In Re: NVIDIA Corporation Securities Litigation 02-CV-00853-First

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

In Re: NVIDIA Corporation Securities Litigation 02-CV-00853-First Case 4:02-cv-00853 Document 61-1 Filed 07/28/2003 Page 1 of 73 1 MILBERG WEISS BERSHAD HYNES & LERACH LLP 2 RANDI D. BANDMAN (145212) AZRA Z. MEHDI (220406) 3 SYLVIA WAHBA (197612) 100 Pine Street, Suite 2600 4 San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: 415/288-4545 5 415/288-4534 (fax) - and - 6 WILLIAM S. LERACH (68581) 401 B Street, Suite 1700 7 San Diego, CA 92101 Telephone: 619/231-1058 8 619/231-7423 (fax) 9 KAPLAN FOX & KILSHEIMER LLP LAURENCE D. KING (206423) 10 LINDA M. FONG 555 Montgomery Street, Suite 1501 11 San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: 415/772-4700 12 415/772-4707 (fax) - and - 13 FREDERIC S. FOX 805 Third Avenue, 22nd Floor 14 New York, NY 10022 Telephone: 212/687-1980 15 212/687-7714 (fax) 16 Co-Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 18 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 19 OAKLAND DIVISION 20 21 In re NVIDIA CORPORATION SECURITIES ) Master File No. C-02-0853-CW LITIGATION ) 22 ) CLASS ACTION ) 23 This Document Relates To: ) FIRST AMENDED CONSOLIDATED ) CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT FOR 24 ALL ACTIONS. ) VIOLATION OF THE FEDERAL ) SECURITIES LAWS 25 DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL 26 27 28 Case 4:02-cv-00853 Document 61-1 Filed 07/28/2003 Page 2 of 73 1 SUMMARY AND OVERVIEW 2 1. This is a securities fraud class action against Nvidia Corporation ("Nvidia" or the 3 "Company") and its senior insiders, on behalf of all persons who purchased the common stock of Nvidia 4 between February 15, 2000 and July 30, 2002, inclusive (the "Class Period").1 5 2. Nvidia operates in a single industry segment: the design, development and marketing of 6 three-dimensional ("3D") graphics, media communication processors and related software for personal 7 computers ("PCs"), workstations and digital entertainment platforms. 8 3. Since the Company went public in 1999, it has enjoyed phenomenal success and was 9 consistently in line with analysts' expectations of revenues and earnings quarter after quarter. Nvidia's 10 former accounting manager, Amy Andren, attributed the Company's ability to meet analysts' expectations 11 to defendants' improper use of various "cookie jar" reserves (bad debt, sales returns, bonus accruals and 12 accounts payable accruals) that were inflated during profitable periods and later reached into and used by 13 defendants when times turned bad. See Andren v. Nvidia Corporation, et al., Case No. CV807900, 14 Complaint (Santa Clara County Super. Ct. May 16, 2002), attached hereto and incorporated herein as 15 Exhibit ("Ex.") 1. 16 4. Defendants2 engaged in the illegal and improper accounting scheme detailed by Andren in 17 order to manipulate Nvidia's earnings and inflate Nvidia's stock price and at the same time sell over $168.6 18 million of Nvidia's stock. Defendants cooked the books and misled the market regarding Nvidia's financial 19 results and ability to maintain continued consistent growth. Defendants created the illusion that Nvidia's 20 profits were rapidly and continuously increasing in line with analysts' expectations when in reality, the 21 Company's profits were erratic and drastically fluctuating. This fluctuation was not what the investors and 22 analysts were expecting based on Nvidia's reported financial results. 23 24 1 The Court's June 11, 2003 Order Granting Defendants' Motion to Dismiss ("Order") dismissed a portion of the claims asserted during this Class Period without leave to amend. Order at 15. In an 25 abundance of caution, and with the intention to maintain all relevant allegations in a single document, plaintiffs include allegations relating to the dismissed claims to preserve plaintiffs' right to appeal the 26 dismissal without leave to amend. The following paragraphs ("¶") contain allegations pertaining to the restatement: 3-12, 43-46, 63-84, 100, 102-111, 116-120, 132-175. 