DOCSLIB.ORG

Stephen Brown Kidd Mcintyre Evidence

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Stephen Brown Kidd Mcintyre Evidence BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH (ENV-2012-CHC-138, 139) IN THE MATTER OF Appeals under sections 120 and 121 of the Act BETWEEN D R MCINTYRE AND WAITAKI TRUSTEES (GOLDEN ACRES LIMITED) Appellant (ENV-2011-CHC-138) AND BETWEEN C E F KIDD AND G W KIDD Appellant (ENV-2011-CHC-139 AND CANTERBURY REGIONAL COUNCIL Respondent EVIDENCE IN CHIEF OF STEPHEN KENNETH BROWN ON BEHALF OF THE ROYAL FOREST AND BIRD PROTECTION SOCIETY OF NEW ZEALAND INCORPORATED AND THE MACKENZIE GUARDIANS INCORPORATED 22 December 2017 Royal Forest and Bird Protection Society of New Zealand Inc. PO Box 2516 Christchurch 8140 Solicitor acting: Peter Anderson 021 2866992 [email protected] Duncan Currie/Ruby Haazen Richard Allen Counsel for Mackenzie Guardians Solicitor 8 Mt Eden Road Unit 1, 26 Putiki Street Eden Terrace PO Box 78326 AUCKLAND Grey Lynn Ph: (021) 144 3457 AUCKLAND E: [email protected] 1. My name is Stephen Kenneth Brown. I hold a Bachelor of Town Planning degree and a post- graduate Diploma of Landscape Architecture. I am a Fellow and past President of the New Zealand Institute of Landscape Architects, an Affiliate Member of the New Zealand Planning Institute. 2. This statement of evidence has been prepared in response to the appeals over the granting of consent for irrigation of land owned by C.E.F. and G.W. Kidd (referred to in my evidence as the Kidd Block) and D.R. McIntyre and Waitaki Trustees Golden Acres Limited (referred to as the McIntyre Block). It has been prepared on behalf of the Royal Forest And Bird Protection Society Of New Zealand Incorporated and the Mackenzie Guardians Incorporated. PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE 3. I have practised as a landscape architect for 36 years. During that period, the great majority of my professional practice has focussed on landscape assessment and planning. This has included evaluating the landscape, natural character and amenity effects associated with large scale proposals, such as Auckland’s Waterview Connection (SH16 / SH20) project, the recently consented East West Link project, and the two tranches of King Salmon marine farm proposals for the Marlborough Sounds. 4. I have also undertaken a large number of assessments of landscape and natural character characteristics and values in different parts of New Zealand, including, for example, the West Coast Region and related districts, the Auckland Region (twice) and the Far North District. Relevant projects and studies are set out in my Appendix A. In 2006 I was also part of a team managed by Urbis Ltd that was awarded the (UK) Landscape Institute’s Strategic Planning Award for the “Landscape Value Mapping Study of Hong Kong”. I developed the assessment method and assessment criteria employed in that study. 5. Of most relevance to the current proceedings, I undertook an evaluation of the northern two- thirds of the Mackenzie Basin in 2016 as part of my analysis of the Basin for the Plan Change 13 Appeals. I prepared evidence for those appeals and attended the Environment Court 2 Brown NZ Ltd December 2017 hearing, which addressed them. I will further explain the relevance of that work to the current appeals in my statement. CODE OF CONDUCT 6. I confirm that I have read the Code of Conduct for Expert Witnesses contained in the Environment Court Practice Note 2014 and that I agree to comply with it. I further confirm that I have considered all the material facts that I am aware of that might alter or detract from the opinions that I express, and that this evidence is within my area of expertise, except where I state that I am relying on the evidence of another person. 