DOCSLIB.ORG

From Internet to Robotics 2020 Edition

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
From Internet to Robotics 2020 Edition September 9, 2020 A Roadmap for US Robotics From Internet to Robotics 2020 Edition Organized By University of California San Diego University of Illinois Urbana Champaign University of Massachusetts Lowell University of Southern California Carnegie Mellon University Clemson University Cornell University Georgia Institute of Technology Johns Hopkins University Oregon State University The University of Utah University of California Berkeley University of Michigan Sponsored by: University of California San Diego Computing Community Consortium University of Massachusetts Lowell University of Illinois, Urbana Champaign University of Southern California 2 Table of contents 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................................... 7 1.1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................. 7 1.2 COVID-19 ...................................................................................................................................... 8 1.3 MAIN FINDINGS ................................................................................................................................ 9 1.4 THE ROADMAP DOCUMENT. ............................................................................................................. 11 1.5 FURTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE FROM: ..................................................................................... 11 2. SOCIETAL DRIVERS ................................................................................................................................... 13 2.1. MANUFACTURING ................................................................................................................................. 13 2.2. LOGISTICS AND E-COMMERCE ................................................................................................................. 16 2.3. TRANSPORTATION ................................................................................................................................. 19 Current Trends ..................................................................................................................................... 19 Personal Transportation...................................................................................................................... 20 Emerging personal mobility systems .................................................................................................. 20 Freight ................................................................................................................................................. 21 Home delivery systems ........................................................................................................................ 21 2.4. QUALITY OF LIFE ................................................................................................................................... 21 2.5. CLINICAL HEALTHCARE ........................................................................................................................... 25 Motivational statistics......................................................................................................................... 25 2.6. FEEDING THE PLANET ............................................................................................................................. 27 2.7. SECURITY AND RESCUE ROBOTICS ............................................................................................................ 28 National Security ................................................................................................................................. 28 Infrastructure Inspection and Maintenance ....................................................................................... 29 Evacuation in Large-Scale Disasters .................................................................................................... 29 Border Surveillance ............................................................................................................................. 31 3. MAPPING SOCIETAL DRIVERS TO RESEARCH CHALLENGES ..................................................................... 33 3.1 IDENTIFYING CHALLENGES TO GROWTH / PROGRESS ..................................................................................... 33 3.1.1 Manufacturing ........................................................................................................................... 33 3.1.2 Logistics ...................................................................................................................................... 34 3.1.3 Transportation ........................................................................................................................... 34 3.1.4 Quality of Life ............................................................................................................................. 35 3.1.5. Medical/Clinical Support ........................................................................................................... 36 3.1.6. Feeding the planet .................................................................................................................... 36 3.1.7 Security & Safety ........................................................................................................................ 37 3.2 MAPPING CHALLENGES TO RESEARCH NEEDS ............................................................................................... 37 3.2.1 Cost ............................................................................................................................................. 37 3.2.2 High Mix / Low Volume .............................................................................................................. 38 3.2.3 Safety.......................................................................................................................................... 38 3.2.4 Effortless Usage ......................................................................................................................... 39 3.2.5 Setup Time .................................................................................................................................. 40 3.2.6. Robustness ................................................................................................................................ 40 4. RESEARCH CHALLENGES .......................................................................................................................... 43 4.1. ARCHITECTURES AND DESIGN REALIZATIONS .............................................................................................. 43 4.2. LOCOMOTION ....................................................................................................................................... 46 Legged Robots: .................................................................................................................................... 46 3 4.3. GRASPING AND MANIPULATION .............................................................................................................. 49 Key Questions ...................................................................................................................................... 