DOCSLIB.ORG

Simplization of the Austrian School Theories on Capital Theory And

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Simplization of the Austrian School Theories on Capital Theory And Overview of the Austrian School theories of capital and business cycles and implications for agent-based modeling Presentation to New School for Social Research Seminar in Economic Theory and Modeling For more information see cameroneconomics.com Background and Motivation The “Austrian School of Economics” lost its prominence in the 1930s with the rise of Keynesian economics. One of the reasons for this (see Hayek 1995) is that Austrian School macroeconomic theory could not be adequately formalized with mathematics, as was done with John Maynard Keynes's ideas from the General Theory. When F.A. Hayek won the Nobel Prize in 1973 this created a resurgence of interest in the ideas of the Austrian School. Our research is a further continuation of this resurgence in Austrian School ideas. Generalized Notes on the “Austrian School of Economics” 1) The Austrian School is not an argument for laissez-faire capitalism. (Hayek believed in the negative income tax and that many institutions belonged in society because they evolved into society, and thus exist for a reason.) 2) The Austrian School can be seen as a methodological approach which is wary of the unintended consequences of government intervention and its effect on the price system which is seen as the coordinating signal for the allocation of scarce resources in a society’s economy. 3) The Austrian School methodology prioritizes logical reasoning over empirical relationships because it assumes the economy is too complex to model causality. 4) The Austrian School uses the individual as entrepreneur as basis for analytical approach and the subjectivity of decision-making. It is thus skeptical of the validity of other economic schools of thought, especially those using generalized aggregations. 5) Hayek later in his career lost faith in economic general equilibrium theory, thus agent-based modeling might be a valid method in which to evaluate some Austrian School concepts. Hayek uses a triangle to graphically represent an economy and the disaggregated, simultaneous, heterogeneous capitals in an economy (the capital structure of an economy). Bohm-Bawerk alone among the Austrians wanted to aggregate capital into an “average period of production.” We have formalized this concept by making the average period of production as given by at Capital Index (K), and Where i = (1, 2, …, k); k is equal to the number of the highest stage of production in the economy (in our model k = 5, where five represents the mining stage of production); x is each stage of production, and w is the weight of the production stage’s quantity of capital in relation to the quantity of capital in the economy as a whole. In this economy, K = .4(1) + .25(2) + .20(3) + .10(4) + .05(5) = 2.15. Austrian School capital theory assumes natural or normal rates of interest under which an economy (society as living organism) creates a natural capital structure, which in turn provides for, under the ‘animal spirits’ of human action and creativity, capital accumulation, economic growth and increasing standards of living. The theory of natural rates of interest (matching the endogenous preferences of savers and borrowers) assumes also that an economy experiences natural business cycles (or “colds” in biological terms) the downturns of which are overcome over time by the ‘animal spirits’ of human action and healthy economic activity. It is only when external bodies enter the natural economy (in this case monetary policy interest rate manipulations) that the natural capital structure is upset, creating incentives which cause malinvestment in unsustainable, longer stages of production and, due to the opportunity costs of scarce resources, reduced consumption. Malinvestment prolongs a natural economic downturn and associated unemployment because the “sticky” over-investment in unproductive sectors needs to be “worked-out” (or in biological terms, “cleansed”) from the system. This cleansing process takes longer than if there had not been unnatural malinvestment. It is when “unhealthy” investment is purged from the economy that healthy investment and (sustainable) economic development continues based on subjective tastes and risk preferences of society’s individual entrepreneurial actors. Austrian School capital theory is based on simultaneous, heterogeneous, capitals, each with a unique level of risk. Note that the alpha risk measure is actually a proxy for market uncertainty, the technology, the regulatory environment, the labor pool, the climate and/or resource dependency, the competitive factors, ‘rational expectations’ based on limited information, and local knowledge surrounding the investment in the stage of production as envisioned by the entrepreneur. Alpha i, therefore, of course, varies with the subjective knowledge of each entrepreneur. Here is a graphical-analogical model example of creative destruction. Let’s assume a technology shock which effects