ADDENDUM TO INFRASTRUCTURE PLAN: TECHNICAL ASSESSMENT 2006-2026 August 2014

City of Westminster

CONTENTS

01_Context and Approach 04_CIL Funding Gap

1.1_ Purpose of this Addendum 5 4.1_CIL Eligibility 15 4.2_ Funding Position 15 1.2_ Definition of Strategic Infrastructure 5 4.3_Agreggate Funding Gap 16 1.3_ The Regulations 5 4.4_CIL Income Projection 16 1.4_ CIL examinations to date 6 4.5_Residual Funding Gap 16 1.5_ Work undertaken for this commission 7

02_Westminster's Growth Profile 05_ Integration with Regulations 2.1_ Context of Growth 9 5.1 _Regulation 123 List 18 2.2_ Residential Population Growth Projections 9 5.2 _ Planning Obligations SPD 18 2.3_ Employment Population Growth Projections 9 2.4_ Housing Development Trajectory 10 2.5_ Commercial Development Trajectory 10

03_Infrastructure Needs Update 06_Appendices 3.1_ Impact of Growth on Service Areas 12 A_ Infrastructure Categories - Policy Context 20 3.2_ Infrastructure Defined 12 B_ Summary Tables 22 3.3_ Summary of Infrastructure Requirements 13 C_ Summary Charts 23 D_ Extract of CIL Income Projection Model 24 E_ Background Documents 25 F_Full Infrastructure Project Schedule 27

3

01 CONTEXT & APPROACH

4

1.1 Purpose of this Addendum Draft Charging Schedule and a Draft Schedule of CIL Infrastructure Projects (commonly referred to as the Regulation 123 List). It is anticipated that will adopt a local Community

Infrastructure Levy (CIL) from April 2015 that will be chargeable on development in the city. CIL is a means of raising money that can be used to support development by funding the provision, improvement, replacement, 1.2 Definition of Strategic Infrastructure operation or maintenance of infrastructure that the council, local community Infrastructure is defined in the Planning Act 2008 Item 216 as including: and neighbourhoods require to help accommodate growth. ▪ Roads and other transport facilities As part of the evidence base informing and supporting the development ▪ Flood defences of Westminster City Council’s Community Infrastructure Levy, the Council commissioned the CIL Knowledge Partnership to update its 2009 Westminster ▪ Schools and other educational facilities Infrastructure Plan: 2006 - 2026 (SIP). Population projections and infrastructure ▪ Health facilities provision information have changed considerably since the production of the SIP. This update includes validating future infrastructure requirements on the ▪ Social care and community safety facilities basis of current population data (both residential and employment), up-to- ▪ Sporting and recreational facilities date housing and commercial development trajectories, and the policies and objectives set out Westminster’s City Plan: Strategic Policies (2013) in order ▪ Open spaces to provide a CIL income projection model that meets the requirements for a CIL A more detailed discussion of what constitutes infrastructure is included in Section examination. 3.2. This addendum supersedes the infrastructure schedule provided in the SIP on the basis described above to indicate what infrastructure is needed, where and when, to facilitate the delivery of the residential and business growth envisaged 1.3 The Regulations in Westminster’s City Plan (2013) between now and 2026/27. CIL was established through the Planning Act 2008 and is bound by a series of This addendum should be used alongside other plans and strategies that Regulations, the first of which came in to force in 2010. Several modifications provide more detail in regard to the ‘what, how and when’ of specific services. were put in place through the CIL (Amendment) Regulations 2011, 2012, Relevant plans, strategies and other background documents are listed in 2013 and 2014. The Regulations require a local authority to establish a Appendix E: Background Documents. charging schedule setting out CIL rate(s). The Rates should be set at a level Infrastructure Planning includes trying to predict and shape the future as best that strikes an appropriate balance between the desirability of funding as possible. Actual usage will vary as people’s needs change and the nature infrastructure from CIL and the potential effects of the imposition of CIL on of service provision adapts to users preferences or takes advantage of new the economic viability of development across an area. technology. In recognition of this ever-changing environment this addendum The Regulations are supported by the government’s web based uses the appropriate available data to plan for growth. Planning Practice Guidance (June 2014) . The guidance This addendum is provided as one of a suite of reports including: Westminster emphasises the importance of striking an appropriate balance when setting Population Data Reconciliation Report, CIL Viability Assessment, a Preliminary rates. The balance needs to specifically weigh up using CIL to fund infrastructure and the impact of CIL on economic viability across the borough as a whole. That balance can also take

5

account of other factors as summarised in figure 1.1. projected aggregate funding gap the rates are justifiable, subject to tests on the impact of CIL rates on development viability. In practice this means each charging authority considering what infrastructure is needed in its area to support development. This is the same exercise as required to produce an Infrastructure Delivery Plan as evidence for a Core Strategy Development Plan Document or Local Plan. Consequently, there is no need to duplicate this process if an up to date IDP exists. The Charging Authority is also required to assess what other known or expected funding sources are likely to be available to establish whether there is a funding gap. The role of this evidence is to provide transparency on what the charging authority intends to fund through CIL and those known site-specific matters where planning obligations (or commonly referred to as section 106 contributions) may continue to be sought. However, as the population data underpinning the 2009 SIP has been superseded by more up-to-date projections, the following extract from the 2014 Guidance document is particularly applicable to assessing the sufficiency of the infrastructure evidence base: ‘A charging authority may undertaken additional infrastructure planning to identify its infrastructure funding gap, if it considers that the infrastructure planning underpinning its relevant Plan (the Local Plan in , Local Development Plan in Wales, and the London Plan in London) is weak or does not reflect its latest priorities. This work may be limited to those projects requiring funding from the levy.’ Planning Practice Guidance June 2014 1.4 CIL examinations to date To date, there are 48 published CIL examination reports. In the early reports infrastructure planning did not feature strongly; generally limited to two to three paragraphs (Poole contains six paragraphs). More recent reports have required more substantial evidence. Each of the Councils had a recently adopted Core Strategy and each of the Councils undertook additional infrastructure planning Figure 1.1: CIL Evidence Gathering and Rate Setting Process in support of CIL.

The message from the examiners appears to be that infrastructure planning should focus on ascertaining the residual funding gap (aggregate gap minus projected CIL income). Where the projected CIL income does not exceed the

6

1.5 Work undertaken for this commission The following activities were undertaken for this commission: Reconciled mid-year population estimates with 2011 census data. Determined the impact of the agreed population figures on growth forecasts and development trajectories. Worked with infrastructure providers to refresh infrastructure needs assessment based on the updated population / growth trajectories and new service delivery models. Worked with Westminster City Council colleagues and external parties to identify which projects should be included in this evidence, and if necessary, add detail to projects to ensure a robust evidence base. This includes specific advice to cost certain projects, and requires cost consultancy skills. Worked with infrastructure providers to establish fair and reasonable estimates of funding based on projections from previous years adjusted (mainstream grants, allocated project funds, outstanding s106, and capital receipts). Built a CIL income projection model / funding gap model linked to the development trajectories.

7

02 WESTMINSTER GROWTH PROFILE

8

2.1 Growth Context Since the completion of the SIP there has been a new census and refreshed sub-national population projections. Due to concerns the Council had with the The is unique in that it is home to the seat of government accuracy of the 2011 Census, a reconciliation of the 2011 census and 2011 Sub- and the Monarchy, hosts more businesses than the City and Canary Wharf national population projections was carried out in order to determine which together, includes two international shopping districts and is home to some population figures should be used for infrastructure planning purposes. of London’s most iconic and historic architecture. Moreover, the residential population of approximately 253,000 swells to over 1 million every day, due Using the reconciled data it is projected that the residential population of to the influx of workers, visitors, and tourists. This creates an exceptional and Westminster will be 259,800 by 2021. This is greater than the 2026 population ever evolving set of demands on the urban infrastructure. Existing facilities projection used in the SIP. Therefore, population growth is projected to be need to be maintained and upgraded if they are to sustain growth, and in some more significant than that accounted for in the SIP. A comparison with the cases additional infrastructure items are required. Westminster’s City Plan: figures used in the SIP can be seen in figure 2.1 Strategic Policies (2013) recognises that managing the impact of Infrastructure providers were asked to use the 2011 Sub-national population development on the socio-economic, natural and built environment is essential projection when validating their needs assessments. for ensuring Westminster’s development is sustainable. In understanding future infrastructure requirements, Westminster faces several Population Growth unique challenges. There remains a growing resident population where there 2011 Sub-national Population WCC SIP 2009 is a direct link between new homes, migration and the need for new school Projections places. Local users and visitors place enormous pressure on transport systems 2009 baseline population 2011 population and some locations struggle to cope with the numbers. However, there are 231,874 219,582 less common requirements such as almost all journeys within Westminster (estimated) (2011 Census) involve a portion of walking within the public realm. Therefore there is a Population at 2026 Population at 257,714 259,800 need to reinvest in public realm to support growth in the visitor economy and (projected) 2021 (projected) encourage sustainable modes of transport. Figure 2.1: Population Growth Projections Comparison

Significant growth in both residential and employment populations is set to put all aspects of infrastructure under considerable pressure. These growth figures are sufficiently different from those used in the SIP to mandate a fresh look 2.3 Employment Population Growth Projections at infrastructure requirements. A comparison of current growth figures and Employment population growth places significant pressure on transport and those used in the SIP is set out in the following sections. public realm infrastructure and is therefore an important consideration for Westminster. In the SIP employment population growth was discussed primarily Another facet impacting Westminster is that it is part of a Tri-Borough in terms of expected increases in commercial building area. A total of 33,200 arrangement for some service areas. This has implications for potential cross- jobs were expected to be created in the period to 2026. borough spending. The London Office Policy Review, which is commissioned by the Authority, sets out robust monitoring benchmarks and associated time series 2.2 Residential Population Growth Projections data to illustrate key trends and market relationships and their bearing on policy The SIP drew on 2001 census data to inform projections of population growth. and to establish growth projections in office development. Westminster City

9

Council has decided to use the London Office Policy Review 2012 triangulated Residential units figures to project employment population growth for all strategic decisions WCC SIP 2009 Housing Trajectory Core Strategy 2011 (period: 2009 (period: 2012 going forward. This data set estimates an increase in jobs of 56,051 in the (period: 2010 –2025) period to 2031. –2026) –2027) Proposed 13,600 12,860 13,100 Again, the employment population growth is now expected to be greater than Completions - 261 1,244 that accounted for in the SIP. Infrastructure providers were asked to use the London Office Policy Review 2012 triangulated figures when validating their Totals 13,600 13,121 14,344 needs assessments. Figure 2.2: Housing Development Trajectory Comparison

2.4 Housing Development Trajectory 2.5 Commercial Development Trajectory The Housing Development Trajectory forecasts for the period from 2012 - The Commercial Development Trajectory forecasts for the period from 2012 - 2027 how many homes will be provided within Westminster. This is driven by 2027 the amount of various types of commercial floor space that will be built development interest and the Council’s requirement to meet the London Plan in Westminster. It is driven by development interest, the London Office Policy Housing Targets. The trajectory has evolved since the SIP because the London Review 2012 office space growth projections and growth projections for other Plan Housing Targets increased. Westminster City Council is projecting that commercial sectors as set out in Westminster’s City Plan: Strategic 744 more homes will be built than was accounted for in the SIP. A comparison P o l i c i e s (2013). The trajectory differs significantly from the estimates as between the figures used in the SIP, in the 2011 draft of the council’s Core included in the SIP and providers were asked to consider employment Strategy and the 2012 trajectory can be seen in figure 2.2 population growth estimates in combination with the information in the The mix of housing units in terms of property size and property type is also Commercial Development Trajectory. A comparison between the figures used relevant. Providers were asked to assume the following proportion of in the SIP and the 2012 Commercial Development Trajectory can be seen in development by size: figure 2.3.

