DOCSLIB.ORG

D9.7. Report of Case Studies on Gender Equality As a Focus Point of National and Nativist Discourses

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
D9.7. Report of Case Studies on Gender Equality As a Focus Point of National and Nativist Discourses D9.7. Report of Case Studies on Gender Equality as a Focus Point of National and Nativist Discourses Authors Birte Siim, Andrea Krizsán, Dominika Gruziel & Anita Nissen Document Identifier D9.7 Report of Case Studies on Gender Equality as a Focus Point of National and Nativist Discourses Version 1.0 Date Due 01.07.2016 Submission date 16.06.2016 WorkPackage 9 Balancing Gender and Generational Citizenship Lead Beneficiary 6 AAU Dissemination Level PU 1 Change log Version Date amended by changes 1.0 16.6.2016 Birte Siim Final document sent to coordinator to be submitted. Partners involved number partner name People involved 1 UU Trudie Knijn, Floor van Maaren 3 UNIZG Josip Šipić 6 AAU Birte Siim, Anita Nissen, Jeppe Fuglsang Larsen 12 CEU Andrea Krizsán, Dominika Gruziel, Katalin Ámon 14 HUJI Dana Halevy, John Gal 16 UNITO Tiziana Caponio, Gaia Testore, Arianna Santero 18 UNIOVI Hans van den Broek, Tania Suárez-Fernández 26 HBS Brigitte Unger, Thomas Gesterkamp, Andreas Kemper 2 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................................ 5 LIST OF CONTRIBUTORS .............................................................................................................................................. 6 LIST OF ACRONYMS .................................................................................................................................................... 7 1. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................................... 8 1.1 Method ................................................................................................................................................................... 10 2. COUNTRY CONTEXTS .............................................................................................................................................12 2.1 Croatia - Croatian Party of Rights dr. Ante Starčević (Hrvatska stranka prava dr. Ante Starčević) ........................ 15 2.2 Denmark - Danish People’s Party (Dansk Folkeparti) ............................................................................................. 16 2.3 Germany – Alternative for Germany (Alternative für Deutschland) ....................................................................... 17 2.4 Hungary - Jobbik Movement for a Better Hungary (Jobbik Magyarországért Mozgalom) .................................... 18 2.5 Israel – The Jewish Home (Ha'Bait Ha'Yeudi) and Israel our Home (Yisrael Beytenu) ............................................ 20 2.6 Italy – North League (Lega Nord) ........................................................................................................................... 20 2.7 The Netherlands – Party for Freedom (Partij voor de Vrijheid) .............................................................................. 21 2.8 Spain – Plataforma per Catalonia (Platform for Catalonia) ................................................................................... 22 3. EUROSCEPTICISM WITHIN RADICAL RIGHT PARTIES AS A CONTEXTUAL VARIABLE FOR FRAMING MIGRATION, DIVERSITY, GENDER AND THE FAMILY .......................................................................................................................24 3.1 The EP Political Group Formation Process .............................................................................................................. 25 The European Conservatives and Reformists group (ECR) ...................................................................................... 25 Europe of Freedom and Direct Democracy (EFDD) .................................................................................................. 26 Europe of Nations and Freedom (ENF) .................................................................................................................... 26 Non-Affiliated Party - Jobbik .................................................................................................................................... 27 3.2 Partial Conclusion ................................................................................................................................................... 27 4. MIGRATION AND INTRA-EU MOBILITY ...................................................................................................................29 4.1 The Frames of Migration ........................................................................................................................................ 29 4.2 The Frames of Migration as Employed by the Parties ............................................................................................ 31 Citizenship based on cultural proximity ................................................................................................................... 31 Migrants as strains on the national social cohesion ................................................................................................ 33 Sending MS as being ignored by the EU .................................................................................................................. 37 3 Intra-EU migration as a demographic/family threat ................................................................................................ 38 Asylum seekers and refugees as a security threat ................................................................................................... 39 Partial Conclusion .................................................................................................................................................... 40 Israel ......................................................................................................................................................................... 41 5. GENDER .................................................................................................................................................................43 5.1 The Frames of Gender Equality............................................................................................................................... 43 5.2 The Frames of Gender Equality as Employed by the Parties .................................................................................. 44 Gender equality as a non-EU matter ....................................................................................................................... 44 Gender equality as a relative norm .......................................................................................................................... 