DOCSLIB.ORG

Cycling Master Plan #Activeelginbikes

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Cycling Master Plan #Activeelginbikes Elgin-St. Thomas Cycling Master Plan #ActiveElginBikes FINAL MASTER PLAN REPORT | SEPTEMBER 2014 AYLMER | BAYHAM | CENTRAL ELGIN | DUTTON / DUNWICH | MALAHIDE | SOUTHWOLD | ST. THOMAS | WEST ELGIN AYLMER | BAYHAM | CENTRAL ELGIN | DUTTON / DUNWICH | MALAHIDE | SOUTHWOLD | ST. THOMAS | WEST ELGIN ELGIN-ST. THOMAS CYCLING MASTER PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Cycling Master Plan Background ................................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Introduction & Study Process Overview .................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Building on what has been done: The Active Transportation Initiative (ATI) ............................................................. 3 1.2.1 Understanding the Trends & Opportunities ....................................................................................................... 4 1.2.2 Developing a High-Level Active Transportation System .................................................................................... 6 1.2.3 Guiding Implementation .................................................................................................................................... 7 1.2.4 What has been done since the ATI was Completed? ........................................................................................ 9 1.3 A Vision for Cycling in Elgin-St. Thomas ................................................................................................................. 11 2.0 The Cycling Plan ........................................................................................................................................................ 13 2.1 Developing the Network ........................................................................................................................................ 13 2.2 What has changed Since the ATI? ......................................................................................................................... 31 2.3 The Cycling Network & Priority Projects ................................................................................................................ 33 2.4 The Cycling Plan: Areas of Action .......................................................................................................................... 39 2.4.1 Planning ........................................................................................................................................................... 40 2.4.2 Designing ......................................................................................................................................................... 41 2.4.3 Promoting ........................................................................................................................................................ 51 2.4.4 Maintaining ...................................................................................................................................................... 55 2.4.5 Tracking ........................................................................................................................................................... 65 CYCLING MASTER PLAN | FINAL REPORT | SEPTEMBER 2014 i AYLMER | BAYHAM | CENTRAL ELGIN | DUTTON / DUNWICH | MALAHIDE | SOUTHWOLD | ST. THOMAS | WEST ELGIN 3.0 Implementing the Plan .............................................................................................................................................. 67 3.1 Implementation Tools ............................................................................................................................................ 67 3.1.1 Strategies to Facilitate Implementation ........................................................................................................... 67 3.1.2 Establishing a Development Process .............................................................................................................. 68 3.1.3 Identifying Roles & Responsibilities ................................................................................................................ 69 3.1.4 Funding Opportunities ..................................................................................................................................... 70 3.2 The Investment ...................................................................................................................................................... 73 3.3 Recommendations ................................................................................................................................................. 74 SUMMARY OF TABLES Table 1.1 – Summary of Existing and Proposed Active Transportation Facilities presented in the ATI ................................. 6 Table 2.1 – Route Selection Criteria used to Assess the ATI Network ................................................................................ 15 Table 2.2 – Overview of OTM Book 18 Facility Selection Tool ............................................................................................ 19 Table 2.3 – Summary of Potential County and City Initial and Additional Priorities .............................................................. 28 Table 2.4 – Summary of Consultation Activities & Input Received ...................................................................................... 29 Table 2.5 – ATI Network Update Definitions ....................................................................................................................... 31 Table 2.6 – Summary of Existing and Proposed Cycling Facility Types ............................................................................... 33 Table 2.7 – Summary and Description of Cycling Master Plan Priority Projects .................................................................. 34 Table 2.8 – Summary of Cycling Master Plan Action Areas ................................................................................................. 39 Table 2.9 – Summary of Family of Sign Types & Description of Application ....................................................................... 50 Table 2.10 – Summary of Potential Partners to Facilitate Implementation .......................................................................... 52 Table 2.11 – Summary of Off-road Trail Maintenance Considerations ................................................................................ 58 Table 2.12 – Summary of On-road Cycling Maintenance Considerations ............................................................................ 