DOCSLIB.ORG

2017 Directory of State and Local Government

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2017 Directory of State and Local Government DIRECTORY OF STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT Prepared by RESEARCH DIVISION LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL BUREAU February 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS Please refer to the Alphabetical Index to the Directory of State and Local Government for a complete list of agencies. NEVADA STATE GOVERNMENT ORGANIZATIONAL CHART ............................................. D-9 CONGRESSIONAL DELEGATION ............................................................................................. D-13 DIRECTORY OF STATE GOVERNMENT CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS: Attorney General ........................................................................................................................ D-15 State Controller ........................................................................................................................... D-20 Governor ..................................................................................................................................... D-21 Lieutenant Governor ................................................................................................................... D-25 Secretary of State ........................................................................................................................ D-26 State Treasurer ............................................................................................................................ D-28 EXECUTIVE BOARDS ................................................................................................................. D-29 NEVADA SYSTEM OF HIGHER EDUCATION ......................................................................... D-30 EXECUTIVE BRANCH AGENCIES: Department of Administration .................................................................................................... D-34 Administrative Services Division ........................................................................................... D-34 Division of Enterprise Information Technology Services ....................................................... D-34 Fleet Services Division ........................................................................................................... D-35 Office of Grant Procurement, Coordination and Management ............................................... D-35 Hearings Division................................................................................................................... D-36 Division of Human Resource Management ............................................................................ D-36 Division of State Library, Archives and Public Records ........................................................ D-37 State Public Works Division .................................................................................................. D-39 Purchasing Division ............................................................................................................... D-40 Risk Management Division .................................................................................................... D-40 Victims of Crime Program ..................................................................................................... D-40 State Department of Agriculture ................................................................................................. D-41 State Board of Agriculture ..................................................................................................... D-41 Division of Consumer Equitability ......................................................................................... D-41 State Quarantine Officer ......................................................................................................... D-42 Garlic and Onion Growers’ Advisory Board .......................................................................... D-42 Alfalfa Seed Advisory Board ................................................................................................. D-42 Nevada Junior Livestock Show Board ................................................................................... D-42 Rangeland Resources Commission ........................................................................................ D-43 State Predatory Animal and Rodent Committee ..................................................................... D-43 Advisory Council for Organic Agricultural Products ............................................................. D-43 State Dairy Commission ......................................................................................................... D-44 Department of Business and Industry ......................................................................................... D-45 Nevada Commission on Minority Affairs .............................................................................. D-45 Nevada Athletic Commission ................................................................................................. D-45 Office of the Nevada Attorney for Injured Workers ............................................................... D-46 Consumer Affairs Unit ........................................................................................................... D-46 Local Government Employee-Management Relations Board ................................................. D-46 Division of Financial Institutions ........................................................................................... D-46 Housing Division ................................................................................................................... D-47 Division of Industrial Relations .............................................................................................. D-47 Division of Insurance ............................................................................................................. D-48 D-3 DIRECTORY OF STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT Office of Labor Commissioner ............................................................................................... D-48 Manufactured Housing Division ............................................................................................ D-49 Division of Mortgage Lending ............................................................................................... D-49 Real Estate Division ............................................................................................................... D-50 Taxicab Authority .................................................................................................................. D-51 Nevada Transportation Authority ........................................................................................... D-51 State Department of Conservation and Natural Resources .......................................................... D-52 Division of Environmental Protection .................................................................................... D-52 Division of Forestry ............................................................................................................... D-54 Office of Historic Preservation ............................................................................................... D-54 Division of State Lands .......................................................................................................... D-55 Division of State Parks ........................................................................................................... D-56 Division of Water Resources .................................................................................................. D-56 Nevada Natural Heritage Program ......................................................................................... D-57 Sagebrush Ecosystem Council ............................................................................................... D-57 Department of Corrections.......................................................................................................... D-58 Board of State Prison Commissioners .................................................................................... D-58 Committee on Industrial Programs ......................................................................................... D-59 State Board of Education ............................................................................................................ D-60 State Board of Education and State Board for Career and Technical Education ..................... D-60 Department of Education ............................................................................................................ D-60 State Public Charter School Authority ................................................................................... D-61 Commission on Educational Technology ............................................................................... D-61 State Council for the Coordination of the Interstate Compact on Educational Opportunity for Military Children ................................................................... D-62 Advisory Council on Parental Involvement and Family Engagement .................................... D-62 Office of Parental Involvement and Family Engagement ....................................................... D-62 Office for a Safe and Respectful Learning Environment ........................................................ D-62 Teachers and Leaders Council of Nevada .............................................................................. D-62 Council to Establish
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Philanthropic Landscape
    SNAPSHOT OF TODAY’S PHILANTHROPIC LANDSCAPE A Guide to Philanthropy in the U.S. 8th Edition, 2019 Letter// INTRODUCTION: from the Reflections Chairman on the Latest Data In 2018, charitable giving in the United States reached a record-breaking $427 billion reported in contributions from individuals, companies, foundations, and charitable bequests. Despite this extraordinary number, there are some underlying trends which raise concerns about the participation of American households in charitable giving. Annual surveys, such as the Philanthropy Panel Study by the IUPUI Lilly Family School of Philanthropy, indicate that the percentage of American households that report making charitable gifts has declined. The most significant dip was during the financial crisis in 2009 with an estimated 14 million fewer U.S. households reporting charitable gifts. Evidence of this trend can be seen in decreasing support in the religious sector, declining alumni participation rates at many educational institutions, and lower engagement in several leading corporate matching gift programs. In contrast, the philanthropic activity of American households with an income of $200,000 or more is growing in significance as evidenced by large publicly reported charitable gifts, institutional fundraising success stories, and an influx of personal assets into donor-advised funds. Those who do give are giving considerably more. There are more than one million registered nonprofit organizations in the United States. How these institutions respond to these trends will affect their revenue streams well into the future. With this in mind, we have endeavored to consolidate many insightful reports on giving and volunteering into this Snapshot of Today’s Philanthropic Landscape.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Organizational Characteristics on Super PAC
    The Impact of Organizational Characteristics on Super PAC Financing and Independent Expenditures Paul S. Herrnson University of Connecticut [email protected] Presented at the Meeting of the Campaign Finance Task Force, Bipartisan Policy Center, Washington, DC, April 21, 2017 (revised June 2017). 1 Exe cutive Summa ry Super PACs have grown in number, wealth, and influence since the Supreme Court laid the foundation for their formation in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, and the decisions reached by other courts and the FEC clarified the boundaries of their political participation. Their objectives and activities also have evolved. Super PACs are not nearly as monolithic as they have been portrayed by the media. While it is inaccurate to characterize them as representative of American society, it is important to recognize that they vary in wealth, mission, structure, affiliation, political perspective, financial transparency, and how and where they participate in political campaigns. Organizational characteristics influence super PAC financing, including the sums they raise. Organizational characteristics also affect super PAC independent expenditures, including the amounts spent, the elections in which they are made, the candidates targeted, and the tone of the messages delivered. The super PAC community is not static. It is likely to continue to evolve in response to legal challenges; regulatory decisions; the objectives of those who create, administer, and finance them; and changes in the broader political environment. 2 Contents I. Introduction 3 II. Data and Methods 4 III. Emergence and Development 7 IV. Organizational Characteristics 11 A. Finances 11 B. Mission 14 C. Affiliation 17 D. Financial Transparency 19 E.
