DOCSLIB.ORG

Attachment a Cowal Gold Mine and Surrounds Flora Survey

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Attachment a Cowal Gold Mine and Surrounds Flora Survey Cowal Gold Mine Extension Modification – Threatened Species Assessment ATTACHMENT A COWAL GOLD MINE AND SURROUNDS FLORA SURVEY (AMBS, 2012) 00541877 Cowal Gold Mine and Surrounds Flora Survey Prepared by Australian Museum Business Services for Barrick (Cowal) Limited Final Report October 2012 110911 Australian Museum Business Services - 6 College Street, Sydney NSW 2010, Ph (02) 9320 6311, Fax (02) 9320 6428 australianmuseum.net.au/AMBS [email protected] Cowal Gold Mine and Surrounds Flora Survey Document Information 110911 AMBS 2012. Cowal Gold Mine and Surrounds Flora Survey. Prepared Citation: for Barrick (Cowal) Limited by Australian Museum Business Services. Versions: Draft Report v5 issued 25 June 2012 Draft Report v6 issued 10 October 2012 Final Version issued 26 October 2012 Recipient: Garry Pearson, Barrick Prepared by: Dr. John T. Hunter, Dr. Dorothy Bell & Belinda Pellow Reviewed by: Uli Kloecher and James Bevan Cowal Gold Mine and Surrounds Flora Survey Executive Summary Australian Museum Business Services (AMBS) was commissioned by Barrick (Cowal) Limited to undertake a flora survey and review the status of vegetation at the Cowal Gold Mine and surrounds. This report collates existing information from previous floristic surveys, provides a map and validation of vegetation communities present, assesses vegetation condition, and reports on the presence of threatened flora and endangered ecological communities. The study area is located approximately 43 kilometres northwest of West Wyalong on the Western Slopes of New South Wales (NSW) and is approximately 11,714 hectares (ha) in size, including a portion of the Lake Cowal bed. As a result of recent rain the lake bed (4,848 ha) was flooded and was not assessed during this survey. A total of 130 full floristic survey sites were placed within the study area along with an additional 65 rapid data point sites (the latter recorded dominant species only). Based on classification (Kulczynski association) analysis, nine floristic associations were defined. An additional two mapping units were also defined: cropping and plantings. These nine communities were mapped based on ground truthing, air photo interpretation and landform. Three communities (C1, C3 and portions of C2) variously represent endangered ecological communities (see table below), Myall Woodland in the Darling Riverine Plains, Brigalow Belt South, Cobar Peneplain, Murray-Darling Depression, Riverina and NSW South Western Slopes Bioregions and Grey Box (Eucalyptus microcarpa) Grassy Woodlands and Derived Native Grasslands of South-Eastern Australia. It is highly likely that in most areas community C2 derived grasslands were originally one of these two EEC’s. This is particularly so in low lying locations of the study area. However, there are some locations where the clearing of other non-EEC’s may have resulted in these grasslands. Only those areas of C2 that were able to be quantitatively confirmed as representing one of these at this point in time have been mapped. Areas of community C2 not delineated as either EEC may in the future develop sufficient features which allow them to be allocated to one of these two EEC’s. A portion of the bed of Lake Cowal fall within the study area. Lake Cowal is named as an area encompassed by the EEC Aquatic Ecological Community in the natural drainage system of the lowland catchment of the Lachlan River. (Fisheries Scientific Committee 2005). Floristic Community Total Area Relevant Endangered Ecological Community (ha) Listing • TSC Act: Myall Woodland in the Darling Riverine Plains, Brigalow Belt South, Cobar Peneplain, C1: Weeping Myall – Belah – Poplar 282 ha Murray-Darling Depression, Riverina and NSW Box Shrubland and Woodland South Western Slopes Bioregions • EPBC Act: Weeping Myall Woodlands EEC • TSC Act: Myall Woodland EEC C2: Spear Grass – Windmill Grass • EPBC Act: Grey Box (Eucalyptus microcarpa) Grassland and Low Open Grassy 2872 ha Grassy Woodlands and Derived Native Grasslands Woodland of South-Eastern Australia C3: Inland Grey Box – Belah – Poplar • EPBC Act: Grey Box EEC 214 ha Box Woodland C4: Mugga Ironbark – Dwyer’s Red 83 ha Not threatened Gum – White Cypress Pine Woodland C5: Wallaby Grass – Spear Grass – 11 ha Not threatened Windmill Grass Grassland C6: Coolah Grass – Blue Grass Grassland 6 ha Not threatened C7: Sedgeland/Herbfield 80 ha Not threatened C8: River Red Gum Woodland and 87 ha Not threatened Forest C9: Dwyer’s Red Gum – Black Cypress 160 ha Not threatened Pine –Woodland ES-1 Cowal Gold Mine and Surrounds Flora Survey C10: Cropping 1389 ha Not applicable C11: Plantings 110 ha Not applicable TSC Act denotes NSW Threatened Species Conservation Act 1995 EPBC Act denotes Commonwealth Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 EEC denotes Endangered Ecological Community A total of 451 flora species from 80 plant families have been recorded within the Cowal Gold Mine and surrounds during surveys from 1995 to 2012. The current survey recorded a total of 306 vascular plant species from 69 families and 176 genera. No threatened flora species were found during field surveys carried out as part of the current investigation; however, the Austral Pillwort (Pilularia novae-hollandiae), listed as Endangered under the TSC Act, was recorded in the study area during surveys undertaken in 1998 and 2003. Given that this species has been recorded in five locations in the past it is unlikely that individuals or propogules are no longer present. Periodic surveys of know locations are recommended into the future. ES-2 Cowal Gold Mine and Surrounds Flora Survey Contents 1 Introduction ................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Objectives ............................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Study area ............................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Previous flora survey work ....................................................................................................... 2 2 Methodology ............................................................................................... 3 2.1 Survey design .......................................................................................................................... 3 2.2 Site and species information .................................................................................................... 5 2.1 Floristics ................................................................................................................................. 5 2.2 Data management ................................................................................................................... 5 2.3 Multivariate analysis ................................................................................................................ 6 2.4 Initial mapping and condition assessment site stratification ..................................................... 7 2.5 Final mapping product ............................................................................................................ 9 2.6 Endangered Ecological Communites ....................................................................................... 9 2.7 Potential threatened species ..................................................................................................... 9 3 Results ........................................................................................................ 12 3.1 Floristics ............................................................................................................................... 12 3.2 Community definition .......................................................................................................... 12 3.3 Community and map unit descriptions ................................................................................. 14 3.3.1 Community C1: Weeping Myall – Belah – Poplar Box Shrubland and Woodland .............. 14 3.3.2 Community C2: Spear Grass – Windmill Grass Grassland and Low Open Grassy Woodland 19 3.3.3 Community C3: Inland Grey Box – Belah – Poplar Box Woodland ................................... 24 3.3.4 Community C4: Mugga Ironbark – Dwyer’s Red Gum – White Cypress Pine Woodland ..... 29 3.3.5 Community C5: Wallaby Grass – Spear Grass – Windmill Grass Grassland ....................... 34 3.3.6 Community C6: Coolah Grass – Blue Grass Grassland ...................................................... 