DOCSLIB.ORG

1 What Is Psychology?

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
1 What Is Psychology? 1 What Is Psychology? 2 M01_WADE4316_11_SE_C01.indd 2 14/12/12 7:23 AM Ask questions. OUTLINE Psychology, Pseudoscience, be willing to wonder and Popular Opinion Thinking Critically and How does “pop psych” on the Internet and TV Creatively about Psychology differ from the psychology in this book? Psychology’s Past: From the Armchair to the Laboratory The Birth of Modern If you want to think critically, must you always Psychology be critical? Three Early Psychologies Psychology’s Present: If you call yourself a psychotherapist, will you The Four Perspectives of be breaking the law? Psychological Science What Psychologists Do What’s the difference between a psychologist, Psychological Research a clinical psychologist, and a psychiatrist? Psychological Practice Psychology in the Community BIOLOGY, CUltURE, and Psychology Taking Psychology with You very April Fools’ Day, the James Randi then advertising the result as an effective The Nine Secrets of Learning E Educational Foundation announces treatment for flu. its “Pigasus” Awards for the year’s worst • The Performer Pigasus Award: Televan- “charlatans, swindlers, psychics, pseudo- gelist Peter Popoff, who made millions in scientists, and faith healers.” James Randi the 1980s by pretending to heal the sick is a professional magician who, years and receive information about audience ago, became outraged to see charlatans members directly from God. He went bankrupt in 1987, after Randi exposed his and scammers use plain old magic tricks as trick: He had a secret earpiece, through evidence of their “psychic powers” and to which his wife fed him information about prey on unsuspecting victims to make money. those audience members. Now, in infomer- Randi made it his cause to educate the public cials on BET, Popoff offers “supernatural by exposing their fraudulent methods. (The debt relief” in exchange for offerings of awards are named for the mythical flying hundreds or even thousands of dollars. IRS horse Pegasus and for Randi’s habit of say- documents show that Popoff has taken in ing “such and such a belief will come true $23.5 million with this scheme. when pigs fly.”) The awards and their 2011 • The Refusal to Face Reality Award: “winners” include: Andrew Wakefield, the researcher who • The Funder Pigasus Award: CVS launched the modern anti-vaccine panic pharmacy, for supporting the manufacturers by claiming that the measles, mumps, and of “homeopathic” remedies, which contain rubella (MMR) vaccine was linked to au- none of the active ingredient they claim tism. In 2010, the medical journal that had and have been shown to be useless in published his article officially retracted it, randomized clinical trials. Although other and the British medical journal BMJ called pharmacies sell these products too, CVS Wakefield’s paper an outright fraud,finding offers their own store brand of the popular “clear evidence of falsification of data,” homeopathic product oscillococcinum. and that “he sought to exploit the ensuing Oscillococcinum is made by grinding up MMR scare for financial gain,”taking more the liver of a duck, putting less than a single than $674,000 from lawyers who intended atom of it into sugar pills (the equivalent of to sue vaccine manufacturers. Repeated adding a drop of water to the ocean), and studies have found no link between vaccines 3 M01_WADE4316_11_SE_C01.indd 3 14/12/12 7:23 AM 4 Chapter 1 What Is Psychology? Psychologists use scientific methods to study many puzzles of human behavior. Why do people dress up in funny outfits? Why do some people commit horrific and autism. Yet Wakefield continues to ask the public to believe he is the victim of acts of brutality? And what enables some a conspiracy that is out to get him, and many worried parents are not vaccinating people to become accomplished athletes in spite of having physical disabilities? their children. As a result, measles, once nearly eradicated, is back with a vengeance, and children’s deaths from measles and whooping cough are rising for the first time in decades. How in the world can you protect yourself from false claims and scammers? How can you tell the difference between medicines that work and save lives (such as vaccines) from those that are