▪ 1 bedroom - 36% WCC SIP 2009 WCC Commercial Pipeline (period: 2009 – 2026) (period: 2012 – 2031) ▪ 2 bedroom - 49% Office/Business 1,137,363 sqm 655,118 sqm (LOPR 2012 figure) ▪ 3 bedroom - 11% ▪ 4 bedroom - 4%. Retail 441,933 sqm 430,482 sqm Leisure 105,458 sqm 110,917 sqm Westminster’s City Plan: Strategic Policies (2013) states that the council will aim Figure 2.3: Commercial Development Trajectory Comparison to exceed 30% of new homes to be affordable. Of this proportion regional guidance sets out an objective of a 60:40 split for social and intermediate affordable housing provision which is used as a guideline for individual schemes in Westminster.

1 0

03 INFRASTRUCTURE NEEDS UPDATE

11

3.1 Impact of Growth on Service Areas 3.2 Infrastructure Defined Work was done with infrastructure providers in all service areas in order to Although the Planning Act 2008 Item 216 broadly defines infrastructure, there update their needs assessments based on the changes to population, housing are several other relevant policy and guidance documents which attempt to and commercial development growth trajectories. Detail was added to projects define infrastructure. For the purposes of this Addendum, the categories of to ensure a robust evidence base. For many infrastructure categories this has infrastructure to be used are set out in more detail in figure 3.1. resulted in a considerably altered project list from what appears in the SIP. For a detailed discussion of the policy and guidance context for each Additionally, in some infrastructure areas like Education and Sports and Leisure, infrastructure category see Appendix A Infrastructure Categories - Policy significant work has been done since the SIP was published to meet needs. This Context. changed the profile of needs in those service areas. Some gaps remain with no new information being made available for Emergency Services and limited new information being available for Early Years and Further Education, Health provision and Libraries.

Infrastructure Defined Category Sub-Category Category Sub-Category Early Years Pedestrian Networks

Primary Education Cycle Networks Secondary Education Public Realm Accessibility Education Special Education Needs Multi-modal Connections Further Education Streetscape Improvements Adult Education Sports and Leisure Internal Leisure and Sports Ambulance Rail

Emergency Services Fire River Transport Police Bus Primary Care Highways and Bridges

Acute Care Water supply, drainage and waste water

Secondary Care Flood Risk Management Health Mental Health Gas

Adult Social Care Utilities Electricity Cemeteries Telecommunications Libraries Carbon Reduction Measures Community Services Community Space Combined heat and power Parks Recycling

Playing Space and Pitches Waste Waste Treatment Parks and Open Space Biodiversity Street Cleaning Trees

Figure 3.1: Infrastructure Categories Defined

12

3.3 Summary of Infrastructure Requirements Figure 3.2 shows a summary of project numbers and cost for each infrastructure area. For a detailed list of projects see Appendix F - Full Infrastructure Project Schedule.

Number Total Cost of Infrastruc- Total Cost of Infrastruc- % of Total costed ture ture % of Total Cost Infrastructure Category Number of projects % of Total Projects Number eligible projects Cost eligible 2012 - 2031 2012-2017/18 2012 - 2017/18 2012-2031 projects Education 14 7% 14 5 £185,950,000 7% £46,200,000 4%

Emergency Services 3 2% 3 0 £- 0% £- 0%

Health 10 5% 10 9 £107,780,000 4% £99,080,000 9%

Community Services 15 8% 15 7 £21,600,000 1% £19,200,000 2%

Parks and Open Space 9 5% 9 8 £65,449,000 3% £12,074,000 1%

Public Realm 79 42% 79 66 £589,747,500 23% £446,968,500 42%

Sports and Leisure 8 4% 8 4 £72,700,000 3% £72,700,000 7%

Transport 31 16% 31 16 £336,794,000 13% £334,279,000 32%

Utilities 14 7% 10 2 £1,203,500,000 46% £24,500,000 2%

Waste 6 3% 6 1 £20,000,000 1% £15,000,000 0% Total 189 100% 185 118 £2,603,520,500 100% £1,070,001,500 100%

13

04 CIL FUNDING GAP

14

4.1 CIL Eligibility In order to establish the numbers and cost of projects eligible to be funded 4.2 Funding Position by CIL (CIL eligible), an analysis of the updated 15 year Infrastructure Project In order to establish a funding gap a Charging Authority is required to calculate Schedule has been completed. the funding from other sources. We have extracted information from the Over the 15 years of Westminster’s City Plan: Strategic Policies (2013): Capital Investment Programme 2010 - 2015, with projections for 2015 - 2017 ▪ There are a total of 189 projects from the 10 infrastructure categories. and, for Transport and Public Realm projects, from the Local Implementation Plan. The funding position for 2012/13 - 2017/18 is: ▪ 185 of the projects are CIL eligible. ▪ The total available funding over the period is £409,977,500.00. ▪ 118 of the CIL eligible projects are costed. ▪ The majority of the funding (44%) is from Westminster City Council’s Capital ▪ The total cost of these 118 projects is £2,603,520,500.00. Receipts. ▪ The majority of the cost is attributed to Utilities (Distributed Energy projects) ▪ The remaining contributors to the funding are: and Public Realm projects. • S106 - 2.6% ▪ Other significant contributors are Transport projects. • Government Grants - 9.7% ▪ The Council has a choice over how long a period it wishes to assess its • Developer and other third parties - 2.9% infrastructure funding gap. A 5-year period has been focused on as cost and • Project funding from revenue - 40.1% income estimates are likely to be more accurate over the short to medium Borrowing is treated as funding of last resort and is therefore not included. term rather than long term. Furthermore, it is recommend that the Council should review its CIL Charging Schedule within a period of three to five years to keep it up to date with developing market conditions. Over the 5 year period 2012/13 - 2017/18: ▪ There are a total of 112 projects from the 10 infrastructure categories. ▪ 112 of the projects are CIL eligible. ▪ 99 of the CIL eligible projects are costed. ▪ The total cost of these 99 projects is £1,055,001,500 ▪ The majority of the cost is attributed to Public Realm and Transport projects. ▪ Other significant contributors are Health, Education and Sports and Leisure projects. For more details please see Appendix F CIL Project Schedule, Appendix B - Summary Tables and Appendix C - Summary Charts.

15

4.3 Aggregate Funding Gap ▪ 30% affordable housing ▪ Proposed developments with extant planning permission are not included The aggregate funding gap is the Total Cost of Infrastructure (shown in section

4.1) minus Funding from Other Sources (shown in section 4.2):

£1,055,001,500 - £409,977,500.00 = £645,024,000.000 The projected CIL income is: Consequently, the aggregate funding gap for the period 2012/13 to 2017/18 is £645,024,000.00. Period Total Income Annual Income

2014 - 2016 £ 39,978,600 £ 13,326,200 4.4 CIL Income Projection 2017 - 2021 £14,091,700 £2,818,340 Using the Housing Development Trajectory and the Commercial Development 2022- 2026 £984,000 £196,800 Trajectory supplied by Westminster City Council, a CIL Income Projection model was built to enable the Council to identify a reasonable CIL funding target. The See Appendix D for a detailed extract from the CIL Income Projection Model. model applies test CIL rates to both trajectories. The test CIL rates are based on a viability assessment conducted by BNP Paribas. A full explanation of the study can be found in the August 2014 4.5 Residual Funding Gap report Community Infrastructure Levy: Viability Assessment. The residual funding gap is calculated by subtracting the projected CIL income The following rates per square metre have been used for various development from the aggregate funding gap and is required for a charging authority to be categories: able to charge CIL.

Aggregate funding gap – Project CIL income (2014-2016) = Residual funding gap Development Type Area: Area: Area: Prime Core Fringe £645,024,000 - £39,978,600 = £605,045,400 Residential £550 £400 £200 The residual funding gap is £605,045,400 Offices £250 £200 £50 Hotels £200 £150 £50 Retail (all ‘A’ use classes and sui £200 £150 £50 generis retail), Nightclubs, Casinos. Other uses Nil It should be noted that the rates shown above exclude the Mayoral CIL. The following assumed variables have been applied to the housing trajectory and commercial trajectory figures to generate the projected CIL income figures:

16

05 INTEGRATION WITH REGULATIONS

17

5.1 Regulation 123 List 5.2 Planning Obligations Supplementary Planning Document

The Regulation 123 (R123) List is a list of infrastructure schemes which Westminster City Council will publish a Planning Obligations Supplementary Westminster City Council intends to fund through CIL. It can be published and Planning Document (SPD) to set out the Council’s general expectations for revised at any time after the council has adopted a CIL. If an infrastructure S106 negotiations that take place following the adoption of CIL. In particular, project or type of infrastructure is included on the R123 List a CIL Charging it will address infrastructure categories and schemes which may not be Authority will be restricted in its use of planning obligations (as secured through delivered by CIL. Section 106 legal agreements) towards the provision of that same infrastructure project or type. It is anticipated that the draft Planning Obligations SPD will be consulted on

alongside the Draft CIL Charging Schedule (PDCS) and adopted at the same Where the R123 list includes a generic infrastructure type site specific time as the final CIL Charging Schedule. planning obligations will only be sought for specific projects in that same category where they can be justified with reference to relevant planning policy requirements and where the infrastructure is required to make the development acceptable in planning terms. The R123 list will make this provision explicit.

If an infrastructure project or type of infrastructure is not included on the list, up to five S106 planning obligations may be pooled to contribute towards the funding or provision of that project or type of infrastructure.

The above provisions have been put in place to ensure that ‘double-charging’ of developers for specific infrastructure project through using both CIL and S106 is avoided.

