DOCSLIB.ORG

Review Binding in the Growth Hormone Receptor Complex James A

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Review Binding in the Growth Hormone Receptor Complex James A Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 93, pp. 1-6, January 1996 Review Binding in the growth hormone receptor complex James A. Wells Department of Protein Engineering, Genentech, Inc., 460 Point San Bruno Boulevard, South San Francisco, CA 94080 ABSTRACT Binding reactions be- sons. First, the pharmacology of hGH is alents of hGHbp (28 kDa) ran as a single tween human growth hormone (hGH) and rather complex (3). For example it can peak (-75 kDa) with no evidence of ex- its receptor provide a detailed account of bind and activate at least two different cess free components. SDS/PAGE and how a polypeptide hormone activates its cloned receptors, the hGH (4) and pro- densitometry of the 75-kDa peak showed receptor and more generally how proteins lactin receptors (5). Moreover, hGH is a it had a composition ofone hGH molecule interact. Through high-resolution struc- member of the cytokine receptor super- per two hGHbp molecules. Furthermore, tural and functional studies it is seen that family (6), and thus an understanding of crystals of the complex were obtained and hGH uses two different sites (site 1 and how it binds its receptor may shed light on when dissociated gave a composition of site 2) to bind two identical receptor mol- the entire family. Finally, it is hoped that one hGH molecule per two hGHbp mol- ecules. This sequential dimerization reac- through a detailed understanding of the ecules (10, 13). tion activates the receptor, presumably by structure and chemistry involved in the Two mutagenesis strategies, homolog- bringing the intracellular domains into binding reaction, one would be in a better scanning (11) and alanine-scanning (12), close proximity so they may activate cy- position to rationally design small mole- were employed to define binding determi- tosolic components. As a consequence of cules that could mimic the large interfaces nants in the hGH and the hGHbp (for this mechanism it is possible to build that are typical of protein-protein com- review see ref. 14). Initially, these studies antagonists to the receptor by introducing plexes. were performed without the aid of the mutations in hGH that block binding at structures of the complex or of the indi- site 2 and to build even more potent Basic Methods and Approaches vidual components. In homolog-scanning, antagonists by combining these with mu- segments (7-30 residues long) derived tants that enhance binding at site 1. Ala- Any detailed structural and functional from nonbinding homologs, such as pro- nine-scanning mutagenesis of all contact analysis is greatly facilitated by having an lactin or porcine growth hormone, were residues at the site 1 interface shows that abundant and recombinant source of the substituted into hGH. From the set of only a small and complementary set of component molecules. We were particu- segment-substituted molecules that dis- side chains clustered near the center of larly fortunate to have Escherichia coli rupted binding affinity, we could infer the interface affects binding. The most secretion systems for both hGH (7) and regions of the hormone that may contain important contacts are hydrophobic, and the hGHbp (8). These expression systems binding determinants. These regions were these are surrounded by polar and allowed rapid and high-level production of then subjected to alanine-scanning mu- charged interactions of lesser impor- these proteins in forms that interacted tagenesis in which each residue within the tance. Kinetic analysis shows for the most with virtually the same affinity as those disruptive segment was replaced by ala- part that the important side chains func- from natural or recombinant mammalian nine and the consequences for binding tion to maintain the complex, not to guide sources (Kd 0.3 nM). affinity were measured. In this way the the hormone to the receptor. Hormone- Determining the stoichiometry of the role of side-chain atoms beyond the /3-car- induced homodimerization or het- complex is fundamental to characterizing bon could be assessed. A panel of mono- erodimerization reactions are turning out any binding reaction. Initially, we pre- clonal antibodies that reacted with the to be pervasive mechanisms for signal sumed that growth hormone bound to native components, but not the unfolded transduction. Moreover, the molecular only one receptor in solution, because forms, were used to verify that these mu- recognition principles seen in the