DOCSLIB.ORG

A Cancer Mortality Atlas Of' New Zealand

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Cancer Mortality Atlas Of' New Zealand ISSN OS48-944X DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SPECIAL REPORT SERIES A CANCER MORTALITY ATLAS OF' NEW ZEALAND Issued by the National Health Statistics Centre Department ofHealth, Wellington New Zealand p 2 1982 , , I I OJe to difficulties in the reproductive stage of printing, the shading for some maps does not precisely cover the areas for which they apply. I ISSN 0548-944X . DEPARTMENT OFHEALTH , . -A CANCER MORTALITYATLAS:OF NEW ZEALAND , I / by BARR Y BORltdAN MA .National Health Statistics Centre Department ofHealth· SPECIAL REPORT No. 63 096369' Issued by the National Health Statistics Centre . Department of Health, Wellington . ., New Zealand . 1982 ,. CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS DISCLAIMER AND COPYRIGHT FOREWORD INTRODUCTI ON 1 METHODOLOGY 3 CANCER OF THE BUCCAL CAVITY AND PHARYNX 11 CANCER OF THE OESOPHAGUS 15 CANCER OF THE STOMACH 19 CANCER OF THE LARGE INTESTINE 25 CANCER OF THE RECTUM 31 CANCER OF THE LARGE BOWEL 37 CANCER OF THE LIVER, GALLBLADDER AND BILE DUCTS 43 CANCER OF THE PANCREAS 49 CANCER OF THE LARYNX 53 CANCER OF THE TRACHEA, BRONCHUS AND LUNG, PLEURA AND MEDIASTINUM 57 MELANOMA OF THE SKIN 63 CANCER OF THE BREAST 67 CANCER OF THE CERVIX UTERI 71 CANCER OF THE UTERUS 75 CANCER OF THE OVARY, FALLOPIAN TUBE AND BROAD LIGAMENT 79 CANCER OF THE PROSTATE 83 CANCER OF THE BLADDER 87 CANCER OF THE BRAIN 91 LYMPHOSARCOMA 95 HODGKIN'S DISEASE 99 MULTIPLE MYELOMA 103 LEUKAEMIA 107 APPENDIX 111 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS· . The co-operation and assistance of th~ following people is gratefu.lly acknowledged: * . DrNMcGlashan, Department of Geography, University of Tasmani.a, .who introduced the author to.the field of medical geography and . made constructive criticisms on the development of this project. *·DrA Smith and Mr N· Pearce, Department of·Community. Health, Wellington' Clinical School of Medicine,. who made available the computer program'to' conduct the temporal analysis,and willingly offered advice and suggestions. * Mr J Findlay and Mr J Fraser, National Health Statistics Centre, ,for their, continued encouragement and support throughout this, .. study. Also Mr F Foster, for allowing access to the data and permission to publish. * Mr HFleming, Mr C Mooney, Miss K Carson, MsA Johnston, Mrs S Leiataua, and Miss S McKenna, for programming, clerical, and typing assistance. * Ms G·Simmonds, and the staff of the General Draughting Section, . Department of Lands and Survey, who accommodated every demand .; n -the production of the maps and graphs. - - /' DISCLAIMER The views expressed in this report are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the Department of Health. COPYRIGHT Provided the source is acknowledged information contained in this report may be freely used by any person. FOREWORD Whereas atlases of diseases, especially those of infectious and epidemic nature, started to appear at international scale in the nineteenth century, it has not been until comparatively recently that national atlases portraying death from cancer on a geographic basis have been produced. This apparent delay has been necessitated by the time taken to determine standard methods of dealing with problems of differential diagnosis, of recording and of presenting these generally unfamiliar data. Since Melvyn Howe's national atlas of mortality for the United Kingdom in 1963, atlases specialising in cancer deaths have been produced from as far afield as the United States and Japan, West Germany and mainland China. Each adopts its own system of geographic units and statistical classes to cope with large population numbers. In New Zealand Mr Borman has had the rather different problems stemming from the small numbers of deaths in individual geographic divisions of a nation of only 3 million people. The major questions, of course, are of selecting small enough units of space to retain realistic accuracy of locality and yet to have large enough populations for confidence in the findings. The time span selected relates to these twin aims: a longer period of years will increase the gross numbers in each unit but tend to disguise temporal shifts of incidence and become more subject to unrealities from the mobility of individuals. Barry Borman has steered a rational and explicable course through these professional problems in a way that presents the facts clearly and establishes for his readers both where significance in his geographic patterns may be placed and where less confidence lies. There can be few of us in the developed countries today whose families have not been touched by one of the many forms of cancer. Any advance in knowledge of these conditions is therefore to be welcomed and the underlying implication of defining cancer variations over space must be, in the long run, to explain those variations either in terms of environmental or other factors. This is a peculiarly geographic task and an approach to cancer elucidation validly complementary to those of