DOCSLIB.ORG

OBSTRUCTION THEORY by TZE-BENG NG B.Sc, University of Warwick, 1971 a THESIS SUBMITTED in PARTIAL FULFILMENT of the REQUIREMENTS

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
OBSTRUCTION THEORY by TZE-BENG NG B.Sc, University of Warwick, 1971 a THESIS SUBMITTED in PARTIAL FULFILMENT of the REQUIREMENTS f OBSTRUCTION THEORY by TZE-BENG NG B.Sc, University of Warwick, 1971 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE in the Department of MATHEMATICS We accept this thesis as conforming to the required standard. , THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA March, 1973. In presenting this thesis in partial fulfilment of the iquirements for an advanced degree at the University of British Columb.^,, I agree that the Library shall make it freely available for reference and study. I further agree that permission for extensive copying of this thesis for scholarly purposes may be granted by the Head of my Department or by his representatives. It is understood that copying or publication of this thesis for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. Tze-Beng Ng Department of Mathematics The University of British Columbia Vancouver 8, Canada Date 19th'i March 1973 .ABSTRACT The aim of this dissertation at the outset is to give a survey of obstruction theories after Steenrod and to describe the various techniques employed by different researchers, the intricate perhaps subtle relation from one technique to another. Owing to the difficulty in computing higher co- homology operations, one is led naturally to K-theory and the Eilenberg-Moore spectral sequence. However, these and other recent developments especially those in the study of stable Postnikov systems go beyond the intention of this modest survey. iii TABLE OF .CONTENTS Chapter'1. Introduction. 1 Chapter 2. Fiber Spaces. 2.1. Definitions and Notations. 10 2.2. Principal Fiber Spaces. 13 2.3. Transgression in Fiber Spaces. 17 2.4. On Decomposition of Fibration and Lifting Problem. 22 2.5. G-spaces. 26 Chapter 3. Classical Obstruction Theory. 3.1. Obstruction to Extension. 30 3.2. Primary Obstruction. 33 3.3. Extension Theorems and Classification of Maps. 35 Chapter 4. Global Obstruction. 4.1. Definitions of Homotopyand Homology Obstructions. 40 4.2. Generalized Cell Complexes and Obstructions. 45 4.3. Extension Theorems. 51 4.4. n-systems. 53 4.5. Secondary Obstruction and Construction of a Postnikov System. 55 4.6. A Postnikov Decomposition. • 57 4.7. Localisation. 61 4.8. Secondary Difference Obstruction. 62 Chapter 5. Principal Fiber Bundles. 5.1. Definitions. 66 5.2. Preliminaries. 67 5.3. Obstructions for Pair of Fiber Spaces 69 5.4. Applications. 72 5.5. Decomposition of Principal Fiber Bundles and Moore-Postnikov Invariants. 74 5.6. The Main Theorems. 79 5.7. Obstruction and Characteristic Classes 81 5.8. Conclusion. 91 Chapter 6. Modified Postnikov Towers and Obstructions to Liftings. 6.1. Modified Postnikov Towers. 94 6.2. Construction of Induced Maps between Postnikov Systems. 98 6.3. The k-invariants for a Lifting. 104 6.4. Obstruction Theory for Orientable Fiber Bundles. 112 6.5. An Illustration. 116 6.6. Some Examples of the Use of Postnikov Towers. 121 Bibliography. 125 ACKNOWLEDGMENT I must thank Professor Denis Sjerve for his guidance, for the many enlightening conversations and helpful suggestions, for bringing to my attention [50] and [51], very much so for making some of the decisions in cutting down the size of this thesis and for reading the final draft. I must also thank Professor U. Suter for reading this thesis. Finally I am pleased to express my gratitude to the Mathematics Department for generously provided a teaching assistantship and a Summer research grant while I am a student of Maths, at the University of British Columbia. Tze-Beng Ng March, 1973. CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION One of the oldest problems in (algebraic) topology is to find liftings for a map a: K KB to E, the domain of another map £: E — —> B. An even more interesting problem is the number of non-homotopic liftings of a, and hence to determine algebraic (problem) invariants for a homotopy classification