An Architectural History of the Canterbury Hebrew Congregation

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

An Architectural History of the Canterbury Hebrew Congregation An Architectural History of the Canterbury Hebrew Congregation Gay Sweely During the 1960s and 70s, many important structures in Christchurch were un- 1 These developments were reported sympathetically demolished due to the lack of heritage laws and the introduc- in the local newspapers, the Lyttelton Times, the Press (Christchurch) and the tion of new construction codes for withstanding seismic activity. Noted historian Otago Daily Times. The newspapers of- John Wilson recorded some of these buildings in Lost Christchurch (1984). Four ten carried notices or reports of inter- years later, the heritage-protected synagogue of the Canterbury Hebrew Con- est to the Jewish community, especially gregation in Gloucester Street met the same demise. In the middle of that year, those solemn days observed throughout the year. In addition, news from other the site contained only rubble from a building that had been loved and admired New Zealand Jewish communities was by many: Jews, local residents and visitors alike. Today, few people walking in also reported by the local press. The Gloucester Street would realize that a once-stately polychrome building proudly Archives of the Christchurch Hebrew Congregation contain a large number of occupied what is now a vacuum of asphalt paving. newspaper clippings, from which many of the details in the present account are This paper outlines the design, construction and ultimate loss of T. S. Lambert’s taken. Further details were obtained Christchurch synagogue. To contextualize the building’s design and construc- from personal interviews with S. Cook tion, the paper also considers earlier synagogues in Australia and other New and S. Bures. Zealand cities. The final section discusses the loss of the Gloucester Street build- ing and the re-use of various elements from it in the replacement, Durham Street synagogue, which continues to serve the Canterbury Hebrew Congregation’s present-day needs. T. S. Lambert’s Synagogue In the early 1860s, gold was discovered on the West Coast near Hokitika, and a small group of Jewish miners and merchants established a congregation on the goldfields. When the gold deposits subsequently dwindled, the Jews of Hokitika and South Westland settled in the Canterbury area. The Torah from the Hokitika congregation was sent and proudly displayed in Christchurch (CHC, 1963b: 11). This combined congregation offered lectures, meetings and social functions dur- ing the late 1860s, as recorded in various articles, advertisements and notices in the local newspaper, the Press. In 1870, the Rev. Isaac Zachariah arrived in Christchurch from the West Coast and, until 1905, provided substantial leadership, hitherto offered only by lay members. During the 1870s, New Zealand Anglo-Jewish Associations and the Jewish Philanthropic Society were formed, as well as a Hebrew school (though informal until 1890) for the study of Judaic literature in the Canterbury 1 Hebrew Congregation. Although the Canterbury Hebrew Congregation was steadily growing, Jewish immigration to New Zealand had historically been low. In the 1870s and 80s, Jews immigrating to New Zealand and Australia were no longer only from Great Britain. The majority of the new immigrants were eastern-European Jews escap- ing waves of pogroms and massive episodes of oppression. The Hebrew congre- gation in Canterbury had expanded so much by 1875 that a meeting was held 95 Fig. 3: The lower level. Drawn by Jonathan Rollins. Fig. 4: The interior, showing the ceiling, gallery and circular window. Drawn by Fig. 3 Fig. 4 Jonathan Rollins. The exterior fronting Gloucester Street East has an elevation of much 2 “The great majority of the new larger Fig. 1: The circular Star of David originality, the chief feature in it being a large circular window, the commercial buildings of the 1870s and stained-glass window in Lambert’s 1880s, and beyond … were Italianate, a building. Drawn by Jonathan tracery of which takes the form of the double triangle (Fig. 1). On either style common in other New Zealand cit- Rollins, Department of Art & Design, side are smaller windows harmonising with the first, and below are ies … [and] many of the city’s imposing Eastern Kentucky University. a pair of handsomely panelled entrance doors... admission is gained Italianate buildings came also from the Fig. 2: The Ark. Drawn by hands of other architects like T. S. Lam- Fig. 1 Fig. 2 through a vestibule, paved with marble in a lozenge pattern.... Two Jonathan Rollins. bert” (Wilson et al., 2008: 81). doors hung so as to open in either direction, lead to the main build- to discuss more suitable accommodation. A building committee was selected to ing. Here, the most striking feature is the decorations at the South end decide on congregational requirements, available funding and an appropriate of the building. This is where the Ark is situated (Fig. 2). The Ark itself architect. The Canterbury-area Jewish community banded together and raised, in is a large receptacle, lined with red velvet and enclosed with two mas- a very short time, £4,000 – quite a feat for such a small congregation. The promi- sively carved sliding doors. In front of these hangs a white silk veil.