Escribe Agenda Package
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
2014-2015 Annual Report
ANNUAL REPORT TO MEMBERS 2014-2015 AND ANNUAL BUSINESS MEETING Friday, May 8, 2015 Greater Sudbury, Ontario FONOM ANNUAL BUSINESS MEETING A G E N D A Friday, May 8, 2015, 8:00 am Main Ballroom, Holiday Inn Hotel 1696 Regent Street Greater Sudbury, ON 1. Approval of / Additions to Agenda 2. Introduction of Executive 3. President’s Report 4. Financial Report (resolution required) 5. Approval of Minutes of Meeting Friday, May 9, 2014 (resolution required) 6. Resolutions 7. Adjourn 2 FONOM BOARD OF DIRECTORS PRESIDENT TELEPHONE (705) REPRESENTING Mayor Alan Spacek Mun Tel 337-4250 District of Town of Kapuskasing Mun Fax 335-5103 Cochrane 88 Riverside Drive Kapuskasing, ON P5N 1B3 Email: [email protected] PAST PRESIDENT Councillor S. Mac Bain Mun Tel 474-0400 City of North Bay City of North Bay Mun Fax 495-4353 PO Box 360 200 McIntyre St. E. North Bay, ON P1B 8H8 Email: [email protected] FIRST VICE PRESIDENT Councillor Danny Whalen Mun Tel 672-3363 District of City of Temiskaming Shores Mun Fax 672-3200 Timiskaming 325 Farr Drive, Box 2050 Haileybury, ON P0J 1C0 Email : [email protected] SECOND VICE PRESIDENT Mayor Brian Bigger Mun Tel 674-4455 City of Greater City of Greater Sudbury Ext. 2514 Sudbury PO Box 5000, Stn A Mun Fax 673-3096 200 Brady Street Sudbury, ON P3A 5P3 Email: [email protected] DIRECTORS (in alphabetical order by surname) Mayor Steven Black Mun Tel 360-2611 City of Timmins City of Timmins Mun Fax 360-2690 220 Algonquin Blvd. East Timmins, ON P1B 8H8 Email: [email protected] Reeve Austin -
“They Demanded — Under Duress — That We Stop Supporting Belinda [Karahalios]. We Are Appalled at This Bullying An
Queen’s Park Today – Daily Report August 20, 2020 Quotation of the day “They demanded — under duress — that we stop supporting Belinda [Karahalios]. We are appalled at this bullying and abuse of power. It is a direct attack on our democracy!” The now-derecognized PC riding association in Cambridge sends out flyers attacking Premier Doug Ford and the PC Party over alleged "intimidation tactics." Today at Queen’s Park Written by Sabrina Nanji On the schedule The house reconvenes on Monday, September 14. The roster for the Select Committee on Emergency Management Oversight — which will scrutinize ongoing extensions of emergency orders via Bill 195 — has been named. The majority-enjoying PC side will feature Bob Bailey, Christine Hogarth, Daryl Kramp, Robin Martin, Sam Oosterhoff, Lindsey Park and Effie Triantafilopoulos. The New Democrat members are Gilles Bisson, Sara Singh and Tom Rakocevic; Liberal MPP John Fraser will take up the Independent spot. The committee was struck as an accountability measure because the PCs empowered themselves to amend or extend the emergency orders for up to the next two years, without requiring a vote or debate in the legislature. Bill 195, the enabling law, also requires the premier or a designate of his choosing to appear at the special committee to justify any changes to the sweeping emergency orders. Premier watch An RFP for the next leg of the Eglinton Crosstown tunnelling project will be issued today. Premier Doug Ford announced the move in Mississauga Tuesday alongside cabinet’s transportation overseers Caroline Mulroney and Kinga Surma. Three construction consortiums have already been shortlisted and are now able to present their detailed costing plans to Infrastructure Ontario. -
WHAT the NEW DOUG FORD GOVERNMENT MEANS for the ENERGY SECTOR – a DETAILED ANALYSIS Posted on July 4, 2018
WHAT THE NEW DOUG FORD GOVERNMENT MEANS FOR THE ENERGY SECTOR – A DETAILED ANALYSIS Posted on July 4, 2018 Categories: Insights, Publications With a new majority provincial government now fully in control of Ontario’s policy landscape, McMillan LLP and McMillan Policy Vantage Group are pleased to provide their insight into what lies ahead for clients and investors in the Energy sector. The New Energy Minister Ontario’s new Minister of Energy already has significant experience with the job ahead, having served in the equivalent federal portfolio in the Cabinet of former Prime Minister Stephen Harper. In that role, Hon. Greg Rickford would have engaged somewhat more on the oil and gas file than the electricity file, but having been responsible for the National Energy Board, he will be very familiar with the nuances of managing a regulated portfolio, and a regulator. Minister Rickford is the MPP for Kenora-Rainy River, the most northerly of the PC Party’s 76 ridings. He is also among the most educated, holding a nursing diploma from Mohawk College, a Bachelor of Science degree from Victoria University, civil and common law degrees from McGill University, and an MBA from Université Laval. Working as a nurse early in his career, Mr. Rickford was stationed in remote First Nations communities across Northern Ontario. He continued to work with Indigenous groups in the north as a lawyer, and later as the federal MP. The fact that Minister Rickford is one of only three members of the Ford executive with any Cabinet-level experience at all will serve him well, as he assumes the responsibilities previously carried by no less than three of his Liberal predecessors; in addition to Energy, he also serves as Minister of Northern Development, Mines, and Indigenous Affairs. -