A draft R123 List is being prepared. It should be noted that the draft will represent proposals for consultation only and should not affect negotiations on planning obligations until a Westminster CIL has been adopted and a R123 List is formally published. It is intended that a draft R123 List will be published at the same time as the Preliminary Draft Charging Schedule.

18

06 APPENDICES

19

APPENDIX A_INFRASTRUCTURE CATEGORIES – POLICY CONTEXT

Westminster’s National Infrastruc- Funding & Planning Infrastructure Cate- London Implemen- Document Planning Act 2008 Planning Practice NPPF City Plan: ture Plan 2013 for Infrastructure gories tation Plan 1 Guidance (2014) Strategic Policies Publisher HM Government DCLG DCLG HM Treasury LGG PAS GLA WCC Date November 2008 June 2014 March 2012 December 2013 September 2010 December 2009 January 2013 November 2013

Spatial Strategy,

Infrastructure Reference S216(2) Throughout Throughout Throughout Throughout Throughout Throughout & Development Impacts

Education √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ Early Years √ √ Primary Education √ √ √ Secondary Education √ √ √ Special Education Needs √ √ Further Education √ √ Adult Education √ √ √ Emergency Services √ √ √ √ Ambulance √ Fire √ Police √ √ √ Health √ √ √ √ √ √ Primary Care √ Acute Care √ Secondary Care √ Mental Health Adult Social Care √ Cemeteries Community Services √ √ √ √ √ Libraries √ Community Space √ Parks and Open Space √ √ √ √ √ √ Parks √ √ √ √ √ √ Playing Space and Pitches √ √ √ √ √ √

20

Westminster’s National Infrastruc- Funding & Planning Infrastructure Cate- London Implemen- Document Planning Act 2008 Planning Practice NPPF City Plan: ture Plan 2013 for Infrastructure gories tation Plan 1 Guidance Strategic Policies Publisher HM Government DCLG DCLG HM Treasury LGG PAS GLA WCC Date November 2008 June 2014 March 2012 December 2013 September 2010 December 2009 January 2013 November 2013

Spatial Strategy, Infrastructure Reference S216(2) Throughout Throughout Throughout Throughout Throughout Throughout & Development Impacts

Biodiversity √ √ √ √ Trees √ √ √ √ Public Realm √ √ √ √ √ √ Pedestrian Networks √ √ Cycle Networks √ √ Accessibility √ Multi-modal Connections √ Streetscape Improvements √ √ Sports and Leisure √ √ √ √ Internal Leisure and Sports √ √ √ √ √ Transport √ √ √ √ √ √ √ Rail √ √ √ √ River √ √ Bus √ √ √ Highways and Bridges √ √ √ √ √ Utilities √ √ √ √ √ Water supply, drainage & waste water √ √ √ √ √ √ Flood Risk Management √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ Gas √ √ √ √ Electricity √ √ √ √ Telecommunications √ √ √ √ √ √ Carbon Reduction Measures √ √ √ √ Combined heat and power √ √ √ √ √ √ Waste √ √ √ √ √ √ Recycling √ √ Waste Treatment √

21

APPENDIX B_SUMMARY TABLES

Number Total Cost of Infrastruc- Total Cost of Infrastruc- % of Total % of Total costed ture ture % of Total Cost Infrastructure Category Number of projects Number eligible projects Cost Projects eligible 2012 - 2031 2012-2017/18 2012 - 2017/18 2012-2031 projects

Education 14 7% 14 5 £185,950,000 7% £46,200,000 4% Emergency Services 3 2% 3 0 £- 0% £- 0% Health 10 5% 10 9 £107,780,000 4% £99,080,000 9% Community Services 15 8% 15 7 £21,600,000 1% £19,200,000 2% Parks and Open Space 9 5% 9 8 £65,449,000 3% £12,074,000 1% Public Realm 79 42% 79 66 £589,747,500 23% £446,968,500 42% Sports and Leisure 8 4% 8 4 £72,700,000 3% £72,700,000 7% Transport 31 16% 31 16 £336,794,000 13% £334,279,000 32% Utilities 14 7% 10 2 £1,203,500,000 46% £24,500,000 2% Waste 6 3% 6 1 £20,000,000 1% £- 0% Total 189 100% 185 118 £2,603,520,500 100% £1,055,001,500 100% Number of categories 10 Figure D.1 - Summary of Infrastructure Project List

Funding (2012/13 -2017/18) Total % of total Notes

Capital Receipts £182,000,000 44.4% None beyond 2014-2015 Reserves £1,548,000 0.4% Carry over from previous years Borrowing £- Funding of last resort. Not accounted 0.0% for.

Includes: Mayor of London, Transport for London, Network Rail, Department for Education, Grants £39,610,000 9.7% Department of Health, National Health Service S106 £10,600,000 2.6%

Developer contributions as per development agreements, property owner contributions, Developer & Third Party £11,963,000 2.9% Crown Estates, other Local Authorities, BIDs Project funding from revenue £164,256,500 40.1% Total funding £409,977,500 100% Aggregate Funding Gap £645,024,000 Projected CIL Income £39,978,600 (2014-2016) Residual Funding Gap £605,045,40 0 Figure D.2 - Summary of Funding Position

22

APPENDIX C_SUMMARY CHARTS

23

APPENDIX D_EXTRACT OF CIL INCOME PROJECTION MODELS DRAFT CHARGING RATES

Other uses Development type Residential Office Retail, Casinos and Nightclubs Hotel Total (by area) 2014 - 2026

Prime 550 250 200 200 0 £ 33,941,950.00 Area Core 400 200 150 150 0 £ 21,111,600.00

Fringe 200 50 50 100 0 £ 750.00

Total (by type) 2014 -2026 £ 33,011,250.00 £ 13,856,500.00 £ 3,347,800.00 £ 4,838,750.00 £ - £ 55,054,300.00

PROJECTED CIL INCOME 2014-2016

Other uses Development type Residential Office Retail, Casinos and Nightclubs Hotel Total (by area)

Prime £ - £ 13,075,150 £ 5,420,500 £ 3,314,200 £ 4,600,400 £ 26,410,250.00

Core £ 4,860,400 £ 8,436,000 £ 32,850 £ 238,350 £ - £ 13,567,600.00 Area Fringe £ - £ - £ 750 £ - £ - £ 750.00

Total (by type) £ 17,935,550.00 £ 13,856,500.00 £ 3,347,800.00 £ 4,838,750.00 £ - £ 39,978,600.00

Annual Income £ 5,978,516.67 £ 4,618,833.33 £ 1,115,933.33 £ 1,612,916.67 £ - £ 13,326,200.00

PROJECTED CIL INCOME 2017-2021

Other uses Development type Residential Office Retail, Casinos and Nightclubs Hotel Total (by area)

Prime £ 7,531,700 £ - £ - £ - £ - £ 7,531,700

Core £ 6,560,000 £ - £ - £ - £ - £ 6,560,000 Area Fringe £ - £ - £ - £ - £ -

Total (by type) £ 14,091,700.00 £ - £ - £ - £ - £ 14,091,700.00

Annual Income £ 2,818,340.00 £ - £ - £ - £ - £ 2,818,340.00

PROJECTED CIL INCOME 2022-2026

Other uses Development type Residential Office Retail, Casinos and Nightclubs Hotel Total (by area)

Prime £ - £ - £ - £ - £ -

Core £ 984,000 £ - £ - £ - £ - £ 984,000 Area Fringe £ - £ - £ - £ - £ -

Total (by type) £ 984,000.00 £ - £ - £ - £ - £ 984,000.00

Annual Income £ 196,800.00 £ - £ - £ - £ - £ 196,800.00

24

APPENDIX E_BACKGROUND DOCUMENTS The following documents provided key information across all infrastructure categories: • Promoting Independence: Commissioning Strategy for Older Person’s Housing in Westminster (Consultation Draft September 2012) ▪ Westminster’s City Plan: Strategic Policies (2013) • SHSOP Redevelopment Financing Summary (2011, author Catherine ▪ Capital Investment Programme 2010 - 2015, with projections for 2015 - 2017 McKinley) ▪ Westminster Infrastructure Plan Technical Assessment 2006 - 2026 v3 ▪ Libraries / Community Hubs ▪ Local Development Framework Evidence Base 2012 • No additional documents

▪ Parks and Open Space By infrastructure category, the following background documents were used to update the Infrastructure Project List: • Westminster City Council Open Space Strategy 2007 • Green Spaces Annual Income Target Business Case 2013/2014 ▪ Education • Parks and Gardens Attendant Accommodation Asset Management Plan • School Organisation and Investment Strategy 2012 - 2013 cabinet report Feb 2012 ▪ Public Realm • Tri-borough Strategy for Alternative Provision Outside of School cabinet • Built Environment Capital Programme to 2017-18 (Dec 2012 update) report Oct 2012 Local Implementation Plan • Tri-borough School Place Planning Update for DLT January 2013 • Westminster City Council website, Transportation Projects page ▪ Emergency Services ▪ Sports and Leisure • No additional documents • Active Westminster Strategy 2008-2013 ▪ Flood Defences • WCC Sports and Leisure Facility Plans Summary • No additional documents ▪ Transport ▪ Health • Built Environment Capital Programme to 2017-18 (Dec 2012 update) • Local Implementation Plan • WCC Infrastructure Plan Health v2 (author: Bernard Moran, KC-PCT Primary Care Premises and Development Manager) • Business Plan: Transport for London’s plans for the next decade • Green Spaces Annual Income Target Business Case 2013/2014 • Westminster City Council website, Transportation Projects page • Westminster City Cemetery office records ▪ ▪ ▪

25

▪ Utilities • Thames Water 5 year plan: 2010 - 2015 • Thames Water 25 year plan for 2010 - 2035 • UK Power Networks Network Asset Management Plan April 2010 -2015 • UK Power Networks Business Plan for London April 2015 to March 2023 (draft) • Invitation to Quote in Respect of a Contract for the Provision of Consultancy Services for Producing a Distributed Energy Masterplan for the City of Westminster

▪ Waste • Core Strategy Waste Evidence Base 2009 • WCC Revised Sustainable Waste Management Strategy (draft) due Dec 2013 • Page Street Cabinet Member Report (draft) • Newport Place Cabinet Member Report (draft) • Farm Street Cabinet Member Report (draft)

26

APPENDIX F_FULL INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECT SCHEDULE

