DOCSLIB.ORG

Factors Affecting Fracture Susceptibility of Tooth Root: a Laboratory and Finite Element Analysis (FEA) Study

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Factors Affecting Fracture Susceptibility of Tooth Root: a Laboratory and Finite Element Analysis (FEA) Study Factors Affecting Fracture Susceptibility of Tooth Root: A Laboratory and Finite Element Analysis (FEA) Study Chankhrit Sathorn Doctor of Clinical Dentistry November 2004 Endodontic Unit School of Dental Science, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Clinical Dentistry Abstract From a fracture mechanics viewpoint, structural defects, cracks or canal irregularities are likely to play a major role in fracture susceptibility of the roots, because stresses can be exponentially amplified at these sites. By incorporating defects into a smooth round canal using rotary NiTi, theoretically the roots could be strengthened. The aims of the study were to determine whether rotary NiTi canal preparation strengthens roots, and whether the fracture pattern can be predicted by finite element analysis (FEA) models. 25 teeth were prepared using hand file and another 25 using rotary NiTi. After obturation, all teeth were subject to loading until fracture; load and patterns were recorded. Four FEA models were created from fractured roots. No significant difference of fracture load between the two techniques was found. Mesio-distal fracture occurred more often in the rotary NiTi group. Stress patterns in three of the four FEA models correlated well with the observed fracture patterns. The aim of the subsequent study was to determine the extent to which canal size, radius of curvature and proximal root concavity influence fracture susceptibility and pattern. A standardized cross-section of the mid-root region of a mandibular incisor was created by averaging the dimensions of ten extracted teeth, and the basic FEA model was created. By varying canal diameter, shape and proximal concavity, these factors could be examined for roles in fracture susceptibility and pattern. The factors all interact in influencing fracture susceptibility and pattern, with dentine thickness not the ii only determining factor. The removal of dentine does not always result in increased fracture susceptibility. iii Declaration This is to certify that the thesis comprises only my original work except where indicated in the preface; due acknowledgement has been made in the text to all other material used; the thesis is 12,858 words in length, inclusive of footnotes, but exclusive of tables, maps, appendices and bibliography. Dr Chankhrit Sathorn iv Acknowledgements Mr Dariusz Walter, a PhD candidate in engineering, for his expertise in LUSAS software. Dr Michael Swain, Professor of Aerospace Mechanical, and Mechatronic Engineering at University of Sydney, for his invaluable suggestions and insights in biomechanical properties of dentin. Dr Sabu John, Associate Professor of Engineering at RMIT, for his in depth understanding of engineering aspects of this research project. Dedication To my family, I couldn’t have done all this, without you. To my high school teacher, Ms Poonsup Mitsumpun, who has always inspired me with her endless enthusiasm and innate curiosity. A great example of how one fine teacher could shape many more student lives. To my mentor, Prof Harold H Messer, a wonderful scientist and a great human being. v Preface This thesis is a part of ongoing research at the University of Melbourne into different aspects of vertical root fractures and endodontics. It consists of four chapters; the first two chapters are introduction and literature review, the latter two are manuscripts that have already been accepted for publication in the Journal of Endodontics. Spelling and referencing formats differ in Chapters 3-4 according to the requirements of the Journal of Endodontics. References are included at the end of Chapters 2-4 because of the structure of the thesis. vi Table of Contents Chapter 1: Introduction .............................................................................................1 Chapter 2: Literature review .....................................................................................2 Vertical Root Fracture (VRF)................................................................................. 2 Clinical problems................................................................................................2 Prevalence...........................................................................................................2 Prognosis.............................................................................................................3 Etiology ...............................................................................................................4 Endodontic procedures.................................................................................. 4 CO 2 test........................................................................................................ 4 Access opening ........................................................................................... 5 Calcium hydroxide medication.................................................................5 Effects of NaOCl ......................................................................................... 6 Canal preparation....................................................................................... 6 Obturation................................................................................................... 8 Retropreparation......................................................................................... 9 Bleaching ..................................................................................................... 9 Restorative procedures ................................................................................ 10 Management ..................................................................................................... 13 Fracture related biomechanical properties of dentine ...................................... 14 Moisture content............................................................................................... 15 Hardness ........................................................................................................... 15 Young’s modulus ............................................................................................. 16 Ultimate strength.............................................................................................. 17 Fracture mechanics .............................................................................................. 18 Stress.................................................................................................................. 