useless (such as homeopathic products)? How are you supposed to distinguish useful information on the Internet from worthless opinions, marketing ploys, and downright rubbish? Wait—here is a website that promises to blast printed information into your brain at a page a second. You can “mentally photo- graph the page at 25,000 words a minute.” Cool! Sign us up! If only it were true. Fortunately for you, you are taking an introductory psychol- ogy course, and by the time you finish it, you will have some good answers about how you can sift through information overload and decide what to ignore and what’s important. Psychology can be defined generally as the discipline concerned with be- psychology The discipline concerned havior and mental processes and how they are affected by an organism’s physical state, with behavior and mental processes and mental state, and external environment. This definition, however, is like defining a car how they are affected by an organism’s as a vehicle for transporting people, without explaining how a car differs from a train physical state, mental state, and external environment; the term is often or a bus or how a Ford differs from a Ferrari. To get a clear picture of this field, you represented by °, the Greek letter psi need to know about its methods, its findings, and its ways of interpreting information. (usually pronounced “sy”). But first, let’s look more closely at what psychology isnot. You are about to learn. • how “psychobabble” differs from serious psychology. • what’s wrong with psychologists’ nonscientific competitors, such as astrologers and psychics. M01_WADE4316_11_SE_C01.indd 4 14/12/12 7:24 AM Chapter 1 What Is Psychology? 5 Psychology, Pseudoscience, and LO 1.1 Popular Opinion In recent decades, the public’s appetite for psychological and medical informa- tion has created a huge market for the kind of outlandish advice and products we just described to you: pseudoscience and quackery covered by a veneer of scientific-sounding language. Pseudoscience promises easy fixes to life’s problems and challenges, such as resolving your unhappiness as an adult by “reliving” the supposed trauma of your birth, or becoming more creative on the job by “reprogramming” your brain. It often plays on the appeal of tech- nology. All sorts of gizmos have been marketed with the promise that they will get both halves of your brain working at their peak: the Graham Potentializer, the Tranquilite, the Floatarium, the Transcutaneous Electro-Neural Stimulator, The marriage of old-fashioned pseudo- the Brain Supercharger, and the Whole Brain Wave Form Synchro-Energizer. science and modern technology has (We are not making these up.) produced products like the “Synchro- The psychology you are about to study—real psychology—bears little relation Energizer,” which supposedly alters to the popular psychology (“pop psych”) and its pseudoscientific relatives (jokingly consciousness, boosts intelligence, called “psychobabble”) found on the Web, on television, and in thousands of self- and enhances sexual functioning, all by help books. It is more complex, more informative, and, we think, far more helpful bombardingView you the with Image lights in and MyPsychLab sounds View in MypsychLab of different frequencies and intensities. because it is based on scientific research and empirical evidence, which was gathered by careful observation, experimentation, and measurement. Scientific psychologyView also the Image in MyPsychLab View in MypsychLab Watch the Video in MyPsychLab Watch in MypsychLab addresses a far broader range of issues than does popular psychology. When people Thinking Like a Psychologist: Debunking think of psychology, they usually think of mental and emotional disorders, personalWatch the VideoMyths in MyPsychLab Watch in MypsychLab problems, and psychotherapy. But psychologists take as their subject the entire spec- Listen to the Chapter Audio in MyPsychLab Listen in MypsychLab trum of brave and cowardly, intelligent and foolish, beautiful and brutish things that people do. They want to know how ordinary human beings (and other animalsListen as to the Chapter100 Audio in MyPsychLab Listen in MypsychLab Explore the Concept in MyPsychLab Explore in MypsychLab well) learn, remember, solve problems, perceive, feel, and get along or fail to get along View the Image