Public Consultation Report – Final

REPUBLIC OF ALBANIA MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE, RURAL DEVELOPMENT AND WATER ADMINISTRATION WATER RESOURCES AND IRRIGATION PROJECT

Consulting Services for PREPARATION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT PLANS (ESMPS) AND RESETTLEMENT ACTIONS PLANS (RAPS) FOR THE REHABILITATION OF IRRIGATION SCHEMES/SYSTEMS PROJECT ID NO: P121186 – RFP NO: MAFCP/CS/007 – LOAN NO. 8211 - AL

PUBLIC CONSULTATION REPORT – FINAL

June 2017

CEIA

REPUBLIC OF ALBANIA MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE, RURAL DEVELOPMENT AND WATER ADMINISTRATION WATER RESOURCES AND IRRIGATION PROJECT

Consulting Services for PREPARATION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT PLANS (ESMPS) AND RESETTLEMENT ACTIONS PLANS (RAPS) FOR THE REHABILITATION OF IRRIGATION SCHEMES/SYSTEMS

PROJECT ID NO: P121186 – RFP NO: MAFCP/CS/007 – LOAN NO. 8211 - AL

PUBLIC CONSULTATION REPORT –FINAL

June 2017

PROJECT NO. A053746

DOCUMENT NO. 01

VERSION D

DATE OF ISSUE June 2017

PREPARED Bardhyl Qilimi/David Heywood

CHECKED Roar Solland/Spartak Sinojmeri

APPROVED RSS

Table of Contents Page No

1 INTRODUCTION ...... 1-1 1.1 Background...... 1-1 1.2 Description of the Project ...... 1-2 1.3 Layout of the Public Consultation Report ...... 1-4

2 REGULATIONS AND REQUIREMENTS ...... 2-1 2.1 Main National Legislative Framework on Public Consultation ...... 2-1 2.2 Relevant Water and Environmental Legislation ...... 2-2 2.3 Expropriation and Compensation Framework ...... 2-3 2.4 International Standards and Requirements ...... 2-5

3 PREVIOUS PUBLIC CONSULTATION ...... 3-1

4 PUBLIC CONSULTATON AND DISCLOSURE PLAN ...... 4-1 4.1 Defining Stakeholders ...... 4-1 4.2 Defining of Focus Groups on Public consultation ...... 4-2 4.3 Consultant's Approach ...... 4-3 4.4 Communication and Public Consultation Methods ...... 4-4 4.5 Resources and Responsibilities ...... 4-6 4.6 Grievance Mechanism ...... 4-7

5 PUBLIC CONSULTATIONS ...... 5-1 5.1 Results from Stakeholder Consultation (Government and the Public) ...... 5-1 5.2 Consultation with National Level Institutions ...... 5-2 5.3 Consultation with Regional Environmental Agencies...... 5-3 5.4 Consultation with Local Government and Local Communities ...... 5-4

6 CONCLUSIONS AND NEXT STEPS ...... 6-1 6.1 Conclusions...... 6-1 6.2 Next Steps ...... 6-1

7 REFERENCES ...... 7-1

8 ANNEXES ...... 8-1 8.1 ANNEX 1: Questionnaire Template ...... 8-1 8.2 ANNEX 2: Detailed Stakeholder Survey Results ...... 8-5 8.3 ANNEX 3: Stakeholder Analysis ...... 8-12 8.4 ANNEX 4: List of Persons Met on Stakeholder Consultation ...... 8-18 8.5 ANNEX 5: Stakeholder Consultation Photos...... 8-23 8.6 ANNEX 6: Stakeholder Comments and Responses ...... 8-37 8.7 ANNEX 7 – Public Hearing – Media Announcements and Publications ...... 8-39 8.8 ANNEX 8 – Public Hearing Official Notices in Municipal Buildings ...... 8-44 8.9 ANNEX 9 – Public Hearings – Photographs...... 8-49

8.10 ANNEX 10 – Public Hearings – Signed Lists of Participants ...... 8-52 8.11 ANNEX 11 – Individual Reports on Public Hearings ...... 8-60

List of Figures Page No Figure 1-1: Location of the Project sites in relation to protected areas ...... 1-5 Figure 4-1: Potential Subdivision of Stakeholder Groups ...... 4-2 Figure 5-1: Main Issues Raised by all Stakeholder Groups ...... 5-1

List of Tables Page No Table 1-1: Key Data on Irrigation Schemes ...... 1-3 Table 5-1: Regional Breakdown of Main Issues Raised by Stakeholders ...... 5-2 Table 5-2: Timeline to Public Hearing for the First Priority I&D schemes ...... 5-12 Table 5-3: Timeline to Public Hearing for the Second Priority I&D schemes ...... 5-13

List of Photos Page No Photo 1: Meeting with MOE Finance Director. Mr Trajan Vasili ...... 8-23 Photo 2: Meeting with MOE Desertification and soil Expert ...... 8-23 Photo 3: MOE Nature Conservation Directorate ...... 8-23 Photo 4: Experts of GDWS Water PIU of MTI ...... 8-23 Photo 5: Chief of Water Lab at NEA ...... 8-24 Photo 6: Chief and experts of EIA Directorate at NEA ...... 8-24 Photo 7: Deputy Mayor Lushnjë Municipality Mr. Gentian Nushi ...... 8-24 Photo 8: Director of Drainage Board - Mr.Ledio Gjyla ...... 8-24 Photo 9: Director Agriculture Mr Agim Rrasa ...... 8-25 Photo 10:Municipality Agriculture Specialist - Mr. Erald Shurdhi ...... 8-25 Photo 11: Administrator Tërbuf – Mr Aleksander Llupi ...... 8-25 Photo 12: Administrator of Krutje. Mrs Alma Veliu ...... 8-25 Photo 13: Mayor of Divjakë Municipality ...... 8-25 Photo 14: Agricultural Expert of Divjakë Municipality ...... 8-25 Photo 15: Prefect of Fier District - Mr.Xhevit Bushi ...... 8-26 Photo 16: Deputy Mayor Roskovec Municipality – Mr Afrim Plaka ...... 8-26 Photo 17: Responsible for Drainage Board Sector - Fier ...... 8-26 Photo 18: Director Agriculture Fier - Mr. Artur Bogdani ...... 8-26 Photo 19: Director of Cadastre – Mrs Valentina Duka ...... 8-26 Photo 20: Agronomist Roskovec Municipality – Mr Agron Dardha ...... 8-26 Photo 21: Mayor Devoll Municipality – Mr Beldjon Nallbati ...... 8-27 Photo 22:Director Drainage Board – Mr Nexhip Merolli ...... 8-27 Photo 23: Director of Agriculture Korçë Region – ...... 8-27 Photo 24: Miras Commune Former Representative – ...... 8-27 Photo 25: Mr. Kastriot Malushi, Chief of Cabinet of the Maliqi mayor ...... 8-27 Photo 26: Mr. Spiro Koti, Expert of investment ...... 8-27 Photo 27: Mr. Kleanthi Mingo, Administrator Pirg administrative unit ...... 8-28 Photo 28: Mr. Petrit Yzo, agronomist of Pirg ...... 8-28 Photo 29: Director of Agriculture Sarandë Region – ...... 8-28 Photo 30: Mayor of Konispol Municipality – Mr Shuaip Beqiri ...... 8-28 Photo 31: Former Chairman Xarra Commune – ...... 8-28

Photo 32: Agronomist Xarra Commune – Mr Kostandin Koco ...... 8-28 Photo 33: Mr. Clirim Brisku, Deputy Mayor of Berat Municipality ...... 8-29 Photo 34: Mr. Bledar Cili, Director of drainage board Berat District ...... 8-29 Photo 35: Mr.Adriatik Seran, Chief of extension Service, AD Berat ...... 8-29 Photo 36: Mr. Ajet Hyka, Agronomist, AD Berat ...... 8-29 Photo 37: Mr. Bojken Tabaku, Administrator of Velabisht ...... 8-29 Photo 38: Mr Ergest Zeqo, Deputy Mayor of Ura Vajgurore Municipality administrative unit ...... 8-29 Photo 39: Mr. Qani Zeqo, Administrator of Cukalat ...... 8-30 Photo 40: Mr. Shpetim Nishani, Deputy Mayor of Kucova Municipality ...... 8-30 Photo 41: Mr. Kostika Mari, Administrator of Lumas ...... 8-30 Photo 42: Mr. Ferid, Agronomist, Lumas ...... 8-30 Photo 43: Mrs. Vilma Zhupaj, Deputy Mayor of Patos Municipality ...... 8-30 Photo 44: Mrs. Lindita Pepa, Agronomist, Zharrez ...... 8-30 Photo 45: Mr. Halit Mula, Director of Drainage Board, Kukës District ...... 8-31 Photo 46: Mrs. Aida Spahia, Engineer, Kukës Drainage Board ...... 8-31 Photo 47: Mr. Sadik Xhafa, Director of Agriculture, Has region ...... 8-31 Photo 48: Mr. Myftar Kapica, Administrator of Fajza administrative unit ...... 8-31 Photo 49:Meeting with Kreshnik Lilaj REA Director and ...... 8-32 Photo 50: Meeting with Irina Kellezi Korçë REA staff ...... 8-32 Photo 51:Meeting with Petraq Tole, Director REA Berat ...... 8-32 Photo 52: Meeting with Edvin Bixha, Director REA Fier ...... 8-32 Photo 53: Meeting with Shemsi Shahu, Director REA Kukës ...... 8-32 Photo 54: Interview in Divjake ...... 8-33 Photo 55: Interview in Divjake ...... 8-33 Photo 56: Interview in Koshnica ...... 8-33 Photo 57: Interview in Koshnica ...... 8-33 Photo 58: Interview in Leminnot ...... 8-33 Photo 59: Interview in Leminot ...... 8-33 Photo 60: Interview in Murriz Thana Cukas Branch ...... 8-34 Photo 61: Interview in Murriz Thana Cukas Branch ...... 8-34 Photo 62: Interview in Murriz Thana Lushnje Branch ...... 8-34 Photo 63: Interview in Murriz Thana Lushnje Branch ...... 8-34 Photo 64: Interview in Kurjan Strum ...... 8-34 Photo 65: Interview in Kurjan Strum ...... 8-34 Photo 66: Interview in Zharrez ...... 8-35 Photo 67: Interview in Zharrez ...... 8-35 Photo 68: Interview in Belesova ...... 8-35 Photo 69: Interview in Belesova ...... 8-35 Photo 70: Interview in Duhanas ...... 8-35 Photo 71: Interview in Duhanas ...... 8-35 Photo 72: Interview in Slanica ...... 8-36 Photo 73: Interview in Slanica ...... 8-36 Photo 74: Interview in Has ...... 8-36 Photo 75: Interview in Has ...... 8-36 Photo 76: Interview in Xarra ...... 8-36 Photo 77: Interview in Xarra ...... 8-36 Photo 78: Divjake Public Hearing ...... 8-49 Photo 79: Murriz Thana Terbuf Branch Public Hearing ...... 8-49 Photo 80: Koshnica Devoll Public Hearing...... 8-49 Photo 81: Koshnica Devoll Public Hearing...... 8-49 Photo 82: Murriz Thana Krutje Branch Public Hearing ...... 8-49 Photo 83: Murriz Thana Krutje Branch Public Hearing ...... 8-49 Photo 84: Roskoveci Kurjan Strum Public Hearing ...... 8-50

Photo 85: Roskoveci Kurjan Strum Public Hearing ...... 8-50 Photo 86: Leminot Scheme Maliq Public Hearing ...... 8-50 Photo 87: Leminot Scheme Maliq Public Hearing ...... 8-50 Photo 88: MT Cukas/Lushnje Branch Public Hearing ...... 8-50 Photo 82: MT Cukas/Lushnje Branch Public Hearing ...... 8-50 Photo 90: Ura Vajgurore Slanica Public Hearing ...... 8-51 Photo 91: Ura Vajgurore, Slanica Scheme Public Hearing ...... 8-51 Photo 92: Has, Tregtan 2 & 3, Vranisht 2 Public Hearing ...... 8-51 Photo 93: Has, Tregtan 2 & 3, Vranisht 2 Public Hearing ...... 8-51 Photo 94: Konsipol Xarra Scheme Public Hearing ...... 8-51 Photo 95: Konsipol Xarra Scheme Public Hearing ...... 8-51

ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS AD Administrative District ALL Albanian Lek ALUIZNI Agency for Legalization and Integration of Informal Properties ARAP Abbreviated Resettlement Action Plan Art. Article AU Administrative Unit BWA Basin Water Agency BWC Basin Water Council CEIA Centre for Environmental Impact Assessment DB Drainage Board DCM Decision of Council of Ministers EBRD European Bank for Reconstruction and Development EC European Commission EEC European Economic Community EIA Environmental Impact Assessment ESP Environmental and Social Policy ESMP Environmental and Social Management Plan EU European Union EUR Euro FAO Food and Agricultural Organisation FGD Focus Group Discussions GDWP General Directorate of Water Projects GoA Government of Albania ha Hectare I&D Irrigation and Drainage IFAD International Fund for Agricultural Development IFC International Finance Corporation INCA Institute for Nature Conservation Albania INSTAT Albania Statistical Office IPPC International Plant Protection Convention IWRM Integrated Water Resources Management JV Joint Venture MAFCP Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Consumer Protection MARDWA Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration formerly MAFCP MOE Ministry of Environment MPWTT Ministry of Public Works, Transport and Telecommunications MTI Ministry of Transport and Infrastructure NEA National Environmental Agency NGO Non-Governmental Organisation No Number NPO Non Political Officer OP Operational Policy P.A. Protected Areas PAP Project Affected Person PCM Public Complaints Mechanisms PCR Public Consultation Report PIP Public Information Policy PIU Project Implementation Unit POP Persistent Organic Pollutants PR Performance Requirement RAP Resettlement Action Plan REA Regional Environmental Agency SCR Stakeholder Consultation Report SDB Sector for Drainage Board Sida Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency SSS Social Safeguard Specialist TOR Terms of Reference

ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS TV Television WB World Bank WRIP Water Resources Irrigation Project WUA Water User Associations WUO Water User Organisations WWTP Wastewater Treatment Plant ZRRP Zyra e Regjistrimit të Pasurive të Paluajtshme (Real Estate Registration Office)

1 INTRODUCTION

1.1 Background In accordance with the terms of reference (TOR) for the preparation of the Environmental and Social Man- agement Plans (ESMPs) and Resettlement Action Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation and Drainage Schemes/Systems (I&D) under the World Bank (WB) and Swedish International Development Co- operation Agency (Sida) Water Resources and Irrigation Project (WRIP), there is need for an element of stakeholders and public consultation to ensure that comments from all stakeholders are obtained to any proposed developments.

The TOR specifically mentions this as Task No 6 with the following scope of work:

“Task 6: Carry out consultations with key stakeholders and public consultations

Consultation activities to review the site-specific ESMPs (both the draft ESMPs and the final ESMPs) will be organized in cooperation with the Social Assessment team.

The Consultant is responsible for disclosing the hard copies of the site-specific ESMPs (both the draft ESMPs used for public consultations and the final ESMPs revised following comments received during consultations) in a public place (library, municipal building, local administration building etc.) in the respective municipalities, and in the local community nearest to the project site(s). Additionally, the Client (MARDWA) shall made draft and subsequently final ESMPs available at the Ministry's website, under the Project and sub-project's name. The Consultant shall place a notification in the local media (e.g. newspaper, local radio, local TV) and at the notice boards at the public buildings as noted above, as to where the draft ESMPs may be viewed. The notice shall contain the information on venue, date and time where the public consultation will be held, together with the name, address and e-mail address (if existing) of person(s) to whom the questions in respect to draft ESMPs could be addressed. Reasonable time (but not less than 7 calendar days) shall be given for the public in order to access, review and provide comments to draft ESMPs.

The Consultant shall, during the public meeting, keep a record of the meeting. The record shall contain, but not be limited to, the following information: details of the public disclosure procedure, with dates, modes and locations; name and address of the venue for the public presentation, date, time, name of presenter(s), number and list of participants; questions raised and answers provided; photo documentation, as relevant. The minutes of public meeting shall be provided to the Client and Bank for endorsement and approval.

The Consultant shall, subsequent to the public meeting, update the draft ESMPs as necessary, and submit them to the Client for the final approval. The version of site-specific ESMP will be considered final once it has been updated to include the details of public consultations and appropriate changes made to site-specific ESMP as an outcome of public presentation. The final version of site-specific ESMPs will be disclosed in a fashion described above, replacing the versions used prior to the public consultations.

The key stakeholders, which will be affected by the project and will be consulted are preliminary identified as Drainage Boards, Local Governments and Water Users’ Organizations, members of beneficiary communities, civil society, including NGOs and other stakeholders. These activities will be undertaken in compliance with the WB OP 4.01 and relevant Albanian legislation."

The WB considers that there are two types of consultations in this context:

• The first type are consultations on professional and technical aspects of the Project held with officers of line ministries, drainage boards etc., while • The second type are consultations in local communities, which include citizens, land owners i.e. all being directly or indirectly affected by the Project. This level of consultation is possible when the documentation including updated Feasibility Study are made available by the Consultant Renardet JV et al and when the individual ESMPs from the I&D schemes are prepared.

This report in hand represent the Public Consultation Report (PCR), the second type of report and follow on from the Stakeholder Consultation Report (SCR) submitted in March 2016and is submitted in accordance with the TOR. This "Public Consultation Report" has now been submitted as the final ESMP and ARAPs were presented at the public meetings. This PCR also contains further details of the meetings and focus group discussions that were held with members of the public including the farmers from the schemes.

Stakeholder consultation therefore deals with the organisation that are connected to the WRIP at national level and those that are connected to the project at Regional/Local level. The PCR deals with issues primarily at the local level

Therefore, the final SCR was submitted in March 2016 and approved by MARDWA in April 2016. The reader is referred to this report, which contain details of the stakeholders' analysis. Following the SCR the Consultant then focused on the first priority I&D schemes and a round of public consultations was held in late June 2016 for the high priority schemes (Murriz Thana (Krutje and Terbuf Branches)- , Koshnica, Kur- jan Strum and Divjake. Then the second priority I&D schemes were then presented at public meetings on specific dates during May 2017.

Following submission of the draft SCR, various comments were made in meetings held in Tirana between World Bank, MARDWA and the Consultant on 5th March 2016 and between Sida, MARDWA and the Con- sultant on 7th March 2016. Further written comments were received from Sida on 11th March 2016. The SCR has been updated based on these comments and a summary of the comment and the responses made is included as Annex 6.

1.2 Description of the Project One of the project development objectives under WRIP is to increase the area under improved irrigation and drainage and in so doing, to establish the institutional basis for improved integrated water resources management (IWRM). The project aims to capture synergies and evident opportunities for win-wins between water resources management and irrigation. Promoting water use efficiency in irrigation schemes will increase farmers’ incomes and strengthen water resources management. Improving farmers’ incomes will enhance the resource base for IWRM that will in turn, require relevance of rational water resources management to a large segment of the population to ensure involvement and ownership. Support for the preparation of agreed river basin management and development plans (being implemented through MARDWA) will tie the preparation of an IWRM Strategy at the national level to structural and non-structural improvements in the quality of water services delivery at the local level that are of immediate relevance to large numbers of water users.

The WRIP has four components.

1. Systems Rehabilitation 2. Institutional and Productive Support for Irrigation and Drainage (I&D) 3. Institutional Support for IWRM 4. Implementation Support

The first component is split into two sub-components, namely: (1) the Reservoir, Irrigation and Drainage Rehabilitation, and (2) Pipeline Preparation.

Part of the preparation of the proposed WRIP (component 1 above) requires preparation of scheme specific Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) for rehabilitation of the existing, dilapidated I&D schemes/systems. Hence, there will be need to prepare thirteen ESMPs for the irrigation system rehabilitation and modernization works (canal, pipes etc.), one for each I&D scheme, once the feasibility studies for I&D schemes have been prepared, approved and adopted.

The deliverables mentioned in the preceding paragraph are required in order to ensure implementation of the project is consistent with the applicable WB and Government of Albania (GoA) environmental safeguards policies. In addition there will be need to prepare specific RAPs for the irrigation schemes that affect peo-

Consequently, the Consultant considers the principal objective of the assignment will be to prepare site- specific ESMPs to effectively integrate environmental quality objectives and social impacts into the proposed WRIP. This will ensure that environmentally and socially - related measures are incorporated in the project implementation mechanisms to prevent, minimize and mitigate possible negative environmental and social impacts.

The project requires a very efficient and effective implementation with speedy decision making after submission of draft project deliverables. Notwithstanding, other objectives of this assignment will be to: a) Define and give a general framework regarding benefits and issues of project implementation, guiding the Client to a feasible framework on project design; b) Control as much as possible the negative impacts expected to be generated by project implementation, giving detailed mitigation measures, indicators on the evaluation of the efficiency of the expected mitigation plan and a monitoring program for environmental, social/cultural and economic impacts in any specific site; and during pre-construction, construction and operation phases; c) Develop a safeguard report to control and mitigate against any community, stakeholders or decision makers complaints that can be caused by construction works or from the operation, such as resettlements, land expropriation, infrastructure fragmentation or temporary damaging, other problems like temporary noises, dusts, health and risks to human health and life etc., and d) Provide useful generic information for other project future steps regarding the socio-economic status of areas that presently are using the irrigation system, or will use it after remediation, as well as offer useful data on the expected benefits and issues caused by project implementation.

1.2.1 Irrigation and Drainage Schemes within the Project The I&D sites are shown in Figure 1-1 below and are widely dispersed principally within the two river basins of Drin - Buna and Semani, but the Xarra site is separate and not within these basins, but in the far south near the Pavlla River that originates from Greece. The 13 irrigation areas can be placed into four groups as follows:

• Group 1 focused around Kukës, comprising sites Vranisht 2, Tregtan 2 and Tregtan 3. All of these schemes are 2nd priority); • Group 2 containing the largest number of I&D schemes focused around Fier/Lushnjë (Murriz Thana – Krutje and Terbuf – 1st priority and Lushnjë and Cukas 2nd priority), Divjake, Kurjan/Strum (both 1st priority) combined and Zharrëz (no priority due to siltation issue),) and Berat district comprising sites Duhanas, Belesovë (both have no priority due to siltation issues) and Slanica (2nd priority); • Group 3 focused around Korçë comprising sites Leminot (2nd priority) and Koshnica (1st priority); and • Group 4 comprising of one scheme at Xarra in the very far south of the country, which is a second priority scheme.

Further details on the locations and key statistics of the irrigated areas and population affected are shown in the following Table 1-1. The 1st priority schemes are shaded in red, the 2nd priority are shaded in green and the no priority are shaded in green.

Table 1-1: Key Data on Irrigation Schemes Original Preferred Actual New Design Estimate Irrigation Scheme No District Command Option Irrigated Command Population in I&D Name Area (ha) No Surface (ha) Area (ha) scheme area GROUP 1 1 Vranisht 2 Kukës 217 1 50 217 959 2 Tregtan 2 Kukës 28 1 15 28 133 3 Tregtan 3 Kukës 315 1 155 260 1,516

Original Preferred Actual New Design Estimate Irrigation Scheme No District Command Option Irrigated Command Population in I&D Name Area (ha) No Surface (ha) Area (ha) scheme area GROUP 2 Murriz Thana (Krutje 4a Lushnjë 29,270 2 new 13,000 29,270 77,866 and Terbuf) Murriz Thana 4b Lushnjë 29,270 2 new 13,000 29,270 77,866 Lushnjë and Cukas 5 Kurjan/Strum Fier 5,430 1 3,000 5,000 17,376 6 Zharrëz Fier 600 1 100 600 2,059 7 Belesovë Berat 1,280 3 50 1,150 1,532 8 Duhanas Berat 550 1 20 550 957 9 Slanica (Cukalat) Berat 300 2 20 260 3,045 12 Divjake Lushnjë 3,000 2 new 2,000 3,000 8,445 GROUP 3 10 Leminot Korçë 400 2 250 450* 2,798 11 Koshnica Korçë 850 1 0 850 2,769 GROUP 4 13 Xarra Sarandë 2,500 3 2,000 3,000** 3,000 TOTAL 44,740 20,660 44,635 122,455 Source: TOR, Mott MacDonald Feasibility Study and Joint Venture RENARDET – BETA STUDIO – HYDROWATER-ALBANIA Feasibility Study *There is a discrepancy 450ha with the original command area figure of 400ha. **There is an additional 500ha (Bufi area) privately owned sprinkler network

1st Priority 2nd Priority No public consultation

1.3 Layout of the Public Consultation Report Based upon the scope of work outlined in the previous section, the Public Consultation Report (PCR) follows the TOR and will help the key stakeholders involved with Project consider issues that will need to be addressed and the course of action most suited to achieve this. It also presents the initial outcomes of the scoping meetings held with key stakeholders. This report therefore includes the following table of contents: • Introduction – brief description of the project, including main elements and locations (e.g. maps) which is the subject of this chapter, • Regulations and requirements – Summary of the relevant policies, laws, regulations, and review processes in Albania for public consultation and disclosure, • The Consultation Process including results of the interviews held with various stakeholders and members of the public. • The Stakeholder Consultation Process and public hearing including results of the interviews held at national and at regional level with various stakeholders and discussions of farmers. • Conclusions • References followed by various Annexes providing more details of the persons met, notices for public meetings, meeting content and photographs.

①Vranisht 2

②Tregtan 2 ③Tregtan 3

⑫Divjakë ④Murriz Thana ⑤Kurjan ⑦Belesovë ⑥Zharrëz ⑧Duhanas

⑨Slanica ⑩Leminot

⑪Koshnica

⑬Xarra

Figure 1-1: Location of the Project sites in relation to protected areas1

Legend Strictly Protected Areas National Parks

Natural Monuments Natural Managed Reserves

Protected Landscapes Managed Resource Protected Area

① I&D Scheme

1 Schematic Map on location of I&D schemes under the study related to Albanian P.A. net

2 REGULATIONS AND REQUIREMENTS The previous report "the Data Collection Report" contained full details of the main laws and regulations involving the rehabilitation of the I&D schemes under WRIP. This chapter provides a summary of the relevant policies, laws, regulations, and review processes in Albania specifically involving public consultation and disclosure regarding environment and land acquisition/ compensation, the two common concerns from the public. The chapter also looks at relevant aligned policies and conventions from Europe and internationally.

2.1 Main National Legislative Framework on Public Consultation The following laws and Decision of Council of Ministers (DCM) are directly relevant to Public Consultation, namely:

• Law No. 8672, dated 26.10.2000, “On the Aarhus Convention Ratification on public right to information, to participate in decision-making and to have access to justice in environmental matters”; • DCM No. 994, dated 02.07.2008, “Public Participation in Environmental Decision Making”; • DCM No. 16, dated 04.01.2012, “On Public Access to environmental information”; • DCM No. 247, dated 30.04.2014, “On the determination of the rules and requirements of the procedures for information and involvement of the public in environmental decision making”;

The Albanian Parliament has recently adopted new Legislation as follows:

• Law No 119/2014, dated 18.09.2014, “On the right of information”; • Law No 146/2014 – On Notification and Public Consultation” – regulates the process of notifying the public on drafting legislative work and other strategic national and local documents; furthermore it;

o Establishes the Commissioner for the right of Information: to address all complaints if public right to information and consultation has been infringed by the public authority; o Transparency Programs for all public institutions made obligatory; o Public Consultation Coordinator in every public institution o New unique electronic register, yearly public reports on all planned acts, number of planned public hearings; o Yearly public reporting on all approved acts, number of public hearings, number of adopted recommendations and refused ones;

Ministry of Environment (MOE) has raised public awareness of this new law on Pubic Consultation through regional training workshops in 2014 and 2015 covering Arhus and Espoo conventions.

For the process of taking due account of comments and outcomes of public participation, public hearings are regularly held for EIA procedure and other decision-making processes:

• At ministry level – for new legislation/national plans/programs, etc. • At local authority level – regional plans, programs, projects, etc.

The channels of notification are websites, email, papers, advertising boards etc. For notification for strategic documents, a period of 30 days prior notice needs to be provided to the public hearing and then no less than 30 days for receipt of comments.

For particularly complex projects – a period of up to 40 days for receipt of comments is allowed (this is contained in the recently adopted Law No 146/2014).

In addition, public hearings are regularly held at the National Environmental Agency (NEA) level - for EIA procedures. For Preliminary and Advanced EIA, the following is necessary:

• After 5 days – 20 days online publication

• 20 days for comments + date of decision, decision uploaded on website • Timeframe for complaints

In a similar manner, the notification channels are websites, email, papers, advertising boards etc.

2.2 Relevant Water and Environmental Legislation Albania’s 1996 Law on Water Resources (No. 8093) (Water Law) comprising the Law No.8093, dated 21.3.1996 “On Water Resources” improved, updated and adapted with the Law No. 8375, date 15.07.1998, Law No.8605, date 20.04.2000, Law No.8736, date 01.02.2001, Law No. 9837, date 03.12.2007, Law No.10 137, date 11.5.2009 is the primary legislation governing the country’s inland, maritime, surface, and groundwater and is intended to ensure the protection, development, and sustainable use of the country’s water and provide for its proper distribution. The Water Law addresses water rights, water use, and governance of water resources. A new law on water management has been drafted and was being circulated internally for review in 2010.

The '1999 Law on Irrigation and Drainage (No. 8518) comprising the Law No 8518, date 30.07.1999 “On Irrigation and Draining” improved, updated and adapted with the Law No 9860, date 21.1.2008 “On Some Changes and Additions in the Law No 8518, date 30.07.1999 “On Irrigation and Draining” established the structure for Water User Associations (WUAs) and Water User Organisations (WUO which are private groups that manage water irrigation infrastructure at and below the secondary canal level. Federations of WUAs manage the primary canal networks. The government maintains ownership of the infrastructure.

The Law on Organization and Functioning of Local Government (No. 8652) (2000) and Law No. 30/2015 On some changes and additions in Law no 8652 dated 31.07.2000, transferred responsibility of water supply and management of water utilities to local government (communes and municipalities).

The 2008 Law on the Regulatory Framework in the Sector of Water Supply and Waste Water Admin- istration (No. 9915) and 2009 Ministerial Order No. 66 provides authority for the establishment of an inter-ministerial working group for the evaluation of projects and issues related to drinking water supply and sewage sector in Albania.

Law No. 10431, dated 09.06.2011 “On Environmental Protection” (entered into force in November 2013, 18 months after being officially published on 30.06.2011 in the Official Gazette). Once this law en- ters into force, Law No. 8934, dated 05.09.2002 was repealed. This law sets out principles, requirements, responsibilities, rules and procedures to ensure a higher level of environmental protection. The law includes dispositions for EIA as a tool for environmental protection, aiming to identify and define the possible direct and indirect effects on the environment mainly to prevent these effects and to make changes to the NEA, formerly Environmental and Forest Agency;

The Law on “The protection of transboundary Lakes”, No 9103, date 10.07.2003, consider protection and monitoring of transboundary lakes and their basins. The law is focused mostly at three main Lakes, namely Shkodër, Prespa and Ohrid. The law aims at the environmental protection of the transboundary lakes in their natural state, guaranteeing the appropriate conditions for the development of life and ecosystems in these lakes, through the promotion of useful activities in compliance with the requirements of the sustainable development principle and stopping of activities that threaten them. Further to this aim, unique ecosystems, with international value, such as the above mentioned transboundary lakes, are specially protected by the state, and have been proclaimed as protected areas, according to laws no. 8906, dated 06.06.2002, on “Pro- tected areas” and no. 8093, dated 21.03.1996 on “Water reserves”, as well as through international conventions ratified by Albania. (Now, all of them are proclaimed by the Decisions of Councils of Ministers as protected areas, while Skadar Lake is proclaimed as a Ramsar site). The scientific research activities in transboundary lakes are implemented with the approval of the Regional Environmental Agency (REAs) or by MOE.

Law No. 9115, dated 24.7.2003 “On the Environmental Treatment of Wastewater” is aimed at protect- ing the environment and the health of people from the negative impacts of wastewater, defining the rules for

DCM no. 177, dated 31.03.2005 “On liquid discharges and the criteria for the receiving waters contains the approved standards for various industries and the quality of urban water following treatment, based on the respective instructions of the European Union (EU). This act sets the criteria for classification of the re- ceptive water bodies, aiming at the compilation of the list of sensitive and less sensitive areas that are re- viewed every 4 years. The law requests the active participation of the Basin Water Councils (BWCs) and Basin Water Agency (BWAs) for the prevention and clean up of the water basins under their jurisdiction.

Law No. 10448, dated 14.07.2011 “On Environmental Permits” (entered into force in January 2013, 18 months after being officially published on 05.08.2011 in the Official Gazette). This law applies the regulatory provisions of Directive 2008/1/EC, “On integrated pollution prevention and control” and the provisions of Directive No. 80/2001 “On some restrictions on air emissions of certain pollutants from large combustion plants.” This law, clarify details on the classification of environmental permits in type A, B, and C upon pollutants discharge level. Once in force, it has a profound impact on most of the current national environmental laws across a wide spectrum.

The Basic Law on Water Management is the Law No. 111 dated 15/11/2012, on "Integrated Management of Water Resources", which is focused on protection of water resources, right distribution and administration of waters, and on definition of institutional framework for water management. This law is referred to the basic environmental law on “Environmental Protection”, no. 10431, date 09/06/2011, and the law on “Envi- ronmental Permit” no. 10448, date 14/072011. Among others, the law describes hygienic and sanitary measures and zones for protection of water resources, etc. The law defines the Agency of Water Basins (BWA), as the main responsible authority for water monitoring, etc.

2.3 Expropriation and Compensation Framework In the Republic of Albania the legal framework for expropriation of land and resettlement issues mainly con- sist of the following legal acts:

• The Constitution of the Republic of Albania. • Law No. 8561 dated 22. 12. 1999 “On Expropriations and Temporary Takings of the Private Property for Public Interest” • Law No. 9235, dated 29.7.2004 “On restitution and compensation of private properties” • Law No. 9482, dated 3.4.2006 "On legalization, urbanization and integration of informal properties” • The Council of Ministers Decision No. 138 dated 23. 3. 2000 provides the legal criteria for the evaluation of properties affected by expropriation. • Council of Ministers Decision No.438, dated 28.6.2006 "On the criteria, procedures and required documentation that determine legalization of informal properties” • The Council of Ministers Decision No 514, dated 30.07.2014 “On approval of property value of each county of Albania Republic.

2.3.1 The Constitution of Republic of Albania Article 41 clause 4 of the Albanian Constitution states: “The expropriations or limitations of a property right that are equivalent to expropriation are permitted only against fair compensation” Furthermore, on the Eu- ropean Convention on Human Rights, Article 1 “Right to property” of the Protocol 1: “Every natural or legal person is entitled to the peaceful enjoyment of his possessions. No one shall be deprived of his possessions expect in the public interest and subject to the conditions provided by the law and by the general principles of international law…”

2.3.2 Law 8561 Law no. 8561 provides the entire process on how an expropriation procedure begins, for which reason, from which subject and the right of the owners to contest the evaluation of the property made unilaterally from the

The principles provided by law 8561“On expropriation…” can be as follows: • The project aims public interest, since it is an investment on water and agricultural sector; (Art. 8/c of Law “On Expropriation...)”; • The beneficiary subject in the expropriation process will be the various communes in the sub project areas) (refer Art. 9 of the Law “On Expropriation)” • A list of necessary documents needs to be submitted to the line Ministry in this case is the MARDWA (refer Art. 10 and 11, of Law 8561); • The line Ministry has to follow the legal procedure, on publishing the request for expropriation, collect- ing the complaints of the affected owners, and preparing the draft of the sub legal act for the Council of Ministers; • The procedure will be considered complete, when the owners through a statement approve the transac- tion of the property in favour of the State; • The decision for the expropriation (for the owners that do not agree with the expropriation) will be approved by the Council of Ministers and will enter into force immediately, also it will be published in the Official Journal/Gazette; • The affected owners have the right of complaint to the Court for compensation and if they do not follow this procedure, the decision of the Council of Ministers will be an executive title. Almost the same procedure “mutatis mutandis”2, will also be followed for:

1- The devaluation of property; (Art 18, of the Law 8561 “On Expropriation....”) 2- The provisional taken on possession of the property; (Art. 27‐ 37 of the Law 8561 “On Expropria- tion.”)

The devaluation of property: During any construction for public interest, it might happen that some properties may not be taken from the owner, but at the same time, the owner will not be able to enjoy the property as he did earlier and thus he has the right to be compensated for the devaluation of his property. This institution is not applied so often in practice, but it is provided for in the law, if owners are affected in this manner during the project implementation.

The provisional taking on possession of the property: During construction, it might happen that certain properties are needed to be taken into possession for temporary use. The request to take on provisional possession a property needs to be addressed to the line Ministry (i.e. MARDWA), describing the property, the reason, the term and the compensation for the owner. The owner has the right to raise a complaint to the court against such decision.

2.3.3 Legal Criteria on the Evaluation of Properties The DCM No. 138 dated 23. 3. 2000 provides the legal criteria for the evaluation of properties affected by expropriation as follows:

• Land: The estimation of expropriated land shall be determined for urban lands, lands within the yellow line town and commune properties according to the prices approved by DCM deriving from Law No. 9235, dated 29.7.2004 “On restitution and compensation of private properties” (Seethe price map). • Residential properties: Value of expropriation compensation for residential properties is considered the average sales price according to the records of the Real Estate Registration Office (ZRPP)3. • Industrial and Agricultural properties: The value of expropriation compensation for industrial and agricultural properties is considered the average sales price according to the records of the Ministry of

2 Mutatis mutandis means the necessary changes being made 3 Albanian name is Zyra e Regjistrimit të Pasurive të Paluajtshme

Transport and Infrastructure (MTI)(formerly Ministry of Public Works Transport and Telecommunica- tions MPWTT) and MARDWA (formerly MAFCP). Depreciation of property must be subtracted from the price. • Agricultural land, forested areas, etc. The estimate value of agricultural lands, forested areas, pastures and grasslands is determined from the prices approved by Council of Ministers Decision complementary to the Law No. 9235, dated 29. 7. 2004 “On restitution and compensation of private properties”. In cases where there are no prices approved for certain regions, the evaluation for agricultural lands, forested areas, pastures and grasslands is determined by the average sales price available at ZRPP. • Fruit trees: For fruit trees, the estimated value is calculated considering costs of investment and expens- es. This value is calculated per unit (number of fruit trees) or unit per land surface (m² of vineyard, nursery etc.). Special MARDWA directives foresee the investment presently in the land, the total ex- penses and different amortization factors. • Crops: For crops, the estimated value is calculated based on the expected yield and market unit price. • Illegal constructions: For investments on national highways the owners of properties, who are not regis- tered at the ZRPP (i.e. without a title), are also expropriated. The entity, which initiates the expropriation has the right to complete the procedure if: the owners of the property have started an administrative process at the Agency for Legalization and Integration of Informal Properties (ALUIZNI) according to Law No. 9482, dated 3.4.2006 "On legalization, urbanization and integration of informal properties”; or in case the illegal building (or additional works on the existing building) have been previously declared and have been qualified later for legalization permit from ALUIZNI, based on the criteria set in the Council of Ministers Decision No.438, dated 28.6.2006 "On the criteria, procedures and required documentation that determine legalization of informal properties”; in case when the owners of the property are in the process of taking a legalization permit, etc.

