DOCSLIB.ORG

Rainfall-Triggered Mass Movements on Steep Loess Slopes and Their

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Rainfall-Triggered Mass Movements on Steep Loess Slopes and Their Catena 183 (2019) 104238 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Catena journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/catena Rainfall-triggered mass movements on steep loess slopes and their entrainment and distribution T ⁎ Wenzhao Guoa,b, Xiangzhou Xuc, Wenlong Wanga,b, , Yakun Liuc, Mingming Guoa, Zhiqiang Cuib a State Key Laboratory of Soil Erosion and Dryland Farming on the Loess Plateau, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, 712100, Shaanxi, China b Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Chinese Academy of Sciences and Ministry of Water Resources, Yangling, 712100, Shaanxi, China c School of Hydraulic Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: Mass movements are predominant geomorphic processes on steep hillslopes. However, the mechanisms gov- Mass movement erning the erosion and entrainment of mass movements remain poorly understood. In this study, experiments on Soil erosion natural loess slopes were conducted to induce a series of mass movements under simulated rainfalls in the Entrainment Liudaogou Catchment on the Loess Plateau of China. A novel topography meter was used to observe random Rainfall simulation experiments mass movements. A total of 499 mass movements in 42 rainfall events and an average of 11 mass movements for Loess Plateau each rainfall event were observed. Three mass movement types were detected: landslides (67%) > mudflows (21%) > avalanches (12%). The volume of landslides dramatically increased through the entrainment of a wet gully bed material, and the volume of landslide mass was magnified by 29% on average through material entrainment. Based on the observed data, the probability of mass movement occurrences decreased with the increasing mass movement volume in a power-law relationship. The critical rainfall amount for mass movement − failure was approximately 25.6 mm at a rainfall intensity of 50 mm h 1. These results can serve as guides to mitigate geological hazards and assess erosion processes on steep loess slopes of the Loess Plateau. 1. Introduction et al. (2015a) suggested a systematic classification of mass movements, including landslides, mudflows, and avalanches. Mudflows have ob- Mass movement, also referred as gravity erosion or mass wasting, is vious flow performance and high water content compared with land- a slope failure on hillslopes. Mass movement is not only a natural ha- slides and avalanches (Guo et al., 2019). During erosion, the failure zard but also an important means of conveying sediments from slopes to block of an avalanche completely separates from the slope surface, channels in mountainous territories, thus severely affecting the struc- whereas that of a landslide slips down as a whole along a weak belt (Xu ture and function of ecosystems and societies (Keefer and Larsen, 2007; et al., 2015a). Zhang et al. (2012) found a close relationship between Qiu, 2014; Fuller et al., 2016; Xu et al., 2017). Therefore, under- the topographic attributes of post-landslide local surface and mass standing this phenomenon is necessary to implement hazard mitigation movement types. However, the responses of different movement types and control erosion. to rainfall characteristics and the distribution of mass movements have Rainfall is the most important triggering factor of mass movements received little attention despite their importance. on the Loess Plateau of China (Xu et al., 2017). Dry loess can sustain Previous studies have shown that the entrainment of initially static near-vertical slopes; however, loess can rapidly disaggregate when lo- materials can increase the mobility of avalanches (Mangeney et al., cally saturated by rainfall (Dai and Lee, 2002). Rainfall-triggered mass 2007). Accordingly, Breien et al. (2008) suggested that entrainment movements frequently occur on soil-mantled landforms (Minder et al., usually causes the debris flow to become increasingly erosive. Debris 2009). A field investigation shows that rainfall-triggered mass move- flow can markedly increase in size and speed when materials are en- ments only occur at a depth of < 2 m, corresponding to a surface layer trained from their beds. In addition, flow deposits from the underlying of completely saturated loess (Wang et al., 2015). erodible layer are difficult to distinguish when they are composed of the Mass movements include various types, each of which has specific same materials (Mangeney, 2011). Therefore, the quantitative mea- mechanisms and conditioning factors (Cruden and Varnes, 1996). Xu surement of entrainment volumes under field conditions becomes ⁎ Corresponding author at: State Key Laboratory of Soil Erosion and Dryland Farming on the Loess Plateau, Northwest Agriculture and Forestry University, Yangling, 712100, Shaanxi, China. E-mail addresses: [email protected] (W. Guo), [email protected] (W. Wang). