The Preservation of Teeth with Root-Originated Fractures

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Preservation of Teeth with Root-Originated Fractures Rosen et al. Evidence-Based Endodontics (2018) 3:2 Evidence-Based Endodontics https://doi.org/10.1186/s41121-018-0016-7 REVIEW Open Access The preservation of teeth with root- originated fractures Eyal Rosen1*, Ilan Beitlitum2 and Igor Tsesis1 Abstract Traditionally, when a root-originated fracture (ROF) was diagnosed in an endodontically treated tooth, the tooth was scheduled for extraction. However, modern endodontics offers new treatment options to manage and maintain certain ROF teeth. The decision of whether to extract a ROF tooth and substitute it with a dental implant, or to implement a more conservative management approach by attempting an additional endodontic treatment aimed to preserve the natural tooth, is complicated and multifactorial. The management alternatives of ROF teeth range from a traditional root amputation in multi-rooted teeth to modern endodontic surgical modalities that may enable the preservation of a fractured tooth. This required decision-making process includes prosthetic, periodontal, esthetic, endodontic, and patient value concerns. Keywords: Root-originated fracture, Vertical root fracture, Treatment, Decision-making Introduction complication is associated with a procedural error, and Root-originated fractures (ROFs), traditionally termed some complications may occur even when all proce- “vertical root fractures,” were defined as “a complete or dures were performed adequately (Tsesis et al. 2015; incomplete fracture initiated from the root at any level, Hofer et al. 2000;Angelos2009). Since ROFs appear in usually directed buccolingually” (Rivera and Walton teeth with either poor or good quality RCTs, ROFs 2008), largely based on its anatomical appearances must be considered as a potential complication, not ne- (Tsesis et al. 2015). cessarily a direct result of a practitioner procedural Since almost all ROFs have a history of root canal error (Tsesis et al. 2015). Therefore, this extended def- treatments (RCTs) (Tsesis et al. 2015; Cuoghi et al. 2010; inition better elucidates both clinical and medico-legal Tsesis et al. 2010a; Garcia-Guerrero et al. 2017; Rosen et aspects of ROFs (Tsesis et al. 2015;Tsesisetal.2010a; al. 2016), it seems clear that there must be an Rosen et al. 2012). association between RCTs and the occurrence of ROFs ROFs are fairly common (Yoshino et al. 2015), with a (Cuoghi et al. 2010; Tsesis et al. 2010a). Thus, based on reported prevalence of 11% up to more than 30% of ex- the nature of these fractures, a new extended definition tracted endodontically treated teeth (Tsesis et al. 2010a; was recently suggested as following: “a complication of Rosen et al. 2012). In a recent study, Yoshino et al. 2015 root canal treatment, characterized by a complete or in- evaluated the prevalence of ROFs as the main reason for complete fracture initiated from the root at any level, the extraction of the permanent teeth. They evaluated a usually directed buccolingually” (Tsesis et al. 2015). total of 736 teeth from 24 different clinics that were ex- It is fundamental to understand that this extended tracted from 626 patients during a 6-month period. Of definition of ROFs as a complication of RCTs does not these teeth, a total of 233 teeth were extracted as a result imply that ROFs necessarily occur as a direct result of a of ROFs (31.7%). practitioner’s procedural error (Hofer et al. 2000). While Anatomically, ROFs frequently develop laterally a procedural error can lead to complications, not every from the root canal wall to the outer root surface (Taschieri et al. 2010). An incomplete fracture extends only on one side of the root surface, while a complete * Correspondence: [email protected] 1Department of Endodontology, The Maurice and Gabriela Goldschleger fracture develops in both directions of the root canal School of Dental Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel Full list of author information is available at the end of the article © The Author(s). 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. Rosen et al. Evidence-Based Endodontics (2018) 3:2 Page 2 of 7 and includes two root surfaces (Taschieri et al. 2010; Floratos and Kratchman 2012). Consequently, extrac- Walton et al. 1984;Tamse2006), occasionally leading tion was normally indicated (Tsesis et al. 2015; to splitting of the root to segments (Tsesis et al. 2015; Taschieri et al. 2010;Tamse2006). Taschieri et al. 2010). The decision whether to attempt retaining a compro- A timely mannered diagnosis and proper management mised endodontically treated tooth by additional treat- are critical in preventing alveolar bone loss, which may ments or to extract the fractured tooth and substitute it impair the future reconstructive procedures, should im- with an implant-supported restoration has been debated plant therapy be the treatment of choice (Tsesis et