How Toxic Masculinity Creates a Second Inescapable Situation for Inmates - DocsLib

Load more

14

Copy Link

Public Interest Law Reporter

Volume 24 Issue 2

2019

The Best We Can Be: How Toxic Masculinity Creates a Second Inescapable Situation for Inmates

Mariah Woodson

Follow this and additional works at: https://lawecommons.luc.edu/pilr

Part of the Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons, Criminal Procedure Commons, Environmental
Law Commons, and the Human Rights Law Commons

Recommended Citation

Mariah Woodson, The Best We Can Be: How Toxic Masculinity Creates a Second Inescapable Situation for Inmates, 24 Pub. Interest L. Rptr. 124 (2019).

Available at: https://lawecommons.luc.edu/pilr/vol24/iss2/3

This Article is brought to you for free and open access by LAW eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Public Interest Law Reporter by an authorized editor of LAW eCommons. For more information, please contact law-

[email protected].

Woodson: The Best We Can Be: How Toxic Masculinity Creates a Second Inesca

Published by LAW eCommons, 2019
1

Public Interest Law Reporter, Vol. 24, Iss. 2 [2019], Art. 3

Woodson: The Best We Can Be: How Toxic Masculinity Creates a Second Inesca

Published by LAW eCommons, 2019
3

Public Interest Law Reporter, Vol. 24, Iss. 2 [2019], Art. 3

Woodson: The Best We Can Be: How Toxic Masculinity Creates a Second Inesca

Published by LAW eCommons, 2019
5

Public Interest Law Reporter, Vol. 24, Iss. 2 [2019], Art. 3

Woodson: The Best We Can Be: How Toxic Masculinity Creates a Second Inesca

Published by LAW eCommons, 2019
7

Public Interest Law Reporter, Vol. 24, Iss. 2 [2019], Art. 3

Woodson: The Best We Can Be: How Toxic Masculinity Creates a Second Inesca

Published by LAW eCommons, 2019
9

Public Interest Law Reporter, Vol. 24, Iss. 2 [2019], Art. 3

Woodson: The Best We Can Be: How Toxic Masculinity Creates a Second Inesca

Published by LAW eCommons, 2019
11

Public Interest Law Reporter, Vol. 24, Iss. 2 [2019], Art. 3

Woodson: The Best We Can Be: How Toxic Masculinity Creates a Second Inesca

Published by LAW eCommons, 2019
13

Recommended publications

Download Download

DOI: 10.4119/ijcv-3805 IJCV: Vol. 14(2)/2020 Connecting Structures: Resistance, Heroic Masculinity and Anti-Feminism as Bridging Narratives within Group Radicalization David Meieringi [email protected] Aziz Dzirii [email protected] Naika Foroutani [email protected] i Berlin Institute for Integration and Migration Research (BIM) at the Humboldt University Berlin Vol. 14(2)/2020 The IJCV provides a forum for scientific exchange and public dissemination of up-to-date scien- tific knowledge on conflict and violence. The IJCV is independent, peer reviewed, open access, and included in the Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI) as well as other rele- vant databases (e.g., SCOPUS, EBSCO, ProQuest, DNB). The topics on which we concentrate—conflict and violence—have always been central to various disciplines. Consequently, the journal encompasses contributions from a wide range of disciplines, including criminology, economics, education, ethnology, his- tory, political science, psychology, social anthropology, sociology, the study of reli- gions, and urban studies. All articles are gathered in yearly volumes, identified by a DOI with article-wise pagi- nation. For more information please visit www.ijcv.or g Suggested Citation: APA: Meiering, D., Dziri, A., & Foroutan, N. (2020). Connecting structures: Resistance, heroic masculinity and anti-feminism as bridging narratives within group radicaliza- tion. International Journal of Conflict and Violence, 14(2), 1-19. doi: 10.4119/ijcv-3805 Harvard: Meiering, David, Dziri, Aziz, Foroutan, Naika. 2020. Connecting Structures: Resistance, Heroic Masculinity and Anti-Feminism as Bridging Narratives within Group Radicalization. International Journal of Conflict and Violence 14(2): 1-19. doi: 10.4119/ijcv-3805 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution—NoDerivatives License.
Toxic Masculinity Involves the Need to Aggressively Compete and Dominate Others and Encompasses the Most Problematic Proclivities in Men

