<<

The and Geochemistry of Cenozoic from the Western

Eric H. Christiansen Department of Geology University of Iowa Iowa City, Iowa 52242

Michael F. Sheridan Donald M. Burt State University Tempe, Arizona 85287

SFEE'It':' FAFE., 205 © 1986 The Geological Society of America, Inc. All rights reserved.

All materials subject to this copyright and included in this volume may be photocopied for the noncommercial purpose of scientific or educational advancement.

Published by The Geological Society of America, Inc. 3300 Penrose Place, P.O. Box 9140, Boulder, 80301

GSA Books Science Editor Campbell Craddock

Printed in U.S.A.

Library ofCongress Cataloging-in-Publication Data

Christiansen, Eric H The geology and geochemistry of Cenozoic topaz rhyolites from the western United States.

(Special paper; 205) Bibliography: p. 1. -West (U.S.) 2. Topaz. 3. Ore­ deposits-West (U.S.) 4. Geology, Stratigraphic­ Crenozoic. 5. Geology-West (U.S.) I. Sheridan, Michael F. II. Burt, Donald M., 1943- . m. Title. IV. Series: Special paper (Geological Society of America); 205. QE462.R4C48 1986 552'.2 86-273 ISBN 0-8137-2205-5 Contents

Acknowledgments v

Abstract I

Introduction ;...... 3

Cenozoic topaz rhyoUtes from the western United States 3 1. Thomas Range, west-central 3 2. Spor Mountain, west-central Utah 10 3. Honeycomb Hills, west-central Utah ...... •...... 13 4. Smelter Knolls, west-central Utah 14 5. Keg Mountain, west-central Utah 15 6. Mountains, western Utah 15 7. Wah Wah Mountains and vicinity, southwestern Utah and southeastern Nevada 17 8. Wilson Creek Range, southeastern Nevada 19 9. Kane Springs Wash, southeastern Nevada...... 19 Topaz rhyolites in the eastern Great Basin: A summary 21 10. Cortez Mountains, north-central Nevada 21 11. Sheep Creek Range, north-central Nevada 23 12. Jarbidge, northern Nevada '" 24 13. Blackfoot field, southeastern 25 14. Elkhorn Mountains, western Montana 26 15. Little Belt Mountains, central Montana 27 16. , north- 29 17. Chalk Mountain, central Colorado 30 18. Nathrop, central Colorado 31 19. Cliff-Rosita, central Colorado 32 20. , central Colorado 34 21. Boston Peak, central Colorado...... 35 22. Lake City, southwestern Colorado 36 Topaz rhyolites in Colorado: A summary 37 23. East Grants Ridge, west-central New Mexico ....•...... 37 24. Black Range, southwestern New Mexico 39 25. Saddle Mountain, eastern Arizona 41 26. Burro Creek, western Arizona 41

Other "topaz rhyolite" occurrences 42 Other Cenozoic occurrences, western United States 42 Mexican topaz rhyolites '...... 42 Precambrian topaz rhyolites -...... 42

iii iv Contents

Principal characteristics of topaz rhyolites 43 Distribution and ages ...... •...... 43 Mode of emplacement 44 Mineralogy 46 Fe-Ti oxides and 46 Feldspar 47 silicates 48 Geochemistry and differentiation trends 50 Isotopic composition 59 -tectonic setting 59 Ore deposits 61 Beryllium 61 Climax-type molybdenum deposits 62 Tin ' 63 Uranium 64 64

Comparison with other types ofrhyolitic rocks 64 Calc-alkaline rhyolites 64 Peralkaline rhyolites 66 Aluminous bimodal rhyolites 67 Ongonites 67

Petrogenetic modelfor topaz rhyolites 69

References cited 74 Acknowledgments

. This work was partially supported by U.S. DOE Subcontract #79-270-E from Bendix Field Engineering Corporation. Additional support was provided by Arizona· State Univer­ sity, the University of Iowa, the U.S. Geological Survey, and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (grant NAGW-537). A large number of people have helped with the new analytical work presented in this report. They include D. McRoberts, M. Druecker, J. Edie, J. V. Bikun, B. Correa, K. Evans, A. Yates, R. Satkin, K. Hon, D. Lambert, C. E. Hedge, K. Futa, A. Bartel, D. R. Shawe, J. S. Stuckless, L. Jones, R. T. Wilson, W. Rehrig, G. Goles, and G. Pine. The technical reviews by W. Nash and W. Hildreth, and editorial assistance of C. Craddock and L. Gregonis are greatly appreciated. We are also indebted to the authors of many of the articles cited herein for helpful discussions and for recording the presence of topaz in the rhyolites they have studied.

v

Geological Society of America Special Paper 205 1986

The Geology and Geochemistry ofCenozoic Topaz Rhyolites from the Western United States