of such liftings. Suppose we cannot lift a, assuming that we do not know this in advance, can we give an "invariant" to confirm the impossible? In many cases we can do so and such an invariant is branded with the term obstruction (to lifting). Suppose we can lift a, i.e. we have the following commutative diagram: where 8: K »• E is a lifting of a i.e. Cog ~ a . Then we know the following diagram: Hn(E) H (K) -> H (B) commutes, we may therefore look at the following algebraic problem: H (E) n n Hn(K) ->Hn(B) When can we find {<}> : H (K) > H (E)} such that Yn n n £. od> = for all n ? * n * (1) If so, when is {<)> ) induced by a map 3: K * E ? < > (2) Do { j n} commute with boundary operator ? (3) Do {<j) } commute with the change of coefficient operator ? n Consider the following diagram: H (E)®Z sr n p H (K) ® Z : y H (B) ® Z n p a ® 1 n p obtained by tensoring the preceding diagram with the integer mod p, Z (p a positive prime). And we consider liftings of this problem. Again the same question can be asked: When is $ representable as some <j>®l The advantage of looking at this problem is its effectiveness. Just looking at the homology is not enough as some simple examples will show. So we increase the structure by looking at the cohomology ring: (E) y s 5 y * ^ * H (K) •< - H (B) a * * When can we find homomorphism 6: H (E) >-.H (K) such that 6o£ = a ? The cohomology ring is more interesting because of its structure. Thus 9 must be a ring homomorphism. We may strengthen the question by requiring 6 to commute with coefficient operators, with the Poincare duality operator in case E and K are Poincare complexes, with the * boundary operator 6 and with the Bockstein operator. But we know we have cohomology operations and we can regard cohomology as modules over the Steenrod mod p algebra Gl(p), for example. Our next requirement on 6 will be that it should commute with all cohomology operations. In addition to requiring 6 be an Ol(p)-module homomorphism, we may require OUp) * that it should also be an (H (B;Z ))-module homomorphism, where TP * * * the module structures on H (E;Z^) and H (K'"Zp) are induced by 5 and * Gtfp) * a respectively, and (H (B;Z )) is the semi-tensor product algebra XP ®Ol which is equal to H (B;Z ) (p) as a vector space and with P multiplication as follows: * For v«>a, u®0 e H (B,Z )®OUP) / (V®a)«(u®0) = I (-1) 1 (va u)«aJB where i|>(a) = £ a, © a'. and i i>: CH(p) -> Ol(p)®0l(p) is the diagonal map. Once again we have the question: When is the module homomorphism induced by a map 0: K •> E ? In another direction one can consider the homotopy lifting TT problem, that is, when can we find a homomorphism g: a (K) • "%(E) making the following diagram: * * (K) , *(B ) # commutative i.e. £„oB = a„ ? When is 8 induced by a map K > E ? In # tt general we cannot tell. But if £: E -*- B is a covering space then we have the following theorem: LIFTING THEOREM [24, pp.89]. Suppose K is connected and locally pathwise connected. Then a can be lifted to a map 8: K >• E iff the following algebraic problem: if. (E) pf 1 fl(K) o—"VTri(B) ft is solvable, i.e. iff there exist homomorphism (3 satisfying K^o$ = ct^, Consider the following situation: K »- B a with a "V a', i.e. a. = a' £ [K, B] , where [K, B] denotes the homotopy classes of maps from K to B. We want some conditions to ensure that the liftability of a depends only on its homotopy class a e [K, B]. In case £ is a fiber space we have the following: COVERING HOMOTOPY THEOREM. Let £=(E, £, B, F) be a fiber space , X locally compact and paracompact, and A closed in X. Suppose f: X — s- E is a fixed given map and h: Xxi > B is a homotopy of a = £of: X • B satisfying h|xx{0} = gof. Suppose further that there is a " partial lifting " of h on A, i.e. a map h': Axiuxx{0} *• E satisfying £oh' = h|AxiWxx{0> and h'|x*{0} = f. Then there exist a homotopy of f, h: Xxi >- E satisfying (1) Koh = h , (2) h|xx{0} = f , and (3) h|Ax!WXx{0} = h". Now, since we know that given any map £: E >• B we can convert it into a map E" >-B , which is a Hurewicz fibration and where E is a deformation retract of E' (see for example [44, pp.84]), we may assume that £ is a fibration