DOCSLIB.ORG

(509) ADORATION of the SHEPHERDS by GIORGIONE Venetian,1477-1510 •

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
(509) ADORATION of the SHEPHERDS by GIORGIONE Venetian,1477-1510 • (509) ADORATION OF THE SHEPHERDS By GIORGIONE Venetian,1477-1510 • I have the pleasure to confirm here that in my opi= nion the picture repreenting the Adoration of shepherds, formerly in the collection of Lord Allandale, is a work by Giorione. The paintings by Giorgione have been di= scussed and attributed to different painters, because we know very little about the master. The Adoration of She pherds has been attributed by tradition to Giorgione, and in 1871 Cavalcaselle still accepted the traditional attri; bution . Afterwards, through the ihr.orellian positivistic me= thod, it was consiAered as by Catena, and later by Titian. When in 1913 I wrote my book on Giorgione I recognised in this pict'ire the character of the masterpiece. Now I Lim convinced that a masterpiece like this can have been crea= ted only by Giorgione. BrMust be realized indeed that u masterpiece cannot be by Vatena. Catena assimilated some pictorial and poetic qualities from Giovanni Bellini and from Giorgione, but he could never rise to a really high level like his models. It has been also suggested the author might be an ar= tist we do not know', an anonymous master. But this seems quite improbable. Indeed the historical tradition of the Venetian painters of the beginning of the XVIth. Century is detailed enough to let us know the names of the best • painters. Even some famous painters like Palma or Cariani could never afford the pictori,1 realisation; the richness of the material, the certainty of visual evidence, like the Adoration of Shepherds: If neither Palma, nor Cariani, nor Catena had the strength to paint in suchNay, who had? Only three painters could do so: Giorgione, Giovanni Belli= ni or Titian. I do think the Adoration of Shepherds be by Giorgione. But if I might suppose In attribution different from mine; it should be to Bellini. The point of departure of any kno= wledge of Giorgione's art is constituted by three paintings: the Tempest, the Philosophers, the Venus. Well, they are u profane subjec:t,, a subject invented in the very moment in which the painting was executed. The subject of the Adora= tion of Shepherds is u traditional one; as is the Madonna p,inted by Giorgione at Castelrranco. The traditional re= ligious character of some paintings shows how similar in style were the lute Bellini and Giorgione: when the pretext of subject is the same; the similarity of style ap)ears more evident. But the Adoration of Shepherds shows a freedom of dreaming; a desire of pantheism, which is characteristic of Giorgione, not of Beilini. This peculiarity of feeling seems very subtle; but it changes the whole world of the work of art; it reveals the world of Giorgione. If not by Bellini, could the Adoration of Shepherds have been painted by Titian? It is much easier to excludt. Rik • (01 _ 3 - • Titian, than Bellini. It is enough to remember how in his youtn Titian was great as a painter and mediocre as a poet; how the early works by Titian are full of life; bold; larger= ly painted, thoroughly realistic, but quite superficial in feeling, without that intimate concentration of expression which was characteristic of Giorgione. The Adoration of Shepherds shows neither the drawing nor the feeling of Ti= tian. Of course the conviction that the Adoration of Shepherds is by Giorgione depends not only by exclusions but above all by comparisons with other works of tne master himself. The composition has the same rhythm as the Philosophers of Vien= na: open air, scene represented in a retired; half closed foreground, free country and far horizon in tne background. St. Joseph has the same type as the oldest of the three PhilQsophers. The tower in the background was very cheri= shed by Giorgione, who repeated it in almost all his pain= tings. The tree, the foliage; the grass correspond perfec= 'LL;g4- tly to those painted injJudith of Leningrad. Such compari= sons are so evident that it is useless to insist upon them. Beyond the details of drawing and colouring; the Ado r tion of 3hepherds shows the conception of the world which is of Giorgione. The religious feeling is still strong, but the Divinity is no more transcendenI. The new sense of the power and greatness of man, which was the ry of Florentine Renaissance, has been combined with a new sense of nature, where man is only a part. The Divinity I 111- s otA 4 411 is innanent not only in man, but also in a tree, in a river, in the whole of nuture. Long before philosophers imagined a system of pantheism, Giorgione expressed a pantheistic feeling through form and colour. After him,painters very often represented nature without God. Gior6ione reached the very point where God and a rock or a river were identi= fied. This was his divine sense of nature, this sug,ested to him his splendour of colouring; this is his eternal, unique charm. (V I ( • ?.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Janson. History of Art. Chapter 16: The
    16_CH16_P556-589.qxp 12/10/09 09:16 Page 556 16_CH16_P556-589.qxp 12/10/09 09:16 Page 557 CHAPTER 16 CHAPTER The High Renaissance in Italy, 1495 1520 OOKINGBACKATTHEARTISTSOFTHEFIFTEENTHCENTURY , THE artist and art historian Giorgio Vasari wrote in 1550, Truly great was the advancement conferred on the arts of architecture, painting, and L sculpture by those excellent masters. From Vasari s perspective, the earlier generation had provided the groundwork that enabled sixteenth-century artists to surpass the age of the ancients. Later artists and critics agreed Leonardo, Bramante, Michelangelo, Raphael, Giorgione, and with Vasari s judgment that the artists who worked in the decades Titian were all sought after in early sixteenth-century Italy, and just before and after 1500 attained a perfection in their art worthy the two who lived beyond 1520, Michelangelo and Titian, were of admiration and emulation. internationally celebrated during their lifetimes. This fame was For Vasari, the artists of this generation were paragons of their part of a wholesale change in the status of artists that had been profession. Following Vasari, artists and art teachers of subse- occurring gradually during the course of the fifteenth century and quent centuries have used the works of this 25-year period which gained strength with these artists. Despite the qualities of between 1495 and 1520, known as the High Renaissance, as a their births, or the differences in their styles and personalities, benchmark against which to measure their own. Yet the idea of a these artists were given the respect due to intellectuals and High Renaissance presupposes that it follows something humanists.