7. This statement has been prepared in response to the appeals arising from the Canterbury Regional Council’s decision to decline water take consents for the Kidd and McIntyre blocks, north to northwest of Lake Benmore within the Mackenzie Basin. As a result, I have visited the Mackenzie Basin and undertaken an evaluation designed to assist the Court in its deliberations over PC13. PRELIMINARY COMMENTS: THE WITHDRAWAL OF THE KIDD APPEAL & CHANGES TO THE McINTYRE PROPOSAL 8. This statement has been prepared in response to both the Kidd and McIntyre appeals. Since nearly of it was prepared, C E F and D G W Kidd have withdrawn their appeal and Mr McIntyre has reduced the scale of his irrigation proposals by approximately 50%. These are significant changes. 9. Unfortunately, I have not had the time to recast my statement in line with those changes, while my Annexures still address both the Kidd and McIntyre blocks, as well as the wider setting afforded by the Mackenzie Basin. I was also unaware of them when I undertook my recent site visit, which compounds the difficulty of responding to the changes to the appeals. Even so, in response to the withdrawal of the Kidd appeal and amendments to the McIntyre application, I have added a brief section at the end of my Conclusions which attempts to summarise how that withdrawal affects my findings. In all other respects, my evidence remains as drafted up to the 20th December 2017. 3 Brown NZ Ltd December 2017 SCOPE OF EVIDENCE 10. I was asked to review the evidence of Christopher Glasson on behalf of the applicants, Peter Rough on behalf of the Canterbury Regional Council, and to visit both the Kidd and McIntyre sites in order to evaluate the landscape effects of both irrigation proposals. I have also been asked to explore those effects in the context of the wider-ranging proposals for irrigation across the Mackenzie Basin that I addressed in my 2016 evidence on PC13, so as to reach findings about the cumulative effects and changes that irrigation proposals – of the sort proposed by Messrs Kidd and McIntryre – are having on the wider landscape character and values of the Basin. 11. I have undertaken that evaluation. At the outset, I need to make it clear that I don’t disagree with the description of both irrigation sites, as outlined in the evidence of Mr Glasson, nor with his analysis of much of the wider landscape setting afforded them. In this regard, my views are also aligned with those of Mr Rough, who makes the point in his statement that he feels little is to be gained from reiterating much of the material in Mr Glasson’s evidence, which provides and introduction to the sites and their landscape surrounds. 12. Consequently, my evidence focuses on the following matters: a) The changes to the wider Mackenzie Basin landscape and its Subzone that led to PC13; b) The Basin’s wider characteristics and values; c) Recent and on-going changes to the Basin’s wider characteristics and values; d) The ‘place’ of the Kidd and McIntryre blocks within this landscape matrix; e) Visual exposure and other effects; f) My findings about the effects of irrigating the Kidd and McIntyre blocks. 13. In reaching my findings about the effects of the both consents, I have also taken into account the evidence of ecologist, Dr Susan Walker. As you will see, there is close alignment between the views that she expresses in relation to some aspects of the current proposals and my own, although I am not an ecologist and have avoided stepping beyond my area of expertise. Nevertheless, as with PC13, I have found Dr Walker’s evidence provides important ‘reference 4 Brown NZ Ltd December 2017 points’ in relation to some key matters addressed by Messrs Glasson and Rough – such as the significance and prevalence of hieraceum within the Mackenzie Basin and the