18 Stress vs. Strength......................................................................................... 19 Strain.................................................................................................................. 20 Young’s modulus ............................................................................................. 20 Fracture toughness........................................................................................... 21 Mode of Fracture .............................................................................................. 21 Brittle fracture............................................................................................... 21 Ductile fracture............................................................................................. 22 Why do fractures occur below a material’s ultimate tensile strength?........ 22 Fatigue failure............................................................................................... 23 Crack, flaw size concept............................................................................... 23 Crack arrest ................................................................................................... 27 Fracture prediction........................................................................................... 28 The study of stress and fracture...................................................................... 28 Experimental method................................................................................... 28 Theoretical method....................................................................................... 28 Numerical method ....................................................................................... 29 Aims ...................................................................................................................... 30 References ............................................................................................................. 31 Chapter 3: Article I Laboratory study and FEA verification................................ 38 vii Abstract................................................................................................................. 39 Introduction.......................................................................................................... 40 Materials and Methods........................................................................................ 41 Results................................................................................................................... 46 Discussion............................................................................................................. 48 References ............................................................................................................. 52 Figure legends ...................................................................................................... 54 Figure 1 ................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Incidence of Vertical Root Fracture at the Apical Third of the Root Canal
    Incidence of Vertical Root Fracture at the Apical Third of the Root Canal System after Preparation with Newer NiTi Rotary Files and Hand Files at Different Working Lengths A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of Tufts University School of Dental Medicine in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Dental Research by Afnan Abdulmajeed 04/2018 i © 2018 Afnan Abdulmajeed ii Thesis Committee Thesis Advisor Robert Amato D.M.D Professor and Chair Department of Endodontics Tufts University School of Dental Medicine Committee Members Gerard Kugel, D.M.D, MS, PhD Professor Department of Prosthodontics & Operative Dentistry Associate Dean for Research Tufts University School of Dental Medicine Britta Magnuson D.M.D Assistant Professor Department of Diagnostic Sciences Tufts University School of Dental Medicine Matthew Finkelman, PhD Associate Professor and Director Division of Biostatistics and Experimental Design, Department of Public Health and Community Service Tufts University School of Dental Medicine iii Abstract Introduction Vertical root fracture (VRF) is considered one of the most unfavorable complications in root canal treatment which may lead to tooth extraction. The aim of the study was to compare the incidence of generation of dentinal defects in the apical third of human extracted teeth after canal preparations with new rotary files (Vortex blue rotary file and HyFlex CM file) at different instrumentation lengths after hand filing vs. hand filing only (K-Flexofile). At different levels, the assessment of the defects was evaluated using a stereomicroscope using a cold light source. Materials and Methods One hundred and twenty anterior teeth (maxillary and mandibular) were mounted in resin blocks with simulated periodontal ligaments after examination and exclusion of cracked teeth.
    [Show full text]
  • Diagnosis and Treatment of Endodontically Treated Teeth With
    Case Report/Clinical Techniques Diagnosis and Treatment of Endodontically Treated Teeth with Vertical Root Fracture: Three Case Reports with Two-year Follow-up Senem Yigit Ozer,€ DDS, PhD,* Gulten€ Unl€ u,€ DDS, PhD,† and Yalc¸ın Deger, DDS, PhD‡ Abstract Introduction: Vertical root fracture (VRF) is an impor- vertical root fracture (VRF) manifests as a complete or incomplete fracture line tant threat to the tooth’s prognosis during and after Aextending obliquely or longitudinally through the enamel and dentin of an root canal treatment. Often the detection of these frac- endodontically treated root. VRFs usually result in extraction of the affected tooth tures occurs years later by using conventional periapical (1). Major iatrogenic and pathologic risk factors for VRFs include excessive root canal radiographs. However, recent studies have addressed preparation, overzealous lateral and vertical compaction forces during root canal the benefits of computed tomography to diagnose these filling, moisture loss in pulpless teeth, overpreparation of post space, excessive pres- problems earlier. Accurately diagnosed VRFs have been sure during post placement, and compromised tooth integrity as a result of large treated by extraction of teeth, with minimal damage to carious lesions or trauma (2). Whereas a multi-rooted tooth with VRF can be conserved the periodontal ligament, extraoral bonding of fractured by resecting the involved root, a single-rooted tooth usually has a poor prognosis, segments with an adhesive resin cement, and inten- leading to extraction in 11%–20% of cases (3). tional replantation of teeth after reconstruction. Although several methods have been used to preserve vertically fractured teeth, no Methods: The 3 case reports presented here describe specific treatment modality has been established (4–9).