50 Manipulation ....................................................................................................................................... 52 Full immersion, telepresence with haptic and multi-modal sensor feedback..................................... 52 4.4. PERCEPTION ......................................................................................................................................... 53 State of the art .................................................................................................................................... 53 Key questions ...................................................................................................................................... 54 4.5. PLANNING AND CONTROL ....................................................................................................................... 55 Task and Motion Planning Under Uncertainty.................................................................................... 55 Manipulation ....................................................................................................................................... 56 Complex and Dynamic Environments.................................................................................................. 56 Control of high-dimensional, highly dynamic, hybrid systems. .......................................................... 57 Planning and Control for Sliding Autonomy ........................................................................................ 57 4.6. LEARNING AND ADAPTIVE SYSTEMS .......................................................................................................... 58 Promise and Challenges of Machine Learning .................................................................................... 58 Robot Learning Approaches ................................................................................................................ 58 Datasets and Benchmarks................................................................................................................... 59 Vision for 5 Years ................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • AI, Robots, and Swarms: Issues, Questions, and Recommended Studies
    AI, Robots, and Swarms Issues, Questions, and Recommended Studies Andrew Ilachinski January 2017 Approved for Public Release; Distribution Unlimited. This document contains the best opinion of CNA at the time of issue. It does not necessarily represent the opinion of the sponsor. Distribution Approved for Public Release; Distribution Unlimited. Specific authority: N00014-11-D-0323. Copies of this document can be obtained through the Defense Technical Information Center at www.dtic.mil or contact CNA Document Control and Distribution Section at 703-824-2123. Photography Credits: http://www.darpa.mil/DDM_Gallery/Small_Gremlins_Web.jpg; http://4810-presscdn-0-38.pagely.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/ Robotics.jpg; http://i.kinja-img.com/gawker-edia/image/upload/18kxb5jw3e01ujpg.jpg Approved by: January 2017 Dr. David A. Broyles Special Activities and Innovation Operations Evaluation Group Copyright © 2017 CNA Abstract The military is on the cusp of a major technological revolution, in which warfare is conducted by unmanned and increasingly autonomous weapon systems. However, unlike the last “sea change,” during the Cold War, when advanced technologies were developed primarily by the Department of Defense (DoD), the key technology enablers today are being developed mostly in the commercial world. This study looks at the state-of-the-art of AI, machine-learning, and robot technologies, and their potential future military implications for autonomous (and semi-autonomous) weapon systems. While no one can predict how AI will evolve or predict its impact on the development of military autonomous systems, it is possible to anticipate many of the conceptual, technical, and operational challenges that DoD will face as it increasingly turns to AI-based technologies.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 3: Internet of Things (Iot)
    2020 Edition Chapter 3: Internet of Things (IoT) http://eps.ieee.org/hir The HIR is devised and intended for technology assessment only and is without regard to any commercial considerations pertaining to individual products or equipment. We acknowledge with gratitude the use of material and figures in this Roadmap that are excerpted from original sources. Figures & tables should be re-used only with the permission of the original source. December 2020 Table of Contents Table of Contents Chapter 1: Heterogeneous Integration Roadmap: Driving Force and Enabling Technology for Systems of the Future1 Chapter 2: High Performance Computing and Data Centers1 Chapter 3: Heterogeneous Integration for the Internet of Things (IoT)1 Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................................. 1 1. Introduction ...................................................................................................................................................... 1 2. Benefits of IoT ................................................................................................................................................. 3 3. Challenges for IoT ........................................................................................................................................... 4 4. Difficult Technical issues ................................................................................................................................ 5 5. Convergence
    [Show full text]
  • Real-Time Kinematics Coordinated Swarm Robotics for Construction 3D Printing
    1 Real-time Kinematics Coordinated Swarm Robotics for Construction 3D Printing Darren Wang and Robert Zhu, John Jay High School Abstract Architectural advancements in housing are limited by traditional construction techniques. Construction 3D printing introduces freedom in design that can lead to drastic improvements in building quality, resource efficiency, and cost. Designs for current construction 3D printers have limited build volume and at the scale needed for printing houses, transportation and setup become issues. We propose a swarm robotics-based construction 3D printing system that bypasses all these issues. A central computer will coordinate the movement and actions of a swarm of robots which are each capable of extruding concrete in a programmable path and navigating on both the ground and the structure. The central computer will create paths for each robot to follow by processing the G-code obtained from slicing a CAD model of the intended structure. The robots will use readings from real-time kinematics (RTK) modules to keep themselves on their designated paths. Our goal for this semester is to create a single functioning unit of the swarm and to develop a system for coordinating its movement and actions. Problem Traditional concrete construction is costly, has substantial environmental impact, and limits freedom in design. In traditional concrete construction, workers use special molds called forms to shape concrete. Over a third of the construction cost of a concrete house stems from the formwork alone. Concrete manufacturing and construction are responsible for 6% – 8% of CO2 emissions as well as 10% of energy usage in the world. Many buildings use more concrete than necessary, and this stems from the fact that formwork construction requires walls, floors, and beams to be solid.
