Local Hazard Mitigation Plan

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Local Hazard Mitigation Plan CITY OF LA PALMA LOCAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN OCTOBER 2019 This page intentionally left blank. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1 – Introduction .......................................................................................... 1-1 Chapter 2 – Community Profile ............................................................................. 2-1 Chapter 3 – Risk Assessment .................................................................................. 3-1 Chapter 4 – Threat and Vulnerability Assessments .................................. 4-1 Chapter 5 – Hazard Mitigation Strategy ........................................................... 5-1 Chapter 6 – Plan Maintenance ................................................................................ 6-1 Appendices – ............................................................................................................................ Appendix A – Meeting Materials ........................................................................................................................... A-1 Appendix B – Community Outreach Materials .............................................................................................. B-1 Appendix C – Adoption Resolution ..................................................................................................................... C-1 Appendix D – Critical Facilities Inventory ...................................................................................................... D-1 Appendix E – Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Implementation Workbook ....................................... E-1 iii This page intentionally left blank. iv City of La Palma 1. CHAPTER 1 - INTRODUCTION PLAN PURPOSE AND AUTHORITY Hazard events can lead to injuries or death, affect overall health and safety of a community, damage or destroy public and private property, harm ecosystems, and disrupt key services. Although the hazard event itself often gets the most attention, it is only one part of a larger emergency management cycle. Emergency planners and responders can take steps during the response, recovery, mitigation, and preparedness phases of the cycle to minimize the harm caused by a disaster. This Local Hazard Mitigation Plan (LHMP) focuses on optimizing the mitigation phase of the cycle. Mitigation involves making a community more resilient to disasters so that when hazard events do ultimately occur, the community suffers less damage and is able to recover more effectively. It differs from preparedness, which involves advanced planning for how best to respond when a disaster occurs or is imminent. For example, a policy to make homes structurally stronger so they suffer less damage during an earthquake is a mitigation action, while fully equipping shelters to accommodate people who lose their homes in an earthquake is a preparedness action. Some activities may qualify as both. La Palma, like all other communities, could potentially suffer severe harm from hazard events, and although large disasters may cause widespread devastation, even smaller disasters can have substantial effects. La Palma cannot make itself completely immune to hazard events, but this LHMP KEY TERMS can help make the community a safer place to live, work, and visit. This Hazard event: An LHMP provides a comprehensive assessment of the threats that La Palma emergency as a faces from natural and human-caused hazard events and a coordinated result of a natural strategy to reduce these threats. It identifies resources and information or human-caused that can help community members, City staff, and local officials event that has the understand local threats and make informed decisions. The LHMP can potential to cause also support increased coordination and collaboration between the City, harm. other public agencies, local employers, service providers, community members, and other key stakeholders. 1-1 Local Hazard Mitigation Plan | Public Review Draft City of La Palma FEDERAL AUTHORITY La Palma is not required to prepare an LHMP, but state and federal regulations encourage it. The federal Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and KEY TERMS Emergency Act, amended by the Disaster Management Act of 2000, creates a federal framework for local hazard mitigation planning. It states Mitigation: that jurisdictions that wish to be eligible for federal hazard mitigation grant Actions that funding must prepare a hazard mitigation plan that meets a certain set of increase guidelines and submit this plan to the Federal Emergency Management resiliency and reduce the Agency (FEMA) for review and approval. These guidelines are outlined in harmful effects the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 44, Part 201, and discussed in of a hazard. greater detail in FEMA’s Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool. Resilient: Better STATE AUTHORITY able to avoid or California Government Code Sections 8685.9 and 65302.6 