45 Gender equality as a threat ..................................................................................................................................... 48 Partial Conclusion .................................................................................................................................................... 50 Israel ......................................................................................................................................................................... 50 6. FAMILY ..................................................................................................................................................................51 6.1 The Perceptions of Family ....................................................................................................................................... 51 6.2 The Perceptions of Family Used by the Parties ....................................................................................................... 52 The family free from state and/or EU interventions ................................................................................................ 52 Traditional family in need of strengthening............................................................................................................. 53 The weakening of the family as a cause of the demographic crisis ......................................................................... 54 Partial Conclusion .................................................................................................................................................... 56 Israel ......................................................................................................................................................................... 57 7. SUMMARY OF THE FRAMINGS OF THE 7 EUROPEAN POPULIST RADICAL RIGHT PARTIES ......................................58 8. CONCLUSION .........................................................................................................................................................59 8.1 Historical Contexts of Political and Cultural Institutions ........................................................................................ 59 8.2 The Migration, Mobility and Diversity Logic – Economic and Cultural Dimensions ............................................... 60 8.3 Gender, Family and Welfare Regimes .................................................................................................................... 61 8.4 The Israeli and European Radical Right Compared ................................................................................................ 63 8.5 Reflections and Issues for Further Research on the Changes of the Populist Radical Right ................................... 63 REFERENCES
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Immigration Policy Paradoxes in Catalonia, Spain, 1985-2011: a Political Economy Approach
    Immigration policy paradoxes in Catalonia, Spain, 1985-2011: a political economy approach by Luke Stobart submitted to the University of Hertfordshire in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of PhD in Business and Management Studies March 2016 Abstract Before the crisis Catalonia and the rest of Spain received high volumes of immigration – of which much was “illegal”. This was despite formally strict controls – EU policy – and different governments in Madrid claiming to operate a legal model of migration – leading to identification of a “policy paradox”. In the same period immigration became problematized, which in Catalonia allowed xenophobic politics to gain popular support – despite being a territory proactive at integrating newcomers. This research aimed to identify the undercurrents of these contradictions and respond to questions on the relative impact of business, state, national and electoral factors. It surveys literature on migration paradoxes and theories, develops an original conceptual framework by critically assessing a range of radical writing, performs quantitative and secondary study of the Catalan, Spanish and European economic and policy contexts (in general and regarding immigration), and analyses findings from interviews with privileged “insiders” and observers (employers, union leaders, migrant activists and policy advisors). Policy contradictions and the problematization of immigration were identified as rooted firstly in the inherent contradictions of the capitalist state. States must ensure availability of new reserves of labour to guarantee accumulation and make savings by not having to “socially reproduce” “imported” labour power. Yet their abstract national and bounded character propels constant nationcraft – a process best performed invisibly and negatively by symbolically and practically excluding migrants from territory, rights and citizenship.
    [Show full text]
  • EUI RSCAS Working Paper 2020
    RSCAS 2020/88 Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies Integrating Diversity in the European Union (InDivEU) The Politics of Differentiated Integration: What do Governments Want? Country Report - Denmark Viktor Emil Sand Madsen European University Institute Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies Integrating Diversity in the European Union (InDivEU) The Politics of Differentiated Integration: What do Governments Want? Country Report - Denmark Viktor Emil Sand Madsen EUI Working Paper RSCAS 2020/88 Terms of access and reuse for this work are governed by the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC- BY 4.0) International license. If cited or quoted, reference should be made to the full name of the author(s), editor(s), the title, the working paper series and number, the year and the publisher. ISSN 1028-3625 © Viktor Emil Sand Madsen, 2020 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY 4.0) International license. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Published in December 2020 by the European University Institute. Badia Fiesolana, via dei Roccettini 9 I – 50014 San Domenico di Fiesole (FI) Italy Views expressed in this publication reflect the opinion of individual author(s) and not those of the European University Institute. This publication is available in Open Access in Cadmus, the EUI Research Repository: https://cadmus.eui.eu Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies The Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies, created in 1992 and currently directed by Professor Brigid Laffan, aims to develop inter-disciplinary and comparative research on the major issues facing the process of European integration, European societies and Europe’s place in 21st century global politics.
