DOCSLIB.ORG

Arxiv:1605.02731V1 [Astro-Ph.EP] 9 May 2016

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Arxiv:1605.02731V1 [Astro-Ph.EP] 9 May 2016 Draft version May 11, 2016 A Preprint typeset using LTEX style emulateapj v. 5/2/11 IMAGING EXTRASOLAR GIANT PLANETS Brendan P. Bowler1,2 Draft version May 11, 2016 ABSTRACT High-contrast adaptive optics imaging is a powerful technique to probe the architectures of planetary systems from the outside-in and survey the atmospheres of self-luminous giant planets. Direct imaging has rapidly matured over the past decade and especially the last few years with the advent of high-order adaptive optics systems, dedicated planet-finding instruments with specialized coronagraphs, and innovative observing and post-processing strategies to suppress speckle noise. This review summarizes recent progress in high-contrast imaging with particular emphasis on observational results, discoveries near and below the deuterium-burning limit, and a practical overview of large-scale surveys and dedicated instruments. I conclude with a statistical meta-analysis of deep imaging surveys in the literature. Based on observations of 384 unique and single young (≈5–300 Myr) stars spanning stellar masses between 0.1–3.0 M⊙, the overall occurrence rate of 5–13 MJup companions at orbital distances +0.7 of 30–300 AU is 0.6−0.5% assuming hot-start evolutionary models. The most massive giant planets regularly accessible to direct imaging are about as rare as hot Jupiters are around Sun-like stars. Dividing this sample into individual stellar mass bins does not reveal any statistically-significant +3.7 trend in planet frequency with host mass: giant planets are found around 2.8−2.3% of BA stars, <4.1% of FGK stars, and <3.9% of M dwarfs. Looking forward, extreme adaptive optics systems and the next generation of ground- and space-based telescopes with smaller inner working angles and deeper detection limits will increase the pace of discovery to ultimately map the demographics, composition, evolution, and origin of planets spanning a broad range of masses and ages. Subject headings: planets and satellites: detection — planets and satellites: gaseous planets 1. INTRODUCTION Webb Space Telescope, WFIRST, and the thirty meter- Over the past two decades the orbital architecture of class telescopes. This “classical” period of high-contrast giant planets has expanded from a single order of mag- imaging spanning approximately 2000 to 2015 has set nitude in the Solar System (5–30 AU) to over five or- the stage and baseline expectations for the next gen- ders of magnitude among extrasolar planetary systems eration of instruments and telescopes that will deliver (0.01–5000 AU; Figure 1). High-contrast adaptive op- ultra-high contrasts and reach unprecedented sensitivi- tics (AO) imaging has played a critical role in this ad- ties. In addition to the first images of bona fide extraso- vancement by probing separations beyond ∼10 AU and lar planets, this early phase experienced a number of sur- prising discoveries including planetary-mass companions masses &1 MJup. Uncovering planetary-mass objects at hundreds and thousands of AU has fueled novel theo- orbiting brown dwarfs; planets on ultra-wide orbits be- ries of planet formation and migration, inspiring a more yond 100 AU; enigmatic (and still poorly understood) ob- complex framework for the origin of giant planets in jects like the optically-bright companion to Fomalhaut; which multiple mechanisms (core accretion, dynamical and unexpectedly red, methane-free, and dust-rich atmo- scattering, disk instability, and cloud fragmentation) op- spheres at low surface gravities. Among the most impor- erate on different timescales and orbital separations. In tant results has been the gradual realization that mas- addition to probing unexplored orbital distances, imag- sive planets are exceedingly rare on wide orbits; only a arXiv:1605.02731v1 [astro-ph.EP] 9 May 2016 ing entails directly capturing photons that originated in handful of discoveries have been made despite thousands planetary atmospheres, providing unparalleled informa- of hours spent on hundreds of targets spanning over a tion about the initial conditions, chemical composition, dozen surveys. Although dismaying, these null detec- internal structure, atmospheric dynamics, photospheric tions provide valuable information about the efficiency condensates, and physical properties of extrasolar plan- of planet formation and the resulting demographics at ets. These three science goals — the architecture, for- wide separations. Making use of mostly general, non- mation, and atmospheres of gas giants — represent the optimized facility instruments and early adaptive optics main motivations to directly image and spectroscopically systems has also led to creative observing strategies and characterize extrasolar giant planets. post-processing solutions for PSF subtraction. This pedagogical review summarizes the field of di- Distinguishing giant planets from low-mass brown rect imaging in the era leading up to and transition- dwarfs is a well-trodden intellectual exercise (e.g., ing towards extreme adaptive optics systems, the James Oppenheimeretal. 