Eastern Box Turtle Species Assessment

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Eastern Box Turtle Species Assessment EASTERN BOX TURTLE ASSESSMENT revised March 31, 2000 Prepared by: Charles S. Todd Maine Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife Wildlife Division Wildlife Resource Assessment Section Endangered and Threatened Species Group EASTERN BOX TURTLE ASSESSMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................. 3 NATURAL HISTORY....................................................................................................... 4 Description............................................................................................................ 4 Distribution............................................................................................................ 6 Taxonomy............................................................................................................. 6 Habitat, Diet, and Movements .............................................................................. 8 Winter Hibernation.............................................................................................. 11 Reproductive Ecology......................................................................................... 12 Survival and Longevity ....................................................................................... 14 MANAGEMENT ............................................................................................................ 15 Regulatory Authority ........................................................................................... 15 Past Goals and Objectives ................................................................................. 19 Past and Current Management........................................................................... 19 HABITAT ASSESSMENT.............................................................................................. 20 Historic Trends ................................................................................................... 20 Current Assessment ........................................................................................... 20 Projections.......................................................................................................... 21 POPULATION ASSESSMENT...................................................................................... 22 Historic Trends ................................................................................................... 22 Current Assessment ........................................................................................... 22 Projections.......................................................................................................... 25 Limiting Factors .................................................................................................. 25 USE AND DEMAND ASSESSMENT ............................................................................ 27 Historic Trends ................................................................................................... 27 Current Assessment ........................................................................................... 28 Projections.......................................................................................................... 29 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS ................................................................................ 30 LITERATURE CITED .................................................................................................... 32 APPENDIX1. Table 1. Historic and recent records of box turtles in southern Maine, by county and township................................. 41 2 EASTERN BOX TURTLE ASSESSMENT INTRODUCTION Since 1968, the Maine Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife (MDIFW) has developed and refined wildlife species assessments to formulate management goals, objectives, and strategic plans. Assessments are based upon available information and the judgments of professional wildlife biologists responsible for individual species or groups of species. This document represents the first planning effort by MDIFW for eastern box turtles (Terrapene carolina carolina), a reptile designated an “endangered species” in Maine. Assessments provide the background for species planning initiatives. A “Natural History” section reviews biological characteristics of the species useful to understanding its status. The “Management” section recaps previous actions, strategic plans, relevant rules, and regulatory authority. Historic, current, and projected future conditions for the species are discussed individually for “Habitat,” “Population,” and “Use and Demand” analyses. The major points of an assessment appear in a “Summary and Conclusions.” Owing to the extreme scarcity of eastern box turtles in Maine and limited information about them, this assessment draws heavily on studies and insights from other regions. Mark McCollough prepared two earlier drafts of this assessment. 