al. extensively for many years (Abboud et al. 2013; Avila et 2015; Tsesis et al. 2010a; Taschieri et al. 2010; Tamse al. 2009; Bashutski and Wang 2007; Iqbal and Kim 2007; 2006; PradeepKumar et al. 2016). However, the clinical Iqbal and Kim 2008; Nemcovsky and Rosen 2017). How- and radiographic diagnosis of ROFs is complicated and ever, in recent years, it has become evident that im- challenging for the practitioner (Tsesis et al. 2010a; plants may be more prone to complications and Corbella et al. 2014) and, in certain cases, is only pos- requiremorepostoperative maintenance than the sible by a direct observation of the suspected site fol- natural tooth, and it seems that the pendulum may lowing flap elevation during surgical endodontic swing back towards endodontics and tooth preserva- treatment (Tsesis et al. 2015;Walton2017)(Fig.1). tion (Nemcovsky and Rosen 2017). Traditionally, teeth with ROFs were considered to have In the context of ROF teeth, in recent years, new re- a hopeless prognosis (Tsesis et al. 2010a; Taschieri et al. ports suggested promising treatment alternatives aimed 2010; Floratos and Kratchman 2012). Efforts to treat to preserve ROF teeth (Tsesis et al. 2010a; Taschieri et ROFs in different ways, such as by a replantation pro- al. 2010; Floratos and Kratchman 2012; Taschieri et al. cedure with bonding of the fractured segments, have 2016) which were traditionally condemned to extraction been reported (Tsesis et al. 2010a; Taschieri et al. 2010; (Tsesis et al. 2015; Tsesis et al. 2010a; Taschieri et al. Floratos and Kratchman 2012; Arikan et al. 2008; Kawai 2010; Floratos and Kratchman 2012; Tsesis et al. 2006; and Masaka 2002; Hayashi et al. 2004). However, most Fabbro et al. 2009; Plotino et al. 2007). These unique of these treatment attempts were found to be unpredict- treatment attempts are in their preliminary stages of able and are not recommended as routine treatment al- development and are based mostly on case reports ternatives (Tsesis et al. 2010a; Taschieri et al. 2010; (Tsesis et al. 2010a; Taschieri et al. 2010;Floratosand Kratchman 2012). Still, it seems that modern endodon- tics offers technical means such as magnification and il- lumination devices (Tsesis et al. 2015; Fabbro et al. 2009; Kim and Baek 2004), and the use of modern ma- terials such as bioceramic cements (Torabinejad and Chivian 1999) for the repair of ROFs (Tsesis et al. 2010a; Taschieri et al. 2010; Floratos and Kratchman 2012), that with proper case selection, may allow the treatment and preservation of some ROF teeth (Tsesis et al. 2015; Taschieri et al. 2016). This manuscript will review the modern treatment op- tions for the preservation of ROF roots. Review The importance of case selection Modern endodontics provides a variety of treatment op- tions that allow the preservation of compromised teeth (Tsesis et al. 2010b). Yet, ROFs still pose a complicated diagnostic and treatment challenge for practitioners and are a common trigger of tooth loss (Tsesis et al. 2010a; Kishen 2006). With the development of modern end- odontic treatment options, new dilemmas emerged (Tsesis et al. 2015; Tsesis et al. 2010b). A common dilemma is the decision whether to preserve Fig. 1 Diagnosis of ROF in an upper anterior tooth by a direct a compromised tooth with ROF or to extract the fractured observation of the suspected site following flap elevation during a tooth or root and substitute it with a dental implant surgical endodontic treatment (Tsesis et al. 2010a; Tsesis et al. 2010b). Traditionally, it Rosen et al. Evidence-Based Endodontics (2018) 3:2 Page 3 of 7 was believed that a fast decision to extract the tooth or in modern dentistry, osseointegration of implants is rootmaybeessentialbecausetheensuinginflamma- readily achievable with high long-term survival rates tion in the surrounding periodontal tissues would lead (Abboud et al. 2013; Bashutski and Wang 2007; Butler to periodontal breakdown followed by the develop- and Kinzer 2012; Wheeler 2007), dental implant success ment of significant osseous destruction (Tsesis et al. should be judged also by esthetic outcomes, and esthetic 2010a;Waltonetal.1984;Tsesisetal.2010b). As a re- predictability may be difficult to attain. Furthermore, sult, a future restoration with dental implants in the when implant failure happens in the esthetic zone, it area may be compromised (Tsesis et al. 2015;Tsesiset may be difficult to be corrected entirely (Tsesis et al. al. 2010a;Tamse2006;Tsesisetal.2010b). However, 2015; Abboud et al. 2013; Bashutski and Wang 2007; each case should be judged objectively as some data Butler and Kinzer 2012; Wheelers 2007). (Eichelsbacher et al. 2009)revealedthatwithadequate Nevertheless, periodontal esthetic complications, such case selection, proper management of teeth affected by as the development of gingival recession and alveolar root-originated fractures has no detrimental impact on bone loss, may happen as a result of the surgical proce- periodontal health over a time.