    [Show full text]
  • Aesthetic Replacement of a Vertically Fractured Anterior Tooth Using the Natural Tooth As a Pontic : a Case Report
    IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences (IOSR-JDMS) e-ISSN: 2279-0853, p-ISSN: 2279-0861.Volume 14, Issue 10 Ver. II (Oct. 2015), PP 04-09 www.iosrjournals.org Aesthetic replacement of a vertically fractured anterior tooth using the natural tooth as a pontic : a Case Report Dr Ankita Gupta1, Dr Sunita Garg2 1,2(Department of Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics , Government Dental College & Hospital, Ahmedabad, Gujarat University, India) Abstract: Teeth with vertical root fractures (VRF) have complete or incomplete fractures that begin in the root and extend toward the occlusal surface. The most common causes of VRFsare trauma, inadequate endodontic treatment, iatrogenic causes, for e.g. excessive canal shaping, excessive restorative procedures, excessive forces of lateral condensation of obturation, etc. Diagnosis is difficult but invariably, treatment is extraction of the tooth/root. The sudden loss of an anterior tooth due to aforementioned reasons can be psychologically and socially damaging to the patient. This paper describes the immediate replacement of an endodontically treatedvertically fractured left central incisor with the natural tooth crown as a ponticusing composite resin. This technique allows the abutment teeth to be conserved with minimal or no preparation, and thus, keeps the technique reversible. Also, it can be completed chair-side, thereby avoiding laboratory costs. Hence, it canbe used as an interimprosthesis to prevent psychological trauma to the patient. Keywords: cone beam computed tomography, natural crown pontic, vertical root fracture, wire-composite splinting, I. Introduction According to the American Association of Endodontists, “A vertical root fracture(VRF) is a longitudinally oriented fracture of the root that originates from the apex and propagates to the coronal part [1].” Vertical root fractures represent about 2 to 5% of crown/root fractures, with the greatest incidence occurring in endodontically treated teeth [2].
    [Show full text]
  • International Association of Dental Traumatology Istanbul, Turkey June 19-21, 2014
    18th Meeting of the International Association of Dental Traumatology Istanbul, Turkey June 19-21, 2014 International Association of Dental Traumatology 4425 Cass Street, Suite A San Diego, CA 92109 Tel: 1 (858) 272-1018 Fax: 1 (858) 272-7687 Email: [email protected] Web Site: www.iadt-dentaltrauma.org Page 1 y Table of Contents Page Supporting Organizations ............................................................ 3 Welcome Letter ............................................................................. 4 Sponsors / Exhibitors ................................................................... 5 Officers / Directors / Committees ................................................. 6 Military Museum Map..................................................................... 7 Conference Overview .................................................................... 8 Social Events, Elective Tours and Activities .......................... 9-12 Program Moderators.................................................................... 13 Program Schedule .................................................................. 14-15 Research Lecture Presentations ........................................... 16-19 Invited Speakers ..................................................................... 20-28 Abstracts ............................................................................... 29-160 Ednodontics & Periodontal Aspects Case Posters ........................................................................ 29-65 Research Posters.................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Quality Resource Guide
    Second Edition Quality Resource Guide Diagnosing and Managing the Cracked Tooth Part 2: Vertical Root Fractures Author Acknowledgements Educational Objectives LEIF K. BAKLAND, DDS Following this unit of instruction, the practitioner should be able to: EMERITUS Professor 1. Differentiate vertical root fractures from other dental fractures. TORY SILVESTRIN, DDS MSD MSHPE Associate Professor, Chair and 2. Recognize the usual symptoms of vertical root fractures. Advanced Program Director 3. Describe methods for diagnosing vertical root fractures. Loma Linda University School of Dentistry Department of Endodontics 4. Recognize the risk factors associated with vertical root fractures. Loma Linda, California 5. Describe treatment options for vertical root fractures. Drs. Bakland and Silvestrin have no 6. Evaluate the prognoses for vertical root fractures. relevant financial relationships to disclose. MetLife designates this activity for 1.5 continuing education credits for the review of this Quality Resource Guide and successful completion of the post test. The following commentary highlights fundamental and commonly accepted practices on the subject matter. The information is intended as a general overview and is for educational purposes only. This information does not constitute legal advice, which can only be provided by an attorney. © 2020 MetLife Services and Solutions, LLC. All materials subject to this copyright may be photocopied for the noncommercial purpose of scientific or educational advancement. Originally published April 2017. Updated and revised March 2020. Expiration date: March 2023. The content of this Guide is subject to change as new scientific information becomes available. Address comments or questions to: Cancellation/Refund Policy: MetLife is an ADA CERP Recognized Provider. [email protected] Any participant who is not 100% satisfied with this course Accepted Program Provider FAGD/MAGD Credit 11/01/16 - 12/31/20.