alpha 3. What is the result on productivity, employment and investment in this and other stages of production? Austrian Capital Theory and Agent-Based Modeling The Basic Model: Models subjective unique risk preferences generalized into three classes, with bounded, “sticky”, investment functions based on time lags for investment to move from one stage of production to another. Unemployment based on investment time-lags, with lay-offs beginning at higher stages of production. Economy operates over-time showing results on accumulation, distribution, growth, employment and population. • Starts with three ‘classes”, 1) rich start with 2 capital units, earn investment returns only and are more risk seeking than middleclass, 2) middleclass start with one capital unit, earn both wage income and investment returns, and 3) poor earn wages only. •Assumes all wages spent. •Capital hires wages. Each capital worker unit initially allocated in economy according to weight of stage of production in capital structure of economy. •Poor moves to middle class after 20 periods of work; when poor moves to middleclass another poor is born. Each agent lives 40 years. •Middleclass moves to rich after accumulating second capital unit. •Interest rate change takes three periods , moving from lower to higher stages of production, before fully integrated into investment decisions. • Model allows for varying endowments , and risk preferences, within classes. For Further Reference Bohm-Bawerk, Eugen. 1891. The Positive Theory of Capital. London: Macmillan and Co. Garrison, Roger. 2001. Time and Money: the Macroeconomics of Capital Structure. New York: Routledge. Garrison, Roger. 2007. “Capital-Based Macroeconomics,” on-line slide show, http://www.slideshare.net/fredypariapaza/capitalbased- macroeconomics, accessed 10/6/07. Hayek, Friedrich A. [1931] 1966a. Prices and Production. New York: Augustus M. Kelley Publishers. Hayek, Friedrich A. [1933] 1966b. Monetary Theory and the Trade Cycle. New York: Augustus M. Kelley. Hayek, Friedrich A. 1995. Contra Keynes and Cambridge: Essays, Correspondence. Edited by Bruce Caldwell. Chicago: University of Chicago. Hoppe, Hans-Hermann. 1993. The Economics and Ethics of Private Property. Boston: Kluwer Academic. Keynes, John M. 1931. “The Pure Theory of Money. A Reply to Dr. Hayek.” Economica (11) 34, 387-397. Kurz, Heinz D. 1990. Capital, Distribution and Effective Demand: Studies in the “Classical Approach” to Economic Theory. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press. Kurz, Heinz and Salvadori, Neri. 1992. Theory of Production I. Milan: Instituto di ricera sulla Dinamica dei Sistemi Economoci (IDSE). Menger, Carl. [1871] 1950. Principles of Economics. Glencoe, IL: Free Press. Mises, Ludwig. [1932] 1990. “The Non-Neutrality of Money”, in Money, Method and the Market Process, Richard M. Ebeling, ed., from lecture given to New York City Economics Club. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Mulligan, Robert F. 2006. “An Empirical Examination of Austrian Business Cycle Theory.” Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics 9 (2), 69-93. Schumpeter, Joseph R. 1950. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. New York: Harper & Row..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Austrian School in Bulgaria: a History✩ Nikolay Nenovsky A,*, Pencho Penchev B
    Russian Journal of Economics 4 (2018) 44–64 DOI 10.3897/j.ruje.4.26005 Publication date: 23 April 2018 www.rujec.org The Austrian school in Bulgaria: A history✩ Nikolay Nenovsky a,*, Pencho Penchev b a University of Picardie Jules Verne, Amiens, France b University of National and World Economy, Sofia, Bulgaria Abstract The main goal of this study is to highlight the acceptance, dissemination, interpretation, criticism and make some attempts at contributing to Austrian economics made in Bulgaria during the last 120 years. We consider some of the main characteristics of the Austrian school, such as subjectivism and marginalism, as basic components of the economic thought in Bulgaria and as incentives for the development of some original theoreti- cal contributions. Even during the first few years of Communist regime (1944–1989), with its Marxist monopoly over intellectual life, the Austrian school had some impact on the economic thought in the country. Subsequent to the collapse of Communism, there was a sort of a Renaissance and rediscovery of this school. Another contribution of our study is that it illustrates the adaptability and spontaneous evolution of ideas in a different and sometimes hostile environment. Keywords: history of economic thought, dissemination of economic ideas, Austrian school, Bulgaria. JEL classification: B00, B13, B30, B41. 1. Introduction The emergence and development of specialized economic thought amongst the Bulgarian intellectuals was a process that occurred significantly slowly in comparison to Western and Central Europe. It also had its specific fea- tures. The first of these was that almost until the outset of the 20th century, the economic theories and different concepts related to them were not well known.