62 Table 3.1 – Cycling Master Plan Roles & Responsibilities ................................................................................................... 70 ii CYCLING MASTER PLAN | FINAL REPORT | SEPTEMBER 2014 AYLMER | BAYHAM | CENTRAL ELGIN | DUTTON / DUNWICH | MALAHIDE | SOUTHWOLD | ST. THOMAS | WEST ELGIN Table 3.2 – Potential Funding Opportunities for Cycling Infrastructure and Programming .................................................. 71 Table 3.3 – Summary of Network Costs by Facility Type and Phase ................................................................................... 73 Table 3.4 – Summary of Cycling Master Plan Recommendations ....................................................................................... 74 SUMMARY OF FIGURES Figure 1-1 – Elgin-St. Thomas Cycling Master Plan Development Process ........................................................................... 1 Figure 1-2 – Summary of Master Plan Objectives ................................................................................................................. 2 Figure 1-3 – Geographic Distribution of Online Questionnaire Respondents ........................................................................ 4 Figure 1-4- Eight-Step Network Development Process used for the ATI .............................................................................. 6 Figure 2-1 – Seven-Step Cycling Network Development Process ....................................................................................... 13 Figure 2-2 – Sample Potential ATI Network Revisions for the Cycling Master Plan ............................................................ 14 Figure 2-3 – KML Overlay of Field Work Route and GPS Waypoints .................................................................................. 27 Figure 2.4 – County and City Initial and Additional Priorities ................................................................................................ 28 Figure 2-5 – Example of Road Diet Application ................................................................................................................... 41 Figure 2-6 – Examples of Cycling Facility Design Alternatives ............................................................................................ 43 Figure 2- 7 – Suggested Width of Paved Shoulder based on Motor Vehicle AADT. Source OTM Book 18 ........................ 45 Figure 2-8 - Map Excerpt from Existing & Proposed Signage Strategy for Lake Erie Waterfront Trail and Sunset Drive in the Port Stanley area. .......................................................................................................................................................... 49 Figure 3-1 – Overview of the Five-Step Network Development Tool from the ATI ............................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Item #Page # 14H)
    Agenda Item #Page # 14h) Appendix D Regional Partnerships London International Airport The City of London and the Southwest Economic Alliance have endorsed a strategy for a central intermodal facility to combine regional, national and International freight at the London International Airport. With the recent Federal authorization of the London International Airport as an International Transshipment Centre and the CanadalEuropean Union (EU) Open Skies agreement of passenger and airfreight access, the Greater London International Airport Authority, the City of London and SWEA are developing a comprehensive regional transportation plan to position Southwest Ontario as an international freight gateway. This proposal has also received endorsement from the London Chamber of Commerce. The provision of essential servicing and infrastructure investment in 2009 and 2010 will create construction jobs and continuing revenues. The London International Airport area is readily accessible from Highway 401 via Veterans Memorial Parkway. It includes substantial tracts of zoned, serviceable and available industrial land making it an ideal location for a multi-modaVtrans-shipment facility. The City of London is collaborating with the London Airport Authority on the planning, servicing and development of this area with a focus on transportation-related uses. Planned Pickering Airport Expansion and London Airport The Greater Toronto Airport Authority continues to propose plans to open a Pickering Airport facility on the assembled lands in the Eastern portion of the GTA. This plan is opposed by a variety of municipalities and citizen groups. A further advantage for the London airport is London’s capability to expand both as a passenger, but more importantly a cargo hub that could provide significant offloading of capacity from Pearson International and offer relief to the anticipated congestion.
    [Show full text]
  • Cargo Bikes As a Growth Area for Bicycle Vs. Auto Trips: Exploring the Potential for Mode Substitution Behavior
    Transportation Research Part F 43 (2016) 48–55 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Transportation Research Part F journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/trf Cargo bikes as a growth area for bicycle vs. auto trips: Exploring the potential for mode substitution behavior William Riggs Department of City and Regional Planning, College of Architecture and Environmental Design, California Polytechnic State University, 1 Grand Ave., San Luis Obispo, CA 93405, United States article info abstract Article history: Cargo bikes are increasing in availability in the United States. While a large body of Received 26 February 2015 research continues to investigate traditional bike transportation, cargo bikes offer the Received in revised form 15 August 2016 potential to capture trips for those that might otherwise be made by car. Data from a sur- Accepted 18 September 2016 vey of cargo bike users queried use and travel dynamics with the hypothesis that cargo and Available online 6 October 2016 e-cargo bike ownership has the potential to contribute to mode substitution behavior. From a descriptive standpoint, 68.9% of those surveyed changed their travel behavior after Keywords: purchasing a cargo bike and the number of auto trips appeared to decline by 1–2 trips per Cargo bikes day, half of the auto travel prior to ownership. Two key reasons cited for this change Bicycles Linked trips include the ability to get around with children and more gear. Regression models that Mode choice underscore this trend toward increased active transport confirm this. Based on these results, further research could include focus on overcoming weather-related/elemental barriers, which continue to be an obstacle to every day cycling, and further investigation into families modeling healthy behaviors to children with cargo bikes.