lessen the California Government Code Section 8685.9 (also known as Assembly Bill harmful effects 2140) limits the State of California’s share of disaster relief funds paid out of a hazard. to local governments to 75 percent of the funds not paid for by federal disaster relief efforts, unless the jurisdiction has adopted a valid hazard mitigation plan consistent with the Disaster Management Act of 2000 and has incorporated the hazard mitigation plan into the jurisdiction’s general plan. In these cases, the State may cover more than 75 percent of the remaining disaster relief costs. All cities and counties in California must prepare a general plan, which must include a safety element that addresses various hazard conditions and other public safety issues. The safety element may be a stand- alone chapter or incorporated into another section, as the community wishes. California Government Code Section 65302.6 indicates that a community may adopt an LHMP into its safety element as long as the LHMP meets applicable state requirements. This allows communities to use the LHMP to satisfy state requirements for safety elements. As the General Plan is an overarching long-term plan for community growth and development, incorporating the LHMP into it creates a stronger mechanism for implementing the LHMP. California Government Code Section 65302 (g)(4) California Government Code Section 65302 (g)(4), also known as Senate Bill (SB) 379, requires that the safety element of a community’s general plan address the hazards created or exacerbated by climate change. The safety element must identify how climate change is expected to affect hazard conditions in the community and include measures to adapt and be more resilient to these anticipated changes. Because the LHMP can be incorporated into the safety element, including these items in the LHMP can satisfy the state requirement. SB 379 requires that climate change must be addressed in the safety element when the LHMP is updated after January 1, 2017, for communities that already have an LHMP, or by January 1, 2022, for communities without an LHMP. 1-2 Local Hazard Mitigation Plan | Public Review Draft City of La Palma This LHMP is consistent with current standards and regulations, as outlined by the California Office of Emergency Services (Cal OES) and FEMA. It uses the best available science, and its mitigation measures reflect best practices and community values. It meets the requirements of current state and federal guidelines and makes La Palma eligible for all appropriate benefits under state and federal law and practices. Note that while FEMA is responsible for reviewing and certifying this LHMP, and Cal OES is responsible for conducting a preliminary review, it does not grant FEMA or Cal OES any increased role in the governance of La Palma or authorize either agency to take any specific action in the community. PLAN ORGANIZATION AND USE The La Palma LHMP is both a reference document and an action plan. It has information and resources to educate readers and decision makers about hazard events and related issues, and a comprehensive strategy that the City and community members can follow up to improve resiliency in La Palma. It is divided into the following FEMA’s Local Mitigation Planning Handbook, last updated in 2013, is one of the key guidance documents chapters: for local communities in preparing hazard mitigation plans. • Chapter 1: Introduction. This chapter describes the background of the Plan, its goals and objectives, and the process used in its development. • Chapter 2: Community Profile. This chapter discusses the history of La Palma, its physical setting and land uses, its demographics, and other important community characteristics. • Chapter 3: Hazard Assessment. This chapter identifies and describes the hazards that pose a threat to La Palma and discusses past and future events as well as the effects of climate change. • Chapter 4: Vulnerability Assessment. This chapter describes the threat of each hazard on La Palma’s critical facilities and community members, including socially vulnerable individuals. • Chapter 5: Mitigation Strategy. This chapter lists the mitigation actions to reduce La Palma’s vulnerability to hazard events, as well as provides an overview of the community’s existing capabilities to improve hazard resiliency. • Chapter 6: Plan Maintenance. This chapter summarizes the process for implementing, monitoring, and updating the LHMP, as well as opportunities for continued public involvement. 1-3 Local Hazard Mitigation Plan | Public Review Draft City of La Palma • Chapter 7: References. This chapter lists all the databases,
Recommended publications
  • The Commercial Property Owner's Guide to Earthquake Safety
