Comparative Morphology of the Primate Tongue

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Comparative Morphology of the Primate Tongue Annals of Anatomy 223 (2019) 19–31 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Annals of Anatomy jou rnal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/aanat Invited Review Comparative morphology of the primate tongue a,b,∗ c d c Shin-ichi Iwasaki , Ken Yoshimura , Junji Shindo , Ikuo Kageyama a Department of Medical Technology and Clinical Engineering, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Hokuriku University, Kanazawa, Japan b Professor emeritus, The Nippon Dental University, Tokyo and Niigata, Japan c Department of Anatomy, The Nippon Dental University School of Life Dentistry at Niigata, Niigata, Japan d Laboratory of Wildlife Science, School of Veterinary Medicine, Kitasato University, Towada, Japan a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t Article history: To clarify the role of the primate tongue as a means to better understand the evolution of oral function Received 16 November 2018 among primates – an example of adaptation within the restricted phylogenetic group - we review the Accepted 15 January 2019 morphological knowledge of the tongues of extant primates in relation to phylogenetic classification. Prosimians tongues are more effective than those of Haplorhini for taking up food with the tongue alone, Keywords: because they are capable of fine movement when outside the oral cavity. However, the role of the tongue Primate in food uptake has diminished when juxtaposed with progress in hand manipulation of food and tools Tongue in Haplorhini, especially with the manipulation of tools by Homininae. This change in the tongue from Lingual papillae prosimians to Homininae can be regarded as degeneration in food uptake by the tongue, although the Comparative anatomy functional role of the tongue within the oral cavity has not diminished. The distribution pattern and form Functional evolution of lingual papillae, except foliate papillae, are very similar among all reported primates species. Although foliate papillae are generally well developed in Haplorhini, most prosimian species have no foliate papil- lae, or a different type of papillae that substitute for foliate papillae. There are three vallate papillae in prosimian species and the New-World macaques, Platyrrhini. These papillae exhibit an inverted V-shape and are more numerous in Old World macaques, Catarrhini. These differences seem to be the result of phylogenetic origin. © 2019 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved. Contents 1. Introduction . 20 2. Primate evolution and phylogenetics . 20 3. Comparative morphology of the tongue and lingual papillae in extant primates . 20 3.1. Strepsirrhini (Semiorder) . 21 3.1.1. Lemuriformes (Infraorder) . 21 3.1.2. Lorisiformes (Infraorder) . 22 3.2. Haplorhini (Semiorder) . 23 3.2.1. Tarsiiformes (Infraorder) . 23 3.2.2. Platyrrhini (Infraorder) . 23 3.2.3. Catarrhini (Infraorder). .24 4. Comparative morphology of the tongue and lingual papillae among species . 26 5. The tongue musculature in extant primates . 26 6. Functional role of the tongue in primate evolution . 29 7. Conclusions . 30 Acknowledgements. .30 References . 30 ∗ Corresponding author at: Department of Medical Technology and Clinical Engineering, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Hokuriku University, 1-1 Taiyo- gaoka, Kanazawa 920-1180, Ishikawa, Japan E-mail address: [email protected] (S.-i. Iwasaki). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aanat.2019.01.008 0940-9602/© 2019 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved. 20 S.-i. Iwasaki, K. Yoshimura, J. Shindo, et al. / Annals of Anatomy 223 (2019) 19–31 1. Introduction The tongue has important roles in food uptake, mastication and swallowing in most tetrapods. A movable tongue of voluntary muscle has developed through adaptation in terrestrial vertebrate evolution and has persisted in almost all extant tetrapods, irrespec- tive of their living environment (Iwasaki, 2002). Recently, Iwasaki et al. (2019) reported significant variations in the role of the tongue in tetrapods. On the one hand, the tongue can be extremely impor- tant in food uptake, as in frogs of the Amphibia, chameleons of the Reptilia and humming birds of the Aves. On the other hand, the role of the tongue is significantly diminished in a few species of