    [Show full text]
  • Technology Roadmap
    Technology Roadmap 1st of February, 2018 Contents 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 3 2 Technology Roadmap structure ............................................................................................. 4 3 Industrial challenges, gaps, barriers and bottlenecks to be solved........................................ 5 3.1 Aeronautic Sector .......................................................................................................... 5 3.1.1 Grand Challenge .................................................................................................... 5 3.1.2 Gaps, Barriers and Bottlenecks to be solved ......................................................... 5 3.2 Automotive Sector ......................................................................................................... 7 3.2.1 Grand Challenge .................................................................................................... 7 3.2.2 Gaps, Barriers and Bottlenecks to be solved ......................................................... 7 3.3 Consumer Goods Sector ................................................................................................ 9 3.3.1 Grand Challenge .................................................................................................... 9 3.3.2 Gaps, Barriers and Bottlenecks to be solved ......................................................... 9 3.4 Capital Goods Sector ..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Advanced Medical Telerobots
    applied sciences Review Review of Advanced Medical Telerobots Sarmad Mehrdad 1,†, Fei Liu 2,† , Minh Tu Pham 3 , Arnaud Lelevé 3,* and S. Farokh Atashzar 1,4,5 1 Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, New York University (NYU), Brooklyn, NY 11201, USA; [email protected] (S.M.); [email protected] (S.F.A.) 2 Advanced Robotics and Controls Lab, University of San Diego, San Diego, CA 92110, USA; [email protected] 3 Ampère, INSA Lyon, CNRS (UMR5005), F69621 Villeurbanne, France; [email protected] 4 Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, New York University (NYU), Brooklyn, NY 11201, USA 5 NYU WIRELESS, Brooklyn, NY 11201, USA * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +33-0472-436035 † Mehrdad and Liu contributed equally to this work and share the first authorship. Abstract: The advent of telerobotic systems has revolutionized various aspects of the industry and human life. This technology is designed to augment human sensorimotor capabilities to extend them beyond natural competence. Classic examples are space and underwater applications when distance and access are the two major physical barriers to be combated with this technology. In modern examples, telerobotic systems have been used in several clinical applications, including teleoperated surgery and telerehabilitation. In this regard, there has been a significant amount of research and development due to the major benefits in terms of medical outcomes. Recently telerobotic systems are combined with advanced artificial intelligence modules to better share the agency with the operator and open new doors of medical automation. In this review paper, we have provided a comprehensive analysis of the literature considering various topologies of telerobotic systems in the medical domain while shedding light on different levels of autonomy for this technology, starting from direct control, going up to command-tracking autonomous telerobots.
    [Show full text]
  • Supporting Mobile Swarm Robotics in Low Power and Lossy Sensor Networks 1 Introduction
    1 Supporting Mobile Swarm Robotics in Low Power and Lossy Sensor Networks Kevin Andrea [email protected] Robert Simon [email protected] Sean Luke [email protected] Department of Computer Science George Mason University 4400 University Drive MSN 4A5 Fairfax, VA 22030 USA Summary Wireless low-power and lossy networks (LLNs) are a key enabling technology for the deployment of massively scaled self-organizing sensor swarm systems. Supporting applications such as providing human users situational awareness across large areas requires that swarm-friendly LLNs effectively support communication between embedded and mobile devices, such as autonomous robots. The reason for this is that large scale embedded sensor applications such as unattended ground sensing systems typically do not have full end-to-end connectivity, but suffer frequent communication partitions. Further, it is desirable for many tactical applications to offload tasks to mobile robots. Despite the importance of support this communication pattern, there has been relatively little work in designing and evaluating LLN-friendly protocols capable of supporting such interactions. This paper addresses the above problem by describing the design, implementation, and evaluation of the MoRoMi system. MoRoMi stands for Mobile Robotic MultI-sink. It is intended to support autonomous mobile robots that interact with embedded sensor swarms engaged in activities such as cooperative target observation, collective map building, and ant foraging. These activities benefit if the swarm can dynamically interact with embedded sensing and actuator systems that provide both local environmental or positional information and an ad-hoc communication system. Our paper quantifies the performance levels that can be expected using current swarm and LLN technologies.