Recommended publications
  • Surgical Management of a Separated Endodontic Instrument Using
    Review Article Clinician’s corner Images in Medicine Experimental Research Case Report Miscellaneous Letter to Editor DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/25761.9991 Case Report Postgraduate Education Surgical Management of a Separated Case Series Endodontic Instrument using Second Dentistry Section Generation Platelet Concentrate and Short Communication Hydroxyapatite SL SATHEESH1, SHEFALI JAIN2, atUL CHANDRA BHUYAN3, LEKSHMY S DEVI4 ABSTRACT Fractured endodontic instrument is an unfortunate endodontic mishap which may obstruct thorough cleaning and shaping of the root canals with potential impact on the endodontic prognosis and treatment outcome. When the fractured segment lies apical to canal curvature, overzealous removal of tooth structure is required to gain access to the separated segment which in turn increases the likelihood of root fracture. In infected cases, the stage at which instrument separation occurs is crucial as root canal disinfection is jeopardized. This case report describes the surgical retrieval of a fractured endodontic file from the mesiobuccal canal of mandibular first molar by limited resection of mesial root. Second generation platelet concentrate called Platelet Rich Fibrin (PRF) and nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite and β- tricalcium phosphate bone graft was placed to fill the surgical defect as the combination enhances the regenerative effect of PRF by exerting an osteoconductive effect in the bony defect area. The clinical and radiographic examination after eighteen months revealed complete periapical healing. Keywords: Bone graft, Instrument fracture, Instrument retrieval, Periapical surgery, Platelet rich fibrin CASE REPORT symptomatic. Treatment plan was changed to periapical surgery to A 32-year-old male patient with a chief complaint of dull aching pain retrieve the fractured file from mesiobuccal canal because it was in relation to his mandibular left first molar tooth (# 19) was referred deemed likely that further attempts to remove the file could perforate to Department of Endodontics for retreatment.
    [Show full text]
  • Apexification of Immature Permanent Incisors Using MTA and Calcium Hydroxide- Case Report
    IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences (IOSR-JDMS) e-ISSN: 2279-0853, p-ISSN: 2279-0861.Volume 19, Issue 4 Ser.7 (April. 2020), PP 33-37 www.iosrjournals.org Apexification of Immature Permanent Incisors using MTA and Calcium hydroxide- Case Report Tanu Rajain1, Kesang Tsomu2, Ritu Namdev3 1Post Graduate Trainee 2nd year , Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, PGIDS , Rohtak, Haryana. 2Post Graduate Trainee 3rd year , Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, PGIDS , Rohtak, Haryana. 3Senior Professor and Head, Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, PGIDS , Rohtak, Haryana. Corresponding Author: Dr. Tanu Rajain , Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Pt. B.D. Sharma PGIMS , Rohtak , Haryana- 124001, India. Abstract- In young pediatric patient the endodontic management of immature non vital permanent teeth is a great challenge to dentist. There is difficulty in debridement and obturation as the walls of the root canals are frequently divergent and open apexes are present. Apexification is a technique to generate a calcific barrier in a root with an open apex or the sustained apical development of an incomplete root in teeth with necrotic pulp. The most commonly advocated medicament is calcium hydroxide although recently considerable interest has been expressed in the use of MTA. In this case series both calcium hydroxide and MTA were used successfully for apexification procedure in teeth with open apex. Keywords- Young permanent maxillary incisor, open apex, calcium hydroxide, mineral trioxide aggregate, apexification. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------- Date of Submission: 04-04-2020 Date of Acceptance: 20-04-2020 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------- I. Introduction Dental trauma in the young adolescent patient is most common to the anterior dentition.