    Commercial Property Owner’s Guide to Earthquake Safety 2006 Edition Published by the California Seismic Safety Commission State of California Arnold Schwarzenegger, Governor SSC No. 06-02 This 2006 Edition of the Commercial Property Owner’s Guide to Earthquake Safety replaces the 1998 Edition on October 1, 2006. Publishing Information The Commercial Property Owner’s Guide to Earthquake Safety was developed and published by the California Seismic Safety Commission. It was distributed under the provisions of the Library Distribution Act and Government Code Section 11096. Copyrighted 2006 by the California Seismic Safety Commission All rights reserved Legislation This guide has been developed and adopted by the California Seismic Safety Commission as required by the Business and Professions Code Section 10147. Ordering Information Copies of this booklet are available from the California Seismic Safety Commission, 1755 Creekside Oaks Drive, Suite 100, Sacramento, CA 95833. To order call (916) 263-5506 or download via our website at http://www.seismic.ca.gov/sscpub.htm On the Cover: The roof of this department store was not well connected to its walls and partially collapsed in Yucca Valley during the 1992 Landers Earthquake. ii The Commercial Property Owner’s Guide to Earthquake Safety CONTENTS Page Page INTRODUCTION ..................................................1 OTHER EARTHQUAKE-RELATED Your Commercial Property and the Law ..............2 CONCERNS ........................................... 26 Recommendations ...............................................3
    [Show full text]
  • Metrolink Station Parking Management Study
    REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) 9-0267 METROLINK STATION PARKING MANAGEMENT STUDY ORANGE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY 550 South Main Street P.O. Box 14184 Orange, CA 92863-1584 (714) 560-6282 Key RFP Dates Issue Date: April 17, 2009 Pre-Proposal Conference Date: April 30, 2009 Question Submittal Date: May 5, 2009 Proposal Submittal Date: May 18, 2009 Interview Date: June 10, 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE NOTICE FOR REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS i SECTION I INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS 1 SECTION II PROPOSAL CONTENT 7 SECTION III EVALUATION AND AWARD 13 A. EVALUATION CRITERIA 14 B. EVALUATION PROCEDURE 14 C. AWARD 15 D. NOTIFICATION OF AWARD AND DEBRIEFING 15 EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF WORK 17 EXHIBIT B COST AND PRICE FORMS 18 EXHIBIT C PROPOSED AGREEMENT 20 EXHIBIT D FORMS 21 EXHIBIT E THE DRUG FREE WORKPLACE ACT OF 1988 32 April 17, 2009 BOARD OF DIRECTORS Peter Buffa Chairman SUBJECT: NOTICE OF REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS Jerry Amante Vice-Chairman RFP 9-0267: “METROLINK STATION PARKING Patricia Bates MANAGEMENT STUDY Director Art Brown Gentlemen/Ladies: Director Bill Campbell Director The Orange County Transportation Authority invites proposals from qualified consultants for the Metrolink Stations Parking Management Study for Orange Carolyn V. Cavecche Director County Metrolink Stations. Consultants shall research, review and William J. Dalton recommend a range of options for best strategies to optimize and effectively Director manage limited parking supply at eleven Metrolink stations. Richard Dixon Director Proposals must be received in the Orange County Transportation Paul G. Glaab Director Authority's office at or before 2:00 p.m. on May 18, 2009.
    [Show full text]
  • New Empirical Relationships Among Magnitude, Rupture Length, Rupture Width, Rupture Area, and Surface Displacement
    Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, Vol. 84, No. 4, pp. 974-1002, August 1994 New Empirical Relationships among Magnitude, Rupture Length, Rupture Width, Rupture Area, and Surface Displacement by Donald L. Wells and Kevin J. Coppersmith Abstract Source parameters for historical earthquakes worldwide are com­ piled to develop a series of empirical relationships among moment magnitude (M), surface rupture length, subsurface rupture length, downdip rupture width, rupture area, and maximum and average displacement per event. The resulting data base is a significant update of previous compilations and includes the ad­ ditional source parameters of seismic moment, moment magnitude, subsurface rupture length, downdip rupture width, and average surface displacement. Each source parameter is classified as reliable or unreliable, based on our evaluation of the accuracy of individual values. Only the reliable source parameters are used in the final analyses. In comparing source parameters, we note the fol­ lowing trends: (1) Generally, the length of rupture at the surface is equal to 75% of the subsurface rupture length; however, the ratio of surface rupture length to subsurface rupture length increases with magnitude; (2) the average surface dis­ placement per event is about one-half the maximum surface displacement per event; and (3) the average subsurface displacement on the fault plane is less than the maximum surface displacement but more than the average surface dis­ placement. Thus, for most earthquakes in this data base, slip on the fault plane at seismogenic depths is manifested by similar displacements at the surface. Log-linear regressions between earthquake magnitude and surface rupture length, subsurface rupture length, and rupture area are especially well correlated, show­ ing standard deviations of 0.25 to 0.35 magnitude units.