… nent Christchurch architect Thomas Stoddart Lambert (1840-1915) was selected. The gallery is supported by iron fluted pillars, having capitals orna- mented with lilies and pomegranates (Figs. 3 and 4).... The lighting Lambert’s designs in Canterbury prior to 1880 had included churches, residences, by day is provided by four double windows on each side, filled with schools, commercial buildings and rural hotels. The Jewish community would cathedral glass, and outlined by glass of more brilliant colours, the have been aware of many of these structures, but they were probably more aware same colours being introduced into the large North window. (New of his commercial buildings on High Street for Mark Marks, W. Simpson and Synagogue, 1880: 2) B. Simpson, as Marks was a member of the Canterbury Hebrew Congregation The Christchurch synagogue was an eclectic mixture of architectural styles. (CHC, 1963c: 11). Born in Selkirk, Scotland, Lambert served his articles there be- Lambert designed in the classical style, as well as the Venetian Gothic and fore extensive travel and a brief residence in London. He arrived in New Zealand 2 Gothic styles. It was a basilica-like structure: the white vertical rusticated bands in early 1866, working on various structures north of the Wellington Province. could easily be massive columns or pilasters. A classical pediment appeared at In 1874, he moved to Wellington but was not optimistic about building prospects the apex, but Gothic window hoods broke up the classical approach. there and thus moved to Christchurch, where he entered the office of Frederick Strouts, who in 1871 had been one of four founding members of the Canterbury Lambert’s use of rustication and constructional polychromy placed the syna- Association of Architects (Stacpoole, 1976: 163). Under Strouts’ supervision, Lam- gogue comfortably within the Canterbury architectural aesthetics of the time. bert “personally surveyed the entire city of Christchurch” (Cyclopedia, 1903: 581). Lambert effectively married classical, Gothic and Scottish elements into a very In 1877, Lambert formed his own architectural firm. He was most likely selected distinctive South Island design. The small Canterbury congregation seemingly for the new synagogue because of his professional reputation: “His contracts was pleased with both the interior design, which was reminiscent of British syn- [were] finished without extras, and their total cost [was] usually somewhat under agogues, and the ornamental exterior: “It had taken more than a year in building his written estimate previously given” (Cyclopedia, 1903: 581). and all the records show that it was considered by all present to be a very hand- some building and worthy of the Jewish citizens of Christchurch at that time” A successful local Christchurch contractor, W. Prudhoe, was selected for the (CHC, 1963c: 14). synagogue construction. Prudhoe had served as contractor for architect Samuel Farr, known for the Christchurch Mechanics Institute, and had completed se- veral Government contracts (Akaroa Civic Trust, n.d.). An 1880 newspaper article Early Synagogues in New Zealand reported that the new synagogue design was unique and that its façade design The mid-nineteenth-century English Jews who settled in New Zealand would would be clad in blue, white and yellow stone, with exterior walls of brick. As the have been familiar with many synagogues around Great Britain, and perhaps account notes, the new synagogue was completed in November 1880: in Continental Europe and Australia. On the continent, architects of synagogues built during this period were experimenting with various styles, such as Roman- INTERSTICES 09 97 3 There is no archival information linking esque, Byzantine, classical, Moorish and German Gothic. However, this eclecti- Provincial Council. By the early 1860s, the Dunedin congregation was outgrow- 6 The style of the Dunedin synagogue is along the lines of More Park, Hertford- the South Island’s Louis Edward Nathan cism in design did not surface in the architecture of English Jewry (for example, ing its wooden synagogue and had to consider building a larger structure on a to David Nathan of Auckland (Clements, shire, especially the central pedimented 2008). Hambro and Bevis Marks in London), for reasons of discretion and financial “more suitable and central site” (Balkind, 1928: 12). Thus, in early 1863, the con- porch and the verticality of the structure. constraints. The Gothic Revival style of the Church of England was held in gregation advertised for a permanent minister and began to discuss the feasibi- 4 There is no ancient tradition governing 7 Nathan served as president of the the separation of the sexes or placement anathema by Jews for its Christian connotations. lity of a new synagogue in a different location. Canterbury Hebrew Congregation from of women in a gallery.