    [Show full text]
  • Interactive Robots in Experimental Biology 3 4 5 6 Jens Krause1,2, Alan F.T
    1 2 Interactive Robots in Experimental Biology 3 4 5 6 Jens Krause1,2, Alan F.T. Winfield3 & Jean-Louis Deneubourg4 7 8 9 10 11 12 1Leibniz-Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries, Department of Biology and 13 Ecology of Fishes, 12587 Berlin, Germany; 14 2Humboldt-University of Berlin, Department for Crop and Animal Sciences, Philippstrasse 15 13, 10115 Berlin, Germany; 16 3Bristol Robotics Laboratory, University of the West of England, Coldharbour Lane, Bristol 17 BS16 1QY, UK; 18 4Unit of Social Ecology, Campus Plaine - CP 231, Université libre de Bruxelles, Bd du 19 Triomphe, B-1050 Brussels - Belgium 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Corresponding author: Krause, J. ([email protected]), Leibniz Institute of Freshwater 29 Ecology and Inland Fisheries, Department of the Biology and Ecology of Fishes, 30 Müggelseedamm 310, 12587 Berlin, Germany. 31 32 33 1 33 Interactive robots have the potential to revolutionise the study of social behaviour because 34 they provide a number of methodological advances. In interactions with live animals the 35 behaviour of robots can be standardised, morphology and behaviour can be decoupled (so that 36 different morphologies and behavioural strategies can be combined), behaviour can be 37 manipulated in complex interaction sequences and models of behaviour can be embodied by 38 the robot and thereby be tested. Furthermore, robots can be used as demonstrators in 39 experiments on social learning. The opportunities that robots create for new experimental 40 approaches have far-reaching consequences for research in fields such as mate choice, 41 cooperation, social learning, personality studies and collective behaviour.
    [Show full text]
  • Control of Mobile Robot for Remote Medical Examination: Design Concepts and Users’ Feedback from Experimental Studies
    Control of Mobile Robot for Remote Medical Examination: Design Concepts and Users’ Feedback from Experimental Studies Krzysztof Arent∗, Janusz Jakubiak∗, Michał Drwi˛ega∗, Mateusz Cholewinski´ ∗, Gerald Stollnbergery, Manuel Giulianiy, Manfred Tscheligiy, Dorota Szczesniak-Stanczykz, Marcin Janowskiz, Wojciech Brzozowskiz, Andrzej Wysokinski´ z ∗ Department of Cybernetics and Robotics, y Center for Human-Computer z Department of Cardiology Faculty of Electronics, Interaction, Medical University of Lublin, Wrocław University of Technology, University of Salzburg, ul. K. Jaczewskiego 8, Wybrzeze˙ Wyspianskiego´ 27, Sigmund-Haffner-Gasse 18, 20-143 Lublin, Poland 50-370 Wrocław, Poland 5020 Salzburg, Austria Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Abstract—In this article we discuss movement control of a ReMeDi medical mobile robot from the user perspective. The control is essentially limited to the level of operator actions where the operator is a member of a nursing staff. Two working modes are the base of considerations: long distance (LD) and short distance (SD) movement. In this context two robot control techniques are subject of study: manual with use of a gamepad and "point and click" on a map that is related to autonomous motion with use of an onboard navigation system. In the SD mode the user manually operates the robot, that is close to a Fig. 1. ReMeDi system overview [1] laying down patient on a settee. In the LD mode the mobile base moves autonomously in a space shared with people to the desired position. Two user studies were conducted. The results show that from the perspective of LD mode the autonomous acceptance from both patients and medical personnel.
    [Show full text]
  • Special Feature on Advanced Mobile Robotics
    applied sciences Editorial Special Feature on Advanced Mobile Robotics DaeEun Kim School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Yonsei University, Shinchon, Seoul 03722, Korea; [email protected] Received: 29 October 2019; Accepted: 31 October 2019; Published: 4 November 2019 1. Introduction Mobile robots and their applications are involved with many research fields including electrical engineering, mechanical engineering, computer science, artificial intelligence and cognitive science. Mobile robots are widely used for transportation, surveillance, inspection, interaction with human, medical system and entertainment. This Special Issue handles recent development of mobile robots and their research, and it will help find or enhance the principle of robotics and practical applications in real world. The Special Issue is intended to be a collection of multidisciplinary work in the field of mobile robotics. Various approaches and integrative contributions are introduced through this Special Issue. Motion control of mobile robots, aerial robots/vehicles, robot navigation, localization and mapping, robot vision and 3D sensing, networked robots, swarm robotics, biologically-inspired robotics, learning and adaptation in robotics, human-robot interaction and control systems for industrial robots are covered. 2. Advanced Mobile Robotics This Special Issue includes a variety of research fields related to mobile robotics. Initially, multi-agent robots or multi-robots are introduced. It covers cooperation of multi-agent robots or formation control. Trajectory planning methods and applications are listed. Robot navigations have been studied as classical robot application. Autonomous navigation examples are demonstrated. Then services robots are introduced as human-robot interaction. Furthermore, unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) or autonomous underwater vehicles (AUVs) are shown for autonomous navigation or map building.