    [Show full text]
  • How Far Is Vienna from Chicago? an Essay on the Methodology of Two Schools of Dogmatic Liberalism
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Paqué, Karl-Heinz Working Paper — Digitized Version How far is Vienna from Chicago? An essay on the methodology of two schools of dogmatic liberalism Kiel Working Paper, No. 209 Provided in Cooperation with: Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW) Suggested Citation: Paqué, Karl-Heinz (1984) : How far is Vienna from Chicago? An essay on the methodology of two schools of dogmatic liberalism, Kiel Working Paper, No. 209, Kiel Institute of World Economics (IfW), Kiel This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/46781 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. www.econstor.eu Kieler Arbeitspapiere Kiel Working Papers Working Paper No.
    [Show full text]
  • Cryptocurrencies As an Alternative to Fiat Monetary Systems David A
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Digital Commons at Buffalo State State University of New York College at Buffalo - Buffalo State College Digital Commons at Buffalo State Applied Economics Theses Economics and Finance 5-2018 Cryptocurrencies as an Alternative to Fiat Monetary Systems David A. Georgeson State University of New York College at Buffalo - Buffalo State College, [email protected] Advisor Tae-Hee Jo, Ph.D., Associate Professor of Economics & Finance First Reader Tae-Hee Jo, Ph.D., Associate Professor of Economics & Finance Second Reader Victor Kasper Jr., Ph.D., Associate Professor of Economics & Finance Third Reader Ted P. Schmidt, Ph.D., Professor of Economics & Finance Department Chair Frederick G. Floss, Ph.D., Chair and Professor of Economics & Finance To learn more about the Economics and Finance Department and its educational programs, research, and resources, go to http://economics.buffalostate.edu. Recommended Citation Georgeson, David A., "Cryptocurrencies as an Alternative to Fiat Monetary Systems" (2018). Applied Economics Theses. 35. http://digitalcommons.buffalostate.edu/economics_theses/35 Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.buffalostate.edu/economics_theses Part of the Economic Theory Commons, Finance Commons, and the Other Economics Commons Cryptocurrencies as an Alternative to Fiat Monetary Systems By David A. Georgeson An Abstract of a Thesis In Applied Economics Submitted in Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements For the Degree of Master of Arts May 2018 State University of New York Buffalo State Department of Economics and Finance ABSTRACT OF THESIS Cryptocurrencies as an Alternative to Fiat Monetary Systems The recent popularity of cryptocurrencies is largely associated with a particular application referred to as Bitcoin.
    [Show full text]
  • The Austrian Theory of Money by Murray N
    The Austrian Theory of Money By Murray N. Rothbard [Reprinted from The Foundations of Modern Austrian Economics, Edwin Dolan, ed. (Kansas City: Sheed Andrews and McMeel, 1976), pp. 160-84.; The Logic of Action One: Method, Money, and the Austrian School (Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 1997), pp. 297-320. The pagination on this edition corresponds to the Logic edition.] The Austrian theory of money virtually begins and ends with Ludwig von Mises's monumental Theory of Money and Credit, published in 1912.1 Mises's fundamental accomplishment was to take the theory of marginal utility, built up by Austrian economists and other marginalists as the explanation for consumer demand and market price, and apply it to the demand for and the value, or the price, of money. No longer did the theory of money need to be separated from the general economic theory of individual action and utility, of supply, demand, and price; no longer did monetary theory have to suffer isolation in a context of "velocities of circulation," "price levels," and "equations of exchange." In applying the analysis of supply and demand to money, Mises used the Wicksteedian concept: supply is the total stock of a commodity at any given time; and demand is the total market demand to gain and hold cash balances, built up out of the marginal-utility rankings of units of money on the value scales of individuals on the market. The Wicksteedian concept is particularly appropriate to money for several reasons: first, because the supply of money is either extremely durable in relation to current production, as under the gold standard, or is determined exogenously to the market by government authority; and, second and most important, because money, uniquely among commodities desired and demanded on the market, is acquired not to be consumed, but to be held for later exchange.