Recommended publications
  • Christchurch Street Names: B
    Christchurch Street Names B Current name Former name Origin of name Suburb Additional information See Source Further information Badger Street Named after Ronald Parklands Badger was a real estate Sylvia Street Information supplied "The property Smith Badger agent and a landowner in by Richard Greenaway market", The Press, (1880?-1946). New Brighton. in 2008. 19 October 1918, p 10 First appears in street directories in 1928. “Obituary, Mr R. S. Badger”, The Press, 18 September 1946, p 5 Baffin Street Named after Baffin Wainoni One of a number of streets Huron Street, “Chester Street West or “Tunnel’s first blast Island in the Arctic in a subdivision between Niagara Street, Cranmer Terrace?”, celebrated”, The Ocean of Northern Ottawa Road, Pages Road Ontario Place, The Press, 28 April Press, 22 July 2011, Canada. and Cuffs Road given Quebec Place, 1959, p 7 p A7 Canadian place names. Vancouver Information supplied in Crescent and Named because Canadian 2005 by Tim Baker in Winnipeg Place. engineers and workers an interview with Also Ottawa lived in the area while Margaret Harper. Road. working for Henry J. Kaiser Co of USA and building the Lyttelton road tunnel. Houses were built for them by Fletcher Construction. After the tunnel was opened in 1964, the Canadians went home and their houses were sold to locals. © Christchurch City Libraries February 2016 Page 1 of 172 Christchurch Street Names B Current name Former name Origin of name Suburb Additional information See Source Further information OR Named because they were near Ottawa Road. Named in 1959. Baigent Way Named after Steve Middleton Baigent was a former Riccarton/Wigram Baigent.
    [Show full text]
  • Christchurch Street Names: I - K
    Christchurch Street Names: I - K Current name Former Origin of name Suburb Additional information See Source Further information name Ian Place Bishopdale First appears in street directories in 1976. Ibsley Lane Probably named Bexley First appears in street after Ibsley in directories in 1977. Hampshire. Ida Street New Brighton The formation of Ida “New Brighton”, Street was discussed by The Press, 16 the New Brighton March 1915, p 3 Borough Council in 1915. First appears in street directories in 1920. Idaho Place Named after Burwood In a subdivision where Michigan Place, Idaho, a state in all the streets were given Oregon Place, Seneca the Pacific American placenames. Place, Tucson Place, Utah Place, Wichita northwest region First appears in street Place and of the USA. directories in 1981. Yellowstone Crescent. © Christchurch City Libraries February 2016 Page 1 of 122 Christchurch Street Names: I - K Current name Former Origin of name Suburb Additional information See Source Further information name Idris Road Hackett’s Named after Bryndwr, Continues the Welsh Bryndwr, Glandovey Fendall’s legacy: a Road was Cader Idris, a Fendalton, theme of street names in Road, Jeffreys Road history of Fendalton incorporated mountain in Strowan. Bryndwr. and other Welsh and north-west names in the into Idris Wales. Idris Road is first Christchurch, p 77 Road. Fendalton/Bryndwr The section from mentioned in The Press “Riccarton”, The area. Blighs Road to in 1882 when land in the Press, 7 September Wairarapa Road vicinity is advertised for 1871, p 3 (later Wairakei sale. “Advertisements”, Road) was First appears in street The Press, 14 July formerly directories in 1894, 1882, p 4 Hackett’s Road.