viability of pastoral planting within the proposed buffer areas around each irrigation circle. INTRODUCTION 14. As with my PC13 evidence, I need to start by indicating that, even though I live and work (for the most part) within Auckland, I have visited and stayed within the Mackenzie Basin over many years – in fact, decades – and consider that I know it reasonably well, albeit not with the same familiarity and intimacy as those who live and work within the Basin. Even so, I have visited it in both a professional capacity, and also as a ‘visitor’: passing through on the way to Wanaka, Queenstown and Mt Cook / The Hermitage far more times than I can recall, as a guest at Tekapo village (once being foolish enough to swim in the lake) and Omarama, while skiing at Roundhill, Mt Dobson and Ohau ski fields, and as a student undertaking field trips to the Pukaki Basin, Mt Cook and the Tasman Glacier. 15. In 2009 I was briefed to assess the effects of proposed irrigation schemes on behalf of a number of Upper Waitaki landholdings owned by Southdown Holdings Ltd, Five Rivers Ltd, Williamson Holdings Ltd, and Killermont Station Ltd. After initially presenting evidence on this matter to Environment Canterbury, I was subsequently asked to prepare evidence for additional intensive dairying proposals. After much consideration, I decided that I could not endorse or support proposals for further dairy intensification within the Upper Waitaki catchment. I was involved in preliminary discussions between Richard Peacock in 2010 (then owner of Glen Eyrie Downs and one of the water right applicants) and EDS, but these occurred without achieving any merger of views over the future of the Upper Waitaki area. 16. In 2013, I was invited to visit Simons Hill Station, abutting SH8, southeast of Lake Pukaki. Again, I was asked if I could support irrigation proposals to support dairy intensification. After much deliberation, I decided that I was unable to support the landowner’s proposals for irrigation of large parts of that property.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Proposed Mokihinui Hydro Scheme Appeal
    BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH ENV-2010-CHC-115, 123, 124 AND 135 IN THE MATTER of Appeals pursuant to Section 120 of the Resource Management Act 1991 BETWEEN WEST COAST ENT INC Appellant AND ROYAL FOREST AND BIRD PROTECTION SOCIETY OF NEW ZEALAND INC Appellant AND WHITE WATER NEW ZEALAND INC Appellant AND DIRECTOR GENERAL OF CONSERVATION Appellant AND WEST COAST REGIONAL COUNCIL AND BULLER DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondents ....Continued over leaf STATEMENT OF EVIDENCE OF ROBIN COCHRANE RHODES DELAMORE Draft as at 22/05/2012 Department of Conservation West Coast Tai o Poutini Conservancy Private Bag 701 Sewell Street HOKITIKA Ph 03 756 9100 Fax 03 756 9188 Counsel Acting D van Mierlo AND MERIDIAN ENERGY LIMITED Applicant AND FRIDA INTA Section 274 Party AND WHANAU PIHAWAI WEST – RICHARD WAYNE BARBER AND IRI MAY BARBER- MILNER Section 274 Party AND J MacTAGGART Section 274 Party AND ORION ENERGY NZ LTD, ALPINE ENERGY LTD, MAIN POWER NZ LTD AND ELECTRICITY ASHBURTON LTD Section 274 Party AND NZ RAFTING INC Section 274 Party AND ANN SHERIDAN Section 274 Party AND BULLER ELECTRICITY Section 274 Party 1 STATEMENT OF EVIDENCE OF ROBIN DELAMORE TABLE OF CONTENTS Note: this draft evidence is not complete, and has been developed on the basis of the draft evidence of technical witnesses for the Director General of Conservation. The wording and references used may therefore not reflect the final briefs of evidence for those witnesses. INTRODUCTION 1. My full name is Robin Cochrane Rhodes Delamore. I am a resource management consultant, based in Christchurch. I hold the qualification of MSc (Resource Management) from Canterbury University, and have 30 year’s experience in resource management and planning.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report
