DOCSLIB.ORG

Counter-Misdirection in Behavior-Based Multi-Robot Teams *

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Counter-Misdirection in Behavior-Based Multi-Robot Teams * Counter-Misdirection in Behavior-based Multi-robot Teams * Shengkang Chen, Graduate Student Member, IEEE and Ronald C. Arkin, Fellow, IEEE Abstract—When teams of mobile robots are tasked with misdirection approach using a novel type of behavior-based different goals in a competitive environment, misdirection and robot agents: counter-misdirection agents (CMAs). counter-misdirection can provide significant advantages. Researchers have studied different misdirection methods but the II. BACKGROUND number of approaches on counter-misdirection for multi-robot A. Robot Deception systems is still limited. In this work, a novel counter-misdirection approach for behavior-based multi-robot teams is developed by Robotic deception can be interpreted as robots using deploying a new type of agent: counter misdirection agents motions and communication to convey false information or (CMAs). These agents can detect the misdirection process and conceal true information [4],[5]. Deceptive behaviors can have “push back” the misdirected agents collaboratively to stop the a wide range of applications from military [6] to sports [7]. misdirection process. This approach has been implemented not only in simulation for various conditions, but also on a physical Researchers have studied robotic deception previously [4] robotic testbed to study its effectiveness. It shows that this through computational approaches [8] in a wide range of areas approach can stop the misdirection process effectively with a from human–robot interaction (HRI) [9]–[11] to ethical issues sufficient number of CMAs. This novel counter-misdirection [4]. Shim and Arkin [5] proposed a taxonomy of robot approach can potentially be applied to different competitive deception with three basic dimensions: interaction object, scenarios such as military and sports applications. interaction goal and interaction type. This taxonomy provides I. INTRODUCTION a basic metric of robot deception. Based on this taxonomy, they [6] developed a computational framework to allow the robot’s Humans and Animals commonly use deception to provide deceptive actions to benefit human users. This work was benefits or advantages for themselves. For instance, blue jays extended to a scenario where robots act deceptively to control can mimic the sound of hawks to scatter other birds in the area victims' fear and shock in search and rescue [7]. Additionally, so that they will have fewer competitors for food [1]. In the they [8] have shown that robots can model deceptive behavior same manner, with the growth of robotic intelligence, applying from small animals. Inspired by the caching behavior of a deceptive behaviors may be beneficial to robotic systems. For squirrel, a robotic deceptive strategy was developed. Instead of example, robots could deceive others including humans or going directly to the caching location, the robot moved other robots by sending inaccurate or falsified information between the actual caching location and the fake locations in purposely. This concept is known as robotic misdirection -- order to confuse competing robots. Furthermore, in human– robots misleading other agents to the wrong location that may robot interaction (HRI), researchers have studied deception in be traps or other remote locations to gain advantage over them. robot motion context. Srinivasa's team analyzed and classified To counter this misdirection, robotic counter-misdirection different deceptive robot motions used to approach different strives to stop this misdirection process or negate its effects. goal areas [4]. Although studies on robotic misdirection [1]–[3] exist, the field of robotic counter-misdirection has been understudied. While most research on robotic deception has focused on single robotic systems, few studies considered multi-robot In a competitive multi-robot environment such as systems. Arkin’s group is one of the few research groups that competitions, some robots can use misdirection techniques to studied deception in multi-robot teams. Earlier their research provide them with an edge over others to accomplish their involved studying mobbing behavior where birds harass a goals. As a result, counter-misdirection becomes crucial for predator for deterrence, resulting in a deceptive model for these misdirected robots. Two main components in counter- multi-robot systems [9]. While this deceptive model was misdirection include misdirection detection and misdirection designed specifically for predator deterrence, the misdirection stoppage. Based on these two main components, a new type framework of this paper is intended for group movement of agent called counter-misdirection agent (CMA) is misdirection scenarios. presented. These agents detect the misdirection process by observing misdirected agents' movements and then forming a B. Group Behaviors in Multi-robot Teams “barrier” to stop them. Multi-robot teams are modeled using group behaviors for The main contributions of this research involve providing a different purposes and scenarios. For example, lekking misdirection/counter-misdirection framework for behavior- behavior from birds has been implemented in multi-robot based multi-robot systems and developing a counter- teams for multi-robot groups [10] where members from a multi-robot team follow the leader of the team while * Research supported by the National Science Foundation under CNS S. Chen is in Electrical and Computer Engineering, R.C. Arkin is in EAGER grant #1848653. Interactive Computing, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30308, USA (e-mail: schen754/[email protected]). maintaining a certain distance. To model the flocking of shills that move with intention, characterized by their high behaviors of animals, the selfish herd model [11] and the Boids linear velocity movement in a common direction with small model [12], [13] were proposed. Selfish herd model [11] is directional changes, this induces mark agents with low group used to mimic a flocking behaviors of a group of sheep or following thresholds to follow the shills. In this manner, mark ducks. Similar to the selfish herd model, the Boids model [12], agents with higher thresholds will also follow as the number [13] which tries to mimic the behavior of a flock of birds, of agents, including the newly recruited lower threshold enables agents to stay close to nearby agents without collision. marks, that move with intention increases. This paper reports Another group behavior model uses the threshold model [14], on research that counteracts this earlier approach [23], since which models the behavior of a crowd of people. When the in addition to the active misdirection tactics utilized earlier, number of nearby individuals that engage in a similar action counter-misdirection strategies are now investigated to halt or exceeds the "threshold" for a nearby individual, this agent will reduce the induced misdirection. likely undertake this action as well. III. MODEL Robots have been used to drive animals to designated In our misdirection and counter-misdirection simulation locations or divert them away from certain locations based on scenarios, each agent can move in a two-dimensional space and their natural flocking behaviors [15]–[18]. Vanghan et al. [16], ⃗⃗⃗⃗ [18] used a robot as a sheepdog to herd ducks to a desired 푙푖,푡 = [푥푖,푡, 푦푖,푡] represents agent ’s location at time 푡 with a location. Strombom et al. [15] proposed a 2-step algorithm to limited observation range 푟푖. In the behavior-based approach drive unwilling agents to move in the same direction using a [24], the movement of each agent is based on its motion vector ⃗⃗⃗⃗⃗⃗⃗⃗⃗ ⃗⃗⃗⃗ single agent. Researchers have also studied diverting flocks of from the current behavior assemblage: 푙푖,푡+1 = 푙푖,푡 + 푣⃗⃗⃗푖⃗⃗,푡 ∗ 훿푡 birds from airports [19], [20] using the Boids model for the where 훿푡 is the time step. The motion vector 푣⃗⃗⃗푖⃗⃗,푡 is the birds. These methods are considered fear-based ‘push’ weighted sum of behavior vectors provided by the primitive approaches where robots act as predators to force animals to behaviors from the current behavior assemblage: ⃗푣⃗⃗푖⃗⃗,푡 = move away from the shepherding robots. ∑ ⃗⃗⃗ 푗∈퐸푖 휌푗푏푗 where 퐸푖 is the set of all composing primitive Based on the threshold model, Pettinati and Arkin [2] ⃗⃗⃗ behaviors and 푏푗 is the behavior vector of primitive behaviors developed an alternative “pull” approach that attracts target with gain 휌 . The definition of each primitive behavior is agents toward the goal area. Compared with the “push” method 푗 described in Appendix I. which requires at least one agent to act as a predator, the “pull” method deploys shills which are embedded among the mark There are four types of robot agents: mark, shill, leader and (target) agents to misdirect them to the goal area. counter-misdirection agent (CMA). These agents can be divided into three different groups: C. Robotic Misdirection • Mark group: a group of marks which is targeted to be Misdirection is one of the main forms of deception which misdirected, i.e., to be moved to a location not of their can influence the attentions or movements of an agent. own choosing.. Magicians often use misdirection in order to create a magical effect. As a result, misdirection has been an interesting area to • Misdirection team: a team composed of a leader and study in the field of psychology. Psychologists and magicians a certain number of shills with the intention to have developed different taxonomies for misdirection [21]. misdirect marks to their goal area. Among them, Lamont
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Flocks and Crowds
    Flocks and Crowds Flocks and crowds are other essential concepts we'll be exploring in this book. amount of realism to your simulation in just a few lines of code. Crowds can be a bit more complex, but we'll be exploring some of the powerful tools that come bundled with Unity to get the job done. In this chapter, we'll cover the following topics: Learning the history of flocks and herds Understanding the concepts behind flocks Flocking using the Unity concepts Flocking using the traditional algorithm Using realistic crowds the technology being the swarm of bats in Batman Returns in 1992, for which he won an and accurate, the algorithm is also very simple to understand and implement. [ 115 ] Understanding the concepts behind As with them to the real-life behaviors they model. As simple as it sounds, these concepts birds exhibit in nature, where a group of birds follow one another toward a common on the group. We've explored how singular agents can move and make decisions large groups of agents moving in unison while modeling unique movement in each Island. This demo came with Unity in Version 2.0, but has been removed since Unity 3.0. For our project. the way, you'll notice some differences and similarities, but there are three basic the algorithm's introduction in the 80s: Separation: This means to maintain a distance with other neighbors in the flock to avoid collision. The following diagram illustrates this concept: Here, the middle boid is shown moving in a direction away from the rest of the boids, without changing its heading [ 116 ] Alignment: This means to move in the same direction as the flock, and with the same velocity.