medical and other researchers in the field. I am happy to commend Barry Borman's work to a readership which I would like to hope will extend beyond medicine, geography and kindred sciences to all those lay people who still have wonder about their world and can question the mechanisms behind the mysterious, even apparently quixotic, cancer distribution patterns of New Zealand. Neil McGlashan Department of Geography University of Tasmania Tasmania INTRODUCTION Cancer is the second leading cause of death in New Zealand, accounting for 20 percent of the total annual mortality. The national death rate for some sites (eg, large bowel and melanoma of the skin) are among the highest in the world. Although the aetiology of most human neoplasms remains elusive, the majority are believed to be attributable, directly or indirectly, to environmental factors. One initial approach to identifying these carcinogens, and hence facilitate primary prevention, is to describe the demographic, geographic, and temporal distributions of cancer in populations. Often this will provide clues to the underlying disease causative processes. This report presents the results of a study designed to define the spatial patterns and secular trends of cancer martality in the total New Zealand population. The principal objective in the cartographic and graphic portrayal of these data is to generate aetiological hypotheses for testing in subsequent research. 1 METHODOLOGY SPATIAL ANALYSIS The age, sex, and domicile of persons registered [1] as dying from cancer in various sites (Table 1) between 1974-1978 (inclusive) were extracted from the computer tapes held by the ~lational Health Statistics Centre. The de jure population [2] of each areal unit at the time of the 1976 Census (held on 23 March 1976) was used as the denominator. This was supplied by the Department of Statistics. The following caveat must be applied to these data. Although both the numerator and denominator take as a person's domicile [3] their 'usual place of residence' there are no stipulated criteria as to what constitutes 'usual'. This may produce anomalous situations. For . example, two people will be coded as living (or dying) in the same area even if the former had resided there for 20 years and the latter only one year. A hierarchy of spatial divisions were employed, which permitted both regional and small-scale local patterns to be defined (Fig. 2): a) The 24 main urban areas. In addition to the central city or borough, these non-administrative units include neighbouring boroughs, town districts and parts of counties which are regarded. as suburban and thus belonging to that centre of population irrespective of their being under different local body administration [4J. Urban areas were used, in preference to cities, as their boundaries at the 1976 Census were, generally, unchanged from those at the 1971 Census [5J. b) Geographic counties (counties) excluding the main urban areas. These cover the county and any borough, or town district which may be geographically ""/ithin, or adjacent to, that county [6]. By the 1976 Census date the Thames and Coromandel Counties and Thames borough had been amalgamated under a single controlling authority - the Thames-Coromande1 District Council. However, in this report the Thames-Coromandel District, as it is officially titled, has been designated the Coromandel ..Thames County to avoid confusion with the Thames hospital board district. c) Hospital board districts (districts) which are amalgams of various counties. It should be noted that the Waiapu, Taumarunui, Mar"lborough, Vincent, and r~aniototo Counties and districts are synonymous. Accordingly, reference to these units implies the same mortality experience at both scales. The need to incorporate some form of stochastic test in spatial studies of morbidity or mortality has been previously emphasised [7J. It is crucial to distinguish between those areas in which disease or death results from random influences and those in which the occurrence is beyond being merely a chance event. A statistically significant variation implies that there is an underlying cause for which an explanation should be sought. 3 4 The indirect method of standardisation [8] was used to adjust for differences in the local population age structures. This permits the calculation, for each area, of a standardised mortality ratio (SMR) which expresses, as a percentage, the ratio of the observed number of deaths to those theoretically expected if the national age-specific death rates had been in operation. An SMR of 100, therefore, indicates a mortality level equal to that of the total New Zealand population; an SMR of less than 100 signifies a more favourable experience; and an SMR of over 100 represents an unfavourable experience. The actual confidence level, based on the Poisson distribution, of each local deviation of the observed from the expected number of deaths was determined [9J. As a probability value could, therefore, be placed on each area it became feasible to identify gradients of morta1i ty by compari ng the. experi ence of conti guous areas.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • No 37, 26 June 1969, 1159