right from the beginning. Dual to the lifting problem we have the extension problem: When can we find a map 8: E > K such that the following diagram, E _ > K is commutative, i.e. p|x = a ? In general the answer is not always "yes". There are some obvious counter examples. In case 8 exists we want some conditions to ensure that all o' ^ a be extendable over E. In this direction we have the well known homotopy extension theorem of Borsuk: - HOMOTOPY EXTENSION THEOREM.' Let g: E > K be a map, X closed in E and 3|X = a. Suppose one of the following conditions is satisfied (1) E and X are triangulable. (2) K is triangulable. (3) K is an ANR. (4) (E, X) is an ANR pair. Then any homotopy h of a can be extended to a homotopy of 8 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Persistent Obstruction Theory for a Model Category of Measures with Applications to Data Merging
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY, SERIES B Volume 8, Pages 1–38 (February 2, 2021) https://doi.org/10.1090/btran/56 PERSISTENT OBSTRUCTION THEORY FOR A MODEL CATEGORY OF MEASURES WITH APPLICATIONS TO DATA MERGING ABRAHAM D. SMITH, PAUL BENDICH, AND JOHN HARER Abstract. Collections of measures on compact metric spaces form a model category (“data complexes”), whose morphisms are marginalization integrals. The fibrant objects in this category represent collections of measures in which there is a measure on a product space that marginalizes to any measures on pairs of its factors. The homotopy and homology for this category allow measurement of obstructions to finding measures on larger and larger product spaces. The obstruction theory is compatible with a fibrant filtration built from the Wasserstein distance on measures. Despite the abstract tools, this is motivated by a widespread problem in data science. Data complexes provide a mathematical foundation for semi- automated data-alignment tools that are common in commercial database software. Practically speaking, the theory shows that database JOIN oper- ations are subject to genuine topological obstructions. Those obstructions can be detected by an obstruction cocycle and can be resolved by moving through a filtration. Thus, any collection of databases has a persistence level, which measures the difficulty of JOINing those databases. Because of its general formulation, this persistent obstruction theory also encompasses multi-modal data fusion problems, some forms of Bayesian inference, and probability cou- plings. 1. Introduction We begin this paper with an abstraction of a problem familiar to any large enterprise. Imagine that the branch offices within the enterprise have access to many data sources.
    [Show full text]
  • Obstructions, Extensions and Reductions. Some Applications Of
    Obstructions, Extensions and Reductions. Some applications of Cohomology ∗ Luis J. Boya Departamento de F´ısica Te´orica, Universidad de Zaragoza. E-50009 Zaragoza, Spain [email protected] October 22, 2018 Abstract After introducing some cohomology classes as obstructions to ori- entation and spin structures etc., we explain some applications of co- homology to physical problems, in especial to reduced holonomy in M- and F -theories. 1 Orientation For a topological space X, the important objects are the homology groups, H∗(X, A), with coefficients A generally in Z, the integers. A bundle ξ : E(M, F ) is an extension E with fiber F (acted upon by a group G) over an space M, noted ξ : F → E → M and it is itself a Cech˘ cohomology element, arXiv:math-ph/0310010v1 8 Oct 2003 ξ ∈ Hˆ 1(M,G). The important objects here the characteristic cohomology classes c(ξ) ∈ H∗(M, A). Let M be a manifold of dimension n. Consider a frame e in a patch U ⊂ M, i.e. n independent vector fields at any point in U. Two frames e, e′ in U define a unique element g of the general linear group GL(n, R) by e′ = g · e, as GL acts freely in {e}. An orientation in M is a global class of frames, two frames e (in U) and e′ (in U ′) being in the same class if det g > 0 where e′ = g · e in the overlap of two patches. A manifold is orientable if it is ∗To be published in the Proceedings of: SYMMETRIES AND GRAVITY IN FIELD THEORY.