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2019.104238 Received 25 October 2018; Received in revised form 19 August 2019; Accepted 23 August 2019 0341-8162/ © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. W. Guo, et al. Catena 183 (2019) 104238 (a) (b) (c) Rainfall simulators Gully Steep slope Mass movement Gully Mass movement T1 Fig. 1. Study area and sampling sites. (a) Location of the Liudaogou Catchment on the Loess Plateau of China; (b) Topography of typical mass movement; (c) Mass movement experiment in the Liudaogou Catchment. T1: Topography meter. Table 1 Table 2 Experimental summary of the initial slope landform and rainfall. Error between design rainfall intensity and experiment rainfall intensity in experiment F1. Test Lower slope configuration Rainfall − number Rainfall events Rainfall intensity (mm h 1) Error Height (m) Gradient (°) Intensity Duration Runs −1 (mm h ) (min) Experiment Design F1 1.0 70 50 60 6 1 47.4 50 5.2% F2 1.0 80 50 60 6 2 46.8 50 6.4% F3 1.0 60 50 60 6 3 48.8 50 2.4% F4 1.5 70 50 60 6 4 49.2 50 1.6% F5 1.5 80 50 60 6 5 50.4 50 −0.8% F6 1.5 60 50 60 6 6 47.4 50 5.2% F7 1.5 70 100 30 6 Average 48.3 50 3.3% complicated. Furthermore, the mechanisms that govern the growth of Table 3 landslides remain unclear, hampering efforts to assess natural hazards Soil physical properties. (Iverson et al., 2011; Mangeney, 2011). − Initial water content/ Dry density/g cm 3 Primary particle size (%) Recently, numerous scholars have conducted laboratory experi- % ments on mass movements to understand their processes and mechan- Clay/mm Silt/mm Sand/mm isms. For instance, Terajima et al. (2014) conducted a flume experiment < 0.002 0.002–0.05 > 0.05 to examine slope subsurface hydrology and found that seepage forces 9.3–13.6 1.44–1.66 2 30 68 affect the promotion of shallow landslide initiation. Xu et al. (2015b) tested the stability of different slope geometries and rainfalls to explore the triggering mechanisms of mass movements on a remolding slope. landslides. Kharismalatri et al. (2019) conducted a flume experiment to Yuliza et al. (2016) prepared a small-scale landslide experiments to evaluate factors for controlling sediment connectivity of landslide ma- determine the soil characteristics and water content that induce terials. However, these laboratory experiments used remolded soil, 2 W. Guo, et al. Catena 183 (2019) 104238 (a) (c) (b) (d) Fig. 2. Comparison of a mass movement and the three-dimensional vector model. (a) Crevice was created and expanded, which indicated that a mass movement was occurring. (b) Failure block was fragmentized and stacked in the main channel. (c) and (d) are 3D surface models reconstructed with ArcGIS corresponding to (a) and (b), respectively. Table 4 Summary information on mass movement in experiments F1–F7. Test number Number of mass movements Amount of mass movements/103 cm3 Avalanche Landslide Mudflow Total Avalanche Landslide Mudflow Total F1 12 41 5 58 11.0 53.3 4.2 68.6 F2 7 14 1 22 3.7 8.4 0.4 12.5 F3 1 3 3 7 0.3 9.5 1.5 11.4 F4 7 126 45 178 5.3 173.4 40.9 219.6 F5 10 89 18 117 5.6 92.2 13.2 111.0 F6 9 56 32 97 6.8 56.1 20.6 83.6 F7 16 4 0 20 49.4 3.1 0.0 52.5 Summation 62 333 104 499 82.2 396.1 80.7 559.0 Percentage 12% 67% 21% 100% 15% 71% 14% 100% destroyed the mechanical structure of the original soil, and could not contribution of avalanches, landslides, and mudflows to the amounts of truly reflect the changes of the stress field on natural slopes. Further- mass movements. In addition, the distribution of mass movements in more, few experiments have focused on the distribution of mass terms of failure volume and rainfall was explored. Different from la- movements in terms of failure volume and rainfall. boratory experiments, the experiment on the segment of unscaled rea- Therefore, this study conducted a series of mass movement experi- lity on natural loess slopes retains the loess scale and natural char- ments on segments of unscaled reality on natural loess slopes on the acteristics (such as the internal structure and vertical joints) while Loess Plateau of China. The objective of this study was to investigate controlling for the location and timing of mass movement occurrence the characteristics and distribution of mass movements and the (Guo et al., 2019). This characteristic in our study is an important 3 W. Guo, et al. Catena 183 (2019) 104238 80% Number landslides, mudflows, and avalanches that contribute large amounts of 71% Volume 67% sediment yield by conveying soil into valleys. 