    No. 31 1159 THE NEW ZEALAND GAZETTE Published by Authority WELLINGTON: THURSDAY, 26 JUNE 1969 Land Taken for Road in Block XVI, Mahurangi Survey A. R. P. Being District, Rodney County o 0 5.4 Part Wharekahika B. 9 Block; coloured blue on plan. AR.THUR PORRI'IT, Governor-General o 0 16.5 Part Wharekahika 18K 11 Block; coloured orange on plan. A PROCLAMATION As the same are more particularly delineated on the plan PURSUANT to the Public Works Act 1928, I, Sir Arthur Espie marked M.O.W. 22597 (S.O. 5755) deposited in the office of Porritt, Baronet, the Governor-General of Ne~ Ze~land, the Minister of Works at Wellington, and thereon coloured hereby proclaim and declare that the land descnbed In the as above-mentioned. Schedule hereto is hereby taken for road; and I also declare that this Proclamation shall take effect on and after the Given under the hand of His Excellency the Governor­ 30th day of June 1969. General, and issued under the Seal of New Zealand, this 5th day of June 1969. [L.S., PBRCY B. ALLEN, Minister of Works. SCHEDULE GOD SAVE THE QUEEN! NORm AUCKLAND LAND DISTRICT ALL that piece of land containing 1.5 perches situated in Block (P.W. 72/35/4/0; 0.0.72/35/4/4/11) XVI, Mahurangi Survey District, Nortlh Auckland R.D., and being part Tungutu Block; as the same is more particularly delineated on the plan marked M.O.W. 23240 (S.O. 45982) Easement over Land Taken for Drainage Purposes in Block deposited in the office of the Minister of Works at Wellington, XV, Rangiora Survey District, and Block 111, Christchurch and thereon ooloured yellow.
    [Show full text]
  • East Coast Inquiry District: an Overview of Crown-Maori Relations 1840-1986
    OFFICIAL Wai 900, A14 WAI 900 East Coast Inquiry District: An Overview of Crown- Maori Relations 1840-1986 A Scoping Report Commissioned by the Waitangi Tribunal Wendy Hart November 2007 Contents Tables...................................................................................................................................................................5 Maps ....................................................................................................................................................................5 Images..................................................................................................................................................................5 Preface.................................................................................................................................................................6 The Author.......................................................................................................................................................... 6 Acknowledgements............................................................................................................................................ 6 Note regarding style........................................................................................................................................... 6 Abbreviations...................................................................................................................................................... 7 Chapter One: Introduction ......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • RMA S32aa Evaluation: Submission 832.1 and 832.4 Hounsell Holdings
    RMA s32AA Evaluation: Submission 832.1 and 832.4 Hounsell Holdings Ltd Table 1: Rezoning Proposal The specific provisions sought to be amended Assessment of the efficiency and effectiveness of the provisions in achieving the objectives of the Proposed Waikato District Plan (PDP) The rezoning proposal The rezoning proposals are to: • Amend the zoning of the property at 268 Te Kowhai Road, Te Kowhai from Rural Zone to Residential Zone; AND Amend the Proposed District Plan to make any consequential amendments as necessary to address the matters raised in the submission. (Submission 832.1) • Amend the zoning of the property at 284 Onion Road, Te Kowhai from Rural Zone to Residential Zone; AND Amend the Proposed District Plan to make any consequential amendments as necessary to address the matters raised in the submission. (Submission 832.4) The extent of these two areas are shown in red on the plan extract below, as included in the submission: 1 | Page The subject land comprises approximately 142 hectares and is generally located in the Te Kowhai area south of Horotiu and borders the State Highway. Directly to the south of the land is the Rotokauri Growth Cell including residential, and business land and the Te Rapa Industrial Area, within Hamilton City. Development of the adjacent land was approved via Special Housing Area in 2018 (133 ha). 2km to the north is the Horotiu settlement and its rural hinterland. A submission (Submission 790.2) has been made to extend the industrial zone. This will come within 650m of the subject land. 4km to the west is the Te Kowhai Settlement The residential zoning will support at least 2,000 dwellings at conventional density as set out in the submission, and 2,500 to 5,000 dwellings at foreseeable target densities.