    [Show full text]
  • 184 Bet. O. Lovf. Vedr. Arbejdsmarkedets Tillægspension
    184 Bet. o. lovf. vedr. Arbejdsmarkedets Tillægspension Til lovforslag nr. L 71. Betænkning afgivet af Folketinget den 21. februar 2008 Betænkning over Forslag til lov om ændring af lov om Arbejdsmarkedets Tillægspension (Kompetenceudviklings- og uddannelsesfonde) [af beskæftigelsesministeren (Claus Hjort Frederiksen)] 1. Udvalgsarbejdet Høring Lovforslaget blev fremsat den 6. februar 2008 Et udkast til lovforslaget har inden fremsættel- og var til 1. behandling den 19. februar 2008. sen været sendt i høring, og beskæftigelsesmini- Lovforslaget blev efter 1. behandling henvist til steren sendte den 18. januar 2008 dette udkast til behandling i Arbejdsmarkedsudvalget. udvalget, jf. alm. del - bilag 63. Den 6. februar 2008 sendte beskæftigelsesministeren de ind- Dispensation fra 3 0-dages-reglen komne høringssvar og et notat herom til udval- Beskæftigelsesministeren har over for udval- get. get anbefalet, at Folketingets behandling gen- nemføres hurtigst muligt, og at der dispenseres 2. Indstillinger fra reglen i Folketingets forretningsorden § 13, stk. 1, om, at der skal gå 30 dage fra lovforsla- Udvalget indstiller lovforslaget til vedtagelse gets fremsættelse til dets vedtagelse. Beskæfti- uændret. gelsesministeren har begrundet anbefalingen, jf. Inuit Ataqatigiit, Siumut, Tjóðveldisfloldmrin L 71 - bilag 5. og Sambandsflokkurin var på tidspunktet for be- Udvalget indstiller, at lovforslaget kommer til tænkningens afgivelse ikke repræsenteret med 3. behandling tidligere end 30 dage efter lovfor- medlemmer i udvalget og havde dermed ikke ad- slagets fremsættelse. gang til at komme med indstillinger eller politi- ske udtalelser i betænkningen. Møder En oversigt over Folketingets sammensætning Udvalget har behandlet lovforslaget i 2 møder. er optrykt i betænkningen. Jens Vibjerg (V) Peter Juel Jensen (V) Flemming Møller (V) Sophie Løhde (V) Bent Bøgsted (DF) Morten Messerschmidt (DF) Knud Kristensen (KF) fmd.