70% 60% 3. Materials and methods 50% To analyze the failure mechanism of mass movements, a series of 40% experiments (F1–F7) were conducted on natural loess slopes in the Liudaogou Catchment of Shenmu County in the summer of 2014 Percentage 30% (Fig.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Beyond the Angle of Repose: a Review and Synthesis of Landslide Processes in Response to Rapid Uplift, Eel River, Northern Eel River, Northern California
    Portland State University PDXScholar Geology Faculty Publications and Presentations Geology 2-23-2015 Beyond the Angle of Repose: A Review and Synthesis of Landslide Processes in Response to Rapid Uplift, Eel River, Northern Eel River, Northern California Joshua J. Roering University of Oregon Benjamin H. Mackey University of Canterbury Alexander L. Handwerger University of Oregon Adam M. Booth Portland State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/geology_fac David A. Schmidt Univ Persityart of of the W Geologyashington Commons , Geomorphology Commons, and the Geophysics and Seismology Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y See next page for additional authors Citation Details Roering, Joshua J., Mackey, Benjamin H., Handwerger, Alexander L., Booth, Adam M., Schmidt, David A., Bennett, Georgina L., Cerovski-Darriau, Corina, Beyond the angle of repose: A review and synthesis of landslide pro-cesses in response to rapid uplift, Eel River, Northern California, Geomorphology (2015), doi: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2015.02.013 This Post-Print is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Geology Faculty Publications and Presentations by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. Authors Joshua J. Roering, Benjamin H. Mackey, Alexander L. Handwerger, Adam M. Booth, David A. Schmidt, Georgina L. Bennett, and Corina Cerovski-Darriau This post-print is available at PDXScholar: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/geology_fac/75 ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Beyond the angle of repose: A review and synthesis of landslide processes in response to rapid uplift, Eel River, Northern California Joshua J.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology and Seismicity
    SECTIONNINE GEOLOGY AND SEISMICITY 9. Section 9 NINE Geology and Seismicity This section describes the major geologic regions that could be affected by project construction and operation and the potential environmental consequences of the alternatives. 9.1 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT The following paragraphs summarize the geologic conditions and hazards that may be encountered during the construction and implementation of the alternatives for the San Luis Drainage Feature Re-evaluation. The geologic environment is discussed in greater detail in Appendix H. The focus of this section is the geologic and seismic characteristics of the Great Valley and the Coast Ranges geomorphic provinces, which may influence the comparison of a the action alternatives due to the geologic conditions and potential geologic hazards associated with these regions. 9.1.1 Regulatory Background Several Federal and State regulations govern geology, seismicity, and soils in California. The Federal actions include the Earthquake Hazard Reduction Act of 1977, Executive Order 12699 on Seismic Safety of Federal Buildings, and the Uniform Building Code (superceded in California by the California Building Code). The State actions include the Alquist-Priolo Act, the Field Act, the California Building Code, and the Seismic Hazards Mapping Act. Some State agencies, including California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) and California Department of Water Resources (DWR), Division of Safety of Dams, have their own actions covering seismic and geologic hazards. In addition, municipalities and counties can have general or specific plans that may include the need for permitting. The regulatory background governing geology, seismicity, and soils is discussed further in Section 4.6. SLDFR Final EIS Section 09_Geology 9-1 SECTIONNINE Geology and Seismicity 9.1.2 Geologic Setting The existing San Luis Drain is situated near the western margin of San Joaquin Valley (Figure 9-1), which comprises the southern region of the Great Valley geomorphic province (Harden 1998).