frogs, turtle species and some bird species. Naturally, in the latter case, the tongue cannot play an important role in food uptake, mastication or swallowing. The degenerative tendency of the tongue illustrated Fig. 1. Classification of extant primate genera from order to infraorder, as compared by these examples is a form of evolutionary specialization. How- with the results of molecular phylogenetic analysis. The red underlining shows five ever, the mechanism by which this form of degeneration originated groups (infraorder) of the systematic classification. The blue asterisks show the five during the process of evolution has not been described. groups identified by molecular phylogenetic analysis. Unlike that of all other vertebrates, the human tongue has an extremely unusual role as the essential organ of spoken language. split - the first divergence after the appearance of the primates - This function also exemplifies evolutionary specialization of the namely, the estimation before the Cretaceous-Paleogene extinc- vertebrate tongue. An important challenge is to clarify the evolu- tion (Springer et al., 2012; Pozzi et al., 2014), and that after the tionary process underlying this function. However, we first need to Cretaceous-Paleogene extinction (Martin 1993; Chatterjee et al., clarify morphological knowledge of the tongues of extant primates 2009; O’Leary et al., 2013). Strepsirrhini is thought to be the in relation to phylogenetic classification. Before describing the evo- ancestor of all extant prosimians (Whitten and Brockman, 2001). lution of the anthropoid tongue prior to the appearance of humans, Molecular and fossil evidence (Goodman et al., 1998) suggested that the role of the primate tongue should be considered in order to Strepsirrhini divided into Lemuriformes and Loriformes, which is better understand how oral function evolved among primates, an thought to be the ancestor of lemurs, lorises and allies, whereas example of adaptation within a restricted phylogenetic group. In Haplorhines divided into Tarsiiformes, the putative ancestor of tar- particular, among primates the tongue of the human, Homo sapi- siers, which are classified as prosimians, and Anthropoides, after ens, has achieved significant specialization in language acquisition. the Cretaceous-Paleogene extinction. Furthermore, Anthropoides Taken together, these analyses may improve our understanding of divided into Platyrrhini, which is thought to be the ancestor of New the evolutionary role of the human tongue. World monkeys, and Catarrhini, the putative ancestor of Old World In this report, we review the relevant literature in order to clarify monkeys. The divergence of the Catarrhini groups Hominoidea and the morphological differences and similarities of primate tongues, Cercopithecidea is estimated to have occurred 23 to 29 Mya (Raaum including the human tongue. We hope that our findings will lead et al., 2005; Chatterjee et al., 2009; Steiper and Young, 2009). In to new hypotheses on the functional role of the primate tongue, addition, the divergence of genus Homo and genus Pan is estimated including that of humans which combine insights from different to have occurred 6 Mya (Raaum et al., 2005). fields, thus yielding a more comprehensive understanding of pri- In a review of primate phylogenetics, Perelman et al. (2011) mate evolution. estimated the extant number of primate species at 261 to 377, and 67 to 69 primate genera originated from a common ances- tor (Goodman et al., 1998; Grove, 2001; Wilson and Reeder, 2005). 2. Primate evolution and phylogenetics Data is accumulating on the numbers of primate species and gen- era. Although there are several different classifications of extant The amniotic Synapsids include the original mammalian ances- primates (Goodman et al., 1998; Groves, 2001; Miller et al., 2005; tor and are thought to have diverged from a Sauropsid reptile Masters et al., 2007; Disotell, 2008; Perelman et al., 2011; Fleagle, during the late Carboniferous, about 320 to 315 million years ago 2013; Pozzi et al., 2014), there are five primate infraorders, namely (Mya), i.e., just a few tens of millions of years after the appearance Lemuriformes, Lorisiformes, Tarsiiformes, Platyrrhini and Catar- of the first amniotes in the mid-Carboniferous, around 340 Mya rhini, according to a recent classification, as shown in Fig. 1 (Carroll, 1992; Steward, 1997; Laurin and Gauthier, 2011). At the (Disotell, 