    [Show full text]
  • 16. Watershed Assets Assessment Report
    16. Watershed Assets Assessment Report Jingfen Sheng John P. Wilson Acknowledgements: Financial support for this work was provided by the San Gabriel and Lower Los Angeles Rivers and Mountains Conservancy and the County of Los Angeles, as part of the “Green Visions Plan for 21st Century Southern California” Project. The authors thank Jennifer Wolch for her comments and edits on this report. The authors would also like to thank Frank Simpson for his input on this report. Prepared for: San Gabriel and Lower Los Angeles Rivers and Mountains Conservancy 900 South Fremont Avenue, Alhambra, California 91802-1460 Photography: Cover, left to right: Arroyo Simi within the city of Moorpark (Jaime Sayre/Jingfen Sheng); eastern Calleguas Creek Watershed tributaries, classifi ed by Strahler stream order (Jingfen Sheng); Morris Dam (Jaime Sayre/Jingfen Sheng). All in-text photos are credited to Jaime Sayre/ Jingfen Sheng, with the exceptions of Photo 4.6 (http://www.you-are- here.com/location/la_river.html) and Photo 4.7 (digital-library.csun.edu/ cdm4/browse.php?...). Preferred Citation: Sheng, J. and Wilson, J.P. 2008. The Green Visions Plan for 21st Century Southern California. 16. Watershed Assets Assessment Report. University of Southern California GIS Research Laboratory and Center for Sustainable Cities, Los Angeles, California. This report was printed on recycled paper. The mission of the Green Visions Plan for 21st Century Southern California is to offer a guide to habitat conservation, watershed health and recreational open space for the Los Angeles metropolitan region. The Plan will also provide decision support tools to nurture a living green matrix for southern California.
    [Show full text]
  • Los Angeles County
    Steelhead/rainbow trout resources of Los Angeles County Arroyo Sequit Arroyo Sequit consists of about 3.3 stream miles. The arroyo is formed by the confluence of the East and West forks, from where it flows south to enter the Pacific Ocean east of Sequit Point. As part of a survey of 32 southern coastal watersheds, Arroyo Sequit was surveyed in 1979. The O. mykiss sampled were between about two and 6.5 inches in length. The survey report states, “Historically, small steelhead runs have been reported in this area” (DFG 1980). It also recommends, “…future upstream water demands and construction should be reviewed to insure that riparian and aquatic habitats are maintained” (DFG 1980). Arroyo Sequit was surveyed in 1989-1990 as part of a study of six streams originating in the Santa Monta Mountains. The resulting report indicates the presence of steelhead and states, “Low streamflows are presently limiting fish habitat, particularly adult habitat, and potential fish passage problems exist…” (Keegan 1990a, p. 3-4). Staff from DFG surveyed Arroyo Sequit in 1993 and captured O. mykiss, taking scale and fin samples for analysis. The individuals ranged in length between about 7.7 and 11.6 inches (DFG 1993). As reported in a distribution study, a 15-17 inch trout was observed in March 2000 in Arroyo Sequit (Dagit 2005). Staff from NMFS surveyed Arroyo Sequit in 2002 as part of a study of steelhead distribution. An adult steelhead was observed during sampling (NMFS 2002a). Additional documentation of steelhead using the creek between 2000-2007 was provided by Dagit et al.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Azusa Local Hazard Mitigation Plan October 2018
    City of Azusa Local Hazard Mitigation Plan October 2018 Executive Summary The City of Azusa prepared this Local Hazard Mitigation Plan (LHMP) to guide hazard mitigation planning to better protect the people and property of the City from the effects of natural disasters and hazard events. This plan demonstrates the community’s commitment to reducing risks from hazards and serves as a tool to help decision makers direct mitigation activities and resources. This plan was also developed in order for the City to be eligible for certain federal disaster assistance, specifically, the Federal Emergency Management Agency’s (FEMA) Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP), Pre-Disaster Mitigation (PDM) Program, and the Flood Mitigation Assistance (FMA) Program. Each year in the United States, natural disasters take the lives of hundreds of people and