    [Show full text]
  • Apicoectomy Treatment
    INFORMED CONSENT DISCUSSION FOR APICOECTOMY TREATMENT Patient Name: Date: DIAGNOSIS: Patient’s initials required Twisted, curved, accessory or blocked canals may prevent removal of all inflamed or infected pulp/nerve during root canal treatment. Since leaving any pulp/nerve in the root canal may cause your symptoms to continue or worsen, this might require an additional procedure called an apicoectomy. Through a small opening cut in the gums and surrounding bone, any infected tissue is removed and the root canal is sealed, which is referred to as a retrofilling procedure. An apicoectomy may also be required if your symptoms continue after root canal therapy and the tooth does not heal. Benefits of Apicoectomy, Not Limited to the Following: Apicoectomy treatment is intended to help you keep your tooth, allowing you to maintain your natural bite and the healthy functioning of your jaw. This treatment has been recommended to relieve the symptoms of the diagnosis described above. Risks of Apicoectomy, Not Limited to the Following: I understand that following treatment I may experience bleeding, pain, swelling and discomfort for several days, which may be treated with pain medication. It is possible that infection may accompany treatment and must be treated with antibiotics. I will immediately contact the office if my condition worsens or if I experience fever, chills, sweats or numbness. I understand that I may receive a local anesthetic and/or other medication. In rare instances patients have a reaction to the anesthetic, which may require emergency medical attention, or find that it reduces their ability to control swallowing. This increases the chance of swallowing foreign objects during treatment.
    [Show full text]
  • A Case of Periradicular Surgery: Apicoectomy and Obturation of the Apex, a Bold Act
    Locurcio et al. Stomatological Dis Sci 2017;1:76-80 DOI: 10.20517/2573-0002.2016.08 Stomatological Disease and Science www.sdsjournal.com Case Report Open Access A case of periradicular surgery: apicoectomy and obturation of the apex, a bold act Lino Lucio Locurcio1, Rachel Leeson2 1Ashford & St. Peter‘s Hospitals, Ashford TW15 3AA, UK. 2Eastman Dental Hospital, London WC1X 8LD, UK. Correspondence to: Dr. Lino Lucio Locurcio, Ashford & St. Peter’s Hospitals, London Road, Ashford TW15 3AA, UK. E-mail: [email protected] How to cite this article: Locurcio LL, Leeson R. A case of periradicular surgery: apicoectomy and obturation of the apex, a bold act. Stomatological Dis Sci 2017;1:76-80. Dr. Lino Lucio Locurcio has a wide experience in oral surgery, achieved throughout his training experience in Italy. He moved to London for a Master at Eastman Dental Institute in London. In addition, Dr. Locurcio had a fellowship in craniofacial surgery at Great Ormond Street Children Hospital. At the moment he is working in London as oral surgeon and implantologist with a special interest in maxillofacial and skin cancer surgery. Besides his hospital commitments, Dr. Locurcio currently works in a private clinic in Battersea, London. ABSTRACT Article history: This paper reports a case of a recurrent periapical cyst treated with enucleation of the lesion, Received: 08-10-2016 apicoectomy, and root end obturation on a lower left first molar. In the case of conventional Accepted: 21-12-2016 root canal treatment failure, non-surgical retreatment is the preferred option in most of the Published: 29-06-2017 cases.
    [Show full text]
  • Surgical Repair of Root and Tooth Perforations JOHN D
    Endodontic Topics 2005, 11, 152–178 Copyright r Blackwell Munksgaard All rights reserved ENDODONTIC TOPICS 2005 1601-1538 Surgical repair of root and tooth perforations JOHN D. REGAN, DAVID E. WITHERSPOON & DEBORAH M. FOYLE A root perforation is a mechanical or pathological communication formed between the supporting periodontal apparatus of the tooth and the root canal system. Three broad categories of etiological factors exist and these are procedural mishaps, resorption and caries. The diagnosis, management and repair of root perforations require skill and creative thinking. Unfortunately, much of what has been written on the subject of root perforation repair is unsubstantiated and empirical in nature and contributes little to evidence-based support for any specific repair procedure. However, perforation repair frequently provides a very attractive and frequently successful alternative to extraction of the involved tooth. In recent years, the procedure has become more predictable owing to the development of new materials, techniques and procedures. Introduction many perforations has been facilitated by the use of improved magnification and illumination provided by A root perforation is a mechanical or pathological the use of loupes or the surgical operating microscope communication formed between the supporting per- (SOM) (9, 10, 15–28). In practice, however, the iodontal apparatus of the tooth and the root canal indications for surgical correction of root perforations system (1). Perforations result in the destruction of the are being eroded from two directions: on the one hand dentine root wall or floor along with the investing by the improved non-surgical management of perfora- cementum. This communication compromises the tions and on the other by the use of implants.