Master's Research Paper Officers of the Assembly and the Ontario
Master's Research Paper Officers of the Assembly and the Ontario Legislature: Reconsidering the Relationship Jocelyn McCauley Student Number: 216280703 Dr. Peter P. Constantinou A Master's Research Paper submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Public Policy, Administration and Law York University Toronto, Ontario, Canada July 2020 Abstract Officers of Parliament, or as they are referred to in Ontario, “officers of the Assembly”, have emerged within Westminster systems as a recognized tool for enhancing parliamentary oversight and increasing transparency in government. However, in Ontario, the absence of a clearly defined relationship with the provincial legislature has meant that certain officers of the Assembly have felt it necessary to “lobby” individual members and committees, as well as the media, in order to carry out their accountability and oversight functions. This lack of clarity places unnecessary stress on the relationship between independent officers, the Ontario Legislature, and the public sector, and can also negatively impact the public’s perception of government overall. This paper looks specifically at the relationship between the Ontario Legislature and officers of the Assembly, in terms of their governance structures, their appearances in legislative committees, and references to their work in House and committee proceedings. It finds that reforms are needed in order to strengthen officers’ relationships with the Legislature. Independent officers possess few powers of enforcement and as such, strong ties to the Assembly are necessary to ensure that recommended action is taken by legislators defend public trust and dollars. 2 Acknowledgements First and foremost, I would like to thank my supervisor, Dr. -
Hon. Ross Romano Minister of Colleges and Universities Ministry of Colleges and Universities 5Th Floor, 438 University Ave Toronto, on M7A 2A5 October 22, 2020
Hon. Ross Romano Minister of Colleges and Universities Ministry of Colleges and Universities 5th Floor, 438 University Ave Toronto, ON M7A 2A5 October 22, 2020 Dear Minister Romano, I am contacting you on behalf of the Ontario Confederation of University Faculty Associations (OCUFA), which represents 17,000 faculty and academic librarians across the province. We are alarmed that your government is intending to discreetly pass legislation that would allow the Canada Christian College to call itself a “university” and award degrees. Broadly, we are concerned about emerging efforts to privatize postsecondary education in Ontario and to give private institutions degree-granting privileges that will undermine the quality and accessibility of postsecondary education in Ontario. This is especially evident in the case of Canada Christian College where Charles McVety, who runs the college, openly holds deeply rooted Islamophobic, transphobic, and homophobic views. McVety has been embroiled in several controversies resulting from his discriminatory beliefs. We will not repeat any of his bigotry in our letter; it is well documented. The Ontario government should not grant accreditation and degree-granting privileges to institutions that do not meet the anti-discriminatory and anti-hate speech principles outlined in the Ontario Human Rights Code. It is imperative that the government protect religious minorities, the queer community, and other marginalized groups. At the very least, the government should do no harm. Allowing the Canada Christian College to call itself a “university” and to award degrees in our province would most certainly harm these marginalized communities and allow hateful and discriminatory speech to persist. Your Ministry must change course on this urgent matter. -
Joint Submission the Standing Committee on General Government Re: Bill 8, Public Sector and MPP Accountability and Transparen
Joint Submission to The Standing Committee on General Government Re: Bill 8, Public Sector and MPP Accountability and Transparency Act, 2014 November 26, 2014 November 26, 2014 To: The Standing Committee on General Government Re: Bill 8, Public Sector and MPP Accountability and Transparency Act, 2014 The four school board/trustee associations would like to take the opportunity to respond and comment on this omnibus piece of legislation and in particular two schedules, out of the total eleven schedules, that will directly affect our membership. The bill’s title refers to accountability and transparency– two values that school boards and their elected trustees strive to ensure on a daily basis. Governed by the Education Act, school boards operate under many regulations, policies and guidelines and provide numerous reports, as required by the Ministry of Education, in order to demonstrate transparency and accountability measures. While we believe the government’s intention is to increase public confidence and to show an openness to the province’s electorate, we feel that, without due consideration of the current mechanisms for accountability and transparency that apply to school boards, we have been unfairly captured in the consideration of Schedule 1 – Broader Public Sector Executive Compensation Act, 2014 and Schedule 9 – Amendments to the Ombudsman Act and Related Amendments. The reporting requirements for school boards far exceed requirements in any other sector. These include highly detailed financial reporting three times a year in addition to multiple layers of reporting with regard to students, employees and board improvement planning. Schedule 1: Broader Public Sector Executive Compensation Act, 2014 The new proposed legislation aims to establish compensation frameworks for a lengthy list of public sector employers including those at Ornge, Metrolinx, OLG and the LCBO as well as the executives at school boards. -