2000; Basri&Brown 2006; Chabrier et al. 2007; Chabrier et al. 2014). Except [email protected] in the few rare cases where the architectures or abun- 1 McDonald Observatory and the University of Texas at dance patterns of individual systems offer clues about Austin, Department of Astronomy, 2515 Speedway, Stop C1400, Austin, TX 78712 a specific formation route, untangling the origin of 2 McDonald Prize Fellow. imaged planetary-mass companions must necessarily 2 1996 2006 2016 75 ) Jup 10 Mass (M 1 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 Separation (AU) Fig. 1.— Substellar companions discovered via radial velocities (gray circles) and direct imaging (red circles) as of 1996, 2006, and 2016. Over this twenty year period the number of directly imaged companions below 10 MJup has steadily increased from one (2M1207–3932 b in 2004) to over a dozen. The surprising discovery of planetary companions at extremely wide separations of hundreds to thousands of AU has expanded the architecture of planetary systems to over five orders of magnitude. Note that the radial velocity planets are minimum masses (msini) and the directly imaged companion masses are inferred from evolutionary models. RV-detected planets are from exoplanets.org (Wright et al. 2011; Han et al. 2014) and are supplemented with a compilation of RV-detected brown dwarfs from the literature. Imaged companions are from Deacon et al. (2014) together with other discoveries from the literature. be addressed as a population and in a statistical man- Marois et al. 2010a; Traub & Oppenheimer 2010; ner. This review is limited in scope to self-luminous Mawet et al. 2012b; Davies & Kasper 2012). companions detected in thermal emission at near- and 2. OPTIMAL TARGETS FOR HIGH-CONTRAST IMAGING mid-infrared wavelengths (1–5 µm) with masses between Planets radiatively cool over time by endlessly releas- ≈1–13 MJup with the understanding that multiple formation routes can probably produce objects in this ing the latent heat generated during their formation “planetary” mass regime (see Section 5). Indeed, the and gravitational contraction. Fundamental scaling rela- separations regularly probed in high-contrast imaging tions for the evolution of brown dwarfs and giant plan- surveys— typically tens to hundreds of AU— lie beyond ets can be derived analytically with basic assumptions the regions in protoplanetary disks containing the of a polytropic equation of state and degenerate electron highest surface densities of solids where core accretion gas (Stevenson 1991; Burrows & Liebert 1993). Neglect- operates most efficiently (e.g., Andrews 2015). Direct ing the influence of lithium burning, deuterium burning, imaging has therefore predominantly surveyed the wide and atmospheres, which act as partly opaque wavelength- orbital distances where alternative formation and migra- dependent boundary conditions, substellar objects with tion channels like disk instability, cloud fragmentation, different masses cool in a similar monotonic fashion over and planet-planet scattering are most likely to apply. time: In the future, the most efficient strategy to detect even −5/4 5/2 smaller super-Earths and terrestrial worlds close to their Lbol ∝ t M . (1) host stars will be in reflected light from a dedicated Here Lbol is the bolometric luminosity, t is the object’s space-based optical telescope. age, and M is its mass. By focusing on the optimal targets, early dis- This steep mass-luminosity relationship means that coveries, largest surveys, and statistical results, luminosity tracks are compressed in the brown dwarf this observationally-oriented overview aims to com- regime (≈13–75 MJup) and fan out in the planetary plement recent reviews on giant planet formation regime with significant consequences for high-contrast (Chabrier et al. 2007; Helled et al. 2013; Chabrier et al. imaging. A small gain in contrast in the brown dwarf 2014; Helling et al. 2014), atmospheric models regime results in a large gain in the limiting detectable (Marley et al. 2007a; Helling