27 2 Defendants are Nvidia and its senior officers, Jen-Hsun Huang, Christine Hoberg, Jeffrey Fisher 28 and Chris Malachowsky, described in ¶¶35-42, infra. FIRST AMENDED CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATION OF THE FEDERAL SECURITIES LAWS - C-02-0853-CW - 1 - Case 4:02-cv-00853 Document 61-1 Filed 07/28/2003 Page 3 of 73 1 5. As a result of defendants' accounting manipulations described in this Complaint, defendants 2 caused the annual financial statements (Form 10-Ks) as well as the quarterly financial statements (Form 3 10-Qs) for fiscal year 2000 ("FY00"),3 fiscal 2001 ("FY01"), fiscal 2002 ("FY02") as well as the first 4 quarter in fiscal year 2003 ("1Q03") to be false and misleading. Rather investors and analysts alike relied 5 upon defendants' false statements about the Company's consistent growth in evaluating whether or not to 6 purchase Nvidia stock. 7 6. Defendants manipulated Nvidia's reported financial results during the Class Period by 8 falsifying the Company's books and records. Andren, former Nvidia accounting manager, explained that 9 defendants' scheme included improper accounting practices such as: 10 (a) improperly using various "cookie jar" reserves (bad debt, sales returns, bonus 11 accruals and accounts payable accruals) inflated during profitable periods that defendants later reached into 12 and used when times turned bad; 13 (b) improperly accounting for its inventory; 14 (c) improperly recording revenues each quarter for product shipped to distributors that 15 had not been sold to end users; 16 (d) managing profit margins by manipulating shipments at the end of quarters; and 17 (e) using "back-in" accounting, i.e., instead of compiling revenue and expenses first and 18 using these actual figures to compute gross margins, Nvidia used a targeted gross margin number and then 19 worked backward to achieve those numbers by creating the revenue and expense calculations necessary 20 to achieve the forecasted margins. 21 7. Former Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") chairman Arthur Levitt described 22 "cookie jar reserves" as an illusion used to "stash accruals ... during the good times and reach into them 23 when needed in the bad times." Ex. 2. Levitt then described various methods of "Accounting Hocus- 24 Pocus" or "illusions" and defined "Cookie Jar Reserves" as one such illusion: 25 A third illusion played by some companies is using unrealistic assumptions to estimate liabilities for such items as sales returns, loan losses or warranty costs. In doing 26 27 3 Effective January 21, 1998, Nvidia changed its fiscal year-end financial reporting period to a 52- or 53-week year ending on the last Sunday in January. For instance, FY02 ended on January 28, 2002. 28 January 29, 2002 marked the beginning of 1Q03. FIRST AMENDED CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATION OF THE FEDERAL SECURITIES LAWS - C-02-0853-CW - 2 - Case 4:02-cv-00853 Document 61-1 Filed 07/28/2003 Page 4 of 73 1 so, they stash accruals in cookie jars during the good times and reach into them when needed in the bad times. 2 Id. Levitt also expressed increasing concern that "the motivation to meet Wall Street earnings expectations 3 may be overriding common sense business practices," making "corporate managers" and others 4 "participants in a game of nods and winks." Id. The SEC's complaint against HealthSouth Corporation 5 and its Chief Executive Officer ("CEO") demonstrates the SEC's position that the manipulating or "fixing" 6 numbers in financial reports to match Wall Street expectations violates federal securities laws. See 7 Securities and Exchange Commission v. HealthSouth Corporation, et al., Civil Action No. 8 CV-03-J-0615-S, Amended Complaint for Injunctive and Other Relief (N.D. Ala. Apr. 3, 2003). Ex. 3. 9 In fact, the SEC brought similar charges against Nvidia. See ¶26, infra. 10 8. Creating and utilizing unnecessary reserves to manage earnings also violates Generally 11 Accepted Accounting Principles ("GAAP") and is expressly forbidden by the SEC. Recently, the SEC 12 found that Microsoft Corporation's ("Microsoft") maintenance of similar undisclosed reserves, accruals, 13 allowances and liability accounts was not in conformity with GAAP and lacked proper documentation and 14 substantiation, as required by the federal securities laws. See In the Matter of Microsoft Corporation, 15 SEC Accounting and Auditing Enforcement Release No. 1563 (June 3, 2002). Ex. 4. In the Microsoft 16 case, the SEC found that senior Microsoft financial personnel relied on their subjective judgments in making 17 adjustments and additions to reserves, without any significant factual support or analysis, such that reserves 18 at the corporate level significantly exceeded the amounts that would have been supported by the 19 information from the operational level. Id. 20 9. As described in ¶¶64-84, defendants here did exactly what the SEC said was wrong in the 21 Microsoft case by arbitrarily causing journal entries to be made to Nvidia's general ledger, without factual 22 support or analysis. These manipulations resulted in reserves being overstated and, hence, public filings 23 based on such financial figures were false. 