ABSTRACT

High-silica, topaz-bearing rhyolites of Cenozoic age are widely distributed across the western United States and Mexico. Topaz rhyolites are characteristically enriched in fluorine (>0.2 wt%) and contain topaz crystallized during post-magmatic vapor-phase alteration. In the United States, their ages span much of the Cenozoic Era (50 to 0.06 Ma). Their emplacement followed or was contemporaneous with calc-alkaline and ba­ saltic magmatism in the , along the , and in Montana, and coincided with episodes of extensional tectonism in these regions. Nearly all topaz rhyolites extruded as small, endogenous lava domes with or with­ out lava flows; no topaz-bearing ash-flow tuffs have yet been identified with certainty in the western United States. Most domes are underlain by a precursory blanket of non­ welded tephra. A few are small, shallowly emplaced intrusive plugs. Volumes of rock «1 to 100 km3) in individual complexes composed of 1 to many separate extrusions suggest that the were erupted from small to medium sized magma bodies. In addition to topaz, these rhyolites also contain , bixbyite, , hematite, and fluorite in cavities or in their devitrified groundmasses. All ofthese phases may form during vapor-phase crystallization. Magmatic phenocrysts include sanidine (ca. Orso), , sodic plagioclase (usually oligoclase), and F- and Fe-rich biotite in order of usual abundance. Fe-rich hornblende or clinopyroxene occur in a few lavas. Common magmatic accessory include , , , apatite, allan­ ite, and fluorite. Titanite and REE-rich phosphates have been identified in a few lavas. The rhyolites crystallized over a wide temperature interval (850 to 600°C, with most at the lower end of this range) and at variable oxygen fugacities. Titanite-bearing lavas crystallized above the NNO buffer under oxidizing conditions. Most others appear to have crystallized near the QFM oxygen buffer. For individual complexes, temperatures correlate negatively with F-content. All topaz rhyolites are high-SiOz rhyolites with elevated F, Na, K, Fe/Mg and low Ti, Mg, Ca, and P. Samples with F concentrations of about 1% have notably lower Si and higher AI and Na than other topaz rhyolite glasses. Most glasses from topaz rhyo­ lites are metaluminous, but many appear to be slightly peraluminous. Fluorine concen­ trations in glasses range from slightly less than 0.2 to more than 1.0 wt%, and F/ Cl ratios are high (3 to 10) compared to F-rich peralkaline glasses «3). Topaz rhyolites are characteristically enriched in incompatible lithophile elements (Rb, U, Th, Ta, Nb, Y, Be, Li, and Cs). Elements compatible in feldspars (Sr, Eu, Ba), ferromagnesian minerals (Ti, . Co, Ni, Cr), and zircon (Zr, Hi) are depleted. The REE patterns ofmost topaz rhyolites are almost flat (La/YbN = 1 to 3) and have pronounced negative Eu anomalies (Eu/Eu* = 0.01 to 0.02). Both of these parameters decrease with differentiation as indicated by increasing F, U, Cs, and other incompatible elements. Titanite-bearing rhyolites have prominent middle REE depletions. Initial Sr-isotope ratios range from 0.705 to over 0.710. Geochemical trends at individual complexes are interpreted as arising from frac­ tional crystallization of an initially more "mafic" rhyolite with about 0.2% fluorine. Extensive fractionation of sanidine, quartz, plagioclase, biotite, and Fe-Ti oxides (in

1 2 Christiansen, Sheridan, and Burt

proportions consistent with their modes) produced much ofthe trace element patterns. Zircon, apatite, and a REE-rich phase (allanite, monazite, or titanite) were minor but important fractionating phases. No liquid-state fractionation is required to explain the geochemical trends. The high F content and FICI ratios oftopaz rhyolite melts may have modified phase relations so as to produce Na and AI enrichments for highly evolved . Topaz rhyolites are intimately related to economic deposits of lithophile elements (i.e. Be, U, F, Li, and Sn). The volcanic rocks were probably ore- and, in some cases, fluid-sources for these mineral deposits. In their age, tectonic setting, mineralogy, chem­ istry, and style ofemplacement, topaz rhyolites bear resemblance to the rhyolitic stocks associated with Climax-type Mo deposits, and some may be surface manifestations of such deposits. In their chemical composition and mineralogy, topaz rhyolites are distinct from both peralkaline rhyolites and calc-alkaline rhyolites with which they may be spatially and temporally associated. Some of the compositional differences between topaz rhyolites and peralkaline rhyolites may be attributed to the relative effects of F and CI, on melt structure and phase relationships in their parental magmas. The F/CI ratios ofthe melt or its source may determine the alumina saturation ofthe magma series. Topaz rhyolites are distinguishable from calc-alkaline rhyolites by lower Sr, Ba, and Eu, and higher F, Rb, U; and Th. The usually low La/Yb ratios of topaz rhyolites distinguish them from both peralkaline and calc-alkaline rhyolite suites. Topaz rhyolites are similar to other aluminous rhyolites erupted in bimodal associations with in the western United States. They may be the equivalent ofthe topaz-bearing ongonites of central Asia. Topaz rhyolites from the western United States are not the eruptive equivalents of S-type granites; we liken them to the highly evolved, non~peralkaline,and F-rich anoro­ genic grnnites. Topaz rhyolites appear to have evolved from partial melts of a residual felsic granulite source in the lower or middle crust of the Precambrian continent. Ac­ cording to the proposed model, the passage ofcontemporaneous mafic magmas through the crust produced necessarily small volumes ofpartial melts as a result ofthe decompo­ sition of small amounts of F.;rich biotite that persisted in a high-grade metamorphic protolith. An extensional tectonic setting allowed these small batches of magma to rise without substantial mixing with contemporaneous mafic magmas. Subsequent fractiona­ tion led to their extreme trace element characteristics. Topaz Rhyolites 3