    [Show full text]
  • Committee of the Whole Speed Limit Review
    JANUARY 28, 2014 Page 1 of 18 11 B.1 - CW ACTION COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE For meeting to be held on: Submitted by: For: January 28, 2014 Chris Traini Action County Engineer Subject: SPEED LIMIT REVIEW BACKGROUND County staff review speed limits on County roads from time to time based on changes to the roadside environment due to development, changes in the alignment of the road resulting from reconstruction, observations by staff, or by citizen, police or municipal request. ANALYSIS County staff is recommending the following speed limit adjustments: County Road 27 (Nissouri Road) & County Road 28 (Thorndale Road) - Thorndale: Significant commercial and residential development in Thorndale has resulted in increased traffic volumes, which necessitated the installation of traffic signals at the intersection of Nissouri and Thorndale Roads in 2012. It is recommended that the existing 50 km/hr zone at the west limit of Thorndale be extended past this intersection, and a new 60 km/hr zone be posted north and south of the intersection on Nissouri Road from the access to the industrial area to the new subdivision road intersection north of Thorndale Road. A citizen request to extend or reduce the posted speed limit to the east of Thorndale was reviewed but no changes are recommended at this time. County Road 15 (Carriage Road): A number of requests have been made from Middlesex OPP to reduce the 90 km/hr zone to a new speed limit of 80 km/hr. This would match the posted speed limit on the sections of road north of Longwoods Road and south of Littlewood Drive which are under the jurisdiction of Middlesex Centre.
    [Show full text]
  • In Creating the Ever-Growing Adventure Cycling Route Network
    Route Network Jasper Edmonton BRITISH COLUMBIA Jasper NP ALBERTA Banff NP Banff GREAT PARKS NORTH Calgary Vancouver 741 mi Blaine SASKATCHEWAN North Cascades NP MANITOBA WASHINGTON PARKS Anacortes Sedro Woolley 866 mi Fernie Waterton Lakes Olympic NP NP Roosville Seattle Twisp Winnipeg Mt Rainier NEW Elma Sandpoint Cut Bank NP Whitefish BRUNSWICK Astoria Spokane QUEBEC WASHINGTON Glacier Great ONTARIO NP Voyageurs Saint John Seaside Falls Wolf Point NP Thunder Bay Portland Yakima Minot Fort Peck Isle Royale Missoula Williston NOVA SCOTIA Otis Circle NORTHERN TIER NP GREEN MAINE Salem Hood Clarkston Helena NORTH DAKOTA 4,293 mi MOUNTAINS Montreal Bar Harbor River MONTANA Glendive Dickinson 380 mi Kooskia Butte Walker Yarmouth Florence Bismarck Fargo Sault Ste Marie Sisters Polaris Three Forks Theodore NORTH LAKES Acadia NP McCall Roosevelt Eugene Duluth 1,160 mi Burlington NH Bend NP Conover VT Brunswick Salmon Bozeman Mackinaw DETROIT OREGON Billings ADIRONDACK PARK North Dalbo Escanaba City ALTERNATE 395 mi Portland Stanley West Yellowstone 505 mi Haverhill Devils Tower Owen Sound Crater Lake SOUTH DAKOTA Osceola LAKE ERIE Ticonderoga Portsmouth Ashland Ketchum NM Crescent City NP Minneapolis CONNECTOR Murphy Boise Yellowstone Rapid Stillwater Traverse City Toronto Grand Teton 507 mi Orchards Boston IDAHO HOT SPRINGS NP City Pierre NEW MA Redwood NP NP Gillette Midland WISCONSIN Albany RI Mt Shasta 518 mi WYOMING Wolf Marine Ithaca YORK Arcata Jackson MINNESOTA Manitowoc Ludington City Ft. Erie Buffalo IDAHO Craters Lake Windsor Locks
    [Show full text]
  • Trans Canada Trail Proposed in the City of Toronto (Various Wards)