hGH- Scatchard analysis from an RIA showed a tations did not affect the overall fold ofthe receptor complex are likely to generalize 1:1 stoichiometry. As it turned out, how- protein. to other protein-protein complexes. ever, the receptor antibody (MAb5, ref. 9) Two different assays were used to de- used to precipitate the hGHhGHbp com- termine the effects of hGH mutants on How do hormones find their receptors? plex sterically excluded the second recep- binding. Using MAb5 to precipitate 1:1 Once there, what forces allow the hor- tor molecule from binding (10). This was complexes, we found a patch of mutations mone to bind? How does hormone bind- a blessing in disguise because more com- that disrupted binding to a region we ing lead to receptor activation? Most plex stoichiometries (such as the 1:2 stoi- called site 1. The second assay followed biological processes are regulated or chiometry that was later discovered) the hGH-induced dimerization of hGHbp structured by these reactions involving would have made interpretation more dif- molecules in solution by the quenching of noncovalent associations. Thus, an under- ficult than was the case for the single inter- a fluorescent tag placed near the C terminus standing of how hormones bind their re- face that was initially discovered (11, 12). of the hGHbp (10). The patch of alanine ceptors is broadly relevant to many other A variety of biophysical methods were mutations outside the site 1 patch that had molecular recognition events in biology. used to determine that the stoichiometry reduced affinity in this assaywe called site 2. This minireview will begin to address of the hGH-hGHbp complex in solution The solution of the x-ray structure of these questions from the perspective of a was 1:2 (10). One of the most powerful the 1:2 hGH-hGHbp complex (15) per- complex between human growth hormone was titration calorimetry, which showed (hGH) and the extracellular domain of its that the binding reaction was complete Abbreviations: hGH, human growth hormone; 1 was hGHbp, the extracellular domain of the hGH receptor, called the hGHbp (for general when equivalent of hormone added receptor; variant proteins are indicated by the reviews see refs. 1 and 2). This complex to 2 equivalents of the hGHbp. Gel filtra- single-letter code for the wild-type residue fol- has been intensively studied by mutational tion showed that mixtures containing 1 lowed by its position in the mature protein and structural methods for several rea- equivalent of hGH (22 kDa) plus 2 equiv- sequence and the substituted residue. 1 Downloaded by guest on September 26, 2021 2 Review: Wells ~~~~~~~~~~~~Proc.Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93 (1996) lized This causes a in A + B .A*B (Ka =kon/koff) [1] hGHbp. change data to be interpreted in structural con- kThfaff refractive index of the medium which is text for the first time. This was an enor- detected by a change in surface plasmon What role do contact side chains in mous advance. Not only did it reveal the play resonance of the gold film (called reso- on-rate or 1:2 natu're of the complex and the struc- determining (kon) off-rate nance units or RU). The stoichiometry of tures of the bound components, it iden- (koff)? To address this question we focused binding can be calculated from the total tified all the contact residues at the two on the binding of hGH via site to the first change in RU, as this is related to the mass interfaces as well as hormone-receptor bound receptor. bound to the chip. On-rates are measured that the contact each showing receptors To study the kinetics of binding we used by the rate of change in RU as a function other (Fig. 1). a BlAcore (Pharmacia) (16). This device of hGH concentration. Off-rates are de- has a flow cell with a film on Side Chains on the hGH Mostly Affect gold layered termined from rate of the decrease in RU Dissociation, Not Association the outside. Attached to the gold film is a upon release of hGH from a saturated layer of dextran fibers which extend into chip. Binding affinity can be considered a sim- the flow cell to which we covalently at- To study the binding of hGH at site 1 ple balance of two reactions, association tached the hGHbp (17). As hGH flows without the complication of forming 1:2 and dissociation (Eq. 1). through the cell, it binds to the immobi- complexes, or binding through site 2, we FIG. 1. Structural model of the 1:2 hGH-hGHbp complex taken from ref 15. hGH is shown in red, while the hGHbpl and hGHbp2 are shown in green and blue, respectively. The membrane bilayer is modeled below. Reprinted with permission from Science 255,257. Copyright 1992 American Association for the Advancement of Science. Downloaded by guest on September 26, 2021 Review: Wells Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93 (1996) 3 prepared a receptor that could bind hGH tly influence the rate of association of the The hGH Receptor Is Activated by only at site 1 (17). This was done by hGH to the receptor, association is con- Sequential Dimerization introducing a mutation in the receptor trolled by diffusion, which is independent stem region (S201C) and fixing this by a of the side-chain composition of the in- Receptor oligomerization is a common, if disulfide linkage to the flow chip.