    [Show full text]
  • Dr Prasad Musale (MDS, MLD)
    Dr Prasad Musale (MDS, MLD) ✤ Graduate from Bharati Vidyapeeth Dental College & Hospital, Pune(1994), Postgraduate from Government Dental College & Hospital, Mumbai(1999) and Masters in Laser Dentistry from Med- ical University of Vienna, Austria(2010) ✤ Teaching experience of 19 years ✤ Core interest in Pediatric Endodontics, Microscopic Pediatric Dentistry, MID and Laser assisted Pediatric Dentistry ✤ Published more than 25 International and National scientific papers ✤ Contributed many chapters in leading Pediatric Dentistry textbooks of authors like Dr Damle and Dr Shobha Tondon. ✤ Invited as Speaker/Faculty for National and international conferences ✤ Director of “Little Ones Big Smiles” Laser and Microscope Integrated Pediatric Dentistry in Pune since 1999 PEDIATRIC ENDODONTICS VITAL AND NON-VITAL PULP THERAPY Dr Prasad Musale (MDS, MLD) Pune,India SCOPE OF PEDIATRIC ENDODONTICS # To understand the developmental and biomedical aspects of primary and permanent pulp # Comprehensive clinical and radiographic diagnosis of the pulp and periradicular lesions # Vital pulp therapy and Nonvital pulp therapy including Regenerative Endodontics # Selective surgical removal of pathological tissues resulting from pulpal pathosis # Intentional replantation and replantation of avulsed teeth # Surgical removal of tooth structure, such as root-end resection and root-end filling; hemisection, and root resection # Bleaching of discolored dentin and enamel # Retreatment of teeth previously treated endodontically # Coronal restorations by means of post
    [Show full text]
  • Incidence of Vertical Root Fracture at the Apical Third of the Root Canal
    Incidence of Vertical Root Fracture at the Apical Third of the Root Canal System after Preparation with Newer NiTi Rotary Files and Hand Files at Different Working Lengths A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of Tufts University School of Dental Medicine in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Dental Research by Afnan Abdulmajeed 04/2018 i © 2018 Afnan Abdulmajeed ii Thesis Committee Thesis Advisor Robert Amato D.M.D Professor and Chair Department of Endodontics Tufts University School of Dental Medicine Committee Members Gerard Kugel, D.M.D, MS, PhD Professor Department of Prosthodontics & Operative Dentistry Associate Dean for Research Tufts University School of Dental Medicine Britta Magnuson D.M.D Assistant Professor Department of Diagnostic Sciences Tufts University School of Dental Medicine Matthew Finkelman, PhD Associate Professor and Director Division of Biostatistics and Experimental Design, Department of Public Health and Community Service Tufts University School of Dental Medicine iii Abstract Introduction Vertical root fracture (VRF) is considered one of the most unfavorable complications in root canal treatment which may lead to tooth extraction. The aim of the study was to compare the incidence of generation of dentinal defects in the apical third of human extracted teeth after canal preparations with new rotary files (Vortex blue rotary file and HyFlex CM file) at different instrumentation lengths after hand filing vs. hand filing only (K-Flexofile). At different levels, the assessment of the defects was evaluated using a stereomicroscope using a cold light source. Materials and Methods One hundred and twenty anterior teeth (maxillary and mandibular) were mounted in resin blocks with simulated periodontal ligaments after examination and exclusion of cracked teeth.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Clinical Studies Related to Apexification Techniques
    Introduction A. Agrafioti, D.G. Giannakoulas*, C.G. Filippatos, E.G. Kontakiotis Teeth with necrotic pulp and open apex bring about several challenges to clinicians due to the lack of natural Department of Endodontics, School of Dentistry, National and apical constriction and the thin root walls that are Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece prone to fracture [Trope, 2006, Camp, 2008]. In order *School of Dentistry, National and Kapodistrian University of to confine filling materials into the root canal space and Athens, Athens, Greece prevent overfilling, the placement of an artificial apical barrier and/or the closure of the apex are necessary email: [email protected] before obturation of the root canal system [Trope 2006]. The traditional approach to handle cases with open apex DOI: 10.23804/ejpd.2017.18.04.03 is the multiple-visit apexification treatment with the use of calcium hydroxide (CH) as intracanal medicament [Seltzer, 