    [Show full text]
  • Nominality of Money: Theory of Credit Money and Chartalism Atsushi Naito
    Review of Keynesian Studies Vol.2 Atsushi Naito Nominality of Money: Theory of Credit Money and Chartalism Atsushi Naito Abstract This paper focuses on the unit of account function of money that is emphasized by Keynes in his book A Treatise on Money (1930) and recently in post-Keynesian endogenous money theory and modern Chartalism, or in other words Modern Monetary Theory. These theories consider the nominality of money as an important characteristic because the unit of account and the corresponding money as a substance could be anything, and this aspect highlights the nominal nature of money; however, although these theories are closely associated, they are different. The three objectives of this paper are to investigate the nominality of money common to both the theories, examine the relationship and differences between the two theories with a focus on Chartalism, and elucidate the significance and policy implications of Chartalism. Keywords: Chartalism; Credit Money; Nominality of Money; Keynes JEL Classification Number: B22; B52; E42; E52; E62 122 Review of Keynesian Studies Vol.2 Atsushi Naito I. Introduction Recent years have seen the development of Modern Monetary Theory or Chartalism and it now holds a certain prestige in the field. This theory primarily deals with state money or fiat money; however, in Post Keynesian economics, the endogenous money theory and theory of monetary circuit place the stress on bank money or credit money. Although Chartalism and the theory of credit money are clearly opposed to each other, there exists another axis of conflict in the field of monetary theory. According to the textbooks, this axis concerns the functions of money, such as means of exchange, means of account, and store of value.
    [Show full text]
  • Positions of the Austrian School on Currency Policy in the Last Decades
    Positions of the Austrian School on currency policy in the last decades of the Habsburg monarchy (1892-1914) Günther Chaloupek, Director (retired) of Economics Dpt., Chamber of Labour, Vienna Paper presented to the 20th Annual ESHET Conference, Paris, May 26 to 28, 2016 first draft 1. The currency reform in the Habsburg monarchy of 18921 After a long period of debate about reform of the monetary system of the Habsburg monarchy, the parliaments of Austria and Hungary passed identical laws in August 1892 that enabled the Austro-Hungarian bank (A-HB) to establish a gold backed currency. The Austrian guilder (Gulden, fl) had been a pure paper currency since 1879. A 10 fl gold coin issued in 1878, equivalent to 24 ffr, which served as a connecting bridge to the international currency system traded against paper notes for some 11,50 (the so-called “gold agio”) in 1879. This ratio increased to 12,4 in 1887 and then declined to 11,7 in March 1892. In view auf this reversed trend, industrial and agricultural interest groups which had opposed the adoption of the gold standard for many years, turned into supporters in fear of continued appreciation which would have worsened their international competitive position. At the time when the final decision was made, the money supply of the monarchy consisted of bank notes, so-called state notes (Staatsnoten), and silver coins. The A-HB’s metal reserves in gold and silver were sufficient to fulfil the requirement for metal coverage of its own bank notes. The governments of Austria and Hungary committed themselves to withdraw state notes amounting to 412 million fl (824 million K) from circulation and replace them by gold until the end of 18992.
    [Show full text]
  • Classical Liberalism and the Austrian School
    Classical Liberalism and the Austrian School Classical Liberalism and the Austrian School Ralph Raico Foreword by Jörg Guido Hülsmann Preface by David Gordon LvMI MISES INSTITUTE The cover design by Chad Parish shows the Neptune Fountain, at the Schönbrunn Palace, in Vienna. Copyright © 2012 by the Ludwig von Mises Institute. Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given. Ludwig von Mises Institute 518 West Magnolia Avenue Auburn, Alabama 36832 mises.org ISBN: 978-1-61016-003-2 Dedicated to the memory of the great Ludwig von Mises Table of Contents Foreword by Jörg Guido Hülsmann . ix Preface by David Gordon . xiii Introduction . .xxv 1. Classical Liberalism and the Austrian School . .1 2. Liberalism: True and False . .67 3. Intellectuals and the Marketplace. 111 4. Was Keynes a Liberal? . .149 5. The Conflict of Classes: Liberal vs. Marxist Theories. .183 6. The Centrality of French Liberalism . .219 7. Ludwig von Mises’s Liberalism on Fascism, Democracy, and Imperalism . .255 8. Eugen Richter and the End of German Liberalism. .301 9. Arthur Ekirch on American Militarism . .331 Index. .339 vii Foreword “History looks backward into the past, but the lesson it teaches concerns things to come. It does not teach indolent quietism; it rouses man to emulate the deeds of earlier generations.” Ludwig von Mises1 The present book contains a collection of essays written through- out the past twenty years. I read virtually all of them when they were first published. They have been a central part of my education in the history of liberalism and of the Austrian School of economics, and I consider myself privileged indeed to have encountered Professor Raico and his work early on in my intellectual development.