    [Show full text]
  • Differentiating Spontaneous Vertical Root Fracture in Endodontically Treated Tooth
    Published online: 25.09.2019 Case Report Differentiating spontaneous vertical root fracture in endodontically treated tooth Myung‑Jin Lim1, Jung‑Ae Kim1, Yoorina Choi2, Chan‑Ui Hong3, Kyung‑San Min1,4 1Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Chonbuk National University, Jeonju, Korea, 2Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Wonkwang University Dental Hospital, Iksan, Korea, 3Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Dankook University, Cheonan, Korea, Correspondence: Dr. Kyung‑San Min 4Biomedical Research Institute of Chonbuk National Email: [email protected] University Hospital, Jeonju, Korea ABSTRACT Although vertical root fracture (VRF) is mostly found in endodontically treated teeth, it also occurs spontaneously. If VRF is recognized after endodontic treatment, it is considered to be iatrogenic and can lead to legal trouble. However, legal problems can be averted if the dentist can prove that the VRF existed before endodontic treatment. This case report describes an unusual, spontaneous VRF in an endodontically treated tooth and presents a useful tip for determining whether a fracture is iatrogenic. We performed nonsurgical endodontic treatment on a mandibular first molar with irreversible pulpitis. After 6 months, the patient revisited with localized swelling, and we diagnosed VRF of the mesial root. We extracted the tooth and prepared it for microscopic examination. We found gutta-percha in the fracture line of the transversely sectioned root, and it appeared to have penetrated to the fracture line through the force generated from the filling. The patient was informed and agreed that the fracture occurred spontaneously before treatment. This case demonstrates the time point of VRF occurrence by identifying the presence of gutta-percha in the fracture line.
    [Show full text]
  • Prevalence and Clinical Characteristics of Teeth Extracted with a Diagnosis of Cracked Tooth: a Retrospective Study
    Virginia Commonwealth University VCU Scholars Compass Theses and Dissertations Graduate School 2017 Prevalence and Clinical Characteristics of Teeth Extracted with a Diagnosis of Cracked Tooth: A Retrospective Study Riley B. Sturgill Virginia Commonwealth University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarscompass.vcu.edu/etd Part of the Dental Public Health and Education Commons, and the Endodontics and Endodontology Commons © The Author Downloaded from https://scholarscompass.vcu.edu/etd/4820 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at VCU Scholars Compass. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of VCU Scholars Compass. For more information, please contact [email protected]. © Riley B. Sturgill, DMD 2017 All Rights Reserved Prevalence and Clinical Characteristics of Teeth Extracted with a Diagnosis of Cracked Tooth: A Retrospective Study A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Dentistry at Virginia Commonwealth University. by Riley B. Sturgill, DMD, BS, King University, 2008 DMD, Arizona School of Dentistry & Oral Health, 2013 Director: Garry L. Myers, DDS Director, Advanced Education Program in Endodontics, Department of Endodontics, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Dentistry Virginia Commonwealth University Richmond, Virginia May, 2017 ii Acknowledgement The author wishes to thank several people. I would like to thank my husband, family, and friends for all of their many prayers, love, and support. I would also like to thank Drs. Best, Myers, and Coe for their help and guidance with this project. iii Table of Contents List of Tables .................................................................................................................................. v List of Figures ...............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Guide to the Endodontic Literature Success & Failure