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Progesterone Receptor Coregulators As Factors Supporting the Function of the Corpus Luteum in Cows
    G C A T T A C G G C A T genes Article Progesterone Receptor Coregulators as Factors Supporting the Function of the Corpus Luteum in Cows Robert Rekawiecki * , Karolina Dobrzyn, Jan Kotwica and Magdalena K. Kowalik Institute of Animal Reproduction and Food Research of the Polish Academy of Sciences, Tuwima 10, 10–747 Olsztyn, Poland; [email protected] (K.D.); [email protected] (J.K.); [email protected] (M.K.K.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +48-89-539-31-17 Received: 5 July 2020; Accepted: 7 August 2020; Published: 12 August 2020 Abstract: Progesterone receptor (PGR) for its action required connection of the coregulatory proteins, including coactivators and corepressors. The former group exhibits a histone acetyltransferase (HAT) activity, while the latter cooperates with histone deacetylase (HDAC). Regulations of the coregulators mRNA and protein and HAT and HDAC activity can have an indirect effect on the PGR function and thus progesterone (P4) action on target cells. The highest mRNA expression levels for the coactivators—histone acetyltransferase p300 (P300), cAMP response element-binding protein (CREB), and steroid receptor coactivator-1 (SRC-1)—and nuclear receptor corepressor-2 (NCOR-2) were found in the corpus luteum (CL) on days 6 to 16 of the estrous cycle. The CREB protein level was higher on days 2–10, whereas SRC-1 and NCOR-2 were higher on days 2–5. The activity of HAT and HDAC was higher on days 6–10 of the estrous cycle. All of the coregulators were localized in the nuclei of small and large luteal cells.
    [Show full text]
  • Receptor-Mediated Dimerization of JAK2 FERM Domains Is Required for JAK2 Activation Ryan D Ferrao, Heidi JA Wallweber, Patrick J Lupardus*
    RESEARCH ARTICLE Receptor-mediated dimerization of JAK2 FERM domains is required for JAK2 activation Ryan D Ferrao, Heidi JA Wallweber, Patrick J Lupardus* Department of Structural Biology, Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, United States Abstract Cytokines and interferons initiate intracellular signaling via receptor dimerization and activation of Janus kinases (JAKs). How JAKs structurally respond to changes in receptor conformation induced by ligand binding is not known. Here, we present two crystal structures of the human JAK2 FERM and SH2 domains bound to Leptin receptor (LEPR) and Erythropoietin receptor (EPOR), which identify a novel dimeric conformation for JAK2. This 2:2 JAK2/receptor dimer, observed in both structures, identifies a previously uncharacterized receptor interaction essential to dimer formation that is mediated by a membrane-proximal peptide motif called the ‘switch’ region. Mutation of the receptor switch region disrupts STAT phosphorylation but does not affect JAK2 binding, indicating that receptor-mediated formation of the JAK2 FERM dimer is required for kinase activation. These data uncover the structural and molecular basis for how a cytokine-bound active receptor dimer brings together two JAK2 molecules to stimulate JAK2 kinase activity. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.38089.001 Introduction Janus kinases (JAKs) are a family of multi-domain non-receptor tyrosine kinases responsible for pleio- tropic regulatory effects on growth, development, immune and hematopoietic signaling (Leonard and O’Shea, 1998). The JAK family consists of four conserved members, including JAK1, *For correspondence: [email protected] JAK2, JAK3, and TYK2, which are differentially activated in response to cytokine and interferon stim- ulation. JAKs are constitutively bound to the intracellular domains of their cognate cytokine signaling Competing interest: See receptors, and are activated after cytokine-mediated dimerization or rearrangement of these recep- page 18 tors establishes a productive receptor signaling complex (Haan et al., 2006).