3 EASTERN BOX TURTLE ASSESSMENT NATURAL HISTORY Description The eastern box turtle is a small terrestrial turtle with a high-domed carapace and unique plastron (Figure 1). The carapace (top shell) has a slight median keel and is steeply sloped on the rear margin. It is brown-colored with variable yellow, orange, or olive patterns of radiating lines, spots, bars, or irregular blotches on each scute. An adult's carapace is 10 - 20 cm long (Smith 1961, Conant and Collins 1991). Maximum size is attained at ages between 12 - 20 years (Nichols 1939). Individuals from the North, especially New England, are larger than others (Milstead 1969, Klemens 1993). The plastron (bottom shell) is tan to dark brown and variably mottled with yellow. A strong hinge on the plastron between the abdominal and pectoral scutes enables it to shut tightly against the carapace after withdrawing legs, head, and tail. This response is common among wild turtles, but not those which are pets. It seals soft body parts from external threats, an adaptation which accounts for the common name “box turtle.” The skin of eastern box turtles is black to reddish-brown with yellow or orange spots and streaks. Head markings vary. The upper jaw has a terminal hook and usually lacks a notch. Sexual dimorphism is marked (Ernst and Barbour 1972, Conant and Collins 1991, Klemens 1993). Most adult males have red or orange eyes; concave plastron; short, stocky, and considerably curved hind feet; long, thick tails; and relatively greater shell width and height than females. Females generally have yellowish-brown eyes; a flat plastron; longer, more slender, and straighter hind legs; and a shorter, slighter tail with the anus located more anterior. Hatchlings lack bright coloration. 4 EASTERN BOX TURTLE ASSESSMENT Figure 1. An eastern box turtle (Terrapene carolina carolina). Figure 2. Range of the eastern box turtle (Terrapene carolina carolina, solid shading), other eastern box turtle subspecies (Terrapene carolina, crosshatched), and ornate box turtles (Terrapene ornata, hatched areas) across North America. 5 EASTERN BOX TURTLE ASSESSMENT Distribution Box turtles occur only in North America (Conant and Collins 1991). Collectively, the two species native to the United States (see “Taxonomy”) range from the Atlantic Ocean to the Rocky Mountains. The species addressed in this assessment, the eastern box turtle (Terrapene carolina), reaches its western limits and overlaps with a midwestern species, the ornate box turtle (Terrapene ornata) in Wisconsin, Illinois, Missouri, Kansas, Oklahoma, and Texas. Eastern box turtles are broadly distributed in the eastern and central U. S. from northern states nearly abutting the Canadian border southward to the Gulf coast and northern Mexico (Figure 2). The subspecies native to Maine, T. c. carolina, occurs broadly over the Atlantic seaboard from southern Maine to northern Florida. It ranges westward through Illinois, Kentucky, Tennessee, and Mississippi to the Mississippi River. A crucial perspective to Maine, its northern limits, are traditionally depicted as: southern Maine; southeastern portions of New Hampshire, Vermont, and New York; across most of Pennsylvania and Ohio; central Michigan; and extreme southeastern Wisconsin (Behler and King 1979). Three other subspecies of eastern box turtles live in the South or Midwest. Taxonomy Approximately 250 species of turtles and tortoises belong to 12 different families in the taxonomic order Testudines (Tyning 1990). Box turtles (genus Terrapene) are members of the family Emydidae which contains the largest number of living turtle species. Commonly called the family of freshwater and marsh turtles, its members occur on all continents except Australia and Antarctica (Carr 1952). This family is 6 EASTERN BOX TURTLE ASSESSMENT represented by 33 species in the U. S. and Canada (Collins 1997). All are aquatic or semiaquatic except for the two species of Terrapene. Although they resemble tortoises (family Testudinidae), box turtles have freestanding toes and some toe webbing: traits shared among all emydid turtles (Tyning 1990). The genus Terrapene occurs exclusively in North America. Phalangeal formulae distinguish species and subspecies of Terrapene (Baur 1891, 1893; Taylor 1895; Minx 1992). The two species living in the U. S. are visually distinct. The ornate box turtle, T. ornata, is identified by distinct, bright colors on a keelless, low, and flattened carapace. The carapace of an eastern box turtle, T. carolina, is keeled and high-arched. They may cross breed in areas of range
Recommended publications
  • Life History Account for Western Pond Turtle
    California Wildlife Habitat Relationships System California Department of Fish and Wildlife California Interagency Wildlife Task Group WESTERN POND TURTLE Actinemys marmorata Family: EMYDIDAE Order: TESTUDINES Class: REPTILIA R004 Written by: S. Morey Reviewed by: T. Papenfuss Edited by: R. Duke Updated by: CWHR Program Staff, March 2000 DISTRIBUTION, ABUNDANCE, AND SEASONALITY The western pond turtle is uncommon to common in suitable aquatic habitat throughout California, west of the Sierra-Cascade crest and absent from desert regions, except in the Mojave Desert along the Mojave River and its tributaries. Elevation range extends from near sea level to 1430 m (4690 ft) (Jennings and Hayes 1994). Associated with permanent or nearly permanent water in a wide variety of habitat types. SPECIFIC HABITAT REQUIREMENTS Feeding: This species is considered omnivorous. Aquatic plant material, including pond lilies, beetles and a variety of aquatic invertebrates as well as fishes, frogs, and even carrion have been reported among their food (Stebbins 1972, Nussbaum et al. 1983). Cover: Pond turtles require basking sites such as partially submerged logs, rocks, mats of floating vegetation, or open mud banks. Turtles slip from basking sites to underwater retreats at the approach of humans or potential predators. Hibernation in colder areas is passed underwater in bottom mud. Reproduction: Storer (1930) suggested that two distinct habitats may be used for oviposition. Along large slow-moving streams, eggs are deposited in nests constructed in sandy banks. Along foothill streams, females may climb hillsides, sometimes moving considerable distances to find a suitable nest site. Nussbaum et al. (1983) reports a nest in a clover field 100 m (325 ft) from water.