Toxic Masculinity as a Barrier to Mental Health Treatment in Prison � Terry A. Kupers The Wright Institute The current article addresses gender issues that become magnified in prison settings and contribute to heightened resistance in psychotherapy and other forms of mental health treatment. Toxic masculinity involves the need to aggressively compete and dominate others and encompasses the most problematic proclivities in men. These same male proclivities foster resistance to psychotherapy. Some of the stresses and complexities of life in men’s prisons are explored. The relation between hegemonic masculin- ity and toxic masculinity is examined. The discussion proceeds to the interplay between individual male characteristics and institutional dynam- ics that intensify toxic masculinity. A discussion of some structural obsta- cles to mental health treatment in prison and resistances on the part of prisoners is followed by some general recommendations for the therapist in this context. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Clin Psychol 61: 713– 724, 2005. Keywords: masculinities; prison; toxic masculinity; gender; prison mental health Over 2 million persons are in jail and prison in the United States, and over 90% of prisoners are male (Bureau of Justice Statistics, 2004). Most prisoners come from low income backgrounds, and a dispropor tionate number are persons of color (Mauer, 1999). Contrary to popular stereotypes, 75% of men entering prison have not been convicted of a violent crime, and a disproportionate number have been convicted of drug-related crimes. Many of them urgently need mental health services because they suffer from serious mental illness, or they require treatment for substance abuse, dysfunctional anger, or proclivity toward sex offenses or domestic violence (Human Rights Watch, 2003; Lamb & Weinberger, 1998; Breiman & Bonner, 2001).
Students' Perception of Toxic Masculinity and Its Effects on Society

Journal of Seybold Report ISSN NO: 1533-9211 Students’ Perception of Toxic Masculinity and its Effects aBhuvaneswari R, bDaiyaan Ahmed,cUmamaheswari S*dNarendiran S, eP .Poomathi aAssistant Professor(Sr), School of Social Sciences and Languages, Vellore Institute of Technology, Chennai, Tamilnadu, India – 600127. Mobile -9840427532, E-mail:[email protected] bStudent, SCOPE, Vellore Institute of Technology, Chennai,Tamilnadu, India – 600127. Mobile –9840309115, E-mail: [email protected] cAssistant Professor, Division of Mathematics, SAS, Vellore Institute of Technology, Chennai, Tamilnadu, India – 600127. Mobile -9094779115, E-mail: [email protected] dResearch Scholar, School of Social Sciences and Languages, Vellore Institute of Technology, Chennai, Tamilnadu, India – 600127. Mobile -9597772416,E-mail: [email protected] eAssistant Professor, Department of EFL, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Chennai, Tamilnadu, India – 600026. Mobile -8637647876,E-mail: [email protected] VOLUME 15 ISSUE 9 2020 Page: 2819 Journal of Seybold Report ISSN NO: 1533-9211 Students’ Perception of Toxic Masculinity and its Effects Abstract: Background:Traditionally, in society, masculinity has always been associated with good judgment, leadership, and reliability; a soldier protecting his country from war, a man sustaining his household by working hours to feed his family, has formed the mainframe for masculine behaviour. Over time this traditional concept has been misinterpreted as being aggressive, bold, and fearless. The over-exaggeration of ‘traditionally masculine traits’ gives rise to a toxic patriarchal system causing imbalances of power and opportunities between men and women. Methods:The study is an analysis of students' perception of toxic masculinity and its effects on society. The survey was conducted among undergraduate engineering studentsin Chennai through an online questionnaire.
The Problem with a Fight Against Toxic Masculinity By: Michael Salter/Feb 27, 2019