et al. 2008, Allard et al. mass, whereas the same contrast gain in the planetary 2012; Marley & Robinson 2015), evolutionary mod- regime has a much smaller influence on limiting mass els, (Burrows et al. 2001; Fortney & Nettelmann (Figure 2). It is much more difficult, for example, to 2009), observational results (Absil & Mawet 2009; improve sensitivity from 10 MJup to 1 MJup than from Lagrange 2014; Bailey 2014; Helling & Casewell 2014; 80 MJup to 10 MJup. Moreover, sensitivity to low masses Madhusudhan et al. 2014; Quanz 2015; Crossfield 2015), and close separations is highly dependent on a star’s and high contrast imaging instruments and speckle youth and proximity. In terms of limiting detectable suppression techniques (Guyon et al. 2006; Beuzit et al. planet mass, observing younger and closer stars is equiv- 2007; Oppenheimer & Hinkley 2009; Biller et al. 2008; alent to improving speckle suppression or integrating for 3 100 −10 mag 5 Gyr ) Jup 1 Gyr 500 Myr 10 100 pc 30 pc −5 mag 10 pc 100 Myr −2 mag NICI 30 Myr +2 mag Planet Mass (M 1 +5 mag 10 Myr 5 Myr 10 100 10 100 10 100 Semimajor Axis (AU) Fig.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Imaging Giant Protoplanets with the Elts
    Astro2020 Science White Paper Imaging Giant Protoplanets with the ELTs Thematic Areas: Planetary Systems Star and Planet Formation Formation and Evolution of Compact Objects Cosmology and Fundamental Physics Stars and Stellar Evolution Resolved Stellar Populations and their Environments Galaxy Evolution Multi-Messenger Astronomy and Astrophysics Principal Author: Name: Steph Sallum Institution: University of California, Santa Cruz Email: [email protected] Phone: (831) 459-4820 Co-authors: Vanessa Bailey (Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Inst. of Technology) Rebecca Bernstein (Carnegie Observatories) Alan Boss (Carnegie Institution) Brendan Bowler (The University of Texas at Austin) Laird Close (University of Arizona) Thayne Currie (NASA-Ames Research Center) Ruobing Dong (University of Victoria) Catherine Espaillat (Boston University) Michael P. Fitzgerald (University of California, Los Angeles) Katherine B. Follette (Amherst College) Jonathan Fortney (University of California, Santa Cruz) Yasuhiro Hasegawa (Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Inst. of Technology) Hannah Jang-Condell (University of Wyoming) Nemanja Jovanovic (California Inst. of Technology) Stephen R. Kane (University of California, Riverside) Quinn Konopacky (University of California, San Diego) Michael Liu (University of Hawaii) Julien Lozi (National Astronomical Observatory of Japan) Jared Males (University of Arizona) Dimitri Mawet (California Inst. of Technology / Jet Propulsion Laboratory) Benjamin Mazin (University of California, Santa Barbara) Max
    [Show full text]
  • Lurking in the Shadows: Wide-Separation Gas Giants As Tracers of Planet Formation
    Lurking in the Shadows: Wide-Separation Gas Giants as Tracers of Planet Formation Thesis by Marta Levesque Bryan In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Pasadena, California 2018 Defended May 1, 2018 ii © 2018 Marta Levesque Bryan ORCID: [0000-0002-6076-5967] All rights reserved iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First and foremost I would like to thank Heather Knutson, who I had the great privilege of working with as my thesis advisor. Her encouragement, guidance, and perspective helped me navigate many a challenging problem, and my conversations with her were a consistent source of positivity and learning throughout my time at Caltech. I leave graduate school a better scientist and person for having her as a role model. Heather fostered a wonderfully positive and supportive environment for her students, giving us the space to explore and grow - I could not have asked for a better advisor or research experience. I would also like to thank Konstantin Batygin for enthusiastic and illuminating discussions that always left me more excited to explore the result at hand. Thank you as well to Dimitri Mawet for providing both expertise and contagious optimism for some of my latest direct imaging endeavors. Thank you to the rest of my thesis committee, namely Geoff Blake, Evan Kirby, and Chuck Steidel for their support, helpful conversations, and insightful questions. I am grateful to have had the opportunity to collaborate with Brendan Bowler. His talk at Caltech my second year of graduate school introduced me to an unexpected population of massive wide-separation planetary-mass companions, and lead to a long-running collaboration from which several of my thesis projects were born.