    [Show full text]
  • Competing Generic Concepts for Blanding's, Pacific and European
    Zootaxa 2791: 41–53 (2011) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2011 · Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) Competing generic concepts for Blanding’s, Pacific and European pond turtles (Emydoidea, Actinemys and Emys)—Which is best? UWE FRITZ1,3, CHRISTIAN SCHMIDT1 & CARL H. ERNST2 1Museum of Zoology, Senckenberg Dresden, A. B. Meyer Building, D-01109 Dresden, Germany 2Division of Amphibians and Reptiles, MRC 162, Smithsonian Institution, P.O. Box 37012, Washington, D.C. 20013-7012, USA 3Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract We review competing taxonomic classifications and hypotheses for the phylogeny of emydine turtles. The formerly rec- ognized genus Clemmys sensu lato clearly is paraphyletic. Two of its former species, now Glyptemys insculpta and G. muhlenbergii, constitute a well-supported basal clade within the Emydinae. However, the phylogenetic position of the oth- er two species traditionally placed in Clemmys remains controversial. Mitochondrial data suggest a clade embracing Actinemys (formerly Clemmys) marmorata, Emydoidea and Emys and as its sister either another clade (Clemmys guttata + Terrapene) or Terrapene alone. In contrast, nuclear genomic data yield conflicting results, depending on which genes are used. Either Clemmys guttata is revealed as sister to ((Emydoidea + Emys) + Actinemys) + Terrapene or Clemmys gut- tata is sister to Actinemys marmorata and these two species together are the sister group of (Emydoidea + Emys); Terra- pene appears then as sister to (Actinemys marmorata + Clemmys guttata) + (Emydoidea + Emys). The contradictory branching patterns depending from the selected loci are suggestive of lineage sorting problems. Ignoring the unclear phy- logenetic position of Actinemys marmorata, one recently proposed classification scheme placed Actinemys marmorata, Emydoidea blandingii, Emys orbicularis, and Emys trinacris in one genus (Emys), while another classification scheme treats Actinemys, Emydoidea, and Emys as distinct genera.
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.MORPHOLOGY and CONSERVATION of the MESOAMERICAN SLIDER (Trachemys Venusta, Emydidae) from the ATRATO RIVER BASIN, COLOMB
    Acta Biológica Colombiana ISSN: 0120-548X [email protected] Universidad Nacional de Colombia Sede Bogotá Colombia CEBALLOS, CLAUDIA P.; BRAND, WILLIAM A. MORPHOLOGY AND CONSERVATION OF THE MESOAMERICAN SLIDER (Trachemys venusta, Emydidae) FROM THE ATRATO RIVER BASIN, COLOMBIA Acta Biológica Colombiana, vol. 19, núm. 3, septiembre-diciembre, 2014, pp. 483-488 Universidad Nacional de Colombia Sede Bogotá Bogotá, Colombia Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=319031647014 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative SEDE BOGOTÁ ACTA BIOLÓGICA COLOMBIANA FACULTAD DE CIENCIAS DEPARTAMENTO DE BIOLOGÍA ARTÍCULO DE INVESTIGACIÓN MORPHOLOGY AND CONSERVATION OF THE MESOAMERICAN SLIDER (Trachemys venusta, EMYDIDAE) FROM THE ATRATO RIVER BASIN, COLOMBIA Morfología y conservación de la tortuga hicotea Mesoamericana (Trachemys venusta, Emydidae) del río Atrato, Colombia CLAUDIA P. CEBALLOS1, Ph. D.; WILLIAM A. BRAND2, Ecol. 1 Grupo Centauro. Escuela de Medicina Veterinaria, Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias, Universidad de Antioquia. Carrera 75 n.º 65-87, of. 47- 122, Medellín, Colombia. [email protected] 2 Corpouraba. Calle 92 n.º 98-39, Turbo, Antioquia, Colombia. [email protected] Author for correspondence: Claudia P. Ceballos, [email protected] Received 20th February 2014, first decision 14th May 2014, accepted 05th June 2014. Citation / Citar este artículo como: CEBALLOS CP, BRAND WA. Morphology and conservation of the mesoamerican slider (Trachemys venusta, Emydidae) from the Atrato River basin, Colombia. Acta biol. Colomb. 2014;19(3):483-488 ABSTRACT The phylogenetic relationships of the Mesoamerican Slider, Trachemys venusta, that inhabits the Atrato River basin of Colombia have been controversial as three different names have been proposed during the last 12 years: T.
