DOCSLIB.ORG

Texts Submitted for the International Symposium on Fiscal Imbalance

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Texts Submitted for the International Symposium on Fiscal Imbalance Commission on Fiscal Imbalance Texts Submitted for the International Symposium on Fiscal Imbalance Report Supporting Document 3 ISBN: 2-550-38871-2 Legal deposit Bibliothèque nationale du Québec, 2002 Commission on Fiscal Imbalance TABLE OF CONTENTS General Introduction ....................................................................................................................................................... 1 Decentralization in the United States: Where has the Country Headed? ........................................................................ 15 By William F. Fox Forces Behind Centralization and Decentralization in the United States........................................................................ 25 By Bruce A. Wallin Maintaining Fiscal Equilibrium in a Federation: Germany............................................................................................. 37 By Paul Bernd Spahn Reforming Intergovernmental Fiscal Relations in Germany: The Bavarian Point of View............................................ 55 By Otto Beierl Fiscal Federalism in Switzerland: A Survey of Constitutional Issues, Budget Responsibility and Equalization............ 63 By Bernard Dafflon Balance and Imbalance in the Swiss Federal System.....................................................................................................101 By Sonja Wälti The 2000 Reform of Intergovernmental Fiscal Arrangements in Australia ....................................................................113 By David J. Collins Concept of Fiscal Decentralisation and Worldwide Overview .......................................................................................145 By Robert D. Ebel and Serdar Yilmaz Fiscal Federalism in Belgium..........................................................................................................................................175 By Marcel Gérard The Lambermont Agreement: Why and How? ...............................................................................................................195 By Géraldine Van der Stichele and Magali Verdonck The Funding of Autonomous Communities in Spain......................................................................................................223 By Pere Galí The Finances of Decentralized Authorities and Financial Relations between Authorities at Different Levels in France Trends and Outlook.............................................................................................................................................227 By Guy Gilbert The Process of Decentralisation in Italy: A Focus on Regional Governments ...............................................................249 By Laura Raimondo Decentralization in Some Non-Federal Countries: The Case of the United Kingdom...................................................265 By David Heald Biographical Notes..........................................................................................................................................................287 i Commission on Fiscal Imbalance GENERAL INTRODUCTION 1. INTRODUCTION The Commission on Fiscal Imbalance, set up by the Québec government, planned to hold an international symposium on September 13 and 14, 2001 at which a number of experts were to describe intergovernmental fiscal arrangements in various countries, namely four established federations (United States, Germany, Switzerland and Australia), one recent federation (Belgium), one country whose institutions are similar to those of a federal country (Spain) and three non- federal countries that nonetheless have a multilevel government structure1 (France, the United Kingdom and Italy). This selection of countries provides a fairly complete portrait of the existing situation in developed countries with federal systems2 and in a few non-federal countries with societies similar to ours. Mr. Robert Ebel of the World Bank Institute was to provide an overview of the situation around the world, more particularly in developing countries and countries in transition to a market economy. Unfortunately, the tragic events of September 11 in New York forced the cancellation of the symposium. Almost all the speakers had sent a text they intended to use for their presentation during the symposium.3 In addition, the Commission had already conducted a study of the fiscal arrangements in six countries that were to be analyzed at the event. This work is summarized in a document entitled Intergovernmental Fiscal Arrangements: Germany, Australia, Belgium, Spain, United States, Switzerland. This general introduction summarizes the speakers’ papers, an exercise that involves definite limits and difficulties. First of all, the symposium was not held. Next, federations are complex entities whose specific