DOCSLIB.ORG

2016-21 Affordable Housing Allocations by Location

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2016-21 Affordable Housing Allocations by Location 2016-21 Affordable Housing Allocations by Location Total 49,398 £1,723,523,456 London Borough Homes GLA Funding Allocation To be confirmed 27,085 £981,326,162 Barking and Dagenham 53 £2,444,000 Barnet 1,585 £45,584,000 Bexley 377 £15,708,000 Brent 813 £23,768,000 Bromley 317 £6,804,000 Camden 335 £7,360,000 City of London 13 £780,000 Croydon 1,060 £36,180,000 Ealing 1,823 £75,900,000 Enfield 662 £16,249,000 Greenwich 926 £15,652,800 Hackney 72 £2,464,000 Hammersmith and Fulham 358 £16,848,000 Haringey 528 £12,901,000 Harrow 882 £39,520,000 Havering 752 £36,296,000 Hillingdon 474 £14,911,926 Hounslow 931 £36,160,000 Islington 648 £17,824,000 Kensington and Chelsea 140 £3,568,000 Kingston upon Thames 97 £0 Lambeth 1,448 £74,640,000 Lewisham 648 £23,032,577 Merton 525 £24,396,000 Newham 1,911 £40,272,000 Redbridge 305 £8,194,000 Richmond upon Thames 364 £16,028,000 Southwark 1,314 £48,279,885 Sutton 162 £1,944,000 Tower Hamlets 1,205 £40,548,073 Waltham Forest 526 £16,028,147 Wandsworth 954 £21,911,886 Westminster 105 £0 2016-21 Affordable Housing Allocations by Housing Provider Total 49,398 £1,723,523,456 Org. Id Organisation Name Homes GLA Funding Allocation 10002 A2Dominion Homes 1,870 £80,776,000 10014 Almshouse Consortium Ltd 86 £5,160,000 10275 Brick by Brick (Croydon Council) 199 £5,572,000 10037 Catalyst Housing Limited 1,216 £41,024,000 10255 City of London 244 £14,640,000 10010 Clarion Housing Group 5,000 £168,300,000 10063 Estuary Housing Association Limited 76 £2,072,000 10283 Evolve Housing + Support 49 £2,940,000 10071 Genesis Housing Association Limited 2,049 £70,712,000 10074 Grainger Trust Ltd 34 £0 10084 Hexagon Housing Association Limited 223 £8,548,000 10085 Home Group Limited 45 £1,164,426 10094 Hyde Housing Association Limited 3,000 £102,000,000 10099 Islington and Shoreditch Housing Association Ltd 124 £6,374,200 10109 Lambeth & Southwark Housing Association Limited 4 £240,000 10122 London & Quadrant Housing 11,610 £394,740,000 10127 London Borough of Enfield 148 £5,345,000 10131 London Borough of Harrow 317 £12,620,000 10133 London Borough of Havering Council 610 £30,296,000 10135 London Borough of Hounslow 174 £9,004,000 10137 London Borough of Lambeth 912 £54,720,000 10144 London Borough of Wandsworth 71 £3,972,000 10146 Look Ahead Care and Support Ltd 38 £2,400,000 10151 Metropolitan Housing Trust Limited 704 £18,376,000 10153 Moat Homes Limited 50 £0 10156 Network Housing Group Limited 1,752 £45,756,000 10159 Newlon Housing Trust 200 £5,600,000 10163 Notting Hill Housing Trust 5,321 £176,386,962 10166 Octavia Housing 833 £31,435,500 10169 One Housing Group Limited 686 £10,184,000 10015/ 10244 Optivo 2,600 £88,400,000 10170 Orbit Group Limited 347 £14,676,000 10176 Paradigm Housing Group Limited 134 £4,008,000 10177 Paragon Community Housing Group Limited 288 £1,265,600 10179 Peabody Trust 6,000 £220,973,768 10187 Poplar HARCA Limited 144 £6,016,000 10194 Richmond Housing Partnership Limited 475 £17,748,000 10201 Sanctuary Affordable Housing Limited 11 £308,000 10210 Southern Housing Group Limited 601 £20,338,000 10165 Southwark Council 201 £12,060,000 10221 Swan Housing Association Limited 127 £5,092,000 10229 Thames Valley Housing Association Limited 418 £8,808,000 10246 Wandle Housing Association Limited 307 £7,472,000 10268 YMCA Thames Gateway 100 £6,000,000 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • BIM for Housing Associations
    BIM for housing associations Asset management in the 21st century This joint project between leading associations and industry specialists seeks to enable housing associations large and small to learn from best practice and digitise development and asset information. Its outputs will provide an opportunity for associations to innovate and lead, showing the housing sector how to use Building Information Modelling (BIM) as a tool to deliver safer, better-managed buildings. Housing associations are among the nation’s largest property developers and landlords, some with £1bn development programmes. Regardless of size, they retain new assets and manage significant portfolios. The sector has led practical innovation by constructing according to the Code for Sustainable Homes and was among the first to address ACM cladding post Grenfell. Soon a new Building Safety Regulator will place challenging requirements on building owners to use a digital record to demonstrate buildings are safe