24 10. Defendants' accounting manipulations of Nvidia's financial reports was so egregious that 25 former accounting manager Andren filed a suit against Nvidia and certain of its senior executives, including 26 defendant Hoberg, alleging that defendants were aware of and maintained "illegal and improper" accounting 27 practices that were in "violation of Securities and Exchange Commission Rule 10-B-5." Ex. 1 at 5, 7, 9. 28 FIRST AMENDED CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATION OF THE FEDERAL SECURITIES LAWS - C-02-0853-CW - 3 - Case 4:02-cv-00853 Document 61-1 Filed 07/28/2003 Page 5 of 73 1 Andren's complaint alleges, among other things, that Nvidia, Hoberg and Controller Richard Cording were 2 aware of and maintained "illegal and improper" accounting practices.
Recommended publications
  • BIOS EPOX, Motherboard 4PCA HT ======Change Optimized Defaults Are Marked !!! Změny Oproti DEFAULT Jsou Označeny !!! ======
    BIOS EPOX, motherboard 4PCA HT =================================================== Change Optimized Defaults are marked !!! Změny oproti DEFAULT jsou označeny !!! =================================================== Standard CMOS Features ====================== Halt On [All, But Keyboard] !!! Advanced BIOS Features ====================== CPU Feature-Delay Prior to Termal [16 Min] Limit CPUID MaxVal [Disabled] Hard Disk Boot Priority Bootovani disku CPU L1 & L2 Cache [Enabled] Hyper-Threading Technology [Enabled] !!! First Boot Device [HDD] !!! Second Boot Device [Disabled] !!! Third Boot Device [Disabled] !!! Boot Other Device [Disabled] !!! Boot Up Floppy Seek [Disabled] !!! Boot Up NumLock Status [On] Security Option [Setup] x APIC Mode (zasedle) [Enabled] HDD S.M.A.R.T .... [Disabled] Advanced Chipset Features ========================= DRAM Timing Selectable [By SPD] x x x x Agresive Memory Mode [Standard] x x x System BIOS Cacheable [Enabled] VIDEO BIOS Cacheable [Disabled] AGP Aperture ... [128] Init Display First [AGP] DRAM DATA Inregrity Mode [ECC] Integrated Peripherals ====================== On Chip IDE Device: IDE HDD [Enabled] IDE DMA [Enabled] On-Chip Primary [Enabled] IDE Primary MASTER PIO [Auto] ... [Auto] On-Chip Secondary [Enabled] IDE Secondary MASTER PIO[Auto] ... [Auto] On Chip Serial ATA [Disabled] (ostatni sede) OnBoard Device: USB Controller [Enabled] USB 2.0 [Enabled] USB Keyboard [Auto] USB Mouse [Disabled] !!! AC97 Audio [Disabled] !!! Game Port [Disabled] !!! Midi Port [Disabled] !!! On Board LAN Device [Enabled]
    [Show full text]
  • Compatibility List For: Adaptec Serial Attached SCSI RAID 4805SAS Adaptec Serial Attached SCSI RAID 4800SAS Adaptec Serial Atta
    COMPATIBILITY REPORT This Compatibility Report reflects testing performed by Adaptec to test the interoperability of Compatibility List for: the products listed. It does not attempt to validate the quality of or preference for any of the Adaptec Serial Attached SCSI RAID 4805SAS listed products. It is also not an inclusive list and reflects a representative sample of products in each of the categories listed. All testing was done by the Adaptec Product Verification Adaptec Serial Attached SCSI RAID 4800SAS Group and the Adaptec InterOperability Test Lab. Adaptec Serial Attached SCSI RAID 4000SAS1 Minimum testing for listed host systems consists of single and multiple RAID controller recognition, RAID controller BIOS interaction with host, and operating system bootability from each RAID controller from every compatible PCI, PCI-X, or PCIe slot. Systems that are capable of supporting more than 4GB and more then 8GB of memory are also tested in operating system environments that support such a configuration. Please note that some systems or motherboards may be listed multiple times if different system BIOS or CPU configurations were used. Host Systems PCI PCI PCI PCIe PCIe PCIe PCIe PCI- 64 64 32 PCI 32 Memory Manufacturer Model BIOS Chipset x1 x4 x8 x16 X (3.3v) (5v) (3.3v) (5v) CPU Memory Type Abit AA8XE Phoenix 16 Intel 925XE 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 P4 3.2GHz 1GB DDR2-533 Pentium-D Abit AW8-MAX Award 19 Intel 955X 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 4GB DDR2-667 3.04GHz 939SLI32- ULI - Asrock AMI P1.0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 3 Athlon64 3200+ 2GB DDR-400 eSATA m1695/1697