    [Show full text]
  • Characterisation of Young Nearby Stars – the Ursa Major Group
    FRIEDRICH-SCHILLER-UNIVERSITAT¨ JENA Physikalisch-Astronomische Fakult¨at Characterisation of young nearby stars – The Ursa Major group Dissertation zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades doctor rerum naturalium (Dr. rer. nat.) vorgelegt dem Rat der Physikalischen-Astronomischen Fakult¨at der Friedrich-Schiller-Universit¨at Jena von Dipl.-Phys. Matthias Ammler geboren am 10.01.1977 in Neuburg a. d. Donau Gutachter 1. Prof. Dr. Ralph Neuh¨auser 2. Dr. habil. Matthias H¨unsch 3. Prof. Dr. Artie P. Hatzes Tag der letzten Rigorosumspr¨ufung: 26. Juni 2006 Tag der ¨offentlichen Verteidigung: 11. Juli 2006 Meinen Eltern Contents List of Figures vii List of Tables ix Abstract xi Zusammenfassung xiii Remarks and Acknowledgements xv 1 Introduction 1 1.1 WhatistheUrsaMajorgroup? . 1 1.1.1 Co-movingstarsin the BigDipper constellation . .... 1 1.1.2 Stellarmotionandmovinggroups . 1 1.1.3 Formation and evolution of open clusters and associations ... 6 1.1.4 The nature of the UMa group – cluster or association, or some- thingelse? ............................ 8 1.2 WhyistheUMagroupinteresting?. 8 1.2.1 Asnapshotinstellarevolution . 8 1.2.2 Alaboratoryinfrontofthedoor . 9 1.2.3 Thecensusofthesolarneighbourhood . 10 1.3 ConstrainingtheUMagroup–previousapproaches . ..... 11 1.3.1 Spatialclustering . 11 1.3.2 Kinematic criteria – derived from a “canonical” memberlist . 12 1.3.3 Kinematic parameters – derived from kinematic clustering ... 15 1.3.4 Stellarparametersandabundances . 17 1.3.5 TheageoftheUMagroup–photometriccriteria . 19 1.3.6 Spectroscopicindicatorsforageandactivity . .... 19 1.3.7 Combining kinematic, spectroscopic, and photometric criteria . 21 1.4 Anewhomogeneousspectroscopicstudy . 21 1.4.1 Definingthesample ....................... 22 1.4.2 Howtoobtainprecisestellarparameters? . .. 23 2 Observations,reductionandcalibration 25 2.1 Requireddata ............................... 25 2.2 Instruments ...............................
    [Show full text]
  • Hubble Space Telescope Observer’S Guide Winter 2021
    HUBBLE SPACE TELESCOPE OBSERVER’S GUIDE WINTER 2021 In 2021, the Hubble Space Telescope will celebrate 31 years in operation as a powerful observatory probing the astrophysics of the cosmos from Solar system studies to the high-redshift universe. The high-resolution imaging capability of HST spanning the IR, optical, and UV, coupled with spectroscopic capability will remain invaluable through the middle of the upcoming decade. HST coupled with JWST will enable new innovative science and be will be key for multi-messenger investigations. Key Science Threads • Properties of the huge variety of exo-planetary systems: compositions and inventories, compositions and characteristics of their planets • Probing the stellar and galactic evolution across the universe: pushing closer to the beginning of galaxy formation and preparing for coordinated JWST observations • Exploring clues as to the nature of dark energy ACS SBC absolute re-calibration (Cycle 27) reveals 30% greater • Probing the effect of dark matter on the evolution sensitivity than previously understood. More information at of galaxies http://www.stsci.edu/contents/news/acs-stans/acs-stan- • Quantifying the types and astrophysics of black holes october-2019 of over 7 orders of magnitude in size WFC3 offers high resolution imaging in many bands ranging from • Tracing the distribution of chemicals of life in 2000 to 17000 Angstroms, as well as spectroscopic capability in the universe the near ultraviolet and infrared. Many different modes are available for high precision photometry, astrometry, spectroscopy, mapping • Investigating phenomena and possible sites for and more. robotic and human exploration within our Solar System COS COS2025 initiative retains full science capability of COS/FUV out to 2025 (http://www.stsci.edu/hst/cos/cos2025).