    [Show full text]
  • An Unholy Alliance
    An Unholy Alliance The European Far Right and Putin’s Russia Antonis Klapsis Antonis Klapsis Antonis Credits Wilfried Martens Centre for European Studies Rue du Commerce 20 Brussels, BE 1000 The Wilfried Martens Centre for European Studies is the political foundation and think tank of the European People’s Party (EPP), dedicated to the promotion of Christian Democrat, conservative and like-minded political values. For more information please visit: www.martenscentre.eu Editor: Ingrid Habets, Research Officer, Martens Centre External editing: Communicative English bvba Layout and cover design: RARO S.L. Typesetting: Victoria Agency Printed in Belgium by Drukkerij Jo Vandenbulcke This publication receives funding from the European Parliament. © Wilfried Martens Centre for European Studies 2015 The European Parliament and the Wilfied Martens Centre for European Studies assume no responsibility for facts or opinions expressed in this publication or their subsequent use. Sole responsibility lies with the author of this publication. ISBN (to come) Table of Contents About us 04 About the author 06 Acknowledgements 08 Executive summary 10 Introduction 12 The ideological connection 16 Russia as a geopolitical alternative 24 Maintaining close contacts 32 Ukraine and Crimea 38 Exercising pressure from within 48 Conclusions 54 Policy recommendations 58 Bibliography 60 Keywords Far right – Political extremism – Russia – European Union – NATO – Anti-Americanism – Euroscepticism – Ukraine – Crimea – Populism About us Martens Centre profile The Wilfried Martens Centre for European Studies, established in 2007, is the political foundation and think tank of the European People’s Party (EPP). The Martens Centre embodies a pan-European mindset, promoting Christian Democrat, conservative and like-minded political values.
    [Show full text]
  • Spain 2012 International Religious Freedom Report
    SPAIN 2012 INTERNATIONAL RELIGIOUS FREEDOM REPORT Executive Summary The constitution and other laws and policies protect religious freedom and, in practice, the government generally respected religious freedom. However, some local governments imposed restrictions that affected members of religious minority groups. For example, some Muslim and non-Catholic Christian groups stated that restrictions and policies at the local level inhibited them from assembling to practice their beliefs. The law provides taxpayers the option of allocating a percentage of their income tax to the Catholic Church but not to other religious groups. The trend in the government’s respect for religious freedom did not change significantly during the year. There were reports of societal discrimination based on religious affiliation, belief, or practice. Prominent societal leaders, however, took positive steps to promote religious freedom. Muslims continued to experience some societal prejudice and challenges related to integration. Some expressions of anti-Semitism persisted, including graffiti and the dissemination of neo-Nazi messages. U.S. officials engaged with government and religious leaders to foster dialogue and promote religious tolerance and freedom. The embassy and consulate general in Barcelona organized events with leaders of minority religious groups, and hosted speakers to share U.S. perspectives on religious freedom. Section I. Religious Demography The National Statistics Institute estimates the population to be 47 million. The government does not collect data on religious affiliation. According to a survey conducted in October by the Spanish Center for Sociological Investigation, approximately 71 percent of respondents identified themselves as Catholic and nearly 3 percent as followers of another religion. In addition, 16 percent described themselves as “non-believers,” and 9 percent as atheists.
    [Show full text]
  • 5. Møde Fald Gøre Ved Denne Retspraksis? Onsdag Den 21
    Onsdag den 21. oktober 2020 (D) 1 Mener ministeren, at det styrker retsfølelsen, når kriminelle kan spe‐ kulere i at lave mere kriminalitet for at opnå en strafrabat og dermed få flere år på fri fod og en kortere dom, og hvad vil ministeren i givet 5. møde fald gøre ved denne retspraksis? Onsdag den 21. oktober 2020 kl. 13.00 (Spm. nr. S 95, skr. begr. Medspørger: Peter Skaarup (DF)). 4) Til justitsministeren af: Dagsorden Peter Skaarup (DF) Hvad mener ministeren om den seneste hamstring af peberspray i 1) Besvarelse af oversendte spørgsmål til ministrene (spørgetid). butikkerne, hvor forhandlerne siger, at det er »hr. og fru Danmark«, (Se nedenfor). der hamstrer peberspray? (Spm. nr. S 89, skr. begr. Medspørger: Morten Messerschmidt (DF)). 2) 1. behandling af lovforslag nr. L 5: Forslag til lov om ændring af lov om byfornyelse og udvikling af 5) Til justitsministeren af: byer. (Anmeldelsesordning for boliger, der lejes ud). Peter Skaarup (DF) Af boligministeren (Kaare Dybvad Bek). Mener ministeren, at det styrker eller svækker retsfølelsen, at en (Fremsættelse 07.10.2020). vanvidsbilist fra Fyn, der dræber tre personer, kun får 3 års fængsel, når strafferammen er 8 år? 3) 1. behandling af lovforslag nr. L 9: (Spm. nr. S 90. Medspørger: Morten Messerschmidt (DF)). Forslag til lov om ændring af lov om midlertidig regulering af bolig‐ forholdene. (Bopælspligt i nyetablerede boliger, der i en lokalplan er 6) Til skatteministeren af: fastlagt til helårsboliger). Morten Messerschmidt (DF) Af boligministeren (Kaare Dybvad Bek). Hvad er ministerens holdning til at gøre håndværkerfradraget mere (Fremsættelse 07.10.2020). fleksibelt for at fremme grønne investeringer hos boligejerne og fast‐ holde arbejdspladser i byggebranchen – eksempelvis ved at skabe 4) 1.