    [Show full text]
  • Titian and Veronese Two Venetian Painters
    Titian and Veronese Two Venetian Painters Titian Veronese Garry Law Sack of Rome 1527 – end of the Renaissance in Rome Timeline and Contemporaries / Predecessors Titian - ~1488-1576 • Born Tiziano Vecellio in Pieve di Cadrone – Small fortified town dating back to the Iron Age. • Father a soldier / local councilor / supplier of timber to Venice • Named after a local saint Titianus • Went to Venice aged 9, apprenticed to Zuccato then Gentile Bellini then Giovani Bellini • Partnership with Giorgione – shared workshop – ended with G’s early death • Together redefined Venetian painting • Their work so similar have long been disputes over authorship of some paintings They did undertake some joint works – frescoes Titian was asked to complete some unfinished works after Giorgione’s death – only one such is known for sure – otherwise we don’t know if he did finish others. The Pastoral Concert - Once considered Giorgione – now considered Titian – though some have considered as by both (Louvre). • Portraits - Royal and Papal commissions late in career • Cabinet Pictures • Religious art • Allegorical / Classical Isabella d’Este “La Bella” • Lead the movement to having large pictures for architectural locations on canvas rather than Fresco – which lasted poorly in Venice’s damp climate • Sought to displace his teacher Bellini as official state painter – declined, but achieved on B’s death. • Married housekeeper by whom he already has two children • Wife dies young in childbirth – a daughter modelled for him for his group pictures • Does not remarry – described as flirting with women but not interested in relationships • Ran a large studio – El Greco was one pupil • Of his most successful pictures many copies were made in the studio Penitent Mary Madelene Two of many versions Christ Carrying the Cross.
    [Show full text]
  • Spatial Vision Anomalies in Renaissance Art: Raphael, Giorgione, Dürer
    Spatial Vision, Vol. 21, No. 3–5, pp. 363–377 (2008) Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, 2008. Also available online - www.brill.nl/sv Spatial vision anomalies in Renaissance art: Raphael, Giorgione, Dürer ROBERT WEALE ∗ University College London Hospital Eye Department, 235 Euston Rd., London NW1 2BU, and Institute of Gerontology, King’s College London, 46 Aldwych, London WC2B 4LL, UK Received 15 March 2006; accepted 10 March 2007 Abstract—Two-dimensional views of three-dimensional space are based on conventions. Renais- sance perspectival drawing invented by Brunelleschi is one of them. It caused difficulties to fifteenth and sixteenth century and later artists, although readily taken up by those understanding mathemat- ics. Raphael was amongst those who did not seem to have understood some of its elements: this is illustrated in the first section. The second addresses the question of whether a squint may manifest in an artist’s work. Giorgione’s ocular anomaly was well documented by several of his self-portraits, and reference is made to some of his paintings with a special analysis of The Tempest. The final sec- tion deals with chromatic stereoscopy, with particular reference to the work of Dürer. His apparently anomalous spatial sense is tentatively explained with the suggestion that he may have suffered from a defect of colour vision (protanomaly). Keywords: Perspective; squint; chromatic stereoscopy. 1. INTRODUCTION The manner in which artists picture space is a matter of convention. As some of their optical illusions show, the Romans were aware of the problem of rendering three-dimensional space on a two-dimensional surface, but, as shown in Pompeii, failed to solve it.