2.4 International Standards and Requirements The International Finance Corporation (IFC) and World Bank have published policies (Operational Policies – OP) on public consultation, among others, to ensure projects are implemented in an environmental and socially responsible manner. The following policies are relevant:

• OP 4.01 Environmental Assessment requires public consultation regarding category “A” projects. An Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) process to be undertaken by the Developer should be used as framework for promoting public consultation and information disclosure and compliance. Once approved public consultation needs to be part of the on going, process during preparatory, construction and operational phases and should be documented in the Environmental Management/ Action Plan. • Operational Directive 11.03 – Safeguarding Cultural Property • Operational Directive 4.30 – Involuntary Resettlement • Operational Policy 7:50 Project on International Waterways

In addition, the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) have a documented environmental and social policy (ESP), Public Complaints Mechanisms – Rules and Procedures (PCM) and Public Information Policy (PIP).

EBRD standards require that projects are more stringent of national standards and European Union standards. For public consultation, this includes the need to comply with EU directives and the Espoo convention as well as concurring with the principles of the Aarhus convention (mentioned earlier).

Under EBRD policy the client will consult with affected persons and communities and facilitate their early and informed participation in decision-making processes related to resettlement, in accordance with performance requirement #PR 5: (1) Affected persons shall be given the opportunity to participate in the negotia- tion of the compensation packages, eligibility requirements, resettlements assistance, suitability of proposed resettlements sites and proposed timing, and PR10 (2) Special provisions shall apply to consultations which involve individuals belonging to vulnerable groups (that should be identified through the process of environmental and social appraisal – performance requirement #1).

The European Commission (EC) requirements for stakeholder involvement in the EIA process are specified in the 1985 Directive on Environmental Assessment (85/337/EEC) amended by Directive 97/11/EEC. Essen- tially the public must be given the opportunity to express and opinion before the project is initiated. The later 1997 Directive adds a requirement to conduct public consultation for projects likely to have significant transboundary environmental effects.

2.4.1 International Conventions: Relevant international conventions that are important for consideration when discussing with stakeholders include:

• Aarhus Convention on access to information, public participation in decision-making and access to justice in environmental matters. • The Barcelona Convention on the protection of the Mediterranean Sea against Pollution • The Basel Convention on the transboundary movement of hazardous waste and their disposal • The Bern Convention on the Conservation of European Wildlife and Natural Habitats • The Convention of Biological Diversity • Espoo Convention on EIA in a transboundary context needed to incorporate comments from neighbour- ing countries; some of the schemes (e.g. Xarra and those in Kukës) have source rivers in Greece and Ko- sovo respectively. • Helsinki Convention on the protection and use of transboundary watercourses and international lakes • International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD) • The International Plant Protection Convention (IPPC), overseen by the Food and Agriculture Organiza- tion (FAO) aims to secure coordinated, effective action to prevent and to control the introduction and spread of pests of plants and plant products. • The Rotterdam Convention (formally, the Rotterdam Convention on the Prior Informed Consent Proce- dure for Certain Hazardous Chemicals and Pesticides in International Trade) is a multilateral treaty to promote shared responsibilities in relation to importation of hazardous chemicals. The convention pro- motes open exchange of information and calls on exporters of hazardous chemicals to use proper label- ling, include directions on safe handling, and inform purchasers of any known restrictions or bans. • Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs) that aims to eliminate or restrict the production and use of POPs.

3 PREVIOUS PUBLIC CONSULTATION

The Consultant referred to previous public consultation undertaken during the preparation of ESMP and RAP for the dams and reservoirs (held in 2010). This was very beneficial to enable the Consultant to highlight potential risks, liabilities or unresolved issues that can then be managed and prioritised in the present project.

Now the rehabilitation of reservoir dams has been completed and it is time to complete the drafting of the technical documentation so that the sooner the implementation of the rehabilitation of the irrigation schemes will begin. First priority I&D schemes have begun the work of rehabilitation in late 2016.

As the project for rehabilitation of irrigation schemes is a continuation of the dam rehabilitation project and extends to the same geographic area, the consultant used the approved dam project reports in order to reflect any specific information during the public consultation process.

The Consultant compared the information gathered in the dam project with the actual one and although there is discordance over time, the environmental and social problems almost do not change.

With a particular importance has been the comparison of the conclusions on the environmental and social impact of the project areas, the definition of the vulnerable groups, at which phase of project development the impacts will be greater, what are the benefits of the project, the need for designing Agreements between project stakeholders etc.

4 PUBLIC CONSULTATON AND DISCLOSURE PLAN Public Consultation is a key element of the Project with the focus to allow stakeholders to interact with the decision making process, express their views and influence mitigation and technical solutions to concerns voiced during the process.

Public consultation is an inclusive and culturally appropriate process that involves sharing information and knowledge, seeking to understand the concerns of others and building relationships based on collaboration. It allows stakeholders to understand the risks, impacts and opportunities of the project in order to achieve positive outcomes. There are a number of questions that can be asked when setting out on the stakeholder consultation pathway:

• Who will be adversely affected by potential environmental and social impacts in the project’s area of influence? • Who are the most vulnerable among the potentially impacted, and are special engagement efforts necessary? • At which stage of project development will stakeholders be most affected (e.g. construction, operations)? • What are the various interests of project stakeholders and what influence might this have on the project? • Which stakeholders might help to enhance the project design or reduce project costs? • Which stakeholders can best assist with the early scoping of issues and impacts? • Who strongly supports or opposes the changes that the project will bring and why?

The Consultant also referred to previous consultation undertaken during the preparation of ESMP and RAP for the reservoirs associated with the I&D schemes. This was very beneficial to enable the Consultant to flag up potential risks, liabilities or unresolved issues that can then be managed and prioritised in the present project.

Hence, the main objectives of public consultation are:

• To ensure that adequate and timely information is provided to those influenced or directly affected by the Project; • To provide these groups with sufficient opportunity to voice their opinions and concerns; and • To ensure that comments are received in a timely manner so that they can be taken into account in Pro- ject decisions.

4.1 Defining Stakeholders Identification of stakeholders is a key activity in Task No 6. This task must be focused on making a sustainable long-term dialogue platform within the already existing or newly emerging bodies/organizations. The schematic presented in Figure 4-1 provides an indication of how the stakeholders can be subdivided into four groups and where they overlap indicates the key stakeholders for the Project. The four groups are:

• Public Sector • Project Affected Persons • Private Sector and • Advocacy Groups

Project Affected People (PAP) a) individuals/ households living in or near Project area b) Owners of land or buildings in project area but not in residence

Public Sector a) Local government Private Sector b) National government KEY a) Private companies c) multi-lateral development b) Local Business STAKEHOLDERS instutions c) Industry associations

Advocacy Groups a) Local and national NGOs b) International NGOs c) Religuous Groups d) University and research centres e) etc

Figure 4-1: Potential Subdivision of Stakeholder Groups

4.2 Defining of Focus Groups on Public consultation The Consultant's team conducted focus group discussions (FGD) to talk about expected environmental and socio-economic impacts of rehabilitation and maintenance of irrigation system, in order to register the opinion and perceptions of main involved stakeholders. The groups were chosen to be as homogenous as possible. Meetings were organized during the time of interviews.

Focus groups were composed by representatives of communes, teachers, representatives from health centres, small enterprises, farmers, and vulnerable groups (women, people with disabilities, pensioners, gypsies, etc.).

4.2.1 Community farmers-families affected by project development (households) Irrigation schemes lie in rural areas and the main activity of households is agriculture and livestock farming. During the interviews, the Consultant took the opinion of various farmers on the economic, social and environmental impact of the rehabilitation of irrigation schemes.

4.2.2 Women's households indirectly affected by project development

In the former communes where the irrigation schemes are located, the Consultant collected information on gender issues (specifically related to female participation in agriculture). The tables in the Annex 4 provides information about female-headed households, civil status upon age group of women, and their level of education, occupation and incomes

Women’s employment is of great concern to the economy of rural zones in Albania. Most of the employed females work in public offices or in private services. The unemployed ones are housewives working in agriculture (dealing mostly with the production of farming products), grazing of animals, cocking, etc.

4.2.3 Young generation, students, pupils etc. The Consultant received information on the population age group, the number of pupils according to the levels of education, the number of students etc. During the interviews and discussions, the consultant received information on the prospects of employment in the village, migration and emigration opportunities etc.

4.2.4 Disabled peoples, retired persons etc. Pensioners and disabled are a category that discussed the positive effects of rehabilitation of irrigation schemes. Given that this category has worked in agriculture, they think that improving irrigation will affect the growth of agricultural production, lowering prices of agricultural products and increasing consumption

4.2.5 Sensitive population - Indigenous people, Roma etc. During the consultation process with the public, the Consultant obtained some response from the gypsy (Roma) community, although the areas under study are not substantially populated by such. This category considered irrigation system improvements to produce very positive effects to their community. Some of their main comments and thoughts are as follows:

• Firstly, they considered that there would be an increase agricultural production, consequently implying that there will be increase the incomes. • Increasing the quality of live and affordability would in turn enable the marketing of more handcrafted products. • Activities would be more profitable increasing family income.

They could have greater opportunities to use various services offered by the municipality, such as education of children, easier access to health services and participation of youngsters and women in vocational training centres.

4.2.6 People that are not affected directly by project development

This category includes people who deal with other activities such as bar-cafe-restaurant, traders, etc. This category thinks that the improvement of the irrigation system will indirectly affect the increase of their income due to the increase in consumption of their products. They also considered that the related infrastructure improvements would bring benefit to the region.

4.2.7 Representatives from Health Centre To determine the level of services, the consultant collected data on the number of health centers and ambulances in the administrative units where the project extends, the level of service, etc

4.3 Consultant's Approach The following approach to the work was undertaken:

• Pre-Scoping - Strategic engagement with government and key informant groups in order to provide overall information about the Project, gauge its viability and identify any key issues early. • Refinement - Introduce the Project to key stakeholders including national, regional and local authorities, to identify any key issues and sensitivities such as sites of interest to be considered in I&D rehabilitation as well as identify any vulnerable groups and gather baseline information. • Scoping - Revisit the stakeholders at a national and regional level to provide further detail on the project and generate feedback on the scope, approach, key issues and key stakeholders to be consulted.

The Consultant believes it is very important to engage with the stakeholders in their own surroundings, this leads to a more transparent process as community members can witness the process and stay informed about what is being discussed on their behalf, and what has been agreed at the close of consultation or negotiations. Furthermore, this also increases accountability of local leaders and community member will know what they

Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Public Consultation Report WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems 4-4 are entitled to demand, and they will be able to monitor its delivery and avoid dishonest practices. Having the Consultant visit the sites also sends the message that the input from communities is valued enough to travel there and spend time there. It also contributes to community members’ feeling of ownership over the engagement process. Community members also have the opportunity to have input into stakeholder meetings thus giving a sense of having a role in the outcome of decisions. Finally, it allows community members to identify their own representatives, preventing illegitimate representatives from claiming that they speak for communities. Having this approach in mind, the Consultant travelled to the different sites and interviewed the stakeholders. The feedback from the interviews were provided onto questionnaires that were completed. Examples of the template for questionnaire forms completed are included in Annex 1.

The questionnaire was also used for the Focus Group discussions (see Section 5.4.7), the results of which for the basis of the deliverable "Public Consultation Report".

4.4 Communication and Public Consultation Methods

4.4.1 Information of interested parties Public Consultation is a procedure that first intends to inform the public, decision makers and other interested parties about the nature of the project. The Consultations are followed by information on important impacts and measures for mitigating negative environmental and social impacts.

Secondly, consultations are intended to encourage the community, decision-makers and other interested parties involved in providing their opinions on the project's effects, proposed mitigation measures, and ideas for implementing a more effective management plan.

The Consultant, for the preparation of reports according to terms of reference during the study period informed the public on the environmental and social effects of the implementation of the rehabilitation project for irrigation and drainage schemes, while through various forms of communication he collected information, suggestions and remarks which has been reflected in the prepared and approved reports

4.4.2 Information campaign and consultation with important focus groups To provide public information on the nature of the irrigation and drainage schemes, the consultant organized an information and consultation campaign with all identified focus groups.

As we have pointed out above, the consultant has used various forms of communication as well

1. Meetings with local authorities, vulnerable groups, farmers, pupils, administrators of new administrative units, teachers, health centre staff, retirees, disabled people, etc.

2. Interviews based on a questionnaire specially built for social and environmental problems

3. Public hearing with the population of the areas where the project will be implemented

The public information and consultation campaign has been conducted in all areas where the project has been extended based on a detailed program on issues to be discussed and timelines.

Consultant notes that important information and suggestions were gathered during the consultation process with the public

The Consultant thinks that through this information campaign many issues have been clarified on project details, environmental impacts and quality of life in ridge areas.

4.4.3 Preparation of Summarized ESMPs for Public hearings The consultant prepared in Power Point a summary of the ESMPs for public hearings. The summary briefly outlined the scope of the project, the nature of the investment, the positive and negative environmental and social impacts, management plans and mitigation measures.

4.4.4 Present summarized reports at NEA and request support for public meetings According to the Albanian Law on “Environmental Permit”, the MARDWA should obtain an environmental permit in order to get permission for the reconstruction works. For this procedure, the MARDWA should submit for approval of ESMP at the National Environment Agency (NEA)

4.4.5 Inform communities for Public hearing date, time and place and distribute the Summarized/simplified ESMPs for Public information.

The Consultant together with representatives of MARDWA organized the work for the public hearing. This working procedure comprised the following

• MBZHRAU informed the central and local government institutions (drainage board, municipalities etc.) about the places, date and time of the public hearings. • The announcements were published in two newspapers, "SOT NEWS" and "Panorama" • In the web site of the MARDWA, they advertised the summarized ESMP and notified the web readers of the dates for public meetings. • The announcements were placed in two to three locations in each of the project areas (individual areas for each I&D scheme. Commonly this was on Municipal notice boards or on the doors of building where the meetings would be held. • Public hearings were carried out on 27-29 June 2016 for the first priority schemes and 22-31 May 2017 for the second priority schemes. No public hearing was held for the three schemes that had issues on the high siltation in the reservoirs (i.e. Belesovë, Duhanas and Zharrëz).

4.4.6 Organize the Public Hearings The same procedure was followed in all public hearings, which is as follows:

• The public hearing session was opened by the local government representative (generally the mayor or deputy mayor) who spoke to the participants about the importance of the project implementation in their area. • The ministry's (MARDWA) representative explained the extension of the irrigation scheme and the volume of investment • The Consultant explained with the aid of a Power Point presentation a summary of environmental and social management plans and ARAPs • Participants' discussions on the environmental and social impacts of project implementation were followed. • Closure of the meeting was made by the representative of the local government and MARDWA

4.4.7 Include the findings from Public Hearings in final ESMPs. After the public hearings, for each scheme was prepared information on the development of public hearings, the agenda of meeting, attendance, discussions and issues raised by the participants. This implied making a summary of the public hearing as a specific chapter for the Public Consultation process in the ESMP (Chap- ter 9). Reference was also made to a separate Report of the Public Hearing, which contained all the necessary information and was accompanied by photos and documents that show that the community announcement procedures and public hearings have been implemented. These details are also attached to this PCR for reference.

4.5 Resources and Responsibilities

4.5.1 Explanation of Project Goal regarding Public hearing This section details how project goals are explained in the public hearing and how agreement from PAPs is important and how the funding process from World Bank to the Albanian Government

Meaningful public participation enables citizens to provide informed and timely input and ultimately influence decisions that affect their environment.

For citizens, participation can include commenting on draft policies, raising concerns at a public hearing, or serving on advisory committees.

For governments, engaging the public in decisions can enhance the quality and legitimacy of decisions. It can ensure fairness in decisions, and give voice to underrepresented groups. For the private sector, public participation can generate demand for higher industry standards and support for better practice.

Public participation builds trust between parties and strengthens the capacity of all stakeholders to engage in environmental decisions and policies. When done well, public participation can offer clear benefits for government, the private sector and society. On the contrary, done poorly or failure to provide for public participation can result in conflict and public resistance to new policies.

The ability of the public to participate in decisions that affect the environment can be determined by the willingness of government officials to engage citizens as well as the efforts by citizens to participate.

For the public to feel that their input is valuable, public participation must be incorporated into the larger culture of decision making. Public participation cannot exist merely as a series of singular events where only the loudest voice is heard. There must be an inclusive community of participation where stakeholders have equal voice and play a continuous role in the policy making process

4.5.2 The goal of RAP, dedicated funds and fund sources. From the information gathered from the feasibility study, the preliminary project and discussions with local authorities, it results that in all project irrigation schemes there are no objects or agricultural land to be expropriated. Therefore, the consultant has prepared for each scheme a RAP Template.

If during the works for rehabilitation of the project there will be damages of agricultural crops, then it will be done according to the RAP template definition. For this, it has also been agreed with local government authorities. It has also been agreed to sign an agreement for the minimization of damages between the local authorities and the construction company prior to the commencement of the works

4.5.3 The rights of PAPs During rehabilitation works of irrigation schemes, if any immovable property, building, land plot, agricultural land or plant sown is damaged, then PAP has the right to claim compensation.

Under the options of the World Bank and the Albanian Law "On Expropriations", compensation is made with another property that has the same value or with Lek.

PAP has the right to demand that the value of any damaged property be calculated according to the market value.

If PAP disagrees with the value of the expropriation, it has the right to request the court to determine the value of the property according to the market value.

4.6 Grievance Mechanism Grievances are a common phenomenon in involuntary resettlement, which, if not amicably and timely resolved, invariably gives rise to local resistance, political tension and unnecessary delays in executing the Pro- ject. A grievance redress mechanism for the project is suggested for addressing potential legitimate concerns of PAPs who may consider themselves deprived of appropriate treatment under the Project. The mechanism will be developed and would include: i) A recording and reporting system, including grievances filed both verbally and in writing, ii) Staff with responsibility at various levels of governments, and iii) A time frame to address the filed grievances.

The functioning of the grievance redress mechanism should be regularly monitored and evaluated during project implementation. For the purposes of the RAP, it is suggested to initially involve a local NPO to assist people with any grievances, fixing problems during implementation, etc., before the need to go to authorities.

5 PUBLIC CONSULTATIONS As mentioned directly above, this report deals with the public consultation stage. The issues dealing with the public in meetings and focus group discussions and the proceedings of these public meetings have served for the compilation of this Public Consultation Report, which is another separate deliverable that is submitted once the ESMP and ARAPs have been processed and completed.

5.1 Results from Stakeholder Consultation (Government and the Public) Based on the interviews conducted in the districts and at national level, this section provides a summary of the overall results of the stakeholder consultation. Issues that evolved from the interviews covered seven main topics as follows:

• Lost livelihood and land compensation • Benefits and poverty reduction • Planned design of I&D Project • Gender/Women's Employment • Impacts and Monitoring • Stakeholder Engagement • Infrastructure Improvements

The following chart (see Figure 5-1) shows a summary of the main issues raised by all the stakeholders based on interviews. The full results are included in Annex 2 along with regional pie charts.

Issues on the benefits and poverty reduction and on the potential impacts and monitoring were the main concerns each with 20%. The next issue of concern was the planned design of the I&D projects with 16% and then stakeholder engagement with 13%. The least issue of concern was infrastructure improvements with 9%.

Interestingly lost livelihoods and land compensation issues were not an issue of great concern with only 11% of all interviewed. This is because the rehabilitation work is only improving existing land and infrastructure. Any land take for ancillary work such as pump houses etc. will be on state owned land.

Figure 5-1: Main Issues Raised by all Stakeholder Groups

When analysing the results in a regional context a different pattern emerges. This is summarised in Table 5-1 below. At national level impacts and monitoring is by far the most important issue. However, benefits and poverty reduction is the single most important issue in all the districts with the exception of Sarandë. In Sarandë, the most important issues were shared between the planned design of the I&D scheme and stakeholder engagement. Individual pie charts for the seven different districts showing the percentage splits for the main issues are provided in Annex 2. Table 5-1: Regional Breakdown of Main Issues Raised by Stakeholders Issues Raised by Stakeholders Lost Benefits and Planned Gender/ District Livelihood - Impacts and Stakeholder Infrastructure poverty Design of I&D Women Land Monitoring Engagement improvements Reduction Project Employment Compensation Kukës 16% 26% 16% 11% 16% 11% 5% Lushnjë 17% 22% 9% 13% 17% 13% 9% Fier 11% 30% 15% 7% 11% 15% 11% Berat 15% 23% 15% 13% 15% 13% 8% Korçë 17% 22% 9% 13% 17% 13% 9% Sarandë 6% 12% 24% 6% 12% 24% 18% National 3% 3% 13% 20% 40% 10% 10%

5.2 Consultation with National Level Institutions From the end of November 2015 until completion of this report in hand, the consulting team was separated into four groups starting consultation with stakeholders and the public. After preparation of the inception report, the consulting team started selection and mapping of stakeholders. Meetings were focused on national and local stakeholders as well as regional ones.

A stakeholder analysis matrix was constructed and this is enclosed in Annex 3.Photos of these meetings are contained in Annex 5. Key questions asked were:

• What is the impact the stakeholders expect from the Project? • How much impact do they as stakeholders expect to have into the Project? • What is important for the Stakeholder? • How could the stakeholder contribute to the Project?

The principal stakeholders of national level were MARDWA, MOE, NEA, INSTAT Albania, Water PIU of GDWP of the MTI, lecturers from the universities dealing with environment, NGOs etc.

In the meeting with Mr. Trajan Vasili, the Director of Finance in the MOE the project goals were discussed, the trends, timetable and budget of the project. The focus of the talk were the possible future cooperation in the budget, the possibilities for the Ministry's departments to be involved on stakeholder consultation and reconfirmation of stakeholder mapping regarding environmental authorities. Mr. Vasili explained plans during the period when "water" was under the administration of MOE and their collaboration with existing projects with MARDWA today. Mr. Vasili really appreciated the project and confirmed a willingness for good collaboration in any future phase as needed.

In the meeting with Ms Elvana Rama, responsible for Nature Conservation Directorate of the MOE, the Con- sultant discussed the possible issues that can be caused by project development within nature specific areas all over the country, and specifically regarding Butrint National Park (I&D Xarra in close proximity) and Divjake/Karavasta National Park (I&D scheme Divjake in close proximity). The location of the I&D schemes were verified on MOE maps in respect to their position in proximity to the PAs to ascertain the distances from the PA boundary to the elements of the I&D schemes. After consultation and deliberation, it was concluded that both Xarra and Divjake I&D schemes do not affect the PAs. However, it was agreed that the Consultant would continue the field evaluation in field and have other consultations with other experts, local administrators and stakeholders and other interested parties.

The meeting with Mr. Halimi of the Directorate of Nature Conservation Directorate of the MOE was focused on sedimentation challenges that can be generated by rehabilitation of irrigation systems, and existing experiences on controlling of salts. The conclusions were positive for preparation of the ESMP, and the planned sedimentation control that are included in the design of the sediment prone I&D systems.

The meeting with Ms. Vanela Gjeci was focused on the water quality of rivers, groundwater, coasts and irrigation reservoirs under the study, monitoring data, future monitoring trends, and existing pollution sources for areas under the study. The meeting concluded that it was considered that the I&D schemes would be expected to generate more water flow and this is expected to be an overall benefit to the area by diluting

The meeting with Evis Mellonashi, chief of EIA office in the NEA, was discussed the main legislation regarding EIA procedures and public consultation. In addition, the consultant required her collaboration for stakeholder consultation in the regions, almost the Regional Environmental Agencies heads and experts. The meeting with Arta Baboci focused on gender issues, expectances of the project, the Ministry experiences and approach on gender studies.

At Tirana INSTAT, Ms. Irma Sinemati was contacted and the talk was about existing gender data collected by existing gender projects. Ms. Sinemati generated existing data on gender for the consultant, but she confirmed that such data was only available at the National and Regional/Prefecture level. Ms. Sinemati suggest to collect more data focused on gender, within the local population by field surveys, but concluded that the timeframe of this existing project would not be sufficient to undertake a comprehensive survey for such.

At the Water PIU of MTI, two groups were met. The first group were Mr. Ilir Salallaku and Hamit Teme, both hydro-technical experts, and the focus was on possible threats to the project development from flood and flood risk. In conclusion, it was agreed that the project is not a threat for floods, but in fact will reduce the flood risk in the project areas.

Mirjeta Zeneli and Marsida Tabaku were also PIU experts and economists, explaining efforts of Water PIU regarding flood control and drinking water issues in the country. In addition, they represent the future efforts of their directorate on water management.

Enkeleda Basha, manager at Waste Water Treatment Plant in Durres, were involved for consultation about pollution control overall from pesticides and organic matter, that can be generated by irrigation system in the lakes or sea. It was concluded that there would be no serious threats to water quality from pesticides as the levels of use at present are very low.

The meeting with Mr. Ardian Shehu, Lecturer at Geoscience University in Tirana, was focused on geological data and features of the I&D sites under the study, the seismological risk etc. Mr. Shehu also provided related maps to the Consultant so that underlying geology could be ascertained.

The chief of the Institute for Nature Conservation in Albania (NGO), ex-chief of flora and fauna in the MOE, explained the possible issues for project development in natural sites. Nevertheless, the conclusions were that the project does not affect negatively the specific natural sites or coasts.

5.3 Consultation with Regional Environmental Agencies The Project Team undertook consultations with staff from the Regional Environmental Agencies (REA) that cover all of the I&D schemes under the study. The REA offices are based within the prefecture capital towns as follows:

• Korçë – covering • Vlorë (covering Sarandë District also) • Berat • Fier (covering Lushnjë District also) and • Kukës

The first meeting was in Korçë with the REA Director Mr. Aleksander (Dashi) Cela, and his staff including Ms. Irina Kellezi REA expert. After explanation of the project and the required report deliverables, the REA staff were informed about needs on public and stakeholder consultation, environmental issues in the I&D schemes, pollution sources, needs for irrigation, EIA process etc. The REA representatives were satisfied with the project goal and express their full willingness for collaboration in any field surveys, consultations and public meetings etc. Mr. Cela, also expressed his desire for the rehabilitation of the many other irrigation schemes and reservoirs in other past of Korçë and Pogradec region.

On 16th February 2016, the Consultant met the chief, Mr. Kreshnik Lilaj, of Vlorë/Sarandë REA and his staff, together with Ms. Areti Papadhima, the Environmental Expert from Sarandë that had travelled to Vlo- rë. The REA Vlorë really appreciates the Project. The meeting discussed about the environmental issues, EIA process, consultation process etc. The REA expressed their willingness for collaboration in full project development. They also will provide support to meet NGOs and experts sharing opinions regarding project effects on human and natural environment.

On 12th February 2016, the Consultants were in Berat District and met with Mr. Petraq Tole Director of REA and his staff. The meeting went through the various components of the project. The Consultant discussed about the environmental issues in the three schemes (Belesovë, Duhanas and Slanica) within Berat District and the procedures on Environmental Permits, public consultation and monitoring requirements.

On 16th February 2016, the Consultant met the chief of REA, Fier Region, Mr Edvin Bisha and Mrs. Ai-da Kristo, the Environmental Expert. After explanation of the project, they were informed about needs on public and stakeholder consultation, environmental issues in the two I&D schemes (Kurjan Strum and Zharrëz) reservoirs, pollution sources, needs for irrigation, EIA process etc.

In 18th February 2016, the consultants met Mr. Shemsi Shahu, director of REA Kukës and his staff. They were informed about the three irrigation schemes in Fajza administrative unit (i.e. Tregtan 2, Tregtan 3 and Vranisht 2). The meeting discussed the need for public and stakeholder consultation, environmental issues, pollution sources, needs for irrigation, EIA process etc. The REA representative was very satisfied by the project goal and express his full willingness for collaboration in any field surveys, with arranging the consultations and public hearings etc.

5.4 Consultation with Local Government and Local Communities The Consultant made a number of visits to the stakeholders representing local government and local communities in the regions of Kukës, Lushnjë, Sarandë, Fier and Korçë. The focus from MARDWA was to complete the first priority I&D sites, namely:

• Murriz Thana - Krutje Branch - Option 2 New • Murriz Thana - Terbuf Branch - Option 2 New • Divjake - Option 2 New • Kurjan Strum - Option 1 • Koshnica - Option 1

The Consultants considered the above priorities and met with local authorities with the main objective to fa- miliarise stakeholders with the principal project components and to ascertain from local communities and local government their pressing issues and concerns.

The dates of visits made and lists of persons met are provided in Annex 4. Photos taken at the times of the national and regional meetings are also provided in Annex 5.

Following this, the Consultant returned to the other I&D Schemes that are second priority as follows:

• Murriz Thana - Cukas Branch – Option 2 New • Murriz Thana – Lushnjë Branch – Option 2 New • Xarra – Option 3 • Belesovë Option 2 – No public hearing due to the siltation issue which needs further funding • Duhanas – Option 1– No public hearing due to the siltation issue which needs further funding • Slanica – Option 2 • Zharrëz – Option 1 – No public hearing due to the siltation issue which needs further funding • Leminot – Option 2 • Tregtan 2 – Option 1 • Tregtan 3 – Option 1 • Vranisht 2- Option 1

Much later in the Project it was decided to discontinue the public consultation process on 3-second priority schemes that required substantial amounts of de-siltation in the reservoirs. These schemes (Belesovë, Duhanas and Zharrëz) are uneconomic with the high costs of de-silting that would be necessary to make the supply of irrigation water economically sustainable.

5.4.1 Lushnjë Region The first visits to Lushnjë region were in the period December 21 to 28 December 2015. The Consultant experts met first with Deputy Mayor of the Municipality of Lushnjë Mr. Gentian Nushi, who welcomed the WRIP initiative of the World Bank and Albania Government. The municipality was very much looking forward to the implementation of investments in the field of irrigation and drainage in the region, especially in the more fertile areas of the municipality such as those Krutje and Terbuf branches, which have been given priority under the Project for completion by MARDWA.

The Deputy Mayor announced that he was ready to cooperate with the Consultant and made available the Municipality's Agricultural Specialist for Lushnjë Municipality. This Municipal Agriculture Specialist Mr. Erald Shurdhi made the Consultant aware of the current process of irrigation and drainage in the communes of Krutje and Terbuf. During the discussions, Mr Shurdhi informed the Consultant that investment in the I&D area was desperately needed and long overdue in order to increase the overall agricultural production of these areas to the extent of 40%.

At the end of the meeting, Mr. Nushi suggested that during the implementation phase of the project, specialists of Lushnjë Municipality should be actively included in the monitoring and supervision of the works that will be carried out in I&D systems in communes of Krutje and Terbuf.

The Consultant also met with the Director of Agriculture for Lushnjë Mr. Agim Rrasa who welcomed the project investment in Lushnjë and especially in the two communes that will provide the District Directorate of Agriculture with increased production of agricultural crops after the investment made by the I&D project. He expressed the view that cooperation between the Department of Agriculture, Municipalities of Lushnjë and Divjake and Irrigation and Drainage board increases the transparency and impact in eliminating the problems that may be encountered during the implementation of I&D project in communes of Krutje and Terbuf. In addition, he expressed the opinion that improvement of irrigation and drainage infrastructure increases the cultivated surface and protects crops farmers in these areas from potential flooding during different periods of the year.

The Consultant also met the Irrigation and Drainage Board Director of Lushnjë, Mr Ledio Gjyla who con- gratulated the World Bank on the provision of investment into the I&D project in the communes Terbuf and Krutje. He mentioned that today Murriz Thana has an I&D network that is terrible dilapidated and over used. He added that the institution, which he leads, is unable to assist farmers in these areas during the irrigation season. Also he told the Consultant that this year the irrigation and drainage board means at its disposal infrastructure has tried to clean drainage canals however he expressed the view that only this type of investment can improve the state of irrigation and drainage in these areas. Mr Gjyla also showed willingness for involvement of his institution in any cooperation during the implementation of the project of irrigation and drainage in the communes of Krutje and Terbuf.

During a meeting with the new Administrative Unit for Krutje, the Consultant met Mrs. Alma Veliu who informed that due to the depreciation of the irrigation and draining system, many of the farmers of the area were not able to plant agricultural crops provided in the book of cultures that draws unit administrative of Krutje before the irrigation season. She was very enthusiastic about the investment being carried out in this administrative unit, because this will increase agricultural production and improve the lives of farmers of the area.

During meetings with the new administrative unit for Terbuf, the Consultant met Mr. Aleksander Llapi who said that in addition to the damaged irrigation network, there are problems that are more serious. This involves the drainage network, especially in the area of Cerme Shkumbini, Cerme e Poshtmer and Sulzotaj. These areas are regularly flooded during the rainy season caused by the River Shkumbini bursting its banks.

Mr. Llapi also informed that this area is mainly connected with agriculture and investment being carried out by the World Bank and the Albanian Government that will directly affect lives of farmers of this very fertile area.

The Consultant also had a meeting with the Mayor of Divjake Municipality, Mr Fredi Kokoneshi on 23 De- cember 2015. The Mayor was very much interested in the perspective of developing the new municipality of Divjake and the possibilities of providing trade with fresh vegetables to the Divjake region.

At the end of the meeting, Mr Kokoneshi suggested that during the implementation phase of the project, the specialists of Divjake Municipality should be invited to be part of supervision of the works that will be carried out on the I&D systems.

Meetings were held in different villages affected by rehabilitation of I&D schemes. Interviews were made with farmers, traders of agricultural products, women and young person etc., explaining to them the focus and meaning of ESMPs and public consultations, the rights for information and compensation, etc. The Con- sultant asked their opinion on the possible effects of I&D schemes rehabilitation, ways to avoid negative impacts and risks, their wishes and expectations. The Consultant provided an answer to all their questions. All findings was included in the Stakeholder Consultation and the current Public Consultation Reports and reflected in the final ESMPs.

5.4.2 Fier Region The Consultant made his first visit to the Fier region between 12 to 16 December 2015 and a second visit on 16 February 2016. The Consultant experts first met with the Prefect of Fier region, Mr. Xhevit Bushi, who welcomed the initiative of the World Bank and GoA for the implementation of investments in the Roskovec and Patos Municipalities. He appreciated the importance of WRIP in increasing of agricultural production and ameliorating of quality of life in the rural areas.

In a meeting with the Director of Drainage Board, Mr Vilson Naci the issues on the quality of works and way of supervision were raised.

The Agriculture Director, Mr Artur Bogdani briefed the Consultant on the state of agriculture in Fier region, especially in Kurjan region. He briefed the Consultant on the perspective of agricultural production after rehabilitation works of irrigation system.

The Consultants met also the Deputy Mayor of Roskovec Municipality, Mr Afrim Plaka who discussed the importance of WRIP in ameliorating of quality of life in rural areas. He expressed readiness to cooperate with MARDWA.

At the end of the meeting, Mr. Plaka suggested us that during the implementation phase of the project, the specialists of Roskovec Municipality should be included in the overall supervision of the works that will be carried out on the I&D systems in Administrative Unit of Kurjan

On the second visit, the Consultant met Mrs. Vilma Zhupaj, Deputy Mayor of Patos Municipality and Mrs. Lindita Pepa, Agronomist in Zharrëz administrative units. After explanation of the project, the consultants discussed with Mrs Vilma Zhupaj on the importance of WRIP for Patos Municipality, the potential contribu- tion of Patos Municipality staff in the supervision processes, and on the level of poverty in rural area of Zharrëz administrative unit.

With Mrs. Lindita Pepa, issues discussed were the fulfilment of I&D infrastructure, demands for water after rehabilitation works and perspective of agricultural production in this area.

5.4.3 Berat Region The Consultant made his a visit to the Berat region of 12 to 16 February 2016 .The Consultant met Deputy Mayor of Berat, Ura Vajgurore and Kucova Municipality, Director of Drainage Board, Specialists in the Agricultural Directory and Administrators of Velabisht, Cukalat and Lumas administrative units which welcomed the implementation of WRIP in Berat region.

With Mr. Clirim Brisku, Deputy Mayor of Berat Municipality, the consultant discussed on importance of WRIP for Berat Municipality and contributes of Berat Municipality staff. Also on the level of poverty in rural area of Duhanas, changes of population in past years and the state of trade of agricultural production

Mr. Bledar Cili Director of Drainage Board, Berat District, raised the issues of quality of engineering works during project implementation and ways of supervising. In addition, the Consultant discussed on the ways of water management during the irrigation period.

With Mr. Adriatik Serani, Chief of Extension Service, AD Berat, the Consultant discussed on impact of improving irrigation schemes in increasing of agricultural production and incomes of farmers. Also on fulfilment of plants demands for water after rehabilitation works (according to feasibility study)

With Mr. Ajet Hyka Agronomist, AD Berat, we discussed on the possibility of changes of agricultural plants structure and increasing of livelihood incomes after reconstruction of irrigation scheme.

Mr. Bojken Tabaku Administrator of Velabisht administrative unit explained to the Consultant the general economic and social situation in the villages of the administrative unit, especially in Duhanas village.

After this the Consultant discussed the importance of WRIP for the farmers living in Duhanas, the changes of population during past years, employment, quality of life in rural areas, the number of disabled people living in the administrative unit of Velabisht, gender etc.

With Mr. Ergest Zeqo, Deputy Mayor of Ura Vajgurore Municipality, the Consultant discussed on the importance of WRIP for Ura Vajgurore Municipality. Also on the level of poverty in the rural area of Cukalat, the changes of population during past years and the state of trade regarding agricultural production.

The Consultant discussed with Mr. Qani Zeqo, Administrator of Cukalat administrative unit on the importance of WRIP for farmers living in administrative unit of Cukalat, employment, quality of life in rural areas, invalids and, gender issues etc.

Mr. Shpetim Nishani Deputy Mayor of Kucova Municipality was really satisfied by the project goal and express his full willingness for collaboration during the supervision process. The Consultant also discussed on

With Mr. Kostika Mari, Administrator of Lumas administrative unit and Mr. Fredi Kaja Agronomist, Lumas administrative unit, the Consultant discussed on the general social and economic status in Lumas area. The meeting also discussed the impact of improving irrigation schemes and in increasing the agricultural production and the incomes of farmers, the fulfilment of plants demands for water after rehabilitation works and perspective of agricultural production in this area, the possibility of enlargement of the planted area with vegetables etc.

5.4.4 Sarandë Region The Consultant made a visit to Sarandë region in the period 25 to 28 November 2015. The Consultant met the local authorities headed by the Mayor of Konispol Municipality Mr. Shuaip Beqiri, Mr Vangjel Dhima, responsible for the Drainage Board, Mrs Majlinda Kondi responsible for the Agriculture Sector, and Mr Dhimo Kote, former Chairman of Xarra commune.

Mr. Shuaip Beqiri welcomed the initiative of the World Bank and Albania Government for the implementation of investments in the field of irrigation and drainage in the Xarra administrative unit. He and his staff were ready to collaborate with MARDWA during the implementation period of the project. Another issue discussed was to ensure the quality of good rehabilitation works and to ensure adequate means of supervision.

Mr. Vangjel Dhima mentioned to the Consultant the possibility and importance of enlargement of irrigated area in the Xarra administrative unit. One of main issues discussed was to ensure adequate provision of water supply from the Mursi reservoir during the summer.

The Consultants discussed with Mrs. Majlinda Kondi on the importance of project implementation and the impact in increasing of agricultural production in Xarra and Konispol areas. She expressed the view that cooperation between the sector of agriculture, municipality of Konispol and irrigation and drainage board increases the transparency and impact in eliminating the problems that may be encountered during the implementation of the I&D project.