    [Show full text]
  • DF Sejlede for Danmark S. 4, 5 Og 25 Politiet Sminker Tal S.8-9
    Nr. 4 • august 2013 • 17. årgang DF sejlede for Danmark s. 4, 5 og 25 Politiet sminker tal s.8-9 DF spejler danskerne s. 10-11 Lokalportræt Holbæk s. 16-17 Årsmøde s.29-31 Leder Prisen på grisen: En varm ret og et varmt emne Frikadellens flugt over denne sommer... plankeværket HARAM! - Hvem skulle have anet, at no- get så uskyldigt og sagesløst som en klas- sisk, dansk frikadelle skulle fylde en del af en dansk sommerdebat? Hvem ville også have anet for blot få år si- den, og vi taler ikke hele årtier, at denne lille runde, pandestegte svinekøds-fætter skulle Foto: Scanpix blive forvist fra danske børns institutioners Helt sagesløs! Alle ved, hvordan en dansk grise- spisekort? basse med krølle på halen ser ud, så her er en for I landet langt mod nord, der lever og længe sommer-emmet HELT uskyldig gris, der hverken har levet svinegodt af netop griseproduktion Foto: Scanpix er forbudt eller tilladt: marcipangrisen. og eksport af kvalitetsbacon, flæskesider, flæ- Statsministeren mistede grebet om den danske skesvær og svinekød til hak, koteletter eller mad og blev af vittige hunde denne sommer kaldt hvad modtagerne har foretrukket, har det vel Frikadelle-Helle dag? At de måske fik madpakke med den dag, forekommet som en latterlig tanke, at landets der var gris på gaflen? At muslimske patienter egne beboere ikke til en hver tid og uden vi- i Hvidovre og på Amager levede af salat eller dere skulle kunne få sig en delle - på brød, i er gris basiskød, man får det alle vegne og i valgte kylling? bolle, med rødkål, med agurk, med kartoffel- alle mulige retter.
    [Show full text]
  • 19 Spain. Populism from the Far Right to the Emergence of Podemos
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by St Mary's University Open Research Archive 19 Spain. Populism From the Far Right to the Emergence of Podemos Karen B. Sanders, Rosa Berganza, and Roberto de Miguel Introduction There is a lack of systematic research on populism and populist political communication in Spain, consisting as it does of mainly descriptive and case study work. This state of research contrasts to the greater body of work carried out in the Latin American context. The absence of a developed corpus of theoretical and empirical research leads us to argue that caution should be exercised in assessing and classifying populism and populist communication in the Spanish context at this stage. However, the evidence that we have been able to collect from published research, survey data, media accounts, and interviews with political actors allows us to present what we hope is a useful review of the state of political populism scholarship regarding Spain. Research on Populism in Spain In the May 2014 European Parliament elections, Podemos (We Can), a party registered in March 2014, won five seats and 1.2 million votes. Podemos emerged from Spain’s 2011 Outraged Movement. Although its activists and leaders claim that it is “neither of the left or of the right” (Carlin, 2015), most Spanish commentators consider it to be Spain’s most significant left-wing populist party (see, e.g., Carlin, 2015), despite the as yet limited number of publications analyzing its rise and characteristics. Until the appearance of Podemos, most research that centered on Spanish political populism relied on single case studies and treated the phenomenon as typical of the far right of Spanish politics in common with developments in other European countries (see Hernández-Carr, 2011, 2013).