    [Show full text]
  • Identification of a Different-Type Homeobox Gene, Barhi, Possibly Causing Bar (B) and Om(Ld) Mutations in Drosophila
    Proc. Nati. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 88, pp. 4343-4347, May 1991 Genetics Identification of a different-type homeobox gene, BarHI, possibly causing Bar (B) and Om(lD) mutations in Drosophila (compound eye/homeodomain/morphogenesis/malformation/M-repeat) TETSUYA KOJIMA, SATOSHI ISHIMARU, SHIN-ICHI HIGASHUIMA, Eui TAKAYAMA, HIROSHI AKIMARU, MASAKI SONE, YASUFUMI EMORI, AND KAORU SAIGO* Department of Biophysics and Biochemistry, Faculty of Science, University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113, Japan Communicated by Melvin M. Green, January 25, 1991 ABSTRACT The Bar mutation B of Drosophila melano- the initial periodicity. A class of mutations including Bar (B) gaster and optic morphology mutation Om(JD) of Drosophila may also be intimately related to early events (9). For ananassae result in suppression of ommatidium differentiation clarification of this point, examination was first made of at the anterior portion of the eye. Examination was made to possible determinant genes for the Bar mutation B of Dro- determine the genes responsible for these mutations. Both loci sophila melanogaster (10) and optic morphology mutation were found to share in common a different type of homeobox Om(JD) of Drosophila ananassae (11), in both of which gene, which we call "BarH1." Polypeptides encoded by D. ommatidium differentiation is suppressed in the anterior melanogaster and D. ananassae BarHl genes consist of543 and portion ofthe eye. Both locit were found to share in common 604 amino acids, respectively, with homeodomains identical in a different type of homeobox gene, called BarH1, which sequence except for one amino acid substitution. A unique encodes a polypeptide of Mr - 60,000.
    [Show full text]
  • Etiology of Hormone Receptor–Defined Breast Cancer: a Systematic Review of the Literature
    1558 Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention Review Etiology of Hormone Receptor–Defined Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review of the Literature Michelle D. Althuis, Jennifer H. Fergenbaum, Montserrat Garcia-Closas, Louise A. Brinton, M. Patricia Madigan, and Mark E. Sherman Hormonal and Reproductive Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland Abstract Breast cancers classified by estrogen receptor (ER) and/ negative tumors. Postmenopausal obesity was also or progesterone receptor (PR) expression have different more consistently associated with increased risk of clinical, pathologic, and molecular features. We exam- hormone receptor–positive than hormone receptor– ined existing evidence from the epidemiologic litera- negative tumors, possibly reflecting increased estrogen ture as to whether breast cancers stratified by hormone synthesis in adipose stores and greater bioavailability. receptor status are also etiologically distinct diseases. Published data are insufficient to suggest that exoge- Despite limited statistical power and nonstandardized nous estrogen use (oral contraceptives or hormone re- receptor assays, in aggregate, the critically evaluated placement therapy) increase risk of hormone-sensitive studies (n = 31) suggest that the etiology of hormone tumors. Risks associated with breast-feeding, alcohol receptor–defined breast cancers may be heterogeneous. consumption, cigarette smoking, family history of Reproduction-related exposures tended to be associat-
    [Show full text]
  • Estrogen Receptor-Α Interaction with the CREB Binding Protein
    307 Estrogen receptor- interaction with the CREB binding protein coactivator is regulated by the cellular environment B M Jaber, R Mukopadhyay and C L Smith Molecular and Cellular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, Houston, Texas 77030, USA (Requests for offprints should be addressed to C L Smith; Email: [email protected]) Abstract The p160 coactivators, steroid receptor coactivator-1 (SRC-1), transcriptional intermediary factor-2 (TIF2) and receptor-associated coactivator-3 (RAC3), as well as the coactivator/integrator CBP, mediate estrogen receptor- (ER)-dependent gene expression. Although these coactivators are widely expressed, ER transcriptional activity is cell-type dependent. In this study, we investigated ER interaction with p160 coactivators and CBP in HeLa and HepG2 cell lines. Basal and estradiol (E2)-dependent interactions between the ER ligand-binding domain (LBD) and SRC-1, TIF2 or RAC3 were observed in HeLa and HepG2 cells. The extents of hormone-dependent interactions were similar and interactions between each of the p160 coactivators and the ER LBD were not enhanced by 4-hydroxytamoxifen in either cell type. In contrast to the situation for p160 coactivators, E2-dependent interaction of the ER LBD with CBP or p300 was detected in HeLa but not HepG2 cells by mammalian two-hybrid and coimmunoprecipitation assays, indicating that the cellular environment modulates ER-CBP/p300 interaction. Furthermore, interactions between CBP and p160 coactivators are much more robust in HeLa than HepG2 cells suggesting that poor CBP-p160 interactions are insufficient to support ER–CBP–p160 ternary complexes important for nuclear receptor–CBP interactions. Alterations in p160 coactivators or CBP expression between these two cell types did not account for differences in ER–p160–CBP interactions.