    [Show full text]
  • Swarm Intelligence
    Swarm Intelligence Leen-Kiat Soh Computer Science & Engineering University of Nebraska Lincoln, NE 68588-0115 [email protected] http://www.cse.unl.edu/agents Introduction • Swarm intelligence was originally used in the context of cellular robotic systems to describe the self-organization of simple mechanical agents through nearest-neighbor interaction • It was later extended to include “any attempt to design algorithms or distributed problem-solving devices inspired by the collective behavior of social insect colonies and other animal societies” • This includes the behaviors of certain ants, honeybees, wasps, cockroaches, beetles, caterpillars, and termites Introduction 2 • Many aspects of the collective activities of social insects, such as ants, are self-organizing • Complex group behavior emerges from the interactions of individuals who exhibit simple behaviors by themselves: finding food and building a nest • Self-organization come about from interactions based entirely on local information • Local decisions, global coherence • Emergent behaviors, self-organization Videos • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dDsmbwOrHJs • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QbUPfMXXQIY • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M028vafB0l8 Why Not Centralized Approach? • Requires that each agent interacts with every other agent • Do not possess (environmental) obstacle avoidance capabilities • Lead to irregular fragmentation and/or collapse • Unbounded (externally predetermined) forces are used for collision avoidance • Do not possess distributed tracking (or migration)
    [Show full text]
  • Boids Algorithm in Economics and Finance a Lesson from Computational Biology
    University of Amsterdam Faculty of Economics and Business Master's thesis Boids Algorithm in Economics and Finance A Lesson from Computational Biology Author: Pavel Dvoˇr´ak Supervisor: Cars Hommes Second reader: Isabelle Salle Academic Year: 2013/2014 Declaration of Authorship The author hereby declares that he compiled this thesis independently, using only the listed resources and literature. The author also declares that he has not used this thesis to acquire another academic degree. The author grants permission to University of Amsterdam to reproduce and to distribute copies of this thesis document in whole or in part. Amsterdam, July 18, 2014 Signature Bibliographic entry Dvorˇak´ , P. (2014): \Boids Algorithm in Economics and Finance: A Les- son from Computational Biology." (Unpublished master's thesis). Uni- versity of Amsterdam. Supervisor: Cars Hommes. Abstract The main objective of this thesis is to introduce an ABM that would contribute to the existing ABM literature on modelling expectations and decision making of economic agents. We propose three different models that are based on the boids model, which was originally designed in biology to model flocking be- haviour of birds. We measure the performance of our models by their ability to replicate selected stylized facts of the financial markets, especially those of the stock returns: no autocorrelation, fat tails and negative skewness, non- Gaussian distribution, volatility clustering, and long-range dependence of the returns. We conclude that our boids-derived models can replicate most of the listed stylized facts but, in some cases, are more complicated than other peer ABMs. Nevertheless, the flexibility and spatial dimension of the boids model can be advantageous in economic modelling in other fields, namely in ecological or urban economics.
    [Show full text]
  • Animating Predator and Prey Fish Interactions
    Georgia State University ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University Computer Science Dissertations Department of Computer Science 5-6-2019 Animating Predator and Prey Fish Interactions Sahithi Podila Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/cs_diss Recommended Citation Podila, Sahithi, "Animating Predator and Prey Fish Interactions." Dissertation, Georgia State University, 2019. https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/cs_diss/149 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Computer Science at ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Computer Science Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ANIMATING PREDATOR AND PREY FISH INTERACTIONS by SAHITHI PODILA Under the Direction of Ying Zhu, PhD ABSTRACT Schooling behavior is one of the most salient social and group activities among fish. They form schools for social reasons like foraging, mating and escaping from predators. Animating a school of fish is difficult because they are large in number, often swim in distinctive patterns that is they take the shape of long thin lines, squares, ovals or amoeboid and exhibit complex coordinated patterns especially when they are attacked by a predator. Previous work in computer graphics has not provided satisfactory models to simulate the many distinctive interactions between a school of prey fish and their predator, how does a predator pick its target? and how does a school of fish react to such attacks? This dissertation presents a method to simulate interactions between prey fish and predator fish in the 3D world based on the biological research findings.