2008; Fleagle, 2013). On the basis of the most recent end of the Mesozoic, the Cretaceous-Paleogene extinction around molecular phylogenetic analysis, Pozzi et al. (2014) reported that 65.5 Mya decisively changed the interrelationship between reptiles extant primates can be divided into five groups; Lorisiformes, and mammals (Alvarez et al., 1980; Schulte et al., 2010). During Lemuriformes, Haplorhini, Anthropoidea and Catarrhini. How- this event, all non-avian dinosaurs, ammonites, Mosasaurus, Ple- ever, in a classification of extant primate genera, Haplorhini is a siosaurus, and many groups of mammals suddenly disappeared semiorder that includes the suborders Tarsiiformes and Anthro- (MacLeod et al., 1997). The consensus is that mammals began to poidea, and the suborder Anthropoidea includes the infraorders rapidly diversify during the Paleogene period after the Cretaceous- Platyrrhini and Catarrhini (Disotell, 2008; Fleagle, 2013). This dis-
Recommended publications
  • Development Team
    Paper No. : 14 Human Origin and Evolution Module : 09 Classification and Distribution of Living Primates Development Team Principal Investigator Prof. Anup Kumar Kapoor Department of Anthropology, University of Delhi Dr. Satwanti Kapoor (Retd Professor) Paper Coordinator Department of Anthropology, University of Delhi Mr. Vijit Deepani & Prof. A.K. Kapoor Content Writer Department of Anthropology, University of Delhi Prof. R.K. Pathak Content Reviewer Department of Anthropology, Panjab University, Chandigarh 1 Classification and Distribution of Living Primates Anthropology Description of Module Subject Name Anthropology Paper Name Human Origin and Evolution Module Name/Title Classification and Distribution of Living Primates Module Id 09 Contents: Primates: A brief Outline Classification of Living Primates Distribution of Living Primates Summary Learning Objectives: To understand the classification of living primates. To discern the distribution of living primates. 2 Classification and Distribution of Living Primates Anthropology Primates: A brief Outline Primates reside at the initial stage in the series of evolution of man and therefore constitute the first footstep of man’s origin. Primates are primarily mammals possessing several basic mammalian features such as presence of mammary glands, dense body hair; heterodonty, increased brain size, endothermy, a relatively long gestation period followed by live birth, considerable capacity for learning and behavioural flexibility. St. George J Mivart (1873) defined Primates (as an order)
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of the Lepilemuridae-Cheirogaleidae Clade
    The evolution of the Lepilemuridae-Cheirogaleidae clade By Curswan Allan Andrews Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY In the Faculty of SCIENCE at the NELSON MANDELA UNIVERSITY Promoters Prof. Judith C. Masters Dr. Fabien G.S. Génin Prof. Graham I.H. Kerley April 2019 1 i Dedication To my mothers’ Cecelia Andrews & Johanna Cloete ii DECLARATION FULL NAME: Curswan Allan Andrews STUDENT NUMBER: 214372952 QUALIFICATION: Doctor of Philosophy DECLARATION: In accordance with Rule G5.6.3, I hereby declare that the above-mentioned thesis is my own work and that it has not previously been submitted for assessment to another University or for another qualification. Signature ________________ Curswan Andrews iii ABSTRACT The Lepilemuridae and the Cheirogaleidae, according to recent molecular reconstructions, share a more recent common ancestor than previously thought. Further phylogenetic reconstructions have indicated that body size evolution in this clade was marked by repeated dwarfing events that coincided with changes in the environment. I aimed to investigate the morphological implications of changes in body size within the Lepilemur-cheirogaleid clade, testing four predictions. Together with Dr. Couette, I collected data on the overall palate shape and predicted that shape is likely to be influenced by several factors including phylogeny, body size and diet. Geometric morphometric analyses revealed that, although a strong phylogenetic signal was detected, diet had the major effect on palate shape. In a similar vein, when examining the arterial circulation patterns in these taxa, I predicted that changes in body size would result in changes and possible reductions in arterial size, particularly the internal carotid artery (ICA) and stapedial artery (SA).