    [Show full text]
  • Julius Haast Towards a New Appreciation of His Life And
    JULIUS HAAST TOWARDS A NEW APPRECIATION OF HIS LIFE AND WORK __________________________________ A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in History in the University of Canterbury by Mark Edward Caudel University of Canterbury 2007 _______ Contents Acknowledgements ............................................................................................... i List of Plates and Figures ...................................................................................... ii Abstract................................................................................................................. iii Chapter 1: Introduction ........................................................................................ 1 Chapter 2: Who Was Julius Haast? ...................................................................... 10 Chapter 3: Julius Haast in New Zealand: An Explanation.................................... 26 Chapter 4: Julius Haast and the Philosophical Institute of Canterbury .................. 44 Chapter 5: Julius Haast’s Museum ....................................................................... 57 Chapter 6: The Significance of Julius Haast ......................................................... 77 Chapter 7: Conclusion.......................................................................................... 86 Bibliography ......................................................................................................... 89 Appendices ..........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Petty Bourgeoisie in Colonial Canterbury; A
    THE PETTY BOURGEOISIE IN COLONIAL CANTERBURY; A STUDY OF THE CANTERBURY WORKING MAN'S POLITICAL PROTECTION AND MUTUAL IMPROVEMENT ASSOCIATION (1865-66), AND THE CANTERBURY FREEHOLD LAND SOCIETY (1866-70) A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in History in the University of Canterbury by G. R. Wright University of Canterbury 1998 CONTENTS Abbreviations ............................................................................................ 1 Abstract ................................................................................................... 2 Preface .................................................................................................... 3 1. The Petty Bourgeoisie ............................................................................... 7 2. Occupations ......................................................................................... 35 3. Politics ............................................................................................... 71 4. Land ................................................................................................ 1 08 5. Voluntary Participation ........................................................................... 137 Conel u sions ........................................................................................... 161 Appendices ............................................................................................ 163 References ............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Benjamin Mountfort and the Gothic Revival
    REVIEWS development of seaside suburbs. Both the similarities with Eastbourne (the focus on the beach and the efforts to develop Days Bay into Wellington's 'playground' in the 1890s, for example) and the differences between the two seaside suburbs (a key one is that there was no state housing development in Eastbourne and the Eastern Bays) are revealed. The text is lively and readable. At times, the clutter of illustrations distracts the reader. These include maps, sketches, reproductions of paintings, and photographs. Many of the photographs have real interest. Two which stood out for me are of the earliest documented race meeting on Titahi Bay beach in March 1862 and the multi-coloured boat sheds at the southern end of the Bay. Other illustrations, however, seem to have no justification for inclusion beyond an attempt to compensate for gaps in the text. Despite some reservations, there is much to appreciate in The Bay. Above all, the achievement of the authors in turning a mass of detail into a readable account in a limited time and within budget is impressive. ANN BEAGLEHOLE Stout Centre, Wellington A Dream of Spires: Benjamin Mountfort and the Gothic Revival. By Ian Lochhead. Canterbury University Press, Christchurch. 1999. 364 pp. NZ price: $79.95. ISBN 0-908812-85-X. BENJAMIN MOUNTFORT was a leading architect in Canterbury through the second half of the nineteenth century. He produced some of the country's most cherished buildings of Gothic Revival influence. Mountford set a lasting imprint on the city of Christchurch, but his prolific work extended as far as Auckland.