    [Show full text]
  • PIECEWISE LINEAR TOPOLOGY Contents 1. Introduction 2 2. Basic
    PIECEWISE LINEAR TOPOLOGY J. L. BRYANT Contents 1. Introduction 2 2. Basic Definitions and Terminology. 2 3. Regular Neighborhoods 9 4. General Position 16 5. Embeddings, Engulfing 19 6. Handle Theory 24 7. Isotopies, Unknotting 30 8. Approximations, Controlled Isotopies 31 9. Triangulations of Manifolds 33 References 35 1 2 J. L. BRYANT 1. Introduction The piecewise linear category offers a rich structural setting in which to study many of the problems that arise in geometric topology. The first systematic ac- counts of the subject may be found in [2] and [63]. Whitehead’s important paper [63] contains the foundation of the geometric and algebraic theory of simplicial com- plexes that we use today. More recent sources, such as [30], [50], and [66], together with [17] and [37], provide a fairly complete development of PL theory up through the early 1970’s. This chapter will present an overview of the subject, drawing heavily upon these sources as well as others with the goal of unifying various topics found there as well as in other parts of the literature. We shall try to give enough in the way of proofs to provide the reader with a flavor of some of the techniques of the subject, while deferring the more intricate details to the literature. Our discussion will generally avoid problems associated with embedding and isotopy in codimension 2. The reader is referred to [12] for a survey of results in this very important area. 2. Basic Definitions and Terminology. Simplexes. A simplex of dimension p (a p-simplex) σ is the convex closure of a n set of (p+1) geometrically independent points {v0, .
    [Show full text]
  • Math 527 - Homotopy Theory Obstruction Theory
    Math 527 - Homotopy Theory Obstruction theory Martin Frankland April 5, 2013 In our discussion of obstruction theory via the skeletal filtration, we left several claims as exercises. The goal of these notes is to fill in two of those gaps. 1 Setup Let us recall the setup, adopting a notation similar to that of May x 18.5. Let (X; A) be a relative CW complex with n-skeleton Xn, and let Y be a simple space. Given two maps fn; gn : Xn ! Y which agree on Xn−1, we defined a difference cochain n d(fn; gn) 2 C (X; A; πn(Y )) whose value on each n-cell was defined using the following \double cone construction". Definition 1.1. Let H; H0 : Dn ! Y be two maps that agree on the boundary @Dn ∼= Sn−1. The difference construction of H and H0 is the map 0 n ∼ n n H [ H : S = D [Sn−1 D ! Y: Here, the two terms Dn are viewed as the upper and lower hemispheres of Sn respectively. 1 2 The two claims In this section, we state two claims and reduce their proof to the case of spheres and discs. Proposition 2.1. Given two maps fn; gn : Xn ! Y which agree on Xn−1, we have fn ' gn rel Xn−1 if and only if d(fn; gn) = 0 holds. n n−1 Proof. For each n-cell eα of X n A, consider its attaching map 'α : S ! Xn−1 and charac- n n−1 teristic map Φα :(D ;S ) ! (Xn;Xn−1).