    [Show full text]
  • • Context. Young Exoplanetary Systems with Ages 600 Ma (I.E. Hyades-Like Or Younger) Can Provide Constraints on the Time Scal
    • Context. Young exoplanetary systems with ages 600 Ma (i.e. Hyades-like or younger) can provide constraints on the time scale and mechanism of planet formation, and on the planet evolution (orbital migration, late heavy bombardment...). Apart from the very young “planet” candidates found by direct imaging (around e.g. HR 8799, 2M1207-39 or AB Pic), some young planet candidates have been found with the radial velocity method, such as HD 70573b (Setiawan et al. 2007) in the Hercules-Lyra subgroup of the Local Association or the controversial TW Hya b (Setiawan et al. 2008). [left, top: histogram of planet ages, from Joergens (2009, ASTROCAM school)] • Aims. We search for bright Hipparcos stars with radial-velocity planets that are member candidates in young moving groups (Montes et al. 2001), such as the Hyades, IC 2391, Ursa Majoris and Castor superclusters and the Local Association ( = 100-600 Ma), and very young moving groups like Pictoris or TW Hydrae ( < 100 Ma). Generally, these stars are discarded from accurate radial-velocity searches based on activity indicators, but there might be young stars that passed the rejection filter (e.g. HD 81040, ~ 700 Ma; Sozzetti et al. 2006). • Methods. On 2009 Sep 1, the Extrasolar Planets Encyclopaedia (exoplanet.eu) tabulated 346 planet candidates in 295 planetary systems detected by radial velocity (35 multiple planet systems). Of them, 228 have Hipparcos stars as host stars. We have computed Galactocentric space velocities UVW derived from star coordinates, proper motions, and parallactic distances (from van Leeuwen 2007), and systemic radial velocities, Vr (), from a number of works, including Nordström et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae - 24 March 2020
    Dr. Eric E. Mamajek Curriculum Vitae - 24 March 2020 Jet Propulsion Laboratory Phone: (818) 354-2153 4800 Oak Grove Drive FAX: (818) 393-4950 MS 321-162 [email protected] Pasadena, CA 91109-8099 https://science.jpl.nasa.gov/people/Mamajek/ Positions 2020- Discipline Program Manager - Exoplanets, Astro. & Physics Directorate, JPL/Caltech 2016- Deputy Program Chief Scientist, NASA Exoplanet Exploration Program, JPL/Caltech 2017- Professor of Physics & Astronomy (Research), University of Rochester 2016-2017 Visiting Professor, Physics & Astronomy, University of Rochester 2016 Professor, Physics & Astronomy, University of Rochester 2013-2016 Associate Professor, Physics & Astronomy, University of Rochester 2011-2012 Associate Astronomer, NOAO, Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory 2008-2013 Assistant Professor, Physics & Astronomy, University of Rochester (on leave 2011-2012) 2004-2008 Clay Postdoctoral Fellow, Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics 2000-2004 Graduate Research Assistant, University of Arizona, Astronomy 1999-2000 Graduate Teaching Assistant, University of Arizona, Astronomy 1998-1999 J. William Fulbright Fellow, Australia, ADFA/UNSW School of Physics Languages English (native), Spanish (advanced) Education 2004 Ph.D. The University of Arizona, Astronomy 2001 M.S. The University of Arizona, Astronomy 2000 M.Sc. The University of New South Wales, ADFA, Physics 1998 B.S. The Pennsylvania State University, Astronomy & Astrophysics, Physics 1993 H.S. Bethel Park High School Research Interests Formation and Evolution
    [Show full text]
  • Li Abundances in F Stars: Planets, Rotation, and Galactic Evolution,