to occupy. No other sector is so well positioned to lead the agenda to evidence safety as well as secure the cost and quality benefits. What is BIM? Building Information Modelling (BIM) isn’t just about 3D models or software. It’s about the managed scoping, production, checking and delivery of digital asset information, no matter what form it takes (models, reports, schedules etc), so that it can support the asset lifecycle. Image: Southern Housing Group / Child Graddon Lewis / Child Graddon Image: Southern Housing Group The Building Safety Regulator Legislation expected by spring 2021 will require the owners of residential buildings of over 18m or six storeys to thoroughly evidence that their buildings are safe.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical and Contemporary Archaeologies of Social Housing: Changing Experiences of the Modern and New, 1870 to Present
    Historical and contemporary archaeologies of social housing: changing experiences of the modern and new, 1870 to present Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the University of Leicester by Emma Dwyer School of Archaeology and Ancient History University of Leicester 2014 Thesis abstract: Historical and contemporary archaeologies of social housing: changing experiences of the modern and new, 1870 to present Emma Dwyer This thesis has used building recording techniques, documentary research and oral history testimonies to explore how concepts of the modern and new between the 1870s and 1930s shaped the urban built environment, through the study of a particular kind of infrastructure that was developed to meet the needs of expanding cities at this time – social (or municipal) housing – and how social housing was perceived and experienced as a new kind of built environment, by planners, architects, local government and residents. This thesis also addressed how the concepts and priorities of the Victorian and Edwardian periods, and the decisions made by those in authority regarding the form of social housing, continue to shape the urban built environment and impact on the lived experience of social housing today. In order to address this, two research questions were devised: How can changing attitudes and responses to the nature of modern life between the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries be seen in the built environment, specifically in the form and use of social housing? Can contradictions between these earlier notions of the modern and new, and our own be seen in the responses of official authority and residents to the built environment? The research questions were applied to three case study areas, three housing estates constructed between 1910 and 1932 in Birmingham, London and Liverpool.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainable Districts ADEME1 Bedzed
    1. BedZed (Sutton - UK) Project description BedZED (Beddington Zero Energy Aerial view of BedZED, credit Bill Dunster Architect Development) is the UK's first and largest carbon-neutral eco-community and is located in Sutton, a residential town 40 minutes South East from London. BedZED consists of 82 residential homes with a mixture of tenures – 34 for outright sale, 23 for shared ownership, 10 for key workers and 15 at affordable rent for social housing – and 1'600 square metres of work space, an onsite shop, café, sport facilities, health centre and childcare facilities with a further 14 galleried apartments for outright sale. Residents have been living at BedZED since March 2002 and currently BedZed is home to 220 residents. The BedZED design concept was driven by the desire to create a net 'zero fossil energy development', one that will produce at least as much energy from renewable sources as it consumes. Only energy from renewable sources is used to meet the energy needs of BedZED the development is therefore a carbon neutral development - resulting in no net addition of carbon dioxide to the atmosphere. Objectives The project aims and objectives are: • No use of fossil fuels • 50% reduction of the energies used for transport • 60% reduction of the domestic energy compared to the average British households • 90% reduction of the heating needs • Usage of renewable energies • 30% reduction of water consumption • Reduce waste and encourage recycling • Use construction materials from local providers (located whithin less than a 60 km radius) • Development of local resources (farmer network for local food) • Develop biodiversity in the natural areas Driving factors The main driving factor of the BedZed project was environmental .