features cannot easily be isolated for comparison purposes. A specific degree of fiscal decentralization4 may prove excessive in a federation whose people have very similar preferences, while it may prove insufficient for a federation with sharp regional differences. Lastly, a summary seeking to bring elements present in all the texts would be doomed to failure. An observation mentioned in many texts may not be in some, and the situation in some countries may differ from that of most countries of the sample. The following summary will, accordingly, try to present the ideas and observations found in many of the texts, with nuances where necessary. The Analytical Framework The following summary is based on a number of general principles of fiscal federalism, principles that implicitly or explicitly inspire most of the texts submitted. Fiscal federalism studies the assignment of fields of jurisdiction among various orders of government in terms of spending (defence, health and education) and taxation (personal income tax, corporate tax and consumption tax). It also deals with intergovernmental fiscal relations. There is a broadly accepted presumption among fiscal federalism experts to the effect that jurisdiction over the delivery of public services should be allocated to the order of government closest to the citizen, unless responsibility for such delivery can be more effectively taken on by a government that is further. This principle is known as either the decentralization principle5 or the subsidiarity principle.6 But decentralization of responsibilities without an allocation of sufficient financial resources (or access to sufficient financial resources) would not allow the full realization of the benefits of decentralization. There must be a matching between spending and revenue. This can be obtained in two fundamentally different ways, i.e. through own-source revenue (in which case the federated states are said to have fiscal autonomy) and through transfer revenue from the federal government (in which case they enjoy financial autonomy if the transfers are unconditional). 1 The expression “levels of government” is appropriate in the context of non-federal countries. The terms “central”, “regional” and “local” in this case designate the three major levels. In the case of a federation, we speak of “orders of government”. Each order is sovereign in its fields of jurisdiction and accordingly is not subordinate, in these areas, to any other. In Canada, the terms “federal order”, “provincial order” and “local level” are used since the municipal level is subordinate, constitutionally, to the provincial order. 2 There are currently 23 federations in the world. Ronald Watts (1999) adds Spain to this list. 3 Only professor Albert Solé, of the University of Barcelona, was unable to send us a text. He had agreed, at the last minute, to replace a speaker who was unable to attend and planned to use manuscript notes for his presentation. 4 A distinction should be made between federalism and territorial administrative decentralization, in which the division of jurisdictions or of tasks between the central and territorial authorities is not constitutionalized and may, consequently, be amended at the discretion of the central authorities. The term “decentralization” in the present document refers to the notion of federalism unless it is clear, from the context, that the other meaning is intended. 5 Robert Ebel notes (see p. 145 of the present document) the classic formulation of this principle, attributable to Wallace Oates, author of the major work Fiscal Federalism in 1972: “each public service should be provided by the jurisdiction having control over the minimum geographic area that would internalize benefits and costs of such provision”. 6 The texts give many definitions of this principle. We will return to this later. 1 Commission on Fiscal Imbalance From the outset, some terminological clarification is needed. The framework of analysis for fiscal federalism used here refers to two separate situations, depending on whether the country in question has a non-federal system of government with many levels or a federal structure. In terms of analysis, there is an essential difference between non-federated countries and federations. In the former case, regional and local administrations are agents of the central power. By contrast, a federal structure implies the presence of orders of government that are, in a sense, “side by side”, autonomous in their respective fields of jurisdiction. The principles of federalism, such as the principles of autonomy, participation and separation, have to be taken into account. In fact, in federal countries, these principles have in practice precedence over the more
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Recognition of the Khojaly Genocide at the ICO