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:2101.06841V2 [Math.AT] 1 Apr 2021
    C2-EQUIVARIANT TOPOLOGICAL MODULAR FORMS DEXTER CHUA Abstract. We compute the homotopy groups of the C2 fixed points of equi- variant topological modular forms at the prime 2 using the descent spectral sequence. We then show that as a TMF-module, it is isomorphic to the tensor product of TMF with an explicit finite cell complex. Contents 1. Introduction 1 2. Equivariant elliptic cohomology 5 3. The E2 page of the DSS 9 4. Differentials in the DSS 13 5. Identification of the last factor 25 6. Further questions 29 Appendix A. Connective C2-equivariant tmf 30 Appendix B. Sage script 35 References 38 1. Introduction Topological K-theory is one of the first examples of generalized cohomology theories. It admits a natural equivariant analogue — for a G-space X, the group 0 KOG(X) is the Grothendieck group of G-equivariant vector bundles over X. In 0 particular, KOG(∗) = Rep(G) is the representation ring of G. As in the case of non-equivariant K-theory, this extends to a G-equivariant cohomology theory KOG, and is represented by a genuine G-spectrum. We shall call this G-spectrum KO, omitting the subscript, as we prefer to think of this as a global equivariant spectrum — one defined for all compact Lie groups. The G-fixed points of this, written KOBG, is a spectrum analogue of the representation ring, BG 0 BG −n with π0KO = KOG(∗) = Rep(G) (more generally, πnKO = KOG (∗)). These fixed point spectra are readily computable as KO-modules. For example, KOBC2 = KO _ KO; KOBC3 = KO _ KU: arXiv:2101.06841v2 [math.AT] 1 Apr 2021 This corresponds to the fact that C2 has two real characters, while C3 has a real character plus a complex conjugate pair.
    [Show full text]
  • ON TOPOLOGICAL and PIECEWISE LINEAR VECTOR FIELDS-T
    ON TOPOLOGICAL AND PIECEWISE LINEAR VECTOR FIELDS-t RONALD J. STERN (Received31 October1973; revised 15 November 1974) INTRODUCTION THE existence of a non-zero vector field on a differentiable manifold M yields geometric and algebraic information about M. For example, (I) A non-zero vector field exists on M if and only if the tangent bundle of M splits off a trivial bundle. (2) The kth Stiefel-Whitney class W,(M) of M is the primary obstruction to obtaining (n -k + I) linearly independent non-zero vector fields on M [37; 0391. In particular, a non-zero vector field exists on a compact manifold M if and only if X(M), the Euler characteristic of M, is zero. (3) Every non-zero vector field on M is integrable. Now suppose that M is a topological (TOP) or piecewise linear (IX) manifold. What is the appropriate definition of a TOP or PL vector field on M? If M were differentiable, then a non-zero vector field is just a non-zero cross-section of the tangent bundle T(M) of M. In I%2 Milnor[29] define! the TOP tangent microbundle T(M) of a TOP manifold M to be the microbundle M - M x M G M, where A(x) = (x, x) and ~(x, y) = x. If M is a PL manifold, the PL tangent microbundle T(M) is defined similarly if one works in the category of PL maps of polyhedra. If M is differentiable, then T(M) is CAT (CAT = TOP or PL) microbundle equivalent to T(M).
    [Show full text]
  • Symmetric Obstruction Theories and Hilbert Schemes of Points On
    Symmetric Obstruction Theories and Hilbert Schemes of Points on Threefolds K. Behrend and B. Fantechi March 12, 2018 Abstract Recall that in an earlier paper by one of the authors Donaldson- Thomas type invariants were expressed as certain weighted Euler char- acteristics of the moduli space. The Euler characteristic is weighted by a certain canonical Z-valued constructible function on the moduli space. This constructible function associates to any point of the moduli space a certain invariant of the singularity of the space at the point. In the present paper, we evaluate this invariant for the case of a sin- gularity which is an isolated point of a C∗-action and which admits a symmetric obstruction theory compatible with the C∗-action. The an- swer is ( 1)d, where d is the dimension of the Zariski tangent space. − We use this result to prove that for any threefold, proper or not, the weighted Euler characteristic of the Hilbert scheme of n points on the threefold is, up to sign, equal to the usual Euler characteristic. For the case of a projective Calabi-Yau threefold, we deduce that the Donaldson- Thomas invariant of the Hilbert scheme of n points is, up to sign, equal to the Euler characteristic. This proves a conjecture of Maulik-Nekrasov- Okounkov-Pandharipande. arXiv:math/0512556v1 [math.AG] 24 Dec 2005 1 Contents Introduction 3 Symmetric obstruction theories . 3 Weighted Euler characteristics and Gm-actions . .. .. 4 Anexample........................... 5 Lagrangian intersections . 5 Hilbertschemes......................... 6 Conventions........................... 6 Acknowledgments. .. .. .. .. .. .. 7 1 Symmetric Obstruction Theories 8 1.1 Non-degenerate symmetric bilinear forms .