    [Show full text]
  • Zone Extents Te Kowhai - Addendum
    SECTION 42A REPORT Report on submissions and further submissions on the Proposed Waikato District Plan Hearing 25: Zone Extents Te Kowhai - Addendum Report prepared by: Jonathan Clease Date: 21 April 2021 1 Supplementary Statement 1.1 Hounsell Holdings Ltd [832] 1. In my s42a report on zone extents in Te Kowhai, I assessed the submission by Hounsell Holdings Ltd who sought to rezone some 142 hectares of land in the Rotokauri area west of Hamilton from Rural Zone to Residential Zone1. The subject site has the address of 268 Te Kowhai Road and 284 Onion Road. 2. In my s42a report I stated that no evidence had been received in support of the submissions2. This was incorrect. A planning statement provided by Mr Craig Batchelor, along with a s32AA assessment, was inadvertently overlooked. The s32AA assessment also included a ‘desk-top’ review of transport matters provided by Ms Judith Makinson who is the Transport Engineering Manager at consulting firm CKL Ltd. 3. This addendum builds on the assessment of Rotokauri contained in my s42a report, and reflects a review of the submitter’s evidence. 4. For ease of reference, the submitters and further submitters on the Rotokauri area are set out in the table below: Submission Submitter Decision requested point 832.1 Hounsell Holdings Ltd Amend the zoning of the property at 268 Te Kowhai Road, Te Kowhai from Rural Zone to Residential Zone; AND Amend the Proposed District Plan to make any consequential amendments as necessary to address the matters raised in the submission. FS1277.55 Waikato Regional Council Oppose FS1108.201 Te Whakakitenga o Oppose Waikato Incorporated (Waikato-Tainui) FS1202.129 New Zealand Transport Oppose Agency FS1379.343 Hamilton City Council Oppose FS1387.1351 Mercury NZ Ltd for Oppose Mercury D 832.4 Hounsell Holdings Ltd Amend the zoning of the property at 284 Onion Road, Te Kowhai from Rural Zone to Residential Zone; AND Amend the Proposed District Plan to make any consequential amendments as necessary to address the matters raised in the submission.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Government on the East Coast
    Local Government on the East Coast August 2009 Jane Luiten A Report Commissioned by HistoryWorks for the Crown Forestry Rental Trust 1 Table of Contents Introduction................................................................................................................................ 5 Local Government.................................................................................................................. 5 Project Brief ........................................................................................................................... 7 Statements of Claim ............................................................................................................... 9 The Author ........................................................................................................................... 11 Executive Summary ................................................................................................................. 13 Part One: The Historical Development of Local Government................................................. 27 1. Local Government in the Colonial Context: 1840-1876................................................... 28 1.1 Introduction.............................................................................................................. 28 1.2 Local Government in the Crown Colony, 1840-1852.............................................. 29 1.3 Constitution Act 1852 .............................................................................................. 35 1.4 Financing
    [Show full text]
  • G11 Schedule
    Gisborne District Council Tairawhiti Resource Management Plan G11 Schedule TERRESTRIAL AREAS OF SIGNIFICANT CONSERVATION VALUE TABLE OF CONTENTS WP12 ........................................................................................................ 32 PR14 .......................................................................................................... 1 WR36 ........................................................................................................ 33 PR36 .......................................................................................................... 2 WR37 ........................................................................................................ 34 PR29 .......................................................................................................... 3 WR38 ........................................................................................................ 35 PR10 .......................................................................................................... 4 WR49 ........................................................................................................ 35 PP0 ............................................................................................................. 5 WR55 ........................................................................................................ 36 PR20 .......................................................................................................... 6 WR56 .......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Census Districts / Statistical Maps
    University of Waikato Library: Map Collection New Zealand: Census Districts / Statistical maps The Map Collection of the University of Waikato Library contains a comprehensive collection of maps from around the world with detailed coverage of New Zealand and the Pacific. These maps are held in storage on Level 1. Please ask a librarian if you would like to use one. NZMS 92 1971 1. North Island: statistical areas and divisions 1: 2,000,000 2. Whangarei urban area 1: 50,000 3. Whangarei City 1: 25,000 4. Auckland statistical division 1: 250,000 5. Northern Auckland urban area 1: 50,000 6. Western Auckland urban area 1: 50,000 7. Central Auckland urban area 1: 50,000 8. Southern Auckland urban area 1: 50,000 9. Hamilton statistical division 1: 250,000 10. Hamilton urban area 1: 50,000 11. Hamilton City 1: 25,000 12. Tauranga urban area 1: 50,000 13. Tauranga City 1: 35,000 14. Rotorua urban area 1: 50,000 15. Rotorua City 1: 25,000 16. Gisborne urban area 1: 50,000 17. Gisborne City 1: 25,000 18. Napier-Hastings statistical division 1: 250,000 19. Napier urban area 1: 50,000 20. Napier City 1: 25,000 21. Hastings urban area 1: 50,000 22. Hastings City 1: 25,000 23. New Plymouth urban area 1: 50,000 24. New Plymouth City 1: 25,000 25. Wanganui urban area 1: 50,000 26. Wanganui City 1: 25,000 27. Palmerston North statistical division 1: 250,000 28. Palmerston North urban area 1: 50,000 29.