    Administrative Department of the President of the Republic of Azerbaijan P R E S I D E N T I A L L I B R A R Y ────────────────────────────────────────────────────── Recognition of the Genocide of Khojaly The member of the US California Assembly recognizes Khojaly Massacre (March 25, 2009) ............................................................................................................................................... 4 The recognition of the Khojaly Genocide at the ICO ............................................................... 5 Massachusetts State of the United States recognizes Khojaly tragedy as a massacre (February 25, 2010) ...................................................................................................................... 7 Recognition of the Khojaly genocide by Pakistan ..................................................................... 8 Recognition of the Khojaly massacre in Mexico ........................................................................ 9 The resolution adopted by the Senate of Mexico (October 27, 2011) .................................... 10 The resolution adopted by the Chamber of Deputies of Mexico (November 30, 2011) ....... 13 Khojaly to be recognized as Genocide in International level: representatives of the Parliaments of 51 States adopts the relevant resolution (January 31, 2012) ........................ 18 Texas House of Representatives passes resolution on Khojaly genocide (February 21, 2012) .....................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Strange Revival of Bicameralism
    The Strange Revival of Bicameralism Coakley, J. (2014). The Strange Revival of Bicameralism. Journal of Legislative Studies, 20(4), 542-572. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2014.926168 Published in: Journal of Legislative Studies Queen's University Belfast - Research Portal: Link to publication record in Queen's University Belfast Research Portal Publisher rights © 2014 Taylor & Francis. This work is made available online in accordance with the publisher’s policies. Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher General rights Copyright for the publications made accessible via the Queen's University Belfast Research Portal is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy The Research Portal is Queen's institutional repository that provides access to Queen's research output. Every effort has been made to ensure that content in the Research Portal does not infringe any person's rights, or applicable UK laws. If you discover content in the Research Portal that you believe breaches copyright or violates any law, please contact [email protected]. Download date:01. Oct. 2021 Published in Journal of Legislative Studies , 20 (4) 2014, pp. 542-572; doi: 10.1080/13572334.2014.926168 THE STRANGE REVIVAL OF BICAMERALISM John Coakley School of Politics and International Relations University College Dublin School of Politics, International Studies and Philosophy Queen’s University Belfast [email protected] [email protected] ABSTRACT The turn of the twenty-first century witnessed a surprising reversal of the long-observed trend towards the disappearance of second chambers in unitary states, with 25 countries— all but one of them unitary—adopting the bicameral system.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 5 Issue 2 2013
    VOLUME 5 ISSUE 2 2013 ISSN: 2036-5438 VOL. 5, ISSUE 2, 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS SPECIAL ISSUE Regional Parliaments in the European Union: A comparison between Italy and Spain Edited by Josep M. Castellà Andreu, Eduardo Gianfrancesco, Nicola Lupo and Anna Mastromarino ESSAYS National and Regional Parliaments in the EU decision-making process, after the The Relationship between State and Treaty of Lisbon and the Euro-crisis Regional Legislatures, Starting from the NICOLA LUPO E- 1-28 Early Warning Mechanism CRISTINA FASONE E-122-155 Spanish Autonomous Communities and EU policies State accountability for violations of EU law AGUSTÍN RUIZ ROBLEDO E- 29-50 by Regions: infringement proceedings and the right of recourse The scrutiny of the principle of subsidiarity CRISTINA BERTOLINO E-156-177 by autonomous regional parliaments with particular reference to the participation of the Parliament of Catalonia in the early warning system ESTHER MARTÍN NÚÑEZ E- 51-73 Early warning and regional parliaments: in search of a new model. Suggestions from the Basque experience JOSU OSÉS ABANDO E- 74-88 The evolving role of the Italian Conference system in representing regional interest in EU decision-making ELENA GRIGLIO E- 89-121 ISSN: 2036-5438 National and Regional Parliaments in the EU decision-making process, after the Treaty of Lisbon and the Euro-crisis by Nicola Lupo Perspectives on Federalism, Vol. 5, issue 2, 2013 Except where otherwise noted content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons 2.5 Italy License E - 1 Abstract The Treaty of Lisbon increased the role of National and Regional Parliaments in the EU decision-making process, in order to compensate for some of the weaknesses of the European institutional architecture.