    A&A 576, A69 (2015) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201425433 & c ESO 2015 Astrophysics Li abundances in F stars: planets, rotation, and Galactic evolution, E. Delgado Mena1,2, S. Bertrán de Lis3,4, V. Zh. Adibekyan1,2,S.G.Sousa1,2,P.Figueira1,2, A. Mortier6, J. I. González Hernández3,4,M.Tsantaki1,2,3, G. Israelian3,4, and N. C. Santos1,2,5 1 Centro de Astrofisica, Universidade do Porto, Rua das Estrelas, 4150-762 Porto, Portugal e-mail: [email protected] 2 Instituto de Astrofísica e Ciências do Espaço, Universidade do Porto, CAUP, Rua das Estrelas, 4150-762 Porto, Portugal 3 Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias, C/via Lactea, s/n, 38200 La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain 4 Departamento de Astrofísica, Universidad de La Laguna, 38205 La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain 5 Departamento de Física e Astronomía, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade do Porto, Portugal 6 SUPA, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of St. Andrews, St. Andrews KY16 9SS, UK Received 28 November 2014 / Accepted 14 December 2014 ABSTRACT Aims. We aim, on the one hand, to study the possible differences of Li abundances between planet hosts and stars without detected planets at effective temperatures hotter than the Sun, and on the other hand, to explore the Li dip and the evolution of Li at high metallicities. Methods. We present lithium abundances for 353 main sequence stars with and without planets in the Teff range 5900–7200 K. We observed 265 stars of our sample with HARPS spectrograph during different planets search programs. We observed the remaining targets with a variety of high-resolution spectrographs.
    [Show full text]
  • Stability of Planets in Binary Star Systems
    StabilityStability ofof PlanetsPlanets inin BinaryBinary StarStar SystemsSystems Ákos Bazsó in collaboration with: E. Pilat-Lohinger, D. Bancelin, B. Funk ADG Group Outline Exoplanets in multiple star systems Secular perturbation theory Application: tight binary systems Summary + Outlook About NFN sub-project SP8 “Binary Star Systems and Habitability” Stand-alone project “Exoplanets: Architecture, Evolution and Habitability” Basic dynamical types S-type motion (“satellite”) around one star P-type motion (“planetary”) around both stars Image: R. Schwarz Exoplanets in multiple star systems Observations: (Schwarz 2014, Binary Catalogue) ● 55 binary star systems with 81 planets ● 43 S-type + 12 P-type systems ● 10 multiple star systems with 10 planets Example: γ Cep (Hatzes et al. 2003) ● RV measurements since 1981 ● Indication for a “planet” (Campbell et al. 1988) ● Binary period ~57 yrs, planet period ~2.5 yrs Multiplicity of stars ~45% of solar like stars (F6 – K3) with d < 25 pc in multiple star systems (Raghavan et al. 2010) Known exoplanet host stars: single double triple+ source 77% 20% 3% Raghavan et al. (2006) 83% 15% 2% Mugrauer & Neuhäuser (2009) 88% 10% 2% Roell et al. (2012) Exoplanet catalogues The Extrasolar Planets Encyclopaedia http://exoplanet.eu Exoplanet Orbit Database http://exoplanets.org Open Exoplanet Catalogue http://www.openexoplanetcatalogue.com The Planetary Habitability Laboratory http://phl.upr.edu/home NASA Exoplanet Archive http://exoplanetarchive.ipac.caltech.edu Binary Catalogue of Exoplanets http://www.univie.ac.at/adg/schwarz/multiple.html Habitable Zone Gallery http://www.hzgallery.org Binary Catalogue Binary Catalogue of Exoplanets http://www.univie.ac.at/adg/schwarz/multiple.html Dynamical stability Stability limit for S-type planets Rabl & Dvorak (1988), Holman & Wiegert (1999), Pilat-Lohinger & Dvorak (2002) Parameters (a , e , μ) bin bin Outer limit at roughly max.