37 3.3.7 Community C7: Sedgeland/Herbfield ............................................................................... 40 3.3.8 Community C8: River Red Gum Woodland and Forest ..................................................... 52 3.3.9 Community C9: Dwyer’s Red Gum – Black Cypress Pine Woodland .................................. 57 3.3.10 Community C10: Cropping ............................................................................................. 61 3.3.11 Community C11: Plantings ............................................................................................. 64 3.4 Endangered Ecological Communities .................................................................................... 67 3.4.1 Myall Woodland ............................................................................................................. 68 3.4.2 Grey Box Woodland .......................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Wolseley Common Conservation Park Management Plan, Adelaide, South Australia’
    Department for Environment and Heritage Management Plan Wolseley Common Conservation Park 2006 www.environment.sa.gov.au This plan of management was adopted on 3 July 2006 and was prepared pursuant to section 38 of the National Parks and Wildlife Act 1972. Published by the Department for Environment and Heritage, Adelaide, Australia © Department for Environment and Heritage, 2006 ISBN: 1 921238 06 2 Cover photography: Buloke Woodland on gilgai soil (Courtesy of Carla O’Neill, DEH) This document may be cited as ‘Department for Environment and Heritage (2006) Wolseley Common Conservation Park Management Plan, Adelaide, South Australia’. FOREWORD Wolseley Common Conservation Park comprises the former parklands of Wolseley, which is just to the south-east of Bordertown in the Upper South East region of South Australia. This small park of approximately 25 hectares is of great conservation significance. It protects one of the few remaining stands of Buloke Woodland on gilgai soil, a vegetation community, which is classified as endangered under national legislation. The Buloke Woodland conserved by the park has been found to represent the best example of a remnant pure Buloke Low Woodland ecosystem on gilgai soil in South Australia. It is believed that this vegetation community once supported a number of distinct native fauna species. Today, the park is known to provide habitat for threatened bird, reptile and invertebrate species. The park is mainly visited by local residents undertaking casual recreation or nature observation along the walking trail known as the “Buloke Walk”. The Tatiara Aboriginal Community has expressed an interest in the park. Wolseley Common Conservation Park is traditionally associated with Potaruwutj people and it has been suggested that the Buloke Woodland may have been a good source of timber for Aboriginal weaponry prior to colonial settlement.
    [Show full text]
  • West Wyalong Solar Project
    WEST WYALONG SOLAR PROJECT Biodiversity Development Assessment Report Prepared for: Lightsource Development Services Australia Pty Ltd c/- Urbis Tower 2, Level 23 Darling Park, 201 Sussex St SYDNEY NSW 2000 SLR Ref: 610.18343-R01 Version No: -v4.0 March 2019 PREPARED BY SLR Consulting Australia Pty Ltd ABN 29 001 584 612 10 Kings Road New Lambton NSW 2305 Australia (PO Box 447 New Lambton NSW 2305 Australia) T: +61 2 4037 3200 E: [email protected] www.slrconsulting.com BASIS OF REPORT This report has been prepared by SLR Consulting Australia Pty Ltd with all reasonable skill, care and diligence, and taking account of the timescale and resources allocated to it by agreement with Lightsource Development Services Australia Pty Ltd (the Client). Information reported herein is based on the interpretation of data collected, which has been accepted in good faith as being accurate and valid. This report is for the exclusive use of the Client. No warranties or guarantees are expressed or should be inferred by any third parties. This report may not be relied upon by other parties without written consent from SLR SLR disclaims any responsibility to the Client and others in respect of any matters outside the agreed scope of the work. DOCUMENT CONTROL Reference Date Prepared Checked Authorised 610.18343-R01-v4.0 26 March 2019 Gilbert Whyte Jeremy Pepper Jeremy Pepper Page ii Lightsource Development Services Australia Pty Ltd SLR Ref No: 610.18343-R01-v4.0_20190326.docx West Wyalong Solar Project March 2019 Biodiversity Development Assessment Report EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Lightsource Development Services Australia Pty Ltd is proposing the development of a Solar Farm Project to be located to the north-east of West Wyalong in Western NSW.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 1. Title of Measure Computer Aided River Management System for the Murrumbidgee River 2. Proponent Undertaking the Measure