    [Show full text]
  • Serving Scotland Better: Scotland and the United Kingdom in the 21St Century
    Serving Scotland Better: Better: Scotland Serving Serving Scotland Better: Scotland and the United Kingdom in the 21st Century Final Report – June 2009 Scotland and the United Kingdom in the 21st Century 21st the in Kingdom United the and Scotland Commission on Scottish Devolution Secretariat 1 Melville Crescent Edinburgh EH3 7HW 2009 June – Report Final Tel: (020) 7270 6759 or (0131) 244 9073 Email: [email protected] This Report is also available online at: www.commissiononscottishdevolution.org.uk © Produced by the Commission on Scottish Devolution 75% Printed on paper consisting of 75% recycled waste Presented to the Presiding Officer of the Scottish Parliament and to the Secretary of State for Scotland, on behalf of Her Majesty’s Government, June 2009 Serving Scotland Better: Scotland and the United Kingdom in the 21st Century | Final Report – June 2009 Serving Scotland Better: Scotland and the United Kingdom in the 21st Century It was a privilege to be asked to chair a Commission to consider how the Scottish Parliament could serve the people of Scotland better. It is a task that has taken just over a year and seen my colleagues and me travelling the length and breadth of Scotland. It has been very hard work – but also very rewarding. Many of the issues are complex, but at the heart of this is our desire to find ways to help improve the lives of the people of Scotland. The reward has been in meeting so many people and discussing the issues with them – at formal evidence sessions, at informal meetings, and at engagement events across the country.
    [Show full text]
  • Scotland and the Isle of Man, C.1400-1625 : Noble Power and Royal Presumption in the Northern Irish Sea Province
    University of Huddersfield Repository Thornton, Tim Scotland and the Isle of Man, c.1400-1625 : noble power and royal presumption in the Northern Irish Sea province Original Citation Thornton, Tim (1998) Scotland and the Isle of Man, c.1400-1625 : noble power and royal presumption in the Northern Irish Sea province. Scottish Historical Review, 77 (1). pp. 1-30. ISSN 0036-9241 This version is available at http://eprints.hud.ac.uk/id/eprint/4136/ The University Repository is a digital collection of the research output of the University, available on Open Access. Copyright and Moral Rights for the items on this site are retained by the individual author and/or other copyright owners. Users may access full items free of charge; copies of full text items generally can be reproduced, displayed or performed and given to third parties in any format or medium for personal research or study, educational or not-for-profit purposes without prior permission or charge, provided: • The authors, title and full bibliographic details is credited in any copy; • A hyperlink and/or URL is included for the original metadata page; and • The content is not changed in any way. For more information, including our policy and submission procedure, please contact the Repository Team at: [email protected]. http://eprints.hud.ac.uk/ The Scottish Historical Review, Volume LXXVII, 1: No. 203: April 1998, 1-30 TIM THORNTON Scotland and the Isle of Man, c.1400-1625: Noble Power and Royal Presumption in the Northern Irish Sea Province One of the major trends in Western European historiography in the last twenty years has been a fascination with territorial expansion and with the consolidation of the nascent national states of the late medieval and early modern period.
    [Show full text]
  • Learning from Other Parliaments
    The Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia Learning from other parliaments Study Program 2006 House of Representatives Standing Committee on Procedure August 2006 © Commonwealth of Australia 2006 ISBN 0 642 78826 X (printed version) ISBN 0 642 78827 8 (HTML version) Contents Foreword...................................................................................................................................................vii Participants..............................................................................................................................................viii 1 Overview of visit ..................................................................................................... 1 Background.....................................................................................................................................1 The program....................................................................................................................................2 Major themes...................................................................................................................................3 Overview Conclusion.....................................................................................................................4 2 Themes and issues................................................................................................. 5 Introduction.....................................................................................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • CPA Learning System for Professional Development