    MERIDIAN ENERGY LIMITED ANNUAL REPORT 02 Generation Assets 04 About Meridian 16 Performance Summary 22 Segment Performance 33 Sustainability 34 People and Health & Safety 36 Environment 38 Community 39 Governance 44 Financial Statements 106 Statutory Information REPORT FOR YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2012 MERIDIAN ENERGY LIMITED ANNUAL REPORT FOR YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2012 OUR PERFORMANCE FINANCIAL FINANCIAL GENERATION HEALTH & SAFETY 28% 13% 19% 50% Reduction in EBITDAF1 Reduction in net Reduction in Improvement in from last year cash flow from generation production lost-time injury IMPACTED BY LOWEST LEVEL OF operating activities OWING TO THE SALE OF THE frequency rate INFLOWS IN 79 yEARS OF RECORDS SINCe 30 JUNe 2011 TEKAPO HYDRO POWER SINCe 30 JUNe 2011 AND THE SALE OF THE TEKAPO STATIONS2 AND CHALLEngIng HYDRO POWER STATIONS2 HYDROLOGY CONDITIONS RETAIL CUSTOMERS EMPLOYEES $5.90 5% 3.4% Per contracted MWh Growth in retail Improvement in customer connections employee engagement IMPROVEMENT IN UNDERLYING3 PROFITABILITY OF OUR RETAIL (installation control SINCe 30 JUNe 2011 SEGMENT SINCe 30 JUNe 2011 points – ICPs) SINCe 30 JUNe 2011 PLANT DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT 0.14 % 420MW 60MW Hydro forced Macarthur wind farm Mill Creek wind farm outage factor CONSTRUCTION IN VICTORIA, BEGAN CONSTRUCTION LOWEST IN 20 yEARS OF RECORDS AUSTRALIA, IS PROGRESSIng IN JULY 2012 TO PLAN 1 Earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, amortisation, change in fair value of financial instruments, impairments, gain/(loss) on sale of assets and joint venture equity accounted earnings. 2 Sold to Genesis Energy on 1 June 2011. 3 Removing the variability of electricity purchase prices and replacing with a fixed input price of $85/MWh.
    [Show full text]
  • Statement of Evidence by Stephen Kenneth Brown
    BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND IN THE MATTER of appeals under Clause 14 of the Act in relation to Manawatu Wanganui Regional Council‟s proposed One Plan BETWEEN MERIDIAN ENERGY LTD ENV-2010-WLG-000149 AND MIGHTY RIVER POWER LTD ENV-2010-WLG-000147 AND TRUSTPOWER LTD ENV-2010-WLG-000145 AND GENESIS POWER LTD Env-2010-WLG-000159 AND MANAWATU WANGANUI REGIONAL COUNCIL RESPONDENT STATEMENT OF EVIDENCE BY STEPHEN KENNETH BROWN INTRODUCTION 1. My name is Stephen Kenneth Brown. I hold a Bachelor of Town Planning degree and a post-graduate Diploma of Landscape Architecture. I am a Fellow and the current President of the New Zealand Institute of Landscape Architects, an Affiliate Member of the New Zealand Planning Institute, and have practised as a landscape architect for 29 years. 2. During that period I have specialised in landscape assessment and planning. This has included undertaking the evaluation of the landscape effects associated with a wide variety of development proposals, including: . The Waterview Connection (SH16 & SH20) motorway projects; . The Marsden Point port development; . Eden Park‟s redevelopment for Rugby World Cup 2011; . The Sylvia Park commercial centre; . Project West Wind for the NZ Wind Energy Association; . Te Hauhiko O Wharauroa Wind Park near Raglan in the western Waikato for D & P Walter ; . The proposed Sidonia Hills Wind Farm in west-central Victoria for Hydro Tasmania and Roaring 40s; . The Moorabool Wind Farm in Victoria for West Wind PTY Ltd; . Project Central Wind for Meridian Energy Ltd; and . Project Mill Creek Wind Farm review for Wellington City Council.
    [Show full text]
  • Meridian Energy Annual Report for Year Ended !" June #"$" How Much Power?