INTRODUCTION rhyolites; 2) their petrography and mineralogy; 3) the major­ element, trace-element, and isotopic composition of the lavas; 4) For decades petrologists have been concerned with the role the nature of ore deposits associated with them; and 5) where of volatiles (principally HzO, cOz, sOz, HzS, BZ03, HCI, and possible, the -tectonic setting as revealed by contempo­ HF) in the genesis and evolution of igneous rocks. Even in fluid­ raneous magmatism and tectonism. undersaturated magmas, volatiles playa key role in determining Many of the data on mineralogy, elemental and isotopic the physical properties, crystallization histories, and emplacement composition, and mineralization are summarized in the figures mechanisms of magmas. Studies of their role can be pursued and tables in the last part of the report. The reader is referred to through theoretical, experimental, and analytical methods. Rhyo­ these summaries in the descriptions of each occurrence. Volcanic . lites that contain topaz (AlzSi04FZ) appear to form a distinctive rock classification in this report follows that of the lUGS and is group of silicic lavas with high fluorine concentrations. The oc­ based on KzO plus NazO and SiOz concentrations (TAS dia­ currence of fluorine-rich volcanic rocks provides the opportunity gram; LeMaitre 1984). Where informative, in parentheses we to examine the effect of fluorine on the mineralogy, geochemical have also included the original rock name used by the authors. evolution, and physical nature of natural rhyolitic magmas. The intent of this report is to document these geologic and petrologic 1. Thomas Range, west-central Utah characteristics as a basis for ongoing efforts to determine the origin and evolution of fluorine-rich silicic magmas (e.g., Christ­ The best-known topaz rhyolites are those from the Thomas iansen et al. 1983a; Ruiz et al. 1985; Kovalenko and Kovalenko Range in west-central Utah (Figure 2). The occurrence of topaz 1984; Pichavant and Manning 1984; Dingwell et al. 1985) and to in rhyolitic lavas from the Thomas Range has been known for determine the nature of the ore deposits associated with them more than a century (Simpson 1876: 325-326). Because of the (e.g., Burt et al. 1982; Burt and Sheridan 1981). occurrence of topaz in the lavas and the presence of U, Be, and F The occurrence oftopaz lining vugs and cavities in rhyolitic deposits in the vicinity, these rhyolites have received considerable lavas from Colorado and Utah was first reported in the nine­ attention in the literature. The most recent comprehensive study teenth century (Smith 1883; Simpson 1876). More recent investi­ of the area is that by Lindsey (1979, 1982). Turley and Nash gations, summarized here, have shown that topaz-bearing lavas (1980), Bikun (1980), and Christiansen et al. (1984) have exam­ are widespread in the western United States and that they contain ined the petrology of the lavas. other minerals uncommon in silicic volcanic rocks (e.g., , The Thomas Range consists of a group of coalesced lava gamet, pseudobrookite, and bixbyite) that reflect the unique flows and domes that were erupted from at least 12 separate vents chemistry and origin of these rhyolites. The lavas also contain 6 to 7 Ma (Lindsey 1979). Eruptive episodes, as described by unusually high concentrations of incompatible lithophile ele­ Bikun (1980), commenced with the emplacement of a series of m.ents (e.g., Be, Li, U, Th, Sn, Ta, Rb) and fluorine. Information pyroclastic flows, minor air-fall sheets, and pyroclastic surge about these distinctive rocks is scattered in the literature on the units, and were terminated by the effusion of rhyolite lavas. geology of the western United States. Welded ash-flows occur within the tuffs, but more commonly the During a study of uranium mineralization associated with ignimbrite units are thin (3 to 4 m) and unwelded. Fused tuffs fluorine-rich volcanic rocks (Burt et al. 1980), it became obvious (Christiansen and Lipman 1966) 1 to 2 m thick occur in the that topaz rhyolites are surprisingly similar to one another in their tephra immediately below some lava flows. Flow , con­ mode of emplacement, mineralogy, major and trace element sisting mostly of vitrophyre blocks up to 2 m in diameter, are chemistry, and tectonic setting. These features are summarized usually found at the base of the lavas. The grades upward here. into flow-banded rhyolite, commonly with numerous lithophy­ sae. The volume of rhyolitic eruptives in the Thomas Range is CENOZOIC TOPAZ RHYOLITES FROM THE about 50 km3. WESTERN UNITED STATES Rhyolites from the Thomas Range (the Topaz Mountain The distribution of Cenozoic topaz rhyolites in the western Rhyolite; Lindsey 1982) contain up to 20% phenocrysts, but most United States is shown in Figure 1 where the occurrences are samples are crystal-poor felsites or . (The mineralogy of numbered in their order of discussion (generally clockwise the rhyolites is summarized in Tables 8 and 9). Sanidine (Or4s to around the , starting in west-central Utah). We Or6S), quartz and plagioclase (AnlO to Anzs) occur in almost all have visited most of the localities described in this report (all samples. Biotite of variable Fe/Mg occurs in most (Figures 31 Utah occurrences; Sheep Creek Range, Jarbidge, and Kane and 32), whereas - gamet, ferro-augite, and Springs Wash, Nevada; Burro Creek, Arizona; both New Mexico Fe-rich hornblende occur as magmatic minerals in a few samples. occurrences; Nathrop, Chalk Mountain, and Tomichi Dome, Accessory minerals include zircon, fluorite, allanite, Fe-Ti oxides, Colorado; Blackfoot lava field, Idaho; and the Elkhorn Moun­ and, in at least one instance, fluorine-bearing titanite (Turley and tains, Montana). Complete results of our new findings are pre­ Nash 1980; Christiansen et al. 1984). Fe-Ti oxide and two­ sented here. For each locality, we have summarized pertinent feldspar geothermometry indicate that the Topaz Mountain information about 1) the geologic setting and emplacement ofthe Rhyolite crystallized at temperatures between 630 and 790°C at 4 Christiansen, Sheridan, and Burt

r-·-· .. ~--._.-.-. \ ----.--­. \ \ \ 15 . \ ~ '. - ~ ...... -'' ..... ' ", ..... 14 • 0" , , . °t ••••••••: ',:- I : I o '0.······ . ••.....•. 0 : I 12 " .. "" d' .. , ....•. o 11 I ! : , : ", i~ .. I .1 , 1 16 .I 10 3. ~. 5 c"\: ,' . r. ·17 : 2 4 21 . \ '\ I/ 18 \ ''\. J 8' t '.. ·6 20 " ".,..~~./ ,'. . 19 " . 22 ., . \ ...... , .. , . .. , ...... \ , \ ..... ~" o ) .: ·23 " ~,..... ­ 26

o 24 ·25 : "-. ,: .. .. : """ _._._.J.- .-:"'...... 0 \ 0 '0 '...... 0

Figure 1. Locations of known Cenozoic topaz rhyolites in the western United States, The numbers refer to the localities listed below and described in the text. Open circles without numbers show locations of some of the peralkaline rhyolites that are approximately contempciraneons with the topaz rhyolites (Noble and Parker 1974). Also shown are several approximations of the western edge of the Precam­ brian craton in the western United States. The solid line represents the outcrop limit of Precambrian rocks (King 1977), the dashed line represents the edge of the craton inferred from Sr-isotope composi­ tion ofMesozoic granitoids (Kistler et al. 1981; Armstrong et al. 1977), and the dash-dot line as inferred by Nd-isotope composition of Mesozoic and Cenozoic granitoids (epsilon Nd = -7; Farmer and DePaolo 1983, 1984). 1. Thomas Range, Utah 10. Cortez, Nevada 20. Tomichi Dome, Colorado 2. Spor Mountain, Utah 11. Sheep Creek Range, Nevada 21. Boston Peak, Colorado 3. Honeycomb Hills, Utah 12. Jarbidge, Nevada 22. Lake City, Colorado 4. Smelter Knolls, Utah 13. Blackfoot lava field, Idaho 23. Grants Ridge, New Mexico 5. Keg Mountains, Utah 14. Elkhorn Mtns, Montana 24. Black Range, New Mexico 6, MineralMountains, Utah 15. Little Belt Mtns, Montana 25. Saddle Mountain, Arizona 7. Wah Wah Mountains, Utah 16. Specimen Mtn, Colorado 26. Burro Creek, Arizona 8. Wilson Creek Range, Nevada 17. Chalk Mountain, Colorado 9. Kane Springs Wash, Nevada 18. Nathrop, Colorado 19. Silver Cliff, Colorado Topaz Rhyolites 5