    [Show full text]
  • Enrichment for Nonhuman Primates, 2005
    A six-booklet series on providing appropriate enrichment for baboons, capuchins, chimpanzees, macaques, marmosets and tamarins, and squirrel monkeys. Contents ...... Introduction Page 4 Baboons Page 6 Background Social World Physical World Special Cases Problem Behaviors Safety Issues References Common Names of the Baboon Capuchins Page 17 Background Social World Physical World Special Cases Problem Behaviors Safety Issues Resources Common Names of Capuchins Chimpanzees Page 28 Background Social World Physical World Special Cases Problem Behaviors Safety Issues Resources Common Names of Chimpanzees contents continued on next page ... Contents Contents continued… ...... Macaques Page 43 Background Social World Physical World Special Cases Problem Behaviors Safety Issues Resources Common Names of the Macaques Sample Pair Housing SOP -- Macaques Marmosets and Tamarins Page 58 Background Social World Physical World Special Cases Safety Issues References Common Names of the Callitrichids Squirrel Monkeys Page 73 Background Social World Physical World Special Cases Problem Behaviors Safety Issues References Common Names of Squirrel Monkeys ..................................................................................................................... For more information, contact OLAW at NIH, tel (301) 496-7163, e-mail [email protected]. NIH Publication Numbers: 05-5745 Baboons 05-5746 Capuchins 05-5748 Chimpanzees 05-5744 Macaques 05-5747 Marmosets and Tamarins 05-5749 Squirrel Monkeys Contents Introduction ...... Nonhuman primates maintained in captivity have a valuable role in education and research. They are also occasionally used in entertainment. The scope of these activities can range from large, accredited zoos to small “roadside” exhib- its; from national primate research centers to small academic institutions with only a few monkeys; and from movie sets to street performers. Attached to these uses of primates comes an ethical responsibility to provide the animals with an environment that promotes their physical and behavioral health and well-be- ing.
    [Show full text]
  • Fascinating Primates 3/4/13 8:09 AM Ancient Egyptians Used Traits of an Ibis Or a Hamadryas Used Traits Egyptians Ancient ) to Represent Their God Thoth
    © Copyright, Princeton University Press. No part of this book may be distributed, posted, or reproduced in any form by digital or mechanical means without prior written permission of the publisher. Fascinating Primates Fascinating The Beginning of an Adventure Ever since the time of the fi rst civilizations, nonhuman primates and people have oc- cupied overlapping habitats, and it is easy to imagine how important these fi rst contacts were for our ancestors’ philosophical refl ections. Long ago, adopting a quasi- scientifi c view, some people accordingly regarded pri- mates as transformed humans. Others, by contrast, respected them as distinct be- ings, seen either as bearers of sacred properties or, conversely, as diabolical creatures. A Rapid Tour around the World In Egypt under the pharaohs, science and religion were still incompletely separated. Priests saw the Papio hamadryas living around them as “brother baboons” guarding their temples. In fact, the Egyptian god Thoth was a complex deity combining qualities of monkeys and those of other wild animal species living in rice paddies next to temples, all able to sound the alarm if thieves were skulking nearby. At fi rst, baboons represented a local god in the Nile delta who guarded sacred sites. The associated cult then spread through middle Egypt. Even- tually, this god was assimilated by the Greeks into Hermes Trismegistus, the deity measuring and interpreting time, the messenger of the gods. One conse- quence of this deifi cation was that many animals were mummifi ed after death to honor them. Ancient Egyptians used traits of an ibis or a Hamadryas Baboon (Papio hamadryas) to represent their god Thoth.
    [Show full text]
  • Diets of Howler Monkeys
    Chapter 2 Diets of Howler Monkeys Pedro Américo D. Dias and Ariadna Rangel-Negrín Abstract Based on a bibliographical review, we examined the diets of howler mon- keys to compile a comprehensive overview of their food resources and document dietary diversity. Additionally, we analyzed the effects of rainfall, group size, and forest size on dietary variation. Howlers eat nearly all available plant parts in their habitats. Time dedicated to the consumption of different food types varies among species and populations, such that feeding behavior can range from high folivory to high frugivory. Overall, howlers were found to use at least 1,165 plant species, belonging to 479 genera and 111 families as food sources. Similarity in the use of plant taxa as food sources (assessed with the Jaccard index) is higher within than between howler species, although variation in similarity is higher within species. Rainfall patterns, group size, and forest size affect several dimensions of the dietary habits of howlers, such that, for instance, the degree of frugivory increases with increased rainfall and habitat size, but decreases with increasing group size in groups that live in more productive habitats. Moreover, the range of variation in dietary habits correlates positively with variation in rainfall, suggesting that some howler species are habitat generalists and have more variable diets, whereas others are habi- tat specialists and tend to concentrate their diets on certain plant parts. Our results highlight the high degree of dietary fl exibility demonstrated by the genus Alouatta and provide new insights for future research on howler foraging strategies. Resumen Con base en una revisión bibliográfi ca, examinamos las dietas de los monos aulladores para describir exhaustivamente sus recursos alimenticios y la diversidad de su dieta.