1988]. The frequency of changes of CH from the root canal constitutes a controversial topic as there are studies Analysis of clinical that propose that a single placement of this medicament is enough to achieve predictable outcomes [Chawla studies related 1986], whereas others claim that multiple replacements of CH could lead to a more rapid formation of a calcified to apexification tissue barrier [Abbot 1998]. The time required for the calcified tissue barrier to form varies from 5 to 20 months techniques [Sheehy and Roberts, 1996] and seems to be influenced by several factors such as opening of the apex, frequency of intracanal medication replacement, age of the patient and the presence of periapical radiolucency [Mackie et al., ABSTRACT 1988; Finucane and Kinirons, 1999; Kleier and Barr, 1991].
    [Show full text]
  • Apicoectomy of Maxillary Anterior Teeth Through a Piezoelectric Bony-Window Osteotomy: Two Case Reports Introducing a New Technique to Preserve Cortical Bone
    Case report ISSN 2234-7658 (print) / ISSN 2234-7666 (online) https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2016.41.4.310 Apicoectomy of maxillary anterior teeth through a piezoelectric bony-window osteotomy: two case reports introducing a new technique to preserve cortical bone Viola Hirsch1,2, Meetu Two case reports describing a new technique of creating a repositionable piezoelectric R. Kohli1*, Syngcuk bony window osteotomy during apicoectomy in order to preserve bone and act as an 1 autologous graft for the surgical site are described. Endodontic microsurgery of anterior Kim teeth with an intact cortical plate and large periapical lesion generally involves removal of a significant amount of healthy bone in order to enucleate the diseased 1 Department of Endodontics, tissue and manage root ends. In the reported cases, apicoectomy was performed on the University of Pennsylvania School of Dental Medicine, Philadelphia, lateral incisors of two patients. A piezoelectric device was used to create and elevate PA, USA a bony window at the surgical site, instead of drilling and destroying bone while 2Private Practice, Munich, Germany making an osteotomy with conventional burs. Routine microsurgical procedures - lesion enucleation, root-end resection, and filling - were carried out through this window preparation. The bony window was repositioned to the original site and the soft tissue sutured. The cases were re-evaluated clinically and radiographically after a period of 12 - 24 months. At follow-up, radiographic healing was observed. No additional grafting material was needed despite the extent of the lesions. The indication for this procedure is when teeth present with an intact or near-intact buccal cortical plate and a large apical lesion to preserve the bone and use it as an autologous graft.
    [Show full text]
  • Treatment Options for the Compromised Tooth: a Decision Guide
    Treatment Options for the Compromised Tooth: A Decision Guide www.aae.org/treatmentoptions Photo by Lindsey Frazier submitted by L. Stephen Buchanan, D.D.S. Root Amputation, Hemisection, Bicuspidization Case One Hemisection of the distal root of tooth #19. PreOp PostOp 13 mo. Recall Case Two* Hemisection of the distal root of tooth #30. PreOp PostOp Clinical Photograph * These images were published in The Color Atlas of Endodontics, Dr. William T. Johnson, p. 162, Copyright Elsevier 2002. Treatment Considerations/Prognosis Favorable Questionable Unfavorable Remaining Coronal Greater than 1.5 mm ferrule 1.0 to 1.5 mm ferrule Less than 1 mm ferrule Tooth Structure Crown Lengthening None needed If required will not Treatment required that compromise the aesthetics will affect the aesthetics or periodontal condition or further compromise the of adjacent teeth osseous tissues (support) of the adjacent teeth Endodontic Treatment Routine endodontic Nonsurgical root canal Canal calcification, complex treatment or not required retreatment required prior canal and root morphology, due to previous treatment to root resection and isolation complicate an ideal endodontic treatment result 2 American Association of Endodontists | www.aae.org Endodontic-Periodontic Lesions Case One Tooth #19 exhibiting probing to the distal apex. Treated in two steps using interim calcium hydroxide. PreOp Calcium Hydroxide PostOp 12 mo. Recall Case Two Tooth #21 exhibiting a wide, but deep probing on the mesial aspect. Treated in two steps using interim calcium hydroxide. PreOp Calcium Hydroxide PostOp 12 mo. Recall Case Three Tooth #19 with an 8 mm probing into furcation. Interim calcium hydroxide used. PreOp PostOp 12 mo.