LEGEND D Quaternary alluvium Topaz Mtn Rhyolite (6 Ma) Spor Mtn Formation (21 Ma) G Older volcanic rocks (30-42 Ma) ~ Sedimentary rocks

Location in Utah

o 3km IIII Scale

Figure 2. Generalized geologic map of the southern part of the Thomas Range, Utah (after Lindsey 1979; Christiansen et al. 1984a). Both the Spor Mountain Formation and the Topaz Mountain Rhyolite contain topaz in rhyolitic lavas. Numbers indicate samples analyzed by Christiansen et aI. (1984). ! -I

fairly low oxygen fugacities (QFM; Figure 30; Turley and Nash radiogenic, which is consistent with a crustal origin for the paren­ 1980; Christiansen et al. 1980). Topaz occurs in lithophysal cavi­ tal magmas. ties and in the devitrified groundmass of many lava flows. No Christiansen et al. (1984) presented a quantitative model for magmatic topaz (e.g., in glass) has been identified. Other vapor­ the geochemical evolution of these lavas based on the fractiona­ phase minerals in lavas from the Thomas Range include quartz, tion of observed phenocrysts from rhyolitic magmas. Major and alkali feldspar, beryl, bixbyite, pseudobrookite, hematite, spessar­ trace element geochemistry demand an interpretation that in­ tine garnet, and cassiterite. volves about 70% crystallization of the most mafic rhyolite ana­ The average compositions of samples from the Thomas lyzed to produce the most evolved rhyolite, even though the Si02 Range are given in Table 1. The compositions of felsites and content increases by only 2.5% across the series. Both major­ vitrophyres are similar but felsites have higher KINa ratios than element mass-balance calculations and Rayleigh fractionation their corresponding vitrophyres. The analyses show high Si, K, models, using the distribution coefficients of Hildreth (1977) and and Na and low Ti, Mg, Ca, and P typical. of topaz rhyolites. Crecraft et al. (1981), suggested that fractionation of sanidine (45 Fluorine ranges from 0.2 to 0.5% in vitrophyres. Most of the lavas to 50%), quartz (30%), plagioclase (15 to 20%), biotite (3%), and are -normative if calculated on a fluorine-free basis. The Fe-Ti oxides (1 %) were the principal fractionating phases. In trace element geochemistry of the lavas is typical of topaz rhyo­ addition, the observed changes in trace elements (La, Hf, Zr, and lites with generally high and covarying concentrations of U:, Th, Lu) led to estimates of 0.04% each of allanite and zircon in the Rb, Li, Be, and Ta (Table 2 and Figure 3). The rare earth element removed mineral phases. The observed P depletion implies that (REB) distributions in the vitrophyres are similar to other topaz 0.06% of the cumulate mineral assemblage was apatite. Minor rhyolites with relatively large negative Eu-anomalies and heavy discrepancies for Y, Nb, Ta, and Th could be explained by the RBB (HRBB) enrichments that are correlated with F content and fractionation of extremely small quantities of REB-rich phos­ other chemical indexes of differentiation (REB patterns are illus­ phates (not yet observed in the vitrophyres) and titanite. trated in Figure 40a). Light REE (LREE) abundances decline Crystallization near the minimum in the simple ternary gran­ with increasing evolution. Sr-isotope ratios (0.707 to 0.712; ite system should produce differentiates whose major element Table 3) show that the Thomas Range lavas are moderately chemistry is not dramatically different from their parent magmas. 6 Christiansen, Sheridan, and Burt

TABLE 1. MAJOR ELEMENT COMPOSITION OF TOPAZ RHYOLITES FROM THE WESTERN UNITED STATES (IN WEIGHT %)

Honeycomb Thomas Range Spor Mountain Hills 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ave. S.D. ave. S.D. ave. S.D. ave. S.D. ave. S.D. ave.

Si02 75.9 0.33 76.28 1.14 76.6 0.22 76.46 1. 03 74.2 0.82 73.66 63.6 75.0 Ti02 0.10 0.03 0.17 0.04 0.10 0.01 0.13 0.04 0.05 0.01 0.03 tr. 0.04 A1203 12.7 0.17 12.42 0.21 12.4 0.21 12.53 1. 09 13.5 0.48 14.34 11.1 13.6 Fe203 1. 07* 0.19 0.47 0.33 0.82 0.09 0.91 0.37 1. 29* 0.24 0.34 0.25 0.98* FeO ------0.46 0.28 0.29 0.07 0.24 0.12 ------1. 90 0.43 ---- MnO 0.06 0.01 0.04 0.00 0.05 0.01 0.04 0.01 0.06 0.02 0.07 0.03 0.06 MgO 0.14 0.07 0.08 0.00 0.16 0.08 0.18 0.11 0.11 0.06 0.13 0.05 0.07 CaO 0.80 0.42 0.77 0.07 0.85 0.08 0.96 0.35 0.61 0.10 0.34 11.1 0.62 Na20 3.78 0.27 3.48 0.19 3.33 0.19 3.34 0.41 3.95 0.56 3.86 3.64 4.60 K20 4.92 0.27 4.95 0.49 5.10 0.11 4.91 0.38 4.86 0.52 4.76 4.00 4.46 P205 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 F 0.28 0.08 0.21 0.04 0.29 ---- 0.29 ---- 1.14 0.35 0.77 8.00 0.95 Cl ------0.06 0.01 ------0.14 ------0.01 0.07

1. Average of 11 rhyolites (Christiansen et al. 1984). 6. Rhyolitic lava (Staatz and Carr 1964). 2. Average of 4 rhyolite lavas (Turley and Nash 1980). 7. Low-silica phase of Honeycomb Hills rhyolite 3. Average of 3 analyses representing 5 rhyolites (Turley and Nash 1980). (Shawe 1966). 8. Average of 2 rhyolite lavas (Christiansen et 4. Average of 7 rhyolite lavas (Staatz and Carr 1964). al 1980). 5. Average of 11 rhyolites (Christiansen et al. 1984).