    [Show full text]
  • The Survival of the Central American Squirrel Monkey
    SIT Graduate Institute/SIT Study Abroad SIT Digital Collections Independent Study Project (ISP) Collection SIT Study Abroad Fall 2005 The urS vival of the Central American Squirrel monkey (Saimiri oerstedi): the habitat and behavior of a troop on the Burica Peninsula in a conservation context Liana Burghardt SIT Study Abroad Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcollections.sit.edu/isp_collection Part of the Animal Sciences Commons, and the Environmental Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Burghardt, Liana, "The urS vival of the Central American Squirrel monkey (Saimiri oerstedi): the habitat and behavior of a troop on the Burica Peninsula in a conservation context" (2005). Independent Study Project (ISP) Collection. 435. https://digitalcollections.sit.edu/isp_collection/435 This Unpublished Paper is brought to you for free and open access by the SIT Study Abroad at SIT Digital Collections. It has been accepted for inclusion in Independent Study Project (ISP) Collection by an authorized administrator of SIT Digital Collections. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Survival of the Central American Squirrel monkey (Saimiri oerstedi): the habitat and behavior of a troop on the Burica Peninsula in a conservation context Liana Burghardt Carleton College Fall 2005 Burghardt 2 I dedicate this paper which documents my first scientific adventure in the field to my father. “It is often necessary to put aside the objective measurements favored in controlled laboratory environments and to adopt a more subjective naturalistic viewpoint in order to see pattern and consistency in the rich, varied context of the natural environment” (Baldwin and Baldwin 1971: 48). Acknowledgments This paper has truly been an adventure and as is common I have many people I wish to thank.
    [Show full text]
  • Common Squirrel Monkey Scientific Name: Saimiri Sciureus
    Common Squirrel Monkey Scientific Name: Saimiri sciureus Class: Mammalia Order: Primates Family: Cebidae The head and body length is 10.4 to 14.4 in.; tail length is 14 to 17 in; and weight is 2.5 to 3.7 lb. The tail is not prehensile. These diurnal monkeys are arboreal and only occasionally descend to the ground. Movement is quadrupedal with relatively little leaping. Ranges are often ill-defined and troops may number into the 40-50 range. During the mating season males establish a dominance hierarchy through fierce fighting with the higher-ranking individuals then interacting with the females. The females establish a dominance hierarchy during pregnancy. After the birth of the young, females exclude the males. The newborn cling to their mothers back for the first few weeks of life. Independence is achieved at 1 year. Range East of the Andes from Colombia and northern Peru to north- eastern Brazil Habitat Primary and secondary forests, cultivated areas, usually along streams Gestation 152-172 days Litter 1 Behavior These diurnal monkeys are arboreal and only occasionally descend to the ground. Movement is quadrupedal with relatively little leaping. Wild troops are most active from early to mid-morning and mid- to late afternoon, usually resting an hour or two at midday. Ranges are often ill-defined, and troops may number into the 40-50 range. Groups are known to split during the day into subgroups of pregnant females, females with young and adult males. Reproduction During the mating season males establish a dominance hierarchy through fierce fighting with the higher-ranking individuals then interacting with the females.
    [Show full text]
  • Diagnosis and Differentiation of the Order Primates
    YEARBOOK OF PHYSICAL ANTHROPOLOGY 30:75-105 (1987) Diagnosis and Differentiation of the Order Primates FREDERICK S. SZALAY, ALFRED L. ROSENBERGER, AND MARIAN DAGOSTO Department of Anthropolog* Hunter College, City University of New York, New York, New York 10021 (F.S.S.); University of Illinois, Urbanq Illinois 61801 (A.L. R.1; School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University/ Baltimore, h4D 21218 (M.B.) KEY WORDS Semiorders Paromomyiformes and Euprimates, Suborders Strepsirhini and Haplorhini, Semisuborder Anthropoidea, Cranioskeletal morphology, Adapidae, Omomyidae, Grades vs. monophyletic (paraphyletic or holophyletic) taxa ABSTRACT We contrast our approach to a phylogenetic diagnosis of the order Primates, and its various supraspecific taxa, with definitional proce- dures. The order, which we divide into the semiorders Paromomyiformes and Euprimates, is clearly diagnosable on the basis of well-corroborated informa- tion from the fossil record. Lists of derived features which we hypothesize to have been fixed in the first representative species of the Primates, Eupri- mates, Strepsirhini, Haplorhini, and Anthropoidea, are presented. Our clas- sification of the order includes both holophyletic and paraphyletic groups, depending on the nature of the available evidence. We discuss in detail the problematic evidence of the basicranium in Paleo- gene primates and present new evidence for the resolution of previously controversial interpretations. We renew and expand our emphasis on postcra- nial analysis of fossil and living primates to show the importance of under- standing their evolutionary morphology and subsequent to this their use for understanding taxon phylogeny. We reject the much advocated %ladograms first, phylogeny next, and scenario third” approach which maintains that biologically founded character analysis, i.e., functional-adaptive analysis and paleontology, is irrelevant to genealogy hypotheses.