    [Show full text]
  • Box Turtles July 2017
    The HERP Project, Herpetology Education in Rural Places and Spaces In Awe of Nature: Treasuring Terrestrial Turtles By Ann Berry Somers, Catherine Matthews, and Lacey Huffling The Herp Project is supported by the National Science Foundation, Grant No. DRL-1114558. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this manuscript are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. Treasuring Terrestrial Turtles Before starting a project like the one described in this curriculum, contact your state wildlife resources commission or state division of fish and game to see what permits you need to work with box turtles. I. Project Description This curriculum was developed by The HERP (Herpetology Education in Rural Places and Spaces) Project to introduce participants to the wonders of nature and science through the study of box turtles (Terrapene spp.). The curriculum was developed over several years of working with high school students in our Herpetological Research Experience (HRE) residential program. Feel free to modify this curriculum as needed. In our program, participants are introduced to turtle biology as well as to The Box Turtle Connection (BTC), our long-term mark/recapture box turtle study in North Carolina. The BTC is designed to follow temporal trends in population size and structure (sex, age class) as well as the health and condition of individual box turtles from numerous sites across North Carolina. The data collected are important to help scientists determine if box turtles need special conservation measures to maintain their populations and thrive in their natural habitat. Our box turtle studies are enhanced by use of Boykin Spaniel dogs to locate and retrieve box turtles and use of radio tracking to determine activity ranges for male and female box turtles.
    [Show full text]
  • AN INTRODUCTION to Texas Turtles
    TEXAS PARKS AND WILDLIFE AN INTRODUCTION TO Texas Turtles Mark Klym An Introduction to Texas Turtles Turtle, tortoise or terrapin? Many people get confused by these terms, often using them interchangeably. Texas has a single species of tortoise, the Texas tortoise (Gopherus berlanderi) and a single species of terrapin, the diamondback terrapin (Malaclemys terrapin). All of the remaining 28 species of the order Testudines found in Texas are called “turtles,” although some like the box turtles (Terrapene spp.) are highly terrestrial others are found only in marine (saltwater) settings. In some countries such as Great Britain or Australia, these terms are very specific and relate to the habit or habitat of the animal; in North America they are denoted using these definitions. Turtle: an aquatic or semi-aquatic animal with webbed feet. Tortoise: a terrestrial animal with clubbed feet, domed shell and generally inhabiting warmer regions. Whatever we call them, these animals are a unique tie to a period of earth’s history all but lost in the living world. Turtles are some of the oldest reptilian species on the earth, virtually unchanged in 200 million years or more! These slow-moving, tooth­ less, egg-laying creatures date back to the dinosaurs and still retain traits they used An Introduction to Texas Turtles | 1 to survive then. Although many turtles spend most of their lives in water, they are air-breathing animals and must come to the surface to breathe. If they spend all this time in water, why do we see them on logs, rocks and the shoreline so often? Unlike birds and mammals, turtles are ectothermic, or cold- blooded, meaning they rely on the temperature around them to regulate their body temperature.