EAPO Webinar Series : Rights of Older Adults
EAPO Webinar Series : Rights of Older Adults March 31st, 2020 The information and opinions expressed here today are not necessarily those of the Government of Ontario Welcome All attendees will be muted during the webinar. Recording: Webinar will be recorded and posted on EAPO’s and/or partner organization’s website. ASL Interpreter: Video of Interpreter will be visible during the webinar today and name of ASL Interpreter is under picture. ASL Interpreting provided by Adjusting Video Size: Drag the line between the video frame and slides to the left (adjust at beginning of the webinar). Welcome to our Webinar! Speaker: Will be visible while presenting. Once the presentation is completed, all speakers will be visible for the Question/Answer period. Questions or Issues: Participants can type their questions in Question/Answer box. A response will be posted during the webinar or asked to speaker after the presentation. The Chat box can also be used to post comments during the session. Evaluation: After the session, you will see pop-up screen asking you to provide your feedback and suggestions for future webinars. Contact information will be provide at the end of presentation. Land Acknowledgement MISSION EAPO envisions an Ontario where ALL seniors are free from abuse, have a strong voice, feel safe and respected. ACTION Raising awareness, delivering education and training, working collaboratively with like-minded organizations and assisting with service coordination and advocacy. @EAPreventionON #RestoringRespect STOP ABUSE – RESTORE RESPECT SIMPLY PUT, WE ALL HAVE A ROLE TO PLAY EAPO is mandated to support the implementation of Ontario’s Strategy to Combat Elder Abuse. -
A Common Cause and New Direction for Sault Ste. Marie
PEOPLE Our collective PLACE future. PROSPERITY 2017 20YRS. 2037 Community Adjustment Committee Report. Nov. 15, 2017 A Common Cause and New Direction For Sault Ste. Marie. Futuressm.com Table of Contents Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................................... 7 Glossary of Terms........................................................................................................................................ 13 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................ 14 1.0 Background to the Sault Ste. Marie Community of Adjustment Committee ....................................... 14 1.1 Purpose and Objectives of the Community Adjustment Committee ............................................... 15 1.2 Community Context for Community Adjustment Committee’s Planning ........................................ 15 1.2.1 Learning from Previous Planning Initiatives .............................................................................. 16 1.3 Adopting a Framework for Community Resilience ........................................................................... 17 2.0 Community Adjustment Committee Process/Methodology ................................................................ 17 2.1 Committee Processes ........................................................................................................................ 17 2.2 Subcommittee -
Dementia Care During a Healthcare Crisis
Dementia Care during a Healthcare Crisis By Aneesha Kotti Presented to OCAD University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Masters in Design in Strategic Foresight and Innovation. Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 2021 CREATIVE COMMONS COPYRIGHT NOTICE This document is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). You are free to: • Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format • Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms. Under the following terms: • Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use. • Non-Commercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes. • Share Alike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original. No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits. Notices - You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation. No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material. -
Oversight Enhanced”