    Meridian Energy Annual Report for year ended !" June #"$" How much power? Meridian is the largest state-owned electricity generator in New Zealand, providing around 30% of New Zealand's total generation. We also retail electricity to more than 180,000 residential, rural and business customers. NAME: CalRENEW!1 NO. OF PV PANELS: %",""" CAPACITY: %MW TOTAL GWh PRODUCED !"##$%&#' # i NAME: Mt Millar3 NAME: Ross Island NO. OF TURBINES: !% NAME: Macarthur2 NO. OF TURBINES: ! CAPACITY: &"MW LOCATION: Victoria CAPACITY: $MW TOTAL GWh PRODUCED STAGE: Pre-construction design !"##$%&#' $" CAPACITY: '#"MW NAME: Mt Mercer LOCATION: Victoria STAGE: Pre-construction design CAPACITY: $!"MW Front Cover: The Ross Island wind farm and Mt Erebus from Observation Hill, Antarctica. Courtesy of George Blaisdell, Antarctica NZ Pictorial Collection. NAME: Central Wind NAME: Te Āpiti STAGE: Consented NO. OF TURBINES: ## CAPACITY: !"$MW CAPACITY: '$MW TOTAL GWh PRODUCED !"##$%&#' %"# TOTAL GWh PRODUCED !"##(%#$' %$' NAME: Ohau A NAME: Te Uku NO. OF GENERATORS: & STAGE: Under construction CAPACITY: ")&MW CAPACITY: )&MW NAME: West Wind TOTAL GWh PRODUCED !,!%& !"##$%&#' NO. OF TURBINES: )" NAME: Mill Creek TOTAL GWh PRODUCED '(% CAPACITY: !&%MW !"##(%#$' STAGE: Environment Court appeal TOTAL GWh PRODUCED &'* CAPACITY: )*MW !"##$%&#' TOTAL GWh PRODUCED !"##(%#$' %( NAME: Ohau B NAME: Mokihinui NO. OF GENERATORS: & STAGE: Environment Court appeal CAPACITY: "!"MW CAPACITY: (#MW NAME: Tekapo A TOTAL GWh PRODUCED '&( !"##$%&#' NO. OF GENERATORS: ! ii TOTAL GWh PRODUCED iii CAPACITY: !"##(%#$' (%& "#MW Brooklyn TOTAL GWh PRODUCED !"##$%&#' !#" TOTAL GWh PRODUCED Wellington !"##(%#$' !"& NAME: Ohau C NO. OF GENERATORS: & CAPACITY: "!"MW NAME: Hurunui Wind TOTAL GWh PRODUCED STAGE: Consultation NAME: Tekapo B !"##$%&#' '&$ CAPACITY: *(MW NO. OF GENERATORS: " TOTAL GWh PRODUCED ("( !"##(%#$' Christchurch CAPACITY: !)$MW TOTAL GWh PRODUCED !"##$%&#' (!* TOTAL GWh PRODUCED (%% NAME: Benmore !"##(%#$' Twizel NAME: Hunter Downs Irrigation NO.
    [Show full text]
  • Meridian Energy Limited Group – Condensed Interim Financial Statements Income Statement for the Six Months Ended 31 December 2010
    Meridian Interim Report For the period to 31 December 2010 Overview Performance Summary Notes Meridian Group 6 MONTHS 6 MONTHS YEAR ENDED ENDED PERIOD ENDED 1 Net profit/(loss) after tax includes unrealised Performance in Brief 31 DEC 2010 31 DEC 2009 CHANGE 30 JUN 2010 gains/(losses) on financial instruments. 2 Underlying net profit/(loss) after tax excludes Net Profit/(Loss) After Tax $m1 84.7 142.5 (57.8) 184.0 unrealised fair value movements and other one-off items. Underlying Net Profit/(Loss) After Tax $m2 123.4 118.7 4.7 251.9 3 EBITDAF – earnings before interest, taxation, EBITDAF $m3 353.3 297.4 55.9 641.7 depreciation, amortisation and financial instruments. EBITDAF $ per MWh4 51.9 43.4 8.5 46.3 4 EBITDAF per megawatt hour (MWh) generated by our New Zealand hydro power stations and wind farms. EBITDAF EBITDAF Increase Injury Rates Reduced $353.3m 19% 47% Earnings before interest, taxation, depreciation, amortisation 19% increase compared with the same Lost-time frequency rate has improved and financial instruments period last year by 47% to 1.8 since December 2009 Retail Development Total Retail ICPs North Island ICPs Powershop ICPs Te Uku 262,923 13% 48% wind farm Customer installation control points (ICPs) Increase in North Island ICPs Growth of Powershop ICPs since Started to generate power in November 2010 since June 2010 June 2010 – now 24,024 customers – full commissioning expected ahead of plan Plant Capacity and Generation Total GWh* Generated Total GWh Generated Total GWh Generated Total Plant Capacity (MW) 6 Months Ended Dec 2010 6 Months Ended Dec 2009 Annual 2010 New Zealand 2,756 6,804 6,854 13,862 International 75 90 – 12 * Gigawatt hours 6,331 558 5 hydro wind solar Hydro GWh generation Wind GWh generation Solar GWh generation Contents Message from the Chairman and Chief Executive 2 Highlights 4 Performance Summary 8 Condensed Interim Financial Statements 16 Review Report from the Auditor-General 35 Directory 36 Benmore Hydro Dam, Waitaki Valley – the Benmore Refurbishment Programme is on track for completion in early 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • Meridian Offer Document