    [Show full text]
  • Differential Gene Expression in Oligodendrocyte Progenitor Cells, Oligodendrocytes and Type II Astrocytes
    Tohoku J. Exp. Med., 2011,Differential 223, 161-176 Gene Expression in OPCs, Oligodendrocytes and Type II Astrocytes 161 Differential Gene Expression in Oligodendrocyte Progenitor Cells, Oligodendrocytes and Type II Astrocytes Jian-Guo Hu,1,2,* Yan-Xia Wang,3,* Jian-Sheng Zhou,2 Chang-Jie Chen,4 Feng-Chao Wang,1 Xing-Wu Li1 and He-Zuo Lü1,2 1Department of Clinical Laboratory Science, The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College, Bengbu, P.R. China 2Anhui Key Laboratory of Tissue Transplantation, Bengbu Medical College, Bengbu, P.R. China 3Department of Neurobiology, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, P.R. China 4Department of Laboratory Medicine, Bengbu Medical College, Bengbu, P.R. China Oligodendrocyte precursor cells (OPCs) are bipotential progenitor cells that can differentiate into myelin-forming oligodendrocytes or functionally undetermined type II astrocytes. Transplantation of OPCs is an attractive therapy for demyelinating diseases. However, due to their bipotential differentiation potential, the majority of OPCs differentiate into astrocytes at transplanted sites. It is therefore important to understand the molecular mechanisms that regulate the transition from OPCs to oligodendrocytes or astrocytes. In this study, we isolated OPCs from the spinal cords of rat embryos (16 days old) and induced them to differentiate into oligodendrocytes or type II astrocytes in the absence or presence of 10% fetal bovine serum, respectively. RNAs were extracted from each cell population and hybridized to GeneChip with 28,700 rat genes. Using the criterion of fold change > 4 in the expression level, we identified 83 genes that were up-regulated and 89 genes that were down-regulated in oligodendrocytes, and 92 genes that were up-regulated and 86 that were down-regulated in type II astrocytes compared with OPCs.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Nuclear Receptor Form and Function Using Structural Biology
    F RASTINEJAD and others Understanding NR form 51:3 T1–T21 Thematic Review and function Understanding nuclear receptor form and function using structural biology Correspondence Fraydoon Rastinejad, Pengxiang Huang, Vikas Chandra and Sepideh Khorasanizadeh should be addressed to F Rastinejad Metabolic Signaling and Disease Program, Sanford-Burnham Medical Research Institute, Orlando, Email Florida 32827, USA frastinejad@ sanfordburnham.org Abstract Nuclear receptors (NRs) are a major transcription factor family whose members selectively Key Words bind small-molecule lipophilic ligands and transduce those signals into specific changes in " nuclear receptors gene programs. For over two decades, structural biology efforts were focused exclusively on " steroid hormones the individual ligand-binding domains (LBDs) or DNA-binding domains of NRs. These " transcription factors analyses revealed the basis for both ligand and DNA binding and also revealed receptor " gene regulation conformations representing both the activated and repressed states. Additionally, " metabolism crystallographic studies explained how NR LBD surfaces recognize discrete portions of transcriptional coregulators. The many structural snapshots of LBDs have also guided the development of synthetic ligands with therapeutic potential. Yet, the exclusive structural focus on isolated NR domains has made it difficult to conceptualize how all the NR polypeptide segments are coordinated physically and functionally in the context of receptor Journal of Molecular Endocrinology quaternary architectures. Newly emerged crystal structures of the peroxisome proliferator- activated receptor-g–retinoid X receptor a (PPARg–RXRa) heterodimer and hepatocyte nuclear factor (HNF)-4a homodimer have recently revealed the higher order organizations of these receptor complexes on DNA, as well as the complexity and uniqueness of their domain–domain interfaces.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Hormone Receptor Antagonism with AP-1 by Inhibition of the JNK Pathway