“Oversight Enhanced” Submission to the Standing Committee on Justice Policy regarding Bill 175, Safer Ontario Act, 2017 Paul Dubé Ombudsman of Ontario February 2018 Table of Contents Reinforcing Police Oversight ........................................................................................... 3 The Ontario Ombudsman and Police Oversight .............................................................. 4 Ontario’s three police oversight bodies ........................................................................ 4 Ombudsman oversight of the SIU, OIPRD, and OCPC ............................................... 5 Oversight Unseen and Oversight Undermined ............................................................. 5 Submission to the Independent Police Oversight Review ............................................ 6 Bill 175: A New Era for Police Accountability .................................................................. 7 Remaining gaps in Bill 175........................................................................................... 8 Ensuring civilian representation ................................................................................ 8 Ensuring effective Ombudsman oversight .............................................................. 11 Ensuring an effective Ontario Special Investigations Unit ....................................... 13 De-escalation training – a key missing piece .......................................................... 14 Conclusion ................................................................................................................... -
Redbrick Communications 2017 Social Media Survey
2017 Municipal Social Media Survey By now, Ontario municipalities recognize that to get in front of their audiences, they have to be on social media. Municipalities are becoming more creative, sophisticated and engaging on social media. A significant portion of municipal Heads of Council are getting social online, too. Read on for a comprehensive look at how Ontario’s municipalities are using social media. 81% of municipalities are on social media Ontario Municipalities on Social Media 361 Year over year 321 300 2017 271 2016 240 2015 2014 193 2013 127 2012 2011 25 2010 Social Media Use by Channel Which social media channels do municipalities use the most?* 98% 22% 71% 31% 8% From 2016 to 2017, Facebook use grew even more – with almost all social municipalities using it. Twitter use decreased, but still remains prevalent. Instagram began to gain rank as the third most popular channel for municipalities. *Data was gathered by actively searching for Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram accounts for each municipality. Data for YouTube and LinkedIn was recorded when municipalities promoted these channels on their website or through other social media accounts. Social Media Approach With so many social media channels, different municipal service areas, multiple audiences, and limited resources, how are municipalities approaching social media? Centralized Municipalities with just one main account per social media channel 30% Centralized Mixed Municipalities that use a central account 49% and up to three specialized accounts for Mixed different departments and service areas Decentralized Decentralized Municipalities with four or more accounts 21% dedicated to different departments or service areas In 2017, many municipalities switched from a decentralized or centralized approach to a mixed approach. -
1/2 for IMMEDIATE RELEASE Patient Ombudsman Launches Systemic Investigation Into the Resident and Caregiver Experience at Ontar
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Patient Ombudsman launches systemic investigation into the resident and caregiver experience at Ontario’s Long-term Care Homes with outbreaks of COVID-19 (Toronto, June 2nd, 2020) Patient Ombudsman began monitoring the impact of COVID-19 on the experiences of patients, residents and caregivers when the pandemic was first declared. Complaints from residents, family members and whistleblowers pointed to a crisis in Ontario’s long-term care homes. On April 26th, 2020, Patient Ombudsman launched a public appeal for COVID-19 complaints in long-term care. Patient Ombudsman asked staff, family members, caregivers and residents to disclose situations where they felt the safety of residents and staff may be in significant jeopardy. Since March, Patient Ombudsman received 150 complaints about long-term care homes. That number continues to grow. “Our office would like to thank every resident, caregiver and staff person of a long-term care home for having the courage to come forward with their complaints. We are committed to resolving these complaints and amplifying the voices of residents and caregivers as we learn from their experiences. Patient Ombudsman acknowledges Ontario Ombudsman’s separate investigation of the oversight of the long-term care system by the province’s Ministry of Long-Term Care and Ministry of Health. Our investigation is specific to the resident and caregiver experience at long-term care homes with outbreaks of COVID-19. We feel that this investigation will help long-term care homes prepare for future outbreaks of infectious diseases, including COVID-19.” (Craig Thompson, Executive Director, Patient Ombudsman) Investigation focus The investigation will focus on the experience of residents and caregivers in those long-term care homes that experienced an outbreak of COVID-19.