    [Show full text]
  • Mass Wasting and Hill-Slopes Mass Wasting
    Mass Wasting and Hill-slopes Mass wasting • Is a collective term addressing all down slope movements of weathered rock (soil) that are created by gravitational forces. • Gravity is the primary component! • Vocabulary – Colluvium – Solifluction (soil flow) The Angle of Repose • The maximum slope at which loose, cohesionless material remains stable. It commonly ranges between 33 and 37 on natural slopes. • Dependent upon size, shape, surface roughness, angularity, of the particles • Wallace Stegner book as well. Dry sand cannot support an angle of >35o from horizontal: this is termed the angle of repose. 35o Moderate amounts of water create Saturation of sediment by increased structural integrity of water eliminates any structural sediment due to surface tension competence. This is the between grains. In this way slopes condition that often leads to steeper than the angle of repose can slope instability and be maintained (e.g., sandcastles). mass wasting. Slope movement types • When defining mass wasting it is necessary to include 1) the type of material in motion, including its coherence and dimensions; and 2) the type and rate of movement including creeping, falling, toppling, sliding, spreading, or flowing (debris flow). Handout Creep • Barely perceptible down slope movement. • Particle creep, individual particle movement due to wetting/drying, heating/cooling • Soil creep, dependent on changing SMR and climates. Creepy drawing Creep (or soil creep) works at a pace of mm/yr. It is generally related to (seasonal) wet-dry or freeze thaw changes. Fall • A fall is a mass movement where singular or multiple blocks of rock plunge from a height. Yosemite, CA Looks like an ideal place for a rock fall or a rock slide, thanks to exfoliation of granite batholiths.
    [Show full text]
  • Mass Wasting and Landslides
    Mass Wasting and Landslides Mass Wasting 1 Introduction Landslide and other ground failures posting substantial damage and loss of life In U.S., average 25–50 deaths; damage more than $3.5 billion For convenience, definition of landslide includes all forms of mass-wasting movements Landslide and subsidence: naturally occurred and affected by human activities Mass wasting Downslope movement of rock and soil debris under the influence of gravity Transportation of large masses of rock Very important kind of erosion 2 Mass wasting Gravity is the driving force of all mass wasting Effects of gravity on a rock lying on a hillslope 3 Boulder on a hillside Mass Movement Mass movements occur when the force of gravity exceeds the strength of the slope material Such an occurrence can be precipitated by slope-weakening events Earthquakes Floods Volcanic Activity Storms/Torrential rain Overloading the strength of the rock 4 Mass Movement Can be either slow (creep) or fast (landslides, debris flows, etc.) As terrain becomes more mountainous, the hazard increases In developed nations impacts of mass-wasting or landslides can result in millions of dollars of damage with some deaths In less developed nations damage is more extensive because of population density, lack of stringent zoning laws, scarcity of information and inadequate preparedness **We can’t always predict or prevent the occurrence of mass- wasting events, a knowledge of the processes and their relationship to local geology can lead to intelligent planning that will help
    [Show full text]
  • Mass-Wasting, Classification and Damage in Ohio C
    MASS-WASTING, CLASSIFICATION AND DAMAGE IN OHIO C. N. SAVAGE Department of Geography and Geology, Kent State University, Kent, Ohio The sudden and often spectacular free fall, slide, flow, creep or subsidence of earth materials may be costly in terms of human lives and property damage. Phenomena of this type, variously called "landslide, earthflow or subsidence" are assigned by geologists to gravity controlled movement or referred to collectively as "mass-wasting." This category also includes movement of dry or hard-frozen masses, or snow-laden debris when moved by gravity. Figure 1 illustrates some of these types of movement. This paper is intended to bring to the attention of laymen and professional men the importance and widespread occurrence of these destructive forces. A brief discussion of damage, origin, prevention and classification is presented, followed by examples in Ohio. It is hoped that the suggested classification will prove useful as an aid to the recognition of different types of mass-movement. Annually, many highways are blocked or destroyed, soils are ruined and buried in rubble, forest lands are ripped apart, and bridges, dams, buildings and other structures are wrecked or buried by landslides. Every year, especially in southern and eastern Ohio, many thousands of dollars are lost because of this type of calamity. There is scarcely a spring which does not bring reports of landslides in the local press. It seems obvious that this is a subject of grave concern to construction engineers, soils experts, conservation men and many others including the tax paying citizen. Wherever there are slopes that are steep enough, and wherever there is loose rock material, mass-wasting is a potential threat.