    [Show full text]
  • The Narrowing of Giorgione's Masterpiece (To the Problem of The
    International Journal of Art and Art History December 2017, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 13-18 ISSN: 2374-2321 (Print), 2374-233X (Online) Copyright © The Author(s).All Rights Reserved. Published by American Research Institute for Policy Development DOI: 10.15640/ijaah.v5n2p2 URL: https://doi.org/10.15640/ijaah.v5n2p2 The Narrowing of Giorgione’s Masterpiece (To the Problem of the Hermitage Judith’s Original Measurements) Ivan Sablin1 The Judith in the museum of Hermitage is one of the few universally acknowledged works by Giorgionei, perhaps the last of them to achieve this standing, for the first time in the 18th century and then definitely, more than a hundred years ago. Such works are rare. Giorgione‟s authorship of even the Castelfranco Madonna has been (recently) contestedii, not to mention a much more complex case of Dresden Venusiii. The most rigorous approach to the size of Giorgione‟s œuvre leaves the artist with only the Three Philosophers in Vienna and the Tempest in Venice, along with the Judith (in spite of some earlier opinions, which have been rejected long ago). None of these attributions is based upon a documentary evidence, be that a verified signature or any archival source, for the only work documented in artist‟s lifetime is the one executed for Fondaco dei tedeschiiv, a fresco cycle long lost to a salty air of Serenissima, its pitiful remains (on show at Franchetti gallery) offering no chance to draw stylistic conclusions for the identification of the other works in question. Yet it is precisely the stylistic analysis that all accepted attributions to Giorgione rely upon, adding to the scarce historic testimonies of not always a trustworthy nature.
    [Show full text]
  • Titian (Tiziano Vecellio)
    Titian (Tiziano Vecellio) a biography Timeline Tiziano Vecellio, known in English as Titian [TI-shuhn], was born where he entertained members of Venetian elite, men of rank, and fellow artists. Subsequently, Titian quickly between 1488-1490 in Pieve di Cadore, a town in the Dolomite became the most well-known painter in Venice, earning commissions from the doges of Venice, and the noble 1490 Mountains just outside Venice. His parents recognized his artistic families of Italy. Nobility such as Federico II Gonzaga, the Duke of Mantua and Francesco Maria della Rovere, 1488/90 Titian (Tizanio Vecellio) abilities and, at age 9 or 10, sent him to Venice with his brother. the Duke of Urbino, commissioned him to create portraits. Titian’s prestigious reputation as a talented por- is born in Pieve de Cadore, Italy Venice was a wealthy, prosperous city boasting of a flourishing traitist spread throughout Europe, and members of the Royal Courts, including Queen Isabella of Portugal, economy that attracted merchants, artists, and craftsmen. the Holy Roman Emperor Charles V and his son Phillip II of Spain, and Pope Paul III, commissioned Titian Titian began his apprenticeship under a minor painter, for his portraits. Sebastian Zuccato, who quickly recognizing his artistic talents, In addition to being known for his portraiture, Titian also c. 1498 Moves to Venice with his and arranged for Titian to work under the guidance of the most painted religious themes, and scenes of mythical and allegori- holder brother to begin apprenticeship prominent painters in Venice, the Bellini brothers. At first Titian cal figures, such as Venus of Urbino and Danaë.
    [Show full text]
  • Venetian Painting in America; the Fifteenth Century
    BOUGHT WITH THE INCOME OF THE • _ „ SAGE ENDOWMENT FUND ; THE GIFT OF HenviS M. Sage 1891 B.3.wyife3 "IaH-o-. DATE DUE hjm^^^ MArfrmfi-Ki^ - t¥iC 9n?i)8g. ,fr 'i- GAYLORD INU.S.A. '"7 , Cornell University Library The original of tiiis book is in the Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924008640496 VENETIAN PAINTING IN AMERICA GiovAHKi Bellini: Madomna Collection or the late Mr. Theodore M. Davis VENETIAN PAINTING IN AMERICA THE FIFTEENTH CENTURY BY BERNARD BERENSON NEW YORK FREDERIC FAIRCHILD SHERMAN MCMXVI 5 Copyright, 1916, by Frederic Fairchild Sherman PREFACE "Now that we are on the subject of Venetian Paint- ing," that would be a more exact title for this book. For, in fact, I have made the stray pictures in our col- lections the pretext for saying what I wanted to say about their authors in general. In some ways this form suits me as it suited my master, Giovanni Morelli. Like him, I have a dis- taste for including in my own writing questions that do not vividly interest me at the moment, no matter how important in themselves ; and like him, I prefer to avoid such systematic treatment as entails dealing with ma- terials either at second hand, or out of dimmed and at- tenuated recollection. It goes against the grain to write about anything that does not fascinate and absorb me. For the last few years it has been the painters of Venice, and Giovanni Bellini in particular, that have preoccupied my leisure and occupied my working hours.