    A Guide to the Endodontic Literature Success & Failure: Authors Description European Soc. Definition of Success: Clinical symptoms originating from an endodontically-induced apical periodontitis should neither persist nor develop after RCT Endodontology (1994 IEJ): and the contours of the PDL space around the root should radiographically be normal. AAE Quality Assurance Objectives of NSRCT (= nonsurgical root canal treatment) Guidelines · Prevent adverse signs or symptoms · Remove RC contents · Create radiographic appearance of well obturated RC system · Promote healing and repair of periradicular tissues · Prevent further breakdown of periradicular tissues The Mantra: · Apical periodontitis (=AP; = periapical radiolucency =PARL) is caused primarily by bacteria in RC systems (Sundqvist 1976; Kakehashi 1965; Moller 1981) · If bacteria in canal systems are reduced to levels that are not detected by culturing, then high success rates are observed (Bystrom 1987; Sjogren 1997) · Best documented results for canal disinfection are chemomechanical debridement with Ca(OH)2 for at least 1week (Sjogren 1991) · Mechanical instrumentation alone (C&S) reduces bacteria by 100-1,000 fold. But only 20-43% of cases show complete elimination (Bystrom 1981; Bystrom & Sundqvist 1985) · Do C&S and add 0.5% NaOCl produces complete disinfection in 40-60% of cases (Bystrom 1983) · Do C&S with 0.5% NaOCl and add one week Ca(OH)2: get complete disinfection in 90-100% of cases (Bystrom 1985; Sjogren 1991). Problems with the Mantra · Koch’s postulates cannot be applied
    [Show full text]
  • Is Pulpotomy a Valid Treatment Option for Irreversible Pulpitis? Scientific Communication of the German Society of Endodontology and Dental Traumatology
    80 RESEARCH REVIEW Gabriel Krastl, Kerstin Galler, Till Dammaschke, Edgar Schäfer Is pulpotomy a valid treatment option for irreversible pulpitis? Scientific Communication of the German Society of Endodontology and Dental Traumatology Summary: Based on the current state of knowledge, vital pulp treatment on teeth with deep carious lesions is indicated only in vital teeth which are asymptomatic, or at the most, show symptoms of reversible pulpitis. In cases of irreversible pulpitis, vital pulp extirpation and root canal treatment consti- tutes a reliable and established method that should still be considered the gold standard. However, recently published clinical studies show that, despite the diagnosis of “irreversible pulpitis”, surprisingly high success rates can be achieved after partial or full pulpotomy. These findings do not only challenge the current treatment concepts for teeth affected by pulpitis, but also the cur- rent system for diagnosing different stages of the disease. Although the diag- nosis of “irreversible pulpitis” is consistent with histologically detectable areas of bacterially infected or already necrotic tissue, these areas are localized be- neath the carious lesion in the coronal pulp and do not affect the entire pulp tissue. Pulpotomy involves the complete removal of inflamed, and therefore heavily bleeding, pulp tissue up to the level where the remaining pulp tissue is healthy in order to create the necessary conditions for healing. To date, a total of 12 clinical studies with a focus on vital pulp treatment in teeth with deep carious lesions and irreversible pulpitis have been published. Success rates after observation periods of 1 to 5 years range between 85 % and 95 % in most studies, regardless of patient age and type of pulpotomy (partial or full).