    [Show full text]
  • Weathering: Big Ideas Mass Wasting
    Weathering: Big Ideas • Humans cannot eliminate natural hazards but can engage in activities that reduce their impacts by identifying high-risk locations, improving construction methods, and developing warning systems. • Water’s unique physical and chemical properties are essential to the dynamics of all of Earth’s systems • Understanding geologic processes active in the modern world is crucial to interpreting Earth’s past • Earth’s systems are dynamic; they continually react to changing influences from geological, hydrological, physical, chemical, and biological processes. Mass Wasting Process by which material moves downslope under the force of gravity http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qEbYpts0Onw Factors Influencing Mass Movement Nature of Steepness of Water Slope Slope Material Slope Content Stability 1 Mass Movement Depends on Nature of Material Angle of Repose: the maximum angle at which a pile of unconsolidated particles can rest The angle of repose increases with increasing grain size Fig. 16.13 Weathered shale forms rubble at base of cliff Angle of Repose Fig. 16.15 Origin of Surface Tension Water molecules in a …whereas surface liquids interior are molecules have a net attracted in all inward attraction that directions… results in surface tension… Fig. 16.13 2 …that acts like a membrane, allowing objects to float. Fig. 16.13 Mass Movement Depends on Water Content Surface tension in damp sand increases Dry sand is bound Saturated sand flows easily cohesion only by friction because of interstitial water Fig. 16.13 Steep slopes in damp sand maintained by moisture between grains Fig. 16.14 3 Loss of vegetation and root systems increases susceptibility of soils to erosion and mass movement Yellowstone National Park Before the 1964 Alaska Earthquake Water saturated, unconsolidated sand Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • 3) Removal of Anchoring Vegetation Root Systems Bind Soil 7 “Cut and Fill” Construction
    1 Mass Wasting and landform development 2 Mass Wasting and landform development Mass wasting Def.: the downslope movement of rock and soil under the direct influence of gravity 3 Role of mass wasting The step that follows weathering Transfers debris downslope to stream valleys 4 Controls and triggers of mass wasting Gravity is the controlling force Important triggers include 1) Saturation of the material with water (rainfall) –Diminishes particle cohesion –Water adds weight 5 Controls and triggers of mass wasting 2) Oversteepening of slopes –Oversteepening slopes are unstable –Stable slope angle (angle of repose; 25-45o) is different for various materials 6 Important triggers include: 3) Removal of anchoring vegetation Root systems bind soil 7 “cut and fill” construction 8 Important triggers include: 4) Ground vibrations from earthquakes –May trigger land slides and result in property damage –Can cause liquefaction – water saturated surface materials behave as fluid-like masses that flow 9 Other triggers Freezing – thawing Construction 1 Volcanic eruptions Freeway traffic 10 Landslides without triggers Slope materials weaken over time Random events that are unpredictable 11 Classification a) Type of material involved • Debris • Mud • Earth • Rock 12 Classification b) Type of motion Fall (free-falling pieces) Slide (moves along a surface as a coherent mass) Flow (moves as a chaotic mixture) 13 Classification c) velocity Fast (avalanche, ~200km/hour) Slow (creep, mm or cm/year) 14 Rock avalanche in Alaska triggered by the 1964 earthquake 15 16 Types of mass wasting Rockfall 17 Rock fall, Oregon 18 Rock fall and Talus Slope, Banff National Park, Canada 19 Types of mass wasting Slump (rotational slide) Movement of material as a unit along a rotational surface Occurs along oversteepened slopes 20 Slump and earth flow) Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Geomorphological Characteristics of Mass-Wasting Features in Ius Chasma, Valles Marineris, Mars
    47th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference (2016) 1890.pdf GEOMORPHOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF MASS-WASTING FEATURES IN IUS CHASMA, VALLES MARINERIS, MARS. K. T. Dębniak1* and O. Kromuszczyńska1**, 1Planetary Geology Lab, Institute of Geological Sciences, Polish Academy of Sciences, Research Centre in Wrocław ul. Podwale 75, 50-449 Wrocław, Poland; *[email protected], **[email protected] Introduction: Ius Chasma is an elongated trough in GCS Mars 2000 Sphere coordinate system and plate constituting one of twelve depressions of Valles Mari- carrée projection (equirectangular projection). The neris. The chasma displays evidences of various pro- process of map