Ref 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Education Education Education Education Education Education Education Education Category Expand SEN Expand Provision south 900 the in school place schools - new secondary of provision Expand in 4FE 6thplus form school schools - new secondary of provision Expand Hub Provision Alternative a Tri-Borough Alternative into Provision of Reorganisation primary schools of provision Expand primary schools of provision Expand Renewal) Park Day Nursery (Housing GreenWestbourne - Canal services integrated children's of provision Expanded Project Project Information CIL Eligible Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Westminster. Northin required provision Therapy Language Speech and 2013 be completed will 2016/2017for period - 2021 schools. Strategysecondary requirement for 2 new indicates Demand 2013 be completed will 2016/2017for period - 2021 schools. Strategysecondary requirement for 2 new indicates Demand School Beachcroft 1FE South in Westminster 2FE Northin Westminster available be deficit. any One should StrategyBorough for tackling 2016. There is not yet a Tri- for theto period identified No / projects planned . . Spring 2013. Description March March WCC / Free School WCC sector?) WCC private (and sponser) sponser) / WCC School (free school St CE Marylebone WCC WCC WCC Academy sponser provider delivery partners) Lead (and other Delivery funding funding DfE Free School not yet known other funding policy / School Funding WCC / DfE Free funding DfE Free School BSF funding DfE Free School S106 Need funding, DfE Basic funding, DfE Free School WCC sector?) WCC private (and Funding Source / Mechanism Delivery Start 2014 Phasing Finish 2015 2019 2015 2012 2012 2012 2017 £ - £- £30,000,000 £30,000,000 £- £- £- £1,200,000 £- of Infrastructure over Plan Estimated Total Cost Period Cost £ 15,000,000 £15,000,000 £30,000,000 £1,200,000 of Infrastructure 2012/13 Estimated Total Cost to 2017/18 £ 14,000,000 £14,000,000 £14,000,000 Amount over Plan £ 7,000,000 £7,000,000 £14,000,000 Amount over period 2012/13 to 2017/18 Funding consideration. under site are and options by accepted the DfE been has proposal A free school change. context policy may or may not be found provider however provider school seek Will a free approval. the DfE for by reviewed being is Proposal currently by BSF.Funded primary free school. a new opening An academy and Need Basic funding using was expanded by DFE. The other funded free school north. One is a new thein Two schools running fit out and build, Costs for required Commentary S106. £ - £- £16,000,000 £16,000,000 £- £- £- £1,200,000 £- Funding Gap over Plan Funding Gap £ 5,000,000.00 £5,000,000.00 £8,000,000.00 £16,000,000.00 £- £- £- £1,200,000.00 £- Funding Gap over period 2012/13 to 2017/18 12 11 10 18 17 16 15 14 13 Ref 9 Health Services Emergency Services Emergency Services Emergency Education Education Education Education Education Education Category Primary CareHealth Patrol Bases Safer Neighbourhood estateexisting of Fire: Modernisation demand service to meet growth in of Expansion Ambulance: at facilities universities improve and Maintain with demand line in - Expansion Education Further and Adult Learning Renewal) (Housing Facility Shared Education GreenWestbourne - SEN Expand Provision SEN Expand Provision SEN Expand Provision Project Project Information CIL Eligible Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Chruch Street Masterplan. Centre.Health Grove Lisson of provision Street site. the re-Includes & 4House Penn Lilestone at Hub Wellbeing and Health areas. travel times to from patrol and the tocommunity and reduce in presence a visible maintain Teams to Neighbourhood for Safer bases local a of tonumber need develop from June 2013, there is a stations thein police borough With the several closure of provider. from available No information provider. from available No information research offer. / academic maintaining and student population for expanding Provision population. for expanding Provision Westminster. South in required Impairment Vision provision Westminster.in anywhere at required primary phase Impairment Hearing provision Westminster. Northin required provision Autistic Spectrum Disorder Description Part Part of the WCC WCC sponser) / WCC School (free school St CE Marylebone PCT WCC / Westminster WCC, MOPAC Authority Planning Fire London Service NHS Trust Ambulance London Universities FE Colleges Services, Education Westminster Adult WCC delivery partners) Lead (and other Delivery contributions Developer WCC / NHS / WCC, MOPAC Authority Planning Fire London NHS HEFCE WCC not yet known other funding policy / School Funding WCC / DfE Free not yet known other funding policy / School Funding WCC / DfE Free funding DfE Free School Funding Source / Mechanism Delivery Start 2013 2013 2018 Phasing Finish 2015 2017 2023 2015 2015 2015 £ 5,500,000 £5,500,000 £124,000,000 £750,000 £- £- £- of Infrastructure over Plan Estimated Total Cost Period Cost £ 5,500,000 £5,500,000 £- £- of Infrastructure 2012/13 Estimated Total Cost to 2017/18 £ - £- Amount over Plan £ - £- Amount over period 2012/13 to 2017/18 Funding of Lisson GroveLisson of site. for release available reciepts capital There may be running. ongoing fit out and build, Costs for required projects identified. No individual not be current. may information thein SIP; identified Three projects were running fit out and build, Costs for required March 2013. be completed will 2016/2017 - 2021 for period Strategyidentified. is Solution not yet March 2013. be completed will 2016/2017 - 2021 for period Strategyidentified. is Solution not yet consideration. under site are and options by accepted the DfE been has proposal A free school Commentary £ 5,500,000 £5,500,000 £- £- £- £- £124,000,000 £750,000 £- £- £- Funding Gap over Plan Funding Gap £ 5,500,000.00 £5,500,000.00 £- £- £- £- £- £- £5,000,000.00 £5,000,000.00 £5,000,000.00 Funding Gap over period 2012/13 to 2017/18 22 21 20 19 25 24 23 Ref Health Health Health Health Health Health Health Category Healthcare NHSHealthcare Trust College Imperial CareSecondary Health - targetshousing on requirements based healthcare secondary primary Cumulative and Primary CareHealth Outcare hospital of Plan Implementation Out hospital of Primary CareHealth Primary CareHealth Project Project Information CIL Eligible Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes St Mary's Urgent Care Centre? estatesany strategy (2013+) through service If modelling. primarily be managed Will a Future."Healthier "Shaping NHS'son based Proposals calculation). homes (HUDU model Assumes 7,700 additional relocation. following accommodation Road. In-patient CAMHSat "north Latimerhub" Westminsterand South "hub" NHSTrust London Foundation - NorthCentral and West systems. Ongoing cost. integrated IT support services by supported clinical out of hospital of care social teams delivery and integrated and facilitate health infrastructure To toprovide primary care, diagnostricts etc. Community care, extended Community Centres.Health Care at Home, Primary care, Estate? Barracks / Ebury Bridge Opportunity Area? Chelsea the South Locality. Victoria New primary care in facility agreed. termslease finish, to be coreto Offered and shell a 1,003 sq.m. centre.health site). Hospital of The provision (on Hub Wellbeing East and Health Description Westminster PCT Westminster PCT Westminster PCT proviers commissioned / otherHopsitals Trusts Foundation / proviers other commissioned Trusts / / Hopsitals NHS/Foundation Westminster PCT Westminster PCT delivery partners) Lead (and other Delivery Unknown Unknown NHS Westminster PCT / NHS Westminster PCT / development strategic - in Unknown NHS Westminster PCT / NHS Westminster PCT / Funding Source / Mechanism Delivery 2013+ Start 2013 2012 Phasing 2017 toup Finish 2023 2014 2017 2018 2018 £ 8,700,000 £8,700,000 £1,480,000 £5,800,000 £6,800,000 £8,000,000 £2,000,000 of Infrastructure over Plan Estimated Total Cost Period Cost £ - £- £- £1,480,000 £5,800,000 £6,800,000 £8,000,000 £2,000,000 of Infrastructure 2012/13 Estimated Total Cost to 2017/18 £ - £- £- £- Amount over Plan £1,480,000.00 £ - £- £- £- Amount over period 2012/13 to 2017/18 Funding projects identified. No individual come online. projects housing when on depend Delivery teimscales projects identified. No individual funded First 2 years are Construction Shell & Core out; s106 fund will fit- NHS fund will Commentary £ - £- £8,700,000 £- £5,800,000 £6,800,000 £8,000,000 £2,000,000 Funding Gap over Plan Funding Gap £ - £- £- £1,480,000.00 £5,800,000.00 £6,800,000.00 £8,000,000.00 £2,000,000.00 Funding Gap over period 2012/13 to 2017/18 28 27 26 33 32 31 30 29 Ref Services Community Safety Services - Community Safety Services - Community Safety Services - Community Safety Services - Community Safety Services - Community Health Health Category requirements. with statutoryline in library provision Expand infrastructure safety Public behaviour crime anti-social and Services for victims of to the community mitigateand risk offenders Services to manage CCTV CCTV cemeteriesof Expansion People StrategyHousing for Older Westminster Specialist Project Project Information CIL Eligible Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Library. Marylebone of Relocation places. public in confidence and improve community safety security and infrastructure to safety public Development of to areas. local functions victim support providing for responsibility of devolution theon based Proposals offenders. areas to local manage on responsibilities additional Government to police place emerging on based Proposals authorities local wit hthe other and agencies control centre partnership in a CCTVtoFunds new develop deployment. CCTV for rapid technology crime mobile detection and to technologies better support new infrastructure, deploying the improving CCTVand through upgrading prevention realm crime detection and our topublic Funds enhance Hill. access paths at Mill additional East and Finchley; Hanwell at over-vaulting required; space 0.4ha additional of CCGs). & Central London London reimbursement tool by West Westminster (using s75 as care social across adult a contractEnable & for health Westminster. in provision of facilities improve and people older meets of needs the changing better Increase capacity which care homes) to costs,reduce assets nursing and (residential care social across and health Programme Redevelopment Description WCC groups Commissioning NHS London Clinical West and London WCC & Central WCC WCC MPS and WCC MOPAC and Trust Probation London WCC, MPS, and WCC WCC