injure thousands more. Nationwide, taxpayers pay billions of dollars annually to help communities, organizations, businesses, and individuals recover from disasters. These monies only partially reflect the true cost of disasters, because additional expenses to insurance companies and nongovernmental organizations are not reimbursed by tax dollars. Many natural disasters are predictable, and much of the damage caused by these events can be alleviated or even eliminated. The purpose of hazard mitigation is to reduce or eliminate long- term risk to people and property from hazards LHMP Plan Development Process Hazard mitigation planning is the process through which hazards that threaten communities are identified, likely impacts determined, mitigation goals set, and appropriate mitigation strategies determined, prioritized, and implemented. This plan documents the hazard mitigation planning process and identifies relevant hazards and vulnerabilities and strategies the City will use to decrease vulnerability and increase resiliency and sustainability in the community.
    [Show full text]
  • Safety Element
    GENERALPLAN SAFETY ELEMENT Draft Plan January 15, 2017 Approved by Planning Commission March 7, 2017 Adopted by Montebello City Council March 8, 2017 CITY OF MONTEBELLO – GENERAL PLAN SAFETY ELEMENT LOGO MONTEBELLO CITY COUNCIL VIVIAN ROMERO, MAYOR WILLIAM M. MOLINARU, MAYOR PRO TEM ART BARAJAS, COUNCILMEMBER VANESSAL DELGADO, COUNCILMEMBER JACK HADJINIAN, COUNCLMEMBER MONTEBELLO PLANNING COMMISSION DANIEL GONZALEZ, CHAIR KEVORK BAGOIAN, VICE CHAIR SONA MOORADIAN, COMMISSIONER BRISSA SOTELO, COMMISSIONER SERGIO ZAZUETA, COMMISSIONER CITY ADMINISTRATION FRANCESCA TUCKER-SCHUYLER, CITY MANAGER DANILO BATSON, ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER CITY STAFF BEN KIM, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DAN FRANCES, FIRE CHIEF KEVIN MCCLURE, POLICE CHIEF DAVID SOSNOWSKI, DIRECTOR OF RECREATION AND COMMUNITY SERVICES TOM BARRIO, DIRECTOR OF TRANSPORTATION STEVE KWON, DIRECTOR OF FINANCE KURT JOHNSON, FIRE MARSHALL CONSULTANTS CALIFORNIA CONSULTING EMERGENCY PLANNING CONSULTING City of Montebello | General Plan Safety Element | January 2017 - 2 - CITY OF MONTEBELLO – GENERAL PLAN SAFETY ELEMENT LOGO THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY City of Montebello | General Plan Safety Element | January 2017 - 3 - CITY OF MONTEBELLO – GENERAL PLAN SAFETY ELEMENT LOGO TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................. 6 PURPOSE AND SCOPE ..................................................................................................... 6 REGULATORY FRAMEWORK ..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Instrumented 7-Storey Reinforced Concrete Building in Van Nuys, California: Description of the Damage from the 1994 Northridge Earthquake and Strong Motion Data
    UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA Department of Civil Engineering INSTRUMENTED 7-STOREY REINFORCED CONCRETE BUILDING IN VAN NUYS, CALIFORNIA: DESCRIPTION OF THE DAMAGE FROM THE 1994 NORTHRIDGE EARTHQUAKE AND STRONG MOTION DATA by M.D. Trifunac, S.S. IvanoviüDQG0,7RGRURYVND Report CE 99-02 July, 1999 Los Angeles, California ABSTRACT This report presents photographs and description of the damage in a seven-story reinforced concrete building in the city of Van Nuys in the Los Angeles metropolitan area caused by the Northridge, California, earthquake of 17 January, 1994. This earthquake was of moderate size (ML=6.4), but occurred right beneath the densely populated San Fernando Valley and caused extensive damage to buildings and to the infrastructure. This building was located about 1.5 km east from the epicenter. It has been instrumented since 1967, and has recorded many earthquake and aftershocks, including the 1971 San Fernando, 1987 Whittier-Narrows, 1992 Landers, 1992 Big Bear, and 1994 Northridge earthquakes. This report also describes strong-motion data from nine earthquakes and three aftershocks recorded in this building, up to December of 1994. It is intended to serve as supporting documentation for studies of the seismic response of this building and the damage caused by the 1994 Northridge earthquake. A brief description of studies of this building conducted by the authors is also included, to illustrate type of analyses these data can be used for. i TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT……………………………………………………………………………….i TABLE OF CONTENTS…………………………………………………………………ii 1. INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Objectives.................................................................................................................1 1.2 Organization of this Report...................................................................................... 3 1.3 Review of Selected Studies of the VN7SH Building..............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Campbell-Bozorgnia NGA Report