generation was divided into three steps, cesses which enlarged, carved, and modified its walls i.e. image gathering (JMARS), image processing and and floors, including features of tectonic, water ero- mosaicking (ISIS), and geomorphological mapping sion, glacial erosion, ponding sedimentation, eolian, (ArcGIS). The spatial resolution of resultant CTX im- and mass-wasting origin. Geomorphological mapping ages was decreased from 6 to 12 m/pixel in order to performed on the basis of CTX image mosaics led to ensure a fluent mapping procedure in ArcGIS software. the development of detailed classifications of wall, Since the ISIS software exacts file size limitations, the floor, glacial, and mass-wasting units [1]. The abstract introduced set of CTX images was divided into three presents cartographic outcomes from investigation of mosaics (western, central, and eastern) covering the landslide deposits and other mass-wasting features. total area of over 375 000 km2. Ius Chasma: The largest western trough of Valles The proposed classification of landslide deposits Marineris displays length of ~850 km, width up to was based on [7], expanded after detailed visual inves- 120 km, and depth locally exceeding 8 km.
    [Show full text]
  • Geol 108 Lab #6 Landslides and Mass Wasting PART I. SLOPE
    Geol 108 Lab #6 Landslides and Mass Wasting Week of October 8-12, 2012 PART I. SLOPE & GRAVITY The main force responsible for mass wasting is gravity. Gravity is the force that acts everywhere on the Earth's surface, pulling everything in a direction toward the center of the Earth. On a flat surface the force of gravity acts downward. So long as the material remains on the flat surface it will not move under the force of gravity. Figure 1. Gravity. Figure 2. Components of forces acting on a slope. D = G sin θ N = G cos θ R = resisting force R = µ N (where µ is the frictional coefficient) If D > R, there will be movement. Down-slope movement is favored by steeper slope angles and anything that reduces the shear strength, such as lowering cohesion among particles or lowering the frictional resistance. 1 of 8 PART II. THE ROLE OF WATER The Role of Water Although water is not always directly involved as the transporting medium in mass-wasting processes, it does play an important role. Water increases mass, hence, increasing gravitational attraction. Dry unconsolidated grains will form a pile with a slope angle determined by the angle of repose. The angle of repose is the steepest angle at which a pile of unconsolidated grains remains stable, and is controlled by the frictional contact between the grains. In general, for dry materials the angle of repose increases with increasing grain size, but usually lies between about 30° and 37°. Slightly wet unconsolidated materials exhibit a very high angle of repose because surface tension between the water and the solid grains tends to hold the grains in place.
    [Show full text]
  • Mass Movements General Anatomy
    CE/SC 10110-20110: Planet Earth Mass Movements Earth Portrait of a Planet Fifth Edition Chapter 16 Mass movement (or mass wasting) is the downslope motion of rock, regolith (soil, sediment, and debris), snow, and ice. General Anatomy Discrete slump blocks Head scarp Bulging toe Road for scale Disaster in the Andes: Yungay, Peru, 1970 Fractures rock, loosens soil particles. Seismic energy overstresses the system. Yungay, Peru, in the Santa River Valley beneath the heavily glaciated Nevado Huascarán (21,860 feet). May, 1970, earthquake occurred offshore ~100 km away - triggered many small rock falls. An 800-meter-wide block of ice was dislodged and avalanched downhill, scooping out small lakes and breaking off large masses of rock debris. Disaster in the Andes: Yungay, Peru, 1970 More than 50 million cubic meters of muddy debris traveled 3.7 km (12,000 feet) vertically and 14.5 km (9 miles) horizontally in less than 4 minutes! Main mass of material traveled down a steep valley, blocking the Santa River and burying ~18,000 people in Ranrachirca. A small part shot up the valley wall, was momentarily airborne before burying the village of Yungay. Estimated death toll = 17,000. Disaster in the Andes: Yungay, Peru, 1970 Before After Whats Left of Yungay. Common Mass Movements Rockfalls and Slides Slow Fast Debris Flows Slumping Lahars and Mudflows Solifluction and Creep These different kinds of mass movements are arranged from slowest (left) to fastest (right). Types of Mass Movement Different types of mass movement based on 4 factors: 1) Type of material involved (rock, regolith, snow, ice); 2) Velocity of the movement (slow, intermediate, fast); 3) Character of the movement (chaotic cloud, slurry, coherent mass; 4) Environment (subaerial, submarine).