    [Show full text]
  • The Epsilon Chamaeleontis Young Stellar Group and The
    The ǫ Chamaeleontis young stellar group and the characterization of sparse stellar clusters Eric D. Feigelson1,2, Warrick A. Lawson2, Gordon P. Garmire1 [email protected] ABSTRACT We present the outcomes of a Chandra X-ray Observatory snapshot study of five nearby Herbig Ae/Be (HAeBe) stars which are kinematically linked with the Oph-Sco-Cen Association (OSCA). Optical photometric and spectroscopic followup was conducted for the HD 104237 field. The principal result is the discovery of a compact group of pre-main sequence (PMS) stars associated with HD 104237 and its codistant, comoving B9 neighbor ǫ Chamaeleontis AB. We name the group after the most massive member. The group has five confirmed stellar systems ranging from spectral type B9–M5, including a remarkably high degree of multiplicity for HD 104237 itself. The HD 104237 system is at least a quintet with four low mass PMS companions in nonhierarchical orbits within a projected separation of 1500 AU of the HAeBe primary. Two of the low- mass members of the group are actively accreting classical T Tauri stars. The Chandra observations also increase the census of companions for two of the other four HAeBe stars, HD 141569 and HD 150193, and identify several additional new members of the OSCA. We discuss this work in light of several theoretical issues: the origin of X-rays from HAeBe stars; the uneventful dynamical history of the high-multiplicity HD arXiv:astro-ph/0309059v1 2 Sep 2003 104237 system; and the origin of the ǫ Cha group and other OSCA outlying groups in the context of turbulent giant molecular clouds.
    [Show full text]
  • Exep Science Plan Appendix (SPA) (This Document)
    ExEP Science Plan, Rev A JPL D: 1735632 Release Date: February 15, 2019 Page 1 of 61 Created By: David A. Breda Date Program TDEM System Engineer Exoplanet Exploration Program NASA/Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Dr. Nick Siegler Date Program Chief Technologist Exoplanet Exploration Program NASA/Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Concurred By: Dr. Gary Blackwood Date Program Manager Exoplanet Exploration Program NASA/Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology EXOPDr.LANET Douglas Hudgins E XPLORATION PROGRAMDate Program Scientist Exoplanet Exploration Program ScienceScience Plan Mission DirectorateAppendix NASA Headquarters Karl Stapelfeldt, Program Chief Scientist Eric Mamajek, Deputy Program Chief Scientist Exoplanet Exploration Program JPL CL#19-0790 JPL Document No: 1735632 ExEP Science Plan, Rev A JPL D: 1735632 Release Date: February 15, 2019 Page 2 of 61 Approved by: Dr. Gary Blackwood Date Program Manager, Exoplanet Exploration Program Office NASA/Jet Propulsion Laboratory Dr. Douglas Hudgins Date Program Scientist Exoplanet Exploration Program Science Mission Directorate NASA Headquarters Created by: Dr. Karl Stapelfeldt Chief Program Scientist Exoplanet Exploration Program Office NASA/Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Dr. Eric Mamajek Deputy Program Chief Scientist Exoplanet Exploration Program Office NASA/Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology This research was carried out at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, under a contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. © 2018 California Institute of Technology. Government sponsorship acknowledged. Exoplanet Exploration Program JPL CL#19-0790 ExEP Science Plan, Rev A JPL D: 1735632 Release Date: February 15, 2019 Page 3 of 61 Table of Contents 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Marta L. Bryan