    [Show full text]
  • Enhancing Real-Time Twitter Filtering and Classification Using a Semi-Automatic Dynamic Machine Learning Setup Approach
    Enhancing Real-Time Twitter Filtering and Classification using a Semi-Automatic Dynamic Machine Learning setup approach Master’s Thesis Nick de Jong Enhancing Real-Time Twitter Filtering and Classification using a Semi-Automatic Dynamic Machine Learning setup approach THESIS submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE in COMPUTER SCIENCE TRACK SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY by Nick de Jong born in Rotterdam, 1988 Web Information Systems Department of Software Technology Faculty EEMCS, Delft University of Technol- CrowdSense ogy Wilhelmina van Pruisenweg 104 Delft, the Netherlands The Hague, the Netherlands http://wis.ewi.tudelft.nl http://www.twitcident.com c 2015 Nick de Jong Enhancing Real-Time Twitter Filtering and Classification using a Semi-Automatic Dynamic Machine Learning setup approach Author: Nick de Jong Student id: 1308130 Email: [email protected] Abstract Twitter contains massive amounts of user generated content that also con- tains a lot of valuable information for various interested parties. Twitcident has been developed to process and filter this information in real-time for interested parties by monitoring a set of predefined topics, exploiting humans as sensors. An analysis of the relevant information by an operator can result in an estimation of severity, and an operator can act accordingly. However, among all relevant and useful content that is extracted, also a lot of irrelevant noise is present. Our goal is to improve the filter in such a way that the majority of information pre- sented by Twitcident is relevant. To this end we designed an artifact consisting of several components, developed within a dynamic framework.
    [Show full text]
  • The Long-Term Budget of the European Union
    2015:1op Same, same but different The Nordic EU members during the crisis THE EU´S POLITICAL AND CONSTITUTIONAL SYSTEM Pernilla Bäckman (ed.) Julie Hassing Nielsen Juha Jokela Jakob Lewander (ed.) Göran von Sydow (ed.) Pernilla Bäckman (ed.), Julie Hassing Nielsen, Juha Jokela, Jakob Lewander (ed.) and Göran von Sydow (ed.) Same, same but different The Nordic EU members during the crisis – SIEPS 2015:1op – SIEPS 2015:1op Same, same but different 1 Occasional Paper No. 1op April 2015 Published by the Swedish Institute for European Policy Studies This publication is available at www.sieps.se The opinions expressed in the publication are those of the authors. Cover design by LuxLucid, Stockholm Typeset and printed in Stockholm by EO Grafiska AB ISSN 1651-8071 ISBN 91-85129-92-5 2 Same, same but different SIEPS 2015:1op Preface The euro crisis has marked change in European political systems and governance. The implications of the financial meltdown for labour markets and for sovereign debts have been immense, and, in turn, they have brought about changes in the EUs infrastructure and have deepened the commitment to European cooperation, such as the fiscal compact, the ESM and the European semester. At the same time, however, the effects of the crisis have been asymmetrically dispersed among - and within - the EU member states, where the ideas, realities and benefits of the EU are receiving new political and electoral focus. In this set of unusual circumstances, the perceptions and conceptualisations of European political cooperation may pass through periods of reaction, and possibly, more long-term changes in the definition of EU membership.