    [Show full text]
  • Review and Discussion Regarding the 2017 Legislative Session with Possible Direction to Staff. (For Possible Action)
    AGENDA ITEM# 12 SUN VALLEY GENERAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT DATE: 2-3-17 TO: Board of Trustees FROM: Darrin Price – General Manager SUBJECT: Review and discussion regarding the 2017 Legislative Session with possible direction to staff. (for possible action). Every two years the Nevada Legislature meets. 2017 is here and it’s that time again. In 2014, the District cancelled its Lobbying contract with Fred Hillerby. At that time the total expenses for the lobbying contract was $1,650.00 dollars a month year round (as to include committee meetings that can and do meet when the session is closed and networking). In February of 2015, the board unanimously approved the General Manager “to act in the lobbying capacity” for the District. Per this direction I have started to assemble a team to assist me with monitoring, tracking, networking, and attending sessions, committee meetings, and general networking to establish relationships with both legislators and their staff. I registered myself, Jennifer, and Maddy as paid lobbyist for this session. The cost to register is $300.00 dollars per person, a total of $900.00 dollars. As a registered lobbyist you can track 10 bills via NELLIS. NELLIS is the Nevada Electronic Legislative Information System. It allows for PLT: What is Personalized Legislative Tracking (PLT)? · PLT allows you to subscribe to BDRs, bills, and budgets that are of interest to you, and subsequently tag and create notes on your subscriptions. · The advantage of PLT is that you will receive immediate notifications of hearings, a daily status notification, and have access to tailored, exportable reports for the subscriptions you have chosen to track.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Complaint. Thedrick Andres Answer Due 8/13/2021
    Lewis v. City of Henderson et al Doc. 19 1 ROBERT W. FREEMAN Nevada Bar No. 3062 2 [email protected] E. MATTHEW FREEMAN 3 Nevada Bar No 14198 [email protected] 4 LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP 6385 S. Rainbow Boulevard, Suite 600 5 Las Vegas, Nevada 89118 702.893.3383 6 FAX: 702.893.3789 Attorneys for Defendant 7 City of Henderson, Nevada Henderson Police Department and 8 Chief Thedrick Andres 9 10 DISTRICT COURT 11 CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA 12 *** 13 MICHAEL LEWIS, Individually and as CASE NO. 2;21-cv-1128-APG-VCF Administrator of the Estate of KEVIN LEWIS, 14 Deceased; MICHAEL LEWIS as Guardian Ad DEFENDANTS CITY OF HENDERSON, Litem of LUKE ARTHUR LEWIS, a minor, NEVADA, HENDERSON POLICE 15 and EMBER LYNN LEWIS, a minor, as heirs DEPARTMENT AND CHIEF THEDRICK of the Estate of KEVIN LEWIS, Deceased, ANDRES’ STIPULATION AND ORDER 16 FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE A Plaintiff, RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS’ 17 COMPLAINT vs. 18 CITY OF HENDERSON, NEVADA, a 19 political subdivision of the State of Nevada: HENDERSON POLICE DEPARTMENT, a 20 political subdivision of the State of Nevada; THEDRICK ANDRES, individually and as 21 policy maker and Chief of CITY OF HENDERSON POLICE DEPARTMENT; 22 DOE HENDERSON POLICE OFFICERS I through X; LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN 23 POLICE DEPARTMENT, a political subdivision of the State of Nevada; SHERIFF 24 JOE LOMBARDO, individually and as policy maker of LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN 25 POLICE DEPARTMENT; DOE LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT 26 OFFICERS, I through X; DOES I through X; and ROE ENTITIES, I through X, inclusive, 27 Defendants.
    [Show full text]
  • Election Spending 2016: Just Three Interests Dominate, Shadow Parties Continue to Rise
    Election Spending 2016: Just Three Interests Dominate, Shadow Parties Continue to Rise Ian Vandewalker *Research provided by Alexis Farmer Outside spending — expenditures by groups other than candidates themselves — is pouring into the races that will determine control of the U.S. Senate. As part of our series on money in key Senate races, the Brennan Center has examined the outside spending in 10 close contests.1 New data will become available in the next week that will allow us to paint a full picture of spending trends in 2016’s most competitive Senate races. In the meantime, our preliminary analysis reveals two important trends: The courts’ deregulation of outside money is not allowing a wider array of voices to fund elections. On the contrary, just a handful of partisan and ideological interests with vast resources, especially the major parties, are using the looser rules to increasingly monopolize election funding. The parties are shifting their resources outside the official committees, which raise money subject to contribution limits and required disclosure of donors, to super PACs and nonprofits controlled by party operatives but able to take unlimited and often secret donations. Spending Is Dominated by Just Three Interests More than half of the outside spending in key Senate races comes from just three interests: the Democratic Party, the Republican Party, and the political network founded by the industrialist Koch brothers. Counting expenditures from FEC data, media reports, and press releases, we found $321 million spent by entities other than the candidates in the 10 closest Senate races (Florida, Illinois, Indiana, Nevada, North Carolina, New Hampshire, Missouri, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin).