    [Show full text]
  • Saimiri Sciureus) by an Amazon Tree Boa (Corallus Hortulanus
    Predation of a squirrel monkey (Saimiri sciureus) by an Amazon tree boa (Corallus hortulanus): even small boids may be a potential threat to small-bodied platyrrhines Marco Antônio Ribeiro-Júnior, Stephen Francis Ferrari, Janaina Reis Ferreira Lima, Claudia Regina da Silva & Jucivaldo Dias Lima Primates ISSN 0032-8332 Primates DOI 10.1007/s10329-016-0545-z 1 23 Your article is protected by copyright and all rights are held exclusively by Japan Monkey Centre and Springer Japan. This e-offprint is for personal use only and shall not be self- archived in electronic repositories. If you wish to self-archive your article, please use the accepted manuscript version for posting on your own website. You may further deposit the accepted manuscript version in any repository, provided it is only made publicly available 12 months after official publication or later and provided acknowledgement is given to the original source of publication and a link is inserted to the published article on Springer's website. The link must be accompanied by the following text: "The final publication is available at link.springer.com”. 1 23 Author's personal copy Primates DOI 10.1007/s10329-016-0545-z NEWS AND PERSPECTIVES Predation of a squirrel monkey (Saimiri sciureus) by an Amazon tree boa (Corallus hortulanus): even small boids may be a potential threat to small-bodied platyrrhines 1 2,3 4,5 Marco Antoˆnio Ribeiro-Ju´nior • Stephen Francis Ferrari • Janaina Reis Ferreira Lima • 5 4,5 Claudia Regina da Silva • Jucivaldo Dias Lima Received: 19 April 2016 / Accepted: 29 April 2016 Ó Japan Monkey Centre and Springer Japan 2016 Abstract Predation has been suggested to play a major capable of capturing an agile monkey like Saimiri, C.
    [Show full text]
  • Squirrel Monkeys and Space Motion Sickness
    Japanese Journal of Physiology, 52, 1–20, 2002 REVIEW Squirrel Monkeys and Space Motion Sickness Kenichi MATSUNAMI Science and Technology Promotion Center, Kakamigahara, 509–0108 Japan Abstract: Studies of the vestibular system in system is crucially important in the genesis of squirrel monkeys in consideration of space mo- SMS (SAS). In this connection, the ablation stud- tion sickness (SMS) or space adaptation syn- ies of labyrinth, semicircular canals, and other drome (SAS) were reviewed. First, the phyloge- SAS-related areas were referred to, and consid- netic position of the squirrel monkey was consid- eration was made for experiments about caloric ered. Then the anatomico-physiological studies irrigation of the ear. A hypothetic model was then of both the peripheral and the central vestibular proposed for the genesis of SAS. [Japanese systems were described, because the vestibular Journal of Physiology, 52, 1–20, 2002] Key words: squirrel monkey, vestibular system, cerebral cortex, space motion sickness (SMS), space adaptation syndromes (SAS). The construction of the new space station will be contamination of fatal B virus for human subjects; (4) completed soon, and many experiments will be under- They are relatively free from dysentery or tuberculo- taken. Many Japanese scientists will join in these new sis; (5) They are less dangerous because of their small experiments. Animal experiments are expected to size. On the other hand, (1) They are small and weak, solve problems in space physiology. Several kinds of thus vulnerable to bleeding during surgery; (2) The nonhuman primates such as the chimpanzee (Pan bone of the skull is thin, and it is difficult to perma- troglodytes), common squirrel monkey (Saimiri sci- nently anchor a cylinder to the skull for a continuous urea), rhesus monkey (Macaca mulatta), and stump- recording of neuronal activity; (3) They are expensive, tailed monkey (Macaca speciosa) have already been particularly in Japan, because of their high mortality used.