    [Show full text]
  • Diagnosis and Treatment of Endodontically Treated Teeth With
    Case Report/Clinical Techniques Diagnosis and Treatment of Endodontically Treated Teeth with Vertical Root Fracture: Three Case Reports with Two-year Follow-up Senem Yigit Ozer,€ DDS, PhD,* Gulten€ Unl€ u,€ DDS, PhD,† and Yalc¸ın Deger, DDS, PhD‡ Abstract Introduction: Vertical root fracture (VRF) is an impor- vertical root fracture (VRF) manifests as a complete or incomplete fracture line tant threat to the tooth’s prognosis during and after Aextending obliquely or longitudinally through the enamel and dentin of an root canal treatment. Often the detection of these frac- endodontically treated root. VRFs usually result in extraction of the affected tooth tures occurs years later by using conventional periapical (1). Major iatrogenic and pathologic risk factors for VRFs include excessive root canal radiographs. However, recent studies have addressed preparation, overzealous lateral and vertical compaction forces during root canal the benefits of computed tomography to diagnose these filling, moisture loss in pulpless teeth, overpreparation of post space, excessive pres- problems earlier. Accurately diagnosed VRFs have been sure during post placement, and compromised tooth integrity as a result of large treated by extraction of teeth, with minimal damage to carious lesions or trauma (2). Whereas a multi-rooted tooth with VRF can be conserved the periodontal ligament, extraoral bonding of fractured by resecting the involved root, a single-rooted tooth usually has a poor prognosis, segments with an adhesive resin cement, and inten- leading to extraction in 11%–20% of cases (3). tional replantation of teeth after reconstruction. Although several methods have been used to preserve vertically fractured teeth, no Methods: The 3 case reports presented here describe specific treatment modality has been established (4–9).
    [Show full text]
  • Aesthetic Replacement of a Vertically Fractured Anterior Tooth Using the Natural Tooth As a Pontic : a Case Report
    IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences (IOSR-JDMS) e-ISSN: 2279-0853, p-ISSN: 2279-0861.Volume 14, Issue 10 Ver. II (Oct. 2015), PP 04-09 www.iosrjournals.org Aesthetic replacement of a vertically fractured anterior tooth using the natural tooth as a pontic : a Case Report Dr Ankita Gupta1, Dr Sunita Garg2 1,2(Department of Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics , Government Dental College & Hospital, Ahmedabad, Gujarat University, India) Abstract: Teeth with vertical root fractures (VRF) have complete or incomplete fractures that begin in the root and extend toward the occlusal surface. The most common causes of VRFsare trauma, inadequate endodontic treatment, iatrogenic causes, for e.g. excessive canal shaping, excessive restorative procedures, excessive forces of lateral condensation of obturation, etc. Diagnosis is difficult but invariably, treatment is extraction of the tooth/root. The sudden loss of an anterior tooth due to aforementioned reasons can be psychologically and socially damaging to the patient. This paper describes the immediate replacement of an endodontically treatedvertically fractured left central incisor with the natural tooth crown as a ponticusing composite resin. This technique allows the abutment teeth to be conserved with minimal or no preparation, and thus, keeps the technique reversible. Also, it can be completed chair-side, thereby avoiding laboratory costs. Hence, it canbe used as an interimprosthesis to prevent psychological trauma to the patient. Keywords: cone beam computed tomography, natural crown pontic, vertical root fracture, wire-composite splinting, I. Introduction According to the American Association of Endodontists, “A vertical root fracture(VRF) is a longitudinally oriented fracture of the root that originates from the apex and propagates to the coronal part [1].” Vertical root fractures represent about 2 to 5% of crown/root fractures, with the greatest incidence occurring in endodontically treated teeth [2].
    [Show full text]