    [Show full text]
  • The Word Made Visible in the Painted Image
    The Word made Visible in the Painted Image The Word made Visible in the Painted Image: Perspective, Proportion, Witness and Threshold in Italian Renaissance Painting By Stephen Miller The Word made Visible in the Painted Image: Perspective, Proportion, Witness and Threshold in Italian Renaissance Painting By Stephen Miller This book first published 2016 Cambridge Scholars Publishing Lady Stephenson Library, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE6 2PA, UK British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Copyright © 2016 by Stephen Miller All rights for this book reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owner. ISBN (10): 1-4438-8542-8 ISBN (13): 978-1-4438-8542-3 For Paula, Lucy and Eddie CONTENTS List of Illustrations ..................................................................................... ix Acknowledgements .................................................................................... xi Introduction ................................................................................................. 1 Chapter One ................................................................................................. 3 Setting the Scene The Rise of Humanism and the Italian Renaissance Changing Style and Attitudes of Patronage in a Devotional Context The Emergence of the Altarpiece in
    [Show full text]
  • Sebastiano Del Piombo and His Collaboration with Michelangelo: Distance and Proximity to the Divine in Catholic Reformation Rome
    SEBASTIANO DEL PIOMBO AND HIS COLLABORATION WITH MICHELANGELO: DISTANCE AND PROXIMITY TO THE DIVINE IN CATHOLIC REFORMATION ROME by Marsha Libina A dissertation submitted to the Johns Hopkins University in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Baltimore, Maryland April, 2015 © 2015 Marsha Libina All Rights Reserved Abstract This dissertation is structured around seven paintings that mark decisive moments in Sebastiano del Piombo’s Roman career (1511-47) and his collaboration with Michelangelo. Scholarship on Sebastiano’s collaborative works with Michelangelo typically concentrates on the artists’ division of labor and explains the works as a reconciliation of Venetian colorito (coloring) and Tuscan disegno (design). Consequently, discourses of interregional rivalry, center and periphery, and the normativity of the Roman High Renaissance become the overriding terms in which Sebastiano’s work is discussed. What has been overlooked is Sebastiano’s own visual intelligence, his active rather than passive use of Michelangelo’s skills, and the novelty of his works, made in response to reform currents of the early sixteenth century. This study investigates the significance behind Sebastiano’s repeating, slowing down, and narrowing in on the figure of Christ in his Roman works. The dissertation begins by addressing Sebastiano’s use of Michelangelo’s drawings as catalysts for his own inventions, demonstrating his investment in collaboration and strategies of citation as tools for artistic image-making. Focusing on Sebastiano’s reinvention of his partner’s drawings, it then looks at the ways in which the artist engaged with the central debates of the Catholic Reformation – debates on the Church’s mediation of the divine, the role of the individual in the path to personal salvation, and the increasingly problematic distance between the layperson and God.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of Landscape in Venetian Painting, 1475-1525
    THE EVOLUTION OF LANDSCAPE IN VENETIAN PAINTING, 1475-1525 by James Reynolds Jewitt BA in Art History, Hartwick College, 2006 BA in English, Hartwick College, 2006 MA, University of Pittsburgh, 2009 Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of The Dietrich School of Arts and Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Pittsburgh 2014 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH KENNETH P. DIETRICH SCHOOL OF ARTS AND SCIENCES This dissertation was presented by James Reynolds Jewitt It was defended on April 7, 2014 and approved by C. Drew Armstrong, Associate Professor, History of Art and Architecture Kirk Savage, Professor, History of Art and Architecture Jennifer Waldron, Associate Professor, Department of English Dissertation Advisor: Ann Sutherland Harris, Professor Emerita, History of Art and Architecture ii Copyright © by James Reynolds Jewitt 2014 iii THE EVOLUTION OF LANDSCAPE IN VENETIAN PAINTING, 1475-1525 James R. Jewitt, PhD University of Pittsburgh, 2014 Landscape painting assumed a new prominence in Venetian painting between the late fifteenth to early sixteenth century: this study aims to understand why and how this happened. It begins by redefining the conception of landscape in Renaissance Italy and then examines several ambitious easel paintings produced by major Venetian painters, beginning with Giovanni Bellini’s (c.1431- 36-1516) St. Francis in the Desert (c.1475), that give landscape a far more significant role than previously seen in comparable commissions by their peers, or even in their own work. After an introductory chapter reconsidering all previous hypotheses regarding Venetian painters’ reputations as accomplished landscape painters, it is divided into four chronologically arranged case study chapters.