    [Show full text]
  • A7N8X Series
    ® A7N8X Series User Manual Motherboard Product Name: A7N8X Checklist Manual Revision: Revised Edition V4 E1292 Release Date: April 2003 Copyright © 2003 ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. All Rights Reserved. No part of this manual, including the products and software described in it, may be reproduced, transmitted, transcribed, stored in a retrieval system, or translated into any language in any form or by any means, except documentation kept by the purchaser for backup purposes, without the express written permission of ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. (“ASUS”). Product warranty or service will not be extended if: (1) the product is repaired, modified or altered, unless such repair, modification of alteration is authorized in writing by ASUS; or (2) the serial number of the product is defaced or missing. Products and corporate names appearing in this manual may or may not be registered trademarks or copyrights of their respective companies, and are used only for identification or explanation and to the owners’ benefit, without intent to infringe. The product name and revision number are both printed on the product itself. Manual revisions are released for each product design represented by the digit before and after the period of the manual revision number. Manual updates are represented by the third digit in the manual revision number. For previous or updated manuals, BIOS, drivers, or product release information, contact ASUS at: http://www.asus.com or through any of the means indicated on the following page. ASUS PROVIDES THIS MANUAL “AS IS” WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EITHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
    [Show full text]
  • 2005 Ranking Results
    2005 Information Transparency and Disclosure Ranking Results in Taiwan Conducted by Securities and Futures Institute Entrusted by Taiwan Stock Exchange Corporation & GreTai Securities Market Despite all reasonable care given in the screening process to ensure objectivity, the SFI bears no responsibility in case of any damage or loss incurred from use of the ranking results. June 8, 2006 2005 Information Transparency and Disclosure Ranking Results in Taiwan About “Information Disclosure and Transparency Ranking System” The recent media focus on corporate governance has prompted calls for greater transparency and disclosure on companies around the globe. As a result, several leading financial-information providers have launched disclosure rankings, evaluations, and research related to how companies disclose information to rely on market force and mechanisms to encourage voluntary disclosures of companies. However, the evaluation criteria selected by those rankings, to some degree, could not provide an overall evaluation of disclosure practices in local market. In additions, there have been calls for standard setters and regulators to expand disclosure requirements according to international standards. Therefore, the Securities and Futures Institute (“SFI”), entrusted by the Taiwan Stock Exchange Corporation (“TSEC”) and the Gre Tai Securities Market (“GTSM”), currently launched “Information Transparency and Disclosure Rankings System”(ITDRS) to evaluate the level of transparency for all listed companies in Taiwan since 2003. For the third time, the 2005 full-year ranking results were released on June 8, 2006. It’s the first time that the full ranking results released. In the 1,032 listed companies of TSEC and GTSM, 12 companies were ranked as “Grade A+”, 183 companies were ranked as “Grade A”, 583 companies were ranked as “Grade B”, and 254 companies were ranked as “Grade C”.