    Amendment date: 22 Sept 2017 1. Title of measure Computer Aided River Management system for the Murrumbidgee River 2. Proponent undertaking the measure NSW 3. Type of measure Supply 4. Requirements for notification a) Date by which the measure entered into or The measure will be operational by 30 June 2024. will enter into operation Must be before 30 June 2024 b) Confirmation that the measure is not an Yes ‘anticipated measure’ It is a new measure (not already included in the benchmark ‘Anticipated measure’ is defined in section 7.02 of conditions). the Basin Plan to mean ‘a measure that is part of the benchmark conditions of development’. c) NSW agrees with the notification Yes 5. Surface water SDL resource units affected by the measure This measure identifies all surface water resource units in the Southern Basin region as affected units for the purposes of notifying supply measures. The identification of affected units does not constitute an agreement between jurisdictions on apportioning the supply contribution, which will be required in coming months. 6. Details of relevant constraint measures Not directly linked to constraint measures but will assist in the operational implementation of the Murrumbidgee constraints management strategy (see separate supply measure notification) and is expected to improve environmental outcomes in the Murrumbidgee. 7. Date on which the measure will enter into operation The date by which the measure will enter into operation is 30 June 2024. 8. Details of the measure a) Description of the works or measures that The Computer Aided River Management (CARM) is an constitute the measure expert Decision Support System (DSS) specifically created for river operations.
    [Show full text]
  • Government Gazette of the STATE of NEW SOUTH WALES Number 83 Friday, 29 June 2007 Published Under Authority by Government Advertising
    3963 Government Gazette OF THE STATE OF NEW SOUTH WALES Number 83 Friday, 29 June 2007 Published under authority by Government Advertising LEGISLATION Allocation of Administration of Acts The Department of Premier and Cabinet, Sydney 28 June 2007 TRANSFER OF THE ADMINISTRATION OF THE SUBORDINATE LEGISLATION ACT 1989 HER Excellency the Governor, with the advice of the Executive Council, has approved the administration of the Subordinate Legislation Act 1994 No.146 being vested in the Ministers indicated in the attached Schedule, subject to the administration of that Act, to the extent that it directly amends another Act, being vested in the Minister administering the other Act or the relevant portion of it. The arrangements are in substitution for those in operation before the date of this notice. MORRIS IEMMA, Premier SCHEDULE Premier Subordinate Legislation Act 1989 No 146, jointly with the Minister for Regulatory Reform Minister for Regulatory Reform Subordinate Legislation Act 1989 No 146, jointly with the Premier 3964 LEGISLATION 29 June 2007 Assents to Acts ACTS OF PARLIAMENT ASSENTED TO Legislative Assembly Offi ce, Sydney 22 June 2007 It is hereby notifi ed, for general information, that the His Excellency the Lieutenant-Governor has, in the name and on behalf of Her Majesty, this day assented to the undermentioned Act passed by the Legislative Assembly and Legislative Council of New South Wales in Parliament assembled, viz.: Act No. 12 2007 – An Act to amend the Guardianship Act 1987 with respect to the review of guardianship orders, the constitution of the Guardianship Tribunal, the exercise of certain functions of that Tribunal by its Registrar and the review of the exercise of those functions and the term of offi ce of members of that Tribunal; and for other purposes.