in MyPsychLab View in MypsychLab 90 with others. They are therefore as likely to study commonplace experiences—rear- Explore the Concept80 in MyPsychLab Explore in MypsychLab ing children, gossiping, remembering a shopping list, daydreaming, making love, and Simulate the Experiment in MyPsychLab Simulate in MypsychLab Watch the Videomaking in MyPsychLab a living—as exceptional ones. Watch in MypsychLab ect 70 Simulate the Experiment60 in MyPsychLab Simulate in MypsychLab Because so many pop-psych ideas have filtered into the media, education, and Study and Review in MyPsychLab Study and Review in MyPsychLab even the law, we all need to develop an ability to distinguish between psychobabble 50 Listen to the Chapterand serious Audio psychology, in MyPsychLab and between unsupportedListen popular in opinion MypsychLab and findings based Study and Review in MyPsychLab Study and Review40 in MyPsychLab on Are unhappy memories “repressed” and then accurately recalled Read
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Brain, Psyche, and Self: a Dialectic Between Analytical Psychology and Neuroscience
    BRAIN, PSYCHE, AND SELF: A DIALECTIC BETWEEN ANALYTICAL PSYCHOLOGY AND NEUROSCIENCE A dissertation submitted by KESSTAN C. BLANDIN to PACIFICA GRADUATE INSTITUTE in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in DEPTH PSYCHOLOGY This dissertation has been accepted for the faculty of Pacifica Graduate Institute by: •ennis P. Slattery, Chair Jennifer L.~Selig, Reader (/tyjz Susan E. Mehrtens, PhD External Reader UMI Number: 3519792 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. DiygrMution UMI 3519792 Published by ProQuest LLC 2012. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 ii JANUARY 25, 2011 Copyright by KESSTAN C. BLANDIN 2011 iii ABSTRACT Brain, Psyche, and Self: A Dialectic Between Analytical Psychology and Neuroscience by Kesstan Blandin Although much of C. G. Jung's work is not compatible with neuroscientific methods or perspectives, his ideas on the structure of the psyche and self overlap with attempts to understand the phenomenon of a self in consciousness through mapping correlates with brain functions and processes. They are therefore appropriate to engage in dialogue with neuroscience. Through these dialogues we can further understand the construction of the self and identity in light of current findings in neuroscience and the theories of C.
    [Show full text]
  • Psychopathology and Crime Causation: Insanity Or Excuse?
    Fidei et Veritatis: The Liberty University Journal of Graduate Research Volume 1 Issue 1 Article 4 2016 Psychopathology and Crime Causation: Insanity or Excuse? Meagan Cline Liberty University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/fidei_et_veritatis Part of the Criminology and Criminal Justice Commons, and the Social Psychology Commons Recommended Citation Cline, Meagan (2016) "Psychopathology and Crime Causation: Insanity or Excuse?," Fidei et Veritatis: The Liberty University Journal of Graduate Research: Vol. 1 : Iss. 1 , Article 4. Available at: https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/fidei_et_veritatis/vol1/iss1/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholars Crossing. It has been accepted for inclusion in Fidei et Veritatis: The Liberty University Journal of Graduate Research by an authorized editor of Scholars Crossing. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Cline: Psychopathology and Crime Causation: Insanity or Excuse? PSYCHOPATHOLOGY AND CRIME CAUSATION: INSANITY OR EXCUSE? By Meagan Cline One of the most controversial topics in the criminal justice industry is the "insanity defense" and its applicability or validity in prosecuting criminal cases. The purpose of this assignment is to identify and discuss psychopathology and crime causation in terms of mental illness, research, and the insanity defense. For this evaluation, information was gathered from scholarly research, textbooks, dictionaries, and published literature. These sources were then carefully reviewed and applied to the evaluation in a concise, yet informative, manner. This assignment also addresses some of the key terms in psychopathology and crime causation, including various theories, definitions, and less commonly known relevant factors influencing claims of mental instability or insanity.