    [Show full text]
  • Tech Item List B
    PRODUCT TYPE PRODUCT_DESCRIPTION CD ROM AOPEN BLACK CD-ROM PANEL CDRW AOPEN BLACK CD-ROM COVER DVD AOPEN CD ROM, 56K ATAPI CD, CAV, 128K, 10,000KB, BULK ACER 52X CD-ROM COOL GREY COLOR RETAIL BOX ACER 52X24X52X CDRW BULK COOL GREY COLOR W/ACER LOGO BenQ 56X IDE CDROM, BEIGE RETAIL BOX DELTA 52X MAX CD-ROM BULK LITE-ON 52X CD-ROM, BULK, IBM WHITE LITE-ON 52X MAX CD-ROM, RETAIL PACKAGE IBM WHITE LITE-ON 52X CD-ROM, BULK, BLACK LITEON 48X24X48 CDRW RETAIL BOX LITEON 52X32X52 CDRW RETAIL BOX LITE ON CDRW 52X32X52 BULK LITE ON CDRW 52X32X52 BLACK BULK LITEON EXT CDRW 40X24X40X RETAIL BOX MSI 52X24X52 CDRW BEIGE BULK MSI CD-ROM 52X, BULK DRIVE, NO CABLES INCLUDED NEC CD-ROM 52X BULK, NO CABLES, BOOTABLE W/MICROSOFT WINDOWS NEC NTI SOFTWARE FOR NEC CDRW 24X10X40 AND 16X10X40, ONLY FO LITEON DVD COMBO 48X24X48X16X BULK BLACK LITEON DVD COMBO 48X24X48X16X RETAIL BOX LITEON DVD-DUAL DRIVE 4X/4X/2X+40X24X40X DVD+RW/DVD-R/DVD-RW LITEON DVD+RW 4X/4X/12X+40X24X40X DVD+RW DRIVE RETAIL BOX NEC DVD-RW 4X2. 4X4X BULK WITH SOFTWARE LITE ON DVD 16X 48 CDROM BULK SW, & CABLE LITE ON DVD 16X 48 CDROM RETAIL PACK, SOFTWARE, MANUAL LITE-ON 16X48 DVD, BULK, BLACK AMD CPU AMD ATHLON 64 BIT PROCCESSOR, 3200+ BOX AMD DURON 1100MHZ BOX CPU AMD DURON 950MHZ CPU TRAY AMD DURON 1600 MHZ, FSB266 MHZ, 64K CACHE MEM, TRAY AMD ATHLON MP 2000 BOX, FOR SERVER / WORKSTATION AMD ATHLON XP 2000+ THROUGHBRED (1667 MHZ) BOX FSB 266MHZ.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    Introduction Why 64-Bit Computing? The question of why we need 64-bit computing is often asked but rarely answered in a satisfactory manner. There are good reasons for the confusion surrounding the question. That is why first of all; let's look through the list of users who need 64 addressing and 64-bit calculations today: • Users of CAD, designing systems, simulators do need RAM over 4 GB. Although there are ways to avoid this limitation (for example, Intel PAE), it impacts the performance. Thus, the Xeon processors support the 36bit addressing mode where they can address up to 64GB RAM. The idea of this support is that the RAM is divided into segments, and an address consists of the numbers of segment and locations inside the segment. This approach causes almost 30% performance loss in operations with memory. Besides, programming is much simpler and more convenient for a flat memory model in the 64bit address space - due to the large address space a location has a simple address processed at one pass. A lot of design offices use quite expensive workstations on the RISC processors where the 64bit addressing and large memory sizes are used for a long time already. • Users of data bases. Any big company has a huge data base, and extension of the maximum memory size and possibility to address data directly in the data base is very costly. Although in the special modes the 32bit architecture IA32 can address up to 64GB memory, a transition to the flat memory model in the 64bit space is much more advantageous in terms of speed and ease of programming.