    [Show full text]
  • Dispersal in the Coahuilan Box Turtle
    1 Running title: Dispersal in the Coahuilan box turtle In press, Molecular Ecology 2 3 4 CONTRASTING DEMOGRAPHIC AND GENETIC ESTIMATES OF DISPERSAL IN THE 5 6 ENDANGERED COAHUILAN BOX TURTLE: A CONTEMPORARY APPROACH TO 7 8 CONSERVATION 9 10 Jennifer G. Howeth1,4, Suzanne E. McGaugh2, Dean A. Hendrickson1,3 11 12 MEC-08-0399 Final 13 1 Section of Integrative Biology 14 University of Texas at Austin 15 1 University Station C0930 16 Austin, Texas 78712 17 Phone: 512 475 8669 18 Fax: 512 471 3878 19 20 2 Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Organismal Biology 21 Iowa State University 22 251 Bessey Hall 23 Ames, Iowa 50011 24 25 3 Texas Natural Science Center, Texas Natural History Collection 26 University of Texas at Austin 27 PRC 176 / R4000 28 10100 Burnet Road 29 Austin, Texas 78758 30 31 4 Corresponding author: [email protected] 32 Abstract: 249 / 250 words 33 Main text: 7,641 / 8,000 words 34 Figures: 5; Supplementary Figures: 2 35 Tables: 3; Supplementary Tables: 2 36 37 38 Keywords: connectivity, isolation by distance, metapopulation, microsatellite, mark-recapture, 39 habitat fragmentation 40 Abstract 41 42 The evolutionary viability of an endangered species depends upon gene flow among subpopulations 43 and the degree of habitat patch connectivity. Contrasting population connectivity over ecological and 44 evolutionary timescales may provide novel insight into what maintains genetic diversity within 45 threatened species. We employed this integrative approach to evaluating dispersal in the critically 46 endangered Coahuilan box turtle (Terrapene coahuila) that inhabits isolated wetlands in the desert- 47 spring ecosystem of Cuatro Ciénegas, Mexico.
    [Show full text]
  • Painted Turtle
    United States Turtle Mapping Project with a Focus on Western Pond Turtle and Painted Turtle Kimberly Barela BioResource Research Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR Deanna H. Olson, Ph.D. U.S. Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station Corvallis, OR Photo by: Jennifer Gervais Background 220 million years (older than Triassic) Survived several geological changes 48% of 328 recognized turtle species are Threatened • 27% of these are Critically Endangered or Endangered Image From :http://animaldiversity.org. (Olson et. al., 2011), (Turtle Taxonomy Working Group 2010) Turtles Are SLOW Movement • Relatively small range Reproduction • Maturity: 4-15 years • Western Pond Turtle: 5-10 years Slow movement + Reproduction = Vulnerable species Image From :http://david-merritt.blogspot.com/2011/07/insight-pausing-and-retrying-messages.html (Olson et. al., 2011) Turtle Threats Habitat loss Road mortality Predation Over-exploitation Recreation disturbances Image From :http://envs.uoregon.edu/elp/turtles/doku.php?id=wpt_conservation (2nd); http://linkinglandscapes.info/ roads/roads.html (1st); Reptilecare.com & Natural-enivironment.com. (3rd), Dan Rosenberg (4th) (Rosenberg et. al. 2009) Why Should We Care? Cultural Ecological Images From: http://www.oneidaindiannation.com/history/creationstory (Lower Left), Everett Collection (Upper Right) http://mdk12.org/instruction/clg/public_release/biology/G3_E5_I3.html (Center), Year of the Turtle Diamondback Terrapin (Malaclemys terrapin) Red-eared Slider (Trachemys scripta elegans) Desert
    [Show full text]
  • In AR, FL, GA, IA, KY, LA, MO, OH, OK, SC, TN, and TX): Species in Red = Depleted to the Point They May Warrant Federal Endangered Species Act Listing
    Southern and Midwestern Turtle Species Affected by Commercial Harvest (in AR, FL, GA, IA, KY, LA, MO, OH, OK, SC, TN, and TX): species in red = depleted to the point they may warrant federal Endangered Species Act listing Common snapping turtle (Chelydra serpentina) – AR, GA, IA, KY, MO, OH, OK, SC, TX Florida common snapping turtle (Chelydra serpentina osceola) - FL Southern painted turtle (Chrysemys dorsalis) – AR Western painted turtle (Chrysemys picta) – IA, MO, OH, OK Spotted turtle (Clemmys gutatta) - FL, GA, OH Florida chicken turtle (Deirochelys reticularia chrysea) – FL Western chicken turtle (Deirochelys reticularia miaria) – AR, FL, GA, KY, MO, OK, TN, TX Barbour’s map turtle (Graptemys barbouri) - FL, GA Cagle’s map turtle (Graptemys caglei) - TX Escambia map turtle (Graptemys ernsti) – FL Common map turtle (Graptemys geographica) – AR, GA, OH, OK Ouachita map turtle (Graptemys ouachitensis) – AR, GA, OH, OK, TX Sabine map turtle (Graptemys ouachitensis sabinensis) – TX False map turtle (Graptemys pseudogeographica) – MO, OK, TX Mississippi map turtle (Graptemys pseuogeographica kohnii) – AR, TX Alabama map turtle (Graptemys pulchra) – GA Texas map turtle (Graptemys versa) - TX Striped mud turtle (Kinosternon baurii) – FL, GA, SC Yellow mud turtle (Kinosternon flavescens) – OK, TX Common mud turtle (Kinosternon subrubrum) – AR, FL, GA, OK, TX Alligator snapping turtle (Macrochelys temminckii) – AR, FL, GA, LA, MO, TX Diamond-back terrapin (Malaclemys terrapin) – FL, GA, LA, SC, TX River cooter (Pseudemys concinna) – AR, FL,
    [Show full text]
  • Box Turtle (Terrapene Carolina) Phillip Demaynadier
    STATE ENDANGERED Box Turtle (Terrapene carolina) Phillip deMaynadier Description would most likely occur in the southwestern part of Box turtles are well-known for their remarkable the state. A few individual box turtles have been ability to seal themselves tightly in their shell during found in the last 20 years as far north as New times of danger. The box turtle is distinguished by a Vinyard in Franklin County and Hermon in brownish carapace (upper shell). Each scute (seg- Penobscot County, although these may have been ment of the shell) has yellow or orange radiating released pets. lines, spots, or blotches. The legs and neck have Box turtles are the most terrestrial turtle in the black to reddish-brown skin with yellow, red, or state. They prefer moist woodlands and wet, brushy orange spots and streaks. The plastron (lower shell) fields, especially where sandy soils are prevalent. Box is tan to dark brown. The box turtle’s most distinc- turtles occasionally are found in meadows, bogs, and tive feature is a hinged plastron, allowing the animal marshes. to withdraw its legs and head entirely within a tightly closed shell. Males have red eyes, a concave Life History and Ecology plastron, a thick tail, and long, curved claws on the Box turtles emerge from hibernation in late hind feet. Females have yellowish-brown eyes; a flat April or early May following the first warm spring or slightly convex plastron; a carapace that is more rains. They attain sexual maturity at 5-10 years old. domed than the male’s; short, slender, straighter Once they reach maturity, they mate anytime claws on the hind feet; and a shorter, thinner tail.
    [Show full text]
  • (Sarracenia) Provide a 21St-Century Perspective on Infraspecific Ranks and Interspecific Hybrids: a Modest Proposal* for Appropriate Recognition and Usage
    Systematic Botany (2014), 39(3) © Copyright 2014 by the American Society of Plant Taxonomists DOI 10.1600/036364414X681473 Date of publication 05/27/2014 Pitcher Plants (Sarracenia) Provide a 21st-Century Perspective on Infraspecific Ranks and Interspecific Hybrids: A Modest Proposal* for Appropriate Recognition and Usage Aaron M. Ellison,1,5 Charles C. Davis,2 Patrick J. Calie,3 and Robert F. C. Naczi4 1Harvard University, Harvard Forest, 324 North Main Street, Petersham, Massachusetts 01366, U. S. A. 2Harvard University Herbaria, Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, 22 Divinity Avenue, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, U. S. A. 3Eastern Kentucky University, Department of Biological Sciences, 521 Lancaster Avenue, Richmond, Kentucky 40475, U. S. A. 4The New York Botanical Garden, 2900 Southern Boulevard, Bronx, New York 10458, U. S. A. 5Author for correspondence ([email protected]) Communicating Editor: Chuck Bell Abstract—The taxonomic use of infraspecific ranks (subspecies, variety, subvariety, form, and subform), and the formal recognition of interspecific hybrid taxa, is permitted by the International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants. However, considerable confusion regarding the biological and systematic merits is caused by current practice in the use of infraspecific ranks, which obscures the meaningful variability on which natural selection operates, and by the formal recognition of those interspecific hybrids that lack the potential for inter-lineage gene flow. These issues also may have pragmatic and legal consequences, especially regarding the legal delimitation and management of threatened and endangered species. A detailed comparison of three contemporary floras highlights the degree to which infraspecific and interspecific variation are treated inconsistently.