The Problem With a Fight Against Toxic Masculinity by: Michael Salter/Feb 27, 2019 The popular term points toward very real problems of male violence and sexism. But it risks misrepresenting what actually causes them. Over the past several years, toxic masculinity has become a catchall explanation for male violence and sexism. The appeal of the term, which distinguishes “toxic” traits such aggression and self-entitlement from “healthy” masculinity, has grown to the point where Gillette invoked it last month in a viral advertisement against bullying and sexual harassment. Around the same time, the American Psychological Association introduced new guidelines for therapists working with boys and men, warning that extreme forms of certain “traditional” masculine traits are linked to aggression, misogyny, and negative health outcomes. A predictable conflict has accompanied the term’s rise. Many conservatives allege that charges of toxic masculinity are an attack on manhood itself, at a time when men already face challenges such as higher rates of drug overdose and suicide. Many progressives, meanwhile, contend that the detoxification of masculinity is an essential pathway to gender equality. Amid this heated discourse, newspaper and magazine articles have blamed toxic masculinity for rape, murder, mass shootings, gang violence, online trolling, climate change, Brexit, and the election of Donald Trump. Masculinity can indeed be destructive. But both conservative and liberal stances on this issue commonly misunderstand how the term toxic masculinity functions. When people use it, they tend to diagnose the problem of masculine aggression and entitlement as a cultural or spiritual illness—something that has infected today’s men and leads them to reproachable acts.
Toxic Masculinity on Television: a Content Analysis of Preferred Adolescent Programs

Toxic Masculinity on Television: A Content Analysis of Preferred Adolescent Programs Item Type text; Electronic Thesis Authors Roberts, Lindsay Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction, presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 28/09/2021 19:30:34 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/634300 Toxic Masculinity on Television: A Content Analysis of Preferred Adolescent Programs By Lindsay Roberts Copyright © Lindsay Roberts 2019 A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNICATION In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 2019 TOXIC MASCULINITY ON TELEVISION 2 TOXIC MASCULINITY ON TELEVISION 3 Acknowledgements I would first like to thank my thesis advisor, Dr. Jennifer Stevens Aubrey who I was fortunate to meet during my undergraduate career and continued to work with during my master’s degree. She has been one of my biggest supporters and a wonderful role model for me as I navigated the highs and lows of writing this thesis. I would also like to thank Dr. Matthew LaPierre and Dr. Jake Harwood for helping to shape this research project by serving on my thesis committee. Without their invaluable help, I would not have been able to accomplish this milestone. Next, I would like to express my deepest gratitude for the communication department at the University of Arizona, and especially those colleagues in my program who discussed my project with me, helped me maintain focus on my research, and most importantly encouraged me to keep going while writing my thesis.
The New/ "Alt" Right, Toxic Masculinity, and Violence”

1 “The New/ "Alt" Right, Toxic Masculinity, and Violence” Paper for presentation at the 2018 conference of the Canadian Political Science Association University of Regina, Saskatchewan **This is a draft. Please do not cite without author permission. John Grant Assistant Professor Department of Political Science King’s University College, Western University [email protected] Fiona MacDonald Associate Professor Department of Political Science University of the Fraser Valley [email protected] Introduction The politics of masculinity are now front and centre in mainstream society to a degree that is unprecedented. Donald Trump’s U.S. presidential campaign and election victory in 2016 were key events in positioning the topic of masculinity publicly in new and unprecedented ways. Much of the media coverage of Trump’s campaign and election victory highlights masculinity as a significant element in analyzing his political successes as well as potential sources of weakness. The Trump campaign has been credited with exposing a “cult of toxic masculinity” (The Telegraph, October 2016) as well as evidencing the need to rebuke and reject the “toxic masculinity” he represents through protest actions like the women’s marches (Cosmopolitan January 2017, The New York Times October 2017). Alongside Trump we are witnessing many other invocations of manhood. Some, such as the “Proud Boys”, reflect a similar kind of toxic masculinity symbolized by Trump—that is, a narrow and constraining understanding of masculinity primarily characterized by dominance, aggression, strength, sexual conquest and the rejection of any traits or behaviors associated with femininity. At the same time, we are witnessing men in politics challenge traditional notions of masculinity.
Towards Healthy Masculinity Jenna Gadille