delivery partners) Lead (and other Delivery WCC WCC, MOPAC Home Office WCC, MOPAC, and Home Office WCC, MOPAC, and WCC WCC WCC for private sale sites development use on mixed of introductiuon (asset disposal); NHS contribution Funding Source / Mechanism Delivery 2013/14 Start 2013 2012 2013 2013 2013 2013 2013 Phasing 2019/20 Finish 2015 2017 2017 2017 2050 2014 205 £ 12,700,000 £12,700,000 £500,000 £69,000,000 of Infrastructure over Plan Estimated Total Cost Period Cost £ 12,700,000 £12,700,000 £500,000 £69,000,000 of Infrastructure 2012/13 Estimated Total Cost to 2017/18 £ 12,700,000 £12,700,000 £- Amount over Plan £4,700,000 £ 12,700,000 £12,700,000 £- Amount over period 2012/13 to 2017/18 Funding £4,700,000 delivery. Currently in system. run and maintain infrastructure; expiring renew current and Cost to required system. run and maintain infrastructure; expiring renew current and Cost to required works. for capital from WCC's budget funds be awarded process to annual the 2013/2014 in be bidding Will by WCC. recouped rental recharge requirements & to SHSOP site added development use mixed of £4-5m).approx Sale to(assumed be asset not required NHSof proceeds through disposal expected Funding Commentary £ - £- £- £- £- £- £- £500,000 £64,300,000 Funding Gap over Plan Funding Gap £ - £- £- £- £- £- £- £500,000.00 £64,300,000.00 Funding Gap over period 2012/13 to 2017/18 37 36 35 34 42 41 40 39 38 Ref Services Community Services Community Services Community Services Community Services Community Services Community Services Community Services Community Services Community Category (Housing Renewal) (Housing Employment Support Hub GreenWestbourne - Renewal) (Housing Park Community Centre GreenWestbourne - Canal requirements. with statutoryline in library provision Expand requirements. with statutoryline in library provision Expand requirements. with statutoryline in library provision Expand requirements. with statutoryline in library provision Expand requirements. with statutoryline in library provision Expand requirements. with statutoryline in library provision Expand requirements. with statutoryline in library provision Expand Project Project Information CIL Eligible Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Expand Westminster Expand Archives. Library. Main Victoria expand and Relocate Park Community Library. Queen's expand and Relocate efficiencies. generate operational better and meet demand local (currently split on sites) to Library Children's Padditingon Library and Main expand and Relocate Community Library expand and Relocate Vale Community Library Maida expand and Relocate for both. facilities improved to Reference provide Library with Westminster Merge CrossCharing Main Description WCC WCC WCC WCC WCC WCC WCC WCC WCC delivery partners) Lead (and other Delivery WCC WCC S106 S106 Contributions WCC, Developer Contributions WCC, Developer Contributions WCC, Developer Contributions WCC, Developer Contributions WCC, Developer Funding Source / Mechanism Delivery Start 2014 2014 Phasing Finish 2016 2017 2020 £ 500,000 £500,000 £1,200,000 £- £- £- £- £- £- £- of Infrastructure over Plan Estimated Total Cost Period Cost £ 500,000 £500,000 £1,200,000 £- £- £- £- £- £- £- of Infrastructure 2012/13 Estimated Total Cost to 2017/18 Amount over Plan Amount over period 2012/13 to 2017/18 Funding running fit out and build, Costs for required running fit out and build, Costs for required 2020. more by space Service need will development. as part the of VT12 go then will forward demonstrate need If service can centre the of estate. thein located the community if betterCould serve Trust.Housing Square the Dolphin by developed being scheme multi-use into a incorporated being of Possibility redevelopment. for be released can that the library site alternative sites so for is looking (private developer) Grosvenor Estates issues. design library with internal Very popular busy, site. appropriate an locating around difficulties are practical scheme but there This is a desirable Commentary £ 500,000 £500,000 £1,200,000 £- £- £- £- £- £- £- Funding Gap over Plan Funding Gap £ 500,000.00 £500,000.00 £1,200,000.00 £- £- £- £- £- £- £- Funding Gap over period 2012/13 to 2017/18 46 45 44 43 51 50 49 48 47 Ref Open Open Space Parks and Open Space Parks and Open Space Parks and Open Space Parks and Services Community Services Community Services Community Services Community Services Community Category Broadley Gardens Broadley StreetChurch and - Lisson Renewal) (Housing South Westminster Gardens and Churchill Space Strategy Implement WCC Open Space Strategy Implement WCC Open North Westminsterof thecommunity in space 500 - 600sqm of requirement of Additional Job brokerage Renewal) Space (Housing Office Flexible Oldbury House GreenWestbourne - Renewal) (Housing Stowe Centre Expansion GreenWestbourne - Paddington Arts Heritage and at StCentre fo Magdalene's Project Project Information CIL Eligible Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes of costsof by confirmation More and detail by service undertaken area. visitors. being Review and working population for residental, space Playable 2013 costsof by confirmation service area. More and detail by undertaken being Review visitors. and population Parks working for residental, 192sqm activity space. 100sqmuse space, flexible space, meeting/training 232sqm 35sqmspace, office with workforce. line in facilities of Expansion NWWEDA. Arts Culture and and WCC masterplan, Strategy for Commplements WG NW Westminster. creates a in visitor destination overcomes serverance and activity, economic and Creates a driver for cultural . Description end 2013 . end WCC WCC WCC Primary School, Magdalene's StChurch, Mary Magdalene's St Mary Development Trust; Paddington WCC WCC developers charities, private organistions, governmental WCC / quasi- developers charities, private organistions, governmental WCC / quasi- Job Centre Plus delivery partners) Lead (and other Delivery WCC WCC developers charities, private organistions, governmental WCC / quasi- developers charities, private organistions, governmental WCC / quasi- Pensions Dept Work of and WCC WCC corporate appeal community and WCC, Fund, Heritage Lottery Funding Source / Mechanism Delivery Start 2018 2018 2013 2014 2014 Phasing Finish 2015 2018 2023 2023 2022 £ 8,500,000 £8,500,000 £14,600,000 £36,200,000 £200,000 £750,000 £1,450,000 £4,800,000 of Infrastructure over Plan Estimated Total Cost Period Cost £ 8,500,000 £8,500,000 £- £- £- £- £- £4,800,000 of Infrastructure 2012/13 Estimated Total Cost to 2017/18 £ 3,500,000 £3,500,000 Amount over Plan £ 3,500,000 £3,500,000 Amount over period 2012/13 to 2017/18 Funding May May 2013 available plan cost full Design and expected Cost plans and projects identified. No individual projects identified No individual running fit out and build, Costs for required running fit out and build, Costs for required . renewal £350k housing £600k fundraising, £3.2mfunding HLF, running. possible fit out and build, Costs for required Commentary end 2013. end £ 5,000,000 £5,000,000 £- £14,600,000 £36,200,000 £- £200,000 £750,000 £1,450,000 £4,800,000 Funding Gap over Plan Funding Gap £ 5,000,000.00 £5,000,000.00 £- £- £- £- £- £- £- £4,800,000.00 Funding Gap over period 2012/13 to 2017/18 54 53 52 58 57 56 55 Ref Public Realm Public Realm Public Open Space Parks and Open Space Parks and Open Space Parks and Open Space Parks and Open Space Parks and Category Legible London London Legible Mayor's 100 Spaces Public facilities existing improve and Maintain facilities existing improve and Maintain facilities existing improve and Maintain facilities existing improve and Maintain Park Westbourne & Canal Project Project Information CIL Eligible Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes signage. to with link streetunderpasses in signage all updating including London around Signage to support navigation Undefined. generating.) income events. (This become could holding when the facilities community rentgroups who better accommodate to also Care and for staff as part facilities Dutyof of or replacing - upgrading Park attendant huts across city across city.Play equipment riverfront gardens. tosimilar surface that at other with resin-bound refinish Embankment Gardens - atPathways Victoria - replace Grounds offices St Church John's Wood Description WCC WCC WCC / TfL WCC WCC WCC WCC delivery partners) Lead (and other Delivery Contributions TfL / Developer contributions/TfL business Government / WCC / Central WCC WCC BID WCC, Northbank WCC WCC Funding Source / Mechanism Delivery Start 2014 2016 2012 2013 2013 Phasing Finish 2014 2017 2022 2017 2017 2020 £ 900,000 £900,000 £249,000 £150,000 £500,000 £250,000 £5,000,000 of Infrastructure over Plan Estimated Total Cost Period Cost £ 900,000 £900,000 £249,000 £75,000 £500,000 £250,000 £2,500,000 of Infrastructure 2012/13 Estimated Total Cost to 2017/18 £ - £- £- £- £- £- £2,500,000 Amount over Plan £900,000.00 £ - £- £- £- £- £- Amount over period 2012/13 to 2017/18 Funding £900,000.00 are underway. discussions funding and development scheme but Unfunded year cost £15kof per programme with 10 year rolling a Green Corridor. createand gardens other riverfront with all aesthetically Victoria Garden's link work would this Completing use. of flexibility greaterallow will facility and Improving location contractor. maintenance costs from grounds to leads inflated and wrong place is thein building interest as the best the Council's Doing this work is in Masterplan Westbourne to Linked Commentary £ - £- £- £249,000 £150,000 £500,000 £250,000 £2,500,000 Funding Gap over Plan Funding Gap £ - £- £- £249,000.00 £75,000.00 £500,000.00 £250,000.00 £2,500,000.00 Funding Gap over period 2012/13 to 2017/18 63 62 61 60 59 67 66 65 64 Ref Public Realm Public Realm Public Realm Public Realm Public Realm Public Realm Public Realm Public Realm Public Realm Public Category Pedestrian Environment Pedestrian Cycle Parking route Delamere Terrace cycle Non Cycling LCN+ LCN+Cycling Station Paddington Victoria Station CrossCharing Station Station Marylebone Project Project Information CIL Eligible Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes safety. connectivity, capacity and Improve accessibility, Estates.estates Peabody and atparking City West Homes cycle of Increase provision Improve cycle facilities. Improve cycle facilities. Improve cycle facilities. streetscapeand appearance. Improve toaccessiblity station Improve toaccessiblity station. Improve toaccessiblity station. Improve toaccessiblity station. Description / / TfL WCC / Network Rail Network Rail Network Rail Network Rail TfL WCC WCC