    [Show full text]
  • Do Parents Matter? Judith Rich Harris and Child Development by Malcolm Gladwell
    August 17, 1998 The New Yorker ANNALS OF BEHAVIOR Do Parents Matter? Judith Rich Harris and child development by Malcolm Gladwell 1. The idea that will make Judith Rich Harris famous came to her, unbidden, on the afternoon of January 20, 1994. At the time, Harris was a textbook writer, with no doctorate or academic affiliation, working from her home in suburban New Jersey. Because of a lupus-like illness, she doesn’t have the strength to leave the house, and she’d spent that morning in bed. By early afternoon, though, she was at her desk, glancing through a paper by a prominent psychologist about juvenile delinquency, and for some reason a couple of unremarkable sentences struck her as odd: “Delinquency must be a social behavior that allows access to some desirable resource. I suggest that the resource is mature status, with its consequent power and privilege.” It is an observation consistent with our ideas about what it means to grow up. Teen-agers rebel against being teen-agers, against the restrictions imposed on them by adults. They smoke because only adults are supposed to smoke. They steal cars because they are too young to have cars. But Harris was suddenly convinced that the paper had it backward. “Adolescents aren’t trying to be like adults--they are trying to contrast themselves with adults,” she explains. “And it was as if a light had gone on in the sky. It was one of the most exciting things that have ever happened to me. In a minute or two, I had the germ of the theory, and in ten minutes I had enough of it to see that it was important.” If adolescents didn’t want to be like adults, it was because they wanted to be like other adolescents.
    [Show full text]
  • Barnes Et Al
    DEMONSTRATING THE VALIDITY OF TWIN RESEARCH IN CRIMINOLOGY∗ J. C. BARNES,1 JOHN PAUL WRIGHT,1,6 BRIAN B. BOUTWELL,2 JOSEPH A. SCHWARTZ,3 ERIC J. CONNOLLY,4 JOSEPH L. NEDELEC,1 and KEVIN M. BEAVER5,6 1School of Criminal Justice, University of Cincinnati 2School of Social Work, Saint Louis University 3School of Criminology and Criminal Justice, University of Nebraska at Omaha 4Criminal Justice Department, Pennsylvania State University, Abington 5College of Criminology and Criminal Justice, Florida State University 6Center for Social and Humanities Research, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia KEYWORDS: assumptions, behavior genetics, biosocial, empirical, quantitative, twins In a recent article published in Criminology, Burt and Simons (2014) claimed that the statistical violations of the classical twin design render heritability studies useless. Claiming quantitative genetics is “fatally flawed” and describing the results generated from these models as “preposterous,” Burt and Simons took the unprecedented step to call for abandoning heritability studies and their constituent findings. We show that their call for an “end to heritability studies” was premature, misleading, and entirely without merit. Specifically, we trace the history of behavioral genetics and show that 1) the Burt and Simons critique dates back 40 years and has been subject to a broad array of empirical investigations, 2) the violation of assumptions in twin models does not in- validate their results, and 3) Burt and Simons created a distorted and highly misleading portrait of behavioral genetics and those who use quantitative genetic approaches. “The flaws of twin studies are not fatal, but rather seem no worse (and may be better) than the flaws of the typical causal study that relies on observational data.” (Felson, 2012: ii) Behavioral genetic research has existed for more than 100 years (Maxson, 2007).
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 1: Prescientific Psychology
    Prescientific Psychology 1 Start with these facts. Psychology is the most popular elective in American high schools today. Furthermore, psychology is one of the two or three most popular undergraduate majors in North American colleges. People cannot seem to get enough of psychol- ogy; it is everywhere today. It is the substance of movies, novels, computer games, social media, magazines, television shows, tabloid newspapers, radio talk shows, and music lyrics. Clearly, there is no shortage of public interest in psychology. People are interested in behavior—their own, their relatives, their neighbors, their cowork- ers, and even strangers who they know only through the media of books, magazines, or television shows such as soap operas, courtroom programs, game shows, situation comedies, dramas, and the so-called “reality” shows. There seems to be a never-ending fascination with human behavior that is perhaps inherent in human nature. It is likely that such an interest has afforded evolutionary advantages. An individual ’ s ability to understand and, better still, anticipate the behavior of others has survival value. Psy- chologists refer to this public interest in psychology as popular psychology. It isn ’ t psychology of the form that would be recognized by most psychologists as scientific psychology. Indeed, many psychologists would be embarrassed by any association with it. However, the public loves it, and it is their psychology. Psychology has existed, no doubt, from the very beginnings of human history. When hominids first walked erect on the earth, facing a life expectancy of perhaps 30 years, a life beset with hardships and dangers that could hardly be imagined today, these early individuals were in need of human comfort, of reassurance, of empa- thy, and of guidance.