    [Show full text]
  • Flocks, Herds, and Schools: a Distributed Behavioral Model 1
    Published in Computer Graphics, 21(4), July 1987, pp. 25-34. (ACM SIGGRAPH '87 Conference Proceedings, Anaheim, California, July 1987.) Flocks, Herds, and Schools: A Distributed Behavioral Model 1 Craig W. Reynolds Symbolics Graphics Division [obsolete addresses removed 2] Abstract The aggregate motion of a flock of birds, a herd of land animals, or a school of fish is a beautiful and familiar part of the natural world. But this type of complex motion is rarely seen in computer animation. This paper explores an approach based on simulation as an alternative to scripting the paths of each bird individually. The simulated flock is an elaboration of a particle system, with the simulated birds being the particles. The aggregate motion of the simulated flock is created by a distributed behavioral model much like that at work in a natural flock; the birds choose their own course. Each simulated bird is implemented as an independent actor that navigates according to its local perception of the dynamic environment, the laws of simulated physics that rule its motion, and a set of behaviors programmed into it by the "animator." The aggregate motion of the simulated flock is the result of the dense interaction of the relatively simple behaviors of the individual simulated birds. Categories and Subject Descriptors: 1.2.10 [Artificial Intelligence]: Vision and Scene Understanding; 1.3.5 [Computer Graphics]: Computational Geometry and Object Modeling; 1.3.7 [Computer Graphics]: Three Dimensional Graphics and Realism-Animation: 1.6.3 [Simulation and Modeling]: Applications. General Terms: Algorithms, design.b Additional Key Words, and Phrases: flock, herd, school, bird, fish, aggregate motion, particle system, actor, flight, behavioral animation, constraints, path planning.
    [Show full text]
  • Expert Assessment of Stigmergy: a Report for the Department of National Defence
    Expert Assessment of Stigmergy: A Report for the Department of National Defence Contract No. W7714-040899/003/SV File No. 011 sv.W7714-040899 Client Reference No.: W7714-4-0899 Requisition No. W7714-040899 Contact Info. Tony White Associate Professor School of Computer Science Room 5302 Herzberg Building Carleton University 1125 Colonel By Drive Ottawa, Ontario K1S 5B6 (Office) 613-520-2600 x2208 (Cell) 613-612-2708 [email protected] http://www.scs.carleton.ca/~arpwhite Expert Assessment of Stigmergy Abstract This report describes the current state of research in the area known as Swarm Intelligence. Swarm Intelligence relies upon stigmergic principles in order to solve complex problems using only simple agents. Swarm Intelligence has been receiving increasing attention over the last 10 years as a result of the acknowledgement of the success of social insect systems in solving complex problems without the need for central control or global information. In swarm- based problem solving, a solution emerges as a result of the collective action of the members of the swarm, often using principles of communication known as stigmergy. The individual behaviours of swarm members do not indicate the nature of the emergent collective behaviour and the solution process is generally very robust to the loss of individual swarm members. This report describes the general principles for swarm-based problem solving, the way in which stigmergy is employed, and presents a number of high level algorithms that have proven utility in solving hard optimization and control problems. Useful tools for the modelling and investigation of swarm-based systems are then briefly described.