    [Show full text]
  • Te Whanau O Erana Pera Manene Ripia (Wai 973)
    OFFICIAL Wai 900, A13 TE WHANAU O ERANA PERA MANENE RIPIA (WAI 973) Scoping Report A scoping report commissioned by the Waitangi Tribunal for the East Coast district inquiry (Wai 900) November 2007 Jonathan Sarich Elissa Chong I. The Authors Jonathan Sarich holds a Masters of Arts in History with distinction from Victoria University of Wellington (2006). He has been employed at the Waitangi Tribunal as a Research Analyst/Inquiry Facilitator since January 2007. Elissa Chong holds a Bachelor of Arts in History with first class honours from Victoria University of Wellington. She has been employed at the Waitangi Tribunal as a Research Analyst/Inquiry Facilitator since August 2005. 2 Content I. THE AUTHORS .................................................................................................................................................................2 II. INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................................................................................4 1. PART ONE: THE LAND HOLDINGS OF HAAPI POWHIRO.............................................................................9 1.1 METHODOLOGY ............................................................................................................................................................9 1.2 HAAPI POWHIRO’S EAST COAST MAORI LAND INTERESTS .........................................................................................15 1.3 HAAPI POWHIRO’S HAURAKI MAORI LAND INTERESTS ..............................................................................................32
    [Show full text]
  • The New Zealand Gazette. 2603
    OCT. 10.] THE NEW ZEALAND GAZETTE. 2603 Rotorua----Napier.-All that main highway in the Counties Matawai - Koranga Bridge.-All that main highway in of Rotorua and Taupo, declared as the Rotoruar-Napier W aikohu County, declared as the Matawai - Koranga Bridge Main Highway, described in Orders in Council dated 9th Main Highway, described in Order in Council dated 2n.d June, 1924, and 14th January, 1932, and published in the April, 1928, and published in the Gazette on 5th April, 1928. Gazette on 12th June, 1924, and 21st January, 1932, Taurangakautuku Road.-Al1 that main highway in Mata­ respectively. kaoa County, declared as the Taurangakautuku Road Main Oambridge-Taupo (via Atiamuri).-All that main high­ Highway, described in Order in Council dated 2nd April, way in the Taupo County, declared as the Cambridgs-Taupo 1928, and published in the Gazette on 5th April, 1928. (via Atiamuri) Main Highway, described in Order in Council Rotokautuku Bridge - Waiomatatini.-AII that main high­ dated 9th June, 1924, and published in the Gazette on 12th way in Waiapu County, declared as the Rotokautuku Bridge - June, 1924. Waomatatini Main Highway, described in Order in Council Guiliotne-Dpotiki via Ooast.-All that main highway in dated 2nd April, 1928, and published in the Gazette on 5th Opotiki County, declared as the Gisborne----Opotiki via Coast April, 1928. Main Highway, described in Order in Council dated 13th Mangakino-Waiomatatini.-All that main highway in November, 1934, and published in the Gazette on 15th Waiapu County, declared as the Mangakino-Waiomatatini November, 1934. Main Highway, described in Order in Council dated 16th December, 1935, and published in the Gazette on 19th Decem­ Waioeka Road.-All that main highway in Opotiki County ber, 1935.