    [Show full text]
  • Barbarigo' by Titian in the National Gallery, London
    MA.JAN.MAZZOTTA.pg.proof.corrs_Layout 1 08/12/2011 15:31 Page 12 A ‘gentiluomo da Ca’ Barbarigo’ by Titian in the National Gallery, London by ANTONIO MAZZOTTA ‘AT THE TIME he first began to paint like Giorgione, when he was no more than eighteen, [Titian] made the portrait of a gen- tleman of the Barbarigo family, a friend of his, which was held to be extremely fine, for the representation of the flesh-colour was true and realistic and the hairs were so well distinguished one from the other that they might have been counted, as might the stitches in a doublet of silvered satin which also appeared in that work. In short the picture was thought to show great diligence and to be very successful. Titian signed it in the shadow, but if he had not done so, it would have been taken for Giorgione’s work. Meanwhile, after Giorgione himself had executed the principal façade of the Fondaco de’ Tedeschi, Titian, through Barbarigo’s intervention, was commissioned to paint certain scenes for the same building, above the Merceria’.1 Vasari’s evocative and detailed description, which would seem to be the result of seeing the painting in the flesh, led Jean Paul Richter in 1895 to believe that it could be identified with Titian’s Portrait of a man then in the collection of the Earl of Darnley at Cobham Hall and now in the National Gallery, London (Fig.15).2 Up to that date it was famous as ‘Titian’s Ariosto’, a confusion that, as we shall see, had been born in the seventeenth century.
    [Show full text]
  • Boucher: Three Pastoral Scenes
    Art Appreciation Lecture Series 2015 Meet the Masters: Highlights from the Scottish National Gallery Meet the Masters: Boucher: three pastoral scenes Lecturer: Professor Mark Ledbury, University of Sydney 10 & 11 June 2015 Lecture summary: This lecture explores the three Pastoral Scenes by François Boucher in the Scottish National Gallery , discussing the personal, institutional and generic contexts in which they were produced and understood and examining through them whether the oft-repeated criticisms of Boucher’s unnatural and unrealistic pastoral style were in fact a product of misunderstanding both of the genre and the complexity of the painter’s compositions. The Lecture will argue that Boucher’s enjoyment of both artifice and nature, and his unashamed love of painting as decoration, demonstrate not his moral debauchery and superficiality but his keen and essential grasp of the painter’s role and the possibilities of painting in the eighteenth century. Slide list: 1. Gustaf Lumberg, Portrait of François Boucher (1741, Pastel, Musée du Louvre, Paris) 2. François Boucher, Venus and Vulcan (1732, Oil on Canvas, Musée du Louvre, Paris) 3. François Boucher, Portrait of Madame Pompadour (1748, Oil on Canvas, Munich, Alte Pinakothek) 4. François Boucher, Odalisque , (c1745, Oil on Canvas, Paris: Louvre) 5. François Boucher, Study of a woman , (Chalk, Pencil on Paper, New York, Cooper Hewitt) 6. François Boucher, The Milliner (Morning) 1746 Oil on Canvas, , Stockholm, Nationalmuseum 7. François Boucher, Pastoral Scene (The offering to the Village Girl), c1762, Oil on Canvas, National Gallery of Scotland 8. François Boucher, Pastoral Scene (The Gallant or Aimiable Pastoral), c.1762, Oil on Canvas, National Gallery of Scotland 9.
    [Show full text]
  • Lives of the Most Eminent Painters Sculptors and Architects
    Lives of the Most Eminent Painters Sculptors and Architects Giorgio Vasari Lives of the Most Eminent Painters Sculptors and Architects Table of Contents Lives of the Most Eminent Painters Sculptors and Architects.......................................................................1 Giorgio Vasari..........................................................................................................................................2 LIFE OF FILIPPO LIPPI, CALLED FILIPPINO...................................................................................9 BERNARDINO PINTURICCHIO........................................................................................................13 LIFE OF BERNARDINO PINTURICCHIO.........................................................................................14 FRANCESCO FRANCIA.....................................................................................................................17 LIFE OF FRANCESCO FRANCIA......................................................................................................18 PIETRO PERUGINO............................................................................................................................22 LIFE OF PIETRO PERUGINO.............................................................................................................23 VITTORE SCARPACCIA (CARPACCIO), AND OTHER VENETIAN AND LOMBARD PAINTERS...........................................................................................................................................31
    [Show full text]