WCC / TfL WCC / TfL delivery partners) Lead (and other Delivery TfL contributions WCC / Developer WCC TfL / Sustrans TfL / Sustrans Network / TfL Rail Network / TfL Rail Network / TfL Rail Network / TfL Rail Funding Source / Mechanism Delivery Start Phasing Finish £ 25,000,000 £25,000,000 £100,000 £320,000 £15,000,000 £200,811,500 £8,000,000 £ 2,975,000 £2,975,000 £5,000,000 of Infrastructure over Plan Estimated Total Cost Period Cost £ - £- £200,811,500 of Infrastructure 2012/13 Estimated Total Cost to 2017/18 £ 2,700,000.00 £2,700,000.00 £- £811,500 £- £- Amount over Plan £ 811,500 £811,500 Amount over period 2012/13 to 2017/18 Funding continuing. discussions funding and development Schemeconfirmed. Some funding continuing. discussions funding and development Schemeconfirmed. Some funding continuing. discussions funding and development Schemeconfirmed. Some funding continuing. discussions funding and development Schemeconfirmed. Some funding continuing. discussions funding and development Schemeconfirmed. Some funding continuing. discussions funding and development Schemeconfirmed. Some funding are underway. discussions funding and development scheme but Unfunded are underway. discussions funding and development scheme but Unfunded are underway. discussions funding and development scheme but Unfunded Commentary £ 22,300,000 £22,300,000 £- £100,000 £320,000 £2,975,000 £15,000,000 £200,000,000 £8,000,000 £5,000,000 Funding Gap over Plan Funding Gap £ - £- £- £- £- £- £- £200,000,000.00 £- £- Funding Gap over period 2012/13 to 2017/18 77 76 75 74 73 72 71 70 69 68 85 84 83 82 81 80 79 78 Ref Public Realm Public Realm Public Realm Public Realm Public Realm Public Realm Public Realm Public Realm Public Realm Public Realm Public Realm Public Realm Public Realm Public Realm Public Realm Public Realm Public Realm Public Realm Public Category Named Named Streetscape relatedNamed Traffic Future Major Projects River Piers StreetBond Victoria Embankment and Strand/ Northbank (including LSE GoreKensington NorthMayfair Covent GardenSoho and Works Way, Circus Cambridge Tottenham Court Two Baker Street Two Way Square) 2 streetsside (Leicester Two Way Phase Piccadilly Haymarket 2, including Two Way Phase Piccadilly 1 Two Way Phase Piccadilly ticket4 including office Leicester Square 1Phase - Bus Stop Accessibility Project Project Information CIL Eligible Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Baker Baker Street. Sanctuary, Neat Streets WTS, Yard, Westminster The Abbey Westminster Deans Abbey Portman Square, Arting Lane, R38, Grove. Ladbroke measures, St Martins Cross, cycle hire complementary improvements, cycle hire and Strand Area Aldwych Not yet identified. Plan. February 2013 River Action thein Mayor’s identified Embankment piers are passengers. Westminster and to simpler information and toservices clearer and provide increased accommodate strategic pier network to a of The development Improve accessibility. stops. at Iimprove accessibility bus Description WCC WCC WCC WCC WCC TfL WCC WCC WCC WCC WCC WCC WCC WCC WCC WCC WCC WCC delivery partners) Lead (and other Delivery contributions WCC / TfL / business WCC / TfL / DfT contributions WCC / TfL / business TfL / s106 Sector / s106 TfL / BID / Private TfL / BID / s106 TfL / s106 s108 TfL / Private sector / s107 TfL / Private sector / s106 TfL / Private sector / TfL / s106 TfL / s106 private sector TfL / BID / s106 / private sector TfL / BID / s106 / contributions WCC / TfL / business contributions WCC business /TfL/ contributions WCC / /TfL business TfL Funding Source / Mechanism Delivery Start 2013 2013 2011 2009 2009 2012 2012 2016 2013 2013 2013 2013 2013 2013 2013 2013 2013 Phasing Finish 2015 2018 2018 2018 2018 2018 2018 2018 2018 2018 2018 2018 2018 2018 2016 2014 2014 £ 9,444,000 £9,444,000 £6,731,000 £1,000,000 £5,000,000 £10,000,000 £15,000,000 £5,000,000 £10,000,000 £5,000,000 £5,000,000 £10,000,000 £5,000,000 £10,000,000 £5,000,000 £7,908,000 £987,000 £3,834,000 £434,000 of Infrastructure over Plan Estimated Total Cost Period Cost £ 7,444,000 £7,444,000 £4,731,000 £1,000,000 £5,000,000 £10,000,000 £15,000,000 £5,000,000 £10,000,000 £5,000,000 £5,000,000 £10,000,000 £5,000,000 £10,000,000 £5,000,000 £7,908,000 £987,000 £3,834,000 of Infrastructure 2012/13 Estimated Total Cost to 2017/18 £ 1,977,000.00 £1,977,000.00 £6,731,000.00 £- £- £- £- £- £- £- £- £- £- £- £- £5,344,000.00 £987,000.00 £3,834,000.00 £80,000.00 Amount over Plan £ 1,977,000.00 £1,977,000.00 £2,131,000.00 £- £- £- £- £- £- £- £- £- £- £- £- £5,344,000.00 £987,000.00 £3,834,000.00 Amount over period 2012/13 to 2017/18 Funding envisaged. envisaged. works currently the extent the of to required deliver be will contributions other and TBC. Match funding this work. Amount to support funding TfL some has continuing. discussions funding and development Schemeconfirmed. Some funding Commentary £ 7,467,000 £7,467,000 £- £1,000,000 £5,000,000 £10,000,000 £15,000,000 £5,000,000 £10,000,000 £5,000,000 £5,000,000 £10,000,000 £5,000,000 £10,000,000 £5,000,000 £2,564,000 £- £- £354,000 Funding Gap over Plan Funding Gap £ 5,467,000.00 £5,467,000.00 £2,600,000.00 £1,000,000.00 £5,000,000.00 £10,000,000.00 £15,000,000.00 £5,000,000.00 £10,000,000.00 £5,000,000.00 £5,000,000.00 £10,000,000.00 £5,000,000.00 £10,000,000.00 £5,000,000.00 £2,564,000.00 £- £- £- Funding Gap over period 2012/13 to 2017/18 105 104 103 102 101 100 94 93 92 91 90 89 88 87 86 99 98 97 96 95 Ref Public Realm Public Realm Public Realm Public Realm Public Realm Public Realm Public Realm Public Realm Public Realm Public Realm Public Realm Public Realm Public Realm Public Realm Public Realm Public Realm Public Realm Public Realm Public Realm Public Realm Public Category Patems /LTVA/Crossrail Transport Sustainable projects River Thames Area future Future Projects Soho Current Projects South StreetMolton StreetRamillies James Street / St Christ scheme/projects Street/Bond Street - future Street/RegentOxford StreetOxford -east end current scheme/projects Street/Bond Street - Street/RegentOxford Edgeware Road Mercer Street Improvements Streets Area Side and projects Covent Garden active Chinatown Newport Place StreetWadour integration projects Victoria Street area Action Plan Victoria Piazza - Cathedral Project Project Information CIL Eligible Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Walking / / Cycling Buses Walking Description WCC WCC WCC WCC WCC WCC WCC WCC WCC WCC WCC WCC WCC WCC WCC WCC WCC WCC WCC WCC delivery partners) Lead (and other Delivery contributions WCC / TfL / business contributions WCC / TfL / business contributions WCC / TfL / business contributions business WCC / TfL / contributions WCC / TfL / business contributions business WCC / TfL / contributions WCC / TfL / business contributions business WCC / TfL / contributions WCC / TfL / business contributions WCC / TfL / business contributions WCC / TfL / business contributions WCC / TfL / business contributions WCC / TfL / business contributions WCC / TfL / business contributions WCC / TfL / business contributions WCC / TfL / business contributions WCC / TfL / business contributions WCC / TfL / business contributions WCC / TfL / business contributions WCC / TfL / business Funding Source / Mechanism Delivery Start 2012 2015 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012 2013 2012 2012 2015 2013 2012 2012 2012 2012 2013 2012 2012 2012 Phasing Finish 2014 2018 2018 2014 2013 2013 2013 2013 2018 2013 2013 2013 2013 2018 2015 2013 2014 2014 2018 2015 £ 535,000 £535,000 £2,680,000 £6,000,000 £500,000 £33,000 £910,000 £21,000 £1,000,000 £15,150,000 £150,000 £461,000 £1,000 £82,000 £5,900,000 £2,717,000 £82,000 £400,000 £400,000 £7,024,000 £1,540,000 of Infrastructure over Plan Estimated Total Cost Period Cost £ 535,000 £535,000 £2,230,000 £6,000,000 £500,000 £33,000 £910,000 £21,000 £1,000,000 £12,150,000 £150,000 £461,000 £1,000 £82,000 £3,900,000 £2,717,000 £82,000 £400,000 £400,000 £5,024,000 £1,540,000 of Infrastructure 2012/13 Estimated Total Cost to 2017/18 £ 535,000.00 £535,000.00 £880,000.00 £1,400,000.00 £500,000.00 £33,000.00 £910,000.00 £21,000.00 £1,000,000.00 £3,450,000.00 £150,000.00 £461,000.00 £1,000.00 £82,000.00 £1,400,000.00 £2,217,000.00 £82,000.00 £400,000.00 £400,000.00 £1,400,000.00 £1,540,000.00 Amount over Plan £ 535,000.00 £535,000.00 £880,000.00 £900,000.00 £500,000.00 £33,000.00 £910,000.00 £21,000.00 £1,000,000.00 £3,450,000.00 £150,000.00 £461,000.00 £1,000.00 £82,000.00 £900,000.00 £2,217,000.00 £82,000.00 £400,000.00 £400,000.00 £1,400,000.00 £1,540,000.00 Amount over period 2012/13 to 2017/18 Funding Commentary £ - £- £1,800,000 £4,600,000 £- £- £- £- £- £11,700,000 £- £- £- £- £4,500,000 £500,000 £- £- £- £5,624,000 £- Funding Gap over Plan Funding Gap £ - £- £1,350,000.00 £5,100,000.00 £- £- £- £- £- £8,700,000.00 £- £- £- £- £3,000,000.00 £500,000.00 £- £- £- £3,624,000.00 £- Funding Gap over period 2012/13 to 2017/18 118 117 116 115 114 113 112 111 110 109 108 107 106 Ref Public Realm Public Realm Public Realm Public Realm Public Realm Public Realm Public Realm Public Realm Public Realm Public Realm Public Realm Public Realm Public Realm Public Category 6-9 Buckingham 6-9Gate Buckingham Improvement A Phase Chiltern Street Streetscape Street Mackennal Zone Pedestrian StreetNewburgh Courts Royal Justiceof Street London StreetHigh Marylebone Improvement Scheme StreetscapePlace Wilcox Lane Marylebone Harrow Road Praed Street West End StreetOxford Grosvenor Project Project Information CIL Eligible Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes accessibility. Improve pedestrian accessibility. Improve pedestrian accessibility. Improve pedestrian Ganton Street. zone to pedestrian extend accessibility; pedestrian Improve streetscape and accessibility. pedestrian Improve streetscape and Area improvements. adjacent heritage areas. Victoriabetween Street and Improve streetscapelinks and Improve accessibility. Improve accessibility. Improve accessibility. Improve accessibility. Description WCC WCC WCC WCC WCC WCC WCC WCC WCC WCC WCC WCC WCC delivery partners) Lead (and other Delivery contributions business Government / WCC / Central contributions business Government / WCC / Central contributions business Government / WCC / Central contributions business Government / WCC / Central WCC contributions WCC / TfL / business contributions WCC / TfL / business contributions WCC / TfL / business contributions WCC / TfL / business contributions business Government / WCC / Central contributions business Government / WCC / Central contributions business Government / WCC / Central contributions WCC / TfL / business Funding Source / Mechanism