    [Show full text]
  • Swarm Robotics”
    applied sciences Editorial Editorial: Special Issue “Swarm Robotics” Giandomenico Spezzano Institute for High Performance Computing and Networking (ICAR), National Research Council of Italy (CNR), Via Pietro Bucci, 8-9C, 87036 Rende (CS), Italy; [email protected] Received: 1 April 2019; Accepted: 2 April 2019; Published: 9 April 2019 Swarm robotics is the study of how to coordinate large groups of relatively simple robots through the use of local rules so that a desired collective behavior emerges from their interaction. The group behavior emerging in the swarms takes its inspiration from societies of insects that can perform tasks that are beyond the capabilities of the individuals. The swarm robotics inspired from nature is a combination of swarm intelligence and robotics [1], which shows a great potential in several aspects. The activities of social insects are often based on a self-organizing process that relies on the combination of the following four basic rules: Positive feedback, negative feedback, randomness, and multiple interactions [2,3]. Collectively working robot teams can solve a problem more efficiently than a single robot while also providing robustness and flexibility to the group. The swarm robotics model is a key component of a cooperative algorithm that controls the behaviors and interactions of all individuals. In the model, the robots in the swarm should have some basic functions, such as sensing, communicating, motioning, and satisfy the following properties: 1. Autonomy—individuals that create the swarm-robotic system are autonomous robots. They are independent and can interact with each other and the environment. 2. Large number—they are in large number so they can cooperate with each other.
    [Show full text]
  • Building 3D-Structures with an Intelligent Robot Swarm
    BUILDING 3D-STRUCTURES WITH AN INTELLIGENT ROBOT SWARM A Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Cornell University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science by Yiwen Hua May 2018 c 2018 Yiwen Hua ALL RIGHTS RESERVED BUILDING 3D-STRUCTURES WITH AN INTELLIGENT ROBOT SWARM Yiwen Hua, M.S. Cornell University 2018 This research is an extension to the TERMES system, a decentralized au- tonomous construction team composed of swarm robots building 2.5D struc- tures1, with custom-designed bricks. The work in this thesis concerns 1) im- proved mechanical design of the robots, 2) addition of heterogeneous building material, and 3) an extended algorithmic framework to use this material. In or- der to lower system cost and maintenance, the TERMES robot is redesigned for manufacturing in low-end 3D printers and the new drive train, including motor adapters and pulleys, is based on 3D printed components instead of machined aluminum. The work further extends the original system by enabling construc- tion of 3D structures without added hardware complexity in the robots. To do this, we introduce a reusable, spring-loaded expandable brick which can be eas- ily manufactured through one-step casting and which complies with the origi- nal robots and bricks. This thesis also introduces a decentralized construction algorithm that permits an arbitrary number of robots to build overhangs over convex cavities. To enable timely completion of large-scale structures, we also introduce a method by which to optimize the transition probabilities used by the robots to traverse the structure.
    [Show full text]
  • Efficient Design of Precision Medical Robotics
    Efficient Design of Precision Medical Robotics by NEVAN CLANCY HANUMARA S.M. Mechanical Engineering Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2006 B.S. Mechanical Engineering, B.A. French University of Rhode Island, 2004 Submitted to the Department of Mechanical Engineering in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctorate of Philosophy in Mechanical Engineering at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology September 2012 ©2012 Massachusetts Institute of Technology All Rights Reserved Author: Department of Mechanical Engineering 30 August 2012 Certified by: Alexander H. Slocum Pappalardo Professor of Mechanical Engineering Thesis Supervisor Accepted by: David E. Hardt Professor of Mechanical Engineering Graduate Officer Efficient Design of Precision Medical Robotics by NEVAN CLANCY HANUMARA Submitted to the M.I.T. Department of Mechanical Engineering on 30 August 2012 in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements of the Degree of Doctorate of Philosophy in Mechanical Engineering Abstract Medical robotics is increasingly demonstrating the potential to improve patient care through more precise interventions. However, taking inspiration from industrial robotics has often resulted in large, sometimes cumbersome designs, which represent high capital and per procedure expenditures, as well as increased procedure times. This thesis proposes and demonstrates an alternative model and method for developing economical, appropriately scaled medical robots that improve care and efficiency, while moderating costs. Key to this approach
    [Show full text]