The former Chairman of Xarra commune, Mr Dhimo Kote discussed with the Consultants the need to increase the irrigated area after project implementation, consequently increasing of production of mandarins and the incomes for families. The Consultant further discussed with Mr. Dhimo Kote about the irrigation scheme, the importance for the participation of farmers in the maintenance works and the payment for irrigation water.

Meetings were held in different villages affected by rehabilitation of I&D schemes. Interviews were made with farmers, traders of agricultural products, women and young person etc., explaining to them the focus and meaning of ESMPs and public consultations, the rights for information and compensation, etc. The Con- sultant asked their opinion on the possible effects of I&D schemes rehabilitation, ways to avoid negative impacts and risks, their wishes and expectations etc. The Consultant provided an answer to all their questions. All findings was included in the Stakeholder Consultation and the current Public Consultation Reports and reflected in the final ESMPs.

5.4.5 Korçë Region The Consultant visited the Miras administrative unit first during the period 5 to 8 December 2015. The consultant met Mr Bledion Nallbati, Mayor of Devoll Municipality, Mr. Nexhip Merolli, director of Drainage Board (Korçë region), Mr.Vullnet Gjolla, The director of agriculture (Korçë District) and Mrs. Matilda Hox- ha, representative of new administrative unit of Miras and Mr. Bajram Ahmetli, Agronomist of new administrative unit of Miras

Mr. Bledion Nallbati welcomed the initiative of the World Bank and GoA for the implementation of investments in the field of irrigation and drainage in the Miras administrative unit. He and his staff were ready to collaborate with MARDWA during the implementation period of the project.

The Director of the Drainage Board discussed with the Consultants on the importance of amelioration of irrigation schemes of Koshnica and Leminot. He also showed willingness for involvement of his institution in any cooperation during the implementation of the project of I&D in the Miras and Pirg communes.

The Consultants discussed with Mr. Vullnet Gjollao on the impact in increasing of agricultural production in Miras and Pirg commune areas. He also added that after amelioration of irrigation system of Koshnica and Leminot will be improved. He added that the structure of planted crops will also be improved, thus providing more incomes for farmers. The Consultant also discussed with representatives of Miras Commune related to project implementation and collaboration with MARDWA during implementation period.

The second visit in Korçë region was carried out in 19 February 2016. The Consultant met employees of Maliq Municipality and the Administrator and members of staff of Pirg administrative unit.

Mr. Kastriot Malushi Chief of Cabinet and the Mayor of Maliq discussed with the Consultant on the level of poverty in the rural area of Pirg and the beneficial impact of improving the irrigation and thereby increasing the agricultural production.

Mr. Spiro Koti, Expert of Investment for Maliq Municipality, raised the issue of the quality of reconstruction works at the dam (Leminot reservoir) and the irrigation scheme extending beyond this.

With Mr. Kleanthi Mingo, Administrator of Pirg administrative unit the Consultant discussed the importance of WRIP for farmers living in the administrative unit of Pirg, the changes of population during past years (a general migration from the area), employment, quality of life in the rural areas, disabled persons, gender etc.

Mr. Petrit Yzo, Agronomist of the administrative unit of Pirg, discussed with the Consultant on the needs of water for plants and the possibility of changes to the agricultural plants structure.

Mrs. Erma Zacellari, Economic Expert provided information on the number of disabled and other incapacitated peoples, peoples that live with economic help, how has changed level of life during past years etc.

Meetings were held in different villages affected by rehabilitation of I&D schemes. Interviews were made with farmers, traders of agricultural products, women and young person etc., explaining to them the focus and meaning of ESMPs and public consultations, the rights for information and compensation, etc. The Con- sultant asked their opinion on the possible effects of I&D schemes rehabilitation, ways to avoid negative impacts and risks, their wishes and expectations etc. The Consultant provided an answer to all their questions. All findings was included in the Stakeholder Consultation and the current Public Consultation Reports and reflected in the final ESMPs.

5.4.6 Kukës Region The site visit of Kukës region was carried out on 16 to 17 February 2016. The Consultant met the Director of the Drainage Board and the Engineer, the Regional Director of Agriculture and the Administrator of Fajza Commune.

Mr. Halit Mula Director of Drainage Board, Kukës District raised the issue of the quality of the engineering works during the project implementation and the ways of supervision. The meeting also discussed on the ways for water management during the irrigation period

With Mrs. Aida Spahia Engineer, Kukës Drainage Board, the Consultant discussed on the quality of rehabilitation works, and the supervision and water management during the irrigation period.

Mr. Sadik Xhafa, Director of Agriculture, Has region, discussed with the Consultant on the fulfilment of plants demands for water after the rehabilitation works and the perspective of agricultural production in the Has area.

Mr. Myftar Kapica, Administrator of Fajza administrative unit discussed with the Consultant on the importance of improving the irrigation system and the beneficial impact in increasing the agricultural production and the incomes of the farmers. The meeting also discussed on the level of poverty in the rural area of Fajza administrative unit, the changes of population during last year’s, gender issues etc.

Meetings were held in different villages affected by rehabilitation of I&D schemes. Interviews were made with farmers, traders of agricultural products, women and young person etc., explaining to them the focus and meaning of ESMPs and public consultations, the rights for information and compensation, etc. The Con- sultant asked their opinion on the possible effects of I&D schemes rehabilitation, ways to avoid negative impacts and risks, their wishes and expectations etc. The Consultant provided an answer to all their questions. All findings was included in the Stakeholder Consultation and the current Public Consultation Reports and reflected in the final ESMPs.

5.4.7 Focus Group Discussions The Consultant's team conducted focus group discussions (FGD) to talk about expected socio-economic impacts of rehabilitation and maintenance of irrigation system, in order to register the opinion and perceptions of main involved stakeholders. The groups were chosen to be as homogenous as possible. Meetings were organized during the time of the interviews in the district centres.

The focus groups comprised male and female representatives of communes (including farmers), teachers, representatives from health centres, small enterprises, farmers, and vulnerable groups (people with disabilities, pensioners, Roma community, etc.).

The following paragraphs summarise the content and main issues raised during the FGD, held with each of the selected stakeholder categories. A more detailed analysis will be provided in the Public Consultation Re- port.

Administrators of New Administrative Units This group think that the rehabilitation of I&D systems are very important for local residents because they imply an increase in agricultural production that will lead to improving the quality of life. A conservative estimate is that by improving the irrigation system, agricultural production can increase by up to 30-40%. They expressed concern on the quality of rehabilitation works and the need to have this undertaken correctly with good contractors. Their general experience of contractors in the past was negative.

According to this group, the biggest issue is trade. It is important that farmers are organised into associations in a correct way and that this is successful. Another issue is the price of imports and the fuel prices that influence the costs of production.

Teachers This group commented that some improvements in road infrastructure were achieved in the past, but still there is much to do. Their major concern was related safety of children traveling long distances along very dangerous roads.

1. Considering communes’ large extent, pupils go to school from all surrounding villages. Usually they have to walk long distances along dangerous roads (walking on the roadside as there are no pavements), being often subject to adverse weather conditions (rain, snow etc.). 2. Pupils coming from most distant villages arrive at school tired from long walks, and are often not in a proper condition to assimilate learning. 3. Roads, especially those near schools, miss sidewalks (pavements) and zebra crossing.

Personnel from Health Centres In many cases, adequate and efficient health services cannot be provided to those people in need. More specifically:

1. Residents have not received adequate health services in time. In several villages, births do not occur in the health centres or in maternity units. This is especially a chronic situation during winter, particularly in remote areas that are isolated due to flooding and rainfall. 2. Health centre personnel have difficulties in visiting sick people due to lack of resources and vehicles. 3. Campaigns of vaccination for young children have been extended in time, to ensure their vaccination.

Small Enterprises The quality of the roads hamper daily commercial activities in terms of:

1. Higher costs in procuring inputs, which are then reflected in higher prices for goods and services, at the expense of the final consumer (local communities). 2. Fast amortization and deterioration of vehicles.

Farmers The improvement of irrigation system helps to increase agricultural production and good roads enables farmers to swiftly reach markets for the sale of goods. The farmers mentioned specifically:

1. Quality of irrigation system help in ensuring access to improved agricultural techniques and technolo- gies, reducing production cost. 2. A better condition of irrigation system will help in maximizing profit margins related to transport and sale of agricultural products. 3. Improvement of roads' quality will help avoid damage of products during transportation, together with less maintenance costs for vehicles and machineries. 4. Another problem is the high price of imports and fuel which influences the costs of production 5. Prices of ploughing of soil and other mechanized processes are very high. Present ploughing of soil cost around 16,000 ALL/Ha (equivalent to EUR 115/Ha).

Disabled persons and incapacitated people The rehabilitation of irrigation system could improve the quality of life for vulnerable groups, which need particular attention and care. More specifically:

1. One of the improvements they expect is shorter time to reach health care centres. 2. Better roads would reduce travel time, and consequently lower ticket prices for urban and inter urban transport such as minibuses and taxis. 3. Improving of irrigation system will increase agricultural production 4. Increasing of agricultural production will reduce prices of goods. 5. Increasing of agricultural production will increase internal self-consumption of goods

Pensioners Irrigation system improvement is expected to ensure considerable benefit to this vulnerable category. Some of the main expectations were:

1. Improving of irrigation system will increase agricultural production 2. Increasing of agricultural production will reduce prices of goods. 3. Increasing of agricultural production will increase internal self-consumption of goods

4. There will be need for more green spaces. 5. Another comment was to consider environmental indicators of air quality and noise, which can be achieved and mitigated by planting of trees along the roadside.

Members of Roma Community This category considered irrigation system improvements to produce very positive effects to their community. Some of their main comments were:

• Firstly, there will be increase in agricultural production and consequently there will be increase the incomes. • Increasing of quality of life will enable more effective marketing of handcrafted products. • Activities would be more profitable, hence increasing family income. • There will be greater opportunities to use various services offered by the municipality, such as education of children, easier access to health services and participation of youngsters and women in vocational training centres.

5.4.8 Public hearings Part of the Public Consultation is also the public hearing. As we have said above, the public hearings of first priority schemes were held during June 2016, while for second priority schemes were held in May 2017. Specific media announcement were made in advance of the public hearing to forewarn the public of the im- pending debates. The following Table 5-2 provides indications on the timelines associated with the public hearings for the High Priority I&D schemes, whilst Table 5-3 provides details of the timelines associated with the Second Priority schemes.

Annex 7 contains details of the advertisements placed in local newspapers (SOT News and Panorama) and the relevant web pages on the MARWA web site. Annex 8 provides details of the notices (photos of actual notices). Annex 9 provides photos from the actual public meetings, while Annex 10 provides lists of the actual public attendance at each of the meetings.

Table 5-2: Timeline to Public Hearing for the First Priority I&D schemes

Preliminary visits to fore- Notice sent by Approved Summary Name of 1st Priority warn the affected com- Advert placed in Date of the Public email to ESMP Reports sent Scheme munities in the I&D Newspaper Hearings Municipalities to Municipalities schemes Terbuf/Krutje 10th June 17th June 24th June 25th June 11am 29th June Divjake 10th June 17th June 24th June 25th June 2pm 29th June Koshnica 11th June 17th June 23rd June 25th June 11am 27th June Kurjan Strum 12th June 17th June 25th June 25th June 11am 30th June

Due to the delays for the approval of Divjake ESMP, the notifications for the first priority schemes Public hearings were separated into two parts.

The first part comprised of simple material, focused on the sites to be affected and the main concentration of the public discussions. This was carried out between 10, 11 and 12 June, by travelling to the local administrative units and explaining to the communities and local authorities the aim the upcoming Public Hearing. During the same time, we explained the importance of environmental impacts and the ways of limiting impact through mitigation measures, as well as explaining the importance of gender and women's participation, grievance mechanisms in cases of RAP, etc.

Then on 23, 24 and 25 June the summarized report as approved from WB and MARDWA was distributed to the municipalities. The newspaper announcement form the MARDWA was sent to press and came out on Saturday 25 June, considered important, as more people were likely to read the newspaper at the weekend.

Table 5-3: Timeline to Public Hearing for the Second Priority I&D schemes

Preliminary visits to Notice sent by Approved Summary Name of 2nd forewarn the affected Advert placed in Date of the Public Hear- email to ESMP Reports sent Priority Scheme communities in the I&D Newspaper ings Municipalities to Municipalities schemes Tregtan 2 2nd May 2017 6th May 2017 17th May 2017 18th May 2017 11am 22nd May 2017 Tregtan 3 2nd May 2017 6th May 2017 17th May 2017 18th May 2017 11am 22nd May 2017 Vranisht 2 2nd May 2017 6th May 2017 17th May 2017 18th May 2017 11am 22nd May 2017 Leminot 3rd May 2017 6th May 2017 17th May 2017 23rd May 2017 11am 24th May 2017 Slanica 4th May 2017 6th May 2017 17th May 2017 23rd May 2017 11am 26th May 2017 Murriz Thana Cukas/ 5th May 2017 6th May 2017 17th May 2017 24th May 2017 2pm 29th May 2017 Lushnjë branches Xarra 6th May 2017 6th May 2017 17th May 2017 24th May 2017 11am 31st May 2017

Belesovë No Public Meeting was convened Duhanas No Public Meeting was convened Zharrëz No Public Meeting was convened

Given that the public hearing is reflected in more detail in ESMP reports for each scheme, below we are giving a summary of the participants' opinion. The full reports for the Public Hearings are contained in Annex 11. In general, all public hearings raise issues such as:

• Local authorities have welcomed the implementation of the irrigation project in their areas and commit- ted themselves to solving any problems that may arise. • The local authorities demanded that they be part of the supervision of the works, in order to ensure the highest quality of the works • Participants expressed that rehabilitation of irrigation schemes would have positive economic and social impacts. • During the meetings it was emphasized that given that the nature of the works, there will be no environmental concerns. • At the meeting held in Lushnjë it was ascertained that in the Karbunar Village, some families discharge the sewage into the irrigation canals and that it needs the construction of septic tanks. • At the meeting for the Xarra scheme, it was required that the irrigation water be drained away from the Butrint lagoon and that this demand be reflected in the final project. • In meetings, it was specified that from the rehabilitation of irrigation schemes there is no need for any expropriation of land or residential facility. If agricultural crops are damaged during the rehabilitation works, then the damage must be evaluated and compensated.

6 CONCLUSIONS AND NEXT STEPS

6.1 Conclusions The Consultant has successfully undertaken the stakeholder consultation at national, regional and local level including meeting with concerned stakeholders associated with the 13 I&D schemes that lie within the six districts of Kukës, Berat, Korçë, Lushnjë, Fier and Sarandë.

Initial stakeholder meetings commenced in November 2015 and concentrated on the four priority I&D schemes of Murriz Thana, Kurjan Strum, Divjake and Koshnica. Later, the other lower priority I&D schemes were visited with the last interviews being held in late February 2017. Public hearings were held for four first priority schemes during June 2016 and for the seven "second priority" schemes in May 2017. Three "second priority" I&D schemes had no public hearings due to the issue of substantial siltation present in the reservoirs feeding these schemes. The estimated cost for desilting these reservoirs to render them operational is not presently viable.

A total of 134 separate meetings were held by the Consultant. Issues that evolved from the interviews conducted covered seven main topics namely; i) lost livelihood and land compensation, ii) benefits and poverty reduction, iii) planned design of I&D Project, iv) gender/women's employment opportunities, v) impacts and monitoring, vi) stakeholder engagement and vii) infrastructure improvements.

On an overall project level, the issues on the benefits and poverty reduction and on the potential impacts and monitoring were the main concerns voiced by stakeholders, followed by the planned design of the I&D projects and then stakeholder engagement. The least issue of concern was infrastructure improvements.

When analysing the results in a regional context benefits and poverty reduction is the single most important issue in all the districts with the exception of Sarandë. In Sarandë, the most important issues were shared between the planned design of the I&D scheme and stakeholder engagement. At national level, the most important issue was impacts and monitoring.

An important point coming out from this stakeholder consultation is that generally, all people are welcoming the rehabilitation of the I&D schemes, as it will provide substantial benefits for their future livelihood. It is crucial however that the selected contractors interact and involve the local communities as much as possible by ensuring employment of local labour in the nearby schemes and by providing transparent dialogue to keep local people well informed. One of the more common issues arising from the focus groups was the need for district road improvement to enable the public to reach markets quicker and to allow their produce to reach market in a good condition.

6.2 Next Steps Following the submission of this PCR and approval from the World Bank and MARDWA, the Consultant will then proceed to finalise the ESMPs and ARAPs that have been prepared for the seven 2nd priority I&D schemes. The four 1st priority ESMPs have already been prepared and been approved in 2016. There are three I&D schemes with no priority (Belesovë, Duhanas and Zharrëz) that are rendered unviable currently, due to the high cost of de-siltation of the reservoirs. Pressing forward with the rehabilitation of these three I&D schemes will need to wait until a source of funding can be ascertained.

The final ESMPs will then need to be publically disclosed in accordance with WB and GoA regulations in preparation for the tendering of the rehabilitation works for the seven 2nd priority I&D schemes.

7 REFERENCES

1 CEIA/COWI 2012, Public Consultation Report on 13 reservoirs and dams as part of WRIP 2 CEIA/COWI 2016, Stakeholder Consultation Report on 13 I&D schemes as part of WRIP 3 EDRB May 2014 Environmental and Social Policy – 61 pages 4 EBRD May 2014 – Public Complaints Mechanisms – Rules and Procedures – 16 pages 5 EBRD May 2014 – Public Information Policy – 22 pages 6 IFC May 2007 Stakeholder Engagement A Good Practice Handbook 7 Renardet JV et al 2015 – Feasibility Study for 13 I&D schemes in Albania World Bank July 2015– Operations Manual updated, 491 pages 8 http://go.worldbank.org/DZDZ9038D0

8 ANNEXES

8.1 ANNEX 1: Questionnaire Template

1. Personi i intervistuar, Emri, mbiemri, funksioni Interviewed person (Name, surname ,assignment)

2. A keni dijeni per projektin e rehabilitimit te skemave te ujitjes? Are you aware of the project of rehabilitation of irrigation schemes? Ne se po, si mendoni, do te ndikoje ne: If yes, how do you think, will affect: a. rritjen e prodhimit bujqesor? Increase agricultural production? b. Rritjen e te ardhurave te familjeve bujqesore? Increase incomes of agricultural families? c. Ndryshimin e structures se kulturave bujqesore qe mbillen aktualisht? Changing the structure of cultivated agricultural crops currently? d. Punesimin e familjeve qe jetojne ne zonen e skemes se ujitjes? Employment of families living in the area of irrigation schemes? 3. Si mendoni, punimet per rehabilitimin e digave jane cilesore apo jo? How do you think, works for the rehabilitation of dams are qualitative or not? Ne se po, If yes, a. Do te sigurohet uji per vaditje sipas kerkesave te bimeve? It will provide water for irrigation according to plant requirements? b. A duhet qe bordi i kullimit dhe stafi i bashkise ose njesise administrative te jete pjese e supervizionit te punimeve? Should be the drainage board and staff of the municipality or administrative unit to be part of the supervision of the works? c. Si do te organizohet mirmbajtja e kanaleve, kryesisht e kanaleve te treta? How will organize maintenance of channels, mainly the third channels? d. A duhet te paguajne per ujin e vaditjes fermeret? Should pay farmers for irrigation water ?

4. A mbillet me kultura bujqesore e gjithe siperfaqja ?

A planted with agricultural crops the entire surface? Ne se jo, cilat jane arsyet? If not, what are the reasons? a. Nuk ka uje per vaditje No water for irrigation b. Kosto e larte e prodhimeve? The high cost of production? c. Mungesa e tregut? Lack of market? d. Cila eshte structura aktuale e mbjelljeve? What is the current sowing structure? 5. A ka zhvillim te blegtorise vitet e fundit? Has livestock development in recent years? a. Cilat lloj kafshesh predominojne? What kind of animals predominate? b. Produktet blegtorale perdoren per vet konsum apo per shitje? The livestock products are used for animal consumption or for sale? c. A ka qendra perpunimi te qumeshtit ne teritorin e njesise administrative? Have milk processing centers in the territory of the administrative unit?

6. A ka vazhduar migrimi dhe emigracioni gjate viteve 2014-2015 A continued migration and emigration during the years 2014-2015? Ne se po, cilat jane arsyet, If yes , what are the reasons? a. Mungesa e tokes? Lack of land? b. Mos sigurimi I te ardhurave nga toka bujqesore? Failure to provide the income from agricultural land? c. Kerkesa per nje jete me te mire? Demand for a better life?

7. Si eshte punesimi ne administraten e ish komunes? Raporti meshkuj-femra? How is the employment administration of former commune? The male-female ratio? 8. Cili eshte niveli arsimor ne ish komune sipas grup moshave?

What is the educational level in the former municipality by age group? 9. Cilat jane aresyet e mos frekuentimit te shkolles nga brezi i ri? What are the reasons for not attending school by the younger generation? a. Nevojat ekonomike? Economic needs? b. Mosdeshira? Unwillingness? 10. A eshte i mjaftueshem numri i shkollave ne fshatrat e njesise administrative? Is a sufficient number of schools in the villages of the administrative unit? 11. Si eshte niveli i institucioneve te shendetit public? How is the level of public health institutions? a. Banoret e marrin sherbimin ne qendrat shendetesore? Residents receive services in health centers? b. I duhet te marin sherbimin ne qytetin me te aferm? I need to receive service in the city with relatives? c. Qendrat shendetsore kane autoambulanca? Health centers have ambulances?

12. A ka te zhvilluar industri perpunuese te produkteve bujqesore ne ish komune? Has developed processing industry of agricultural products in the former municipality? 13. Sa % e prodhimeve bujqesore jane per vet konsum dhe per treg? What % of its agricultural products are for consumption and for market? 14. A eshte e organizuar tregtia e produkteve bujqesore? Is organized trade in agricultural products? 15. A ka qendra grumbullimi te prodhimit? Have products collection centers? 16. Si jane cmimet e produkteve bujqesore? How are the prices of agricultural products? 17. Sa jane te ardhurat mesatare per nje familje? How are the average incomes for a family? 18. Sa % zene te ardhurat nga aktiviteti bujqesor? Busy income as% of agricultural activity? 19. Sa eshte xhiro ditore e bar restoranteve, e dyqaneve etj? What is the daily turnover of bar restaurants, shops etc.?

20. Sa jane te ardhurat e profesioneve si murator, mekanik, elektricist, etj? How are the revenues of occupations as a bricklayer, mechanic, electrician, etc.? 21. A ka familje qe marin ndihme ekonomike? Are there families that receive economic aid? 22. A ka femra kryefamiljare? Are there female-headed? Ne se po, If , yes a. Si eshte shperndarja sipas grup moshave? How is the distribution by age group? b. Cfar niveli arsimor kane? What level of education have? c. Sa jane te ardhurat mujore te familjeve te tyre? How much are the monthly income of their families? d. A jane dhe ku jane te punesuara Are they and where are employed?

8.2 ANNEX 2: Detailed Stakeholder Survey Results

8.2.1 ANNEX 2A: Table of Results

Issues Raised by Stakeholders District (loca- No or No of Stakeholders Lost Livelihood Benefits and Gender/ tion) and I&D persons Planned design Impacts and Stakeholder Infrastructure interviewed - Land poverty women scheme interviewed of I&D Project Monitoring Engagement improvements Compensation reduction employment Kukës Mr. Halit Mula 1 1 1 1 1 Vranisht 2 Mrs. Aida Spahia 1 1 1 1 1 Tregtan 2 Mr. Sadik Xhafa 1 1 1 Tregtan 2 Mr. Myftar Kapica 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 REA Kukës Mr Shemsi Shahu 1 1 1 1 SUB TOTAL 5 3 5 3 2 3 2 1 Lushnjë Mr. Gentian Nushi 1 1 1 1 1 Murriz Thana Mr. Ledio Gjyla 1 1 1 Divjake Mr. Agim Rrasa 1 1 1 1 Mr. Erald Shurdhi 1 1 1 1 Mr. Aleksander Llapi 1 1 1 Mrs. Alma Veliu 1 1 1 1 Mr. Fredi Kokoneshi 1 1 1 1 Mr. Avni Koci 1 1 1 1 SUB TOTAL 8 2 6 5 1 6 2 1 Fier Mr. Xhevit Bushi 1 1 1 1 Kurjan + Strum Mr. Afrim Plaka 1 1 Zharrëz Mr. Vilson Naci 1 1 1 Mr. Artur Bogdani 1 1 1 1 Mr. Agron Dardha 1 1 1 1 Mrs. Valentina Duka 1 1 1 1 Fier Mrs. Vilma Zhupaj 1 1 1 1 1 Zharrëz Mrs. Lindita Pepa 1 1 1 1 1 1 REA Fier Mr. Edwin Bixha 1 1 1 1 SUB TOTAL 9 3 8 4 2 3 4 3 Berat Mr. Clirim Brisku 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

Issues Raised by Stakeholders District (loca- No or No of Stakeholders Lost Livelihood Benefits and Gender/ tion) and I&D persons Planned design Impacts and Stakeholder Infrastructure interviewed - Land poverty women scheme interviewed of I&D Project Monitoring Engagement improvements Compensation reduction employment Duhanas Mr. Bledar Cili 1 1 1 1 1 Belesovë Mr. Adriatik Serani 1 1 Slanica Mr. Ajet Hyka 1 1 1 1 Mr. Bojken Tabaku 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Mr. Ergest Zeqo 1 1 1 1 1 1 Mr. Qani Zeqo 1 1 1 1 1 Mr. Shpetim Nishani 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Mr. Kostika Mari 1 1 1 1 1 Mr. Fredi Kaja 1 1 1 1 1 1 REA Berat Mr Petraq Tole 1 1 1 1 SUB TOTAL 11 7 11 7 6 7 6 4 Korçë Mr. Kastriot Malushi 1 1 Leminot Mr. Spiro Koti 1 1 1 Mr. Kleanthi Mingo 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Mr. Petrit Yzo 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Mrs. Erma Zacellari 1 1 Mr Aleksander Cela and REA Korçë 2 2 2 1 2 Ms Irina Kellezi SUB TOTAL 7 4 5 2 3 4 3 2 Sarandë Mr. Shuaip Beqiri 1 1 1 1 Xarra Mr. Vangjel Dhima 1 1 1 1 1 Mrs. Majlinda Kondi 1 1 1 1 Mr Dhimo Kote 1 1 1 1 1 Mr. Kostandin Koca 1 1 1 1 REA Vlore Mr Kreshnik Lilaj 1 Sarandë Munic- Mr Areti Papadhima 1 ipality SUB TOTAL 7 1 2 4 1 2 4 3 National Level MARDWA Arta Baboci 1 1 1 1 Inst Nat Cons Nihat Dragoti 1 1 MOE Nat Prot Ermal Halimi etc. 3 1 Water PIU MTI Ilir Sallaku, HamitTeme 2 1 1 1

8.2.2 ANNEX 2B: Regional Pie Charts

8.3 ANNEX 3: Stakeholder Analysis STAKEHOLDER ANALYSIS MATRIX Position and Name of Person Impact expected from the How much impact they have What is important for the How could the stakeholder Other Com- Name of Organi- Contact Details Interviewed Project? into the Project? Stakeholder? contribute to the Project? ments zation NATIONAL LEVEL Medium Director of Fi- Ministry of Envi- High impact To support any proposed By providing approval to (Improve the environmental nance-Ministry of ronment, Rr. Tefta (Part of the project approval development action as long project steps and agreeing Trajan Vasili quality and provide a better Environment Tashko, process (Expert of the line as it is in line with environ- with project final design, climate to increase the funds (MOE) Tirana. Albania Ministry)) mental policy. ESMP and RAPS for environmental protection) Medium High impact Institute for Na- To be inline and correct with (Avoiding as much as possible (Great influence in National Incite local and national NGOs ture Conservation INCA, rr Kavajes, biodiversity conservation Nihat Dragoti negative impacts to biodiversi- Parks administration, environ- to support project develop- in Albania (INCA) Tirana. Albania policy ty especially related to Divjake mental associations and NGOs ment (NGO) Gender issues and Butrint National Parks) etc.) Medium Experts of the High impact MOE, Rr. Tefta (Respect local and national Justify the efforts on envi- MOE Directorate (Decision maker on project Support project development Ermal Halimi etc. Tashko, policies on environmental ronmental protection and of Nature Protec- development and achieve- and approval Tirana, Albania protection erosion control tion ment) Erosion control) Stakeholders Hydro-technical Water PIU, GDWP, Medium Support project development Medium impact Develop appropriate instru- are working in Ilir Sallaku, Hamit experts at Water Rr. Sami Frasheri, (Support PIU project on sus- and approval (Important actors to support ments to apply sustainable the same field Teme PIU/ GDWR of MTI, tainable use of water re- Deliver useful information on project development) use of waters but for other MTI Tirana, Albania sources) project development issues at MTI High (Justify the efforts of MOE for High impact Support project development MOE, Chief of MOE, Rr. Tefta nature conservation Respect ESIA and ESMP (Decision maker on project and incite international or- Elvana Ramaj Directorate of Tashko, Facilitate understanding of the guidelines on project devel- development and achieve- ganization approval of project Nature Protection Tirana compatibility of Albanian pro- opment ment) development and finalization ject goals with EU requirements) Medium Medium (Use the project development (Ensure project support from Geological expert, Get support on their theory University of Tirana, and achievements as example students etc. Help for the project support Ardian Shehu lector in Geosci- on the possibility of sustain- Geosciences Faculty for improving understanding of Develop/inform on project by youngers and student ence Faculty able development environmental importance to ideas and use as examples at students and training groups) other lectures) Low Efficiency of their infor- Great oppor- High impact Chief of Agricul- INSTAT Tirana, Rr. (Justify efforts for collection, mation and participation of Delivery of basic information tunity to im- (Ensure important basic infor- Irma Sinemati tural office at Tefta Tashko analyses, classification and the INSTAT regional repre- on socio-economy and gender prove monitor- mation on social, cultural and INSTAT Albania distribution of socio- sentatives on project devel- data ing data collec- gender data) economical and gender data) opment tion Vanela Gjeci Experts and Re- NEA, Rr. Sami Medium High impact Ensuring data on physical, Delivering important basic Actively in-

STAKEHOLDER ANALYSIS MATRIX Position and Name of Person Impact expected from the How much impact they have What is important for the How could the stakeholder Other Com- Name of Organi- Contact Details Interviewed Project? into the Project? Stakeholder? contribute to the Project? ments zation sponsible for Frasheri, Tirana, (Improve monitoring system at (Help on project support from biological and social status, information on surface water volved in the Chemical Lab of Albania surface and groundwater NEA) expected development vec- quality of reservoirs, rivers ESMP during National Envi- basins under the study) tors and management/ mon- etc. under the study and for the Project ronmental Agency itoring items for irrigation lagoons and coasts where the operation schemes under the study irrigation waters are dis- phase charged Support consultant with na- National Environ- Medium High impact Implementation of EIA tional regulations regarding Experts and Chief mental Agency, Rr. Evis Mellonashi (Implementation of EIA guide- (Help on project environmental guidelines on development EIA/ESMP of EIA Office Sami Frasher. Tira- lines developed by NEA) permit from NEA) projects Support the organization of na, Albania public hearings High Information on MARDWA MARDWA, Sheshi Medium (Consider gender issues in Consider relation of project Gender Focal objectives on consideration of Arta Baboci Skenderbej 2, Tira- (Respecting gender require- project development vectors in development with gender Point at MARDWA gender issues and national na, Albania ments during ESMP and RAPs) respect with MARDWA objec- issues in affected people policy tives) REGIONAL LEVEL Deputy Mayor of Medium Low. Quality of reconstruction and Lushnje Municipality Lushnje Municipality can take Mr. Gentian Nushi Lushnje Munici- Improve quality of life in rural WRIP will be implemented by maintenance works and Lushnje part in supervision processes pality area of Lushnje Municipality MARDWA. supervision High DB is under MARDWA and Directory of Drain- Medium responsible for function of I&D Director of Drain- age Board, Lushnje The project will improve the systems. DB of Lushnje will Quality of reconstruction and Monitoring of reconstruction Mr. Ledio Gjyla age Board (DB) District irrigation schemes and will receive delivery of irrigation maintenance works works quality. (Lushnje District) Lushnje increase area under irrigation schemes, so it is concerned that the reconstruction work must be of good quality Medium Implementation of WRIP will Director of Agri- increase the irrigated areas Agriculture Directo- Low Enlargement of area under AD could contribute with culture District and will assist in augmentation Mr. Agim Rrasa ry of Lushnje District AD is interested to collaborate irrigation and quality of suggestions during detailed (AD) (Lushnje of agricultural production. Lushnje with Drainage Board works design processes District) WRIP will indicate too in innovation of cultivated plants structure Medium The municipality could con- Agriculture Spe- The project will improve aug- tribute with suggestions dur- Low Enlargement of area under cialist of the Lushnje Municipality mentation of agricultural pro- ing detailed design processes Mr. Erald Shurdhi The municipality currently has irrigation and quality of Lushnje Munici- Lushnje duction, and incomes of fami- Secondly if Lushnje munici- no access to the project works pality lies in rural areas of municipal- pality can take part in super- ity vision processes

STAKEHOLDER ANALYSIS MATRIX Position and Name of Person Impact expected from the How much impact they have What is important for the How could the stakeholder Other Com- Name of Organi- Contact Details Interviewed Project? into the Project? Stakeholder? contribute to the Project? ments zation The municipality of Divjake Temporary Ad- Low could contribute to the pro- High ministrator of Former commune of Municipality of Divjake and Enlargement of area under ject with suggestions during Mr.Aleksander Project will augment agricul- new Administra- Tërbuf administrative unit of Tërbuf irrigation and quality of detailed design processes Llapi tural production and incomes tive Unit (AU) of Cerm Sector currently have no access to the works Secondly Municipality and of families in Tërbuf areas Tërbuf project AU can take part in supervision processes Municipality of Lushnje and all of Krutje can contribute to High Low Enlargement of area under the project with suggestions Temporary Ad- Former Commune The project will indicate in The municipality of Lushnje irrigation and quality of during detailed design pro- Mrs. Alma Veliu ministrator of of Krutje augmentation of agricultural and administrative unit of works cesses new AU of Krutje Krutje production and incomes of Krutje currently have not ac- Employment of women in Secondly if Municipality and families in Krutje areas cess to the project the irrigation schemes AU can take part in supervision processes Medium WRIP will improve economic Municipality could contribute situation of farmers, conse- to the project with sugges- The Mayor of Low Quality of reconstruction and Mr. Fredi Kokone- Divjake Municipality quently will improve social tions during detailed design Divjake Munici- WRIP will be implemented by maintenance works and shi Divjake conditions for the population. processes pality MARDWA. supervision Fresh agricultural productions and if will take part in super- will be attractive and help vision processes developing tourism in this area Implementation of WRIP will Municipality could contribute increase the irrigated areas to the project with sugges- Municipality of Low Enlargement of area under and augment agricultural pro- tions during detailed design Mr. Avni Koci Agriculture Expert Divjake Municipality currently has no irrigation and quality of duction. WRIP will also allow processes Divjake access to the project works new innovation of cultivated and if will take part in super- plants structure vision processes Medium Low WRIP will improve farmers Prefecture could contribute Prefecture is very interested to Improving of quality of life Prefect of Fieri Prefecture of Fier economic situation and will by coordinating collaboration Mr.Xhevit Bushi assist in Project implementa- and social issues in rural District Fier augment social aspects, better between MARDWA and local tion (two schemes) as soon as areas trade to cities, employment government possible. etc. Roskovec Municipality can Deputy Mayor of Roskovec Municipal- Medium Low. Quality of reconstruction and take part in supervision pro- Mr. Afrim Plaka Roskovec Munici- ity Improve quality of life in rural WRIP will be implemented by maintenance works and cesses, that would help I&D pality Roskovec area of Roskovec Municipality MARDWA. supervision scheme "ownership" Director of Drain- Directory of Drain- Medium High Quality of reconstruction and Monitoring of reconstruction Mr.Vilson Naci age Board (Fier age Board, Fier The project will improve the DB is under MARDWA and maintenance works works quality. District) District irrigation schemes and will responsible for function of I&D

STAKEHOLDER ANALYSIS MATRIX Position and Name of Person Impact expected from the How much impact they have What is important for the How could the stakeholder Other Com- Name of Organi- Contact Details Interviewed Project? into the Project? Stakeholder? contribute to the Project? ments zation Fier increase area under irrigation systems. DB of Fier will receive delivery of I&D schemes, so it is important that reconstruction work is made to be good quality Medium Implementation of WRIP will increase irrigated areas and Director of Agri- Agriculture Directo- Low Enlargement of area under AD could contribute with augment agricultural produc- Mr.Artur Bogdani culture (Fier Dis- ry of Fier District AD is interested to collaborate irrigation and quality of suggestions during detailed tion. WRIP will indicate too in trict) Fier with DB works design processes innovation of cultivated plants structure, will increase access to trade and export Low Municipality could contribute Implementation of WRIP will Municipality of to the project with sugges- Agronomist, Ros- increase the irrigated areas Low Enlargement of area under Roskovec tions during detailed design Mr. Agron Dardha kovec Municipali- and augment agricultural pro- The municipality currently has irrigation and quality of Roskovec processes ty duction. WRIP will enable not access to the project works Divjake and if will take part in super- innovation of cultivated plants vision processes structure Considering RAP outputs the High High Cadastre could contribute affected per- Mrs. Valentina Director of Cadas- County of Fier Avoiding affected entities and Cadastre is the Main Entity for The issues of land cadastre with legal information in case sons disclaims Duka tre, (Fier District) Fier persons claims for compensa- RAP 7 ownership regarding and ownership of expropriations will be avoided tion database As much as possible Medium Low. Quality of reconstruction and Mr.Bledjon Mayor of Devoll Devoll Municipality Devoll Municipality can take Improve quality of life in rural WRIP is implemented by maintenance works and Nallbati Municipality Devoll part in supervision processes area of Devoll municipality MARDWA. supervision High DB is under MARDWA and The director of Medium responsible for functioning of Directory of DB, Drainage Board The project will improve the I&D systems. DB of Korça will Quality of reconstruction and Monitoring of reconstruction Mr.Nexhip Merolli Korça District (DB) irrigation schemes and will receive delivery of irrigation maintenance works works quality. Korça (Korça District) increase area under irrigation schemes, so it is concerned that the reconstruction work to be good quality Agriculture Director Medium The director of Low Enlargement of area under AD could contribute with (AD) of Korça Dis- Implementation of WRIP will Mr.Arben Malo agriculture (Korça AD is interested to collaborate irrigation and quality of suggestions during detailed trict increase the irrigated areas District) with DB works design processes Korça and augment agricultural pro-