    Meridian Share Offer INITIAL PUBLIC OFFERING OF ORDINARY SHARES IN MERIDIAN ENERGY LIMITED Investment Statement and Prospectus 20 September 2013 THE FINANCIAL MARKETS AUTHORITY You should seek your own taxation advice on the REGULATES CONDUCT IN FINANCIAL MARKETS implications of an investment in the securities offered under this Offer Document. The Financial Markets Authority regulates Important conduct in New Zealand’s financial markets. The This Offer Document may not be distributed Financial Markets Authority’s main objective is to to or relied upon by persons in the United promote and facilitate the development of fair, States unless it is part of the International Information efficient, and transparent financial markets. Offering Memorandum used in connection with the Institutional Offer. See 1.4 Answers For more information about investing, go to to Important Questions for certain important http://www.fma.govt.nz. selling restrictions. (The information in this section is FINANCIAL ADVISERS CAN HELP YOU MAKE required under the Securities Act 1978.) NO GUARANTEE INVESTMENT DECISIONS No person guarantees the securities offered under Investment decisions are very important. Using a financial adviser cannot prevent you from this Offer Document. No person warrants or They often have long-term consequences. losing money, but it should be able to help you guarantees the performance of the securities or make better investment decisions. Read all documents carefully. any return on any investments made pursuant to Ask questions. Seek advice before Financial advisers are regulated by the Financial this Offer Document. Markets Authority to varying levels, depending on committing yourself. the type of adviser and the nature of the services REGISTRATION they provide.
    [Show full text]
  • Energy Policies of IEA Countries New Zealand
    Please note that this PDF is subject to specific restrictions that limit its use and distribution. The terms and conditions are available online at www.iea.org/about/copyright.asp Energy Policies of IEA Countries New Zealand 2010 Review Energy Policies of IEA Countries New Zealand New Zealand’s strong commitment to liberalised energy markets has delivered a relatively high level of energy security and economic prosperity for consumers. Since the previous IEA review in 2006, the government has built on the success of existing policy mechanisms and implemented a number of far-reaching changes in the electricity sector and environmental policy. But progress in some sectors, such as energy efficiency, has not been as strong as anticipated. In mid-2010, the government commenced a review of the New Zealand Energy Strategy. The result is the publication of a new energy strategy, which establishes clear long-term policy priorities and energy-savings goals. Implementing these strategies will bring many new challenges, including attainment of the government’s medium-term energy-savings targets. New Zealand enjoys the advantage of a diverse and balanced portfolio of renewable-energy resources, which contribute over 70% of electricity output – the third highest portion in IEA member countries. This resource base has the potential to deliver greater volumes of energy and the government aspires to increase this proportion to 90% of electricity generation by 2025. Meeting this target will bring many benefits but also tough challenges, such as maintaining a robust National Grid. This review analyses the energy-policy challenges facing New Zealand and provides sectoral critiques and recommendations for further policy improvements.
    [Show full text]