    [Show full text]
  • Learning by Design: Full Text
    Macmillan Brown Library Learning by Design: Full Text Introduction Learning by Design: Building Canterbury College in the city 1873-1973 An illustrated history inspired by the Armson Collins Architectural Drawings Collection The buildings that form the original town site of the University of Canterbury, once known as Canterbury College, are far more than just bricks and mortar. They are no less than the building blocks of our institution, in which we may find stories of staff and students, of education and recreation, and of service to community. Although the first site of Canterbury College is no longer formally attached to the University, the buildings continue to serve the wider community as the Arts Centre, and in the hearts of many former students and staff they still represent a place where minds and lives were forever changed. ‘Learning by Design’ is a visual history of the building of Canterbury College from its humble foundation in 1873, through the College’s evolution into a University with ivy-clad cloisters, and finally to the gifting of the town site to the people of Christchurch in 1973. The inspiration for this exhibition came from the visionary designs for many of the College buildings which may be found in the Armson Collins Architectural Drawings Collection. A project to digitize the Armson Collins Collection in 2012 has slowly illuminated a rich source of historical documents which show how much of Canterbury College was conceived and constructed. By connecting the architectural drawings to the wealth of archives, photos, and books in the University Library’s collections, this exhibition highlights how architecture, education, and community combined to create Canterbury College.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix B: Conservation Plan
    Appendix B CONSERVATION PLAN AS LODGED Conservation plan All Saints’, Palmerston North Revised February 2018 IAN BOWMAN Architect and conservator Contents 1 Introduction 4 1.1 Background to the plan 4 1.2 Methodology for the plan 4 1.3 Photographic sources 4 1.4 Copyright 5 1.5 Contributors to the plan 5 1.6 Scope and limitations 5 1.7 Heritage status and legal description 5 1.8 Acknowledgements 5 2 History of the place 6 2.1 History of the church 6 2.2 Chronology of events 8 2.3 People and organisations associated with the buildings 9 3 Describing the place 14 3.1 Architecture 14 3.2 Schedule of spaces and fabric 18 3.3 Materials used in the building 18 4 Assessing the place 19 4.1 Significance assessment 19 4.2 Summary statement of heritage significance 22 4.3 Degree of significance 23 5 Conservation issues 27 5.1 Influences on conservation policy 27 5.2 Threats to heritage values 34 6 Managing the place 37 6.1 Policies and priorities 37 Bibliography 46 Published 46 Unpublished 49 Websites 49 Appendix 1 50 ICOMOS New Zealand Charter for the Conservation of Places of Cultural Heritage Value Revised 2010 50 2 Appendix 2 57 Detailed schedule of spaces and fabric 57 Exterior 57 Interior 60 Appendix 3 64 Criteria for assessment of heritage values 64 Appendix 4 66 Ranking heritage values and significance 66 Appendix 5 69 History of building materials used 69 Appendix 6 73 Contemporary architectural styles - the New Zealand scene 73 3 Conservation Plan • All Saints, Palmerston North 1 Introduction This revision of the 2008 Conservation Plan was commissioned by the All Saints’ Church Building Advisory Board.