    [Show full text]
  • Landlords Moving Onto the UC Landlord Portal and Becoming Trusted Partners in 2017
    Registered Social Landlords moving onto the UC Landlord Portal and becoming Trusted Partners in 2017 Landlord A2Dominion Homes Limited Accent Foundation Limited Adactus Housing Association Limited Affinity Sutton Homes Limited Aldwyck Housing Group Limited Angus Council Aster Communities B3 Living Limited Basildon District Council Bassetlaw District Council Birmingham City Council Boston Mayflower Limited bpha Limited Bracknell Forest Homes Limited Broadacres Housing Association Limited Bromford Housing Association Limited Catalyst Housing Limited Chesterfield Borough Council Circle Thirty Three Housing Trust Limited Coast and Country Housing Limited Coastline Housing Limited Community Gateway Association Limited Contour Homes Limited Cornwall Council Cottsway Housing Association Limited Cross Keys Homes Limited Curo Places Limited Devon and Cornwall Housing Limited Dudley Metropolitan Borough Council Dundee City Council East Durham Homes Limited East Thames EMH Homes (East Midlands Housing and Regeneration Limited) Family Mosaic Housing Festival Housing Limited Fife Council First Choice Homes Flagship Housing Group Limited Futures Homescape Limited Genesis Housing Association Limited Great Places Housing Association Greenfields Community Housing Gwalia Housing Group Hanover Housing Association Heart Of England Housing Association Helena Partnerships Limited Highland Council Home Group Limited Housing Solutions Limited Hyde Housing Association Limited Karbon Homes Limited Kirklees Metropolitan Borough Council Knightstone Housing Association
    [Show full text]
  • GOOD NEIGHBOURS Housing Associations’ Role in Neighbourhood Governance
    GOOD NEIGHBOURS HOUSING ASSOCIATIONS’ ROLE IN NEIGHBOURHOOD GOVERNANCE niCOLA BACon, LIZ BARTLETT & Anne-MArie brADY Nicola Bacon Nicola is the Young Foundation’s Local Projects Director. She is responsible for the Foundation’s work on neighbourhoods and local innovation, which includes major initiatives on neighbourhoods and wellbeing. Liz Bartlett Liz is a Researcher in the Young Foundation’s Neighbourhoods and Local Innovation team. As well as her work on housing, Liz is also part of the team developing the Young Foundation’s work on wellbeing. Anne Marie Brady Anne Marie was an Associate at the Young Foundation until April 2007. She was responsible for managing the fieldwork for this report. Published by: CONTENTS 2 Foreword 6 Executive Summary 9 Introduction 11 The research 15 The findings 24 Implications for housing associations 29 The future? 30 Policy recommendations 35 Conclusions 36 Acknowledgments ‘Good Neighbours: The Role of Housing Associations in Neighbourhood Governance’ Summary report Copies of the full and summary reports are available at youngfoundation.org Publishing Information ISBN: 978-1-90551-04-0 Researched and written by Nicola Bacon, Liz Bartlett and Anne Marie Brady. Published by the Young Foundation, 2007 Copyright © 2007 The Young Foundation and The Housing Corporation, all rights reserved. Price £10 Further copies may be obtained from: The Young Foundation, 18 Victoria Park Square, Bethnal Green, London, E2 9PF Tel: 0208 980 6263 Online: youngfoundation.org Please note This report reflects the views of the authors only, and does not represent the views of either the members of the virtual advisory group or the Housing Corporation.
    [Show full text]
  • Our List of Registered Providers and Local Authorities
    Nationwide public sector eligibility list The public sector bodies to whom the use of this framework agreement is open, include without limitation: 1. Central government departments & their executive agencies: a list of such departments and executive agencies can be found at http://www.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/government-business/government-ministers- responsibilities.aspx 2. Non-departmental public bodies (NDPBs): a list of NDPBs can be found at annex A to the Public Bodies Directory 2007 published by the Cabinet Office) which can be found at https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/506070/An nex_-_Public_Bodies_Reform_Programme_Update_16_Dec_2015.pdf 3. All Local Authorities, (as defined in Regulation 3(2) to 3(5) inclusive of the Utilities Contracts Regulations 2006 (as amended by the Public Contracts Regulations 2015)) and all and any subsidiaries and joint-venture vehicles of those local authorities, including, but not limited to, all listed on this website: https://www.lgbce.org.uk/records- and-resources/local-authorities-in-england 4. All National Health Service (NHS) bodies, including, but not limited to, NHS Trusts as defined in the Regulation 2 of the Public Contract Regulations 2015 which, in turn, includes: 4.1. Acute trusts; 4.2. Trusts operating community hospitals and the provider functions of primary care trusts; 4.3. Primary care trusts; 4.4. Care trusts; 4.5. Care trusts plus; 4.6. Ambulance trusts; 4.7. Mental health trusts; 4.8. Strategic health authorities; 4.9. Special health authorities; 4.10. Community health councils; 4.11. Local health boards; 4.12. NHS foundation trusts; 4.13.