    [Show full text]
  • CHAPTER 4 Motherboards and Buses 05 0789729741 Ch04 7/15/03 4:03 PM Page 196
    05 0789729741 ch04 7/15/03 4:03 PM Page 195 CHAPTER 4 Motherboards and Buses 05 0789729741 ch04 7/15/03 4:03 PM Page 196 196 Chapter 4 Motherboards and Buses Motherboard Form Factors Without a doubt, the most important component in a PC system is the main board or motherboard. Some companies refer to the motherboard as a system board or planar. The terms motherboard, main board, system board, and planar are interchangeable, although I prefer the motherboard designation. This chapter examines the various types of motherboards available and those components typically contained on the motherboard and motherboard interface connectors. Several common form factors are used for PC motherboards. The form factor refers to the physical dimensions (size and shape) as well as certain connector, screw hole, and other positions that dictate into which type of case the board will fit. Some are true standards (meaning that all boards with that form factor are interchangeable), whereas others are not standardized enough to allow for inter- changeability. Unfortunately, these nonstandard form factors preclude any easy upgrade or inexpen- sive replacement, which generally means they should be avoided. The more commonly known PC motherboard form factors include the following: Obsolete Form Factors Modern Form Factors All Others ■ Baby-AT ■ ATX ■ Fully proprietary designs ■ Full-size AT ■ micro-ATX (certain Compaq, Packard Bell, Hewlett-Packard, ■ ■ LPX (semiproprietary) Flex-ATX notebook/portable sys- ■ WTX (no longer in production) ■ Mini-ITX (flex-ATX tems, and so on) ■ ITX (flex-ATX variation, never variation) produced) ■ NLX Motherboards have evolved over the years from the original Baby-AT form factor boards used in the original IBM PC and XT to the current ATX and NLX boards used in most full-size desktop and tower systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrator ® NV Series Hybrid Windows Capture Cards
    Integrator ® NV Series www.avermedia-usa.com/surveillance Hybrid Windows Capture Cards www.averusa.com/surveillance RNV3000ECOMMENDATIONS Hardware Recommendation List Motherboard System Requirements: Our products support most of the current Intel chipsets for motherboards. Intel • CPU: Pentium 4 3.0 GHz or higher 848, 865, 875, 915, 925, 945, 955, 965, P35, NVIDIA nFORCE4 SLI - Intel Edition, • OS: Windows 7/XP/Vista/2000 - 32 bit NVIDIA nForce3 250Gb Platform Processor chipsets • RAM: 512MB or higher • HDD: 120GB or higher Below is a list of Motherboards that our validation labs have tested; however we • CD-RM/DVD-RM do support other motherboards beyond the ones listed below • Graphic Card: 32-bit high color SVGA Intel Socket graphics card with 128MB video Brand Asus Gigabyte Epox Intel FOXCONN MSI memory and DirectDraw/YUV 848 P4P800 SE Rendering Capability P4P800 GA-8IPE1000 P4P800-VM GA-8IG1000Pro-G • 10/100 Base-T Ethernet card 865 P4P8X GA-8IPE1000-G (Rev 3.1) • Sound card and speaker P5P800 P4C800 GA-8IK1100 875P Neo FISR 875 GA-8I875 915 P5GD1 Pro GA-8I915G-Duo EP-5EPA+ 915G Combo 925 P5AD2 Premium D925XCV 915G Combo P5LD2 GA-8I945P-G P5LD2-VM GA-8I 945G -MF 945 P5PL2-E GA-945PL-S3 (Rev 2.0) GA-8I945PL-G GA-8I955X Pro Note: 955 GA-8I955X Royal Based on Intel’s suggestion, for all of Microsoft P5B Deluxe/ GA-965P-DS3P (Rev 3.3) Windows XP Operating Systems, Hyper-Threading must 965 WiFi-AP GA-965P-DS3 2.0 be disabled in the system BIOS Setup program for our 975 GA-G1975X-C DVR products.
