbed by Brutus), the Jewish Ghetto and the Circus Maximus. Then we’ll enter the Colosseum, reliving the brutal entertainment of the gladiators and the lions, refereed by the Emperor himself. Overnight in Rome (B) Day 4 - Rome - Vatican Museum - Sistine Chapel - St. Peter's Basilica This morning, it’s a 5-minute drive to another country – Vatican City! With our expert local guide we’ll tour the Vatican Museums, a treasure trove of ancient Greek sculptures, medieval tapestries and Renaissance paintings. Our visit culminates in the Sistine Chapel, the room where the Pope is elected.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    Journal of Arts & Humanities Volume 09, Issue 06, 2020: 01-11 Article Received: 26-04-2020 Accepted: 05-06-2020 Available Online: 13-06-2020 ISSN: 2167-9045 (Print), 2167-9053 (Online) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18533/journal.v9i6.1920 Caravaggio and Tenebrism—Beauty of light and shadow in baroque paintings Andy Xu1 ABSTRACT The following paper examines the reasons behind the use of tenebrism by Caravaggio under the special context of Counter-Reformation and its influence on later artists during the Baroque in Northern Europe. As Protestantism expanded throughout the entire Europe, the Catholic Church was seeking artistic methods to reattract believers. Being the precursor of Counter-Reformation art, Caravaggio incorporated tenebrism in his paintings. Art historians mostly correlate the use of tenebrism with religion, but there have also been scholars proposing how tenebrism reflects a unique naturalism that only belongs to Caravaggio. The paper will thus start with the introduction of tenebrism, discuss the two major uses of this artistic technique and will finally discuss Caravaggio’s legacy until today. Keywords: Caravaggio, Tenebrism, Counter-Reformation, Baroque, Painting, Religion. This is an open access article under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. 1. Introduction Most scholars agree that the Baroque range approximately from 1600 to 1750. There are mainly four aspects that led to the Baroque: scientific experimentation, free-market economies in Northern Europe, new philosophical and political ideas, and the division in the Catholic Church due to criticism of its corruption. Despite the fact that Galileo's discovery in astronomy, the Tulip bulb craze in Amsterdam, the diplomatic artworks by Peter Paul Rubens, the music by Johann Sebastian Bach, the Mercantilist economic theories of Colbert, the Absolutism in France are all fascinating, this paper will focus on the sophisticated and dramatic production of Catholic art during the Counter-Reformation ("Baroque Art and Architecture," n.d.).
    [Show full text]