TABLE 1. (CONTINUED)

Wilson Kane Sheep Smelter Mineral Creek Springs Creek Knolls Mountains Wah Wah vicinity Range Wash Range Jarbidge 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 ave. S.D. ave. S.D. ave. S.D. ave. S.D. ave. S.D.

Si02 75.84 loll 76.5 0.29 76.1 1. 05 76.2 0.90 75.4 0.50 76.7 77.6 75.3 Ti02 0.04 0.01 0.08 0.02 0.07 0.04 0.08 0.02 0.04 0.02 <0.2 0.12 0.16 A1203 12.56 0.39 12.7 0.11 12.7 0.29 12.3 0.70 13.2 0.22 13.2 12.5 12.9 Fe203 0.12 0.09 0.35 0.16 1.13* 0.19 1.16* 0.27 1.28* 0.19 0.89* 1.56* 1. 60* FeO 0.99 0.09 0.28 0.11 ------MnO 0.04 0.01 0.08 0.02 0.08 0.03 0.09 0.02 0.04 0.01 ---- 0.04 0.02 MgO 0.08 0.04 0.16 0.12 0.10 0.04 0.09 0.06 0.04 0.02 0.12 0.09 0.20 CaO 0.96 0.61 0.45 0.04 0.52 0.18 0.74 0.35 0.43 0.15 0.42 0.52 0.34 Na20 3.79 0.20 4.30 0.16 3.90 0.56 3.76 0.25 4.75 0.12 3.84 3.00 4.32 K20 4.77 0.-08 4.77 0.14 4.83 0.26 4.53 0.60 4.70 0.15 4.60 5.20 5.44 P205 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.01 ------<0.05 0.02 ---- F 0.72 0.07 0.41 ---- 0.32 ---- 0.42 ------0.49 0.28 ---- Cl 0.10 0.03 ------0.12 ------0.05 ------

9. Average of 4 rhyolites (Turley and Nash 1980). 13. Average of 5 rhyolite lavas (Barrott 1984; 10. Average of 5 rhyolites from domes (Evans and written communication 1985). Nash 1978). 14. Kane Spring Wash topaz rhyolite (Novak 1984). 11. Average of 7 early Miocene rhyolites 15. Rhyolite lava (Christiansen et al. 1980). (Christiansen 1980; Best et al. 1981). 16. Rhyolite lava (Christiansen, unpublished 12. Average of 8 Pliocene rhyolites (Christiansen analysis.) 1980; Best et al. 1981). Topaz Rhyolites 7

TABLE 1. (CONTINUED)

Elkhorn Specimen Chalk China Cap Mountains Little Belt Mtns. Mountain Mountain Nathrop 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 ave. S.D. ave. S.D. ave. S.D.

Si02 76.4 0.53 77.3 1.4 74.7 76.2 76.51 77.0 0.81 74.94 75.3 75.8 76.6 77.5 Ti02 0.12 0.016 0.07 0.0 0.08 0.02 0.03 0.06 0.11 ---- 0.09 0.08 0.08 0.07 A1203 12.9 0.42 13.63 1.2 14.5 13.7 13.81 12.6 0.55 14.82 13.1' 12.7 12.9 12.5

Fe203 0.46 0.133 1. 00 0.45 0.51 0.23 0.43* 0.97 0.38 0.56* 0.64* 0.76* 0.40 0.35 FeO 0.42 0.125 0.49 0.16 0.27 0.20 ---- 0.30 0.10 ------0.23 0.25 MnO 0.06 0.003 0.14 0.19 0.25 0.25 ------0.18 0.10 0.06 0.01 0.07

MgO 0.2 ---- 0.03 0.04 0.06 0.10 0.03 0.05 0.03 0.37 0.22 0.05 0.05 0.04 CaO 0.52 0.048 0.34 0.29 loll 0.50 0.29 0.42 0.37 0.84 0.61 0.41 0.43 0.43 Na20 4.21 0.118 3.59 0.42 3.50 4.55 4.61 4.04 0.42 4.00 4.26 4.35 4.20 4.5

K20 4.50 0.105 4.70 0.66 5.00 4.24 4.14 4.55 0.35 4.56 4.97 4.54 4.70 4.4 P205 0.01 ---- 0.01 0.01 0.03 0.00 0.01 ------0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 F 0.45 0.073 ------0.34 ------0.55 ---- 0.21 ---- Cl 0.04 0.001 ------

17. Average of 6 analyses (Dayvault et al 1984). 23. "Effusive" rhyolite (Cross 1886). 18. Average of 3 rhyolite lavas (Smedes 1966). 24. Rhyolite vitrophyre (Christiansen et al. 1980). 19. Rhyolite sill at Yogo Peak (Pirsson 1900). 25. Devitrified rhyolite (Christiansen et al. 1980). 20. Rhyolite stock at Granite Mountain (Witkind 1973). 26. Average of 2 vitrophyres (Van Alstine 1969). 21. Rhyolite stock at Granite Mountain (Rupp 1980). 27. Devitrified groundmass of rhyolite (Carmichael 22. Average of 4 rhyolitic lavas (Wahlstrom 1944). 1963) .

TABLE 1. (CONTINUED)

Tomichi Boston Lake Grants Black Silver Cliff Dome Peak City Ridge Range 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 ave. S.D. ave. S.D. ave. S.D. ave. S.D. ave. S.D.