Long Island University Digital Commons @ LIU Undergraduate Honors College Theses 2016- LIU Post 2019 The aW y It Should Be: Towards Healthy Masculinity Jenna Gadille Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.liu.edu/post_honors_theses The Way It Should Be: Towards Healthy Masculinity an Honors College Thesis by Jenna Gadille Spring 2019 Theatre ___________________________ (Faculty Advisor, Lauren Reinhard) ___________________________ (Reader, Maria Porter) ___________________________ (date) Gadille 1 ABSTRACT My thesis paper explains how my research on the pervasiveness of gendered violence provided the material we used to devise a show. I analyze what causes the issue of specifically gendered violence, instead of just “violence”. I focus on the gender binary and how it creates an unhealthy practice of masculinity, which is a major contributing factor to gendered violence. My ensemble used that research to create devised pieces during the process, which we molded into an original show we titled Beyond Us. To start, we identified why the topic mattered to us and why we were all in a room together to make a theatre piece. We identified our big questions regarding the topic and followed them. This guided our devising process. We were all so passionate about the topic that we ended up making pieces that went in several different directions. Within the last week of rehearsals, we had to pare down our show and focus on what we really wanted to say with the time allotted. We stuck with the pieces that were more personal for us rather than those based in the initial research. Beyond Us served as a platform for us to speak on why gendered violence matters to us and how we want to make change.
Masculinity and Misogyny in the Digital Age

Masculinity and Misogyny in the Digital Age What social data can tell us about the climate surrounding masculinity constructs and use of misogynistic language. Ditch the Label your world, prejudice free . Masculinity and Misogyny in the Digital Age | 1 Contents Introduction �� 4 Background �� 4 Key Findings �� 5 Preface ��6 Methodology �� 7 Masculinity Constructs �� 7 Misogyny �� 7 Key Facts �� 7 1.0 What is Masculinity?
Man Up! Masculinity and (Homo)Sexuality in René Depestre's Transatlantic World

humanities Article Man up! Masculinity and (Homo)sexuality in René Depestre’s Transatlantic World Jacqueline Couti 1,* and Jason C. Grant 2 1 Department of Classical and European Studies, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005, USA 2 Department of Romance Languages and Literatures, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 8 July 2019; Accepted: 10 September 2019; Published: 16 September 2019 Abstract: The question of homosexuality in Francophone Caribbean literature is often overlooked. However, the ways in which the Haitian René Depestre’s Le mât de cocagne (The Festival of the Greasy Pole, 1979) and “Blues pour une tasse de thé vert” (“Blues for a Cup of Green Tea”), a short story from the collection Eros dans un train chinois (Eros on a Chinese Train, 1990) portray homoeroticism and homosexuality begs further study. In these texts, the study of the violence that surrounds the representation of sexuality reveals the sociopolitical implications of erotic and racial images in a French transatlantic world. Hence, the proposed essay “Man up!” interrogates a (Black) hegemonic masculinity inherited from colonialism and the homophobia it generates. This masculinity prescribes normative traits that frequently appear toxic as it thrives on hypersexuality and brute force. When these two traits become associated with violence and homoeroticism, however, they threaten this very masculinity. Initially, Depestre valorizes “solar eroticism,” a French Caribbean expression of a Black sexuality, free and joyful, and “geolibertinage,” its transnational and global expression. Namely, his novel and short story sing a hegemonic and polyamorous heterosexuality, respectively, in a postcolonial milieu (Haiti) and a diasporic space (Paris).
Who's Afraid of 'Toxic Masculinity'?