    [Show full text]
  • BLACK HOWLER MONKEY PRIMATA Family: Cebidae Genus: Alouatta Species: Caraya
    BLACK HOWLER MONKEY PRIMATA Family: Cebidae Genus: Alouatta Species: caraya Female with baby Range: eastern Bolivia, northeastern Argentina, Paraguay and southern Brazil Habitat: Various tropical habitats including seasonal (dry) to typical rainforest and wooded savannas Niche: arboreal, diurnal, herbivorous Wild diet: leaves, fruits, other vegetable matter Zoo diet: fruits, vegetables, monkey chow and browse Life Span: Wild 16 – 20, Captivity 23 – 28 years Sexual dimorphism: F 68-75% smaller; M are black while F and young are yellow-brown Location in SF Zoo: Primate Discovery Center APPEARANCE & PHYSICAL ADAPTATIONS: Males are completely black while females and juveniles are yellow-brown or olive-buff. Juvenile males will darken in about 3 months reaching completely black at sexual maturity. The bare underside of the prehensile tail is sensitive to touch and enables the monkey to feel what it is gripping thus assisting when leaping from tree to tree. The hands have a cleft between index finger and middle finger that affords a secure grip since Howlers lack the opposable thumb but have opposable large toes. They usually hold Weight: M - 11-18 lbs objects between their second and third digits on their hand. F - 8 - 12 lbs HBL: 22-36 inches Howlers have enlarged throats, due to an extra-large voice box. The TL: 23-36 inches angle of the lower jaw and the hyoid bone are both greatly enlarged. The special bony pouch (carniculum) is an offshoot of the larynx, just beneath the throat, acts as a resonance box, amplifying the howls. These chambers are larger in the males allowing for the howl to be heard more than a kilometer away in a natural environment.
    [Show full text]
  • World's Most Endangered Primates
    Primates in Peril The World’s 25 Most Endangered Primates 2016–2018 Edited by Christoph Schwitzer, Russell A. Mittermeier, Anthony B. Rylands, Federica Chiozza, Elizabeth A. Williamson, Elizabeth J. Macfie, Janette Wallis and Alison Cotton Illustrations by Stephen D. Nash IUCN SSC Primate Specialist Group (PSG) International Primatological Society (IPS) Conservation International (CI) Bristol Zoological Society (BZS) Published by: IUCN SSC Primate Specialist Group (PSG), International Primatological Society (IPS), Conservation International (CI), Bristol Zoological Society (BZS) Copyright: ©2017 Conservation International All rights reserved. No part of this report may be reproduced in any form or by any means without permission in writing from the publisher. Inquiries to the publisher should be directed to the following address: Russell A. Mittermeier, Chair, IUCN SSC Primate Specialist Group, Conservation International, 2011 Crystal Drive, Suite 500, Arlington, VA 22202, USA. Citation (report): Schwitzer, C., Mittermeier, R.A., Rylands, A.B., Chiozza, F., Williamson, E.A., Macfie, E.J., Wallis, J. and Cotton, A. (eds.). 2017. Primates in Peril: The World’s 25 Most Endangered Primates 2016–2018. IUCN SSC Primate Specialist Group (PSG), International Primatological Society (IPS), Conservation International (CI), and Bristol Zoological Society, Arlington, VA. 99 pp. Citation (species): Salmona, J., Patel, E.R., Chikhi, L. and Banks, M.A. 2017. Propithecus perrieri (Lavauden, 1931). In: C. Schwitzer, R.A. Mittermeier, A.B. Rylands, F. Chiozza, E.A. Williamson, E.J. Macfie, J. Wallis and A. Cotton (eds.), Primates in Peril: The World’s 25 Most Endangered Primates 2016–2018, pp. 40-43. IUCN SSC Primate Specialist Group (PSG), International Primatological Society (IPS), Conservation International (CI), and Bristol Zoological Society, Arlington, VA.
    [Show full text]