    [Show full text]
  • Acacia Trineura F.Muell
    WATTLE Acacias of Australia Acacia trineura F.Muell. Source: Australian Plant Image Index (dig.1939). Source: Australian Plant Image Index (dig.1940). Source: W orldW ideW attle ver. 2. ANBG © M. Fagg, 2006 ANBG © M. Fagg, 2006 Published at: w w w .w orldw idew attle.com See illustration. Source: Australian Plant Image Index (a.10071). ANBG © M. Fagg, 1993 Source: W orldW ideW attle ver. 2. Source: W orldW ideW attle ver. 2. Source: W orldW ideW attle ver. 2. Published at: w w w .w orldw idew attle.com Published at: w w w .w orldw idew attle.com Published at: w w w .w orldw idew attle.com See illustration. See illustration. See illustration. Acacia trineura occurrence map. O ccurrence map generated via Atlas of Living Australia (https://w w w .ala.org.au). Common Name Three-nerved Wattle, Green Wattle, Hindmarsh Wattle Family Fabaceae Distribution Disjunct, occurring across the central and south-western slopes and plains of N.S.W. from Gilgandra SW to Berrigan; also in western Vic. from Wyperfeld S to Dimboola, extending to near Lucindale, S.A. (collections from further W in S.A. probably represent naturalised occurrences). Description Rounded fragrant shrub or tree 1–5 m high, sometimes ±prostrate. Branchlets resin-ribbed at extremities, hoary puberulous. Phyllodes oblanceolate to oblong-oblanceolate, straight to slightly incurved, 3.5–8 cm long, 3–8 (–11) mm wide, obtuse with minute callose apiculum, dark green, glabrous, 3–7-nerved per face with 3 nerves more prominent than the rest (when multinerved); nerves resinous and impressed in crests of low ridges; anastomoses absent or few between the nerves; gland at distal end of pulvinus.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Soils' and 'Vegetation'?
    Is there a close association between ‘soils’ and ‘vegetation’? A case study from central western New South Wales M.O. Rankin1, 3, W.S Semple2, B.W. Murphy1 and T.B. Koen1 1 Department of Natural Resources, PO Box 445, Cowra, NSW 2794, AUSTRALIA 2 Department of Natural Resources, PO Box 53, Orange, NSW 2800, AUSTRALIA 3 Corresponding author, email: [email protected] Abstract: The assumption that ‘soils’ and ‘vegetation’ are closely associated was tested by describing soils and vegetation along a Travelling Stock Reserve west of Grenfell, New South Wales (lat 33° 55’S, long 147° 45’E). The transect was selected on the basis of (a) minimising the effects of non-soil factors (human interference, climate and relief) on vegetation and (b) the presence of various soil and vegetation types as indicated by previous mapping. ‘Soils’ were considered at three levels: soil landscapes (a broad mapping unit widely used in central western NSW), soil types (according to a range of classifications) and soil properties (depth, pH, etc.). ‘Vegetation’ was considered in three ways: vegetation type (in various classifications), density/floristic indices (density of woody species, abundance of native species, etc.) and presence/absence of individual species. Sites along the transect were grouped according to soil landscapes or soil types and compared to vegetation types or indices recorded at the sites. Various measures indicated low associations between vegetation types and soil landscapes or soil types. Except for infrequent occurrences of a soil type or landscape, any one soil type or landscape was commonly associated with a number of vegetation types and any one vegetation type was associated with a number of soil landscapes or soil types.
    [Show full text]
  • ACT, Australian Capital Territory
    Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations.
    [Show full text]
  • Government Gazette of the STATE of NEW SOUTH WALES Number 29 Friday, 6 February 2009 Published Under Authority by Government Advertising
    559 Government Gazette OF THE STATE OF NEW SOUTH WALES Number 29 Friday, 6 February 2009 Published under authority by Government Advertising LEGISLATION Announcement Online notification of the making of statutory instruments Following the commencement of the remaining provisions of the Interpretation Amendment Act 2006, the following statutory instruments are to be notified on the official NSW legislation website (www.legislation.nsw.gov.au) instead of being published in the Gazette: (a) all environmental planning instruments, on and from 26 January 2009, (b) all statutory instruments drafted by the Parliamentary Counsel’s Office and made by the Governor (mainly regulations and commencement proclamations) and court rules, on and from 2 March 2009. Instruments for notification on the website are to be sent via email to [email protected] or fax (02) 9232 4796 to the Parliamentary Counsel's Office. These instruments will be listed on the “Notification” page of the NSW legislation website and will be published as part of the permanent “As Made” collection on the website and also delivered to subscribers to the weekly email service. Principal statutory instruments also appear in the “In Force” collection where they are maintained in an up-to-date consolidated form. Notified instruments will also be listed in the Gazette for the week following notification. For further information about the new notification process contact the Parliamentary Counsel’s Office on (02) 9321 3333. 