Class, Race and Corporate Power Volume 5 Issue 3 U.S. Labor and Social Justice Article 6 2017 Who’s Afraid of ‘Toxic Masculinity’? Bryant W. Sculos Florida International University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/classracecorporatepower Part of the Political Theory Commons Recommended Citation Sculos, Bryant W. (2017) "Who’s Afraid of ‘Toxic Masculinity’?," Class, Race and Corporate Power: Vol. 5 : Iss. 3 , Article 6. DOI: 10.25148/CRCP.5.3.006517 Available at: https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/classracecorporatepower/vol5/iss3/6 This work is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Arts, Sciences & Education at FIU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Class, Race and Corporate Power by an authorized administrator of FIU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Who’s Afraid of ‘Toxic Masculinity’? Abstract Part autoethnography, part critique, this essay details the author's personal experience with the far-right media world and explores the universal opposition to "toxic masculinity" from the Left and the Right. The Left opposes the substance of toxic masculinity for the harms it creates in society. The Right fears toxic masculinity as a concept, because it is a threat to their identities and broader ideological acceptance of capitalism. Keywords Toxic Masculinity, Sexism Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Erratum In "Class, Race and Corporate Power" Vol. 5, Iss. 3 (2017) the article “Who’s Afraid of ‘Toxic Masculinity’? by Bryant William Sculos, footnote #1 mistakenly attributed the first use of the concept “toxic masculinity” to Shepherd Bliss’s doctoral dissertation.
Addressing Transmisogyny Workshop Notes

Meeting Details • Date and Time: 9/14/2020, 8-9pm • Location: https://zoom.us/j/92640669024?pwd=YnZQMFRvN0xzc2hjcS93NXI3NytDZz09 Attendees • Host o Rox Anderson, They/Them Purposes for being present today • Folks shared that they are looking forward to learning more about inclusion, engaging in a great conversation with community, unpacking the ways these manifest for our community specifically Introduction and Grounding Definitions • Start with a definition of Toxic Masculinity as it is the source of much of misogyny. o Harmful to everyone - women, men, trans folks, etc o It is not intended to demonize men; just recognize some of the harmful effects related to traditional/stereotypical masculine norms o Can include things like dominance, homophobia, and transphobia that circulate out of the idea that men are superior and therefore better o Encompasses the violence that co-occurs with these notions such as sexual assault and relationship violence o Bullying and other dynamics add to these issues o Emotional repressions and other psychological problems result, and toxic masculine traits can proliferate in the form of mental health, substance abuse o Posturing to assert dominance such as catcalling and related social behaviors are also harmful results o These manifest emotionally in anxiety, depression, withdrawal from connection to others. These all add to a weight that harms men further (and everyone) • Trans folks and our community o Part of transitioning for many people can include aligning with gender norms. Folks who are finally invited to express their gender in alignment with who they are can sometimes pendulum far into masculinity and pick up toxic masculine behaviors, e.g.
Toxic Masculinity: an Exploration of Traditional Masculine Norms in Relation to Mental Health Outcomes and Help-Seeking Behaviors in College-Aged Males

University of South Carolina Scholar Commons Senior Theses Honors College Spring 2021 Toxic Masculinity: An Exploration of Traditional Masculine Norms in Relation to Mental Health Outcomes and Help-Seeking Behaviors in College-Aged Males Benjamin Harris University of South Carolina - Columbia Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/senior_theses Part of the Clinical Psychology Commons, Community Psychology Commons, and the Counseling Psychology Commons Recommended Citation Harris, Benjamin, "Toxic Masculinity: An Exploration of Traditional Masculine Norms in Relation to Mental Health Outcomes and Help-Seeking Behaviors in College-Aged Males" (2021). Senior Theses. 431. https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/senior_theses/431 This Thesis is brought to you by the Honors College at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Senior Theses by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 2 Table of Contents 1. Introduction ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3 a. Literature Review ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 3 2. Purpose ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 16 3. Methods ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 17 a. Survey Development ------------------------------------------------------------------ 17 b. Measures --------------------------------------------------------------------------------