    [Show full text]
  • Reconstruction in New Zealand Post 2010-11 Christchurch Earthquakes
    ReBuilDD Field Trip February 2012 RECONSTRUCTION IN NEW ZEALAND POST 2010-11 CHRISTCHURCH EARTHQUAKES Stephen Platt Christchurch city centre, February 2012 UNIVERSITY OF ImageCat CAMBRIDGE CAR Published by Cambridge Architectural Research Ltd. CURBE was established in 1997 to create a structure for interdisciplinary collaboration for disaster and risk research and application. Projects link the skills and expertise from distinct disciplines to understand and resolve disaster and risk issues, particularly related to reducing detrimental impacts of disasters. CURBE is based at the Martin Centre within the Department of Architecture at the University of Cambridge. About the research This report is one of a number of outputs from a research project funded by the UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC), entitled Indicators for Measuring, Monitoring and Evaluating Post-Disaster Recovery. The overall aim of the research is to develop indicators of recovery by exploiting the wealth of data now available, including that from satellite imagery, internet-based statistics and advanced field survey techniques. The specific aim of this trip report is to describe the planning process after major disaster with a view to understanding the information needs of planners. Project team The project team has included Michael Ramage, Dr Emily So, Dr Torwong Chenvidyakarn and Daniel Brown, CURBE, University of Cambridge Ltd; Professor Robin Spence, Dr Stephen Platt and Dr Keiko Saito, Cambridge Architectural Research; Dr Beverley Adams and Dr John Bevington, ImageCat. Inc; Dr Ratana Chuenpagdee, University of Newfoundland who led the fieldwork team in Thailand; and Professor Amir Khan, University of Peshawar who led the fieldwork team in Pakistan.
    [Show full text]
  • B W Mountfort and the Gothic Revival in Canterbury
    and the Gothic Revival in Canterbury: A Centermial Exhibition 17 ptember - 22 ovemb 998 Ro It cOo 11 Art Gall ehri c ur h, Ze I d ; ::.1,+---------~_______I On 15 March] 998, the centenary of Mountfort alh a pI que was unveiled in the Great Hall at th Art Centre. It reads: Benjamin oolfi Id ountfort 1825-1898 uth hit c of Canterbll.lY e II, 1853) ountforf impa t on Canterbury ha endured - lit rally and m taphorically - more resolutely than the Ie a of any other colonial personality. Tb architectural character of Chri tchurch' key ninet emh c ntury buildings i unique in this country an tho building that were not de ign d by ountfort till acknowledge hi influenc a devo ed and remarkably talented di ciple of th Golhi R vival. Hi building are the pre-eminent I m nt ofVictorian Christchurch and have continu to influence local architect until th rec nt p t. B. W. Mou.ntfon. Photo: Canterbury MWiewn Our Gallery's tribute to the centennial celebr tiOI acknowledges not only his I would lik to thank colleagues at th contribution to th rchit ctural heritage of this Auckland Art Gall ry for allowing us to borrow city but more broadly, hi contribution nationally Nor'w ler in tit cemetery by our Cantabrian icon. - he is arguably N w Z aland's most significant William A Sutton. I-lis work is one of the few colonial archit t. d piction of Mountfort's long-demolished Our gu st cur tOf, Dr Ian Lochhead, Senior fun 'ary cl1 p LH ppily, its stained glass windows Lectur r in Art Hi tory t the University of ar now af ly in our own collection and will b Canterbury, h uppli d an overview of display d longside this famous 1950 oil on canva Mountforl's c r r through his building plans and for the duration of the exhibition.
    [Show full text]
  • Church of St Mary the Virgin,– 30, 30E Church Square,Christchurch
    DISTRICT PLAN –LISTED HERITAGE PLACE HERITAGE ASSESSMENT –STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE CHURCH OF ST MARY THE VIRGIN,– 30, 30E CHURCH SQUARE,CHRISTCHURCH Research to date suggests that the group of buildings – the Church of St Mary the Virgin (St Mary’s Church), the bell tower and the lychgate – within their own substantial square are unique in New Zealand. The group reflects the efforts of the early Canterbury settlers to recreate the village landscapes they left behind. Prominent early Cantabrian, Henry Sewell, played a major role in the church, from his donation of the land in 1863, when he subdivided his land to create the suburb of Addington and set aside land for an Anglican church, until his death in 1879. Richard John Seddon, Premier of New Zealand from 1893 was also closely associated with the church until his sudden death in 1906 The group of church buildings is situated in the midst of the mature trees of Church Square, the only parish church in the city to occupy its own square. The belltower and lychgate are also within the original square. The square provides an important focal point for the Addington Anglican community. Page 1 DISTRICT PLAN –LISTED HERITAGE PLACE HERITAGE ASSESSMENT –STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE HERITAGE ITEM NUMBER 1300 CHURCH OF ST MARY THE VIRGIN AND SETTING –30, 30E CHURCH SQUARE,CHRISTCHURCH PHOTOGRAPH : M.VAIR-PIOVA, 23/12/2014 HISTORICAL AND SOCIAL SIGNIFICANCE Historical and social values that demonstrate or are associated with: a particular person, group, organisation, institution, event, phase or activity; the continuity and/or change of a phase or activity; social, historical, traditional, economic, political or other patterns.