Si02 77.0 75.7 75.9 0.37 75.6 0.32 76.2 0.13 76.2 1.22 74.7 77.7 0.88 Ti02 0.06 ---- 0.08 0.05 0.08 0.006 0.07 0.01 0.19 0.09 ' 0.07 0.18 0.02 A1203 13.0 13.9 13.6 0.35 13.6 0.25 13.4 0.22 13.8 0.72 13.7 12.0 0.81

Fe203 0.78 0.70 0.44 0.27 1. 61 0.26 1.00* 0.08 1. 29* 0.43 0.87 1.18* 0.07 FeO 0.15 0.30 0.27 0.06 0.14 0.04 ------0.48 ------MnO 0.14 0.17 0.20 0.04 ------0.12 0.03 0.09 0.02 0.06 0.06 0.01

MgO 0.i4 0.15 0.10 0.07 0.13 0.09 0.06 0.04 ------0.37 0.07 0.06 CaO 0.22 0.78 0.65 0.12 0.34 0.05 0.38 0.10 0.78 0.60 0.30 0.53 0.19 Na20 3.96 3.99 3.45 0.51 4.05 0.39 4.15 0.26 2.34 0.99 4.96 3.30 0.17

K20 4.10 4.30 5.14 0.69 4.38 0.04 4.53 0.10 4.85 0.25 4.50 4.67 0.07 P205 0.02 ---- 0.04 0.02 0.06 0.06 0.02 0.005 0.05 0.03 0.01 0.03 0.01 F 0.18 ---- 0.14 0.06 0.14 0.05 0.52 ---- 0.10 0.05 ---- 0.38 ---- Cl ------,

Burro Topaz 28. Average of 2 rhyolites (Phair and Jenkins 1975) • Creek Rhyoli te 29. "Pitchstone" (Cross 1896) • 36 37 30. Average of 5 rhyolite glasses (Mutshler et a1. 1985) • ave. S:D. 31. Average of 3 rhyolites (Ernst 1980) • 32. Average of 6 rhyolites (Ernst 1980) • 33. Average of 21 rhyolites (Ernst 1981) • 34. Average of rhyolite pumice and glassy lava and (Baker Si02 75.6 0.42 76.0 and Ridley 1970) • Ti02 0.04 0.01 0.06 35. Average of 3 rhyolitic lavas (Correa 1980) • A1203 12.7 0.16 13.0 36. Average of 9 rhyolite vitrophyres (Moyer 1982) • 37. Modal values of histograms in Figure 35. Fe203 0.79* 0.12 1. 0* FeO ------Note: All analyses recalculated H20 and CO2 free. Fluorine and MnO 0.09 0.02 0.06 chlorine concentrations only reported for vitrophyres.

MgO 0.09 0.06 0.06 * FeTotal reported as Fe203. CaO 0.71 0.12 0.60 Na20 4.25 0.32 4.00 ---- Not reported.

K20 4.47 0.37 4.80 S.D. - 1 standard deviation reported for averages of more than P205 0.01 0.01 0.01 two samples. F 0.18 0.03 0.30 Cl 0.04 0.01 ---- 8 Christiansen, Sheridan, and Burt

TABLE 2. TRACE ELEMENT COMPOSITION (IN PPM) OF TOPAZ RHYOLITES FROM THE WESTERN UNITED STATES

Wilson Thomas Spor Honeycomb Smelter Mineral Wah Wah Creek Range Mountain Hills Knolls Mtns Mountains Range Cortez 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14

Li 50 37 80 336 201 134 590 245 115 65 Rb 423 369 1010 602 1051 1400 1025 441 333 634 564 617 665 Cs 11.3 56 24.4 19.6 21.3 50 21

Be 6.5 10 63 16* 11 13 6 28 13 9 Sr 28 22 6 27* 200 15 12 30 5 nd 11 71* 14 32 Ba 41 63* nd nd 2 nd 156 19 Cr 2.0 3.4 3.2 2.6 3.2 1.7 13 Co nd 0.4 0.3 11.1 Cu Ga 34 48 53* 80 65 25 45 50

Sc 2.0 2.6 3.7 3.9 2.4 1.1 1.4 Y 58 49 116 85* 120 105 42 90 175 18 74 214* 134 75 Zr 129 126 110 97* 50 90 46 60 110 87 140 151* 172 95 ------~------Nb 53 64 109 122* 50 80 145 45 52 40 92 125* 90 40 Mo 24 3.4 3.8 14 Sn 30 25 65 12

Hf 5.5 6.7 5.5 6.1 7.6 8..1 Ta 5.6 26 7.7 16.3 Pb 31 56* 40 30 70 50 42 37 50

Th 54.8 49 67 61. 8 26.8 30.4 26 57.4 37 59 47.3 U 21.6 11 37.1 12.4 151 16.7 22 15.0 20.4 11. 7

F 4150 2025 10000 79700 19000 7200 4100 4600 Cl 631 1370 75 80 957 1230

1. Average of 5 rhyolite vitrophyres (Christiansen 7. Pegmatitic inclusion (Christiansen et al. 1980). et a1. 1984). 8. Rhyolite vitrophyre (Christiansen et al. 1980). 2. Average rhyolite (Turley and Nash 1980). 9. Average vitrophyre (Turley and Nash 1980). 3. Average of 3 rhyolite vitrophyres (Christiansen 10. Average dome-related (Evans and Nash 1978). et a1. 1984). 11. Average rhyolite vitrophyre (Christiansen et al. 4. Average devitrified rhyolite. Analyses with * 1980; Christiansen 1980). are semi-quantitative emission spectrometry 12. Average rhyolite. Analyses with * are semi­ analyses (Lindsey 1979). quantitative (Keith 1980). 5. Low-silica phase of Honeycomb Hills rhyolite 13. Average of 5 rhyolite lavas (Barrott 1984). (Turley and Nash 1980). 14. Average of 2 devitrified rhyolites. 6. Rhyolite (Turley and Nash 1980).

SM-29-206 Cs 4 U Be SM-61a Lu 3 Li Vb Ta Figure 3. Enrichment factor diagram showing evolutionary trends in the Rb Tb" Th rhyolites of the Thomas Range, Utah, (thick line) derived by comparing 2 Mn an incompatible element-poor and an incompatible element-rich speci­ men. The samples are from lavas presumed to be cogenetic. Enrichment factors for the Bishop (Hildreth 1979) are shown with thin lines and 1 are similar in magnitude and direction (except for Sc and Sm) to those for these rhyolite lavas.