560 LEGISLATION 6 February 2009 Proclamations New South Wales Proclamation under the Brigalow and Nandewar Community Conservation Area Act 2005 MARIE BASHIR,, Governor I, Professor Marie Bashir AC, CVO, Governor of the State of New South Wales, with the advice of the Executive Council, and in pursuance of section 16 (1) of the Brigalow and Nandewar Community Conservation Area Act 2005, do, by this my Proclamation, amend that Act as set out in Schedule 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Cunninghamia Date of Publication: September 2016 a Journal of Plant Ecology for Eastern Australia
    Cunninghamia Date of Publication: September 2016 A journal of plant ecology for eastern Australia ISSN 0727- 9620 (print) • ISSN 2200 - 405X (Online) Vegetation of Naree and Yantabulla stations on the Cuttaburra Creek, Far North Western Plains, New South Wales John T. Hunter1 & Vanessa H. Hunter2 1School of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351 AUSTRALIA; email: [email protected] 2Hewlett Hunter Pty Ltd, Armidale, NSW 2350 AUSTRALIA. Abstract: Naree and Yantabulla stations (31,990 ha) are found 60 km south-east of Hungerford and 112 km north-west of Bourke, New South Wales (lat. 29° 55'S; long. 150°37'N). The properties occur on the Cuttaburra Creek within the Mulga Lands Bioregion. We describe the vegetation assemblages found on these properties within three hierarchical levels (Group, Alliance & Association). Vegetation levels are defined based on flexible UPGMA analysis of cover- abundance scores of all vascular plant taxa. These vegetation units are mapped based on extensive ground truthing, SPOT5 imagery interpretation and substrate. Three ‘Group’ level vegetation types are described: Mulga Complex, Shrublands Complex and Floodplain Wetlands Complex. Within these Groups nine ‘Alliances’ are described: Rat’s tail Couch – Lovegrass Grasslands, Canegrass Grasslands, Lignum – Glinus Shrublands, Coolibah – Black Box Woodlands, Turpentine – Button Grass – Windmill Grass Shrublands, Turpentine – Hop Bush – Kerosene Grass shrublands and Mulga Shrublands. Sixteen ‘Associations’ are described 1)
    [Show full text]
  • Cunninghamia : a Journal of Plant Ecology for Eastern Australia
    Westbrooke et al., Vegetation of Peery Lake area, western NSW 111 The vegetation of Peery Lake area, Paroo-Darling National Park, western New South Wales M. Westbrooke, J. Leversha, M. Gibson, M. O’Keefe, R. Milne, S. Gowans, C. Harding and K. Callister Centre for Environmental Management, University of Ballarat, PO Box 663 Ballarat, Victoria 3353, AUSTRALIA Abstract: The vegetation of Peery Lake area, Paroo-Darling National Park (32°18’–32°40’S, 142°10’–142°25’E) in north western New South Wales was assessed using intensive quadrat sampling and mapped using extensive ground truthing and interpretation of aerial photograph and Landsat Thematic Mapper satellite images. 378 species of vascular plants were recorded from this survey from 66 families. Species recorded from previous studies but not noted in the present study have been added to give a total of 424 vascular plant species for the Park including 55 (13%) exotic species. Twenty vegetation communities were identified and mapped, the most widespread being Acacia aneura tall shrubland/tall open-shrubland, Eremophila/Dodonaea/Acacia open shrubland and Maireana pyramidata low open shrubland. One hundred and fifty years of pastoral use has impacted on many of these communities. Cunninghamia (2003) 8(1): 111–128 Introduction Elder and Waite held the Momba pastoral lease from early 1870 (Heathcote 1965). In 1889 it was reported that Momba Peery Lake area of Paroo–Darling National Park (32°18’– was overrun by kangaroos (Heathcote 1965). About this time 32°40’S, 142°10’–142°25’E) is located in north western New a party of shooters found opal in the sandstone hills and by South Wales (NSW) 110 km north east of Broken Hill the 1890s White Cliffs township was established (Hardy (Figure 1).