    [Show full text]
  • From Gatekeepers to Gateway Constructors
    Critical Perspectives on Accounting xxx (xxxx) xxx Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Critical Perspectives on Accounting journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/cpa From gatekeepers to gateway constructors: Credit rating agencies and the financialisation of housing associations ⇑ Stewart Smyth a, , Ian Cole b, Desiree Fields c a Sheffield University Management School, UK b Centre for Regional Economic and Social Research (CRESR), Sheffield Hallam University, UK c Department of Geography, University of California, Berkeley, US article info abstract Article history: This paper uses the twin metaphors of ‘gatekeeper’ and ‘gateway constructor’ as devices to Received 7 September 2017 explore the role of Credit Rating Agencies (CRAs) as intermediaries between global Revised 10 July 2019 corporate finance and specific institutions – housing associations in England. The Accepted 11 July 2019 analysis utilises a financialisation framing, whereby the practices, logics and Available online xxxx measurements of finance capital, increasingly permeate government, institutional and household behaviour and discourse. This paper examines how housing associations have Keywords: increasingly resorted to corporate bond finance, partly in response to reductions in Financialisation government funding, and in the process engaged with CRAs. Social housing Credit rating agencies Surprisingly little research has been undertaken on the role and function of CRAs, and Corporate bonds their impact on the organisations they rate. The case of housing associations (HAs) is of particular interest, given their historical social mission to build and manage properties to meet housing need, rather than operate as commercial private landlords conversant with market-based rationales. A case study of the large London-based HAs draws on a narrative and financial analysis of annual reports, supplemented by semi-structured interviews with senior HA finance officers to explore how CRA methodologies have been internalised and have contributed to changes in strategic and operational activities.
    [Show full text]
  • 6 5 2 1 3 7 9 8Q Y T U R E W I O G J H K F D S
    i s 8 7q a 3 CITY 5 e TOWER HAMLETS k p 4 1 u rf 6w y 2 9 g j t do h RADICAL HOUSING LOCATIONS Virtual Radical Housing Tour for Open House Hope you enjoyed the virtual tour. Here’s a list of the sites we visited on the tour with some hopefully useful info. Please see the map on the website https://www.londonsights.org.uk/ and https://www.morehousing.co.uk/ ENJOY… No Site Year Address Borough Built VICTORIAN PHILANTHROPISTS Prince Albert’s Model Cottage 1851 Prince Consort Lodge, Lambeth Built for the Great Exhibition 1851 and moved here. Prince Albert = President of Society for Kennington Park, Improving the Condition of the Labouring Classes. Prototype for social housing schemes. Kennington Park Place, 4 self-contained flats with inside WCs. Now HQ for Trees for Cities charity. London SE11 4AS Lambeth’s former workhouse – now the Cinema Museum 1880s The Cinema Museum Lambeth Charlie Chaplin sent here 1896 with mother and brother. Masters Lodge. 2 Dugard Way, Prince's, See website for opening times http://www.cinemamuseum.org.uk/ London SE11 4TH Parnell House 1850 Streatham Street Camden Earliest example of social housing in London. Same architect (Henry Roberts) as Model Cottage in Fitzrovia, London stop 1. Now owned by Peabody housing association (HA). Grade 2 listed. WC1A 1JB George Peabody statue Royal Exchange Avenue, City of London George Peabody - an American financier & philanthropist. Founded Peabody Trust HA with a Cornhill, charitable donation of £500k. London EC3V 3NL First flats built by Peabody HA 1863 Commercial Street Tower Now in private ownership London E1 Hamlets Peabody’s Blackfriars Road estate 1871 Blackfriars Road Southwark More typical ‘Peabody’ design.