    [Show full text]
  • Mass Wasting
    Mass Wasting Mass Movement: the downslope transfer of material through the direct action of gravity. Mass Movement can be fast, as in landslides, or slow, as in creep. Angle of Repose The steepest slope on which loose material such as talus, will remain at rest without rolling farther downslope (Average = 30°). Factors influencing Mass Movement *Saturation of material with water Lubricates and adds weight *Vibrations from earthquakes 1970 Peru Quake – 400m³ moved downslope 300km/hr, killing 40,000at the base of Mount Huascaran. 1976 Guatemala – Quake resulted in 10,000 mass movements *Oversteepening of slopes by undercutting. By nature (rivers) or humans (Highways, Malibu) *Alternating Freezing and Thawing Cases: Madagascar, Vaiont Reservoir (1963) in Italy Types of Mass Movement Creep – Extremely slow, almost imperceptible downslope movement of soil and rock debris that results from the constant minor readjustments of the constituent particles. Creep Evidence: 1) Hard to see it move, but evidence can be seen 2) Bulges or low, wave-like swells in the soil 3) Bending of steeply dipping strata 4) Tilted trees and posts 5) Deformed roads, fence lines 6) Tilted retaining walls Includes Block Slides: caused by heaving process that results from the alternating expansion and contraction of loose rock fragments in the regolith. Freeze/Thaw Wetting/Drying Other Factors that lead to Creep: Growing plants (or lack of) Undercutting by streams Increased loads by rainwater or snow Earthquakes Construction by humans Rates of Creep 1-2 mm/yr in humid temperature regions 5-10 mm/yr in semi arid with cold winters Special Type: Solifluction (soil flowage) Common in polar regions (permafrost) Can occur in water drenched soils Debris Flows No definite plane of slippage Medium to fast movement Consist of mixtures of rock fragments, mud and water that flows downslope as viscous fluids.
    [Show full text]
  • Mass Wasting Hazards Many Landslides, Slope Failures Or Sinkholes
    page - 1 Environmental Geology Lab 5 - Mass Wasting Hazards Many landslides, slope failures or sinkholes (collapse structures formed in terrain underlain by limestone rocks) occur during or immediately after periods of heavy rain. It is commonly thought that the infiltration “lubricates” the soil or rock and hence weakens it. This is actually very rare because, with the exception of some swelling clays, the shear strength of most geologic materials does not change appreciably with moisture content. Some of the ways in which groundwater can contribute to these types of hazards are described below: 1. Water pressure. Water pressure reduces the effective stress (and hence the frictional resistance to movement) between particles in the soil, or along fracture or fault surfaces due to the buoyant effect of the water. During or after a heavy rain the water table rises which further increases the buoyant effects, while adding to the total weight of material above the failure surface. If this change exceeds the shear strength of the soil or rock movement along the failure surface will occur (Figures 1a and 1b). Groundwater pressure has a similar effect along major faults and is a contributing factor in the occurrence of earthquakes. Another example of its influence on slope stability is illustrated in Figure 1c, where infiltration fills up a tension crack at the top of the slope. The water pressure in the slope tends to push the block of soil or rock outwards. This type of movement can be repeated over and over with the block moving a little further during each rainstorm until, finally, it topples over.
    [Show full text]