    PACIFIC EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING RESEARCH CENTER Campbell-Bozorgnia NGA Ground Motion Relations for the Geometric Mean Horizontal Component of Peak and Spectral Ground Motion Parameters Kenneth W. Campbell EQECAT, Inc. Beaverton, Oregon and Yousef Bozorgnia Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center University of California, Berkeley PEER 2007/02 MAY 2007 Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. PEER 2007/02 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date Campbell-Bozorgnia NGA Ground Motion Relations for the May 2007 Geometric Mean Horizontal Component of Peak and Spectral Ground 6. Performing Organization Code Motion Parameters. 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Kenneth W. Campbell and Yousef Bozorgnia UCB/PEER 2007/02 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center 325 Davis Hall MC 1792 University of California 11. Contract or Grant No. Berkeley, CA 94720 65A0058 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered California Department of Transportation Technical report through June 2006 Engineering Service Center 1801 30th St., West Building MS-9 14. Sponsoring Agency Code Sacramento, CA 95807 06681 15. Supplementary Notes This study was sponsored by the Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center’s Program of Applied Earthquake Engineering Research of Lifelines Systems supported by the California Department of Transportation, the California Energy Commission, and the Pacific Gas and Electric Company. 16. Abstract We present a new empirical ground motion model, commonly referred to as an attenuation relationship, which we developed as part of the PEER Next Generation Attenuation of Ground Motion (NGA) Project.
    [Show full text]
  • ATN]D Illill for the Regular Meeting of June 26, 2018 on Mating Epartment: Community Deve1opmv Department Head: City Manager: Icha Flat”
    Item No. 5 City ofSouth Gatt. CITY COUNCiL ATN]D IllILL For the Regular Meeting of June 26, 2018 On mating epartment: Community Deve1opmV Department Head: City Manager: ichaFlat” SUBJECT: RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE UPDATED LOCAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN PURPOSE: Consider the Planning Commission’s recommendation to adopt the updated Local Hazard Mitigation Plan. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Following the conclusion of the public hearing, adopt Resolution adopting the updated Local Hazard Mitigation Plan, describing the City’s efforts to prepare for and respond to emergencies. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no direct fiscal impact to the City. Failure to adopt the Resolution could affect the City’s eligibility for Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) disaster mitigation funding. ALIGNMENT WITH COUNCIL GOALS: The adoption of the updated Local Hazard Mitigation Plan supports the goal of protecting strong and sustainable neighborhoods. Some naturally occurring hazards may be unavoidable, but the potential impact on the City of South Gate can be reduced through advance planning and preparation. The updated Local Hazard Mitigation Plan addresses geologic, seismic, flood, and fire hazards, as well as hazards created by human activity such as hazardous materials and incidents that call for emergency protection. ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION: The foregoing is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) under Section 15061 (b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines, which provides that CEQA only applies to projects that have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where, as here, it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA.