    [Show full text]
  • What Is Addiction?
    Methadone and Buprenorphine Maintenance: Effective Treatments for Opiate Addiction Mary Jeanne Kreek, M.D. Patrick E. and Beatrice M. Haggerty Professor Head of Laboratory The Laboratory of the Biology of Addictive Diseases The Rockefeller University Senior Physician The Rockefeller University Hospital June 11, 2019 International Conference on Opioids Boston, MA funded primarily by NIH-NIDA, NIH-NCRR and the Adelson Medical Research Foundation What is Addiction? Compulsive drug seeking behavior and drug self-administration, without regard to negative consequences to self or others. (adapted from WHO) “drug” = nicotine, alcohol – legal drugs prescription opiates, marijuana (cannabis) – medicines (?) heroin, cocaine – illegal drugs 2019 Natural History of Drug and Alcohol Abuse and Addictions relapse to addiction without pharmacotherapy 90% - opiate; Primary Possible Utility of Vaccines Medications Useful 60% - cocaine, alcohol Prevention and Selected Medications and Needed Initial Sporadic Regular Addiction Early Protracted Self-Administration Intermittent Use Withdrawal Abstinence of Drug of Abuse Use (abstinence) Progression sustain abstinence with no specific medications ADDICTION: Compulsive drug seeking behavior 10% - opiate; and drug self-administration, without regard to 40% - cocaine, alcohol negative consequences to self or others (adapted from WHO). Adapted from Kreek et al., Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 1:710, 2002; 2019 1 Prevalence of Specific Drug Abuse and Vulnerability to Develop Addictions – 2019 National Household Survey
    [Show full text]
  • The 2017 Nevada Legislative Session Review & Report Card
    The 2017 Nevada Legislative Session Review & Report Card by Daniel Honchariw Nevada Policy Research Institute 1 Composite Scores Nevada Legislature 40.66% Assembly 38.78% Senate 44.06% Democrats 15.37% Republicans 82.34% Assembly Democrats 14.89% Assembly Republicans 83.30% Senate Democrats 16.44% Senate Republicans 80.90% Gov. Sandoval*** 74.92% Individual Legislative Scores Rank Legislator Party Chamber Score 1 Robin Titus R Assembly 92.96% 2 Jim Marchant R Assembly 90.28% 3 Donald Gustavson R Senate 90.18% 4 Ira Hansen R Assembly 88.17% 5 Lisa Krasner R Assembly 86.39% 6 John Ellison R Assembly 86.38% 7 Richard McArthur R Assembly 85.83% 8 John Hambrick R Assembly 85.45% 9 Michael Roberson R Senate 82.69% 10 Jim Wheeler R Assembly 82.56% 11 Ben Kieckhefer*** R Senate 82.43% 12 Keith Pickard R Assembly 81.97% 13 Al Kramer R Assembly 81.66% 14 Chris Edwards R Assembly 81.39% 15 James Settelmeyer R Senate 80.62% 24 16 Pete Goicoechea R Senate 80.47% 17 Joseph Hardy R Senate 79.84% 18 Paul Anderson R Assembly 79.53% 19 Scott Hammond R Senate 79.36% 20 Heidi Gansert*** R Senate 77.95% 21 Jill Tolles R Assembly 77.50% 22 James Oscarson R Assembly 75.83% 23 Melissa Woodbury R Assembly 75.29% 24 Becky Harris*** R Senate 74.42% 25 Nicole Cannizzaro D Senate 20.67% 26 Skip Daly D Assembly 20.00% 27 Maggie Carlton D Assembly 18.89% 28 Patricia Farley I Senate 18.60% 29 Sandra Jauregui D Assembly 16.39% 29 William McCurdy II D Assembly 16.39% 29 Daniele Monroe-Moreno D Assembly 16.39% 29 Justin Watkins D Assembly 16.39% 33 Steve Yeager D Assembly
    [Show full text]
  • Eli Zborowski Dr
    Vol. 33-No.1 ISSN 0892-1571 September/October 2006-Elul/Tishrei 5767 ELI ZBOROWSKI DR. MIRIAM & SHELDON G. ADELSON LIFETIME ACHIEVEMENT AWARD YAD VASHEM REMEMBRANCE AWARD ne of Eli Zborowski’s most cherished childhood memories is sitting with his r. Miriam Adelson was born and raised in Israel with the shadow of the father, Moshe, in the comfort of their Zarki home on Shabbat afternoon Holocaust ever-present in her life. Her parents, the Ochshorns, fled Poland Oreading and exploring the pearls of wisdom found in Pirkei Avot, The Ethics Djust prior to the war. But significant portions of their families, who chose to of the Fathers. That warm and nurturing