STAKEHOLDER ANALYSIS MATRIX Position and Name of Person Impact expected from the How much impact they have What is important for the How could the stakeholder Other Com- Name of Organi- Contact Details Interviewed Project? into the Project? Stakeholder? contribute to the Project? ments zation duction. WRIP will enable innovation of cultivated plants structure and will increase access to trade and export The municipality of Devoll and administrative unit of Miras High Low could contribute to the pro- Representative of Former Commune The project will indicate in The municipality of Devoll and Enlargement of area under Mrs. Matilda ject with suggestions during new Administra- of Miras augmentation of agricultural administrative unit of Miras irrigation and quality of Hoxha detailed design processes tive Unit of Miras Miras, Devoll production and incomes of currently have not access to works Secondly if municipality and families in Miras areas the project administrative unit will take part in supervision processes Implementation of WRIP will increase the irrigated areas The administrative unit could Low Agronomist of Administrative unit consequently; will indicate in Enlargement of area under contribute to the project with Mr. Barjam Ah- The administrative unit cur- new Administra- of Miras augmentation of agricultural irrigation and quality of suggestions during detailed metli rently has not access to the tive Unit of Miras Miras, Devoll production. WRIP will indicate works design processes project too in innovation of cultivated plants structure High WRIP will improve economic Low situation of farmers, conse- The municipality could con- Municipality of The municipality is very inter- Improving of quality of live Mayor of Konispol quently will indicate into social tribute to coordinate collabo- Mr.Shuaip Beqiri Konispol ested in implementing of pro- and social issues in rural Municipality aspects, into provision of trade ration between MARDWA and Konispol, Sarandë ject (Xara scheme) as soon as areas of the Sarandë city, employ- local government possible. ment, developing of trade and export etc. High SDB is under DB of Vlorë and MARDWA and is responsible Responsible of Sector of Drainage Medium for functioning of I&D Sector for Drain- Board, Vlorë Dis- The project will improve the Quality of reconstruction and Monitoring of reconstruction Mr.Vangjel Dhima schemes. DB of Vlorë and SDB age Board (SDB) trict irrigation schemes and will maintenance works works quality. of Sarandë will receive delivery ((Sarandë District) Sarandë increase area under irrigation of irrigation schemes, so it is concerned that the reconstruction work to be good quality Medium Enlargement of area under Implementation of WRIP will Responsible for The sector of agri- Low irrigation and quality of AD could contribute with increase the irrigated areas Mrs.Lindita Kondi Agriculture Sector culture AS is interested to collaborate works. Improvement of suggestions during detailed consequently; will indicate in Sarandë district Sarandë with DB irrigation technical operat- design process augmentation of agricultural ing modality production. WRIP will indicate

8.4 ANNEX 4: List of Persons Met on Stakeholder Consultation

8.4.1 Persons met at National Level Position and Name of Insti- Name Main Focus of Consultation Date of meetings tution Possible issues expected in Butrint and Institute for Nature Conser- 1 Nihat Dragoti Divjake National Parks by rehabilitation of 15 November 2015 vation in Albania Mursi and Divjake irrigation schemes Experts of the Ministry of Possible negative impacts expected to be Environment, developed in the natural and semi natural 2 Ermal Halimi etc. 16 November 2015 Directorate of Nature Pro- environments by rehabilitation of irrigation tection schemes Ilir Sallaku, Hydro-technical experts at Possible flood effects expected by rehabili- 3 18 November 2015 HamitTeme Water PIU, MTI tation of irrigation schemes Ministry of Environment, Consultation on spatial position of Irriga- 4 Elvana Ramaj Chief of Directorate of Na- tion schemes under the study related to 19 November 2015 ture Protection Natural specific habitats Geological expert, Geological features of sites where are situ- 5 Ardian Shehu lecturer in Geoscience Fac- 20 November 2015 ated Irrigation schemes ulty Ways to control nutrients expected to be Environmental chemists, 6 Enkeleda Basha transferred from irrigation schemes to 2 December 2015 WWTP manager stagnant waters Chief of Agricultural Albanian Gender data sources and study 7 Irma Sinemati 3 December 2015 office at INSTAT methodologies Budget forecast for water monitoring in MOE Finance and Budget 8 Trajan Vasili irrigation systems and reservoirs and in 7 January 2016 Director main rivers of Albania Marsida Tabaku Experts in Water PIU GDWP Data and goals for drinking water opera- 9 7 January 2016 Mirjeta Zeneli in MTI tion and monitoring, WWTP etc. in Sarandë Experts and those Monitoring system, lab capability, existing responsible for data etc. on surface and ground water 10 Vanela Gjeci Laboratory testing at Na- 12 January 2016 status in Semani, Drin Buna and Pavlla tional Environmental Agen- River basins cy Procedures on Environmental Permits, Experts and Chief of the EIA requirements of NEA for Stakeholder and 11 Evis Mellonashi office. At National Envi- Public consultation and coordination for 12 January 2016 ronmental Agency in Tirana meeting with REA of Kukës, Sarandë/Vlorë, Korçë, Fier, Lushnjë and Berat Gender expert at focal 12 Arta Baboci Gender data and focuses 19 January 2015 point at MARDWA

8.4.2 Persons met at Regional Level Position and Name of No Name Focus of Consultation Date of meetings Institution On importance of WRIP for Lushnjë Region and contribute of Lushnjë Municipality Deputy Mayor staff. Also on structure and changes of 1 Mr. Gentian Nushi 21 December.2015 Lushnjë municipality population in rural area, women employment, gender etc., incomes of household etc. On quality of engineering works during Director of Drainage Board 2 Mr. Ledio Gjyla project implementation. Also on way of 21 December.2015 (Lushnjë District) supervising. On impact of improving irrigation schemes Director of Agriculture 3 Mr. Agim Rrasa in increasing of agricultural production and 22 December.2015 (Lushnjë District) incomes of farmers Agriculture Specialist of On importance of organization of mainte- 4 Mr. Erald Shurdhi 21 December.2015 Lushnjë Municipality nance of irrigation scheme

Position and Name of No Name Focus of Consultation Date of meetings Institution On general social and economic situation in Administrator of new ad- administrative unite of Terbuf and ex- 25 to 26 5 Mr. Aleksander Llapi ministrative unit of Terbuf pected impact of irrigation scheme rehabil- December.2015 itation On general social and economic situation in Administrator of new ad- 27 to 28 6 Mrs. Alma Veliu administrative unite of Krutje and expected ministrative unit of Krutje December.2015 impact of irrigation scheme rehabilitation On importance of WRIP for Divjake Region and contribute of Divjake Municipality The Mayor of Divjake Mu- staff. Also on structure and changes of 7 Mr. Fredi Kokoneshi 23 December.2015 nicipality population in rural area, women employment, gender etc., incomes of household etc. On impact of improving irrigation schemes in increasing of agricultural production and 23 to 24 8 Mr. Avni Koci Agriculture Expert incomes of farmers. Also on drainage situa- December.2015 tion and impact of production reduction and incomes of household On extension of new administrative unites in Fier Region and expected impact of 9 Mr. Xhevit Bushi Prefect of Fier District 12 December.2015 WRIP in improving of life quality in rural area. On importance of WRIP for Roskovec municipality and contribute of Roskovec Mu- nicipality staff. Also on level of poverty in Deputy Mayor 10 Mr. Afrim Plaka rural area of Kurjan and changes of popu- 14 December.2015 Roskovec Municipality lation during last years, women employment, gender etc., incomes of household etc. On quality of engineering works during Director of Drainage Board 11 Mr. Vilson Naci project implementation and ways of super- 12 December.2015 (Fier District) vising. Also on drainage situation in region On impact of improving irrigation schemes in increasing of agricultural production and Director of Agriculture 12 Mr. Artur Bogdani incomes of farmers. Also on drainage situa- 13 December.2015 (Fier District) tion and impact of production reduction and incomes of household On needs of agricultural plants for water and changes of structure of plants after Agronomist, Roskovec 13 Mr. Agron Dardha rehabilitation of irrigation schemes and 14 December.2015 municipality impact in production and incomes of household On legal status of land in area where will Director of Cadastre, (Fier 14 Mrs. Valentina Duka carry out rehabilitation works 13 December.2015 District)

On importance of WRIP for Devoll Munici- pality and contribute of Devoll Municipality Mayor Devoll staff. Also on level of poverty in rural area 15 Mr. Bledjon Nallbati 6 December.2015 Municipality of Miras, changes of population during last years and trade state of agricultural production On quality of engineering works during Director of Drainage Board 16 Mr. Nexhip Merolli project implementation and ways of super- 6 December.2015 (Korçë District) vising. Also reconstruction of Koshnica dam On impact of improving irrigation schemes in increasing of agricultural production and Director of Agriculture 17 Mr.Vullnet Gjolla incomes of farmers. Also on fulfilment of 7 December.2015 (Korçë District) demands for water after rehabilitation works. Mrs. Matilda Representative of new On demography, women employment, 18 8 December.2015 Hoxha administrative unit of gender etc., incomes of household etc.

Position and Name of No Name Focus of Consultation Date of meetings Institution Miras On land tenure in administrative unit of Meeting with Mr. Agronomist of new admin- Miras, actual structure of cultivated plants, 19 8 December.2015 Barjam Ahmetli istrative unit of Miras the perspective after rehabilitation of irrigation scheme etc. On level of poverty in rural area of Pirg Meeting with Mr. Chief of Cabinet of the 20 and impact of improving of irrigation in 19 February 2016 Kastriot Malushi Maliq mayor increasing of agricultural production On quality of reconstruction works at dam Expert on investment, 21 Mr. Spiro Koti of Leminot reservoir and spreading of 19 February 2016 Maliq municipality irrigation scheme On importance of WRIP for farmers living 19 February 2016 in administrative unit of Pirg, changes of Administrator of Pirg ad- 22 Mr. Kleanthi Mingo population during last year’s, employment, ministrative unit quality of life in rural areas, invalids in administrative unit of Pirg, gender etc. Agronomist of administra- On needs of plants for water and possibility 23 Mr. Petrit Yzo 19 February 2016 tive unit of Pirg of changes of agricultural plants structure. On number of invalids and other incapable 19 February 2016 Expert of economic help. peoples, peoples that live with economic 24 Mrs. Erma Zacellari Pirg help, how has changed level of life during last year’s etc. On importance of WRIP for Konispol Mu- nicipality. Also on structure and changes of Mayor Konispol 25 Mr. Shuaip Beqiri population in rural area, women employ- 27 November.2015 Municipality ment, gender etc., incomes of household etc. On quality of engineering works during Responsible of Sector for project implementation and ways of super- 26 Mr. Vangjel Dhima Drainage Board (Sarandë vising. Also on modernization of tech- 25 November.2015 District) niques in Xarra irrigation scheme, and importance of Janjari reservoir rehabilitation On impact of improving irrigation schemes in increasing of agricultural production and Director of Agriculture 27 Mrs. Lindita Kondi incomes of farmers. Also on fulfilment of 26 November.2015 (Sarandë District) demands for water after rehabilitation works. On impact of improving irrigation schemes in increasing of agricultural production and incomes of farmers. Also on possibility of Former chairman of Xarra 28 Mr. Dhimo Kote enlargement of area planted with manda- 26 November.2015 Commune rin trees after rehabilitation of irrigation scheme and general social and economic state in Xarra area. On impact of improving irrigation schemes in increasing of agricultural production and Former Agronomist, Xarra 29 Mr. Konstantin Koca incomes of farmers in Xarra area. Also on 27 November.2015 Commune fulfilment of demands for water after rehabilitation works. On importance of WRIP for Berat Munici- pality and contribute of Berat Municipality Deputy Mayor of Berat staff. Also on level of poverty in rural area 30 Mr. Clirim Brisku 12 February 2016 Municipality of Duhanas, changes of population during last year’s and trade state of agricultural production On quality of engineering works during 12 February 2016 Director of Drainage Board project implementation and ways of super- 31 Mr. Bledar Cili Berat District vising. Also on ways of water management during irrigation period Chief of extension On impact of improving irrigation schemes 32 Mr. Adriatik Serani 12 February 2016 Service, AD Berat in increasing of agricultural production and

Position and Name of No Name Focus of Consultation Date of meetings Institution incomes of farmers. Also on fulfilment of plants demands for water after rehabilitation works. On possibility of changes of agricultural 12 February 2016 plants structure and increasing of liveli- 34 Mr. Ajet Hyka Agronomist, AD Berat hood incomes after reconstruction of irrigation scheme. On importance of WRIP for farmers living in administrative unit of Velabisht, changes Administrator of Velabisht of population during last year’s, employ- 35 Mr. Bojken Tabaku 15 February 2016 administrative unit ment, quality of life in rural areas, invalids in administrative unit of Velabisht, gender etc. On importance of WRIP for Ura Vajgurore 15 February 2016 Municipality. Also on level of poverty in Deputy Mayor of Ura Va- 36 Mr. Ergest Zeqo rural area of Cukalat, changes of popula- jgurore Municipality tion during last year’s and trade state of agricultural production On importance of WRIP for farmers living 15 February 2016 in administrative unit of Cukalat, employ- Administrator of Cukalat 37 Mr. Qani Zeqo ment, quality of life in rural areas, invalids administrative unit in administrative unit of Cukalat, gender etc. On importance of WRIP for Kucova Munici- 15 February 2016 pality and contribute of Kucova Municipali- Deputy Mayor of Kucova ty staff in supervising processes. Also on 38 Mr. Shpetim Nishani Municipality level of poverty in rural area of Lumas, changes of population during last year’s and trade state of agricultural production On impact of improving irrigation schemes 15 February 2016 in increasing of agricultural production and incomes of farmers. Also on possibility of Administrator of Lumas 39 Mr. Kostika Mari enlargement of area planted with vegeta- administrative unit bles after rehabilitation of irrigation scheme and general social and economic state in Lumas area. On fulfilment of plants demands for water 15 February 2016 after rehabilitation works and perspective Agronomist, Lumas of agricultural production in this area. Also 40 Mr. Fredi Kaja administrative unit on quality of rehabilitation works and participation of administrative unit staff in supervision processes. On importance of WRIP for Patos Munici- pality and contribute of Patos Municipality Deputy Mayor of Patos 41 Mrs. Vilma Zhupaj staff in supervising processes. Also on level 16 February 2016 Municipality of poverty in rural area of Zharrëz administrative unit. On fulfilment of plants demands for water Agronomist, Zharrëz 42 Mrs. Lindita Pepa after rehabilitation works and perspective 16 February 2016 administrative unit of agricultural production in this area. On quality of engineering works during Director of drainage board, project implementation and ways of super- 43 Mr. Halit Mula 17 February 2016 Kukës District vising. Also on ways of water management during irrigation period On quality of rehabilitation works, super- Engineer, Kukës Drainage 44 Mrs. Aida Spahia vising and water management during irri- 17 February 2016 Board gation period On fulfilment of plants demands for water Director of agriculture, Has 44 Mr. Sadik Xhafa after rehabilitation works and perspective 17 February 2016 region of agricultural production in this area. 45 Mr. Myftar Kapica Administrator of Fajza On impact of improving irrigation schemes 17 February 2016

Position and Name of No Name Focus of Consultation Date of meetings Institution administrative unit in increasing of agricultural production and incomes of farmers. Also on level of poverty in rural area of Fajza administrative unit, changes of population during last year’s, gender etc. Possible impacts of project in social and Aleksander Cela and Director of REA Korçë and natural environments 46 10-11 February 2016 Irina Kellezi senior staff Organization of consultation and public hearing Possible impacts of project in social and Director of Vlorë REA and Kreshnik Lilaj natural environments 47 Environmental expert of 15-16 February 2016 Areti Papadhima Organization of consultation and public Sarandë Municipality hearing Procedures on Environmental Permits, 48 Petraq Tole Director REA Berat public consultation and monitoring re- 12 February 2016 quirements Procedures on Environmental Permits, 49 Edvin Bixha Director REA Fier public consultation and monitoring re- 16 February 2016 quirements Procedures on Environmental Permits, 50 Shemsi Shahu Director REA Kukës public consultation and monitoring re- 18February 2016 quirements

8.5 ANNEX 5: Stakeholder Consultation Photos

8.5.1 National Level Meetings

Photo 1: Meeting with MOE Finance Director. Mr Trajan Photo 2: Meeting with MOE Desertification and soil Vasili Expert

Photo 3: MOE Nature Conservation Directorate Photo 4: Experts of GDWS Water PIU of MTI

Photo 5: Chief of Water Lab at NEA Photo 6: Chief and experts of EIA Directorate at NEA

8.5.2 Regional Level Meetings Lushnjë region

Photo 7: Deputy Mayor Lushnjë Municipality Mr. Gentian Photo 8: Director of Drainage Board - Mr. Ledio Gjyla Nushi

Photo 9: Director Agriculture Mr Agim Rrasa Photo 10:Municipality Agriculture Specialist - Mr. Erald Shurdhi

Photo 11: Administrator Terbuf – Mr Aleksander Llapi Photo 12: Administrator of Krutje. Mrs Alma Veliu

Lushnjë region (Continued)

Photo 13: Mayor of Divjake Municipality Photo 14: Agricultural Expert of Divjake Municipality

Fier Region

Photo 15: Prefect of Fier District - Mr. Xhevit Bushi Photo 16: Deputy Mayor Roskovec Municipality – Mr Afrim Plaka

Photo 17: Responsible for Drainage Board Sector - Fier Photo 18: Director Agriculture Fier - Mr. Artur Bogdani

Fier Region (Continued)

Photo 19: Director of Cadastre – Mrs Valentina Duka Photo 20: Agronomist Roskovec Municipality – Mr Agron Dardha

Devoll Region

Photo 21: Mayor Devoll Municipality – Mr Bledion Photo 22:Director Drainage Board – Mr Nexhip Merolli Nallbati

Photo 23: Director of Agriculture Korçë Region – Photo 24: Miras Commune Former Representative – Mr Vullnet Gjolla Mrs Matilda Hoxha and Mr Bajram Ahmetli

Photo 25: Mr. Kastriot Malushi, Chief of Cabinet of the Photo 26: Mr. Spiro Koti, Expert of investment Maliq mayor

Photo 27: Mr. Kleanthi Mingo, Administrator Pirg admin- Photo 28: Mr. Petrit Yzo, agronomist of Pirg istrative unit

Sarandë Region

Photo 29: Director of Agriculture Sarandë Region – Photo 30: Mayor of Konispol Municipality – Mr Shuaip Mrs Lindita Kondi Beqiri

Photo 31: Former Chairman Xarra Commune – Photo 32: Agronomist Xarra Commune – Mr Konstantin Mr Dhimo Kote Koca

Berat Region

Photo 33: Mr. Clirim Brisku, Deputy Mayor of Berat Mu- Photo 34: Mr. Bledar Cili, Director of drainage board nicipality Berat District

Photo 35: Mr. Adriatik Saran, Chief of extension Service, Photo 36: Mr. Ajet Hyka, Agronomist, AD Berat AD Berat

Photo 37: Mr. Bojken Tabaku, Administrator of Velabisht Photo 38: Mr Ergest Zeqo, Deputy Mayor of Ura Vajgu- rore Municipality administrative unit

Photo 39: Mr. Qani Zeqo, Administrator of Cukalat Photo 40: Mr. Shpetim Nishani, Deputy Mayor of Kucova Municipality

Photo 41: Mr. Kostika Mari, Administrator of Lumas Photo 42: Mr. Fredi, Agronomist, Lumas

Photo 43: Mrs. Vilma Zhupaj, Deputy Mayor of Patos Photo 44: Mrs. Lindita Pepa, Agronomist, Zharrëz Municipality

Photo 45: Mr. Halit Mula, Director of Drainage Board, Photo 46: Mrs. Aida Spahia, Engineer, Kukës Drainage Kukës District Board

Photo 47: Mr. Sadik Xhafa, Director of Agriculture, Has Photo 48: Mr. Myftar Kapica, Administrator of Fajza region administrative unit

Meetings with Regional Environment Agency

Photo 49:Meeting with Kreshnik Lilaj REA Director and Photo 50: Meeting with Irina Kellezi Korçë REA staff Areti Papadhima REA staff Vlore region

Photo 51:Meeting with Petraq Tole, Director REA Berat Photo 52: Meeting with Edvin Bixha, Director REA Fier

Photo 53: Meeting with Shemsi Shahu, Director REA Kukës

8.5.3 Photo Interviews filling in Questionnaires

Photo 54: Interview in Divjake Photo 55: Interview in Divjake

Photo 56: Interview in Koshnica Photo 57: Interview in Koshnica

Photo 58: Interview in Leminot Photo 59: Interview in Leminot

Photo 60: Interview in Murriz Thana Cukas Branch Photo 61: Interview in Murriz Thana Cukas Branch

Photo 62: Interview in Murriz Thana Lushnjë Branch Photo 63: Interview in Murriz Thana Lushnjë Branch

Photo 64: Interview in Kurjan Strum Photo 65: Interview in Kurjan Strum

Photo 66: Interview in Zharrëz Photo 67: Interview in Zharrëz

Photo 68: Interview in Belesovë Photo 69: Interview in Belesovë

Photo 70: Interview in Duhanas Photo 71: Interview in Duhanas

Photo 72: Interview in Slanica Photo 73: Interview in Slanica

Photo 74: Interview in Has Photo 75: Interview in Has

Photo 76: Interview in Xarra Photo 77: Interview in Xarra

8.6 ANNEX 6: Stakeholder Comments and Responses COMPILED COMMENTS AND RESPONSES ON STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATION REPORT Stakeholder Institution and Details of the Comments made by Reviewers Response/ Action Taken by Consultant Reviewer

A meeting was held between World Bank Social Safeguard Specialist (SSS), MARDWA and the Consultant on Saturday 5th March 2016. No specific written comments were forthcoming from the SSS, but based An addition to the first para on page 2 was provided distin- upon the discussion the following is noted: World Bank guishing between the stakeholder and public consultation Page 2 first para – define the difference between stakeholder and public consultation reports Bekim Ymeri reports. Page 13 last para – describe more about how questionnaire used Social Safeguard Appropriate sentences were provided describing how ques- Section 3.3 page 14 1st para – clarify more on focus group and public consultation Specialist tionnaire was used and on focus group discussion and public Section 3.7.7. Focus Groups – add that a more detailed analysis will be made in public consultation re- consultations. ports Section 4.2 next steps – add that FGD analysis will be added into the public consultation report

General comments at front cover: Old comment from the inception report, repeated in the baseline: The Consultant has made an attempt to disaggregate by sex in Please ensure that all statistics provided are disaggregated by sex. E.g. unemployment/ youth unem- the Data Collection Report (often this was only possible at ployment and population figures in the irrigation schemes, who were included in meetings – but go prefecture level) and in the ESMP reports (again only prefec- through the document and ensure this is done consistently. ture level data is available). We have disaggregated at I&D

scheme level/commune level when # males and # females are Sida For upcoming reports - please provide statistics on: known, but often this is not broken further down in to age Anja Nordlund - Who are invited to meetings/consultations (disaggregated by sex) groups. - Who attend meetings/consultations (disaggregated by sex)

- What kind of methodology is used However for upcoming reports (i.e. the public consultation - Whose ideas and needs are included (disaggregated by sex – this can only be done by working with report we will ensure that those invited, those attending, etc. sole female and male groups). are disaggregated by sex.

It is not feasible to see in this report the above clearly stated – expressed in numbers that is. Sida Statement – no response necessary – we are pleased the pho- Nice pictures – great to see Anja Nordlund to is appreciated. The Reviewer is correct affordability and willingness to pay Would have been good with affordability and willingness to pay – but I understand this is not part of ToR. were not mentioned in the TOR. IF you have been in a position to present some overall findings for the schemes in general and for the Sida The Consultant has gathered some information in the ESMP priority schemes in particular this could be useful information. Anja Nordlund reports on family incomes at the I&D level and will make some In Divjakë, they have drip irrigation and a fairly good income – do they understand the possibilities in mention of this at the appropriate section in the ESMP re- getting in fresh water for the irrigation – are they willing to pay for this? ports. Sida Sida (always in small letters) and then – for some unknown reason – the full name is Swedish Interna- The Consultant thanks the Reviewer for bringing this to our Anja Nordlund tional development Cooperation Agency attention. Sida will be written in all future documents.

COMPILED COMMENTS AND RESPONSES ON STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATION REPORT Stakeholder Institution and Details of the Comments made by Reviewers Response/ Action Taken by Consultant Reviewer We understand 7 calendar days is considered by MARDWA to be an adequate time for notification of public meetings. The Page 1 - Are these strategic documents? In that case would the 30 day notification not apply here? Sida project also has strict time limits.

Anja Nordlund The Consultant is only quoting in italics the written text men- Participants disaggregated by sex tioned in the TOR. We assume MARDWA have prepared the TOR in consultation with World Bank and Sida. Sida The Consultant thanks the Reviewer for picking up this error. Page 3 section 1.2.1 The group 2 schemes are missing Divjake Anja Nordlund The bullet point has been corrected. Page 10 Section 2.4 - I assume you are referring to the Environmental and social policy of the EBRD? The Consultant thanks the Reviewer for picking up this error. A Sida Performance requirement (PR) 5 is about resettlement and economic displacement - although PR 10 is change to the paragraph has been effected as well as EBRD Anja Nordlund about consultations I think it is the 5 you are referring to? policy references been added to Chapter 5 The Consultant agrees with the Reviewers comment. We con- Page 12 – Section 3 last bullet after 2nd para. cur that women in addition to the Roma community are a Sida Which stakeholders are likely not engaging without special efforts? group that do not generally engage unless special efforts are Anja Nordlund We often talk about the ones we include, but forget the ones we do not see. You already talked to the made. The Consultant ensured there were adequate female Roma population at one place, this is such a group – women another. staff present during the interviews with stakeholders. Page 13 – Section 3.2 2nd para. Sida This is a statement by the Reviewer and no response is neces- Well put Anja Nordlund sary The same would be applicable for ‘men’ speaking on behalf of ‘women’. Sida The word "women" has been taken out of the brackets but Page 22- Section 3.7.7 - It is just words, but many women do not see themselves as vulnerable. Anja Nordlund "men and women" have been added to the sentence.

8.7 ANNEX 7 – Public Hearing – Media Announcements and Publications

Notifications for the first priority schemes (Divjake, Murriz Thana Krutje and Terbuf Branches, Koshnica and Kurjan Strum) within the newspapers are shown below:

Notices were also placed in the newspapers in a similar manner for the second priority schemes.

The MARDWA sent official letters to two newspapers, namely "Panorama" and "SOT" news for the second priority schemes. In addition, emails were also sent to the two newspaper agencies providing the same information.

MARDWA also announced the dates and information on the public hearings on the official MARDWA website.

For the second priority schemes this commenced on 6th May 2017 and continued until the end of the public hearing process (31st May 2017).

8.8 ANNEX 8 – Public Hearing Official Notices in Municipal Buildings The official notices for the public hearings were sent to the municipalities by MARDWA.

For the first priority schemes, this was sent on 17th June 2016.

Murriz Thana – Krutje and Terbuf Divjake

Koshnica Kurjan Strum

For the second priority schemes this was sent out to the municipalities on the 6th May 2017

Murriz Thana – Cukas Branch Murriz Thana – Cukas Branch

Murriz Thana – Lushnje Branch Murriz Thana – Lushnje Branch

Slanica Scheme Slanica Scheme

Xarra Scheme Xarra Scheme

The details of the official notices for the second priority schemes are shown below (in Albanian)

8.9 ANNEX 9 – Public Hearings – Photographs The first group of photos relate to the public hearings that were held between the 27th and 30th June 2016 in Divjake, Koshnica, Lushnje (Kruje and Terbuf Branches) and Kurjan Strum (Roskoveci).

Photo 78: Divjake Public Hearing Photo 79: Murriz Thana Terbuf Branch Public Hearing

Photo 80: Koshnica Devoll Public Hearing Photo 81: Koshnica Devoll Public Hearing

Photo 82: Murriz Thana Krutje Branch Public Hearing Photo 83: Murriz Thana Krutje Branch Public Hearing

Photo 84: Roskoveci Kurjan Strum Public Hearing Photo 85: Roskoveci Kurjan Strum Public Hearing

The next set of photos relate to the public meetings held for the second priority schemes. These meetings took place between the 22nd May 2017 and the 31st May 2017.

Photo 86: Leminot Scheme Maliq Public Hearing Photo 87: Leminot Scheme Maliq Public Hearing

Photo 88: MT Cukas/Lushnje Branch Public Hearing Photo 89: MT Cukas/Lushnje Branch Public Hearing

Photo 90: Ura Vajgurore Slanica Public Hearing Photo 91: Ura Vajgurore, Slanica Scheme Public Hearing

Photo 92: Has, Tregtan 2 & 3, Vranisht 2 Public Hearing Photo 93: Has, Tregtan 2 & 3, Vranisht 2 Public Hearing

Photo 94: Konsipol Xarra Scheme Public Hearing Photo 95: Konsipol Xarra Scheme Public Hearing

8.10 ANNEX 10 – Public Hearings – Signed Lists of Participants All participants were requested to acknowledge their attendance at the public debates by signing the attendance sheet. This recorded the participants names, job title, telephone number and email address (if they have one). The first lists are from public hearings for first priority schemes

List of Participants from Divjake Scheme 29th June 2016

List of Participants from Murriz Thana – Terbuf Branch - 29th June 2016

List of Participants Murriz Thana – Krutje Branch – 29th June 2016

List of Participants from Koshnica Scheme – 27th June 2016

List of Participants Kurjan Strum Scheme Roskoveci – 30th June 2016

The next lists are from public hearings for second priority schemes

List of Participants Tregtan 2 Tregtan,3 and Vranisht 2 Schemes – Has – 22nd May 2017

List of Participants from Leminot Scheme – Maliq – 24th May 2017

List of Participants for Slanica Scheme - Ura Vajgurore -26th May 2017

List of Participants Murriz Thana – Cukas Branch Lushnje – 29th May 2017

List of Participants Xarra Scheme – Konispol – 31st May 2017

8.11 ANNEX 11 – Individual Reports on Public Hearings

REPUBLIC OF ALBANIA MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE, RURAL DEVELOPMENT AND WATER ADMINISTRATION WATER RESOURCES AND IRRIGATION PROJECT

PREPARATION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT PLANS (ESMPS) AND RESETTLEMENT ACTIONS PLANS (RAPS) FOR THE REHABILITATION OF IRRIGATION SCHEMES/SYSTEMS PROJECT ID NO: P121186 – RFP NO: MAFCP/CS/007 – LOAN NO. 8211 - AL

DIVJAKË PRIORITY SCHEME REPORT ON PUBLIC HEARING AND MINUTES OF MEETING

July 2016

CEIA

REPUBLIC OF ALBANIA MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE, RURAL DEVELOPMENT AND WATER ADMINISTRATION WATER RESOURCES AND IRRIGATION PROJECT

PREPARATION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT PLANS (ESMPS) AND RESETTLEMENT ACTIONS PLANS (RAPS) FOR THE REHABILITATION OF IRRIGATION SCHEMES/SYSTEMS

PROJECT ID NO: P121186 – RFP NO: MAFCP/CS/007 – LOAN NO. 8211 - AL

DIVJAKË PRIORITY SCHEME REPORT ON PUBLIC HEARING AND MINUTES OF MEETING July 2016

PROJECT NO. A079377

DOCUMENT NO. 1

VERSION 1

DATE OF ISSUE June 2016

PREPARED David Heywood

CHECKED Roar Solland/Spartak Sinojmeri

APPROVED RSS Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Divjakë Priority Scheme Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems i

Table of Contents Page No

1 INTRODUCTION ...... 1 1.1 Background ...... 1 1.2 Divjaka Scheme ...... 1

2 OBJECTIVE OF PUBLIC HEARING ...... 1

3 PUBLIC HEARING ...... 2 3.1 Implementation Procedure ...... 2 3.2 Agenda for the Meeting ...... 2 3.3 Meeting Participation ...... 2 3.4 Minutes of the Meeting ...... 3

4 ANNEXES ...... 6 4.1 Annex 1 – Divjake I&D Scheme Particulars ...... 6 4.2 Annex 2 – Public Notices ...... 10 4.3 Annex 3 – List of Participants ...... 11 4.4 Annex 4 – Photos from the Meeting ...... 13 4.5 Annex 5 - Powerpoint Presentation for the Public Hearing ...... 14

List of Tables Page No Table 4-1: Divjakë I&D scheme – Summary of works for Option 4d ...... 9

List of Figures Page No Figure 4-1: Location of the Divjakë Dam, Reservoir and I&D Scheme ...... 6 Figure 4-2: Divjakë Option 4d and proximity of Karavasta Protected Area ...... 7 Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Divjakë Priority Scheme Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems 1

1 INTRODUCTION

1.1 Background The Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration of Albania (MARDWA) is implementing the Water Resources Irrigation Project (WRIP). The financing agencies are the World Bank (WB) and Swedish International Development Association (SIDA).

The overall development objective for WRIP is to increase the area under improved irrigation and drainage and in so doing, to establish the institutional basis for improved IWRM.

Implementation of the public hearing was based on World Bank policies (OP 4.12) and the environmental Al- banian legislation.

The principle document of reference to enable to Consultant to prepare the Public Hearing Report are the following:

1. The Updated Feasibility Study Report prepared by the Consultant - Joint Venture Renardet – Beta Studio – Hydrowater-Albania (Renardet et al) 2. The Detailed Design for Divjakë produced by the same Consultant Renardet et al 3. The Environmental and Social Management Plan Report prepared by the Consultant COWI-CEIA

1.2 Divjaka Scheme The former municipality of Divjaka is currently under a new administrative unit consisting of Divjaka municipality and Fier County. Until June 2015, Divjaka was an independent municipality, part of the administrative units of the country. Given that the irrigation project is designed before the administrative reform of 2015 and improvement of irrigation schemes is planned according to this administrative division, the drafting of this Pub- lic Hearing Report on WRIP development is focused on the former territory and population of Divjaka.

The Divjakë Irrigation and Drainage (I&D) scheme is part of general irrigation scheme which takes water from the reservoir of Divjaka and drainage collectors. Currently, the irrigation scheme provides channels which receive water by gravity but they are in need of repair and rehabilitation. Annex 1 provides further details of the scheme particulars.

2 OBJECTIVE OF PUBLIC HEARING Public consultation aims to first inform the public, decision makers and other interested parties, on the nature of the project. This is followed by information on potential environmental impacts and social and mitigation measures to reduce the identified negative impacts. Secondly, the consultation aims to promote community, decision makers and other parties concerned for giving their opinion on the effects of the project, the proposed mitigation measures, ideas for implementing the best efficiency of the management plans, etc., aiming to avoid as the greatest of routine meetings and replace them with realistic and efficient consultation. The Public Hear- ing is part of this consultation process.

Public hearings was focused on the environmental and social management plan (ESMP) of Divjaka scheme. Earlier meetings had discussed the Divjakë scheme (there have been various options proposed). The public was informed by the Consultant, and discussed especially for the environmental impact, management plans of irrigation schemes, and procedures for Resettlement Action Plan, if it would need.

Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Divjakë Priority Scheme Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems 2

3 PUBLIC HEARING

3.1 Implementation Procedure Implementation of the public hearing was based on World Bank policies (OP 4.12) and the Albanian legislation "For the environment".

Consequently announcements were made in the municipal authority of Divjakë and the Administrative Unit of Divjakë. In early June public notices were placed on notice boards in the territory of the administrative unit of Divjakë informing the local people of the time, date and venue and purpose of the meeting.

The date for the meeting was 29th June 2016. The planned time for the meeting was 13:00 hours and the venue was the Meeting Hall at Divjakë Municipality.

Copies of the public notices are included in Annex 2.

3.2 Agenda for the Meeting The agenda provided by Divjakë Municipality for the meeting was as follows:

1. Opening of the meeting by Mr. Fredi Kokoneshi, Mayor of Divjaka presents

2. Introduction of main meeting participants

3. Presentations

- Mr. Luan Bregu, Director of Irrigation and Drainage, MARDWA

- Mr. Spartak Sinojmeri, Consultant (COWI, CEIA

4. Open and Public Discussion

5. Closure

3.3 Meeting Participation The participants that attended the meeting were asked to record their name, their position and contact number. The meeting was attended by more than 29 participants. Details of the participation list are contained in Annex 3 to this report. Photos from the meeting are included in Annex 4.

The meeting had a broad spectrum of different people in attendance, including the following: a. Mayor of Divjakë, Mr. Fredi Kokoneshi and part of his municipality staff b. Director of Irrigation and Drainage of MARDWA - Mr Luan Bregu, c. Specialists of the Department of Irrigation and Drainage MARDWA and WRIP - Mrs Lida Xhuveli and Mr Tomi Decolli d. Consultants from ESMP - Mr Spartak Sinojmeri and Mr Bardhyl Qilimi, Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Divjakë Priority Scheme Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems 3 e. Chief of the Administrative unit, Divjaka f. Farmers from the Divjakë I&D scheme g. Members of civil society h. Members of women's groups i. Drainage Board Director and Drainage Engineers, Fier District

3.4 Minutes of the Meeting Venue: Main Meeting Hall, Divjakë Municipality Date: 29th June 2016 Start Time: 13:15hours Organiser: Divjakë Municipality with support from MARDWA

Background and Introductions The announcement for public hearing was made by MARDWA and Divjakë Municipality with the publication of notices on main public buildings in Divjakë Municipality.

The meeting was opened by Mayor Divjaka, Mr. Fredi Kokoneshi, who noted the importance of reconstruction of irrigation schemes for rural area of Divjaka, and the impact on social and economic life of farmers. He noted also that the rehabilitation works should not cause environmental and social problems.

Mr. Luan Bregu, the director in MARDWA, informed the participants at the meeting on the extension of the Divjaka scheme to be rehabilitated and the future development of other schemes. He presented the works to be done under WB/Sida investment for rehabilitation of Irrigation Scheme. Details of the scheme are shown in Annex 1. Mr Bregu also then commented upon the state of the irrigation system at Divjakë and the need for rehabilitation. He then provided a view of the development of agriculture in the area of Divjaka.

Mr. Spartak Sinojmeri representing the Consultant responsible for the Environmental and Social Management Plan for Divjaka scheme then provided a presentation. This is enclosed as Annex 5. The presentation focused mainly on the positive and negative impacts on the environment, gender issues, employment and the procedures for resettlement /compensation /grievance mechanisms, if it will be necessary during the implementation of rehabilitation works etc.

Mr Sinojmeri presented the goal and objectives of the meeting and a summary of the ESMP's for Divjaka irrigation scheme. He explained to the participants the important of their input and feedback regarding issues that can be generated by the project development from environmental point of view (health and accidental risks, issues for infrastructure damage, or barrier to existing access roads etc., pollution and contamination and risks of the Karavasta Lagoon), social issues, giving the right importance to the gender, employment and needs for training.

The Mayor then opened the meeting to the public for open discussion.

Matters Arising The main issues concerning the environment at the public hearing for Divjakë scheme are as follows: At the meeting, the specific issues that were raised regarding the environmental impact were as follows:

Mr Avni Koci, Department of Agriculture Divjakë a. He raised the issue for impact of irrigation water in lagoon. Currently in lagoon waters discharged from the 6 channels that bring sediment and residue of pesticides and chemical fertilizers. Existing irrigation schemes affects the depth of the lagoon reduction, biodiversity, etc. His proposal was: From six channels flowing into the lagoon, three can be eliminated. Water flowing down to the Divjaka forest to pass on Tërbuf canal (Divjakë station in shifts) and discharged directly into the sea. b. Another issue was the intensive development of agriculture in the area and the use of fertilizers and pesticides. His proposal was: To guide farmers to use organic fertilizers (especially for providing nitrogen for plants).

The Environmental Consultant explained that deviation of draining channels from the lagoon, can hardly impact the lagoon waters equilibrium, increasing artificially lagoon waters salinity and destroying the habitats of fish and “pelecanus crispus”, internationally protected species, with high importance for the PA lagoon. The Environmental Consultant fully agrees with Mr Koci and noted that there should take care and have a focused campaign to provide farmers with the goods expected from development of traditional lagoon

Mr. Ahmet Bila, Divjakë a) He raised the issue that in the lagoon come sediments from irrigation water. His proposal. During the designing of the scheme thee is a need to take account of the spill avoidance of irrigation waters in the lagoon and barriers for sedimentation.