    [Show full text]
  • Riparian Vegetation of the River Murray COVER: Healthy Red Gum in the Kex)Ndrook State Forest Near Barham N.S.W
    Riparian Vegetation of The River Murray COVER: Healthy red gum in the Kex)ndrook State Forest near Barham N.S.W. Background, black box silhouette. PHOTO: D. Eastburn ISBN 1 R75209 02 6 RIVER MURRAY RIPARIAN VEGET ION STUDY PREPARED FOR: MURRAY-DARLING BASIN COMMISSION BY: MARGULES AND PARTNERS PTY LTD PAND J SMITH ECOLOGICAL CONSULTANTS DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION FORESTS AND LANDS VICTORIA January 1990 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS The River Murray Riparian Vegetation Survey was initiated by the Murray­ Darling Basin Commission t9 assessJhe present status ofthe vegetationalong the Murray, to identify causes ofdegradation, and to develop solutions for its rehabilitation and long term stability. The study area was the floodplain of the Murray River and its anabranches, including the Edward-Wakool system, from below Hume Dam to the upper end of Lake Alexandrina. The components of the study were: · Literature Review A comprehensive bibliography was compiled on the floodplain vegeta­ tion, its environment and the impact ofman's activities. The literature was reviewed and summarised. · Floristic Survey A field survey was carried out, visiting 112 sites throughout the study area and collecting vegetation data from 335 plots. Data collected were the species present, their relative abundance, the condition of the eucalypts, the amount ofeucalypt regeneration and indices ofgrazing pressure. Brief studies were made of the effects of river regulation and salinisation at specific sites. Thirty-seven plant communities were identified from a numerical analyis ofthe floristic survey data. The differences reflect environmental changes both along the river and across the floodplain. The most important factors were identified as soil salinity levels and flooding frequency.
    [Show full text]
  • Vegetation of Culgoa National Park, Central Northern New South Wales
    275 Vegetation of Culgoa National Park, central northern New South Wales John T. Hunter School of Human and Environmental Studies, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, AUSTRALIA. Email: [email protected] Abstract: The vegetation of Culgoa National Park (22 986 ha in area; 29°15’ S, 147°15’ E) in the central north of New South Wales, approximately 40 km west of Goodooga and adjoining the NSW/Queensland border, is described. Six vegetation communities are delineated based on UPGMA analysis of cover-abundance scores of all vascular plant taxa. These communities are mapped based on ground truthing and air photo interpretation. All communities are simple in structure being primarily woodlands, shrublands and grasslands. Communities described are: 1) Eucalyptus coolabah Woodlands, 2) Muehlenbeckia florulenta Shrubby Thickets, 3) Eucalyptus coolabah – Acacia pendula Woodlands & Grasslands, 4) Eucalyptus largiflorens – Eucalyptus coolabah Woodlands, 5) Eucalyptus largiflorens – Alectryon oleifolius Woodlands, 6) Callitris glaucophylla – Eucalyptus populnea Woodlands and Shrublands. A total of 240 vascular plant taxa were found of which 8% were exotic in origin. Conservation issues are discussed. Cunninghamia (2005) 9(2): 275–284 Introduction 1947 (Gentilli 1971). Since that time the rainfall has been substantially higher and there has been an increase in the Culgoa National Park (29°15’ S, 147°15’ E) is located near amount of summer rainfall (Pickard & Norris 1994). There Weilmoringle, in the central north of New South Wales, are long hot summers and short cold winters. The average approximately 40 km west of Goodooga and 80 km north maximum and minimum temperatures for summer are 36°C of Brewarrina.
    [Show full text]