    [Show full text]
  • The Farming of Maori Lands
    THE FARMING OF MAORI LANDS CHARLES GOLDSMITH, Te Araroa We have seen how the Maori inherited his land and how through the process of succession the numbers of the owners increased. I$w were lands with such a multiplicity of ownership to be farmed? Any one owner could start something ‘on his own account, and so could everyone else in the block who had a mind to do so. Trouble started and no one got anywhere. The solution lay in leasing to one of the owners, or some other Maori or European, or by incorporating the block. By the latter means, the Committee of Management could borrow money and farm the land in the interests of all the owners. One block with over 500 owners comprising 16,100 acres of virgin country in the Matakaoa County was incorporated in 1913, with the late Sir Apirana Ngata as the Chairman of the Com- mittee of Management. He was empowered by the Court to borrow on the security of the freehold for the purposes of surveying and development. The block was subdivided into 13 allotments, a community woolshed built, and yards and dip erected. The Committee then granted leases of 21 years with right of renewal to selected and approved owners who had gained know- ledge and experience of farming methods from other incorpora- tions or European settlers, especially from the late Mr T. S. Williams, the “father” of Maori farming oh the East Coast. The lessees were in their turn granted loans from the bank on the security of their leases and stock, backed up by guarantees from the Block Committee.
    [Show full text]
  • Addendum Agenda of Ordinary Strategic Growth Committee
    Notice of Meeting: I hereby give notice that an ordinary Meeting of the Strategic Growth Committee will be held on: Date: Thursday 14 May 2020 Time: 10.00 am Meeting Room: Audio Visual Link Richard Briggs Chief Executive Strategic Growth Committee Komiti Rautaki Whakatupu OPEN LATE AGENDA Membership Chairperson Cr D Macpherson Deputy Chairperson Cr R Hamilton Members Mayor P Southgate Deputy Mayor G Taylor Cr M Bunting Cr M Forsyth Cr M Gallagher Cr K Naidoo-Rauf Cr A O’Leary Cr R Pascoe Cr S Thomson Cr M van Oosten Cr E Wilson Maangai J Whetu Quorum: A majority of members (including vacancies) Meeting Frequency: Six weekly Becca Brooke Governance Manager Menetia Mana Whakahaere 12 May 2020 Telephone: 07 838 6727 [email protected] www.hamilton.govt.nz Strategic Growth Committee Agenda 14 May 2020- OPEN Page 1 of 84 ITEM TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 11 Strategic Growth Committee Chairs Report - 13 February 2020 3 12 Hamilton-Waikato Metro Area Wastewater Project 6 13 Future Proof Update 38 Strategic Growth Committee Agenda 14 May 2020- OPEN Page 2 of 84 Committee: Strategic Growth Committee Date: 14 May 2020 Author: Rebecca Watson Authoriser: Amy Viggers Item 11Item Position: Governance Advisor Position: Governance Team Leader Report Name: Strategic Growth Committee Chairs Report - 14 May 2020 Report Status Open Staff Recommendation - Tuutohu-aa-kaimahi 1. That the Strategic Growth Committee receives the report. Attachments - Ngaa taapirihanga Attachment 1 - Chair's Report - 14 May 2020. Strategic Growth Committee Agenda 14 May 2020-
    [Show full text]
  • No 67, 3 August 1944
    Jlumb. 67 939 THE NEW ZEALAND GAZETTE WELLINGTON, THURSDAY, AUGUST 3, 1944 CoRRIGENDUl\I Allocating Railway Land to the Purposes of Street in the Borough of Carterton Department of Agriculture, Wellington, 28th July, 1944. N the notice of the result ·of the general eJectior, of certain [L.S.] C. L. N. NEWALL, Governor-General I Rabbit Boards, dated the 10th ,Tuly, 1944, anJ published in A PROCLAMATION the New Zealancl Gazpftp, No. 58, 1944, page 886, for "Tauranga-o­ N pursuance and exercise of the powers and authorities vested moana Rabbit Board " mentionrd in the Schedule thereto read I in me by the Public Works Act, 1928, and of every other "Turanga-o-moana Rabbit Board". power and authority in anywise enabling me in this behalf, I, Cyril In the notice of appointment of members of certain Rabbit Louis Norton Newall, the Governor-General of the Dominion of Boards, dated the 25th July, 1944, and published in +.he New New Zealand, do hereby proclaim and declare that the land which Zealand Gazette No. 64, 1944, page 924, for " Gerald Miller " is described in the Schedule hereto (and which was taken for the mentioned in the third eolumn of the Schedule tberet.o read Wellington-Napier Railway, and is not now required for such " Gerald lVfillar ", and f 01' " Otara- W allacetown " mentioned in purpose) shall, upon the publicn.tion hereof in the New Zealand the second column of the said Schedule read" Otatara--VVallacetown ''. Gazette, become street, and that such street shall be maintained by R. B. TENNENT, the Carterton ·Borough Council in like manner as other streets Assistant Direct,or-General of Agriculture.
    [Show full text]