Cooperative Learning-Embedded Assessment: Implications for Students' Assessment Literacy and Self-Directedness in Learning
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Classroom Assessment and Pedagogy
Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice ISSN: 0969-594X (Print) 1465-329X (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/caie20 Classroom assessment and pedagogy Paul Black & Dylan Wiliam To cite this article: Paul Black & Dylan Wiliam (2018) Classroom assessment and pedagogy, Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 25:6, 551-575, DOI: 10.1080/0969594X.2018.1441807 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2018.1441807 Published online: 22 Mar 2018. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 11598 View Crossmark data Citing articles: 6 View citing articles Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=caie20 ASSESSMENT IN EDUCATION: PRINCIPLES, POLICY & PRACTICE 2018, VOL. 25, NO. 6, 551–575 https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2018.1441807 Classroom assessment and pedagogy Paul Blacka and Dylan Wiliamb aDepartment of Education and Professional Studies, King’s College London, London, UK; bDepartment of Curriculum, Pedagogy and Assessment, University College London Institute of Education, London, UK ABSTRACT ARTICLE HISTORY Since our 1998 review of research on classroom assessment and Received 28 March 2017 learning was published, we have contributed to theorising formative Accepted 27 January 2018 assessment, but recognise that this work is incomplete. In this paper, KEYWORDS we take up a suggestion by Perrenoud that any theory of formative Formative assessment; assessment must be embedded within a wider theoretical field, summative assessment; specifically, within a theory of pedagogy. We propose a model whereby assessment for learning; the design of educational activities and associated assessments is pedagogy; instruction influenced by the theories of pedagogy, instruction and learning, and by the subject discipline, together with the wider context of education. -
RETHINKING CLASS SIZE the Complex Story of Impact on Teaching and Learning
RETHINKING CLASS SIZE The complex story of impact on teaching and learning Peter Blatchford Anthony Russell Rethinking Class Size Rethinking Class Size The complex story of impact on teaching and learning Peter Blatchford and Anthony Russell First published in 2020 by UCL Press University College London Gower Street London WC1E 6BT Available to download free: www.uclpress.co.uk © Peter Blatchford and Anthony Russell, 2020 Figures © owners noted below each one. Peter Blatchford and Anthony Russell have asserted their rights under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 to be identified as the author of this work. A CIP catalogue record for this book is available from The British Library. This book is published under a Creative Commons 4.0 International licence (CC BY 4.0). This licence allows you to share, copy, distribute and transmit the work; to adapt the work and to make commercial use of the work providing attribution is made to the authors (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work). Attribution should include the following information: Blatchford, P. and Russell, A. 2020. Rethinking Class Size: The complex story of impact on teaching and learning. London: UCL Press. https://doi.org/ 10.14324/111.9781787358799 Further details about Creative Commons licences are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ Any third-party material in this book is published under the book’s Creative Commons licence unless indicated otherwise in the credit line to the material. If you would like to reuse any third-party material not covered by the book’s Creative Commons licence, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. -
Evidence-Informed Teaching: an Evaluation of Progress in England
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Sheffield Hallam University Research Archive Evidence-informed teaching: an evaluation of progress in England. Research Report COLDWELL, Michael <http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7385-3077>, GREANY, Toby <http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3079-6743>, HIGGINS, Steve <http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0314-4846>, BROWN, Chris, MAXWELL, Bronwen <http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8022-9213>, STIELL, Bernadette <http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8784-6989>, STOLL, Louise, WILLIS, Benjamin <http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4346-0459> and BURNS, Helen Available from Sheffield Hallam University Research Archive (SHURA) at: http://shura.shu.ac.uk/16140/ This document is the author deposited version. You are advised to consult the publisher's version if you wish to cite from it. Published version COLDWELL, Michael, GREANY, Toby, HIGGINS, Steve, BROWN, Chris, MAXWELL, Bronwen, STIELL, Bernadette, STOLL, Louise, WILLIS, Benjamin and BURNS, Helen (2017). Evidence-informed teaching: an evaluation of progress in England. Research Report. Project Report. London, UK, Department for Education. Repository use policy Copyright © and Moral Rights for the papers on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. Users may download and/or print one copy of any article(s) in SHURA to facilitate their private study or for non- commercial research. You may not engage in further distribution of the material or use it for any profit-making activities or any commercial gain. Sheffield Hallam University Research Archive http://shura.shu.ac.uk Evidence-informed teaching: an evaluation of progress in England Research report July 2017 Mike Coldwell1, Toby Greany2, Steve Higgins3, Chris Brown2, Bronwen Maxwell1, Bernadette Stiell1, Louise Stoll2, Ben Willis1 and Helen Burns3 1Sheffield Hallam University 2UCL Institute of Education 3Durham University Contents List of figures 3 List of tables 4 Executive Summary 5 Project outline and methods 5 Findings 6 Concluding messages 9 1. -
Efficacy of Formative Classroom Assessments in Theory and Practice Ian Clark a Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment Of
Efficacy of Formative Classroom Assessments in Theory and Practice Ian Clark A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Washington 2013 Reading Committee: Geneva Gay, Chair John Frederiksen Min Li Program Authorized to Offer Degree: College of Education ©Copyright 2013 Ian Clark University of Washington Abstract Efficacy of Formative Classroom Assessments in Theory and Practice Ian Clark Chair of Supervisory Committee: Dr Geneva Gay Department of Curriculum and Instruction The articles which constitute the core of this dissertation orbit, either explicitly or implicitly, around the "theory of formative assessment". This conception is, at the theoretical level, a blend of socio-cultural and socio-cognitive perspectives. Accordingly, the theory of formative assessment holds that (1) thinking and learning processes are supported when students are given information and feedback regarding the learning criteria and standards by which they are assessed; and (2) when there is subsequent use of that feedback by students and teachers as they plan the next steps of the learning process together. Each article is intended for practitioners, policymakers, and researchers, and together they represent a methodological progression which begins with a discussion on theories that underpin formative assessment, and their implications for teaching methods and learning strategies. The second article presents a detailed case-study of the implementation of formative assessment in the Scottish region of the UK. The third and final article in the set employs a grounded theory (GT) method to build a theoretical framework to explain how the theory of formative assessment promotes self-regulated learning (SRL) in public school (K-12) classrooms.