    Trans Canada Trail Proposed in the City of Toronto (Various Wards) (City Council on February 29, March 1 and 2, 2000, adopted this Clause, without amendment.) The Economic Development and Parks Committee recommends the adoption of the following report (January 24, 2000) from the Commissioner of Economic Development, Culture and Tourism: Purpose: To report on the development of the Trans Canada Trail; identifying the City of Toronto’s potential participation through the identification of a trail route through the City and the siting of one or more Trans Canada Trail pavilions at appropriate locations along that route. Financial Implications and Impact Statement: Identifying existing trails and cycling routes within the City as part of the Trans Canada Trail can be accomplished at very minimal costs to the City (e.g., the installation of Trans Canada Trail signage). The development of new trails to fill in gaps in the City’s trail network will also provide linkages that may be suitable for the Trans Canada Trail, in either an interim or long-term framework. These sections of new trail will be planned and budgeted for as part of the City’s future Capital Works Programs. Since pavilions are an integral part of the Trans Canada Trail program, the Trans Canada Trail Foundation provides 100 percent of the funding for the construction of each pavilion. Funding assistance for trail development in each province/territory is potentially available from the Trans Canada Trail Foundation. Individual donations may only be identified by the donor to be used on a provincial/territorial basis and not at a more specific local level.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Meeting for Mary Avenue Grade Separation, Aug. 10, 2017
    Caltrain Grade Separation Feasibility Study Mary Avenue Railroad Crossing Community Meeting August 10, 2017 Agenda • Meeting format review • Goals and context • Mary Avenue options Feedback • Q and A • Next steps • Adjourn 2 Caltrain Grade Separations Project Goals Improve Safety (LUTE Policy 24, 36, 40, 41, 42, 46) Enhance Reduce Ped/Bike Traffic Delay Access (LUTE Policy 32, 42) (LUTE Policy 24, 33, 36, 41) 4 Project Context 60,000 50,000 40,000 30,000 Average Daily Ridership Daily Average 20,000 76 trains 92 trains 114 trains (2003) (2016) +80-106 HSR (2040) Caltrain Grade Separation – VTA Program Description Sunnyvale has 2 of the 8 at grade crossings VTA criteria include cost efficiency and Complete Streets 6 Screening Alternatives Screening • Establish rail and road criteria Alternatives • Identify existing conditions • Develop cursory design of alternatives • Identify impacts and constraints Impacts • Bring results to community Variants of • Identify feasible alternatives Screening • Develop variants to minimize impacts Alternatives • Engage community for input 7 Initial Screening Alternatives 8 At-grade Railroad Crossing Grade Separated Crossing - Overpass At-grade Railroad Crossing Grade Separated Crossing - Underpass Design Criteria Roadway Railroad Grades 4.75% 1.2% max Design speed 30 - 45 mph 79 mph for shoofly (temp rail) Based on posted speed 110 mph for final condition plus 5 mph Bridge depth 5’ 6.75’ Supporting roadway Supporting railroad Vertical clearance Underpass Overpass 15.5’ over roadway 27’ over railroad Roadway
    [Show full text]
  • MN MUTCD Chapter 2H
    Chapter 2B. REGULATORY SIGNS TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 2B. REGULATORY SIGNS 2B.1 Application of Regulatory Signs ..........................................................................................2B-1 2B.2 Design of Regulatory Signs ..................................................................................................2B-1 2B.3 Size of Regulatory Signs ......................................................................................................2B-1 2B.4 Right-of-Way at Intersections ...............................................................................................2B-7 2B.5 STOP Sign (R1-1) and ALL WAY Plaque (R1-3P) ...............................................................2B-8 2B.6 STOP Sign Applications .......................................................................................................2B-9 2B.7 Multi-Way Stop Applications ...............................................................................................2B-9 