    [Show full text]
  • View Annual Report
    FORM 10−K/A NVIDIA CORP − NVDA Filed: November 29, 2006 (period: January 29, 2006) Amendment to a previously filed 10−K Table of Contents Part I Item 1 Business as to Forward−Looking Statements and Available Information ; Part II Item 5 Market for Registrant s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchas Part IV Item 15 Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules. Item 1. Business 1 ITEM 1. BUSINESS ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS ITEM 2. PROPERTIES ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS PART II ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF E ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK ITEM 8. CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION PART III ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATT ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES PART IV ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES SIGNATURES EXHIBIT INDEX EX−23.1 (CONSENT OF PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP) EX−23.2 (CONSENT OF KPMG LLP) EX−31.1 (RULE 13A−14(A) CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER) EX−31.2 (RULE 13A−14(A) CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER) EX−32.1 (STATEMENT OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER UNDER RULE 13A−14(B)) EX−32.2 (STATEMENT OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER UNDER RULE 13A−14(B)) EX−99.1 (NVIDIA CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA) Table of Contents UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Brief
    Technical Brief Fast Texture Downloads and Readbacks using Pixel Buffer Objects in OpenGL August 2005 TB-02011-001_v01 Document Change History Version Date Responsible Reason for Change 01 00/00/00 Initial release 02 08/17/05 Ikrima Added Chris, Mark, and Eric’s suggestions Elhassan 03 08/17/05 Ikrima Added perf #s and section about motherboards & Elhassan chipsets DA-00xxx-001_v01 i 9/28/2005 NVIDIA CONFIDENTIAL Preface Bandwidth bottleneck is a common occurrence in many applications. This technical brief discusses how to achieve efficient bandwidth rates in your application, including transfers from and to the graphics processing unit (GPU). Ikrima Elhassan [email protected] NVIDIA Corporation 2701 San Tomas Expressway Santa Clara, CA 95050 August 16, 2005 TB-02011-001_v01 1 08/17/05 Achieving Efficient Bandwidth Rates Graphics applications are often bandwidth bound. To make matters worse, non PCI-e video cards have asymmetric bandwidth rates, with slower readback rates than download rates. Unfortunately, applications often require reading the frame buffer. For example, some applications write intermediary results to the frame buffer and use it as an input to additional rendering or computation passes. This paper aims to discuss ways to achieve fast transfers by: Using an nForce3 or comparable AGP chipset Using pixel sizes that are multiples of 32 bits to avoid data padding. Storing 8-bit textures in a BGRA layout in system memory and use the GL_BGRA as the external format for textures to avoid swizzling. Using a PBO to transfer data to and from the GPU. If possible, using multiple PBOs to implement an asynchronous readback scheme.
