USAID Manila,Philippines
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
GENERAL ARTEMIO RICARTE Y GARCIA: a FILIPINO NATIONALIST MARIA PILAR S
GENERAL ARTEMIO RICARTE y GARCIA: A FILIPINO NATIONALIST MARIA PILAR s. LUNA As A RESULT OF THE AMERICAN OCCUPATION OF THE PHILIPPINES., especially during the early 1900's, a number of social movements emerged. While some took the form of apocalyptic expression-,, others developed into social banditry and still others appeared as nationalistic movements. They deVeloped in an attempt to show their strong defiance against the government established by the United States in the Philippines. While a majority of the Filipinos belonging to the intelligent, proper-, tied and educated class cooperated heartily with the authorities, a good num-· ber of people proved to be irreconcilable. One of them is General Artemio Ricarte y Garcia - "an iron-willed man who defied the Americans down to- his last breath,"1 a patriot who is "the living body, the flesh and blood of the Filipino heroes who chose hardships, misfortune and death to subjuga- tion."2 The movement he organized assumed nationalistic forms. It cannot be classified as social banditry because in the first place it was not reformist;. rather, it was revolutionary in the sense that it did not accept the general framework of the established government. Instead it insisted that the estab- lished government must be fundamentally transformed. 3 In the second place, its aim was not vengeance on the rich. Neither did it assume the characteris- tics of an agrarian movement. Nor did Ricar.te in any of his pamphlets. declare or state anything about having a "New Jerusalem" or of worshipping a supposedly reincarnation of a saint or God for that matter. -
Let Tutorial Center 2016
website: https://dailysauce.000webhostapp.com/ facebook group: https://www.facebook.com/groups/415083995495758 2016 LET TUTORIAL CENTER General Education GENERAL EDUCATION English Fi lipino Mathematics Science Social Science 1 website: https://dailysauce.000webhostapp.com/ facebook group: https://www.facebook.com/groups/415083995495758 LET Reviewer-ENGLISH LECTURE NOTES MODELS OF COMMUNICATION The communication process is indeed a paradox. We always communicate with each other, yet defining the process itself seems to be a very difficult task. Language of different historical periods, in their dire attempts to bridge the gap, were able to formulate their own theories to explain the process of communication, Since the linear representation of Aristotle to the complex depiction of modern linguist, we can say that this endeavor has come a long way. Renowned linguist have different points of view about the communication process, and this diversity proves to be the fuel that keeps linguist of today on taking forward steps en route to the better understanding of this process. Two to be discussed in this chapter, each representing the traditional and the contemporary schools of thought as regards communication. Berio’s representation, being the most widely cited and extensively use model, will be discussed to explain in the basic components of the communication cycle, while the Dance Helix model will be clarified to give a fresh and novel perspective on the practice of other long-standing theories. Berios’Model David Berios’s paradigm of the communication process is considered one of the most recognizable representations. It has four major components: source, receiver, message, and the channel. That is why at times this model is also called SMRC. -
Downloaded File
See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/337949713 ANG KABABAIHAN NG KATIPUNAN, ANG KATIPUNAN SA KABABAIHAN: ISANG DISKURSO SA AMBAG NG MGA BABAE SA HIMAGSIKANG PILIPINO Article · November 2017 CITATIONS READS 3 65,265 1 author: Axle Christien Tugano University of the Philippines Los Baños 35 PUBLICATIONS 16 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE All content following this page was uploaded by Axle Christien Tugano on 29 January 2021. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. E-Journal Saliksik Tomo 6, Bilang 2 | Nobyembre 2017 ISSN 2244-0231 © 2017 Bagong Kasaysayan (BAKAS), Inc. at mga may-akda. RESERBADO ANG LAHAT NG KARAPATAN. Nasa tagapaglathala at mga may-akda ang lahat ng karapatan sa e-journal na ito. Hindi maaaring kopyahin o sipiin ninuman sa anumang paraan ng paglimbag ang anumang bahagi ng e-journal na ito nang walang pahintulot sa mga may karapatang-sipi. Ang Saliksik E-Journal ay naglalayong isulong ang akademikong talastasan sa agham panlipunan, humanidades, kasaysayan, pilosopiya, at siyensya sa wikang Filipino. Isa itong refereed e-journal na itinatag nina Zeus A. Salazar, Ph.D., Jaime F. Tiongson, at Lorenz D. Lasco. Lumalabas ito ng hindi bababa sa isang beses kada taon. LUPON NG MGA PATNUGOT: Patnugot ng Isyu: Nancy Kimuell-Gabriel, Ph.D. (University of the Philippines) • Tagapamahalang Patnugot: Atoy M. Navarro (Thammasat University, Thailand) • Kasapi ng Lupon: Adonis L. Elumbre (University of the Philippines) • Roderick C. Javar, Ph.D. (University of the Philippines) • Mary Jane B. Rodriguez-Tatel (University of the Philippines) • Ma. Florina Y. Orillos-Juan, Ph.D. -
Comments on Luis C. Dery, “The Trial and Death of Andres Bonifacio : a Myth,” Powerpoint Presentation Delivered at the Polyt
Comments on Luis C. Dery, “The Trial and Death of Andres Bonifacio : A Myth,” Powerpoint presentation delivered at the Polytechnic University of the Philippines conference “Bonifacio@150: Dangal at Kabayanihan,” November 27, 2013. Jim Richardson December 17, 2013 Prof. Dery cites three sources in support of his contention that Bonifacio was killed in Limbon on April 23, 1897. Looking at these sources in turn: (a) Manuel Artigas y Cuerva, Glorias nacionales: Andres Bonifacio y El ‘Katipunan’ (Manila: Librería ‘Manila Filatelica’, 1911), p.89. Artigas y Cuerva draws here on a personal interview with Emilio Aguinaldo, one of the key protagonists. Aguinaldo, says Artigas y Cuerva, related that Bonifacio had been sentenced to death by a Council of War and that “esa decisión se cumplió en Maragondon el día 23 de Abril de 1897”. There are three major problems with this evidence: (i) most crucially, Aguinaldo does not corroborate Dery’s case that Bonifacio was killed in Limbon – he says that Bonifacio was killed in Maragondon; (ii) if Aguinaldo was reportedly correctly by Artigas y Cuerva as saying Bonifacio was killed in Maragondon on April 23, 1897, he was demonstrably wrong, because Bonifacio was indeed in Limbon on that date (and Aguinaldo and his embryonic government were in Naik, so none of the leading protagonists was then in Maragondon); and (iii) Artigas y Cuerva contradicts the “April 23” version on two other pages of the same work – on p.98 he cites the letter Bonifacio wrote to Jacinto on April 24, and on p.59 he says Bonifacio was killed on April 26.