2B.8 YIELD Sign (R1-2) ..............................................................................................................2B-10 2B.9 YIELD Sign Applications .....................................................................................................2B-10 2B.10 STOP Sign or YIELD Sign Placement .................................................................................2B-10 2B.11 Stop Here For Pedestrians Signs (R1-5 Series) ....................................................................2B-11 2B.12 In-Street and Overhead Pedestrian
    [Show full text]
  • Elgin-St. Thomas Cycling Master Plan 2014
    Elgin-St. Thomas Cycling Master Plan #ActiveElginBikes DRAFT MASTER PLAN REPORT | JUNE 2014 AYLMER | BAYHAM | CENTRAL ELGIN | DUTTON / DUNWICH | MALAHIDE | SOUTHWOLD | ST. THOMAS | WEST ELGIN AYLMER | BAYHAM | CENTRAL ELGIN | DUTTON / DUNWICH | MALAHIDE | SOUTHWOLD | ST. THOMAS | WEST ELGIN ELGIN-ST. THOMAS CYCLING MASTER PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Cycling Master Plan Background ................................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Introduction & Study Process Overview .................................................................................................................. 1 1.3 Building on what has been done: The Active Transportation Initiative (ATI) ............................................................. 3 1.2.1 Understanding the Trends & Opportunities ....................................................................................................... 4 1.2.2 Developing a High-Level Active Transportation System .................................................................................... 6 1.2.3 Guiding Implementation .................................................................................................................................... 7 1.2.4 What has been done since the ATI was Completed? ........................................................................................ 9 1.3 A Vision for Cycling in Elgin-St. Thomas ................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Aylmer Express Presents the Eighth Annual Three Port Tour
    AYLMER EXPRESS PRESENTS THE EIGHTH ANNUAL THREE PORT TOUR SATURDAY, AUGUST 18, 2018 Three routes to suit all levels of cyclists – from entry level to challenging: SouthwesternSouthwestern Ontario’sOntario’s One Port Two Ports Three Ports BBestest RideRide 50 km 100 km 160 km Beautiful Elgin County 3 Supported Routes Lakeshore & Countryside with Lunch, Snacks & Drinks starting & finishing in Aylmer sourced from local businesses & farms For only • Route map • Coffee, muffins & fruit • Rest stop snacks & drinks $$ • Lunch in Port Bruce 6565 • T-Shirt (before August 7) you get all • Road support provided of this: along the route Sign Up Today at threeporttour.com Contact Brett Hueston for more information AYLMER 519.697.0018 · 1.800.465.9433 · [email protected] EXPRESS Proceeds to EESS Environmental Leadership Program and Forest City Velodrome Over $75,000 donated since 2011 Aylmer · Port Burwell · Port Bruce · Port Stanley SouthwesternSouthwestern Ontario’sOntario’s BBestest RideRide Third Saturday in August www.threeporttour.com Wed., July 4, 2018–AYLMER EXPRESS–PAGE 5 Hueston trial adjourned until Aug. 15 CONTINUED FROM PAGE 1 that day: information from a porter. present included a Charter of gating OPP officer. fire chief and the “media officer All three of the officers were Rights and Freedoms applica- Why it took a year for those of the OPP.” asked by Justice Donald if they tion. notes to be released as disclo- The new date for the tri- would be available on Aug. 15 Justice Donald addressed sure by the Crown attorney’s al of Wednesday, Aug. 15 was to which they indicated they the Huestons in granting the office was not explained.