    [Show full text]
  • Gardner on Exorcisms • Creationism and 'Rare Earth' • When Scientific Evidence Is the Enemy
    GARDNER ON EXORCISMS • CREATIONISM AND 'RARE EARTH' • WHEN SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE IS THE ENEMY THE MAGAZINE FOR SCIENCE AND REASON Volume 25, No. 6 • November/December 2001 THE COMMITTEE FOR THE SCIENTIFIC INVESTIGATION OF CLAIMS OF THE PARANORMAL AT THE CENTER FOR INQUIRY-INTERNATIONAL (ADJACENT TO THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO) • AN INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION Paul Kurtz, Chairman; professor emeritus of philosophy. State University of New York at Buffalo Barry Karr, Executive Director Joe Nickell, Research Fellow Massimo Polidoro, Research Fellow Richard Wiseman, Research Fellow Lee Nisbet, Special Projects Director FELLOWS James E. Alcock,* psychologist. York Univ., Susan Haack, Cooper Senior Scholar in Arts Loren Pankratz, psychologist. Oregon Health Toronto and Sciences, prof, of philosophy. University Sciences Univ. Jerry Andrus, magician and inventor, Albany, of Miami John Paulos, mathematician. Temple Univ. Oregon C. E. M. Hansel, psychologist. Univ. of Wales Steven Pinker, cognitive scientist. MIT Marcia Angell, M.D.. former editor-in-chief, Al Hibbs, scientist. Jet Propulsion Laboratory Massimo Polidoro, science writer, author, New England Journal of Medicine Douglas Hofstadter, professor of human under­ executive director CICAP, Italy Robert A. Baker, psychologist. Univ. of standing and cognitive science, Indiana Univ. Milton Rosenberg, psychologist, Univ. of Kentucky Gerald Holton, Mallinckrodt Professor of Chicago Stephen Barrett M.D., psychiatrist, author, Physics and professor of history of science. Wallace Sampson, M.D., clinical professor of consumer advocate, Allentown, Pa. Harvard Univ. Barry Beyerstein,* biopsychologist. Simon Ray Hyman,* psychologist. Univ. of Oregon medicine, Stanford Univ., editor. Scientific Fraser Univ.. Vancouver, B.C., Canada Leon Jaroff, sciences editor emeritus, Time Review of Alternative Medicine Irving Biederman, psychologist Univ.
    [Show full text]
  • Psycho-Babble
    Psycho-Babble September 2017 ​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​ ​​ ​ IN THIS ISSUE ​ ​ ​ ​ Department Events | Department Information | Alumni News ​ ​ ​ ​​ ​ ​ ​​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​​ ​ ​ ​ Chair Talk from Joan ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ Welcome and welcome back, everyone! The summer ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​​ ​ ​ ​ was in some ways a difficult one, as we witnessed ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ events marked by intense hate in Charlottesville, VA, ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ and elsewhere; the devastation wrought by Hurricane ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ Harvey; and many other challenging and heartbreaking ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ moments. The summer also filled with wonder and ​ ​​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ hope, as it afforded many of us a chance to witness a ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ pretty rare solar eclipse, to see counter protests and ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ other efforts focused on peace and justice, and to see ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ the ways that communities - like those in and around ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ Houston, TX - come together to offer support and ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ resource. Here in the psychology department, we are looking ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ forward to a semester that we hope will be filled with opportunities for connection, community building, and ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ intellectual engagement. I am thrilled to welcome two full-time visitors to the department: Ariel James (who ​ ​ ​ ​​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ recently
    [Show full text]
  • CHILDREN DON't DO THINGS HALF WAY a Conversation with Judith Rich Harris [June 1999]