    [Show full text]
  • Almost Complex Structures and Obstruction Theory
    ALMOST COMPLEX STRUCTURES AND OBSTRUCTION THEORY MICHAEL ALBANESE Abstract. These are notes for a lecture I gave in John Morgan's Homotopy Theory course at Stony Brook in Fall 2018. Let X be a CW complex and Y a simply connected space. Last time we discussed the obstruction to extending a map f : X(n) ! Y to a map X(n+1) ! Y ; recall that X(k) denotes the k-skeleton of X. n+1 There is an obstruction o(f) 2 C (X; πn(Y )) which vanishes if and only if f can be extended to (n+1) n+1 X . Moreover, o(f) is a cocycle and [o(f)] 2 H (X; πn(Y )) vanishes if and only if fjX(n−1) can be extended to X(n+1); that is, f may need to be redefined on the n-cells. Obstructions to lifting a map p Given a fibration F ! E −! B and a map f : X ! B, when can f be lifted to a map g : X ! E? If X = B and f = idB, then we are asking when p has a section. For convenience, we will only consider the case where F and B are simply connected, from which it follows that E is simply connected. For a more general statement, see Theorem 7.37 of [2]. Suppose g has been defined on X(n). Let en+1 be an n-cell and α : Sn ! X(n) its attaching map, then p ◦ g ◦ α : Sn ! B is equal to f ◦ α and is nullhomotopic (as f extends over the (n + 1)-cell).
    [Show full text]
  • MATH 227A – LECTURE NOTES 1. Obstruction Theory a Fundamental Question in Topology Is How to Compute the Homotopy Classes of M
    MATH 227A { LECTURE NOTES INCOMPLETE AND UPDATING! 1. Obstruction Theory A fundamental question in topology is how to compute the homotopy classes of maps between two spaces. Many problems in geometry and algebra can be reduced to this problem, but it is monsterously hard. More generally, we can ask when we can extend a map defined on a subspace and then how many extensions exist. Definition 1.1. If f : A ! X is continuous, then let M(f) = X q A × [0; 1]=f(a) ∼ (a; 0): This is the mapping cylinder of f. The mapping cylinder has several nice properties which we will spend some time generalizing. (1) The natural inclusion i: X,! M(f) is a deformation retraction: there is a continous map r : M(f) ! X such that r ◦ i = IdX and i ◦ r 'X IdM(f). Consider the following diagram: A A × I f◦πA X M(f) i r Id X: Since A ! A × I is a homotopy equivalence relative to the copy of A, we deduce the same is true for i. (2) The map j : A ! M(f) given by a 7! (a; 1) is a closed embedding and there is an open set U such that A ⊂ U ⊂ M(f) and U deformation retracts back to A: take A × (1=2; 1]. We will often refer to a pair A ⊂ X with these properties as \good". (3) The composite r ◦ j = f. One way to package this is that we have factored any map into a composite of a homotopy equivalence r with a closed inclusion j.