    Downloaded from genesdev.cshlp.org on September 26, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Nuclear hormone receptor antagonism with AP-1 by inhibition of the JNK pathway Carme Caelles,1 Jose´M. Gonza´lez-Sancho, and Alberto Mun˜oz2 Instituto de Investigaciones Biome´dicas, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientı´ficas, E-28029 Madrid, Spain The activity of c-Jun, the major component of the transcription factor AP-1, is potentiated by amino-terminal phosphorylation on serines 63 and 73 (Ser-63/73). This phosphorylation is mediated by the Jun amino-terminal kinase (JNK) and required to recruit the transcriptional coactivator CREB-binding protein (CBP). AP-1 function is antagonized by activated members of the steroid/thyroid hormone receptor superfamily. Recently, a competition for CBP has been proposed as a mechanism for this antagonism. Here we present evidence that hormone-activated nuclear receptors prevent c-Jun phosphorylation on Ser-63/73 and, consequently, AP-1 activation, by blocking the induction of the JNK signaling cascade. Consistently, nuclear receptors also antagonize other JNK-activated transcription factors such as Elk-1 and ATF-2. Interference with the JNK signaling pathway represents a novel mechanism by which nuclear hormone receptors antagonize AP-1. This mechanism is based on the blockade of the AP-1 activation step, which is a requisite to interact with CBP. In addition to acting directly on gene transcription, regulation of the JNK cascade activity constitutes an alternative mode whereby steroids and retinoids may control cell fate and conduct their pharmacological actions as immunosupressive, anti-inflammatory, and antineoplastic agents.
    [Show full text]
  • Pancancer IO360 Human Vapril2018
    Gene Name Official Full Gene name Alias/Prev Symbols Previous Name(s) Alias Symbol(s) Alias Name(s) A2M alpha-2-macroglobulin FWP007,S863-7,CPAMD5 ABCF1 ATP binding cassette subfamily F member 1 ABC50 ATP-binding cassette, sub-family F (GCN20),EST123147 member 1 ACVR1C activin A receptor type 1C activin A receptor, type IC ALK7,ACVRLK7 ADAM12 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 12 a disintegrin and metalloproteinase domainMCMPMltna,MLTN 12 (meltrin alpha) meltrin alpha ADGRE1 adhesion G protein-coupled receptor E1 TM7LN3,EMR1 egf-like module containing, mucin-like, hormone receptor-like sequence 1,egf-like module containing, mucin-like, hormone receptor-like 1 ADM adrenomedullin AM ADORA2A adenosine A2a receptor ADORA2 RDC8 AKT1 AKT serine/threonine kinase 1 v-akt murine thymoma viral oncogene homologRAC,PKB,PRKBA,AKT 1 ALDOA aldolase, fructose-bisphosphate A aldolase A, fructose-bisphosphate ALDOC aldolase, fructose-bisphosphate C aldolase C, fructose-bisphosphate ANGPT1 angiopoietin 1 KIAA0003,Ang1 ANGPT2 angiopoietin 2 Ang2 ANGPTL4 angiopoietin like 4 angiopoietin-like 4 pp1158,PGAR,ARP4,HFARP,FIAF,NL2fasting-induced adipose factor,hepatic angiopoietin-related protein,PPARG angiopoietin related protein,hepatic fibrinogen/angiopoietin-related protein,peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) gamma induced angiopoietin-related protein,angiopoietin-related protein 4 ANLN anillin actin binding protein anillin (Drosophila Scraps homolog), actin bindingANILLIN,Scraps,scra protein,anillin, actin binding protein (scraps homolog, Drosophila)
    [Show full text]
  • Biochem II Signaling Intro and Enz Receptors
    Signal Transduction What is signal transduction? Binding of ligands to a macromolecule (receptor) “The secret life is molecular recognition; the ability of one molecule to “recognize” another through weak bonding interactions.” Linus Pauling Pleasure or Pain – it is the receptor ligand recognition So why do cells need to communicate? -Coordination of movement bacterial movement towards a chemical gradient green algae - colonies swimming through the water - Coordination of metabolism - insulin glucagon effects on metabolism -Coordination of growth - wound healing, skin. blood and gut cells Hormones are chemical signals. 1) Every different hormone binds to a specific receptor and in binding a significant alteration in receptor conformation results in a biochemical response inside the cell 2) This can be thought of as an allosteric modification with two distinct conformations; bound and free. Log Dose Response • Log dose response (Fractional Bound) • Measures potency/efficacy of hormone, agonist or antagonist • If measuring response, potency (efficacy) is shown differently Scatchard Plot Derived like kinetics R + L ó RL Used to measure receptor binding affinity KD (KL – 50% occupancy) in presence or absence of inhibitor/antagonist (B = Receptor bound to ligand) 3) The binding of the hormone leads to a transduction of the hormone signal into a biochemical response. 4) Hormone receptors are proteins and are typically classified as a cell surface receptor or an intracellular receptor. Each have different roles and very different means of regulating biochemical / cellular function. Intracellular Hormone Receptors The steroid/thyroid hormone receptor superfamily (e.g. glucocorticoid, vitamin D, retinoic acid and thyroid hormone receptors) • Protein receptors that reside in the cytoplasm and bind the lipophilic steroid/thyroid hormones.