    CPA Learning System for Professional Development Module on Parliamentary Democracy COMMONWEALTH PARLIAMENTARY ASSOCIATION in association with Athabasca University a Course Team Author: David Stewart, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada Course Team Managers: ąMalinda S. Smith, Athabasca University and ąDavid McNeil, Commonwealth Parliamentary Association, Alberta Branch Course Team: David Stewart, Malinda S. Smith, David McNeil, Alvin Finkel, ąMicheline Gravel, Patrick Guiton, Sandra Rein Library and Internet Resources: Sandra Perry, Vivianne Fagnan, ąWolfgang Maul, Heather Close Managing Editor: Erna Dominey Visual Presentation: Athabasca University Typesetting Unit Visual Design: Margaret Anderson Project Coordinator: Raja Gomez ISBN 0Ć919737Ć51ĆX Every effort has been taken to ensure that these materials comply with the requirements of copyright clearances and appropriate credits. The Commonwealth Parliamentary Association and Athabasca University will attempt to incorporate in future printings any corrections which are communicated to it. The inclusion of any material in this publication is strictly in accord with the consents obtained. The Commonwealth Parliamentary Association and Athabasca University do not authorize or license any further reproduction or use without the consent of the copyright holders. Commonwealth Parliamentary Association and Athabasca University 2001 All rights reserved Expert Group on Professional Development of Parliamentarians Hon. Hector McClean, MP Speaker of the House of Representatives, Trinidad
    [Show full text]
  • Scottish Labour Devolution Commission Report
    Powers for a purpose - Strengthening Accountability and Empowering People Scottish Labour Devolution Commission March 2014 Powers for a Purpose Strengthening Accountability and Empowering People Foreword Scottish Labour is a party of both devolution and the union. For over 100 years, Labour has led the argument for Scottish devolution within the union, and it is a cause we have advanced out of deep-seated conviction. That is why it was a Labour Government which set up the Scottish Parliament, delivering on what John Smith memorably called “unfinished business”. In making the case for devolution, Labour has brought enhanced democratic accountability for decisions affecting the people of Scotland. Our desire has always been a simple one: meeting the Scottish people’s legitimate desire for more powers and enhanced accountability within a strengthened union. To lead in the twenty-first century, to preserve our values and advance the people’s interests, Scotland needs the United Kingdom and the United Kingdom needs Scotland. As a successful multinational state we have shared over 300 years of history in a joint endeavour for economic security and social justice. The question for us today is how we remodel the union to preserve the gains we have made and lay the foundations for further achievements in the twenty-first century. The UK is a union with economic, social, and political dimensions. All three are connected. Without political union it is not possible to have the economic integration which promotes jobs, growth and economic security. We as a Labour Party are committed to the sharing of resources and risks which allows social union across the whole UK – we believe in social solidarity that gives security for pensioners and others who have to rely on social services wherever they are.
    [Show full text]
  • Officers of State and Representation in the Pre-Modern Scottish Parliament
    Chapter 7 Officers of State and Representation in the Pre-modern Scottish Parliament Alastair J. Mann Pre-modern parliamentary historiography’s obsession with the two main branches of representative study—the “selection” of individual members of parliament by some electoral process, and the credibility of parliamentary par- ticipants from the ranks of a social group or estate—has resulted in limited reflection on officers of state.1 It is as if the very condition of crown ministers, not being “public men”,2 undermines the value of collective or particularized analysis, other than through studies of the ubiquitous great ministers of na- tional history, such as Axel Oxenstierna (1583–1654) of Sweden under Gustavus Adolphus or Cardinal Mazarin (1602–61) of France under Louis xiv. Anach- ronistically, the others seem but civil servants in a pre-modern setting. In a Scottish parliamentary context this is especially unsatisfactory from both pro- cedural and political perspectives. Scottish historians are to blame themselves, of course. The fact that no monograph of the pre-1707 Scottish Parliament was published between 1924 and 1996 confirms what MacDonald describes as a limited “historiographical tradition on which to draw”.3 Nevertheless, in the last two decades, fresh interest in procedural exploration coupled with a reappraisal of the significance and sophistication of the Scottish Parliament 1 Most, deliberately or by omission, are unconvinced, see Antonio Marongiu, Medieval Parlia- ments: A Comparative Study (London, 1968), pp. 223–28; A.R. Myers, Parliaments and Estates in Europe to 1789 (London, 1975), pp. 23–29; Wim Blockmans, “Representation (Since the Thir- teenth Century)”, in The New Cambridge Medieval History, vol.