    [Show full text]
  • Darya Bazarkina Moscow State University for Humanities Sholokhov, Russia
    Originalan naučni rad UDK 329.055.1:323.28 329.18:316.774(4-672 EU) Primljeno: 14.10.2015. Odobreno: 02.11.2015. Darya Bazarkina Moscow State University for Humanities Sholokhov, Russia RIGHT-WING EXTREMISM AND TERRORISM IN THE TERRITORY OF THE EU: FROM “STREET FIGHTERS” TO “NATIONAL-SOCIALIST UNDERGROUND” Abstract In this paper are elaborated contemporary forms of extreme right-wing in the terri- tory of the EU, with special emphasis on right-wing terrorist activities. The author paid special attention to communicational aspect of contemporary extreme right- wing actions through comparative analysis of media from the EU territories. The goal of this paper is examination of causes and consequences of the contemporary European extreme right-wing and the consequences of their actions. The ideology of neo-Nazism is explained, within which the author pointed out similarities and differences between the old and the new reforms of the right-wing extremism. The author concludes that the two main communication channels that were on-going previous years – internet and WPM scene – are still continuously used with a goal of spreading the neo-Nazi idea throughout Europe. Key words: extreme right-wing, Nazism, neo-Nazism, fascism, communication, violence, terrorism, EU. Ultra-right-wing spirits have become a big problem of the European society during the actual economic crisis. That is, for example, according to survey data which was collected by Institute for market researches in Linz, ordered by the Austri- an magazine Standard, “more than a half of the population (54%) believes that Nazis are very possible to win the elections, if it is assumed that banning of the Nauka i drustvo 2-2015.indd 85 16.12.2015 17:08:14 86 Darya Bazarkina national-socialist ideology will be overthrown”1.
    [Show full text]
  • EUU Alm.Del Offentligt Referat : 08-46811 EUU
    Europaudvalget 2008-09 EUU Alm.del Offentligt referat Offentligt Europaudvalget REFERAT AF 8. EUROPAUDVALGSMØDE Dato: Fredag den 14. november 2008 Tidspunkt: Kl. 10.30 Sted: Vær. 2-133 Til stede: Svend Auken (S) formand, Erling Bonnesen (V), Henrik Høegh (V) næstformand, Morten Messerschmidt (DF), Pia Adelsteen (DF), Helle Sjelle (KF), Kim Mortensen (S), Benny Engelbrecht (S), Anne Grete Holmsgaard (SF) (fungerede på skift med Lone Dybkjær som formand un- der dagsordenens punkter 2-8), Karina Lorentzen (SF), Hanne Agersnap (SF), Astrid Kragh (SF), Lone Dybkjær (RV) (fungerede på skift med Anne Grete Holmsgaard som formand under dagsordenens punkter 2-8), Bjarne Laustsen (S) Desuden deltog: Justitsminister Brian Mikkelsen, undervisningsminister Bertel Haarder – med bistand fra Bente Skovgaard Kri- stensen, Kulturministeriet, og Torben Kornbech Rasmus- sen, Undervisningsministeriet – og fødevareminister Eva Kjer Hansen L Punkt 1. Drøftelse og eventuel afgivelse af beretning om åbenhed og ansvarlighed på kapitalmarkederne i Europa EUU alm. del (08) – bilag 58 (2. udkast til beretning) EUU alm. del (08) – bilag 59 (regeringens notat om dansk indspil m.v. på kapitalmarkederne af 13/11-08) Dette punkt blev behandlet for lukkede døre. 244 8. Europaudvalgsmøde 14/11-08 FO Punkt 2. Rådsmøde nr. 2906 (økonomi- og finansministre – budget) den 21. november 2008 Formanden gjorde ved mødets begyndelse opmærksom på, at da finansministe- ren er syg, havde regeringen tilbudt, at en anden minister kunne forelægge dags- ordenens punkt 2. Dette havde formanden imidlertid afslået, idet han håbede på, at finansministeren ville blive rask inden rådsmødet den 21. november, således at han selv kunne forelægge EU’s budget for 2009. Formanden bad om, at man i Finansministeriet overvejer i fremtiden at lave en mere pædagogisk udgave af samlenotaterne, hvor man gør opmærksom på, hvor brudfladerne er.
    [Show full text]