    [Show full text]
  • The Emergence of Animal Social Complexity
    The Emergence of Animal Social Complexity: theoretical and biobehavioral evidence Bradly Alicea Orthogonal Research (http://orthogonal-research.tumblr.com) Keywords: Social Complexity, Sociogenomics, Neuroendocrinology, Metastability AbstractAbstract ThisThis paper paper will will introduce introduce a a theorytheory ofof emergentemergent animalanimal socialsocial complexitycomplexity usingusing variousvarious results results from from computational computational models models andand empiricalempirical resultsresults.. TheseThese resultsresults willwill bebe organizedorganized into into a avertical vertical model model of of socialsocial complexity.complexity. ThisThis willwill supportsupport thethe perspperspectiveective thatthat social social complexity complexity is isin in essence essence an an emergent emergent phenomenon phenomenon while while helping helping to answerto answer of analysistwo interrelated larger than questions. the individual The first organism.of these involves The second how behavior involves is placingintegrated aggregate at units socialof analysis events larger into thethan context the individual of processes organism. occurring The secondwithin involvesindividual placing organi aggregatesms over timesocial (e.g. events genomic into the and context physiological of processes processes) occurring. withinBy using individual a complex organisms systems over perspective,time (e.g. fivegenomic principles and physiologicalof social complexity processes). can Bybe identified.using a complexThese principles systems
    [Show full text]
  • Background on Swarms the Problem the Algorithm Tested On: Boids
    Anomaly Detection in Swarm Robotics: What if a member is hacked? Dan Cronce, Dr. Andrew Williams, Dr. Debbie Perouli Background on Swarms The Problem Finding Absolute Positions of Others ● Swarm - a collection of homogeneous individuals who The messages broadcasted from each swarm member contain In swarm intelligence, each member locally contributes to the locally interact global behavior. If a member were to be maliciously positions from its odometry. However, we cannot trust the controlled, its behavior could be used to control a portion of member we’re monitoring, so we must have a another way of ● Swarm Intelligence - the collective behavior exhibited by the global behavior. This research attempts to determine how finding the position of the suspect. Our method is to find the a swarm one member can determine anomalous behavior in another. distance from three points using the signal strength of its WiFi However, a problem arises: and then using trilateration to determine its current position. Swarm intelligence algorithms enjoy many benefits such as If all we’re detecting is anomalous behavior, how do we tell the scalability and fault tolerance. However, in order to achieve difference between a fault and being hacked? these benefits, the algorithm should follow four rules: Experimental Setting From an outside perspective, we can’t tell if there’s a problem Currently, we have a large, empty space for the robots to roam. with the sensors, the motor, or whether the device is being ● Local interactions only - there cannot be a global store of We plan to set up devices to act as wifi trilateration servers, information or a central server to command the swarm manipulated.
    [Show full text]
  • From Insect Nests to Modern Architecture
    Eco-Architecture II 117 Swarm-driven idea models – from insect nests to modern architecture S. von Mammen & C. Jacob Department of Computer Science, University of Calgary, Canada Abstract Inspired by the construction behavior of social insects we have developed a computational model of a swarm to build architectural idea models in virtual three-dimensional space. Instead of following a blueprint for construction, the individuals of a swarm react to their local environment according to an innate behavioral script. Through the interplay of the swarm with its environment, inter- action sequences take place that give rise to complex emergent constructions. The configuration of the swarm determines the character of the emerging architectural models. We breed swarms that meet our expectations through artificial evolution, a very general framework for computationally phrased optimization problems. We present several evolved, swarm-built architectural idea models and discuss their potential in regards to modern ecological architecture. Keywords: swarm grammar, ideal model, ecological architecture, bio-inspired computing, computer-aided design, computer-aided architectural design, gener- ative representation, swarm intelligence, collective intelligence, artificial intel- ligence, artificial life, evolutionary computation, stigmergy, collaborative algo- rithm. 1 Introduction Flocks of birds, schools of fish and bee hives are prominent examples of swarm systems. In these, large numbers of individuals interact by following sim- ple stimulus-reaction rules. Globally, the swarm exhibits collectively intelligent behavior. Examples of their emergent abilities are nest constructions of social insect swarms, like termite mounds, wasp nests and ant galleries [1]. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, Vol 113, © 2008 WIT Press www.witpress.com, ISSN 1743-3541 (on-line) doi:10.2495/ARC080121 118 Eco-Architecture II Artificial models of constructive insect swarms have successfully reproduced diverse nest architectures in computational simulations [2,3].