    Marta L. Bryan 501 Campbell Hall #3411 Email: [email protected] University of California at Berkeley Homepage: w.astro.berkeley.edu/∼martalbryan Berkeley, CA 94720-3411 Appointments NASA Hubble Fellowship Program Sagan Fellow, UC Berkeley Astronomy Fall 2021 - present Department 51 Pegasi b Postdoctoral Fellow, UC Berkeley Astronomy Department 2018 - Fall 2021 Education PhD in Astrophysics, California Institute of Technology May 2018 Advisor: Prof. Heather Knutson Thesis: Lurking in the Shadows: Wide-Separation Gas Giants as Tracers of Planet Formation MS in Astrophysics, California Institute of Technology June 2014 BA cum laude with High Honors in Astrophysics, Harvard University June 2012 Undergraduate Thesis Advisor: Prof. David Latham Thesis: Characterizing Qatar-2b: A Hot Jupiter Orbiting a K Dwarf Research Interests Exploring the formation, evolution, and architectures of planetary systems Characterizing exoplanet rotation rates and atmospheres using high-resolution spectroscopy High-contrast AO imaging of exoplanets and brown dwarfs Constraining the frequencies of gas giants in systems hosting different populations of terrestrial and ice giant planets Bridging the gap between radial velocity and direct imaging survey sensitivities to planets using radial velocity trends Awards and Honors NASA Hubble Fellowship Program Sagan Fellowship 2021 51 Pegasi b Postdoctoral Fellowship 2018 NASA Hubble Fellowship Program Sagan Fellowship (declined) 2018 David and Barbara Groce Grant to attend the Exoplanets I meeting in Davos 2016 Switzerland, California Institute of Technology AAS 2015 International Travel Grant 2015 National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Honorable Mention 2014, 2013 Chambliss Astronomy Achievement Student Award Honorable Mention, AAS 2014 Moffet Fellowship, California Institute of Technology 2012-2013 Origins of Life Research Grant, Harvard University 2011-2012 Leo Goldberg Prize for outstanding undergraduate thesis work, Harvard University 2011 U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Issue 36, June 2008
    June2008 June2008 In This Issue: 7 Supernova Birth Seen in Real Time Alicia Soderberg & Edo Berger 23 Arp299 With LGS AO Damien Gratadour & Jean-René Roy 46 Aspen Instrument Update Joseph Jensen On the Cover: NGC 2770, home to Supernova 2008D (see story starting on page 7 Engaging Our Host of this issue, and image 52 above showing location Communities of supernova). Image Stephen J. O’Meara, Janice Harvey, was obtained with the Gemini Multi-Object & Maria Antonieta García Spectrograph (GMOS) on Gemini North. 2 Gemini Observatory www.gemini.edu GeminiFocus Director’s Message 4 Doug Simons 11 Intermediate-Mass Black Hole in Gemini South at moonset, April 2008 Omega Centauri Eva Noyola Collisions of 15 Planetary Embryos Earthquake Readiness Joseph Rhee 49 Workshop Michael Sheehan 19 Taking the Measure of a Black Hole 58 Polly Roth Andrea Prestwich Staff Profile Peter Michaud 28 To Coldly Go Where No Brown Dwarf 62 Rodrigo Carrasco Has Gone Before Staff Profile Étienne Artigau & Philippe Delorme David Tytell Recent 31 66 Photo Journal Science Highlights North & South Jean-René Roy & R. Scott Fisher Photographs by Gemini Staff: • Étienne Artigau NICI Update • Kirk Pu‘uohau-Pummill 37 Tom Hayward GNIRS Update 39 Joseph Jensen & Scot Kleinman FLAMINGOS-2 Update Managing Editor, Peter Michaud 42 Stephen Eikenberry Science Editor, R. Scott Fisher MCAO System Status Associate Editor, Carolyn Collins Petersen 44 Maxime Boccas & François Rigaut Designer, Kirk Pu‘uohau-Pummill 3 Gemini Observatory www.gemini.edu June2008 by Doug Simons Director, Gemini Observatory Director’s Message Figure 1. any organizations (Gemini Observatory 100 The year-end task included) have extremely dedicated and hard- completion statistics 90 working staff members striving to achieve a across the entire M 80 0-49% Done observatory are worthwhile goal.
    [Show full text]