    [Show full text]
  • Cranmer Club Introduction the Cranmer Club Stands at 25 Armagh Street on the South-West Corner of Cranmer Square
    THE ARCHITECTURAL HERITAGE OF 4. Cranm~:Club CHRISTCHURCH CITY COUNCIL TOW PLANNING DIVISION Preface Christchurch has a charm that depends to a large extent on features built or planned by man. The quiet dignity of the city owes much to its early buildings. It is still possible to trace the history of Christchurch in the many fine examples of colonial architecture that remain. Action by the New Zealand Historic Places Trust (Canterbury Regional Committee) and other public interest groups has saved several important city buildings including the Provincial Government Buildings. Trinity Church, the Theatre Royal and the old university (now the Christchurch Arts Centre). As the city grows and changes, there is a danger that histor- icallv or environmentallv valuable buildinas mav be thoughtlessly or needleisly destroyed. TK~christchurch City Council District Plannina Scheme lists 190 historic buiidings and objects, and provides opportunities and incentives for their retention. Although the scheme encour- ages preservation, in the end only the determination of the community can effectively protect or revitalise buildings it considers important. One of the major aims of the present series of booklets is the identification and description of the city's most valuable historic buildings, in the hope that greater public aware- ness of their importance will increase their chances of survival. Even if preservation should prove impossible in some cases. this series will gather information, illustrations and analyses of each building to provide a published record of the city's rich architectural heritage. If these booklets encouraae you to think about the historic significance of this city's architecture, and help you to recognise the special value of Christchurch's historic build- ings,then they will have served their purpose.
    [Show full text]
  • Church of the Good Shepherd Introduction the Church of the Good Shepherd at 40 Phillips Street Was Built in 1885
    6.Churct7 of the Good Shephel cI-m3W~CTP/COUNCIL TOWN PLAMVIW DIVISION Preface Christchurch has a charm that depends to a large extent on features built or planned by man. he quiet dignity of the citv om# much to its earhr buildinas. It is still ~ossiMeto trabe the hiiory of ~hristkhurchin the many heexamples of cdoni architecture that remain. Action bv the New &%and Historic Places frust (canterbury ~bional Committee) and other public interest groups has saved several important city buildings including the Provincial Government Buildings. Trinity Church, the Theatre Royal and the dd university (now the Christchurch Arts Centre). As the city grows and changes, there is a danger that historically or mvironmentallyvaluable buildings may be thoughtlessly or needlessly destroyed. The Christchurch City Council District Planning Scheme lists 190 historic buildings and objects. Although the scheme encourages their preservation, in the end only the determination of the community can effectii protect or revitalise buildings it considers important. One of the major aims of the present series of booklets is the identiRcation and degcriMon of the city's most valuable historic buildings. in the'hope that gm-ter public awa- of their imDortance will increase their chancea of survival. Even it pr6#m9tion should prove impossibk in some cases. thii series will gather information. illusbations and analyses of each building to provide a published record of the city's rich archiiral heritage. If these booklets emrageyou to think about the historic significance of this city's architecture. and help you to misethe special dueof Christchurch's historic buildings, then they will have served their purpose.
    [Show full text]