    [Show full text]
  • Willy WATTS 14
    VOLUME 4 BO. 3 <,JARTERLY JULY 1977 { Official Organ UNICYCLING SOCIETY OF AMERICA. Inc. c 1977 ~11 Rts Rea. Yearly Membership S5 Incl~des NeVl!lletter (4) ID Card - See Blank Pg.18 OFFICERS FELI.OW UNICYCLISTS: Due to o·trcwastances beyond our control (namely a big pile of dirt and construction lfOrk) the Southland Mall in Marion Pres. Paul Fox will not be available for our National Meet races on A.ug. 20. lttempts v.Pres. R.Tschudin to secure an alternate suita'Qle location nearby have failed. We are Sec. T. ni.ck Haines therefore planning to anit the Saturday morning races and utilize that FOUNDER M:El-!BE&S part of the day this year ror a general convention type get-together where clubs and inru.viduais can meet each other, swap ideas, and display Bernard Crandall their talents and cycles. · We still plan to hold the preliminary elimi­ Paul & Nancy Fox nations for the group an9- trick riding later in the day at the Catholic Peter Hangach High School parking lot·. We also have the use of the Coliseum again for Patricia Herron the Sunday afternoon final~. A pan.de is still in question and if we do Bill Jenack hold one it will be JllUCh s.horter than last year. It, is hoped that every Gordon Kruse member will make a ~ec~al-effort to attend the annual business meeting Steve McPeak Sunday rooming at th(' Hpltday Inn. We have a number of V9ry important Fr. Jas. J. Moran items on the agenda (see pag~ 14 for further infomation).
    [Show full text]
  • Exhibition Place Master Plan – Phase 1 Proposals Report
    Acknowledgments The site of Exhibition Place has had a long tradition as a gathering place. Given its location on the water, these lands would have attracted Indigenous populations before recorded history. We acknowledge that the land occupied by Exhibition Place is the traditional territory of many nations including the Mississaugas of the Credit, the Anishnabeg, the Chippewa, the Haudenosaunee and the Wendat peoples and is now home to many diverse First Nations, Inuit and Metis peoples. We also acknowledge that Toronto is covered by Treaty 13 with the Mississaugas of the Credit, and the Williams Treaties signed with multiple Mississaugas and Chippewa bands. Figure 1. Moccasin Identifier engraving at Toronto Trillium Park The study team would like to thank City Planning Division Study Team Exhibition Place Lynda Macdonald, Director Don Boyle, Chief Executive Officer Nasim Adab Gilles Bouchard Tamara Anson-Cartwright Catherine de Nobriga Juliana Azem Ribeiro de Almeida Mark Goss Bryan Bowen Hardat Persaud David Brutto Tony Porter Brent Fairbairn Laura Purdy Christian Giles Debbie Sanderson Kevin Lee Kelvin Seow Liz McFarland Svetlana Lavrentieva Board of Governors Melanie Melnyk Tenants, Clients and Operators Dan Nicholson James Parakh David Stonehouse Brad Sunderland Nigel Tahair Alison Torrie-Lapaire 4 - PHASE 1 PROPOSALS REPORT FOR EXHIBITION PLACE Local Advisory Committee Technical Advisory Committee Bathurst Quay Neighbourhood Association Michelle Berquist - Transportation Planning The Bentway Swinzle Chauhan – Transportation Services
    [Show full text]
  • Multi-Purpose Trails Plan
    CITY OF COSTA MESA MULTI-PURPOSE TRAILS PLAN JUNE 2016 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The City of Costa Mesa Multi-Purpose Trails Plan was prepared under the guidance of: Raja Sethuraman, Transportation Services Manager This plan was prepared by KTU+A Planning + Landscape Architecture: John Holloway, Principal, PLA, ASLA, LCI Joe Punsalan, Senior Associate, GISP, PTP, LCI Alison Moss, Associate Mobility Planner, AICP Beth Chamberlin, Associate Planner Juan Alberto Bonilla, Planner Diana Smith, GISP, GIS Manager Kristin Bleile, GIS Analyst This is a project for the City of Costs Mesa with funding provided by the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) Sustainability Program. The Sustainability Program is a key SCAG initiative for implementing the Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategies (RTP/SCS), combining Compass Blueprint assistance for integrated land use and transportation planning with new Green Region Initiative assistance aimed at local sustainability and Active Transportation assistance for bicycle and pedestrian planning efforts. Sustainability Projects are intended to provide SCAG-member jurisdictions the resources to implement regional policies at the local level, focusing on voluntary efforts that will meet local needs and contribute to implementing the SCS, reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and providing the range of local and regional benefits outlined in the SCS. The preparation of this report has been financed in part through grant(s) from the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) through the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) in accordance with the provisions under the Metropolitan Planning Program as set forth in Section 104(f) of Title 23 of the U.S. Code. The contents of this report reflect the views of the author who is responsible for the facts and accuracy of the data presented herein.
    [Show full text]