    [Show full text]
  • Wrap.Warwick.Ac.Uk/91754
    Original citation: Hu, Jiamiao and Christian, Mark. (2017) Hormonal factors in the control of the browning of white adipose tissue. Hormone Molecular Biology and Clinical Investigation. Permanent WRAP URL: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/91754 Copyright and reuse: The Warwick Research Archive Portal (WRAP) makes this work by researchers of the University of Warwick available open access under the following conditions. Copyright © and all moral rights to the version of the paper presented here belong to the individual author(s) and/or other copyright owners. To the extent reasonable and practicable the material made available in WRAP has been checked for eligibility before being made available. Copies of full items can be used for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-profit purposes without prior permission or charge. Provided that the authors, title and full bibliographic details are credited, a hyperlink and/or URL is given for the original metadata page and the content is not changed in any way. Publisher’s statement: “The final publication is available at www.degruyter.com ” http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/hmbci-2017-0017 A note on versions: The version presented here may differ from the published version or, version of record, if you wish to cite this item you are advised to consult the publisher’s version. Please see the ‘permanent WRAP URL’ above for details on accessing the published version and note that access may require a subscription. For more information, please contact the WRAP Team at: [email protected] warwick.ac.uk/lib-publications DE GRUYTER Hormone Molecular Biology and Clinical Investigation.
    [Show full text]
  • Role of Estrogen Receptor in Breast Cancer Cell Gene Expression
    4046 MOLECULAR MEDICINE REPORTS 13: 4046-4050, 2016 Role of estrogen receptor in breast cancer cell gene expression YABING ZHENG1, XIYING SHAO1, YUAN HUANG1, LEI SHI1, BO CHEN2, XIAOJIA WANG1, HONGJIAN YANG3, ZHANHONG CHEN1 and XIPING ZHANG3 Departments of 1Medical Oncology (Breast), 2Pathology and 3Breast Surgery, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310022, P.R. China Received April 28, 2015; Accepted February 23, 2016 DOI: 10.3892/mmr.2016.5018 Abstract. The aim of the present study was to establish the Europe in 2012, and the number of breast cancer-associated underlying regulatory mechanism of estrogen receptor (ER) mortalities is 131,000 (6). Furthermore, breast cancer is in breast cancer cell gene expression. A gene expression the most common cause of cancer-associated mortality in profile accession( no. GSE11324) was downloaded from the females. Therefore, it is essential to understand its molecular Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database. Differentially mechanism and develop more effective therapeutic methods expressed genes (DEGs) from an estrogen treatment group and for breast cancer treatment. a control group were identified. Chromatin immunoprecipita- The estrogen receptor (ER) is critical in determining the tion with high-throughput sequencing data (series GSE25710) phenotype of human breast cancers and is one of the most was obtained from the GEO for the ER binding sites, and important therapeutic targets (7). Furthermore, certain studies binding and expression target analysis was performed. A total have suggested that activation of ER is responsible for various of 3,122 DEGs were obtained and ER was demonstrated to biological processes, including cell growth and differentia- exhibit inhibition and activation roles during the regulation tion, and programmed cell death (8,9).
    [Show full text]