    [Show full text]
  • Organization A2dominion Housing Group Ltd Aberdeen Standard
    Social Housing Annual Conference Thursday 9th November 200 Aldersgate, London EC1A 4HD. Sample delegate list (1 November 2017) T: +44 (0)207 772 8337 E: [email protected] Organization Job Title A2Dominion Housing Group Ltd Group Chief Exec Aberdeen Standard Investments Sales Director - Liquidity Solutions Aberdeen Standard Investments Institutional Business Development Manager Aberdeen Standard Investments Investment director, credit Accent Group Chief Executive Accent Group Executive Director of Finance & Corporate Services Al Bawardi Critchlow Managing Partner Aldwyck Housing Group Group Director of Finance Aldwyck Housing Group Group Chief Executive Aldwyck Housing Group Group chief executive Allen & Overy LLP Senior Associate Allen & Overy LLP Associate Allen & Overy LLP Consultant Altair Partner Altair Director Altair Director Altair Consultant Anchor Trust Financial Director Anthony Collins Solicitors LLP Partner Anthony Collins Solicitors LLP Partner Arawak Walton Housing Association Finance Director Arawak Walton Housing Association Deputy CEO and Executive Director, Resources ARK Consultancy Senior Consultant Assured Guaranty Director Aster Group Group chief executive Baily Garner LLP Partner Barclays Head of Social Housing, Barclays Barclays Relationship Director, Barclays Barclays Director, Barclays Barclays Director, Barclays PLC Bartra Capital Property CEO Black Country Housing Group Board Member BOARD Sector Lead – Commercial Property and Construction BOARD Business Development Manager Bond Woodhouse Managing
    [Show full text]
  • A Step by Step Guide to Giving Security
    A Step by Step Guide to Giving Security 1 Contents Page Introduction 3 Our Team 4 Team Profiles: 8 • London Office 8 • Colchester Office 12 • Leeds Office 15 Specialist team for smaller RPs and RSLs 17 Stress-free Securitisation 18 Securitisation Toolkit 19 Guide to Giving Security First Identify the Titles 20 Certificate of Title 21 Other Conditions Precedent 25 Pre-Completion Searches 26 Post-Completion Matters 27 Security Training 28 Suggested Timetable 29 Table of Confirmations 31 DEV1 Form 36 2 Introduction The purpose of this guide is to explain the legal process involved in charging properties as well as to provide practical tips to simplify the process and assist you to maximise the value of your property portfolio. We understand that the securitisation of your portfolio goes beyond just property charging. To assist with this, we have identified a number of key areas in this guide that we would recommend are reviewed as part of the overall securitisation process. We have also attached an indicative timetable setting out the necessary steps in order which can be tailored to our clients’ requirements. In our experience, it takes an average of twelve to sixteen weeks to charge a portfolio of properties with co-operation by Local Authorities. If you have any queries on this guide or would like a quote for acting for you on a charging exercise or are interested in any of the other services we have to offer, please contact Sharon Kirkham on 07932 105777 or [email protected] 3 Our Team: Sharon Kirkham Richard Sharpe Saghar
    [Show full text]
  • Affordable Housing Brochure
    Affordable Housing FCBStudios Affordable Housing 01 | Pioneering modular 02 | Medium Density 03 | Estate Regeneration 04 | Low density Feilden Clegg Bradley Studios LLP Twenty Carver’s Warehouse Studio 2 Tottenham Street 77 Dale Street 15a Calton Road London W1T 4RF Manchester M1 2HG Edinburgh United Kingdom United Kingdom EH8 8DL T +44 (0)20 7323 5737 T +44 (0)161 883 2544 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] +44 131 285 7370 Bath Brewery 5 Commercial Court Toll Bridge Road Belfast Bath BA1 7DE BT1 2NB United Kingdom United Kingdom T +44 (0)1225 852 545 T +44 (0)28 9099 2760 [email protected] [email protected] www.fcbstudios.com Great Eastern Quays Phase 2 Feilden Clegg Bradley Studios Feilden Clegg Bradley Studios is an architectural and urban design practice with an international reputation for design quality, for pioneering environmental expertise and a progressive architectural approach. From large-scale urban design to the all-important incidental spaces in our buildings, architecture can have a positive impact on society and humanity. We create buildings and spaces that develop our culture and enhance our communities. It’s also a way of life for us and gives us a platform from which to engage in wider social issues from a cycling culture to a stance on creative education and an approach to heritage in the built environment. We started small 40 years ago and have grown to over 200 staff. We continue to be committed to social and humanistic values in our work and are proud to have won the RIBA Stirling Prize for Accordia, a scheme which is widely regarded as setting a new benchmark for housing in the UK.
    [Show full text]
  • Private Renting: Can Social Landlords Help? Anne Power, Alice Belotti, Laura Lane, Bert Provan
    Private Renting: Can social landlords help? Anne Power, Alice Belotti, Laura Lane, Bert Provan CASEReport 113 January 2018 Contents Foreword ................................................................................................................................ 4 Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................ 5 Key Headlines ............................................................................................................................. 7 1. Private Renting – Can Social Landlords Help? .................................................................... 8 Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 8 History .................................................................................................................................... 8 Post-War Boom ...................................................................................................................... 9 Government Changes Tack .................................................................................................. 10 Rebirth of Private Renting.................................................................................................... 12 Demographic and tenure change ........................................................................................ 12 Conclusion ...........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]