    Summer Reading from the Archive CHILDREN DON'T DO THINGS HALF WAY A Conversation with Judith Rich Harris [June 1999] I'm prone to making statements like this one: how the parents rear the child has no long-term effects on the child's personality, intelligence, or mental health. I guess you could call that an extreme statement. But I prefer to think of myself as a defender of the null hypothesis. Introduction It was in the 1990s that I received a phone call from Steven Pinker who wanted to make the world aware of the work of Judith Rich Harris, an unheralded psychologist who was advocating a revolutionary idea which she discussed in her 1999 Edge interview, "Children don't do things half way: children don’t compromise," in which she said, "how the parents rear the child has no long-term effects on the child's personality, intelligence, or mental health." 1 From the very early days of Edge, Harris was the gift that kept giving. Beginning in 1998, with her response to "What Questions Are You Asking Yourself?" through "The Last Question" in 2016, she exemplified the role of the Third Culture intellectual: "those scientists and other thinkers in the empirical world who, through their work and expository writing, are taking the place of the traditional intellectual in rendering visible the deeper meanings of our lives, redefining who and what we are." Her subsequent Edge essays over the years focused on subjects as varied as natural selection, parenting styles, the effect of genes on human behavior, twin studies, the survival of friendship, beauty as truth, among others are evidence of a keen intellect and a fearless thinker determined to advance science-based thinking as well as her own controversial ideas.
    [Show full text]
  • Do Parents Make a Difference in Children's Character Development?
    DO PARENTS MAKE A DIFFERENCE IN CHILDREN’S CHARACTER DEVELOPMENT? WHAT THE RESEARCH SHOWS Tom Lickona Center for the 4th and 5th Rs SUNY Cortland Fourth Annual Fall Character Education Seminar November 20, 1998 In its August 24, 1998 issue, Newsweek magazine devoted its cover story to a controversial new book, The Nurture Assumption: Why Children Turn Out the Way They Do by Judith Rich Harris. Ms. Harris does not claim to be a psychologist or expert in child development; she is a textbook writer. Nevertheless, she puts forth a startling thesis: Parents do not have much effect on how kids turn out. How kids turn out, Harris says, is mostly the result of genes and peers. Of course, we all know that heredity and peers play a part in kids' development. But is it true, as Harris says, that parents have little influence? If it's true that parents have little influence on their children, that's very bad news for schools, for schools would logically have even less influence. I'd like to argue that Harris is wrong and common sense is right: Parents do matter. Studies of childrearing reveal many things effective parents do that make a major impact on their children and especially on their character development. We should know this body of evidence for at least two reasons. First, so we can counter Harris's claim and communicate to parents what the research really shows, thereby bolstering their confidence that they do make a difference. A second reason is that good schools are like good families.
    [Show full text]
  • Popular Cognitive Neuroscience, Brain Images, Self-Help and the Consumer*
    CAN WE TRUST CONSUMERS WITH THEIR BRAINS? POPULAR COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, BRAIN IMAGES, SELF-HELP AND THE CONSUMER* Tracy D. Gunter** I. INTRODUCTION ................................... 483 II. THE BRAIN'S RISE TO PROMINENCE ................. 486 III. THE BRAIN AS A ROCK STAR ....................... 497 IV. THE RISE OF THE NEUROS AND NEURO SELF-HELP.......503 A. The Market for Brain Self Help Products ............. 506 B. Examples of Commercial Brain Products..............509 V. BRAIN SELF-HELP CONSUMERS AND CONSUMER PROTECTION ............................... ..... 514 A. Why Protect the Brain Self-Help Consumer?........518 B. Examples of Information Offered to Consumers... 523 C. Enhancing ConsumerLiteracy ....... ........ 532 VI. MECHANISMS OF CONSUMER PROTECTION ..... ...... 537 A. Self-Regula tion and Soft La w ...... ............... 539 B. DirectRegulation........................... 541 C CES Devices:An Example ofRegulation and Enforcement.. ................................ 543 VII. CONCLUSION .............................. ...... 550 I. INTRODUCTION Cognitive neuroscience captures the imagination by exploring connections between the physical brain and the abstract mind. Through recent advances in functional * ©2014 Tracy D. Gunter. All rights reserved ** Tracy Gunter, M.D., Associate Professor Of Clinical Psychiatry at the IU School of Medicine, Adjunct Professor of Law, Indiana University Robert H. McKinney School of Law, e-mail [email protected]. I thank research assistants Emily Steeb and Scott Spicer for editorial help and