    [Show full text]
  • 11087020 San Gabriel River Above Whittier Narrows Dam, CA San Gabriel River Basin
    Water-Data Report 2013 11087020 San Gabriel River above Whittier Narrows Dam, CA San Gabriel River Basin LOCATION.--Lat 34°02′03″, long 118°02′14″ referenced to North American Datum of 1927, Los Angeles County, CA, Hydrologic Unit 18070106, in La Puente Grant, at Peck Road, 0.8 mi downstream from San Jose Flood Channel, 1.2 mi upstream from axis of Whittier Narrows Dam, and 1.8 mi south of El Monte. DRAINAGE AREA.--442 mi². SURFACE-WATER RECORDS PERIOD OF RECORD.--October 1955 to September 1957, October 1963 to current year. REVISED RECORDS.--WDR CA-86-1: Drainage area. GAGE.--Water-stage recorder and crest-stage gage. Elevation of gage is 220 ft above NGVD of 1929, from topographic map. COOPERATION.--Records of diversion to Rio Hondo provided by Los Angeles County Department of Public Works. REMARKS.--Records fair except for estimated daily discharges, which are poor. Flow regulated by several reservoirs, combined capacity, 123,000 acre-ft. Many diversions upstream from station for irrigation, power development, and ground-water replenishment. Colorado River water released to the San Gabriel River at site 14.9 mi upstream from gage, at Metropolitan Water District aqueduct crossing on San Dimas Creek for ground-water replenishment. Los Angeles County Department of Public Works diverted 184 acre-ft from San Gabriel River below Santa Fe Dam to Rio Hondo during the current year. See schematic diagram of San Gabriel River and Los Angeles River Basins available from the California Water Science Center. EXTREMES FOR PERIOD OF RECORD.--Maximum discharge, 46,600 ft³/s, Jan.
    [Show full text]
  • Civil and Construction Engineering O R E G O N S T a T E U N I V E R S I T Y
    SHERKOW, Franklin E. 1 Director of Civil Engineering Outreach CIVIL AND CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING O R E G O N S T A T E U N I V E R S I T Y SHERKOW, Franklin E. Director of Civil Engineering Outreach DEGREES B.S.C.E.E. - Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison (Senior Honors). B.S. - City Planning, University of Wisconsin-Madison (Senior Honors). More than 35 additional courses in management and technical areas. Trainer for the Iowa State Management Training System. Project Management Institute, Project Management Training, 2002. SERVICE ON OSU FACULTY 4 years: November 2007 to Present – Director of Civil Engineering Outreach, School of Civil and Construction Engineering, Oregon State University OTHER RELATED EXPERIENCE August 2006 to Present – Executive Vice President and CFO (August 2006 to December 2007), and Partner (August 2006 to present) Southstar Engineering and Consulting, Inc. August 2000 to August 2006 – Senior Vice President, Aztec Engineering; and Executive Vice President, Aguilar & Sherkow Consulting Engineers, Inc. September 1997 to August 2000 – Vice President and Area Manager, Parsons Transportation Group (LA and Inland Empire) – Parsons Corporation July 1995 to September 1997 - President, Sherkow Consulting November 1991 to July 1995 - Agency Director, Transportation and Land Management Agency, County of Riverside (CA) July 1990 to August 1993 - Director of Transportation, County of Riverside (CA) September 1984 to July 1990 - Transportation Director, Northeast Ohio Areawide Coordinating
    [Show full text]