Delivery Start 2012 2012 2015 2012 2013 Phasing Finish 2013 2016 2014 2017 2014 £ 224,000 £224,000 £800,000 £501,000 £3,600,000 £1,500,000 £500,000 £20,000,000 £3,048,000 of Infrastructure over Plan Estimated Total Cost Period Cost £ 224,000 £224,000 £800,000 £501,000 £3,600,000 £3,048,000 of Infrastructure 2012/13 Estimated Total Cost to 2017/18 £ 224,000.00 £224,000.00 £800,000.00 £501,000.00 £800,000.00 £- £- £- £3,048,000.00 Amount over Plan £ 224,000.00 £224,000.00 £800,000.00 £501,000.00 £800,000.00 £- £- £- £3,048,000.00 Amount over period 2012/13 to 2017/18 Funding Fully Fully funded. Fully funded. continuing. discussions funding and development Schemeconfirmed. Some funding continuing. discussions funding and development Schemeconfirmed. Some funding Fully funded. continuing. discussions funding and development Schemeconfirmed. Some funding continuing. discussions funding and development Schemeconfirmed. Some funding are underway. discussions funding and development scheme but Unfunded Commentary £ - £- £- £- £- £- £- £- £- £2,800,000 £1,500,000 £500,000 £20,000,000 £- Funding Gap over Plan Funding Gap £ - £- £- £- £- £- £- £- £- £2,800,000.00 £- £- £- £- Funding Gap over period 2012/13 to 2017/18 129 128 127 126 125 124 123 122 121 120 119 Ref Public Realm Public Realm Public Realm Public Realm Public Realm Public Realm Public Realm Public Realm Public Realm Public Realm Public Realm Public Category across all housing estates across housing all realm Standards public of Renewal) (Housing Ebury Bridge Estate Renewal) (Housing South Westminster Gardens and Churchill Renewal) (Housing Road / Westbourne Harrow Renewal) (Housing flyover north Edgware of Road Renewal) StreetChurch (Housing Access Cycle and Pedestrian Hermitage Street GroveWestbourne and Queensway Projects / Westbourne Paddington Berwick Street Improvement Scheme 135-137 StreetNew Bond Project Project Information CIL Eligible Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes crossing crossing Regent's Canal. cycle routenorth-south to Road support creation a of a Provide across link Harrow 1.Phase Streetscape improvements routes into market area. Improve market area and upgrade. lighting Place, part Bloomfield of pedestrianise accessibility, Improve pedestrian Description WCC WCC WCC WCC WCC WCC WCC WCC WCC WCC WCC / TfL delivery partners) Lead (and other Delivery WCC WCC WCC WCC WCC WCC Contributions Developer WCC / TfL / Contributions Developer WCC / TfL / contributions WCC / TfL / business contributions business Government / WCC / Central Funding Source / Mechanism Delivery Start 2014 2012 2012 2013 2013 2012 2013 2015 2014 2014 2014 Phasing Finish 2023 2017 2020 2020 2024 2017 2013 2015 2018 2015 2013 £ 80,000,000 £80,000,000 £1,000,000 £- £7,000,000 £10,000,000 £13,000,000 £2,500,000 £6,500,000 £1,700,000 of Infrastructure over Plan Estimated Total Cost Period Cost £ 40,000,000 £40,000,000 £1,000,000 £- £3,500,000 £6,000,000 £13,000,000 £2,500,000 £4,500,000 £1,700,000 of Infrastructure 2012/13 Estimated Total Cost to 2017/18 £ 60,000,000.00 £60,000,000.00 £500,000.00 £- £3,500,000.00 £- £3,500,000.00 £2,500,000.00 £1,400,000.00 £1,700,000.00 Amount over Plan £ 30,000,000.00 £30,000,000.00 £500,000.00 £- £- £- £3,500,000.00 £2,500,000.00 £900,000.00 £1,700,000.00 Amount over period 2012/13 to 2017/18 Funding estates across all multiplied area studies recent on Based 2013end expected Costs plans and Masterplan Westbourne to Linked 2013 May end available Concept design May 2013 end available plan cost full Design and Fully funded. Fully funded. Commentary £ 20,000,000 £20,000,000 £500,000 £- £3,500,000 £10,000,000 £9,500,000 £- £- £5,100,000 £- £- Funding Gap over Plan Funding Gap £ 10,000,000.00 £10,000,000.00 £500,000.00 £- £3,500,000.00 £6,000,000.00 £9,500,000.00 £- £- £3,600,000.00 £- £- Funding Gap over period 2012/13 to 2017/18 139 138 137 136 135 134 133 132 131 130 Ref Leisure Sports and Leisure Sports and Leisure Sports and Leisure Sports and Realm Public Realm Public Realm Public Realm Public Realm Public Realm Public Category Chelsea Barracks Chelsea SportsMoberly Centre StreetMarshall Sports Centre for Lighting Maintenance Preventative Planned SmartLights Scheme and of Implementation areas. marketnew developing and Improving existing Car Schemes Club facilities Coach Control Taxi Paddington facilities Taxi Project Project Information CIL Eligible Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Subterranean. for the brief site. the planning S106 requirement as part of 5300m2 wet dry and facility. 6500m2 wet dry and facility. part the of site. Grade 2 on flats built facility; existing of refurbishment and Redevelopment New sports centre. TMA columns, infrastructure. smart signs, structurally critical regulative sign replacement, testing,improvements, load programme, lighting energy replacement, saving column cherished equipment, Aged expired this. is working on Management Projects not Cityyet defined. ownership. thefor car need Reduce Improve accessibility. Improve taxi facilities. Improve accessibility. Description TfL TfL / WCC WCC TfL / WCC WCC Private/ developer WCC Private/ developer WCC Private/ developer WCC WCC WCC WCC delivery partners) Lead (and other Delivery agreement development partner through a development Private agreement development partner through a development Private agreement development partner through a development Private Lottery Fund Skills Active, Big WCC, Sport England, WCC Contributions WCC / Developer Contributions WCC / Developer Contributions Developer WCC / TfL / Contributions Developer WCC / TfL / Contributions Developer WCC / TfL / Funding Source / Mechanism Delivery Start 2012 Phasing Finish 2017 2016 2016 2016 2018 £ 40,000,000 £40,000,000 £16,700,000 £12,000,000 £4,000,000 £15,844,000 £1,000,000 £2,000,000 of Infrastructure over Plan Estimated Total Cost Period Cost £ 40,000,000 £40,000,000 £16,700,000 £12,000,000 £4,000,000 £15,844,000 of Infrastructure 2012/13 Estimated Total Cost to 2017/18 £ 40,000,000.00 £40,000,000.00 £16,700,000.00 £12,000,000.00 £4,000,000.00 £15,844,000.00 £- £- Amount over Plan £ 40,000,000.00 £40,000,000.00 £16,700,000.00 £12,000,000.00 £4,000,000.00 £15,844,000.00 £- £- Amount over period 2012/13 to 2017/18 Funding committed. is Funding continuing. discussions funding and development Schemeconfirmed. Some funding continuing. discussions funding and development Schemeconfirmed. Some funding continuing. discussions funding and development Schemeconfirmed. Some funding continuing. discussions funding and development Schemeconfirmed. Some funding Commentary £ - £- £- £- £- £- £- £- £- £1,000,000 £2,000,000 Funding Gap over Plan Funding Gap £ - £- £- £- £- £- £- £- £- £- £- Funding Gap over period 2012/13 to 2017/18 149 148 147 146 145 144 143 142 141 140 Ref Transport Transport Transport Transport Transport Transport Leisure Sports and Leisure Sports and Leisure Sports and Leisure Sports and Category Maintenance - Highways Maintenance Preventative Planned Structures - Bridges and Maintenance Preventative Planned Bus Priority Structures Future Bridges and Structures Named Bridges and Bus service enhancement Grasspitches playing External tennis courts Synthetic turf facilitis Games Areas Free-to-access Multi-Use Project Project Information CIL Eligible Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes footways to footways their extend life. strengthening maintenance, programmed surfacing roads, skid resistant principal streetdefective nameplates, of replacement managements, asset reconstruction, highways gully maintenance, programmed footway paving, damaged maintenance, Carriageway programmed Various. Improve journey bus times. responsibility. WCC for which sole has for repairs / works to bridges be but not will yet identified Strand parapets. reparis, animation, bridge Embankment Sturgeon Victoria underpasses, improvements to road tunnel refurbishment), Footbridge (lift joint), Jubilee Golden (mid-span scheme not progressed). being for account Cross River Tram (Strategiclinks and review to capacity additional Provide Across Westminster. South Westminster. South Westminster. throughout Westminster. areas residential in Required Description WCC / TfL WCC Private/ developer WCC WCC TfL, WCC, WCC WCC delivery partners) Lead (and other Delivery WCC / TfL WCC / TfL TfL , WCC WCC WCC / TfL / DfT contributions TfL / Developer partners development Private Funding Source / Mechanism Delivery Start 2012 2012 2017 2012 Phasing TBD Finish 2018 2018 2017 £ 37,044,000 £37,044,000 £3,795,000 £1,000,000 £4,074,000 of Infrastructure over Plan Estimated Total Cost Period Cost £ 37,044,000 £37,044,000 £3,130,000 £1,000,000 £3,074,000 of Infrastructure 2012/13 Estimated Total Cost to 2017/18 £ 37,044,000.00 £37,044,000.00 £3,615,000.00 £- £3,624,000.00 £100,000.00 Amount over Plan £ 37,044,000.00 £37,044,000.00 £3,000,000.00 £- £2,624,000.00 Amount over period 2012/13 to 2017/18 Funding Westminster. network in 10% the of highway make only up which TLRNon roads for routesare which responsible TfL only Westminster. network in 10% the of highway make only up which TLRNon roads for routesare which responsible TfL only Use Games Areas. Multi of availability and quality improvement thein support an West Homes to Working with City Commentary £ - £- £180,000 £- £1,000,000 £450,000 -£ 100,000 £- £- £- £- Funding Gap over Plan Funding Gap £ - £- £130,000.00 £- £1,000,000.00 £450,000.00 £- £- £- £- £- Funding Gap over period 2012/13 to 2017/18 165 164 163 162 161 160 159 158 157 156 155 154 153 152 151 150 Ref Transport Transport Transport Transport Transport Transport Transport Transport Transport Transport Transport Transport Transport Transport Transport Transport Category Station Improvements Victoria Underground Station Improvements Rail Victoria Mainline Crossrail 2 Crossrail Sussex Brighton and Integrated Kent Franchise Court Road Crossrail / LULTottenham Crossrail / LUL Dean Street East Crossrail Street/ LUL Bond West Crossrail Street/ LUL Bond Crossrail / LUL Paddington Street Victoria Station, Victoria Safety SchemesRoad Local Schemes Safety and Management Prioritised Traffic of Implementation Transport Sustainable StreetOxford West Project Project Information CIL Eligible Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Address Address overcrowding. Address overcrowding. Victoria. Tottenham Courtand Road capacity at additional provide Project not yet secured. To rail link link. a faster provide east to west system and underground pressure To theon alleviate Victoria. capacity into Increased VictoriaCross. Charing and capacity into Increased Improve road safety. Park.Queen's