Fe Hf 0.5 " Nd Ce Mg La p Tl Co 0.1 Sr Eu Topaz Rhyolites 9

TABLE 2. (CONTINUED)

Sheep Little Creek China Belt Silver Tomichi Boston Black Burro Range Jarbidge Cap Mtns. Nathrop Cliff Dome Peak Lake City Grants Ridge Range Creek 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Li 96.5 177 96 16 107 167 75 185 160 23 100 Rb 380 275 493 304 176 289 580 378 680 348 451 Cs 7.7 9.3

B 14.6 Be 12.8 10 6 12* 19 6 7 Sr 40 42 <12 7.5 1.3 11 23 7.5 126 5 5

Ba <22 15.6' 1 36 93 63 600 29 Cr 11 2.7 Co 0.1 0.42 Cu 2 Ga 55 43 Sc 1.7 Y 110 176 13 34 105 121 Zr 154 286 125 75 101 169 192 14 Zn 25 Nb 43 46 83 53 35 96 36* 39 Mo <10 1. 98 5 1 Sn 13 1. 90 6 16 25 10 Hg <0.5 Hf 4.4 7.8 Ta 5.1 3.3 Pb 35 60 43 33 47* 21 Th 50 50 49 34.0 59 32.4 U 24 15.3 16.2 5.9 5.4 13 40 8.2 8.1 12.9

F 2800 4450 3375 1700 1350 1399 2954 100 1000 5200 3800 3800 1845 Cl 377 397

15. Devitrified rhyolite (Christiansen 23. Average of devitrified rhyolites except U and Th et al. 1980; and unpublished data). concentrations from 3 marginal vitrophyres 16. Average rhyolite (Christiansen unpublished (Steven et al.1977). Zielinski (1978) reports data). U (40, 26, 43, and 41 ppm). Analyses with * 17. Average rhyolite (Dayvault et al. 1984). are semi-quantitative. 18. Rhyolite (Rupp 1980). 24. Average of 21 rhyolites (Ernst 1981). 19. Obsidian (Zielinski et al. 1977; and 25. Vitrophyre. (Christiansen unpublished data). Christiansen unpublished data). Christiansen Zielinski (1978) reported the U concentrations. et a1. (1980) report U (16 ppm) and Th (33 ppm). 26. Devitrified rhyolite (Christiansen unpublished 20. Average of 3 hydrated rhyolite glasses data) • Mutschler et al. in press) • 27. Vitrophyre (Correa 1980; Christiansen unpublished 21. Average of 3 rhyolites (Ernst 1980). data) • 22. Average of 6 rhyolites (Ernst 1980). 28. Average rhyolite vitrophyre (Moyer 1982; Burt et al. 1981).

The differentiates would, nonetheless, have widely varying trace The Thomas Range lies in the central portion of the Deep element characteristics. Crystal settling seems to be an unlikely Creek-Tintic mineral belt (Shawe and Stewart 1976; Stewart et mechanism of crystal fractionation; a more plausible method al. 1977b), an east-trending zone of basement highs, Cenozoic would be the fractionation model described by McBirney (1980) volcanic centers and associated mineralization (Figure 4). Like and Huppert and Sparks (1984) that involves wall crystallization, the Pioche mineral belt to the south, it is expressed as a series of the generation of a buoyant evolved liquid, and its consequent aeromagnetic highs. Cenozoic magmatism along the belt (Lindsey upward escape to produce a vertically stratified magma chamber. et al. 1975; Lindsey 1982) began about 42 Ma with the eruption In contrast to the nearby Spor Mountain rhyolites, no eco­ of a calc-alkaline sequence ofintermediate-composition lavas, ash nomic mineralization has been found associated with the younger flows, and small intrusions. (38 to 32 Ma) volcanism Topaz Mountain Rhyolite. Bikun (1980) attributes this lack of in the Thomas Range region was more silicic and is represented mineralization to lower magmatic concentrations of lithophile by several ash-flow tuffs that emanated from collapse . elements and to their retention in the spherulitically-devitrified An 11 m.y.lull in magmatic activity preceded the eruption of the rhyolite lavas ofthe Thomas Range. Spor Mountain Formation, which also contains topaz (see 10 Christiansen, Sheridan, and Burt

TABLE 3. Sr AND Pb ISOTOPIC COMPOSITION OF TOPAZ RHYOLITES FROM THE WESTERN UNITED STATES

Sample No. Rb Sr Age Analystl (ppm) (ppm) Ma

Thomas Range, Utah SM-6lc 184.6 79.34 6.740 0.70938 0.70879 6.3 EHC Sl1-62b 371.8 58.60 18.38 0.71338 0.71174 6.3 EHC SM-29-206 433 2.5 495 0.75141 0.7071 6.3 LJ

Mineral Range, Utah MR-l 188.4 37.47 14.56 0.70616 0.70606 0.5 EHC

Wah Wah Range, Utah WW-6b 381. 4 18.19 60.78 0.71635 0.70599 12.0 EHC WW-9 626 20.2 89.7 0.72752 0.7122 12.0 LJ STC-4 596 10.9 159 0.75485 0.7092 20.2 LJ

Cortez, Nevada DRS-155-62 631. 7 38.38 47.71 0.71810 0.70800 14.9 EHC DRS-149-62 627.2 19.44 93.65 0.72843 0.70862 14.9 EHC

Sheep Creek Range, Nevada IZ-l 358 28 37 0.71577 0.7085 13.8 LJ

Jarbidge, Nevada RT-MC 294 35 24.3 0.71949 0.7142 15.4 LJ TjR-l 178 70 7.36 0.71217 0.7106 15.4 LJ TjR-2 352 16.1 63.5 0.72397 0.7101 15.4 LJ

Nathrop, Colorado NAT-2 318.8 3.24 288 0.83433 0.7141 29.3 EHC 0.7080 30.8

Lake City, Colorado 72L-47K 281 112 7.23 0.7073 0.7054 18.5 PWL

Black Range, New Mexico HC-8 350 3.7 270 0.82203 0.7158 27.7 LJ 0.7108 29.0

Little Belt Mountains, Mont~na 15a 529 8.51 179.9 0.8341 0.7094 48.8 ZP 15b 523 8.91 169.8 0.8269 0.7092 48.8 ZP

Note 1: EHC-Eric H. Christiansen, analyst at USGS, . Rb, Sr, and isotope ratios by mass spectrometry and isotope dilution. LJ -Lois Jones, analyst at Conoco, Ponca City. Rb by XRF; Sr and isotope ratios by mass spectrometry and isotope dilution. ZP -Zell Peterman, analyst at USGS, Denver. Rb, Sr, and isotope ratios by mass spectrometry and isotope dilution (Marvin et al. 1973). PWL-from Lipman et al. (1978a).