weekly interlude came to an abrupt halt in stay, perished during the Shoah. As Miriam so poignantly reveals, “I am the daugh- 1942 when the deportations to the death camps began. Soon after, Moshe ter of a mother who, when she was a teen, lost almost her entire family. One day Zborowski was murdered by the Poles. This thrust Eli, the oldest son, into his first everyone disappeared. I grew up feeling my mother’s pain.” Miriam recalls that fol- of many lifelong leadership roles. During the lowing the war, there was suddenly an influx of cousins in her life whom she had pre- war he was a member of the Jewish Fighters viously not known. Responding to the needs of young family members who lost their Organization, serving as a liaison between parents, the Ochshorns ghettos and non-Jewish partisan units. The brought them from family, his mother, sister, younger brother and Europe and helped himself survived the war in hiding with the help them to become estab- of righteous Poles.
    [Show full text]
  • Directory of State and Local Government
    DIRECTORY OF STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT Prepared by RESEARCH DIVISION LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL BUREAU 2020 Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS Please refer to the Alphabetical Index to the Directory of State and Local Government for a complete list of agencies. NEVADA STATE GOVERNMENT ORGANIZATIONAL CHART ............................................. D-9 CONGRESSIONAL DELEGATION ............................................................................................. D-13 DIRECTORY OF STATE GOVERNMENT CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS: Attorney General ........................................................................................................................ D-15 State Controller ........................................................................................................................... D-19 Governor ..................................................................................................................................... D-20 Lieutenant Governor ................................................................................................................... D-27 Secretary of State ........................................................................................................................ D-28 State Treasurer ............................................................................................................................ D-30 EXECUTIVE BOARDS ................................................................................................................. D-31 NEVADA SYSTEM OF HIGHER EDUCATION
    [Show full text]
  • Assembly Committee on Judiciary-2/24/2021
    MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY Eighty-First Session February 24, 2021 The Committee on Judiciary was called to order by Chairman Steve Yeager at 8:05 a.m. on Wednesday, February 24, 2021, Online. Copies of the minutes, including the Agenda (Exhibit A), the Attendance Roster (Exhibit B), and other substantive exhibits, are available and on file in the Research Library of the Legislative Counsel Bureau and on the Nevada Legislature's website at www.leg.state.nv.us/App/NELIS/REL/81st2021. COMMITTEE MEMBERS PRESENT: Assemblyman Steve Yeager, Chairman Assemblywoman Rochelle T. Nguyen, Vice Chairwoman Assemblywoman Shannon Bilbray-Axelrod Assemblywoman Lesley E. Cohen Assemblywoman Cecelia González Assemblywoman Alexis Hansen Assemblywoman Melissa Hardy Assemblywoman Heidi Kasama Assemblywoman Lisa Krasner Assemblywoman Elaine Marzola Assemblyman C.H. Miller Assemblyman P.K. O'Neill Assemblyman David Orentlicher Assemblywoman Shondra Summers-Armstrong Assemblyman Jim Wheeler COMMITTEE MEMBERS ABSENT: None GUEST LEGISLATORS PRESENT: Assemblywoman Bea Duran, Assembly District No. 11 Minutes ID: 299 *CM299* Assembly Committee on Judiciary February 24, 2021 Page 2 STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Diane C. Thornton, Committee Policy Analyst Ashlee Kalina, Assistant Committee Policy Analyst Bradley A. Wilkinson, Committee Counsel Bonnie Borda Hoffecker, Committee Manager Kalin Ingstad, Committee Secretary Melissa Loomis, Committee Assistant OTHERS PRESENT: Justin Watkins, representing Nevada Justice Association Justin Randall,