Crossing at Lane, Kilburn scheme is a toZebra develop proposed junction. The second Street Road/Gillingham the and Belgrave junction Street Belgrave Road/Denbigh junction, Place Cumberland Berkley Street/ Great Upper junctions namely at signals traffic three The first is the removal of Temple Place. socket dual for motorcycles on one charge new and points Street, Leinster Gardens; Two Street, Upper Grosvenor Whitcomb Street,on Berners Two Electric Car Points Charing Street,Palace Place; Whitehall Horseferry on each Road, One Electric Car Point Charging Description TfL TfL / WCC WCC / TfL TfL Network Rail TfL / Network Rail TfL / Network Rail Network Rail Network Rail WCC / TfL WCC / TfL WCC / TfL WCC / TfL WCC / TfL WCC / TfL WCC TfL / WCC delivery partners) Lead (and other Delivery TfL Network Rail Developers / Buinesses TfL / Network / Rail Developers / Buinesses TfL / Network / Rail Network Rail Network Rail TfL / s106 TfL / s106 TfL / s106 TfL / s106 TfL / s106 Sector / s106 TfL / BID / Private WCC / TfL WCC / TfL Contributions Developer WCC / TfL / ? Funding Source / Mechanism Delivery Start 2013 2013 2013 2013 2013 2013 2013 2013 2012 Phasing Finish 2017 2026 2017 2014 2014 2018 2018 2018 2018 2018 2018 2018 2014 2014 2018 £ 101,000,000 £101,000,000 £56,000,000 £5,000,000 £5,000,000 £10,000,000 £5,000,000 £5,000,000 £20,000,000 £1,465,000 £2,246,000 £170,000 £80,000,000 of Infrastructure over Plan Estimated Total Cost Period Cost £ 101,000,000 £101,000,000 £56,000,000 £5,000,000 £5,000,000 £10,000,000 £5,000,000 £5,000,000 £20,000,000 £1,115,000 £1,746,000 £170,000 £80,000,000 of Infrastructure 2012/13 Estimated Total Cost to 2017/18 £ 101,000,000.00 £101,000,000.00 £56,000,000.00 £- £- £- £- £- £- £330,000.00 £546,000.00 £170,000.00 £- Amount over Plan £ 101,000,000.00 £101,000,000.00 £56,000,000.00 £- £- £- £- £- £- £330,000.00 £546,000.00 £170,000.00 £- Amount over period 2012/13 to 2017/18 Funding business plan. business through TfL Fully funded scheme. planned Committed and funding. and subject to powers safeguarded Line other mechanisms. CIL Mayoral and through the Is funded being Commentary £ - £- £- £- £- £- £- £5,000,000 £5,000,000 £10,000,000 £5,000,000 £5,000,000 £20,000,000 £1,135,000 £1,700,000 £- £80,000,000 Funding Gap over Plan Funding Gap £ - £- £- £- £- £- £- £5,000,000.00 £5,000,000.00 £10,000,000.00 £5,000,000.00 £5,000,000.00 £20,000,000.00 £785,000.00 £1,200,000.00 £- £80,000,000.00 Funding Gap over period 2012/13 to 2017/18 177 176 175 174 173 172 171 170 169 168 167 166 Ref Utilities Utilities Utilities Transport Transport Transport Transport Transport Transport Transport Transport Transport Category Sewarage Sewarage scheme Thames Tideway Drainage Systems Urban Sustainable - Risk Flood Management Improvement Works Line Bakerloo Works & City Improvement Line HammersmithCircle and Improvement Works Line Metropolitan Works District Improvement Line Improvement Works Line Piccadilly Improvement Works Northern 2Phase Line Station Improvements StreetBond Underground Improvements Station Underground Tottenham Court Road Station Improvements Underground Paddington Project Project Information CIL Eligible Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No odor odor reduction. Westminster City, including outside be located treatmentnew works tolikely Westminster inside City and treatment works Refurbished the River Thames. water into foul of discharge water order in to prevent water separate from foul ain sewer Alleviate flooding; earliest. implementation. from government on guidance term options. Awaiting investigate long and body Adopt SUDS. Create approval sewer flooding. alleviate Help frequency. increased trains new and signalling, Increase capacity by improving merged service. and T-cup trains, frequency increased Increase capacity with new frequency. trains increased and Increase capacity with new longer trains. and Increase capacity with new trains. new and signalling Increase capacity by improving Kennington. Cross Charing and lines and Bank Seperation of Address overcrowding. Address overcrowding. Address overcrowding. Description April April 14 at TfL TfL TfL TfL TfL TfL TfL regulator Thames Water and regulator Thames Water and WCC TfL TfL delivery partners) Lead (and other Delivery Thames Thames Water regulator Thames Water and regulator Water and Developers, Thames WCC, Private TfL TfL TfL TfL TfL TfL TfL TfL TfL Funding Source / Mechanism Delivery TBD TBD Start Phasing Finish 2020 2022 2016 2016 2018 2020 2020 2016 2016 2014 £ 59,000,000 £59,000,000 £22,000,000 of Infrastructure over Plan Estimated Total Cost Period Cost £ - £- £- of Infrastructure 2012/13 Estimated Total Cost to 2017/18 £ 22,000,000.00 £22,000,000.00 Amount over Plan £59,000,000 Amount over period 2012/13 to 2017/18 Funding refurbished. Station been has Sewage Pumping the and Western network 2010in strategic sewer London's on Works were begun cycle. planning Water's next 5 year Thames in identified No projects are plan. TfL business through confirmed not yetFunding plan. business through TfL Fully funded plan. business through TfL Fully funded plan. business through TfL Fully funded plan. TfL business through confirmed not yetFunding plan. TfL business through confirmed not yetFunding plan. business through TfL Fully funded plan. business through TfL Fully funded plan. business through TfL Fully funded Commentary £ - £- £- £- £- £- £- £- £- £- £- £- £- Funding Gap over Plan Funding Gap £ - £- £- £- £- £- £- £- £- £- £- £- £- Funding Gap over period 2012/13 to 2017/18 188 187 186 185 184 183 182 181 180 179 178 Ref Utilities Utilities Utilities Utilities Utilities Utilities Utilities Utilities Utilities Utilities Utilities Category Energy Carbon Low of Provision Renewal) District Heating (Housing GreenWestbourne - Renewal) District Heating (Housing utility database Unified NetworkSubway Pipe infrastructure telecoms Additional capacity water supply Additional gas capacity Additional capacity electrical Additional Stations Pumping Sewers Project Project Information CIL Eligible Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Network. Distributedexisting Energy of upgrade and Expansion works resinstatementsof and improve efficiency massively £100K per year - would Estimate £500K set and up infrastructure for growth. provide realm and Essential to protect public with utility industry. investment up case Joined infrastructure for growth. providide realm and Essential to protect public with utility industry. investment up case Joined infrastructure for growth. provide realm and Essential to protect public infrastructure. 13,163,847 related and l/day additional of Provision infrastructure. m3/hr related and 13,450 additional of Provision related infrastructure. 150,740 KVA to 2026 and additional of Provision boundaries. Westminsterwithin City stations New refurbished and boundaries. Westminsterwithin City sewers New refurbished and Description provider Regulator / Utility funded developer required, connection new system charge) or, if (Distribution use of DUOSvia provider Regulator / Utility regulator Thames Water and regulator Thames Water and Southern Scottish and CityWestHomes / WCC / WCC WCC WCC providers WCC / Utility provider Regulator / Utility provider Regulator / Utility delivery partners) Lead (and other Delivery partnership private in and Public WCC WCC WCC WCC Utility / providers Utility provider developer. connection, where new Utility or, provider Utility provider Utility provider Thames Water Thames Water Funding Source / Mechanism Delivery TBD TBD Start 2012 2010 2018 2014 2014 2014 Phasing Finish 2050 2020 2023 2017 2024 2024 2023 2020 £ 1,200,000,000 £1,200,000,000 £3,500,000 £4,000,000 £74,000,000 of Infrastructure over Plan Estimated Total Cost Period Cost £ 21,000,000 £21,000,000 £3,500,000 £- £- of Infrastructure 2012/13 Estimated Total Cost to 2017/18 £ - £- £1,250,000.00 £4,000,000.00 £74,000,000.00 Amount over Plan £ - £- £1,250,000.00 Amount over period 2012/13 to 2017/18 Funding more details. more details. provide will design policy subsequent July 2013 City Council Westminster for Masterplan Energy Masterplan Westbourne to Linked costed scheme 1 phase Specific Commentary and due due end £ 1,200,000,000 £1,200,000,000 £- £2,250,000 £- £- £- £- £- £- £- £- Funding Gap over Plan Funding Gap £ 21,000,000.00 £21,000,000.00 £- £2,250,000.00 £- £- £- £- £- £- £- £- Funding Gap over period 2012/13 to 2017/18 194 193 192 191 190 189 Ref Totals Waste Waste Waste Waste Waste Waste Category existing facilities existing improve and Maintain facilities existing improve and Maintain facilities existing improve and Maintain recovery facilities treatment energy and centre, waste/recycling Recycling Micro and Reuse Renewal) (Housing storage underground Vaccum waste and for materials collected Improved storage facilites Project Project Information CIL Eligible Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes - replace with new. with - replace new. Farm St Street Depot Cleansing new. Depot with - replace Cleansing Newport StreetPlace site.with on - replace new Page St Street Depot Cleansing 8 required. appropriate. or solutions other as be underground Could Description WCC contractor) partner (waste WCC / delivery WCC Private/ developer WCC Private/ developer WCC Private/ developer contractor) partner (waste WCC / delivery delivery partners) Lead (and other Delivery obligation through planning Private Developer obligation through planning Private Developer obligation through planning Private Developer (waste contractor) partner delivery / developers WCC / private WCC (waste contractor) partner delivery / developers WCC / private Funding Source / Mechanism Delivery Start 2014 Phasing Finish 2018 2018 2018 2022 2024 2017 £ 20,000,000 £20,000,000 of Infrastructure over Plan Estimated Total Cost £2,762,520,500.00 Period Cost £ 15,000,000 £15,000,000 of Infrastructure 2012/13 Estimated Total Cost to 2017/18 £1,070,001,500.00 £ 1,250,000.00 £1,250,000.00 Amount over Plan £624,052,500.00 £ 1,250,000.00 £1,250,000.00 Amount over period 2012/13 to 2017/18 Funding £409,977,500.00 Fully Fully funded Fully funded Fully funded options. delivery costs, priorty and 2013 Strategy Management Waste Sustainable WCC Revised from developments with savings space Cost be offset can options. delivery costs, priorty and 2013 Strategy Management Waste Sustainable WCC Revised Commentary will confirm confirm will will confirm confirm will due D due due Dec ec £ - £- £- £- £- £18,750,000 £- Funding Gap over Plan £2,138,468,000.00 Funding Gap £ - £- £- £- £- £13,750,000.00 £- Funding Gap over period 2012/13 to 2017/18 £680,024,000.00