Decay constant for Rb=1.42 x 10-11/y •

below). Scattered centers of rhyolitic and basaltic lavas were 2. Spor Mountain, west-central Utah formed after about 10 Ma including the eruption of the Topaz Mountain Rhyolite 6-7 Ma. Although the rhyolites of the The topaz rhyolite exposed around· the margins of Spor Thomas Range were not emplaced in a strictly bimodal volcanic Mountain in west-central Utah is related to the largest commer­ field with contemporaneous mafic and silicic lavas, they are part cial source of beryllium known in North America. The minerali­ of this regional sequence of basalt or basaltic (Figure 5) zation occurs in an altered pyroclastic deposit cogenetic with a 21 and high-silica rhyolite. Mafic lavas with ages of about 6 and 1 Ma rhyolite flow (Lindsey 1982). The most recent studies of the Ma are exposed at Fumarole Butte 23 kIn to the west (Peterson rhyolite and the mineral deposits include those of Lindsey (1977, and Nash 1980; Best et al. 1980). 1982), Bikun (1980), and Christiansen et al. (1984). Topaz Rhyolites 11

NV UT

40° CD c 0 N -CD :J 0 39° ()

CD -c. Ol Cil E 0 38°' "- «CD ,,- ...- Aeromagnetic High

km , o 80 160 Mineral Belts

OU -Oquirrh - U i nt a DT -Deep Creek Tintic P -Pioche 01 -Delamar-Iron Springs

Figure 4. Index map of eastern Nevada and western Utah showing the location of east-trending structural, mineral, igneous, and aeromagnetic lineaments (modified from Rowley et al. 1978b). Note the corresopndence of the locations of topaz rhyolites in Utah (filled circles) with the location of the major lineaments-the Deep Creek-Tintic (DT), the Pioche-Marysvale or Pioche (P), and the Delamar­ Iron Springs (D!) mineral belts of Shawe and Stewart (1976).

Spor Mountain consists of a block of tilted and intricately eruptions commenced with the emplacement ofa series ofignim­ faulted lower and middle Paleozoic sedimentary rocks that are brites, pyroclastic air-fall sheets, and pyroclastic-surge units, and chiefly carbonates (Figure 2). Numerous, relatively small rhyolite were terminated by the extrusion of lavas over the tuff. The tuff plugs, dikes, and breccia pipes have intruded the sequence. The contains lithic inclusions of (altered to fluorite near the pre-volcanic surface was disrupted by northeast-trending ridges top ofthe tuff) and older volcanic rocks that were entrained from and valleys, perhaps formed by faulting (Williams 1963). Post­ the country rock as the pyroclastic material moved through the eruption basin-and-range faulting has further complicated the vent. Locally, the tuff is absent and the lava rests on Paleozoic structure making it difficult to estimate the number of vents in­ sedimentary rocks, but where present the tuff reaches a thickness volved. Lindsey (1979) identified at least three major vents. The of almost 100 m (Williams 1963; drill core information). A 12 Christiansen, Sheridan, and Burt

variation diagrams) and by sanidine rims on sieve-textured calcic .1140' 113° 112° I-!I+------+-----~~-r__40° plagioclase cores (see,for example, Hibbard 1981). The Spor Mountain rhyolite is generally phenocryst-rich (20 10-8 ~ (J to 40%). Major phases include sanidine (Orso to Or60), smoky 6-7)}. ~a quartz, plagioclase (AnlO to An13), and aluminous Fe- and F-rich 4.~ ~ ~ (f)X5.3,6.0 21 ~ :,,, 1.0 biotite (Figures 31 and 32). Magmatic accessories include Fe-Ti c< ~::.. oxides, zircon, fluorite, and allanite. The groundmass of felsitic ~ 3.4 6.1 samples is granophyric, probably as a result of the thickness and z slow cooling of the flow. The groundmass consists of alkali feld­ 110.3 -Delta 0.4 spars, silica minerals, fluorite, topaz, and biotite or hematite. o miles 40 ~ Topaz also occurs in miarolitic cavities that surround the mafic o km 60 .tj{~: , inclusions. Two-feldspar geothermometry indicates the pheno­ ::/12:';, 0.1,0.2 390 crysts in the rhyolite equilibrated at 680°C (Table 4) and the 0.9 "',! - Filmore composition of the biotites suggest equilibration near the QFM 2.3 ··0~0.4 oxygen buffer (log f02 = -18 to -19; Figure 30; Christiansen et 1.0~2.5e : al. 1980). The mafic inclusions contain plagioclase (AnSO-30 _. 0.5 '~" Il Ab4S-600r4-11), augite (Ca37Mg3sFezs), titaniferous magnetite, 0.3 .~.!:" Cove Fort 24. and ilmenite in a quench-textured matrix of needle-like pyroxene. u&~8~SV181e Sanidine rims (Or60Ab34An6) on plagioclase suggest tempera­ 0.5- .8[1'~1.0 20-22~'f::23 7.9 1.1 lQ 12. • tures of 910°C, while co-existing microphenocrysts of Fe-Ti ox­ o .'!i 13 ~ __ ides yield equilibration temperatures of 1100 to 1200°C and f0 7.6 b. 8 : 2 eo '10: 9-11 c;;,;: 23 21.1 5 :':~"., near the QFM buffer.