    [Show full text]
  • The Preservation of Teeth with Root-Originated Fractures
    Rosen et al. Evidence-Based Endodontics (2018) 3:2 Evidence-Based Endodontics https://doi.org/10.1186/s41121-018-0016-7 REVIEW Open Access The preservation of teeth with root- originated fractures Eyal Rosen1*, Ilan Beitlitum2 and Igor Tsesis1 Abstract Traditionally, when a root-originated fracture (ROF) was diagnosed in an endodontically treated tooth, the tooth was scheduled for extraction. However, modern endodontics offers new treatment options to manage and maintain certain ROF teeth. The decision of whether to extract a ROF tooth and substitute it with a dental implant, or to implement a more conservative management approach by attempting an additional endodontic treatment aimed to preserve the natural tooth, is complicated and multifactorial. The management alternatives of ROF teeth range from a traditional root amputation in multi-rooted teeth to modern endodontic surgical modalities that may enable the preservation of a fractured tooth. This required decision-making process includes prosthetic, periodontal, esthetic, endodontic, and patient value concerns. Keywords: Root-originated fracture, Vertical root fracture, Treatment, Decision-making Introduction complication is associated with a procedural error, and Root-originated fractures (ROFs), traditionally termed some complications may occur even when all proce- “vertical root fractures,” were defined as “a complete or dures were performed adequately (Tsesis et al. 2015; incomplete fracture initiated from the root at any level, Hofer et al. 2000;Angelos2009). Since ROFs appear in usually directed buccolingually” (Rivera and Walton teeth with either poor or good quality RCTs, ROFs 2008), largely based on its anatomical appearances must be considered as a potential complication, not ne- (Tsesis et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Further Investigation of Spreader Loads Required to Cause Vertical Root Fracture During Lateral Condensation
    0099-2399/8611306"0277/$020010 jOdjRNAL OF ENDODONrICS Printed in U.S.A. CopyrK:J~t 91986 by The Amercan AssooatK)n of Enoodontists VOL. 13, NO. 6, JUNE 1987 Further Investigation of Spreader Loads Required to Cause Vertical Root Fracture during Lateral Condensation John Q. Holcomb, DDS, MSD, David L. Pitts, DDS, MSD, and Jack I. Nicholls, PhD The roots of 54 extracted human mandibular incisors root canals, working lengths, number of accessory were instrumented, measured, and then filled with cones used, spreader penetration depths, and rates of gutta-percha by lateral condensation on an Instron spreader load increase. testing machine until vertical root fracture occurred. A spreader load as small as 1.5 kg (3.3 Ib) produced MATERIALS AND METHODS a fracture, and 13% of the sample fractured at a load of 3.5 kg (7.7 Ib) or less. Computer bivariate Specimens for this study consisted of 60 recently correlation analysis revealed significant positive lin- extracted human mandibular incisors. These teeth were ear correlations (p _< 0.05) between fracture load found to be free of preexisting cracks when viewed and root width, canal width, canal taper, ratio of through a dissecting microscope (x12) assisted by a canal width to total root width, and number of ac- fiberoptic light source. Only incisors featuring a straight cessory cones placed. All specimens had fractures root and single canal throughout the length of the root in the faciolingual dimension and 28% also had were included. All of the specimens were continuously mesiodistal fractures. In 26% of the sample, the hydrated in water containing a small amount of antibac- fractures did not extend completely through the root terial agent (phenol) from the time of extraction through from the canal to the root surface.
    [Show full text]
  • Case of the Month – February 2018 SURGICAL TREATMENT
    Case of the Month – February 2018 SURGICAL TREATMENT OF A NON HEALING PERIAPICAL PATHOSIS THROUGH APICOECTOMY & MANAGEMENT OF ASSOCIATED VERTICAL ROOT FRACTURE USING BIODENTINE – A CASE REPORT INTRODUCTION Traditional endodontic treatment aims to eliminate bacteria from root canal system and establish effective barriers against root recontamination1. To achieve success, cleaning, shaping and filling of the entire root canal system are considered essential steps in endodontic therapy2. Failure factors in root canal conventional treatment are frequently related to presence of residual bacteria (persistent infection) or reinfection in a previously disinfected canal (secondary infection)4. “A vertical root fracture (VRF) is a longitudinally oriented fracture of the root that originates from the apex and propagates to the coronal part1. Vertical root fracture is an important threat to the tooth's prognosis during and after root canal treatment2. The diagnosis of vertical root fracture can be problematic, and it often requires prediction rather than definitive identification3. The clinical scenario of vertical root fracture may resemble that of a periodontal disease or of a failed root canal treatment4.So it is important to differentially diagnose vertical root fracture from other similar clinical conditions5. Radiographic diagnosis of vertical fracture of root is also difficult, as not all the classical radiographic signs of vertical root fracture may be present in every case5. Case of the Month – February 2018 CBCT has been used in recent studies with a high accuracy and sensitivity in detecting vertical root fracture6 . Preserving a vertically fractured tooth helps improving function, esthetics and maintaining the integrity of the arch by preserving the alveolar bone height6.
    [Show full text]