    [Show full text]
  • Differential Topology Forty-Six Years Later
    Differential Topology Forty-six Years Later John Milnor n the 1965 Hedrick Lectures,1 I described its uniqueness up to a PL-isomorphism that is the state of differential topology, a field that topologically isotopic to the identity. In particular, was then young but growing very rapidly. they proved the following. During the intervening years, many problems Theorem 1. If a topological manifold Mn without in differential and geometric topology that boundary satisfies Ihad seemed totally impossible have been solved, 3 n 4 n often using drastically new tools. The following is H (M ; Z/2) = H (M ; Z/2) = 0 with n ≥ 5 , a brief survey, describing some of the highlights then it possesses a PL-manifold structure that is of these many developments. unique up to PL-isomorphism. Major Developments (For manifolds with boundary one needs n > 5.) The corresponding theorem for all manifolds of The first big breakthrough, by Kirby and Sieben- dimension n ≤ 3 had been proved much earlier mann [1969, 1969a, 1977], was an obstruction by Moise [1952]. However, we will see that the theory for the problem of triangulating a given corresponding statement in dimension 4 is false. topological manifold as a PL (= piecewise-linear) An analogous obstruction theory for the prob- manifold. (This was a sharpening of earlier work lem of passing from a PL-structure to a smooth by Casson and Sullivan and by Lashof and Rothen- structure had previously been introduced by berg. See [Ranicki, 1996].) If B and B are the Top PL Munkres [1960, 1964a, 1964b] and Hirsch [1963].
    [Show full text]
  • ALMOST COMPLEX STRUCTURES and OBSTRUCTION THEORY Let
    ALMOST COMPLEX STRUCTURES AND OBSTRUCTION THEORY MICHAEL ALBANESE Abstract. These are notes for a lecture I gave in John Morgan's Homotopy Theory course at Stony Brook in Fall 2018. Let X be a CW complex and Y a simply connected space. Last time we discussed the obstruction to extending a map f : X(n) ! Y to a map X(n+1) ! Y ; recall that X(k) denotes the k-skeleton n+1 of X. There is an obstruction o(f) 2 C (X; πn(Y )) which vanishes if and only if f can be (n+1) n+1 extended to X . Moreover, o(f) is a cocycle and [o(f)] 2 H (X; πn(Y )) vanishes if and only (n+1) if fjX(n−1) can be extended to X ; that is, f may need to be redefined on the n-cells. Obstructions to lifting a map p Given a fibration F ! E −! B and a map f : X ! B, when can f be lifted to a map g : X ! E? If X = B and f = idB, then we are asking when p has a section. For convenience, we will only consider the case where F and B are simply connected, from which it follows that E is simply connected. For a more general statement, see Theorem 7.37 of [2]. Suppose g has been defined on X(n). Let en+1 be an n-cell and α : Sn ! X(n) its attaching map, then p ◦ g ◦ α : Sn ! B is equal to f ◦ α and is nullhomotopic (as f extends over the (n + 1)-cell).
    [Show full text]
  • Topological Modular Forms with Level Structure
    Topological modular forms with level structure Michael Hill,∗ Tyler Lawsony February 3, 2015 Abstract The cohomology theory known as Tmf, for \topological modular forms," is a universal object mapping out to elliptic cohomology theories, and its coefficient ring is closely connected to the classical ring of modular forms. We extend this to a functorial family of objects corresponding to elliptic curves with level structure and modular forms on them. Along the way, we produce a natural way to restrict to the cusps, providing multiplicative maps from Tmf with level structure to forms of K-theory. In particular, this allows us to construct a connective spectrum tmf0(3) consistent with properties suggested by Mahowald and Rezk. This is accomplished using the machinery of logarithmic structures. We construct a presheaf of locally even-periodic elliptic cohomology theo- ries, equipped with highly structured multiplication, on the log-´etalesite of the moduli of elliptic curves. Evaluating this presheaf on modular curves produces Tmf with level structure. 1 Introduction The subject of topological modular forms traces its origin back to the Witten genus. The Witten genus is a function taking String manifolds and producing elements of the power series ring C[[q]], in a manner preserving multiplication and bordism classes (making it a genus of String manifolds). It can therefore be described in terms of a ring homomorphism from the bordism ring MOh8i∗ to this ring of power series. Moreover, Witten explained that this should factor through a map taking values in a particular subring MF∗: the ring of modular forms. An algebraic perspective on modular forms is that they are universal func- tions on elliptic curves.
    [Show full text]