    [Show full text]
  • The Foundations of Modern Austrian Economics Studies in Economic Theory Laurence S
    í' The Foundations of Modern Austrian Economics Studies in Economic Theory Laurence S. Moss, Editor America's Great Depression, Murray N. Rothbard (1975) The Economics of Ludwig ron Mises: Toward a Critical Reappraisal, ed. Laurence S. Moss (1976) The Foundations ofModern ,dustrian Economics, ed. Edwin G. Dolan (1,976) The Economic Point of View, Israel M. Kirzner (1976) -,,.' The Foundations of Modern Austrian Economlcs Edited with an Introduction by Edwin G. Dolan SHEED & WARD, INC. Subsidiary of Univer-_L!Press Syndicate KansasCity This edition is cosponsored by the Institute for Humane Studies, Inc., Menlo Park, California. The Foundation_ of Modern dustrian Economics Copyright © 1976 by the Institute for Humane Studies Al ñghts reserved. Printed in the United States of America. No part of this book may be used or repro- duced in any manner whatsoever without written permission except in the case of reprints in the context of reviews. For information write Sheed & Ward, Ira:., 6700 Squibb Road, Mission, Kansas 6620"2. Library of Congress Cataloging in Publi¢ation Data Main entry under title: The Foundations of modern Austrian economics. (Studies in economic theory) Proce.edings of a con ference sponsored by the Insti- tute for Humane Studies and held at Royalton College, South Royalton, Vt., in June 1974. Bibliography: p. lncludes index. 1. Austrian school of economists -- Congresses. I. Dolan, Edwin G. II. Instítute for Humane Studies. I11. Series. HB98.F68 330'.09436 76-5894 ISBN 0-8362-0653-3 ISBN 0-8362-.0654-1 pbk. -g CONTENTS PREFACE vii PART 1 INTRODUCTION Austrian Economics as Extraordinary Science 3 Edwin G.
    [Show full text]
  • Austrian Foundations for the Theory and Practice of Finance
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS AND FINANCE EDUCATION • Volume 10 • Number 2 • Fall 2011 70 Austrian Foundations for the Theory and Practice of Finance Gregory M. Dempster1 Abstract An Austrian perspective on financial theory and practice could address some fundamental problems of epistemology and method in mainstream approaches and help inform a reconstruction of the field of finance education. This paper outlines the development of a distinctive Austrian approach to finance that rests on the foundations of fundamental uncertainty, reasonable views of individual and collective expectations, social capital and embeddedness, methodological subjectivism, and organic, evolutionary processes. Introduction The Austrian School of Economics has a long and distinguished history of dealing with problems of epistemology and method in economics that the mainstream of the profession has predominately ignored. The discipline of finance (a specialized sub-field of economics that deals with the principles of the acquisition, management, and use of money capital, by individuals and firms, as a source of liquidity and investment funding), though typically better grounded in real-world practice than its parent discipline, nonetheless suffers from epistemological problems, as well as methodological inconsistencies, that an Austrian perspective could potentially address. The goals of this paper are threefold. First, it represents an attempt to draw out the philosophical implications of the Austrian approach for the study of financial markets by focusing attention on the advances in theory and method attributed to certain “leading lights” of the School. Second, it will provide a survey of recent contributions to financial theory and practice that have been made by Austrian economists on the basis of the underpinnings that are laid down in the first section.