    [Show full text]
  • Inter-Governmental Relations in the UK
    SELECT COMMITTEE ON THE CONSTITUTION Inter-governmental relations in the UK Oral and written evidence Contents Professor Derek Birrell, University of Ulster—Written evidence (IGR0013) ............................. 3 Dr Andrew Blick, Institute of Contemporary British History, King’s College London— Written evidence (IGR0006) .................................................................................................................... 9 Rt Hon. Alistair Carmichael MP, Secretary of State for Scotland; and Rt Hon. Lord Wallace of Tankerness, Advocate-General For Scotland—Oral evidence (QQ 76-86) ......................... 11 Mr Bruce Crawford MSP, Devolution (Further Powers) Committee, Scottish Parliament; Mr Ian Davidson MP, House of Commons Scottish Affairs Committee; and Mr Laurence Robertson MP, House of Commons Northern Ireland Affairs Committee—Oral evidence (QQ 55-63) ............................................................................................................................................... 26 Mr Ian Davidson MP, House of Commons Scottish Affairs Committee; Mr Laurence Robertson MP, House of Commons Northern Ireland Affairs Committee; and Mr Bruce Crawford MSP, Devolution (Further Powers) Committee, Scottish Parliament—Oral evidence (QQ 55-63) .............................................................................................................................. 27 Mr David Davies MP, House of Commons Welsh Affairs Committee; and Mr David Melding AM, Welsh Assembly Constitutional and Legislative Affairs
    [Show full text]
  • Devolution and Democratic Accountability
    Accounting in Politics This book looks at the effectiveness of the 1999 restructuring of the UK through the establishment of the Scottish Parliament and the Assemblies for Northern Ireland and Wales, considering the process of devolution and its consequences on the key mechanisms of accounting and democratic accountability. Many of the chapters in this book examine whether devolu- tion is enhancing democratic accountability, or creating a fragmentary state with conflict and tensions between the Westminster government and the devolved bodies. The focus is on the financial mechanisms for democratic accountability both in the UK and in international comparator countries (New Zealand, Norway and the US). The book examines the turbulent pattern of relation- ships between central and devolved government and explores whether the present arrangements for devolution in the UK represent an end game, or whether they may be merely a stepping stone to a more fully fledged federal state. It is argued that the main thrust of many of the financial reforms in the UK has confounded, obfuscated and complicated the desire for democratic accountability. The four academics involved in the editing of this volume were involved in a research project in a major ESRC programme on devolution and consti- tutional change. The resulting work will be of interest to students and researchers who are engaged in examining UK devolution and, more particu- larly, those with a concern related to resource accounting and budgeting issues. It will also make fascinating reading for civil servants and politicians involved in the devolution process. Mahmoud Ezzamel is Professorial Fellow of Cardiff Business School.
    [Show full text]
  • The Experiences of Scottish Devolution
    The Experiences of Scottish Devolution Constitutional and Parliamentary Mechanisms of the Scottish Parliament June 2016 FOREWORD DPI aims to create an environment which facilitates the sharing of knowledge, opinions, ideas and concerns relating to peace and democracy building. We seek to create a structured public dialogue and support the diversity of opinion, as well as creating and widening existing platforms for discussion. DPI’s principle objective is to identify common priorities and develop innovative approaches to participate in and influence the process of finding democratic solutions. Comparative studies of associated case studies enable us to effectively analyse past mistakes so as to avoid their repetition. Therefore, we see comparative analysis of models of peace and democracy building to be central to the achievement of our aims and objectives. As domestic politics continue to shape international affairs and the potential for conflict, it is vital to comprehend the nature of local government structures. This paper seeks to map the steps taken towards devolving greater power from the UK central government to Scotland. The relationship between Westminster and Holyrood has shifted significantly over the past two decades, and faces further changes today. Through understanding the nature of these developments we can seek to pre-empt the future of these relationships and to recognise the way society is developing as a result. The UK and in particular the case of Scotland, continues to provide a useful case study on questions of governance, presenting numerous topics in relation to power sharing and devolution processes. TABLE OF CONTENTS I. COUNTRY OVERVIEW II. INTRODUCTION III. CONSTITUTIONAL AND PARLIAMENTARY MECHANISMS OF SCOTTISH PARLIAMENT AND GOVERNMENT i.
    [Show full text]