    [Show full text]
  • Old Tricks, New Dogs: Ethology and Interactive Creatures
    Old Tricks, New Dogs: Ethology and Interactive Creatures Bruce Mitchell Blumberg Bachelor of Arts, Amherst College, 1977 Master of Science, Sloan School of Management, MIT, 1981 SUBMITTED TO THE PROGRAM IN MEDIA ARTS AND SCIENCES, SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY AT THE MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY. February 1997 @ Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1996. All Rights Reserved Author:...................................................... ............................ .......................................... Program in Media Arts and Sciences' September 27,1996 Certified By:................................. Pattie Maes Associate Professor Sony Corporation Career Development Professor of Media Arts and Science Program in Media Arts and Sciences Thesis Supervisor . A ccepted By:................................. ......... .... ............................ Stephen A. Benton Chair, Departmental Committee on Graduate Students Program in Media Arts and Sciences MAR 1 9 1997 2 Old Tricks, New Dogs: Ethology and Interactive Creatures Bruce Mitchell Blumberg SUBMITTED TO THE PROGRAM IN MEDIA ARTS AND SCIENCES, SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING ON SEPTEMBER 27, 1996 IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY AT THE MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Abstract This thesis seeks to address the problem of building things with behavior and character. By things we mean autonomous animated creatures or intelligent physical devices. By behavior we mean that they display the rich level of behavior found in animals. By char- acter we mean that the viewer should "know" what they are "feeling" and what they are likely to do next. We identify five key problems associated with building these kinds of creatures: Rele- vance (i.e. "do the right things"), Persistence (i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Design and Simulation of the Emergent Behavior of Small Drones Swarming for Distributed Target Localization
    Paper draft - please export an up-to-date reference from http://www.iet.unipi.it/m.cimino/pub Design and simulation of the emergent behavior of small drones swarming for distributed target localization Antonio L. Alfeo1,2, Mario G. C. A. Cimino1, Nicoletta De Francesco1, Massimiliano Lega3, Gigliola Vaglini1 Abstract A swarm of autonomous drones with self-coordination and environment adap- tation can offer a robust, scalable and flexible manner to localize objects in an unexplored, dangerous or unstructured environment. We design a novel coor- dination algorithm combining three biologically-inspired processes: stigmergy, flocking and evolution. Stigmergy, a form of coordination exhibited by social insects, is exploited to attract drones in areas with potential targets. Flocking enables efficient cooperation between flock mates upon target detection, while keeping an effective scan. The two mechanisms can interoperate if their struc- tural parameters are correctly tuned for a given scenario. Differential evolution adapts the swarm coordination according to environmental conditions. The per- formance of the proposed algorithm is examined with synthetic and real-world scenarios. Keywords: Swarm Intelligence, Drone, Stigmergy, Flocking, Differential Evolution, Target search ∗Corresponding authors: Antonio L. Alfeo, Mario G. C. A. Cimino Email addresses: [email protected] (Antonio L. Alfeo), [email protected] (Mario G. C. A. Cimino ) 1University of Pisa, largo Lucio Lazzarino 1, Pisa, 56122, Italy 2University of Florence, via di Santa Marta 3, Florence, 50139, Italy 3University of Naples "Parthenope", Centro Direzionale Isola C4, Naples, 80143, Italy 1. Introduction and Motivation 1.1. Motivation In this paper we consider the problem of discovering static targets in an un- structured environment, employing a set of small dedicated Unmanned Aircraft 5 Vehicles (UAVs) and minimizing the total time spent to discover targets.
    [Show full text]
  • Emergent Behavior Development and Control in Multi-Agent Systems
    Air Force Institute of Technology AFIT Scholar Theses and Dissertations Student Graduate Works 8-16-2019 Emergent Behavior Development and Control in Multi-Agent Systems David W. King Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.afit.edu/etd Part of the Artificial Intelligence and Robotics Commons Recommended Citation King, David W., "Emergent Behavior Development and Control in Multi-Agent Systems" (2019). Theses and Dissertations. 2376. https://scholar.afit.edu/etd/2376 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Graduate Works at AFIT Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of AFIT Scholar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Emergent Behavior Development and Control in Multi-Agent Systems DISSERTATION David W. King, Maj, USAF AFIT-ENG-DS-19-S-007 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR UNIVERSITY AIR FORCE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE; DISTRIBUTION UNLIMITED. The views expressed in this document are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy or position of the United States Air Force, the United States Department of Defense or the United States Government. This material is declared a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. AFIT-ENG-DS-19-S-007 EMERGENT BEHAVIOR DEVELOPMENT AND CONTROL IN MULTI-AGENT SYSTEMS DISSERTATION Presented to the Faculty Graduate School of Engineering and Management Air Force Institute of Technology Air University Air Education and Training Command in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Computer Science David W.
    [Show full text]