The Environmental Consultant agreed with comments, and noted that the ESMP considered all such issues, still the maintenance during operation should be carried out from the collaboration of all actors including the decision makers present at the meeting.

Representative of protected areas a) He raised the issue for monitoring of water reservoirs of Divjakë and lagoon. His proposal. The planned establishment of the monitoring system.

The Environmental Consultant thanked the representative for the comments, and explained that monitoring is the main instrument to assess the possible changes in lagoon waters quality as well as the importance of having an agreement between the main actors to achieve a good collaboration on development of the agriculture and protection of the Protected Area.

Mr. Qilimi - Consultant He proposed to the participants the importance of RAP and grievance mechanisms. He explained to all the WB policies and Albanian legislation regarding this issue. He asked the participants to provide their opinion on resettlement as well as on the employment, the importance of women participation in the different project phases (construction and operation) etc., clarifying to the participants on their rights and the support offered from the WB/Sida project representatives. Notwithstanding, there were no comments on this issue, except that the participants considered that employment of the local community and women's participation in all steps of project development a positive development.

Mr Fredi Kokoneshi, Mayor of Divjaka. He stated that for the avoidance of adverse environmental phenomena he proposes:

 That the municipality staff have active participation in the team supervision on the rehabilitation works.  Preparation of environmental action plan by the selected construction firm awarded the rehabilitation contract.

In the meeting was discussed about these issues and farmers, administrators, Director of the Drainage Board, Fier, Eng. Drainage Board, Director of Irrigation and Drainage in MARDWA.

During the public hearing, the participants asked many questions regarding the scope of the Divjaka scheme and the impact on the environment during the field work.

Mr. Spartak Sinojmeri explained to the participants on every issue rose based on the environmental and social management plan.

Conclusions and closure Conclusions and closure of the meeting was made by Mr. Luan Bregu, director of MARDWA and Mr. Spartak Sinojmeri, CEIA-COWI expert.

They thanked the community for their participation, questions and issues raised on the project development and assured the participants that everything will be part of the ESMP. However, a very important step remains their active participation in all project steps.

The meeting ended at 15:00 hours

4 ANNEXES

4.1 Annex 1 – Divjakë I&D Scheme Particulars

4.1.1 Project Details The Divjakë I&D scheme rehabilitation can be classified as a Category B project under World Bank because the impact on human population or environmentally important areas is less adverse than those of Category A projects. The general impacts associated with the works are temporary during the construction stage; few, if any, are irreversible and all are site specific. The project outcome and the adopted mitigation measures employed will actually benefit the area for the future. However, there is an issue regarding the proximity of the Karavasta Lagoon and the risk of I&D scheme drainage water flowing into the lagoon. Karavasta La- goon/Divjakë Forest is a National Park (RAMSAR site) and some important mitigation measures contained within this ESMP Report must be adhered to. Under Albanian law the contents of the ESMP can be adopted as a Preliminary EIA document as the rehabilitation project falls under the list of project types within Appendix 2 of the Albanian EIA law.

The Divjakë I&D scheme services the agricultural area of Divjakë located east and north of Karavasta Lagoon. The scheme was originally built from 1960-1964 and started with the excavation of drainage ditches. The irrigation network was added later in the 1970's starting with Divjakë reservoir and then Xengu 1, Xengu 2 and Miza reservoirs to feed the scheme. These reservoirs had limited catchment areas and were supplied by pumping stations abstracting water from the drainage network. In 1988 and 1989, the Divjakë and Bishcukas pump stations were installed. The location of the Divjakë dam, reservoir and I&D scheme is shown on Figure 4-1 below. Please refer to Figure 4-2 which shows priority branches of irrigation channels for rehabilitation and the proximity to the Karavasta National Park. As can be seen, the I&D scheme takes place within the "Tradi- tional Agricultural" zone of the protected area.

Shkumbini River

Divjakë I&D Scheme Dam and reservoir Area

Karavasta Lagoon and National Park

~5 kms

Figure 4-1: Location of the Divjakë Dam, Reservoir and I&D Scheme

Source: Updated FS from JV Renardet, Beta Studio, Hydrowater Albania Figure 4-2: Divjakë Option 4d and proximity of Karavasta Protected Area

The Divjakë I&D scheme is composed of five main canals:

 LUU2-1 Upper Branch,  LUU2-2 Lower Branch,  LUU2-3 Divjakë Branch,  LUU2-4 Sulzotaj irrigation canal and  LUU2-5 Feeder canal of Divjakë reservoir.

The scheme also has 26 secondary canals that cover an original design area of 2240 ha, comprising highly productive, agricultural land surrounding Divjakë city and the villages of Xengu, Mize and Sulzotaj.

The condition of the main canals is poor and they have not been maintained and are subsequently damaged. There are many illegal intakes in the canals causing breaches and risk of flooding. As previously mentioned, the structures on the I&D schemes are also damaged, the secondary canals are even worse; the embankments are destroyed; lining is broken and structures missing. Three of the pumping stations are not functional and are destroyed. The reservoirs are partly in good shape, but need some repair.

After stakeholder consultation from the FS and DD Consultant (JV Renardet et al) I&D scheme rehabilitation "Option 4d" was chosen and confirmed by MARDWA. This option will rehabilitate the full amount of the original design area of 3,000 ha of scheme. The detailed design of the Divjakë scheme has been complex and a number of options have been considered. The main objective of the proposed Divjakë scheme is to recharge the underground water table, which has been stressed by over pumping by farmers from their private wells, which has exacerbated ingress of saline water due to the proximity of the Adriatic coast. If farmers can use the water supplied by the scheme they will be less reliant upon their wells and this will enable the groundwater table to recover. The local community have however expressed concern about the raising of the water level by Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Divjakë Priority Scheme Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems 8 the rehabilitated salt water barrier that can damage crops grown downstream of the barrier. In addition, the raising of the water level by the Tërbuf canal will lead to a non-uniform recharge in areas far from the main Tërbuf feeder canal.

The Detailed Design Consultant concluded the following solution:

 The gates of the salt barrier structure will be opened during the irrigation season when the water table in general will be low. On the other hand the whole area upstream of the salt barriers will be on the period of intensive irrigation, consequently the water table will be lower and the raised up water elevation by the barrier gates will infiltrate to feed these area instead of taking a longer way to downstream. However the gates should be under strict monitoring during the period, especially during the sudden downpours when the gates should be kept opened.  The risk of the disproportional recharge of the area by the drainage canals is possible and alternative solutions should be given to uniform the recharge of the area.  The potential risk of penetration of the salt water inside the agriculture area of Divjakë is always possible as long as the water withdrawal by individual farmers will be out of control.

4.1.2 High Priority Works covered under World Bank funding The high priority works to be covered under World Bank funding therefore will involve the following:

 Abandonment of the existing Bishcukas pumping station, raising main, siphon, gravity canal and tunnel, supplying the Divjakë reservoir of 4.5 mill. m3capacity.  Construction of the Divjakë PS with two heads, the first to supply with water the Sulzotaj area by lifting the water to the elevation of 23.00 m.a.s.l. and rehabilitating the secondary irrigation canals on this area and second to feed the HDPE pipe 600 mm diam. Designed along the existing irrigation canal transferring the water through the toe of the hills until the outlet area of the Divjakë reservoir. This pipe with capacity 500 l/s will be constructed as a buried pressure pipe that will feed the drainage canal along the route. Offtake structures will be provided on average every 500m.  The secondary off takes will continue with HDPE pipes branches to feed the end sections of the drainage canals  Construction of a booster station with capacity of 250 l/s at the end of the pipe coming from Divjakë pumping station or a new pumping station with the same capacity if this will be gravity canal. In this way the rehabilitation of the Bishcukas PS is avoided and the transmission canals supply Divjakë reservoir directly.  Construction of the pressure HDPE pipe to supply the Divjakë South with water from the reservoir. The pressure pipe coming from the Divjakë PS will be connected through a bypass with the south pressure pipes supplied by the reservoir to enable a flexible supply scheme during operation.  Re-sectioning and profiling the drainage canals Divjakë North, which will be fed by the Tërbuf main drainage serving the agriculture area of north Divjakë covering an area of about 1100 ha. The water elevation in the Tërbuf main drainage canal will be controlled by the Salt barrier structure, which will also be rehabilitated.  Construction and rehabilitation of the irrigation canal in the South of reservoir outlet to provide water to the drainage canals of the Divjakë South agriculture area covering an area of about 1500 ha. This canal will reach as far as Miza village. This canal will have the capacity of 1200 l/s at the beginning and reducing consequently downstream to 600 l/sec, 400 l/s and will 200 l/sec at the end and will be constructed as an open gravity canal or a piped one. This canal will progressively feed secondary drainage canals along, the route with offtake structures constructed every 500 m on average.  Re-sectioning and profiling the drainage canals in the south of Divjakë equipped with Control gate structures at the ends of them.

The new proposed scheme (Option 4d) will have the following advantages:  The distribution of the pumped water to the whole area will assure in some extend the distribution of the Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Divjakë Priority Scheme Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems 9

water to the whole Divjakë South covering an area of 1500 ha  Reconstruction of the pressure pipeline along the existing irrigation canal will cover the whole agriculture area of Divjakë, which will be adopted on the future for any advanced irrigation scheme.  Avoiding the Bishcukas PS will compact the irrigation scheme, especially regarding energy supply as consumption will be reduced considerably.  Design of the supply pipes instead of the open gravity canals will simplify further the management and distribution of the pumped water and the scheme will be more flexible. Evaporation will also be reduced.  This scheme will use the drained water from the Tërbuf main drainage canal by closing the salt control structure, raising the water level and distribution to the profiled drainage canals.

The summary of the main components for the high priority rehabilitation works for Divjakë I&D (Option 4d) scheme are shown in in Table 4-1 below.

Table 4-1: Divjakë I&D scheme – Summary of works for Option 4d

No Item Units Amount 1 Divjakë Pump Station – One set of 3 pumps (to supply Sulzotaj area) No pumps 3 Divjakë Pump Station – One set of 3 pumps (to supply Divjakë North and 2 No pumps 3 Divjakë South as well as Divjakë Reservoir) 3 Booster pump station at toe of Divjakë Reservoir with 2 pumps No pumps 2 Rising main for Divjakë Pump Station supplying Sulzotaj area HDPE 450 mm 4 kms 1.570 dia. Rising main for Divjakë Pump Station supplying Divjakë north and south with 5 kms 4.900 HDPE 630 mm dia. 6 Rising main for Booster station to Divjakë reservoir HDPE 630 mm dia. kms 0.200 HDPE pipes to Divjakë south from Divjakë reservoir – HDPE of varying diam‐ 7 kms 3.700 eters Secondary pipes supplying Divjakë north and south (seven branches HDPE 8 kms 8.500 varying diameters 450 to 315 mm dia. and respective manholes) 9 Concrete lining of secondary irrigation canals kms 4.177 10 Reshaping and profiling of unlined canal reaches Kms 30.688 11 Main control gates No 27 12 Secondary control gates and intakes structures No 59 13 Bridges No 45 14 Culverts No 17

4.2 Annex 2 – Public Notices

4.3 Annex 3 – List of Participants

4.4 Annex 4 – Photos from the Meeting

4.5 Annex 5 - PowerPoint Presentation for the Public Hearing

REPUBLIC OF ALBANIA MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE, RURAL DEVELOPMENT AND WATER ADMINISTRATION WATER RESOURCES AND IRRIGATION PROJECT

MURRIZ THANA – KRUTJE TERBUF PRIORITY SCHEME REPORT ON PUBLIC HEARING AND MINUTES OF MEETING

July 2016

CEIA

REPUBLIC OF ALBANIA MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE, RURAL DEVELOPMENT AND WATER ADMINISTRATION WATER RESOURCES AND IRRIGATION PROJECT

PREPARATION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT PLANS (ESMPS) AND RESETTLEMENT ACTIONS PLANS (RAPS) FOR THE REHABILITATION OF IRRIGATION SCHEMES/SYSTEMS

PROJECT ID NO: P121186 – RFP NO: MAFCP/CS/007 – LOAN NO. 8211 - AL

MURRIZ THANA – KRUTJE TERBUF PRIORITY SCHEME REPORT ON PUBLIC HEARING AND MINUTES OF MEETING July 2016

PROJECT NO. A079377

DOCUMENT NO. 1

VERSION 1

DATE OF ISSUE June 2016

PREPARED David Heywood

CHECKED Roar Solland/Spartak Sinojmeri

APPROVED RSS Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Murriz Thana – Krutje Terbuf Priority Scheme Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems i

Table of Contents Page No

1 INTRODUCTION ...... 1 1.1 Background ...... 1 1.2 Murriz Thana Scheme – Krutje and Terbuf Priority Branches ...... 1

2 OBJECTIVE OF PUBLIC HEARING ...... 1

3 PUBLIC HEARING ...... 2 3.1 Implementation Procedure ...... 2 3.2 Agenda for the Meeting ...... 2 3.3 Meeting Participation ...... 2 3.4 Minutes of the Meeting ...... 3

4 ANNEXES ...... 7 4.1 Annex 1 – Murriz Thana I&D Scheme Particulars ...... 7 4.2 Annex 2 – Public Notices ...... 10 4.3 Annex 3 – List of Participants ...... 11 4.4 Annex 4 – Photos from the Meeting ...... 13 4.5 Annex 5 - PowerPoint Presentation for the Public Hearing ...... 14

List of Tables Page No Table 4-1: Murriz Thana I&D scheme – Vital statistics of the four main irrigation branches ...... 8 Table 4-2: Murriz Thana I&D scheme – Summary of works for Terbuf and Krutje branches ...... 8

List of Figures Page No Figure 4-1: Murriz Thana Final Option and proximity of Karavasta Protected Area ...... 7 Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Murriz Thana – Krutje Terbuf Priority Scheme Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems 1

1 INTRODUCTION

The overall development objective for WRIP is to increase the area under improved irrigation and drainage and in so doing, to establish the institutional basis for improved IWRM.

Implementation of the public hearing was based on World Bank policies (OP 4.12) and the environmental Al- banian legislation.

The principle document of reference to enable to Consultant to prepare the Public Hearing Report are the following:

1. The Updated Feasibility Study Report prepared by the Consultant - Joint Venture Renardet – Beta Studio – Hydrowater-Albania (Renardet et al) 2. The Detailed Design for Murriz Thana produced by the same Consultant Renardet et al 3. The Environmental and Social Management Plan Report prepared by the Consultant COWI-CEIA

1.2 Murriz Thana Scheme – Krutje and Terbuf Priority Branches The former commune of Krutja is currently administrative units consisting of Lushnje municipality and Fieri County, while former commune of Tërbuf is currently administrative units consisting of Divjaka municipality. Until June 2015, Krutja and Tërbuf have been independent commune, part of the administrative units of the country. Given that the irrigation project is designed before the administrative reform of 2015 and improvement of irrigation schemes is planned according to this administrative division, the drafting of Public Hearing Rapport of WRIP development is focused on the former territory and population of Krutja and Tërbuf, as part of Murriz- Thana scheme.

Krutja and Tërbuf scheme are part of general irrigation scheme which takes water from the reservoir of Thana.

Currently, irrigation scheme provides rehabilitation channels which receive water by gravity

Public hearings was focused on the environmental and social management plan (ESMP) of Murriz Thana scheme, priority branches of Krutje and Terbuf.

Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Murriz Thana – Krutje Terbuf Priority Scheme Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems 2

The public was informed by the consultant, and discussed especially for the environmental impact, management plans of irrigation schemes, and procedures for Resettlement Action Plan, if necessary.

3 PUBLIC HEARING

3.1 Implementation Procedure Implementation of the public hearing was based on World Bank policies (OP 4.12) and the Albanian legislation "For the environment".

Consequently announcements were made in the municipal authority of Lushnje and Divjakë and the Adminis- trative Unit of Krutje and Terbuf. In early June public notices were placed on notice boards in the territory of the administrative unit of Krutje and Terbuf informing the local people of the time, date and venue and purpose of the meeting.

The date for the meeting was 29th June 2016. The planned time for the meeting was 11:00 hours and the venue was the Meeting Hall at Lushnje Municipality.

Copies of the public notices are included in Annex 2.

3.2 Agenda for the Meeting The agenda provided by Lushnje Administration for the meeting was as follows:

1. Opening of the meeting by Mr Genti Nushi, Deputy Mayor of Lushnje

2. Introduction of main meeting participants

3. Presentations

- Mr. Luan Bregu, Director of Irrigation and Drainage, MARDWA

- Mr. Spartak Sinojmeri, Environmental Consultant (COWI, CEIA)

4. Open and Public Discussion

5. Closure

3.3 Meeting Participation The participants that attended the meeting were asked to record their name, their position and contact number. The meeting was attended by more than 43 participants. Details of the participation list are contained in Annex 3 to this report. Photos from the meeting are included in Annex 4.

The meeting had a broad spectrum of different people in attendance, including the following: a. Deputy Mayor, Mr. Genti Nushi and part of municipality staff b. Deputy Mayor, Mrs. Teuta Koreshi c. Deputy Mayor, Mr. Agim Sema Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Murriz Thana – Krutje Terbuf Priority Scheme Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems 3 d. Director of Irrigation and Drainage of MARDWA - Mr Luan Bregu, e. Specialists of the Department of Irrigation and Drainage MARDWA and WRIP - Mrs Lida Xhuveli and Mr Tomi Decolli f. Consultants from ESMP - Mr Spartak Sinojmeri and Mr Bardhyl Qilimi, g. Chief of the Administrative unit, Krutje h. Chief of the Administrative unit, Terbuf i. Farmers from the Murriz Thana I&D scheme j. Members of civil society k. Members of women's groups l. Drainage Board Director and Drainage Engineers, Fier District

3.4 Minutes of the Meeting Venue: Main Meeting Hall, Lushnje Municipality Date: 29th June 2016 Start Time: 11:00 hours Organiser: Lushnje Municipality with support from MARDWA

Background and Introductions The announcement for public hearing was made by MARDWA and Lushnje Municipality with the publication of notices on main public buildings in Lushnje Municipality.

The meeting was opened by Deputy Mayor Mr. Genti Nushi, who noted the importance of reconstruction of irrigation schemes for rural area of Lushnje, and the impact on social and economic life of farmers. He noted also that the rehabilitation works should not cause environmental and social problems.

Mr. Luan Bregu, the director in MARDWA, informed the participants at the meeting on the extension of the Murriz Thana scheme (Krutje and Terbuf priority works) to be rehabilitated and the future development of other schemes. He presented the works to be done under WB/Sida investment for rehabilitation of Irrigation Scheme. Details of the scheme are shown in Annex 1. Mr. Bregu also then commented upon the state of the irrigation system at Murriz Thana and the need for rehabilitation. He then provided a view of the development of agriculture in the area of Murriz Thana.

Mr. Spartak Sinojmeri representing the Consultant responsible for the Environmental and Social Management Plan for Murriz Thana scheme then provided a presentation. This is enclosed as Annex 5. The presentation focused mainly on the positive and negative impacts on the environment, gender issues, employment and the procedures for resettlement /compensation /grievance mechanisms, if it will be necessary during the implementation of rehabilitation works etc.

Mr Sinojmeri presented the goal and objectives of the meeting and a summary of the ESMP's for Murriz Thana irrigation scheme. He explained to the participants the important of their input and feedback regarding Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Murriz Thana – Krutje Terbuf Priority Scheme Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems 4 issues that can be generated by the project development from environmental point of view (health and accidental risks, issues for infrastructure damage, or barrier to existing access roads etc., pollution and contamination, social issues, giving the right importance to the gender, employment and needs for training.

The Deputy Mayor then opened the meeting to the public for open discussion.

Matters Arising The main issues concerning the environment at the public hearing for Murriz Thana scheme are as follows: At the meeting, the specific issues that were raised regarding the environmental impact were as follows:

The environmental issues that participants raised in the public hearing for Murriz Thana scheme.

At the meeting, in addition to other, specific issues were raised regarding the environmental impact that would have rehabilitation of Murriz Thana scheme as:

Agim Qosja. Administrative Unit Krutje Concern raised: a) During the works there will be waste. Waste should not be deposited on the containers of the village Proposal. Construction firms to predict the placement of special containers for waste project only. b) During the works of rehabilitation of irrigation schemes will have damage to the roads of the village. Proposal. The roads planned to be brought to the previous situation. c) Before the start of the irrigation season canals are polluted with waste. Proposal. Will not start without clear irrigation canals. d) In Krutje in some areas the houses are close channels. This risks damaging the channels and the lives of people, especially children Proposal. The obstacles be placed to share network synergy for irrigation channel from inhabited areas. e) Second channels associated with parcels culverts. Experience has shown that they damaged. Proposal. During the drafting of the technical project to take into account another way, for example with siphon. f) Problem are the steel tubes that can be stolen or damaged. Proposal. To keep in mind during the preparation of the technical project another alternative g) For the addition of greenery. Proposal. During the drafting of the technical project to keep in mind the planting of trees.

The Environmental Consultant thanked the participant for the comments and explained that the construction company is obligated to dispose the remaining solid wastes only in places approved by the municipality. Also, the ESMP predicts that in case that infrastructure will be damaged, not only roads, but the electric and water network etc., the construction company is liable and should repair it to its original state before starting the project. This is a condition for work closure in the end of construction services.

Representative of Bubullima a. It is very worrying problem of waste in areas that are not affected by irrigation schemes. For example the Gjaze collector collects such residues coming from the irrigation scheme of Krutje. Proposal. Will not start without clear irrigation canals.

The Environmental Consultant said that his project team also raised such problems but, this is an issue that cannot be resolved during this project.

Gjergji Lici, agriculture specialist, administrative unit Allkaj. a. Concern raised for irrigation water quality (with high content of salt) Proposes isolating the source of salinity in the reservoir Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Murriz Thana – Krutje Terbuf Priority Scheme Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems 5 b. Proposes that during the preparation of the technical project, the branch of Cukas to get water from the Semani River.

The Environmental Consultant stated that this is a major issue, but cannot be resolved by this project. The min- eral salts have a natural origin. There are some solutions, but the technical alternatives should be joined by a strong cost benefit analysis. As far as for using of the Semani river water to substitute the Murriz Thana waters, another project should consider the importance of a lower ecologic level for natural rivers.

Mrs. Teuta Koreshi, Deputy / Mayor a. Concern raised that the salt content in irrigation water, especially from the middle to the end of the season. Proposed: adding water for feed reservoir from Shkumbini River and connection of a permanent contract with the Banja power plant staff. b. She requires the development of a scheme to monitor the water quality in reservoir. c. The participation of women in project development is very important.

The Environmental Consultant on the first issue said that this can be subject for another project. Still, the proposal should take into account the nature of Albanian rivers and the requirements for ecologic minimum requirement. Some time, in the summer period, the Albanian rivers experience their lowest possible level, which does not permit additional water abstraction. The Environmental Consultant fully agrees with the proposals on monitoring, and he explained that this is proposed in ESMP monitoring program. The project incites the initiative for women's participation, but this should be an imperative and frequent part of any initiative incited by local and national authorities. The ESMP include a separate point for women participation.

Shpetim Kasapi. Specialist a. Concern raised for irrigation water quality (with high content of salt) Proposes isolating the source of salinity in the reservoir.

The Environmental Consultant said that this is a very important point, but not part of the project in scope.

Engjell Gjuri, Administrator of Remas a. Concern raised that the rehabilitation of the existing scheme could affect 2-3 families that have built close to the channel. Proposal. During the drafting of the technical project to keep in mind the deviation of the scheme or their expropriation.

The Environmental Consultant stated that this is one of the objectives of the project. Until now, the technical team does not provide any note on that. Still, during preparation of final ESMP report, a team of Technical experts, MARDWA experts and Environmental Consultant will verify things in field and react for the final RAP.

Mr. Genti Nushi. Deputy / Mayor a. Raises the problem of quality control works. He proposes municipality participation in the supervision of works.

The Environmental Consultant evaluates highly such a pretext and explained that in the ESMP, the municipality is proposed to play an important role on evaluation of project implementation.

Conclusions and closure Conclusions and closure of the meeting was made by Mr. Luan Bregu, director of MARDWA and Mr. Spartak Sinojmeri, CEIA-COWI expert.

Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Murriz Thana – Krutje Terbuf Priority Scheme Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems 6

They thanked the community for their participation, questions and issues raised on the project development and assured the participants that everything will be part of the ESMP.

The meeting ended at 12:30 hours Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Murriz Thana – Krutje Terbuf Priority Scheme Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems 7

4 ANNEXES

4.1 Annex 1 – Murriz Thana I&D Scheme Particulars

4.1.1 Project Details The Murriz Thana I&D scheme rehabilitation involving the branches Krutje and Terbuf can be classified as a Category B project under World Bank because the impact on human population or environmentally important areas is less adverse than those of Category A projects. The general impacts associated with the works are temporary during the construction stage; few, if any, are irreversible and all are site specific. The project outcome and the adopted mitigation measures employed will actually benefit the area for the future. Under Albanian law the contents of the ESMP can be adopted as a Preliminary EIA document as the rehabilitation project falls under the list of project types within Appendix 2 of the Albanian EIA law.

The Murriz-Thana I&D scheme with priority branches Krutje and Terbuf is located in Lushnje and Fier Dis- tricts occupying part of the Lowland Zone and with a command area of 29,700 ha is the largest irrigation scheme in Albania and the most important of the thirteen sites that have to be assessed by the Consultant. Please refer to Figure 4-1 which shows priority branches for rehabilitation and the proximity to the Karavasta National Park.

Source: Updated FS from JV Renardet, Beta Studio, Hydrowater Albania Figure 4-1: Murriz Thana Final Option and proximity of Karavasta Protected Area

The I&D schemes comprises four main branches Çukas, Krutja Lushnje and Terbuf. The Krutje and Terbuf branches are a priority for rehabilitation and the detailed design has been undertaken first for these branches. The following Table 4-1 provides a breakdown of the irrigated areas covered by each branch. The columns Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Murriz Thana – Krutje Terbuf Priority Scheme Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems 8 shaded in green are the branches that are to be rehabilitated under the World Bank funding and which are covered by the ESMP. Table 4-1: Murriz Thana I&D scheme – Vital statistics of the four main irrigation branches (priority shaded green)

Canal Canal Canal Canal Item Description branch branch branch branch Totals Lushnje Terbuf Krutja Cukas Irrigated area ha 6,850 4,680 10,800 6,940 29,270 Irrigated flow m³/s 7.9 5.3 12.4 7.9 33.5 Main canal length kms 39.8 31.9 32.0 30.3 134.0 Secondary canal length kms 124 62 178 202 566.0 Pump station from main canal 3 1 4 (all ruined) Pump station from secondary canal 1 1 2 (all ruined) Lined canal length 1ary and 2ary kms 10+39 6+12 10+56 8+31 34+138 Not lined (but to be relined) kms 112 76 144 172 504

4.1.2 High Priority Works covered under World Bank funding Krutja Branch Krutja Branch was originally 23.4 km long and irrigated 6,850 ha in Lushnje district. During the 1980s the Branch was extended twice (bifurcating at the tail), the first (V2) by 9.2km to irrigate a further 1300ha in Lushnje irrigation area, the second by approximately 6km (V1) to irrigate 1,000ha which belongs to Fier irrigation area. Krutja Branch was originally designed only for the 6,900ha, and now covers 10,800ha. Therefore, at peak times there is not sufficient water to irrigate land associated with the extensions. Bitaj pumping station provides water during the peak season from the main drain (Bitaj collector) back into Krutja branch at the point of bifurcation. This pumping station still functions although the immediate associated canals and the pumping station are in need of rehabilitation. Only 20% of the rehabilitation of the canals and structures on the main and secondary canals was undertaken in 1995 – 2005. The Krutja branch is a raised canal and in need of lining which is proposed in all rehabilitation options. The scheme area supplied by this branch is part of the most important agricultural land in Albania and it is therefore proposed that the canals are lined to reduce the losses and that automatic regulation of the water level and off takes with automatic duckbill cross regulators is implemented. This should ensure the provision of more than 8m3/s (the original design capacity) in the branch and increase the reliability of water supply at the tail to assist at the peak times with supply in V2. This will reduce the reliance on the pumping station. Terbuf Branch Terbuf main canal branch is 31.9kms long and irrigates 4,680ha and starts approximately 6km south of Lush- nje, takes water from the main drain, K1, however this drain is supplied directly by the reservoir approximately 1km downstream of the dam. Terbuf canal is divided into two branches heading west and north. A sprinkler irrigation section of 500 ha (Grabjan) is located at the end of the northern branch. The western branch has never functioned since its construction because of lack of water availability. Since 2000, the two branches were rehabilitated, but they are still not working and more rehabilitation is required in order to ensure an adequate volume of water. A summary of the high priority rehabilitation works for Terbuf and Krutje are shown in Table 4-2 below.

Table 4-2: Murriz Thana I&D scheme – Summary of works for Terbuf and Krutje branches

Terbuf Krutje No Item Units branch Branch 1 Main canal lining Kms 26.4 28.3 2 Secondary canal lining Kms 23.6 41.7 3 Cross regulators on main canals No 10 18 4 Main control radial gates No 3 8 5 Secondary off takes along the main canal No 34 49 Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Murriz Thana – Krutje Terbuf Priority Scheme Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems 9

Terbuf Krutje No Item Units branch Branch 6 Steel gates on main canals No 30 40 7 Cross regulators on secondary canals No 170 150 8 Regulated off takes secondary canals No 21 25 9 Off takes secondary canals No 60 90 10 Road culverts, bridges, siphons No 108 117 11 minor steel gates No 290 340

Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Murriz Thana – Krutje Terbuf Priority Scheme Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems 10

4.2 Annex 2 – Public Notices

Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Murriz Thana – Krutje Terbuf Priority Scheme Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems 11

4.3 Annex 3 – List of Participants

Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Murriz Thana – Krutje Terbuf Priority Scheme Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems 12

Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Murriz Thana – Krutje Terbuf Priority Scheme Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems 13

4.4 Annex 4 – Photos from the Meeting

Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Murriz Thana – Krutje Terbuf Priority Scheme Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems 14

4.5 Annex 5 - PowerPoint Presentation for the Public Hearing

Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Murriz Thana – Krutje Terbuf Priority Scheme Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems 15

REPUBLIC OF ALBANIA MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE, RURAL DEVELOPMENT AND WATER ADMINISTRATION WATER RESOURCES AND IRRIGATION PROJECT

KOSHNICA PRIORITY SCHEME REPORT ON PUBLIC HEARING AND MINUTES OF MEETING

July 2016

CEIA

REPUBLIC OF ALBANIA MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE, RURAL DEVELOPMENT AND WATER ADMINISTRATION WATER RESOURCES AND IRRIGATION PROJECT

PREPARATION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT PLANS (ESMPS) AND RESETTLEMENT ACTIONS PLANS (RAPS) FOR THE REHABILITATION OF IRRIGATION SCHEMES/SYSTEMS

PROJECT ID NO: P121186 – RFP NO: MAFCP/CS/007 – LOAN NO. 8211 - AL

KOSHNICA PRIORITY SCHEME REPORT ON PUBLIC HEARING AND MINUTES OF MEETING July 2016

PROJECT NO. A079377

DOCUMENT NO. 1

VERSION 1

DATE OF ISSUE June 2016

PREPARED David Heywood

CHECKED Roar Solland/Spartak Sinojmeri

APPROVED RSS Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Koshnica Priority Scheme Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems i

Table of Contents Page No

1 INTRODUCTION ...... 1 1.1 Background ...... 1 1.2 Koshnica Scheme ...... 1

2 OBJECTIVE OF PUBLIC HEARING ...... 1

3 PUBLIC HEARING ...... 2 3.1 Implementation Procedure ...... 2 3.2 Agenda for the Meeting ...... 2 3.3 Meeting Participation ...... 2 3.4 Minutes of the Meeting ...... 3

4 ANNEXES ...... 6 4.1 Annex 1 – Koshnica I&D Scheme Particulars ...... 6 4.2 Annex 2 – Public Notices ...... 9 4.3 Annex 3 – List of Participants ...... 10 4.4 Annex 4 – Photos from the Meeting ...... 12 4.5 Annex 5 - PowerPoint Presentation for the Public Hearing ...... 13

List of Tables Page No Table 4-1: Koshnica I&D scheme – Summary of works taken from BoQ ...... 8

List of Figures Page No Figure 4-1: Map of the Koshnica I&D scheme and proximity to Devolli River ...... 6 Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Koshnica Priority Scheme Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems 1

1 INTRODUCTION

The overall development objective for WRIP is to increase the area under improved irrigation and drainage and in so doing, to establish the institutional basis for improved IWRM.

Implementation of the public hearing was based on World Bank policies (OP 4.12) and the environmental Al- banian legislation.

The principle document of reference to enable to Consultant to prepare the Public Hearing Report are the following:

1. The Updated Feasibility Study Report prepared by the Consultant - Joint Venture Renardet – Beta Studio – Hydrowater-Albania (Renardet et al) 2. The Detailed Design for Koshnica produced by the same Consultant Renardet et al 3. The Environmental and Social Management Plan Report prepared by the Consultant COWI-CEIA

1.2 Koshnica Scheme The former commune of Mirasi is currently administrative units consisting of Devolli municipality and Korca County. Until June 2015, Mirasi has been independent commune, part of the administrative units of the country. Given that the irrigation project is designed before the administrative reform of 2015 and improvement of irrigation schemes is planned according to this administrative division, the drafting of Public Hearing Report of WRIP development is focused on the former territory and population of Mirasi.

Koshnica scheme is part of general irrigation scheme which takes water from the reservoir of Koshnica and Devolli River.

Currently, irrigation scheme provides rehabilitation channels per 350 ha which receive water by gravity. An- nex 1 provides further details of the Koshnica scheme.

Public hearings was focused on the environmental and social management plan (ESMP) of Koshnica scheme (350 ha with gravitation only)

The public was informed by the consultant, and discussed especially for the environmental impact, management plans of irrigation schemes, and procedures for Resettlement Action Plan, if necessary. Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Koshnica Priority Scheme Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems 2

3 PUBLIC HEARING

3.1 Implementation Procedure Implementation of the public hearing was based on World Bank policies (OP 4.12) and the Albanian legislation "For the environment".

Consequently announcements were made in the municipal authority of Devolli and the Administrative Unit of Miras. In early June public notices were placed on notice boards in the territory of the administrative unit of Miras informing the local people of the time, date and venue and purpose of the meeting.

The date for the meeting was 27th June 2016. The planned time for the meeting was 11:00 hours and the venue was the Meeting Hall at Devolli Municipality.

Copies of the public notices are included in Annex 2.

3.2 Agenda for the Meeting The agenda provided by Devolli Administration for the meeting was as follows:

1. Opening of the meeting by Mr. Blendon Nallbati, Mayor of Devolli

2. Introduction of main meeting participants

3. Presentations

- Mr. Luan Bregu, Director of Irrigation and Drainage, MARDWA

- Mr. Spartak Sinojmeri, Consultant (COWI, CEIA

4. Open and Public Discussion

5. Closure

3.3 Meeting Participation The participants that attended the meeting were asked to record their name, their position and contact number. The meeting was attended by more than 25 participants. Details of the participation list are contained in Annex 3 to this report. Photos from the meeting are included in Annex 4.

The meeting had a broad spectrum of different people in attendance, including the following: a. Mayor of Devolli, Mr. Blendon Nallbati and part of his municipality staff b. Director of Irrigation and Drainage of MARDWA - Mr Luan Bregu, c. Specialists of the Department of Irrigation and Drainage MARDWA and WRIP - Mrs Lida Xhuveli and Mr Tomi Decolli d. Consultants from ESMP - Mr Spartak Sinojmeri and Mr Bardhyl Qilimi, Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Koshnica Priority Scheme Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems 3 e. Chief of the Administrative unit, Miras f. Farmers from the Koshnica I&D scheme g. Members of civil society h. Members of women's groups i. Drainage Board Director and Drainage Engineers, Korca District

3.4 Minutes of the Meeting Venue: Main Meeting Hall, Devolli Municipality Date: 27th June 2016 Start Time: 12:00 hours Organiser: Devolli Municipality with support from MARDWA

Background and Introductions The announcement for public hearing was made by MARDWA and Devolli Municipality with the publication of notices on main public buildings in Devolli Municipality.

The meeting was opened by Mayor Mr Blendon Nallbati, who noted the importance of reconstruction of irrigation schemes for rural area of Devolli, and the impact on social and economic life of farmers. He noted also that the rehabilitation works should not cause environmental and social problems.

Mr. Luan Bregu, the director in MARDWA, informed the participants at the meeting on the extension of the Koshnica scheme to be rehabilitated and the future development of other schemes. He presented the works to be done under WB/Sida investment for rehabilitation of Irrigation Scheme. Details of the scheme are shown in Annex 1. Mr Bregu also then commented upon the state of the irrigation system at Koshnica and the need for rehabilitation. He then provided a view of the development of agriculture in the area of Koshnica.

Mr. Spartak Sinojmeri representing the Consultant responsible for the Environmental and Social Management Plan for Koshnica scheme then provided a presentation. This is enclosed as Annex 5. The presentation focused mainly on the positive and negative impacts on the environment, gender issues, employment and the procedures for resettlement /compensation /grievance mechanisms, if it will be necessary during the implementation of rehabilitation works etc.

Mr Sinojmeri presented the goal and objectives of the meeting and a summary of the ESMP's for Koshnica irrigation scheme. He explained to the participants the important of their input and feedback regarding issues that can be generated by the project development from environmental point of view (health and accidental risks, issues for infrastructure damage, or barrier to existing access roads etc., pollution and contamination, social issues, giving the right importance to the gender, employment and needs for training.

The Mayor then opened the meeting to the public for open discussion.

Matters Arising The main issues concerning the environment at the public hearing for Koshnica scheme are as follows: At the meeting, the specific issues that were raised regarding the environmental impact were as follows:

The environmental issues that participants raised in the public hearing for Koshnica scheme.

Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Koshnica Priority Scheme Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems 4

At the meeting, in addition to other, specific issues were raised regarding the environmental impact that would have rehabilitation of Koshnica scheme as:

Anesti Lubonja. Eng. of Drainage Board, Korca.  The Engineer raised the concern that the sewage of Koshnica village flowing into the reservoir Koshnice. Consequently caused pollution in the lake and in the soil and agricultural crops during the irrigation process.  This concern arose before for the local authorities so that in parallel with the reconstruction of the irrigation scheme, there is planned construction of septic tanks for each household or sewage system.

The Environmental Consultant explained that this is one common issues for all Albanian irrigation schemes, but this can be answered only by the local authorities and community. They should manage the wastewater in such a way that it does not affect the present investment for community development such as this project represents.

Mrs. Enerida Hoxha, Resident of Miras Administrative Unit, representative of civil society  Mrs Hoxha raised the concern of the employment of women during the rehabilitation works of irrigation scheme and the using of water reservoir to other economic activities such as fishing, etc.

The Environmental Consultant clarified again that this is one of the main topic of the project, that is proposed and conditioned in ESMP, but the community should be an important partner to promote and lead the way on such actions and also being active on grievance mechanisms.

Mr Haki Begolli, Headman of the village Menkulas  The headman of the village raised the concern about the quality of rehabilitation works. Poor quality of work can cause decay in the channels causing the water to flow out into the street, causing pollution and flooding of land, etc. impacts in the groundwater etc. Therefore he proposed:

The Environmental Consultant agreed on participation of the representative of the community (unit or municipality) in the evaluation of the rehabilitation works, as well as on cases that is impact the community interest, owns etc. He explained how important is the grievance mechanism and the procedure to do it, for a successful project implementation.