    [Show full text]
  • WAR in the WEST the Bundy Ranch Standoff and the American Radical Right
    WAR IN THE WEST The Bundy Ranch Standoff and the American Radical Right A Special Report from the Southern Poverty Law Center Montgomery, Alabama JULY 2014 southern poverty law center WAR IN THE WEST The Bundy Ranch Standoff and the American Radical Right THE SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER is a nonprofit organization that combats hate, intolerance and discrimination through education and litigation. Its Intelligence Project, which prepared this report and also produces the quarterly investigative magazine Intelligence Report, tracks the activities of hate groups and the nativist movement and monitors militia and other extremist antigovernment activity. Its Teaching Tolerance project helps foster respect and understanding in the classroom. Its litigation arm files lawsuits against hate groups for the violent acts of their members. MEDIA AND GENERAL INQUIRIES Mark Potok or Heidi Beirich Southern Poverty Law Center 400 Washington Ave., Montgomery, Ala. (334) 956-8200 www.splcenter.org This report was prepared by the staff of the Intelligence Project of the Southern Poverty Law Center. The Center is supported entirely by private donations. No government funds are involved. © Southern Poverty Law Center. All rights reserved. southern poverty law center about the report Written by Ryan Lenz and Mark Potok Edited by Heidi Beirich Designed by Russell Estes, Shannon Anderson and Sunny Paulk Cover photos by Jim Urquhart/Reuters/Corbis and Ryan Lenz southern poverty law center table of contents Executive Summary 5 Guns of April: The Bundy Standoff 8 Backgrounding Bundy: The Movement 18 Land Use and the ‘Patriots’: A Timeline 22 southern poverty law center After the climbdown: Militiamen and other support- ers of Cliven Bundy head for the corral where govern- ment agents were holding the Nevadan’s cattle.
    [Show full text]
  • Directory of State and Local Government
    DIRECTORY OF STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT Last updated July 23, 2021 Prepared by RESEARCH DIVISION LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL BUREAU APRIL 2021 The last comprehensive update of this publication was in April 2021. It is updated monthly with new information about which the Research Division is made aware. The most updated version of the Directory of State and Local Government is available on an ongoing basis at: https://www.leg.state.nv.us/Division/Research/Content/items/ directory-of-state-and-local-government Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS NEVADA STATE GOVERNMENT ORGANIZATIONAL CHART � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 15 CONGRESSIONAL DELEGATION � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 21 DIRECTORY OF STATE GOVERNMENT � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 23 EXECUTIVE BRANCH CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 24 Attorney General . .24 Office of the Attorney General . .24 Bureau of Consumer Protection . .24 Fraud Control Unit for Industrial Insurance �������������������������������������������������������������������������������24 Fraud Control Unit for Insurance . .25 Unit for the Investigation and Prosecution of Crimes Against Older Persons or Vulnerable Persons �����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������25 Medicaid Fraud Control Unit . .25 Committee on Domestic Violence . .25 Office of Ombudsman for Victims of Domestic Violence . .26 Office
    [Show full text]