    [Show full text]
  • Psychotherapy in Tightly Knit Communities
    EthxWeb Search Results Search Detail: Result=("17.2".PC.) AND (@YD >= "20000000") 2=1 : " Documents: 1 ­ 325 of 388 Document 1 Kahr, Brett Dr Paul Weston and the bloodstained couch. The International journal of psycho­analysis 2011 Aug; 92(4): 1051­8 Georgetown users check Georgetown Journal Finder for access to full text Document 2 Imber­Black, Evan Toward a contemporary social justice agenda in family therapy research and practice. Family process 2011 Jun; 50(2): 129­31 Georgetown users check Georgetown Journal Finder for access to full text Document 3 Katz­Bearnot, Sherry The family doctor: psychodynamic psychotherapy in tightly knit communities. The journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis and Dynamic Psychiatry 2011 Spring; 39(1): 169­77 Abstract: Although unusual, psychodynamic psychiatrists engage in the practice of treating multiple members, and constellations of members, of families with psychodynamic psychotherapy as well as other treatment modalities. Such clinicians are considered the "Family Psychiatrist." Psychological characteristics of such families who cannot be referred to other clinicians are articulated. The literature on psychotherapy in small rural communities is reviewed as having relevance to define the ethical issues that arise in such treatments. These issues include: maintaining therapeutic neutrality; creating functional, flexible, and appropriate boundaries; maintaining confidentiality; promoting patient autonomy and growth; as well as managing conflicts of interest. Relevant countertransference issues are examined. Georgetown users check Georgetown Journal Finder for access to full text Document 4 Roussos, Andrés J; Braun, Malena; Duarte, Adela Leibovich de Ethical behaviors of Latin American psychotherapy researchers. Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE 2011 Mar; 6(1): 51­4 Abstract: The ethical practices of psychotherapy researchers in Latin America were surveyed online.
    [Show full text]
  • History of Psychology
    The Psych 101 Series James C. Kaufman, PhD, Series Editor Department of Educational Psychology University of Connecticut David C. Devonis, PhD, received his doctorate in the history of psychology from the University of New Hampshire’s erstwhile pro- gram in that subject in 1989 with a thesis on the history of conscious pleasure in modern American psychology. Since then he has taught vir- tually every course in the psychology curriculum in his academic odys- sey from the University of Redlands in Redlands, California, and the now-closed Teikyo Marycrest University (formerly Marycrest College in Davenport, Iowa) to—for the past 17 years—Graceland University in Lamoni, Iowa, alma mater of Bruce Jenner and, more famously for the history of psychology, of Noble H. Kelly (1901–1997), eminent con- tributor to psychology’s infrastructure through his many years of ser- vice to the American Board of Examiners in Professional Psychology. Dr. Devonis has been a member of Cheiron: The International Society for the History of Behavioral and Social Sciences since 1990, a con- tributor to many of its activities, and its treasurer for the past 10 years. Currently he is on the editorial board of the American Psychological Association journal History of Psychology and is, with Wade Pickren, coeditor and compiler of the online bibliography History of Psychology in the Oxford Bibliographies Online series. History of Psychology 101 David C. Devonis, PhD Copyright © 2014 Springer Publishing Company, LLC All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or trans- mitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior permission of Springer Publishing Company, LLC, or authorization through payment of the appropriate fees to the Copyright Clearance Cen- ter, Inc., 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, 978-750-8400, fax 978-646-8600, [email protected] or on the Web at www.copyright.com.
    [Show full text]