    [Show full text]
  • Glyptemys Muhlenbergii) and the Need for a Regional Approach to Turtle Conservation Author(S): Kevin T
    Genetic Connectivity among Populations of the Threatened Bog Turtle (Glyptemys muhlenbergii) and the Need for a Regional Approach to Turtle Conservation Author(s): Kevin T. Shoemaker and James P. Gibbs Source: Copeia, 2013(2):324-331. Published By: The American Society of Ichthyologists and Herpetologists DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1643/OT-12-022 URL: http://www.bioone.org/doi/full/10.1643/OT-12-022 BioOne (www.bioone.org) is a nonprofit, online aggregation of core research in the biological, ecological, and environmental sciences. BioOne provides a sustainable online platform for over 170 journals and books published by nonprofit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses. Your use of this PDF, the BioOne Web site, and all posted and associated content indicates your acceptance of BioOne’s Terms of Use, available at www.bioone.org/page/terms_of_use. Usage of BioOne content is strictly limited to personal, educational, and non-commercial use. Commercial inquiries or rights and permissions requests should be directed to the individual publisher as copyright holder. BioOne sees sustainable scholarly publishing as an inherently collaborative enterprise connecting authors, nonprofit publishers, academic institutions, research libraries, and research funders in the common goal of maximizing access to critical research. Copeia 2013, No. 2, 324–331 Genetic Connectivity among Populations of the Threatened Bog Turtle (Glyptemys muhlenbergii) and the Need for a Regional Approach to Turtle Conservation Kevin T. Shoemaker1,2 and James P. Gibbs1 The threatened Bog Turtle (Glyptemys muhlenbergii) is considered among the most sedentary of turtles, yet with population sizes generally below 50 individuals, gene flow among populations is clearly necessary to maintain healthy levels of genetic diversity.
    [Show full text]
  • Invasion of the Turtles? Wageningen Approach
    Alterra is part of the international expertise organisation Wageningen UR (University & Research centre). Our mission is ‘To explore the potential of nature to improve the quality of life’. Within Wageningen UR, nine research institutes – both specialised and applied – have joined forces with Wageningen University and Van Hall Larenstein University of Applied Sciences to help answer the most important questions in the domain of healthy food and living environment. With approximately 40 locations (in the Netherlands, Brazil and China), 6,500 members of staff and 10,000 students, Wageningen UR is one of the leading organisations in its domain worldwide. The integral approach to problems and the cooperation between the exact sciences and the technological and social disciplines are at the heart of the Invasion of the turtles? Wageningen Approach. Alterra is the research institute for our green living environment. We offer a combination of practical and scientific Exotic turtles in the Netherlands: a risk assessment research in a multitude of disciplines related to the green world around us and the sustainable use of our living environment, such as flora and fauna, soil, water, the environment, geo-information and remote sensing, landscape and spatial planning, man and society. Alterra report 2186 ISSN 1566-7197 More information: www.alterra.wur.nl/uk R.J.F. Bugter, F.G.W.A. Ottburg, I. Roessink, H.A.H. Jansman, E.A. van der Grift and A.J. Griffioen Invasion of the turtles? Commissioned by the Invasive Alien Species Team of the Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority Invasion of the turtles? Exotic turtles in the Netherlands: a risk assessment R.J.F.
    [Show full text]