Mr Blendon Nallbati. Mayor of Devolli. He stated that for the avoidance of adverse environmental phenomena he proposes:

In the meeting Mr. Gjergji Kote, headman of the village Zicisht, Ilir Cenolli, Director of the Drainage Board, Afrim Brato, Eng. Drainage Board, Neki Pasho, farmer, Olsi Toska, Farmer, Director of Irrigation and Drainage in MARDWA discussed about these issues.

During the public hearing, the participants asked many questions regarding the scope of the Koshnica scheme and the impact on the environment during the field work.

Mr. Spartak Sinojmeri explained to the participants on every issue based on the environmental and social management plan.

Conclusions and closure Conclusions and closure of the meeting was made by Mr. Luan Bregu, director of MARDWA and Mr. Spartak Sinojmeri, CEIA-COWI expert. Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Koshnica Priority Scheme Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems 5

The meeting ended at 12:30 hours

Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Koshnica Priority Scheme Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems 6

4 ANNEXES

4.1 Annex 1 – Koshnica I&D Scheme Particulars

4.1.1 Project Details The Koshnica I&D scheme rehabilitation can be classified as a Category B project under World Bank because the impact on human population or environmentally important areas is less adverse than those of Category A projects. The general impacts associated with the works are temporary during the construction stage; few, if any, are irreversible and all are site specific. The project outcome and the adopted mitigation measures employed will actually benefit the area for the future. Under Albanian law the contents of the ESMP can be adopted as a Preliminary EIA document as the rehabilitation project falls under the list of project types within Appendix 2 of the Albanian EIA law.

The Koshnica I&D scheme lies within Miras and Devolli districts in the Prefecture of Korça and was constructed in 1973. The accompanying reservoir has a design volume of 2,350,000 m3. The catchment of Ko- shnica reservoir is about 7.14 km2 but the main supply of waters comes from this watershed there is feeding canal but is destroyed and not functioning. The surface area of the reservoir is about 18.9 ha. The village of Koshnica is located upstream of the dam close to the edge of the southern limb of the reservoir. The Koshnica dam has failed and cannot hold water to top water level (TWL) and the feeder canal is inoperable for the past 20 years. The outlet of the dam has been left permanently open for safety and water flows through the outlet and into the irrigation channel below. So even without the dam retaining water the local commune report that they can irrigate only 100ha annually. Please refer to Figure 4-1 which shows which shows the planned rehabilitation work and its proximity to the Devolli River

Source: Updated FS from JV Renardet, Beta Studio, Hydrowater Albania Figure 4-1: Map of the Koshnica I&D scheme and proximity to Devolli River Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Koshnica Priority Scheme Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems 7

The project area was designed as 350 ha gravity fed scheme and 500 ha pumped scheme located on the hilly left side served by a pumping station. The pumped area has two branches; a shorter branch (in an East direction) which is about 2 km long; and the longer branch flowing in a west direction towards Zicisht village, with a length of 13.2 km. The I&D scheme lies on clays and underlying rocks of the Helmesi formation of Pliocene age. The original I&D scheme was only part implemented because the dam had problems during the construction.

Only parts of the partially constructed canals were ever lined. Furthermore, the rehabilitation of the feeder canal is crucial to ensure the reliability of water supply from the reservoir. The downstream irrigation infrastructure is in poor condition and the dam has failed and has not filled in the last 14 years. This scheme needs the reconstruction of the Koshnica dam to move forward and work commenced on this aspect in 2015. The pumping station was designed to service the upper hilly area by means of a rising pipe. The building is totally ruined and only some part of the foundations remain, a damaged concrete manhole and substantial amounts of rusty electro-mechanical equipment that is not serviceable.

In the downstream area for the gravity network, a canal 23.5 kms long flows in an eastward direction towards the villages of Fitore and Vishocica villages. The canal is designed as a trapezoidal canal section with a capacity to convey water flow of 310 l/s. The canal is unlined and mostly unshaped throughout its entire length and in some parts; the track of the canal is completely missing.

4.1.2 High Priority Works covered under World Bank funding The Feasibility Study by JV Renardet et al provides details of the main rehabilitation works to be undertaken at the I&D scheme under review. After stakeholder consultation from the FS Consultant (JV Renardet et al) Koshnica I&D scheme rehabilitation Option 1 was chosen and confirmed by MARDWA. This option will rehabilitate the entire gravity and pumped fed system making a total command area of 850ha. Rehabilitation works comprise of the following key points:

Pump fed area (500ha)

 Reconstruction of the intake immediately downstream of the dam outlet inserting a 550 mm dia. sluice valve.  Reinforced concrete lining of 15.58 km of canals with a design flow rate from 620 to 300 l/s with trapezoidal sections, with (width 0.4 to 0.7 m; height 0.65 to 1.15m;  Reconstruction of the pumping station with 2 pump sets (Qtot= 2 x 310 l/s, H = 57 m, 445 kW)  Replacement of the pump station steel rising main of 500 mm dia. and length of 400m;  Reconstruction of the siphon over a length of 200m with 400 mm dia.  The construction, supply and settings of steel gates 60x70; 50x70; 40x40 and cross regulation gate.  Construction supply and settings of culverts (Ø=80; Ø=100) pipe aqueducts crossing, and irrigation bridges.  Siphon with length of 200m and dia. 400 mm.

Gravity fed area (350ha)

 Lining and reinforcement of 23.5 km of canals with a flow rate from 310 to 200 l/s with trapezoidal sections, slope 1/1, with (width 0.4 to 0.6m; height 0.65 to 1.10m;  Construction, supply and settings of steel gates 70x80; 40x60 and cross regulation gate.  Construction, supply and settings of culverts, pipe aqueduct crossings, and irrigation bridges.  Reconstruction of the intake immediately downstream of the dam outlet of the dam.

The bill of quantity for the high priority rehabilitation works on the Koshnica I&D schemes are shown in Table 4-1 below.

Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Koshnica Priority Scheme Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems 8

Table 4-1: Koshnica I&D scheme – Summary of works taken from BoQ Gravity Pumped No Item Units Network Network 1 Main and secondary canal lining kms 23.5 15.58 2 Irrigation bridges No 10 6 3 Cross regulators on main canals No 1 1 4 Large steel gates No 39 70x80cm 17 60x70cm 5 Medium steel gates No 17 40x60cm 36 50x70cm 6 Small steel gates No 4 40x40cm 7 Aqueducts No 14 14 8 Culverts No 9 7 9 Siphons No 1 10 Pumping Station No 1 11 Intake No 1 12 Rising main replacement m 400

Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Koshnica Priority Scheme Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems 9

4.2 Annex 2 – Public Notices

Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Koshnica Priority Scheme Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems 10

4.3 Annex 3 – List of Participants

Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Koshnica Priority Scheme Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems 11

Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Koshnica Priority Scheme Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems 12

4.4 Annex 4 – Photos from the Meeting

Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Koshnica Priority Scheme Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems 13

4.5 Annex 5 - PowerPoint Presentation for the Public Hearing

Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Koshnica Priority Scheme Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems 14

REPUBLIC OF ALBANIA MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE, RURAL DEVELOPMENT AND WATER ADMINISTRATION WATER RESOURCES AND IRRIGATION PROJECT

KURJAN STRUM PRIORITY SCHEME REPORT ON PUBLIC HEARING AND MINUTES OF MEETING

July 2016

CEIA

REPUBLIC OF ALBANIA MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE, RURAL DEVELOPMENT AND WATER ADMINISTRATION WATER RESOURCES AND IRRIGATION PROJECT

PREPARATION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT PLANS (ESMPS) AND RESETTLEMENT ACTIONS PLANS (RAPS) FOR THE REHABILITATION OF IRRIGATION SCHEMES/SYSTEMS

PROJECT ID NO: P121186 – RFP NO: MAFCP/CS/007 – LOAN NO. 8211 - AL

KURJAN STRUM PRIORITY SCHEME REPORT ON PUBLIC HEARING AND MINUTES OF MEETING July 2016

PROJECT NO. A079377

DOCUMENT NO. 1

VERSION 1

DATE OF ISSUE June 2016

PREPARED David Heywood

CHECKED Roar Solland/Spartak Sinojmeri

APPROVED RSS Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Kurjan Strum Priority Scheme Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems i

Table of Contents Page No

1 INTRODUCTION ...... 1 1.1 Background ...... 1 1.2 Kurjan Strum Scheme ...... 1

2 OBJECTIVE OF PUBLIC HEARING ...... 1

3 PUBLIC HEARING ...... 2 3.1 Implementation Procedure ...... 2 3.2 Agenda for the Meeting ...... 2 3.3 Meeting Participation ...... 2 3.4 Minutes of the Meeting ...... 3

4 ANNEXES ...... 6 4.1 Annex 1 – Kurjan Strum I&D Scheme Particulars ...... 6 4.2 Annex 2 – Public Notices ...... 9 4.3 Annex 3 – List of Participants ...... 10 4.4 Annex 4 – Photos from the Meeting ...... 12 4.5 Annex 5 - PowerPoint Presentation for the Public Hearing ...... 13

List of Tables Page No Table 4-1: Kurjan Strum I&D scheme - Dimensions of canal sections ...... 7 Table 4-2: Kurjan Strum I&D scheme – Summary of works taken from BoQ ...... 7

List of Figures Page No Figure 4-1: Kurjan Strum I&D scheme and proximity to Semani River and Marinez Oilfield ...... 6 Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Kurjan Strum Priority Scheme Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems 1

1 INTRODUCTION

The overall development objective for WRIP is to increase the area under improved irrigation and drainage and in so doing, to establish the institutional basis for improved IWRM.

Implementation of the public hearing was based on World Bank policies (OP 4.12) and the environmental Al- banian legislation.

The principle document of reference to enable to Consultant to prepare the Public Hearing Report are the following:

1. The Updated Feasibility Study Report prepared by the Consultant - Joint Venture Renardet – Beta Studio – Hydrowater-Albania (Renardet et al) 2. The Detailed Design for Kurjan Strum produced by the same Consultant Renardet et al 3. The Environmental and Social Management Plan Report prepared by the Consultant COWI-CEIA

1.2 Kurjan Strum Scheme The former commune of Kuman is currently administrative unit consisting of Roskoveci municipality and Fier County. Until June 2015, Kuman has been independent commune, part of the administrative units of the country. Given that the irrigation project is designed before the administrative reform of 2015 and improvement of irrigation schemes is planned according to this administrative division, the drafting of Public Hearing Report of WRIP development is focused on the former territory and population of Kuman.

Kurjan-Strum scheme is part of general irrigation scheme which takes water from the reservoir of Kurjan.

Currently, irrigation scheme provides rehabilitation channels which receive water by gravity

Public hearings was focused on the environmental and social management plan (ESMP) of Kurjan Strum scheme

The public was informed by the consultant, and discussed especially for the environmental impact, management plans of irrigation schemes, and procedures for Resettlement Action Plan, if necessary. Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Kurjan Strum Priority Scheme Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems 2

3 PUBLIC HEARING

3.1 Implementation Procedure Implementation of the public hearing was based on World Bank policies (OP 4.12) and the Albanian legislation "For the environment".

Consequently announcements were made in the municipal authority of Roskovec and the Administrative Unit of Kuman. In early June public notices were placed on notice boards in the territory of the administrative unit of Roskovec informing the local people of the time, date and venue and purpose of the meeting.

The date for the meeting was30th June 2016. The planned time for the meeting was 11:00 hours and the venue was the Meeting Hall at Roskovec Municipality.

Copies of the public notices are included in Annex 2.

3.2 Agenda for the Meeting The agenda provided by Roskovec Administration for the meeting was as follows:

1. Opening of the meeting by Mrs Barda Begaj, Deputy Mayor of Roskovec

2. Introduction of main meeting participants

3. Presentations

- Mr. Luan Bregu, Director of Irrigation and Drainage, MARDWA

- Mr. Spartak Sinojmeri, Consultant (COWI, CEIA

4. Open and Public Discussion

5. Closure

3.3 Meeting Participation The participants that attended the meeting were asked to record their name, their position and contact number. The meeting was attended by more than 35 participants. Details of the participation list are contained in Annex 3 to this report. Photos from the meeting are included in Annex 4.

The meeting had a broad spectrum of different people in attendance, including the following: a. Deputy Mayor of Roskovec, Mrs Barda Begaj and part of her municipality staff b. Deputy Mayor, Mr. Afrim Plaka c. Director of Irrigation and Drainage of MARDWA - Mr Luan Bregu, d. Specialists of the Department of Irrigation and Drainage MARDWA and WRIP - Mrs Lida Xhuveli and Mr Tomi Decolli Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Kurjan Strum Priority Scheme Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems 3 e. Consultants from ESMP - Mr Spartak Sinojmeri and Mr Bardhyl Qilimi, f. Chief of the Administrative unit, Kuman g. Farmers from the Kurjan Strum I&D scheme h. Members of civil society i. Members of women's groups j. Drainage Board Director and Drainage Engineers, Fier District k. Member of ARM Fier

3.4 Minutes of the Meeting Venue: Main Meeting Hall, Roskovec Municipality Date: 30th June 2016 Start Time: 11:00 hours Organiser: Roskovec Municipality with support from MARDWA

Background and Introductions The announcement for public hearing was made by MARDWA and Roskovec Municipality with the publication of notices on main public buildings in Roskovec Municipality.

The meeting was opened by Deputy Mayor Mrs Barda Begaj, who noted the importance of reconstruction of irrigation schemes for rural area of Roskovec, and the impact on social and economic life of farmers. He noted also that the rehabilitation works should not cause environmental and social problems.

Mr. Luan Bregu, the director in MARDWA, informed the participants at the meeting on the extension of the Kurjan Strum scheme to be rehabilitated and the future development of other schemes. He presented the works to be done under WB/Sida investment for rehabilitation of Irrigation Scheme. Details of the scheme are shown in Annex 1. Mr Bregu also then commented upon the state of the irrigation system at Kurjan Strum and the need for rehabilitation. He then provided a view of the development of agriculture in the area of Kurjan Strum.

Mr. Spartak Sinojmeri representing the Consultant responsible for the Environmental and Social Management Plan for Kurjan Strum scheme then provided a presentation. This is enclosed as Annex 5. The presentation focused mainly on the positive and negative impacts on the environment, gender issues, employment and the procedures for resettlement /compensation /grievance mechanisms, if it will be necessary during the implementation of rehabilitation works etc.

Mr Sinojmeri presented the goal and objectives of the meeting and a summary of the ESMP's for Kurjan Strum irrigation scheme. He explained to the participants the important of their input and feedback regarding issues that can be generated by the project development from environmental point of view (health and accidental risks, issues for infrastructure damage, or barrier to existing access roads etc., pollution and contamination, social issues, giving the right importance to the gender, employment and needs for training.

The Deputy Mayor then opened the meeting to the public for open discussion.

Matters Arising Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Kurjan Strum Priority Scheme Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems 4

The main issues concerning the environment at the public hearing for Kurjan Strum scheme are as follows: At the meeting, the specific issues that were raised regarding the environmental impact were as follows:

The environmental issues that participants raised in the public hearing for Kurjan Strum scheme.

At the meeting, in addition to other, specific issues were raised regarding the environmental impact that would have rehabilitation of Kurjan Strum scheme as:

Mr. Behar Musta. Strum administrative unit  Two channels of Strum, bring sediments and affect downstream area. Proposal. During the design of the scheme to keep in mind the construction of barriers.

Mrs Kaljopi Sopiku, Farmer, Roskovec  She raised the issues that during flooding wastewater channels pollutes the areas of Roskoveci  Central collector don’t absorb water and during the irrigation season could have a mixture of wastewater with water irrigation Proposal. During the process of drafting the detailed project taken into account the remarks of the population.

The Environmental Consultant fully agreed with her concerns. He explained that the project can give the ways and examples for the control of wastewater discharges in the draining canals, but is the municipality and community that should manage better waste waters and solid wastes, to save the present investment and give chance for other similar projects to be developed by the same funders.

Albert Kola Farmer, Roskovec  At the sports field of Roskoveci, the channel passes through the neighbourhood and mixed with sewage. Proposal. In this part of the channel to be replaced by pipeline or trough cover. This distance is about 1 km.

The Environmental Consultant stated that the proposed action will just hide the pollution, but does not affect the real state of drainage waters and does not reduce the contamination risk. The ESMP, will propose to control all wastewater discharge into the draining channel, but cannot cover the management of wastewater per se, and the potential flooding over the city. This is a goal for the municipality and community.

Mustafa Tomori. Farmer, Vermish  He raised the concern that according to the existing scheme, the channels pass near residential houses which generate urban waste. Proposal. Keeping in mind by the designer the isolation of the canals from other residential spaces.

The Environmental Consultant stressed that this is a very important issue. The project can develop ways to control pollution sources discharged into the channel, but it is not in the project goal or to provide answers on wastewater management per se. This is a duty of the community and the stakeholders/decision makers. He further explain that the project has proposed to adopt septic tanks but in case that is not possible then this should form part of the town wastewater network. But, he stressed that it is not a solution that the project will control the wastewater discharge for the moment and after project implementation, such pollution ways will be opened again.

Mrs. Bardha Begaj Deputy Mayor  She raised the concern for employment during rehabilitation works of the population in the area, especially women.

Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Kurjan Strum Priority Scheme Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems 5

The Environmental Consultant fully agrees with this comment and clarify the ways and instruments to be used for such purposes.

Mr. Afrim Plaka. Deputy Major  The concern. The waste (solid, dirt) that will be created during the rehabilitation works and their inability to deposit the thread in Roskoveci land field. Proposal. The planning during the drafting of land field only for inert part of project.  He raised the problem of quality control works. Proposal for more municipality participation in the supervision of works.

The Environmental Consultant fully support such ideas, but the definition of the territory of wastewater disposal from construction works is the duty of the Municipality. In case that the debris is of good quality, after the approval of environmental authorities, can be reused for tertiary road improvement etc. He also explained to the participants that the ESMP will consider the participation of the municipality for the supervision of construction works.

Conclusions and closure Conclusions and closure of the meeting was made by Mr. Luan Bregu, director of MARDWA and Mr. Spartak Sinojmeri, CEIA-COWI expert.

They thanked the community for their participation, questions and issues raised on the project development and assured the participants that everything will be part of the ESMP.

The meeting ended at 12:30 hours

Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Kurjan Strum Priority Scheme Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems 6

4 ANNEXES

4.1 Annex 1 – Kurjan Strum I&D Scheme Particulars

4.1.1 Project Details

The Kurjan Strum I&D scheme rehabilitation can be classified as a Category B project under World Bank because the impact on human population or environmentally important areas is less adverse than those of Cate- gory A projects. The general impacts associated with the works are temporary during the construction stage; few, if any, are irreversible and all are site specific. The project outcome and the adopted mitigation measures employed will actually benefit the area for the future. Under Albanian law the contents of the ESMP can be adopted as a Preliminary EIA document as the rehabilitation project falls under the list of project types within Appendix 2 of the Albanian EIA law.

The Kurjan Strum I&D scheme is located in Fier District occupying part of the Lowland Zone and with a command area of 5,430 ha that has to be assessed by the Consultant. The scheme forms a crude rectangular shape aligned east – west with the reservoir located to the east and the command area mainly extending west Please refer to Figure 4-1 which shows the planned rehabilitation work and the proximity to the Marinez Oilfield. The Marinez oilfield is downstream of the I&D scheme and therefore does not pose a risk to pollution

Source: Updated FS from JV Renardet, Beta Studio, Hydrowater Albania Figure 4-1: Kurjan Strum I&D scheme and proximity to Semani River and Marinez Oilfield

The I&D scheme main branches are as follows: Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Kurjan Strum Priority Scheme Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems 7

 The primary irrigation canals extend for 35.8 kms and comprise Branch 1-7 = 11.8kms, Branch 7-10 = 12 kms, and Branch 10-14 = 12 kms.  The Secondary canals are 3-3/1 = 1.2kms, 4-4/1 = 1.3kms, 6-6/1 = 2.4kms, 7-7/1 = 2.4kms, 9-9/1 = 2.5 kms and 12-121 = 2.5kms.  There are then 51.9 kms of other branches that are of lower significance.

The following Table 4-1 provides a breakdown of the main and secondary canal sections. Table 4-1: Kurjan Strum I&D scheme - Dimensions of canal sections Section Length (kms) Width (m) Height (m) Slope 6.041 2.0 2.0 1.5 3.152 2.0 1.5 1.5 Main canal 5.537 3.0 1.5 1.5 12.257 2.0 1.8 1.5 Feeder Canal Cerveni 2.0 3.0 2.0 1.5 20.9 0.5 0.5 1.0 22.75 0.5 0.7 1.0 13.475 0.5 0.8 1.0 Secondary Canal 5.1 0.8 0.8 1.0 1.25 1.0 0.8 1.0 4.25 1.0 0.9 1.0 2.0 1.5 1.1 1.0 3.5 0.8 0.6 1.0 Secondary Canal Pump Fed Area 4.0 0.6 0.4 1.0 TAKEN FROM TABLE 2.2 FROM ESMP

4.1.2 High Priority Works covered under World Bank funding The Feasibility Study by JV Renardet et al provides details of the main rehabilitation works to be undertaken at the I&D scheme under review. After stakeholder consultation from the FS Consultant (JV Renardet et al) Kurjan Strum I&D scheme rehabilitation Option 1 was chosen and confirmed by MARDWA. This option will rehabilitate 5,000ha of the original 5,430ha of scheme. A total of 4,300ha will be gravity fed and 700ha will be using pump fed irrigation. The rehabilitation works comprise of the following key points:

 The lining and reinforcement of most part of the secondary canals and of part of the main canals;  The rehabilitation of the Cerveni feeder canal (removal of sediment and earth slips, lining etc.  Rehabilitation of the intake and cross regulator /escape from the Cerveni feeder canal • Reconstruction of two pumping stations at (Vidhishte and Kurjan) • Rehabilitation of the irrigation canals fed by the above named pumping stations. • Reconstruction of siphons, control weirs, delivery gates and other facilities.

A summary of the high priority rehabilitation works for Kurjan Strum are shown in Table 4-2 below.

Table 4-2: Kurjan Strum I&D scheme – Summary of works taken from BoQ Gravity No Item Units Network 1 Main canal lining Kms Not known 2 Secondary canal lining Kms Not known 3 Cross regulators on main canals No 10 4 Main control radial gates No 15 5 Secondary off takes along the main canal No 15 Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Kurjan Strum Priority Scheme Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems 8

Gravity No Item Units Network 6 Steel gates on main canals No 30 7 Cross regulators on secondary canals No 100 8 Regulated off takes secondary canals No 20 9 Off takes secondary canals No 70 10 Road culverts, bridges, siphons No 110 11 minor steel gates No 216

Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Kurjan Strum Priority Scheme Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems 9

4.2 Annex 2 – Public Notices

Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Kurjan Strum Priority Scheme Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems 10

4.3 Annex 3 – List of Participants

Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Kurjan Strum Priority Scheme Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems 11

Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Kurjan Strum Priority Scheme Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems 12

4.4 Annex 4 – Photos from the Meeting

Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Kurjan Strum Priority Scheme Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems 13

4.5 Annex 5 - PowerPoint Presentation for the Public Hearing

Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Kurjan Strum Priority Scheme Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems 14

REPUBLIC OF ALBANIA MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE, RURAL DEVELOPMENT AND WATER ADMINISTRATION WATER RESOURCES AND IRRIGATION PROJECT

REPORT ON PUBLIC DISCLOSURE PROCESS FOR MURRIZ THANA I&D SCHEME – CUKAS AND LUSHNJE BRANCHES

June 2017

CEIA

REPUBLIC OF ALBANIA MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE, RURAL DEVELOPMENT AND WATER ADMINISTRATION WATER RESOURCES AND IRRIGATION PROJECT

PREPARATION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT PLANS (ESMPS) AND RESETTLEMENT ACTIONS PLANS (RAPS) FOR THE REHABILITATION OF IRRIGATION SCHEMES/SYSTEMS

PROJECT ID NO: P121186 – RFP NO: MAFCP/CS/007 – LOAN NO. 8211 - AL

REPORT ON PUBLIC DISCLOSURE PROCESS FOR MURRIZ THANA I&D SCHEME – CUKAS AND LUSHNJE BRANCHES June 2017

PROJECT NO. A079377

DOCUMENT NO. 1

VERSION 2

DATE OF ISSUE June 2017

PREPARED Bardhyl Qilimi/ David Heywood

CHECKED Roar Solland/ Spartak Sinojmeri

APPROVED RSS Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Murriz Thana – Cukas and Lushnje Scheme Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems i

Table of Contents Page No

1 INTRODUCTION ...... 1 1.1 Background ...... 1 1.2 Murriz Thana Scheme – Cukas and Lushnje Low Priority Branches ...... 1

2 OBJECTIVE OF PUBLIC HEARING ...... 1

3 PUBLIC HEARING ...... 2 3.1 Implementation Procedure ...... 2 3.2 Agenda for the Meeting ...... 2 3.3 Meeting Participation ...... 3 3.4 Minutes of the Meeting ...... 3

4 ANNEXES ...... 7 4.1 Annex 1 – Murriz Thana I&D Scheme Particulars ...... 7 4.2 Annex 2 – Public Notices and Advertisements ...... 9 4.3 Annex 3 – List of Participants ...... 15 4.4 Annex 4 – Photos from the Meeting ...... 16 4.5 Annex 5 ‐ PowerPoint Presentation for the Public Hearing ...... 17

List of Tables Page No Table 4‐1: Murriz Thana I&D scheme – Vital statistics (relevant Cukas/Lushnje branches shaded green) ...... 8 Table 4‐2: Murriz Thana I&D scheme – Summary of works for Cukas and Lushnje branches ...... 8

List of Figures Page No Figure 4‐1: Murriz Thana Final Option and proximity of Karavasta Protected Area ...... 7 Figure 4‐2: Official MARDWA Letter to Panorama ...... 9 Figure 4‐3: Official MARDWA Letter to SOT news ...... 10 Figure 4‐4: Advert in SOT News and Panorama ...... 11 Figure 4‐5: MARDWA email to Panorama ...... 11 Figure 4‐6: MARDWA Email to SOT news ...... 12 Figure 4‐7: Public Announcement on MARDWA Website ...... 13 Figure 4‐8: Public Notices in Lushnje Municipality ...... 14 Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Murriz Thana – Cukas and Lushnje Scheme Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems 1

1 INTRODUCTION

The overall development objective for WRIP is to increase the area under improved irrigation and drainage and in so doing, to establish the institutional basis for improved IWRM.

Implementation of the public hearing to discuss the Environmental Management Plan (ESMP) was based on World Bank policies (OP 4.12) and the incumbent environmental Albanian legislation.

The principle document of reference to enable to Consultant to prepare the Public Hearing Report for Murriz Thana – Cukas and Lushnje branches are the following:

1. The Updated Feasibility Study Report prepared by the Consultant - Joint Venture Renardet – Beta Studio – Hydrowater-Albania (Renardet et al)1 2. The Environmental and Social Management Plan (ESMP) Report and the Abbreviated Resettlement Action Plan (ARAP) prepared by the Consultant COWI-CEIA

1.2 Murriz Thana Scheme – Cukas and Lushnje Low Priority Branches The Administrative Units of Cukas, Karbunara, Savra, Dushku and Golem are under administration of the Lushnje municipality and Fier County.

The low priority Lushnje and Cukas branches (schemes) are part of general irrigation scheme which takes water from the reservoir of Murriz-Thana. Works on the rehabilitation of the Murriz Thana reservoir: the main source of water supply for the irrigation scheme; were completed in 2016, Works on the higher priority Krutje and Terbuf branches have already been discussed in public debates in June 2016 and subsequent rehabilitation works for the irrigation works have already commenced in late 2016 and are scheduled for completion in 2017.

Currently, the low priority scheme when rehabilitated will provide irrigation to 13790 ha of agricultural land (6850 Lushnje + 6940 Cukas). A summary of the proposed works including a plan of the I&D scheme (Figure 4-1) is shown in Annex 1.

The objective of the public hearing in this instance is to inform the public about the findings presented in the environmental and social management plan (ESMP) of Murriz Thana scheme covering branches of Lushnje and Cukas. This was prepared by COWI/CEIA during 2016 and 2017.

1 The detailed design for Cukas and Lushnje branches is yet to be prepared Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Murriz Thana – Cukas and Lushnje Scheme Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems 2

The public would also be informed by the Consultant, about the potential environmental impact, the environmental management plans of irrigation schemes, and the procedures for the ARAP, if necessary.

3 PUBLIC HEARING

3.1 Implementation Procedure The ESMP is subject to the procedure of public consultations conducted in accordance with the operational policies of the World Bank (OP. 4.01). The purpose of the public consultations is to enable the access to contents of documents for normal members of the public, institutions and all other interested parties, and to assure the possibility of informing potential comments, questions and conclusions on their contents. Furthermore, the consultation process must satisfy the current Albanian legislation which includes:

 Law No. 8672, dated 26.10.2000, “On the Aarhus Convention Ratification on public right to information, to participate in decision-making and to have access to justice in environmental matters”;  DCM No. 994, dated 02.07.2008, “Public Participation in Environmental Decision Making”;  DCM No. 16, dated 04.01.2012, “On Public Access to environmental information”;  DCM No. 247, dated 30.04.2014, “On the determination of the rules and requirements of the procedures for information and involvement of the public in environmental decision making”;  Law No 119/2014, dated 18.09.2014, “On the right of information”;  Law No 146/2014 – On Notification and Public Consultation” – regulates the process of notifying the public on drafting legislative work and other strategic national and local documents;

For the organization of the public hearing, announcements were initially made during the first week in May 2017 in the municipal authority of Lushnje and specifically in the Administrative Units of Cukas, Karbunara, Savra, Dushku and Golem. On May 22 the announcement was made in the Albanian newspapers Panorama and Sot News.

On May 23, 2017 in municipal building and notice boards in Lushnje and Cukas Municipalities was placed announcements informing the public for the purpose of the forthcoming public meeting on 29th May at the Historic Museum Meeting Hall in Lushnje Municipality at 14:00 hours

Detailed information on the access to the summary ESMP document and the possibility of the public to provide comments were also placed in various media. Copies of the correspondence to newspapers, the public notices and the announcement on the MARDWA web pages are included in Annex 2. In summary they are as follows:

 The MARDWA sent official letters (Figure 4-2 and Figure 4-3) to two newspapers namely "Panorama" and "SOT" new on 17th May 2017 – 12 days before date of public hearing ,  Emails were also sent to these same newspapers on 22nd May 2017 – 7 days before the date of public hearing (Figure 4-5 and Figure 4-6).  Newspaper advert placed in "SOT" news and "Panorama" (Figure 4-4)  On the MARDWA website from 6th May – 23 days before date of public hearing (Figure 4-7).  In notices placed on Municipal notices boards (Figure 4-8 ) 10 days before the date of the public hearing.

3.2 Agenda for the Meeting The agenda provided by Lushnje Administration for the meeting was as follows:

1. Opening of the meeting by Mr. Shpetim Kasapi, Director of agriculture of Lushnje Municipality and Fredi Dervishi, ing in Drainage Board, Lushnje Sector 2. Introduction of main meeting participants Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Murriz Thana – Cukas and Lushnje Scheme Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems 3

3. MARDWA and Consultant representatives - Mr. Tomi Decolli Chief of monitoring and administration sector, MARDWA, presented a summary of the Irrigation Scheme for Murriz Thana with focus on the Lushnje and Cukas branches - Mr. Bardhyl Qilimi, Consultant (COWI, CEIA) presents a summary of the ESMP's of Murriz Thana with focus on Lushnje and Cukas schemes 4. Open discussion with members of the Public 5. Closure

3.3 Meeting Participation The participants that attended the meeting were asked to record their name, their position and contact number. The meeting was attended by more than 17 participants. Details of the participation list are contained in Annex 3 to this report. Photos from the meeting are included in Annex 4.

The meeting had a broad spectrum of different people in attendance, including the following:

 Mr Shpetim Kasapi, Director of agriculture of Lushnje Municipality]  Mr Fredi Dervishi, ing in Drainage Board, Lushnje Sector  Chief of Monitoring and Administration sector MARDWA Mr Tomi Decolli  Consultant from ESMP - Mr Bardhyl Qilimi,  Chief of the Administrative unit, Cukas  Chief of the Administrative unit, Lushnje  Farmers from the Murriz Thana I&D scheme involving Cukas and Lushnje branches  Members of civil society

3.4 Minutes of the Meeting Venue: Hall of Historic Museum, Lushnje Municipality Date: 29th May 2017 Start Time: 14:00 -15:30 hours Organiser: Lushnje Municipality with support from MARDWA

Background and Introductions The announcement for public hearing was made by MARDWA and Lushnje Municipality with the publication of notices on main public buildings in Lushnje Municipality.

The meeting was opened by co chairman - Mr. Fredi Dervishi head of the Drainage board – Lushnje Sector, who noted the importance of reconstruction of irrigation schemes for rural area of Lushnje Municipality, and the impact on social and economic life of farmers. He noted also that the rehabilitation works should not cause environmental and social problems.

Mr. Tomi Decolli, Chef of monitoring and administration sector in MARDWA, informed the participants at the meeting on the extension of the Lushnje and Cukas branch to be rehabilitated and the future development of other schemes. The work would be of a similar nature to the presently ongoing work on Krutje and Terbuf branches. Mr Decolli provided the meeting attendees with information on the WRIP and discussed the most important assumptions of the Project in relation to irrigation and drainage taking into consideration the main design assumptions from the preliminary design.

Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Murriz Thana – Cukas and Lushnje Scheme Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems 4

Mr. Bardhyl Qilimi presented the Environmental and Social Management Plan of Murriz-Thana scheme, Lush- nje and Cukas branch focusing mainly on the positive and negative impacts on the environment, the procedures for resettlement if it will be necessary during the implementation of rehabilitation works etc. Mr Qilimi provided some information on the essence of the ESMP, presented the document’s structure and characterized contents of particular chapters of the ESMP. Mr Qilimi then discussed the role of the ESMP within the framework of a contract for construction works on the stage of the bidding procedure and during performance of the works.

Mr Qilimi then provided a presentation. This is enclosed as Annex 5. The presentation focused mainly on the positive and negative impacts on the environment, gender issues, employment and the procedures for resettlement /compensation /grievance mechanisms, if it will be necessary during the implementation of rehabilitation works etc.

Mr Qilimi presented the goal and objectives of the meeting and a summary of the ESMP for Murriz Thana irrigation scheme. He explained to the participants the importance of their input and feedback regarding issues that can be generated by the project development from environmental point of view (health and accidental risks, issues for infrastructure damage, or barrier to existing access roads etc., pollution and contamination, social issues, giving the right importance to the gender, employment and needs for training.

The co chairman Mr Dervishi then opened the meeting for discussion. He asked if there had been any letters received from members of the public or any stakeholders related to the proposed rehabilitation of the I&D scheme. He was informed that no letters were received.

Matters Arising The co chairman then encouraged the meeting attendees to ask questions. Those questions and the answers (shown in boxes) are reported below. The main issues raised were concerning the environmental impact and are summarised were as follows:

Mr. Shpetim Kasapi, Director of agriculture, Lushnje Municipality asked about the use of chemicals and fertilisers. He added that the area has a tradition in agriculture and there is a risk of excessive use of fertilizers. Consequently there are concerns about pollution in the soil and agricultural crops during the irrigation process. He proposed drafting an agreement between the Agriculture Directorate and Farmers for the use of fertilizers and pesticides.

Mr Qilimi said that the ESMP contains important information on the fertiliser and pesticide use. He directed the participants to section 2.24 and Table 4.1 and also to Annex 7 of the ESMP document which provides a Pesticide and Fertiliser Managment Plan that should be adhered to. He added that this had also been costed into the ESMP document (Chapter 8 of the ESMP). Mr Qilimi added that the ESMP advocates more training inthe proper use of fertiliser and pesticide and also the ESMP recommends an agreement between all the stakeholders in the safe use of pesticides and fertilisers.

Mr. Kasapi also asked about how to encourage the construction firm undertaking the rehabilitation of the I&D scheme also proposed the signing of an agreement with the construction firm for women's employment

Mr Qilimi said that the ESMP contains important information on recommending the employment of local labour and particularly women wherever possible during the construction and operation phases of the works. A priority of the WRIP project overall is to reduce the amount of unemployment in the rural areas and to prevent migration of people of working age away from rural areas.

Mr. Hilmi Uku, Administrator of Karbunara raised the concern of the employment of residents during the rehabilitation works of irrigation scheme. He also requested information on any necessary resettlement due to the Preliminary Design

Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Murriz Thana – Cukas and Lushnje Scheme Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems 5

Mr Qilimi repeated his answer that the ESMP contains important recommendations to prioritise the employment of local people in the rehabilitaiton works. Mr. Qilimi, explained also, that no resettlement actions are foreseen in this stage. Even so, if any resettlement action will be required from theDetailed Design, a Template Resettlement Action Plan, has been prepared and is provided under the project, where are explained the methodology, the procedure for grievance mechanisms on compensation, which are in compliance with WB requirement and the Albanian Legislation.

Mr Uku also noted that in Karbunare currently there is a sewage pollution. There are about 10 houses that do not have septic tanks.

Mr Qilimi stated that the ESMP states that sewage pollution into the irrigation and drainage networks is not recommended and that septic tanks must be provided to control this runoff. He therefore said that the local government administration and the municipal authorities must work together to ensure that these specific homes are provided with septic tanks. This work should be timed to coincide with the works of the I&D scheme rehabilitation.

Mr. Uku also asked about what the procedure is for damage to land and agricultural crops. He also demanded reparation if the construction firm would have damaged land or agricultural crops

Mr Qilimi stated again that the ARAP document contains the grievance procedure necessary for obtaining compensation by the contractor for damage to crops and to agricultural land.

Mr. Afrim Dedei, Administrator of Dushk raised the concern quality control of rehabilitation works. He requested that the administrative unit to be part of the work control. Poor quality of work can cause decay channels, the water out in the street, pollution and flooding of land, etc. impacts in the groundwater etc. Therefore, he proposed participation of the community in the supervision of the rehabilitation works.

Mr Qilimi stated that the ESMP (Chapters 5, 6 and 7) provide details on monitoring and organisation. The works must be supervised and MARDWA together with local governemnt will oversee this process. Hence Mr Qilimi considered the involvement of the local community in supervision very important

Mr Fredi Dervishi. Ing Drainage Board, Lushnja sector asked about the avoidance of adverse environmental phenomena. He wanted to propose the participation of a local team for supervision of rehabilitation works and also during preparation of environmental action plan by the reconstruction firm. This action needs a preparation of an agreement between the participants in the project and local team of the community. Mr Dervishi was also supported in this question by Mr. Namik Manoku, Administrator of administrative unit nr 4, Lushnja municipality and Mr Solli Tashi, farmer in Savra.

Mr Qilimi that local participation had already been discussed but he added that the ESMP (especially Table 4.1) provide many details on a mandatory arrangement with the Contractor in the Pre Construction phase following into the Construction phase, which outlines many plans that have to be provided. This includes the Traffic Management Plan, Waste Disposal Plan, various Method Statements for construction, etc. Mr Qilimi recommended that the lcoal administrative units must work together with the municipality and MARDWA to have agreement in their reqirements of the contractor.

Conclusions and closure The meeting was closed after all answers to the questions had been provided. The wrap up and meeting closure was made by Mr. Dervishi and Mr Qilimi CEIA-COWI expert. Mr Qilimi summarised that the questions were mainly concerning pollution and ensuring local participation in the supervision of the works as well as ensuring proper compensation to any affected persons.

Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Murriz Thana – Cukas and Lushnje Scheme Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems 6

Mr Qilimi thanked the community for their participation, questions and issues raised on the project development and assured the participants that all their comments would be recorded and taken into consideration within the final ESMP document. Upon approval by MARDWA and the World Bank this report in hand on the public debate would be disclosed on the MARDWA and World Bank websites.

The meeting ended at 15:30 hours

Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Murriz Thana – Cukas and Lushnje Scheme Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems 7

4 ANNEXES

4.1 Annex 1 – Murriz Thana I&D Scheme Particulars

4.1.1 Project Details The Murriz Thana I&D scheme rehabilitation involving the branches Cukas and Lushnje can be classified as Category B project under World Bank because the impact on human population or environmentally important areas is less adverse than those of Category A projects. The general impacts associated with the works are temporary during the construction stage; few, if any, are irreversible and all are site specific. The project outcome and the adopted mitigation measures employed will actually benefit the area for the future. Under Albanian law the contents of the ESMP can be adopted as a Preliminary EIA document as the rehabilitation project falls under the list of project types within Appendix 2 of the Albanian EIA law.

The Murriz-Thana I&D scheme with branches Cukas and Lushnje is located in part of the Lowland Zone and with a total command area of 29,700 ha is the largest irrigation scheme in Albania and the most important of the thirteen sites that have to be assessed by the Consultant. Please refer to Figure 4-1 which shows the overall I&D scheme and the proximity to the Karavasta National Park.

Source: Updated FS from JV Renardet, Beta Studio, Hydrowater Albania Figure 4-1: Murriz Thana Final Option and proximity of Karavasta Protected Area

The I&D schemes comprises four main branches Çukas, Krutja Lushnje and Terbuf. The Krutje and Terbuf branches are a priority for rehabilitation and the detailed design has been undertaken first for these branches and was discussed at public debate in June 2016. The following Table 4-1 provides a breakdown of the irrigated areas covered by each branch. The columns shaded in green are the Cukas and Lushnje branches that are now to be rehabilitated under the World Bank funding and which are covered by the ESMP.

Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Murriz Thana – Cukas and Lushnje Scheme Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems 8

Table 4-1: Murriz Thana I&D scheme – Vital statistics (relevant Cukas/Lushnje branches shaded green)

4.1.2 Proposed Works covered under World Bank funding Cukas Branch Çukas branch canal irrigates in total 6,940 ha, 3,940ha in the Lushnje Irrigation area and 3,000ha in the Fier Irrigation area. Its total length of the main canal is 30.4km, which then supplies a secondary network of 202kms. The branch is unlined and some structures were rehabilitated between 1995 and 2005. The first 10 km are in a cut channel, below the level of the surrounding fields, and the remaining 20 km is mostly raised. Due to lack of water and malfunctioning of the regulation structures, at present the water flow does not reach the end of the canal. All the area was gravity irrigated, except the part (1,100 ha) fed by the Grabian and Bish- cukas pump stations. Lushnje Branch Lushnje main canal is about 40km long and irrigates 6,850 ha from which 1,330 ha are pumped. There are four pumping stations, but they no longer operate these are Karbunare, Dushk, Kosova and Terbuf. The Lushnje main branch is about 18 km long main branch canal irrigates 1500 ha directly. Immediately downstream of Lushnje town the branch canal divides into two main branches, V3 (5.1km) and V4 (16.7km) where the remaining hectares are irrigated up as far as Cerma scheme. Lushnje branch is a contour canal and has problems with silt and stability. The capacity of the main canal up to Lushnje is variable from 14 to 10 m³/s due to restrictions in its dimensions. There are also 60km of secondary channels.

It is important to highlight that the rehabilitation of the canals downstream of Lushnje town is necessary also in order to supply Divjaka scheme (3,000 ha). Almost 124 km of secondary canals originate from the main canal and are controlled by a small number of cross regulators and off-takes in very poor conditions. At the end of a secondary canal, close to Bishcukas is a pump station serving the pressurized irrigation scheme of Bish- cukas-1 (600 ha). The sprinkler irrigation system and the pumps station are completely out of order and the pipes have been removed too. A summary of the rehabilitation works for Cukas and Lushnje from the Prelimi- nary Design are shown in Error! Reference source not found. below.

Table 4-2: Murriz Thana I&D scheme – Summary of works for Cukas and Lushnje branches No Item Units Cukas branch Lushnje Branch Kms 30 18.5 1 Main canal lining (9.1 bad) 2 Secondary canal lining Kms 112 80 3 Cross regulators on main canals No 6 7 4 Long crested weirs (Duckbills) No 9 7 5 Secondary off takes along the main canal No 32 56 6 Steel gates on main canals No 12 28 7 Cross regulators on secondary canals No 140 175 8 Regulated off takes secondary canals No 25 18 9 Off takes secondary canals No 163 180 10 Road culverts, bridges, siphons No 111 122 11 minor steel gates No 280 310

Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Murriz Thana – Cukas and Lushnje Scheme Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems 9

4.2 Annex 2 – Public Notices and Advertisements

Figure 4-2: Official MARDWA Letter to Panorama

Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Murriz Thana – Cukas and Lushnje Scheme Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems 10

Figure 4-3: Official MARDWA Letter to SOT news

Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Murriz Thana – Cukas and Lushnje Scheme Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems 11

Figure 4-4: Advert in SOT News and Panorama

Figure 4-5: MARDWA email to Panorama

Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Murriz Thana – Cukas and Lushnje Scheme Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems 12

Figure 4-6: MARDWA Email to SOT news

Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Murriz Thana – Cukas and Lushnje Scheme Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems 13

Figure 4-7: Public Announcement on MARDWA Website

Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Murriz Thana – Cukas and Lushnje Scheme Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems 14

Murriz Thana – Cukas Branch Murriz Thana – Cukas Branch

Murriz Thana – Lushnje Branch Murriz Thana – Lushnje Branch Figure 4-8: Public Notices in Lushnje Municipality

Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Murriz Thana – Cukas and Lushnje Scheme Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems 15

4.3 Annex 3 – List of Participants

List of Participants Murriz Thana – Cukas Branch Lushnje – 29th May 2017

Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Murriz Thana – Cukas and Lushnje Scheme Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems 16

4.4 Annex 4 – Photos from the Meeting

Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Murriz Thana – Cukas and Lushnje Scheme Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems 17

4.5 Annex 5 - PowerPoint Presentation for the Public Hearing

Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Murriz Thana – Cukas and Lushnje Scheme Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems 18

REPUBLIC OF ALBANIA MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE, RURAL DEVELOPMENT AND WATER ADMINISTRATION WATER RESOURCES AND IRRIGATION PROJECT

REPORT ON PUBLIC DISCLOSURE PROCESS FOR LEMINOT I&D SCHEME

June 2017

CEIA

REPUBLIC OF ALBANIA MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE, RURAL DEVELOPMENT AND WATER ADMINISTRATION WATER RESOURCES AND IRRIGATION PROJECT

PREPARATION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT PLANS (ESMPS) AND RESETTLEMENT ACTIONS PLANS (RAPS) FOR THE REHABILITATION OF IRRIGATION SCHEMES/SYSTEMS

PROJECT ID NO: P121186 – RFP NO: MAFCP/CS/007 – LOAN NO. 8211 - AL

REPORT ON PUBLIC DISCLOSURE PROCESS FOR LEMINOT I&D SCHEME June 2017

PROJECT NO. A079377

DOCUMENT NO. 1

VERSION 2

DATE OF ISSUE June 2017

PREPARED Bardhyl Qilimi/ David Heywood

CHECKED Roar Solland/Spartak Sinojmeri

APPROVED RSS Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Leminot Scheme Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems i

Table of Contents Page No

1 INTRODUCTION ...... 1 1.1 Background ...... 1 1.2 Leminot Scheme ...... 1

2 OBJECTIVE OF PUBLIC HEARING ...... 1

3 PUBLIC HEARING ...... 2 3.1 Implementation Procedure ...... 2 3.2 Agenda for the Meeting ...... 2 3.3 Meeting Participation ...... 3 3.4 Minutes of the Meeting ...... 3

4 ANNEXES ...... 6 4.1 Annex 1 – Leminot I&D Scheme Particulars ...... 6 4.2 Annex 2 – Public Notices and Advertisements ...... 7 4.3 Annex 3 – List of Participants ...... 13 4.4 Annex 4 – Photos from the Meeting ...... 14 4.5 Annex 5 ‐ PowerPoint Presentation for the Public Hearing ...... 15

List of Figures Page No Figure 4‐1: Official MARDWA Letter to Panorama ...... 7 Figure 4‐2: Official MARDWA Letter to SOT news ...... 8 Figure 4‐3: Advert in SOT News and Panorama ...... 9 Figure 4‐4: MARDWA email to Panorama ...... 10 Figure 4‐5: MARDWA Email to SOT news ...... 10 Figure 4‐6: Public Announcement on MARDWA Website ...... 11 Figure 4‐7: Public Notice in Maliq Municipality ...... 12 Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Leminot Scheme Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems 1

1 INTRODUCTION

The overall development objective for WRIP is to increase the area under improved irrigation and drainage and in so doing, to establish the institutional basis for improved IWRM.

Implementation of the public hearing to discuss the Environmental Management Plan (ESMP) was based on World Bank policies (OP 4.12) and the incumbent environmental Albanian legislation.

The principle document of reference to enable to Consultant to prepare the Public Hearing Report for Leminot are the following:

1.2 Leminot Scheme The Administrative Unit of Pirg is part of Maliq Municipality of Korca County. The I&D scheme for Leminot falls within this municipality and takes water from the reservoir of the same name.

Works on the rehabilitation of the Leminot reservoir: the main source of water supply for the irrigation scheme; were completed in 2016. The work on the irrigation channels are scheduled to commence in 2017.

Currently, the low priority scheme when rehabilitated will provide irrigation to 450ha of agricultural land all by gravity. A summary of the proposed works is shown in Annex 1.

The objective of the public hearing in this instance is to inform the public about the findings presented in the environmental and social management plan (ESMP) of Leminot scheme. This was prepared by COWI/CEIA during 2016 and 2017.

1 The detailed design for Leminot is yet to be prepared Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Leminot Scheme Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems 2

3 PUBLIC HEARING

For the organization of the public hearing, announcements were initially made during the first week in May 2017 in the municipal authority of Maliq and specifically in the Administrative Unit or Pirg. On May 22 the announcement was made in the Albanian newspapers Panorama and Sot News.

On May 23, 2017 in municipal building was placed announcements informing the public for the purpose of the forthcoming public meeting on 24th May at the Meeting Hall in Pirg administrative unit at 11:00 hours

 The MARDWA sent official letters (Figure 4-1 and Figure 4-2) to two newspapers namely "Panorama" and "SOT" new on 17th May 2017 – 7 days before date of public hearing ,  Emails were also sent to these same newspapers on 22nd May 2017 – 2 days before the date of public hearing (Figure 4-4 and Figure 4-5).  Newspaper advert placed in "SOT" news and "Panorama" (Figure 4-3 )  On the MARDWA website from 6th May – 17 days before date of public hearing (Figure 4-6).  In notices placed on Municipal notices boards (Figure 4-7 ) 3 days before the date of the public hearing.

3.2 Agenda for the Meeting The agenda provided by Maliq Administration for the meeting was as follows:

1. Opening of the meeting by Deputy Mayor of Maliq, Mr. Vaske Cinoku, 2. Introduction of main meeting participants 3. Presentations - Mrs. Lida Xhuveli, irrigation specialist in MARDWA, informed the participants at the meeting on the extension of the Leminot scheme to be rehabilitated and the future development of other schemes

- Mr. Bardhyl Qilimi, Consultant (COWI, CEIA) presents a summary of the ESMP's of Leminot scheme Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Leminot Scheme Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems 3

4. Open discussion with members of the Public 5. Closure

3.3 Meeting Participation The participants that attended the meeting were asked to record their name, their position and contact number. The meeting was attended by more than 55 participants. Details of the participation list are contained in Annex 3 to this report. Photos from the meeting are included in Annex 4.

The meeting had a broad spectrum of different people in attendance, including the following:

 Deputy Mayor, Mr. Vaske Cinoku and part of Maliq municipality staff  Mr. Nexhip Merolli, Director of water, Municipality Maliq  Chief of Monitoring and Administration sector MARDWA Mr Tomi Decolli.  Mrs Elida Xhuveli and Shaqir Xhumari, Specialist of irrigation and drainage MARDWA  Consultant from ESMP - Mr Bardhyl Qilimi,  Chief of the Administrative unit, Pirg  Farmers from the Leminot I&D scheme  Members of civil society

3.4 Minutes of the Meeting Venue: Meeting Hall Pirg administrative unit Date: 24th May 2017 Start Time: 11:00 -12:30 hours Organiser: Maliq Municipality with support from MARDWA

Background and Introductions The announcement for public hearing was made by MARDWA and Maliq Municipality with the publication of notices on main public buildings in Maliq Municipality.

The meeting was opened by Chairman - Mr. Vaske Cinoku who noted the importance of reconstruction of irrigation schemes for rural area of Pirg administrative unit and the impact on social and economic life of farmers. He noted also that the rehabilitation works should not cause environmental and social problems.

Mrs Elida Xhuveli an irrigation specialist in MARDWA, informed the participants at the meeting on the Leminot scheme to be rehabilitated. Mrs Xhuveli provided the meeting attendees with information on the WRIP and discussed the most important assumptions of the Project in relation to irrigation and drainage taking into consideration the main design assumptions from the preliminary design

Mr. Bardhyl Qilimi presented the Environmental and Social Management Plan of Leminot scheme, focusing mainly on the positive and negative impacts on the environment, the procedures for resettlement if it will be necessary during the implementation of rehabilitation works etc. Mr Qilimi provided some information on the essence of the ESMP, presented the document’s structure and characterized contents of particular chapters of the ESMP. Mr Qilimi then discussed the role of the ESMP within the framework of a contract for construction works on the stage of the bidding procedure and during performance of the works.

Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Leminot Scheme Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems 4

Mr Qilimi presented the goal and objectives of the meeting and a summary of the ESMP for Leminot scheme. He explained to the participants the important of their input and feedback regarding issues that can be generated by the project development from environmental point of view (health and accidental risks, issues for infrastructure damage, or barrier to existing access roads etc., pollution and contamination, social issues, giving the right importance to the gender, employment and needs for training.

The Chairman Deputy Mayor of Maliq, Mr. Vaske Cinoku then opened the meeting for discussion. He asked if there had been any letters received from members of the public or any stakeholders related to the proposed rehabilitation of the I&D scheme. He was informed that no letters were received.

Matters Arising The Chairman then encouraged the meeting attendees to ask questions. Those questions and the answers (shown in boxes) are reported below. The main issues raised were concerning the environmental impact and are summarised as follows:

Mr. Kleanthi Minga from the administrative unit of Pirg asked about the layout of the Leminot scheme. He mentioned that the existing schemes passes through the middle of the village. Rehabilitation works can affect the network of canals. There is also sewer pipes and electricity cables passing through the same are. Therefore there is a risk of pollution from sewage and the health of the population. Also, damages to village infrastructure may occur. He added that the area is prone to land slips which can cause structural damage to homes. Therefore technical project authors have to collaborate with the community to avoid the above phenomena.

Mr. Qilimi said that the ESMP contains important information on the water quality and safeguarding against pollution and damage to property and human health. He directed the participants to Table 4.1 of the ESMP for mitigation measures, where are predicted all actions to avoid pollution and contamination, reaction for accidental damages, responsibilities etc. Mr Qilimi added that the ESMP advocates substantial monitoring of parameters (including water quality) throughout the conctruction and during the operation of the I&D scheme.

Mr Nexhip Merolli. Director of Water, Municipality Maliq added to this debate by stating that in some areas of Leminot village the sewage flows directly into the irigation scheme of Leminot.causing pollution in the soil and agricultural crops during the irrigation process. Mr Merolli said that the construction of septic tanks in the affected areas at the same time as the planned rehabilition works to minimse disruption, will be an important action for saving of the appropriate irrigation water quality.

Mr Qilimi repeated his answer that the ESMP contains important recommendations to mitigate against pollution. He added that the planned coordination of the sewage improvement with the irrigation rehabilitation works is a good idea. Mr Qillimi recommended that the Municipality, MARDWA and the Contractor (when appointed) should work closely together to streamline the overall improvements to the scheme and sewage network in Leminot village.

Mr Kujtim Kucka, Resident of Pirg Administrative Unit, raised the concern of the employment of residents during the rehabilitation works of irrigation scheme and the using water reservoir to other economic activities such as fishing, etc.

Mr Qilimi said that the ESMP contains important information on recommending the employment of local labour . A priority of the WRIP project overall is to reduce the amount of unemployment in the rural areas and to prevent migration of people of working age away from rural areas.

Mr. Dritan Bregu, a farmer raised the concern about the quality of rehabilitation works. Poor quality of work can cause decay in the channels and water can leak into the street causing pollution and flooding of land, etc. impacts in the groundwater etc. Therefore he proposed a careful project implementation and greater participation of the community in the rehabilitation works.

Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Leminot Scheme Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems 5

Mr Qilimi repeated his answer from before that was to Mr Merolli. The local government administration and the municipal authorities must work together to ensure that these specific homes are provided with septic tanks. This work should be timed to coincide with the works of the I&D scheme rehabilitation to limit the disruption caused. The ESMP, mitigation measures and monitoring program, is well focused on such issues, and respecting of it, is an obligation for construction firm. The local community should not only be employed in construction works, but the inhabitants should closely supervise the works and report any malfunction of works.

Mr Vaske Cinoku, Deputy Mayor of Devoll asked about the avoidance of adverse environmental phenomena. He proposed the participation of the community in supervision, by a local team. This team should participate also on preparation of environmental action plan by the reconstruction firm. He proposed the preparation of an agreement between the participants in the project and the local supervision team. Mr Cinoku was also supported in this question by Mrs Marinela Pere, Inspector in Maliq Municipality, Mr. Agim Zacellari, a Pensioner, Mr. Bashkim Mehmeti - Farmer, Mr. Alban Hoxhallari - Farmer etc.

Mr Qilimi said that local participation had already been discussed but he added that the ESMP (especially Table 4.1) provide many details on a mandatory arrangement with the Contractor in the Pre Construction phase following into the Construction phase, which outlines many plans that have to be provided. This includes the Traffic Management Plan, Waste Disposal Plan, various Method Statements for construction, etc. Mr Qilimi recommended that the lcoal administrative units must work together with the municipality and MARDWA to have agreement in their reqirements of the contractor.

Conclusions and closure The meeting was closed after all answers to the questions had been provided. The wrap up and meeting closure was made by the Deputy Mayor Mr. Vaske Cinoku , Mrs. Lida Xhuveli, irrigation specialist of MARDWA and Mr Qilimi CEIA-COWI expert. Mr Qilimi summarised that the questions were mainly concerning pollution and ensuring local participation in the supervision of the works.

The meeting ended at 12:30 hours

Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Leminot Scheme Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems 6

4 ANNEXES

4.1 Annex 1 – Leminot I&D Scheme Particulars

4.1.1 Project Details The Leminot I&D scheme rehabilitation can be classified as a Category B project under World Bank because the impact on human population or environmentally important areas is less adverse than those of Category A projects. The general impacts associated with the works are temporary during the construction stage; few, if any, are irreversible and all are site specific. The project outcome and the adopted mitigation measures employed will actually benefit the area for the future. Under Albanian law the contents of the ESMP can be adopted as a Preliminary EIA document as the rehabilitation project falls under the list of project types within Appendix 2 of the Albanian EIA law.

The Leminot I&D infrastructure is one of the better schemes in terms of condition and this is probably because approximately 5km of the right branch main canal and 0.5 km of the left branch main canal were rehabilitated in 2010. However, for the rest of the main canal on both the right branch and left branch, significant rehabilitation is required to enable the scheme to function as designed. Therefore, the condition of the present downstream irrigation infrastructure imposes a partial constraint on the original, current and future use of part of the scheme. Around 250ha are currently irrigated from the original design of 450ha all by gravity

The 300 ha gravity fed command area (right branch) is a narrow belt with N-S alignment spreads along the lower slopes of the hills that bordered the Cereshnikuti stream valley. Southward, parallel with the stream, it intersects Sovjani and Novosele villages. Towards the north is located another 50 ha area (left branch) served by the gravity system located nearby the Shqitas village.

The condition of the Leminot dam is considered to be fair and does not currently constrain the supply of water to the irrigation scheme. A total of 12.7 km of main irrigation channel on the right branch and 2.2 km on the left branch is planned to be rehabilitated.

4.1.2 Proposed Works covered under World Bank funding The Updated Feasibility Study and more recently the Preliminary Design by JV Renardet et al provides details of the main rehabilitation works to be undertaken at the I&D scheme under review. After stakeholder consultation with JV Renardet et al) Leminot I&D scheme was chosen and confirmed by MARDWA. This work will rehabilitate the entire gravity fed system with a total command area of 450ha. Rehabilitation works comprise of the following key points:

 Periodic lining and reinforcement of canal right branch which totals12.7 km with replacement of 7 culverts, 4 pipe aqueduct crossing (4 siphons), 18 offtakes and 7 irrigation bridges.  Periodic lining and reinforcement of canal left branch which totals d2.2km with replacement of 2 aqueduct crossings, 4 offtakes and 1 irrigation bridge.  Lining of 1.7 km of minor secondary works of canals in the distribution network with a flow rate from 100 l/s  Reconstruction of the intake immediately downstream of the dam outlet with sluice valve 550 mm;  Reconstruction of the divider with two sluice gates 50x90cm  Construction, supply and settings of steel gates 60x60; 50x60; 40x40 and cross regulation gate on the right and left branches.  Construction supply and settings of culverts (Ø=80mm; Ø=100mm) pipe aqueducts crossing, and irrigation bridge on the right and left branches as mentioned above.  Construction of 4 long crested weirs (duckbills)

Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Leminot Scheme Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems 7

4.2 Annex 2 – Public Notices and Advertisements

Figure 4-1: Official MARDWA Letter to Panorama

Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Leminot Scheme Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems 8

Figure 4-2: Official MARDWA Letter to SOT news

Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Leminot Scheme Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems 9

Figure 4-3: Advert in SOT News and Panorama

Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Leminot Scheme Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems 10

Figure 4-4: MARDWA email to Panorama

Figure 4-5: MARDWA Email to SOT news

Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Leminot Scheme Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems 11

Figure 4-6: Public Announcement on MARDWA Website

Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Leminot Scheme Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems 12

Figure 4-7: Public Notice in Maliq Municipality

Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Leminot Scheme Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems 13

4.3 Annex 3 – List of Participants

List of Participants Leminot 24th May 2017

Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Leminot Scheme Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems 14

4.4 Annex 4 – Photos from the Meeting

Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Leminot Scheme Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems 15

4.5 Annex 5 - PowerPoint Presentation for the Public Hearing

Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Leminot Scheme Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems 16

REPUBLIC OF ALBANIA MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE, RURAL DEVELOPMENT AND WATER ADMINISTRATION WATER RESOURCES AND IRRIGATION PROJECT

REPORT ON PUBLIC DISCLOSURE PROCESS FOR XARRA I&D SCHEME

June 2017

CEIA

REPUBLIC OF ALBANIA MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE, RURAL DEVELOPMENT AND WATER ADMINISTRATION WATER RESOURCES AND IRRIGATION PROJECT

PREPARATION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT PLANS (ESMPS) AND RESETTLEMENT ACTIONS PLANS (RAPS) FOR THE REHABILITATION OF IRRIGATION SCHEMES/SYSTEMS

PROJECT ID NO: P121186 – RFP NO: MAFCP/CS/007 – LOAN NO. 8211 - AL

REPORT ON PUBLIC DISCLOSURE PROCESS FOR XARRA I&D SCHEME June 2017

PROJECT NO. A079377

DOCUMENT NO. 1

VERSION 3

DATE OF ISSUE June 2017

PREPARED Bardhyl Qilimi/David Heywood

CHECKED Roar Solland/Spartak Sinojmeri

APPROVED RSS Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Xarra Scheme Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems i

Table of Contents Page No

1 INTRODUCTION ...... 1 1.1 Background ...... 1 1.2 Xarra Scheme ...... 1

2 OBJECTIVE OF PUBLIC HEARING ...... 1

3 PUBLIC HEARING ...... 2 3.1 Implementation Procedure ...... 2 3.2 Agenda for the Meeting ...... 2 3.3 Meeting Participation ...... 3 3.4 Minutes of the Meeting ...... 3

4 ANNEXES ...... 6 4.1 Annex 1 – Xarra I&D Scheme Particulars ...... 6 4.2 Annex 2 – Public Notices and Advertisements ...... 8 4.3 Annex 3 – List of Participants ...... 14 4.4 Annex 4 – Photos from the Meeting ...... 15 4.5 Annex 5 ‐ PowerPoint Presentation for the Public Hearing ...... 16

List of Figures Page No Figure 4‐1: Satellite image of the Xarra I&D scheme) ...... 6 Figure 4‐2: Official MARDWA Letter to Panorama ...... 8 Figure 4‐3: Official MARDWA Letter to SOT news ...... 9 Figure 4‐4: Advert in SOT News and Panorama ...... 10 Figure 4‐5: MARDWA email to Panorama ...... 11 Figure 4‐6: MARDWA Email to SOT news ...... 11 Figure 4‐7: Public Announcement on MARDWA Website ...... 12 Figure 4‐8: Public Notice in Konispol Municipality ...... 13 Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Xarra Scheme Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems 1

1 INTRODUCTION

The overall development objective for WRIP is to increase the area under improved irrigation and drainage and in so doing, to establish the institutional basis for improved IWRM.

Implementation of the public hearing to discuss the Environmental Management Plan (ESMP) was based on World Bank policies (OP 4.12) and the incumbent environmental Albanian legislation.

The principle document of reference to enable to Consultant to prepare the Public Hearing Report for Xarra I&D scheme are the following:

1.2 Xarra Scheme The Mursi and Janjari reservoirs and related irrigation scheme, are part of the Xarra Administrative Unit, under Municipality of Saranda County. Xarra scheme is part of general irrigation scheme which takes water from the above mentioned reservoirs. Currently, the low priority scheme when rehabilitated will provide irrigation to 2,500 ha of agricultural land. A summary of the proposed works including a plan of the I&D scheme (Figure 4-1) is shown in Annex 1.

The objective of the public hearing in this instance is to inform the public about the findings presented in the environmental and social management plan (ESMP) of Xarra scheme. This was prepared by CWI/CEIA during 2016 and 2017.

1 The detailed design for Xarra is yet to be prepared Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Xarra Scheme Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems 2

3 PUBLIC HEARING

For the organization of the public hearing, announcements were initially made during the first week in May 2017 in the municipal authority of Konsipol in the Administrative Units of Xarra. On May 22 the announcement was made in the Albanian newspapers Panorama and Sot News.

On May 29, 2017 in municipal building and notice boards in Konsipol Municipality was placed announcements informing the public for the purpose of the forthcoming public meeting on 31st May at the Meeting Hall in Mursi village of Konsipol Municipality at 11:00 hours

 The MARDWA sent official letters (Figure 4-2 and Figure 4-3) to two newspapers namely "Panorama" and "SOT" new on 17th May 2017 – 14 days before date of public hearing ,  Emails were also sent to these same newspapers on 22nd May 2017 –9 days before the date of public hearing (Figure 4-5 and Figure 4-6).  Newspaper advert placed in "SOT" news and "Panorama" (Figure 4-4 )  On the MARDWA website from 6th May – 25 days before date of public hearing (Figure 4-7).  In notices placed on Municipal notices boards (Figure 4-8 ) 2 days before the date of the public hearing.

3.2 Agenda for the Meeting The agenda provided by Konsipol Administration for the meeting was as follows:

1. Opening of the meeting by Mrs. Athina Pando, Administrator of Xarra 2. Introduction of main meeting participants 3. Presentations - Mrs. Elida Xhuveli, Specialist of Irrigation, MARDWA, presents the Irrigation Scheme with gravity (2500Ha)

- Mr. Bardhyl Qilimi, Consultant (COWI, CEIA) presents a summary of the ESMP's of Xarra scheme Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Xarra Scheme Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems 3

4. Open discussion with members of the Public 5. Closure

3.3 Meeting Participation The participants that attended the meeting were asked to record their name, their position and contact number. The meeting was attended by more than 20 participants. Details of the participation list are contained in Annex 3 to this report. Photos from the meeting are included in Annex 4.

The meeting had a broad spectrum of different people in attendance, including the following:

 Administrator of Xarra, Mrs. Athina Pando and part of her administrative staff  Mr. Luan Bregu, Director of irrigation and drainage, MARDWA  Mr Tomi Decolli Chief of Monitoring and Administration sector MARDWA  Mrs. Elida Xhuveli, Specialist of Irrigation, MARDWA  Dhaqir Xhumari, Specialist of irrigation and drainage MARDWA  Consultant from ESMP - Mr Bardhyl Qilimi,  Mrs. Entela Hysa, Drainage Board, Saranda sector  Foto Kote, Agronomist, Agriculture directory, Konispol Municipality  Farmers from the Xarra scheme  Members of civil society

3.4 Minutes of the Meeting Venue: Hall in Mursi village part of Xarra Administrative Unit Date: 31st May 2017 Start Time: 11:00 -12:30 hours Organiser: Konsipol Municipality with support from MARDWA

Background and Introductions The announcement for public hearing was made by MARDWA and Konsipol Municipality with the publication of notices on main public buildings in Mursi Village Hall.

The meeting was opened by Administrator of Xarra (Xarra Administration Unit), Mrs. Athina Pando, who noted the importance of reconstruction of irrigation schemes for rural area of Konsipol Municipality, and the impact on social and economic life of farmers. She noted also that the rehabilitation works should not cause environmental and social problems.

Mrs. Elida Xhuveli, specialist of irrigation in MARDWA, informed the participants at the meeting on the extension of Xarra scheme to be rehabilitated and the future development of other schemes. Mrs Xhuveli provided the meeting attendees with information on the WRIP and discussed the most important assumptions of the Project in relation to irrigation and drainage taking into consideration the main design assumptions from the preliminary design

Mr. Bardhyl Qilimi presented the Environmental and Social Management Plan of Xarra scheme focusing mainly on the positive and negative impacts on the environment, the procedures for resettlement if it will be necessary during the implementation of rehabilitation works etc. Mr Qilimi provided some information on the essence of the ESMP, presented the document’s structure and characterized contents of particular chapters of the ESMP. Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Xarra Scheme Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems 4

Mr Qilimi then discussed the role of the ESMP within the framework of a contract for construction works on the stage of the bidding procedure and during performance of the works.

Mr Qilimi presented the goal and objectives of the meeting and a summary of the ESMP for Xarra scheme. He explained to the participants the important of their input and feedback regarding issues that can be generated by the project development from environmental point of view (health and accidental risks, issues for infrastructure damage, or barrier to existing access roads etc., pollution and contamination, social issues, giving the right importance to the gender, employment and needs for training.

The Chairman Mrs Pando then opened the meeting for discussion. She asked the participants, if they were familiar with the Summarized ESMP report, especially with the chapter of the Management Plan, with its mitigation measures and monitoring program. After all of the participants declared that they have seen the document, she asked if they have any comment in principle. No principal comment were presented by attendees.

Matters Arising The chairman then encouraged the meeting attendees to ask questions. Those questions and the answers (shown in boxes) are reported below. The main issues raised were concerning the environmental impact and are summarised as follows:

Prior to opening the floor to others Mrs Pando as administrator for Xarra stated that she is responsible for solving any of the problems that may arise during the rehabilitation work of the scheme. She raised the concern of quality of rehabilitation work. The Administrator explained that the channel scheme is far from the inhabited area, so the risk of dust pollution is minimal. Mrs. Pando proposed that the technical project foresees the spillage of irrigation water to the sea as far as possible from the Butrint lagoon. Secondly, she proposed that the administrative unit be involved in the supervision of the works. Thirdly and finally she proposed the signing of an agreement with the construction firm for women's employment.

Mr Qilimi said that the ESMP contains important information on all kinds of pollution including air pollution (from dust). He directed the participants to Table 4.1 of the ESMP document which provides an exhaustive list of the various mitigation measures that can be used to prevent damage to the environment. Mr Qilimi mentioned the importance of the Butrint lagoon and said that monitoring of the water quality in the lagoon was very important especially regarding pesticides and fertilisers. He mentioned also that a Pesticide and Fertiliser Managment Plan should be adhered to which was included as an Annex in the ESMP document. Mr Qilimi added that the ESMP advocates more training in the proper use of fertiliser and pesticide and also the ESMP recommends an agreement between all the stakeholders in the safe use of pesticides and fertilisers.

Mr Qilimi said that the ESMP contains important information on recommending the employment of local labour and particularly women wherever possible during the construction and operational phases of the planned works . A priority of the WRIP project overall is to reduce unemployment in the rural areas and to prevent migration of people of working age, away from rural areas.

Mr. Foto Kote. Specialist of agriculture, Municipality Konispol raised the concern of throwing away the empty packages of chemical fertilizers after their use into the Pavlla River. This has caused damage to the fish population in the lower reaches of the Pavlla River. This area has a tradition in agriculture and there is a risk of excessive use of fertilizers. Also over use of pesticides and herbicides may cause pollution in the soil and agricultural crops during the irrigation process. He proposed drafting an agreement between the Agriculture Directorate and Farm- ers for the use of fertilizers and pesticides. Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Xarra Scheme Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems 5

Mr. Qilimi stated that this issue is out of the project framework. But, he suggest that the Municipality and Administrative Units, should provide a management plan for dangereous wastes, like packages of used pesticides etc. This plan should consider temporary disposal of them, transport and final disposal or destruction.

Mr Qilimi referred to his previous answer to Mrs Pando. The ESMP contained a detailed pesticide and fertiliser management plan which advocates specific and careful dosage of pesticides and indicates those that are not recommended in close proximity to an area of importance such as Butrint National Park area.

Mr. Dhimo Kote, Farmers association raised the concern of the employment of residents during the rehabilitation works of irrigation scheme. He also stressed that there is no risk of sewage pollution in area of irrigation schemes. He also demanded that compensation from the construction firm must be paid also if there is damage to land or agricultural crops. Mr. Kote proposed preparation of environmental action plan by reconstruction firm and also preparation of an agreement between the participants in the project

Mr Qilimi stated that local participation had already been discussed but he added that the ESMP (especially Table 4.1) provide many details on a mandatory arrangement with the Contractor in the Pre Construction phase following into the Construction phase, which outlines many plans that have to be provided. This includes the Traffic Management Plan, Waste Disposal Plan, various Method Statements for construction, etc. Mr Qilimi recommended that the local administrative units must work together with the municipality and MARDWA to have agreement in their reqirements of the contractor In additon, Mr Qilimi stated that the ARAP document contains the grievance procedure necessary for obtaining compensation by the contractor for damage to crops and to agricultural land.

Mr. Vasil Xhai, Farmer, raised the concern of quality control of rehabilitation works. He requested that the resident's representative to be part of the work control. Poor quality of work can cause decay of channels, the water can flow out onto the street causing pollution and flooding of land, etc., impacts in the groundwater etc. Therefore he proposed participation of the community in the supervision of the rehabilitation works. Mr Xhai was also supported by two farmers Mr. Kristi Mello and Mr.Miho Buzuqi and Mrs.Vasilika Cavo a Specialist.

Mr Qilimi stated that the ESMP (Chapters 4, 5, 6 and 7) provides details on monitoring and organisation. The works must be supervised and MARDWA together with local governement, that will oversee this process. Hence Mr Qilimi considered the involvement of the local community in supervision very important.

Conclusions and closure The meeting was closed after all answers to the questions had been provided. The wrap up and meeting closure was made by Mrs Pando, Mrs Elida Xhuveli Specialist of irrigation and drainage from MARDWA and Mr Qilimi CEIA-COWI expert. Mr Qilimi summarised that the questions were mainly concerning pollution and ensuring local participation in the supervision of the works as well as ensuring proper compensation to any affected persons.

The meeting ended at 12:30 hours

Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Xarra Scheme Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems 6

4 ANNEXES

4.1 Annex 1 – Xarra I&D Scheme Particulars

4.1.1 Project Details

The Janjari reservoir provides water to three I&D areas and Xarra is one of them, the Sorone and Konsipol valley are the other areas. The entire scheme was constructed in 1989, but never completed, and presently is totally out of order, while the upstream Janjari reservoir is functional, but with a difficult access. The main canal, coming downstream from the dam, has a length of 19 km. Along the course there is a short tunnel 600 m long and three close conduit steel syphons. The tunnel has never worked and is unclear if it is blocked from rock falls or is flowing away through other fissures. Please refer to Error! Reference source not found. which shows the overall I&D scheme and the proximity to the Butrint National Park.

Bufi command area (blue)

Xarra command area (red)

Figure 4-1: Satellite image of the Xarra I&D scheme)

The other irrigation water supply is from Mursi dam. Through the main outlet channel, this is irrigating about 1,500 ha. It has a feeding canal of 4.7 km from Pavlla River to the reservoir and two main irrigation canals of Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Xarra Scheme Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems 7

2.4 km and 4.8 km respectively. The 2.4 km branch of the main canal is the one that irrigates the agriculture land of Xarra commune. The feeding canal is not lined with concrete and therefore water is lost into the ground. There is presently no land being irrigated from the Mursi dam. Consequently, 520ha are now irrigated from the original design area of 2,000ha.

It is also important to highlight that during the summer season the reservoir has deficiency of water because the main source of water for this reservoir is Pavlla River and is characterized by low flow rates. The old pumping station is located near Pavlla River and had a pumping capacity of about 160 l/s.

The maximum water release from the reservoir is 2.6 m3/sec and Bufi branch receives about 0.7 m3/sec. The complete I&D system from Janjari reservoir is in poor conditions and has urgent need for rehabilitation. As mentioned previously, the Mursi reservoir has a capacity of 4.5 Mm³ that is not sufficient to satisfy completely the irrigation needs during the dry season.

4.1.2 Proposed Works covered under World Bank funding The Feasibility Study and more recently the Preliminary Design by JV Renardet et al provides details of the main rehabilitation works to be undertaken at the I&D scheme under review. After stakeholder consultation (with JV Renardet et al) Xarra I&D scheme was chosen and confirmed by MARDWA. This work will rehabilitate the entire original scheme of 3000 ha (2,500ha for Xarra and 500 ha for Bufi).

Rehabilitation works comprise of the following key points:

 Taking water directly from Janjari Reservoir and to discharge into Pavlla River upstream  Land Acquisition (state owned land only)  Diversion weir and intake work on Pavlla River;  A 4.7km feeder canal with concrete lining;  The rebuild of Bufi pumping station;  Laying of 120m of steel rising main pipe DN450 and header manhole;  Lining of 12.1kms of the Bufi canal and 5 main offtakes  Lining of 429kms of primary and secondary Xarra irrigation canals (F1 3,433m, F2 2,447m, F3 9,281m, 4 13,012m, F5 6,872m, F6 1,492m, F7 1,116m and F8 5,220m);  Construction of 5 long crested weirs (Duckbills)  Construction of 120 delivery sluice gates.

Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Xarra Scheme Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems 8

4.2 Annex 2 – Public Notices and Advertisements

Figure 4-2: Official MARDWA Letter to Panorama

Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Xarra Scheme Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems 9

Figure 4-3: Official MARDWA Letter to SOT news

Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Xarra Scheme Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems 10

Figure 4-4: Advert in SOT News and Panorama

Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Xarra Scheme Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems 11

Figure 4-5: MARDWA email to Panorama

Figure 4-6: MARDWA Email to SOT news

Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Xarra Scheme Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems 12

Figure 4-7: Public Announcement on MARDWA Website

Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Xarra Scheme Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems 13

Figure 4-8: Public Notice in Konispol Municipality

Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Xarra Scheme Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems 14

4.3 Annex 3 – List of Participants

List of Participants for Xarra Scheme - Konispol-26th May 2017

Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Xarra Scheme Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems 15

4.4 Annex 4 – Photos from the Meeting

Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Xarra Scheme Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems 16

4.5 Annex 5 - PowerPoint Presentation for the Public Hearing

Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Xarra Scheme Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems 17

REPUBLIC OF ALBANIA MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE, RURAL DEVELOPMENT AND WATER ADMINISTRATION WATER RESOURCES AND IRRIGATION PROJECT

REPORT ON PUBLIC DISCLOSURE PROCESS FOR SLANICA I&D SCHEME

June 2017

CEIA

REPUBLIC OF ALBANIA MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE, RURAL DEVELOPMENT AND WATER ADMINISTRATION WATER RESOURCES AND IRRIGATION PROJECT

PREPARATION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT PLANS (ESMPS) AND RESETTLEMENT ACTIONS PLANS (RAPS) FOR THE REHABILITATION OF IRRIGATION SCHEMES/SYSTEMS

PROJECT ID NO: P121186 – RFP NO: MAFCP/CS/007 – LOAN NO. 8211 - AL

REPORT ON PUBLIC DISCLOSURE PROCESS FOR SLANICA I&D SCHEME June 2017

PROJECT NO. A079377

DOCUMENT NO. 1

VERSION 3

DATE OF ISSUE June 2017

PREPARED Bardhyl Qilimi/ David Heywood

CHECKED Roar Solland/Spartak Sinojmeri

APPROVED RSS Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Slanica Scheme Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems i

Table of Contents Page No

1 INTRODUCTION ...... 1 1.1 Background ...... 1 1.2 Murriz Thana Scheme – Cukas and Lushnje Low Priority Branches ...... 1

2 OBJECTIVE OF PUBLIC HEARING ...... 1

3 PUBLIC HEARING ...... 2 3.1 Implementation Procedure ...... 2 3.2 Agenda for the Meeting ...... 2 3.3 Meeting Participation ...... 3 3.4 Minutes of the Meeting ...... 3

4 ANNEXES ...... 6 4.1 Annex 1 – Murriz Thana I&D Scheme Particulars ...... 6 4.2 Annex 2 – Public Notices and Advertisements ...... 7 4.3 Annex 3 – List of Participants ...... 13 4.4 Annex 4 – Photos from the Meeting ...... 14 4.5 Annex 5 ‐ PowerPoint Presentation for the Public Hearing ...... 16

List of Figures Page No Figure 4‐1: Official MARDWA Letter to Panorama ...... 7 Figure 4‐2: Official MARDWA Letter to SOT news ...... 8 Figure 4‐3: Advert in SOT News and Panorama ...... 9 Figure 4‐4: MARDWA email to Panorama ...... 10 Figure 4‐5: MARDWA Email to SOT news ...... 10 Figure 4‐6: Public Announcement on MARDWA Website ...... 11 Figure 4‐7: Public Notice in Ura Vajgurore Municipality ...... 12 Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Slanica Scheme Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems 1

1 INTRODUCTION

The overall development objective for WRIP is to increase the area under improved irrigation and drainage and in so doing, to establish the institutional basis for improved IWRM.

Implementation of the public hearing to discuss the Environmental Management Plan (ESMP) was based on World Bank policies (OP 4.12) and the incumbent environmental Albanian legislation.

The principle document of reference to enable to Consultant to prepare the Public Hearing Report for Slanica I&D scheme are the following:

1.2 Slanica Scheme The Cukalat is part of Ura Vajgurore municipality and Berat County. The low priority Slanica I&D scheme takes water from the reservoir of Slanica. The Slanica reservoir is the main source of water supply for the irrigation scheme, and works are completed in 2016. Currently, the low priority scheme when rehabilitated will provide irrigation to 260 ha of agricultural land all by gravity. A summary of the proposed works is shown in Annex 1.

The objective of the public hearing in this instance is to inform the public about the findings presented in the environmental and social management plan (ESMP) of Slanica scheme. This was prepared by CWI/CEIA during 2016 and 2017.

1 The detailed design for Slanica is yet to be prepared Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Slanica Scheme Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems 2

3 PUBLIC HEARING

For the organization of the public hearing, announcements were initially made during the first week in May 2017 in the municipal authority of Ura Vajgurore and specifically in the Administrative Unit of Cukalat. On May 22 the announcement was made in the Albanian newspapers Panorama and Sot News.

On May 24, 2017 in municipal building and notice boards in Ura Vajgurore Municipality was placed announcements informing the public for the purpose of the forthcoming public meeting on 26th May at the Meeting Hall in Donofrosa village, part of Cukalat administrative unit at 11:00 hours

 The MARDWA sent official letters (Figure 4-1 and Figure 4-2) to two newspapers namely "Panorama" and "SOT" new on 17th May 2017 – 9 days before date of public hearing ,  Emails were also sent to these same newspapers on 22nd May 2017 – 4 days before the date of public hearing (Figure 4-4 and Figure 4-5).  Newspaper advert placed in "SOT" news and "Panorama"(Figure 4-3 )  On the MARDWA website from 6th May – 20 days before date of public hearing (Figure 4-6).  In notices placed on Municipal notices boards (Figure 4-7 ) 7 days before the date of the public hearing.

3.2 Agenda for the Meeting The agenda provided by Ura Vajgurore Administration for the meeting was as follows:

1. Opening of the meeting by Mr. Shpetim Vrapi Deputy Mayor 2. Introduction of main meeting participants 3. Presentations - Mr. Luan Bregu, Director of Irrigation and Drainage, MARDWA, presents the Irrigation Scheme with gravity (260 Ha)

- Mr. Bardhyl Qilimi, Consultant (COWI, CEIA) presents a summary of the ESMP's of Slanica scheme Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Slanica Scheme Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems 3

4. Open discussion with members of the Public 5. Closure

3.3 Meeting Participation The participants that attended the meeting were asked to record their name, their position and contact number. The meeting was well attended by more than 46 participants. Details of the participation list are contained in Annex 3 to this report. Photos from the meeting are included in Annex 4.

The meeting had a broad spectrum of different people in attendance, including the following:

 Deputy Mayor, Mr. Shpetim Vrapi and part of municipality staff  Mr Luan Bregu, Director of irrigation and drainage MARDWA  Mr Tomi Decolli, Chief of Monitoring and Administration sector MARDWA  Mr Bardhyl Qilimi, Consultant from ESMP -  Mr. Qani Zeqo Chief of the Administrative unit, Slanica  Mrs Fatime Plaku, Director of Agriculture, Municipality Ura Vajgurore  Farmers from Slanica I&D Scheme  Members of civil society

3.4 Minutes of the Meeting Venue: Hall at Donofrosa village, part of Administrative Unit of Cukalat Date: 26th May 2017 Start Time: 11:00 -12:30 hours Organiser: Ura Vajgurore Municipality with support from MARDWA

Background and Introductions The announcement for public hearing was made by MARDWA and Ura Vajgurore Municipality with the publication of notices on main public buildings in Ura Vajgurore Municipality.

The meeting was opened by co chairman - Deputy Mayor of Ura Vajgurore, Mr. Shpetim Vrapi, who noted the importance of reconstruction of irrigation schemes for rural area of Ura Vajgurore Municipality, and the impact on social and economic life of farmers. He noted also that the rehabilitation works should not cause environmental and social problems.

Mr. Luan Bregu, Irrigation and Drainage Director in MARDWA, informed the participants at the meeting on the extension of the Slanica I&D scheme to be rehabilitated and the future development of other schemes. Mr Bregu provided the meeting attendees with information on the WRIP and discussed the most important assumptions of the Project in relation to irrigation and drainage taking into consideration the main design assumptions from the preliminary design

Mr. Bardhyl Qilimi presented the Environmental and Social Management Plan of Slanica Scheme, focusing mainly on the positive and negative impacts on the environment, the procedures for resettlement if it will be necessary during the implementation of rehabilitation works etc. Mr Qilimi provided some information on the essence of the ESMP, presented the document’s structure and characterized contents of particular chapters of the ESMP. Mr Qilimi then discussed the role of the ESMP within the framework of a contract for construction works on the stage of the bidding procedure and during performance of the works. Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Slanica Scheme Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems 4

Mr Qilimi presented the goal and objectives of the meeting and a summary of the ESMP for Slanica irrigation scheme. He explained to the participants the important of their input and feedback regarding issues that can be generated by the project development from environmental point of view (health and accidental risks, issues for infrastructure damage, or barrier to existing access roads etc., pollution and contamination, social issues, giving the right importance to the gender, employment and needs for training.

The Chairman Mr Vrapi then opened the meeting for discussion. He asked if the participants were familiar with the summarized ESMP, delivered by the MARDWA and Consultant three weeks ago in early May before in the Donofros village, Cukalat and Ura Vajgurore Administrative Units. After most of the participants declared that they were familiar with summarized ESMP, he asked if there had been any letters received from members of the public or any stakeholders related to the proposed rehabilitation of the I&D scheme. He was informed that no letters were received.

Mr. Qani Zeqo, the Administrator from the administrative unit of Cukalat said that he is responsible for solving any problems that may arise during the rehabilitation work of the scheme. He raised the concern of quality of rehabilitation work, because in the past construction firms did not work well. He explained that the irrigation channel for the scheme is far from the inhabited area, so the risk of pollution is minimal. Despite this Mr. Zeqo proposes that enforcement measures for the construction works are undertaken to preserve the existing infrastructure. He also advocates that the administrative unit be involved in the supervision of the works.

Mr Qilimi said that local participation is encouraged in the ESMP (see Table 4.1) which provide many details on a mandatory arrangement with the Contractor in the Pre Construction phase following into the Construction phase, which outlines many plans that have to be provided. This includes the Traffic Management Plan, Waste Disposal Plan, various Method Statements for construction, etc. Mr Qilimi recommended that the local administrative unit must work together with the municipality and MARDWA to have agreement in their reqirements of the contractor.

Mrs. Fatime Plaku. Director of Agriculture, Municipality Ura Vajgurore raised the concern of use of chemical fertilizers. This area has tradition in agriculture and there is a risk of excessive use of fertilizers. Consequently, causing pollution in the soil and agricultural crops during the irrigation process. She proposed drafting an agreement between the Agriculture Directorate and Farmers for the use of fertilizers and pesticides.

Mrs. Plaku also proposed the signing of an agreement with the construction firm for women's employment

Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Slanica Scheme Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems 5

Mr Qilimi said that the ESMP contains important information on recommending the employment of local labour and particularly women wherever possible during the construction and operation phases . A priority of the WRIP project overall is to reduce the amount of unemployment in the rural areas and to prevent migration of people of working age away from rural areas.

Mr. Rasim Hoxha, Reeve of Cukalat raised the concern of the employment of residents during the rehabilitation works of irrigation scheme. He also stressed that there is no risk of pollution from sewers in Cucalat. He also demanded compensation if the construction firm damaged land or agricultural crops.

Mr Qilimi repeated his answer that the ESMP contains important recommendations to prioritise the employment of local people in the rehabilitaiton works. Mr Qilimi stated that the ARAP document contains the grievance procedure necessary for obtaining compensation by the contractor for damage to crops and to agricultural land.

Mr. Haxhi Oshafi, farmer and Chief of the Water User Organization raised concern and conflicts between the fishermen and irrigation water users and of quality control of rehabilitation works. The fishermen wish to main- tain the lower level of reservoir waters, to make fishing easier, in the meantime the farmers need a larger amount of water available during the irrigation period during the summer months He requested also that the administrative unit to be part of the work control. Poor quality of work can cause decay to channels, the water flowing out in the street, causing pollution and flooding of land, etc. impacts in the groundwater etc. Therefore, he proposed participation of the community in the supervision of the rehabilitation works.

Mr Qilimi clarify, that a signed agreement is proposed for all stakeholders on irrigation water use and irrigation reservoir management. He also stated that the ESMP (Chapters 5, 6 and 7) provide details on monitoring and organisation. The works must be supervised and MARDWA together with local governemnt will oversee this process. Hence Mr Qilimi considered the involvement of the local community in supervision very important.

Mr Shpetim Vrapi. Deputy Mayor of Ura Vajgurore asked about the avoidance of adverse environmental phenomena. He proposed also, the participation of a local team supervision on rehabilitation works. Mr. Vrapi was also supported in this question by three farmers Mr. Agur Sulko, Mr. Ervin Bendaj and Mr. Vasil Hoxha.

Mr Qilimi stated that local participation had already been discussed but he added that the ESMP (especially Table 4.1) provide many details on a mandatory arrangement with the Contractor in the Pre Construction phase, Construction Phase and the Operation Phase Mr Qilimi recommended that the local administrative units must work together with the municipality and MARDWA to have agreement in their reqirements of the contractor.

Conclusions and closure The meeting was closed after all answers to the questions had been provided. The wrap up and meeting closure was made by the Deputy Mayor Mr Vrapi, Mr Luan Bregu, Director of Irrigation and Drainage of MARDWA and Mr Qilimi CEIA-COWI expert. Mr Qilimi summarised that the questions were mainly concerning pollution and ensuring local participation in the supervision of the works as well as ensuring proper compensation to any affected persons.

The meeting ended at 12:30 hours

Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Slanica Scheme Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems 6

4 ANNEXES

4.1 Annex 1 – Slanica I&D Scheme Particulars

4.1.1 Project Details Slanica dam, and reservoir are located in Kutalli commune in Berat District while the I&D scheme is mainly located in Cukulat commune. The dam and resulting reservoir cover an area of about 8 ha, with a storage volume of 0.8 Mm³. The earth fill dam was constructed in 1976 across the Donofosi River at an elevation of 150 m.a.s.l. The catchment area of Slanica is about 3.52 km2 and there is no supplementary feeder canal providing other water supply to this reservoir. The original command area design had an extension of 300 ha: 260 ha is gravity fed and 40 ha is fed by a pumping station.

The Slanica I&D main canal originates from the dam outlet, where two sluice valves are located. The main canal then runs for 1.5 km along the right bank of the river up to a divider where two secondary canals originate.

The first goes along the right bank for 2.5 km and the second, crossing the river through a siphon, and feeds the canal on the left bank (4.5 km) and also the pump station. This pump station conveys water to an upper canal (for a length of 2 km) dividing in two small branches. Another small canal starts from the outlet of the dam and runs for 1 km along the left side of the valley

4.1.2 Proposed Works covered under World Bank funding The Updated Feasibility Study and the more recent Preliminary Design by JV Renardet et al provides details of the main rehabilitation works to be undertaken at the I&D scheme under review. After stakeholder consultation with JV Renardet et al Slanica I&D scheme was chosen and confirmed by MARDWA.

This work will rehabilitate the gravity fed system with a total command area of 260ha and the 40ha pumped section. The rehabilitation works comprise of the following key points:

 Lining and reinforcement of 9.5 km of main and secondary canals with designed flows of between 50 to 300 l/s. The trapezoidal sections and slope of 1/1. The canal sections are, width 0.3m by 0.3 m high (for 1.8kms), 0.5m wide by 0.4m high (for 6.1km), 0.50 m wide and 0.6 m high (1.6km) Main damage is in parts U1 0-2.4kms and U2 0 – 0.5km.  Construction of 95 offtakes 40x50cm  Construction of 1 inspection manhole  Construction of the intake immediately downstream of the dam outlet  Replacement of Dronfosi siphon (a length of 300 m) connecting the left branch canal, with a DN400 mm steel pipe, protected with a deep concrete sill crossing the riverbed.  Construction of a pumping station (100 m² in area) with 100 l/sec flow rate 40m head and 60kW pump, surrounded by 150 metres of fencing and with 2 inspection manholes.  A wash out manhole for periodic pipe cleanings of the silt deposits will be located close to the river bank; and  Replacement of control and delivery gates and other facilities.  Construction of 7 long crested weirs (duckbills)

Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Slanica Scheme Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems 7

4.2 Annex 2 – Public Notices and Advertisements

Figure 4-1: Official MARDWA Letter to Panorama

Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Slanica Scheme Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems 8

Figure 4-2: Official MARDWA Letter to SOT news

Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Slanica Scheme Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems 9

Figure 4-3: Advert in SOT News and Panorama

Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Slanica Scheme Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems 10

Figure 4-4: MARDWA email to Panorama

Figure 4-5: MARDWA Email to SOT news

Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Slanica Scheme Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems 11

Figure 4-6: Public Announcement on MARDWA Website

Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Slanica Scheme Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems 12

Figure 4-7: Public Notice in Ura Vajgurore Municipality

Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Slanica Scheme Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems 13

4.3 Annex 3 – List of Participants

List of Participants for Slanica Scheme - Ura Vajgurore -26th May 2017

Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Slanica Scheme Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems 14

4.4 Annex 4 – Photos from the Meeting

Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Slanica Scheme Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems 15

Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Slanica Scheme Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems 16

4.5 Annex 5 - PowerPoint Presentation for the Public Hearing

Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Slanica Scheme Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems 17

REPUBLIC OF ALBANIA MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE, RURAL DEVELOPMENT AND WATER ADMINISTRATION WATER RESOURCES AND IRRIGATION PROJECT

REPORT ON PUBLIC DISCLOSURE PROCESS FOR I&D SCHEMES - TREGTAN 2 AND 3 AND VRANISHT 2

June 2017

CEIA

REPUBLIC OF ALBANIA MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE, RURAL DEVELOPMENT AND WATER ADMINISTRATION WATER RESOURCES AND IRRIGATION PROJECT

PREPARATION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT PLANS (ESMPS) AND RESETTLEMENT ACTIONS PLANS (RAPS) FOR THE REHABILITATION OF IRRIGATION SCHEMES/SYSTEMS

PROJECT ID NO: P121186 – RFP NO: MAFCP/CS/007 – LOAN NO. 8211 - AL

REPORT ON PUBLIC DISCLOSURE PROCESS FOR I&D SCHEMES - TREGTAN 2 AND 3 AND VRANISHT 2

June 2017

PROJECT NO. A079377

DOCUMENT NO. 1

VERSION 3

DATE OF ISSUE June 2017

PREPARED Bardhyl Qilimi/ David Heywood

CHECKED Roar Solland/Spartak Sinojmeri

APPROVED RSS Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Tregtan 2 and 3 and Vranisht 2 Schemes Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems i

Table of Contents Page No

1 INTRODUCTION ...... 1 1.1 Background ...... 1 1.2 Tregtan 2 Tregtan 3 and Vranisht 2 I&D Schemes ...... 1

2 OBJECTIVE OF PUBLIC HEARING ...... 1

3 PUBLIC HEARING ...... 2 3.1 Implementation Procedure ...... 2 3.2 Agenda for the Meeting ...... 2 3.3 Meeting Participation ...... 3 3.4 Minutes of the Meeting ...... 3

4 ANNEXES ...... 6 4.1 Annex 1 – Tregtan 2, Tregtan 3 and Vranisht 2 Scheme Particulars ...... 6 4.2 Annex 2 – Public Notices and Advertisements ...... 9 4.3 Annex 3 – List of Participants ...... 15 4.4 Annex 4 – Photos from the Meeting ...... 16 4.5 Annex 5 ‐ PowerPoint Presentation for the Public Hearing ...... 17

List of Figures Page No Figure 4‐1: Official MARDWA Letter to Panorama ...... 9 Figure 4‐2: Official MARDWA Letter to SOT news ...... 10 Figure 4‐3: Advert in SOT News and Panorama ...... 11 Figure 4‐4: MARDWA email to Panorama ...... 12 Figure 4‐5: MARDWA Email to SOT news ...... 12 Figure 4‐6: Public Announcement on MARDWA Website ...... 13 Figure 4‐7: Public Notices in Has Municipality – Fajze Adminitrative Unit ...... 14 Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Tregtan 2 and 3 and Vranisht 2 Schemes Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems 1

1 INTRODUCTION

The overall development objective for WRIP is to increase the area under improved irrigation and drainage and in so doing, to establish the institutional basis for improved IWRM.

Implementation of the public hearing to discuss the Environmental Management Plan (ESMP) was based on World Bank policies (OP 4.12) and the incumbent environmental Albanian legislation.

The principle document of reference to enable to Consultant to prepare the Public Hearing Report for Tregtan 2, Tregtan 3 and Vranisht 2 I&D schemes are the following:

1. The Updated Feasibility Study Report for the three respective schemes prepared by the Consultant - Joint Venture Renardet – Beta Studio – Hydrowater-Albania (Renardet et al)1 2. The Environmental and Social Management Plan (ESMP) Report and the Abbreviated Resettlement Action Plan (ARAP) for the three respective schemes prepared by the Consultant COWI-CEIA

1.2 Tregtan 2 Tregtan 3 and Vranisht 2 I&D Schemes The Administrative unit of Fajza, is part of the Has Municipality of Kukes County.

The low priority Tregtan 2, Tregtan 3 and Vranisht 2 I&D schemes take water from the reservoirs with the same names. Works on the rehabilitation of the Tregtan 2, Tregtan 3 and Vranisht 2 reservoirs which are the main sources of water supply for the irrigation schemes; were completed in 2016. The planned rehabilitation works for the irrigation works have already commenced in late 2016 and are scheduled for completion in 2017.

A summary of the proposed works including a plan of the I&D scheme is shown in Annex 1.

The objective of the public hearing in this instance is to inform the public about the findings presented in the environmental and social management plan (ESMP) of Tregtan 2, Tregtan 3 and Vranisht 2 I&D schemes. Due to the remoteness, the close proximity of the three schemes and the general irrigated areas (15 ha is one instance) it was decided to only have a single public hearing to cover the three schemes. The ESMPs which are individual reports were prepared by COWI/CEIA during 2016 and 2017.

1 The detailed design for Tregtan 2, Tregtan 3 and Vranisht 2 irrigation schemes are yet to be prepared Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Tregtan 2 and 3 and Vranisht 2 Schemes Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems 2

3 PUBLIC HEARING

For the organization of the public hearing, announcements were initially made during the first week in May 2017 in the municipal authority of Has and specifically in the Administrative Unit of Fajza. On May 19th and 20th the announcement was made in the Albanian newspapers Panorama and Sot News.

On May 20th, 2017 in municipal building and notice boards in Has Municipality was placed announcements informing the public for the purpose of the forthcoming public meeting on 22nd May at the Meeting Hall in Has Municipality at 11:00 hours

 The MARDWA sent official letters (Figure 4-1 and Figure 4-2) to two newspapers namely "Panorama" and "SOT" new on 17th May 2017 – 3 days before date of public hearing ,  Emails were also sent to these same newspapers on 19 May 2017 – 3 days before the date of public hearing (Figure 4-4 and Figure 4-5).  Newspaper advert placed in "SOT" news and "Panorama" (Figure 4-3 )  On the MARDWA website from 6th May – 16 days before date of public hearing (Figure 4-6).  In notices placed on Municipal notices boards (Figure 4-7) 2 days before the date of the public hearing.

3.2 Agenda for the Meeting The agenda provided by Lushnje Administration for the meeting was as follows:

1. Opening of the meeting by Mr Adem Lala Mayor of Has Municipality 2. Introduction of main meeting participants 3. Presentations Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Tregtan 2 and 3 and Vranisht 2 Schemes Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems 3

- Mr. Tomi Decolli Chief of monitoring and administration sector, MARDWA, presented a summary of the Irrigation Schemes for Tregtan 2, Tregtan 3 and Vranisht 2 - Mr. Bardhyl Qilimi, Consultant (COWI, CEIA) presents a summary of the ESMP's for Tregtan 2, Tregtan 3 and Vranisht 2 4. Open discussion with members of the Public 5. Closure

The meeting had a broad spectrum of different people in attendance, including the following:

 Mr Adem Lala, Mayor and his municipal staff  Chief of Monitoring and Administration sector MARDWA Mr Tomi Decolli  Consultant from ESMP - Mr Bardhyl Qilimi,  Mr Arben Dodaj, Director and specialists of Drainage Board of Lezha  Mr Halit Mulaj, Responsible of drainage board, Kukes Sector  Farmers from the Tregtan 2, Tregtan 3 and Vranisht 2 I&D schemes  Members of civil society

3.4 Minutes of the Meeting Venue: Meeting Hall of Has Municipality Date: 22nd May 2017 Start Time: 11:00 -12:30 hours Organiser: Has Municipality with support from MARDWA

Background and Introductions The announcement for public hearing was made by MARDWA and Has Municipality with the publication of notices on main public buildings in Has Municipality.

The meeting was opened by the Chairman Mr Adem Lala Mayor of Has who noted the importance of reconstruction of irrigation schemes for rural area of Has Municipality, and the impact on social and economic life of farmers. He noted also that the rehabilitation works should not cause environmental and social problems.

Mr. Tomi Decolli, Chef of monitoring and administration sector in MARDWA, informed the participants at the meeting on the improvements to the schemes Tregtan 2, Tregtan 3 and Vranisht 2 to be rehabilitated. Mr Decolli provided the meeting attendees with information on the WRIP and discussed the most important assumptions of the Project in relation to irrigation and drainage taking into consideration the main design assumptions from the preliminary design

Mr. Bardhyl Qilimi presented the Environmental and Social Management Plan for Tregtan 2, Tregtan 3 and Vranisht 2 focusing mainly on the positive and negative impacts on the environment, the procedures for resettlement if it will be necessary during the implementation of rehabilitation works etc. Mr Qilimi provided some information on the essence of the ESMP, presented the document’s structure and characterized contents of particular chapters of the ESMP. Mr Qilimi then discussed the role of the ESMP within the framework of a contract for construction works on the stage of the bidding procedure and during performance of the works. Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Tregtan 2 and 3 and Vranisht 2 Schemes Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems 4

Mr Qilimi presented the goal and objectives of the meeting and a summary of the ESMP for Tregtan 2, Treg- tan 3 and Vranisht 2 irrigation schemes. He explained to the participants the important of their input and feedback regarding issues that can be generated by the project development from environmental point of view (health and accidental risks, issues for infrastructure damage, or barrier to existing access roads etc., pollution and contamination, social issues, giving the right importance to the gender, employment and needs for training.

The chairman Mr Lala then opened the meeting for discussion. He asked if there had been any letters received from members of the public or any stakeholders related to the proposed rehabilitation of the I&D scheme. He was informed that no letters were received.

Mr. Halit Mulaj, Responsible of Drainage Board, Kukes Sector raised the issue for impact of irrigation water in Fierza Lake. Currently waters discharged into the lake from channels that bring sediment and residue of pesticides and chemical fertilizers. He added that the existing irrigation schemes affects biodiversity, etc. He proposed to sign an agreement between farmers, agriculture directorate, drainage board and local authorities on the use of fertilizers, pesticides and soil protection. He added that there is a need to guide farmers to use organic fertilizers (especially for providing nitrogen for plants). He proposed the following:

 An agreement to be signed between farmers, Agricultural Directorate, Drainage Board and Local authorities for appropriate use of fertilizers, pesticides and soil protection and pollution control in Fierza Lake.  To encourage and to train the farmers, on organic fertilizer use, in such a way to avoid runoff and leaching of Nitrates/Nitrites  The Construction firm, to plan and get the approval on use of a specific disposal site for solid wastes generated by the project development

Mr Qilimi said that the ESMP contains important information on the fertiliser and pesticide use. He directed the participants to section 2.24 and Table 4.1 and also to Annex 7 of the ESMP document which provides a Pesticide and Fertiliser Managment Plan that should be adhered to. He added that this had also been costed into the ESMP document (Chapter 8 of the ESMP). In response of the proposals, Mr Qilimi added that The ESMP advocates more training in the proper use of fertiliser and pesticide and also the ESMP recommends an agreement between all the stakeholders in the safe use of pesticides and fertilisers.

Mr. Halit Doci, resident raised the issue of erosion and sediments from irrigation water. Due to damage to irrigation channels and sloping of areas, irrigation water causes land erosion currently.

Mr Qilimi said that the ESMP contains important information on sedimentation and farming practices and ways to try and reduce this.

Mr. Abaz Mazreku, Reeve of Vranisht raised the problem of pollution from dust during work on rehabilitation schemes. It also raised the problem of damaging crops and land. He proposed that the construction firm should compensate farmers if they damages plants or land. He also asked on compensation for resettlement, damage to agricultural areas, and/or to other proprieties. Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Tregtan 2 and 3 and Vranisht 2 Schemes Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems 5

Mr Qilimi said that the ESMP and in particular Table 4.1 provides a mitigation plan and details those responsible for putting right environmental damage. Until now there is no predicted resettlement action. Regarding accidental damage or resettlement required during the implementation phase, Mr Qilimi stated that the ARAP document contains the grievance procedure necessary for obtaining compensation by the contractor for damage to crops and to agricultural land or other assets.

Mr Adem Lala Mayor of Has asked about the avoidance of adverse environmental phenomena. He wanted to propose the participation of local team supervision of rehabilitation works. The preparation of environmental action plan by the reconstruction firm. The preparation of an agreement between the participants in the project. Mr Lala was also supported in this question by the Director of the Drainage Board and many farmers.

Mr Qilimi stated, that local participation is advocated in the ESMP (especially Table 4.1) which provide many details on a mandatory arrangement with the Contractor in the Pre Construction phase following into the Construction phase, which outlines many plans that have to be provided. This includes the Traffic Management Plan, Waste Disposal Plan, various Method Statements for construction, etc. Mr Qilimi recommended that the local administrative unit of Fajza must work together with the Has Municipality and MARDWA to have agreement in their reqirements for the contractor.

Conclusions and closure The meeting was closed after all answers to the questions had been provided. The wrap up and meeting closure was made by Mr Lala Mayor of Has, Mr Decolli from MARDWA and Mr Qilimi CEIA-COWI expert. Mr Qilimi summarised that the questions were mainly concerning pollution and ensuring local participation in the supervision of the works as well as ensuring proper compensation to any affected persons.

The meeting ended at 12:30 hours

Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Tregtan 2 and 3 and Vranisht 2 Schemes Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems 6

4 ANNEXES

4.1 Annex 1 – Tregtan 2, Tregtan 3 and Vranisht 2 Scheme Particulars

4.1.1 Project Details Tregtan 2 The Tregtan 2 scheme was built in 1969, is the smallest I&D system of the entire project with a command area of only 28 ha. The command area is fed from a reservoir formed by a small earth dam with a capacity of 56,000m³ with a crest el at 495.00 masl (493.5 masl in Preliminary Design from Renardet et al).

The Tregtan 2 reservoir has a direct catchment area of 0.35 km², but is also filled by overflow from the upstream Tregtan 1 dam through a feeder channel (this dam is not part of the rehabilitation project). Siltation is minimal in the 46 years of operation of the dam and is not considered a problem. The area underlying the I&D scheme is made up of weak sandstones and pyroxenes from the Jurassic.

The Tregtan 2 dam has now been rehabilitated with the defects liability period ending in November 2016. . Among the rehabilitation works, related with downstream irrigation network, there is only the reconstruction of the outlet chamber from where the irrigation main canal originates. The outlet structure consists of a single steel 300mm diameter pipe with downstream control valve. The outlet structure is acceptable but the outlet chamber, located at the toe of the dam embankment has been replaced with the dam works.

Tregtan 3 Tregtan 3 reservoir was designed to irrigate by gravity and by pumping an area of 315 ha, but realistically only 260ha of this area is now possible. The I&D scheme was constructed in 1989 with a designed volume of 945,000 m³ but only 915,000 m³ is now possible. The catchment basin of Tregtan 3 reservoir is about 0.79 km² and the main supply of waters comes from feeder canals with a catchment of 3.5 km² but only 10-20% of this area is actually realised.

Siltation is minimal in the 25 years of operation of the dam and is not considered a problem. The area underlying the I&D scheme is made up of weak sandstones and pyroxenes from the Jurassic. The command area is divided in two belts of pressure: the gravity fed area (160 ha) and the pumped fed area (100 ha). While the gravity fed network is still partially functioning, the pumped one’s is completely out of order for many decades and is destroyed. Due to this, only 155 ha are currently irrigated.

The drainage to the irrigated areas is by main and secondary canals that are lined. There are two siphons in the pumped fed area, but the pump station is not functional (the transformer still operates, but pumps and building have been removed).

Around 155 ha are irrigated from the original design of 315ha (215ha by gravity and 100ha pumped) and only 260ha will be achievable even after rehabilitation (160ha by gravity and 100ha by pumping). The irrigation inlet needs rehabilitation.

The current condition of the downstream irrigation infrastructure imposes a partial constraint on the original, current and future use of the scheme. The need for of a functioning feeder canal is also important. There are two feeders a left feeder 2.027km and a right feeder 2.361km in length.

Vranisht 2 Vranisht 2 consists of a dam and a reservoir surface area of 6.8 ha designed to irrigate by gravity an area of 217 ha. It was constructed in 1970 with a designed volume of 650 000 m³ (0.65 Mm³) the full supply level elevation is at 437.00 m.a.s.l (440 masl in Preliminary Design from Renardet et al). It is estimated that the current live storage is approximately 0.6 Mm³ (0.5 Mm3 from Renardet et al), a reduction of 7.6 % in 45 years of operation, suggesting that siltation is not a concern at this reservoir. Along the dam crest, a DN 500 mm siphon pipe has been laid.

Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Tregtan 2 and 3 and Vranisht 2 Schemes Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems 7

The catchment area of Vranisht reservoir is about 7.3 km2 but the main supply of waters comes from this watershed, and there is no feeding canal from any other location. The underlying geology of the area is made up of weak mudstones and clay with underlying gabbro from the Jurassic formation.

The current condition of the downstream irrigation infrastructure imposes a partial constraint on the original, current and future use of the scheme. The condition of Vranisht 2 dam was very poor and this implied that the dam needed to be held down for safety reasons thus imposing a significant constraint on the original, current and future use of the I&D scheme. The dam works have already commenced under a separate contract.

A total of 3.81km of main irrigation channel before the bifurcation and a further 8.9 km (two channels (right channel) x 3.93kms and left channel x4.95km in length) after bifurcation are planned to be rehabilitated. The outlet chamber with the control valve is in bad condition and the main canal lining, in stone masonry, is leak- ing significantly along 70% of its length obstructed as well in some parts by small side channel collapses.

The two secondary canals, with trapezoidal section and without concrete lining are completely silted up. As previously mentioned only 50ha of the command area is presently irrigated, but in addition the irrigated water is not properly delivered, due to the reduction of the canals sections. With hilly morphology of the command area, drainage of irrigation water is not a concern.

The downstream I&D infrastructure for Vranisht 2 has not been rehabilitated since it was constructed and has not been maintained in decades. Several pipes cross the main canal from another nearby I&D scheme called Fajzes that are in a severe state of disrepair and have in turn created problems for the Vranisht 2 I&D scheme.

4.1.2 Proposed Works covered under World Bank funding

Tregtan 2 The Updated Feasibility Study and more recently the Preliminary Design by JV Renardet et al provides details of the main rehabilitation works to be undertaken at the Tregtan 2 I&D scheme under review. After stakeholder consultation with JV Renardet et al Tregtan 2 I&D scheme was chosen and confirmed by MARDWA. This will rehabilitate the entire gravity fed system with a total command area of 28ha. Currently only 15ha is operational. Rehabilitation works comprise of the following key points:

 Restoration of the canal intake (RCC manhole, escape and header chamber and A3 offtake manhole)  Control gates and control devices (10 offtakes)  Lining works of the Main Canal (51 and 42 metres)  Main canal extraordinary repairs (sealing and cement patching) a total length of about 504 metres  Laying of pressure pipe DN200 (110 metres)

Tregtan 3 The Updated Feasibility Study and more recently the Preliminary Design by JV Renardet et al provides details of the main rehabilitation works to be undertaken at the Tregtan 3 I&D scheme under review. After stakeholder consultation from the FS Consultant (JV Renardet et al) I&D scheme rehabilitation Option 1 was chosen and confirmed by MARDWA. This option will rehabilitate 260ha. The rehabilitation works will include the following key points:

 RCC lining of 7.6km of feeder canals, 5.6kms of main and secondary irrigation canals, both of gravity fed area (25% of length – 1.3kms) and pumped fed area (100% of length – 4.2kms);  restoration of the canal intake;  construction of three cross sluice gates;  rehabilitation of the pumping station and replacement of 110 m DN 300 steel rising pipe, and restoration of the header manhole/chamber;  laying 1,049 m of PVC syphons and PVC secondary irrigation pipes;  extraordinary repair/substitution of 10 delivery sluice gates and hydrants; Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Tregtan 2 and 3 and Vranisht 2 Schemes Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems 8

Vranisht 2 The Updated Feasibility Study and more recently the Preliminary Design by JV Renardet et al provides details of the main rehabilitation works to be undertaken at the Vranisht 2 I&D scheme under review. After stakeholder consultation with JV Renardet et al Vranisht 2 I&D scheme was chosen and confirmed by MARDWA. This will rehabilitate the entire original scheme of 217 ha maintaining the original scheme maintaining as well the traditional method of irrigation in which the farmers are accustomed. There is no pumping of irrigation water necessary at this scheme. Due to the location of Vranisht 2 in the north of Albania, a short irrigation season only permits one full crop each year.

The rehabilitation works will include the following key points:  Restoration of the canal intake (partly rehabilitated under dam contract)  RCC lining along 12.7 kms of the canals (3.81km of main irrigation channel before the bifurcation and a further 8.9 km (in two branches) after bifurcation.  Laying of 30m of DN 500 suspended steel pipe upstream the divider work;  Restoration of the divider work  Extraordinary repair/substitution of delivery sluice gates/offtakes (60 in number – 33 on the left branch and 27 on the right branch))

Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Tregtan 2 and 3 and Vranisht 2 Schemes Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems 9

4.2 Annex 2 – Public Notices and Advertisements

Figure 4-1: Official MARDWA Letter to Panorama

Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Tregtan 2 and 3 and Vranisht 2 Schemes Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems 10

Figure 4-2: Official MARDWA Letter to SOT news

Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Tregtan 2 and 3 and Vranisht 2 Schemes Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems 11

Figure 4-3: Advert in SOT News and Panorama

Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Tregtan 2 and 3 and Vranisht 2 Schemes Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems 12

Figure 4-4: MARDWA email to Panorama

Figure 4-5: MARDWA Email to SOT news

Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Tregtan 2 and 3 and Vranisht 2 Schemes Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems 13

Figure 4-6: Public Announcement on MARDWA Website

Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Tregtan 2 and 3 and Vranisht 2 Schemes Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems 14

Figure 4-7: Public Notices in Has Municipality – Fajze Adminitrative Unit

Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Tregtan 2 and 3 and Vranisht 2 Schemes Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems 15

4.3 Annex 3 – List of Participants

List of Participants Tregtan 2 Tregtan,3 and Vranisht 2 Schemes – Has – 22nd May 2017

Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Tregtan 2 and 3 and Vranisht 2 Schemes Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems 16

4.4 Annex 4 – Photos from the Meeting

Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Tregtan 2 and 3 and Vranisht 2 Schemes Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems 17

4.5 Annex 5 - PowerPoint Presentation for the Public Hearing

Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration Report on Public Hearing and Meeting Minutes WRIP - Preparation of the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Tregtan 2 and 3 and Vranisht 2 Schemes Resettlement Actions Plans (RAPs) for the Rehabilitation of Irrigation Schemes/Systems 18