    [Show full text]
  • The Austrian School 2
    The Austrian School 2 goods of the lowest order. Eugen von Böhm-Bawerk (1959 [1889]) introduced the similar notion of “maturity classes” to capture this temporal element in the economy’s production process. He stressed the point that an increase in the economy’s growth rate must entail an increase in activity in the earlier maturity classes relative to (concurrent) activity in the later maturity classes. Böhm-Bawerk was possibly the first economist to insist that propositions 9. The Austrian School about the macroeconomy have firm microeconomic foundations. In an 1895 essay, he wrote that “One cannot eschew studying the microcosm if one wants to * understand properly the macrocosm of a developed economy” (Hennings, 1997, Roger W. Garrison p.74). Ludwig von Mises (1953 [1912]), who is generally credited for using marginal utility analysis to account for the value of money, was also the first to recognize the significance of credit creation in the context of a decentralized, time- consuming production process. The capital theory originated by Menger and the Mr. Keynes's aggregates conceal the most fundamental mechanisms of change. (Hayek, 1931) theory of money and credit set out by Mises was developed by Friedrich Hayek (1967 [1935]) into the Austrian theory of the business cycle. Lionel Robbins (1971 9.1 The Mengerian Vision [1934]) and Murray Rothbard (1963) applied the theory to the interwar episode of boom and bust. Eventually, the insights of these and other Austrians gave rise to a The Austrian school is best known for its microeconomics and, in particular, for its full-fledged capital-based macroeconomics (Horwitz, 2000 and Garrison, 2001).
    [Show full text]
  • Libertarianism
    Libertarianism BIBLIOGRAPHY maintaining residence within the polity, one voluntarily The Committee of Santa Fe. 1980. A New Inter-American Policy agrees to the government laws one lives under. for the Eighties. Washington, DC: Council for Inter-American Government is recognized as a special kind of organiza- Security. tion, and might be said to enjoy a special kind of legiti- Cone, James H. 1990. A Black Theology of Liberation. 20th macy, but it does not get a special dispensation on Anniversary ed. Maryknoll, NY: Orbis Books. coercion. In the eyes of the libertarian, everything the gov- Gutierrez, Gustavo. 1988. A Theology of Liberation: History, ernment does that would be deemed coercive and crimi- Politics, and Salvation. Trans. and ed. Sister Caridad Inda and nal if done by any other party in society is still coercive. John Eagleson. Maryknoll, NY: Orbis Books. For example, imagine that a neighbor decided to impose a Levine, Daniel H. 1992. Popular Voices in Latin American minimum-wage law on you. Since most government Catholicism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. action, including taxation, is of that nature, libertarians Smith, Christian. 1991. The Emergence of Liberation Theology: see government as a unique kind of organization engaged Radical Religion and Social Movement Theory. Chicago: in wholesale coercion, and coercion is the treading on lib- University of Chicago Press. erty. This semantic, libertarians say, was central in eigh- teenth- and nineteenth-century custom and social Otto Maduro thought, for example in Adam Smith’s treatment of “nat- ural liberty” and through the American founders, the abolitionists, John Stuart Mill (1806–1873), Herbert Spencer (1820–1903), and William Graham Sumner LIBERTARIANISM (1840–1910).
    [Show full text]
  • Chronology of the Austrian School
    Chronology of the Austrian School 1871 - Menger's Principles of Economics published. 1872 - Böhm-Bawerk and Wieser (BB & W) graduate from University of Vienna. They were never direct students of Menger, but read his book soon thereafter. 1873 - Menger appointed Associate Professor at Univ. of Vienna. 1875 - Menger begins work on his methodology book. 1876 - Their attempts to popularize Menger's views in the seminars of the members of the Older Historical School (Knies at Heidelberg) were useless. Wieser's paper was on value and cost (disputing cost theories of value), BB's on capital and interest, topics to which each would return. 1876-78 - Menger tutors Crown Prince Rudolf. 1879 - Menger appointed Full Professor. 1881 - BB is appointed Associate Professor at Innsbruck, having passed his Habilitation in 1880. His book examined the utility aspects of goods (he argued that credit, patents, and goodwill are not "economic goods") but did not have any treatment of marginal utility. 1883 - Menger publishes his methodology book, Untersuchungen uber die Methode der Socialwissenschaften und der politischen Oekonomie insbesondere. The book was condescendingly reviewed by Gustav Schmoller. 1884 - Menger publishes, in the form of a series of letters, a brochure entitled Die Irrthumer des Historismus in der deutschen Nationalokonomie, attacking Schmoller's position. Schmoller stated in his journal that the pamphlet was not worth a review and that he had returned it to Menger, but he did reprint the insulting letter which accompanied the returned book. This began the famous Methodenstreit, the debate over methods. 1884 - BB is appointed Full Professor and publishes History and Critique of Interest Theories, but again nothing in it on marginal utility.
    [Show full text]