    [Show full text]
  • A7N8X-VM Front Matter.P65
    A7N8X-VM/400 User Guide Motherboard E1480 Checklist First Edition V1 December 2003 Copyright © 2003 ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. All Rights Reserved. No part of this manual, including the products and software described in it, may be reproduced, transmitted, transcribed, stored in a retrieval system, or translated into any language in any form or by any means, except documentation kept by the purchaser for backup purposes, without the express written permission of ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. (“ASUS”). Product warranty or service will not be extended if: (1) the product is repaired, modified or altered, unless such repair, modification of alteration is authorized in writing by ASUS; or (2) the serial number of the product is defaced or missing. ASUS PROVIDES THIS MANUAL “AS IS” WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EITHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. IN NO EVENT SHALL ASUS, ITS DIRECTORS, OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES OR AGENTS BE LIABLE FOR ANY INDIRECT, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS, LOSS OF BUSINESS, LOSS OF USE OR DATA, INTERRUPTION OF BUSINESS AND THE LIKE), EVEN IF ASUS HAS BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES ARISING FROM ANY DEFECT OR ERROR IN THIS MANUAL OR PRODUCT. SPECIFICATIONS AND INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS MANUAL ARE FURNISHED FOR INFORMATIONAL USE ONLY, AND ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AT ANY TIME WITHOUT NOTICE, AND SHOULD NOT BE CONSTRUED AS A COMMITMENT BY ASUS. ASUS ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY OR LIABILITY FOR ANY ERRORS OR INACCURACIES THAT MAY APPEAR IN THIS MANUAL, INCLUDING THE PRODUCTS AND SOFTWARE DESCRIBED IN IT.
    [Show full text]
  • PROMO Genius Speaker SW-5.1 Home Theater
    Genius Speaker SW-5.1 Home Theater / Lemn 399 439.00 16/8/16/6/4/-/16x Nec DVD±RW ND-3540A DL 149 162.00 Creative Sound Blaster AUDIGY SE 7.1 89 106.60 PROMO 256Mb Corsair DDR 400MHz CL2.5 (3-3-8) 85 99.00 Week 2 / 09.01.2005 – 15.12.2005 410583 Oradea, Nufarului 22 • e-mail: [email protected] • tel.: +4 0259 472113 (2 linii) • RDSTel: +4 0359 401802 (2 linii) • fax: +4 0259 474113 FARA TVA FARA TVA CU TVA FARA TVA CU TVA G PRODUS USD EURO ROL RON RON 36 ASUS MOTHERBOARD / Socket 754 / 3 YEARS 36 ↓ Asus K8U-X / SiS760GX/965L / Socket 754 52.94 44.97 1992000 167.39 199.20 36 ↓ Asus K8V-MX / K8M800 / Socket 754 62.06 52.72 2335000 196.22 233.50 36 ↓ Asus K8V-X SE / K8T800 / Socket 754 60.97 51.79 2294000 192.77 229.40 36 ↓ Asus K8V SE Deluxe / K8T800 / Socket 754 76.49 64.98 2878000 241.85 287.80 36 ↓ Asus K8N / nForce3 250 / Socket 754 66.87 56.81 2516000 211.43 251.60 36 ↓ Asus K8N-E Deluxe / nForce3 250 / Socket 754 83.45 70.89 3140000 263.87 314.00 36 ↓ Asus K8N4-E / nForce4 250 / Socket 754 80.23 68.16 3019000 253.70 301.90 36 ↓ Asus K8N4-E Deluxe / nForce4 250 / Socket 754 90.94 77.26 3422000 287.56 342.20 36 ASUS MOTHERBOARD / Socket 939 / 3 YEARS 36 ↓ Asus A8S-X / SiS756 / Socket 939 79.17 67.26 2979000 250.34 297.90 36 ↓ Asus A8V-MX / K8M800 / Socket 939 73.83 62.72 2778000 233.45 277.80 36 ↓ Asus A8V / K8T800PRO / Socket 939 88.79 75.43 3341000 280.76 334.10 36 ↓ Asus A8V-DELUXE / K8T800PRO / Socket 939 99.50 84.53 3744000 314.62 374.40 36 ↓ Asus A8V DELUXE WiFi / K8T800PRO / Socket 939 116.08 98.62 4368000 367.06 436.80 36 ↓ Asus
    [Show full text]